diff --git a/.github/workflows/ci.yml b/.github/workflows/ci.yml index 0f74b8a..cd354c9 100644 --- a/.github/workflows/ci.yml +++ b/.github/workflows/ci.yml @@ -30,20 +30,21 @@ jobs: - run: python3 -m py_compile adapters/*.py receipts: - name: every v1 receipt answers a v1 world + name: every receipt answers a world of its edition runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - run: | python3 - <<'EOF' import json, glob, sys - digests = {json.load(open(p))["digest"] for p in glob.glob("worlds/v1/*.json")} bad = [] - for p in glob.glob("results/v1/**/*.json", recursive=True): - d = json.load(open(p)) - found = [s["digest"] for s in d["sizes"]] if "sizes" in d else [d["script_digest"]] - bad += [(p, x) for x in found if x not in digests] - for p, x in bad: - print(f"{p}: digest {x} is not a v1 world", file=sys.stderr) + for edition in ("v1", "v2"): + digests = {json.load(open(p))["digest"] for p in glob.glob(f"worlds/{edition}/*.json")} + for p in glob.glob(f"results/{edition}/**/*.json", recursive=True): + d = json.load(open(p)) + found = [s["digest"] for s in d["sizes"]] if "sizes" in d else [d["script_digest"]] + bad += [(p, x, edition) for x in found if x not in digests] + for p, x, edition in bad: + print(f"{p}: digest {x} is not a {edition} world", file=sys.stderr) sys.exit(1 if bad else 0) EOF diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.md b/CONTRIBUTING.md index 626cc3d..3c92eac 100644 --- a/CONTRIBUTING.md +++ b/CONTRIBUTING.md @@ -2,8 +2,9 @@ Two kinds of pull request are expected: **an adapter** for a memory system, and **a result** for a system on the v1 worlds. Anything else — a new -family, a generator change, a scoring change — is a v2 conversation; open -an issue first. (Opt-in variants that leave the plain worlds' digests +family, a generator change, a scoring change — belongs to **v2**, which is +open on the `v2` branch (`--v2`, `worlds/v2/`, `results/v2/`, +`docs/scoring.md`); open an issue first. (Opt-in variants that leave the plain worlds' digests untouched — the pollution shapes, the `--authority` family — are how a family is added inside v1: the variant world is frozen beside the others and reported in its own table, never folded into the leaderboard row.) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 4bf7441..2d353bc 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,30 +1,41 @@ -# KnowledgeDrift v1 +# KnowledgeDrift v2 An offline, judge-free benchmark for AI memory in software development. One seeded world of invented project knowledge is poured into a memory -system through an eleven-operation protocol, and then the system is questioned, -re-decided, contradicted, asked to forget, endorsed, and asked again. Every probe is a -**task** with a pass/fail rule fixed before the question was asked. The -headline is the **mean success over every task**, beside a macro-averaged -**composite** and an attention-multiplied **score**. Nothing in the loop is -a language model, and nothing asks a model whether a model did well. - -| system (v1, 500 tested facts, 3 seeds) | success | score | tok / answer | -|------------------------------------------------------------|---|---|---| -| LangMem 0.0.30 (store + semantic index) | 63% (61–66) | 52 (51–54) | ~2,300 | -| vector top-k (`rag`) | 63% (61–66) | 52 (51–54) | ~2,300 | -| Mem0 2.0.20 (`infer=False`) | 59% (57–61) | 46 (45–48) | ~2,600 | -| cognee 1.5.4 (no LLM: chunk store + `CHUNKS` search) | 58% (56–60) | 40 (39–42) | ~2,000 | -| keyword overlap (`grep`) | 53% (51–55) | 43 (42–44) | ~2,600 | -| MemContinuum 0.2.0rc5 (append-only topics, hybrid FTS5 + bge-small) | 52% (49–55) | 33 (33–34) | ~800 | -| the whole file in context | 71% (69–74) | 5 (5–5) | ~134,000 | -| a curated 3,000-token file | 9% (9–9) | 4 (4–4) | ~2,900 | -| [Engram Alpha](https://github.com/techtheist/engram) 0.9.4 | 85% (84–85) | 525 (511–543) | ~260 | - -Full tables, the 1500 rung, per-family readings and receipts: -[`results/v1/`](results/v1/README.md) and [`RESULTS.md`](RESULTS.md). -Submit your own system: [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](CONTRIBUTING.md). +system through a twelve-operation protocol, and then the system is +questioned, re-decided, contradicted, asked to forget, endorsed, and asked +again. Every probe is a **task** with a pass/fail rule fixed before the +question was asked. The headline is the **score**: every family's pass +rate as points out of 100 (eight families, 800), plus a capped efficiency +bonus — a signal score for how much of what the reader was shown was the +answer, and a token score for how little had to be read (100 each). +Nothing in the loop is a language model, and nothing asks a model whether +a model did well. + +## The ladder: 1,500 tested facts + +1,883 notes, 9,008 tasks, one seed, every system with the same local +embedder (`results/v2/`): + +| system | success | families | signal | tokens | **score** | tok / answer | +|----------------------------------------------------------------|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| TF-IDF over titles, one snippet per answer (`tfidf`) | 43% | 442 | 37 | 100 | **580** | ~160 | +| the whole file in context | 71% | 390 | 0 | 0 | **390** | ~404,000 | +| MemContinuum 0.2.0rc5 (topics + `for-path` chains) | 44% | 326 | 7 | 47 | **380** | ~840 | +| vector top-k (`rag`) | 48% | 340 | 7 | 11 | **359** | ~2,200 | +| LangMem 0.0.30 (store + semantic index) | 48% | 340 | 7 | 11 | **359** | ~2,200 | +| Mem0 2.0.20 (`infer=False`) | 44% | 333 | 6 | 8 | **348** | ~2,400 | +| keyword overlap (`grep`) | 41% | 315 | 6 | 3 | **325** | ~2,800 | +| cognee 1.5.4 (no LLM: chunk store) | 43% | 240 | 8 | 16 | **263** | ~1,900 | +| chance | 3% | 103 | 0 | 9 | **112** | ~2,300 | +| a curated 3,000-token file | 5% | 108 | 0 | 1 | **109** | ~2,960 | +| [Reference System](https://github.com/techtheist/engram) 0.9.5 | 66% | 616 | 32 | 69 | **718** | ~460 | + +Three seeds at 500 tested facts, every family's pass rate, every column, +and what the numbers mean: [`RESULTS.md`](RESULTS.md). Receipts and how +each was produced: [`results/v2/`](results/v2/README.md). Submit your own +system: [`CONTRIBUTING.md`](CONTRIBUTING.md). ## Why @@ -44,6 +55,7 @@ with rules a script can check: why it left?* - *Why did we decide that?* - *What did we decide around the time of the outage?* +- *What should I know before I touch this file?* - *How much did the reader have to read to get the answer?* Two design rules are taken from [ForgetEval](https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.15903), @@ -71,38 +83,41 @@ world (seeded, invented) ──► script (JSON: ops + probes + digest) ``` 1. **A world** is generated from a seed: a few hundred notes about an - invented software project (subjects like *Vanor lease broker* — nothing - answerable from pretraining), with links, re-decided subjects, a polluted - share of stale siblings, planted contradictions, deletions and capture - times. The ten v1 worlds are frozen under `worlds/v1/` and regenerate - byte for byte from this crate (a test checks their digests). + invented software project, with links, re-decided subjects, a polluted + share of stale siblings, planted contradictions, deletions, code refs + and capture times. Subjects are three ordinary words (*amber harbor + lease broker*): nothing answerable from pretraining, and no single + token names a note. The shipped worlds are frozen under `worlds/v2/` + and regenerate byte for byte from this crate (a test checks their + digests). 2. **A script** is the world as a list of operations — import, link, - supersede, release, purge, settle, recall, suspects, lineage — followed - by probes with their expected outcomes. The script carries a digest; - a transcript for a different world is refused rather than scored. + supersede, release, purge, endorse, settle, recall, recall by path, + suspects, lineage — followed by probes with their expected outcomes. + The script carries a digest; a transcript for a different world is + refused rather than scored. 3. **An adapter** replays the operations against a memory system through its own API and writes a transcript: one reply per probe with the exact text the system showed, plus the capabilities it honestly has. 4. **The grader** scores the transcript: every probe becomes a task with - one rule, tasks group into eight families, and the headline is passed - over posed. + one rule, tasks group into eight families, and the headline is the + families' points plus the efficiency bonus. ## Quick start ```sh # grade a transcript — no models, no features, seconds to build cargo run --release -- --grade my-transcript.json \ - --script worlds/v1/knowledgedrift-500-seed1.json --json my-graded.json + --script worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed1-v2.json --json my-graded.json # write an adapter in Python (see adapters/README.md), then replay python3 adapters/run.py --adapter mysystem \ - --script worlds/v1/knowledgedrift-500-seed1.json --out out/mysystem-500.json + --script worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed1-v2.json --out out/mysystem-500.json -# run the reference arms in-process (Engram Alpha + five baselines, real models) -cargo run --release --features fastembed -- --sizes 500,1500 --json ladder.json +# run the reference arms in-process (Engram Alpha + six baselines, real models) +cargo run --release --features fastembed -- --v2 --sizes 500,1500 --json ladder.json # look at what a world contains -cargo run -- --sizes 100 --sample +cargo run -- --v2 --sizes 100 --sample ``` The official ladder is **500 and 1500 tested facts**, seed 1, pollution @@ -112,7 +127,7 @@ The official ladder is **500 and 1500 tested facts**, seed 1, pollution ## The protocol -Eleven operations an adapter implements against its native API +Twelve operations an adapter implements against its native API ([`docs/protocol.md`](docs/protocol.md) has the wire format): | op | meaning | @@ -125,6 +140,7 @@ Eleven operations an adapter implements against its native API | `endorse(key, by)` | someone vouches for a note: `retrieval` (delivered and used), `assistant` (confirmed still true), `user` (the owner approved it), `supervisor` (pinned) | | `settle()` | a session boundary: calibration, sweeps, consolidation | | `recall(query, k, window?)` | top-k, optionally scoped to a capture-time window | +| `recall_path(path, k)` | what a caller about to touch a file should see — an edit hook's channel; without one, the path is searched as a query | | `suspects()` | every disagreement the system wants a person to judge | | `lineage(key)` | the supersession history reachable from a note | | `standing_tokens()` | what the system costs every session before a question is asked | @@ -135,7 +151,9 @@ what the attention columns bill. A system declares which capabilities it has (`link`, `history`, `trace`, `suspects`, `temporal`, `verdict`, `write_check`, and the four endorsement rungs `endorse_retrieval` / `endorse_assistant` / `endorse_user` / `endorse_supervisor`); the families — -and, in the authority family, the tasks — that need a missing one are N/A. +and, in the authority family, the tasks — that need a missing one are N/A, +and a declared capability whose column never shows is flagged in the +receipt. ## The families @@ -144,10 +162,10 @@ Eight families — nine with `--authority` — each with one rule per task | family | asks | pass | |---|---|---| -| **retrieval** | three questions per fact — its own words, a paraphrase, an oblique one that never names the subject | gold in the top five, and not outranked by its stale sibling | -| **abstention** | a question about a subject that was never written | nothing delivered, or delivered under the system's own decline | +| **retrieval** | four questions per fact — its own words, a paraphrase, an oblique one that never names the subject, a crossed one that shares no content word with the note — and every file the code refs name, read by path | gold in the top five with its value readable, and not outranked by its stale sibling; for a path, a bound note in the top five | +| **abstention** | a question about a subject that was never written, and a question a written subject has no note for | nothing delivered, or delivered under the system's own decline | | **currency** | the current state of a re-decided subject; the history behind it | the head in the top five and no retired generation delivered; the walk reaches every generation | -| **contradiction** | after a planted note contradicts (or only seems to contradict) an existing one | raised for a person to judge; a negative never raised, or raised with a clearing label | +| **contradiction** | after a planted note contradicts (or only seems to contradict) an existing one — by value, by unit, reworded, by clause, by synonym | raised for a person to judge; a negative never raised, or raised with a clearing label | | **drift** | nothing — the stale siblings were imported beside the facts and nobody said so | the pair raised by the end of the run | | **deletion** | a released or purged note, by its own question; then the note written back | gone as live knowledge; a released note's rewrite comes back with a warning | | **rationale** | *why does the X …?* and *what answers the open issue where …?* | the reason in the top five, directly or carried as context by a hit | @@ -159,55 +177,59 @@ a flipped value, dated earlier, imported and never superseded by anyone. Three shapes of it exist (`stale`, `twin`, `late`); the drift family and the retrieval column `stale_above` read them. -The **authority** family is opt-in (`--authority`; worlds -`knowledgedrift-{100,500,1500}-seed1-authority.json`): it plants its twins after -every other family has been asked, so a run of the authority world reproduces -the plain world's eight families to the digit and adds the ninth. Twenty-one -scenarios in four layers — the assistant alone, owner governance over the -assistant, retrieval use counted beside both, a supervisor's pin above -everything — state one expectation: *retrieval < assistant < user < -supervisor*, a later endorsement beats an earlier one on the same rung, count -never beats rung, and no confound outranks a rung. A task whose winning rung -the system does not declare is posed, not attempted. +The **authority** family is opt-in (`--authority`): it plants its twins +after every other family has been asked, so a run of the authority world +reproduces the plain world's eight families to the digit and adds the +ninth. Twenty-one scenarios in four layers — the assistant alone, owner +governance over the assistant, retrieval use counted beside both, a +supervisor's pin above everything — state one expectation: *retrieval < +assistant < user < supervisor*, a later endorsement beats an earlier one on +the same rung, count never beats rung, and no confound outranks a rung. A +task whose winning rung the system does not declare is posed, not +attempted. -## The numbers +## The score Every task is posed to every system. **success** = passed / posed, with an N/A task counted as failed — a memory that cannot notice drift has not -noticed it. **of attempted** is printed beside it for the capability-aware -reading. **composite** is the unweighted mean of the eight family pass -rates the world poses (eight, or nine with `--authority`). **S** is the share -of delivered tokens that belonged to the answer; -the **multiplier** is clamp(10·S, 0.1, 10); **score** = 100 × composite × -multiplier, read as a whole number (0.87 at ×6.4 is 550; a dump at 0.49 and -×0.1 is 5). - -The multiplier is the benchmark's stance: the less polluted a delivery is, -the less of the model's attention it spends, and a memory that hands the -reader nothing but the answer is worth ten times one that buries it in ten -whole notes. It is printed beside the unmultiplied composite so a reader -can take it or leave it, and floored so that silence cannot buy it. +noticed it. The **score** is a sum, out of 1,000: + +- **family points** — Σ over the eight families of pass rate × 100 (N/A = + 0): 0–800; +- **signal score** — 100 × the mean share of delivered tokens that belonged + to the answer, over every retrieval probe, a miss or a hedge on an + answerable question counting as zero: 0–100; +- **token score** — 100 at 200 tokens per query, 0 at 3,000, logarithmic + between, the standing cost of a session amortised over twenty questions: + 0–100. + +One family point trades one-for-one against one bonus point, and the bonus +caps at 200 against the families' 800, so no system wins on efficiency +alone: the equilibrium a developer is asked to find is between knowing +more, showing less, and showing the right thing. [`docs/scoring.md`](docs/scoring.md) has the definitions. ## Layout ``` -worlds/v1/ the frozen v1 worlds (100/500/1500 seed 1; 500 seeds 2, 3; 500 twin, late; 100/500/1500 authority) +worlds/v2/ the frozen worlds (100/500/1500 seed 1; 500 seeds 2, 3) src/ protocol, script, world generator (vendored corpus), runner, grader, report src/arms/ the in-process arms (--features arms | fastembed) adapters/ the Python protocol mirror, the runner, and the Mem0, LangMem, MemContinuum and cognee adapters -results/v1/ every graded receipt behind the tables, and how each was produced +results/v2/ every graded receipt behind the tables, and how each was produced docs/ protocol, families, scoring -RESULTS.md what the v1 numbers say +RESULTS.md what the numbers say CONTRIBUTING.md submitting an adapter or a result ``` ## Versioning -**v1** is frozen: the worlds under `worlds/v1/`, the rules in `src/grade.rs` -and the scoring are what every v1 result was measured against. A change to -any of them is a v2 with its own worlds and its own tables; results are -never compared across versions. +An edition is frozen once its numbers are published: its worlds, the rules +in `src/grade.rs` and the scoring are what every result in its tables was +measured against. A change to any of them is a new edition with its own +worlds and its own tables; results are never compared across editions. +Earlier editions keep their worlds, receipts and readings under their own +directories. ## Related diff --git a/RESULTS.md b/RESULTS.md index 819fee6..e115303 100644 --- a/RESULTS.md +++ b/RESULTS.md @@ -1,311 +1,235 @@ -# KnowledgeDrift v1 — what the numbers say +# KnowledgeDrift — what the numbers say -A reading of the receipts under `results/v1/`. The benchmark itself — +A reading of the receipts under `results/v2/`. The benchmark itself — world, protocol, families, rules, scoring — is in the README and `docs/`; -this file says what the v1 numbers mean, what they do not, and which -design decisions were made because an earlier version of the number was -misleading. Every figure is quoted from a named receipt; nothing is -rounded past what three seeds support. +this file says what the numbers mean and what they do not. Every figure is +quoted from a named receipt; nothing is rounded past what three seeds +support. + +**Environment.** One Apple-silicon laptop, CPU only, 2026-09-16; +`BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5` for every embedding arm; the reference system +(Engram Alpha 0.9.4, arm `engram`) with `jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en` and +`deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli`. Eleven systems: the reference system, +six in-process baselines (`tfidf`, `whole`, `rag`, `grep`, `curated`, +`chance`) and four external adapters (MemContinuum, LangMem, Mem0, cognee) +replaying the exported scripts through their own APIs. External systems +ran one seed; the in-process arms ran three at 500. ## In one paragraph -Coding agents forget, but the failures that cost a project are not -amnesia: they are answering from the note that was re-decided, not -noticing that two notes disagree, bringing back what a person deleted, -and being unable to say *why* anything was decided. KnowledgeDrift pours -one seeded, invented software project into a memory system through a -ten-operation protocol, then questions, re-decides, contradicts, deletes -and re-asks it, grading every probe by a rule fixed before the question. -Measured on the official 500/1500 ladder with the same local embedder -everywhere, the reference system (Engram Alpha 0.9.4, arm `engram`) scores 85% / 80% success -(score 511 / 459) against 63% / 57% for LangMem's store, 58% / 55% for -Mem0 as a raw store, and 53% / 51% for keyword overlap — and the three -flat stores, given the same vectors, are one system: they fail the same -tasks for the same reason. The distance is not recall. It is abstention, -rationale, the suspect queue, the resurrection warning, and roughly an -eighth of the tokens per answer. - -## The official ladder (seed 1) - -`results/v1/reference-arms/ladder-500-1500-seed1.json`, -`results/v1/{langmem-0.0.30,mem0-2.0.20,memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5,cognee-1.5.4}/{500,1500}-seed1.json`. - -| arm | success @500 | score @500 | success @1500 | score @1500 | tok/query | -|---|---|---|---|---|---| -| Engram Alpha 0.9.4 | **85%** | **511** | **80%** | **459** | 263–289 | -| langmem 0.0.30 | 63% | 51 | 57% | 52 | ~2,200 | -| rag | 63% | 51 | 57% | 52 | ~2,200 | -| mem0 2.0.20 | 58% | 45 | 55% | 47 | ~2,500 | -| cognee 1.5.4 | 57% | 39 | 52% | 39 | ~2,000 | -| grep | 53% | 44 | 51% | 43 | ~2,600 | -| memcontinuum 0.2.0rc5 | 52% | 33 | 48% | 32 | ~800 | -| whole file | 71% | 5 | 71% | 5 | 134k–402k | -| curated 3k | 9% | 4 | 5% | 4 | ~2,900 | -| chance | 4% | 15 | 4% | 13 | ~2,300 | - -Five readings: - -1. **Three flat stores are one system.** `rag` (the harness's own vector - top-k), LangMem's store and Mem0 with `infer=False` land within four - points of each other at every rung and fail identically: fp 1.00 - (nothing declines), rationale 1% at 1500 (a *why* question that only - structure answers), the stale sibling above the answer on ~40% of - polluted questions, and no suspect, drift or lineage task attempted. - Mem0 is lowest because its hybrid BM25 rescoring costs oblique recall - (0.19 vs 0.35 at 1500) — a keyword channel weighted on the wrong - register. -2. **Recall is not where the reference system wins.** On retrieval alone - the flat stores match its r@5 (0.76 vs 0.78 at 1500). Its lead is the - families they cannot attempt and the bill: abstention fp 0.02 vs 1.00, - rationale 99% vs 1%, contradiction 75% and drift 91% vs N/A, - resurrection warned 50–69% vs N/A, and 263–289 tokens per answer at - focus 0.52–0.57 against ~2,300 at 0.11. -3. **MemContinuum is a flat store with a chain.** Its append-only topics - carry supersession natively — currency 85%, lineage 1.00, pollution - 0.00, the only external system to attempt the lineage walk — and it - shows snippets, so it answers in ~800 tokens instead of ~2,300. But its - hybrid search ranks the stale sibling above the truth on 81–89% of - polluted questions (the sibling's short "kept for reference" ruling - wins BM25's length normalisation and the vector over title-plus-short- - body), rationale is 2%, nothing declines, and the per-field authority - its schema is built around never reaches ranking (see the authority - section). 52% (49–55) over three seeds, score 33; 48% at 1500, where - oblique recall falls to 0.14 and *why* to 0%. -4. **cognee without its LLM is `rag` minus the clock.** With the - extraction task out of its pipeline, cognee is documents → chunks → - one LanceDB cosine search, and its retrieval lands where the flat - stores land (80% (78–82) over three seeds, r@5 0.83–0.84, oblique - 0.52–0.57, the stale sibling above the truth on 37–45% of polluted - questions). Its currency is 91% because delete + add leaves no retired - generation to pollute, and its bill is the flat store's (~2,000 tokens - per answer, whole notes). What separates it from `rag` is the one - family every other flat store attempts: its chunk search has no time - filter, so the temporal family is N/A and the headline charges for it — - 58% (56–60), score 40. At 1500 it holds the pattern: 52%, score 39, - retrieval 72% (r@5 0.75, oblique 0.33), currency 81%, rationale 1%. -5. **The whole file is the honest ceiling on recall and the floor on - cost.** 71% of tasks at every rung by showing everything; composite - 0.49, score 5. The curated 3,000-token file, the thing most agent - frameworks ship as "memory", loses by 100 notes (29% → 9% → 5%). - -The reference system's families at 1500 (pass rate, then the columns that -explain it): - -| family | tasks | pass | reading | -|---|---|---|---| -| retrieval | 4,500 | 75% | r@5 0.78, oblique 0.34, `stale_above` 0.23 — one polluted question in four hands the reader the stale value first | -| abstention | 330 | 98% | fp 0.02, declined 0.98, separation 0.76 | -| currency | 300 | 80% | head r@5 0.74, pollution 0.00, lineage 1.00 — retired generations never come back and the history is always reachable | -| contradiction | 500 | 75% | t1 0.78, t2 0.91, t3 0.01; false alarms t2 0.03, t3 0.15 (the `historical` trap) | -| drift | 158 | 91% | noticed 0.91, flagged 0.73 | -| deletion | 375 | 83% | released and purged both gone 1.00; trace 1.00; `marker_leak` 1.00; resurrection warned 0.50 (0.69 at 500, 1.00 at 100 — the marker is crowded out of the nearest neighbours as the graph grows) | -| rationale | 540 | 99% | direct 0.00, assisted 0.99 — *why* is answered by structure, never by ranking | -| temporal | 375 | 99% | in-window r@5 0.99, leak 0.00 | - -What moves with scale for it: oblique recall 0.54 → 0.34, head r@5 -0.84 → 0.74, resurrection warning 0.69 → 0.50, tier-1 contradiction -0.94 → 0.78 — every one a ranking-depth effect on a growing graph; the -structural columns (pollution 0.00, lineage 1.00, gone 1.00, leak 0.00) do -not move. +A memory that knows what it knows leads by 138 points at 1,500 tested +facts and 158 at 500, and the distance is not recall. The reference +system's retrieval family is *under* the vector store's (57% against 57% +at 1500, 63% against 65% at 500): what it earns is abstention (96–100% +where every flat store answers every question it should not), a suspect +queue that notices planted contradictions and silent drift, a +resurrection warning when a deleted note comes back, rationale through +its edges, and an answer a fifth the size. The lexical arm shows the +other edge of the score: 100 token points and 37–42 signal points for +answering in a title, and a family column that says exactly what a title +cannot do. The three flat stores given the same vectors are one system — +LangMem is `rag` to the digit at both sizes — and the one external system +with a structural channel, MemContinuum, is the only one whose rationale +family is not a rounding error. + +## The ladder: 1,500 tested facts (seed 1) + +1,883 notes, 9,008 tasks: 6,064 retrieval (four phrasings and 64 path +reads), 714 abstention, 300 currency, 500 contradiction, 158 drift, 375 +deletion, 522 rationale, 375 temporal. +`results/v2/reference-arms/1500-seed1.json` and +`results/v2//1500-seed1.json`. + +| system | success | passed / attempted | families (800) | signal (100) | tokens (100) | **score** | billed tok/query | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| **engram** | 66% | 5,927 / 9,008 | 616 | 32 | 69 | **718** | 457 | +| tfidf | 43% | 3,886 / 8,808 | 442 | 37 | 100 | **580** | 158 | +| whole file | 71% | 6,429 / 7,775 | 390 | 0 | 0 | **390** | 404,164 | +| MemContinuum | 44% | 3,984 / 7,850 | 326 | 7 | 47 | **380** | 844 | +| rag | 48% | 4,283 / 8,150 | 340 | 7 | 11 | **359** | 2,208 | +| LangMem | 48% | 4,281 / 8,150 | 340 | 7 | 11 | **359** | 2,201 | +| Mem0 | 44% | 4,001 / 8,150 | 333 | 6 | 8 | **348** | 2,438 | +| grep | 41% | 3,651 / 8,150 | 315 | 6 | 3 | **325** | 2,766 | +| cognee | 43% | 3,836 / 7,775 | 240 | 8 | 16 | **263** | 1,934 | +| chance | 3% | 285 / 8,150 | 103 | 0 | 9 | **112** | 2,333 | +| curated (3k) | 5% | 424 / 7,775 | 108 | 0 | 1 | **109** | 2,959 | + +**By family** (pass rate; n/a = the family needs a capability the system +does not have, and is scored zero in the headline): + +| system | retrieval | abstention | currency | contradiction | drift | deletion | rationale | temporal | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| engram | 57% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 48% | 87% | 99% | 100% | +| tfidf | 45% | 0% | 67% | 58% | 73% | 100% | 0% | 100% | +| whole file | 90% | 0% | 100% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 100% | n/a | +| MemContinuum | 49% | 0% | 77% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 100% | n/a | +| rag | 57% | 0% | 80% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% | 99% | +| LangMem | 57% | 0% | 80% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% | 99% | +| Mem0 | 52% | 0% | 74% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 7% | 100% | +| grep | 47% | 0% | 67% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 1% | 100% | +| cognee | 56% | 0% | 80% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 3% | n/a | +| chance | 0% | 0% | 0% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 0% | 2% | +| curated (3k) | 2% | 0% | 0% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 6% | n/a | + +**Columns worth reading at 1500:** + +| system | crossed_r@5 | oblique_r@5 | path_r@5 | path_cover | stale_above | phantom_fp | natural_fp | hedge | t1_recall | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| engram | 0.02 | 0.32 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.34 | 0.04 | +| tfidf | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.63 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.42 | +| MemContinuum | 0.02 | 0.14 | 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | – | +| rag | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 0.18 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | – | +| LangMem | 0.09 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | – | +| Mem0 | 0.03 | 0.18 | 0.61 | 0.18 | 0.29 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | – | +| grep | 0.00 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | – | +| cognee | 0.09 | 0.29 | 0.47 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | – | ## Is it stable? Three seeds at 500 -`results/v1/reference-arms/{ladder-500-1500-seed1,500-seed2,500-seed3}.json` -and the matching external files. Same models, same flags; only the world -changes (607–641 notes, 2,318–2,373 tasks). Mean, then min–max: - -| arm | success | composite | score | -|---|---|---|---| -| engram | **85% (84–85)** | 0.907 (0.898–0.918) | **525 (511–543)** | -| langmem | 63% (61–66) | 0.468 (0.461–0.473) | 52 (51–54) | -| rag | 63% (61–66) | 0.468 (0.461–0.473) | 52 (51–54) | -| mem0 | 59% (57–61) | 0.443 (0.438–0.447) | 46 (45–48) | -| cognee | 58% (56–60) | 0.342 (0.337–0.348) | 40 (39–42) | -| grep | 53% (51–55) | 0.418 (0.414–0.422) | 43 (42–44) | -| memcontinuum | 52% (49–55) | 0.321 (0.314–0.327) | 33 (33–34) | -| whole file | 71% (69–74) | 0.487 (0.483–0.492) | 5 (5–5) | -| curated 3k | 9% (9–9) | 0.156 (0.151–0.160) | 4 (4–4) | -| chance | 4% (4–4) | 0.131 (0.131–0.132) | 13 (11–15) | - -The reference system's families over the three seeds: retrieval 81% -(80–82), abstention 100% (99–100), currency 89% (87–91), contradiction -74% (72–75), drift 93% (91–97), deletion 90% (90–90), rationale 100% -(99–100), temporal 100% (99–100). Under the contradiction number, tier-1 -recall is 0.94 / 1.00 / 0.88 and tier-2 0.97 / 0.90 / 0.87 by seed; the -tier-3 false-alarm rate (the `historical` trap) is 0.24 / 0.21 / 0.37 — -the widest-swinging column, because it sits on six to ten cases. The -stale sibling outranks the answer on 0.21 / 0.32 / 0.26 of polluted -questions; the resurrection warning is 0.69 on every seed; abstention fp -never exceeds 0.01; tokens per answer 249–263. - -So: the success percentages are stable to about one point for every arm, -the score to about three percent (it multiplies two means), and the -ordering never changes. LangMem and `rag` agree **on every seed** to the -same 61 / 63 / 66 — a flat store with this embedder is one system. The -ten-point gaps between the reference system and the nearest flat store, -and between the flat stores and grep, are real; a one-point gap anywhere -in this table is not. - -## Pollution shapes: what gives the stale sibling away - -`results/v1/reference-arms/500-seed1-{twin,late}.json` against the -default. The stale sibling is the same flipped restatement each time; -`twin` takes away the body hint (it wears the truth's own body, so only -the value and the date differ), `late` takes away the clock (it is -stamped 20–40 days *after* the truth, as a migration would). The column -that reads the shape is `stale_above`: the share of polluted questions -whose stale sibling outranked the answer. +630 notes and 3,042 tasks per world (2,063 retrieval, of which 63 path +reads; 238 abstention, of which 125 natural nulls; 100 currency; 166 +contradiction; 55 drift; 125 deletion; 170 rationale; 125 temporal). +Mean, then min–max, over `results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed{1,2,3}.json`. +The score is a sum of means, so it is stable to about a point per arm — +two for the reference system, whose calibrated decline line refits on +every run (741 / 736 / 739 on the three seeds; an identical rerun of seed 1 +gave 739). -| shape | engram success | engram `stale_above` | engram drift noticed | rag `stale_above` | grep `stale_above` | +| arm | success | families (800) | signal (100) | tokens (100) | **score** | |---|---|---|---|---|---| -| `stale` (default) | 85% | 0.21 | 0.91 | 0.38 | 0.58 | -| `twin` | 82% | **0.64** | **0.98** | 0.55 | 0.78 | -| `late` | 85% | **0.35** | 0.91 | 0.38 | 0.58 | - -Two findings, both of them the point of the benchmark: - -- **The body hint was carrying the ranking-side separation for - everybody.** Take it away and the stale sibling outranks the truth on - 64% of polluted questions for the reference system, 55% for the vector - store, 78% for grep. A ranker cannot tell apart two notes that differ - by a number and a date, and no amount of reranking changes that — a - reranker reads the hint, not the calendar. What holds the family up is - the second channel: the drift queue notices 98% of twin pairs (a twin - is closer in similarity than a hinted sibling), and the reference - system's success falls three points, all of it in retrieval. **Ranking - cannot resolve drift; a queue a person judges can.** That is the - benchmark's thesis stated as a number. -- **Recency is a prior, not a truth.** `rag` and `grep` are byte-identical - under `late` — they never look at capture time. The reference system's - `stale_above` moves 0.21 → 0.35: a fresher stamp earns a little trust in - its ranking, so a migration that restamps import time as capture time - makes it prefer the re-imported past on a seventh more polluted - questions, while success is unchanged because the drift queue is - clock-blind and still raises every pair. The receipt says by how much. - -## Authority: whose word ranks? - -`results/v1/reference-arms/{500,1500}-seed1-authority.json`. The ninth family is -opt-in (`--authority`) and lands after the eighth has been asked, so its -world reproduces the plain ladder's first eight families within one task -and adds 166 tasks of its own. Each plants one to four **twins** of a note — -same body, same capture time, a different value in the title — endorses -them on a four-rung ladder (retrieval use, the assistant's confirm, the -owner's approve, a supervisor's pin) through the new `endorse` operation, -and asks the subject's paraphrase question. The stated expectation: -*higher rung wins; same rung, the later endorsement wins; count never -beats rung; no confound — a fresher stamp, a weightier kind, a body that -says it is verified — outranks a rung.* A task whose winning rung a system -does not declare is posed, not attempted. - -The reference system declares three rungs (confirm, approve, pin; -retrieval use is deliberately not evidence in its trust model) and passes -**49%** of the 135 tasks it attempts at 500 and **56%** of 405 at 1500: -layers 0.47 / 0.61 / 0.50 / 0.29, then 0.59 / 0.65 / 0.58 / 0.34. The -winner is in the top five 99% of the time and first among its twins 52% -(59%) of the time. Read per scenario (500, then 1500 in brackets), the -numbers say exactly where its trust ladder reaches its ranking and where -it does not: - -- **An endorsement wins when nothing else separates the twins.** - `confirm_vs_none` 0.88 (0.92), `approve_vs_confirms` 0.88 (0.83) — one - approval over three confirms; count does not beat rung. -- **It loses to every confound of its own size.** Trust enters the fused - retrieval score as a multiplier, `1 + 0.15·trust`, beside a recency - factor and a per-type rank prior of the same magnitude: a confirm (0.6 - against 0.5) is a 1.5% nudge and loses to a stamp ten days fresher - (`confirm_vs_fresh` 0.25, 0.46 at 1500) and to the `Insight`-vs-`Decision` - prior (`confirm_vs_kind` 0.38, 0.62); an approval (1.0 against 0.5, a 7% - nudge) wins the retrieval half of the final rank vote and then meets the - reranker's half, which reads title and snippet and no trust at all — so - `approve_vs_confirm`, `approve_vs_kind`, `approve_vs_fresh_confirm` sit at - 0.62–0.71 and `approve_vs_claims`, `ladder2` near the coin flip - (0.50–0.62). -- **Pin and approve are one number.** Both compute trust 1.0; - `pin_vs_approve` 0.50 (0.42), `pin_vs_everything` 0.25 (0.35). -- **Equal rungs have no clock.** `latest_confirm` 0.38 (0.38), - `latest_approve` 0.50 (0.50), `latest_pin` 0.38 (0.43) — the endorsement - stamps are stored and never compared, so "which did the owner approve - last" is unanswerable. -- **A pinned note survives its own supersession.** `pin_then_supersede` - 0/8 at 500 and 4/24 at 1500, with the superseded pinned twin still - delivered 86% (78%) of the time: the - reference system exempts pinned notes from the archive that a `replaces` - edge otherwise performs (a pin is the user's "never fade"). The benchmark - states the opposite reading — a re-decision must not be resurrected by a - pin — and the column is the honest record of the disagreement. - -MemContinuum declares one rung (the owner's promotion to an -`owner-ratified` ruling) and passes 2% of the 56 tasks it attempts: the -promotion writes an authority field its hybrid search filters by and never -ranks by. Every flat store declares no rung and is N/A across the family. - -What the family is for, then, is not the headline: it is a per-scenario -map of which endorsements a system's *ranking* can see, against a stated -ladder. On this evidence the reference system's ladder is real in its trust -numbers and mostly invisible in its ranking, which is a product finding the -plain families could not have produced. - -## Design decisions the numbers forced - -Kept here because the next benchmark author will think of them too. - -- **Success over attempted tasks as the headline.** The first tables read - "83% of the tasks attempted" and made a store that cannot notice drift - look like one that did not miss it. The headline now counts every posed - task; the capability-aware rate is the column beside it. -- **A multiplier floored at 1.** With it, a dump scored like a memory. The - floor is 0.1 and the score reads as a whole number (0.05 → 5, 5.50 → - 550), so a delivery that spends the reader's attention pays for it. -- **Similarity as a contradiction detector.** Full-note cosine 0.69–0.81 - for planted contradictions against 0.64–0.77 for the agreeing - negatives; title-only and claim cosine the same. Similarity finds - *related*, not *disagreeing*, which is why the contradiction ladder - carries negatives in every tier and why a raised pair with no label - fails. -- **A generated bench needs real-prose negatives.** The `collider` shape - (a different, unrelated claim about the same subject) was added after - sentence-pair judges were found to call two facts about one subject a - contradiction on real project notes. Without it the tier-2 false-alarm - column was flattering every system. -- **The `historical` tier-3 trap** (*until the rollout X …; the current - note stands*). Every sentence-pair judge reads it as a contradiction; - it is the family's documented false-alarm floor (t3 false alarm - 0.15–0.37), not a bug to chase. -- **No LLM arms.** Lethe and every LLM-driven memory manager are - deliberately out: their numbers depend on a model in the loop and the - comparison would be model, not mechanism. +| **engram** | **70% (70–71)** | **632 (629–636)** | 36 (35–37) | 71 (70–71) | **739 (736–741)** | +| tfidf | 44% (43–46) | 439 (433–445) | 42 (41–44) | 100 | **581 (574–586)** | +| whole file | 72% (70–75) | 390 (387–394) | 0 | 0 | **390 (387–394)** | +| rag | 53% (52–55) | 358 (355–360) | 8 (8–9) | 9 (7–10) | **375 (374–376)** | +| grep | 43% (41–45) | 322 (320–323) | 9 | 3 (3–4) | **334 (332–335)** | +| curated (3k) | 8% (8–9) | 122 (120–125) | 0 | 1 | **123 (120–126)** | +| chance | 4% (3–4) | 107 (106–107) | 0 | 9 (8–10) | **116 (116–117)** | + +The external systems on seed 1 at 500 (`results/v2//500-seed1.json`; +their three-seed spread is not yet measured): + +| system | success | families (800) | signal (100) | tokens (100) | **score** | billed tok/query | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| MemContinuum | 48% | 337 | 9 | 46 | **392** | 852 | +| LangMem | 53% | 359 | 8 | 9 | **376** | 2,360 | +| Mem0 | 47% | 334 | 7 | 6 | **347** | 2,567 | +| cognee | 48% | 259 | 8 | 14 | **281** | 2,053 | + +**By family at 500** (three seeds for the in-process arms, seed 1 for the +external systems): + +| system | retrieval | abstention | currency | contradiction | drift | deletion | rationale | temporal | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| engram | 63% (62–64) | 100% (99–100) | 88% | 46% | 44% (41–47) | 93% (91–94) | 98% (97–99) | 100% | +| tfidf | 46% (44–48) | 0% | 69% | 59% | 65% (60–73) | 100% | 0% | 100% | +| whole file | 90% (87–94) | 0% | 100% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 100% | n/a | +| MemContinuum | 55% | 0% | 82% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 100% | n/a | +| LangMem | 64% | 0% | 91% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% | 100% | +| rag | 65% (64–66) | 0% | 89% (87–91) | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% (3–5) | 100% | +| Mem0 | 56% | 0% | 73% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 5% | 100% | +| grep | 51% (49–52) | 0% | 68% (68–69) | n/a | n/a | 100% | 2% (2–3) | 100% | +| cognee | 63% | 0% | 92% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% | n/a | +| curated (3k) | 7% | 0% | 0% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 15% (13–17) | n/a | +| chance | 1% | 0% | 0% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 1% (0–3) | 5% (3–6) | + +**Columns by seed** (seed 1 / 2 / 3): engram `crossed_r@5` 0.02 / 0.04 / +0.02, `hedge` 0.40 / 0.40 / 0.39, `stale_above` 0.15 / 0.22 / 0.19, +`natural_fp` 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.02, `phantom_fp` 0.01 / 0.00 / 0.00, tier-1 +contradiction recall 0.04 / 0.04 / 0.00, `path_r@5` 1.00 on every seed. +tfidf `crossed_r@5` 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.01, `stale_above` 0.70 / 0.71 / 0.71, +`natural_fp` and `phantom_fp` 1.00 on every seed, tier-1 recall 0.38 on +every seed, `path_r@5` 0.21 / 0.44 / 0.32. rag `path_r@5` 0.68 / 0.66 / +0.60 at `path_cover` 0.34–0.36; grep 1.00 at 0.97–0.99. + +## What the numbers say + +**The flat stores are one system.** LangMem and `rag` agree to the digit +at both sizes (376 / 359); Mem0 and cognee sit within a few points of +them on every family they attempt. Given the same embedder, a vector +store is a vector store: it retrieves 57–65% of questions, answers every +phantom and every natural null (`phantom_fp` and `natural_fp` 1.00), puts +the stale sibling above the truth on about a quarter of polluted +questions, and cannot say why anything was decided (rationale 3–7%). The +difference between them is a clock (cognee has none: temporal N/A) and +the length of the text they show. + +**The reference system's lead is not recall.** At 1500 its retrieval +family is 57%, level with `rag`; its `crossed_r@5` is 0.02 against +`rag`'s 0.09 (a question sharing no content word with its note is where +the keyword channel and the reranker vote have nothing to hold); and its +calibrated "not in memory" line hedges on 34–40% of answerable questions, +which the signal score counts as zero — the signal score is 32–36 where +the retrieval focus alone would give about 60. The lead is the families +the flat stores score zero on: abstention 96–100%, contradiction 46–47%, +drift 44–48%, rationale 98–99% through its edges, deletion 87–93% with a +resurrection warning, and 450 billed tokens a query against 2,200–2,800. + +**The lexical arm shows the ceiling of a title.** `tfidf` earns 100 token +points and 37–42 signal points by answering in a snippet, and 58–59% on +contradiction from token differencing (`value` and `unit` flips, tier-1 +recall 0.38–0.42). Its columns show what a title index cannot do: the +crossed phrasing 0.00, the oblique 0.01–0.05, abstention 0% (every word of +a coined subject was written somewhere, so an unseen token is not an +oracle), the stale sibling above the truth 63–71% of the time, the path +read 0.08–0.44, rationale 0%. + +**The whole file is the cheapest honest memory and the most expensive +reader.** Every note in context scores 71–72% success — the highest of +any system — and 390: it pays 404,164 tokens a query at 1500 for 0 signal +and 0 token points, and it cannot abstain, cannot notice a contradiction, +and holds the stale sibling beside the truth on every polluted question +(`stale_above` 1.00). The curated 3,000-token file is the same idea with a +budget, and at 500 notes the budget holds 7% of the answers. + +**MemContinuum's channel is the chain, and the chain carries the +rationale.** Its author's review of an earlier measurement said the bench +had read `search` where the agent reads the hook-injected +`for-path`/`chain`. The adapter now writes the schema's typed edges on +`link`, delivers a hit's edge-neighbours, and answers the path read with +`for-path`: rationale is 100% (all of it `structure_only` — the reason +arrives as context, never in the top five itself), the path read is 1.00 +at `path_cover` 0.95 / 0.87, and the score is 392 / 380. What the author +did not dispute stayed where it was: `stale_above` 0.58–0.62 (the widest +of any system: its FTS5 channel prefers the sibling's shorter title), +abstention 0%, no suspect queue, no clock. Its unranked chain text costs +850 tokens a query, the only external bonus worth having (46–47 token +points). + +**The path read separates three kinds of system.** A file channel — +engram's code-ref match, grep's substring match over the note files, +MemContinuum's `for-path` — answers every file and covers 0.87–1.00 of +what is bound. A vector store handed a path embeds the string and finds +the *component's* notes: one bound note in the top five for 0.47–0.68 of +files, never the file (cover 0.18–0.36). A title index barely sees it +(0.08–0.44). The read is 63–64 of 3,042–9,008 tasks, so it moves no +headline by more than a point; it is a column. ## Threats to validity -- **One generator, one style.** One subject, one slot, one value per note; - the contradiction tiers are templates. Real notes are mushier — long, - multi-clause titles about one subject are a shape the generator does - not produce, and the `collider` negative is the one place it tries. -- **The reference system's models grade the reference system.** Its - reranker and NLI model are its own; the flat stores get the embedder - only, which is the point of the comparison (mechanism, not model) and - also its limit. A submission with a stronger embedder should be read - against `rag` with that embedder, not against these rows. -- **Pollution is three shapes of one thing,** and drift in the wild has - more: a note that quietly stopped being true, a tombstone whose victim - was re-derived in different words, a supersession whose successor sits - in another component. -- **Trust reads the wall clock** in the reference system while the - world's clock is fixed, so its trust-modulated rankings move by a hair - between days. The structural columns do not. -- **No behaviour.** Whether an agent *acts* on what it recalls is a - separate, online question this benchmark does not ask. - -## What v2 would add - -- A `collider`-style negative for every family, not only contradiction. -- Authority scenarios the generator cannot yet template: an endorsed note - that is later contradicted by judged evidence (demotion vs approval), - and endorsements spread across sessions rather than stamped in one. -- A pollution shape the generator cannot template: a note that stopped - being true without any sibling saying so. -- A second corpus style (chat-shaped or issue-tracker-shaped notes) to - see which columns are register-dependent. -- Results from systems with a language model in the loop, once a - judge-free way to hold the model fixed exists. +- **One seed for the external systems.** The in-process arms are stable + to a point across three seeds at 500; the external rows are quoted from + seed 1 and should be read with that spread in mind until their seeds + 2 and 3 are run. +- **The reference system moves by two points between identical runs.** + Its decline line is fitted per run on graph-vocabulary probes; the + three-seed range (736–741) is partly that refit, not only the seeds. + Every other arm reproduces to the digit. +- **Contended wall-clock.** Every receipt was taken with three chains + running side by side on one laptop; the timing columns say nothing + about any system's speed. +- **One embedder, one register.** Every embedding arm uses the same + 384-dimensional model, and every world is one corpus register + (software-project notes with three-word subjects). A system tuned for + another embedder or another register is not measured here. +- **Adapters are the adapter author's reading of a system.** Each maps + twelve operations onto a native API and declares capabilities; a + deviation is listed in the adapter's notes, and a system's author can + submit a different mapping by pull request. + +## Not yet run + +Seeds 2 and 3 at 500 for the external systems; the 100 rung; the +authority world; a path read on a directory rather than a file, and a +path that binds no note; a second corpus register; systems with a +language model in the loop, once a judge-free way to hold the model fixed +exists. diff --git a/adapters/README.md b/adapters/README.md index 63acf65..c3d3713 100644 --- a/adapters/README.md +++ b/adapters/README.md @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ makes the grader complain about missing replies; inspect the JSON instead. The grader poses fewer tasks than the script has probes: the rewrite of a purged note is a column, never a task. -`adapter.py` is the protocol (eleven operations, the hit shape, capabilities); +`adapter.py` is the protocol (twelve operations, the hit shape, capabilities); `run.py` is the loop. An adapter is one file, `_adapter.py`, with a class `Adapter(MemoryAdapter)`. It maps keys to native ids itself, returns exactly the text its system would show a caller, declares only the diff --git a/adapters/adapter.py b/adapters/adapter.py index 5fba6a4..7561700 100644 --- a/adapters/adapter.py +++ b/adapters/adapter.py @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ :class:`MemoryAdapter` and handing the resulting transcript to the Rust grader (``knowledgedrift --grade transcript.json --script script.json``). The runner (``run.py``) owns the loop, the timings and the transcript -shape; an adapter owns only the mapping from the ten operations to its +shape; an adapter owns only the mapping from the twelve operations to its system's native API. Keys @@ -175,6 +175,14 @@ def recall(self, query: str, k: int, window: Optional[dict[str, int]]) -> Recall """``window``: {"after": unix, "before": unix} half-open, or None.""" raise NotImplementedError + def recall_path(self, path: str, k: int) -> Recalled: + """The path-shaped read (v2 worlds): what a caller about to touch + ``path`` should see. A system with a file channel (an edit hook, a + code-ref index, a metadata filter) answers from it; the default + hands the path to ``recall`` as a query, which is what a store + without one would do.""" + return self.recall(path, k, None) + def suspects(self) -> Optional[list[dict[str, Any]]]: """Every disagreement the system wants a person to judge, as {"a": key, "b": key, "hint": "contradiction"|...}. None = no such diff --git a/adapters/memcontinuum.md b/adapters/memcontinuum.md index f5c8462..346f680 100644 --- a/adapters/memcontinuum.md +++ b/adapters/memcontinuum.md @@ -52,14 +52,15 @@ passed explicitly (`adapters/out/memcontinuum-index.sqlite`). | op | what it becomes | dropped | |---|---|---| | `inscribe(record, mode)` | a topic file `topics//.md`: `id` = key, `title`, `area` = kind, `code_refs`, `tags: [kind]`, one link `L1` (`status: active`, `kind: adopted`, `ruling.text` = body, `ruling.authority: agent-inference`, `date` = capture day); the body renders the chain newest-first | `open` (Problems are rulings like any other); `mode` (no write-time checks exist) | -| `link(from, to, verb)` | nothing — a link's typed `edges` take only the schema's seven `rel` values, and search never reads them | the edge | +| `link(from, to, verb)` | a typed edge on the link whose sentence it is, in the one reading the schema's seven `rel` values allow: `X because Y` → on Y `led_to X`; `R answers P` → on P `led_to R`; `X builds-on Y` → on Y `led_to X`; `X about Y` → on X `applies_to Y` (v2 adapter; the v1 receipts were taken with `link` mapped to nothing) | the verb's own name | | `supersede(old, new)` | the old link's lifecycle move `status: superseded` + `superseded_by`, a new link `L` (`kind: reversed`, `reverses`, `reason_for_change: changed-mind`, the new body as its ruling), the topic's `title` and `current` updated (title changes are free per SCHEMA §7) | — | | `release(key, reason)` | the lifecycle move `status: historical` on the active link ("no longer applicable, nothing replaced it"); the reason appended to the topic's free body text | the trace: default search hides non-active rulings | | `purge(key)` | the topic file deleted; the next reindex drops its rows | — | | `endorse(key, "user")` | SCHEMA §5 promotion: a new active link with the same text at `authority: owner-ratified`, `promoted_by` on the promoted link | — | | `endorse(key, retrieval / assistant / supervisor)` | nothing — no use counter, no agent-side confirmation act (only the owner promotes), no pin | the endorsement | | `settle()` | `cmd_reindex` if a write landed since the last read | — | -| `recall(query, k, window)` | `cmd_search --json --mode hybrid --limit k` with the defaults (active rulings only, inbox excluded): FTS5 BM25 and cosine over the fresh vectors, RRF-fused (k=60), one hit per topic family | the window (search filters by status/type/area/topic/authority, never by date) | +| `recall(query, k, window)` | `cmd_search --json --mode hybrid --limit k` with the defaults (active rulings only, inbox excluded): FTS5 BM25 and cosine over the fresh vectors, RRF-fused (k=60), one hit per topic family; each hit carries as `neighbors` the current keys of the topics its typed edges touch, read off the index's `edges` table in both directions | the window (search filters by status/type/area/topic/authority, never by date) | +| `recall_path(path, k)` | `cmd_for_path --json --with-chain-text`: every topic whose `code_refs` cover the path (exact, directory prefix or glob — the pre-edit hook's own match), each delivered as its chain text (the exact lines the hook injects), in index order, unranked; the first `k`; edge neighbours as above | the rest of a match list longer than `k` | | `suspects()` | `None` | — | | `lineage(key)` | the topic's links newest-first, mapped back to the keys they were written under — what `memidx chain` shows | — | | `standing_tokens()` | 0 — the hooks inject `for-path` chains per edited file, not a standing memory file | — | @@ -73,7 +74,7 @@ topic-row hit answers to its newest active link's key. | capability | value | why | |---|---|---| -| `link` | false | edges exist in the schema but never influence search | +| `link` | **true** | typed edges are stored on links and delivered as a hit's neighbours (v2 adapter) | | `history` | **true** | the chain is the unit; `memidx chain` walks it | | `trace` | false | a `historical` ruling stays in the file but default search does not deliver it | | `suspects` | false | no disagreement detection | @@ -100,9 +101,26 @@ topic-row hit answers to its newest active link's key. notes — which under the schema's citation rule makes every ruling CONTEXT, never CONSTRAINT, until the owner promotes it. The authority family's `user` rung is exactly that promotion. +- **Edges are read both ways.** `chain --json` and `for-path --json` show + a link's *outgoing* edges; a rationale question lands on the decision + and needs the reason, which is the edge's source. The adapter reads the + index's own `edges` table by `to_ref` as well — one query on the same + table the CLI walks, not a search feature the system has. +- **`for-path` delivers everything bound, unranked.** The protocol asks + for `k`; the adapter returns the first `k` matches in index order. On + the 1500 world some files bind more topics than `k`. - **Timing columns are contended**: every replay ran beside the in-process ladder on one laptop. ## Numbers -See `results/v1/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/README.md`. +v1 (the adapter as first written — `link` mapped to nothing, `search` +for every read): `results/v1/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/README.md`. v2 (this +adapter: typed edges on `link`, edge-neighbours on every hit, `for-path` +behind `recall_path`): `results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/README.md` — +392 at 500 and 380 at 1500, rationale 100% (`structure_only` 0.95), +`path_r@5` 1.00. The revision followed the author's review of the v1 +numbers: the agent's channel is the hook-injected `for-path` chain, not +`search`; the v2 adapter measures that channel where the protocol has a +place for it (the rationale walk, the path read) and leaves `search` as +the answer to a question, which is the only thing a question can ask. diff --git a/adapters/memcontinuum_adapter.py b/adapters/memcontinuum_adapter.py index e109c15..a033ed3 100644 --- a/adapters/memcontinuum_adapter.py +++ b/adapters/memcontinuum_adapter.py @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ import json import os import shutil +import sqlite3 import sys from datetime import datetime, timezone from pathlib import Path @@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ def close(self) -> None: def capabilities(self) -> dict[str, bool]: return { - "link": False, # typed edges exist on links but search never reads them + "link": True, # typed edges on links; a hit carries its edge-neighbours (see recall) "history": True, # the chain: memidx chain / the topic's own link list "trace": False, # a historical ruling leaves the file but default search hides it "suspects": False, @@ -248,8 +249,32 @@ def inscribe(self, record: dict[str, Any], mode: str) -> Inscribed: self._write(topic) return Inscribed() + # The schema's seven edge relations have no "because"; each harness + # verb is written as the one true reading the vocabulary allows, on the + # side whose sentence it is: + # X because Y -> Y led_to X (the reason led to the decision) + # R answers P -> P led_to R (the problem led to the resolution) + # X builds-on Y -> Y led_to X + # X about Y -> X applies_to Y + EDGE_OF = { + "because": ("led_to", True), + "answers": ("led_to", True), + "builds-on": ("led_to", True), + "about": ("applies_to", False), + } + def link(self, from_key: str, to_key: str, verb: str) -> bool: - return False + rel, reverse = self.EDGE_OF.get(verb, (None, False)) + if rel is None: + return False + src, dst = (to_key, from_key) if reverse else (from_key, to_key) + topic, target = self._topic_of(src), self._topic_of(dst) + link = topic.link_for_key(src) + if link is None: + raise KeyError(f"link: {src} has no link in topic {topic.id}") + link.setdefault("edges", []).append({"rel": rel, "to": target.id}) + self._write(topic) + return True def supersede(self, old_key: str, new_record: dict[str, Any]) -> None: topic = self._topic_of(old_key) @@ -369,6 +394,7 @@ def recall(self, query: str, k: int, window: Optional[dict[str, int]]) -> Recall if payload.get("embedding"): raise RuntimeError(f"memcontinuum search degraded: {payload}") payload = payload.get("results", []) + neighbours = self._edge_neighbours([entry["id"] for entry in payload]) hits: list[Hit] = [] for entry in payload: topic = self.topics.get(entry["id"]) @@ -389,6 +415,84 @@ def recall(self, query: str, k: int, window: Optional[dict[str, int]]) -> Recall text=f"{entry['title']}\n{entry.get('snippet', '')}", score=float(entry["score"]), created_at=created, + neighbors=neighbours.get(entry["id"], []), + ) + ) + return Recalled(hits=hits) + + def _current_key(self, topic_id: str) -> Optional[str]: + topic = self.topics.get(topic_id) + if topic is None: + return None + link = topic.current() + return topic.key_of.get(link["link"]) if link is not None else None + + def _edge_neighbours(self, topic_ids: list[str]) -> dict[str, list[str]]: + """The typed edges touching each topic, read off the index's own + ``edges`` table in both directions (``chain --json`` shows a link's + outgoing edges; the incoming side is the same table queried by + ``to_ref``). A neighbour is delivered as its topic's current key.""" + if not topic_ids: + return {} + conn = sqlite3.connect(self.db) + try: + marks = ",".join("?" * len(topic_ids)) + rows = conn.execute( + f"SELECT from_ref, to_ref FROM edges WHERE project=? AND " + f"(substr(from_ref, 1, instr(from_ref, '/') - 1) IN ({marks}) OR to_ref IN ({marks}))", + (PROJECT, *topic_ids, *topic_ids), + ).fetchall() + finally: + conn.close() + out: dict[str, list[str]] = {} + for from_ref, to_ref in rows: + a = from_ref.split("/", 1)[0] + b = to_ref.split("/", 1)[0].split("#", 1)[0] + for me, other in ((a, b), (b, a)): + if me in topic_ids and other != me: + key = self._current_key(other) + if key is not None and key not in out.setdefault(me, []): + out[me].append(key) + return out + + def recall_path(self, path: str, k: int) -> Recalled: + """The system's primary channel: ``for-path``, what the pre-edit hook + injects for a file — every topic whose ``code_refs`` cover the path, + each delivered as its chain text (the exact lines the hook prints), + in index order, unranked. The first ``k`` are returned.""" + self._reindex() + out, err = io.StringIO(), io.StringIO() + args = self._args(root=str(self.root), file_path=path, json=True, with_chain_text=True) + with contextlib.redirect_stdout(out), contextlib.redirect_stderr(err): + rc = memidx.cmd_for_path(args) + if rc not in (0, 4): + raise RuntimeError(f"memcontinuum for-path failed ({rc}): {err.getvalue()}") + payload = json.loads(out.getvalue() or "{}") + results = payload.get("results", []) if isinstance(payload, dict) else payload + chain_text = payload.get("chain_text", "") if isinstance(payload, dict) else "" + # The hook's text, split back into one block per topic: a topic's + # block starts with its unindented head line. + blocks: dict[str, str] = {} + current: Optional[str] = None + for line in chain_text.splitlines(): + if line and not line.startswith(" "): + current = line.split(" ", 1)[0] + blocks[current] = line + elif current is not None: + blocks[current] += "\n" + line + topic_ids = [r["id"] for r in results if r.get("kind") != "concept"][:k] + neighbours = self._edge_neighbours(topic_ids) + hits: list[Hit] = [] + for tid in topic_ids: + topic = self.topics.get(tid) + link = topic.current() if topic is not None else None + hits.append( + Hit( + key=self._current_key(tid), + text=blocks.get(tid, tid), + score=None, + created_at=_day_unix(link["date"]) if link is not None else None, + neighbors=neighbours.get(tid, []), ) ) return Recalled(hits=hits) diff --git a/adapters/run.py b/adapters/run.py index 6a84d17..a082eef 100644 --- a/adapters/run.py +++ b/adapters/run.py @@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ def clock(kind: str, started: float) -> None: elif kind == "recall": result = mem.recall(op["query"], op["k"], op.get("window")) replies.append({"reply": "recall", "id": op["id"], "result": result.to_json()}) + elif kind == "recall_path": + result = mem.recall_path(op["path"], op["k"]) + replies.append({"reply": "recall", "id": op["id"], "result": result.to_json()}) elif kind == "suspects": pairs = mem.suspects() r: dict = {"reply": "suspects", "id": op["id"]} diff --git a/adapters/table.py b/adapters/table.py index c98ed89..80ffe8c 100644 --- a/adapters/table.py +++ b/adapters/table.py @@ -22,6 +22,12 @@ def row(g: dict) -> str: cost = g.get("cost", {}) + if g.get("edition", 1) >= 2: + return ( + f"| {g['arm']} | {g['success'] * 100:.0f}% | {g['passed']:,} / {g['attempted']:,} | " + f"{g['family_points']:.0f} | {g['signal_score']:.0f} | {g['token_score']:.0f} | " + f"**{g['score']:.0f}** | {g['tokens_billed']:,.0f} |" + ) return ( f"| {g['arm']} | {g['success'] * 100:.0f}% | {g['passed']:,} / {g['attempted']:,} | " f"{g['composite']:.3f} | {g['signal_share']:.2f} | ×{g['multiplier']:.1f} | {g['score']:.0f} | " @@ -103,8 +109,6 @@ def main() -> None: if a.seeds: seed_rows(collect(a.seeds + a.graded, a.size)) return - print("| arm | success | passed / attempted | composite | S | mult | score | standing tok | tok/query |") - print("|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|") arms: list[dict] = [] if a.receipt: r = json.load(open(a.receipt)) @@ -113,8 +117,17 @@ def main() -> None: arms.extend(s["arms"]) for p in a.graded: arms.append(json.load(open(p))) + if arms and arms[0].get("edition", 1) >= 2: + print("| arm | success | passed / attempted | families (800) | signal (100) | tokens (100) | v2 score | billed tok/query |") + print("|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|") + else: + print("| arm | success | passed / attempted | composite | S | mult | score | standing tok | tok/query |") + print("|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|") for g in arms: print(row(g)) + for g in arms: + for flag in g.get("flags", []): + print(f"") if a.families: for g in arms: print(f"\n{g['arm']}:") diff --git a/docs/families.md b/docs/families.md index 09f529d..ebb4b16 100644 --- a/docs/families.md +++ b/docs/families.md @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ the benchmark is about: | re-decided subjects | max(4, N/20) chains of `--chain-len` generations, a month apart | currency: is the head current, is the history reachable | | **pollution** | `--pollution` share of tested subjects (default **10%**), shaped by `--pollution-shape` | a stale sibling of the fact — same subject, flipped value — imported and **never superseded by anyone** | | capture times | spread over 60 days | temporal scoping; the world's "now" is 2026-09-01 | +| code refs | on ~40% of notes, one to three paths `src//{mod,state,handler,config}.rs` | v2: the path-shaped read — every file is asked once, by path | | controls | N/4 subjects that are never written | abstention | | planted contradictions | max(6, N/3) cases across eleven shapes | the contradiction ladder | | deletions | max(4, N/6) victims, half released with a reason, half purged | deletion honesty | @@ -53,13 +54,29 @@ the family's tasks unless noted. Three questions per tested fact: **lexical** (the fact's own words), **paraphrase** (names the subject, rewords the rest), **oblique** (never -names the subject, shares no content vocabulary). Rank of the gold among -live hits; a dump delivers what it holds at rank 1. +names the subject, shares no content vocabulary). On a v2 world a fourth, +**crossed**: oblique, and the component is described rather than named +(`the service that hands out grants — which one picked …`), so the question +shares no content word at all with the note that answers it. Rank of the +gold among live hits; a dump delivers what it holds at rank 1. + +On a v2 world the family also poses the **path** read: every file the +world's code refs name is asked once through `recall_path`, as a path and +no question — what a caller about to edit the file should see. Gold is +every live, truthful note bound to the file (chain heads and distractors +included: an editor should see them; a stale sibling bound to the same +file is neither gold nor penalised). A system with a file channel — an +edit hook, a code-ref index — answers from it; one without searches the +path string. *Pass:* a bound note readable in the top five. Columns: +`path_r@5`, `path_cover` (of the notes bound to the file, the share the +top-k delivered, capped at k). The path reads count in the family's pass +rate and in the signal score, not in `weighted_r@5`. *Pass:* gold in the top five **and not outranked by its stale sibling** when the subject was polluted (a dump holding both is ambiguous and fails). Columns: `r@1`, `r@5`, `mrr`, per-phrasing `r@5`, `weighted_r@5` -(45/45/10 — a stated assumption), `stale_above` (over polluted questions), +(45/45/10 on v1 — a stated assumption; the four phrasings weigh equally on +v2, `crossed_r@5` beside them), `stale_above` (over polluted questions), `hedge` (the gold was delivered under a decline), `noise`, `tokens`. ### attention — what did the reader wade through? @@ -72,9 +89,16 @@ and **standing_tokens** price the two halves of the bill. ### abstention — does it say no? -One question per subject that was never written. *Pass:* nothing -delivered, or delivered under the system's own decline signal. Columns: -`fp` (the failure rate), `answered`, `declined`, and `separation` — the +One question per subject that was never written — a **phantom**. On a v2 +world, as many **natural nulls** beside them: a question about a subject +that *was* written, in the template of a kind that subject has no note of +(*what is still broken in the teal creek ingest job?* when the only note +about that job is a Decision). Every word of a natural null exists in +memory; the answer does not. A phantom is caught by a detector that has +never seen a token; a natural null is caught only by one that knows what +it knows. *Pass:* nothing delivered, or delivered under the system's own +decline signal. Columns: `fp` (the failure rate; `phantom_fp` and +`natural_fp` split it on v2), `answered`, `declined`, and `separation` — the balanced accuracy of the best threshold between answerable and control top scores, the threshold-free number a system with no decline rule can still be read on. FP is never printed without recall beside it: a mute @@ -91,7 +115,10 @@ Columns: `head_r@1`, `head_r@5`, `pollution`, `lineage`. ### contradiction — does it notice the disagreement? Cases are planted as assistant-style writes after the world is probed, -one per target subject, rotating through eleven shapes in three tiers: +one per target subject, rotating through eleven shapes in three tiers +(fourteen on a v2 world — the three marked *v2* are aimed at lexical +detectors, which the first field submission showed catch a one-token edit +and nothing else): | tier | shape | polarity | what it plants | |---|---|---|---| @@ -106,6 +133,9 @@ one per target subject, rotating through eleven shapes in three tiers: | 3 | `transitive` | + | two notes: *X mirrors every setting of G* and the flipped claim about G — the contradiction exists only across the bridge | | 3 | `compound` | + | a sentence that agrees with the note and then, as a separate matter, contradicts it | | 3 | `historical` | − | *until the 3.1 rollout X …; the rollout changed that and the current note stands* — reads as a contradiction, is history | +| 1 | `reworded` *v2* | + | the flip in a wholly different frame (*Operators pinned the X to 12 attempts for its retry budget*) — no token of the original sentence survives but the subject and the slot word | +| 2 | `clause` *v2* | + | the flip carried by a clause, not a token (*Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the X …; the earlier note was mistaken*) | +| 2 | `synonym` *v2* | − | the title with exactly one token swapped for a synonym (*uses* → *keeps*, *when* → *whenever*) — must not be flagged; a detector that flags any small edit fails here | Tier 2 is where a sentence-pair logic layer earns its place; tier 3 is what an encoder-only system is not expected to survive, and the score diff --git a/docs/protocol.md b/docs/protocol.md index 66e32ae..ea1dfdb 100644 --- a/docs/protocol.md +++ b/docs/protocol.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # The protocol -Eleven operations (`src/protocol.rs`; mirrored for Python in +Twelve operations (`src/protocol.rs`; mirrored for Python in `adapters/adapter.py`). An adapter implements them against its system's native API; the harness never reaches around them. @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ native API; the harness never reaches around them. | `endorse(key, by)` | someone vouches for the note on one rung of the authority ladder: `retrieval` (it was delivered and used), `assistant` (confirmed still true), `user` (the owner approved it), `supervisor` (pinned above every other signal); a rung may repeat | nothing (`endorse_*: false`) | | `settle()` | a session boundary: calibration, sweeps, consolidation | nothing | | `recall(query, k, window?)` | top-k, optionally scoped to a capture-time window | rank, filter by date if it has one | +| `recall_path(path, k)` | (v2) the path-shaped read: what a caller about to touch `path` should see — an edit hook's channel, a code-ref index | hand the path to `recall` as a query (the default) | | `suspects()` | every disagreement the system wants a person to judge | `None` (`suspects: false`) | | `lineage(key)` | the supersession history reachable from a note | `None` | | `standing_tokens()` | what the system costs every session before a question is asked | 0 (a file: its size) | @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ them (`docs/scoring.md`). { "op": "settle" }, { "op": "recall", "id": "R1", "query": "Vanor lease broker retry budget", "k": 10 }, { "op": "recall", "id": "R77", "query": "...", "k": 10, "window": { "after": 1781000000, "before": 1781900000 } }, + { "op": "recall_path", "id": "P1", "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", "k": 10 }, { "op": "inscribe", "id": "W1", "record": { "key": "c0a", "...": "..." }, "mode": "write" }, { "op": "suspects", "id": "S" }, { "op": "release", "key": "f0004", "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" }, @@ -83,6 +85,7 @@ them (`docs/scoring.md`). ], "probes": [ { "id": "R1", "family": "retrieval", "expect": "gold", "gold": "f0000", "phrasing": "lexical", "stale": "s-f0000" }, + { "id": "P1", "family": "retrieval", "expect": "bound", "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", "gold": ["f0000", "f0140"], "answers": ["retry budget of 3", "..."] }, { "id": "C0", "family": "contradiction", "expect": "case", "gold": "f0000", "planted": ["c0a"], "witness": "c0a", "tier": 1, "shape": "value", "positive": true }, { "id": "R412", "family": "authority", "expect": "ranked", "winner": "a3a", "losers": ["a3b", "f0011"], "order": false, "layer": 2, "scenario": "approve_vs_confirm", "needs": ["endorse_user"] } ] } @@ -92,8 +95,9 @@ The operation order is load-bearing and the same in every world: 1. import the world (notes, links, stale siblings, supersession chains); 2. settle — a session boundary; -3. probe retrieval, abstention, currency, rationale, temporal on the - untouched world, so no family's plantings crowd another's questions; +3. probe retrieval (on v2, every file the code refs name is also read by + path), abstention, currency, rationale, temporal on the untouched world, + so no family's plantings crowd another's questions; 4. plant the contradiction cases as assistant-style writes; 5. settle, then ask for the suspect queue (contradiction + drift); 6. release and purge the deletion targets, probe them, write them back; diff --git a/docs/scoring.md b/docs/scoring.md index 4cee721..12d0fe0 100644 --- a/docs/scoring.md +++ b/docs/scoring.md @@ -1,5 +1,11 @@ # Scoring +Two editions. **v1** (the frozen worlds under `worlds/v1/`, every receipt +under `results/v1/`) scores composite × an attention multiplier. **v2** +(`--v2`, `worlds/v2/`, `results/v2/`) scores additively: family points plus +an efficiency bonus. The grader reads the world's `edition` and applies the +matching rule; a v1 receipt regraded today gets its v1 number. + Every task is posed to every system; the task list is fixed by the script. A system attempts every task its declared capabilities cover: a system with a suspect queue, history and a clock attempts all of them; a flat store @@ -74,3 +80,57 @@ shipped). On v1 the success percentages hold to about one point per arm and the score to about three percent (it multiplies two means); the widest family column is the tier-3 contradiction false alarm, which sits on six to ten cases per world. + +## v2: the additive score + +v1's multiplier let a system that answers in a few tokens earn up to ×10 on +whatever it got right — and the first lexical submission did exactly that: +TF-IDF over the titles, one short snippet per answer, signal share 0.94, +score 823 at 76% success against the reference system's 511 at 80%. The +bill for attention is real, but it must not outweigh what the memory knows. + +The v2 score is a sum: + +- **family points** = Σ over the eight plain families of pass rate × 100 + (N/A = 0): 0–800. The authority family, when the world poses it, is + reported beside this and not summed. +- **signal score** = 100 × the mean **focus** over **every** retrieval + probe (the path reads included): the share of delivered tokens that + belonged to the answering record, counted as zero when the answer was not delivered, was delivered + without its value readable in the text, or was delivered under a decline + — a miss is noise, and so is hedging on a question the memory could + answer. 0–100. +- **token score** = 100 × clamp(ln(3000 / t) / ln 15, 0, 1), where t is the + tokens per query plus the standing tokens amortised over twenty questions + a session (a dump is billed once — its delivered text *is* its standing + text). 100 at 200 tokens, 15 at 2,000, 0 at 3,000, logarithmic between, + so halving the bill is worth the same everywhere and there is no cliff to + clip toward. 0–100. + +**v2 score** = family points + signal score + token score, out of 1,000. + +One family point trades one-for-one against one bonus point, and the bonus +caps at 200 against the families' 800, so no system wins on efficiency +alone: a memory that abandons a family (100 points) to shorten its answers +(at most 100) loses. The equilibrium a developer is asked to find is between +knowing more, showing less, and showing the right thing. + +Two rules that hold only on v2 worlds: + +- **A hit counts only when the answer is readable.** Every v2 retrieval, + currency, rationale and temporal probe carries the answer substring; a + hit whose delivered text does not contain it is a miss, however well it + is keyed. A title-only snippet that names the note but not its value + earns nothing. +- **A file is a query.** Every file the world's code refs name is read by + path through `recall_path`; a system without a file channel searches the + path string. `path_r@5` and `path_cover` sit in the retrieval family. +- **Declared capabilities are checked against their columns.** `trace` + with no marker ever delivered, `verdict` with no recall ever declined, + `suspects` with an empty queue, `history` with no lineage walk, + `write_check` with no verdict on any write — each is a `flags` line in + the receipt and in the report. Flags change no number; a review reads + them before the numbers. + +The v1 columns (`composite`, `S`, `multiplier`) are still computed and +printed on a v2 receipt, so the two editions can be read side by side. diff --git a/results/v1/README.md b/results/v1/README.md index cab1f59..1784f4e 100644 --- a/results/v1/README.md +++ b/results/v1/README.md @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ the `.log` beside each receipt is the terminal report. | `500-seed1-late.json` | `--sizes 500 --pollution-shape late` | pollution shape | | `500-seed1-authority.json` | `--sizes 500 --authority` | the authority family (plus the plain eight) | | `1500-seed1-authority.json` | `--sizes 1500 --authority` | the authority family at 1500 | +| `500-seed1-tfidf.json` | `--sizes 500 --arms tfidf` | the in-process `tfidf` arm (v2 branch): the lexical crack reproduced on the v1 500 world — 564 at 61% | Arms in every file: `engram` (engram-core 0.9.4, in-memory store, driven the way its daemon drives it), `rag` (vector top-k, same embedder, nothing diff --git a/results/v1/reference-arms/500-seed1-tfidf.json b/results/v1/reference-arms/500-seed1-tfidf.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..66a08a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v1/reference-arms/500-seed1-tfidf.json @@ -0,0 +1,1099 @@ +{ + "generator": "knowledgedrift 1.0.0", + "flags": [], + "embedder": "bge-small-en-v1.5 (fake)", + "reranker": "none", + "nli": "fake", + "embeddings_are_fake": true, + "sizes": [ + { + "spec": { + "size": 500, + "seed": 1, + "k": 10, + "chains": 25, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "notes": 630, + "edges": 530 + }, + "digest": "a43dd4dec5b10c3f", + "probes": 2387, + "ops": 3593, + "arms": [ + { + "arm": "tfidf", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": true, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": true, + "write_check": true, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "a43dd4dec5b10c3f", + "settle_note": "token differencing nominated 269 pairs", + "tasks": 2346, + "attempted": 2279, + "passed": 1422, + "success": 0.6061381074168798, + "attempted_success": 0.6239578762615182, + "composite": 0.6832070098576123, + "signal_share": 0.824973619108793, + "multiplier": 8.24973619108793, + "score": 563.6277595227313, + "edition": 1, + "family_points": 546.5656078860899, + "signal_score": 56.48319378831536, + "token_score": 100.0, + "tokens_billed": 99.68866666666666, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 1500, + "tasks": 1500, + "passed": 912, + "pass_rate": 0.608, + "columns": { + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.95, + "mrr": 0.6233772486772486, + "noise": 0.45143650793650725, + "oblique_r@5": 0.056, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.962, + "r@1": 0.5906666666666667, + "r@5": 0.656, + "stale_above": 0.9393939393939394, + "tokens": 99.68866666666666, + "weighted_r@5": 0.8660000000000001 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 110, + "tasks": 110, + "passed": 110, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 1.0, + "fp": 0.0, + "separation": 0.8042424242424242 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 51, + "pass_rate": 0.68, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6666666666666666, + "head_r@5": 0.68, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 166, + "passed": 114, + "pass_rate": 0.6867469879518072, + "columns": { + "absorbed": 0.0, + "flagged": 0.44155844155844154, + "queued": 0.44155844155844154, + "t1_recall": 0.75, + "t2_false_alarm": 0.08333333333333333, + "t2_recall": 0.3870967741935484, + "t3_false_alarm": 0.13793103448275862, + "t3_recall": 0.3333333333333333 + } + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 165, + "tasks": 165, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.0, + "direct_r@5": 0.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 55, + "passed": 27, + "pass_rate": 0.4909090909090909, + "columns": { + "flagged": 0.4909090909090909, + "noticed": 0.4909090909090909 + } + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.824973619108793, + "noise": 0.45143650793650725, + "tokens_per_query": 99.68866666666666 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.07842510189573458, + "lineage_ms": 0.00016492000000000004, + "link_ms": 0.00003168301886792459, + "purge_ms": 0.007682878048780488, + "recall_ms": 5.090700792517011, + "release_ms": 0.009835380952380953, + "settle_ms": 131.2188955, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.03262164, + "suspects_ms": 0.018125, + "tokens_per_query": 99.68866666666666 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 844, + "total_ms": 66.19078599999999 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.004123000000000001 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.016792000000000033 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.314998 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2058, + "total_ms": 10476.66223100001 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.41308600000000006 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 262.437791 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 1.6310820000000001 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.018125 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R6", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R17", + "R18", + "R21", + "R24", + "R27", + "R30", + "R33", + "R36", + "R39", + "R42", + "R45", + "R48", + "R51", + "R54", + "R57", + "R60", + "R63", + "R64", + "R65", + "R66", + "R69", + "R70", + "R71", + "R72", + "R75", + "R78", + "R84", + "R87", + "R90", + "R93", + "R96", + "R99", + "R102", + "R108", + "R111", + "R114", + "R117", + "R120", + "R123", + "R126", + "R129", + "R130", + "R131", + "R132", + "R133", + "R134", + "R135", + "R138", + "R141", + "R147", + "R150", + "R153", + "R156", + "R159", + "R162", + "R165", + "R168", + "R171", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R185", + "R186", + "R189", + "R192", + "R193", + "R194", + "R195", + "R198", + "R199", + "R200", + "R201", + "R207", + "R210", + "R213", + "R216", + "R219", + "R225", + "R228", + "R231", + "R234", + "R237", + "R240", + "R243", + "R246", + "R249", + "R252", + "R255", + "R258", + "R261", + "R264", + "R267", + "R270", + "R273", + "R276", + "R279", + "R282", + "R285", + "R288", + "R291", + "R294", + "R297", + "R300", + "R303", + "R306", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R312", + "R315", + "R318", + "R319", + "R320", + "R321", + "R322", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R330", + "R333", + "R336", + "R339", + "R342", + "R345", + "R348", + "R351", + "R354", + "R357", + "R358", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R366", + "R369", + "R372", + "R375", + "R378", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R387", + "R390", + "R393", + "R396", + "R399", + "R402", + "R405", + "R406", + "R407", + "R408", + "R411", + "R414", + "R417", + "R420", + "R423", + "R426", + "R429", + "R432", + "R435", + "R438", + "R441", + "R442", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R450", + "R453", + "R456", + "R459", + "R462", + "R465", + "R468", + "R471", + "R474", + "R477", + "R480", + "R483", + "R486", + "R489", + "R492", + "R493", + "R494", + "R495", + "R498", + "R501", + "R502", + "R503", + "R504", + "R505", + "R506", + "R507", + "R510", + "R513", + "R516", + "R519", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R525", + "R528", + "R529", + "R530", + "R531", + "R534", + "R537", + "R540", + "R543", + "R546", + "R549", + "R552", + "R555", + "R558", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R570", + "R573", + "R574", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R582", + "R585", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R594", + "R597", + "R600", + "R603", + "R606", + "R609", + "R612", + "R613", + "R614", + "R615", + "R618", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R627", + "R630", + "R633", + "R639", + "R642", + "R645", + "R648", + "R651", + "R654", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R660", + "R663", + "R666", + "R669", + "R672", + "R675", + "R676", + "R677", + "R678", + "R681", + "R684", + "R687", + "R693", + "R696", + "R699", + "R702", + "R705", + "R708", + "R711", + "R714", + "R720", + "R723", + "R726", + "R729", + "R730", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R738", + "R741", + "R744", + "R747", + "R750", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R762", + "R765", + "R768", + "R771", + "R774", + "R777", + "R780", + "R783", + "R786", + "R789", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R797", + "R798", + "R801", + "R804", + "R807", + "R810", + "R813", + "R816", + "R819", + "R822", + "R825", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R837", + "R840", + "R843", + "R846", + "R852", + "R855", + "R858", + "R861", + "R867", + "R870", + "R873", + "R876", + "R879", + "R882", + "R888", + "R891", + "R894", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R900", + "R903", + "R906", + "R909", + "R910", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R918", + "R921", + "R927", + "R930", + "R933", + "R936", + "R939", + "R942", + "R945", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R957", + "R958", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R966", + "R969", + "R972", + "R975", + "R976", + "R977", + "R978", + "R981", + "R984", + "R987", + "R990", + "R993", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1002", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1014", + "R1017", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1026", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1038", + "R1041", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1050", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1053", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1062", + "R1065", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1073", + "R1074", + "R1077", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1086", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1089", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1098", + "R1101", + "R1104", + "R1107", + "R1110", + "R1113", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1122", + "R1125", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1134", + "R1137", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1146", + "R1149", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1158", + "R1161", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1170", + "R1173", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1182", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1194", + "R1197", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1206", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1209", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1218", + "R1221", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1230", + "R1233", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1245", + "R1246", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1254", + "R1257", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1266", + "R1269", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1278", + "R1281", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1289", + "R1290", + "R1293", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1305", + "R1311", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1326", + "R1329", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1338", + "R1341", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1350", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1353", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1361", + "R1362", + "R1365", + "R1368", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1373", + "R1374", + "R1377", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1386", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1389", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1398", + "R1401", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1410", + "R1413", + "R1416", + "R1419", + "R1422", + "R1425", + "R1428", + "R1431", + "R1434", + "R1437", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1458", + "R1461", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1470", + "R1473", + "R1476", + "R1477", + "R1478", + "R1479", + "R1482", + "R1485", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1493", + "R1494", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1497", + "R1500", + "R1613", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1622", + "R1625", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1634", + "R1637", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1649", + "R1652", + "R1655", + "R1658", + "R1661", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1670", + "R1673", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1682", + "R1685", + "R1686", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1689", + "R1690", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1693", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1701", + "R1702", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1709", + "R1710", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1721", + "R1722", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1725", + "R1726", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1729", + "R1730", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1737", + "R1738", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1741", + "R1742", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1745", + "R1746", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1753", + "R1754", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1761", + "R1762", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1769", + "R1770", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1773", + "R1774", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1777", + "R1778", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1781", + "R1782", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1785", + "R1786", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1793", + "R1794", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1797", + "R1798", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1805", + "R1806", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1809", + "R1810", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1817", + "R1818", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1821", + "R1822", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1825", + "R1826", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1833", + "R1834", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1837", + "R1838", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1841", + "R1842", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1845", + "R1846", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "C5", + "C6", + "C16", + "C17", + "C19", + "C27", + "C28", + "C34", + "C39", + "C41", + "C43", + "C44", + "C49", + "C50", + "C52", + "C53", + "C56", + "C60", + "C61", + "C68", + "C71", + "C72", + "C75", + "C78", + "C82", + "C83", + "C88", + "C94", + "C96", + "C99", + "C103", + "C104", + "C105", + "C107", + "C108", + "C113", + "C115", + "C116", + "C122", + "C126", + "C127", + "C129", + "C137", + "C144", + "C149", + "C151", + "C153", + "C154", + "C158", + "C159", + "C160", + "C162", + "D2", + "D21", + "D58", + "D61", + "D64", + "D102", + "D106", + "D107", + "D127", + "D147", + "D167", + "D174", + "D176", + "D207", + "D218", + "D251", + "D276", + "D298", + "D317", + "D334", + "D357", + "D362", + "D402", + "D457", + "D462", + "D492", + "D497", + "D498" + ] + } + ] + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v1/reference-arms/500-seed1-tfidf.log b/results/v1/reference-arms/500-seed1-tfidf.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5c030ab --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v1/reference-arms/500-seed1-tfidf.log @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +! fake embedder: the lexical path is measured, the semantic numbers are noise +knowledgedrift 1.0.0 — embedder bge-small-en-v1.5 (fake), reranker none, nli fake, seed 1, pollution 10% (stale) +world 500: 630 notes, 530 edges, 3593 ops, 2387 probes + tfidf: 2346 tasks, success 0.606, 11s + settle: token differencing nominated 269 pairs + +== 500 tested facts, 630 notes == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + tfidf 2346 2279 1422 61% 62% 0.683 0.82 8.2 564 0 99 + tfidf success 61% = 1422 passed of 2346 posed (attempted 2279/2346, 62% of those passed) composite 0.683 S 0.82 ×8.2 score 564 standing 0 tok 99 tok/query + retrieval 1500 61% r@1 0.59 r@5 0.66 lexical_r@5 0.95 paraphrase_r@5 0.96 oblique_r@5 0.06 stale_above 0.94 hedge 0.00 noise 0.45 + abstention 110 100% fp 0.00 answered 1.00 declined 1.00 separation 0.80 + currency 75 68% head_r@1 0.67 head_r@5 0.68 pollution 0.00 + contradiction 166 69% t1_recall 0.75 t2_recall 0.39 t3_recall 0.33 t2_false_alarm 0.08 t3_false_alarm 0.14 queued 0.44 flagged 0.44 absorbed 0.00 + drift 55 49% noticed 0.49 flagged 0.49 + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 165 0% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + +wrote results/v1/reference-arms/500-seed1-tfidf.json diff --git a/results/v2/README.md b/results/v2/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..773bcf9 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,289 @@ +# v2 results + +The v2 edition (`--v2`): shared-vocabulary subjects, a fourth crossed +phrasing, natural-null controls beside the phantoms, three contradiction +shapes aimed at token differencing, answer-readable credit, capability +flags, the additive score, and — since 2026-09-16 — the **path-shaped +read**: every file the world's code refs name is asked once, by path, +through `recall_path`, the way an edit hook asks (`docs/families.md`, +`docs/protocol.md`). Worlds under `worlds/v2/` (the same five specs as v1's +100/500/1500 and 500 seeds 2–3, regenerated byte for byte by a golden test). +The seven in-process arms and the four external adapters have run the +official ladder (500 and 1500, seed 1); the in-process arms also the three +seeds at 500. + +## The ladder + +| arm | v2 score @500 (3 seeds) | v2 score @1500 | success @500 | success @1500 | +|---|---|---|---|---| +| tfidf | 581 (574–586) | 580 | 44% | 43% | +| MemContinuum 0.2.0rc5 (1 seed) | 392 | 380 | 48% | 44% | +| whole | 390 (387–394) | 390 | 72% | 71% | +| LangMem 0.0.30 (1 seed) | 376 | 359 | 53% | 48% | +| rag | 375 (374–376) | 359 | 53% | 48% | +| Mem0 2.0.20 (1 seed) | 347 | 348 | 47% | 44% | +| grep | 334 (332–335) | 325 | 43% | 41% | +| cognee 1.5.4 (1 seed) | 281 | 263 | 48% | 43% | +| curated | 123 (120–126) | 109 | 8% | 5% | +| chance | 116 (116–117) | 112 | 4% | 3% | +| engram | **739 (736–741)** | 718 | **70%** | 66% | + +**Environment.** One Apple-silicon laptop (macOS), CPU only, 2026-09-16, +Rust stable; `BAAI/bge-small-en-v1.5` for every embedding arm, the engram +arm with `jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en` and `deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli` +(engram-core at the revision `Cargo.toml` pins — the v1 stack, untouched). + +```sh +cargo run --release --features fastembed -- --v2 --sizes 500 [--seed N] \ + --arms engram,rag,grep,curated,whole,chance,tfidf \ + --json results/v2/reference-arms/500-seedN.json # run-ladder.sh drives the rest +``` + +Wall-clock, all seven arms, with the three external chains running beside +them: 14–18 minutes per 500 world, 63 minutes for the 1500 rung. + +## Three seeds at 500 (`reference-arms/500-seed{1,2,3}.json`) + +Mean, then min–max. The score is stable to about a point per arm: it is a +sum of means, not a product. + +| arm | success | families (800) | signal (100) | tokens (100) | v2 score | +|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| tfidf | 44% (43–46) | 439 (433–445) | 42 (41–44) | 100 | **581 (574–586)** | +| whole file | 72% (70–75) | 390 (387–394) | 0 | 0 | **390 (387–394)** | +| rag | 53% (52–55) | 358 (355–360) | 8 (8–9) | 9 (7–10) | **375 (374–376)** | +| grep | 43% (41–45) | 322 (320–323) | 9 | 3 (3–4) | **334 (332–335)** | +| curated (3k) | 8% (8–9) | 122 (120–125) | 0 | 1 | **123 (120–126)** | +| chance | 4% (3–4) | 107 (106–107) | 0 | 9 (8–10) | **116 (116–117)** | +| **engram** | **70% (70–71)** | **632 (629–636)** | 36 (35–37) | 71 (70–71) | **739 (736–741)** | + +| arm | retrieval | abstention | currency | contradiction | drift | deletion | rationale | temporal | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| tfidf | 46% (44–48) | 0% | 69% | 59% | 65% (60–73) | 100% | 0% | 100% | +| rag | 65% (64–66) | 0% | 89% (87–91) | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% (3–5) | 100% | +| grep | 51% (49–52) | 0% | 68% (68–69) | n/a | n/a | 100% | 2% (2–3) | 100% | +| whole | 90% (87–94) | 0% | 100% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 100% | n/a | +| curated | 7% | 0% | 0% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 15% (13–17) | n/a | +| chance | 1% | 0% | 0% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 1% (0–3) | 5% (3–6) | +| engram | 63% (62–64) | 100% (99–100) | 88% | 46% | 44% (41–47) | 93% (91–94) | 98% (97–99) | 100% | + +The path read, by seed (`path_r@5` / `path_cover`): engram 1.00 / 0.99–1.00, +grep 1.00 / 0.97–0.99, whole 1.00 / 1.00, rag 0.60–0.68 / 0.34–0.36, +tfidf 0.21–0.44 / 0.22–0.24, curated 0.34–0.40 / 0.07–0.09, chance +0.03–0.10 / 0.02–0.03. Under the engram row, by seed: `crossed_r@5` +0.02 / 0.04 / 0.02, `hedge` 0.40 / 0.40 / 0.39, `stale_above` 0.15 / 0.22 / +0.19, `natural_fp` 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.02, `phantom_fp` 0.01 / 0.00 / 0.00, +tier-1 contradiction recall 0.04 / 0.04 / 0.00. Under tfidf: `crossed_r@5` +0.00 / 0.00 / 0.01, `stale_above` 0.70 / 0.71 / 0.71, `natural_fp` and +`phantom_fp` 1.00 on every seed, tier-1 recall 0.38 on every seed. + +## 1500 tested facts, seed 1 (`reference-arms/1500-seed1.json`) + +1,883 notes, 9,008 tasks (6,064 retrieval, of which 64 path reads). +All seven arms in 63 minutes beside the external chains. + +| arm | success | passed / attempted | families (800) | signal (100) | tokens (100) | v2 score | billed tok/query | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| tfidf | 43% | 3,886 / 8,808 | 442 | 37 | 100 | **580** | 158 | +| whole file | 71% | 6,429 / 7,775 | 390 | 0 | 0 | **390** | 404,164 | +| rag | 48% | 4,283 / 8,150 | 340 | 7 | 11 | **359** | 2,208 | +| grep | 41% | 3,651 / 8,150 | 315 | 6 | 3 | **325** | 2,766 | +| chance | 3% | 285 / 8,150 | 103 | 0 | 9 | **112** | 2,333 | +| curated (3k) | 5% | 424 / 7,775 | 108 | 0 | 1 | **109** | 2,959 | +| **engram** | 66% | 5,927 / 9,008 | 616 | 32 | 69 | **718** | 457 | + +| arm | retrieval | abstention | currency | contradiction | drift | deletion | rationale | temporal | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| tfidf | 45% | 0% | 67% | 58% | 73% | 100% | 0% | 100% | +| rag | 57% | 0% | 80% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% | 99% | +| grep | 47% | 0% | 67% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 1% | 100% | +| engram | 57% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 48% | 87% | 99% | 100% | + +Path read at 1500 (`path_r@5` / `path_cover`): engram 1.00 / 0.98, grep +1.00 / 0.92, whole 1.00 / 1.00, rag 0.56 / 0.18, curated 0.33 / 0.05, +chance 0.11 / 0.02, tfidf 0.08 / 0.03 — a file binds up to 53 notes at +1500, and the embedding of a path finds the component, not the file. +tfidf at 1500: `crossed_r@5` 0.00, `oblique_r@5` 0.01, `stale_above` 0.63, +`phantom_fp` 1.00, `natural_fp` 1.00, tier-1 recall 0.42, tier-3 false +alarm 0.13, drift noticed 0.73. engram at 1500: `crossed_r@5` 0.02, +`oblique_r@5` 0.32, `hedge` 0.34, `stale_above` 0.17, `natural_fp` 0.06, +tier-1 recall 0.04. The ordering is the 500 ordering, and every gap holds: +the reference system leads the lexical arm by 138 points at 1500 and 158 +at 500. + +## 500 tested facts, seed 1 (`reference-arms/500-seed1.json`) + +630 notes, 3,042 tasks (2,063 retrieval — four phrasings and 63 path +reads — 238 abstention, of which 125 natural nulls, 100 currency, 166 +contradiction, 55 drift, 125 deletion, 170 rationale, 125 temporal). + +| arm | success | passed / attempted | families (800) | signal (100) | tokens (100) | v2 score | billed tok/query | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| tfidf | 43% | 1,317 / 2,975 | 433 | 41 | 100 | **574** | 140 | +| whole file | 71% | 2,171 / 2,629 | 389 | 0 | 0 | **390** | 134,790 | +| rag | 53% | 1,601 / 2,754 | 359 | 8 | 9 | **376** | 2,367 | +| grep | 43% | 1,313 / 2,754 | 323 | 9 | 3 | **335** | 2,730 | +| curated (3k) | 9% | 262 / 2,629 | 123 | 0 | 1 | **123** | 2,959 | +| chance | 4% | 112 / 2,754 | 106 | 0 | 9 | **116** | 2,322 | +| **engram** | **70%** | 2,140 / 3,042 | **636** | 35 | 70 | **741** | 450 | + +Per family (pass rate; the v1 500 seed-1 number in brackets where the +family is comparable): + +| arm | retrieval | abstention | currency | contradiction | drift | deletion | rationale | temporal | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| tfidf | 45% | 0% | 69% | 59% | 60% | 100% | 0% | 100% | +| rag | 64% [80%] | 0% | 91% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% | 100% | +| grep | 51% [65%] | 0% | 69% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 2% | 100% | +| engram | 63% [81%] | 100% [100%] | 88% [89%] | 46% [75%] | 47% [91%] | 94% [90%] | 98% [99%] | 100% | + +Columns worth reading (`500-seed1.log` has them all): + +| arm | crossed_r@5 | oblique_r@5 | path_r@5 | path_cover | phantom_fp | natural_fp | stale_above | hedge | t1_recall | t2_false_alarm | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| tfidf | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.04 | +| rag | 0.17 | 0.51 | 0.68 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.27 | 0.00 | – | – | +| grep | 0.01 | 0.15 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.44 | 0.00 | – | – | +| engram | 0.02 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.40 | 0.04 | 0.00 | + +## The path read + +Every note in a world carries zero to three code refs of the shape +`src//.rs`; 63–64 distinct files exist at every size, and +a file binds 2–15 live notes at 500 and 8–53 at 1500. Each file is asked +once, as a path, with no question around it: *pass* is a bound note +readable in the top five, `path_cover` the share of the bound notes the +top-k delivered. Three kinds of system show up: + +- **A file channel.** engram's code-ref match (the file-read hook's own + lookup), grep's substring match over the note files, and MemContinuum's + `for-path` answer every file and cover 0.87–1.00 of what is bound. +- **A vector store handed a path.** `rag`, LangMem, Mem0 and cognee embed + the path string and find the *component's* notes — enough for 0.56–0.68 + of files to show one bound note in the top five, never enough to cover + the file (0.18–0.36). +- **Titles only.** tfidf tokenises the path and matches the component + words; its short snippets never carry the refs (0.08–0.44). + +The read is 63 of 3,042 tasks at 500 and 64 of 9,008 at 1500, so it moves +no headline by more than a point; it is a column, and it is the column +MemContinuum's author asked for (below). + +## The TF-IDF arm, v1 against v2 + +`results/v1/reference-arms/500-seed1-tfidf.json` is the same arm on the v1 +500 world: **564 at 61% success**, signal share 0.82, 99 tokens per answer +— above the reference system's v1 511 at 85%, which is the crack the field +submission reported (823 at 76% on the 1500 world). On v2 the same arm +scores **574 at 43%**, 167 under the reference system's 741, and the +mechanisms it rode are each visible in a column: + +- the idf oracle is dead — `phantom_fp` 1.00 (it was 0.00 on v1: every + word of a v2 phantom subject was written somewhere) and `natural_fp` + 1.00; +- the crossed phrasing is unreachable — `crossed_r@5` 0.00, and the four + phrasings weigh equally, so retrieval falls from 61% to 45%; +- `stale_above` 0.70: the stale sibling's shorter title wins cosine; +- the path read is out of reach for a title index — `path_r@5` 0.21; +- the contradiction column keeps what token differencing can do (`value` + and `unit`, tier-1 recall 0.38) and shows what it cannot: `reworded` + and `clause` positives are missed and the `synonym` negative is not + flagged, which is the trap working both ways. + +What it still earns is honest: 100 token points (140 tokens per answer) +and 41 signal points, plus the families it attempts — temporal, deletion, +a fair share of drift. That is where the additive score puts a lexical +system: above the flat stores that show ten whole notes, well under a +memory that knows what it knows. + +## What v2 did to the reference system + +Its v2 number is not a v1 number regraded. Three columns moved, and each +is a finding about the product, not the bench: + +1. **`crossed_r@5` 0.02** (rag 0.17): a question sharing no content word + with its note is where the keyword channel and the reranker vote have + nothing to hold, and the hybrid lands under pure cosine. +2. **`hedge` 0.40**: the calibrated "not in memory" line, fitted on v1's + register, declines 40% of answerable v2 questions. On v2 a decline on + an answerable question is zero signal, so the signal score is 36 where + the retrieval focus alone would give about 60. +3. **Contradiction 46% (t1 0.04) and drift 47%** against 75% and 91% on + v1: the title-NLI nomination gate barely raises the v2 `value` flips. + The three-word lowercase subjects are the suspect — the gate's subject + guard was tuned on capitalised coined names — and that is a product + question for engram, recorded in its graph, not a v2 knob. + +The path read adds nothing new about it: the code-ref match is the +mechanism the file-read hook already runs, and it answers every file +(1.00 / 0.99). None of this is fixed here: the engram arm is the v1 stack +at the pinned revision, and the v2 branch measures it as it is. + +## External systems (`{langmem-0.0.30,mem0-2.0.20,memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5,cognee-1.5.4}/`) + +The four adapters replayed the v2 500 and 1500 worlds (seed 1). Three of +them are the v1 adapters unchanged — an adapter maps the twelve operations +and never reads a probe, and `recall_path` falls back to a search of the +path string for a system without a file channel. **MemContinuum's adapter +was revised for v2** after its author reviewed the v1 numbers +(`adapters/memcontinuum.md`): `link` now writes the schema's typed edges +(`led_to`, `applies_to`) and a hit carries its edge-neighbours, and +`recall_path` is the system's own `for-path` — the channel its pre-edit +hook actually uses. One seed each; the three-seed spread is not measured +for them. + +| system | success @500 | families | signal | tokens | **v2 score @500** | success @1500 | **v2 score @1500** | billed tok/query | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| MemContinuum 0.2.0rc5 (v2 adapter) | 48% | 337 | 9 | 46 | **392** | 44% | **380** | 852 | +| LangMem 0.0.30 | 53% | 359 | 8 | 9 | **376** | 48% | **359** | 2,360 | +| Mem0 2.0.20 | 47% | 334 | 7 | 6 | **347** | 44% | **348** | 2,567 | +| cognee 1.5.4 | 48% | 259 | 8 | 14 | **281** | 43% | **263** | 2,053 | + +Per family at 500: + +| system | retrieval | abstention | currency | contradiction | drift | deletion | rationale | temporal | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| memcontinuum | 55% | 0% | 82% | n/a | n/a | 100% | **100%** | n/a | +| langmem | 64% | 0% | 91% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% | 100% | +| mem0 | 56% | 0% | 73% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 5% | 100% | +| cognee | 63% | 0% | 92% | n/a | n/a | 100% | 4% | n/a | + +Path read at 500 (`path_r@5` / `path_cover`): MemContinuum 1.00 / 0.95, +LangMem 0.67 / 0.34, Mem0 0.65 / 0.33, cognee 0.62 / 0.32; at 1500 +MemContinuum 1.00 / 0.87, LangMem 0.56 / 0.19, Mem0 0.61 / 0.18, cognee 0.47 / 0.18. + +**MemContinuum, before and after the revision.** Its author's reply to the +v1 numbers made two claims: that the 2% rationale measured the wrong +channel (the agent reads `for-path`/`chain`, which deliver the whole +record with its edges, not `search`'s 200-character snippet), and that +the system's job is to deliver every record bound to a file, unranked, +for the agent to judge. Both are now measured. Rationale went from 4% to +**100%** — every one of it is `structure_only` (0.95): the reason arrives +as the anchor's edge-neighbour, never in the top five itself, which is +exactly the chain doing the work the author described. The path read is +1.00 / 0.95 at 500 and 1.00 / 0.87 at 1500 through `for-path`. The score +moved from 295 to **392** at 500 and 287 to **380** at 1500 — one family, +one hundred points, as the additive score prices it. What did not move +is the snippet: the v1 number was a ranking miss, not a truncation +(`readable` never failed a MemContinuum hit), and the columns the author +did not dispute are where they were — `stale_above` 0.62 (the widest of +any system: its FTS5 channel prefers the sibling's shorter title), +abstention 0%, no suspect queue, no clock, oblique 0.31, crossed 0.05. +The unranked delivery is billed as it is used: 852 tokens a query, 46 +token points, the only external bonus worth having. + +Reading the rest: LangMem is `rag` to the digit again (376 and 359 +against 376 and 359) — a flat store with this embedder is one system, on +v2 as on v1. Every flat store answers every natural null and every phantom +(`natural_fp` and `phantom_fp` 1.00 for all four), finds the crossed +question at r@5 0.17 (LangMem), 0.06 (Mem0), 0.05 (MemContinuum), 0.17 +(cognee), and puts the stale sibling above the truth on 0.27 / 0.30 / +0.62 / 0.26 of polluted questions. cognee is `rag` minus the clock again, +281, temporal N/A. + +## Not yet run + +Seeds 2 and 3 at 500 for the external systems, the 100 rung, and the +authority world under v2. A path read on a directory (`src/`) +rather than a file; a path that binds no note (the abstention shape of the +read). diff --git a/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/1500-seed1.json b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/1500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..87b5801 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/1500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,4148 @@ +{ + "arm": "cognee", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 7775, + "passed": 3836, + "success": 0.4258436944937833, + "attempted_success": 0.49337620578778135, + "composite": 0.29946482728292845, + "signal_share": 0.1197720711363638, + "multiplier": 1.1977207113636381, + "score": 263.3643311157804, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 239.5718618263428, + "signal_score": 7.579708938785264, + "token_score": 16.21276035065229, + "tokens_billed": 1933.946240105541, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 3388, + "pass_rate": 0.5587071240105541, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.088, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.9926666666666667, + "mrr": 0.5201553571428578, + "noise": 0.9354056728231864, + "oblique_r@5": 0.2946666666666667, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.9646666666666667, + "path_cover": 0.17762276785714284, + "path_r@5": 0.46875, + "r@1": 0.4663333333333333, + "r@5": 0.585, + "stale_above": 0.2626582278481013, + "tokens": 1933.946240105541, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5850000000000001 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.57925637273379 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 225, + "passed": 181, + "pass_rate": 0.8044444444444444, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.7111111111111111, + "head_r@5": 0.8044444444444444, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 17, + "pass_rate": 0.032567049808429116, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.032567049808429116, + "direct_r@5": 0.032567049808429116, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.1197720711363638, + "noise": 0.9354056728231864, + "tokens_per_query": 1933.946240105541 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 147.94472923854298, + "lineage_ms": 0.0030271553744872413, + "link_ms": 0.0003505454240542538, + "purge_ms": 4619.211985323578, + "recall_ms": 377.9494995773914, + "recall_path_ms": 156.06591667892644, + "release_ms": 4401.944779964164, + "settle_ms": 654111.5301875398, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 368.1310036048914, + "suspects_ms": 0.04587508738040924, + "tokens_per_query": 1933.946240105541 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 372672.7729518898 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.22703665308654308 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 0.5573672242462635 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 577401.4981654473 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 3056099.653582787 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 9988.218667451292 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 550243.0974955205 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 1308223.0603750795 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 55219.65054073371 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.04587508738040924 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R7", + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R48", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R140", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R175", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R184", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R271", + "R272", + "R276", + "R280", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R311", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R347", + "R348", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R360", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R374", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R387", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R420", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R447", + "R448", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R500", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R535", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R543", + "R544", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R624", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R658", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R753", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R844", + "R848", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R919", + "R920", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1124", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1324", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1503", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1684", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1812", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1832", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1952", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1993", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2047", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2060", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2088", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2104", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2124", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2132", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2147", + "R2152", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2167", + "R2172", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2184", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2200", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2212", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2235", + "R2248", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2260", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2288", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2320", + "R2324", + "R2326", + "R2332", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2340", + "R2344", + "R2348", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2392", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2400", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2412", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2440", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2452", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2472", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2488", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2520", + "R2523", + "R2524", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2532", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2544", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2560", + "R2564", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2572", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2580", + "R2584", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2623", + "R2624", + "R2626", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2632", + "R2635", + "R2636", + "R2639", + "R2640", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2651", + "R2652", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2663", + "R2664", + "R2667", + "R2668", + "R2671", + "R2672", + "R2675", + "R2676", + "R2679", + "R2684", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2703", + "R2704", + "R2706", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2711", + "R2712", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2719", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2725", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2732", + "R2735", + "R2736", + "R2740", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2755", + "R2756", + "R2759", + "R2760", + "R2761", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2771", + "R2772", + "R2775", + "R2776", + "R2780", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2792", + "R2795", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2811", + "R2812", + "R2816", + "R2820", + "R2824", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2832", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2840", + "R2844", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2856", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2872", + "R2876", + "R2880", + "R2883", + "R2884", + "R2886", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2911", + "R2912", + "R2916", + "R2924", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2936", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2955", + "R2956", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2971", + "R2972", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R2979", + "R2980", + "R2984", + "R2987", + "R2988", + "R2991", + "R2992", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3012", + "R3016", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3024", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3031", + "R3032", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3047", + "R3048", + "R3052", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3063", + "R3064", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3077", + "R3078", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3084", + "R3087", + "R3088", + "R3092", + "R3095", + "R3096", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3103", + "R3104", + "R3108", + "R3112", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3119", + "R3120", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3131", + "R3132", + "R3136", + "R3140", + "R3144", + "R3147", + "R3148", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3156", + "R3160", + "R3164", + "R3167", + "R3168", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3184", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3195", + "R3196", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3204", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3220", + "R3224", + "R3227", + "R3228", + "R3232", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3239", + "R3240", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3263", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3272", + "R3275", + "R3276", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3284", + "R3287", + "R3288", + "R3292", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3300", + "R3304", + "R3308", + "R3312", + "R3319", + "R3320", + "R3323", + "R3324", + "R3327", + "R3328", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3340", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3359", + "R3360", + "R3364", + "R3367", + "R3368", + "R3371", + "R3372", + "R3373", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3386", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3391", + "R3392", + "R3396", + "R3400", + "R3401", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3413", + "R3414", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3419", + "R3420", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3426", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3431", + "R3432", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3439", + "R3440", + "R3444", + "R3447", + "R3448", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3456", + "R3459", + "R3464", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3472", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3480", + "R3484", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3491", + "R3492", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3499", + "R3500", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3520", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3528", + "R3531", + "R3532", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3551", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3571", + "R3572", + "R3576", + "R3580", + "R3583", + "R3584", + "R3588", + "R3596", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3604", + "R3606", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3615", + "R3616", + "R3623", + "R3624", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3632", + "R3636", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3647", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3660", + "R3664", + "R3666", + "R3667", + "R3668", + "R3671", + "R3672", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3679", + "R3680", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3691", + "R3692", + "R3695", + "R3696", + "R3699", + "R3700", + "R3703", + "R3704", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3711", + "R3712", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3724", + "R3727", + "R3728", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3740", + "R3743", + "R3744", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3751", + "R3752", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3775", + "R3776", + "R3779", + "R3780", + "R3784", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3791", + "R3792", + "R3794", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3799", + "R3800", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3811", + "R3812", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3817", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3827", + "R3828", + "R3831", + "R3832", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3844", + "R3848", + "R3853", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3864", + "R3867", + "R3868", + "R3871", + "R3872", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3884", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3899", + "R3900", + "R3904", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3912", + "R3913", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3928", + "R3932", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3944", + "R3947", + "R3948", + "R3952", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3964", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3971", + "R3972", + "R3974", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3980", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3988", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3996", + "R3999", + "R4000", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4008", + "R4011", + "R4012", + "R4016", + "R4020", + "R4024", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4032", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4044", + "R4047", + "R4048", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4063", + "R4064", + "R4067", + "R4068", + "R4075", + "R4076", + "R4084", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4091", + "R4092", + "R4095", + "R4096", + "R4099", + "R4100", + "R4104", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4115", + "R4116", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4124", + "R4127", + "R4128", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4135", + "R4136", + "R4140", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4151", + "R4152", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4163", + "R4164", + "R4166", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4171", + "R4172", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4184", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4196", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4207", + "R4208", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4215", + "R4216", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4223", + "R4224", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4231", + "R4232", + "R4235", + "R4236", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4267", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4276", + "R4279", + "R4280", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4287", + "R4288", + "R4292", + "R4296", + "R4300", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4304", + "R4306", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4312", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4327", + "R4328", + "R4331", + "R4332", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4339", + "R4340", + "R4343", + "R4344", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4355", + "R4356", + "R4360", + "R4364", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4376", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4383", + "R4384", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4406", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4416", + "R4419", + "R4420", + "R4424", + "R4431", + "R4432", + "R4434", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4440", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4452", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4459", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4472", + "R4475", + "R4476", + "R4479", + "R4480", + "R4483", + "R4484", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4500", + "R4504", + "R4507", + "R4508", + "R4511", + "R4512", + "R4516", + "R4523", + "R4524", + "R4527", + "R4528", + "R4532", + "R4535", + "R4536", + "R4539", + "R4540", + "R4543", + "R4544", + "R4556", + "R4560", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4568", + "R4575", + "R4576", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4586", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4591", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4603", + "R4604", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4611", + "R4612", + "R4615", + "R4616", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4631", + "R4632", + "R4636", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4644", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4651", + "R4652", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4660", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4668", + "R4669", + "R4671", + "R4672", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4680", + "R4684", + "R4687", + "R4688", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4700", + "R4703", + "R4704", + "R4706", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4712", + "R4715", + "R4716", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4739", + "R4740", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4752", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4761", + "R4762", + "R4764", + "R4768", + "R4772", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4796", + "R4803", + "R4804", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4811", + "R4812", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4831", + "R4832", + "R4834", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4844", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4855", + "R4856", + "R4859", + "R4860", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4871", + "R4872", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4884", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4891", + "R4892", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4900", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4915", + "R4916", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4932", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4939", + "R4940", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4946", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4952", + "R4955", + "R4956", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4963", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4975", + "R4976", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4994", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R5001", + "R5002", + "R5003", + "R5004", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5011", + "R5012", + "R5013", + "R5015", + "R5016", + "R5019", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5027", + "R5031", + "R5032", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5048", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5067", + "R5068", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5083", + "R5084", + "R5087", + "R5088", + "R5095", + "R5096", + "R5101", + "R5104", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5111", + "R5112", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5124", + "R5131", + "R5132", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5146", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5152", + "R5156", + "R5159", + "R5160", + "R5163", + "R5164", + "R5168", + "R5176", + "R5179", + "R5183", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5188", + "R5191", + "R5192", + "R5195", + "R5196", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5207", + "R5208", + "R5212", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5219", + "R5220", + "R5224", + "R5227", + "R5228", + "R5232", + "R5233", + "R5236", + "R5239", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5252", + "R5255", + "R5256", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5275", + "R5276", + "R5279", + "R5280", + "R5284", + "R5288", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5297", + "R5298", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5304", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5311", + "R5312", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5319", + "R5320", + "R5324", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5351", + "R5352", + "R5355", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5364", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5373", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5385", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5394", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5411", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5420", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5431", + "R5432", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5440", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5448", + "R5451", + "R5452", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5465", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5479", + "R5480", + "R5484", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5492", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5499", + "R5500", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5512", + "R5515", + "R5516", + "R5519", + "R5520", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5527", + "R5528", + "R5531", + "R5532", + "R5535", + "R5536", + "R5537", + "R5538", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5544", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5552", + "R5554", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5560", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5567", + "R5568", + "R5572", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5579", + "R5580", + "R5584", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5592", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5612", + "R5615", + "R5616", + "R5619", + "R5620", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5632", + "R5634", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5671", + "R5672", + "R5675", + "R5676", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5695", + "R5696", + "R5699", + "R5700", + "R5703", + "R5704", + "R5705", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5720", + "R5724", + "R5727", + "R5731", + "R5732", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5752", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5759", + "R5760", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5775", + "R5776", + "R5779", + "R5780", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5792", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5800", + "R5803", + "R5804", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5824", + "R5832", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5844", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5851", + "R5852", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5860", + "R5864", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5880", + "R5883", + "R5884", + "R5887", + "R5888", + "R5891", + "R5892", + "R5896", + "R5897", + "R5898", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5908", + "R5911", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5924", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5943", + "R5944", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5949", + "R5951", + "R5952", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5959", + "R5960", + "R5963", + "R5964", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5971", + "R5972", + "R5976", + "R5979", + "R5980", + "R5983", + "R5984", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "P2", + "P6", + "P8", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P16", + "P17", + "P18", + "P21", + "P22", + "P24", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P29", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P35", + "P37", + "P39", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P50", + "P52", + "P53", + "P60", + "P63", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714", + "R6717", + "R6720", + "R6723", + "R6726", + "R6732", + "R6735", + "R6738", + "R6750", + "R6759", + "R6762", + "R6771", + "R6777", + "R6786", + "R6789", + "R6795", + "R6801", + "R6807", + "R6810", + "R6813", + "R6819", + "R6828", + "R6831", + "R6834", + "R6837", + "R6843", + "R6846", + "R6852", + "R6855", + "R6858", + "R6870", + "R6876", + "R6879", + "R6882", + "R6885", + "R6888", + "R6894", + "R6900", + "R6909", + "R6921", + "R6927", + "R6930", + "R6933", + "R6936", + "R6939", + "R6940", + "R6941", + "R6942", + "R6943", + "R6944", + "R6945", + "R6946", + "R6947", + "R6948", + "R6949", + "R6950", + "R6951", + "R6952", + "R6953", + "R6954", + "R6955", + "R6956", + "R6957", + "R6958", + "R6959", + "R6960", + "R6961", + "R6962", + "R6964", + "R6965", + "R6966", + "R6967", + "R6968", + "R6969", + "R6970", + "R6972", + "R6973", + "R6974", + "R6977", + "R6979", + "R6980", + "R6981", + "R6982", + "R6983", + "R6984", + "R6985", + "R6986", + "R6987", + "R6988", + "R6989", + "R6990", + "R6991", + "R6992", + "R6993", + "R6994", + "R6995", + "R6996", + "R6997", + "R6998", + "R6999", + "R7000", + "R7001", + "R7002", + "R7003", + "R7004", + "R7005", + "R7006", + "R7007", + "R7008", + "R7009", + "R7010", + "R7011", + "R7012", + "R7013", + "R7014", + "R7015", + "R7016", + "R7017", + "R7018", + "R7019", + "R7020", + "R7021", + "R7022", + "R7023", + "R7024", + "R7025", + "R7026", + "R7027", + "R7029", + "R7030", + "R7031", + "R7032", + "R7033", + "R7034", + "R7035", + "R7036", + "R7037", + "R7038", + "R7039", + "R7040", + "R7041", + "R7042", + "R7043", + "R7044", + "R7045", + "R7046", + "R7047", + "R7048", + "R7049", + "R7050", + "R7051", + "R7053", + "R7054", + "R7055", + "R7056", + "R7057", + "R7058", + "R7059", + "R7060", + "R7061", + "R7062", + "R7063", + "R7064", + "R7065", + "R7066", + "R7067", + "R7068", + "R7069", + "R7070", + "R7072", + "R7073", + "R7074", + "R7075", + "R7076", + "R7078", + "R7079", + "R7080", + "R7081", + "R7082", + "R7083", + "R7084", + "R7085", + "R7086", + "R7087", + "R7088", + "R7089", + "R7090", + "R7091", + "R7092", + "R7093", + "R7094", + "R7095", + "R7096", + "R7097", + "R7098", + "R7099", + "R7100", + "R7101", + "R7102", + "R7103", + "R7104", + "R7105", + "R7106", + "R7107", + "R7108", + "R7109", + "R7110", + "R7111", + "R7112", + "R7113", + "R7114", + "R7115", + "R7116", + "R7118", + "R7119", + "R7120", + "R7121", + "R7122", + "R7123", + "R7124", + "R7125", + "R7126", + "R7127", + "R7128", + "R7129", + "R7130", + "R7131", + "R7132", + "R7133", + "R7134", + "R7135", + "R7136", + "R7137", + "R7138", + "R7139", + "R7140", + "R7141", + "R7142", + "R7143", + "R7144", + "R7146", + "R7147", + "R7148", + "R7149", + "R7150", + "R7151", + "R7152", + "R7153", + "R7154", + "R7155", + "R7156", + "R7157", + "R7158", + "R7159", + "R7160", + "R7161", + "R7162", + "R7163", + "R7164", + "R7165", + "R7166", + "R7167", + "R7168", + "R7169", + "R7170", + "R7172", + "R7173", + "R7174", + "R7175", + "R7176", + "R7177", + "R7178", + "R7179", + "R7180", + "R7182", + "R7183", + "R7184", + "R7185", + "R7186", + "R7187", + "R7188", + "R7189", + "R7190", + "R7191", + "R7192", + "R7193", + "R7194", + "R7195", + "R7196", + "R7197", + "R7198", + "R7199", + "R7200", + "R7202", + "R7203", + "R7204", + "R7205", + "R7206", + "R7207", + "R7208", + "R7209", + "R7210", + "R7211", + "R7212", + "R7213", + "R7214", + "R7215", + "R7216", + "R7217", + "R7218", + "R7219", + "R7220", + "R7221", + "R7222", + "R7223", + "R7224", + "R7225", + "R7226", + "R7227", + "R7228", + "R7229", + "R7230", + "R7231", + "R7232", + "R7233", + "R7234", + "R7235", + "R7236", + "R7237", + "R7238", + "R7239", + "R7240", + "R7241", + "R7242", + "R7243", + "R7244", + "R7245", + "R7246", + "R7247", + "R7248", + "R7249", + "R7250", + "R7251", + "R7252", + "R7253", + "R7254", + "R7255", + "R7256", + "R7257", + "R7258", + "R7259", + "R7260", + "R7261", + "R7262", + "R7263", + "R7264", + "R7265", + "R7266", + "R7267", + "R7268", + "R7269", + "R7270", + "R7271", + "R7272", + "R7273", + "R7274", + "R7275", + "R7276", + "R7277", + "R7278", + "R7279", + "R7280", + "R7281", + "R7282", + "R7283", + "R7284", + "R7285", + "R7286", + "R7287", + "R7288", + "R7289", + "R7291", + "R7292", + "R7293", + "R7294", + "R7295", + "R7296", + "R7297", + "R7298", + "R7299", + "R7300", + "R7301", + "R7302", + "R7303", + "R7304", + "R7305", + "R7306", + "R7308", + "R7309", + "R7310", + "R7311", + "R7312", + "R7313", + "R7314", + "R7315", + "R7316", + "R7317", + "R7318", + "R7319", + "R7320", + "R7321", + "R7322", + "R7323", + "R7324", + "R7325", + "R7326", + "R7327", + "R7328", + "R7329", + "R7330", + "R7331", + "R7332", + "R7333", + "R7334", + "R7335", + "R7336", + "R7337", + "R7338", + "R7340", + "R7341", + "R7342", + "R7343", + "R7344", + "R7345", + "R7346", + "R7347", + "R7348", + "R7349", + "R7350", + "R7351", + "R7352", + "R7353", + "R7354", + "R7355", + "R7356", + "R7357", + "R7358", + "R7359", + "R7360", + "R7361", + "R7362", + "R7363", + "R7364", + "R7365", + "R7366", + "R7367", + "R7368", + "R7369", + "R7370", + "R7371", + "R7372", + "R7373", + "R7374", + "R7375", + "R7376", + "R7377", + "R7378", + "R7379", + "R7380", + "R7381", + "R7382", + "R7383", + "R7384", + "R7385", + "R7386", + "R7387", + "R7388", + "R7389", + "R7390", + "R7391", + "R7392", + "R7393", + "R7394", + "R7395", + "R7396", + "R7397", + "R7398", + "R7399", + "R7400", + "R7401", + "R7402", + "R7403", + "R7404", + "R7405", + "R7406", + "R7407", + "R7408", + "R7409", + "R7410", + "R7411", + "R7412", + "R7413", + "R7414", + "R7415", + "R7416", + "R7417", + "R7418", + "R7419", + "R7420", + "R7421", + "R7422", + "R7423", + "R7424", + "R7425", + "R7426", + "R7427", + "R7428", + "R7429", + "R7430", + "R7431", + "R7432", + "R7433", + "R7434", + "R7435", + "R7436", + "R7437", + "R7438", + "R7439", + "R7440", + "R7441", + "R7442", + "R7443", + "R7444", + "R7445", + "R7446", + "R7447", + "R7448", + "R7449", + "R7450", + "R7451", + "R7452", + "R7453", + "R7454", + "R7455", + "R7456", + "R7457", + "R7458", + "R7459", + "R7460", + "R7461" + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/1500-seed1.log b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/1500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dfad731 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/1500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +== 1500 tested facts, 1883 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + cognee 9008 7775 3836 43% 49% 0.299 0.12 1.2 263 0 1933 + arm families signal tokens score billed + cognee 240 8 16 263 1934 + cognee success 43% = 3836 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 7775/9008, 49% of those passed) composite 0.299 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 263 standing 0 tok 1933 tok/query + v2 score 263 = families 240 + signal 8 + tokens 16 (billed 1934 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 56% r@1 0.47 r@5 0.58 lexical_r@5 0.99 paraphrase_r@5 0.96 oblique_r@5 0.29 crossed_r@5 0.09 path_r@5 0.47 path_cover 0.18 stale_above 0.26 hedge 0.00 noise 0.94 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.58 + currency 225 80% head_r@1 0.71 head_r@5 0.80 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 3% direct_r@5 0.03 assisted_r@5 0.03 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping +wrote results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/1500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/500-seed1.json b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..61115dd --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1383 @@ +{ + "arm": "cognee", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2629, + "passed": 1455, + "success": 0.47830374753451677, + "attempted_success": 0.5534423735260555, + "composite": 0.32367347666162927, + "signal_share": 0.1163579980740303, + "multiplier": 1.163579980740303, + "score": 281.3353611885333, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 258.9387813293034, + "signal_score": 8.39634748672271, + "token_score": 14.000232372507119, + "tokens_billed": 2053.3630634997576, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1296, + "pass_rate": 0.6282113427047988, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.168, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.994, + "mrr": 0.5720515873015873, + "noise": 0.9244304411052091, + "oblique_r@5": 0.48, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.986, + "path_cover": 0.3165406903502142, + "path_r@5": 0.6190476190476191, + "r@1": 0.5045, + "r@5": 0.657, + "stale_above": 0.2636363636363636, + "tokens": 2053.3630634997576, + "weighted_r@5": 0.657 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5863503423667091 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 69, + "pass_rate": 0.92, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.7733333333333333, + "head_r@5": 0.92, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 7, + "pass_rate": 0.041176470588235294, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.041176470588235294, + "direct_r@5": 0.041176470588235294, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.1163579980740303, + "noise": 0.9244304411052091, + "tokens_per_query": 2053.3630634997576 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 119.16904453648858, + "lineage_ms": 0.003595082089304924, + "link_ms": 0.00039207889645729427, + "purge_ms": 1598.793591452172, + "recall_ms": 193.42432774718267, + "recall_path_ms": 120.05084653251937, + "release_ms": 1577.5088481826797, + "settle_ms": 109246.98566657025, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 305.7342891581357, + "suspects_ms": 0.03891694359481335, + "tokens_per_query": 2053.3630634997576 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 100221.1664551869 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0898770522326231 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.20780181512236595 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 65550.53724953905 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 520504.8659676686 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 7563.203331548721 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 66255.37162367254 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 218493.9713331405 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 15286.714457906784 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.03891694359481335 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R44", + "R48", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R68", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R108", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R144", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R172", + "R173", + "R175", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R184", + "R192", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R272", + "R276", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R347", + "R348", + "R355", + "R356", + "R360", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R420", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R440", + "R447", + "R448", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R484", + "R488", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R500", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R536", + "R540", + "R541", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R624", + "R627", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R658", + "R660", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R748", + "R753", + "R756", + "R760", + "R764", + "R765", + "R767", + "R768", + "R772", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R791", + "R792", + "R799", + "R800", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R875", + "R876", + "R883", + "R884", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R956", + "R960", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R1000", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1124", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1140", + "R1144", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1264", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1392", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1512", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1600", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1812", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1832", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1872", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1880", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1993", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P8", + "P12", + "P13", + "P17", + "P18", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P24", + "P26", + "P32", + "P35", + "P40", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P49", + "P50", + "P53", + "P57", + "P59", + "P63", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2244", + "R2265", + "R2280", + "R2292", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483" + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/500-seed1.log b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dc8c69a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +== 500 tested facts, 630 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + cognee 3042 2629 1455 48% 55% 0.324 0.12 1.2 281 0 2053 + arm families signal tokens score billed + cognee 259 8 14 281 2053 + cognee success 48% = 1455 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2629/3042, 55% of those passed) composite 0.324 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 281 standing 0 tok 2053 tok/query + v2 score 281 = families 259 + signal 8 + tokens 14 (billed 2053 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 63% r@1 0.50 r@5 0.66 lexical_r@5 0.99 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.48 crossed_r@5 0.17 path_r@5 0.62 path_cover 0.32 stale_above 0.26 hedge 0.00 noise 0.92 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.59 + currency 75 92% head_r@1 0.77 head_r@5 0.92 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 4% direct_r@5 0.04 assisted_r@5 0.04 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping +wrote results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/README.md b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b7e4c95 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/cognee-1.5.4/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +# cognee 1.5.4 — v2 receipts + +the cognify pipeline without its LLM task, `CHUNKS` search (`adapters/cognee.md`), the v1 adapter unchanged, replayed on `worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-{500,1500}-seed1-v2.json` +(2026-09-15, one Apple-silicon laptop, CPU, the three external chains +running side by side so wall-clock is contended). Files `500-seed1.json` +and `1500-seed1.json` are what `knowledgedrift --grade … --json` wrote; +the `.log` beside each is the terminal report. The rows are in +`results/v2/README.md`. diff --git a/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/1500-seed1.json b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/1500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6428e04 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/1500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,4080 @@ +{ + "arm": "langmem", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 8150, + "passed": 4281, + "success": 0.4752442273534636, + "attempted_success": 0.5252760736196319, + "composite": 0.42530669600885573, + "signal_share": 0.11637600686565217, + "multiplier": 1.1637600686565217, + "score": 359.1711772843725, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 340.2453568070846, + "signal_score": 7.494822384294071, + "token_score": 11.430998092993855, + "tokens_billed": 2201.315468337731, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 3457, + "pass_rate": 0.5700857519788918, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.09133333333333334, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.992, + "mrr": 0.5242035052910052, + "noise": 0.9341523746701517, + "oblique_r@5": 0.3393333333333333, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.9693333333333334, + "path_cover": 0.1858258928571428, + "path_r@5": 0.5625, + "r@1": 0.4651666666666667, + "r@5": 0.598, + "stale_above": 0.28322784810126583, + "tokens": 2201.315468337731, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5980000000000001 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5930564178177867 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 225, + "passed": 179, + "pass_rate": 0.7955555555555556, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6977777777777778, + "head_r@5": 0.7955555555555556, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 22, + "pass_rate": 0.0421455938697318, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.0421455938697318, + "direct_r@5": 0.0421455938697318, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 375, + "passed": 373, + "pass_rate": 0.9946666666666667, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 0.9946666666666667, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.11637600686565217, + "noise": 0.9341523746701517, + "tokens_per_query": 2201.315468337731 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 30.302251465640794, + "lineage_ms": 0.002216675008336703, + "link_ms": 0.0003657457506600416, + "purge_ms": 0.024105001240968704, + "recall_ms": 22.916300325217236, + "recall_path_ms": 23.879855518316617, + "release_ms": 0.02227631025016308, + "settle_ms": 0.002603977918624878, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 39.55221444834024, + "suspects_ms": 0.0020829029381275177, + "tokens_per_query": 2201.315468337731 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 76331.37144194916 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.16625062562525272 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 0.5815357435494661 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 3.013125155121088 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 185301.20442970656 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 1528.3107531722635 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 2.784538781270385 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.005207955837249756 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 5932.832167251036 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.0020829029381275177 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R7", + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R44", + "R48", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R63", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R140", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R175", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R184", + "R188", + "R192", + "R196", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R271", + "R272", + "R276", + "R280", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R360", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R383", + "R384", + "R387", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R420", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R447", + "R448", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R500", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R543", + "R544", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R624", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R658", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R753", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R804", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R844", + "R847", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R960", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1124", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1297", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1392", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1684", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1812", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1832", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1993", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2012", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2020", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2047", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2088", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2104", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2124", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2132", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2152", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2164", + "R2172", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2184", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2200", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2212", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2235", + "R2248", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2260", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2272", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2312", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2320", + "R2324", + "R2326", + "R2332", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2340", + "R2344", + "R2348", + "R2352", + "R2360", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2372", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2380", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2392", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2412", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2440", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2452", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2472", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2488", + "R2495", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2520", + "R2524", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2532", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2564", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2572", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2580", + "R2584", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2623", + "R2624", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2632", + "R2635", + "R2636", + "R2639", + "R2640", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2651", + "R2652", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2663", + "R2664", + "R2667", + "R2668", + "R2671", + "R2672", + "R2676", + "R2684", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2703", + "R2704", + "R2706", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2712", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2725", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2732", + "R2735", + "R2736", + "R2740", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2755", + "R2756", + "R2759", + "R2760", + "R2761", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2771", + "R2772", + "R2776", + "R2780", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2795", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2811", + "R2812", + "R2815", + "R2816", + "R2820", + "R2824", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2832", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2840", + "R2844", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2856", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2872", + "R2876", + "R2880", + "R2883", + "R2884", + "R2886", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2911", + "R2912", + "R2916", + "R2923", + "R2924", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2936", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2955", + "R2956", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2972", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R2979", + "R2980", + "R2984", + "R2987", + "R2988", + "R2991", + "R2992", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3012", + "R3016", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3024", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3031", + "R3032", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3039", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3047", + "R3048", + "R3052", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3063", + "R3064", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3077", + "R3078", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3084", + "R3087", + "R3088", + "R3092", + "R3095", + "R3096", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3101", + "R3102", + "R3103", + "R3104", + "R3108", + "R3112", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3119", + "R3120", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3131", + "R3132", + "R3135", + "R3136", + "R3140", + "R3144", + "R3147", + "R3148", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3156", + "R3160", + "R3164", + "R3167", + "R3168", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3184", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3195", + "R3196", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3204", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3220", + "R3224", + "R3227", + "R3228", + "R3232", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3240", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3272", + "R3275", + "R3276", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3284", + "R3288", + "R3292", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3300", + "R3304", + "R3308", + "R3311", + "R3312", + "R3320", + "R3323", + "R3324", + "R3327", + "R3328", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3340", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3359", + "R3360", + "R3364", + "R3367", + "R3368", + "R3371", + "R3372", + "R3373", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3386", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3391", + "R3392", + "R3396", + "R3400", + "R3401", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3413", + "R3414", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3419", + "R3420", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3426", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3431", + "R3432", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3439", + "R3440", + "R3444", + "R3447", + "R3448", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3455", + "R3456", + "R3459", + "R3464", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3472", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3480", + "R3484", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3491", + "R3492", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3500", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3520", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3528", + "R3531", + "R3532", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3571", + "R3572", + "R3576", + "R3580", + "R3584", + "R3588", + "R3596", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3604", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3615", + "R3616", + "R3623", + "R3624", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3632", + "R3636", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3647", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3660", + "R3663", + "R3666", + "R3667", + "R3668", + "R3671", + "R3672", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3679", + "R3680", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3691", + "R3692", + "R3695", + "R3696", + "R3699", + "R3700", + "R3703", + "R3704", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3711", + "R3712", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3724", + "R3727", + "R3728", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3740", + "R3743", + "R3744", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3751", + "R3752", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3775", + "R3776", + "R3779", + "R3780", + "R3784", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3791", + "R3792", + "R3794", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3800", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3811", + "R3812", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3817", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3828", + "R3832", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3844", + "R3848", + "R3853", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3864", + "R3867", + "R3868", + "R3871", + "R3872", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3884", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3900", + "R3904", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3912", + "R3913", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3928", + "R3932", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3944", + "R3947", + "R3948", + "R3951", + "R3952", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3964", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3971", + "R3972", + "R3974", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3988", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3996", + "R4000", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4008", + "R4011", + "R4012", + "R4016", + "R4020", + "R4024", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4031", + "R4032", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4044", + "R4047", + "R4048", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4064", + "R4068", + "R4075", + "R4076", + "R4084", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4092", + "R4095", + "R4096", + "R4100", + "R4104", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4116", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4128", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4135", + "R4136", + "R4140", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4151", + "R4152", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4159", + "R4163", + "R4164", + "R4166", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4171", + "R4172", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4184", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4196", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4207", + "R4208", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4215", + "R4216", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4224", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4232", + "R4235", + "R4236", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4267", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4276", + "R4279", + "R4280", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4287", + "R4288", + "R4292", + "R4296", + "R4300", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4306", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4312", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4328", + "R4332", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4340", + "R4344", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4355", + "R4356", + "R4360", + "R4364", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4376", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4383", + "R4384", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4406", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4416", + "R4419", + "R4420", + "R4424", + "R4432", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4440", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4452", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4459", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4472", + "R4476", + "R4479", + "R4480", + "R4484", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4500", + "R4504", + "R4507", + "R4508", + "R4511", + "R4512", + "R4516", + "R4520", + "R4523", + "R4524", + "R4527", + "R4528", + "R4532", + "R4536", + "R4539", + "R4540", + "R4544", + "R4559", + "R4560", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4575", + "R4576", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4586", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4591", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4603", + "R4604", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4612", + "R4616", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4631", + "R4632", + "R4636", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4644", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4651", + "R4652", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4660", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4668", + "R4669", + "R4672", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4680", + "R4684", + "R4687", + "R4688", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4700", + "R4703", + "R4704", + "R4706", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4712", + "R4715", + "R4716", + "R4717", + "R4718", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4740", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4752", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4761", + "R4762", + "R4764", + "R4768", + "R4772", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4796", + "R4800", + "R4803", + "R4804", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4812", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4831", + "R4832", + "R4834", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4844", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4855", + "R4856", + "R4860", + "R4861", + "R4862", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4871", + "R4872", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4884", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4891", + "R4892", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4900", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4915", + "R4916", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4932", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4939", + "R4940", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4946", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4952", + "R4956", + "R4957", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4975", + "R4976", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4994", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R5001", + "R5002", + "R5004", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5012", + "R5013", + "R5016", + "R5019", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5027", + "R5031", + "R5032", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5048", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5067", + "R5068", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5084", + "R5087", + "R5088", + "R5095", + "R5096", + "R5101", + "R5102", + "R5104", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5112", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5120", + "R5124", + "R5132", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5146", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5152", + "R5156", + "R5159", + "R5160", + "R5164", + "R5168", + "R5176", + "R5181", + "R5183", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5188", + "R5191", + "R5192", + "R5195", + "R5196", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5207", + "R5208", + "R5212", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5219", + "R5220", + "R5224", + "R5227", + "R5228", + "R5231", + "R5232", + "R5233", + "R5236", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5252", + "R5255", + "R5256", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5276", + "R5280", + "R5284", + "R5288", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5297", + "R5298", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5304", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5311", + "R5312", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5320", + "R5324", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5351", + "R5352", + "R5355", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5364", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5373", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5385", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5411", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5419", + "R5420", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5431", + "R5432", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5440", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5448", + "R5451", + "R5452", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5465", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5480", + "R5484", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5492", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5500", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5512", + "R5516", + "R5519", + "R5520", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5527", + "R5528", + "R5531", + "R5532", + "R5535", + "R5536", + "R5537", + "R5538", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5543", + "R5544", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5551", + "R5552", + "R5554", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5560", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5567", + "R5568", + "R5572", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5579", + "R5580", + "R5584", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5592", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5612", + "R5615", + "R5616", + "R5619", + "R5620", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5631", + "R5632", + "R5634", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5671", + "R5672", + "R5675", + "R5676", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5695", + "R5696", + "R5699", + "R5700", + "R5704", + "R5705", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5720", + "R5724", + "R5727", + "R5728", + "R5732", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5752", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5759", + "R5760", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5775", + "R5776", + "R5780", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5792", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5800", + "R5804", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5823", + "R5824", + "R5832", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5844", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5851", + "R5852", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5860", + "R5864", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5880", + "R5883", + "R5884", + "R5887", + "R5888", + "R5891", + "R5892", + "R5896", + "R5897", + "R5898", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5908", + "R5911", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5924", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5944", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5949", + "R5951", + "R5952", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5960", + "R5963", + "R5964", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5972", + "R5976", + "R5979", + "R5980", + "R5983", + "R5984", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "P2", + "P6", + "P8", + "P10", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P16", + "P18", + "P21", + "P22", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P39", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P50", + "P52", + "P53", + "P60", + "P63", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714", + "R6717", + "R6720", + "R6723", + "R6726", + "R6732", + "R6735", + "R6738", + "R6750", + "R6759", + "R6762", + "R6771", + "R6777", + "R6786", + "R6789", + "R6795", + "R6798", + "R6807", + "R6810", + "R6813", + "R6819", + "R6828", + "R6831", + "R6834", + "R6837", + "R6843", + "R6846", + "R6852", + "R6855", + "R6858", + "R6870", + "R6876", + "R6879", + "R6882", + "R6885", + "R6888", + "R6894", + "R6900", + "R6906", + "R6909", + "R6918", + "R6921", + "R6927", + "R6930", + "R6933", + "R6936", + "R6939", + "R6940", + "R6941", + "R6942", + "R6943", + "R6944", + "R6945", + "R6946", + "R6947", + "R6948", + "R6949", + "R6950", + "R6951", + "R6952", + "R6953", + "R6954", + "R6955", + "R6956", + "R6957", + "R6958", + "R6959", + "R6960", + "R6961", + "R6962", + "R6964", + "R6965", + "R6966", + "R6967", + "R6968", + "R6969", + "R6970", + "R6972", + "R6973", + "R6974", + "R6977", + "R6978", + "R6979", + "R6980", + "R6981", + "R6982", + "R6983", + "R6984", + "R6985", + "R6986", + "R6987", + "R6988", + "R6989", + "R6990", + "R6991", + "R6992", + "R6993", + "R6994", + "R6995", + "R6996", + "R6997", + "R6998", + "R6999", + "R7000", + "R7001", + "R7002", + "R7003", + "R7004", + "R7005", + "R7006", + "R7007", + "R7008", + "R7009", + "R7010", + "R7011", + "R7012", + "R7014", + "R7015", + "R7016", + "R7017", + "R7018", + "R7019", + "R7020", + "R7021", + "R7022", + "R7023", + "R7024", + "R7025", + "R7026", + "R7027", + "R7029", + "R7030", + "R7031", + "R7032", + "R7033", + "R7034", + "R7035", + "R7036", + "R7037", + "R7038", + "R7039", + "R7040", + "R7041", + "R7042", + "R7043", + "R7044", + "R7045", + "R7046", + "R7047", + "R7048", + "R7049", + "R7050", + "R7051", + "R7053", + "R7054", + "R7055", + "R7056", + "R7057", + "R7059", + "R7060", + "R7061", + "R7062", + "R7063", + "R7064", + "R7065", + "R7066", + "R7067", + "R7068", + "R7069", + "R7070", + "R7072", + "R7073", + "R7074", + "R7075", + "R7076", + "R7078", + "R7079", + "R7080", + "R7081", + "R7082", + "R7083", + "R7084", + "R7085", + "R7086", + "R7087", + "R7088", + "R7089", + "R7090", + "R7091", + "R7092", + "R7093", + "R7094", + "R7095", + "R7096", + "R7097", + "R7098", + "R7099", + "R7100", + "R7101", + "R7102", + "R7103", + "R7104", + "R7105", + "R7106", + "R7107", + "R7108", + "R7109", + "R7110", + "R7111", + "R7112", + "R7113", + "R7114", + "R7115", + "R7116", + "R7118", + "R7119", + "R7120", + "R7121", + "R7122", + "R7123", + "R7124", + "R7125", + "R7126", + "R7127", + "R7128", + "R7129", + "R7130", + "R7131", + "R7132", + "R7133", + "R7135", + "R7136", + "R7137", + "R7138", + "R7139", + "R7140", + "R7141", + "R7142", + "R7143", + "R7144", + "R7146", + "R7147", + "R7148", + "R7149", + "R7150", + "R7151", + "R7152", + "R7153", + "R7154", + "R7155", + "R7156", + "R7157", + "R7158", + "R7159", + "R7160", + "R7161", + "R7162", + "R7163", + "R7164", + "R7165", + "R7166", + "R7167", + "R7168", + "R7169", + "R7170", + "R7172", + "R7173", + "R7174", + "R7175", + "R7176", + "R7177", + "R7178", + "R7179", + "R7180", + "R7182", + "R7183", + "R7184", + "R7185", + "R7186", + "R7187", + "R7188", + "R7189", + "R7190", + "R7191", + "R7192", + "R7193", + "R7194", + "R7195", + "R7196", + "R7197", + "R7198", + "R7199", + "R7200", + "R7202", + "R7203", + "R7204", + "R7205", + "R7206", + "R7207", + "R7209", + "R7210", + "R7211", + "R7212", + "R7213", + "R7214", + "R7215", + "R7216", + "R7217", + "R7218", + "R7219", + "R7220", + "R7221", + "R7222", + "R7223", + "R7224", + "R7225", + "R7226", + "R7227", + "R7228", + "R7229", + "R7230", + "R7231", + "R7232", + "R7233", + "R7234", + "R7235", + "R7236", + "R7237", + "R7238", + "R7239", + "R7240", + "R7241", + "R7242", + "R7243", + "R7244", + "R7245", + "R7246", + "R7247", + "R7248", + "R7249", + "R7250", + "R7251", + "R7252", + "R7253", + "R7254", + "R7255", + "R7256", + "R7257", + "R7258", + "R7259", + "R7260", + "R7261", + "R7262", + "R7263", + "R7264", + "R7265", + "R7266", + "R7267", + "R7268", + "R7269", + "R7270", + "R7271", + "R7272", + "R7273", + "R7274", + "R7275", + "R7276", + "R7277", + "R7278", + "R7279", + "R7280", + "R7281", + "R7282", + "R7283", + "R7284", + "R7285", + "R7287", + "R7288", + "R7289", + "R7291", + "R7292", + "R7293", + "R7294", + "R7295", + "R7296", + "R7297", + "R7298", + "R7299", + "R7300", + "R7301", + "R7302", + "R7303", + "R7304", + "R7305", + "R7306", + "R7308", + "R7309", + "R7310", + "R7311", + "R7312", + "R7313", + "R7314", + "R7315", + "R7316", + "R7317", + "R7318", + "R7319", + "R7320", + "R7321", + "R7322", + "R7323", + "R7324", + "R7325", + "R7326", + "R7327", + "R7328", + "R7329", + "R7330", + "R7331", + "R7332", + "R7333", + "R7334", + "R7335", + "R7336", + "R7337", + "R7338", + "R7340", + "R7341", + "R7342", + "R7343", + "R7344", + "R7345", + "R7346", + "R7347", + "R7348", + "R7349", + "R7350", + "R7351", + "R7352", + "R7353", + "R7354", + "R7355", + "R7356", + "R7357", + "R7358", + "R7359", + "R7360", + "R7361", + "R7362", + "R7363", + "R7364", + "R7365", + "R7366", + "R7367", + "R7368", + "R7369", + "R7370", + "R7371", + "R7372", + "R7373", + "R7374", + "R7375", + "R7376", + "R7377", + "R7378", + "R7379", + "R7380", + "R7381", + "R7382", + "R7383", + "R7384", + "R7385", + "R7386", + "R7387", + "R7388", + "R7389", + "R7390", + "R7391", + "R7392", + "R7393", + "R7394", + "R7395", + "R7396", + "R7397", + "R7398", + "R7399", + "R7400", + "R7401", + "R7402", + "R7403", + "R7404", + "R7405", + "R7406", + "R7407", + "R7408", + "R7409", + "R7410", + "R7411", + "R7412", + "R7413", + "R7414", + "R7415", + "R7416", + "R7417", + "R7418", + "R7419", + "R7420", + "R7421", + "R7422", + "R7423", + "R7424", + "R7425", + "R7427", + "R7428", + "R7429", + "R7430", + "R7431", + "R7432", + "R7433", + "R7434", + "R7435", + "R7436", + "R7437", + "R7438", + "R7439", + "R7440", + "R7441", + "R7442", + "R7443", + "R7444", + "R7445", + "R7446", + "R7447", + "R7448", + "R7449", + "R7450", + "R7451", + "R7452", + "R7453", + "R7454", + "R7455", + "R7456", + "R7457", + "R7458", + "R7459", + "R7460", + "R7461", + "R7655", + "R7820" + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/1500-seed1.log b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/1500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8f1b665 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/1500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +== 1500 tested facts, 1883 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + langmem 9008 8150 4281 48% 53% 0.425 0.12 1.2 359 0 2201 + arm families signal tokens score billed + langmem 340 7 11 359 2201 + langmem success 48% = 4281 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 8150/9008, 53% of those passed) composite 0.425 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 359 standing 0 tok 2201 tok/query + v2 score 359 = families 340 + signal 7 + tokens 11 (billed 2201 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 57% r@1 0.47 r@5 0.60 lexical_r@5 0.99 paraphrase_r@5 0.97 oblique_r@5 0.34 crossed_r@5 0.09 path_r@5 0.56 path_cover 0.19 stale_above 0.28 hedge 0.00 noise 0.93 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.59 + currency 225 80% head_r@1 0.70 head_r@5 0.80 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 4% direct_r@5 0.04 assisted_r@5 0.04 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 375 99% in_window_r@5 0.99 leak 0.00 +wrote results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/1500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/500-seed1.json b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4b94eb5 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1365 @@ +{ + "arm": "langmem", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2754, + "passed": 1600, + "success": 0.5259697567389875, + "attempted_success": 0.5809731299927379, + "composite": 0.44827922880252435, + "signal_share": 0.11159042289903458, + "multiplier": 1.1159042289903458, + "score": 375.6138423568093, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 358.6233830420195, + "signal_score": 8.128845140427766, + "token_score": 8.861614174362069, + "tokens_billed": 2359.9379544352882, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1317, + "pass_rate": 0.6383906931652933, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.168, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.996, + "mrr": 0.5811039682539684, + "noise": 0.923460979156591, + "oblique_r@5": 0.512, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.988, + "path_cover": 0.33633156966490285, + "path_r@5": 0.6666666666666666, + "r@1": 0.514, + "r@5": 0.666, + "stale_above": 0.2727272727272727, + "tokens": 2359.9379544352882, + "weighted_r@5": 0.666 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.603638741002945 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 68, + "pass_rate": 0.9066666666666666, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.7733333333333333, + "head_r@5": 0.9066666666666666, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 7, + "pass_rate": 0.041176470588235294, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.041176470588235294, + "direct_r@5": 0.041176470588235294, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.11159042289903458, + "noise": 0.923460979156591, + "tokens_per_query": 2359.9379544352882 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 50.155005176074354, + "lineage_ms": 0.0038368720561265945, + "link_ms": 0.0004389305722038701, + "purge_ms": 0.02652747988155702, + "recall_ms": 22.21513864875327, + "recall_path_ms": 12.988170087780981, + "release_ms": 0.024729114513666856, + "settle_ms": 0.0031045638024806976, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 57.928053336218, + "suspects_ms": 0.013750046491622925, + "tokens_per_query": 2359.9379544352882 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 42180.35935307853 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.09592180140316486 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.23263320326805115 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 1.087626675143838 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 59780.93810379505 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 818.2547155302018 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 1.038622809574008 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.006209127604961395 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 2896.4026668109 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.013750046491622925 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R44", + "R48", + "R55", + "R56", + "R60", + "R64", + "R68", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R108", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R143", + "R144", + "R148", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R172", + "R173", + "R175", + "R176", + "R180", + "R184", + "R192", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R260", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R272", + "R276", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R347", + "R348", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R360", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R392", + "R396", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R420", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R440", + "R447", + "R448", + "R456", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R472", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R484", + "R488", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R500", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R536", + "R540", + "R541", + "R543", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R624", + "R627", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R644", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R658", + "R660", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R753", + "R756", + "R760", + "R764", + "R765", + "R767", + "R768", + "R772", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R791", + "R792", + "R799", + "R800", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R956", + "R960", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R1000", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1056", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1124", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1140", + "R1144", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1220", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1264", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1316", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1392", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1512", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1812", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1832", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1880", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1900", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1993", + "R1996", + "R2000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P8", + "P12", + "P17", + "P18", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P24", + "P26", + "P32", + "P35", + "P40", + "P42", + "P43", + "P49", + "P50", + "P53", + "P57", + "P59", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2244", + "R2259", + "R2265", + "R2280", + "R2292", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483" + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/500-seed1.log b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c7a996c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +== 500 tested facts, 630 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + langmem 3042 2754 1600 53% 58% 0.448 0.11 1.1 376 0 2359 + arm families signal tokens score billed + langmem 359 8 9 376 2360 + langmem success 53% = 1600 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2754/3042, 58% of those passed) composite 0.448 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 376 standing 0 tok 2359 tok/query + v2 score 376 = families 359 + signal 8 + tokens 9 (billed 2360 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 64% r@1 0.51 r@5 0.67 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.51 crossed_r@5 0.17 path_r@5 0.67 path_cover 0.34 stale_above 0.27 hedge 0.00 noise 0.92 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.60 + currency 75 91% head_r@1 0.77 head_r@5 0.91 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 4% direct_r@5 0.04 assisted_r@5 0.04 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 +wrote results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/README.md b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..69b8b14 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/langmem-0.0.30/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +# LangMem 0.0.30 — v2 receipts + +the LangGraph store with LangMem's semantic index (`adapters/langmem.md`), the v1 adapter unchanged, replayed on `worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-{500,1500}-seed1-v2.json` +(2026-09-15, one Apple-silicon laptop, CPU, the three external chains +running side by side so wall-clock is contended). Files `500-seed1.json` +and `1500-seed1.json` are what `knowledgedrift --grade … --json` wrote; +the `.log` beside each is the terminal report. The rows are in +`results/v2/README.md`. diff --git a/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/1500-seed1.json b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/1500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..000d2ea --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/1500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,4360 @@ +{ + "arm": "mem0", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 8150, + "passed": 4001, + "success": 0.4441607460035524, + "attempted_success": 0.490920245398773, + "composite": 0.4168049647944278, + "signal_share": 0.10933432564432621, + "multiplier": 1.0933432564432621, + "score": 347.5477974696965, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 333.44397183554224, + "signal_score": 6.442122872059601, + "token_score": 7.6617027620946505, + "tokens_billed": 2437.8817612137204, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 3173, + "pass_rate": 0.5232519788918206, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.03266666666666666, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.9966666666666667, + "mrr": 0.49507982804232803, + "noise": 0.9397757255936362, + "oblique_r@5": 0.18266666666666667, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.99, + "path_cover": 0.1811383928571428, + "path_r@5": 0.609375, + "r@1": 0.448, + "r@5": 0.5505, + "stale_above": 0.2879746835443038, + "tokens": 2437.8817612137204, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5505 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5841130647509664 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 225, + "passed": 167, + "pass_rate": 0.7422222222222222, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6622222222222223, + "head_r@5": 0.7422222222222222, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 36, + "pass_rate": 0.06896551724137931, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.06896551724137931, + "direct_r@5": 0.06896551724137931, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 375, + "passed": 375, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.10933432564432621, + "noise": 0.9397757255936362, + "tokens_per_query": 2437.8817612137204 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 45.00447565871954, + "lineage_ms": 0.0021872234841187796, + "link_ms": 0.00037674180015265566, + "purge_ms": 1.7431019898504019, + "recall_ms": 86.72636026567119, + "recall_path_ms": 72.33756833011284, + "release_ms": 1.8184563387185335, + "settle_ms": 0.015645986422896385, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 68.65857883666952, + "suspects_ms": 0.00695791095495224, + "tokens_per_query": 2437.8817612137204 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 113366.27418431452 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.16404176130890846 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 0.5990194622427225 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 217.88774873130023 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 701269.3491082173 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 4629.604373127222 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 227.3070423398167 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.03129197284579277 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 10298.786825500429 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.00695791095495224 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R43", + "R44", + "R48", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R175", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R187", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R271", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R311", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R400", + "R403", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R487", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R532", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R543", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R591", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R699", + "R700", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R767", + "R768", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R844", + "R848", + "R851", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1184", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1528", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1740", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2012", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2027", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2144", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2172", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2200", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2236", + "R2240", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2272", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2279", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2324", + "R2326", + "R2328", + "R2332", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2352", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2380", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2412", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2432", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2492", + "R2495", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2523", + "R2524", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2532", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2560", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2571", + "R2572", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2584", + "R2587", + "R2588", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2603", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2624", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2631", + "R2632", + "R2636", + "R2640", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2652", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2659", + "R2660", + "R2663", + "R2664", + "R2667", + "R2668", + "R2672", + "R2675", + "R2676", + "R2679", + "R2680", + "R2683", + "R2684", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2700", + "R2704", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2711", + "R2712", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2719", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2725", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2731", + "R2732", + "R2735", + "R2736", + "R2740", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2755", + "R2756", + "R2759", + "R2760", + "R2761", + "R2763", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2771", + "R2772", + "R2775", + "R2776", + "R2779", + "R2780", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2791", + "R2792", + "R2795", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2800", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2812", + "R2815", + "R2816", + "R2819", + "R2820", + "R2823", + "R2824", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2831", + "R2832", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2840", + "R2844", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2852", + "R2855", + "R2856", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2872", + "R2876", + "R2879", + "R2880", + "R2883", + "R2884", + "R2886", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2912", + "R2915", + "R2916", + "R2919", + "R2923", + "R2924", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2935", + "R2936", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2951", + "R2952", + "R2955", + "R2956", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2963", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2972", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R2979", + "R2980", + "R2983", + "R2984", + "R2987", + "R2988", + "R2991", + "R2992", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3011", + "R3012", + "R3015", + "R3016", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3023", + "R3024", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3031", + "R3032", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3039", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3048", + "R3051", + "R3052", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3064", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3077", + "R3078", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3084", + "R3087", + "R3088", + "R3091", + "R3092", + "R3095", + "R3096", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3101", + "R3102", + "R3104", + "R3108", + "R3112", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3120", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3131", + "R3132", + "R3136", + "R3139", + "R3140", + "R3144", + "R3147", + "R3148", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3155", + "R3156", + "R3159", + "R3160", + "R3164", + "R3167", + "R3168", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3184", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3196", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3203", + "R3204", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3220", + "R3223", + "R3224", + "R3227", + "R3228", + "R3232", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3240", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3271", + "R3272", + "R3275", + "R3276", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3283", + "R3284", + "R3288", + "R3292", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3299", + "R3300", + "R3303", + "R3304", + "R3307", + "R3308", + "R3311", + "R3312", + "R3316", + "R3319", + "R3320", + "R3323", + "R3324", + "R3327", + "R3328", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3339", + "R3340", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3360", + "R3364", + "R3367", + "R3368", + "R3371", + "R3372", + "R3373", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3386", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3391", + "R3392", + "R3396", + "R3399", + "R3400", + "R3401", + "R3403", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3413", + "R3414", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3420", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3426", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3431", + "R3432", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3440", + "R3444", + "R3448", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3455", + "R3456", + "R3459", + "R3460", + "R3463", + "R3464", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3471", + "R3472", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3479", + "R3480", + "R3484", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3492", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3499", + "R3500", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3519", + "R3520", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3527", + "R3528", + "R3531", + "R3532", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3539", + "R3540", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3564", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3571", + "R3572", + "R3576", + "R3580", + "R3584", + "R3587", + "R3588", + "R3591", + "R3592", + "R3596", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3603", + "R3604", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3612", + "R3615", + "R3616", + "R3623", + "R3624", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3632", + "R3636", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3647", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3652", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3660", + "R3663", + "R3664", + "R3666", + "R3667", + "R3668", + "R3671", + "R3672", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3679", + "R3680", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3691", + "R3692", + "R3695", + "R3696", + "R3699", + "R3700", + "R3703", + "R3704", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3711", + "R3712", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3727", + "R3728", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3740", + "R3743", + "R3744", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3751", + "R3752", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3764", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3772", + "R3775", + "R3776", + "R3779", + "R3780", + "R3783", + "R3784", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3791", + "R3792", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3799", + "R3800", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3811", + "R3812", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3817", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3827", + "R3828", + "R3832", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3844", + "R3848", + "R3852", + "R3853", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3864", + "R3867", + "R3868", + "R3872", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3884", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3899", + "R3900", + "R3904", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3911", + "R3912", + "R3913", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3927", + "R3928", + "R3931", + "R3932", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3943", + "R3944", + "R3947", + "R3948", + "R3951", + "R3952", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3963", + "R3964", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3971", + "R3972", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3987", + "R3988", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3996", + "R3999", + "R4000", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4007", + "R4008", + "R4012", + "R4016", + "R4019", + "R4020", + "R4023", + "R4024", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4031", + "R4032", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4039", + "R4040", + "R4044", + "R4047", + "R4048", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4064", + "R4067", + "R4068", + "R4071", + "R4072", + "R4075", + "R4076", + "R4080", + "R4083", + "R4084", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4092", + "R4095", + "R4096", + "R4099", + "R4100", + "R4104", + "R4107", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4115", + "R4116", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4123", + "R4124", + "R4127", + "R4128", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4135", + "R4136", + "R4139", + "R4140", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4151", + "R4152", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4159", + "R4160", + "R4163", + "R4164", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4171", + "R4172", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4183", + "R4184", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4196", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4207", + "R4208", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4215", + "R4216", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4224", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4231", + "R4232", + "R4235", + "R4236", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4247", + "R4248", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4267", + "R4268", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4275", + "R4276", + "R4280", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4287", + "R4288", + "R4292", + "R4296", + "R4300", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4306", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4311", + "R4312", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4323", + "R4324", + "R4327", + "R4328", + "R4331", + "R4332", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4339", + "R4340", + "R4343", + "R4344", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4355", + "R4356", + "R4359", + "R4360", + "R4363", + "R4364", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4371", + "R4372", + "R4376", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4384", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4416", + "R4419", + "R4420", + "R4423", + "R4424", + "R4427", + "R4428", + "R4431", + "R4432", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4440", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4451", + "R4452", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4459", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4472", + "R4476", + "R4479", + "R4480", + "R4483", + "R4484", + "R4487", + "R4488", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4499", + "R4500", + "R4503", + "R4504", + "R4507", + "R4508", + "R4511", + "R4512", + "R4516", + "R4520", + "R4524", + "R4527", + "R4528", + "R4531", + "R4532", + "R4535", + "R4536", + "R4540", + "R4544", + "R4547", + "R4551", + "R4552", + "R4556", + "R4559", + "R4560", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4568", + "R4575", + "R4576", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4591", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4604", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4611", + "R4612", + "R4616", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4631", + "R4632", + "R4636", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4643", + "R4644", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4651", + "R4652", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4659", + "R4660", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4668", + "R4669", + "R4672", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4679", + "R4680", + "R4684", + "R4687", + "R4688", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4699", + "R4700", + "R4704", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4712", + "R4715", + "R4716", + "R4717", + "R4718", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4724", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4739", + "R4740", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4752", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4759", + "R4760", + "R4761", + "R4762", + "R4764", + "R4768", + "R4771", + "R4772", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4796", + "R4800", + "R4803", + "R4804", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4811", + "R4812", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4844", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4855", + "R4856", + "R4859", + "R4860", + "R4861", + "R4862", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4871", + "R4872", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4883", + "R4884", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4892", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4899", + "R4900", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4907", + "R4908", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4916", + "R4919", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4932", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4939", + "R4940", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4952", + "R4955", + "R4956", + "R4957", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4963", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4975", + "R4976", + "R4979", + "R4980", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R4999", + "R5001", + "R5002", + "R5003", + "R5004", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5011", + "R5012", + "R5013", + "R5015", + "R5016", + "R5019", + "R5020", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5027", + "R5031", + "R5032", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5047", + "R5048", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5060", + "R5063", + "R5064", + "R5067", + "R5068", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5083", + "R5084", + "R5087", + "R5088", + "R5091", + "R5092", + "R5096", + "R5101", + "R5102", + "R5104", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5111", + "R5112", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5120", + "R5123", + "R5124", + "R5127", + "R5128", + "R5131", + "R5132", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5144", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5151", + "R5152", + "R5156", + "R5159", + "R5160", + "R5163", + "R5164", + "R5168", + "R5171", + "R5175", + "R5176", + "R5179", + "R5180", + "R5181", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5187", + "R5188", + "R5192", + "R5195", + "R5196", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5207", + "R5208", + "R5212", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5219", + "R5220", + "R5223", + "R5224", + "R5227", + "R5228", + "R5232", + "R5233", + "R5235", + "R5236", + "R5239", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5252", + "R5255", + "R5256", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5275", + "R5276", + "R5280", + "R5283", + "R5284", + "R5287", + "R5288", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5297", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5303", + "R5304", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5311", + "R5312", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5319", + "R5320", + "R5323", + "R5324", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5351", + "R5352", + "R5356", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5363", + "R5364", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5373", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5385", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5419", + "R5420", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5431", + "R5432", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5440", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5447", + "R5448", + "R5451", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5463", + "R5465", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5479", + "R5480", + "R5483", + "R5484", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5492", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5499", + "R5500", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5511", + "R5512", + "R5515", + "R5516", + "R5519", + "R5520", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5528", + "R5531", + "R5532", + "R5535", + "R5536", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5543", + "R5544", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5551", + "R5552", + "R5554", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5560", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5567", + "R5568", + "R5571", + "R5572", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5579", + "R5580", + "R5583", + "R5584", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5592", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5607", + "R5608", + "R5612", + "R5615", + "R5616", + "R5619", + "R5620", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5631", + "R5632", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5668", + "R5671", + "R5672", + "R5675", + "R5676", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5695", + "R5696", + "R5703", + "R5704", + "R5705", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5720", + "R5723", + "R5724", + "R5727", + "R5728", + "R5731", + "R5732", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5744", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5751", + "R5752", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5759", + "R5760", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5775", + "R5776", + "R5779", + "R5780", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5792", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5800", + "R5803", + "R5804", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5820", + "R5824", + "R5828", + "R5831", + "R5832", + "R5836", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5843", + "R5844", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5852", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5859", + "R5860", + "R5863", + "R5864", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5880", + "R5884", + "R5887", + "R5888", + "R5891", + "R5892", + "R5895", + "R5896", + "R5897", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5907", + "R5908", + "R5911", + "R5912", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5924", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5943", + "R5944", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5951", + "R5952", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5959", + "R5960", + "R5963", + "R5964", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5971", + "R5972", + "R5975", + "R5976", + "R5979", + "R5984", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "P2", + "P6", + "P8", + "P10", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P21", + "P22", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P39", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P50", + "P53", + "P60", + "P63", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714", + "R6717", + "R6732", + "R6735", + "R6738", + "R6744", + "R6747", + "R6756", + "R6759", + "R6762", + "R6765", + "R6768", + "R6771", + "R6777", + "R6780", + "R6783", + "R6786", + "R6789", + "R6792", + "R6795", + "R6801", + "R6804", + "R6807", + "R6810", + "R6813", + "R6816", + "R6819", + "R6825", + "R6828", + "R6831", + "R6837", + "R6840", + "R6843", + "R6846", + "R6852", + "R6855", + "R6858", + "R6861", + "R6864", + "R6873", + "R6876", + "R6879", + "R6882", + "R6885", + "R6888", + "R6894", + "R6900", + "R6903", + "R6906", + "R6909", + "R6915", + "R6918", + "R6921", + "R6924", + "R6927", + "R6930", + "R6933", + "R6936", + "R6939", + "R6940", + "R6941", + "R6942", + "R6943", + "R6944", + "R6945", + "R6946", + "R6947", + "R6948", + "R6949", + "R6950", + "R6951", + "R6952", + "R6953", + "R6954", + "R6955", + "R6956", + "R6957", + "R6958", + "R6959", + "R6960", + "R6961", + "R6962", + "R6964", + "R6965", + "R6966", + "R6967", + "R6968", + "R6969", + "R6970", + "R6972", + "R6973", + "R6974", + "R6977", + "R6979", + "R6980", + "R6981", + "R6982", + "R6983", + "R6984", + "R6985", + "R6986", + "R6987", + "R6988", + "R6989", + "R6990", + "R6991", + "R6992", + "R6993", + "R6994", + "R6995", + "R6996", + "R6997", + "R6998", + "R6999", + "R7000", + "R7001", + "R7002", + "R7003", + "R7004", + "R7005", + "R7006", + "R7007", + "R7008", + "R7009", + "R7010", + "R7011", + "R7012", + "R7014", + "R7015", + "R7016", + "R7017", + "R7018", + "R7019", + "R7020", + "R7021", + "R7022", + "R7023", + "R7024", + "R7025", + "R7026", + "R7027", + "R7029", + "R7030", + "R7031", + "R7032", + "R7033", + "R7034", + "R7035", + "R7036", + "R7037", + "R7038", + "R7039", + "R7040", + "R7041", + "R7042", + "R7043", + "R7044", + "R7045", + "R7046", + "R7047", + "R7049", + "R7050", + "R7051", + "R7053", + "R7054", + "R7055", + "R7056", + "R7057", + "R7059", + "R7060", + "R7061", + "R7062", + "R7063", + "R7064", + "R7065", + "R7066", + "R7069", + "R7070", + "R7072", + "R7073", + "R7074", + "R7076", + "R7078", + "R7079", + "R7080", + "R7081", + "R7082", + "R7083", + "R7084", + "R7085", + "R7086", + "R7087", + "R7088", + "R7089", + "R7090", + "R7091", + "R7092", + "R7093", + "R7094", + "R7095", + "R7096", + "R7097", + "R7098", + "R7099", + "R7101", + "R7102", + "R7103", + "R7104", + "R7105", + "R7106", + "R7107", + "R7109", + "R7110", + "R7111", + "R7112", + "R7113", + "R7115", + "R7116", + "R7118", + "R7119", + "R7120", + "R7121", + "R7122", + "R7123", + "R7124", + "R7125", + "R7126", + "R7127", + "R7128", + "R7129", + "R7130", + "R7131", + "R7132", + "R7133", + "R7135", + "R7136", + "R7137", + "R7138", + "R7139", + "R7140", + "R7141", + "R7142", + "R7143", + "R7144", + "R7146", + "R7147", + "R7148", + "R7149", + "R7150", + "R7151", + "R7152", + "R7153", + "R7154", + "R7155", + "R7156", + "R7157", + "R7158", + "R7159", + "R7160", + "R7161", + "R7162", + "R7163", + "R7164", + "R7165", + "R7166", + "R7167", + "R7168", + "R7169", + "R7170", + "R7172", + "R7173", + "R7174", + "R7175", + "R7176", + "R7177", + "R7178", + "R7179", + "R7182", + "R7183", + "R7184", + "R7185", + "R7186", + "R7187", + "R7188", + "R7189", + "R7190", + "R7191", + "R7192", + "R7193", + "R7194", + "R7195", + "R7196", + "R7197", + "R7198", + "R7199", + "R7200", + "R7202", + "R7203", + "R7204", + "R7205", + "R7206", + "R7209", + "R7210", + "R7211", + "R7212", + "R7213", + "R7214", + "R7215", + "R7216", + "R7217", + "R7219", + "R7220", + "R7221", + "R7222", + "R7223", + "R7224", + "R7225", + "R7226", + "R7227", + "R7228", + "R7229", + "R7230", + "R7231", + "R7232", + "R7233", + "R7234", + "R7235", + "R7236", + "R7237", + "R7238", + "R7239", + "R7240", + "R7241", + "R7242", + "R7243", + "R7244", + "R7245", + "R7246", + "R7247", + "R7248", + "R7249", + "R7250", + "R7251", + "R7252", + "R7253", + "R7254", + "R7255", + "R7256", + "R7257", + "R7258", + "R7259", + "R7260", + "R7261", + "R7262", + "R7263", + "R7264", + "R7265", + "R7266", + "R7267", + "R7268", + "R7269", + "R7270", + "R7271", + "R7272", + "R7273", + "R7274", + "R7275", + "R7276", + "R7277", + "R7278", + "R7279", + "R7280", + "R7281", + "R7282", + "R7283", + "R7284", + "R7285", + "R7287", + "R7288", + "R7289", + "R7291", + "R7292", + "R7293", + "R7294", + "R7295", + "R7296", + "R7298", + "R7299", + "R7300", + "R7301", + "R7302", + "R7303", + "R7304", + "R7305", + "R7306", + "R7308", + "R7309", + "R7310", + "R7311", + "R7312", + "R7313", + "R7314", + "R7315", + "R7316", + "R7317", + "R7318", + "R7319", + "R7321", + "R7322", + "R7323", + "R7324", + "R7325", + "R7326", + "R7327", + "R7328", + "R7329", + "R7330", + "R7331", + "R7332", + "R7333", + "R7334", + "R7335", + "R7336", + "R7337", + "R7338", + "R7340", + "R7341", + "R7342", + "R7343", + "R7344", + "R7345", + "R7346", + "R7347", + "R7348", + "R7349", + "R7350", + "R7351", + "R7352", + "R7353", + "R7354", + "R7355", + "R7356", + "R7357", + "R7358", + "R7359", + "R7360", + "R7361", + "R7362", + "R7363", + "R7364", + "R7365", + "R7366", + "R7367", + "R7368", + "R7369", + "R7370", + "R7371", + "R7372", + "R7373", + "R7374", + "R7375", + "R7376", + "R7378", + "R7379", + "R7380", + "R7381", + "R7382", + "R7383", + "R7384", + "R7385", + "R7386", + "R7387", + "R7388", + "R7389", + "R7390", + "R7391", + "R7392", + "R7393", + "R7394", + "R7395", + "R7396", + "R7397", + "R7398", + "R7399", + "R7400", + "R7401", + "R7402", + "R7403", + "R7404", + "R7405", + "R7406", + "R7407", + "R7408", + "R7409", + "R7410", + "R7411", + "R7412", + "R7413", + "R7414", + "R7415", + "R7416", + "R7417", + "R7418", + "R7419", + "R7420", + "R7421", + "R7422", + "R7423", + "R7424", + "R7425", + "R7427", + "R7428", + "R7429", + "R7430", + "R7431", + "R7432", + "R7433", + "R7434", + "R7435", + "R7436", + "R7437", + "R7438", + "R7439", + "R7440", + "R7441", + "R7442", + "R7443", + "R7444", + "R7445", + "R7446", + "R7447", + "R7448", + "R7449", + "R7450", + "R7451", + "R7452", + "R7453", + "R7454", + "R7455", + "R7456", + "R7457", + "R7458", + "R7459", + "R7460", + "R7461" + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/1500-seed1.log b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/1500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f73fbeb --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/1500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +== 1500 tested facts, 1883 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + mem0 9008 8150 4001 44% 49% 0.417 0.11 1.1 348 0 2437 + arm families signal tokens score billed + mem0 333 6 8 348 2438 + mem0 success 44% = 4001 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 8150/9008, 49% of those passed) composite 0.417 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 348 standing 0 tok 2437 tok/query + v2 score 348 = families 333 + signal 6 + tokens 8 (billed 2438 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 52% r@1 0.45 r@5 0.55 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.18 crossed_r@5 0.03 path_r@5 0.61 path_cover 0.18 stale_above 0.29 hedge 0.00 noise 0.94 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.58 + currency 225 74% head_r@1 0.66 head_r@5 0.74 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 7% direct_r@5 0.07 assisted_r@5 0.07 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 375 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 +wrote results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/1500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/500-seed1.json b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4d2755c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1538 @@ +{ + "arm": "mem0", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2754, + "passed": 1427, + "success": 0.4690992767915845, + "attempted_success": 0.5181554103122731, + "composite": 0.4175926453955309, + "signal_share": 0.10589546777857463, + "multiplier": 1.0589546777857464, + "score": 346.77646321299505, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 334.0741163164248, + "signal_score": 6.952358545484437, + "token_score": 5.749988351085782, + "tokens_billed": 2567.415414444983, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1156, + "pass_rate": 0.5603490063015026, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.056, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.998, + "mrr": 0.5297450396825399, + "noise": 0.930634997576366, + "oblique_r@5": 0.29, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.998, + "path_cover": 0.32590073066263536, + "path_r@5": 0.6507936507936508, + "r@1": 0.4755, + "r@5": 0.5855, + "stale_above": 0.29545454545454547, + "tokens": 2567.415414444983, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5855 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5930602003283136 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 55, + "pass_rate": 0.7333333333333333, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.72, + "head_r@5": 0.7333333333333333, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 8, + "pass_rate": 0.047058823529411764, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.047058823529411764, + "direct_r@5": 0.047058823529411764, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.10589546777857463, + "noise": 0.930634997576366, + "tokens_per_query": 2567.415414444983 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 38.59786646452807, + "lineage_ms": 0.0027549918740987778, + "link_ms": 0.0003342261924496237, + "purge_ms": 1.5867245951440276, + "recall_ms": 41.82038056556535, + "recall_path_ms": 37.325374944697295, + "release_ms": 1.6763780676271944, + "settle_ms": 0.002625049091875553, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 44.503079103305936, + "suspects_ms": 0.01200009137392044, + "tokens_per_query": 2567.415414444983 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 32460.805696668103 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.06887479685246944 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.17713988199830055 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 65.05570840090513 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 112538.64410193636 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 2351.4986215159297 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 70.40787884034216 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.005250098183751106 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 2225.153955165297 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.01200009137392044 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R7", + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R43", + "R44", + "R48", + "R55", + "R56", + "R60", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R108", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R123", + "R124", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R172", + "R173", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R271", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R364", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R392", + "R396", + "R403", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R487", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R496", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R699", + "R700", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R767", + "R768", + "R772", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R844", + "R851", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R956", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1148", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1312", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1600", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1740", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P2", + "P8", + "P10", + "P13", + "P17", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P24", + "P26", + "P31", + "P32", + "P34", + "P35", + "P36", + "P40", + "P42", + "P43", + "P49", + "P50", + "P53", + "P57", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2262", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2277", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2286", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2310", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483" + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/500-seed1.log b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..21fbd54 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +== 500 tested facts, 630 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + mem0 3042 2754 1427 47% 52% 0.418 0.11 1.1 347 0 2567 + arm families signal tokens score billed + mem0 334 7 6 347 2567 + mem0 success 47% = 1427 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2754/3042, 52% of those passed) composite 0.418 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 347 standing 0 tok 2567 tok/query + v2 score 347 = families 334 + signal 7 + tokens 6 (billed 2567 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 56% r@1 0.48 r@5 0.59 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 0.29 crossed_r@5 0.06 path_r@5 0.65 path_cover 0.33 stale_above 0.30 hedge 0.00 noise 0.93 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.59 + currency 75 73% head_r@1 0.72 head_r@5 0.73 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 5% direct_r@5 0.05 assisted_r@5 0.05 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 +wrote results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/README.md b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..031d60e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/mem0-2.0.20/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +# Mem0 2.0.20 — v2 receipts + +`infer=False`, hybrid BM25 on, no LLM (`adapters/mem0.md`), the v1 adapter unchanged, replayed on `worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-{500,1500}-seed1-v2.json` +(2026-09-15, one Apple-silicon laptop, CPU, the three external chains +running side by side so wall-clock is contended). Files `500-seed1.json` +and `1500-seed1.json` are what `knowledgedrift --grade … --json` wrote; +the `.log` beside each is the terminal report. The rows are in +`results/v2/README.md`. diff --git a/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/1500-seed1.json b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/1500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..576af64 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/1500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,4076 @@ +{ + "arm": "memcontinuum", + "capabilities": { + "link": true, + "history": true, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": true, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "settle_note": "reindexed 3 times", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 7850, + "passed": 3984, + "success": 0.4422735346358792, + "attempted_success": 0.507515923566879, + "composite": 0.40809476693051894, + "signal_share": 0.1163930871230026, + "multiplier": 1.163930871230026, + "score": 380.07712763650153, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 326.47581354441513, + "signal_score": 6.771682245546721, + "token_score": 46.829631846539634, + "tokens_billed": 844.0380936675461, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 2980, + "pass_rate": 0.49142480211081796, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.017333333333333333, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.4941875000000002, + "noise": 0.9337071240105256, + "oblique_r@5": 0.14266666666666666, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.9973333333333333, + "path_cover": 0.8712053571428566, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.4505, + "r@5": 0.5393333333333333, + "stale_above": 0.5822784810126582, + "tokens": 844.0380936675461, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5393333333333332 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5009790525708965 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 300, + "passed": 232, + "pass_rate": 0.7733333333333333, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6755555555555556, + "head_r@5": 0.6977777777777778, + "lineage": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 522, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 1.0, + "direct_r@5": 0.07088122605363985, + "structure_only": 0.9291187739463601 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no tasks in this world", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.1163930871230026, + "noise": 0.9337071240105256, + "tokens_per_query": 844.0380936675461 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.9448602149516654, + "lineage_ms": 0.010400560374061266, + "link_ms": 0.8929472551358946, + "purge_ms": 0.566136984154582, + "recall_ms": 636.2646215713592, + "recall_path_ms": 40.10684828608646, + "release_ms": 1.406841343268752, + "settle_ms": 129997.8719369974, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 1.8957599718123674, + "suspects_ms": 0.0524159986525774, + "tokens_per_query": 844.0380936675461 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 2380.102881463245 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.780042028054595 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 1419.7861356660724 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 70.76712301932275 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 5144835.73002601 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 2566.8382903095335 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 175.855167908594 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 259995.7438739948 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 284.3639957718551 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.0524159986525774 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R43", + "R44", + "R47", + "R48", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R67", + "R68", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R187", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R211", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R272", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R299", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R343", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R400", + "R403", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R747", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1664", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1813", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2132", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2144", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2172", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2200", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2279", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2312", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2328", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2344", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2360", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2392", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2440", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2523", + "R2524", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2531", + "R2532", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2559", + "R2560", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2571", + "R2572", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2584", + "R2587", + "R2588", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2603", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2624", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2631", + "R2632", + "R2635", + "R2636", + "R2639", + "R2640", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2651", + "R2652", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2659", + "R2660", + "R2664", + "R2667", + "R2668", + "R2671", + "R2672", + "R2675", + "R2676", + "R2680", + "R2683", + "R2684", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2699", + "R2700", + "R2703", + "R2704", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2712", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2719", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2725", + "R2726", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2732", + "R2735", + "R2736", + "R2740", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2756", + "R2760", + "R2761", + "R2762", + "R2763", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2771", + "R2772", + "R2775", + "R2776", + "R2779", + "R2780", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2791", + "R2792", + "R2795", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2811", + "R2812", + "R2815", + "R2816", + "R2819", + "R2820", + "R2824", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2831", + "R2832", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2840", + "R2843", + "R2844", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2852", + "R2855", + "R2856", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2872", + "R2875", + "R2876", + "R2879", + "R2880", + "R2884", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2911", + "R2912", + "R2915", + "R2916", + "R2923", + "R2924", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2935", + "R2936", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2951", + "R2952", + "R2955", + "R2956", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2963", + "R2964", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2971", + "R2972", + "R2973", + "R2974", + "R2975", + "R2980", + "R2983", + "R2984", + "R2987", + "R2988", + "R2991", + "R2992", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3012", + "R3015", + "R3016", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3023", + "R3024", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3031", + "R3032", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3051", + "R3052", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3064", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3083", + "R3084", + "R3088", + "R3089", + "R3090", + "R3091", + "R3092", + "R3095", + "R3096", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3101", + "R3102", + "R3104", + "R3108", + "R3112", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3120", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3131", + "R3132", + "R3136", + "R3139", + "R3140", + "R3143", + "R3144", + "R3147", + "R3148", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3155", + "R3156", + "R3159", + "R3160", + "R3163", + "R3164", + "R3167", + "R3168", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3183", + "R3184", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3192", + "R3195", + "R3196", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3201", + "R3202", + "R3203", + "R3204", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3220", + "R3223", + "R3224", + "R3227", + "R3228", + "R3231", + "R3232", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3240", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3271", + "R3272", + "R3275", + "R3276", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3283", + "R3284", + "R3288", + "R3291", + "R3292", + "R3293", + "R3294", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3300", + "R3303", + "R3304", + "R3307", + "R3308", + "R3311", + "R3312", + "R3316", + "R3319", + "R3320", + "R3323", + "R3324", + "R3327", + "R3328", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3339", + "R3340", + "R3341", + "R3342", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3359", + "R3360", + "R3364", + "R3367", + "R3368", + "R3372", + "R3373", + "R3374", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3386", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3391", + "R3392", + "R3395", + "R3396", + "R3401", + "R3402", + "R3403", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3413", + "R3414", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3417", + "R3418", + "R3419", + "R3420", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3431", + "R3432", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3439", + "R3440", + "R3443", + "R3444", + "R3447", + "R3448", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3455", + "R3456", + "R3459", + "R3460", + "R3463", + "R3464", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3471", + "R3472", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3479", + "R3480", + "R3483", + "R3484", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3491", + "R3492", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3499", + "R3500", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3510", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3519", + "R3520", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3528", + "R3531", + "R3532", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3537", + "R3538", + "R3539", + "R3540", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3551", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3563", + "R3564", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3571", + "R3572", + "R3575", + "R3576", + "R3579", + "R3580", + "R3584", + "R3587", + "R3588", + "R3591", + "R3592", + "R3596", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3603", + "R3604", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3611", + "R3612", + "R3615", + "R3616", + "R3619", + "R3623", + "R3624", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3631", + "R3632", + "R3633", + "R3634", + "R3635", + "R3636", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3647", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3650", + "R3651", + "R3652", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3657", + "R3658", + "R3659", + "R3660", + "R3663", + "R3664", + "R3667", + "R3668", + "R3671", + "R3672", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3679", + "R3680", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3692", + "R3695", + "R3696", + "R3700", + "R3703", + "R3704", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3711", + "R3712", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3723", + "R3724", + "R3727", + "R3728", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3739", + "R3740", + "R3744", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3751", + "R3752", + "R3753", + "R3754", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3759", + "R3760", + "R3763", + "R3764", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3771", + "R3772", + "R3775", + "R3776", + "R3780", + "R3783", + "R3784", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3791", + "R3792", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3799", + "R3800", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3811", + "R3812", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3817", + "R3818", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3827", + "R3828", + "R3831", + "R3832", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3843", + "R3844", + "R3847", + "R3848", + "R3851", + "R3852", + "R3853", + "R3854", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3863", + "R3864", + "R3867", + "R3868", + "R3871", + "R3872", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3881", + "R3882", + "R3884", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3899", + "R3900", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3912", + "R3913", + "R3914", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3927", + "R3928", + "R3931", + "R3932", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3943", + "R3944", + "R3947", + "R3948", + "R3951", + "R3952", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3957", + "R3958", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3963", + "R3964", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3972", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3979", + "R3980", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3987", + "R3988", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3995", + "R3996", + "R3999", + "R4000", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4007", + "R4008", + "R4011", + "R4012", + "R4015", + "R4016", + "R4019", + "R4020", + "R4023", + "R4024", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4031", + "R4032", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4044", + "R4047", + "R4048", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4063", + "R4064", + "R4067", + "R4068", + "R4071", + "R4075", + "R4076", + "R4079", + "R4080", + "R4083", + "R4084", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4091", + "R4092", + "R4095", + "R4096", + "R4100", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4115", + "R4116", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4123", + "R4124", + "R4127", + "R4128", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4135", + "R4136", + "R4139", + "R4140", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4151", + "R4152", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4159", + "R4160", + "R4163", + "R4164", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4171", + "R4172", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4181", + "R4182", + "R4183", + "R4184", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4195", + "R4196", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4207", + "R4208", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4215", + "R4216", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4224", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4231", + "R4232", + "R4235", + "R4236", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4247", + "R4248", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4267", + "R4268", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4276", + "R4279", + "R4280", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4287", + "R4288", + "R4292", + "R4296", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4311", + "R4312", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4323", + "R4324", + "R4327", + "R4328", + "R4331", + "R4332", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4339", + "R4340", + "R4343", + "R4344", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4355", + "R4356", + "R4359", + "R4360", + "R4363", + "R4364", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4371", + "R4372", + "R4376", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4384", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4415", + "R4416", + "R4419", + "R4420", + "R4424", + "R4427", + "R4428", + "R4431", + "R4432", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4440", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4452", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4457", + "R4458", + "R4459", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4472", + "R4475", + "R4476", + "R4479", + "R4480", + "R4483", + "R4484", + "R4487", + "R4488", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4499", + "R4500", + "R4503", + "R4504", + "R4507", + "R4508", + "R4511", + "R4512", + "R4515", + "R4516", + "R4520", + "R4523", + "R4524", + "R4527", + "R4528", + "R4531", + "R4532", + "R4535", + "R4536", + "R4540", + "R4544", + "R4547", + "R4548", + "R4551", + "R4552", + "R4556", + "R4559", + "R4560", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4567", + "R4568", + "R4571", + "R4572", + "R4575", + "R4576", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4591", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4603", + "R4604", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4611", + "R4612", + "R4615", + "R4616", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4632", + "R4636", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4643", + "R4644", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4651", + "R4652", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4659", + "R4660", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4667", + "R4668", + "R4669", + "R4670", + "R4671", + "R4672", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4679", + "R4680", + "R4683", + "R4684", + "R4687", + "R4688", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4699", + "R4700", + "R4704", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4712", + "R4715", + "R4716", + "R4717", + "R4718", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4723", + "R4724", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4730", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4734", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4739", + "R4740", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4752", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4759", + "R4760", + "R4761", + "R4762", + "R4763", + "R4764", + "R4767", + "R4768", + "R4771", + "R4772", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4796", + "R4799", + "R4800", + "R4804", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4811", + "R4812", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4831", + "R4832", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4843", + "R4844", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4851", + "R4852", + "R4855", + "R4856", + "R4859", + "R4860", + "R4861", + "R4862", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4866", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4871", + "R4872", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4884", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4892", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4899", + "R4900", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4907", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4916", + "R4919", + "R4920", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4931", + "R4932", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4940", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4951", + "R4952", + "R4955", + "R4956", + "R4957", + "R4958", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4963", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4975", + "R4976", + "R4979", + "R4980", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R5000", + "R5001", + "R5002", + "R5003", + "R5004", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5012", + "R5013", + "R5014", + "R5015", + "R5016", + "R5019", + "R5020", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5027", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5048", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5053", + "R5054", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5059", + "R5060", + "R5063", + "R5064", + "R5067", + "R5068", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5083", + "R5084", + "R5087", + "R5088", + "R5091", + "R5092", + "R5095", + "R5096", + "R5101", + "R5102", + "R5103", + "R5104", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5111", + "R5112", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5119", + "R5120", + "R5123", + "R5124", + "R5128", + "R5131", + "R5132", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5143", + "R5144", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5151", + "R5152", + "R5156", + "R5159", + "R5160", + "R5163", + "R5164", + "R5168", + "R5171", + "R5172", + "R5175", + "R5176", + "R5179", + "R5180", + "R5181", + "R5182", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5187", + "R5188", + "R5192", + "R5195", + "R5196", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5207", + "R5208", + "R5212", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5219", + "R5220", + "R5223", + "R5224", + "R5227", + "R5228", + "R5231", + "R5232", + "R5233", + "R5234", + "R5235", + "R5236", + "R5240", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5251", + "R5252", + "R5255", + "R5256", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5275", + "R5276", + "R5280", + "R5283", + "R5284", + "R5288", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5303", + "R5304", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5311", + "R5312", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5320", + "R5323", + "R5324", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5351", + "R5352", + "R5355", + "R5356", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5361", + "R5362", + "R5364", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5373", + "R5374", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5385", + "R5386", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5401", + "R5402", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5411", + "R5412", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5419", + "R5420", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5432", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5447", + "R5448", + "R5451", + "R5452", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5464", + "R5465", + "R5466", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5479", + "R5480", + "R5484", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5491", + "R5492", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5499", + "R5500", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5511", + "R5512", + "R5513", + "R5514", + "R5515", + "R5516", + "R5519", + "R5520", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5528", + "R5531", + "R5532", + "R5535", + "R5536", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5543", + "R5544", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5551", + "R5552", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5560", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5567", + "R5568", + "R5571", + "R5572", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5579", + "R5580", + "R5583", + "R5584", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5591", + "R5592", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5607", + "R5608", + "R5611", + "R5612", + "R5615", + "R5616", + "R5620", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5631", + "R5632", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5646", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5668", + "R5671", + "R5672", + "R5675", + "R5676", + "R5677", + "R5678", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5695", + "R5696", + "R5699", + "R5700", + "R5704", + "R5705", + "R5706", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5719", + "R5720", + "R5723", + "R5724", + "R5727", + "R5728", + "R5731", + "R5732", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5743", + "R5744", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5750", + "R5752", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5759", + "R5760", + "R5761", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5775", + "R5776", + "R5780", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5791", + "R5792", + "R5793", + "R5794", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5800", + "R5801", + "R5802", + "R5803", + "R5804", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5809", + "R5810", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5819", + "R5820", + "R5824", + "R5827", + "R5828", + "R5831", + "R5832", + "R5833", + "R5834", + "R5836", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5841", + "R5842", + "R5843", + "R5844", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5851", + "R5852", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5859", + "R5860", + "R5863", + "R5864", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5877", + "R5878", + "R5879", + "R5880", + "R5883", + "R5884", + "R5887", + "R5888", + "R5891", + "R5892", + "R5895", + "R5896", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5908", + "R5911", + "R5912", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5923", + "R5924", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5931", + "R5932", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5943", + "R5944", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5951", + "R5952", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5959", + "R5960", + "R5964", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5971", + "R5972", + "R5973", + "R5974", + "R5975", + "R5976", + "R5984", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5992", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714", + "R6717", + "R6720", + "R6723", + "R6726", + "R6729", + "R6732", + "R6735", + "R6738", + "R6741", + "R6744", + "R6747", + "R6753", + "R6756", + "R6759", + "R6762", + "R6765", + "R6768", + "R6771", + "R6777", + "R6780", + "R6783", + "R6786", + "R6789", + "R6792", + "R6795", + "R6801", + "R6804", + "R6807", + "R6810", + "R6813", + "R6816", + "R6819", + "R6825", + "R6828", + "R6831", + "R6834", + "R6837", + "R6840", + "R6843", + "R6846", + "R6849", + "R6852", + "R6855", + "R6858", + "R6861", + "R6864", + "R6876", + "R6879", + "R6882", + "R6885", + "R6888", + "R6891", + "R6894", + "R6897", + "R6900", + "R6903", + "R6906", + "R6909", + "R6912", + "R6915", + "R6918", + "R6921", + "R6924", + "R6927", + "R6930", + "R6933", + "R6936", + "R6939" + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/1500-seed1.log b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/1500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3bfa562 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/1500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +== 1500 tested facts, 1883 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + memcontinuum 9008 7850 3984 44% 51% 0.408 0.12 1.2 380 0 844 + arm families signal tokens score billed + memcontinuum 326 7 47 380 844 + memcontinuum success 44% = 3984 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 7850/9008, 51% of those passed) composite 0.408 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 380 standing 0 tok 844 tok/query + v2 score 380 = families 326 + signal 7 + tokens 47 (billed 844 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 49% r@1 0.45 r@5 0.54 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 0.14 crossed_r@5 0.02 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 0.87 stale_above 0.58 hedge 0.00 noise 0.93 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 300 77% head_r@1 0.68 head_r@5 0.70 pollution 0.00 lineage 1.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 100% direct_r@5 0.07 assisted_r@5 1.00 structure_only 0.93 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping +wrote results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/1500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/500-seed1.json b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e18853d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,1401 @@ +{ + "arm": "memcontinuum", + "capabilities": { + "link": true, + "history": true, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": true, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "settle_note": "reindexed 3 times", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2654, + "passed": 1463, + "success": 0.4809335963182117, + "attempted_success": 0.551243406179352, + "composite": 0.4208470673776054, + "signal_share": 0.1377591606799994, + "multiplier": 1.377591606799994, + "score": 392.3968301800444, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 336.67765390208433, + "signal_score": 9.255171919654833, + "token_score": 46.464004358305196, + "tokens_billed": 852.4367426078527, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1128, + "pass_rate": 0.5467765390208434, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.046, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.5251065476190474, + "noise": 0.9088701921227574, + "oblique_r@5": 0.314, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.998, + "path_cover": 0.9475623582766438, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.465, + "r@5": 0.5895, + "stale_above": 0.6227272727272727, + "tokens": 852.4367426078527, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5894999999999999 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 100, + "passed": 82, + "pass_rate": 0.82, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6933333333333334, + "head_r@5": 0.76, + "lineage": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 170, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 1.0, + "direct_r@5": 0.047058823529411764, + "structure_only": 0.9529411764705882 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no tasks in this world", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.1377591606799994, + "noise": 0.9088701921227574, + "tokens_per_query": 852.4367426078527 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.8336436155713944, + "lineage_ms": 0.0051233358681201935, + "link_ms": 0.7843689878805066, + "purge_ms": 0.20276530782078825, + "recall_ms": 189.24086434108736, + "recall_path_ms": 13.081101844796823, + "release_ms": 1.2266330165965926, + "settle_ms": 48930.68037438206, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 1.7792392009869218, + "suspects_ms": 0.01379195600748062, + "tokens_per_query": 852.4367426078527 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 701.0942806955427 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.12808339670300484 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 415.7155635766685 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 8.313377620652318 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 509247.1659418661 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 824.1094162221998 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 51.51858669705689 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 97861.36074876411 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 88.96196004934609 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.01379195600748062 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R44", + "R47", + "R48", + "R51", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R67", + "R68", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R111", + "R112", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R211", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R272", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R299", + "R303", + "R304", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R387", + "R388", + "R392", + "R396", + "R400", + "R404", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R420", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R748", + "R752", + "R753", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R799", + "R800", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R812", + "R815", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R840", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R904", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R924", + "R928", + "R932", + "R936", + "R940", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1312", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1740", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1812", + "R1813", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R2000", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2277", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2286", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2310", + "R2313" + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/500-seed1.log b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2dcd878 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +== 500 tested facts, 630 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + memcontinuum 3042 2654 1463 48% 55% 0.421 0.14 1.4 392 0 852 + arm families signal tokens score billed + memcontinuum 337 9 46 392 852 + memcontinuum success 48% = 1463 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2654/3042, 55% of those passed) composite 0.421 S 0.14 ×1.4 score 392 standing 0 tok 852 tok/query + v2 score 392 = families 337 + signal 9 + tokens 46 (billed 852 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 55% r@1 0.47 r@5 0.59 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 0.31 crossed_r@5 0.05 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 0.95 stale_above 0.62 hedge 0.00 noise 0.91 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 100 82% head_r@1 0.69 head_r@5 0.76 pollution 0.00 lineage 1.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 100% direct_r@5 0.05 assisted_r@5 1.00 structure_only 0.95 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping +wrote results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/README.md b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a11bfa --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +# MemContinuum 0.2.0rc5 — v2 receipts + +decision chains over append-only topics, hybrid FTS5 + bge-small +(`adapters/memcontinuum.md`), **the v2 adapter** — `link` writes the +schema's typed edges and a hit carries its edge-neighbours, `recall_path` +is the system's own `for-path` — replayed on +`worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-{500,1500}-seed1-v2.json` (2026-09-16, one +Apple-silicon laptop, CPU, the three external chains and the in-process +ladder running side by side so wall-clock is contended). Files +`500-seed1.json` and `1500-seed1.json` are what +`knowledgedrift --grade … --json` wrote; the `.log` beside each is the +terminal report. The rows and the before/after reading are in +`results/v2/README.md`. + +| world | success | families | signal | tokens | v2 score | billed tok/query | rationale | path_r@5 / path_cover | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---| +| 500 seed 1 | 48% | 337 | 9 | 46 | **392** | 852 | 100% (structure_only 0.95) | 1.00 / 0.95 | +| 1500 seed 1 | 44% | 326 | 7 | 47 | **380** | 844 | 100% (structure_only 0.93) | 1.00 / 0.87 | + +With the v1 adapter on the same worlds (before 2026-09-16): 295 and 287, +rationale 5% at both sizes. The v1 receipts under `results/v1/` were taken +with that adapter and are left as they were. diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/1500-seed1.json b/results/v2/reference-arms/1500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ff5346e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/1500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,34461 @@ +{ + "generator": "knowledgedrift 1.0.0", + "flags": [ + "--v2" + ], + "embedder": "bge-small-en-v1.5", + "reranker": "jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en", + "nli": "deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli", + "embeddings_are_fake": false, + "sizes": [ + { + "spec": { + "size": 1500, + "seed": 1, + "k": 10, + "chains": 75, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "edition": 2, + "notes": 1883, + "edges": 1590 + }, + "digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "probes": 9133, + "ops": 12737, + "arms": [ + { + "arm": "engram", + "capabilities": { + "link": true, + "history": true, + "trace": true, + "suspects": true, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": true, + "write_check": true, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": true, + "endorse_user": true, + "endorse_supervisor": true + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "settle_note": "auto-tune left the defaults; weak line 0.844; sweep queued 2", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 9008, + "passed": 5927, + "success": 0.6579706927175843, + "attempted_success": 0.6579706927175843, + "composite": 0.770593043574885, + "signal_share": 0.6184262972404901, + "multiplier": 6.184262972404902, + "score": 718.3120388399633, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 616.4744348599081, + "signal_score": 32.358638226555286, + "token_score": 69.47896575349989, + "tokens_billed": 457.0726253298153, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 3463, + "pass_rate": 0.571075197889182, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.016, + "hedge": 0.3433351035581519, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.5370382936507936, + "noise": 0.5586185843070803, + "oblique_r@5": 0.32, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.992, + "path_cover": 0.9812499999999998, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.5028333333333334, + "r@5": 0.582, + "stale_above": 0.1661392405063291, + "tokens": 263.4726253298153, + "weighted_r@5": 0.582 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 689, + "pass_rate": 0.9649859943977591, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.9649859943977591, + "fp": 0.0350140056022409, + "natural_fp": 0.06133333333333333, + "phantom_fp": 0.0058997050147492625, + "separation": 0.6901024921842088 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 300, + "passed": 244, + "pass_rate": 0.8133333333333334, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.7066666666666667, + "head_r@5": 0.7511111111111111, + "lineage": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 500, + "passed": 235, + "pass_rate": 0.47, + "columns": { + "absorbed": 0.017421602787456445, + "flagged": 0.059233449477351915, + "queued": 0.09407665505226481, + "t1_recall": 0.041666666666666664, + "t2_false_alarm": 0.0, + "t2_recall": 0.09722222222222222, + "t3_false_alarm": 0.0, + "t3_recall": 0.07042253521126761 + } + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 375, + "passed": 327, + "pass_rate": 0.872, + "columns": { + "marker_leak": 1.0, + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.016, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.616, + "trace": 1.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 518, + "pass_rate": 0.9923371647509579, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.9923371647509579, + "direct_r@5": 0.0038314176245210726, + "structure_only": 0.9885057471264368 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 375, + "passed": 375, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 158, + "passed": 76, + "pass_rate": 0.4810126582278481, + "columns": { + "flagged": 0.27848101265822783, + "noticed": 0.4810126582278481 + } + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no tasks in this world", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.6184262972404901, + "noise": 0.5586185843070803, + "tokens_per_query": 263.4726253298153 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 215.62341721714955, + "lineage_ms": 0.06650276000000001, + "link_ms": 0.06439990943396234, + "purge_ms": 18.156567303999996, + "recall_ms": 298.4628488999503, + "recall_path_ms": 4.092533749999999, + "release_ms": 90.40021060000002, + "settle_ms": 84541.2866045, + "standing_tokens": 3872.0, + "supersede_ms": 198.3907849933333, + "suspects_ms": 32165.754333999997, + "tokens_per_query": 263.4726253298153 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 543155.3879699997 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 4.987707 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 102.39585600000014 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 2269.5709129999996 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 2413370.596204998 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 261.92215999999996 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 11300.026325000003 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 169082.573209 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 29758.617748999997 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 32165.754333999997 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R48", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R60", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R72", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R112", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R172", + "R175", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R188", + "R191", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R211", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R231", + "R232", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R244", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R264", + "R268", + "R272", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R284", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R296", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R343", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R364", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R388", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R400", + "R403", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R412", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R428", + "R431", + "R432", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R447", + "R448", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R536", + "R540", + "R541", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R588", + "R591", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R616", + "R619", + "R620", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R631", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R672", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R695", + "R696", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R707", + "R708", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R752", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R828", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R840", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R871", + "R872", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R924", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R960", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1124", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1204", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1320", + "R1324", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1388", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1512", + "R1516", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1532", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1708", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1816", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1832", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1852", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1992", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2088", + "R2092", + "R2094", + "R2096", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2112", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2128", + "R2132", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2144", + "R2148", + "R2152", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2164", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2172", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2188", + "R2192", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2212", + "R2216", + "R2220", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2236", + "R2240", + "R2244", + "R2248", + "R2252", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2279", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2288", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2312", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2324", + "R2328", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2344", + "R2348", + "R2352", + "R2356", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2380", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2392", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2400", + "R2404", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2412", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2432", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2448", + "R2452", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2472", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2492", + "R2496", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2514", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2520", + "R2523", + "R2524", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2532", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2559", + "R2560", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2572", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2584", + "R2588", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2623", + "R2624", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2632", + "R2636", + "R2639", + "R2640", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2651", + "R2652", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2663", + "R2664", + "R2668", + "R2671", + "R2672", + "R2675", + "R2676", + "R2679", + "R2680", + "R2683", + "R2684", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2700", + "R2703", + "R2704", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2712", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2719", + "R2720", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2732", + "R2736", + "R2739", + "R2740", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2756", + "R2759", + "R2760", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2772", + "R2775", + "R2776", + "R2779", + "R2780", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2791", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2812", + "R2816", + "R2819", + "R2820", + "R2824", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2832", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2840", + "R2843", + "R2844", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2851", + "R2852", + "R2856", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2875", + "R2876", + "R2880", + "R2883", + "R2884", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2915", + "R2916", + "R2919", + "R2920", + "R2923", + "R2924", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2934", + "R2935", + "R2936", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2951", + "R2952", + "R2956", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2963", + "R2964", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2972", + "R2974", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R2979", + "R2980", + "R2984", + "R2988", + "R2991", + "R2992", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3011", + "R3012", + "R3016", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3023", + "R3024", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3032", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3048", + "R3051", + "R3052", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3063", + "R3064", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3084", + "R3088", + "R3089", + "R3090", + "R3091", + "R3092", + "R3096", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3101", + "R3103", + "R3104", + "R3108", + "R3112", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3119", + "R3120", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3132", + "R3136", + "R3139", + "R3140", + "R3143", + "R3144", + "R3148", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3155", + "R3156", + "R3159", + "R3160", + "R3163", + "R3164", + "R3168", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3179", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3184", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3192", + "R3196", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3203", + "R3204", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3220", + "R3223", + "R3224", + "R3228", + "R3232", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3240", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3268", + "R3271", + "R3272", + "R3276", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3283", + "R3284", + "R3288", + "R3292", + "R3296", + "R3299", + "R3300", + "R3303", + "R3304", + "R3307", + "R3308", + "R3311", + "R3312", + "R3316", + "R3319", + "R3320", + "R3324", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3334", + "R3336", + "R3339", + "R3340", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3360", + "R3363", + "R3364", + "R3368", + "R3372", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3392", + "R3396", + "R3400", + "R3404", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3420", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3432", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3440", + "R3444", + "R3448", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3456", + "R3459", + "R3460", + "R3463", + "R3464", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3471", + "R3472", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3479", + "R3480", + "R3484", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3491", + "R3492", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3499", + "R3500", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3510", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3520", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3528", + "R3532", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3539", + "R3540", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3563", + "R3564", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3571", + "R3572", + "R3575", + "R3576", + "R3580", + "R3587", + "R3588", + "R3592", + "R3596", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3603", + "R3604", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3612", + "R3616", + "R3624", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3631", + "R3632", + "R3633", + "R3634", + "R3635", + "R3636", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3650", + "R3652", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3659", + "R3660", + "R3663", + "R3664", + "R3666", + "R3668", + "R3671", + "R3672", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3680", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3691", + "R3692", + "R3696", + "R3699", + "R3700", + "R3704", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3712", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3723", + "R3724", + "R3728", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3739", + "R3740", + "R3744", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3752", + "R3756", + "R3760", + "R3763", + "R3764", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3772", + "R3776", + "R3779", + "R3780", + "R3783", + "R3784", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3792", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3799", + "R3800", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3811", + "R3812", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3827", + "R3828", + "R3832", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3844", + "R3848", + "R3852", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3864", + "R3868", + "R3871", + "R3872", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3883", + "R3884", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3899", + "R3900", + "R3904", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3912", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3928", + "R3932", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3943", + "R3944", + "R3948", + "R3951", + "R3952", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3964", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3971", + "R3972", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3980", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3987", + "R3988", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3996", + "R4000", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4007", + "R4008", + "R4012", + "R4015", + "R4016", + "R4019", + "R4020", + "R4023", + "R4024", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4032", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4040", + "R4044", + "R4048", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4063", + "R4064", + "R4068", + "R4071", + "R4076", + "R4080", + "R4083", + "R4084", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4092", + "R4096", + "R4099", + "R4100", + "R4104", + "R4107", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4115", + "R4116", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4123", + "R4124", + "R4128", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4136", + "R4140", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4152", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4160", + "R4164", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4172", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4184", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4195", + "R4196", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4207", + "R4208", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4216", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4224", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4231", + "R4232", + "R4236", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4247", + "R4248", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4268", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4275", + "R4276", + "R4279", + "R4280", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4288", + "R4292", + "R4296", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4311", + "R4312", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4323", + "R4324", + "R4327", + "R4328", + "R4331", + "R4332", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4339", + "R4340", + "R4343", + "R4344", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4356", + "R4359", + "R4360", + "R4363", + "R4364", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4372", + "R4376", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4384", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4416", + "R4420", + "R4423", + "R4424", + "R4428", + "R4432", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4440", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4452", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4460", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4472", + "R4476", + "R4480", + "R4483", + "R4484", + "R4488", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4499", + "R4500", + "R4503", + "R4504", + "R4508", + "R4512", + "R4515", + "R4516", + "R4519", + "R4520", + "R4523", + "R4524", + "R4528", + "R4532", + "R4536", + "R4540", + "R4544", + "R4548", + "R4551", + "R4552", + "R4556", + "R4559", + "R4560", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4567", + "R4568", + "R4572", + "R4576", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4603", + "R4604", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4611", + "R4612", + "R4616", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4631", + "R4632", + "R4636", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4643", + "R4644", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4652", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4659", + "R4660", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4668", + "R4672", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4679", + "R4680", + "R4683", + "R4684", + "R4688", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4699", + "R4700", + "R4703", + "R4704", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4712", + "R4716", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4730", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4739", + "R4740", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4752", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4759", + "R4760", + "R4761", + "R4764", + "R4768", + "R4772", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4796", + "R4800", + "R4803", + "R4804", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4832", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4844", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4852", + "R4856", + "R4859", + "R4860", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4872", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4884", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4891", + "R4892", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4899", + "R4900", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4908", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4914", + "R4915", + "R4916", + "R4919", + "R4920", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4932", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4939", + "R4940", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4952", + "R4955", + "R4956", + "R4960", + "R4963", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4976", + "R4979", + "R4980", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R4999", + "R5000", + "R5003", + "R5004", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5011", + "R5012", + "R5015", + "R5016", + "R5019", + "R5020", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5027", + "R5028", + "R5031", + "R5032", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5048", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5060", + "R5064", + "R5068", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5084", + "R5088", + "R5092", + "R5096", + "R5104", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5112", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5120", + "R5123", + "R5124", + "R5128", + "R5131", + "R5132", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5144", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5152", + "R5155", + "R5156", + "R5160", + "R5163", + "R5164", + "R5168", + "R5172", + "R5175", + "R5176", + "R5179", + "R5180", + "R5181", + "R5182", + "R5183", + "R5184", + "R5188", + "R5191", + "R5192", + "R5196", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5208", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5219", + "R5220", + "R5223", + "R5224", + "R5228", + "R5232", + "R5235", + "R5236", + "R5239", + "R5240", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5252", + "R5255", + "R5256", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5276", + "R5279", + "R5280", + "R5284", + "R5288", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5303", + "R5304", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5312", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5319", + "R5320", + "R5323", + "R5324", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5351", + "R5352", + "R5355", + "R5356", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5364", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5376", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5388", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5401", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5411", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5419", + "R5420", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5431", + "R5432", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5440", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5448", + "R5452", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5464", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5479", + "R5480", + "R5484", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5492", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5500", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5511", + "R5512", + "R5514", + "R5516", + "R5520", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5527", + "R5528", + "R5531", + "R5532", + "R5536", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5543", + "R5544", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5551", + "R5552", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5559", + "R5560", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5568", + "R5572", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5580", + "R5584", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5592", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5608", + "R5612", + "R5616", + "R5619", + "R5620", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5631", + "R5632", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5643", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5652", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5668", + "R5672", + "R5676", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5696", + "R5699", + "R5700", + "R5703", + "R5704", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5720", + "R5723", + "R5724", + "R5727", + "R5728", + "R5731", + "R5732", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5743", + "R5744", + "R5745", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5752", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5760", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5776", + "R5779", + "R5780", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5791", + "R5792", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5799", + "R5800", + "R5803", + "R5804", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5809", + "R5810", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5820", + "R5824", + "R5828", + "R5832", + "R5836", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5843", + "R5844", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5851", + "R5852", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5859", + "R5860", + "R5864", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5879", + "R5880", + "R5883", + "R5884", + "R5888", + "R5891", + "R5892", + "R5895", + "R5896", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5908", + "R5911", + "R5912", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5923", + "R5924", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5944", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5952", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5960", + "R5964", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5971", + "R5972", + "R5976", + "R5983", + "R5984", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5992", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "R6169", + "R6268", + "R6341", + "R6365", + "R6375", + "R6379", + "R6405", + "R6410", + "R6415", + "R6419", + "R6460", + "R6475", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6491", + "R6515", + "R6530", + "R6535", + "R6596", + "R6600", + "R6640", + "R6644", + "R6665", + "R6691", + "R6701", + "R6717", + "R6720", + "R6723", + "R6726", + "R6732", + "R6735", + "R6738", + "R6747", + "R6750", + "R6759", + "R6762", + "R6768", + "R6771", + "R6777", + "R6783", + "R6786", + "R6792", + "R6795", + "R6807", + "R6810", + "R6813", + "R6819", + "R6825", + "R6828", + "R6831", + "R6834", + "R6837", + "R6840", + "R6843", + "R6849", + "R6852", + "R6855", + "R6858", + "R6861", + "R6864", + "R6867", + "R6870", + "R6873", + "R6876", + "R6879", + "R6882", + "R6885", + "R6888", + "R6891", + "R6894", + "R6900", + "R6903", + "R6906", + "R6909", + "R6915", + "R6924", + "R6927", + "R6930", + "R6933", + "R6936", + "R6939", + "R7038", + "R7341", + "R7412", + "R7417", + "C0", + "C1", + "C5", + "C6", + "C8", + "C9", + "C11", + "C14", + "C15", + "C16", + "C19", + "C20", + "C22", + "C23", + "C25", + "C28", + "C29", + "C33", + "C34", + "C36", + "C37", + "C42", + "C43", + "C44", + "C47", + "C48", + "C50", + "C51", + "C53", + "C56", + "C57", + "C61", + "C62", + "C64", + "C65", + "C67", + "C70", + "C71", + "C72", + "C75", + "C76", + "C78", + "C79", + "C81", + "C84", + "C85", + "C86", + "C89", + "C90", + "C92", + "C93", + "C99", + "C100", + "C103", + "C104", + "C106", + "C107", + "C109", + "C112", + "C113", + "C117", + "C118", + "C120", + "C121", + "C123", + "C126", + "C127", + "C128", + "C131", + "C132", + "C134", + "C135", + "C137", + "C140", + "C141", + "C142", + "C145", + "C146", + "C148", + "C149", + "C151", + "C154", + "C155", + "C156", + "C159", + "C160", + "C162", + "C163", + "C165", + "C169", + "C173", + "C174", + "C176", + "C177", + "C179", + "C182", + "C183", + "C187", + "C188", + "C190", + "C191", + "C193", + "C196", + "C197", + "C198", + "C201", + "C202", + "C204", + "C205", + "C207", + "C210", + "C211", + "C212", + "C215", + "C216", + "C218", + "C219", + "C221", + "C224", + "C225", + "C226", + "C229", + "C230", + "C232", + "C233", + "C235", + "C238", + "C239", + "C243", + "C244", + "C246", + "C247", + "C249", + "C252", + "C253", + "C257", + "C258", + "C260", + "C261", + "C263", + "C266", + "C267", + "C268", + "C271", + "C272", + "C274", + "C275", + "C277", + "C280", + "C281", + "C282", + "C285", + "C286", + "C288", + "C289", + "C291", + "C294", + "C295", + "C296", + "C299", + "C300", + "C302", + "C305", + "C308", + "C309", + "C313", + "C314", + "C316", + "C317", + "C322", + "C323", + "C327", + "C328", + "C330", + "C331", + "C333", + "C336", + "C337", + "C338", + "C341", + "C342", + "C344", + "C345", + "C347", + "C350", + "C351", + "C352", + "C355", + "C356", + "C358", + "C359", + "C361", + "C364", + "C365", + "C369", + "C370", + "C372", + "C373", + "C379", + "C380", + "C383", + "C384", + "C386", + "C387", + "C389", + "C392", + "C393", + "C394", + "C397", + "C398", + "C400", + "C401", + "C403", + "C406", + "C407", + "C408", + "C411", + "C412", + "C414", + "C415", + "C417", + "C420", + "C421", + "C422", + "C425", + "C426", + "C428", + "C429", + "C431", + "C434", + "C435", + "C436", + "C439", + "C440", + "C442", + "C443", + "C448", + "C449", + "C453", + "C454", + "C456", + "C457", + "C459", + "C462", + "C463", + "C467", + "C468", + "C470", + "C471", + "C473", + "C476", + "C477", + "C478", + "C481", + "C482", + "C484", + "C485", + "C487", + "C490", + "C491", + "C492", + "C495", + "C496", + "C498", + "C499", + "D2", + "D21", + "D23", + "D43", + "D58", + "D107", + "D127", + "D147", + "D168", + "D176", + "D188", + "D191", + "D218", + "D243", + "D251", + "D276", + "D303", + "D317", + "D325", + "D357", + "D402", + "D413", + "D415", + "D433", + "D450", + "D453", + "D462", + "D497", + "D498", + "D501", + "D505", + "D523", + "D535", + "D571", + "D601", + "D604", + "D681", + "D743", + "D772", + "D823", + "D833", + "D843", + "D853", + "D877", + "D884", + "D888", + "D908", + "D912", + "D938", + "D963", + "D978", + "D981", + "D989", + "D1027", + "D1075", + "D1148", + "D1182", + "D1183", + "D1215", + "D1216", + "D1241", + "D1250", + "D1253", + "D1263", + "D1308", + "D1346", + "D1366", + "D1376", + "D1378", + "D1406", + "D1412", + "D1416", + "D1419", + "D1426", + "D1436", + "D1437", + "D1440", + "D1442", + "D1448", + "D1458", + "D1460", + "D1493", + "W539", + "W547", + "W557", + "W563", + "W567", + "W571", + "W581", + "W589", + "W593", + "W597", + "W617", + "W619", + "W627", + "W631", + "W639", + "W643", + "W655", + "W659", + "W665", + "W669", + "W675", + "W679", + "W683", + "W695", + "W699", + "W703", + "W705", + "W713", + "W715", + "W719", + "W721", + "W723", + "W725", + "W727", + "W731", + "W733", + "W735", + "W739", + "W741", + "W745", + "W749", + "W751", + "W753", + "W757", + "W761", + "W771", + "W777", + "W785" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "rag", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 8150, + "passed": 4283, + "success": 0.4754662522202487, + "attempted_success": 0.525521472392638, + "composite": 0.42512907277671635, + "signal_share": 0.11628361087541728, + "multiplier": 1.1628361087541728, + "score": 358.92013979566127, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 340.10325822137304, + "signal_score": 7.494550311629783, + "token_score": 11.322331262658466, + "tokens_billed": 2207.8029353562006, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 3460, + "pass_rate": 0.570580474934037, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.092, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.9933333333333333, + "mrr": 0.5243906084656084, + "noise": 0.9341193931398084, + "oblique_r@5": 0.3393333333333333, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.9693333333333334, + "path_cover": 0.1842633928571428, + "path_r@5": 0.5625, + "r@1": 0.4653333333333333, + "r@5": 0.5985, + "stale_above": 0.28322784810126583, + "tokens": 2207.8029353562006, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5985 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5933037792953593 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 225, + "passed": 179, + "pass_rate": 0.7955555555555556, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6977777777777778, + "head_r@5": 0.7955555555555556, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 21, + "pass_rate": 0.040229885057471264, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.040229885057471264, + "direct_r@5": 0.040229885057471264, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 375, + "passed": 373, + "pass_rate": 0.9946666666666667, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 0.9946666666666667, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.11628361087541728, + "noise": 0.9341193931398084, + "tokens_per_query": 2207.8029353562006 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 31.425199267963485, + "lineage_ms": 0.0007378133333333337, + "link_ms": 0.0000673836477987422, + "purge_ms": 0.028091943999999997, + "recall_ms": 10.258917706406148, + "recall_path_ms": 8.3096021875, + "release_ms": 0.029987656, + "settle_ms": 0.0006039999999999999, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 41.655264433333336, + "suspects_ms": 0.00775, + "tokens_per_query": 2207.8029353562006 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 79160.07695600002 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.05533600000000003 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 0.10714000000000008 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 3.5114929999999998 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 82953.60857400011 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 531.81454 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 3.748457 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.0012079999999999999 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 6248.289665 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.00775 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R44", + "R48", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R63", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R140", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R175", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R184", + "R188", + "R192", + "R196", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R271", + "R272", + "R276", + "R280", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R360", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R383", + "R384", + "R387", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R420", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R447", + "R448", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R500", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R543", + "R544", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R624", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R658", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R753", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R804", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R844", + "R847", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R960", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1124", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1392", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1684", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1812", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1832", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1993", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2012", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2020", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2047", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2088", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2104", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2124", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2132", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2152", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2164", + "R2172", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2184", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2200", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2212", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2235", + "R2248", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2260", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2272", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2312", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2320", + "R2324", + "R2326", + "R2332", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2340", + "R2344", + "R2348", + "R2352", + "R2360", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2372", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2380", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2392", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2412", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2440", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2452", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2472", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2488", + "R2495", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2520", + "R2524", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2532", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2564", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2572", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2580", + "R2584", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2623", + "R2624", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2632", + "R2635", + "R2636", + "R2639", + "R2640", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2651", + "R2652", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2663", + "R2664", + "R2667", + "R2668", + "R2671", + "R2672", + "R2676", + "R2684", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2703", + "R2704", + "R2706", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2712", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2725", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2732", + "R2735", + "R2736", + "R2740", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2755", + "R2756", + "R2759", + "R2760", + "R2761", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2771", + "R2772", + "R2776", + "R2780", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2795", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2811", + "R2812", + "R2815", + "R2816", + "R2820", + "R2824", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2832", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2840", + "R2844", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2856", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2872", + "R2876", + "R2880", + "R2883", + "R2884", + "R2886", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2911", + "R2912", + "R2916", + "R2923", + "R2924", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2936", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2955", + "R2956", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2972", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R2979", + "R2980", + "R2984", + "R2987", + "R2988", + "R2991", + "R2992", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3012", + "R3016", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3024", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3031", + "R3032", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3039", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3047", + "R3048", + "R3052", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3063", + "R3064", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3077", + "R3078", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3084", + "R3087", + "R3088", + "R3092", + "R3095", + "R3096", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3101", + "R3102", + "R3103", + "R3104", + "R3108", + "R3112", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3119", + "R3120", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3131", + "R3132", + "R3135", + "R3136", + "R3140", + "R3144", + "R3147", + "R3148", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3156", + "R3160", + "R3164", + "R3167", + "R3168", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3184", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3195", + "R3196", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3204", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3220", + "R3224", + "R3227", + "R3228", + "R3232", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3240", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3272", + "R3275", + "R3276", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3284", + "R3288", + "R3292", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3300", + "R3304", + "R3308", + "R3311", + "R3312", + "R3320", + "R3323", + "R3324", + "R3327", + "R3328", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3340", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3359", + "R3360", + "R3364", + "R3367", + "R3368", + "R3371", + "R3372", + "R3373", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3386", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3391", + "R3392", + "R3396", + "R3400", + "R3401", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3413", + "R3414", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3419", + "R3420", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3426", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3431", + "R3432", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3439", + "R3440", + "R3444", + "R3447", + "R3448", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3455", + "R3456", + "R3459", + "R3464", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3472", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3480", + "R3484", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3491", + "R3492", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3500", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3520", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3528", + "R3531", + "R3532", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3571", + "R3572", + "R3576", + "R3580", + "R3584", + "R3588", + "R3596", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3604", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3615", + "R3616", + "R3623", + "R3624", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3632", + "R3636", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3647", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3660", + "R3663", + "R3666", + "R3667", + "R3668", + "R3671", + "R3672", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3679", + "R3680", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3691", + "R3692", + "R3695", + "R3696", + "R3699", + "R3700", + "R3703", + "R3704", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3711", + "R3712", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3724", + "R3727", + "R3728", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3740", + "R3743", + "R3744", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3751", + "R3752", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3775", + "R3776", + "R3779", + "R3780", + "R3784", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3791", + "R3792", + "R3794", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3800", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3811", + "R3812", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3817", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3828", + "R3832", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3844", + "R3848", + "R3853", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3864", + "R3867", + "R3868", + "R3871", + "R3872", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3884", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3900", + "R3904", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3912", + "R3913", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3928", + "R3932", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3944", + "R3947", + "R3948", + "R3951", + "R3952", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3964", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3971", + "R3972", + "R3974", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3988", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3996", + "R4000", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4008", + "R4011", + "R4012", + "R4016", + "R4020", + "R4024", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4031", + "R4032", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4044", + "R4047", + "R4048", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4064", + "R4068", + "R4075", + "R4076", + "R4084", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4092", + "R4095", + "R4096", + "R4100", + "R4104", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4116", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4127", + "R4128", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4135", + "R4136", + "R4140", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4151", + "R4152", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4159", + "R4163", + "R4164", + "R4166", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4171", + "R4172", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4184", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4196", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4207", + "R4208", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4215", + "R4216", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4224", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4232", + "R4235", + "R4236", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4267", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4276", + "R4279", + "R4280", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4287", + "R4288", + "R4292", + "R4296", + "R4300", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4306", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4312", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4328", + "R4332", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4340", + "R4344", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4355", + "R4356", + "R4360", + "R4364", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4376", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4383", + "R4384", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4406", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4416", + "R4419", + "R4420", + "R4424", + "R4432", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4440", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4452", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4459", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4472", + "R4476", + "R4479", + "R4480", + "R4484", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4500", + "R4504", + "R4507", + "R4508", + "R4511", + "R4512", + "R4516", + "R4520", + "R4523", + "R4524", + "R4527", + "R4528", + "R4532", + "R4536", + "R4539", + "R4540", + "R4544", + "R4559", + "R4560", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4575", + "R4576", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4586", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4591", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4603", + "R4604", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4612", + "R4616", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4631", + "R4632", + "R4636", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4644", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4651", + "R4652", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4660", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4668", + "R4669", + "R4672", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4680", + "R4684", + "R4687", + "R4688", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4700", + "R4703", + "R4704", + "R4706", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4712", + "R4715", + "R4716", + "R4717", + "R4718", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4740", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4752", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4761", + "R4762", + "R4764", + "R4768", + "R4772", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4796", + "R4800", + "R4803", + "R4804", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4812", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4831", + "R4832", + "R4834", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4844", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4855", + "R4856", + "R4860", + "R4861", + "R4862", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4871", + "R4872", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4884", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4891", + "R4892", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4900", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4915", + "R4916", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4932", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4939", + "R4940", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4946", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4952", + "R4956", + "R4957", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4975", + "R4976", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4994", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R5001", + "R5002", + "R5004", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5012", + "R5013", + "R5016", + "R5019", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5027", + "R5031", + "R5032", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5048", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5067", + "R5068", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5084", + "R5087", + "R5088", + "R5095", + "R5096", + "R5101", + "R5102", + "R5104", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5112", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5120", + "R5124", + "R5132", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5146", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5152", + "R5156", + "R5159", + "R5160", + "R5164", + "R5168", + "R5176", + "R5181", + "R5183", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5188", + "R5191", + "R5192", + "R5195", + "R5196", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5207", + "R5208", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5219", + "R5220", + "R5224", + "R5227", + "R5228", + "R5231", + "R5232", + "R5233", + "R5236", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5252", + "R5255", + "R5256", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5276", + "R5280", + "R5284", + "R5288", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5297", + "R5298", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5304", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5311", + "R5312", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5320", + "R5324", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5351", + "R5352", + "R5355", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5364", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5373", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5385", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5411", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5419", + "R5420", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5431", + "R5432", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5440", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5448", + "R5451", + "R5452", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5465", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5480", + "R5484", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5492", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5500", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5512", + "R5516", + "R5519", + "R5520", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5527", + "R5528", + "R5531", + "R5532", + "R5535", + "R5536", + "R5537", + "R5538", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5543", + "R5544", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5551", + "R5552", + "R5554", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5560", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5567", + "R5568", + "R5572", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5579", + "R5580", + "R5584", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5592", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5612", + "R5615", + "R5616", + "R5619", + "R5620", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5631", + "R5632", + "R5634", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5671", + "R5672", + "R5675", + "R5676", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5695", + "R5696", + "R5699", + "R5700", + "R5704", + "R5705", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5720", + "R5724", + "R5727", + "R5728", + "R5732", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5752", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5759", + "R5760", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5775", + "R5776", + "R5780", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5792", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5800", + "R5804", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5823", + "R5824", + "R5832", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5844", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5851", + "R5852", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5860", + "R5864", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5880", + "R5883", + "R5884", + "R5887", + "R5888", + "R5891", + "R5892", + "R5896", + "R5897", + "R5898", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5908", + "R5911", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5924", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5944", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5949", + "R5951", + "R5952", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5960", + "R5963", + "R5964", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5972", + "R5976", + "R5979", + "R5980", + "R5983", + "R5984", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "P2", + "P6", + "P8", + "P10", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P16", + "P18", + "P21", + "P22", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P39", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P50", + "P52", + "P53", + "P60", + "P63", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714", + "R6717", + "R6720", + "R6723", + "R6726", + "R6732", + "R6735", + "R6738", + "R6750", + "R6759", + "R6762", + "R6771", + "R6777", + "R6786", + "R6789", + "R6795", + "R6798", + "R6807", + "R6810", + "R6813", + "R6819", + "R6828", + "R6831", + "R6834", + "R6837", + "R6843", + "R6846", + "R6852", + "R6855", + "R6858", + "R6870", + "R6876", + "R6879", + "R6882", + "R6885", + "R6888", + "R6894", + "R6900", + "R6906", + "R6909", + "R6918", + "R6921", + "R6927", + "R6930", + "R6933", + "R6936", + "R6939", + "R6940", + "R6941", + "R6942", + "R6943", + "R6944", + "R6945", + "R6946", + "R6947", + "R6948", + "R6949", + "R6950", + "R6951", + "R6952", + "R6953", + "R6954", + "R6955", + "R6956", + "R6957", + "R6958", + "R6959", + "R6960", + "R6961", + "R6962", + "R6964", + "R6965", + "R6966", + "R6967", + "R6968", + "R6969", + "R6970", + "R6972", + "R6973", + "R6974", + "R6977", + "R6978", + "R6979", + "R6980", + "R6981", + "R6982", + "R6983", + "R6984", + "R6985", + "R6986", + "R6987", + "R6988", + "R6989", + "R6990", + "R6991", + "R6992", + "R6993", + "R6994", + "R6995", + "R6996", + "R6997", + "R6998", + "R6999", + "R7000", + "R7001", + "R7002", + "R7003", + "R7004", + "R7005", + "R7006", + "R7007", + "R7008", + "R7009", + "R7010", + "R7011", + "R7012", + "R7014", + "R7015", + "R7016", + "R7017", + "R7018", + "R7019", + "R7020", + "R7021", + "R7022", + "R7023", + "R7024", + "R7025", + "R7026", + "R7027", + "R7029", + "R7030", + "R7031", + "R7032", + "R7033", + "R7034", + "R7035", + "R7036", + "R7037", + "R7038", + "R7039", + "R7040", + "R7041", + "R7042", + "R7043", + "R7044", + "R7045", + "R7046", + "R7047", + "R7048", + "R7049", + "R7050", + "R7051", + "R7053", + "R7054", + "R7055", + "R7056", + "R7057", + "R7058", + "R7059", + "R7060", + "R7061", + "R7062", + "R7063", + "R7064", + "R7065", + "R7066", + "R7067", + "R7068", + "R7069", + "R7070", + "R7072", + "R7073", + "R7074", + "R7075", + "R7076", + "R7078", + "R7079", + "R7080", + "R7081", + "R7082", + "R7083", + "R7084", + "R7085", + "R7086", + "R7087", + "R7088", + "R7089", + "R7090", + "R7091", + "R7092", + "R7093", + "R7094", + "R7095", + "R7096", + "R7097", + "R7098", + "R7099", + "R7100", + "R7101", + "R7102", + "R7103", + "R7104", + "R7105", + "R7106", + "R7107", + "R7108", + "R7109", + "R7110", + "R7111", + "R7112", + "R7113", + "R7114", + "R7115", + "R7116", + "R7118", + "R7119", + "R7120", + "R7121", + "R7122", + "R7123", + "R7124", + "R7125", + "R7126", + "R7127", + "R7128", + "R7129", + "R7130", + "R7131", + "R7132", + "R7133", + "R7135", + "R7136", + "R7137", + "R7138", + "R7139", + "R7140", + "R7141", + "R7142", + "R7143", + "R7144", + "R7146", + "R7147", + "R7148", + "R7149", + "R7150", + "R7151", + "R7152", + "R7153", + "R7154", + "R7155", + "R7156", + "R7157", + "R7158", + "R7159", + "R7160", + "R7161", + "R7162", + "R7163", + "R7164", + "R7165", + "R7166", + "R7167", + "R7168", + "R7169", + "R7170", + "R7172", + "R7173", + "R7174", + "R7175", + "R7176", + "R7177", + "R7178", + "R7179", + "R7180", + "R7182", + "R7183", + "R7184", + "R7185", + "R7186", + "R7187", + "R7188", + "R7189", + "R7190", + "R7191", + "R7192", + "R7193", + "R7194", + "R7195", + "R7196", + "R7197", + "R7198", + "R7199", + "R7200", + "R7202", + "R7203", + "R7204", + "R7205", + "R7206", + "R7207", + "R7209", + "R7210", + "R7211", + "R7212", + "R7213", + "R7214", + "R7215", + "R7216", + "R7217", + "R7218", + "R7219", + "R7220", + "R7221", + "R7222", + "R7223", + "R7224", + "R7225", + "R7226", + "R7227", + "R7228", + "R7229", + "R7230", + "R7231", + "R7232", + "R7233", + "R7234", + "R7235", + "R7236", + "R7237", + "R7238", + "R7239", + "R7240", + "R7241", + "R7242", + "R7243", + "R7244", + "R7245", + "R7246", + "R7247", + "R7248", + "R7249", + "R7250", + "R7251", + "R7252", + "R7253", + "R7254", + "R7255", + "R7256", + "R7257", + "R7258", + "R7259", + "R7260", + "R7261", + "R7262", + "R7263", + "R7264", + "R7265", + "R7266", + "R7267", + "R7268", + "R7269", + "R7270", + "R7271", + "R7272", + "R7273", + "R7274", + "R7275", + "R7276", + "R7277", + "R7278", + "R7279", + "R7280", + "R7281", + "R7282", + "R7283", + "R7284", + "R7285", + "R7287", + "R7288", + "R7289", + "R7291", + "R7292", + "R7293", + "R7294", + "R7295", + "R7296", + "R7297", + "R7298", + "R7299", + "R7300", + "R7301", + "R7302", + "R7303", + "R7304", + "R7305", + "R7306", + "R7308", + "R7309", + "R7310", + "R7311", + "R7312", + "R7313", + "R7314", + "R7315", + "R7316", + "R7317", + "R7318", + "R7319", + "R7320", + "R7321", + "R7322", + "R7323", + "R7324", + "R7325", + "R7326", + "R7327", + "R7328", + "R7329", + "R7330", + "R7331", + "R7332", + "R7333", + "R7334", + "R7335", + "R7336", + "R7337", + "R7338", + "R7340", + "R7341", + "R7342", + "R7343", + "R7344", + "R7345", + "R7346", + "R7347", + "R7348", + "R7349", + "R7350", + "R7351", + "R7352", + "R7353", + "R7354", + "R7355", + "R7356", + "R7357", + "R7358", + "R7359", + "R7360", + "R7361", + "R7362", + "R7363", + "R7364", + "R7365", + "R7366", + "R7367", + "R7368", + "R7369", + "R7370", + "R7371", + "R7372", + "R7373", + "R7374", + "R7375", + "R7376", + "R7377", + "R7378", + "R7379", + "R7380", + "R7381", + "R7382", + "R7383", + "R7384", + "R7385", + "R7386", + "R7387", + "R7388", + "R7389", + "R7390", + "R7391", + "R7392", + "R7393", + "R7394", + "R7395", + "R7396", + "R7397", + "R7398", + "R7399", + "R7400", + "R7401", + "R7402", + "R7403", + "R7404", + "R7405", + "R7406", + "R7407", + "R7408", + "R7409", + "R7410", + "R7411", + "R7412", + "R7413", + "R7414", + "R7415", + "R7416", + "R7417", + "R7418", + "R7419", + "R7420", + "R7421", + "R7422", + "R7423", + "R7424", + "R7425", + "R7427", + "R7428", + "R7429", + "R7430", + "R7431", + "R7432", + "R7433", + "R7434", + "R7435", + "R7436", + "R7437", + "R7438", + "R7439", + "R7440", + "R7441", + "R7442", + "R7443", + "R7444", + "R7445", + "R7446", + "R7447", + "R7448", + "R7449", + "R7450", + "R7451", + "R7452", + "R7453", + "R7454", + "R7455", + "R7456", + "R7457", + "R7458", + "R7459", + "R7460", + "R7461", + "R7655", + "R7820" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "grep", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 8150, + "passed": 3651, + "success": 0.4053063943161634, + "attempted_success": 0.4479754601226994, + "composite": 0.39424682694932217, + "signal_share": 0.12209169998354115, + "multiplier": 1.2209169998354115, + "score": 324.86003119003436, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 315.3974615594577, + "signal_score": 6.469007784418167, + "token_score": 2.9935618461584608, + "tokens_billed": 2766.395283641161, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 2870, + "pass_rate": 0.4732849604221636, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.004, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.48365410052910063, + "noise": 0.9384564643799214, + "oblique_r@5": 0.051333333333333335, + "paraphrase_r@5": 1.0, + "path_cover": 0.9156249999999994, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.455, + "r@5": 0.5138333333333334, + "stale_above": 0.439873417721519, + "tokens": 2766.395283641161, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5138333333333334 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.7177256786619661 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 225, + "passed": 151, + "pass_rate": 0.6711111111111111, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6622222222222223, + "head_r@5": 0.6711111111111111, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 5, + "pass_rate": 0.009578544061302681, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.009578544061302681, + "direct_r@5": 0.009578544061302681, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 375, + "passed": 375, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.12209169998354115, + "noise": 0.9384564643799214, + "tokens_per_query": 2766.395283641161 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0006347574434299309, + "lineage_ms": 0.0003677866666666668, + "link_ms": 0.000029244654088050354, + "purge_ms": 0.013397047999999998, + "recall_ms": 3.4458067652732938, + "recall_path_ms": 0.01782421875000001, + "release_ms": 0.013121328, + "settle_ms": 0.00022899999999999998, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0017658333333333308, + "suspects_ms": 0.0027080000000000003, + "tokens_per_query": 2766.395283641161 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 1.598953999999996 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.027584000000000008 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 0.04649900000000006 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 1.6746309999999998 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 27862.793503999852 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 1.1407500000000006 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 1.640166 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.00045799999999999997 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 0.26487499999999964 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.0027080000000000003 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R48", + "R51", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R60", + "R67", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R115", + "R116", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R136", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R223", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R311", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R343", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R391", + "R392", + "R396", + "R400", + "R403", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R487", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R535", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R631", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R843", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R876", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R919", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1148", + "R1152", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1813", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2048", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2120", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2252", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2432", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2523", + "R2524", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2531", + "R2532", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2559", + "R2560", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2571", + "R2572", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2583", + "R2584", + "R2587", + "R2588", + "R2592", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2603", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2623", + "R2624", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2631", + "R2632", + "R2635", + "R2636", + "R2639", + "R2640", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2652", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2659", + "R2660", + "R2663", + "R2664", + "R2667", + "R2668", + "R2671", + "R2672", + "R2675", + "R2676", + "R2679", + "R2680", + "R2683", + "R2684", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2699", + "R2700", + "R2703", + "R2704", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2711", + "R2712", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2719", + "R2720", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2725", + "R2726", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2732", + "R2735", + "R2736", + "R2739", + "R2740", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2755", + "R2756", + "R2759", + "R2760", + "R2761", + "R2762", + "R2763", + "R2764", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2771", + "R2772", + "R2775", + "R2776", + "R2779", + "R2780", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2791", + "R2792", + "R2795", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2811", + "R2812", + "R2815", + "R2816", + "R2820", + "R2823", + "R2824", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2831", + "R2832", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2839", + "R2840", + "R2843", + "R2844", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2851", + "R2852", + "R2855", + "R2856", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2872", + "R2875", + "R2876", + "R2879", + "R2880", + "R2883", + "R2884", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2912", + "R2915", + "R2916", + "R2919", + "R2920", + "R2923", + "R2924", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2935", + "R2936", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2951", + "R2952", + "R2955", + "R2956", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2963", + "R2964", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2971", + "R2972", + "R2973", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R2979", + "R2980", + "R2983", + "R2984", + "R2987", + "R2988", + "R2991", + "R2992", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3011", + "R3012", + "R3015", + "R3016", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3023", + "R3024", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3031", + "R3032", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3039", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3047", + "R3048", + "R3051", + "R3052", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3063", + "R3064", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3083", + "R3084", + "R3087", + "R3088", + "R3089", + "R3090", + "R3091", + "R3092", + "R3095", + "R3096", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3101", + "R3102", + "R3103", + "R3104", + "R3107", + "R3108", + "R3111", + "R3112", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3119", + "R3120", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3131", + "R3132", + "R3135", + "R3136", + "R3139", + "R3140", + "R3143", + "R3144", + "R3147", + "R3148", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3155", + "R3156", + "R3159", + "R3160", + "R3163", + "R3164", + "R3167", + "R3168", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3179", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3183", + "R3184", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3191", + "R3192", + "R3195", + "R3196", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3201", + "R3203", + "R3204", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3219", + "R3220", + "R3223", + "R3224", + "R3227", + "R3228", + "R3231", + "R3232", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3239", + "R3240", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3263", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3271", + "R3272", + "R3275", + "R3276", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3283", + "R3284", + "R3287", + "R3288", + "R3291", + "R3292", + "R3293", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3299", + "R3300", + "R3303", + "R3304", + "R3307", + "R3308", + "R3311", + "R3312", + "R3315", + "R3316", + "R3319", + "R3320", + "R3323", + "R3324", + "R3327", + "R3328", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3339", + "R3340", + "R3341", + "R3342", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3359", + "R3360", + "R3363", + "R3364", + "R3367", + "R3368", + "R3371", + "R3372", + "R3373", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3391", + "R3392", + "R3395", + "R3396", + "R3399", + "R3400", + "R3401", + "R3402", + "R3403", + "R3404", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3413", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3417", + "R3418", + "R3419", + "R3420", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3431", + "R3432", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3439", + "R3440", + "R3443", + "R3444", + "R3447", + "R3448", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3455", + "R3456", + "R3459", + "R3460", + "R3463", + "R3464", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3471", + "R3472", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3479", + "R3480", + "R3483", + "R3484", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3491", + "R3492", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3499", + "R3500", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3510", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3519", + "R3520", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3527", + "R3528", + "R3531", + "R3532", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3537", + "R3538", + "R3539", + "R3540", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3563", + "R3564", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3571", + "R3572", + "R3575", + "R3576", + "R3579", + "R3580", + "R3583", + "R3584", + "R3587", + "R3588", + "R3591", + "R3592", + "R3595", + "R3596", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3603", + "R3604", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3611", + "R3612", + "R3615", + "R3616", + "R3619", + "R3620", + "R3623", + "R3624", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3631", + "R3632", + "R3633", + "R3635", + "R3636", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3647", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3650", + "R3651", + "R3652", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3657", + "R3658", + "R3660", + "R3663", + "R3664", + "R3667", + "R3668", + "R3671", + "R3672", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3679", + "R3680", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3691", + "R3692", + "R3695", + "R3696", + "R3699", + "R3700", + "R3703", + "R3704", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3711", + "R3712", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3723", + "R3724", + "R3727", + "R3728", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3739", + "R3740", + "R3743", + "R3744", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3751", + "R3752", + "R3753", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3759", + "R3760", + "R3763", + "R3764", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3771", + "R3772", + "R3775", + "R3776", + "R3779", + "R3780", + "R3783", + "R3784", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3791", + "R3792", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3799", + "R3800", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3811", + "R3812", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3817", + "R3818", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3827", + "R3828", + "R3831", + "R3832", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3843", + "R3844", + "R3847", + "R3848", + "R3851", + "R3852", + "R3853", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3863", + "R3864", + "R3867", + "R3868", + "R3871", + "R3872", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3881", + "R3882", + "R3883", + "R3884", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3899", + "R3900", + "R3903", + "R3904", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3911", + "R3912", + "R3913", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3927", + "R3928", + "R3931", + "R3932", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3943", + "R3944", + "R3947", + "R3948", + "R3951", + "R3952", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3957", + "R3958", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3963", + "R3964", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3971", + "R3972", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3979", + "R3980", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3987", + "R3988", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3995", + "R3996", + "R3999", + "R4000", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4007", + "R4008", + "R4012", + "R4015", + "R4016", + "R4019", + "R4020", + "R4023", + "R4024", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4031", + "R4032", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4039", + "R4040", + "R4043", + "R4044", + "R4047", + "R4048", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4063", + "R4064", + "R4067", + "R4068", + "R4071", + "R4072", + "R4075", + "R4076", + "R4079", + "R4080", + "R4083", + "R4084", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4091", + "R4092", + "R4095", + "R4096", + "R4099", + "R4100", + "R4103", + "R4104", + "R4107", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4115", + "R4116", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4123", + "R4124", + "R4127", + "R4128", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4135", + "R4136", + "R4139", + "R4140", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4151", + "R4152", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4159", + "R4160", + "R4163", + "R4164", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4171", + "R4172", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4181", + "R4182", + "R4183", + "R4184", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4195", + "R4196", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4208", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4215", + "R4216", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4223", + "R4224", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4231", + "R4232", + "R4235", + "R4236", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4247", + "R4248", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4267", + "R4268", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4275", + "R4276", + "R4279", + "R4280", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4287", + "R4288", + "R4291", + "R4292", + "R4295", + "R4296", + "R4300", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4311", + "R4312", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4323", + "R4324", + "R4327", + "R4328", + "R4331", + "R4332", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4339", + "R4340", + "R4343", + "R4344", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4355", + "R4356", + "R4359", + "R4360", + "R4363", + "R4364", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4371", + "R4372", + "R4375", + "R4376", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4383", + "R4384", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4415", + "R4416", + "R4419", + "R4420", + "R4423", + "R4424", + "R4427", + "R4428", + "R4431", + "R4432", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4439", + "R4440", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4451", + "R4452", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4457", + "R4458", + "R4459", + "R4460", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4471", + "R4472", + "R4475", + "R4476", + "R4479", + "R4480", + "R4483", + "R4484", + "R4487", + "R4488", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4499", + "R4500", + "R4503", + "R4504", + "R4507", + "R4508", + "R4511", + "R4512", + "R4515", + "R4516", + "R4519", + "R4520", + "R4523", + "R4524", + "R4527", + "R4528", + "R4531", + "R4532", + "R4535", + "R4536", + "R4539", + "R4540", + "R4543", + "R4544", + "R4547", + "R4548", + "R4551", + "R4552", + "R4555", + "R4556", + "R4559", + "R4560", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4567", + "R4568", + "R4571", + "R4572", + "R4575", + "R4576", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4591", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4603", + "R4604", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4611", + "R4612", + "R4615", + "R4616", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4631", + "R4632", + "R4635", + "R4636", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4643", + "R4644", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4651", + "R4652", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4659", + "R4660", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4667", + "R4668", + "R4669", + "R4670", + "R4671", + "R4672", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4679", + "R4680", + "R4683", + "R4684", + "R4687", + "R4688", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4699", + "R4700", + "R4703", + "R4704", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4711", + "R4712", + "R4715", + "R4716", + "R4717", + "R4718", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4723", + "R4724", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4730", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4739", + "R4740", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4751", + "R4752", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4759", + "R4760", + "R4761", + "R4762", + "R4763", + "R4764", + "R4767", + "R4768", + "R4771", + "R4772", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4795", + "R4796", + "R4799", + "R4800", + "R4803", + "R4804", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4811", + "R4812", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4832", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4843", + "R4844", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4851", + "R4852", + "R4855", + "R4856", + "R4859", + "R4860", + "R4861", + "R4862", + "R4863", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4866", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4871", + "R4872", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4883", + "R4884", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4891", + "R4892", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4899", + "R4900", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4907", + "R4908", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4915", + "R4916", + "R4919", + "R4920", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4931", + "R4932", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4939", + "R4940", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4951", + "R4952", + "R4955", + "R4956", + "R4957", + "R4958", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4963", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4975", + "R4976", + "R4979", + "R4980", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R4999", + "R5000", + "R5001", + "R5003", + "R5004", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5011", + "R5012", + "R5013", + "R5015", + "R5016", + "R5019", + "R5020", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5027", + "R5028", + "R5031", + "R5032", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5047", + "R5048", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5053", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5059", + "R5060", + "R5063", + "R5064", + "R5067", + "R5068", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5083", + "R5084", + "R5087", + "R5088", + "R5091", + "R5092", + "R5095", + "R5096", + "R5099", + "R5100", + "R5101", + "R5102", + "R5103", + "R5104", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5111", + "R5112", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5119", + "R5120", + "R5123", + "R5124", + "R5127", + "R5128", + "R5131", + "R5132", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5143", + "R5144", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5151", + "R5152", + "R5155", + "R5156", + "R5159", + "R5160", + "R5163", + "R5164", + "R5167", + "R5168", + "R5171", + "R5172", + "R5175", + "R5176", + "R5179", + "R5180", + "R5181", + "R5182", + "R5183", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5187", + "R5188", + "R5191", + "R5192", + "R5195", + "R5196", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5207", + "R5208", + "R5211", + "R5212", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5220", + "R5223", + "R5224", + "R5227", + "R5228", + "R5231", + "R5232", + "R5233", + "R5235", + "R5236", + "R5239", + "R5240", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5251", + "R5252", + "R5255", + "R5256", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5275", + "R5276", + "R5279", + "R5280", + "R5283", + "R5284", + "R5287", + "R5288", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5303", + "R5304", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5312", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5319", + "R5320", + "R5323", + "R5324", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5351", + "R5352", + "R5355", + "R5356", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5361", + "R5362", + "R5363", + "R5364", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5373", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5385", + "R5386", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5401", + "R5402", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5411", + "R5412", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5419", + "R5420", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5431", + "R5432", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5439", + "R5440", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5447", + "R5448", + "R5451", + "R5452", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5463", + "R5464", + "R5465", + "R5466", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5479", + "R5480", + "R5483", + "R5484", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5491", + "R5492", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5499", + "R5500", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5511", + "R5512", + "R5513", + "R5515", + "R5516", + "R5519", + "R5520", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5527", + "R5528", + "R5531", + "R5532", + "R5535", + "R5536", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5543", + "R5544", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5551", + "R5552", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5559", + "R5560", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5567", + "R5568", + "R5571", + "R5572", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5579", + "R5580", + "R5583", + "R5584", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5591", + "R5592", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5607", + "R5608", + "R5611", + "R5612", + "R5615", + "R5616", + "R5619", + "R5620", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5631", + "R5632", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5643", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5646", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5668", + "R5671", + "R5672", + "R5675", + "R5676", + "R5677", + "R5678", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5695", + "R5696", + "R5699", + "R5700", + "R5703", + "R5704", + "R5705", + "R5706", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5719", + "R5720", + "R5723", + "R5724", + "R5727", + "R5728", + "R5731", + "R5732", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5743", + "R5744", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5750", + "R5751", + "R5752", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5759", + "R5760", + "R5761", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5775", + "R5776", + "R5779", + "R5780", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5791", + "R5792", + "R5793", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5799", + "R5800", + "R5801", + "R5802", + "R5803", + "R5804", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5809", + "R5810", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5819", + "R5820", + "R5823", + "R5824", + "R5827", + "R5828", + "R5831", + "R5832", + "R5833", + "R5835", + "R5836", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5841", + "R5842", + "R5843", + "R5844", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5852", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5859", + "R5860", + "R5863", + "R5864", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5877", + "R5878", + "R5879", + "R5880", + "R5883", + "R5884", + "R5887", + "R5888", + "R5891", + "R5892", + "R5895", + "R5896", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5907", + "R5908", + "R5911", + "R5912", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5923", + "R5924", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5931", + "R5932", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5943", + "R5944", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5951", + "R5952", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5959", + "R5960", + "R5963", + "R5964", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5971", + "R5972", + "R5973", + "R5975", + "R5976", + "R5979", + "R5980", + "R5983", + "R5984", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5991", + "R5992", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714", + "R6717", + "R6720", + "R6723", + "R6726", + "R6729", + "R6732", + "R6735", + "R6738", + "R6741", + "R6744", + "R6747", + "R6750", + "R6753", + "R6756", + "R6759", + "R6762", + "R6765", + "R6768", + "R6771", + "R6774", + "R6777", + "R6780", + "R6783", + "R6786", + "R6789", + "R6792", + "R6795", + "R6798", + "R6801", + "R6804", + "R6807", + "R6810", + "R6813", + "R6816", + "R6819", + "R6825", + "R6828", + "R6831", + "R6834", + "R6837", + "R6840", + "R6843", + "R6846", + "R6849", + "R6852", + "R6855", + "R6858", + "R6861", + "R6864", + "R6867", + "R6870", + "R6873", + "R6876", + "R6879", + "R6882", + "R6885", + "R6888", + "R6891", + "R6894", + "R6897", + "R6900", + "R6903", + "R6906", + "R6909", + "R6912", + "R6915", + "R6918", + "R6921", + "R6924", + "R6927", + "R6930", + "R6933", + "R6936", + "R6939", + "R6940", + "R6941", + "R6942", + "R6943", + "R6944", + "R6945", + "R6946", + "R6947", + "R6948", + "R6949", + "R6950", + "R6951", + "R6952", + "R6953", + "R6954", + "R6955", + "R6956", + "R6957", + "R6958", + "R6959", + "R6960", + "R6961", + "R6962", + "R6963", + "R6964", + "R6965", + "R6966", + "R6967", + "R6968", + "R6969", + "R6970", + "R6971", + "R6972", + "R6973", + "R6974", + "R6975", + "R6976", + "R6977", + "R6978", + "R6979", + "R6980", + "R6981", + "R6982", + "R6983", + "R6984", + "R6985", + "R6986", + "R6987", + "R6988", + "R6989", + "R6990", + "R6991", + "R6992", + "R6993", + "R6994", + "R6995", + "R6996", + "R6997", + "R6998", + "R6999", + "R7000", + "R7001", + "R7002", + "R7003", + "R7004", + "R7005", + "R7006", + "R7007", + "R7008", + "R7009", + "R7010", + "R7011", + "R7012", + "R7013", + "R7014", + "R7015", + "R7017", + "R7018", + "R7019", + "R7020", + "R7021", + "R7022", + "R7023", + "R7024", + "R7025", + "R7026", + "R7027", + "R7028", + "R7029", + "R7030", + "R7031", + "R7032", + "R7033", + "R7034", + "R7035", + "R7036", + "R7037", + "R7038", + "R7039", + "R7040", + "R7041", + "R7042", + "R7043", + "R7044", + "R7045", + "R7046", + "R7047", + "R7048", + "R7049", + "R7050", + "R7051", + "R7052", + "R7053", + "R7054", + "R7055", + "R7056", + "R7057", + "R7058", + "R7059", + "R7060", + "R7061", + "R7062", + "R7063", + "R7064", + "R7065", + "R7066", + "R7067", + "R7068", + "R7069", + "R7070", + "R7071", + "R7072", + "R7073", + "R7074", + "R7075", + "R7076", + "R7077", + "R7078", + "R7079", + "R7080", + "R7081", + "R7083", + "R7084", + "R7085", + "R7086", + "R7087", + "R7088", + "R7089", + "R7090", + "R7091", + "R7092", + "R7093", + "R7094", + "R7095", + "R7096", + "R7097", + "R7098", + "R7099", + "R7100", + "R7101", + "R7102", + "R7103", + "R7104", + "R7105", + "R7106", + "R7107", + "R7108", + "R7109", + "R7110", + "R7111", + "R7112", + "R7113", + "R7114", + "R7115", + "R7116", + "R7117", + "R7118", + "R7119", + "R7120", + "R7121", + "R7122", + "R7123", + "R7124", + "R7125", + "R7126", + "R7127", + "R7128", + "R7129", + "R7130", + "R7131", + "R7132", + "R7133", + "R7134", + "R7135", + "R7136", + "R7137", + "R7138", + "R7139", + "R7140", + "R7141", + "R7142", + "R7143", + "R7144", + "R7145", + "R7146", + "R7147", + "R7148", + "R7149", + "R7150", + "R7151", + "R7152", + "R7153", + "R7154", + "R7155", + "R7156", + "R7157", + "R7158", + "R7159", + "R7160", + "R7161", + "R7162", + "R7163", + "R7164", + "R7165", + "R7166", + "R7167", + "R7168", + "R7169", + "R7170", + "R7171", + "R7172", + "R7173", + "R7174", + "R7175", + "R7176", + "R7177", + "R7178", + "R7179", + "R7181", + "R7182", + "R7183", + "R7184", + "R7185", + "R7186", + "R7187", + "R7188", + "R7189", + "R7190", + "R7191", + "R7192", + "R7193", + "R7194", + "R7195", + "R7196", + "R7197", + "R7198", + "R7199", + "R7200", + "R7201", + "R7202", + "R7203", + "R7204", + "R7205", + "R7206", + "R7207", + "R7208", + "R7209", + "R7210", + "R7211", + "R7212", + "R7213", + "R7214", + "R7215", + "R7216", + "R7217", + "R7218", + "R7219", + "R7220", + "R7221", + "R7222", + "R7223", + "R7224", + "R7225", + "R7226", + "R7227", + "R7228", + "R7229", + "R7230", + "R7231", + "R7232", + "R7233", + "R7234", + "R7235", + "R7236", + "R7237", + "R7238", + "R7239", + "R7240", + "R7241", + "R7242", + "R7243", + "R7244", + "R7245", + "R7246", + "R7247", + "R7248", + "R7249", + "R7250", + "R7251", + "R7252", + "R7253", + "R7254", + "R7255", + "R7256", + "R7257", + "R7258", + "R7259", + "R7260", + "R7261", + "R7262", + "R7263", + "R7264", + "R7265", + "R7266", + "R7267", + "R7268", + "R7269", + "R7270", + "R7271", + "R7272", + "R7273", + "R7274", + "R7275", + "R7276", + "R7277", + "R7278", + "R7279", + "R7280", + "R7281", + "R7282", + "R7283", + "R7284", + "R7285", + "R7286", + "R7287", + "R7288", + "R7289", + "R7291", + "R7292", + "R7293", + "R7294", + "R7295", + "R7296", + "R7297", + "R7298", + "R7299", + "R7300", + "R7301", + "R7302", + "R7303", + "R7304", + "R7305", + "R7306", + "R7307", + "R7308", + "R7309", + "R7310", + "R7311", + "R7312", + "R7313", + "R7314", + "R7315", + "R7316", + "R7317", + "R7318", + "R7319", + "R7320", + "R7321", + "R7322", + "R7323", + "R7324", + "R7325", + "R7326", + "R7327", + "R7328", + "R7329", + "R7330", + "R7331", + "R7332", + "R7333", + "R7334", + "R7335", + "R7336", + "R7337", + "R7338", + "R7339", + "R7340", + "R7341", + "R7342", + "R7343", + "R7344", + "R7345", + "R7346", + "R7347", + "R7348", + "R7349", + "R7350", + "R7351", + "R7352", + "R7353", + "R7354", + "R7355", + "R7356", + "R7357", + "R7358", + "R7359", + "R7360", + "R7361", + "R7362", + "R7363", + "R7364", + "R7365", + "R7366", + "R7367", + "R7368", + "R7369", + "R7370", + "R7371", + "R7372", + "R7373", + "R7374", + "R7375", + "R7376", + "R7377", + "R7378", + "R7379", + "R7380", + "R7381", + "R7382", + "R7383", + "R7384", + "R7385", + "R7386", + "R7387", + "R7388", + "R7389", + "R7390", + "R7391", + "R7392", + "R7393", + "R7394", + "R7395", + "R7396", + "R7397", + "R7398", + "R7399", + "R7400", + "R7401", + "R7402", + "R7403", + "R7404", + "R7405", + "R7406", + "R7407", + "R7408", + "R7409", + "R7410", + "R7411", + "R7412", + "R7413", + "R7414", + "R7415", + "R7416", + "R7417", + "R7418", + "R7419", + "R7420", + "R7421", + "R7422", + "R7423", + "R7424", + "R7425", + "R7427", + "R7428", + "R7429", + "R7430", + "R7431", + "R7432", + "R7433", + "R7434", + "R7435", + "R7436", + "R7437", + "R7438", + "R7439", + "R7440", + "R7441", + "R7442", + "R7443", + "R7444", + "R7445", + "R7446", + "R7447", + "R7448", + "R7449", + "R7450", + "R7451", + "R7452", + "R7453", + "R7454", + "R7455", + "R7456", + "R7457", + "R7458", + "R7459", + "R7460", + "R7461" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "curated", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 7775, + "passed": 424, + "success": 0.04706927175843695, + "attempted_success": 0.05453376205787781, + "composite": 0.13493339563177953, + "signal_share": 0.029655841158137238, + "multiplier": 0.29655841158137236, + "score": 108.52968922955996, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 107.94671650542364, + "signal_score": 0.07482426941284627, + "token_score": 0.5081484547234812, + "tokens_billed": 2959.0, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 145, + "pass_rate": 0.02391160949868074, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.022, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.022, + "mrr": 0.022, + "noise": 0.9993280013192622, + "oblique_r@5": 0.022, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.022, + "path_cover": 0.04900173611111113, + "path_r@5": 0.328125, + "r@1": 0.022, + "r@5": 0.022, + "stale_above": 0.04430379746835443, + "tokens": 2959.0, + "weighted_r@5": 0.022 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 225, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.0, + "head_r@5": 0.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 29, + "pass_rate": 0.05555555555555555, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.05555555555555555, + "direct_r@5": 0.05555555555555555, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.029655841158137238, + "noise": 0.9993280013192622, + "tokens_per_query": 2959.0 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0012188269154426283, + "lineage_ms": 0.0003694133333333334, + "link_ms": 0.000047285534591195014, + "purge_ms": 0.012224655999999999, + "recall_ms": 1.6887643240168273, + "recall_path_ms": 1.97578778125, + "release_ms": 0.011176984000000003, + "settle_ms": 0.0002085, + "standing_tokens": 3000.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0025870333333333287, + "suspects_ms": 0.0055, + "tokens_per_query": 2959.0 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 3.0702249999999807 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.027706000000000005 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 0.07518400000000007 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 1.528082 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 13655.348324000066 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 126.450418 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 1.3971230000000003 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000417 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 0.3880549999999993 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.0055 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R5", + "R6", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R13", + "R14", + "R15", + "R16", + "R17", + "R18", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R25", + "R26", + "R27", + "R28", + "R29", + "R30", + "R31", + "R32", + "R33", + "R34", + "R35", + "R36", + "R37", + "R38", + "R39", + "R40", + "R41", + "R42", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R49", + "R50", + "R51", + "R52", + "R53", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R57", + "R58", + "R59", + "R60", + "R61", + "R62", + "R63", + "R64", + "R65", + "R66", + "R67", + "R68", + "R69", + "R70", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R80", + "R81", + "R82", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R97", + "R98", + "R99", + "R100", + "R101", + "R102", + "R103", + "R104", + "R105", + "R106", + "R107", + "R108", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R121", + "R122", + "R123", + "R124", + "R125", + "R126", + "R127", + "R128", + "R129", + "R130", + "R131", + "R132", + "R133", + "R134", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R141", + "R142", + "R143", + "R144", + "R145", + "R146", + "R147", + "R148", + "R149", + "R150", + "R151", + "R152", + "R153", + "R154", + "R155", + "R156", + "R157", + "R158", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R165", + "R166", + "R167", + "R168", + "R169", + "R170", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R181", + "R182", + "R183", + "R184", + "R185", + "R186", + "R187", + "R188", + "R189", + "R190", + "R191", + "R192", + "R193", + "R194", + "R195", + "R196", + "R197", + "R198", + "R199", + "R200", + "R201", + "R202", + "R203", + "R204", + "R205", + "R206", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R213", + "R214", + "R215", + "R216", + "R217", + "R218", + "R219", + "R220", + "R221", + "R222", + "R223", + "R224", + "R225", + "R226", + "R227", + "R228", + "R229", + "R230", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R237", + "R238", + "R239", + "R240", + "R241", + "R242", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R261", + "R262", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R269", + "R270", + "R271", + "R272", + "R273", + "R274", + "R275", + "R276", + "R277", + "R278", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R285", + "R286", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R293", + "R294", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R301", + "R302", + "R303", + "R304", + "R305", + "R306", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R317", + "R318", + "R319", + "R320", + "R321", + "R322", + "R323", + "R324", + "R325", + "R326", + "R327", + "R328", + "R329", + "R330", + "R331", + "R332", + "R333", + "R334", + "R335", + "R336", + "R337", + "R338", + "R339", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R345", + "R346", + "R347", + "R348", + "R349", + "R350", + "R351", + "R352", + "R353", + "R354", + "R355", + "R356", + "R357", + "R358", + "R359", + "R360", + "R361", + "R362", + "R363", + "R364", + "R365", + "R366", + "R367", + "R368", + "R369", + "R370", + "R371", + "R372", + "R373", + "R374", + "R375", + "R376", + "R377", + "R378", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R385", + "R386", + "R387", + "R388", + "R389", + "R390", + "R391", + "R392", + "R393", + "R394", + "R395", + "R396", + "R397", + "R398", + "R399", + "R400", + "R401", + "R402", + "R403", + "R404", + "R405", + "R406", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R413", + "R414", + "R415", + "R416", + "R417", + "R418", + "R419", + "R420", + "R421", + "R422", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R433", + "R434", + "R435", + "R436", + "R437", + "R438", + "R439", + "R440", + "R441", + "R442", + "R443", + "R444", + "R445", + "R446", + "R447", + "R448", + "R449", + "R450", + "R451", + "R452", + "R453", + "R454", + "R455", + "R456", + "R457", + "R458", + "R459", + "R460", + "R461", + "R462", + "R463", + "R464", + "R465", + "R466", + "R467", + "R468", + "R469", + "R470", + "R471", + "R472", + "R473", + "R474", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R481", + "R482", + "R483", + "R484", + "R485", + "R486", + "R487", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R493", + "R494", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R501", + "R502", + "R503", + "R504", + "R505", + "R506", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R513", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R517", + "R518", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R525", + "R526", + "R527", + "R528", + "R529", + "R530", + "R531", + "R532", + "R533", + "R534", + "R535", + "R536", + "R537", + "R538", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R545", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R549", + "R550", + "R551", + "R552", + "R553", + "R554", + "R555", + "R556", + "R557", + "R558", + "R559", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R569", + "R570", + "R571", + "R572", + "R573", + "R574", + "R575", + "R576", + "R577", + "R578", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R585", + "R586", + "R587", + "R588", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R601", + "R602", + "R603", + "R604", + "R605", + "R606", + "R607", + "R608", + "R613", + "R614", + "R615", + "R616", + "R617", + "R618", + "R619", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R629", + "R630", + "R631", + "R632", + "R633", + "R634", + "R635", + "R636", + "R637", + "R638", + "R639", + "R640", + "R641", + "R642", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R649", + "R650", + "R651", + "R652", + "R653", + "R654", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R661", + "R662", + "R663", + "R664", + "R665", + "R666", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R677", + "R678", + "R679", + "R680", + "R681", + "R682", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R689", + "R690", + "R691", + "R692", + "R693", + "R694", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R709", + "R710", + "R711", + "R712", + "R713", + "R714", + "R715", + "R716", + "R717", + "R718", + "R719", + "R720", + "R721", + "R722", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R729", + "R730", + "R731", + "R732", + "R733", + "R734", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R745", + "R746", + "R747", + "R748", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R761", + "R762", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R769", + "R770", + "R771", + "R772", + "R773", + "R774", + "R775", + "R776", + "R777", + "R778", + "R779", + "R780", + "R781", + "R782", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R793", + "R794", + "R795", + "R796", + "R797", + "R798", + "R799", + "R800", + "R801", + "R802", + "R803", + "R804", + "R805", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R809", + "R810", + "R811", + "R812", + "R813", + "R814", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R821", + "R822", + "R823", + "R824", + "R825", + "R826", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R833", + "R834", + "R835", + "R836", + "R837", + "R838", + "R839", + "R840", + "R841", + "R842", + "R843", + "R844", + "R845", + "R846", + "R847", + "R848", + "R849", + "R850", + "R851", + "R852", + "R853", + "R854", + "R855", + "R856", + "R857", + "R858", + "R859", + "R860", + "R861", + "R862", + "R863", + "R864", + "R865", + "R866", + "R867", + "R868", + "R869", + "R870", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R877", + "R878", + "R879", + "R880", + "R881", + "R882", + "R883", + "R884", + "R885", + "R886", + "R887", + "R888", + "R889", + "R890", + "R891", + "R892", + "R893", + "R894", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R909", + "R910", + "R911", + "R912", + "R913", + "R914", + "R915", + "R916", + "R917", + "R918", + "R919", + "R920", + "R921", + "R922", + "R923", + "R924", + "R925", + "R926", + "R927", + "R928", + "R929", + "R930", + "R931", + "R932", + "R933", + "R934", + "R935", + "R936", + "R937", + "R938", + "R939", + "R940", + "R941", + "R942", + "R943", + "R944", + "R945", + "R946", + "R947", + "R948", + "R949", + "R950", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R957", + "R958", + "R959", + "R960", + "R961", + "R962", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R969", + "R970", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R977", + "R978", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R985", + "R986", + "R987", + "R988", + "R989", + "R990", + "R991", + "R992", + "R993", + "R994", + "R995", + "R996", + "R997", + "R998", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1001", + "R1002", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1009", + "R1010", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1017", + "R1018", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1021", + "R1022", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1029", + "R1030", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1037", + "R1038", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1041", + "R1042", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1049", + "R1050", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1053", + "R1054", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1065", + "R1066", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1069", + "R1070", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1073", + "R1074", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1077", + "R1078", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1081", + "R1082", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1085", + "R1086", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1089", + "R1090", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1093", + "R1094", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1097", + "R1098", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1101", + "R1102", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1109", + "R1110", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1113", + "R1114", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1117", + "R1118", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1121", + "R1122", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1125", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1129", + "R1130", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1137", + "R1138", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1141", + "R1142", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1149", + "R1150", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1153", + "R1154", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1157", + "R1158", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1173", + "R1174", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1177", + "R1178", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1181", + "R1182", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1189", + "R1190", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1197", + "R1198", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1201", + "R1202", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1205", + "R1206", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1209", + "R1210", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1221", + "R1222", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1225", + "R1226", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1233", + "R1234", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1245", + "R1246", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1249", + "R1250", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1253", + "R1254", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1257", + "R1258", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1261", + "R1262", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1265", + "R1266", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1281", + "R1282", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1285", + "R1286", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1293", + "R1294", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1297", + "R1298", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1305", + "R1306", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1309", + "R1310", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1313", + "R1314", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1317", + "R1318", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1325", + "R1326", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1329", + "R1330", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1333", + "R1334", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1341", + "R1342", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1345", + "R1346", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1353", + "R1354", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1357", + "R1358", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1361", + "R1362", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1369", + "R1370", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1373", + "R1374", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1377", + "R1378", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1381", + "R1382", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1385", + "R1386", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1389", + "R1390", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1397", + "R1398", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1405", + "R1406", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1409", + "R1410", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1413", + "R1414", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1417", + "R1418", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1433", + "R1434", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1437", + "R1438", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1453", + "R1454", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1457", + "R1458", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1461", + "R1462", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1465", + "R1466", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1473", + "R1474", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1477", + "R1478", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1481", + "R1482", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1489", + "R1490", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1493", + "R1494", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1497", + "R1498", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1505", + "R1506", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1509", + "R1510", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1517", + "R1518", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1521", + "R1522", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1525", + "R1526", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1529", + "R1530", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1533", + "R1534", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1537", + "R1538", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1541", + "R1542", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1545", + "R1546", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1549", + "R1550", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1557", + "R1558", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1561", + "R1562", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1569", + "R1570", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1573", + "R1574", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1581", + "R1582", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1585", + "R1586", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1593", + "R1594", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1597", + "R1598", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1601", + "R1602", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1613", + "R1614", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1621", + "R1622", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1629", + "R1630", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1633", + "R1634", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1637", + "R1638", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1641", + "R1642", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1645", + "R1646", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1649", + "R1650", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1657", + "R1658", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1665", + "R1666", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1669", + "R1670", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1673", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1677", + "R1678", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1681", + "R1682", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1685", + "R1686", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1693", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1701", + "R1702", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1721", + "R1722", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1725", + "R1726", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1729", + "R1730", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1737", + "R1738", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1741", + "R1742", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1745", + "R1746", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1753", + "R1754", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1761", + "R1762", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1769", + "R1770", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1773", + "R1774", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1777", + "R1778", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1781", + "R1782", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1785", + "R1786", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1793", + "R1794", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1797", + "R1798", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1805", + "R1806", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1817", + "R1818", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1821", + "R1822", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1825", + "R1826", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1833", + "R1834", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1837", + "R1838", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1841", + "R1842", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1845", + "R1846", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1853", + "R1854", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1861", + "R1862", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1869", + "R1870", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1873", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1881", + "R1882", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1885", + "R1886", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1893", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1897", + "R1898", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1901", + "R1902", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1905", + "R1906", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1909", + "R1910", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1913", + "R1914", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1917", + "R1918", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1921", + "R1922", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1925", + "R1926", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1934", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1937", + "R1938", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1941", + "R1942", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1945", + "R1946", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1949", + "R1950", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1953", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1957", + "R1958", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1961", + "R1962", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1965", + "R1966", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1973", + "R1974", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1977", + "R1978", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1981", + "R1982", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1985", + "R1986", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1997", + "R1998", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2241", + "R2242", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2245", + "R2246", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2249", + "R2250", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2253", + "R2254", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2257", + "R2258", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2261", + "R2262", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2265", + "R2266", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2269", + "R2270", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2273", + "R2274", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2277", + "R2278", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2281", + "R2282", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2289", + "R2290", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2293", + "R2294", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2301", + "R2302", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2305", + "R2306", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2309", + "R2310", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2485", + "R2486", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2489", + "R2490", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2493", + "R2494", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2497", + "R2498", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2501", + "R2502", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2505", + "R2506", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2509", + "R2510", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2513", + "R2514", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2521", + "R2522", + "R2523", + "R2524", + "R2525", + "R2526", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2533", + "R2534", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2537", + "R2538", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2541", + "R2542", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2545", + "R2546", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2553", + "R2554", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2557", + "R2558", + "R2559", + "R2560", + "R2561", + "R2562", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2565", + "R2566", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2569", + "R2570", + "R2571", + "R2572", + "R2573", + "R2574", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2577", + "R2578", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2581", + "R2582", + "R2583", + "R2584", + "R2585", + "R2586", + "R2587", + "R2588", + "R2593", + "R2594", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2597", + "R2598", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2601", + "R2602", + "R2603", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2609", + "R2610", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2613", + "R2614", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2617", + "R2618", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2621", + "R2622", + "R2623", + "R2624", + "R2625", + "R2626", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2629", + "R2630", + "R2631", + "R2632", + "R2633", + "R2634", + "R2635", + "R2636", + "R2637", + "R2638", + "R2639", + "R2640", + "R2641", + "R2642", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2645", + "R2646", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2649", + "R2650", + "R2651", + "R2652", + "R2653", + "R2654", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2659", + "R2660", + "R2661", + "R2662", + "R2663", + "R2664", + "R2665", + "R2666", + "R2667", + "R2668", + "R2669", + "R2670", + "R2671", + "R2672", + "R2673", + "R2674", + "R2675", + "R2676", + "R2677", + "R2678", + "R2679", + "R2680", + "R2681", + "R2682", + "R2683", + "R2684", + "R2685", + "R2686", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2689", + "R2690", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2693", + "R2694", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2697", + "R2698", + "R2699", + "R2700", + "R2701", + "R2702", + "R2703", + "R2704", + "R2705", + "R2706", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2709", + "R2710", + "R2711", + "R2712", + "R2713", + "R2714", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2719", + "R2720", + "R2721", + "R2722", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2725", + "R2726", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2729", + "R2730", + "R2731", + "R2732", + "R2733", + "R2734", + "R2735", + "R2736", + "R2737", + "R2738", + "R2739", + "R2740", + "R2741", + "R2742", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2745", + "R2746", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2749", + "R2750", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2753", + "R2754", + "R2755", + "R2756", + "R2757", + "R2758", + "R2759", + "R2760", + "R2761", + "R2762", + "R2763", + "R2764", + "R2765", + "R2766", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2769", + "R2770", + "R2771", + "R2772", + "R2773", + "R2774", + "R2775", + "R2776", + "R2777", + "R2778", + "R2779", + "R2780", + "R2781", + "R2782", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2785", + "R2786", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2789", + "R2790", + "R2791", + "R2792", + "R2793", + "R2794", + "R2795", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2801", + "R2802", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2805", + "R2806", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2809", + "R2810", + "R2811", + "R2812", + "R2813", + "R2814", + "R2815", + "R2816", + "R2817", + "R2818", + "R2819", + "R2820", + "R2821", + "R2822", + "R2823", + "R2824", + "R2825", + "R2826", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2829", + "R2830", + "R2831", + "R2832", + "R2833", + "R2834", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2837", + "R2838", + "R2839", + "R2840", + "R2841", + "R2842", + "R2843", + "R2844", + "R2845", + "R2846", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2849", + "R2850", + "R2851", + "R2852", + "R2853", + "R2854", + "R2855", + "R2856", + "R2857", + "R2858", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2861", + "R2862", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2865", + "R2866", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2872", + "R2873", + "R2874", + "R2875", + "R2876", + "R2877", + "R2878", + "R2879", + "R2880", + "R2881", + "R2882", + "R2883", + "R2884", + "R2885", + "R2886", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2893", + "R2894", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2897", + "R2898", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2901", + "R2902", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2905", + "R2906", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2909", + "R2910", + "R2911", + "R2912", + "R2913", + "R2914", + "R2915", + "R2916", + "R2917", + "R2918", + "R2919", + "R2920", + "R2921", + "R2922", + "R2923", + "R2924", + "R2925", + "R2926", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2929", + "R2930", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2933", + "R2934", + "R2935", + "R2936", + "R2937", + "R2938", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2941", + "R2942", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2945", + "R2946", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2949", + "R2950", + "R2951", + "R2952", + "R2953", + "R2954", + "R2955", + "R2956", + "R2957", + "R2958", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2961", + "R2962", + "R2963", + "R2964", + "R2965", + "R2966", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2969", + "R2970", + "R2971", + "R2972", + "R2973", + "R2974", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R2977", + "R2978", + "R2979", + "R2980", + "R2981", + "R2982", + "R2983", + "R2984", + "R2985", + "R2986", + "R2987", + "R2988", + "R2993", + "R2994", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2997", + "R2998", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3001", + "R3002", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3005", + "R3006", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3009", + "R3010", + "R3011", + "R3012", + "R3013", + "R3014", + "R3015", + "R3016", + "R3017", + "R3018", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3021", + "R3022", + "R3023", + "R3024", + "R3025", + "R3026", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3029", + "R3030", + "R3031", + "R3032", + "R3033", + "R3034", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3037", + "R3038", + "R3039", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3045", + "R3046", + "R3047", + "R3048", + "R3049", + "R3050", + "R3051", + "R3052", + "R3053", + "R3054", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3057", + "R3058", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3061", + "R3062", + "R3063", + "R3064", + "R3065", + "R3066", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3069", + "R3070", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3073", + "R3074", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3077", + "R3078", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3081", + "R3082", + "R3083", + "R3084", + "R3085", + "R3086", + "R3087", + "R3088", + "R3089", + "R3090", + "R3091", + "R3092", + "R3093", + "R3094", + "R3095", + "R3096", + "R3097", + "R3098", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3101", + "R3102", + "R3103", + "R3104", + "R3105", + "R3106", + "R3107", + "R3108", + "R3113", + "R3114", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3117", + "R3118", + "R3119", + "R3120", + "R3121", + "R3122", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3125", + "R3126", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3129", + "R3130", + "R3131", + "R3132", + "R3133", + "R3134", + "R3135", + "R3136", + "R3137", + "R3138", + "R3139", + "R3140", + "R3141", + "R3142", + "R3143", + "R3144", + "R3145", + "R3146", + "R3147", + "R3148", + "R3149", + "R3150", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3153", + "R3154", + "R3155", + "R3156", + "R3157", + "R3158", + "R3159", + "R3160", + "R3161", + "R3162", + "R3163", + "R3164", + "R3165", + "R3166", + "R3167", + "R3168", + "R3169", + "R3170", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3173", + "R3174", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3177", + "R3178", + "R3179", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3183", + "R3184", + "R3185", + "R3186", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3189", + "R3190", + "R3191", + "R3192", + "R3193", + "R3194", + "R3195", + "R3196", + "R3197", + "R3198", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3201", + "R3202", + "R3203", + "R3204", + "R3205", + "R3206", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3209", + "R3210", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3213", + "R3214", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3217", + "R3218", + "R3219", + "R3220", + "R3221", + "R3222", + "R3223", + "R3224", + "R3225", + "R3226", + "R3227", + "R3228", + "R3229", + "R3230", + "R3231", + "R3232", + "R3233", + "R3234", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3237", + "R3238", + "R3239", + "R3240", + "R3241", + "R3242", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3245", + "R3246", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3249", + "R3250", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3253", + "R3254", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3257", + "R3258", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3261", + "R3262", + "R3263", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3269", + "R3270", + "R3271", + "R3272", + "R3273", + "R3274", + "R3275", + "R3276", + "R3277", + "R3278", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3281", + "R3282", + "R3283", + "R3284", + "R3285", + "R3286", + "R3287", + "R3288", + "R3289", + "R3290", + "R3291", + "R3292", + "R3293", + "R3294", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3297", + "R3298", + "R3299", + "R3300", + "R3301", + "R3302", + "R3303", + "R3304", + "R3305", + "R3306", + "R3307", + "R3308", + "R3309", + "R3310", + "R3311", + "R3312", + "R3313", + "R3314", + "R3315", + "R3316", + "R3317", + "R3318", + "R3319", + "R3320", + "R3321", + "R3322", + "R3323", + "R3324", + "R3325", + "R3326", + "R3327", + "R3328", + "R3329", + "R3330", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3334", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3337", + "R3338", + "R3339", + "R3340", + "R3341", + "R3342", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3345", + "R3346", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3349", + "R3350", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3353", + "R3354", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3357", + "R3358", + "R3359", + "R3360", + "R3361", + "R3362", + "R3363", + "R3364", + "R3365", + "R3366", + "R3367", + "R3368", + "R3369", + "R3370", + "R3371", + "R3372", + "R3373", + "R3374", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3377", + "R3378", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3381", + "R3382", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3385", + "R3386", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3389", + "R3390", + "R3391", + "R3392", + "R3393", + "R3394", + "R3395", + "R3396", + "R3397", + "R3398", + "R3399", + "R3400", + "R3401", + "R3402", + "R3403", + "R3404", + "R3405", + "R3406", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3409", + "R3410", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3413", + "R3414", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3417", + "R3418", + "R3419", + "R3420", + "R3421", + "R3422", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3425", + "R3426", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3429", + "R3430", + "R3431", + "R3432", + "R3433", + "R3434", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3437", + "R3438", + "R3439", + "R3440", + "R3441", + "R3442", + "R3443", + "R3444", + "R3445", + "R3446", + "R3447", + "R3448", + "R3449", + "R3450", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3453", + "R3454", + "R3455", + "R3456", + "R3457", + "R3458", + "R3459", + "R3460", + "R3461", + "R3462", + "R3463", + "R3464", + "R3465", + "R3466", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3469", + "R3470", + "R3471", + "R3472", + "R3473", + "R3474", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3479", + "R3480", + "R3481", + "R3482", + "R3483", + "R3484", + "R3485", + "R3486", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3493", + "R3494", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3497", + "R3498", + "R3499", + "R3500", + "R3501", + "R3502", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3505", + "R3506", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3510", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3513", + "R3514", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3517", + "R3518", + "R3519", + "R3520", + "R3521", + "R3522", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3525", + "R3526", + "R3527", + "R3528", + "R3529", + "R3530", + "R3531", + "R3532", + "R3533", + "R3534", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3537", + "R3538", + "R3539", + "R3540", + "R3541", + "R3542", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3545", + "R3546", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3549", + "R3550", + "R3551", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3557", + "R3558", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3561", + "R3562", + "R3563", + "R3564", + "R3565", + "R3566", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3573", + "R3574", + "R3575", + "R3576", + "R3577", + "R3578", + "R3579", + "R3580", + "R3581", + "R3582", + "R3583", + "R3584", + "R3585", + "R3586", + "R3587", + "R3588", + "R3589", + "R3590", + "R3591", + "R3592", + "R3593", + "R3594", + "R3595", + "R3596", + "R3597", + "R3598", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3601", + "R3602", + "R3603", + "R3604", + "R3605", + "R3606", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3613", + "R3614", + "R3615", + "R3616", + "R3617", + "R3618", + "R3619", + "R3620", + "R3621", + "R3622", + "R3623", + "R3624", + "R3625", + "R3626", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3629", + "R3630", + "R3631", + "R3632", + "R3633", + "R3634", + "R3635", + "R3636", + "R3637", + "R3638", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3641", + "R3642", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3645", + "R3646", + "R3647", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3650", + "R3651", + "R3652", + "R3653", + "R3654", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3657", + "R3658", + "R3659", + "R3660", + "R3661", + "R3662", + "R3663", + "R3664", + "R3665", + "R3666", + "R3667", + "R3668", + "R3673", + "R3674", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3677", + "R3678", + "R3679", + "R3680", + "R3681", + "R3682", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3685", + "R3686", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3689", + "R3690", + "R3691", + "R3692", + "R3693", + "R3694", + "R3695", + "R3696", + "R3697", + "R3698", + "R3699", + "R3700", + "R3701", + "R3702", + "R3703", + "R3704", + "R3705", + "R3706", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3713", + "R3714", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3721", + "R3722", + "R3723", + "R3724", + "R3725", + "R3726", + "R3727", + "R3728", + "R3729", + "R3730", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3733", + "R3734", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3737", + "R3738", + "R3739", + "R3740", + "R3741", + "R3742", + "R3743", + "R3744", + "R3745", + "R3746", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3749", + "R3750", + "R3751", + "R3752", + "R3753", + "R3754", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3757", + "R3758", + "R3759", + "R3760", + "R3761", + "R3762", + "R3763", + "R3764", + "R3765", + "R3766", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3769", + "R3770", + "R3771", + "R3772", + "R3773", + "R3774", + "R3775", + "R3776", + "R3777", + "R3778", + "R3779", + "R3780", + "R3781", + "R3782", + "R3783", + "R3784", + "R3785", + "R3786", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3789", + "R3790", + "R3791", + "R3792", + "R3793", + "R3794", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3797", + "R3798", + "R3799", + "R3800", + "R3801", + "R3802", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3805", + "R3806", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3813", + "R3814", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3817", + "R3818", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3821", + "R3822", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3825", + "R3826", + "R3827", + "R3828", + "R3829", + "R3830", + "R3831", + "R3832", + "R3833", + "R3834", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3837", + "R3838", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3841", + "R3842", + "R3843", + "R3844", + "R3845", + "R3846", + "R3847", + "R3848", + "R3849", + "R3850", + "R3851", + "R3852", + "R3853", + "R3854", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3857", + "R3858", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3861", + "R3862", + "R3863", + "R3864", + "R3865", + "R3866", + "R3867", + "R3868", + "R3869", + "R3870", + "R3871", + "R3872", + "R3873", + "R3874", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3877", + "R3878", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3881", + "R3882", + "R3883", + "R3884", + "R3885", + "R3886", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3889", + "R3890", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3893", + "R3894", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3897", + "R3898", + "R3899", + "R3900", + "R3901", + "R3902", + "R3903", + "R3904", + "R3905", + "R3906", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3909", + "R3910", + "R3911", + "R3912", + "R3913", + "R3914", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3917", + "R3918", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3921", + "R3922", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3927", + "R3928", + "R3933", + "R3934", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3937", + "R3938", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3941", + "R3942", + "R3943", + "R3944", + "R3945", + "R3946", + "R3947", + "R3948", + "R3949", + "R3950", + "R3951", + "R3952", + "R3953", + "R3954", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3957", + "R3958", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3961", + "R3962", + "R3963", + "R3964", + "R3965", + "R3966", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3969", + "R3970", + "R3971", + "R3972", + "R3973", + "R3974", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3977", + "R3978", + "R3979", + "R3980", + "R3981", + "R3982", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3985", + "R3986", + "R3987", + "R3988", + "R3989", + "R3990", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3993", + "R3994", + "R3995", + "R3996", + "R3997", + "R3998", + "R3999", + "R4000", + "R4001", + "R4002", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4005", + "R4006", + "R4007", + "R4008", + "R4009", + "R4010", + "R4011", + "R4012", + "R4013", + "R4014", + "R4015", + "R4016", + "R4017", + "R4018", + "R4019", + "R4020", + "R4021", + "R4022", + "R4023", + "R4024", + "R4025", + "R4026", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4029", + "R4030", + "R4031", + "R4032", + "R4033", + "R4034", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4037", + "R4038", + "R4039", + "R4040", + "R4041", + "R4042", + "R4043", + "R4044", + "R4045", + "R4046", + "R4047", + "R4048", + "R4049", + "R4050", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4053", + "R4054", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4057", + "R4058", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4061", + "R4062", + "R4063", + "R4064", + "R4065", + "R4066", + "R4067", + "R4068", + "R4069", + "R4070", + "R4071", + "R4072", + "R4073", + "R4074", + "R4075", + "R4076", + "R4077", + "R4078", + "R4079", + "R4080", + "R4081", + "R4082", + "R4083", + "R4084", + "R4085", + "R4086", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4089", + "R4090", + "R4091", + "R4092", + "R4093", + "R4094", + "R4095", + "R4096", + "R4097", + "R4098", + "R4099", + "R4100", + "R4101", + "R4102", + "R4103", + "R4104", + "R4105", + "R4106", + "R4107", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4113", + "R4114", + "R4115", + "R4116", + "R4117", + "R4118", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4121", + "R4122", + "R4123", + "R4124", + "R4125", + "R4126", + "R4127", + "R4128", + "R4129", + "R4130", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4133", + "R4134", + "R4135", + "R4136", + "R4137", + "R4138", + "R4139", + "R4140", + "R4141", + "R4142", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4145", + "R4146", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4149", + "R4150", + "R4151", + "R4152", + "R4153", + "R4154", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4157", + "R4158", + "R4159", + "R4160", + "R4161", + "R4162", + "R4163", + "R4164", + "R4165", + "R4166", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4169", + "R4170", + "R4171", + "R4172", + "R4173", + "R4174", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4177", + "R4178", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4181", + "R4182", + "R4183", + "R4184", + "R4185", + "R4186", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4189", + "R4190", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4193", + "R4194", + "R4195", + "R4196", + "R4197", + "R4198", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4201", + "R4202", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4205", + "R4206", + "R4207", + "R4208", + "R4209", + "R4210", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4213", + "R4214", + "R4215", + "R4216", + "R4217", + "R4218", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4221", + "R4222", + "R4223", + "R4224", + "R4225", + "R4226", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4229", + "R4230", + "R4231", + "R4232", + "R4233", + "R4234", + "R4235", + "R4236", + "R4237", + "R4238", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4241", + "R4242", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4245", + "R4246", + "R4247", + "R4248", + "R4249", + "R4250", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4253", + "R4254", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4257", + "R4258", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4261", + "R4262", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4265", + "R4266", + "R4267", + "R4268", + "R4269", + "R4270", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4273", + "R4274", + "R4275", + "R4276", + "R4277", + "R4278", + "R4279", + "R4280", + "R4281", + "R4282", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4285", + "R4286", + "R4287", + "R4288", + "R4289", + "R4290", + "R4291", + "R4292", + "R4293", + "R4294", + "R4295", + "R4296", + "R4297", + "R4298", + "R4299", + "R4300", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4305", + "R4306", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4309", + "R4310", + "R4311", + "R4312", + "R4313", + "R4314", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4317", + "R4318", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4321", + "R4322", + "R4323", + "R4324", + "R4325", + "R4326", + "R4327", + "R4328", + "R4329", + "R4330", + "R4331", + "R4332", + "R4333", + "R4334", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4337", + "R4338", + "R4339", + "R4340", + "R4341", + "R4342", + "R4343", + "R4344", + "R4345", + "R4346", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4349", + "R4350", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4353", + "R4354", + "R4355", + "R4356", + "R4357", + "R4358", + "R4359", + "R4360", + "R4361", + "R4362", + "R4363", + "R4364", + "R4365", + "R4366", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4369", + "R4370", + "R4371", + "R4372", + "R4373", + "R4374", + "R4375", + "R4376", + "R4377", + "R4378", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4381", + "R4382", + "R4383", + "R4384", + "R4385", + "R4386", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4389", + "R4390", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4393", + "R4394", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4397", + "R4398", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4401", + "R4402", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4405", + "R4406", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4409", + "R4410", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4413", + "R4414", + "R4415", + "R4416", + "R4417", + "R4418", + "R4419", + "R4420", + "R4421", + "R4422", + "R4423", + "R4424", + "R4425", + "R4426", + "R4427", + "R4428", + "R4429", + "R4430", + "R4431", + "R4432", + "R4433", + "R4434", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4437", + "R4438", + "R4439", + "R4440", + "R4441", + "R4442", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4445", + "R4446", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4449", + "R4450", + "R4451", + "R4452", + "R4453", + "R4454", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4457", + "R4458", + "R4459", + "R4460", + "R4461", + "R4462", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4465", + "R4466", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4469", + "R4470", + "R4471", + "R4472", + "R4473", + "R4474", + "R4475", + "R4476", + "R4477", + "R4478", + "R4479", + "R4480", + "R4481", + "R4482", + "R4483", + "R4484", + "R4485", + "R4486", + "R4487", + "R4488", + "R4489", + "R4490", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4493", + "R4494", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4497", + "R4498", + "R4499", + "R4500", + "R4501", + "R4502", + "R4503", + "R4504", + "R4505", + "R4506", + "R4507", + "R4508", + "R4513", + "R4514", + "R4515", + "R4516", + "R4517", + "R4518", + "R4519", + "R4520", + "R4521", + "R4522", + "R4523", + "R4524", + "R4525", + "R4526", + "R4527", + "R4528", + "R4529", + "R4530", + "R4531", + "R4532", + "R4533", + "R4534", + "R4535", + "R4536", + "R4537", + "R4538", + "R4539", + "R4540", + "R4541", + "R4542", + "R4543", + "R4544", + "R4545", + "R4546", + "R4547", + "R4548", + "R4549", + "R4550", + "R4551", + "R4552", + "R4553", + "R4554", + "R4555", + "R4556", + "R4557", + "R4558", + "R4559", + "R4560", + "R4561", + "R4562", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4565", + "R4566", + "R4567", + "R4568", + "R4569", + "R4570", + "R4571", + "R4572", + "R4573", + "R4574", + "R4575", + "R4576", + "R4577", + "R4578", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4581", + "R4582", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4585", + "R4586", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4589", + "R4590", + "R4591", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4597", + "R4598", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4601", + "R4602", + "R4603", + "R4604", + "R4605", + "R4606", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4609", + "R4610", + "R4611", + "R4612", + "R4613", + "R4614", + "R4615", + "R4616", + "R4617", + "R4618", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4621", + "R4622", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4625", + "R4626", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4629", + "R4630", + "R4631", + "R4632", + "R4633", + "R4634", + "R4635", + "R4636", + "R4637", + "R4638", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4641", + "R4642", + "R4643", + "R4644", + "R4645", + "R4646", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4649", + "R4650", + "R4651", + "R4652", + "R4653", + "R4654", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4657", + "R4658", + "R4659", + "R4660", + "R4661", + "R4662", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4665", + "R4666", + "R4667", + "R4668", + "R4669", + "R4670", + "R4671", + "R4672", + "R4673", + "R4674", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4677", + "R4678", + "R4679", + "R4680", + "R4681", + "R4682", + "R4683", + "R4684", + "R4685", + "R4686", + "R4687", + "R4688", + "R4689", + "R4690", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4693", + "R4694", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4697", + "R4698", + "R4699", + "R4700", + "R4701", + "R4702", + "R4703", + "R4704", + "R4705", + "R4706", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4709", + "R4710", + "R4711", + "R4712", + "R4713", + "R4714", + "R4715", + "R4716", + "R4717", + "R4718", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4721", + "R4722", + "R4723", + "R4724", + "R4725", + "R4726", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4730", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4734", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4737", + "R4738", + "R4739", + "R4740", + "R4741", + "R4742", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4745", + "R4746", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4749", + "R4750", + "R4751", + "R4752", + "R4753", + "R4754", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4757", + "R4758", + "R4759", + "R4760", + "R4761", + "R4762", + "R4763", + "R4764", + "R4765", + "R4766", + "R4767", + "R4768", + "R4769", + "R4770", + "R4771", + "R4772", + "R4773", + "R4774", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4777", + "R4778", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4781", + "R4782", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4785", + "R4786", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4789", + "R4790", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4793", + "R4794", + "R4795", + "R4796", + "R4797", + "R4798", + "R4799", + "R4800", + "R4801", + "R4802", + "R4803", + "R4804", + "R4805", + "R4806", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4809", + "R4810", + "R4811", + "R4812", + "R4813", + "R4814", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4817", + "R4818", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4821", + "R4822", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4825", + "R4826", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4829", + "R4830", + "R4831", + "R4832", + "R4833", + "R4834", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4837", + "R4838", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4841", + "R4842", + "R4843", + "R4844", + "R4845", + "R4846", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4849", + "R4850", + "R4851", + "R4852", + "R4853", + "R4854", + "R4855", + "R4856", + "R4857", + "R4858", + "R4859", + "R4860", + "R4861", + "R4862", + "R4863", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4866", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4869", + "R4870", + "R4871", + "R4872", + "R4873", + "R4874", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4877", + "R4878", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4881", + "R4882", + "R4883", + "R4884", + "R4885", + "R4886", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4889", + "R4890", + "R4891", + "R4892", + "R4893", + "R4894", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4897", + "R4898", + "R4899", + "R4900", + "R4901", + "R4902", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4905", + "R4906", + "R4907", + "R4908", + "R4909", + "R4910", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4914", + "R4915", + "R4916", + "R4917", + "R4918", + "R4919", + "R4920", + "R4921", + "R4922", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4925", + "R4926", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4929", + "R4930", + "R4931", + "R4932", + "R4933", + "R4934", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4937", + "R4938", + "R4939", + "R4940", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4945", + "R4946", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4949", + "R4950", + "R4951", + "R4952", + "R4953", + "R4954", + "R4955", + "R4956", + "R4957", + "R4958", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4961", + "R4962", + "R4963", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4969", + "R4970", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4973", + "R4974", + "R4975", + "R4976", + "R4977", + "R4978", + "R4979", + "R4980", + "R4981", + "R4982", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4985", + "R4986", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4989", + "R4990", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4993", + "R4994", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R4997", + "R4998", + "R4999", + "R5000", + "R5001", + "R5002", + "R5003", + "R5004", + "R5005", + "R5006", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5013", + "R5014", + "R5015", + "R5016", + "R5017", + "R5018", + "R5019", + "R5020", + "R5021", + "R5022", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5025", + "R5026", + "R5027", + "R5028", + "R5029", + "R5030", + "R5031", + "R5032", + "R5033", + "R5034", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5037", + "R5038", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5041", + "R5042", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5045", + "R5046", + "R5047", + "R5048", + "R5049", + "R5050", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5053", + "R5054", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5059", + "R5060", + "R5061", + "R5062", + "R5063", + "R5064", + "R5065", + "R5066", + "R5067", + "R5068", + "R5069", + "R5070", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5073", + "R5074", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5077", + "R5078", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5081", + "R5082", + "R5083", + "R5084", + "R5085", + "R5086", + "R5087", + "R5088", + "R5089", + "R5090", + "R5091", + "R5092", + "R5093", + "R5094", + "R5095", + "R5096", + "R5097", + "R5098", + "R5099", + "R5100", + "R5101", + "R5102", + "R5103", + "R5104", + "R5105", + "R5106", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5109", + "R5110", + "R5111", + "R5112", + "R5113", + "R5114", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5117", + "R5118", + "R5119", + "R5120", + "R5121", + "R5122", + "R5123", + "R5124", + "R5125", + "R5126", + "R5127", + "R5128", + "R5129", + "R5130", + "R5131", + "R5132", + "R5133", + "R5134", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5137", + "R5138", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5141", + "R5142", + "R5143", + "R5144", + "R5145", + "R5146", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5149", + "R5150", + "R5151", + "R5152", + "R5153", + "R5154", + "R5155", + "R5156", + "R5157", + "R5158", + "R5159", + "R5160", + "R5161", + "R5162", + "R5163", + "R5164", + "R5165", + "R5166", + "R5167", + "R5168", + "R5169", + "R5170", + "R5171", + "R5172", + "R5173", + "R5174", + "R5175", + "R5176", + "R5177", + "R5178", + "R5179", + "R5180", + "R5181", + "R5182", + "R5183", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5187", + "R5188", + "R5189", + "R5190", + "R5191", + "R5192", + "R5193", + "R5194", + "R5195", + "R5196", + "R5197", + "R5198", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5201", + "R5202", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5205", + "R5206", + "R5207", + "R5208", + "R5209", + "R5210", + "R5211", + "R5212", + "R5213", + "R5214", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5217", + "R5218", + "R5219", + "R5220", + "R5221", + "R5222", + "R5223", + "R5224", + "R5225", + "R5226", + "R5227", + "R5228", + "R5229", + "R5230", + "R5231", + "R5232", + "R5233", + "R5234", + "R5235", + "R5236", + "R5237", + "R5238", + "R5239", + "R5240", + "R5241", + "R5242", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5245", + "R5246", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5249", + "R5250", + "R5251", + "R5252", + "R5253", + "R5254", + "R5255", + "R5256", + "R5257", + "R5258", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5261", + "R5262", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5265", + "R5266", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5269", + "R5270", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5273", + "R5274", + "R5275", + "R5276", + "R5277", + "R5278", + "R5279", + "R5280", + "R5281", + "R5282", + "R5283", + "R5284", + "R5285", + "R5286", + "R5287", + "R5288", + "R5289", + "R5290", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5293", + "R5294", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5297", + "R5298", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5301", + "R5302", + "R5303", + "R5304", + "R5305", + "R5306", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5309", + "R5310", + "R5311", + "R5312", + "R5313", + "R5314", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5317", + "R5318", + "R5319", + "R5320", + "R5321", + "R5322", + "R5323", + "R5324", + "R5325", + "R5326", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5329", + "R5330", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5333", + "R5334", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5337", + "R5338", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5341", + "R5342", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5345", + "R5346", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5353", + "R5354", + "R5355", + "R5356", + "R5357", + "R5358", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5361", + "R5362", + "R5363", + "R5364", + "R5365", + "R5366", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5369", + "R5370", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5373", + "R5374", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5377", + "R5378", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5381", + "R5382", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5385", + "R5386", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5389", + "R5390", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5393", + "R5394", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5397", + "R5398", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5401", + "R5402", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5405", + "R5406", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5409", + "R5410", + "R5411", + "R5412", + "R5413", + "R5414", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5417", + "R5418", + "R5419", + "R5420", + "R5421", + "R5422", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5425", + "R5426", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5429", + "R5430", + "R5431", + "R5432", + "R5433", + "R5434", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5437", + "R5438", + "R5439", + "R5440", + "R5441", + "R5442", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5445", + "R5446", + "R5447", + "R5448", + "R5449", + "R5450", + "R5451", + "R5452", + "R5453", + "R5454", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5457", + "R5458", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5461", + "R5462", + "R5463", + "R5464", + "R5465", + "R5466", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5469", + "R5470", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5473", + "R5474", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5477", + "R5478", + "R5479", + "R5480", + "R5481", + "R5482", + "R5483", + "R5484", + "R5485", + "R5486", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5489", + "R5490", + "R5491", + "R5492", + "R5493", + "R5494", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5497", + "R5498", + "R5499", + "R5500", + "R5501", + "R5502", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5509", + "R5510", + "R5511", + "R5512", + "R5513", + "R5514", + "R5515", + "R5516", + "R5517", + "R5518", + "R5519", + "R5520", + "R5521", + "R5522", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5525", + "R5526", + "R5527", + "R5528", + "R5533", + "R5534", + "R5535", + "R5536", + "R5537", + "R5538", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5541", + "R5542", + "R5543", + "R5544", + "R5545", + "R5546", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5549", + "R5550", + "R5551", + "R5552", + "R5553", + "R5554", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5557", + "R5558", + "R5559", + "R5560", + "R5561", + "R5562", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5565", + "R5566", + "R5567", + "R5568", + "R5569", + "R5570", + "R5571", + "R5572", + "R5573", + "R5574", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5577", + "R5578", + "R5579", + "R5580", + "R5581", + "R5582", + "R5583", + "R5584", + "R5585", + "R5586", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5589", + "R5590", + "R5591", + "R5592", + "R5593", + "R5594", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5597", + "R5598", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5601", + "R5602", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5605", + "R5606", + "R5607", + "R5608", + "R5609", + "R5610", + "R5611", + "R5612", + "R5613", + "R5614", + "R5615", + "R5616", + "R5617", + "R5618", + "R5619", + "R5620", + "R5621", + "R5622", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5629", + "R5630", + "R5631", + "R5632", + "R5633", + "R5634", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5637", + "R5638", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5641", + "R5642", + "R5643", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5646", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5653", + "R5654", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5657", + "R5658", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5661", + "R5662", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5668", + "R5669", + "R5670", + "R5671", + "R5672", + "R5673", + "R5674", + "R5675", + "R5676", + "R5677", + "R5678", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5681", + "R5682", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5685", + "R5686", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5689", + "R5690", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5693", + "R5694", + "R5695", + "R5696", + "R5697", + "R5698", + "R5699", + "R5700", + "R5701", + "R5702", + "R5703", + "R5704", + "R5705", + "R5706", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5709", + "R5710", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5713", + "R5714", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5717", + "R5718", + "R5719", + "R5720", + "R5721", + "R5722", + "R5723", + "R5724", + "R5725", + "R5726", + "R5727", + "R5728", + "R5729", + "R5730", + "R5731", + "R5732", + "R5733", + "R5734", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5737", + "R5738", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5741", + "R5742", + "R5743", + "R5744", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5750", + "R5751", + "R5752", + "R5753", + "R5754", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5757", + "R5758", + "R5759", + "R5760", + "R5761", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5765", + "R5766", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5773", + "R5774", + "R5775", + "R5776", + "R5777", + "R5778", + "R5779", + "R5780", + "R5781", + "R5782", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5785", + "R5786", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5789", + "R5790", + "R5791", + "R5792", + "R5793", + "R5794", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5797", + "R5798", + "R5799", + "R5800", + "R5801", + "R5802", + "R5803", + "R5804", + "R5805", + "R5806", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5809", + "R5810", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5813", + "R5814", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5817", + "R5818", + "R5819", + "R5820", + "R5821", + "R5822", + "R5823", + "R5824", + "R5825", + "R5826", + "R5827", + "R5828", + "R5829", + "R5830", + "R5831", + "R5832", + "R5833", + "R5834", + "R5835", + "R5836", + "R5837", + "R5838", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5841", + "R5842", + "R5843", + "R5844", + "R5845", + "R5846", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5853", + "R5854", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5857", + "R5858", + "R5859", + "R5860", + "R5861", + "R5862", + "R5863", + "R5864", + "R5865", + "R5866", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5869", + "R5870", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5873", + "R5874", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5877", + "R5878", + "R5879", + "R5880", + "R5881", + "R5882", + "R5883", + "R5884", + "R5885", + "R5886", + "R5887", + "R5888", + "R5893", + "R5894", + "R5895", + "R5896", + "R5897", + "R5898", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5905", + "R5906", + "R5907", + "R5908", + "R5909", + "R5910", + "R5911", + "R5912", + "R5913", + "R5914", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5917", + "R5918", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5921", + "R5922", + "R5923", + "R5924", + "R5925", + "R5926", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5929", + "R5930", + "R5931", + "R5932", + "R5933", + "R5934", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5937", + "R5938", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5941", + "R5942", + "R5943", + "R5944", + "R5945", + "R5946", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5949", + "R5950", + "R5951", + "R5952", + "R5953", + "R5954", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5959", + "R5960", + "R5961", + "R5962", + "R5963", + "R5964", + "R5965", + "R5966", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5969", + "R5970", + "R5971", + "R5972", + "R5973", + "R5974", + "R5975", + "R5976", + "R5977", + "R5978", + "R5979", + "R5980", + "R5981", + "R5982", + "R5983", + "R5984", + "R5985", + "R5986", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5989", + "R5990", + "R5991", + "R5992", + "R5993", + "R5994", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P4", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P9", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P17", + "P18", + "P19", + "P20", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P29", + "P31", + "P32", + "P35", + "P36", + "P37", + "P39", + "P40", + "P41", + "P43", + "P45", + "P49", + "P52", + "P54", + "P55", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P59", + "P61", + "P62", + "P63", + "P64", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714", + "R6715", + "R6716", + "R6717", + "R6718", + "R6719", + "R6720", + "R6721", + "R6722", + "R6723", + "R6724", + "R6725", + "R6726", + "R6727", + "R6728", + "R6729", + "R6730", + "R6731", + "R6732", + "R6733", + "R6734", + "R6735", + "R6736", + "R6737", + "R6738", + "R6739", + "R6740", + "R6741", + "R6742", + "R6743", + "R6744", + "R6745", + "R6746", + "R6747", + "R6748", + "R6749", + "R6750", + "R6751", + "R6752", + "R6753", + "R6754", + "R6755", + "R6756", + "R6757", + "R6758", + "R6759", + "R6760", + "R6761", + "R6762", + "R6763", + "R6764", + "R6765", + "R6766", + "R6767", + "R6768", + "R6769", + "R6770", + "R6771", + "R6772", + "R6773", + "R6774", + "R6775", + "R6776", + "R6777", + "R6778", + "R6779", + "R6780", + "R6781", + "R6782", + "R6783", + "R6784", + "R6785", + "R6786", + "R6787", + "R6788", + "R6789", + "R6790", + "R6791", + "R6792", + "R6793", + "R6794", + "R6795", + "R6796", + "R6797", + "R6798", + "R6799", + "R6800", + "R6801", + "R6802", + "R6803", + "R6804", + "R6805", + "R6806", + "R6807", + "R6808", + "R6809", + "R6810", + "R6811", + "R6812", + "R6813", + "R6814", + "R6815", + "R6816", + "R6817", + "R6818", + "R6819", + "R6820", + "R6821", + "R6822", + "R6823", + "R6824", + "R6825", + "R6826", + "R6827", + "R6828", + "R6829", + "R6830", + "R6831", + "R6832", + "R6833", + "R6834", + "R6835", + "R6836", + "R6837", + "R6838", + "R6839", + "R6840", + "R6841", + "R6842", + "R6843", + "R6844", + "R6845", + "R6846", + "R6847", + "R6848", + "R6849", + "R6850", + "R6851", + "R6852", + "R6853", + "R6854", + "R6855", + "R6856", + "R6857", + "R6858", + "R6859", + "R6860", + "R6861", + "R6862", + "R6863", + "R6864", + "R6865", + "R6866", + "R6867", + "R6868", + "R6869", + "R6870", + "R6871", + "R6872", + "R6873", + "R6874", + "R6875", + "R6876", + "R6877", + "R6878", + "R6879", + "R6880", + "R6881", + "R6882", + "R6883", + "R6884", + "R6885", + "R6886", + "R6887", + "R6888", + "R6889", + "R6890", + "R6891", + "R6892", + "R6893", + "R6894", + "R6895", + "R6896", + "R6897", + "R6898", + "R6899", + "R6900", + "R6901", + "R6902", + "R6903", + "R6904", + "R6905", + "R6906", + "R6907", + "R6908", + "R6909", + "R6910", + "R6911", + "R6912", + "R6913", + "R6914", + "R6915", + "R6916", + "R6917", + "R6918", + "R6919", + "R6920", + "R6921", + "R6922", + "R6923", + "R6924", + "R6925", + "R6926", + "R6927", + "R6928", + "R6929", + "R6930", + "R6931", + "R6932", + "R6933", + "R6934", + "R6935", + "R6936", + "R6937", + "R6938", + "R6939", + "R6940", + "R6941", + "R6942", + "R6943", + "R6944", + "R6945", + "R6946", + "R6947", + "R6948", + "R6949", + "R6951", + "R6952", + "R6953", + "R6954", + "R6955", + "R6956", + "R6957", + "R6958", + "R6959", + "R6960", + "R6961", + "R6962", + "R6963", + "R6964", + "R6965", + "R6966", + "R6967", + "R6968", + "R6969", + "R6970", + "R6971", + "R6972", + "R6973", + "R6975", + "R6976", + "R6977", + "R6978", + "R6979", + "R6980", + "R6981", + "R6982", + "R6983", + "R6984", + "R6985", + "R6986", + "R6987", + "R6989", + "R6990", + "R6991", + "R6992", + "R6993", + "R6994", + "R6995", + "R6996", + "R6997", + "R6998", + "R6999", + "R7001", + "R7002", + "R7003", + "R7004", + "R7006", + "R7007", + "R7008", + "R7010", + "R7012", + "R7013", + "R7015", + "R7016", + "R7018", + "R7019", + "R7020", + "R7021", + "R7022", + "R7023", + "R7024", + "R7025", + "R7026", + "R7027", + "R7028", + "R7030", + "R7031", + "R7032", + "R7033", + "R7034", + "R7035", + "R7036", + "R7037", + "R7038", + "R7039", + "R7040", + "R7041", + "R7042", + "R7043", + "R7044", + "R7045", + "R7046", + "R7047", + "R7048", + "R7049", + "R7050", + "R7051", + "R7052", + "R7053", + "R7054", + "R7055", + "R7056", + "R7057", + "R7058", + "R7059", + "R7060", + "R7061", + "R7062", + "R7063", + "R7064", + "R7065", + "R7066", + "R7067", + "R7068", + "R7069", + "R7070", + "R7071", + "R7072", + "R7073", + "R7074", + "R7075", + "R7076", + "R7077", + "R7078", + "R7079", + "R7080", + "R7081", + "R7082", + "R7083", + "R7084", + "R7085", + "R7086", + "R7088", + "R7089", + "R7090", + "R7091", + "R7093", + "R7094", + "R7095", + "R7096", + "R7097", + "R7098", + "R7099", + "R7100", + "R7101", + "R7102", + "R7103", + "R7104", + "R7105", + "R7106", + "R7108", + "R7109", + "R7110", + "R7111", + "R7112", + "R7113", + "R7114", + "R7115", + "R7116", + "R7117", + "R7118", + "R7119", + "R7120", + "R7121", + "R7122", + "R7123", + "R7124", + "R7125", + "R7126", + "R7127", + "R7128", + "R7129", + "R7130", + "R7131", + "R7132", + "R7133", + "R7134", + "R7135", + "R7136", + "R7137", + "R7138", + "R7141", + "R7142", + "R7143", + "R7144", + "R7145", + "R7146", + "R7147", + "R7148", + "R7149", + "R7150", + "R7151", + "R7152", + "R7153", + "R7154", + "R7155", + "R7156", + "R7157", + "R7158", + "R7160", + "R7161", + "R7162", + "R7163", + "R7164", + "R7165", + "R7166", + "R7167", + "R7168", + "R7169", + "R7170", + "R7171", + "R7172", + "R7173", + "R7174", + "R7175", + "R7176", + "R7177", + "R7178", + "R7180", + "R7181", + "R7182", + "R7183", + "R7184", + "R7186", + "R7187", + "R7188", + "R7189", + "R7190", + "R7191", + "R7192", + "R7193", + "R7194", + "R7195", + "R7196", + "R7197", + "R7198", + "R7199", + "R7200", + "R7201", + "R7202", + "R7203", + "R7204", + "R7205", + "R7206", + "R7207", + "R7208", + "R7209", + "R7210", + "R7211", + "R7212", + "R7213", + "R7214", + "R7216", + "R7217", + "R7218", + "R7219", + "R7220", + "R7221", + "R7222", + "R7223", + "R7224", + "R7225", + "R7226", + "R7227", + "R7228", + "R7229", + "R7230", + "R7231", + "R7232", + "R7233", + "R7234", + "R7235", + "R7236", + "R7237", + "R7238", + "R7239", + "R7240", + "R7241", + "R7242", + "R7243", + "R7244", + "R7246", + "R7247", + "R7248", + "R7249", + "R7250", + "R7251", + "R7252", + "R7253", + "R7254", + "R7255", + "R7256", + "R7257", + "R7258", + "R7259", + "R7260", + "R7261", + "R7262", + "R7263", + "R7264", + "R7265", + "R7266", + "R7267", + "R7268", + "R7269", + "R7270", + "R7271", + "R7272", + "R7273", + "R7274", + "R7275", + "R7276", + "R7277", + "R7278", + "R7279", + "R7280", + "R7281", + "R7282", + "R7283", + "R7284", + "R7285", + "R7286", + "R7287", + "R7288", + "R7289", + "R7290", + "R7291", + "R7292", + "R7293", + "R7294", + "R7295", + "R7296", + "R7297", + "R7298", + "R7299", + "R7300", + "R7301", + "R7302", + "R7305", + "R7306", + "R7307", + "R7308", + "R7309", + "R7310", + "R7311", + "R7312", + "R7313", + "R7314", + "R7315", + "R7316", + "R7317", + "R7318", + "R7319", + "R7320", + "R7321", + "R7322", + "R7323", + "R7324", + "R7325", + "R7326", + "R7327", + "R7329", + "R7330", + "R7331", + "R7332", + "R7333", + "R7334", + "R7335", + "R7336", + "R7337", + "R7338", + "R7339", + "R7340", + "R7342", + "R7343", + "R7344", + "R7345", + "R7346", + "R7347", + "R7348", + "R7349", + "R7350", + "R7351", + "R7352", + "R7353", + "R7354", + "R7355", + "R7356", + "R7358", + "R7359", + "R7360", + "R7361", + "R7362", + "R7363", + "R7365", + "R7366", + "R7367", + "R7368", + "R7369", + "R7370", + "R7371", + "R7372", + "R7373", + "R7374", + "R7375", + "R7376", + "R7377", + "R7378", + "R7379", + "R7380", + "R7381", + "R7382", + "R7383", + "R7384", + "R7385", + "R7386", + "R7387", + "R7388", + "R7389", + "R7390", + "R7391", + "R7392", + "R7393", + "R7394", + "R7395", + "R7396", + "R7397", + "R7398", + "R7399", + "R7401", + "R7402", + "R7403", + "R7404", + "R7405", + "R7406", + "R7407", + "R7409", + "R7410", + "R7411", + "R7412", + "R7413", + "R7414", + "R7415", + "R7416", + "R7417", + "R7418", + "R7419", + "R7420", + "R7421", + "R7422", + "R7423", + "R7424", + "R7425", + "R7426", + "R7427", + "R7428", + "R7429", + "R7430", + "R7431", + "R7432", + "R7433", + "R7434", + "R7435", + "R7436", + "R7437", + "R7438", + "R7439", + "R7440", + "R7441", + "R7442", + "R7443", + "R7444", + "R7446", + "R7447", + "R7448", + "R7449", + "R7450", + "R7451", + "R7452", + "R7453", + "R7454", + "R7455", + "R7456", + "R7457", + "R7458", + "R7459", + "R7460", + "R7461" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "whole", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 7775, + "passed": 6429, + "success": 0.7136989342806395, + "attempted_success": 0.8268810289389068, + "composite": 0.4869722955145119, + "signal_share": 0.0007379315886267752, + "multiplier": 0.1, + "score": 389.65162957047215, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 389.5778364116095, + "signal_score": 0.07379315886267752, + "token_score": 0.0, + "tokens_billed": 404164.0, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 5432, + "pass_rate": 0.895778364116095, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 1.0, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 1.0, + "noise": 0.9993155333302661, + "oblique_r@5": 1.0, + "paraphrase_r@5": 1.0, + "path_cover": 1.0, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 1.0, + "r@5": 1.0, + "stale_above": 1.0, + "tokens": 404164.0, + "weighted_r@5": 1.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 225, + "passed": 225, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 1.0, + "head_r@5": 1.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 522, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 1.0, + "direct_r@5": 1.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.0007379315886267752, + "noise": 0.9993155333302661, + "tokens_per_query": 404164.0 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.02758523620484305, + "lineage_ms": 0.011249453333333334, + "link_ms": 0.000026857861635220157, + "purge_ms": 0.04201796000000001, + "recall_ms": 1.2149260369774908, + "recall_path_ms": 0.9446888749999995, + "release_ms": 0.05306699999999998, + "settle_ms": 0.0009165, + "standing_tokens": 427881.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0016544466666666645, + "suspects_ms": 0.383916, + "tokens_per_query": 404164.0 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 69.48720999999965 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.843709 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 0.04270400000000005 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 5.252245000000001 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 9823.89193499999 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 60.46008799999997 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 6.633374999999997 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.001833 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 0.24816699999999967 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.383916 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2659", + "R2660", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2719", + "R2720", + "R2725", + "R2726", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2761", + "R2762", + "R2763", + "R2764", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2872", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2973", + "R2974", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3089", + "R3090", + "R3091", + "R3092", + "R3101", + "R3102", + "R3103", + "R3104", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3183", + "R3184", + "R3201", + "R3202", + "R3203", + "R3204", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3293", + "R3294", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3333", + "R3334", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3341", + "R3342", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3373", + "R3374", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3401", + "R3402", + "R3403", + "R3404", + "R3413", + "R3414", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3417", + "R3418", + "R3419", + "R3420", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3479", + "R3480", + "R3509", + "R3510", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3537", + "R3538", + "R3539", + "R3540", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3633", + "R3634", + "R3635", + "R3636", + "R3649", + "R3650", + "R3651", + "R3652", + "R3657", + "R3658", + "R3659", + "R3660", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3753", + "R3754", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3817", + "R3818", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3853", + "R3854", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3881", + "R3882", + "R3883", + "R3884", + "R3913", + "R3914", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3927", + "R3928", + "R3957", + "R3958", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4181", + "R4182", + "R4183", + "R4184", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4457", + "R4458", + "R4459", + "R4460", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4669", + "R4670", + "R4671", + "R4672", + "R4717", + "R4718", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4729", + "R4730", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4734", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4761", + "R4762", + "R4763", + "R4764", + "R4861", + "R4862", + "R4863", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4866", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4913", + "R4914", + "R4915", + "R4916", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4957", + "R4958", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R5001", + "R5002", + "R5003", + "R5004", + "R5013", + "R5014", + "R5015", + "R5016", + "R5053", + "R5054", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5059", + "R5060", + "R5101", + "R5102", + "R5103", + "R5104", + "R5181", + "R5182", + "R5183", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5187", + "R5188", + "R5233", + "R5234", + "R5235", + "R5236", + "R5361", + "R5362", + "R5363", + "R5364", + "R5373", + "R5374", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5385", + "R5386", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5401", + "R5402", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5465", + "R5466", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5513", + "R5514", + "R5515", + "R5516", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5645", + "R5646", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5668", + "R5677", + "R5678", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5705", + "R5706", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5750", + "R5751", + "R5752", + "R5761", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5793", + "R5794", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5801", + "R5802", + "R5803", + "R5804", + "R5809", + "R5810", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5833", + "R5834", + "R5835", + "R5836", + "R5841", + "R5842", + "R5843", + "R5844", + "R5877", + "R5878", + "R5879", + "R5880", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5959", + "R5960", + "R5973", + "R5974", + "R5975", + "R5976", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "chance", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 8150, + "passed": 285, + "success": 0.03163854351687389, + "attempted_success": 0.03496932515337423, + "composite": 0.12834821040447233, + "signal_share": 0.10209867197565652, + "multiplier": 1.0209867197565652, + "score": 112.0266785742663, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 102.67856832357788, + "signal_score": 0.06056301269815499, + "token_score": 9.287547237990267, + "tokens_billed": 2332.8736807387863, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 26, + "pass_rate": 0.004287598944591029, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.0006666666666666666, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.007333333333333333, + "mrr": 0.0014939153439153436, + "noise": 0.9993403693931383, + "oblique_r@5": 0.0026666666666666666, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.002, + "path_cover": 0.018923611111111113, + "path_r@5": 0.109375, + "r@1": 0.0003333333333333333, + "r@5": 0.0031666666666666666, + "stale_above": 0.006329113924050633, + "tokens": 2332.8736807387863, + "weighted_r@5": 0.003166666666666666 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 225, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.0, + "head_r@5": 0.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 2, + "pass_rate": 0.0038314176245210726, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.0038314176245210726, + "direct_r@5": 0.0038314176245210726, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 375, + "passed": 7, + "pass_rate": 0.018666666666666668, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 0.018666666666666668, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.10209867197565652, + "noise": 0.9993403693931383, + "tokens_per_query": 2332.8736807387863 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.012936372369988111, + "lineage_ms": 0.00024676000000000006, + "link_ms": 0.0005782295597484219, + "purge_ms": 0.010966392, + "recall_ms": 0.027728244372990263, + "recall_path_ms": 0.00902209375, + "release_ms": 0.013439919999999998, + "settle_ms": 0.00031249999999999995, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.019093086666666665, + "suspects_ms": 0.005292000000000001, + "tokens_per_query": 2332.8736807387863 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 32.58672200000005 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.018507000000000006 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 0.9193849999999907 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 1.370799 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 224.21058399999927 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 0.577414 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 1.6799899999999997 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.0006249999999999999 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 2.8639629999999996 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.005292000000000001 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R5", + "R6", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R13", + "R14", + "R15", + "R16", + "R17", + "R18", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R25", + "R26", + "R27", + "R28", + "R29", + "R30", + "R31", + "R32", + "R33", + "R34", + "R35", + "R36", + "R37", + "R38", + "R39", + "R40", + "R41", + "R42", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R49", + "R50", + "R51", + "R52", + "R53", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R57", + "R58", + "R59", + "R60", + "R61", + "R62", + "R63", + "R64", + "R65", + "R66", + "R67", + "R68", + "R69", + "R70", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R80", + "R81", + "R82", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R97", + "R98", + "R99", + "R100", + "R101", + "R102", + "R103", + "R104", + "R105", + "R106", + "R107", + "R108", + "R109", + "R110", + "R111", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R121", + "R122", + "R123", + "R124", + "R125", + "R126", + "R127", + "R128", + "R129", + "R130", + "R131", + "R132", + "R133", + "R134", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R141", + "R142", + "R143", + "R144", + "R145", + "R146", + "R147", + "R148", + "R149", + "R150", + "R151", + "R152", + "R153", + "R154", + "R155", + "R156", + "R157", + "R158", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R165", + "R166", + "R167", + "R168", + "R169", + "R170", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R181", + "R182", + "R183", + "R184", + "R185", + "R186", + "R187", + "R188", + "R189", + "R190", + "R191", + "R192", + "R193", + "R194", + "R195", + "R196", + "R197", + "R198", + "R199", + "R200", + "R201", + "R202", + "R203", + "R204", + "R205", + "R206", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R213", + "R214", + "R215", + "R216", + "R217", + "R218", + "R219", + "R220", + "R221", + "R222", + "R223", + "R224", + "R225", + "R226", + "R227", + "R228", + "R229", + "R230", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R237", + "R238", + "R239", + "R240", + "R241", + "R242", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R249", + "R250", + "R251", + "R252", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R261", + "R262", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R269", + "R270", + "R271", + "R272", + "R273", + "R274", + "R275", + "R276", + "R277", + "R278", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R285", + "R286", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R293", + "R294", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R301", + "R302", + "R303", + "R304", + "R305", + "R306", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R317", + "R318", + "R319", + "R320", + "R321", + "R322", + "R323", + "R324", + "R325", + "R326", + "R327", + "R328", + "R329", + "R330", + "R331", + "R332", + "R333", + "R334", + "R335", + "R336", + "R337", + "R338", + "R339", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R345", + "R346", + "R347", + "R348", + "R349", + "R350", + "R351", + "R352", + "R353", + "R354", + "R355", + "R356", + "R357", + "R358", + "R359", + "R360", + "R361", + "R362", + "R363", + "R364", + "R365", + "R366", + "R367", + "R368", + "R369", + "R370", + "R371", + "R372", + "R373", + "R374", + "R375", + "R376", + "R377", + "R378", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R385", + "R386", + "R387", + "R388", + "R389", + "R390", + "R391", + "R392", + "R393", + "R394", + "R395", + "R396", + "R397", + "R398", + "R399", + "R400", + "R401", + "R402", + "R403", + "R404", + "R405", + "R406", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R413", + "R414", + "R415", + "R416", + "R417", + "R418", + "R419", + "R420", + "R421", + "R422", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R433", + "R434", + "R435", + "R436", + "R437", + "R438", + "R439", + "R440", + "R441", + "R442", + "R443", + "R444", + "R445", + "R446", + "R447", + "R448", + "R449", + "R450", + "R451", + "R452", + "R453", + "R454", + "R455", + "R456", + "R457", + "R458", + "R459", + "R460", + "R461", + "R462", + "R463", + "R464", + "R465", + "R466", + "R467", + "R468", + "R469", + "R470", + "R471", + "R472", + "R473", + "R474", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R481", + "R482", + "R483", + "R484", + "R485", + "R486", + "R487", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R493", + "R494", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R501", + "R502", + "R503", + "R504", + "R505", + "R506", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R513", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R517", + "R518", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R525", + "R526", + "R527", + "R528", + "R529", + "R530", + "R531", + "R532", + "R533", + "R534", + "R535", + "R536", + "R537", + "R538", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R545", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R549", + "R550", + "R551", + "R552", + "R553", + "R554", + "R555", + "R556", + "R557", + "R558", + "R559", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R569", + "R570", + "R571", + "R572", + "R573", + "R574", + "R575", + "R576", + "R577", + "R578", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R585", + "R586", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R601", + "R602", + "R603", + "R604", + "R605", + "R606", + "R607", + "R608", + "R609", + "R610", + "R611", + "R612", + "R613", + "R614", + "R615", + "R616", + "R617", + "R618", + "R619", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R629", + "R630", + "R631", + "R632", + "R633", + "R634", + "R635", + "R636", + "R637", + "R638", + "R639", + "R640", + "R641", + "R642", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R649", + "R650", + "R651", + "R652", + "R653", + "R654", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R661", + "R662", + "R663", + "R664", + "R665", + "R666", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R677", + "R678", + "R679", + "R680", + "R681", + "R682", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R689", + "R690", + "R691", + "R692", + "R693", + "R694", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R709", + "R710", + "R711", + "R712", + "R713", + "R714", + "R715", + "R716", + "R717", + "R718", + "R719", + "R720", + "R721", + "R722", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R729", + "R730", + "R731", + "R732", + "R733", + "R734", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R745", + "R746", + "R747", + "R748", + "R749", + "R750", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R761", + "R762", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R769", + "R770", + "R771", + "R772", + "R773", + "R774", + "R775", + "R776", + "R777", + "R778", + "R779", + "R780", + "R781", + "R782", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R793", + "R794", + "R795", + "R796", + "R797", + "R798", + "R799", + "R800", + "R801", + "R802", + "R803", + "R804", + "R805", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R809", + "R810", + "R811", + "R812", + "R813", + "R814", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R821", + "R822", + "R823", + "R824", + "R825", + "R826", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R833", + "R834", + "R835", + "R836", + "R837", + "R838", + "R839", + "R840", + "R841", + "R842", + "R843", + "R844", + "R845", + "R846", + "R847", + "R848", + "R849", + "R850", + "R851", + "R852", + "R853", + "R854", + "R855", + "R856", + "R857", + "R858", + "R859", + "R860", + "R861", + "R862", + "R863", + "R864", + "R865", + "R866", + "R867", + "R868", + "R869", + "R870", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R877", + "R878", + "R879", + "R880", + "R881", + "R882", + "R883", + "R884", + "R885", + "R886", + "R887", + "R888", + "R889", + "R890", + "R891", + "R892", + "R893", + "R894", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R909", + "R910", + "R911", + "R912", + "R913", + "R914", + "R915", + "R916", + "R917", + "R918", + "R919", + "R920", + "R921", + "R922", + "R923", + "R924", + "R925", + "R926", + "R927", + "R928", + "R929", + "R930", + "R931", + "R932", + "R933", + "R934", + "R935", + "R936", + "R937", + "R938", + "R939", + "R940", + "R941", + "R942", + "R943", + "R944", + "R945", + "R946", + "R947", + "R948", + "R949", + "R950", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R957", + "R958", + "R959", + "R960", + "R961", + "R962", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R969", + "R970", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R977", + "R978", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R985", + "R986", + "R987", + "R988", + "R989", + "R990", + "R991", + "R992", + "R993", + "R994", + "R995", + "R996", + "R998", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1001", + "R1002", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1009", + "R1010", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1017", + "R1018", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1021", + "R1022", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1029", + "R1030", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1037", + "R1038", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1041", + "R1042", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1049", + "R1050", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1053", + "R1054", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1065", + "R1066", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1069", + "R1070", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1073", + "R1074", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1077", + "R1078", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1081", + "R1082", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1085", + "R1086", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1089", + "R1090", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1093", + "R1094", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1097", + "R1098", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1101", + "R1102", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1109", + "R1110", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1113", + "R1114", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1117", + "R1118", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1121", + "R1122", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1125", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1129", + "R1130", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1137", + "R1138", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1141", + "R1142", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1149", + "R1150", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1153", + "R1154", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1157", + "R1158", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1173", + "R1174", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1177", + "R1178", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1181", + "R1182", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1189", + "R1190", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1197", + "R1198", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1201", + "R1202", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1205", + "R1206", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1210", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1221", + "R1222", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1225", + "R1226", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1233", + "R1234", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1245", + "R1246", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1249", + "R1250", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1253", + "R1254", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1257", + "R1258", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1261", + "R1262", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1265", + "R1266", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1281", + "R1282", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1285", + "R1286", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1289", + "R1290", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1293", + "R1294", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1297", + "R1298", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1305", + "R1306", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1309", + "R1310", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1313", + "R1314", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1317", + "R1318", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1325", + "R1326", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1329", + "R1330", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1333", + "R1334", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1341", + "R1342", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1345", + "R1346", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1349", + "R1350", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1353", + "R1354", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1357", + "R1358", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1361", + "R1362", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1369", + "R1370", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1373", + "R1374", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1377", + "R1378", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1381", + "R1382", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1385", + "R1386", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1389", + "R1390", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1397", + "R1398", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1405", + "R1406", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1409", + "R1410", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1413", + "R1414", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1417", + "R1418", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1433", + "R1434", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1438", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1453", + "R1454", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1457", + "R1458", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1461", + "R1462", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1465", + "R1466", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1469", + "R1470", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1473", + "R1474", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1477", + "R1478", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1481", + "R1482", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1489", + "R1490", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1493", + "R1494", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1497", + "R1498", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1505", + "R1506", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1509", + "R1510", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1517", + "R1518", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1521", + "R1522", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1525", + "R1526", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1529", + "R1530", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1533", + "R1534", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1537", + "R1538", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1541", + "R1542", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1545", + "R1546", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1549", + "R1550", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1557", + "R1558", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1561", + "R1562", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1569", + "R1570", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1573", + "R1574", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1581", + "R1582", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1585", + "R1586", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1593", + "R1594", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1597", + "R1598", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1601", + "R1602", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1613", + "R1614", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1621", + "R1622", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1629", + "R1630", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1633", + "R1634", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1637", + "R1638", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1641", + "R1642", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1645", + "R1646", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1649", + "R1650", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1657", + "R1658", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1665", + "R1666", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1669", + "R1670", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1673", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1677", + "R1678", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1681", + "R1682", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1685", + "R1686", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1689", + "R1690", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1693", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1701", + "R1702", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1709", + "R1710", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1721", + "R1722", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1725", + "R1726", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1729", + "R1730", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1737", + "R1738", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1741", + "R1742", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1745", + "R1746", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1753", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1761", + "R1762", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1769", + "R1770", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1773", + "R1774", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1777", + "R1778", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1781", + "R1782", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1785", + "R1786", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1793", + "R1794", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1797", + "R1798", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1805", + "R1806", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1809", + "R1810", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1817", + "R1818", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1821", + "R1822", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1825", + "R1826", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1833", + "R1834", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1837", + "R1838", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1841", + "R1842", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1845", + "R1846", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1853", + "R1854", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1861", + "R1862", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1869", + "R1870", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1873", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1881", + "R1882", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1885", + "R1886", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1889", + "R1890", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1893", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1897", + "R1898", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1901", + "R1902", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1905", + "R1906", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1909", + "R1910", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1913", + "R1914", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1917", + "R1918", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1921", + "R1922", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1925", + "R1926", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1934", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1937", + "R1938", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1941", + "R1942", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1945", + "R1946", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1949", + "R1950", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1953", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1957", + "R1958", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1961", + "R1962", + "R1964", + "R1965", + "R1966", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1973", + "R1974", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1977", + "R1978", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1981", + "R1982", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1985", + "R1986", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1997", + "R1998", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2241", + "R2242", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2245", + "R2246", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2249", + "R2250", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2253", + "R2254", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2257", + "R2258", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2261", + "R2262", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2265", + "R2266", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2269", + "R2270", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2273", + "R2274", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2277", + "R2278", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2281", + "R2282", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2289", + "R2290", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2293", + "R2294", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2301", + "R2302", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2305", + "R2306", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2309", + "R2310", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2485", + "R2486", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2489", + "R2490", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2493", + "R2494", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2497", + "R2498", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2501", + "R2502", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2505", + "R2506", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2509", + "R2510", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2513", + "R2514", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2521", + "R2522", + "R2523", + "R2524", + "R2525", + "R2526", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2529", + "R2530", + "R2531", + "R2532", + "R2533", + "R2534", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2537", + "R2538", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2541", + "R2542", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2545", + "R2546", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2549", + "R2550", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2553", + "R2554", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2557", + "R2558", + "R2559", + "R2560", + "R2561", + "R2562", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2565", + "R2566", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2569", + "R2570", + "R2571", + "R2572", + "R2573", + "R2574", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2577", + "R2578", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2581", + "R2582", + "R2583", + "R2584", + "R2585", + "R2586", + "R2587", + "R2588", + "R2589", + "R2590", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2593", + "R2594", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2597", + "R2598", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2601", + "R2602", + "R2603", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2609", + "R2610", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2613", + "R2614", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2617", + "R2618", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2621", + "R2622", + "R2623", + "R2624", + "R2625", + "R2626", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2629", + "R2630", + "R2631", + "R2632", + "R2633", + "R2634", + "R2635", + "R2636", + "R2637", + "R2638", + "R2639", + "R2640", + "R2641", + "R2642", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2645", + "R2646", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2649", + "R2650", + "R2651", + "R2652", + "R2653", + "R2654", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2659", + "R2660", + "R2661", + "R2662", + "R2663", + "R2664", + "R2665", + "R2666", + "R2667", + "R2668", + "R2669", + "R2670", + "R2671", + "R2672", + "R2673", + "R2674", + "R2675", + "R2676", + "R2677", + "R2678", + "R2679", + "R2680", + "R2681", + "R2682", + "R2683", + "R2684", + "R2685", + "R2686", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2689", + "R2690", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2693", + "R2694", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2697", + "R2698", + "R2699", + "R2700", + "R2701", + "R2702", + "R2703", + "R2704", + "R2705", + "R2706", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2709", + "R2710", + "R2711", + "R2712", + "R2713", + "R2714", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2719", + "R2720", + "R2721", + "R2722", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2725", + "R2726", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2729", + "R2730", + "R2731", + "R2732", + "R2733", + "R2734", + "R2735", + "R2736", + "R2737", + "R2738", + "R2739", + "R2740", + "R2741", + "R2742", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2745", + "R2746", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2749", + "R2750", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2753", + "R2754", + "R2755", + "R2756", + "R2757", + "R2758", + "R2759", + "R2760", + "R2761", + "R2762", + "R2763", + "R2764", + "R2765", + "R2766", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2769", + "R2770", + "R2771", + "R2772", + "R2773", + "R2774", + "R2775", + "R2776", + "R2777", + "R2778", + "R2779", + "R2780", + "R2781", + "R2782", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2785", + "R2786", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2789", + "R2790", + "R2791", + "R2792", + "R2793", + "R2794", + "R2795", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2801", + "R2802", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2805", + "R2806", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2809", + "R2810", + "R2811", + "R2812", + "R2813", + "R2814", + "R2815", + "R2816", + "R2817", + "R2818", + "R2819", + "R2820", + "R2821", + "R2822", + "R2823", + "R2824", + "R2825", + "R2826", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2829", + "R2830", + "R2831", + "R2832", + "R2833", + "R2834", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2837", + "R2838", + "R2839", + "R2840", + "R2841", + "R2842", + "R2843", + "R2844", + "R2845", + "R2846", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2849", + "R2850", + "R2851", + "R2852", + "R2853", + "R2854", + "R2855", + "R2856", + "R2857", + "R2858", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2861", + "R2862", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2865", + "R2866", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2872", + "R2873", + "R2874", + "R2875", + "R2876", + "R2877", + "R2878", + "R2879", + "R2880", + "R2881", + "R2882", + "R2883", + "R2884", + "R2885", + "R2886", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2893", + "R2894", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2897", + "R2898", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2901", + "R2902", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2905", + "R2906", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2909", + "R2910", + "R2911", + "R2912", + "R2913", + "R2914", + "R2915", + "R2916", + "R2917", + "R2918", + "R2919", + "R2920", + "R2921", + "R2922", + "R2923", + "R2924", + "R2925", + "R2926", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2929", + "R2930", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2933", + "R2934", + "R2935", + "R2936", + "R2938", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2941", + "R2942", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2945", + "R2946", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2949", + "R2950", + "R2951", + "R2952", + "R2953", + "R2954", + "R2955", + "R2956", + "R2957", + "R2958", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2961", + "R2962", + "R2963", + "R2964", + "R2965", + "R2966", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2969", + "R2970", + "R2971", + "R2972", + "R2973", + "R2974", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R2977", + "R2978", + "R2979", + "R2980", + "R2981", + "R2982", + "R2983", + "R2984", + "R2985", + "R2986", + "R2987", + "R2988", + "R2989", + "R2990", + "R2991", + "R2992", + "R2993", + "R2994", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2997", + "R2998", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3001", + "R3002", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3005", + "R3006", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3009", + "R3010", + "R3011", + "R3012", + "R3013", + "R3014", + "R3015", + "R3016", + "R3017", + "R3018", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3021", + "R3022", + "R3023", + "R3024", + "R3025", + "R3026", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3029", + "R3030", + "R3031", + "R3032", + "R3033", + "R3034", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3037", + "R3038", + "R3039", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3045", + "R3046", + "R3047", + "R3048", + "R3049", + "R3050", + "R3051", + "R3052", + "R3053", + "R3054", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3057", + "R3058", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3061", + "R3062", + "R3063", + "R3064", + "R3065", + "R3066", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3069", + "R3070", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3073", + "R3074", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3077", + "R3078", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3081", + "R3082", + "R3083", + "R3084", + "R3085", + "R3086", + "R3087", + "R3088", + "R3089", + "R3090", + "R3091", + "R3092", + "R3093", + "R3094", + "R3095", + "R3096", + "R3097", + "R3098", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3101", + "R3102", + "R3103", + "R3104", + "R3105", + "R3106", + "R3107", + "R3108", + "R3109", + "R3110", + "R3111", + "R3112", + "R3113", + "R3114", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3117", + "R3118", + "R3119", + "R3120", + "R3121", + "R3122", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3125", + "R3126", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3129", + "R3130", + "R3131", + "R3132", + "R3133", + "R3134", + "R3135", + "R3136", + "R3137", + "R3138", + "R3139", + "R3140", + "R3141", + "R3142", + "R3143", + "R3144", + "R3145", + "R3146", + "R3147", + "R3148", + "R3149", + "R3150", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3153", + "R3154", + "R3155", + "R3156", + "R3157", + "R3158", + "R3159", + "R3160", + "R3161", + "R3162", + "R3163", + "R3164", + "R3165", + "R3166", + "R3167", + "R3168", + "R3169", + "R3170", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3173", + "R3174", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3177", + "R3178", + "R3179", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3183", + "R3184", + "R3185", + "R3186", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3189", + "R3190", + "R3191", + "R3192", + "R3193", + "R3194", + "R3195", + "R3196", + "R3197", + "R3198", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3201", + "R3202", + "R3203", + "R3204", + "R3205", + "R3206", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3209", + "R3210", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3213", + "R3214", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3217", + "R3218", + "R3219", + "R3220", + "R3221", + "R3222", + "R3223", + "R3224", + "R3225", + "R3226", + "R3227", + "R3228", + "R3229", + "R3230", + "R3231", + "R3232", + "R3233", + "R3234", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3237", + "R3238", + "R3239", + "R3240", + "R3241", + "R3242", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3245", + "R3246", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3249", + "R3250", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3253", + "R3254", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3257", + "R3258", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3261", + "R3262", + "R3263", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3269", + "R3270", + "R3271", + "R3272", + "R3273", + "R3274", + "R3275", + "R3276", + "R3277", + "R3278", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3281", + "R3282", + "R3283", + "R3284", + "R3285", + "R3286", + "R3287", + "R3288", + "R3289", + "R3290", + "R3291", + "R3292", + "R3293", + "R3294", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3297", + "R3298", + "R3299", + "R3300", + "R3301", + "R3302", + "R3303", + "R3304", + "R3305", + "R3306", + "R3307", + "R3308", + "R3309", + "R3310", + "R3311", + "R3312", + "R3313", + "R3314", + "R3315", + "R3316", + "R3317", + "R3318", + "R3319", + "R3320", + "R3321", + "R3322", + "R3323", + "R3324", + "R3325", + "R3326", + "R3327", + "R3328", + "R3329", + "R3330", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3334", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3337", + "R3338", + "R3339", + "R3340", + "R3341", + "R3342", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3345", + "R3346", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3349", + "R3350", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3353", + "R3354", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3357", + "R3358", + "R3359", + "R3360", + "R3361", + "R3362", + "R3363", + "R3364", + "R3365", + "R3366", + "R3367", + "R3368", + "R3369", + "R3370", + "R3371", + "R3372", + "R3373", + "R3374", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3377", + "R3378", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3381", + "R3382", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3385", + "R3386", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3389", + "R3390", + "R3391", + "R3392", + "R3393", + "R3394", + "R3395", + "R3396", + "R3397", + "R3398", + "R3399", + "R3400", + "R3401", + "R3402", + "R3403", + "R3404", + "R3405", + "R3406", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3409", + "R3410", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3413", + "R3414", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3417", + "R3418", + "R3419", + "R3420", + "R3421", + "R3422", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3425", + "R3426", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3429", + "R3430", + "R3431", + "R3432", + "R3433", + "R3434", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3437", + "R3438", + "R3439", + "R3440", + "R3441", + "R3442", + "R3443", + "R3444", + "R3445", + "R3446", + "R3447", + "R3448", + "R3449", + "R3450", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3453", + "R3454", + "R3455", + "R3456", + "R3457", + "R3458", + "R3459", + "R3460", + "R3461", + "R3462", + "R3463", + "R3464", + "R3465", + "R3466", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3469", + "R3470", + "R3471", + "R3472", + "R3473", + "R3474", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3479", + "R3480", + "R3481", + "R3482", + "R3483", + "R3484", + "R3485", + "R3486", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3489", + "R3490", + "R3491", + "R3492", + "R3493", + "R3494", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3497", + "R3498", + "R3499", + "R3500", + "R3501", + "R3502", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3505", + "R3506", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3510", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3513", + "R3514", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3517", + "R3518", + "R3519", + "R3520", + "R3521", + "R3522", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3525", + "R3526", + "R3527", + "R3528", + "R3529", + "R3530", + "R3531", + "R3532", + "R3533", + "R3534", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3537", + "R3538", + "R3539", + "R3540", + "R3541", + "R3542", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3545", + "R3546", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3549", + "R3550", + "R3551", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3557", + "R3558", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3561", + "R3562", + "R3563", + "R3564", + "R3565", + "R3566", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3569", + "R3570", + "R3571", + "R3572", + "R3573", + "R3574", + "R3575", + "R3576", + "R3577", + "R3578", + "R3579", + "R3580", + "R3581", + "R3582", + "R3583", + "R3584", + "R3585", + "R3586", + "R3587", + "R3588", + "R3589", + "R3590", + "R3591", + "R3592", + "R3593", + "R3594", + "R3595", + "R3596", + "R3597", + "R3598", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3601", + "R3602", + "R3603", + "R3604", + "R3605", + "R3606", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3609", + "R3610", + "R3611", + "R3612", + "R3613", + "R3614", + "R3615", + "R3616", + "R3617", + "R3618", + "R3619", + "R3620", + "R3621", + "R3622", + "R3623", + "R3624", + "R3625", + "R3626", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3629", + "R3630", + "R3631", + "R3632", + "R3633", + "R3634", + "R3635", + "R3636", + "R3637", + "R3638", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3641", + "R3642", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3645", + "R3646", + "R3647", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3650", + "R3651", + "R3652", + "R3653", + "R3654", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3657", + "R3658", + "R3659", + "R3660", + "R3661", + "R3662", + "R3663", + "R3664", + "R3665", + "R3666", + "R3667", + "R3668", + "R3669", + "R3670", + "R3671", + "R3672", + "R3673", + "R3674", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3677", + "R3678", + "R3679", + "R3680", + "R3681", + "R3682", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3685", + "R3686", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3689", + "R3690", + "R3691", + "R3692", + "R3693", + "R3694", + "R3695", + "R3696", + "R3697", + "R3698", + "R3699", + "R3700", + "R3701", + "R3702", + "R3703", + "R3704", + "R3705", + "R3706", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3709", + "R3710", + "R3711", + "R3712", + "R3713", + "R3714", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3721", + "R3722", + "R3723", + "R3724", + "R3725", + "R3726", + "R3727", + "R3728", + "R3729", + "R3730", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3733", + "R3734", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3737", + "R3738", + "R3739", + "R3740", + "R3741", + "R3742", + "R3743", + "R3744", + "R3745", + "R3746", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3749", + "R3750", + "R3751", + "R3752", + "R3753", + "R3754", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3757", + "R3758", + "R3759", + "R3760", + "R3761", + "R3762", + "R3763", + "R3764", + "R3765", + "R3766", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3769", + "R3770", + "R3771", + "R3772", + "R3773", + "R3774", + "R3775", + "R3776", + "R3777", + "R3778", + "R3779", + "R3780", + "R3781", + "R3782", + "R3783", + "R3784", + "R3785", + "R3786", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3789", + "R3790", + "R3791", + "R3792", + "R3793", + "R3794", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3797", + "R3798", + "R3799", + "R3800", + "R3801", + "R3802", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3805", + "R3806", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3809", + "R3810", + "R3811", + "R3812", + "R3813", + "R3814", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3817", + "R3818", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3821", + "R3822", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3825", + "R3826", + "R3827", + "R3828", + "R3829", + "R3830", + "R3831", + "R3832", + "R3833", + "R3834", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3837", + "R3838", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3841", + "R3842", + "R3843", + "R3844", + "R3845", + "R3846", + "R3847", + "R3848", + "R3849", + "R3850", + "R3851", + "R3852", + "R3853", + "R3854", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3857", + "R3858", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3861", + "R3862", + "R3863", + "R3864", + "R3865", + "R3866", + "R3867", + "R3868", + "R3869", + "R3870", + "R3871", + "R3872", + "R3873", + "R3874", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3877", + "R3878", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3881", + "R3882", + "R3883", + "R3884", + "R3885", + "R3886", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3889", + "R3890", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3893", + "R3894", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3897", + "R3898", + "R3899", + "R3900", + "R3901", + "R3902", + "R3903", + "R3904", + "R3905", + "R3906", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3909", + "R3910", + "R3911", + "R3912", + "R3913", + "R3914", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3917", + "R3918", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3921", + "R3922", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3927", + "R3928", + "R3929", + "R3930", + "R3931", + "R3932", + "R3933", + "R3934", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3937", + "R3938", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3941", + "R3942", + "R3943", + "R3944", + "R3945", + "R3946", + "R3947", + "R3948", + "R3949", + "R3950", + "R3951", + "R3952", + "R3953", + "R3954", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3957", + "R3958", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3961", + "R3962", + "R3963", + "R3964", + "R3965", + "R3966", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3969", + "R3970", + "R3971", + "R3972", + "R3973", + "R3974", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3977", + "R3978", + "R3979", + "R3980", + "R3981", + "R3982", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3985", + "R3986", + "R3987", + "R3988", + "R3989", + "R3990", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3993", + "R3994", + "R3995", + "R3996", + "R3997", + "R3998", + "R3999", + "R4000", + "R4001", + "R4002", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4005", + "R4006", + "R4007", + "R4008", + "R4009", + "R4010", + "R4011", + "R4012", + "R4013", + "R4014", + "R4015", + "R4016", + "R4017", + "R4018", + "R4019", + "R4020", + "R4021", + "R4022", + "R4023", + "R4024", + "R4025", + "R4026", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4029", + "R4030", + "R4031", + "R4032", + "R4033", + "R4034", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4037", + "R4038", + "R4039", + "R4040", + "R4041", + "R4042", + "R4043", + "R4044", + "R4045", + "R4046", + "R4047", + "R4048", + "R4049", + "R4050", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4053", + "R4054", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4057", + "R4058", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4061", + "R4062", + "R4063", + "R4064", + "R4065", + "R4066", + "R4067", + "R4068", + "R4069", + "R4070", + "R4071", + "R4072", + "R4073", + "R4074", + "R4075", + "R4076", + "R4077", + "R4078", + "R4079", + "R4080", + "R4081", + "R4082", + "R4083", + "R4084", + "R4085", + "R4086", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4089", + "R4090", + "R4091", + "R4092", + "R4093", + "R4094", + "R4095", + "R4096", + "R4097", + "R4098", + "R4099", + "R4100", + "R4101", + "R4102", + "R4103", + "R4104", + "R4105", + "R4106", + "R4107", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4113", + "R4114", + "R4115", + "R4116", + "R4117", + "R4118", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4121", + "R4122", + "R4123", + "R4124", + "R4125", + "R4126", + "R4127", + "R4128", + "R4129", + "R4130", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4133", + "R4134", + "R4135", + "R4136", + "R4137", + "R4138", + "R4139", + "R4140", + "R4141", + "R4142", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4145", + "R4146", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4149", + "R4150", + "R4151", + "R4152", + "R4153", + "R4154", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4157", + "R4158", + "R4159", + "R4160", + "R4161", + "R4162", + "R4163", + "R4164", + "R4165", + "R4166", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4169", + "R4170", + "R4171", + "R4172", + "R4173", + "R4174", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4177", + "R4178", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4181", + "R4182", + "R4183", + "R4184", + "R4185", + "R4186", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4189", + "R4190", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4194", + "R4195", + "R4196", + "R4197", + "R4198", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4201", + "R4202", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4205", + "R4206", + "R4207", + "R4208", + "R4209", + "R4210", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4213", + "R4214", + "R4215", + "R4216", + "R4217", + "R4218", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4221", + "R4222", + "R4223", + "R4224", + "R4225", + "R4226", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4229", + "R4230", + "R4231", + "R4232", + "R4233", + "R4234", + "R4235", + "R4236", + "R4237", + "R4238", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4241", + "R4242", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4245", + "R4246", + "R4247", + "R4248", + "R4249", + "R4250", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4253", + "R4254", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4258", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4261", + "R4262", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4265", + "R4266", + "R4267", + "R4268", + "R4269", + "R4270", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4273", + "R4274", + "R4275", + "R4276", + "R4277", + "R4278", + "R4279", + "R4280", + "R4281", + "R4282", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4285", + "R4286", + "R4287", + "R4288", + "R4289", + "R4290", + "R4291", + "R4292", + "R4293", + "R4294", + "R4295", + "R4296", + "R4297", + "R4298", + "R4299", + "R4300", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4305", + "R4306", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4309", + "R4310", + "R4311", + "R4312", + "R4313", + "R4314", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4317", + "R4318", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4321", + "R4322", + "R4323", + "R4324", + "R4325", + "R4326", + "R4327", + "R4328", + "R4329", + "R4330", + "R4331", + "R4332", + "R4333", + "R4334", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4337", + "R4338", + "R4339", + "R4340", + "R4341", + "R4342", + "R4343", + "R4344", + "R4345", + "R4346", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4349", + "R4350", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4353", + "R4354", + "R4355", + "R4356", + "R4357", + "R4358", + "R4359", + "R4360", + "R4361", + "R4362", + "R4363", + "R4364", + "R4365", + "R4366", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4369", + "R4370", + "R4371", + "R4372", + "R4373", + "R4374", + "R4376", + "R4377", + "R4378", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4381", + "R4382", + "R4383", + "R4386", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4389", + "R4390", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4393", + "R4394", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4397", + "R4398", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4401", + "R4402", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4405", + "R4406", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4409", + "R4410", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4413", + "R4414", + "R4415", + "R4416", + "R4417", + "R4418", + "R4419", + "R4420", + "R4421", + "R4422", + "R4423", + "R4424", + "R4425", + "R4426", + "R4427", + "R4428", + "R4429", + "R4430", + "R4431", + "R4432", + "R4433", + "R4434", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4437", + "R4438", + "R4439", + "R4440", + "R4441", + "R4442", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4445", + "R4446", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4449", + "R4450", + "R4451", + "R4452", + "R4453", + "R4454", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4457", + "R4458", + "R4459", + "R4460", + "R4461", + "R4462", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4465", + "R4466", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4469", + "R4470", + "R4471", + "R4472", + "R4473", + "R4474", + "R4475", + "R4476", + "R4477", + "R4478", + "R4479", + "R4480", + "R4481", + "R4482", + "R4483", + "R4484", + "R4485", + "R4486", + "R4487", + "R4488", + "R4489", + "R4490", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4493", + "R4494", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4497", + "R4498", + "R4499", + "R4500", + "R4501", + "R4502", + "R4503", + "R4504", + "R4505", + "R4506", + "R4507", + "R4508", + "R4509", + "R4510", + "R4511", + "R4512", + "R4513", + "R4514", + "R4515", + "R4516", + "R4517", + "R4518", + "R4519", + "R4520", + "R4521", + "R4522", + "R4523", + "R4524", + "R4525", + "R4526", + "R4527", + "R4528", + "R4529", + "R4530", + "R4531", + "R4532", + "R4533", + "R4534", + "R4535", + "R4536", + "R4537", + "R4538", + "R4539", + "R4540", + "R4541", + "R4542", + "R4543", + "R4544", + "R4545", + "R4546", + "R4547", + "R4548", + "R4549", + "R4550", + "R4551", + "R4552", + "R4553", + "R4554", + "R4555", + "R4556", + "R4557", + "R4558", + "R4559", + "R4560", + "R4561", + "R4562", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4565", + "R4566", + "R4567", + "R4568", + "R4569", + "R4570", + "R4571", + "R4572", + "R4573", + "R4574", + "R4575", + "R4576", + "R4577", + "R4578", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4581", + "R4582", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4585", + "R4586", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4589", + "R4590", + "R4591", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4597", + "R4598", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4601", + "R4602", + "R4603", + "R4604", + "R4605", + "R4606", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4609", + "R4610", + "R4611", + "R4612", + "R4613", + "R4614", + "R4615", + "R4616", + "R4617", + "R4618", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4621", + "R4622", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4625", + "R4626", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4629", + "R4630", + "R4631", + "R4632", + "R4633", + "R4634", + "R4635", + "R4636", + "R4637", + "R4638", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4641", + "R4642", + "R4643", + "R4644", + "R4645", + "R4646", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4649", + "R4650", + "R4651", + "R4652", + "R4653", + "R4654", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4657", + "R4658", + "R4659", + "R4660", + "R4661", + "R4662", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4665", + "R4666", + "R4667", + "R4668", + "R4669", + "R4670", + "R4671", + "R4672", + "R4673", + "R4674", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4677", + "R4678", + "R4679", + "R4680", + "R4681", + "R4682", + "R4683", + "R4684", + "R4685", + "R4686", + "R4687", + "R4688", + "R4689", + "R4690", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4693", + "R4694", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4697", + "R4698", + "R4699", + "R4700", + "R4701", + "R4702", + "R4703", + "R4704", + "R4705", + "R4706", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4709", + "R4710", + "R4711", + "R4712", + "R4713", + "R4714", + "R4715", + "R4716", + "R4717", + "R4718", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4721", + "R4722", + "R4723", + "R4724", + "R4725", + "R4726", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4730", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4734", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4737", + "R4738", + "R4739", + "R4740", + "R4741", + "R4742", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4745", + "R4746", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4749", + "R4750", + "R4751", + "R4752", + "R4753", + "R4754", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4757", + "R4758", + "R4759", + "R4760", + "R4761", + "R4763", + "R4764", + "R4765", + "R4766", + "R4767", + "R4768", + "R4769", + "R4770", + "R4771", + "R4772", + "R4773", + "R4774", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4777", + "R4778", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4781", + "R4782", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4785", + "R4786", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4789", + "R4790", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4793", + "R4794", + "R4795", + "R4796", + "R4797", + "R4798", + "R4799", + "R4800", + "R4801", + "R4802", + "R4803", + "R4804", + "R4805", + "R4806", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4809", + "R4810", + "R4811", + "R4812", + "R4813", + "R4814", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4817", + "R4818", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4821", + "R4822", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4825", + "R4826", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4829", + "R4830", + "R4831", + "R4832", + "R4833", + "R4834", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4837", + "R4838", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4841", + "R4842", + "R4843", + "R4844", + "R4845", + "R4846", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4849", + "R4850", + "R4851", + "R4852", + "R4853", + "R4854", + "R4855", + "R4856", + "R4857", + "R4858", + "R4859", + "R4860", + "R4861", + "R4862", + "R4863", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4866", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4869", + "R4870", + "R4871", + "R4872", + "R4873", + "R4874", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4877", + "R4878", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4881", + "R4882", + "R4883", + "R4884", + "R4885", + "R4886", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4889", + "R4890", + "R4891", + "R4892", + "R4893", + "R4894", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4897", + "R4898", + "R4899", + "R4900", + "R4901", + "R4902", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4905", + "R4906", + "R4907", + "R4908", + "R4909", + "R4910", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4914", + "R4915", + "R4916", + "R4917", + "R4918", + "R4919", + "R4920", + "R4921", + "R4922", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4925", + "R4926", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4929", + "R4930", + "R4931", + "R4932", + "R4933", + "R4934", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4937", + "R4938", + "R4939", + "R4940", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4945", + "R4946", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4949", + "R4950", + "R4951", + "R4952", + "R4953", + "R4954", + "R4955", + "R4956", + "R4957", + "R4958", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4961", + "R4962", + "R4963", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4969", + "R4970", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4973", + "R4974", + "R4975", + "R4976", + "R4977", + "R4978", + "R4979", + "R4980", + "R4981", + "R4982", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4985", + "R4986", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4989", + "R4990", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4993", + "R4994", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R4997", + "R4998", + "R4999", + "R5000", + "R5001", + "R5002", + "R5003", + "R5004", + "R5005", + "R5006", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5009", + "R5010", + "R5011", + "R5012", + "R5013", + "R5014", + "R5015", + "R5016", + "R5017", + "R5018", + "R5019", + "R5020", + "R5021", + "R5022", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5025", + "R5026", + "R5027", + "R5028", + "R5029", + "R5030", + "R5032", + "R5033", + "R5034", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5037", + "R5038", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5041", + "R5042", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5045", + "R5046", + "R5047", + "R5048", + "R5049", + "R5050", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5053", + "R5054", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5059", + "R5060", + "R5061", + "R5062", + "R5063", + "R5064", + "R5065", + "R5066", + "R5067", + "R5068", + "R5069", + "R5070", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5073", + "R5074", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5077", + "R5078", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5081", + "R5082", + "R5083", + "R5084", + "R5085", + "R5086", + "R5087", + "R5088", + "R5089", + "R5090", + "R5091", + "R5092", + "R5093", + "R5094", + "R5095", + "R5096", + "R5097", + "R5098", + "R5099", + "R5100", + "R5101", + "R5102", + "R5103", + "R5104", + "R5105", + "R5106", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5109", + "R5110", + "R5111", + "R5112", + "R5113", + "R5114", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5117", + "R5118", + "R5119", + "R5120", + "R5121", + "R5122", + "R5123", + "R5124", + "R5125", + "R5126", + "R5127", + "R5128", + "R5129", + "R5130", + "R5131", + "R5132", + "R5133", + "R5134", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5137", + "R5138", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5141", + "R5142", + "R5143", + "R5144", + "R5145", + "R5146", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5149", + "R5150", + "R5151", + "R5152", + "R5153", + "R5154", + "R5155", + "R5156", + "R5157", + "R5158", + "R5159", + "R5160", + "R5161", + "R5162", + "R5163", + "R5164", + "R5165", + "R5166", + "R5167", + "R5168", + "R5169", + "R5170", + "R5171", + "R5172", + "R5173", + "R5174", + "R5175", + "R5176", + "R5177", + "R5178", + "R5179", + "R5180", + "R5181", + "R5182", + "R5183", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5187", + "R5188", + "R5189", + "R5190", + "R5191", + "R5192", + "R5193", + "R5194", + "R5195", + "R5196", + "R5197", + "R5198", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5201", + "R5202", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5205", + "R5206", + "R5207", + "R5208", + "R5209", + "R5210", + "R5211", + "R5212", + "R5213", + "R5214", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5217", + "R5218", + "R5219", + "R5220", + "R5222", + "R5223", + "R5224", + "R5225", + "R5226", + "R5227", + "R5228", + "R5229", + "R5230", + "R5231", + "R5232", + "R5233", + "R5234", + "R5235", + "R5236", + "R5237", + "R5238", + "R5239", + "R5240", + "R5241", + "R5242", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5245", + "R5246", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5249", + "R5250", + "R5251", + "R5252", + "R5253", + "R5254", + "R5256", + "R5257", + "R5258", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5261", + "R5262", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5265", + "R5266", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5269", + "R5270", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5273", + "R5274", + "R5275", + "R5276", + "R5277", + "R5278", + "R5279", + "R5280", + "R5281", + "R5282", + "R5283", + "R5284", + "R5285", + "R5286", + "R5287", + "R5288", + "R5289", + "R5290", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5293", + "R5294", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5297", + "R5298", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5301", + "R5302", + "R5303", + "R5304", + "R5305", + "R5306", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5309", + "R5310", + "R5311", + "R5312", + "R5313", + "R5314", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5317", + "R5318", + "R5319", + "R5320", + "R5321", + "R5322", + "R5323", + "R5324", + "R5325", + "R5326", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5329", + "R5330", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5333", + "R5334", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5337", + "R5338", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5341", + "R5342", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5345", + "R5346", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5349", + "R5350", + "R5351", + "R5352", + "R5353", + "R5354", + "R5355", + "R5356", + "R5357", + "R5358", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5361", + "R5362", + "R5363", + "R5364", + "R5365", + "R5366", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5369", + "R5370", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5373", + "R5374", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5377", + "R5378", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5381", + "R5382", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5385", + "R5386", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5389", + "R5390", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5393", + "R5394", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5397", + "R5398", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5401", + "R5402", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5405", + "R5406", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5409", + "R5410", + "R5411", + "R5412", + "R5413", + "R5414", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5417", + "R5418", + "R5419", + "R5420", + "R5421", + "R5422", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5425", + "R5426", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5429", + "R5430", + "R5431", + "R5432", + "R5433", + "R5434", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5437", + "R5438", + "R5439", + "R5440", + "R5441", + "R5442", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5445", + "R5446", + "R5447", + "R5448", + "R5449", + "R5450", + "R5451", + "R5452", + "R5453", + "R5454", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5457", + "R5458", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5461", + "R5462", + "R5463", + "R5464", + "R5465", + "R5466", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5469", + "R5470", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5473", + "R5474", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5477", + "R5478", + "R5479", + "R5480", + "R5481", + "R5482", + "R5483", + "R5484", + "R5485", + "R5486", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5489", + "R5490", + "R5491", + "R5492", + "R5493", + "R5494", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5497", + "R5498", + "R5499", + "R5500", + "R5501", + "R5502", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5509", + "R5510", + "R5511", + "R5512", + "R5513", + "R5514", + "R5515", + "R5516", + "R5517", + "R5518", + "R5519", + "R5520", + "R5521", + "R5522", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5525", + "R5526", + "R5527", + "R5528", + "R5529", + "R5530", + "R5531", + "R5532", + "R5533", + "R5534", + "R5535", + "R5536", + "R5537", + "R5538", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5541", + "R5542", + "R5543", + "R5544", + "R5545", + "R5546", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5549", + "R5550", + "R5551", + "R5552", + "R5553", + "R5554", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5557", + "R5558", + "R5559", + "R5560", + "R5561", + "R5562", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5565", + "R5566", + "R5567", + "R5568", + "R5569", + "R5570", + "R5571", + "R5572", + "R5573", + "R5574", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5577", + "R5578", + "R5579", + "R5580", + "R5581", + "R5582", + "R5583", + "R5584", + "R5585", + "R5586", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5589", + "R5590", + "R5591", + "R5592", + "R5593", + "R5594", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5597", + "R5598", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5601", + "R5602", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5605", + "R5606", + "R5607", + "R5608", + "R5609", + "R5610", + "R5611", + "R5612", + "R5613", + "R5614", + "R5615", + "R5616", + "R5617", + "R5618", + "R5619", + "R5620", + "R5621", + "R5622", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5629", + "R5630", + "R5631", + "R5632", + "R5633", + "R5634", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5637", + "R5638", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5641", + "R5642", + "R5643", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5646", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5653", + "R5654", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5657", + "R5658", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5661", + "R5662", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5668", + "R5669", + "R5670", + "R5671", + "R5672", + "R5674", + "R5675", + "R5676", + "R5677", + "R5678", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5681", + "R5682", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5685", + "R5686", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5689", + "R5690", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5693", + "R5694", + "R5695", + "R5696", + "R5697", + "R5698", + "R5699", + "R5700", + "R5701", + "R5702", + "R5703", + "R5704", + "R5705", + "R5706", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5709", + "R5710", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5713", + "R5714", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5717", + "R5718", + "R5719", + "R5720", + "R5721", + "R5722", + "R5723", + "R5724", + "R5725", + "R5726", + "R5727", + "R5728", + "R5729", + "R5730", + "R5731", + "R5732", + "R5733", + "R5734", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5737", + "R5738", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5741", + "R5742", + "R5743", + "R5744", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5750", + "R5751", + "R5752", + "R5753", + "R5754", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5757", + "R5758", + "R5759", + "R5760", + "R5761", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5765", + "R5766", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5773", + "R5774", + "R5775", + "R5776", + "R5777", + "R5778", + "R5779", + "R5780", + "R5781", + "R5782", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5785", + "R5786", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5789", + "R5790", + "R5791", + "R5792", + "R5793", + "R5794", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5797", + "R5798", + "R5799", + "R5800", + "R5801", + "R5802", + "R5803", + "R5804", + "R5805", + "R5806", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5809", + "R5810", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5813", + "R5814", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5817", + "R5818", + "R5819", + "R5820", + "R5821", + "R5822", + "R5823", + "R5824", + "R5825", + "R5826", + "R5827", + "R5828", + "R5829", + "R5830", + "R5831", + "R5832", + "R5833", + "R5834", + "R5835", + "R5836", + "R5837", + "R5838", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5841", + "R5842", + "R5843", + "R5844", + "R5845", + "R5846", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5849", + "R5850", + "R5851", + "R5852", + "R5853", + "R5854", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5857", + "R5858", + "R5859", + "R5860", + "R5861", + "R5862", + "R5863", + "R5864", + "R5865", + "R5866", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5869", + "R5870", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5873", + "R5874", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5877", + "R5878", + "R5879", + "R5880", + "R5881", + "R5882", + "R5883", + "R5884", + "R5885", + "R5886", + "R5887", + "R5888", + "R5889", + "R5890", + "R5891", + "R5892", + "R5893", + "R5894", + "R5895", + "R5896", + "R5897", + "R5898", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5905", + "R5906", + "R5907", + "R5908", + "R5909", + "R5910", + "R5911", + "R5912", + "R5913", + "R5914", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5917", + "R5918", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5921", + "R5922", + "R5923", + "R5924", + "R5925", + "R5926", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5929", + "R5930", + "R5931", + "R5932", + "R5934", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5937", + "R5938", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5941", + "R5942", + "R5943", + "R5944", + "R5945", + "R5946", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5949", + "R5950", + "R5951", + "R5952", + "R5953", + "R5954", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5959", + "R5960", + "R5961", + "R5962", + "R5963", + "R5964", + "R5965", + "R5966", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5969", + "R5970", + "R5971", + "R5972", + "R5973", + "R5974", + "R5975", + "R5976", + "R5977", + "R5978", + "R5979", + "R5980", + "R5981", + "R5982", + "R5983", + "R5984", + "R5985", + "R5986", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5989", + "R5990", + "R5991", + "R5992", + "R5993", + "R5994", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P3", + "P4", + "P5", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P9", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P16", + "P17", + "P18", + "P19", + "P20", + "P22", + "P24", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P28", + "P29", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P35", + "P36", + "P37", + "P38", + "P39", + "P40", + "P41", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P46", + "P47", + "P48", + "P49", + "P50", + "P51", + "P52", + "P53", + "P55", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P59", + "P60", + "P62", + "P64", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714", + "R6715", + "R6716", + "R6717", + "R6718", + "R6719", + "R6720", + "R6721", + "R6722", + "R6723", + "R6724", + "R6725", + "R6726", + "R6727", + "R6728", + "R6729", + "R6730", + "R6731", + "R6732", + "R6733", + "R6734", + "R6735", + "R6736", + "R6737", + "R6738", + "R6739", + "R6740", + "R6741", + "R6742", + "R6743", + "R6744", + "R6745", + "R6746", + "R6747", + "R6748", + "R6749", + "R6750", + "R6751", + "R6752", + "R6753", + "R6754", + "R6755", + "R6756", + "R6757", + "R6758", + "R6759", + "R6760", + "R6761", + "R6762", + "R6763", + "R6764", + "R6765", + "R6766", + "R6767", + "R6768", + "R6769", + "R6770", + "R6771", + "R6772", + "R6773", + "R6774", + "R6775", + "R6776", + "R6777", + "R6778", + "R6779", + "R6780", + "R6781", + "R6782", + "R6783", + "R6784", + "R6785", + "R6786", + "R6787", + "R6788", + "R6789", + "R6790", + "R6791", + "R6792", + "R6793", + "R6794", + "R6795", + "R6796", + "R6797", + "R6798", + "R6799", + "R6800", + "R6801", + "R6802", + "R6803", + "R6804", + "R6805", + "R6806", + "R6807", + "R6808", + "R6809", + "R6810", + "R6811", + "R6812", + "R6813", + "R6814", + "R6815", + "R6816", + "R6817", + "R6818", + "R6819", + "R6820", + "R6821", + "R6822", + "R6823", + "R6824", + "R6825", + "R6826", + "R6827", + "R6828", + "R6829", + "R6830", + "R6831", + "R6832", + "R6833", + "R6834", + "R6835", + "R6836", + "R6837", + "R6838", + "R6839", + "R6840", + "R6841", + "R6842", + "R6843", + "R6844", + "R6845", + "R6846", + "R6847", + "R6848", + "R6849", + "R6850", + "R6851", + "R6852", + "R6853", + "R6854", + "R6855", + "R6856", + "R6857", + "R6858", + "R6859", + "R6860", + "R6861", + "R6862", + "R6863", + "R6864", + "R6865", + "R6866", + "R6867", + "R6868", + "R6869", + "R6870", + "R6871", + "R6872", + "R6873", + "R6874", + "R6875", + "R6876", + "R6877", + "R6878", + "R6879", + "R6880", + "R6881", + "R6882", + "R6883", + "R6884", + "R6885", + "R6886", + "R6887", + "R6888", + "R6889", + "R6890", + "R6891", + "R6892", + "R6893", + "R6894", + "R6895", + "R6896", + "R6897", + "R6898", + "R6899", + "R6900", + "R6901", + "R6902", + "R6903", + "R6904", + "R6905", + "R6906", + "R6907", + "R6908", + "R6909", + "R6910", + "R6911", + "R6912", + "R6913", + "R6914", + "R6915", + "R6916", + "R6917", + "R6918", + "R6919", + "R6920", + "R6921", + "R6922", + "R6923", + "R6924", + "R6925", + "R6926", + "R6927", + "R6928", + "R6929", + "R6930", + "R6931", + "R6932", + "R6933", + "R6934", + "R6935", + "R6936", + "R6937", + "R6938", + "R6939", + "R6940", + "R6941", + "R6942", + "R6943", + "R6944", + "R6945", + "R6946", + "R6947", + "R6948", + "R6949", + "R6950", + "R6951", + "R6952", + "R6953", + "R6954", + "R6955", + "R6956", + "R6957", + "R6958", + "R6959", + "R6960", + "R6961", + "R6962", + "R6963", + "R6964", + "R6965", + "R6966", + "R6967", + "R6968", + "R6969", + "R6970", + "R6971", + "R6972", + "R6973", + "R6974", + "R6975", + "R6976", + "R6977", + "R6978", + "R6979", + "R6980", + "R6981", + "R6982", + "R6983", + "R6984", + "R6985", + "R6986", + "R6987", + "R6988", + "R6989", + "R6990", + "R6991", + "R6992", + "R6993", + "R6994", + "R6995", + "R6996", + "R6997", + "R6998", + "R6999", + "R7000", + "R7001", + "R7002", + "R7003", + "R7004", + "R7005", + "R7006", + "R7007", + "R7008", + "R7009", + "R7010", + "R7011", + "R7012", + "R7013", + "R7014", + "R7015", + "R7016", + "R7017", + "R7018", + "R7019", + "R7020", + "R7021", + "R7022", + "R7023", + "R7024", + "R7025", + "R7026", + "R7027", + "R7028", + "R7029", + "R7030", + "R7031", + "R7032", + "R7033", + "R7034", + "R7035", + "R7036", + "R7037", + "R7038", + "R7039", + "R7040", + "R7041", + "R7042", + "R7043", + "R7044", + "R7045", + "R7046", + "R7047", + "R7048", + "R7049", + "R7050", + "R7051", + "R7052", + "R7053", + "R7054", + "R7055", + "R7056", + "R7057", + "R7058", + "R7059", + "R7060", + "R7061", + "R7062", + "R7063", + "R7064", + "R7065", + "R7066", + "R7067", + "R7068", + "R7069", + "R7070", + "R7071", + "R7072", + "R7073", + "R7074", + "R7075", + "R7076", + "R7077", + "R7078", + "R7079", + "R7080", + "R7081", + "R7082", + "R7083", + "R7084", + "R7085", + "R7086", + "R7087", + "R7088", + "R7089", + "R7090", + "R7091", + "R7092", + "R7093", + "R7094", + "R7095", + "R7096", + "R7097", + "R7098", + "R7099", + "R7100", + "R7101", + "R7102", + "R7103", + "R7104", + "R7105", + "R7106", + "R7107", + "R7108", + "R7109", + "R7110", + "R7111", + "R7112", + "R7113", + "R7114", + "R7115", + "R7116", + "R7117", + "R7118", + "R7119", + "R7120", + "R7121", + "R7122", + "R7123", + "R7124", + "R7125", + "R7126", + "R7127", + "R7128", + "R7129", + "R7130", + "R7131", + "R7132", + "R7133", + "R7134", + "R7135", + "R7136", + "R7137", + "R7138", + "R7139", + "R7140", + "R7141", + "R7142", + "R7143", + "R7144", + "R7145", + "R7146", + "R7147", + "R7148", + "R7149", + "R7150", + "R7151", + "R7152", + "R7153", + "R7154", + "R7155", + "R7156", + "R7157", + "R7158", + "R7159", + "R7160", + "R7161", + "R7162", + "R7163", + "R7164", + "R7165", + "R7166", + "R7167", + "R7168", + "R7169", + "R7170", + "R7171", + "R7172", + "R7173", + "R7174", + "R7175", + "R7176", + "R7177", + "R7178", + "R7179", + "R7180", + "R7181", + "R7182", + "R7183", + "R7184", + "R7185", + "R7186", + "R7187", + "R7188", + "R7189", + "R7190", + "R7191", + "R7192", + "R7193", + "R7194", + "R7195", + "R7196", + "R7197", + "R7198", + "R7199", + "R7200", + "R7201", + "R7202", + "R7203", + "R7204", + "R7205", + "R7206", + "R7207", + "R7208", + "R7209", + "R7210", + "R7211", + "R7212", + "R7213", + "R7214", + "R7215", + "R7216", + "R7217", + "R7218", + "R7219", + "R7220", + "R7222", + "R7223", + "R7224", + "R7225", + "R7226", + "R7228", + "R7229", + "R7230", + "R7231", + "R7232", + "R7233", + "R7234", + "R7235", + "R7236", + "R7237", + "R7238", + "R7239", + "R7240", + "R7241", + "R7242", + "R7243", + "R7244", + "R7245", + "R7246", + "R7247", + "R7248", + "R7249", + "R7250", + "R7251", + "R7252", + "R7253", + "R7254", + "R7255", + "R7256", + "R7257", + "R7258", + "R7259", + "R7260", + "R7261", + "R7262", + "R7263", + "R7264", + "R7265", + "R7266", + "R7267", + "R7268", + "R7269", + "R7270", + "R7271", + "R7272", + "R7273", + "R7274", + "R7275", + "R7276", + "R7277", + "R7278", + "R7279", + "R7280", + "R7281", + "R7282", + "R7283", + "R7284", + "R7285", + "R7286", + "R7287", + "R7288", + "R7289", + "R7290", + "R7291", + "R7292", + "R7293", + "R7294", + "R7295", + "R7296", + "R7297", + "R7298", + "R7299", + "R7300", + "R7301", + "R7302", + "R7303", + "R7304", + "R7305", + "R7306", + "R7307", + "R7308", + "R7309", + "R7310", + "R7311", + "R7312", + "R7313", + "R7314", + "R7315", + "R7316", + "R7317", + "R7318", + "R7319", + "R7320", + "R7321", + "R7322", + "R7323", + "R7324", + "R7325", + "R7326", + "R7327", + "R7328", + "R7329", + "R7330", + "R7331", + "R7332", + "R7333", + "R7334", + "R7335", + "R7336", + "R7337", + "R7338", + "R7339", + "R7340", + "R7341", + "R7342", + "R7343", + "R7344", + "R7345", + "R7346", + "R7347", + "R7348", + "R7349", + "R7350", + "R7351", + "R7352", + "R7353", + "R7354", + "R7355", + "R7356", + "R7357", + "R7358", + "R7359", + "R7360", + "R7361", + "R7362", + "R7363", + "R7364", + "R7365", + "R7366", + "R7367", + "R7368", + "R7369", + "R7370", + "R7371", + "R7372", + "R7373", + "R7374", + "R7375", + "R7376", + "R7377", + "R7378", + "R7379", + "R7380", + "R7381", + "R7382", + "R7383", + "R7384", + "R7385", + "R7386", + "R7387", + "R7388", + "R7389", + "R7390", + "R7391", + "R7392", + "R7393", + "R7394", + "R7395", + "R7396", + "R7397", + "R7398", + "R7399", + "R7400", + "R7401", + "R7402", + "R7403", + "R7404", + "R7405", + "R7406", + "R7407", + "R7408", + "R7409", + "R7410", + "R7411", + "R7412", + "R7413", + "R7414", + "R7415", + "R7416", + "R7417", + "R7418", + "R7419", + "R7420", + "R7421", + "R7422", + "R7423", + "R7424", + "R7425", + "R7426", + "R7427", + "R7428", + "R7429", + "R7430", + "R7431", + "R7432", + "R7433", + "R7434", + "R7435", + "R7436", + "R7437", + "R7438", + "R7439", + "R7440", + "R7441", + "R7442", + "R7443", + "R7444", + "R7445", + "R7446", + "R7447", + "R7448", + "R7449", + "R7450", + "R7451", + "R7452", + "R7453", + "R7454", + "R7455", + "R7456", + "R7457", + "R7458", + "R7459", + "R7460", + "R7461", + "R7462", + "R7463", + "R7464", + "R7465", + "R7466", + "R7467", + "R7468", + "R7469", + "R7470", + "R7471", + "R7472", + "R7473", + "R7474", + "R7475", + "R7476", + "R7477", + "R7478", + "R7479", + "R7480", + "R7481", + "R7482", + "R7483", + "R7484", + "R7485", + "R7486", + "R7487", + "R7488", + "R7489", + "R7490", + "R7491", + "R7492", + "R7493", + "R7494", + "R7495", + "R7496", + "R7497", + "R7498", + "R7499", + "R7500", + "R7501", + "R7502", + "R7503", + "R7505", + "R7506", + "R7507", + "R7508", + "R7509", + "R7510", + "R7511", + "R7512", + "R7513", + "R7514", + "R7515", + "R7516", + "R7517", + "R7518", + "R7519", + "R7520", + "R7521", + "R7522", + "R7523", + "R7524", + "R7525", + "R7526", + "R7527", + "R7528", + "R7529", + "R7530", + "R7531", + "R7532", + "R7533", + "R7534", + "R7535", + "R7536", + "R7537", + "R7538", + "R7539", + "R7540", + "R7541", + "R7542", + "R7543", + "R7544", + "R7545", + "R7546", + "R7547", + "R7548", + "R7549", + "R7550", + "R7551", + "R7552", + "R7553", + "R7554", + "R7555", + "R7556", + "R7557", + "R7558", + "R7559", + "R7560", + "R7561", + "R7562", + "R7563", + "R7564", + "R7565", + "R7566", + "R7567", + "R7568", + "R7569", + "R7570", + "R7571", + "R7572", + "R7573", + "R7574", + "R7575", + "R7576", + "R7577", + "R7578", + "R7579", + "R7580", + "R7581", + "R7582", + "R7583", + "R7584", + "R7585", + "R7586", + "R7587", + "R7588", + "R7589", + "R7590", + "R7591", + "R7592", + "R7593", + "R7594", + "R7595", + "R7596", + "R7597", + "R7599", + "R7600", + "R7601", + "R7602", + "R7603", + "R7604", + "R7605", + "R7606", + "R7607", + "R7608", + "R7609", + "R7610", + "R7611", + "R7612", + "R7613", + "R7614", + "R7615", + "R7616", + "R7617", + "R7618", + "R7619", + "R7620", + "R7621", + "R7622", + "R7623", + "R7624", + "R7625", + "R7626", + "R7627", + "R7628", + "R7629", + "R7630", + "R7631", + "R7632", + "R7633", + "R7634", + "R7635", + "R7636", + "R7637", + "R7638", + "R7639", + "R7640", + "R7641", + "R7642", + "R7643", + "R7644", + "R7645", + "R7646", + "R7647", + "R7648", + "R7649", + "R7650", + "R7651", + "R7653", + "R7654", + "R7655", + "R7656", + "R7657", + "R7658", + "R7659", + "R7660", + "R7661", + "R7662", + "R7663", + "R7664", + "R7665", + "R7666", + "R7667", + "R7668", + "R7669", + "R7670", + "R7671", + "R7672", + "R7673", + "R7674", + "R7675", + "R7676", + "R7677", + "R7678", + "R7679", + "R7680", + "R7681", + "R7682", + "R7683", + "R7684", + "R7685", + "R7686", + "R7687", + "R7688", + "R7689", + "R7690", + "R7691", + "R7692", + "R7693", + "R7694", + "R7695", + "R7696", + "R7697", + "R7698", + "R7699", + "R7700", + "R7701", + "R7702", + "R7703", + "R7704", + "R7705", + "R7706", + "R7707", + "R7708", + "R7709", + "R7710", + "R7711", + "R7712", + "R7713", + "R7714", + "R7715", + "R7716", + "R7717", + "R7718", + "R7719", + "R7720", + "R7721", + "R7722", + "R7723", + "R7724", + "R7725", + "R7726", + "R7727", + "R7728", + "R7729", + "R7730", + "R7731", + "R7732", + "R7733", + "R7734", + "R7735", + "R7736", + "R7737", + "R7739", + "R7740", + "R7741", + "R7742", + "R7743", + "R7744", + "R7745", + "R7746", + "R7747", + "R7748", + "R7749", + "R7750", + "R7751", + "R7752", + "R7753", + "R7754", + "R7755", + "R7756", + "R7757", + "R7758", + "R7759", + "R7760", + "R7761", + "R7762", + "R7763", + "R7764", + "R7765", + "R7766", + "R7767", + "R7768", + "R7769", + "R7770", + "R7771", + "R7772", + "R7773", + "R7774", + "R7775", + "R7776", + "R7777", + "R7778", + "R7779", + "R7780", + "R7781", + "R7782", + "R7783", + "R7784", + "R7785", + "R7786", + "R7787", + "R7788", + "R7789", + "R7790", + "R7791", + "R7794", + "R7795", + "R7796", + "R7797", + "R7798", + "R7799", + "R7800", + "R7801", + "R7802", + "R7803", + "R7804", + "R7805", + "R7806", + "R7807", + "R7808", + "R7809", + "R7810", + "R7811", + "R7812", + "R7813", + "R7814", + "R7815", + "R7816", + "R7817", + "R7818", + "R7819", + "R7820", + "R7821", + "R7822", + "R7823", + "R7825", + "R7826", + "R7827", + "R7828", + "R7829", + "R7830", + "R7831", + "R7832", + "R7833", + "R7834", + "R7835", + "R7836" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "tfidf", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": true, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": true, + "write_check": true, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "settle_note": "token differencing nominated 1187 pairs", + "tasks": 9008, + "attempted": 8808, + "passed": 3886, + "success": 0.4313943161634103, + "attempted_success": 0.44118982742960944, + "composite": 0.5530425958727772, + "signal_share": 0.7621693205788787, + "multiplier": 7.6216932057887865, + "score": 579.6455779558055, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 442.43407669822165, + "signal_score": 37.211501257583905, + "token_score": 100.0, + "tokens_billed": 158.33789577836413, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 6064, + "tasks": 6064, + "passed": 2704, + "pass_rate": 0.44591029023746703, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.0026666666666666666, + "hedge": 0.0010124873439082012, + "lexical_r@5": 0.9686666666666667, + "mrr": 0.45889649470899463, + "noise": 0.6419083349038817, + "oblique_r@5": 0.008, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.976, + "path_cover": 0.030357142857142864, + "path_r@5": 0.078125, + "r@1": 0.43033333333333335, + "r@5": 0.48883333333333334, + "stale_above": 0.6329113924050633, + "tokens": 158.33789577836413, + "weighted_r@5": 0.4888333333333333 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 714, + "tasks": 714, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.6666216288626268 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 300, + "tasks": 225, + "passed": 150, + "pass_rate": 0.6666666666666666, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6666666666666666, + "head_r@5": 0.6666666666666666, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 500, + "tasks": 500, + "passed": 291, + "pass_rate": 0.582, + "columns": { + "absorbed": 0.0, + "flagged": 0.33797909407665505, + "queued": 0.33797909407665505, + "t1_recall": 0.4166666666666667, + "t2_false_alarm": 0.06944444444444445, + "t2_recall": 0.3333333333333333, + "t3_false_alarm": 0.13043478260869565, + "t3_recall": 0.2676056338028169 + } + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 250, + "passed": 250, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 522, + "tasks": 522, + "passed": 1, + "pass_rate": 0.0019157088122605363, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.0019157088122605363, + "direct_r@5": 0.0019157088122605363, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 375, + "tasks": 375, + "passed": 375, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 158, + "tasks": 158, + "passed": 115, + "pass_rate": 0.7278481012658228, + "columns": { + "flagged": 0.7278481012658228, + "noticed": 0.7278481012658228 + } + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.7621693205788787, + "noise": 0.6419083349038817, + "tokens_per_query": 158.33789577836413 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.252724051210798, + "lineage_ms": 0.0006305600000000003, + "link_ms": 0.00002777735849056607, + "purge_ms": 0.051385016, + "recall_ms": 19.18925066163745, + "recall_path_ms": 20.550847640624998, + "release_ms": 0.048286656, + "settle_ms": 1523.9307505000002, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.035328566666666665, + "suspects_ms": 0.067667, + "tokens_per_query": 158.33789577836413 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 2519, + "total_ms": 636.6118850000001 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 75, + "total_ms": 0.04729200000000002 + }, + "link": { + "count": 1590, + "total_ms": 0.04416600000000005 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 6.423127 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 8086, + "total_ms": 155164.28085000042 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 1315.2542489999998 + }, + "release": { + "count": 125, + "total_ms": 6.035832 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 3047.8615010000003 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 150, + "total_ms": 5.299284999999999 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.067667 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R47", + "R48", + "R51", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R63", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R140", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R187", + "R188", + "R191", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R211", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R223", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R299", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R311", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R343", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R383", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R399", + "R400", + "R403", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R487", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R535", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R619", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R631", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R747", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R843", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R919", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2523", + "R2524", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2531", + "R2532", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2559", + "R2560", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2571", + "R2572", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2583", + "R2584", + "R2587", + "R2588", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2603", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2611", + "R2612", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2623", + "R2624", + "R2627", + "R2628", + "R2631", + "R2632", + "R2635", + "R2636", + "R2639", + "R2640", + "R2643", + "R2644", + "R2647", + "R2648", + "R2651", + "R2652", + "R2655", + "R2656", + "R2657", + "R2658", + "R2659", + "R2660", + "R2663", + "R2664", + "R2667", + "R2668", + "R2671", + "R2672", + "R2675", + "R2676", + "R2679", + "R2680", + "R2683", + "R2684", + "R2687", + "R2688", + "R2691", + "R2692", + "R2695", + "R2696", + "R2699", + "R2700", + "R2703", + "R2704", + "R2707", + "R2708", + "R2711", + "R2712", + "R2715", + "R2716", + "R2717", + "R2718", + "R2719", + "R2720", + "R2723", + "R2724", + "R2725", + "R2726", + "R2727", + "R2728", + "R2731", + "R2732", + "R2735", + "R2736", + "R2739", + "R2740", + "R2743", + "R2744", + "R2747", + "R2748", + "R2751", + "R2752", + "R2755", + "R2756", + "R2759", + "R2760", + "R2761", + "R2762", + "R2763", + "R2764", + "R2767", + "R2768", + "R2771", + "R2772", + "R2775", + "R2776", + "R2779", + "R2780", + "R2783", + "R2784", + "R2787", + "R2788", + "R2791", + "R2792", + "R2795", + "R2796", + "R2797", + "R2798", + "R2799", + "R2800", + "R2803", + "R2804", + "R2807", + "R2808", + "R2811", + "R2812", + "R2815", + "R2816", + "R2819", + "R2820", + "R2823", + "R2824", + "R2827", + "R2828", + "R2831", + "R2832", + "R2835", + "R2836", + "R2839", + "R2840", + "R2843", + "R2844", + "R2847", + "R2848", + "R2851", + "R2852", + "R2855", + "R2856", + "R2859", + "R2860", + "R2863", + "R2864", + "R2867", + "R2868", + "R2869", + "R2870", + "R2871", + "R2872", + "R2875", + "R2876", + "R2879", + "R2880", + "R2883", + "R2884", + "R2887", + "R2888", + "R2889", + "R2890", + "R2891", + "R2892", + "R2895", + "R2896", + "R2899", + "R2900", + "R2903", + "R2904", + "R2907", + "R2908", + "R2911", + "R2912", + "R2915", + "R2916", + "R2919", + "R2920", + "R2923", + "R2924", + "R2927", + "R2928", + "R2931", + "R2932", + "R2935", + "R2936", + "R2939", + "R2940", + "R2943", + "R2944", + "R2947", + "R2948", + "R2951", + "R2952", + "R2955", + "R2956", + "R2959", + "R2960", + "R2963", + "R2964", + "R2967", + "R2968", + "R2971", + "R2972", + "R2973", + "R2974", + "R2975", + "R2976", + "R2979", + "R2980", + "R2983", + "R2984", + "R2987", + "R2988", + "R2991", + "R2992", + "R2995", + "R2996", + "R2999", + "R3000", + "R3003", + "R3004", + "R3007", + "R3008", + "R3011", + "R3012", + "R3015", + "R3016", + "R3019", + "R3020", + "R3023", + "R3024", + "R3027", + "R3028", + "R3031", + "R3032", + "R3035", + "R3036", + "R3039", + "R3040", + "R3041", + "R3042", + "R3043", + "R3044", + "R3051", + "R3052", + "R3055", + "R3056", + "R3059", + "R3060", + "R3063", + "R3064", + "R3067", + "R3068", + "R3071", + "R3072", + "R3075", + "R3076", + "R3079", + "R3080", + "R3083", + "R3084", + "R3088", + "R3089", + "R3090", + "R3091", + "R3092", + "R3095", + "R3096", + "R3099", + "R3100", + "R3101", + "R3102", + "R3103", + "R3104", + "R3107", + "R3108", + "R3111", + "R3112", + "R3115", + "R3116", + "R3119", + "R3120", + "R3123", + "R3124", + "R3127", + "R3128", + "R3131", + "R3132", + "R3135", + "R3136", + "R3139", + "R3140", + "R3143", + "R3144", + "R3147", + "R3148", + "R3151", + "R3152", + "R3155", + "R3156", + "R3159", + "R3160", + "R3163", + "R3164", + "R3167", + "R3168", + "R3171", + "R3172", + "R3175", + "R3176", + "R3179", + "R3180", + "R3181", + "R3182", + "R3183", + "R3184", + "R3187", + "R3188", + "R3191", + "R3192", + "R3195", + "R3196", + "R3199", + "R3200", + "R3201", + "R3202", + "R3203", + "R3204", + "R3207", + "R3208", + "R3211", + "R3212", + "R3215", + "R3216", + "R3219", + "R3220", + "R3223", + "R3224", + "R3227", + "R3228", + "R3231", + "R3232", + "R3235", + "R3236", + "R3239", + "R3240", + "R3243", + "R3244", + "R3247", + "R3248", + "R3251", + "R3252", + "R3255", + "R3256", + "R3259", + "R3260", + "R3263", + "R3264", + "R3265", + "R3266", + "R3267", + "R3268", + "R3271", + "R3272", + "R3275", + "R3276", + "R3279", + "R3280", + "R3283", + "R3284", + "R3287", + "R3288", + "R3291", + "R3292", + "R3293", + "R3294", + "R3295", + "R3296", + "R3299", + "R3300", + "R3303", + "R3304", + "R3307", + "R3308", + "R3311", + "R3312", + "R3315", + "R3316", + "R3319", + "R3320", + "R3323", + "R3324", + "R3327", + "R3328", + "R3331", + "R3332", + "R3333", + "R3334", + "R3335", + "R3336", + "R3339", + "R3340", + "R3341", + "R3342", + "R3343", + "R3344", + "R3347", + "R3348", + "R3351", + "R3352", + "R3355", + "R3356", + "R3359", + "R3360", + "R3363", + "R3364", + "R3367", + "R3368", + "R3371", + "R3372", + "R3373", + "R3374", + "R3375", + "R3376", + "R3379", + "R3380", + "R3383", + "R3384", + "R3387", + "R3388", + "R3391", + "R3392", + "R3395", + "R3396", + "R3399", + "R3400", + "R3401", + "R3402", + "R3403", + "R3404", + "R3407", + "R3408", + "R3411", + "R3412", + "R3413", + "R3414", + "R3415", + "R3416", + "R3417", + "R3418", + "R3419", + "R3420", + "R3423", + "R3424", + "R3427", + "R3428", + "R3431", + "R3432", + "R3435", + "R3436", + "R3439", + "R3440", + "R3443", + "R3444", + "R3447", + "R3448", + "R3451", + "R3452", + "R3455", + "R3456", + "R3459", + "R3460", + "R3463", + "R3464", + "R3467", + "R3468", + "R3471", + "R3472", + "R3475", + "R3476", + "R3477", + "R3478", + "R3479", + "R3480", + "R3483", + "R3484", + "R3487", + "R3488", + "R3491", + "R3492", + "R3495", + "R3496", + "R3499", + "R3500", + "R3503", + "R3504", + "R3507", + "R3508", + "R3509", + "R3510", + "R3511", + "R3512", + "R3515", + "R3516", + "R3519", + "R3520", + "R3523", + "R3524", + "R3527", + "R3528", + "R3531", + "R3532", + "R3535", + "R3536", + "R3537", + "R3538", + "R3539", + "R3540", + "R3543", + "R3544", + "R3547", + "R3548", + "R3551", + "R3552", + "R3553", + "R3554", + "R3555", + "R3556", + "R3559", + "R3560", + "R3563", + "R3564", + "R3567", + "R3568", + "R3571", + "R3572", + "R3575", + "R3576", + "R3579", + "R3580", + "R3583", + "R3584", + "R3587", + "R3588", + "R3591", + "R3592", + "R3595", + "R3596", + "R3599", + "R3600", + "R3603", + "R3604", + "R3607", + "R3608", + "R3611", + "R3612", + "R3615", + "R3616", + "R3619", + "R3623", + "R3624", + "R3627", + "R3628", + "R3631", + "R3632", + "R3633", + "R3634", + "R3635", + "R3636", + "R3639", + "R3640", + "R3643", + "R3644", + "R3647", + "R3648", + "R3649", + "R3650", + "R3651", + "R3652", + "R3655", + "R3656", + "R3657", + "R3658", + "R3659", + "R3660", + "R3663", + "R3664", + "R3667", + "R3668", + "R3671", + "R3672", + "R3675", + "R3676", + "R3679", + "R3680", + "R3683", + "R3684", + "R3687", + "R3688", + "R3691", + "R3692", + "R3695", + "R3696", + "R3699", + "R3700", + "R3703", + "R3704", + "R3707", + "R3708", + "R3711", + "R3712", + "R3715", + "R3716", + "R3717", + "R3718", + "R3719", + "R3720", + "R3723", + "R3724", + "R3727", + "R3728", + "R3731", + "R3732", + "R3735", + "R3736", + "R3739", + "R3740", + "R3743", + "R3744", + "R3747", + "R3748", + "R3751", + "R3752", + "R3753", + "R3754", + "R3755", + "R3756", + "R3759", + "R3760", + "R3763", + "R3764", + "R3767", + "R3768", + "R3771", + "R3772", + "R3775", + "R3776", + "R3779", + "R3780", + "R3783", + "R3784", + "R3787", + "R3788", + "R3791", + "R3792", + "R3795", + "R3796", + "R3799", + "R3800", + "R3803", + "R3804", + "R3807", + "R3808", + "R3811", + "R3812", + "R3815", + "R3816", + "R3817", + "R3818", + "R3819", + "R3820", + "R3823", + "R3824", + "R3827", + "R3828", + "R3831", + "R3832", + "R3835", + "R3836", + "R3839", + "R3840", + "R3843", + "R3844", + "R3847", + "R3848", + "R3851", + "R3852", + "R3853", + "R3854", + "R3855", + "R3856", + "R3859", + "R3860", + "R3863", + "R3864", + "R3867", + "R3868", + "R3871", + "R3872", + "R3875", + "R3876", + "R3879", + "R3880", + "R3881", + "R3882", + "R3883", + "R3884", + "R3887", + "R3888", + "R3891", + "R3892", + "R3895", + "R3896", + "R3899", + "R3900", + "R3903", + "R3904", + "R3907", + "R3908", + "R3911", + "R3912", + "R3913", + "R3914", + "R3915", + "R3916", + "R3919", + "R3920", + "R3923", + "R3924", + "R3925", + "R3926", + "R3927", + "R3928", + "R3931", + "R3932", + "R3935", + "R3936", + "R3939", + "R3940", + "R3943", + "R3944", + "R3947", + "R3948", + "R3951", + "R3952", + "R3955", + "R3956", + "R3957", + "R3958", + "R3959", + "R3960", + "R3963", + "R3964", + "R3967", + "R3968", + "R3971", + "R3972", + "R3975", + "R3976", + "R3979", + "R3980", + "R3983", + "R3984", + "R3987", + "R3988", + "R3991", + "R3992", + "R3995", + "R3996", + "R3999", + "R4000", + "R4003", + "R4004", + "R4007", + "R4008", + "R4011", + "R4012", + "R4015", + "R4016", + "R4019", + "R4020", + "R4023", + "R4024", + "R4027", + "R4028", + "R4031", + "R4032", + "R4035", + "R4036", + "R4039", + "R4040", + "R4043", + "R4044", + "R4047", + "R4048", + "R4051", + "R4052", + "R4055", + "R4056", + "R4059", + "R4060", + "R4063", + "R4064", + "R4067", + "R4068", + "R4071", + "R4072", + "R4075", + "R4076", + "R4079", + "R4080", + "R4083", + "R4084", + "R4087", + "R4088", + "R4091", + "R4092", + "R4095", + "R4096", + "R4099", + "R4100", + "R4103", + "R4104", + "R4107", + "R4108", + "R4109", + "R4110", + "R4111", + "R4112", + "R4115", + "R4116", + "R4119", + "R4120", + "R4123", + "R4124", + "R4127", + "R4128", + "R4131", + "R4132", + "R4135", + "R4136", + "R4139", + "R4140", + "R4143", + "R4144", + "R4147", + "R4148", + "R4151", + "R4152", + "R4155", + "R4156", + "R4159", + "R4160", + "R4163", + "R4164", + "R4167", + "R4168", + "R4171", + "R4172", + "R4175", + "R4176", + "R4179", + "R4180", + "R4181", + "R4182", + "R4183", + "R4184", + "R4187", + "R4188", + "R4191", + "R4192", + "R4195", + "R4196", + "R4199", + "R4200", + "R4203", + "R4204", + "R4207", + "R4208", + "R4211", + "R4212", + "R4215", + "R4216", + "R4219", + "R4220", + "R4223", + "R4224", + "R4227", + "R4228", + "R4231", + "R4232", + "R4235", + "R4236", + "R4239", + "R4240", + "R4243", + "R4244", + "R4247", + "R4248", + "R4251", + "R4252", + "R4255", + "R4256", + "R4259", + "R4260", + "R4263", + "R4264", + "R4267", + "R4268", + "R4271", + "R4272", + "R4275", + "R4276", + "R4279", + "R4280", + "R4283", + "R4284", + "R4287", + "R4288", + "R4291", + "R4292", + "R4295", + "R4296", + "R4299", + "R4300", + "R4301", + "R4302", + "R4303", + "R4304", + "R4307", + "R4308", + "R4311", + "R4312", + "R4315", + "R4316", + "R4319", + "R4320", + "R4323", + "R4324", + "R4327", + "R4328", + "R4331", + "R4332", + "R4335", + "R4336", + "R4339", + "R4340", + "R4343", + "R4344", + "R4347", + "R4348", + "R4351", + "R4352", + "R4355", + "R4356", + "R4359", + "R4360", + "R4363", + "R4364", + "R4367", + "R4368", + "R4371", + "R4372", + "R4375", + "R4376", + "R4379", + "R4380", + "R4383", + "R4384", + "R4387", + "R4388", + "R4391", + "R4392", + "R4395", + "R4396", + "R4399", + "R4400", + "R4403", + "R4404", + "R4407", + "R4408", + "R4411", + "R4412", + "R4415", + "R4416", + "R4419", + "R4420", + "R4423", + "R4424", + "R4427", + "R4428", + "R4431", + "R4432", + "R4435", + "R4436", + "R4439", + "R4440", + "R4443", + "R4444", + "R4447", + "R4448", + "R4451", + "R4452", + "R4455", + "R4456", + "R4457", + "R4458", + "R4459", + "R4460", + "R4463", + "R4464", + "R4467", + "R4468", + "R4471", + "R4472", + "R4475", + "R4476", + "R4479", + "R4480", + "R4483", + "R4484", + "R4487", + "R4488", + "R4491", + "R4492", + "R4495", + "R4496", + "R4499", + "R4500", + "R4503", + "R4504", + "R4507", + "R4508", + "R4511", + "R4512", + "R4515", + "R4516", + "R4519", + "R4520", + "R4523", + "R4524", + "R4527", + "R4528", + "R4531", + "R4532", + "R4535", + "R4536", + "R4539", + "R4540", + "R4543", + "R4544", + "R4547", + "R4548", + "R4551", + "R4552", + "R4555", + "R4556", + "R4559", + "R4560", + "R4563", + "R4564", + "R4567", + "R4568", + "R4571", + "R4572", + "R4575", + "R4576", + "R4579", + "R4580", + "R4583", + "R4584", + "R4587", + "R4588", + "R4591", + "R4592", + "R4593", + "R4594", + "R4595", + "R4596", + "R4599", + "R4600", + "R4603", + "R4604", + "R4607", + "R4608", + "R4611", + "R4612", + "R4615", + "R4616", + "R4619", + "R4620", + "R4623", + "R4624", + "R4627", + "R4628", + "R4631", + "R4632", + "R4635", + "R4636", + "R4639", + "R4640", + "R4643", + "R4644", + "R4647", + "R4648", + "R4651", + "R4652", + "R4655", + "R4656", + "R4659", + "R4660", + "R4663", + "R4664", + "R4667", + "R4668", + "R4669", + "R4670", + "R4671", + "R4672", + "R4675", + "R4676", + "R4679", + "R4680", + "R4683", + "R4684", + "R4687", + "R4688", + "R4691", + "R4692", + "R4695", + "R4696", + "R4699", + "R4700", + "R4703", + "R4704", + "R4707", + "R4708", + "R4711", + "R4712", + "R4715", + "R4716", + "R4717", + "R4718", + "R4719", + "R4720", + "R4723", + "R4724", + "R4727", + "R4728", + "R4729", + "R4730", + "R4731", + "R4732", + "R4733", + "R4734", + "R4735", + "R4736", + "R4739", + "R4740", + "R4743", + "R4744", + "R4747", + "R4748", + "R4751", + "R4752", + "R4755", + "R4756", + "R4759", + "R4760", + "R4761", + "R4762", + "R4763", + "R4764", + "R4767", + "R4768", + "R4771", + "R4772", + "R4775", + "R4776", + "R4779", + "R4780", + "R4783", + "R4784", + "R4787", + "R4788", + "R4791", + "R4792", + "R4795", + "R4796", + "R4799", + "R4800", + "R4803", + "R4804", + "R4807", + "R4808", + "R4811", + "R4812", + "R4815", + "R4816", + "R4819", + "R4820", + "R4823", + "R4824", + "R4827", + "R4828", + "R4831", + "R4832", + "R4835", + "R4836", + "R4839", + "R4840", + "R4843", + "R4844", + "R4847", + "R4848", + "R4851", + "R4852", + "R4855", + "R4856", + "R4859", + "R4860", + "R4861", + "R4862", + "R4863", + "R4864", + "R4865", + "R4866", + "R4867", + "R4868", + "R4871", + "R4872", + "R4875", + "R4876", + "R4879", + "R4880", + "R4883", + "R4884", + "R4887", + "R4888", + "R4891", + "R4892", + "R4895", + "R4896", + "R4899", + "R4900", + "R4903", + "R4904", + "R4907", + "R4908", + "R4911", + "R4912", + "R4913", + "R4914", + "R4915", + "R4916", + "R4919", + "R4920", + "R4923", + "R4924", + "R4927", + "R4928", + "R4931", + "R4932", + "R4935", + "R4936", + "R4939", + "R4940", + "R4941", + "R4942", + "R4943", + "R4944", + "R4947", + "R4948", + "R4951", + "R4952", + "R4955", + "R4956", + "R4957", + "R4958", + "R4959", + "R4960", + "R4963", + "R4964", + "R4965", + "R4966", + "R4967", + "R4968", + "R4971", + "R4972", + "R4975", + "R4976", + "R4979", + "R4980", + "R4983", + "R4984", + "R4987", + "R4988", + "R4991", + "R4992", + "R4995", + "R4996", + "R4999", + "R5000", + "R5001", + "R5002", + "R5003", + "R5004", + "R5007", + "R5008", + "R5011", + "R5012", + "R5013", + "R5014", + "R5015", + "R5016", + "R5019", + "R5020", + "R5023", + "R5024", + "R5027", + "R5028", + "R5035", + "R5036", + "R5039", + "R5040", + "R5043", + "R5044", + "R5047", + "R5048", + "R5051", + "R5052", + "R5053", + "R5054", + "R5055", + "R5056", + "R5057", + "R5058", + "R5059", + "R5060", + "R5063", + "R5064", + "R5067", + "R5068", + "R5071", + "R5072", + "R5075", + "R5076", + "R5079", + "R5080", + "R5083", + "R5084", + "R5087", + "R5088", + "R5091", + "R5092", + "R5095", + "R5096", + "R5101", + "R5102", + "R5103", + "R5104", + "R5107", + "R5108", + "R5111", + "R5112", + "R5115", + "R5116", + "R5119", + "R5120", + "R5123", + "R5124", + "R5127", + "R5128", + "R5131", + "R5132", + "R5135", + "R5136", + "R5139", + "R5140", + "R5143", + "R5144", + "R5147", + "R5148", + "R5151", + "R5152", + "R5155", + "R5156", + "R5159", + "R5160", + "R5163", + "R5164", + "R5167", + "R5168", + "R5171", + "R5172", + "R5175", + "R5176", + "R5179", + "R5180", + "R5181", + "R5182", + "R5183", + "R5184", + "R5185", + "R5186", + "R5187", + "R5188", + "R5191", + "R5192", + "R5195", + "R5196", + "R5199", + "R5200", + "R5203", + "R5204", + "R5207", + "R5208", + "R5211", + "R5212", + "R5215", + "R5216", + "R5219", + "R5220", + "R5223", + "R5224", + "R5227", + "R5228", + "R5231", + "R5232", + "R5233", + "R5234", + "R5235", + "R5236", + "R5239", + "R5240", + "R5243", + "R5244", + "R5247", + "R5248", + "R5251", + "R5252", + "R5255", + "R5256", + "R5259", + "R5260", + "R5263", + "R5264", + "R5267", + "R5268", + "R5271", + "R5272", + "R5275", + "R5276", + "R5279", + "R5280", + "R5283", + "R5284", + "R5287", + "R5288", + "R5291", + "R5292", + "R5295", + "R5296", + "R5299", + "R5300", + "R5303", + "R5304", + "R5307", + "R5308", + "R5311", + "R5312", + "R5315", + "R5316", + "R5319", + "R5320", + "R5323", + "R5324", + "R5327", + "R5328", + "R5331", + "R5332", + "R5335", + "R5336", + "R5339", + "R5340", + "R5343", + "R5344", + "R5347", + "R5348", + "R5351", + "R5352", + "R5355", + "R5356", + "R5359", + "R5360", + "R5361", + "R5362", + "R5363", + "R5364", + "R5367", + "R5368", + "R5371", + "R5372", + "R5373", + "R5374", + "R5375", + "R5376", + "R5379", + "R5380", + "R5383", + "R5384", + "R5385", + "R5386", + "R5387", + "R5388", + "R5391", + "R5392", + "R5395", + "R5396", + "R5399", + "R5400", + "R5401", + "R5402", + "R5403", + "R5404", + "R5407", + "R5408", + "R5411", + "R5412", + "R5415", + "R5416", + "R5419", + "R5420", + "R5423", + "R5424", + "R5427", + "R5428", + "R5431", + "R5432", + "R5435", + "R5436", + "R5439", + "R5440", + "R5443", + "R5444", + "R5447", + "R5448", + "R5451", + "R5452", + "R5455", + "R5456", + "R5459", + "R5460", + "R5463", + "R5464", + "R5465", + "R5466", + "R5467", + "R5468", + "R5471", + "R5472", + "R5475", + "R5476", + "R5479", + "R5480", + "R5483", + "R5484", + "R5487", + "R5488", + "R5491", + "R5492", + "R5495", + "R5496", + "R5499", + "R5500", + "R5503", + "R5504", + "R5505", + "R5506", + "R5507", + "R5508", + "R5511", + "R5512", + "R5513", + "R5514", + "R5515", + "R5516", + "R5519", + "R5520", + "R5523", + "R5524", + "R5527", + "R5528", + "R5531", + "R5532", + "R5535", + "R5536", + "R5539", + "R5540", + "R5543", + "R5544", + "R5547", + "R5548", + "R5551", + "R5552", + "R5555", + "R5556", + "R5559", + "R5560", + "R5563", + "R5564", + "R5567", + "R5568", + "R5571", + "R5572", + "R5575", + "R5576", + "R5579", + "R5580", + "R5583", + "R5584", + "R5587", + "R5588", + "R5591", + "R5592", + "R5595", + "R5596", + "R5599", + "R5600", + "R5603", + "R5604", + "R5607", + "R5608", + "R5611", + "R5612", + "R5615", + "R5616", + "R5619", + "R5620", + "R5623", + "R5624", + "R5625", + "R5626", + "R5627", + "R5628", + "R5631", + "R5632", + "R5635", + "R5636", + "R5639", + "R5640", + "R5643", + "R5644", + "R5645", + "R5646", + "R5647", + "R5648", + "R5649", + "R5650", + "R5651", + "R5652", + "R5655", + "R5656", + "R5659", + "R5660", + "R5663", + "R5664", + "R5665", + "R5666", + "R5667", + "R5668", + "R5671", + "R5672", + "R5675", + "R5676", + "R5677", + "R5678", + "R5679", + "R5680", + "R5683", + "R5684", + "R5687", + "R5688", + "R5691", + "R5692", + "R5695", + "R5696", + "R5699", + "R5700", + "R5703", + "R5704", + "R5705", + "R5706", + "R5707", + "R5708", + "R5711", + "R5712", + "R5715", + "R5716", + "R5719", + "R5720", + "R5723", + "R5724", + "R5727", + "R5728", + "R5731", + "R5732", + "R5735", + "R5736", + "R5739", + "R5740", + "R5743", + "R5744", + "R5745", + "R5746", + "R5747", + "R5748", + "R5749", + "R5750", + "R5751", + "R5752", + "R5755", + "R5756", + "R5759", + "R5760", + "R5761", + "R5762", + "R5763", + "R5764", + "R5767", + "R5768", + "R5769", + "R5770", + "R5771", + "R5772", + "R5775", + "R5776", + "R5779", + "R5780", + "R5783", + "R5784", + "R5787", + "R5788", + "R5791", + "R5792", + "R5793", + "R5794", + "R5795", + "R5796", + "R5799", + "R5800", + "R5801", + "R5802", + "R5803", + "R5804", + "R5807", + "R5808", + "R5809", + "R5810", + "R5811", + "R5812", + "R5815", + "R5816", + "R5819", + "R5820", + "R5823", + "R5824", + "R5827", + "R5828", + "R5831", + "R5832", + "R5833", + "R5834", + "R5835", + "R5836", + "R5839", + "R5840", + "R5841", + "R5842", + "R5843", + "R5844", + "R5847", + "R5848", + "R5851", + "R5852", + "R5855", + "R5856", + "R5859", + "R5860", + "R5863", + "R5864", + "R5867", + "R5868", + "R5871", + "R5872", + "R5875", + "R5876", + "R5877", + "R5878", + "R5879", + "R5880", + "R5883", + "R5884", + "R5887", + "R5888", + "R5891", + "R5892", + "R5895", + "R5896", + "R5899", + "R5900", + "R5901", + "R5902", + "R5903", + "R5904", + "R5908", + "R5911", + "R5912", + "R5915", + "R5916", + "R5919", + "R5920", + "R5923", + "R5924", + "R5927", + "R5928", + "R5931", + "R5932", + "R5935", + "R5936", + "R5939", + "R5940", + "R5943", + "R5944", + "R5947", + "R5948", + "R5951", + "R5952", + "R5955", + "R5956", + "R5957", + "R5958", + "R5959", + "R5960", + "R5963", + "R5964", + "R5967", + "R5968", + "R5971", + "R5972", + "R5973", + "R5974", + "R5975", + "R5976", + "R5979", + "R5980", + "R5983", + "R5984", + "R5987", + "R5988", + "R5991", + "R5992", + "R5995", + "R5996", + "R5997", + "R5998", + "R5999", + "R6000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P3", + "P4", + "P5", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P17", + "P18", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P23", + "P24", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P28", + "P29", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P35", + "P37", + "P38", + "P39", + "P40", + "P41", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P45", + "P46", + "P47", + "P48", + "P49", + "P50", + "P51", + "P52", + "P53", + "P54", + "P55", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P59", + "P60", + "P61", + "P62", + "P63", + "P64", + "R6001", + "R6002", + "R6003", + "R6004", + "R6005", + "R6006", + "R6007", + "R6008", + "R6009", + "R6010", + "R6011", + "R6012", + "R6013", + "R6014", + "R6015", + "R6016", + "R6017", + "R6018", + "R6019", + "R6020", + "R6021", + "R6022", + "R6023", + "R6024", + "R6025", + "R6026", + "R6027", + "R6028", + "R6029", + "R6030", + "R6031", + "R6032", + "R6033", + "R6034", + "R6035", + "R6036", + "R6037", + "R6038", + "R6039", + "R6040", + "R6041", + "R6042", + "R6043", + "R6044", + "R6045", + "R6046", + "R6047", + "R6048", + "R6049", + "R6050", + "R6051", + "R6052", + "R6053", + "R6054", + "R6055", + "R6056", + "R6057", + "R6058", + "R6059", + "R6060", + "R6061", + "R6062", + "R6063", + "R6064", + "R6065", + "R6066", + "R6067", + "R6068", + "R6069", + "R6070", + "R6071", + "R6072", + "R6073", + "R6074", + "R6075", + "R6076", + "R6077", + "R6078", + "R6079", + "R6080", + "R6081", + "R6082", + "R6083", + "R6084", + "R6085", + "R6086", + "R6087", + "R6088", + "R6089", + "R6090", + "R6091", + "R6092", + "R6093", + "R6094", + "R6095", + "R6096", + "R6097", + "R6098", + "R6099", + "R6100", + "R6101", + "R6102", + "R6103", + "R6104", + "R6105", + "R6106", + "R6107", + "R6108", + "R6109", + "R6110", + "R6111", + "R6112", + "R6113", + "R6114", + "R6115", + "R6116", + "R6117", + "R6118", + "R6119", + "R6120", + "R6121", + "R6122", + "R6123", + "R6124", + "R6125", + "R6126", + "R6127", + "R6128", + "R6129", + "R6130", + "R6131", + "R6132", + "R6133", + "R6134", + "R6135", + "R6136", + "R6137", + "R6138", + "R6139", + "R6140", + "R6141", + "R6142", + "R6143", + "R6144", + "R6145", + "R6146", + "R6147", + "R6148", + "R6149", + "R6150", + "R6151", + "R6152", + "R6153", + "R6154", + "R6155", + "R6156", + "R6157", + "R6158", + "R6159", + "R6160", + "R6161", + "R6162", + "R6163", + "R6164", + "R6165", + "R6166", + "R6167", + "R6168", + "R6169", + "R6170", + "R6171", + "R6172", + "R6173", + "R6174", + "R6175", + "R6176", + "R6177", + "R6178", + "R6179", + "R6180", + "R6181", + "R6182", + "R6183", + "R6184", + "R6185", + "R6186", + "R6187", + "R6188", + "R6189", + "R6190", + "R6191", + "R6192", + "R6193", + "R6194", + "R6195", + "R6196", + "R6197", + "R6198", + "R6199", + "R6200", + "R6201", + "R6202", + "R6203", + "R6204", + "R6205", + "R6206", + "R6207", + "R6208", + "R6209", + "R6210", + "R6211", + "R6212", + "R6213", + "R6214", + "R6215", + "R6216", + "R6217", + "R6218", + "R6219", + "R6220", + "R6221", + "R6222", + "R6223", + "R6224", + "R6225", + "R6226", + "R6227", + "R6228", + "R6229", + "R6230", + "R6231", + "R6232", + "R6233", + "R6234", + "R6235", + "R6236", + "R6237", + "R6238", + "R6239", + "R6240", + "R6241", + "R6242", + "R6243", + "R6244", + "R6245", + "R6246", + "R6247", + "R6248", + "R6249", + "R6250", + "R6251", + "R6252", + "R6253", + "R6254", + "R6255", + "R6256", + "R6257", + "R6258", + "R6259", + "R6260", + "R6261", + "R6262", + "R6263", + "R6264", + "R6265", + "R6266", + "R6267", + "R6268", + "R6269", + "R6270", + "R6271", + "R6272", + "R6273", + "R6274", + "R6275", + "R6276", + "R6277", + "R6278", + "R6279", + "R6280", + "R6281", + "R6282", + "R6283", + "R6284", + "R6285", + "R6286", + "R6287", + "R6288", + "R6289", + "R6290", + "R6291", + "R6292", + "R6293", + "R6294", + "R6295", + "R6296", + "R6297", + "R6298", + "R6299", + "R6300", + "R6301", + "R6302", + "R6303", + "R6304", + "R6305", + "R6306", + "R6307", + "R6308", + "R6309", + "R6310", + "R6311", + "R6312", + "R6313", + "R6314", + "R6315", + "R6316", + "R6317", + "R6318", + "R6319", + "R6320", + "R6321", + "R6322", + "R6323", + "R6324", + "R6325", + "R6326", + "R6327", + "R6328", + "R6329", + "R6330", + "R6331", + "R6332", + "R6333", + "R6334", + "R6335", + "R6336", + "R6337", + "R6338", + "R6339", + "R6340", + "R6341", + "R6342", + "R6343", + "R6344", + "R6345", + "R6346", + "R6347", + "R6348", + "R6349", + "R6350", + "R6351", + "R6352", + "R6353", + "R6354", + "R6355", + "R6356", + "R6357", + "R6358", + "R6359", + "R6360", + "R6361", + "R6362", + "R6363", + "R6364", + "R6365", + "R6366", + "R6367", + "R6368", + "R6369", + "R6370", + "R6371", + "R6372", + "R6373", + "R6374", + "R6375", + "R6376", + "R6377", + "R6378", + "R6379", + "R6380", + "R6381", + "R6382", + "R6383", + "R6384", + "R6385", + "R6386", + "R6387", + "R6388", + "R6389", + "R6390", + "R6391", + "R6392", + "R6393", + "R6394", + "R6395", + "R6396", + "R6397", + "R6398", + "R6399", + "R6400", + "R6401", + "R6402", + "R6403", + "R6404", + "R6405", + "R6406", + "R6407", + "R6408", + "R6409", + "R6410", + "R6411", + "R6412", + "R6413", + "R6414", + "R6415", + "R6416", + "R6417", + "R6418", + "R6419", + "R6420", + "R6421", + "R6422", + "R6423", + "R6424", + "R6425", + "R6426", + "R6427", + "R6428", + "R6429", + "R6430", + "R6431", + "R6432", + "R6433", + "R6434", + "R6435", + "R6436", + "R6437", + "R6438", + "R6439", + "R6440", + "R6441", + "R6442", + "R6443", + "R6444", + "R6445", + "R6446", + "R6447", + "R6448", + "R6449", + "R6450", + "R6451", + "R6452", + "R6453", + "R6454", + "R6455", + "R6456", + "R6457", + "R6458", + "R6459", + "R6460", + "R6461", + "R6462", + "R6463", + "R6464", + "R6465", + "R6466", + "R6467", + "R6468", + "R6469", + "R6470", + "R6471", + "R6472", + "R6473", + "R6474", + "R6475", + "R6476", + "R6477", + "R6478", + "R6479", + "R6480", + "R6481", + "R6482", + "R6483", + "R6484", + "R6485", + "R6486", + "R6487", + "R6488", + "R6489", + "R6490", + "R6491", + "R6492", + "R6493", + "R6494", + "R6495", + "R6496", + "R6497", + "R6498", + "R6499", + "R6500", + "R6501", + "R6502", + "R6503", + "R6504", + "R6505", + "R6506", + "R6507", + "R6508", + "R6509", + "R6510", + "R6511", + "R6512", + "R6513", + "R6514", + "R6515", + "R6516", + "R6517", + "R6518", + "R6519", + "R6520", + "R6521", + "R6522", + "R6523", + "R6524", + "R6525", + "R6526", + "R6527", + "R6528", + "R6529", + "R6530", + "R6531", + "R6532", + "R6533", + "R6534", + "R6535", + "R6536", + "R6537", + "R6538", + "R6539", + "R6540", + "R6541", + "R6542", + "R6543", + "R6544", + "R6545", + "R6546", + "R6547", + "R6548", + "R6549", + "R6550", + "R6551", + "R6552", + "R6553", + "R6554", + "R6555", + "R6556", + "R6557", + "R6558", + "R6559", + "R6560", + "R6561", + "R6562", + "R6563", + "R6564", + "R6565", + "R6566", + "R6567", + "R6568", + "R6569", + "R6570", + "R6571", + "R6572", + "R6573", + "R6574", + "R6575", + "R6576", + "R6577", + "R6578", + "R6579", + "R6580", + "R6581", + "R6582", + "R6583", + "R6584", + "R6585", + "R6586", + "R6587", + "R6588", + "R6589", + "R6590", + "R6591", + "R6592", + "R6593", + "R6594", + "R6595", + "R6596", + "R6597", + "R6598", + "R6599", + "R6600", + "R6601", + "R6602", + "R6603", + "R6604", + "R6605", + "R6606", + "R6607", + "R6608", + "R6609", + "R6610", + "R6611", + "R6612", + "R6613", + "R6614", + "R6615", + "R6616", + "R6617", + "R6618", + "R6619", + "R6620", + "R6621", + "R6622", + "R6623", + "R6624", + "R6625", + "R6626", + "R6627", + "R6628", + "R6629", + "R6630", + "R6631", + "R6632", + "R6633", + "R6634", + "R6635", + "R6636", + "R6637", + "R6638", + "R6639", + "R6640", + "R6641", + "R6642", + "R6643", + "R6644", + "R6645", + "R6646", + "R6647", + "R6648", + "R6649", + "R6650", + "R6651", + "R6652", + "R6653", + "R6654", + "R6655", + "R6656", + "R6657", + "R6658", + "R6659", + "R6660", + "R6661", + "R6662", + "R6663", + "R6664", + "R6665", + "R6666", + "R6667", + "R6668", + "R6669", + "R6670", + "R6671", + "R6672", + "R6673", + "R6674", + "R6675", + "R6676", + "R6677", + "R6678", + "R6679", + "R6680", + "R6681", + "R6682", + "R6683", + "R6684", + "R6685", + "R6686", + "R6687", + "R6688", + "R6689", + "R6690", + "R6691", + "R6692", + "R6693", + "R6694", + "R6695", + "R6696", + "R6697", + "R6698", + "R6699", + "R6700", + "R6701", + "R6702", + "R6703", + "R6704", + "R6705", + "R6706", + "R6707", + "R6708", + "R6709", + "R6710", + "R6711", + "R6712", + "R6713", + "R6714", + "R6717", + "R6720", + "R6723", + "R6726", + "R6729", + "R6732", + "R6735", + "R6738", + "R6741", + "R6744", + "R6747", + "R6750", + "R6753", + "R6756", + "R6759", + "R6762", + "R6765", + "R6768", + "R6771", + "R6774", + "R6777", + "R6780", + "R6783", + "R6786", + "R6789", + "R6792", + "R6795", + "R6798", + "R6801", + "R6804", + "R6807", + "R6810", + "R6813", + "R6816", + "R6819", + "R6822", + "R6825", + "R6828", + "R6831", + "R6834", + "R6837", + "R6840", + "R6843", + "R6846", + "R6849", + "R6852", + "R6855", + "R6858", + "R6861", + "R6864", + "R6867", + "R6870", + "R6873", + "R6876", + "R6879", + "R6882", + "R6885", + "R6888", + "R6891", + "R6894", + "R6897", + "R6900", + "R6903", + "R6906", + "R6909", + "R6912", + "R6915", + "R6918", + "R6921", + "R6924", + "R6927", + "R6930", + "R6933", + "R6936", + "R6939", + "R6940", + "R6941", + "R6942", + "R6943", + "R6944", + "R6945", + "R6946", + "R6947", + "R6948", + "R6949", + "R6950", + "R6951", + "R6952", + "R6953", + "R6954", + "R6955", + "R6956", + "R6957", + "R6958", + "R6959", + "R6960", + "R6961", + "R6962", + "R6963", + "R6964", + "R6965", + "R6966", + "R6967", + "R6968", + "R6969", + "R6970", + "R6971", + "R6972", + "R6973", + "R6974", + "R6975", + "R6976", + "R6977", + "R6978", + "R6979", + "R6980", + "R6981", + "R6982", + "R6983", + "R6984", + "R6985", + "R6986", + "R6987", + "R6988", + "R6989", + "R6990", + "R6991", + "R6992", + "R6993", + "R6994", + "R6995", + "R6996", + "R6997", + "R6998", + "R6999", + "R7000", + "R7001", + "R7002", + "R7003", + "R7004", + "R7005", + "R7006", + "R7007", + "R7008", + "R7009", + "R7010", + "R7011", + "R7012", + "R7013", + "R7014", + "R7015", + "R7016", + "R7017", + "R7018", + "R7019", + "R7020", + "R7021", + "R7022", + "R7023", + "R7024", + "R7025", + "R7026", + "R7027", + "R7028", + "R7029", + "R7030", + "R7031", + "R7032", + "R7033", + "R7034", + "R7035", + "R7036", + "R7037", + "R7038", + "R7039", + "R7040", + "R7041", + "R7042", + "R7043", + "R7044", + "R7045", + "R7046", + "R7047", + "R7048", + "R7049", + "R7050", + "R7051", + "R7052", + "R7053", + "R7054", + "R7055", + "R7056", + "R7057", + "R7058", + "R7059", + "R7060", + "R7061", + "R7062", + "R7063", + "R7064", + "R7065", + "R7066", + "R7067", + "R7068", + "R7069", + "R7070", + "R7071", + "R7072", + "R7073", + "R7074", + "R7075", + "R7076", + "R7077", + "R7078", + "R7079", + "R7080", + "R7081", + "R7083", + "R7084", + "R7085", + "R7086", + "R7087", + "R7088", + "R7089", + "R7090", + "R7091", + "R7092", + "R7093", + "R7094", + "R7095", + "R7096", + "R7097", + "R7098", + "R7099", + "R7100", + "R7101", + "R7102", + "R7103", + "R7104", + "R7105", + "R7106", + "R7107", + "R7108", + "R7109", + "R7110", + "R7111", + "R7112", + "R7113", + "R7114", + "R7115", + "R7116", + "R7117", + "R7118", + "R7119", + "R7120", + "R7121", + "R7122", + "R7123", + "R7124", + "R7125", + "R7126", + "R7127", + "R7128", + "R7129", + "R7130", + "R7131", + "R7132", + "R7133", + "R7134", + "R7135", + "R7136", + "R7137", + "R7138", + "R7139", + "R7140", + "R7141", + "R7142", + "R7143", + "R7144", + "R7145", + "R7146", + "R7147", + "R7148", + "R7149", + "R7150", + "R7151", + "R7152", + "R7153", + "R7154", + "R7155", + "R7156", + "R7157", + "R7158", + "R7159", + "R7160", + "R7161", + "R7162", + "R7163", + "R7164", + "R7165", + "R7166", + "R7167", + "R7168", + "R7169", + "R7170", + "R7171", + "R7172", + "R7173", + "R7174", + "R7175", + "R7176", + "R7177", + "R7178", + "R7179", + "R7180", + "R7181", + "R7182", + "R7183", + "R7184", + "R7185", + "R7186", + "R7187", + "R7188", + "R7189", + "R7190", + "R7191", + "R7192", + "R7193", + "R7194", + "R7195", + "R7196", + "R7197", + "R7198", + "R7199", + "R7200", + "R7201", + "R7202", + "R7203", + "R7204", + "R7205", + "R7206", + "R7207", + "R7208", + "R7209", + "R7210", + "R7211", + "R7212", + "R7213", + "R7214", + "R7215", + "R7216", + "R7217", + "R7218", + "R7219", + "R7220", + "R7221", + "R7222", + "R7223", + "R7224", + "R7225", + "R7226", + "R7227", + "R7228", + "R7229", + "R7230", + "R7231", + "R7232", + "R7233", + "R7234", + "R7235", + "R7236", + "R7237", + "R7238", + "R7239", + "R7240", + "R7241", + "R7242", + "R7243", + "R7244", + "R7245", + "R7246", + "R7247", + "R7248", + "R7249", + "R7250", + "R7251", + "R7252", + "R7253", + "R7254", + "R7255", + "R7256", + "R7257", + "R7258", + "R7259", + "R7260", + "R7261", + "R7262", + "R7263", + "R7264", + "R7265", + "R7266", + "R7267", + "R7268", + "R7269", + "R7270", + "R7271", + "R7272", + "R7273", + "R7274", + "R7275", + "R7276", + "R7277", + "R7278", + "R7279", + "R7280", + "R7281", + "R7282", + "R7283", + "R7284", + "R7285", + "R7286", + "R7287", + "R7288", + "R7289", + "R7290", + "R7291", + "R7292", + "R7293", + "R7294", + "R7295", + "R7296", + "R7297", + "R7298", + "R7299", + "R7300", + "R7301", + "R7302", + "R7303", + "R7304", + "R7305", + "R7306", + "R7307", + "R7308", + "R7309", + "R7310", + "R7311", + "R7312", + "R7313", + "R7314", + "R7315", + "R7316", + "R7317", + "R7318", + "R7319", + "R7320", + "R7321", + "R7322", + "R7323", + "R7324", + "R7325", + "R7326", + "R7327", + "R7328", + "R7329", + "R7330", + "R7331", + "R7332", + "R7333", + "R7334", + "R7335", + "R7336", + "R7337", + "R7338", + "R7339", + "R7340", + "R7341", + "R7342", + "R7343", + "R7344", + "R7345", + "R7346", + "R7347", + "R7348", + "R7349", + "R7350", + "R7351", + "R7352", + "R7353", + "R7354", + "R7355", + "R7356", + "R7357", + "R7358", + "R7359", + "R7360", + "R7361", + "R7362", + "R7363", + "R7364", + "R7365", + "R7366", + "R7367", + "R7368", + "R7369", + "R7370", + "R7371", + "R7372", + "R7373", + "R7374", + "R7375", + "R7376", + "R7377", + "R7378", + "R7379", + "R7380", + "R7381", + "R7382", + "R7383", + "R7384", + "R7385", + "R7386", + "R7387", + "R7388", + "R7389", + "R7390", + "R7391", + "R7392", + "R7393", + "R7394", + "R7395", + "R7396", + "R7397", + "R7398", + "R7399", + "R7400", + "R7401", + "R7402", + "R7403", + "R7404", + "R7405", + "R7406", + "R7407", + "R7408", + "R7409", + "R7410", + "R7411", + "R7412", + "R7413", + "R7414", + "R7415", + "R7416", + "R7417", + "R7418", + "R7419", + "R7420", + "R7421", + "R7422", + "R7423", + "R7424", + "R7425", + "R7426", + "R7427", + "R7428", + "R7429", + "R7430", + "R7431", + "R7432", + "R7433", + "R7434", + "R7435", + "R7436", + "R7437", + "R7438", + "R7439", + "R7440", + "R7441", + "R7442", + "R7443", + "R7444", + "R7445", + "R7446", + "R7447", + "R7448", + "R7449", + "R7450", + "R7451", + "R7452", + "R7453", + "R7454", + "R7455", + "R7456", + "R7457", + "R7458", + "R7459", + "R7460", + "R7461", + "C1", + "C2", + "C6", + "C8", + "C9", + "C11", + "C13", + "C14", + "C15", + "C16", + "C22", + "C23", + "C29", + "C33", + "C36", + "C37", + "C39", + "C47", + "C48", + "C50", + "C51", + "C57", + "C58", + "C61", + "C62", + "C63", + "C64", + "C65", + "C67", + "C68", + "C71", + "C72", + "C76", + "C78", + "C79", + "C81", + "C83", + "C84", + "C85", + "C92", + "C98", + "C99", + "C103", + "C106", + "C107", + "C114", + "C117", + "C118", + "C120", + "C121", + "C126", + "C127", + "C128", + "C131", + "C132", + "C133", + "C134", + "C135", + "C137", + "C141", + "C146", + "C149", + "C151", + "C153", + "C154", + "C155", + "C162", + "C163", + "C168", + "C169", + "C170", + "C173", + "C176", + "C177", + "C179", + "C184", + "C187", + "C188", + "C190", + "C191", + "C197", + "C201", + "C202", + "C203", + "C204", + "C205", + "C207", + "C211", + "C213", + "C216", + "C218", + "C219", + "C221", + "C223", + "C224", + "C225", + "C226", + "C232", + "C233", + "C239", + "C240", + "C243", + "C246", + "C247", + "C249", + "C250", + "C257", + "C258", + "C260", + "C261", + "C267", + "C268", + "C271", + "C272", + "C273", + "C274", + "C275", + "C277", + "C278", + "C281", + "C282", + "C286", + "C288", + "C289", + "C291", + "C293", + "C294", + "C295", + "C296", + "C302", + "C303", + "C309", + "C313", + "C316", + "C317", + "C319", + "C327", + "C328", + "C330", + "C331", + "C337", + "C338", + "C341", + "C342", + "C343", + "C344", + "C345", + "C347", + "C348", + "C351", + "C352", + "C356", + "C359", + "C361", + "C364", + "C365", + "C372", + "C378", + "C379", + "C383", + "C386", + "C387", + "C394", + "C397", + "C398", + "C400", + "C401", + "C406", + "C407", + "C408", + "C411", + "C412", + "C413", + "C414", + "C415", + "C417", + "C421", + "C426", + "C429", + "C431", + "C433", + "C434", + "C435", + "C442", + "C443", + "C448", + "C449", + "C450", + "C453", + "C456", + "C457", + "C459", + "C464", + "C467", + "C468", + "C470", + "C471", + "C477", + "C481", + "C482", + "C483", + "C484", + "C485", + "C487", + "C491", + "C493", + "C496", + "C498", + "C499", + "D2", + "D58", + "D64", + "D102", + "D107", + "D127", + "D147", + "D167", + "D174", + "D207", + "D218", + "D298", + "D317", + "D334", + "D357", + "D362", + "D402", + "D457", + "D462", + "D492", + "D497", + "D498", + "D534", + "D574", + "D664", + "D717", + "D722", + "D772", + "D854", + "D877", + "D912", + "D938", + "D978", + "D1027", + "D1167", + "D1182", + "D1264", + "D1378", + "D1412", + "D1437", + "D1442", + "D1452", + "D1458" + ] + } + ] + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/1500-seed1.log b/results/v2/reference-arms/1500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9f6b77e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/1500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.72s + Running `target/release/knowledgedrift --v2 --sizes 1500 --seed 1 --arms engram,rag,grep,curated,whole,chance,tfidf --json results/v2/reference-arms/1500-seed1.json` +knowledgedrift 1.0.0 — embedder bge-small-en-v1.5, reranker jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en, nli deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli, seed 1, pollution 10% (stale) +edition 2: additive score = families (800) + signal (100) + tokens (100) +world 1500: 1883 notes, 1590 edges, 12737 ops, 9133 probes + engram: 9008 tasks, success 0.658, 3203s + settle: auto-tune left the defaults; weak line 0.844; sweep queued 2 + rag: 9008 tasks, success 0.475, 169s + grep: 9008 tasks, success 0.405, 28s + curated: 9008 tasks, success 0.047, 14s + whole: 9008 tasks, success 0.714, 110s + chance: 9008 tasks, success 0.032, 0s + tfidf: 9008 tasks, success 0.431, 160s + settle: token differencing nominated 1187 pairs + +== 1500 tested facts, 1883 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + engram 9008 9008 5927 66% 66% 0.771 0.62 6.2 718 3872 263 + rag 9008 8150 4283 48% 53% 0.425 0.12 1.2 359 0 2207 + grep 9008 8150 3651 41% 45% 0.394 0.12 1.2 325 0 2766 + curated 9008 7775 424 5% 5% 0.135 0.03 0.3 109 3000 2959 + whole 9008 7775 6429 71% 83% 0.487 0.00 0.1 390 427881 404164 + chance 9008 8150 285 3% 3% 0.128 0.10 1.0 112 0 2332 + tfidf 9008 8808 3886 43% 44% 0.553 0.76 7.6 580 0 158 + arm families signal tokens score billed + engram 616 32 69 718 457 + rag 340 7 11 359 2208 + grep 315 6 3 325 2766 + curated 108 0 1 109 2959 + whole 390 0 0 390 404164 + chance 103 0 9 112 2333 + tfidf 442 37 100 580 158 + engram success 66% = 5927 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 9008/9008, 66% of those passed) composite 0.771 S 0.62 ×6.2 score 718 standing 3872 tok 263 tok/query + v2 score 718 = families 616 + signal 32 + tokens 69 (billed 457 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 57% r@1 0.50 r@5 0.58 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.32 crossed_r@5 0.02 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 0.98 stale_above 0.17 hedge 0.34 noise 0.56 + abstention 714 96% fp 0.04 phantom_fp 0.01 natural_fp 0.06 answered 1.00 declined 0.96 separation 0.69 + currency 300 81% head_r@1 0.71 head_r@5 0.75 pollution 0.00 lineage 1.00 + contradiction 500 47% t1_recall 0.04 t2_recall 0.10 t3_recall 0.07 t2_false_alarm 0.00 t3_false_alarm 0.00 queued 0.09 flagged 0.06 absorbed 0.02 + drift 158 48% noticed 0.48 flagged 0.28 + deletion 375 87% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 trace 1.00 marker_leak 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.62 purged_rewrite_warned 0.02 + rationale 522 99% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.99 structure_only 0.99 + temporal 375 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + rag success 48% = 4283 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 8150/9008, 53% of those passed) composite 0.425 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 359 standing 0 tok 2207 tok/query + v2 score 359 = families 340 + signal 7 + tokens 11 (billed 2208 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 57% r@1 0.47 r@5 0.60 lexical_r@5 0.99 paraphrase_r@5 0.97 oblique_r@5 0.34 crossed_r@5 0.09 path_r@5 0.56 path_cover 0.18 stale_above 0.28 hedge 0.00 noise 0.93 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.59 + currency 225 80% head_r@1 0.70 head_r@5 0.80 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 4% direct_r@5 0.04 assisted_r@5 0.04 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 375 99% in_window_r@5 0.99 leak 0.00 + grep success 41% = 3651 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 8150/9008, 45% of those passed) composite 0.394 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 325 standing 0 tok 2766 tok/query + v2 score 325 = families 315 + signal 6 + tokens 3 (billed 2766 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 47% r@1 0.46 r@5 0.51 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 0.05 crossed_r@5 0.00 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 0.92 stale_above 0.44 hedge 0.00 noise 0.94 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.72 + currency 225 67% head_r@1 0.66 head_r@5 0.67 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 1% direct_r@5 0.01 assisted_r@5 0.01 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 375 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + curated success 5% = 424 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 7775/9008, 5% of those passed) composite 0.135 S 0.03 ×0.3 score 109 standing 3000 tok 2959 tok/query + v2 score 109 = families 108 + signal 0 + tokens 1 (billed 2959 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 2% r@1 0.02 r@5 0.02 lexical_r@5 0.02 paraphrase_r@5 0.02 oblique_r@5 0.02 crossed_r@5 0.02 path_r@5 0.33 path_cover 0.05 stale_above 0.04 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 225 0% head_r@1 0.00 head_r@5 0.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 6% direct_r@5 0.06 assisted_r@5 0.06 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping + whole success 71% = 6429 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 7775/9008, 83% of those passed) composite 0.487 S 0.00 ×0.1 score 390 standing 427881 tok 404164 tok/query + v2 score 390 = families 390 + signal 0 + tokens 0 (billed 404164 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 90% r@1 1.00 r@5 1.00 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 1.00 crossed_r@5 1.00 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 1.00 stale_above 1.00 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 225 100% head_r@1 1.00 head_r@5 1.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 100% direct_r@5 1.00 assisted_r@5 1.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping + chance success 3% = 285 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 8150/9008, 3% of those passed) composite 0.128 S 0.10 ×1.0 score 112 standing 0 tok 2332 tok/query + v2 score 112 = families 103 + signal 0 + tokens 9 (billed 2333 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 0% r@1 0.00 r@5 0.00 lexical_r@5 0.01 paraphrase_r@5 0.00 oblique_r@5 0.00 crossed_r@5 0.00 path_r@5 0.11 path_cover 0.02 stale_above 0.01 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 225 0% head_r@1 0.00 head_r@5 0.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 0% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 375 2% in_window_r@5 0.02 leak 0.00 + tfidf success 43% = 3886 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 8808/9008, 44% of those passed) composite 0.553 S 0.76 ×7.6 score 580 standing 0 tok 158 tok/query + v2 score 580 = families 442 + signal 37 + tokens 100 (billed 158 tok/query) + retrieval 6064 45% r@1 0.43 r@5 0.49 lexical_r@5 0.97 paraphrase_r@5 0.98 oblique_r@5 0.01 crossed_r@5 0.00 path_r@5 0.08 path_cover 0.03 stale_above 0.63 hedge 0.00 noise 0.64 + abstention 714 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.67 + currency 225 67% head_r@1 0.67 head_r@5 0.67 pollution 0.00 + contradiction 500 58% t1_recall 0.42 t2_recall 0.33 t3_recall 0.27 t2_false_alarm 0.07 t3_false_alarm 0.13 queued 0.34 flagged 0.34 absorbed 0.00 + drift 158 73% noticed 0.73 flagged 0.73 + deletion 250 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 522 0% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 375 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + +wrote results/v2/reference-arms/1500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed1.json b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed1.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1eb95bb --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed1.json @@ -0,0 +1,12151 @@ +{ + "generator": "knowledgedrift 1.0.0", + "flags": [ + "--v2" + ], + "embedder": "bge-small-en-v1.5", + "reranker": "jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en", + "nli": "deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli", + "embeddings_are_fake": false, + "sizes": [ + { + "spec": { + "size": 500, + "seed": 1, + "k": 10, + "chains": 25, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "edition": 2, + "notes": 630, + "edges": 530 + }, + "digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "probes": 3083, + "ops": 4286, + "arms": [ + { + "arm": "engram", + "capabilities": { + "link": true, + "history": true, + "trace": true, + "suspects": true, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": true, + "write_check": true, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": true, + "endorse_user": true, + "endorse_supervisor": true + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "settle_note": "auto-tune left the defaults; weak line 0.927; sweep queued 0", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 3042, + "passed": 2140, + "success": 0.7034845496383958, + "attempted_success": 0.7034845496383958, + "composite": 0.7952923018053981, + "signal_share": 0.6326797828377424, + "multiplier": 6.326797828377424, + "score": 740.8287509111022, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 636.2338414443185, + "signal_score": 34.54827981887818, + "token_score": 70.04662964790559, + "tokens_billed": 450.0999515269026, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1303, + "pass_rate": 0.6316044595249637, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.024, + "hedge": 0.4036697247706422, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.5779666666666672, + "noise": 0.5062261000700137, + "oblique_r@5": 0.52, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.988, + "path_cover": 0.9920634920634921, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.5355, + "r@5": 0.633, + "stale_above": 0.15, + "tokens": 255.69995152690257, + "weighted_r@5": 0.633 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 237, + "pass_rate": 0.9957983193277311, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.9957983193277311, + "fp": 0.004201680672268907, + "natural_fp": 0.0, + "phantom_fp": 0.008849557522123894, + "separation": 0.6899330745385891 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 100, + "passed": 88, + "pass_rate": 0.88, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.72, + "head_r@5": 0.84, + "lineage": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 166, + "passed": 77, + "pass_rate": 0.463855421686747, + "columns": { + "absorbed": 0.020833333333333332, + "flagged": 0.052083333333333336, + "queued": 0.09375, + "t1_recall": 0.041666666666666664, + "t2_false_alarm": 0.0, + "t2_recall": 0.08333333333333333, + "t3_false_alarm": 0.0, + "t3_recall": 0.08333333333333333 + } + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 117, + "pass_rate": 0.936, + "columns": { + "marker_leak": 1.0, + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.024390243902439025, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.8095238095238095, + "trace": 1.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 167, + "pass_rate": 0.9823529411764705, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.9823529411764705, + "direct_r@5": 0.0, + "structure_only": 0.9823529411764705 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 55, + "passed": 26, + "pass_rate": 0.4727272727272727, + "columns": { + "flagged": 0.2727272727272727, + "noticed": 0.4727272727272727 + } + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no tasks in this world", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.6326797828377424, + "noise": 0.5062261000700137, + "tokens_per_query": 255.69995152690257 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 163.44904521046385, + "lineage_ms": 0.033623320000000005, + "link_ms": 0.05879694716981133, + "purge_ms": 5.556431975609756, + "recall_ms": 250.92657109401742, + "recall_path_ms": 1.376610396825397, + "release_ms": 59.856980166666666, + "settle_ms": 20055.32875, + "standing_tokens": 3888.0, + "supersede_ms": 142.65898254, + "suspects_ms": 5685.95325, + "tokens_per_query": 255.69995152690257 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 137460.6470220001 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.8405830000000001 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 31.162382000000004 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 227.813711 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 675243.4028140008 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 86.72645500000002 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 2513.993167 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 40110.6575 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 7132.949127 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 5685.95325 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R8", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R24", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R48", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R60", + "R64", + "R68", + "R72", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R87", + "R88", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R104", + "R108", + "R112", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R128", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R164", + "R168", + "R172", + "R175", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R184", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R244", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R268", + "R272", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R284", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R296", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R364", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R388", + "R392", + "R396", + "R400", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R412", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R424", + "R425", + "R428", + "R431", + "R432", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R456", + "R460", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R508", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R536", + "R540", + "R541", + "R543", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R552", + "R556", + "R560", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R588", + "R592", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R611", + "R612", + "R616", + "R619", + "R620", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R672", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R695", + "R696", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R707", + "R708", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R724", + "R728", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R752", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R788", + "R792", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R812", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R824", + "R828", + "R831", + "R835", + "R836", + "R840", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R852", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R864", + "R868", + "R872", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R884", + "R886", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R912", + "R916", + "R920", + "R924", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R936", + "R940", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R960", + "R964", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R992", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1124", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1172", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1194", + "R1196", + "R1200", + "R1204", + "R1208", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1220", + "R1224", + "R1228", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1312", + "R1316", + "R1320", + "R1324", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1388", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1512", + "R1516", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1532", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1576", + "R1580", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1660", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1684", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1708", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1732", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1772", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1808", + "R1812", + "R1816", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1832", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1852", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1900", + "R1904", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1944", + "R1948", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1984", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1992", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2082", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2280", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2307", + "R2310", + "R2416", + "R2447", + "R2465", + "C0", + "C1", + "C5", + "C6", + "C8", + "C9", + "C11", + "C14", + "C15", + "C16", + "C19", + "C20", + "C22", + "C23", + "C25", + "C28", + "C29", + "C33", + "C34", + "C36", + "C37", + "C42", + "C43", + "C44", + "C47", + "C48", + "C50", + "C51", + "C53", + "C56", + "C57", + "C61", + "C62", + "C64", + "C65", + "C67", + "C70", + "C71", + "C72", + "C75", + "C76", + "C78", + "C79", + "C81", + "C84", + "C85", + "C86", + "C89", + "C90", + "C92", + "C93", + "C99", + "C100", + "C103", + "C104", + "C106", + "C107", + "C109", + "C112", + "C113", + "C117", + "C118", + "C120", + "C121", + "C123", + "C126", + "C127", + "C128", + "C131", + "C132", + "C134", + "C135", + "C137", + "C140", + "C141", + "C142", + "C145", + "C146", + "C148", + "C149", + "C151", + "C154", + "C155", + "C156", + "C159", + "C160", + "C162", + "C163", + "C165", + "D2", + "D21", + "D23", + "D43", + "D58", + "D107", + "D127", + "D147", + "D168", + "D176", + "D188", + "D191", + "D218", + "D243", + "D251", + "D276", + "D303", + "D317", + "D325", + "D357", + "D402", + "D413", + "D415", + "D433", + "D450", + "D453", + "D462", + "D497", + "D498", + "W181", + "W189", + "W205", + "W209", + "W223", + "W231", + "W235", + "W261" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "rag", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2754, + "passed": 1601, + "success": 0.5262984878369493, + "attempted_success": 0.5813362381989833, + "composite": 0.44833982017431306, + "signal_share": 0.11156979889918833, + "multiplier": 1.1156979889918834, + "score": 375.5665849513928, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 358.6718561394504, + "signal_score": 8.138067762655657, + "token_score": 8.756661049286745, + "tokens_billed": 2366.654871546292, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1318, + "pass_rate": 0.6388754241396025, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.168, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.996, + "mrr": 0.5817920634920637, + "noise": 0.923460979156591, + "oblique_r@5": 0.512, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.988, + "path_cover": 0.33633156966490285, + "path_r@5": 0.6825396825396826, + "r@1": 0.515, + "r@5": 0.666, + "stale_above": 0.2727272727272727, + "tokens": 2366.654871546292, + "weighted_r@5": 0.666 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.6038811064900997 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 68, + "pass_rate": 0.9066666666666666, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.7733333333333333, + "head_r@5": 0.9066666666666666, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 7, + "pass_rate": 0.041176470588235294, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.041176470588235294, + "direct_r@5": 0.041176470588235294, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.11156979889918833, + "noise": 0.923460979156591, + "tokens_per_query": 2366.654871546292 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 33.6470312877527, + "lineage_ms": 0.00043328000000000013, + "link_ms": 0.000072022641509434, + "purge_ms": 0.011998878048780488, + "recall_ms": 9.448444303232986, + "recall_path_ms": 6.11966007936508, + "release_ms": 0.013920642857142859, + "settle_ms": 0.0105, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 33.11513256, + "suspects_ms": 0.005542, + "tokens_per_query": 2366.654871546292 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 28297.153313000017 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.010832000000000003 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.03817200000000002 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.491954 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 25425.763619999965 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 385.53858500000007 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.584667 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.021 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 1655.756628 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.005542 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R44", + "R48", + "R55", + "R56", + "R60", + "R64", + "R68", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R108", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R143", + "R144", + "R148", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R172", + "R173", + "R175", + "R176", + "R180", + "R184", + "R192", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R260", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R272", + "R276", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R347", + "R348", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R360", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R392", + "R396", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R420", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R440", + "R447", + "R448", + "R456", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R472", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R484", + "R488", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R500", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R536", + "R540", + "R541", + "R543", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R624", + "R627", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R644", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R658", + "R660", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R753", + "R756", + "R760", + "R764", + "R765", + "R767", + "R768", + "R772", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R791", + "R792", + "R799", + "R800", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R956", + "R960", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R1000", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1032", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1056", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1124", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1136", + "R1140", + "R1144", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1220", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1264", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1316", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1360", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1392", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1512", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1812", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1832", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1880", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1900", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1993", + "R1996", + "R2000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P8", + "P12", + "P17", + "P18", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P24", + "P26", + "P32", + "P35", + "P40", + "P42", + "P43", + "P49", + "P50", + "P53", + "P57", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2244", + "R2259", + "R2265", + "R2280", + "R2292", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "grep", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2754, + "passed": 1313, + "success": 0.43162393162393164, + "attempted_success": 0.4767610748002905, + "composite": 0.40316819214355637, + "signal_share": 0.14992427622906096, + "multiplier": 1.4992427622906095, + "score": 334.79913778124865, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 322.5345537148451, + "signal_score": 8.778891211086071, + "token_score": 3.485692855317423, + "tokens_billed": 2729.7716917111, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1049, + "pass_rate": 0.508482792050412, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.01, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.49906825396825394, + "noise": 0.9160772953550624, + "oblique_r@5": 0.152, + "paraphrase_r@5": 1.0, + "path_cover": 0.9857142857142857, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.4605, + "r@5": 0.5405, + "stale_above": 0.43636363636363634, + "tokens": 2729.7716917111, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5405 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.7249946027853701 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 52, + "pass_rate": 0.6933333333333334, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6666666666666666, + "head_r@5": 0.6933333333333334, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 4, + "pass_rate": 0.023529411764705882, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.023529411764705882, + "direct_r@5": 0.023529411764705882, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.14992427622906096, + "noise": 0.9160772953550624, + "tokens_per_query": 2729.7716917111 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0011128263971462527, + "lineage_ms": 0.00017500000000000005, + "link_ms": 0.000029388679245283057, + "purge_ms": 0.0036352195121951234, + "recall_ms": 1.1290390984764025, + "recall_path_ms": 0.01298077777777778, + "release_ms": 0.0036001904761904756, + "settle_ms": 0.0001875, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0006883600000000004, + "suspects_ms": 0.000375, + "tokens_per_query": 2729.7716917111 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 0.9358869999999985 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.004375000000000001 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.01557600000000002 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.14904400000000007 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 3038.244213999999 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 0.8177890000000002 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.15120799999999998 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000375 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.03441800000000002 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.000375 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R20", + "R21", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R48", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R60", + "R67", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R108", + "R115", + "R116", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R136", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R172", + "R173", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R208", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R236", + "R240", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R311", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R343", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R391", + "R392", + "R396", + "R400", + "R403", + "R404", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R487", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R535", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R631", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R755", + "R756", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R843", + "R844", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R873", + "R876", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R919", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1068", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1148", + "R1152", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1813", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2250", + "R2253", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2262", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2277", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2286", + "R2289", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2298", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2310", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "curated", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2629, + "passed": 262, + "success": 0.0861275476660092, + "attempted_success": 0.099657664511221, + "composite": 0.1533881269424881, + "signal_share": 0.028506359740229005, + "multiplier": 0.28506359740229004, + "score": 123.43559128254896, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 122.71050155399048, + "signal_score": 0.21694127383499534, + "token_score": 0.5081484547234812, + "tokens_billed": 2959.0, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 153, + "pass_rate": 0.07416383906931653, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.066, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.066, + "mrr": 0.066, + "noise": 0.9980489578284019, + "oblique_r@5": 0.066, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.066, + "path_cover": 0.08276643990929707, + "path_r@5": 0.3968253968253968, + "r@1": 0.066, + "r@5": 0.066, + "stale_above": 0.12727272727272726, + "tokens": 2959.0, + "weighted_r@5": 0.066 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.0, + "head_r@5": 0.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 26, + "pass_rate": 0.15294117647058825, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.15294117647058825, + "direct_r@5": 0.15294117647058825, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.028506359740229005, + "noise": 0.9980489578284019, + "tokens_per_query": 2959.0 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.00029203091557669235, + "lineage_ms": 0.00011656, + "link_ms": 0.000027122641509434016, + "purge_ms": 0.004879121951219511, + "recall_ms": 0.5472012735042739, + "recall_path_ms": 0.6198610317460317, + "release_ms": 0.004273857142857143, + "settle_ms": 0.00010400000000000001, + "standing_tokens": 2994.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0006183200000000002, + "suspects_ms": 0.000209, + "tokens_per_query": 2959.0 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 0.24559799999999826 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.002914 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.014375000000000028 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.20004399999999997 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 1472.518627000001 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 39.051244999999994 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.179502 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.00020800000000000001 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.030916000000000013 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.000209 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R5", + "R6", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R13", + "R14", + "R15", + "R16", + "R17", + "R18", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R25", + "R26", + "R27", + "R28", + "R29", + "R30", + "R31", + "R32", + "R33", + "R34", + "R35", + "R36", + "R37", + "R38", + "R39", + "R40", + "R41", + "R42", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R49", + "R50", + "R51", + "R52", + "R53", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R57", + "R58", + "R59", + "R60", + "R61", + "R62", + "R63", + "R64", + "R65", + "R66", + "R67", + "R68", + "R69", + "R70", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R80", + "R81", + "R82", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R97", + "R98", + "R99", + "R100", + "R101", + "R102", + "R103", + "R104", + "R105", + "R106", + "R107", + "R108", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R121", + "R122", + "R123", + "R124", + "R125", + "R126", + "R127", + "R128", + "R133", + "R134", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R141", + "R142", + "R143", + "R144", + "R145", + "R146", + "R147", + "R148", + "R149", + "R150", + "R151", + "R152", + "R153", + "R154", + "R155", + "R156", + "R157", + "R158", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R165", + "R166", + "R167", + "R168", + "R169", + "R170", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R181", + "R182", + "R183", + "R184", + "R185", + "R186", + "R187", + "R188", + "R189", + "R190", + "R191", + "R192", + "R193", + "R194", + "R195", + "R196", + "R197", + "R198", + "R199", + "R200", + "R201", + "R202", + "R203", + "R204", + "R205", + "R206", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R213", + "R214", + "R215", + "R216", + "R217", + "R218", + "R219", + "R220", + "R221", + "R222", + "R223", + "R224", + "R225", + "R226", + "R227", + "R228", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R237", + "R238", + "R239", + "R240", + "R241", + "R242", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R261", + "R262", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R273", + "R274", + "R275", + "R276", + "R277", + "R278", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R285", + "R286", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R293", + "R294", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R301", + "R302", + "R303", + "R304", + "R305", + "R306", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R317", + "R318", + "R319", + "R320", + "R321", + "R322", + "R323", + "R324", + "R325", + "R326", + "R327", + "R328", + "R329", + "R330", + "R331", + "R332", + "R333", + "R334", + "R335", + "R336", + "R337", + "R338", + "R339", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R345", + "R346", + "R347", + "R348", + "R349", + "R350", + "R351", + "R352", + "R353", + "R354", + "R355", + "R356", + "R357", + "R358", + "R359", + "R360", + "R361", + "R362", + "R363", + "R364", + "R365", + "R366", + "R367", + "R368", + "R373", + "R374", + "R375", + "R376", + "R377", + "R378", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R385", + "R386", + "R387", + "R388", + "R393", + "R394", + "R395", + "R396", + "R397", + "R398", + "R399", + "R400", + "R401", + "R402", + "R403", + "R404", + "R405", + "R406", + "R407", + "R408", + "R413", + "R414", + "R415", + "R416", + "R417", + "R418", + "R419", + "R420", + "R421", + "R422", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R433", + "R434", + "R435", + "R436", + "R437", + "R438", + "R439", + "R440", + "R441", + "R442", + "R443", + "R444", + "R445", + "R446", + "R447", + "R448", + "R449", + "R450", + "R451", + "R452", + "R453", + "R454", + "R455", + "R456", + "R457", + "R458", + "R459", + "R460", + "R461", + "R462", + "R463", + "R464", + "R465", + "R466", + "R467", + "R468", + "R473", + "R474", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R481", + "R482", + "R483", + "R484", + "R485", + "R486", + "R487", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R493", + "R494", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R501", + "R502", + "R503", + "R504", + "R505", + "R506", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R513", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R517", + "R518", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R525", + "R526", + "R527", + "R528", + "R529", + "R530", + "R531", + "R532", + "R533", + "R534", + "R535", + "R536", + "R537", + "R538", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R545", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R549", + "R550", + "R551", + "R552", + "R553", + "R554", + "R555", + "R556", + "R557", + "R558", + "R559", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R569", + "R570", + "R571", + "R572", + "R573", + "R574", + "R575", + "R576", + "R577", + "R578", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R585", + "R586", + "R587", + "R588", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R601", + "R602", + "R603", + "R604", + "R605", + "R606", + "R607", + "R608", + "R613", + "R614", + "R615", + "R616", + "R617", + "R618", + "R619", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R629", + "R630", + "R631", + "R632", + "R633", + "R634", + "R635", + "R636", + "R637", + "R638", + "R639", + "R640", + "R641", + "R642", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R649", + "R650", + "R651", + "R652", + "R653", + "R654", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R661", + "R662", + "R663", + "R664", + "R665", + "R666", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R677", + "R678", + "R679", + "R680", + "R681", + "R682", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R689", + "R690", + "R691", + "R692", + "R693", + "R694", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R709", + "R710", + "R711", + "R712", + "R713", + "R714", + "R715", + "R716", + "R717", + "R718", + "R719", + "R720", + "R721", + "R722", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R729", + "R730", + "R731", + "R732", + "R733", + "R734", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R745", + "R746", + "R747", + "R748", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R761", + "R762", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R773", + "R774", + "R775", + "R776", + "R777", + "R778", + "R779", + "R780", + "R781", + "R782", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R793", + "R794", + "R795", + "R796", + "R797", + "R798", + "R799", + "R800", + "R801", + "R802", + "R803", + "R804", + "R805", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R809", + "R810", + "R811", + "R812", + "R813", + "R814", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R821", + "R822", + "R823", + "R824", + "R825", + "R826", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R833", + "R834", + "R835", + "R836", + "R837", + "R838", + "R839", + "R840", + "R841", + "R842", + "R843", + "R844", + "R845", + "R846", + "R847", + "R848", + "R849", + "R850", + "R851", + "R852", + "R853", + "R854", + "R855", + "R856", + "R857", + "R858", + "R859", + "R860", + "R861", + "R862", + "R863", + "R864", + "R865", + "R866", + "R867", + "R868", + "R869", + "R870", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R877", + "R878", + "R879", + "R880", + "R881", + "R882", + "R883", + "R884", + "R885", + "R886", + "R887", + "R888", + "R889", + "R890", + "R891", + "R892", + "R893", + "R894", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R909", + "R910", + "R911", + "R912", + "R913", + "R914", + "R915", + "R916", + "R917", + "R918", + "R919", + "R920", + "R921", + "R922", + "R923", + "R924", + "R925", + "R926", + "R927", + "R928", + "R933", + "R934", + "R935", + "R936", + "R937", + "R938", + "R939", + "R940", + "R941", + "R942", + "R943", + "R944", + "R945", + "R946", + "R947", + "R948", + "R949", + "R950", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R957", + "R958", + "R959", + "R960", + "R961", + "R962", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R969", + "R970", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R977", + "R978", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R985", + "R986", + "R987", + "R988", + "R993", + "R994", + "R995", + "R996", + "R997", + "R998", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1001", + "R1002", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1017", + "R1018", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1021", + "R1022", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1037", + "R1038", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1041", + "R1042", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1049", + "R1050", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1053", + "R1054", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1065", + "R1066", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1069", + "R1070", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1073", + "R1074", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1077", + "R1078", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1081", + "R1082", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1085", + "R1086", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1089", + "R1090", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1093", + "R1094", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1097", + "R1098", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1101", + "R1102", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1109", + "R1110", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1113", + "R1114", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1117", + "R1118", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1121", + "R1122", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1125", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1129", + "R1130", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1137", + "R1138", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1141", + "R1142", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1149", + "R1150", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1153", + "R1154", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1157", + "R1158", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1173", + "R1174", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1177", + "R1178", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1181", + "R1182", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1197", + "R1198", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1201", + "R1202", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1205", + "R1206", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1209", + "R1210", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1221", + "R1222", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1225", + "R1226", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1233", + "R1234", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1245", + "R1246", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1249", + "R1250", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1253", + "R1254", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1257", + "R1258", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1261", + "R1262", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1265", + "R1266", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1281", + "R1282", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1285", + "R1286", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1293", + "R1294", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1297", + "R1298", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1305", + "R1306", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1309", + "R1310", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1313", + "R1314", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1317", + "R1318", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1325", + "R1326", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1329", + "R1330", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1333", + "R1334", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1341", + "R1342", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1345", + "R1346", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1353", + "R1354", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1357", + "R1358", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1361", + "R1362", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1369", + "R1370", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1373", + "R1374", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1377", + "R1378", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1381", + "R1382", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1385", + "R1386", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1397", + "R1398", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1405", + "R1406", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1409", + "R1410", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1413", + "R1414", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1417", + "R1418", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1433", + "R1434", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1437", + "R1438", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1453", + "R1454", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1457", + "R1458", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1461", + "R1462", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1465", + "R1466", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1473", + "R1474", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1477", + "R1478", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1481", + "R1482", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1489", + "R1490", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1493", + "R1494", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1497", + "R1498", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1505", + "R1506", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1517", + "R1518", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1521", + "R1522", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1525", + "R1526", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1529", + "R1530", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1533", + "R1534", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1537", + "R1538", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1541", + "R1542", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1545", + "R1546", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1549", + "R1550", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1557", + "R1558", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1561", + "R1562", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1569", + "R1570", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1573", + "R1574", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1581", + "R1582", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1585", + "R1586", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1593", + "R1594", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1597", + "R1598", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1601", + "R1602", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1613", + "R1614", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1621", + "R1622", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1629", + "R1630", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1633", + "R1634", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1637", + "R1638", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1641", + "R1642", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1645", + "R1646", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1657", + "R1658", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1665", + "R1666", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1669", + "R1670", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1673", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1677", + "R1678", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1681", + "R1682", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1685", + "R1686", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1693", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1701", + "R1702", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1721", + "R1722", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1725", + "R1726", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1737", + "R1738", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1741", + "R1742", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1745", + "R1746", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1753", + "R1754", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1761", + "R1762", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1769", + "R1770", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1773", + "R1774", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1777", + "R1778", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1781", + "R1782", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1785", + "R1786", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1793", + "R1794", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1797", + "R1798", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1805", + "R1806", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1817", + "R1818", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1821", + "R1822", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1825", + "R1826", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1833", + "R1834", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1837", + "R1838", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1841", + "R1842", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1845", + "R1846", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1853", + "R1854", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1861", + "R1862", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1869", + "R1870", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1873", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1881", + "R1882", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1885", + "R1886", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1893", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1897", + "R1898", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1901", + "R1902", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1905", + "R1906", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1909", + "R1910", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1913", + "R1914", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1917", + "R1918", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1921", + "R1922", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1925", + "R1926", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1934", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1937", + "R1938", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1941", + "R1942", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1945", + "R1946", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1949", + "R1950", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1953", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1957", + "R1958", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1961", + "R1962", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1965", + "R1966", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1973", + "R1974", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1977", + "R1978", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1981", + "R1982", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1985", + "R1986", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1997", + "R1998", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P9", + "P10", + "P11", + "P14", + "P15", + "P17", + "P21", + "P22", + "P23", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P29", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P36", + "P37", + "P38", + "P39", + "P40", + "P41", + "P42", + "P44", + "P45", + "P49", + "P52", + "P55", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P59", + "P60", + "P63", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2241", + "R2242", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2245", + "R2246", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2249", + "R2250", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2253", + "R2254", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2257", + "R2258", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2261", + "R2262", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2265", + "R2266", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2269", + "R2270", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2273", + "R2274", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2277", + "R2278", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2281", + "R2282", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2289", + "R2290", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2293", + "R2294", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2301", + "R2302", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2305", + "R2306", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2309", + "R2310", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2318", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2438", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2460", + "R2463", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "whole", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2629, + "passed": 2171, + "success": 0.7136752136752137, + "attempted_success": 0.8257892734880182, + "composite": 0.4866698982064954, + "signal_share": 0.002166918993610896, + "multiplier": 0.1, + "score": 389.5526104645574, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 389.3359185651963, + "signal_score": 0.21669189936108962, + "token_score": 0.0, + "tokens_billed": 134790.0, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1843, + "pass_rate": 0.8933591856519632, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 1.0, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 1.0, + "noise": 0.9979950524011316, + "oblique_r@5": 1.0, + "paraphrase_r@5": 1.0, + "path_cover": 1.0, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 1.0, + "r@5": 1.0, + "stale_above": 1.0, + "tokens": 134790.0, + "weighted_r@5": 1.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 75, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 1.0, + "head_r@5": 1.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 170, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 1.0, + "direct_r@5": 1.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.002166918993610896, + "noise": 0.9979950524011316, + "tokens_per_query": 134790.0 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.007398520808561243, + "lineage_ms": 0.00009340000000000001, + "link_ms": 0.000028698113207547227, + "purge_ms": 0.01711599999999999, + "recall_ms": 0.3643180126347076, + "recall_path_ms": 0.31519187301587304, + "release_ms": 0.025315404761904765, + "settle_ms": 0.1792915, + "standing_tokens": 142661.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0006351200000000003, + "suspects_ms": 0.009042000000000001, + "tokens_per_query": 134790.0 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 6.222156000000005 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0023350000000000003 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.01521000000000003 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.7017559999999996 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 980.3797719999982 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 19.857088 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 1.063247 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.358583 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.03175600000000001 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.009042000000000001 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "chance", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2754, + "passed": 112, + "success": 0.036817882971729124, + "attempted_success": 0.04066811909949165, + "composite": 0.13239360155113913, + "signal_share": 0.09910878667404223, + "multiplier": 0.9910878667404223, + "score": 115.52745211407593, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 105.91488124091128, + "signal_score": 0.15862253365172174, + "token_score": 9.453948339512914, + "tokens_billed": 2322.3848763936016, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 23, + "pass_rate": 0.011148812409112942, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.01, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.008, + "mrr": 0.004068452380952382, + "noise": 0.9983034415899185, + "oblique_r@5": 0.004, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.012, + "path_cover": 0.022108843537414966, + "path_r@5": 0.09523809523809523, + "r@1": 0.0005, + "r@5": 0.0085, + "stale_above": 0.031818181818181815, + "tokens": 2322.3848763936016, + "weighted_r@5": 0.0085 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.0, + "head_r@5": 0.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.0, + "direct_r@5": 0.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 6, + "pass_rate": 0.048, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 0.048, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.09910878667404223, + "noise": 0.9983034415899185, + "tokens_per_query": 2322.3848763936016 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.001000416171224735, + "lineage_ms": 0.00006508, + "link_ms": 0.00004402830188679251, + "purge_ms": 0.0030305853658536604, + "recall_ms": 0.006881444072835441, + "recall_path_ms": 0.005539746031746032, + "release_ms": 0.003100142857142859, + "settle_ms": 0.0001875, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0007259200000000004, + "suspects_ms": 0.0014169999999999999, + "tokens_per_query": 2322.3848763936016 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 0.841350000000002 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0016269999999999998 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.02333500000000003 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.12425400000000007 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 18.517966000000172 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 0.34900400000000004 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.13020600000000007 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000375 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.03629600000000002 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.0014169999999999999 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R5", + "R6", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R13", + "R14", + "R15", + "R16", + "R17", + "R18", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R25", + "R26", + "R27", + "R28", + "R29", + "R30", + "R31", + "R32", + "R33", + "R34", + "R35", + "R36", + "R37", + "R38", + "R39", + "R40", + "R41", + "R42", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R49", + "R50", + "R51", + "R52", + "R53", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R57", + "R58", + "R59", + "R60", + "R61", + "R62", + "R63", + "R64", + "R65", + "R66", + "R67", + "R68", + "R69", + "R70", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R81", + "R82", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R97", + "R98", + "R99", + "R100", + "R101", + "R102", + "R103", + "R104", + "R105", + "R106", + "R107", + "R108", + "R109", + "R110", + "R111", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R121", + "R122", + "R123", + "R124", + "R125", + "R126", + "R127", + "R128", + "R129", + "R130", + "R131", + "R132", + "R133", + "R134", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R141", + "R142", + "R143", + "R144", + "R145", + "R146", + "R147", + "R148", + "R149", + "R150", + "R151", + "R152", + "R153", + "R154", + "R155", + "R156", + "R157", + "R158", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R165", + "R166", + "R167", + "R168", + "R169", + "R170", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R181", + "R182", + "R183", + "R184", + "R185", + "R186", + "R187", + "R188", + "R189", + "R190", + "R191", + "R192", + "R193", + "R194", + "R195", + "R196", + "R197", + "R198", + "R199", + "R200", + "R201", + "R202", + "R203", + "R204", + "R205", + "R206", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R213", + "R214", + "R215", + "R216", + "R217", + "R218", + "R219", + "R220", + "R221", + "R222", + "R223", + "R224", + "R225", + "R226", + "R227", + "R228", + "R229", + "R230", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R237", + "R238", + "R239", + "R240", + "R241", + "R242", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R249", + "R250", + "R251", + "R252", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R261", + "R262", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R269", + "R270", + "R271", + "R272", + "R273", + "R274", + "R275", + "R276", + "R277", + "R278", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R285", + "R286", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R293", + "R294", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R301", + "R302", + "R303", + "R304", + "R305", + "R306", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R317", + "R318", + "R319", + "R320", + "R321", + "R322", + "R323", + "R324", + "R325", + "R326", + "R327", + "R328", + "R329", + "R330", + "R331", + "R332", + "R333", + "R334", + "R335", + "R336", + "R337", + "R338", + "R339", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R345", + "R346", + "R347", + "R348", + "R349", + "R350", + "R351", + "R352", + "R353", + "R354", + "R355", + "R356", + "R357", + "R358", + "R359", + "R360", + "R361", + "R362", + "R363", + "R364", + "R365", + "R366", + "R367", + "R368", + "R369", + "R370", + "R371", + "R372", + "R373", + "R374", + "R375", + "R376", + "R377", + "R378", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R385", + "R386", + "R387", + "R388", + "R389", + "R390", + "R391", + "R392", + "R393", + "R394", + "R395", + "R396", + "R397", + "R398", + "R399", + "R400", + "R401", + "R402", + "R403", + "R404", + "R405", + "R406", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R413", + "R414", + "R415", + "R416", + "R417", + "R418", + "R419", + "R420", + "R421", + "R422", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R433", + "R434", + "R435", + "R436", + "R437", + "R438", + "R439", + "R440", + "R441", + "R442", + "R443", + "R444", + "R445", + "R446", + "R447", + "R448", + "R449", + "R450", + "R451", + "R452", + "R453", + "R454", + "R455", + "R456", + "R457", + "R458", + "R459", + "R460", + "R461", + "R462", + "R463", + "R464", + "R465", + "R466", + "R467", + "R468", + "R469", + "R470", + "R471", + "R472", + "R473", + "R474", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R481", + "R482", + "R483", + "R484", + "R485", + "R486", + "R487", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R493", + "R494", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R501", + "R502", + "R503", + "R504", + "R505", + "R506", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R513", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R517", + "R518", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R525", + "R526", + "R527", + "R528", + "R529", + "R530", + "R531", + "R532", + "R533", + "R534", + "R535", + "R536", + "R537", + "R538", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R545", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R549", + "R550", + "R551", + "R552", + "R553", + "R554", + "R555", + "R556", + "R557", + "R558", + "R559", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R569", + "R570", + "R571", + "R572", + "R573", + "R574", + "R575", + "R576", + "R577", + "R578", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R585", + "R586", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R601", + "R602", + "R603", + "R604", + "R605", + "R606", + "R607", + "R608", + "R609", + "R610", + "R611", + "R612", + "R613", + "R614", + "R615", + "R616", + "R617", + "R618", + "R619", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R629", + "R630", + "R631", + "R632", + "R633", + "R634", + "R635", + "R636", + "R637", + "R638", + "R639", + "R640", + "R641", + "R642", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R649", + "R650", + "R651", + "R652", + "R653", + "R654", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R661", + "R662", + "R663", + "R664", + "R665", + "R666", + "R667", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R677", + "R678", + "R679", + "R680", + "R681", + "R682", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R689", + "R690", + "R691", + "R692", + "R693", + "R694", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R709", + "R710", + "R711", + "R712", + "R713", + "R714", + "R715", + "R716", + "R717", + "R718", + "R719", + "R720", + "R721", + "R722", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R729", + "R730", + "R731", + "R732", + "R733", + "R734", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R745", + "R746", + "R747", + "R748", + "R749", + "R750", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R761", + "R762", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R769", + "R770", + "R771", + "R772", + "R773", + "R774", + "R775", + "R776", + "R777", + "R778", + "R779", + "R780", + "R781", + "R782", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R793", + "R794", + "R795", + "R796", + "R797", + "R798", + "R799", + "R800", + "R801", + "R802", + "R803", + "R804", + "R805", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R809", + "R810", + "R811", + "R812", + "R813", + "R814", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R821", + "R822", + "R823", + "R824", + "R825", + "R826", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R834", + "R835", + "R836", + "R837", + "R839", + "R840", + "R841", + "R842", + "R843", + "R844", + "R845", + "R846", + "R847", + "R848", + "R849", + "R850", + "R851", + "R852", + "R853", + "R854", + "R855", + "R856", + "R857", + "R858", + "R859", + "R860", + "R861", + "R862", + "R863", + "R864", + "R865", + "R866", + "R867", + "R868", + "R869", + "R870", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R877", + "R878", + "R879", + "R880", + "R881", + "R882", + "R883", + "R884", + "R885", + "R886", + "R887", + "R888", + "R889", + "R890", + "R891", + "R892", + "R893", + "R894", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R909", + "R911", + "R912", + "R913", + "R914", + "R915", + "R917", + "R918", + "R919", + "R920", + "R921", + "R922", + "R923", + "R924", + "R925", + "R926", + "R927", + "R928", + "R929", + "R930", + "R931", + "R932", + "R933", + "R934", + "R935", + "R936", + "R937", + "R938", + "R939", + "R940", + "R942", + "R943", + "R944", + "R945", + "R946", + "R947", + "R948", + "R949", + "R950", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R957", + "R958", + "R959", + "R960", + "R961", + "R962", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R969", + "R970", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R977", + "R978", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R985", + "R986", + "R987", + "R988", + "R989", + "R990", + "R991", + "R992", + "R993", + "R994", + "R995", + "R996", + "R997", + "R998", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1001", + "R1002", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1009", + "R1010", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1017", + "R1018", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1021", + "R1022", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1029", + "R1030", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1038", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1041", + "R1042", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1049", + "R1050", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1053", + "R1054", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1065", + "R1066", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1069", + "R1070", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1073", + "R1074", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1077", + "R1078", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1081", + "R1082", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1085", + "R1086", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1089", + "R1090", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1093", + "R1094", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1097", + "R1098", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1101", + "R1102", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1109", + "R1110", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1113", + "R1114", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1117", + "R1118", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1121", + "R1122", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1125", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1129", + "R1130", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1137", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1141", + "R1142", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1149", + "R1150", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1153", + "R1154", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1157", + "R1158", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1173", + "R1174", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1177", + "R1178", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1181", + "R1182", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1189", + "R1190", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1197", + "R1198", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1201", + "R1202", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1205", + "R1206", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1209", + "R1210", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1221", + "R1222", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1225", + "R1226", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1233", + "R1234", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1245", + "R1246", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1249", + "R1250", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1253", + "R1254", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1257", + "R1258", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1261", + "R1262", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1265", + "R1266", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1281", + "R1282", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1285", + "R1286", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1289", + "R1290", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1293", + "R1294", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1297", + "R1298", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1305", + "R1306", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1309", + "R1310", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1313", + "R1314", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1317", + "R1318", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1325", + "R1326", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1329", + "R1330", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1333", + "R1334", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1341", + "R1342", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1345", + "R1346", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1349", + "R1350", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1353", + "R1354", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1357", + "R1358", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1361", + "R1362", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1369", + "R1370", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1373", + "R1374", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1377", + "R1378", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1381", + "R1382", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1385", + "R1386", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1389", + "R1390", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1397", + "R1398", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1405", + "R1406", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1409", + "R1410", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1413", + "R1414", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1417", + "R1418", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1433", + "R1434", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1437", + "R1438", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1453", + "R1454", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1457", + "R1458", + "R1460", + "R1461", + "R1462", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1465", + "R1466", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1469", + "R1470", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1473", + "R1474", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1477", + "R1478", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1481", + "R1482", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1489", + "R1490", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1493", + "R1494", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1497", + "R1498", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1505", + "R1506", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1509", + "R1510", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1517", + "R1518", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1521", + "R1522", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1525", + "R1526", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1529", + "R1530", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1533", + "R1534", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1537", + "R1538", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1541", + "R1542", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1545", + "R1546", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1549", + "R1550", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1557", + "R1558", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1561", + "R1562", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1569", + "R1570", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1573", + "R1574", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1581", + "R1582", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1585", + "R1586", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1594", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1597", + "R1598", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1601", + "R1602", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1613", + "R1614", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1621", + "R1622", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1629", + "R1630", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1633", + "R1634", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1637", + "R1638", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1641", + "R1642", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1645", + "R1646", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1649", + "R1650", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1657", + "R1658", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1665", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1669", + "R1670", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1673", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1677", + "R1678", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1681", + "R1682", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1685", + "R1686", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1689", + "R1690", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1693", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1701", + "R1702", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1709", + "R1710", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1721", + "R1722", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1725", + "R1726", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1729", + "R1730", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1737", + "R1738", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1741", + "R1742", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1745", + "R1746", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1753", + "R1754", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1761", + "R1762", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1769", + "R1770", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1773", + "R1774", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1777", + "R1778", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1781", + "R1782", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1785", + "R1786", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1793", + "R1794", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1797", + "R1798", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1805", + "R1806", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1809", + "R1810", + "R1811", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1817", + "R1818", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1821", + "R1822", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1825", + "R1826", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1833", + "R1834", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1837", + "R1838", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1841", + "R1842", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1845", + "R1846", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1853", + "R1854", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1861", + "R1862", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1869", + "R1870", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1873", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1881", + "R1882", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1885", + "R1886", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1889", + "R1890", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1893", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1897", + "R1898", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1901", + "R1902", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1905", + "R1906", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1909", + "R1910", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1913", + "R1914", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1917", + "R1918", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1921", + "R1922", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1925", + "R1926", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1934", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1937", + "R1938", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1941", + "R1942", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1945", + "R1946", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1949", + "R1950", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1953", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1957", + "R1958", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1961", + "R1962", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1965", + "R1966", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1973", + "R1974", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1977", + "R1978", + "R1979", + "R1981", + "R1982", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1985", + "R1986", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1997", + "R1998", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P3", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P9", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P16", + "P17", + "P18", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P23", + "P24", + "P25", + "P27", + "P28", + "P29", + "P30", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P35", + "P36", + "P37", + "P38", + "P39", + "P40", + "P41", + "P42", + "P44", + "P45", + "P46", + "P47", + "P48", + "P49", + "P50", + "P51", + "P52", + "P53", + "P54", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P59", + "P60", + "P61", + "P62", + "P63", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2241", + "R2242", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2245", + "R2246", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2249", + "R2250", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2253", + "R2254", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2257", + "R2258", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2261", + "R2262", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2265", + "R2266", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2269", + "R2270", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2273", + "R2274", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2277", + "R2278", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2281", + "R2282", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2289", + "R2290", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2293", + "R2294", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2301", + "R2302", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2305", + "R2306", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2309", + "R2310", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2485", + "R2486", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2489", + "R2490", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2493", + "R2494", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2497", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2501", + "R2502", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2505", + "R2506", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2509", + "R2510", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2513", + "R2514", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2521", + "R2522", + "R2523", + "R2525", + "R2526", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2529", + "R2530", + "R2531", + "R2532", + "R2533", + "R2534", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2537", + "R2538", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2541", + "R2542", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2545", + "R2546", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2549", + "R2550", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2553", + "R2554", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2557", + "R2558", + "R2559", + "R2561", + "R2562", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2565", + "R2566", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2569", + "R2570", + "R2571", + "R2572", + "R2573", + "R2574", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2577", + "R2578", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2581", + "R2582", + "R2583", + "R2584", + "R2585", + "R2586", + "R2587", + "R2588", + "R2590", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2593", + "R2594", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2597", + "R2598", + "R2600", + "R2601", + "R2602", + "R2603", + "R2604", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "tfidf", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": true, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": true, + "write_check": true, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "settle_note": "token differencing nominated 174 pairs", + "tasks": 3042, + "attempted": 2975, + "passed": 1317, + "success": 0.4329388560157791, + "attempted_success": 0.4426890756302521, + "composite": 0.5415694576658548, + "signal_share": 0.7828030100611654, + "multiplier": 7.828030100611654, + "score": 573.9629283861746, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 433.25556613268395, + "signal_score": 40.70736225349053, + "token_score": 100.0, + "tokens_billed": 140.2729035385361, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 926, + "pass_rate": 0.44886088221037324, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.0, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.962, + "mrr": 0.4680994047619048, + "noise": 0.6030197585578106, + "oblique_r@5": 0.054, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.966, + "path_cover": 0.21971529352481728, + "path_r@5": 0.20634920634920634, + "r@1": 0.4395, + "r@5": 0.4955, + "stale_above": 0.7045454545454546, + "tokens": 140.2729035385361, + "weighted_r@5": 0.4955 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.674096832140515 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 52, + "pass_rate": 0.6933333333333334, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6666666666666666, + "head_r@5": 0.6933333333333334, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 166, + "passed": 98, + "pass_rate": 0.5903614457831325, + "columns": { + "absorbed": 0.0, + "flagged": 0.3541666666666667, + "queued": 0.3541666666666667, + "t1_recall": 0.375, + "t2_false_alarm": 0.041666666666666664, + "t2_recall": 0.375, + "t3_false_alarm": 0.18181818181818182, + "t3_recall": 0.2916666666666667 + } + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 170, + "tasks": 170, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.0, + "direct_r@5": 0.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 55, + "tasks": 55, + "passed": 33, + "pass_rate": 0.6, + "columns": { + "flagged": 0.6, + "noticed": 0.6 + } + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.7828030100611654, + "noise": 0.6030197585578106, + "tokens_per_query": 140.2729035385361 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.08688100832342453, + "lineage_ms": 0.0002466, + "link_ms": 0.000028939622641509493, + "purge_ms": 0.015447097560975606, + "recall_ms": 6.376943905611319, + "recall_path_ms": 5.984848634920637, + "release_ms": 0.011895857142857144, + "settle_ms": 140.708875, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.025980860000000005, + "suspects_ms": 0.029875000000000002, + "tokens_per_query": 140.2729035385361 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 841, + "total_ms": 73.06692800000003 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0061649999999999995 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.01533800000000003 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.6333309999999999 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2691, + "total_ms": 17160.35605000006 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 377.04546400000015 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.499626 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 281.41775 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 1.2990430000000002 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.029875000000000002 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R47", + "R48", + "R51", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R63", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R140", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R187", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R211", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R223", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R296", + "R299", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R311", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R343", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R383", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R399", + "R400", + "R403", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R487", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R535", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R619", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R631", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R752", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R843", + "R844", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1180", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P3", + "P4", + "P5", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P9", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P17", + "P18", + "P19", + "P20", + "P23", + "P24", + "P25", + "P27", + "P28", + "P29", + "P32", + "P36", + "P38", + "P39", + "P40", + "P41", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P45", + "P46", + "P47", + "P49", + "P50", + "P52", + "P53", + "P54", + "P55", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P59", + "P61", + "P62", + "P63", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2250", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2262", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2277", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2286", + "R2289", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2298", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2310", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "C1", + "C2", + "C6", + "C8", + "C9", + "C11", + "C13", + "C14", + "C15", + "C16", + "C22", + "C23", + "C29", + "C33", + "C36", + "C37", + "C39", + "C47", + "C48", + "C50", + "C51", + "C57", + "C58", + "C61", + "C62", + "C63", + "C64", + "C65", + "C67", + "C68", + "C71", + "C72", + "C76", + "C78", + "C79", + "C81", + "C83", + "C84", + "C85", + "C92", + "C98", + "C99", + "C103", + "C106", + "C107", + "C114", + "C117", + "C118", + "C120", + "C121", + "C126", + "C127", + "C128", + "C131", + "C132", + "C133", + "C134", + "C135", + "C137", + "C141", + "C146", + "C149", + "C151", + "C153", + "C154", + "C155", + "C162", + "C163", + "D2", + "D58", + "D64", + "D102", + "D107", + "D127", + "D147", + "D167", + "D174", + "D207", + "D218", + "D298", + "D317", + "D334", + "D357", + "D362", + "D402", + "D457", + "D462", + "D492", + "D497", + "D498" + ] + } + ] + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed1.log b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed1.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..74b801e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed1.log @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.66s + Running `target/release/knowledgedrift --v2 --sizes 500 --seed 1 --arms engram,rag,grep,curated,whole,chance,tfidf --json results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed1.json` +knowledgedrift 1.0.0 — embedder bge-small-en-v1.5, reranker jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en, nli deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli, seed 1, pollution 10% (stale) +edition 2: additive score = families (800) + signal (100) + tokens (100) +world 500: 630 notes, 530 edges, 4286 ops, 3083 probes + engram: 3042 tasks, success 0.703, 869s + settle: auto-tune left the defaults; weak line 0.927; sweep queued 0 + rag: 3042 tasks, success 0.526, 56s + grep: 3042 tasks, success 0.432, 3s + curated: 3042 tasks, success 0.086, 2s + whole: 3042 tasks, success 0.714, 2s + chance: 3042 tasks, success 0.037, 0s + tfidf: 3042 tasks, success 0.433, 18s + settle: token differencing nominated 174 pairs + +== 500 tested facts, 630 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + engram 3042 3042 2140 70% 70% 0.795 0.63 6.3 741 3888 255 + rag 3042 2754 1601 53% 58% 0.448 0.11 1.1 376 0 2366 + grep 3042 2754 1313 43% 48% 0.403 0.15 1.5 335 0 2729 + curated 3042 2629 262 9% 10% 0.153 0.03 0.3 123 2994 2959 + whole 3042 2629 2171 71% 83% 0.487 0.00 0.1 390 142661 134790 + chance 3042 2754 112 4% 4% 0.132 0.10 1.0 116 0 2322 + tfidf 3042 2975 1317 43% 44% 0.542 0.78 7.8 574 0 140 + arm families signal tokens score billed + engram 636 35 70 741 450 + rag 359 8 9 376 2367 + grep 323 9 3 335 2730 + curated 123 0 1 123 2959 + whole 389 0 0 390 134790 + chance 106 0 9 116 2322 + tfidf 433 41 100 574 140 + engram success 70% = 2140 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 3042/3042, 70% of those passed) composite 0.795 S 0.63 ×6.3 score 741 standing 3888 tok 255 tok/query + v2 score 741 = families 636 + signal 35 + tokens 70 (billed 450 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 63% r@1 0.54 r@5 0.63 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.52 crossed_r@5 0.02 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 0.99 stale_above 0.15 hedge 0.40 noise 0.51 + abstention 238 100% fp 0.00 phantom_fp 0.01 natural_fp 0.00 answered 1.00 declined 1.00 separation 0.69 + currency 100 88% head_r@1 0.72 head_r@5 0.84 pollution 0.00 lineage 1.00 + contradiction 166 46% t1_recall 0.04 t2_recall 0.08 t3_recall 0.08 t2_false_alarm 0.00 t3_false_alarm 0.00 queued 0.09 flagged 0.05 absorbed 0.02 + drift 55 47% noticed 0.47 flagged 0.27 + deletion 125 94% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 trace 1.00 marker_leak 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.81 purged_rewrite_warned 0.02 + rationale 170 98% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.98 structure_only 0.98 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + rag success 53% = 1601 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2754/3042, 58% of those passed) composite 0.448 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 376 standing 0 tok 2366 tok/query + v2 score 376 = families 359 + signal 8 + tokens 9 (billed 2367 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 64% r@1 0.52 r@5 0.67 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.51 crossed_r@5 0.17 path_r@5 0.68 path_cover 0.34 stale_above 0.27 hedge 0.00 noise 0.92 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.60 + currency 75 91% head_r@1 0.77 head_r@5 0.91 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 4% direct_r@5 0.04 assisted_r@5 0.04 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + grep success 43% = 1313 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2754/3042, 48% of those passed) composite 0.403 S 0.15 ×1.5 score 335 standing 0 tok 2729 tok/query + v2 score 335 = families 323 + signal 9 + tokens 3 (billed 2730 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 51% r@1 0.46 r@5 0.54 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 0.15 crossed_r@5 0.01 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 0.99 stale_above 0.44 hedge 0.00 noise 0.92 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.72 + currency 75 69% head_r@1 0.67 head_r@5 0.69 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 2% direct_r@5 0.02 assisted_r@5 0.02 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + curated success 9% = 262 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2629/3042, 10% of those passed) composite 0.153 S 0.03 ×0.3 score 123 standing 2994 tok 2959 tok/query + v2 score 123 = families 123 + signal 0 + tokens 1 (billed 2959 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 7% r@1 0.07 r@5 0.07 lexical_r@5 0.07 paraphrase_r@5 0.07 oblique_r@5 0.07 crossed_r@5 0.07 path_r@5 0.40 path_cover 0.08 stale_above 0.13 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 75 0% head_r@1 0.00 head_r@5 0.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 15% direct_r@5 0.15 assisted_r@5 0.15 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping + whole success 71% = 2171 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2629/3042, 83% of those passed) composite 0.487 S 0.00 ×0.1 score 390 standing 142661 tok 134790 tok/query + v2 score 390 = families 389 + signal 0 + tokens 0 (billed 134790 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 89% r@1 1.00 r@5 1.00 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 1.00 crossed_r@5 1.00 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 1.00 stale_above 1.00 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 75 100% head_r@1 1.00 head_r@5 1.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 100% direct_r@5 1.00 assisted_r@5 1.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping + chance success 4% = 112 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2754/3042, 4% of those passed) composite 0.132 S 0.10 ×1.0 score 116 standing 0 tok 2322 tok/query + v2 score 116 = families 106 + signal 0 + tokens 9 (billed 2322 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 1% r@1 0.00 r@5 0.01 lexical_r@5 0.01 paraphrase_r@5 0.01 oblique_r@5 0.00 crossed_r@5 0.01 path_r@5 0.10 path_cover 0.02 stale_above 0.03 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 75 0% head_r@1 0.00 head_r@5 0.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 0% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 5% in_window_r@5 0.05 leak 0.00 + tfidf success 43% = 1317 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2975/3042, 44% of those passed) composite 0.542 S 0.78 ×7.8 score 574 standing 0 tok 140 tok/query + v2 score 574 = families 433 + signal 41 + tokens 100 (billed 140 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 45% r@1 0.44 r@5 0.50 lexical_r@5 0.96 paraphrase_r@5 0.97 oblique_r@5 0.05 crossed_r@5 0.00 path_r@5 0.21 path_cover 0.22 stale_above 0.70 hedge 0.00 noise 0.60 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.67 + currency 75 69% head_r@1 0.67 head_r@5 0.69 pollution 0.00 + contradiction 166 59% t1_recall 0.38 t2_recall 0.38 t3_recall 0.29 t2_false_alarm 0.04 t3_false_alarm 0.18 queued 0.35 flagged 0.35 absorbed 0.00 + drift 55 60% noticed 0.60 flagged 0.60 + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 170 0% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + +wrote results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed1.json diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed2.json b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1aabf5e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed2.json @@ -0,0 +1,11813 @@ +{ + "generator": "knowledgedrift 1.0.0", + "flags": [ + "--v2" + ], + "embedder": "bge-small-en-v1.5", + "reranker": "jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en", + "nli": "deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli", + "embeddings_are_fake": false, + "sizes": [ + { + "spec": { + "size": 500, + "seed": 2, + "k": 10, + "chains": 25, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "edition": 2, + "notes": 607, + "edges": 530 + }, + "digest": "f19851acdf7c3043", + "probes": 3048, + "ops": 4251, + "arms": [ + { + "arm": "engram", + "capabilities": { + "link": true, + "history": true, + "trace": true, + "suspects": true, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": true, + "write_check": true, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": true, + "endorse_user": true, + "endorse_supervisor": true + }, + "script_digest": "f19851acdf7c3043", + "settle_note": "auto-tune left the defaults; weak line 0.928; sweep queued 1", + "tasks": 3007, + "attempted": 3007, + "passed": 2124, + "success": 0.7063518456933822, + "attempted_success": 0.7063518456933822, + "composite": 0.7864849257234835, + "signal_share": 0.6670074109661275, + "multiplier": 6.670074109661275, + "score": 736.3433493725805, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 629.1879405787868, + "signal_score": 36.0672078611114, + "token_score": 71.08820093268226, + "tokens_billed": 437.58168604651166, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2064, + "tasks": 2064, + "passed": 1313, + "pass_rate": 0.6361434108527132, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.04, + "hedge": 0.4040758959943781, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.5746003968253973, + "noise": 0.4771467792543351, + "oblique_r@5": 0.512, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.992, + "path_cover": 0.996875, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.5295, + "r@5": 0.636, + "stale_above": 0.21875, + "tokens": 243.18168604651163, + "weighted_r@5": 0.636 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 238, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 1.0, + "fp": 0.0, + "natural_fp": 0.0, + "phantom_fp": 0.0, + "separation": 0.6942829457364341 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 100, + "passed": 88, + "pass_rate": 0.88, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.7466666666666667, + "head_r@5": 0.84, + "lineage": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 166, + "passed": 77, + "pass_rate": 0.463855421686747, + "columns": { + "absorbed": 0.020833333333333332, + "flagged": 0.0625, + "queued": 0.09375, + "t1_recall": 0.041666666666666664, + "t2_false_alarm": 0.0, + "t2_recall": 0.10416666666666667, + "t3_false_alarm": 0.0, + "t3_recall": 0.041666666666666664 + } + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 114, + "pass_rate": 0.912, + "columns": { + "marker_leak": 1.0, + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.12195121951219512, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.7380952380952381, + "trace": 1.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 157, + "tasks": 157, + "passed": 156, + "pass_rate": 0.9936305732484076, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.9936305732484076, + "direct_r@5": 0.006369426751592357, + "structure_only": 0.9872611464968153 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 32, + "tasks": 32, + "passed": 13, + "pass_rate": 0.40625, + "columns": { + "flagged": 0.28125, + "noticed": 0.40625 + } + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no tasks in this world", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.6670074109661275, + "noise": 0.4771467792543351, + "tokens_per_query": 243.18168604651163 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 149.65309164669935, + "lineage_ms": 0.026231640000000004, + "link_ms": 0.12425070754716991, + "purge_ms": 5.128246902439023, + "recall_ms": 241.21451143875964, + "recall_path_ms": 1.1605292968750003, + "release_ms": 45.397605142857145, + "settle_ms": 18757.3938955, + "standing_tokens": 3888.0, + "supersede_ms": 153.49310736000004, + "suspects_ms": 4363.5740829999995, + "tokens_per_query": 243.18168604651163 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 818, + "total_ms": 122416.22896700008 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.6557910000000001 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 65.85287500000005 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 210.25812299999996 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2678, + "total_ms": 645972.4616329983 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 74.27387500000002 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 1906.6994160000002 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 37514.787791 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 7674.6553680000015 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 4363.5740829999995 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R24", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R44", + "R48", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R64", + "R68", + "R72", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R87", + "R88", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R119", + "R120", + "R124", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R139", + "R140", + "R144", + "R148", + "R152", + "R156", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R184", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R204", + "R208", + "R212", + "R216", + "R220", + "R224", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R244", + "R248", + "R256", + "R260", + "R264", + "R268", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R296", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R311", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R320", + "R324", + "R328", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R380", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R390", + "R392", + "R396", + "R399", + "R400", + "R403", + "R404", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R412", + "R419", + "R420", + "R428", + "R432", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R476", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R504", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R520", + "R524", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R536", + "R540", + "R544", + "R548", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R584", + "R588", + "R592", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R655", + "R656", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R747", + "R748", + "R752", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R764", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R787", + "R788", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R800", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R828", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R888", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R912", + "R916", + "R920", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R934", + "R935", + "R936", + "R940", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R968", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R992", + "R996", + "R1000", + "R1004", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1029", + "R1030", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1088", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1148", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1212", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1224", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1244", + "R1248", + "R1256", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1268", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1340", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1448", + "R1451", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1544", + "R1548", + "R1552", + "R1556", + "R1560", + "R1564", + "R1568", + "R1572", + "R1576", + "R1580", + "R1584", + "R1588", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1596", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1612", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1624", + "R1628", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1648", + "R1652", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1712", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1724", + "R1728", + "R1732", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1744", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1848", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1864", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1884", + "R1888", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1900", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1936", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1972", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2259", + "R2262", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2286", + "R2289", + "R2304", + "R2439", + "C0", + "C1", + "C2", + "C5", + "C6", + "C8", + "C9", + "C11", + "C14", + "C15", + "C16", + "C19", + "C20", + "C22", + "C23", + "C25", + "C28", + "C29", + "C33", + "C34", + "C36", + "C37", + "C39", + "C42", + "C43", + "C47", + "C48", + "C50", + "C51", + "C53", + "C56", + "C57", + "C58", + "C61", + "C62", + "C64", + "C65", + "C67", + "C70", + "C71", + "C72", + "C75", + "C76", + "C78", + "C79", + "C81", + "C84", + "C85", + "C86", + "C89", + "C90", + "C92", + "C93", + "C99", + "C103", + "C104", + "C106", + "C107", + "C109", + "C112", + "C113", + "C117", + "C118", + "C120", + "C121", + "C123", + "C126", + "C127", + "C131", + "C132", + "C134", + "C135", + "C137", + "C140", + "C141", + "C142", + "C145", + "C146", + "C148", + "C149", + "C151", + "C154", + "C155", + "C156", + "C159", + "C160", + "C162", + "C163", + "C165", + "D11", + "D29", + "D122", + "D124", + "D130", + "D145", + "D148", + "D161", + "D197", + "D243", + "D257", + "D291", + "D310", + "D318", + "D378", + "D428", + "D439", + "D447", + "D482", + "W179", + "W189", + "W193", + "W197", + "W211", + "W215", + "W223", + "W231", + "W243", + "W247", + "W251" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "rag", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "f19851acdf7c3043", + "tasks": 3007, + "attempted": 2742, + "passed": 1646, + "success": 0.5473894246757566, + "attempted_success": 0.600291757840992, + "composite": 0.44998137621586926, + "signal_share": 0.10861890989567036, + "multiplier": 1.0861890989567036, + "score": 375.418380807574, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 359.98510097269536, + "signal_score": 8.019875973158099, + "token_score": 7.413403861720534, + "tokens_billed": 2454.329457364341, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2064, + "tasks": 2064, + "passed": 1365, + "pass_rate": 0.6613372093023255, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.174, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.998, + "mrr": 0.5978605158730163, + "noise": 0.9218023255814184, + "oblique_r@5": 0.546, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.988, + "path_cover": 0.3553013392857144, + "path_r@5": 0.65625, + "r@1": 0.538, + "r@5": 0.6765, + "stale_above": 0.2421875, + "tokens": 2454.329457364341, + "weighted_r@5": 0.6765 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.6088162008989643 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 68, + "pass_rate": 0.9066666666666666, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.7466666666666667, + "head_r@5": 0.9066666666666666, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 157, + "tasks": 157, + "passed": 5, + "pass_rate": 0.03184713375796178, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.03184713375796178, + "direct_r@5": 0.03184713375796178, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 32, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.10861890989567036, + "noise": 0.9218023255814184, + "tokens_per_query": 2454.329457364341 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 22.83277920904645, + "lineage_ms": 0.00024832, + "link_ms": 0.00002665471698113214, + "purge_ms": 0.008730658536585367, + "recall_ms": 7.06472404891712, + "recall_path_ms": 6.1218958125, + "release_ms": 0.008576380952380952, + "settle_ms": 0.0005835, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 25.88200836, + "suspects_ms": 0.000625, + "tokens_per_query": 2454.329457364341 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 818, + "total_ms": 18677.213392999995 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.006208 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.014127000000000034 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.357957 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2678, + "total_ms": 18919.331003000047 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 391.801332 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.360208 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.001167 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 1294.100418 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.000625 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R24", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R64", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R88", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R104", + "R108", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R127", + "R128", + "R132", + "R136", + "R139", + "R140", + "R143", + "R144", + "R148", + "R155", + "R156", + "R160", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R176", + "R184", + "R192", + "R194", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R211", + "R212", + "R216", + "R228", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R240", + "R244", + "R252", + "R263", + "R264", + "R267", + "R268", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R283", + "R284", + "R288", + "R292", + "R296", + "R303", + "R304", + "R308", + "R311", + "R316", + "R327", + "R328", + "R339", + "R340", + "R344", + "R348", + "R352", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R400", + "R404", + "R408", + "R412", + "R428", + "R435", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R468", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R504", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R524", + "R528", + "R532", + "R536", + "R540", + "R544", + "R546", + "R547", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R588", + "R592", + "R596", + "R600", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R621", + "R622", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R631", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R640", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R664", + "R668", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R696", + "R708", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R767", + "R768", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R784", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R804", + "R808", + "R815", + "R816", + "R823", + "R824", + "R828", + "R832", + "R836", + "R840", + "R843", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R916", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R940", + "R944", + "R948", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R967", + "R968", + "R973", + "R975", + "R976", + "R980", + "R981", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R992", + "R996", + "R1000", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1029", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1104", + "R1107", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1140", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1176", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1220", + "R1224", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1244", + "R1248", + "R1256", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1271", + "R1273", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1320", + "R1324", + "R1328", + "R1332", + "R1336", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1360", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1380", + "R1384", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1400", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1428", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1444", + "R1448", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1464", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1540", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1572", + "R1576", + "R1580", + "R1584", + "R1588", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1628", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1640", + "R1647", + "R1652", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1684", + "R1692", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1713", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1827", + "R1832", + "R1836", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1880", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1932", + "R1936", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1988", + "R1992", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P3", + "P4", + "P7", + "P17", + "P24", + "P25", + "P27", + "P30", + "P31", + "P35", + "P36", + "P38", + "P40", + "P41", + "P44", + "P46", + "P48", + "P53", + "P57", + "P58", + "P62", + "P64", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2244", + "R2259", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2286", + "R2304", + "R2310", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2333", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2343", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "grep", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "f19851acdf7c3043", + "tasks": 3007, + "attempted": 2742, + "passed": 1345, + "success": 0.44728965746591287, + "attempted_success": 0.49051787016776077, + "composite": 0.4029771978225449, + "signal_share": 0.1463950025744235, + "multiplier": 1.463950025744235, + "score": 333.79433377873517, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 322.38175825803586, + "signal_score": 8.639007419362782, + "token_score": 2.7735681013365556, + "tokens_billed": 2782.9253875968993, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2064, + "tasks": 2064, + "passed": 1083, + "pass_rate": 0.5247093023255814, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.01, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.506409126984127, + "noise": 0.9145533407161475, + "oblique_r@5": 0.146, + "paraphrase_r@5": 1.0, + "path_cover": 0.9904513888888888, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.4765, + "r@5": 0.539, + "stale_above": 0.4609375, + "tokens": 2782.9253875968993, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5389999999999999 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.7255288743404339 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 51, + "pass_rate": 0.68, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6666666666666666, + "head_r@5": 0.68, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 157, + "tasks": 157, + "passed": 3, + "pass_rate": 0.01910828025477707, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.01910828025477707, + "direct_r@5": 0.01910828025477707, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 32, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.1463950025744235, + "noise": 0.9145533407161475, + "tokens_per_query": 2782.9253875968993 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0003015293398532984, + "lineage_ms": 0.00011000000000000002, + "link_ms": 0.00002720188679245289, + "purge_ms": 0.0030244146341463435, + "recall_ms": 0.9500327912621335, + "recall_path_ms": 0.007755875, + "release_ms": 0.003234047619047619, + "settle_ms": 0.0003125, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0006065800000000002, + "suspects_ms": 0.000334, + "tokens_per_query": 2782.9253875968993 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 818, + "total_ms": 0.2466509999999981 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0027500000000000003 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.014417000000000032 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.12400100000000008 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2678, + "total_ms": 2544.1878149999934 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 0.496376 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.13583 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000625 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.030329000000000012 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.000334 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R48", + "R51", + "R52", + "R56", + "R63", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R87", + "R88", + "R96", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R112", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R140", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R172", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R187", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R208", + "R211", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R231", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R248", + "R252", + "R256", + "R260", + "R264", + "R268", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R299", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R311", + "R312", + "R316", + "R320", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R389", + "R390", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R399", + "R400", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R427", + "R428", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R487", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R535", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R591", + "R592", + "R593", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R668", + "R672", + "R675", + "R676", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R688", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R700", + "R704", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R752", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R816", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R828", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R843", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R919", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1024", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1029", + "R1030", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1513", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1713", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2250", + "R2253", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2262", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2274", + "R2277", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2286", + "R2289", + "R2292", + "R2298", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2310", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "curated", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "f19851acdf7c3043", + "tasks": 3007, + "attempted": 2617, + "passed": 264, + "success": 0.08779514466245428, + "attempted_success": 0.10087886893389378, + "composite": 0.1558233656742211, + "signal_share": 0.029274848351496685, + "multiplier": 0.29274848351496685, + "score": 125.70425484514278, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 124.65869253937687, + "signal_score": 0.22410009881475176, + "token_score": 0.8214622069511672, + "tokens_billed": 2934.0, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2064, + "tasks": 2064, + "passed": 154, + "pass_rate": 0.07461240310077519, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.068, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.068, + "mrr": 0.068, + "noise": 0.9978962668298631, + "oblique_r@5": 0.068, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.068, + "path_cover": 0.07297247023809524, + "path_r@5": 0.34375, + "r@1": 0.068, + "r@5": 0.068, + "stale_above": 0.125, + "tokens": 2934.0, + "weighted_r@5": 0.068 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.0, + "head_r@5": 0.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 157, + "tasks": 157, + "passed": 27, + "pass_rate": 0.17197452229299362, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.17197452229299362, + "direct_r@5": 0.17197452229299362, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 32, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.029274848351496685, + "noise": 0.9978962668298631, + "tokens_per_query": 2934.0 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0003147493887530549, + "lineage_ms": 0.00009667999999999998, + "link_ms": 0.00002736792452830195, + "purge_ms": 0.003907512195121952, + "recall_ms": 0.4231087490664671, + "recall_path_ms": 0.41784695312500014, + "release_ms": 0.004572452380952381, + "settle_ms": 0.0003125, + "standing_tokens": 2997.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0005782800000000001, + "suspects_ms": 0.000375, + "tokens_per_query": 2934.0 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 818, + "total_ms": 0.2574649999999989 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0024169999999999994 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.014505000000000033 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.16020800000000002 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2678, + "total_ms": 1133.085229999999 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 26.74220500000001 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.19204300000000002 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000625 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.02891400000000001 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.000375 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R5", + "R6", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R13", + "R14", + "R15", + "R16", + "R17", + "R18", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R25", + "R26", + "R27", + "R28", + "R29", + "R30", + "R31", + "R32", + "R33", + "R34", + "R35", + "R36", + "R37", + "R38", + "R39", + "R40", + "R41", + "R42", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R49", + "R50", + "R51", + "R52", + "R53", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R57", + "R58", + "R59", + "R60", + "R61", + "R62", + "R63", + "R64", + "R65", + "R66", + "R67", + "R68", + "R69", + "R70", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R80", + "R81", + "R82", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R97", + "R98", + "R99", + "R100", + "R101", + "R102", + "R103", + "R104", + "R105", + "R106", + "R107", + "R108", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R121", + "R122", + "R123", + "R124", + "R125", + "R126", + "R127", + "R128", + "R133", + "R134", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R141", + "R142", + "R143", + "R144", + "R145", + "R146", + "R147", + "R148", + "R149", + "R150", + "R151", + "R152", + "R153", + "R154", + "R155", + "R156", + "R157", + "R158", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R165", + "R166", + "R167", + "R168", + "R169", + "R170", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R181", + "R182", + "R183", + "R184", + "R185", + "R186", + "R187", + "R188", + "R189", + "R190", + "R191", + "R192", + "R193", + "R194", + "R195", + "R196", + "R197", + "R198", + "R199", + "R200", + "R201", + "R202", + "R203", + "R204", + "R205", + "R206", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R213", + "R214", + "R215", + "R216", + "R217", + "R218", + "R219", + "R220", + "R221", + "R222", + "R223", + "R224", + "R225", + "R226", + "R227", + "R228", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R237", + "R238", + "R239", + "R240", + "R241", + "R242", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R261", + "R262", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R273", + "R274", + "R275", + "R276", + "R277", + "R278", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R285", + "R286", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R293", + "R294", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R301", + "R302", + "R303", + "R304", + "R305", + "R306", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R317", + "R318", + "R319", + "R320", + "R321", + "R322", + "R323", + "R324", + "R325", + "R326", + "R327", + "R328", + "R329", + "R330", + "R331", + "R332", + "R333", + "R334", + "R335", + "R336", + "R337", + "R338", + "R339", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R345", + "R346", + "R347", + "R348", + "R349", + "R350", + "R351", + "R352", + "R353", + "R354", + "R355", + "R356", + "R357", + "R358", + "R359", + "R360", + "R361", + "R362", + "R363", + "R364", + "R365", + "R366", + "R367", + "R368", + "R373", + "R374", + "R375", + "R376", + "R377", + "R378", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R385", + "R386", + "R387", + "R388", + "R393", + "R394", + "R395", + "R396", + "R397", + "R398", + "R399", + "R400", + "R401", + "R402", + "R403", + "R404", + "R405", + "R406", + "R407", + "R408", + "R413", + "R414", + "R415", + "R416", + "R417", + "R418", + "R419", + "R420", + "R421", + "R422", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R433", + "R434", + "R435", + "R436", + "R437", + "R438", + "R439", + "R440", + "R441", + "R442", + "R443", + "R444", + "R445", + "R446", + "R447", + "R448", + "R449", + "R450", + "R451", + "R452", + "R453", + "R454", + "R455", + "R456", + "R457", + "R458", + "R459", + "R460", + "R461", + "R462", + "R463", + "R464", + "R465", + "R466", + "R467", + "R468", + "R473", + "R474", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R481", + "R482", + "R483", + "R484", + "R485", + "R486", + "R487", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R493", + "R494", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R501", + "R502", + "R503", + "R504", + "R505", + "R506", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R513", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R517", + "R518", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R525", + "R526", + "R527", + "R528", + "R529", + "R530", + "R531", + "R532", + "R533", + "R534", + "R535", + "R536", + "R537", + "R538", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R545", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R549", + "R550", + "R551", + "R552", + "R553", + "R554", + "R555", + "R556", + "R557", + "R558", + "R559", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R569", + "R570", + "R571", + "R572", + "R573", + "R574", + "R575", + "R576", + "R577", + "R578", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R585", + "R586", + "R587", + "R588", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R601", + "R602", + "R603", + "R604", + "R605", + "R606", + "R607", + "R608", + "R613", + "R614", + "R615", + "R616", + "R617", + "R618", + "R619", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R629", + "R630", + "R631", + "R632", + "R633", + "R634", + "R635", + "R636", + "R637", + "R638", + "R639", + "R640", + "R641", + "R642", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R649", + "R650", + "R651", + "R652", + "R653", + "R654", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R661", + "R662", + "R663", + "R664", + "R665", + "R666", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R677", + "R678", + "R679", + "R680", + "R681", + "R682", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R689", + "R690", + "R691", + "R692", + "R693", + "R694", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R709", + "R710", + "R711", + "R712", + "R713", + "R714", + "R715", + "R716", + "R717", + "R718", + "R719", + "R720", + "R721", + "R722", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R729", + "R730", + "R731", + "R732", + "R733", + "R734", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R745", + "R746", + "R747", + "R748", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R761", + "R762", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R773", + "R774", + "R775", + "R776", + "R777", + "R778", + "R779", + "R780", + "R781", + "R782", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R793", + "R794", + "R795", + "R796", + "R797", + "R798", + "R799", + "R800", + "R801", + "R802", + "R803", + "R804", + "R805", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R809", + "R810", + "R811", + "R812", + "R813", + "R814", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R821", + "R822", + "R823", + "R824", + "R825", + "R826", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R833", + "R834", + "R835", + "R836", + "R837", + "R838", + "R839", + "R840", + "R841", + "R842", + "R843", + "R844", + "R845", + "R846", + "R847", + "R848", + "R849", + "R850", + "R851", + "R852", + "R853", + "R854", + "R855", + "R856", + "R857", + "R858", + "R859", + "R860", + "R861", + "R862", + "R863", + "R864", + "R865", + "R866", + "R867", + "R868", + "R869", + "R870", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R877", + "R878", + "R879", + "R880", + "R881", + "R882", + "R883", + "R884", + "R885", + "R886", + "R887", + "R888", + "R889", + "R890", + "R891", + "R892", + "R893", + "R894", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R909", + "R910", + "R911", + "R912", + "R913", + "R914", + "R915", + "R916", + "R917", + "R918", + "R919", + "R920", + "R921", + "R922", + "R923", + "R924", + "R925", + "R926", + "R927", + "R928", + "R933", + "R934", + "R935", + "R936", + "R937", + "R938", + "R939", + "R940", + "R941", + "R942", + "R943", + "R944", + "R945", + "R946", + "R947", + "R948", + "R949", + "R950", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R957", + "R958", + "R959", + "R960", + "R961", + "R962", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R969", + "R970", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R977", + "R978", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R985", + "R986", + "R987", + "R988", + "R993", + "R994", + "R995", + "R996", + "R997", + "R998", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1001", + "R1002", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1017", + "R1018", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1021", + "R1022", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1037", + "R1038", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1041", + "R1042", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1049", + "R1050", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1053", + "R1054", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1065", + "R1066", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1069", + "R1070", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1073", + "R1074", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1077", + "R1078", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1081", + "R1082", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1085", + "R1086", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1089", + "R1090", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1093", + "R1094", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1097", + "R1098", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1101", + "R1102", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1109", + "R1110", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1113", + "R1114", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1117", + "R1118", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1121", + "R1122", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1125", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1129", + "R1130", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1137", + "R1138", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1141", + "R1142", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1149", + "R1150", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1153", + "R1154", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1157", + "R1158", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1173", + "R1174", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1177", + "R1178", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1181", + "R1182", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1197", + "R1198", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1201", + "R1202", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1205", + "R1206", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1209", + "R1210", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1221", + "R1222", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1225", + "R1226", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1233", + "R1234", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1245", + "R1246", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1249", + "R1250", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1253", + "R1254", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1257", + "R1258", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1261", + "R1262", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1265", + "R1266", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1281", + "R1282", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1285", + "R1286", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1293", + "R1294", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1297", + "R1298", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1305", + "R1306", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1309", + "R1310", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1313", + "R1314", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1317", + "R1318", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1325", + "R1326", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1329", + "R1330", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1333", + "R1334", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1341", + "R1342", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1345", + "R1346", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1353", + "R1354", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1357", + "R1358", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1361", + "R1362", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1369", + "R1370", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1373", + "R1374", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1377", + "R1378", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1381", + "R1382", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1385", + "R1386", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1397", + "R1398", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1405", + "R1406", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1409", + "R1410", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1413", + "R1414", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1417", + "R1418", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1433", + "R1434", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1437", + "R1438", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1453", + "R1454", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1457", + "R1458", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1461", + "R1462", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1465", + "R1466", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1473", + "R1474", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1477", + "R1478", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1481", + "R1482", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1489", + "R1490", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1493", + "R1494", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1497", + "R1498", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1505", + "R1506", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1517", + "R1518", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1521", + "R1522", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1525", + "R1526", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1529", + "R1530", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1533", + "R1534", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1537", + "R1538", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1541", + "R1542", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1545", + "R1546", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1549", + "R1550", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1557", + "R1558", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1561", + "R1562", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1569", + "R1570", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1573", + "R1574", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1581", + "R1582", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1585", + "R1586", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1593", + "R1594", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1597", + "R1598", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1601", + "R1602", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1613", + "R1614", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1621", + "R1622", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1629", + "R1630", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1633", + "R1634", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1637", + "R1638", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1641", + "R1642", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1645", + "R1646", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1657", + "R1658", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1665", + "R1666", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1669", + "R1670", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1673", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1677", + "R1678", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1681", + "R1682", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1685", + "R1686", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1693", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1701", + "R1702", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1721", + "R1722", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1725", + "R1726", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1737", + "R1738", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1741", + "R1742", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1745", + "R1746", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1753", + "R1754", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1761", + "R1762", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1769", + "R1770", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1773", + "R1774", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1777", + "R1778", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1781", + "R1782", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1785", + "R1786", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1793", + "R1794", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1797", + "R1798", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1805", + "R1806", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1817", + "R1818", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1821", + "R1822", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1825", + "R1826", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1833", + "R1834", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1837", + "R1838", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1841", + "R1842", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1845", + "R1846", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1853", + "R1854", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1861", + "R1862", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1869", + "R1870", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1873", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1881", + "R1882", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1885", + "R1886", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1893", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1897", + "R1898", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1901", + "R1902", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1905", + "R1906", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1913", + "R1914", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1917", + "R1918", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1921", + "R1922", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1925", + "R1926", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1934", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1937", + "R1938", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1941", + "R1942", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1945", + "R1946", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1949", + "R1950", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1953", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1957", + "R1958", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1961", + "R1962", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1965", + "R1966", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1973", + "R1974", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1977", + "R1978", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1981", + "R1982", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1985", + "R1986", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1997", + "R1998", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P4", + "P5", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P9", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P18", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P23", + "P24", + "P25", + "P27", + "P28", + "P35", + "P37", + "P38", + "P39", + "P41", + "P44", + "P45", + "P46", + "P47", + "P49", + "P50", + "P51", + "P54", + "P55", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P61", + "P62", + "P63", + "P64", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2241", + "R2242", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2245", + "R2246", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2249", + "R2250", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2253", + "R2254", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2257", + "R2258", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2261", + "R2262", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2265", + "R2266", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2269", + "R2270", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2273", + "R2274", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2277", + "R2278", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2281", + "R2282", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2289", + "R2290", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2293", + "R2294", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2301", + "R2302", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2305", + "R2306", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2309", + "R2310", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2329", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2345", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2365", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2438", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2450", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "whole", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "f19851acdf7c3043", + "tasks": 3007, + "attempted": 2617, + "passed": 2251, + "success": 0.7485866311938809, + "attempted_success": 0.8601452044325564, + "composite": 0.49224806201550386, + "signal_share": 0.0021800894722331103, + "multiplier": 0.1, + "score": 394.0164585596264, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 393.7984496124031, + "signal_score": 0.21800894722331104, + "token_score": 0.0, + "tokens_billed": 133749.0, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2064, + "tasks": 2064, + "passed": 1936, + "pass_rate": 0.937984496124031, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 1.0, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 1.0, + "noise": 0.9979132743239594, + "oblique_r@5": 1.0, + "paraphrase_r@5": 1.0, + "path_cover": 1.0, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 1.0, + "r@5": 1.0, + "stale_above": 1.0, + "tokens": 133749.0, + "weighted_r@5": 1.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 75, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 1.0, + "head_r@5": 1.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 157, + "tasks": 157, + "passed": 157, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 1.0, + "direct_r@5": 1.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 32, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.0021800894722331103, + "noise": 0.9979132743239594, + "tokens_per_query": 133749.0 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0003596760391198036, + "lineage_ms": 0.00041332000000000006, + "link_ms": 0.000028062264150943452, + "purge_ms": 0.0038628292682926827, + "recall_ms": 0.2070725108289773, + "recall_path_ms": 0.255117140625, + "release_ms": 0.004711380952380953, + "settle_ms": 0.000167, + "standing_tokens": 141514.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0006115600000000003, + "suspects_ms": 0.00045900000000000004, + "tokens_per_query": 133749.0 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 818, + "total_ms": 0.29421499999999934 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.010333000000000002 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.01487300000000003 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.158376 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2678, + "total_ms": 554.5401840000012 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 16.327497 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.19787800000000003 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000334 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.030578000000000015 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.00045900000000000004 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R389", + "R390", + "R391", + "R392", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R1029", + "R1030", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "chance", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "f19851acdf7c3043", + "tasks": 3007, + "attempted": 2742, + "passed": 115, + "success": 0.03824409710675091, + "attempted_success": 0.041940189642596645, + "composite": 0.13437381807633436, + "signal_share": 0.09503888354093334, + "multiplier": 0.9503888354093335, + "score": 115.83628154172413, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 107.4990544610675, + "signal_score": 0.21618110426066062, + "token_score": 8.121045976395974, + "tokens_billed": 2407.7441860465115, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2064, + "tasks": 2064, + "passed": 23, + "pass_rate": 0.011143410852713179, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.016, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.006, + "mrr": 0.007434126984126981, + "noise": 0.9975775193798463, + "oblique_r@5": 0.012, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.008, + "path_cover": 0.01814236111111111, + "path_r@5": 0.03125, + "r@1": 0.0035, + "r@5": 0.0105, + "stale_above": 0.0234375, + "tokens": 2407.7441860465115, + "weighted_r@5": 0.0105 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.0, + "head_r@5": 0.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 157, + "tasks": 157, + "passed": 5, + "pass_rate": 0.03184713375796178, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.03184713375796178, + "direct_r@5": 0.03184713375796178, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 4, + "pass_rate": 0.032, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 0.032, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 32, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.09503888354093334, + "noise": 0.9975775193798463, + "tokens_per_query": 2407.7441860465115 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0012339926650366856, + "lineage_ms": 0.00010659999999999998, + "link_ms": 0.000027116981132075526, + "purge_ms": 0.0027825365853658556, + "recall_ms": 0.005555597460791712, + "recall_path_ms": 0.005154281250000001, + "release_ms": 0.002852166666666668, + "settle_ms": 0.0000835, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0005875000000000003, + "suspects_ms": 0.000417, + "tokens_per_query": 2407.7441860465115 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 818, + "total_ms": 1.009406000000009 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0026649999999999994 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.014372000000000029 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.11408400000000007 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2678, + "total_ms": 14.877890000000205 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 0.32987400000000006 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.11979100000000006 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000167 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.029375000000000016 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.000417 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R5", + "R6", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R13", + "R14", + "R15", + "R16", + "R17", + "R18", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R25", + "R26", + "R27", + "R28", + "R29", + "R30", + "R31", + "R32", + "R33", + "R34", + "R35", + "R36", + "R37", + "R38", + "R39", + "R40", + "R41", + "R42", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R49", + "R50", + "R51", + "R52", + "R53", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R57", + "R58", + "R59", + "R60", + "R61", + "R62", + "R63", + "R64", + "R65", + "R66", + "R67", + "R68", + "R69", + "R70", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R80", + "R81", + "R82", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R97", + "R98", + "R99", + "R100", + "R101", + "R102", + "R103", + "R104", + "R105", + "R106", + "R107", + "R108", + "R109", + "R110", + "R111", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R121", + "R122", + "R123", + "R124", + "R125", + "R126", + "R127", + "R128", + "R129", + "R130", + "R131", + "R132", + "R133", + "R134", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R141", + "R142", + "R143", + "R144", + "R145", + "R146", + "R147", + "R148", + "R149", + "R150", + "R151", + "R152", + "R153", + "R154", + "R155", + "R156", + "R157", + "R158", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R165", + "R166", + "R167", + "R168", + "R169", + "R170", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R181", + "R182", + "R183", + "R184", + "R185", + "R186", + "R187", + "R188", + "R189", + "R190", + "R191", + "R192", + "R193", + "R194", + "R195", + "R196", + "R197", + "R198", + "R200", + "R201", + "R202", + "R203", + "R204", + "R205", + "R206", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R213", + "R214", + "R215", + "R216", + "R217", + "R218", + "R219", + "R220", + "R221", + "R222", + "R223", + "R224", + "R225", + "R226", + "R227", + "R228", + "R229", + "R230", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R237", + "R238", + "R239", + "R240", + "R241", + "R242", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R249", + "R250", + "R251", + "R252", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R261", + "R262", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R269", + "R270", + "R271", + "R272", + "R273", + "R274", + "R275", + "R276", + "R277", + "R278", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R285", + "R286", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R293", + "R294", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R301", + "R302", + "R303", + "R304", + "R305", + "R306", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R317", + "R318", + "R319", + "R320", + "R321", + "R322", + "R323", + "R324", + "R325", + "R326", + "R327", + "R328", + "R329", + "R330", + "R331", + "R332", + "R333", + "R334", + "R335", + "R336", + "R337", + "R338", + "R339", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R345", + "R346", + "R347", + "R348", + "R349", + "R350", + "R351", + "R352", + "R353", + "R354", + "R355", + "R356", + "R357", + "R358", + "R359", + "R360", + "R361", + "R362", + "R363", + "R364", + "R365", + "R366", + "R367", + "R368", + "R369", + "R370", + "R371", + "R372", + "R373", + "R374", + "R375", + "R376", + "R377", + "R378", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R385", + "R386", + "R387", + "R388", + "R389", + "R390", + "R391", + "R392", + "R393", + "R394", + "R395", + "R396", + "R397", + "R398", + "R399", + "R400", + "R401", + "R402", + "R403", + "R405", + "R406", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R413", + "R414", + "R415", + "R416", + "R417", + "R418", + "R419", + "R420", + "R421", + "R422", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R433", + "R434", + "R435", + "R436", + "R437", + "R438", + "R440", + "R441", + "R442", + "R443", + "R444", + "R445", + "R446", + "R447", + "R448", + "R449", + "R450", + "R451", + "R452", + "R453", + "R454", + "R455", + "R456", + "R457", + "R458", + "R459", + "R460", + "R461", + "R462", + "R463", + "R464", + "R465", + "R466", + "R467", + "R468", + "R469", + "R470", + "R471", + "R472", + "R473", + "R474", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R481", + "R482", + "R483", + "R484", + "R485", + "R486", + "R487", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R493", + "R494", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R501", + "R502", + "R503", + "R504", + "R505", + "R506", + "R507", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R513", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R517", + "R518", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R525", + "R526", + "R527", + "R528", + "R529", + "R530", + "R531", + "R532", + "R533", + "R534", + "R535", + "R536", + "R537", + "R538", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R545", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R549", + "R550", + "R551", + "R552", + "R553", + "R554", + "R555", + "R556", + "R557", + "R558", + "R559", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R569", + "R570", + "R571", + "R572", + "R573", + "R574", + "R575", + "R576", + "R577", + "R578", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R585", + "R586", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R601", + "R602", + "R604", + "R605", + "R606", + "R607", + "R608", + "R609", + "R610", + "R611", + "R612", + "R613", + "R614", + "R615", + "R616", + "R617", + "R618", + "R619", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R629", + "R630", + "R631", + "R632", + "R633", + "R634", + "R635", + "R636", + "R637", + "R638", + "R639", + "R640", + "R641", + "R642", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R649", + "R650", + "R651", + "R652", + "R653", + "R654", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R661", + "R662", + "R663", + "R664", + "R665", + "R666", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R677", + "R678", + "R679", + "R680", + "R681", + "R682", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R689", + "R690", + "R691", + "R692", + "R693", + "R694", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R709", + "R710", + "R711", + "R712", + "R713", + "R714", + "R715", + "R716", + "R717", + "R718", + "R719", + "R720", + "R721", + "R722", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R729", + "R730", + "R731", + "R732", + "R733", + "R734", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R745", + "R746", + "R747", + "R748", + "R749", + "R750", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R761", + "R762", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R769", + "R770", + "R771", + "R772", + "R773", + "R774", + "R775", + "R776", + "R777", + "R778", + "R779", + "R780", + "R781", + "R782", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R793", + "R794", + "R795", + "R796", + "R797", + "R798", + "R799", + "R800", + "R801", + "R802", + "R803", + "R804", + "R805", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R809", + "R810", + "R811", + "R812", + "R813", + "R814", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R821", + "R822", + "R823", + "R824", + "R825", + "R826", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R833", + "R834", + "R835", + "R836", + "R837", + "R838", + "R839", + "R840", + "R841", + "R842", + "R843", + "R844", + "R845", + "R846", + "R847", + "R848", + "R849", + "R850", + "R851", + "R852", + "R853", + "R854", + "R855", + "R856", + "R857", + "R858", + "R859", + "R861", + "R862", + "R863", + "R864", + "R865", + "R866", + "R867", + "R868", + "R869", + "R870", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R877", + "R878", + "R879", + "R880", + "R881", + "R882", + "R883", + "R884", + "R885", + "R886", + "R887", + "R888", + "R889", + "R890", + "R891", + "R892", + "R893", + "R894", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R909", + "R910", + "R911", + "R912", + "R913", + "R914", + "R915", + "R916", + "R917", + "R918", + "R919", + "R920", + "R921", + "R922", + "R923", + "R924", + "R925", + "R926", + "R927", + "R928", + "R929", + "R930", + "R931", + "R932", + "R933", + "R934", + "R935", + "R936", + "R937", + "R938", + "R939", + "R940", + "R941", + "R942", + "R943", + "R944", + "R945", + "R946", + "R947", + "R948", + "R949", + "R950", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R957", + "R958", + "R959", + "R960", + "R961", + "R962", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R969", + "R970", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R977", + "R978", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R985", + "R986", + "R987", + "R988", + "R989", + "R990", + "R991", + "R992", + "R993", + "R994", + "R995", + "R996", + "R997", + "R998", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1001", + "R1002", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1009", + "R1010", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1017", + "R1018", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1021", + "R1022", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1029", + "R1030", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1037", + "R1038", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1041", + "R1042", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1049", + "R1050", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1053", + "R1054", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1065", + "R1066", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1069", + "R1070", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1073", + "R1074", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1077", + "R1078", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1081", + "R1082", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1085", + "R1086", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1089", + "R1090", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1093", + "R1094", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1097", + "R1098", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1101", + "R1102", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1109", + "R1110", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1113", + "R1114", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1117", + "R1118", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1121", + "R1122", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1125", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1129", + "R1130", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1137", + "R1138", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1141", + "R1142", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1149", + "R1150", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1153", + "R1154", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1157", + "R1158", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1173", + "R1174", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1177", + "R1178", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1181", + "R1182", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1189", + "R1190", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1197", + "R1198", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1201", + "R1202", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1205", + "R1206", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1209", + "R1210", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1221", + "R1222", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1225", + "R1226", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1233", + "R1234", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1245", + "R1246", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1249", + "R1250", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1253", + "R1254", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1257", + "R1258", + "R1259", + "R1261", + "R1262", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1265", + "R1266", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1281", + "R1282", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1285", + "R1286", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1289", + "R1290", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1293", + "R1294", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1297", + "R1298", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1305", + "R1306", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1309", + "R1310", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1313", + "R1314", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1317", + "R1318", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1325", + "R1326", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1329", + "R1330", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1333", + "R1334", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1341", + "R1342", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1345", + "R1346", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1349", + "R1350", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1353", + "R1354", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1357", + "R1358", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1361", + "R1362", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1369", + "R1370", + "R1372", + "R1373", + "R1374", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1377", + "R1378", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1381", + "R1382", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1385", + "R1386", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1389", + "R1390", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1397", + "R1398", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1405", + "R1406", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1409", + "R1410", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1413", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1417", + "R1418", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1433", + "R1434", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1437", + "R1438", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1453", + "R1454", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1457", + "R1458", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1461", + "R1462", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1465", + "R1466", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1469", + "R1470", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1473", + "R1474", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1477", + "R1478", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1481", + "R1482", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1489", + "R1490", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1493", + "R1494", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1497", + "R1498", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1505", + "R1506", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1509", + "R1510", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1517", + "R1518", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1521", + "R1522", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1525", + "R1526", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1529", + "R1530", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1533", + "R1534", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1537", + "R1538", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1541", + "R1542", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1545", + "R1546", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1549", + "R1550", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1557", + "R1558", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1561", + "R1562", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1569", + "R1570", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1573", + "R1574", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1581", + "R1582", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1585", + "R1586", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1593", + "R1594", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1598", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1601", + "R1602", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1613", + "R1614", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1621", + "R1622", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1629", + "R1630", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1633", + "R1634", + "R1636", + "R1637", + "R1638", + "R1640", + "R1641", + "R1642", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1645", + "R1646", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1649", + "R1650", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1657", + "R1658", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1665", + "R1666", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1669", + "R1670", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1673", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1677", + "R1678", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1681", + "R1682", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1685", + "R1686", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1689", + "R1690", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1693", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1701", + "R1702", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1709", + "R1710", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1721", + "R1722", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1725", + "R1726", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1729", + "R1730", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1737", + "R1738", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1741", + "R1742", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1745", + "R1746", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1753", + "R1754", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1761", + "R1762", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1769", + "R1770", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1773", + "R1774", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1777", + "R1778", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1781", + "R1782", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1785", + "R1786", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1793", + "R1794", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1797", + "R1798", + "R1799", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1805", + "R1806", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1809", + "R1811", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1817", + "R1818", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1821", + "R1822", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1825", + "R1826", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1833", + "R1834", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1837", + "R1838", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1841", + "R1842", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1846", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1853", + "R1854", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1861", + "R1862", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1869", + "R1870", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1873", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1881", + "R1882", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1885", + "R1886", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1889", + "R1890", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1893", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1897", + "R1898", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1901", + "R1902", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1905", + "R1906", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1909", + "R1910", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1913", + "R1914", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1917", + "R1918", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1921", + "R1922", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1925", + "R1926", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1937", + "R1938", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1941", + "R1942", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1945", + "R1946", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1949", + "R1950", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1953", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1957", + "R1958", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1961", + "R1962", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1965", + "R1966", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1973", + "R1974", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1977", + "R1978", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1981", + "R1982", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1985", + "R1986", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1997", + "R1998", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P3", + "P4", + "P5", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P9", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P14", + "P15", + "P16", + "P17", + "P18", + "P19", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P23", + "P24", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P28", + "P29", + "P30", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P35", + "P36", + "P37", + "P38", + "P39", + "P40", + "P41", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P45", + "P46", + "P47", + "P48", + "P50", + "P51", + "P52", + "P53", + "P54", + "P55", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P59", + "P60", + "P61", + "P62", + "P63", + "P64", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2241", + "R2242", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2245", + "R2246", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2249", + "R2250", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2253", + "R2254", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2257", + "R2258", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2261", + "R2262", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2265", + "R2266", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2269", + "R2270", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2273", + "R2274", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2277", + "R2278", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2281", + "R2282", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2289", + "R2290", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2293", + "R2294", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2301", + "R2302", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2305", + "R2306", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2309", + "R2310", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2485", + "R2486", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2489", + "R2490", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2493", + "R2494", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2497", + "R2498", + "R2499", + "R2501", + "R2502", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2506", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2509", + "R2510", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2513", + "R2514", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2521", + "R2522", + "R2523", + "R2525", + "R2526", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2529", + "R2530", + "R2531", + "R2532", + "R2533", + "R2534", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2537", + "R2538", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2541", + "R2542", + "R2543", + "R2544", + "R2545", + "R2546", + "R2547", + "R2549", + "R2550", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2553", + "R2554", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2557", + "R2558", + "R2559", + "R2560", + "R2561", + "R2562", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2565", + "R2566", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2569", + "R2570", + "R2571", + "R2572", + "R2573", + "R2574", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2577", + "R2578", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2581", + "R2582", + "R2583", + "R2584", + "R2585", + "R2586", + "R2587", + "R2588", + "R2589", + "R2590", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2593", + "R2594", + "R2595" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "tfidf", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": true, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": true, + "write_check": true, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "f19851acdf7c3043", + "settle_note": "token differencing nominated 148 pairs", + "tasks": 3007, + "attempted": 2940, + "passed": 1379, + "success": 0.45859660791486534, + "attempted_success": 0.46904761904761905, + "composite": 0.5492094249089381, + "signal_share": 0.8166877457786182, + "multiplier": 8.166877457786182, + "score": 583.4465872857643, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 439.36753992715046, + "signal_score": 44.0790473586138, + "token_score": 100.0, + "tokens_billed": 140.37403100775194, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2064, + "tasks": 2064, + "passed": 1001, + "pass_rate": 0.48498062015503873, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.004, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.986, + "mrr": 0.4897303571428572, + "noise": 0.5654262027808538, + "oblique_r@5": 0.074, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.988, + "path_cover": 0.23594990079365077, + "path_r@5": 0.4375, + "r@1": 0.4675, + "r@5": 0.513, + "stale_above": 0.7109375, + "tokens": 140.37403100775194, + "weighted_r@5": 0.513 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.6808676959155755 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 52, + "pass_rate": 0.6933333333333334, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.68, + "head_r@5": 0.6933333333333334, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 166, + "passed": 98, + "pass_rate": 0.5903614457831325, + "columns": { + "absorbed": 0.0, + "flagged": 0.3645833333333333, + "queued": 0.3645833333333333, + "t1_recall": 0.375, + "t2_false_alarm": 0.061224489795918366, + "t2_recall": 0.375, + "t3_false_alarm": 0.19047619047619047, + "t3_recall": 0.3333333333333333 + } + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 157, + "tasks": 157, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.0, + "direct_r@5": 0.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 32, + "tasks": 32, + "passed": 20, + "pass_rate": 0.625, + "columns": { + "flagged": 0.625, + "noticed": 0.625 + } + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.8166877457786182, + "noise": 0.5654262027808538, + "tokens_per_query": 140.37403100775194 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.07987082640586794, + "lineage_ms": 0.00010664000000000002, + "link_ms": 0.000026569811320754776, + "purge_ms": 0.009212243902439021, + "recall_ms": 5.246507953323376, + "recall_path_ms": 5.390324203124999, + "release_ms": 0.01118054761904762, + "settle_ms": 125.2770625, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.024334119999999994, + "suspects_ms": 0.010458, + "tokens_per_query": 140.37403100775194 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 818, + "total_ms": 65.33433599999998 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0026660000000000004 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.014082000000000032 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.37770199999999987 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2678, + "total_ms": 14050.148299 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 64, + "total_ms": 344.98074899999995 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.46958300000000003 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 250.554125 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 1.2167059999999996 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.010458 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R51", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R63", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R87", + "R88", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R139", + "R140", + "R143", + "R144", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R163", + "R164", + "R168", + "R172", + "R175", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R187", + "R188", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R211", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R223", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R231", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R247", + "R248", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R259", + "R260", + "R264", + "R267", + "R268", + "R271", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R287", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R299", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R311", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R383", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R389", + "R390", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R399", + "R400", + "R403", + "R404", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R415", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R428", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R535", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R543", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R591", + "R592", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R619", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R627", + "R628", + "R631", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R639", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R668", + "R671", + "R672", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R755", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R816", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R827", + "R828", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R843", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R875", + "R876", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R919", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1028", + "R1029", + "R1030", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1252", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1448", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P3", + "P5", + "P6", + "P8", + "P9", + "P10", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P18", + "P19", + "P20", + "P28", + "P29", + "P30", + "P32", + "P34", + "P35", + "P36", + "P37", + "P39", + "P41", + "P42", + "P43", + "P45", + "P52", + "P53", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P60", + "P61", + "P64", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2250", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2262", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2277", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2286", + "R2289", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2298", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2310", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "C1", + "C2", + "C6", + "C8", + "C9", + "C11", + "C13", + "C14", + "C15", + "C16", + "C22", + "C23", + "C29", + "C33", + "C36", + "C37", + "C39", + "C40", + "C47", + "C48", + "C50", + "C51", + "C57", + "C58", + "C61", + "C62", + "C63", + "C64", + "C65", + "C67", + "C68", + "C71", + "C72", + "C76", + "C79", + "C81", + "C83", + "C84", + "C85", + "C92", + "C98", + "C99", + "C103", + "C106", + "C107", + "C114", + "C117", + "C118", + "C120", + "C121", + "C126", + "C127", + "C128", + "C131", + "C132", + "C133", + "C134", + "C135", + "C137", + "C141", + "C146", + "C149", + "C151", + "C153", + "C154", + "C155", + "C162", + "C163", + "D97", + "D102", + "D197", + "D224", + "D257", + "D292", + "D304", + "D378", + "D402", + "D437", + "D447", + "D482" + ] + } + ] + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed2.log b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed2.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a630f38 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed2.log @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 0.63s + Running `target/release/knowledgedrift --v2 --sizes 500 --seed 2 --arms engram,rag,grep,curated,whole,chance,tfidf --json results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed2.json` +knowledgedrift 1.0.0 — embedder bge-small-en-v1.5, reranker jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en, nli deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli, seed 2, pollution 10% (stale) +edition 2: additive score = families (800) + signal (100) + tokens (100) +world 500: 607 notes, 530 edges, 4251 ops, 3048 probes + engram: 3007 tasks, success 0.706, 821s + settle: auto-tune left the defaults; weak line 0.928; sweep queued 1 + rag: 3007 tasks, success 0.547, 39s + grep: 3007 tasks, success 0.447, 3s + curated: 3007 tasks, success 0.088, 1s + whole: 3007 tasks, success 0.749, 1s + chance: 3007 tasks, success 0.038, 0s + tfidf: 3007 tasks, success 0.459, 15s + settle: token differencing nominated 148 pairs + +== 500 tested facts, 607 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + engram 3007 3007 2124 71% 71% 0.786 0.67 6.7 736 3888 243 + rag 3007 2742 1646 55% 60% 0.450 0.11 1.1 375 0 2454 + grep 3007 2742 1345 45% 49% 0.403 0.15 1.5 334 0 2782 + curated 3007 2617 264 9% 10% 0.156 0.03 0.3 126 2997 2934 + whole 3007 2617 2251 75% 86% 0.492 0.00 0.1 394 141514 133749 + chance 3007 2742 115 4% 4% 0.134 0.10 1.0 116 0 2407 + tfidf 3007 2940 1379 46% 47% 0.549 0.82 8.2 583 0 140 + arm families signal tokens score billed + engram 629 36 71 736 438 + rag 360 8 7 375 2454 + grep 322 9 3 334 2783 + curated 125 0 1 126 2934 + whole 394 0 0 394 133749 + chance 107 0 8 116 2408 + tfidf 439 44 100 583 140 + engram success 71% = 2124 passed of 3007 posed (attempted 3007/3007, 71% of those passed) composite 0.786 S 0.67 ×6.7 score 736 standing 3888 tok 243 tok/query + v2 score 736 = families 629 + signal 36 + tokens 71 (billed 438 tok/query) + retrieval 2064 64% r@1 0.53 r@5 0.64 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.51 crossed_r@5 0.04 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 1.00 stale_above 0.22 hedge 0.40 noise 0.48 + abstention 238 100% fp 0.00 phantom_fp 0.00 natural_fp 0.00 answered 1.00 declined 1.00 separation 0.69 + currency 100 88% head_r@1 0.75 head_r@5 0.84 pollution 0.00 lineage 1.00 + contradiction 166 46% t1_recall 0.04 t2_recall 0.10 t3_recall 0.04 t2_false_alarm 0.00 t3_false_alarm 0.00 queued 0.09 flagged 0.06 absorbed 0.02 + drift 32 41% noticed 0.41 flagged 0.28 + deletion 125 91% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 trace 1.00 marker_leak 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.74 purged_rewrite_warned 0.12 + rationale 157 99% direct_r@5 0.01 assisted_r@5 0.99 structure_only 0.99 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + rag success 55% = 1646 passed of 3007 posed (attempted 2742/3007, 60% of those passed) composite 0.450 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 375 standing 0 tok 2454 tok/query + v2 score 375 = families 360 + signal 8 + tokens 7 (billed 2454 tok/query) + retrieval 2064 66% r@1 0.54 r@5 0.68 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.55 crossed_r@5 0.17 path_r@5 0.66 path_cover 0.36 stale_above 0.24 hedge 0.00 noise 0.92 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.61 + currency 75 91% head_r@1 0.75 head_r@5 0.91 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 157 3% direct_r@5 0.03 assisted_r@5 0.03 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + grep success 45% = 1345 passed of 3007 posed (attempted 2742/3007, 49% of those passed) composite 0.403 S 0.15 ×1.5 score 334 standing 0 tok 2782 tok/query + v2 score 334 = families 322 + signal 9 + tokens 3 (billed 2783 tok/query) + retrieval 2064 52% r@1 0.48 r@5 0.54 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 0.15 crossed_r@5 0.01 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 0.99 stale_above 0.46 hedge 0.00 noise 0.91 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.73 + currency 75 68% head_r@1 0.67 head_r@5 0.68 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 157 2% direct_r@5 0.02 assisted_r@5 0.02 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + curated success 9% = 264 passed of 3007 posed (attempted 2617/3007, 10% of those passed) composite 0.156 S 0.03 ×0.3 score 126 standing 2997 tok 2934 tok/query + v2 score 126 = families 125 + signal 0 + tokens 1 (billed 2934 tok/query) + retrieval 2064 7% r@1 0.07 r@5 0.07 lexical_r@5 0.07 paraphrase_r@5 0.07 oblique_r@5 0.07 crossed_r@5 0.07 path_r@5 0.34 path_cover 0.07 stale_above 0.12 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 75 0% head_r@1 0.00 head_r@5 0.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 157 17% direct_r@5 0.17 assisted_r@5 0.17 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping + whole success 75% = 2251 passed of 3007 posed (attempted 2617/3007, 86% of those passed) composite 0.492 S 0.00 ×0.1 score 394 standing 141514 tok 133749 tok/query + v2 score 394 = families 394 + signal 0 + tokens 0 (billed 133749 tok/query) + retrieval 2064 94% r@1 1.00 r@5 1.00 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 1.00 crossed_r@5 1.00 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 1.00 stale_above 1.00 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 75 100% head_r@1 1.00 head_r@5 1.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 157 100% direct_r@5 1.00 assisted_r@5 1.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping + chance success 4% = 115 passed of 3007 posed (attempted 2742/3007, 4% of those passed) composite 0.134 S 0.10 ×1.0 score 116 standing 0 tok 2407 tok/query + v2 score 116 = families 107 + signal 0 + tokens 8 (billed 2408 tok/query) + retrieval 2064 1% r@1 0.00 r@5 0.01 lexical_r@5 0.01 paraphrase_r@5 0.01 oblique_r@5 0.01 crossed_r@5 0.02 path_r@5 0.03 path_cover 0.02 stale_above 0.02 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 75 0% head_r@1 0.00 head_r@5 0.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 157 3% direct_r@5 0.03 assisted_r@5 0.03 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 3% in_window_r@5 0.03 leak 0.00 + tfidf success 46% = 1379 passed of 3007 posed (attempted 2940/3007, 47% of those passed) composite 0.549 S 0.82 ×8.2 score 583 standing 0 tok 140 tok/query + v2 score 583 = families 439 + signal 44 + tokens 100 (billed 140 tok/query) + retrieval 2064 48% r@1 0.47 r@5 0.51 lexical_r@5 0.99 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.07 crossed_r@5 0.00 path_r@5 0.44 path_cover 0.24 stale_above 0.71 hedge 0.00 noise 0.57 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.68 + currency 75 69% head_r@1 0.68 head_r@5 0.69 pollution 0.00 + contradiction 166 59% t1_recall 0.38 t2_recall 0.38 t3_recall 0.33 t2_false_alarm 0.06 t3_false_alarm 0.19 queued 0.36 flagged 0.36 absorbed 0.00 + drift 32 62% noticed 0.62 flagged 0.62 + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 157 0% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + +wrote results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed2.json diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed3.json b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed3.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a82d64b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed3.json @@ -0,0 +1,12394 @@ +{ + "generator": "knowledgedrift 1.0.0", + "flags": [ + "--v2" + ], + "embedder": "bge-small-en-v1.5", + "reranker": "jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en", + "nli": "deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli", + "embeddings_are_fake": false, + "sizes": [ + { + "spec": { + "size": 500, + "seed": 3, + "k": 10, + "chains": 25, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "edition": 2, + "notes": 641, + "edges": 530 + }, + "digest": "cdbbbcf8710e192e", + "probes": 3112, + "ops": 4315, + "arms": [ + { + "arm": "engram", + "capabilities": { + "link": true, + "history": true, + "trace": true, + "suspects": true, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": true, + "write_check": true, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": true, + "endorse_user": true, + "endorse_supervisor": true + }, + "script_digest": "cdbbbcf8710e192e", + "settle_note": "auto-tune left the defaults; weak line 0.894; sweep queued 0", + "tasks": 3071, + "attempted": 3071, + "passed": 2140, + "success": 0.696841419732986, + "attempted_success": 0.696841419732986, + "composite": 0.7886808317790436, + "signal_share": 0.6590982771207853, + "multiplier": 6.590982771207853, + "score": 738.8749745953706, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 630.9446654232349, + "signal_score": 36.73494255687005, + "token_score": 71.19536661526567, + "tokens_billed": 436.3136209403781, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1286, + "pass_rate": 0.6233640329617063, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.024, + "hedge": 0.38663823738450603, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.5695212301587302, + "noise": 0.4763780209126763, + "oblique_r@5": 0.522, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.992, + "path_cover": 0.9936507936507936, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.5215, + "r@5": 0.6345, + "stale_above": 0.19318181818181818, + "tokens": 242.3136209403781, + "weighted_r@5": 0.6345000000000001 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 236, + "pass_rate": 0.9915966386554622, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.9915966386554622, + "fp": 0.008403361344537815, + "natural_fp": 0.016, + "phantom_fp": 0.0, + "separation": 0.6911449019743623 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 100, + "passed": 88, + "pass_rate": 0.88, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.72, + "head_r@5": 0.84, + "lineage": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 166, + "passed": 77, + "pass_rate": 0.463855421686747, + "columns": { + "absorbed": 0.03125, + "flagged": 0.052083333333333336, + "queued": 0.10416666666666667, + "t1_recall": 0.0, + "t2_false_alarm": 0.0, + "t2_recall": 0.125, + "t3_false_alarm": 0.0, + "t3_recall": 0.041666666666666664 + } + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 116, + "pass_rate": 0.928, + "columns": { + "marker_leak": 1.0, + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.7857142857142857, + "trace": 1.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 188, + "tasks": 188, + "passed": 182, + "pass_rate": 0.9680851063829787, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.9680851063829787, + "direct_r@5": 0.005319148936170213, + "structure_only": 0.9627659574468085 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 66, + "tasks": 66, + "passed": 30, + "pass_rate": 0.45454545454545453, + "columns": { + "flagged": 0.25757575757575757, + "noticed": 0.45454545454545453 + } + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no tasks in this world", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.6590982771207853, + "noise": 0.4763780209126763, + "tokens_per_query": 242.3136209403781 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 180.08041237558675, + "lineage_ms": 0.026543360000000005, + "link_ms": 0.05788900566037739, + "purge_ms": 5.6331900243902435, + "recall_ms": 226.40550805131056, + "recall_path_ms": 1.1511567301587302, + "release_ms": 77.0295149047619, + "settle_ms": 20956.7816665, + "standing_tokens": 3880.0, + "supersede_ms": 159.81122995999996, + "suspects_ms": 5261.7399159999995, + "tokens_per_query": 242.3136209403781 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 852, + "total_ms": 153428.5113439999 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.6635840000000002 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 30.68117300000002 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 230.960791 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2709, + "total_ms": 613332.5213110003 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 72.522874 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 3235.2396259999996 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 41913.563333 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 7990.561497999998 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 5261.7399159999995 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R3", + "R4", + "R8", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R47", + "R48", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R79", + "R80", + "R84", + "R87", + "R88", + "R92", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R115", + "R116", + "R120", + "R123", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R139", + "R140", + "R144", + "R148", + "R152", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R164", + "R168", + "R172", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R187", + "R188", + "R192", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R212", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R224", + "R228", + "R232", + "R234", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R247", + "R248", + "R252", + "R255", + "R256", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R268", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R280", + "R283", + "R284", + "R288", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R312", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R344", + "R348", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R360", + "R364", + "R368", + "R369", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R380", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R399", + "R400", + "R404", + "R408", + "R412", + "R416", + "R420", + "R424", + "R428", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R468", + "R469", + "R470", + "R472", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R484", + "R488", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R508", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R532", + "R536", + "R540", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R552", + "R556", + "R560", + "R564", + "R565", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R576", + "R580", + "R584", + "R588", + "R592", + "R596", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R608", + "R612", + "R616", + "R619", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R627", + "R628", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R648", + "R652", + "R656", + "R659", + "R660", + "R668", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R680", + "R685", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R696", + "R699", + "R700", + "R704", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R716", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R727", + "R728", + "R732", + "R736", + "R739", + "R740", + "R743", + "R744", + "R747", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R756", + "R759", + "R760", + "R764", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R784", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R804", + "R808", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R819", + "R820", + "R827", + "R828", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R840", + "R844", + "R848", + "R852", + "R856", + "R860", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R875", + "R876", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R908", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R924", + "R928", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R940", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R968", + "R972", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R984", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1032", + "R1034", + "R1036", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1064", + "R1068", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1136", + "R1140", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1160", + "R1164", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1224", + "R1228", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1256", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1308", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1340", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1368", + "R1372", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1404", + "R1408", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1428", + "R1432", + "R1436", + "R1440", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1448", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1544", + "R1548", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1620", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1648", + "R1652", + "R1656", + "R1660", + "R1664", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1704", + "R1708", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1788", + "R1792", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1804", + "R1808", + "R1809", + "R1810", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1820", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1832", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1868", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1892", + "R1896", + "R1900", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1912", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1933", + "R1936", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1964", + "R1968", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1980", + "R1984", + "R1988", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1996", + "R2000", + "R2114", + "R2164", + "R2241", + "R2253", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2268", + "R2277", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2292", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2396", + "R2415", + "R2465", + "R2472", + "R2493", + "R2497", + "C0", + "C1", + "C2", + "C5", + "C6", + "C8", + "C9", + "C11", + "C14", + "C15", + "C16", + "C19", + "C20", + "C22", + "C25", + "C28", + "C29", + "C33", + "C34", + "C36", + "C37", + "C39", + "C42", + "C43", + "C47", + "C48", + "C50", + "C51", + "C53", + "C56", + "C57", + "C61", + "C62", + "C64", + "C65", + "C67", + "C70", + "C71", + "C72", + "C75", + "C76", + "C78", + "C79", + "C81", + "C84", + "C85", + "C86", + "C89", + "C90", + "C92", + "C93", + "C95", + "C98", + "C99", + "C103", + "C104", + "C106", + "C107", + "C109", + "C112", + "C113", + "C117", + "C118", + "C120", + "C121", + "C126", + "C127", + "C128", + "C131", + "C132", + "C134", + "C135", + "C137", + "C140", + "C141", + "C142", + "C145", + "C146", + "C148", + "C149", + "C151", + "C154", + "C155", + "C156", + "C159", + "C160", + "C162", + "C163", + "C165", + "D0", + "D5", + "D18", + "D22", + "D40", + "D52", + "D57", + "D63", + "D72", + "D78", + "D92", + "D95", + "D117", + "D141", + "D156", + "D168", + "D181", + "D185", + "D226", + "D238", + "D253", + "D256", + "D258", + "D283", + "D290", + "D307", + "D356", + "D361", + "D375", + "D378", + "D388", + "D391", + "D397", + "D406", + "D426", + "D483", + "W181", + "W183", + "W187", + "W189", + "W203", + "W211", + "W215", + "W223", + "W249" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "rag", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "cdbbbcf8710e192e", + "tasks": 3071, + "attempted": 2772, + "passed": 1595, + "success": 0.5193747964832303, + "attempted_success": 0.5753968253968254, + "composite": 0.44387384704503186, + "signal_share": 0.11921504924167295, + "multiplier": 1.1921504924167294, + "score": 374.0718218327114, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 355.0990776360255, + "signal_score": 8.541158896499834, + "token_score": 10.43158530018602, + "tokens_billed": 2261.706737760543, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1313, + "pass_rate": 0.6364517692680562, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.184, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.996, + "mrr": 0.5793900793650792, + "noise": 0.9238972370334694, + "oblique_r@5": 0.526, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.98, + "path_cover": 0.3605001259763164, + "path_r@5": 0.6031746031746031, + "r@1": 0.507, + "r@5": 0.6715, + "stale_above": 0.29924242424242425, + "tokens": 2261.706737760543, + "weighted_r@5": 0.6715 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5929817879648224 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 65, + "pass_rate": 0.8666666666666667, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.72, + "head_r@5": 0.8666666666666667, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 188, + "tasks": 188, + "passed": 9, + "pass_rate": 0.047872340425531915, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.047872340425531915, + "direct_r@5": 0.047872340425531915, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 66, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.11921504924167295, + "noise": 0.9238972370334694, + "tokens_per_query": 2261.706737760543 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 39.37384404107985, + "lineage_ms": 0.00050668, + "link_ms": 0.00009679433962264153, + "purge_ms": 0.013464512195121955, + "recall_ms": 10.491843069398303, + "recall_path_ms": 9.31496966666667, + "release_ms": 0.018756023809523813, + "settle_ms": 0.001042, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 57.22715671999998, + "suspects_ms": 0.023917, + "tokens_per_query": 2261.706737760543 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 852, + "total_ms": 33546.515123000034 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.012667000000000001 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.05130100000000001 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.5520450000000001 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2709, + "total_ms": 28422.402875000003 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 586.8430890000002 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.7877530000000001 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.002084 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 2861.357835999999 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.023917 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R4", + "R8", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R37", + "R38", + "R39", + "R40", + "R47", + "R48", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R79", + "R80", + "R87", + "R88", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R100", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R115", + "R116", + "R127", + "R128", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R144", + "R148", + "R152", + "R156", + "R160", + "R161", + "R168", + "R172", + "R175", + "R176", + "R179", + "R180", + "R187", + "R188", + "R191", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R212", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R228", + "R229", + "R230", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R244", + "R247", + "R248", + "R253", + "R256", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R268", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R280", + "R284", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R312", + "R313", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R332", + "R336", + "R337", + "R338", + "R339", + "R340", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R369", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R380", + "R382", + "R384", + "R386", + "R387", + "R388", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R399", + "R400", + "R404", + "R412", + "R416", + "R420", + "R428", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R469", + "R479", + "R480", + "R488", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R516", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R536", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R552", + "R556", + "R560", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R580", + "R584", + "R588", + "R592", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R619", + "R620", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R635", + "R636", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R648", + "R655", + "R656", + "R659", + "R660", + "R667", + "R668", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R680", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R692", + "R696", + "R699", + "R700", + "R703", + "R704", + "R708", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R724", + "R725", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R744", + "R747", + "R748", + "R752", + "R755", + "R756", + "R760", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R775", + "R776", + "R784", + "R788", + "R792", + "R799", + "R800", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R820", + "R827", + "R828", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R840", + "R844", + "R848", + "R852", + "R856", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R866", + "R867", + "R868", + "R872", + "R875", + "R876", + "R883", + "R884", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R904", + "R905", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R920", + "R927", + "R928", + "R935", + "R936", + "R947", + "R948", + "R952", + "R955", + "R956", + "R960", + "R964", + "R965", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R975", + "R976", + "R980", + "R984", + "R991", + "R992", + "R996", + "R1004", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1012", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1032", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1064", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1080", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1092", + "R1096", + "R1100", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1154", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1161", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1220", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1236", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1268", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1308", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1320", + "R1324", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1336", + "R1340", + "R1344", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1400", + "R1412", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1428", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1444", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1468", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1488", + "R1492", + "R1496", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1552", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1600", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1634", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1640", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1732", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1748", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1760", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1768", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1788", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1809", + "R1810", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1832", + "R1848", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1907", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1933", + "R1944", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1968", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1984", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P4", + "P5", + "P7", + "P12", + "P17", + "P19", + "P20", + "P21", + "P27", + "P31", + "P34", + "P35", + "P39", + "P43", + "P44", + "P45", + "P46", + "P47", + "P49", + "P51", + "P52", + "P53", + "P55", + "P59", + "P62", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2256", + "R2268", + "R2274", + "R2277", + "R2292", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2360", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2485", + "R2486", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2489", + "R2490", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2493", + "R2494", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2497", + "R2498", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2501" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "grep", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "cdbbbcf8710e192e", + "tasks": 3071, + "attempted": 2772, + "passed": 1274, + "success": 0.4148485835232823, + "attempted_success": 0.4595959595959596, + "composite": 0.39952175359165026, + "signal_share": 0.15219319493926356, + "multiplier": 1.5219319493926355, + "score": 332.4811900486867, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 319.6174028733202, + "signal_score": 8.852730679937775, + "token_score": 4.011056495428723, + "tokens_billed": 2691.2098885118758, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1010, + "pass_rate": 0.48957828405235093, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.006, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 0.49134980158730174, + "noise": 0.9173045110757342, + "oblique_r@5": 0.132, + "paraphrase_r@5": 1.0, + "path_cover": 0.9723356009070294, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 0.4485, + "r@5": 0.5345, + "stale_above": 0.4621212121212121, + "tokens": 2691.2098885118758, + "weighted_r@5": 0.5345 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.7301657454062576 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 51, + "pass_rate": 0.68, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6666666666666666, + "head_r@5": 0.68, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 188, + "tasks": 188, + "passed": 5, + "pass_rate": 0.026595744680851064, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.026595744680851064, + "direct_r@5": 0.026595744680851064, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 66, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.15219319493926356, + "noise": 0.9173045110757342, + "tokens_per_query": 2691.2098885118758 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0005115492957746421, + "lineage_ms": 0.00014164000000000006, + "link_ms": 0.00003024339622641513, + "purge_ms": 0.004209341463414635, + "recall_ms": 1.2266866419342912, + "recall_path_ms": 0.009473555555555551, + "release_ms": 0.004423666666666665, + "settle_ms": 0.00022899999999999998, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0008008200000000003, + "suspects_ms": 0.00029099999999999997, + "tokens_per_query": 2691.2098885118758 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 852, + "total_ms": 0.43583999999999506 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.003541000000000001 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.01602900000000002 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.17258300000000004 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2709, + "total_ms": 3323.0941129999946 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 0.5968339999999998 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.18579399999999993 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.00045799999999999997 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.040041000000000014 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.00029099999999999997 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R47", + "R48", + "R51", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R80", + "R87", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R92", + "R96", + "R103", + "R104", + "R108", + "R112", + "R115", + "R116", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R152", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R175", + "R176", + "R180", + "R183", + "R184", + "R187", + "R188", + "R191", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R220", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R229", + "R230", + "R231", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R244", + "R248", + "R252", + "R253", + "R256", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R268", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R343", + "R344", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R368", + "R369", + "R370", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R399", + "R400", + "R404", + "R408", + "R412", + "R416", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R428", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R469", + "R470", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R487", + "R488", + "R491", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R535", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R591", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R631", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R704", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R748", + "R752", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R819", + "R820", + "R823", + "R824", + "R828", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R843", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R871", + "R872", + "R875", + "R876", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R919", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R952", + "R953", + "R955", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R971", + "R972", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1013", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1033", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1452", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1513", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1809", + "R1810", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2250", + "R2253", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2262", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2274", + "R2277", + "R2280", + "R2283", + "R2286", + "R2289", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2298", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2310", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2485", + "R2486", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2489", + "R2490", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2493", + "R2494", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2497", + "R2498", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2501" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "curated", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "cdbbbcf8710e192e", + "tasks": 3071, + "attempted": 2647, + "passed": 248, + "success": 0.08075545424943015, + "attempted_success": 0.09369097091046467, + "composite": 0.1495008302307113, + "signal_share": 0.02836901816223125, + "multiplier": 0.28369018162231247, + "score": 120.4176694630977, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 119.60066418456906, + "signal_score": 0.2213966032050039, + "token_score": 0.5956086753236279, + "tokens_billed": 2952.0, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 141, + "pass_rate": 0.06834706737760543, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.068, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.068, + "mrr": 0.068, + "noise": 0.9979492151086884, + "oblique_r@5": 0.068, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.068, + "path_cover": 0.08658352229780801, + "path_r@5": 0.3968253968253968, + "r@1": 0.068, + "r@5": 0.068, + "stale_above": 0.07575757575757576, + "tokens": 2952.0, + "weighted_r@5": 0.068 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.0, + "head_r@5": 0.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 188, + "tasks": 188, + "passed": 24, + "pass_rate": 0.1276595744680851, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.1276595744680851, + "direct_r@5": 0.1276595744680851, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 66, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.02836901816223125, + "noise": 0.9979492151086884, + "tokens_per_query": 2952.0 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.00027952934272300307, + "lineage_ms": 0.00013832000000000002, + "link_ms": 0.000028683018867924573, + "purge_ms": 0.0037857073170731704, + "recall_ms": 0.528138824658546, + "recall_path_ms": 0.5404934603174602, + "release_ms": 0.005267880952380953, + "settle_ms": 0.0002295, + "standing_tokens": 2998.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0006099800000000003, + "suspects_ms": 0.00033299999999999996, + "tokens_per_query": 2952.0 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 852, + "total_ms": 0.23815899999999862 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0034580000000000006 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.015202000000000025 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.155214 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2709, + "total_ms": 1430.7280760000012 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 34.05108799999999 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.221251 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000459 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.030499000000000016 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.00033299999999999996 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R5", + "R6", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R13", + "R14", + "R15", + "R16", + "R17", + "R18", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R25", + "R26", + "R27", + "R28", + "R29", + "R30", + "R31", + "R32", + "R33", + "R34", + "R35", + "R36", + "R37", + "R38", + "R39", + "R40", + "R41", + "R42", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R49", + "R50", + "R51", + "R52", + "R53", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R57", + "R58", + "R59", + "R60", + "R61", + "R62", + "R63", + "R64", + "R65", + "R66", + "R67", + "R68", + "R69", + "R70", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R80", + "R81", + "R82", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R92", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R97", + "R98", + "R99", + "R100", + "R101", + "R102", + "R103", + "R104", + "R105", + "R106", + "R107", + "R108", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R121", + "R122", + "R123", + "R124", + "R125", + "R126", + "R127", + "R128", + "R133", + "R134", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R141", + "R142", + "R143", + "R144", + "R145", + "R146", + "R147", + "R148", + "R149", + "R150", + "R151", + "R152", + "R153", + "R154", + "R155", + "R156", + "R157", + "R158", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R165", + "R166", + "R167", + "R168", + "R169", + "R170", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R181", + "R182", + "R183", + "R184", + "R185", + "R186", + "R187", + "R188", + "R189", + "R190", + "R191", + "R192", + "R193", + "R194", + "R195", + "R196", + "R197", + "R198", + "R199", + "R200", + "R201", + "R202", + "R203", + "R204", + "R205", + "R206", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R213", + "R214", + "R215", + "R216", + "R217", + "R218", + "R219", + "R220", + "R221", + "R222", + "R223", + "R224", + "R225", + "R226", + "R227", + "R228", + "R229", + "R230", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R237", + "R238", + "R239", + "R240", + "R241", + "R242", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R261", + "R262", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R273", + "R274", + "R275", + "R276", + "R277", + "R278", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R285", + "R286", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R293", + "R294", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R301", + "R302", + "R303", + "R304", + "R305", + "R306", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R317", + "R318", + "R319", + "R320", + "R321", + "R322", + "R323", + "R324", + "R325", + "R326", + "R327", + "R328", + "R329", + "R330", + "R331", + "R332", + "R333", + "R334", + "R335", + "R336", + "R337", + "R338", + "R339", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R345", + "R346", + "R347", + "R348", + "R349", + "R350", + "R351", + "R352", + "R353", + "R354", + "R355", + "R356", + "R357", + "R358", + "R359", + "R360", + "R361", + "R362", + "R363", + "R364", + "R365", + "R366", + "R367", + "R368", + "R369", + "R370", + "R371", + "R372", + "R373", + "R374", + "R375", + "R376", + "R377", + "R378", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R385", + "R386", + "R387", + "R388", + "R393", + "R394", + "R395", + "R396", + "R397", + "R398", + "R399", + "R400", + "R401", + "R402", + "R403", + "R404", + "R405", + "R406", + "R407", + "R408", + "R413", + "R414", + "R415", + "R416", + "R417", + "R418", + "R419", + "R420", + "R421", + "R422", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R433", + "R434", + "R435", + "R436", + "R437", + "R438", + "R439", + "R440", + "R441", + "R442", + "R443", + "R444", + "R445", + "R446", + "R447", + "R448", + "R449", + "R450", + "R451", + "R452", + "R453", + "R454", + "R455", + "R456", + "R457", + "R458", + "R459", + "R460", + "R461", + "R462", + "R463", + "R464", + "R465", + "R466", + "R467", + "R468", + "R469", + "R470", + "R471", + "R472", + "R473", + "R474", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R481", + "R482", + "R483", + "R484", + "R485", + "R486", + "R487", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R493", + "R494", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R501", + "R502", + "R503", + "R504", + "R505", + "R506", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R513", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R517", + "R518", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R525", + "R526", + "R527", + "R528", + "R529", + "R530", + "R531", + "R532", + "R533", + "R534", + "R535", + "R536", + "R537", + "R538", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R545", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R549", + "R550", + "R551", + "R552", + "R553", + "R554", + "R555", + "R556", + "R557", + "R558", + "R559", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R569", + "R570", + "R571", + "R572", + "R573", + "R574", + "R575", + "R576", + "R577", + "R578", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R585", + "R586", + "R587", + "R588", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R601", + "R602", + "R603", + "R604", + "R605", + "R606", + "R607", + "R608", + "R613", + "R614", + "R615", + "R616", + "R617", + "R618", + "R619", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R629", + "R630", + "R631", + "R632", + "R633", + "R634", + "R635", + "R636", + "R637", + "R638", + "R639", + "R640", + "R641", + "R642", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R649", + "R650", + "R651", + "R652", + "R653", + "R654", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R661", + "R662", + "R663", + "R664", + "R665", + "R666", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R677", + "R678", + "R679", + "R680", + "R681", + "R682", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R689", + "R690", + "R691", + "R692", + "R693", + "R694", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R709", + "R710", + "R711", + "R712", + "R713", + "R714", + "R715", + "R716", + "R717", + "R718", + "R719", + "R720", + "R721", + "R722", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R729", + "R730", + "R731", + "R732", + "R733", + "R734", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R745", + "R746", + "R747", + "R748", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R761", + "R762", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R773", + "R774", + "R775", + "R776", + "R777", + "R778", + "R779", + "R780", + "R781", + "R782", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R793", + "R794", + "R795", + "R796", + "R797", + "R798", + "R799", + "R800", + "R801", + "R802", + "R803", + "R804", + "R805", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R809", + "R810", + "R811", + "R812", + "R813", + "R814", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R821", + "R822", + "R823", + "R824", + "R825", + "R826", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R833", + "R834", + "R835", + "R836", + "R837", + "R838", + "R839", + "R840", + "R841", + "R842", + "R843", + "R844", + "R845", + "R846", + "R847", + "R848", + "R849", + "R850", + "R851", + "R852", + "R853", + "R854", + "R855", + "R856", + "R857", + "R858", + "R859", + "R860", + "R861", + "R862", + "R863", + "R864", + "R865", + "R866", + "R867", + "R868", + "R869", + "R870", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R877", + "R878", + "R879", + "R880", + "R881", + "R882", + "R883", + "R884", + "R885", + "R886", + "R887", + "R888", + "R889", + "R890", + "R891", + "R892", + "R893", + "R894", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R909", + "R910", + "R911", + "R912", + "R913", + "R914", + "R915", + "R916", + "R917", + "R918", + "R919", + "R920", + "R921", + "R922", + "R923", + "R924", + "R925", + "R926", + "R927", + "R928", + "R933", + "R934", + "R935", + "R936", + "R937", + "R938", + "R939", + "R940", + "R941", + "R942", + "R943", + "R944", + "R945", + "R946", + "R947", + "R948", + "R949", + "R950", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R957", + "R958", + "R959", + "R960", + "R961", + "R962", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R969", + "R970", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R977", + "R978", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R985", + "R986", + "R987", + "R988", + "R993", + "R994", + "R995", + "R996", + "R997", + "R998", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1001", + "R1002", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1017", + "R1018", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1021", + "R1022", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1037", + "R1038", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1041", + "R1042", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1049", + "R1050", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1053", + "R1054", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1065", + "R1066", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1069", + "R1070", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1073", + "R1074", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1077", + "R1078", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1081", + "R1082", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1085", + "R1086", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1089", + "R1090", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1093", + "R1094", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1097", + "R1098", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1101", + "R1102", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1109", + "R1110", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1113", + "R1114", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1117", + "R1118", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1121", + "R1122", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1125", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1129", + "R1130", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1137", + "R1138", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1141", + "R1142", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1149", + "R1150", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1153", + "R1154", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1157", + "R1158", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1173", + "R1174", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1177", + "R1178", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1181", + "R1182", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1197", + "R1198", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1201", + "R1202", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1205", + "R1206", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1209", + "R1210", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1221", + "R1222", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1225", + "R1226", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1233", + "R1234", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1245", + "R1246", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1249", + "R1250", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1253", + "R1254", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1257", + "R1258", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1261", + "R1262", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1265", + "R1266", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1281", + "R1282", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1285", + "R1286", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1293", + "R1294", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1297", + "R1298", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1305", + "R1306", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1309", + "R1310", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1313", + "R1314", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1317", + "R1318", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1325", + "R1326", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1329", + "R1330", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1333", + "R1334", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1341", + "R1342", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1345", + "R1346", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1353", + "R1354", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1357", + "R1358", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1361", + "R1362", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1369", + "R1370", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1373", + "R1374", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1377", + "R1378", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1381", + "R1382", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1385", + "R1386", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1397", + "R1398", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1405", + "R1406", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1409", + "R1410", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1413", + "R1414", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1417", + "R1418", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1433", + "R1434", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1437", + "R1438", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1453", + "R1454", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1457", + "R1458", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1461", + "R1462", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1465", + "R1466", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1473", + "R1474", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1477", + "R1478", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1481", + "R1482", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1489", + "R1490", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1493", + "R1494", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1497", + "R1498", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1505", + "R1506", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1517", + "R1518", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1521", + "R1522", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1525", + "R1526", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1529", + "R1530", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1533", + "R1534", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1537", + "R1538", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1541", + "R1542", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1545", + "R1546", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1549", + "R1550", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1557", + "R1558", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1561", + "R1562", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1569", + "R1570", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1573", + "R1574", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1581", + "R1582", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1585", + "R1586", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1593", + "R1594", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1597", + "R1598", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1601", + "R1602", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1613", + "R1614", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1621", + "R1622", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1629", + "R1630", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1633", + "R1634", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1637", + "R1638", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1641", + "R1642", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1645", + "R1646", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1657", + "R1658", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1665", + "R1666", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1669", + "R1670", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1673", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1677", + "R1678", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1681", + "R1682", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1685", + "R1686", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1693", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1701", + "R1702", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1721", + "R1722", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1725", + "R1726", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1737", + "R1738", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1741", + "R1742", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1745", + "R1746", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1753", + "R1754", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1761", + "R1762", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1769", + "R1770", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1773", + "R1774", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1777", + "R1778", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1781", + "R1782", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1785", + "R1786", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1793", + "R1794", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1797", + "R1798", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1805", + "R1806", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1817", + "R1818", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1821", + "R1822", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1825", + "R1826", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1833", + "R1834", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1837", + "R1838", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1841", + "R1842", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1845", + "R1846", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1853", + "R1854", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1861", + "R1862", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1869", + "R1870", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1873", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1881", + "R1882", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1885", + "R1886", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1893", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1897", + "R1898", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1901", + "R1902", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1905", + "R1906", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1913", + "R1914", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1917", + "R1918", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1921", + "R1922", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1925", + "R1926", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1934", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1937", + "R1938", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1941", + "R1942", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1945", + "R1946", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1949", + "R1950", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1953", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1957", + "R1958", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1961", + "R1962", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1965", + "R1966", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1973", + "R1974", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1977", + "R1978", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1981", + "R1982", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1985", + "R1986", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1997", + "R1998", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P4", + "P9", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P17", + "P19", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P23", + "P27", + "P29", + "P30", + "P31", + "P32", + "P35", + "P36", + "P39", + "P40", + "P41", + "P42", + "P43", + "P47", + "P49", + "P52", + "P53", + "P54", + "P55", + "P56", + "P58", + "P60", + "P61", + "P62", + "P63", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2241", + "R2242", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2245", + "R2246", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2249", + "R2250", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2253", + "R2254", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2257", + "R2258", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2261", + "R2262", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2265", + "R2266", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2269", + "R2270", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2273", + "R2274", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2277", + "R2278", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2281", + "R2282", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2289", + "R2290", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2293", + "R2294", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2301", + "R2302", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2305", + "R2306", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2309", + "R2310", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2413", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2485", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2489", + "R2490", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2493", + "R2494", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2497", + "R2498", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2501" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "whole", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": false, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "cdbbbcf8710e192e", + "tasks": 3071, + "attempted": 2647, + "passed": 2145, + "success": 0.6984695538912407, + "attempted_success": 0.8103513411409142, + "composite": 0.4840038778477945, + "signal_share": 0.002159797053218453, + "multiplier": 0.1, + "score": 387.4190819835574, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 387.2031022782356, + "signal_score": 0.21597970532184527, + "token_score": 0.0, + "tokens_billed": 134995.0, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 1799, + "pass_rate": 0.8720310227823558, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 1.0, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 1.0, + "mrr": 1.0, + "noise": 0.9980323695307287, + "oblique_r@5": 1.0, + "paraphrase_r@5": 1.0, + "path_cover": 1.0, + "path_r@5": 1.0, + "r@1": 1.0, + "r@5": 1.0, + "stale_above": 1.0, + "tokens": 134995.0, + "weighted_r@5": 1.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 75, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 1.0, + "head_r@5": 1.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 188, + "tasks": 188, + "passed": 188, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 1.0, + "direct_r@5": 1.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no capture-time scoping", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 66, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.002159797053218453, + "noise": 0.9980323695307287, + "tokens_per_query": 134995.0 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0004126197183098573, + "lineage_ms": 0.00010835999999999999, + "link_ms": 0.000028381132075471753, + "purge_ms": 0.0034949268292682936, + "recall_ms": 0.3116426637135475, + "recall_path_ms": 0.2783658095238095, + "release_ms": 0.005249000000000001, + "settle_ms": 0.000292, + "standing_tokens": 142881.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0005941800000000004, + "suspects_ms": 0.004959, + "tokens_per_query": 134995.0 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 852, + "total_ms": 0.3515519999999984 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0027089999999999996 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.01504200000000003 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.14329200000000003 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2709, + "total_ms": 844.2399760000001 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 17.537046 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.22045800000000004 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000584 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.029709000000000017 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.004959 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R80", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R92", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R229", + "R230", + "R231", + "R232", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R369", + "R370", + "R371", + "R372", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R469", + "R470", + "R471", + "R472", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1809", + "R1810", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1933", + "R1934", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "chance", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": false, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": false, + "write_check": false, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "cdbbbcf8710e192e", + "tasks": 3071, + "attempted": 2772, + "passed": 107, + "success": 0.0348420709866493, + "attempted_success": 0.0386002886002886, + "composite": 0.13303005332040718, + "signal_share": 0.10776309181317381, + "multiplier": 1.077630918131738, + "score": 116.99056684468306, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 106.42404265632574, + "signal_score": 0.1485092707385546, + "token_score": 10.418014917618757, + "tokens_billed": 2262.5380513814835, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 17, + "pass_rate": 0.008240426563257392, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.006, + "hedge": 0.0, + "lexical_r@5": 0.01, + "mrr": 0.00345952380952381, + "noise": 0.9983519146873492, + "oblique_r@5": 0.002, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.008, + "path_cover": 0.0309901738473167, + "path_r@5": 0.06349206349206349, + "r@1": 0.001, + "r@5": 0.0065, + "stale_above": 0.015151515151515152, + "tokens": 2262.5380513814835, + "weighted_r@5": 0.006500000000000001 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.5 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.0, + "head_r@5": 0.0, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 188, + "tasks": 188, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.0, + "direct_r@5": 0.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 7, + "pass_rate": 0.056, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 0.056, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 66, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no suspect nomination", + "columns": {} + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.10776309181317381, + "noise": 0.9983519146873492, + "tokens_per_query": 2262.5380513814835 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.0019931068075117364, + "lineage_ms": 0.00011835999999999997, + "link_ms": 0.00004583962264150949, + "purge_ms": 0.0030742682926829285, + "recall_ms": 0.00810276928756002, + "recall_path_ms": 0.005607809523809523, + "release_ms": 0.0031517857142857155, + "settle_ms": 0.0001875, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.0007140800000000002, + "suspects_ms": 0.000334, + "tokens_per_query": 2262.5380513814835 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 852, + "total_ms": 1.6981269999999993 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.0029589999999999994 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.02429500000000003 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.12604500000000007 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2709, + "total_ms": 21.950402000000093 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 0.35329199999999994 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.13237500000000005 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 0.000375 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 0.03570400000000001 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.000334 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R5", + "R6", + "R7", + "R8", + "R9", + "R10", + "R11", + "R12", + "R13", + "R14", + "R15", + "R16", + "R17", + "R18", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R25", + "R26", + "R27", + "R28", + "R29", + "R30", + "R31", + "R32", + "R33", + "R34", + "R35", + "R36", + "R37", + "R38", + "R39", + "R40", + "R41", + "R42", + "R43", + "R44", + "R45", + "R46", + "R47", + "R48", + "R49", + "R50", + "R51", + "R52", + "R53", + "R54", + "R55", + "R56", + "R57", + "R58", + "R59", + "R60", + "R61", + "R62", + "R63", + "R64", + "R65", + "R66", + "R67", + "R68", + "R69", + "R70", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R80", + "R81", + "R82", + "R83", + "R84", + "R85", + "R86", + "R87", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R93", + "R94", + "R95", + "R96", + "R97", + "R98", + "R99", + "R100", + "R101", + "R102", + "R103", + "R104", + "R105", + "R106", + "R107", + "R108", + "R109", + "R110", + "R111", + "R112", + "R113", + "R114", + "R115", + "R116", + "R117", + "R118", + "R119", + "R120", + "R121", + "R122", + "R123", + "R124", + "R125", + "R126", + "R127", + "R128", + "R129", + "R130", + "R131", + "R132", + "R133", + "R134", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R141", + "R142", + "R143", + "R144", + "R145", + "R146", + "R147", + "R148", + "R149", + "R150", + "R151", + "R152", + "R153", + "R154", + "R155", + "R156", + "R157", + "R158", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R165", + "R166", + "R167", + "R168", + "R169", + "R170", + "R171", + "R172", + "R173", + "R174", + "R175", + "R176", + "R177", + "R178", + "R179", + "R180", + "R182", + "R183", + "R184", + "R185", + "R186", + "R187", + "R188", + "R189", + "R190", + "R191", + "R192", + "R193", + "R194", + "R195", + "R196", + "R197", + "R198", + "R199", + "R200", + "R201", + "R202", + "R203", + "R204", + "R205", + "R206", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R213", + "R214", + "R215", + "R216", + "R217", + "R218", + "R219", + "R220", + "R221", + "R222", + "R223", + "R224", + "R225", + "R226", + "R227", + "R228", + "R229", + "R230", + "R231", + "R232", + "R233", + "R234", + "R235", + "R236", + "R237", + "R238", + "R239", + "R240", + "R241", + "R242", + "R243", + "R244", + "R245", + "R246", + "R247", + "R248", + "R249", + "R250", + "R251", + "R252", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R257", + "R258", + "R259", + "R260", + "R261", + "R262", + "R263", + "R264", + "R265", + "R266", + "R267", + "R268", + "R269", + "R270", + "R271", + "R272", + "R273", + "R274", + "R275", + "R276", + "R277", + "R278", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R285", + "R286", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R293", + "R294", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R301", + "R302", + "R303", + "R304", + "R305", + "R306", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R317", + "R318", + "R319", + "R320", + "R321", + "R322", + "R323", + "R324", + "R325", + "R326", + "R327", + "R328", + "R329", + "R330", + "R331", + "R332", + "R333", + "R334", + "R335", + "R336", + "R337", + "R338", + "R339", + "R340", + "R341", + "R342", + "R343", + "R344", + "R345", + "R346", + "R347", + "R348", + "R349", + "R350", + "R351", + "R352", + "R353", + "R354", + "R355", + "R356", + "R357", + "R358", + "R359", + "R360", + "R361", + "R362", + "R363", + "R364", + "R365", + "R366", + "R367", + "R368", + "R369", + "R370", + "R371", + "R372", + "R373", + "R374", + "R375", + "R376", + "R377", + "R378", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R385", + "R386", + "R387", + "R388", + "R390", + "R391", + "R392", + "R393", + "R394", + "R395", + "R396", + "R397", + "R398", + "R399", + "R400", + "R401", + "R402", + "R403", + "R404", + "R405", + "R406", + "R407", + "R408", + "R409", + "R410", + "R411", + "R412", + "R413", + "R414", + "R415", + "R416", + "R417", + "R418", + "R419", + "R420", + "R421", + "R422", + "R423", + "R424", + "R425", + "R426", + "R427", + "R428", + "R429", + "R430", + "R431", + "R432", + "R433", + "R434", + "R435", + "R436", + "R437", + "R438", + "R439", + "R440", + "R441", + "R442", + "R443", + "R444", + "R445", + "R446", + "R447", + "R448", + "R449", + "R450", + "R451", + "R452", + "R453", + "R454", + "R455", + "R456", + "R457", + "R459", + "R460", + "R461", + "R462", + "R463", + "R464", + "R465", + "R466", + "R467", + "R468", + "R469", + "R470", + "R471", + "R472", + "R473", + "R474", + "R475", + "R476", + "R477", + "R478", + "R479", + "R480", + "R481", + "R482", + "R483", + "R484", + "R485", + "R486", + "R487", + "R488", + "R489", + "R490", + "R491", + "R492", + "R493", + "R494", + "R495", + "R496", + "R497", + "R498", + "R499", + "R500", + "R501", + "R502", + "R503", + "R504", + "R505", + "R506", + "R507", + "R508", + "R509", + "R510", + "R511", + "R512", + "R513", + "R514", + "R515", + "R516", + "R517", + "R518", + "R519", + "R520", + "R521", + "R522", + "R523", + "R524", + "R525", + "R526", + "R527", + "R528", + "R529", + "R530", + "R531", + "R532", + "R533", + "R534", + "R535", + "R536", + "R537", + "R538", + "R539", + "R540", + "R541", + "R542", + "R543", + "R544", + "R545", + "R546", + "R547", + "R548", + "R549", + "R550", + "R551", + "R552", + "R553", + "R554", + "R555", + "R556", + "R557", + "R558", + "R559", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R569", + "R570", + "R571", + "R572", + "R573", + "R574", + "R575", + "R576", + "R577", + "R578", + "R579", + "R580", + "R581", + "R582", + "R583", + "R584", + "R585", + "R586", + "R587", + "R588", + "R589", + "R590", + "R591", + "R592", + "R593", + "R594", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R601", + "R602", + "R603", + "R604", + "R605", + "R606", + "R607", + "R608", + "R609", + "R610", + "R611", + "R612", + "R613", + "R614", + "R615", + "R616", + "R617", + "R618", + "R619", + "R620", + "R621", + "R622", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R629", + "R630", + "R631", + "R632", + "R633", + "R634", + "R635", + "R636", + "R637", + "R638", + "R639", + "R640", + "R641", + "R642", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R649", + "R650", + "R651", + "R652", + "R653", + "R654", + "R655", + "R656", + "R657", + "R658", + "R659", + "R660", + "R661", + "R662", + "R663", + "R664", + "R665", + "R666", + "R667", + "R668", + "R669", + "R670", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R677", + "R678", + "R679", + "R680", + "R681", + "R682", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R689", + "R690", + "R691", + "R692", + "R693", + "R694", + "R695", + "R696", + "R697", + "R698", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R705", + "R706", + "R707", + "R708", + "R709", + "R710", + "R711", + "R712", + "R713", + "R714", + "R715", + "R716", + "R717", + "R718", + "R719", + "R720", + "R721", + "R722", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R729", + "R730", + "R731", + "R732", + "R733", + "R734", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R745", + "R746", + "R747", + "R748", + "R749", + "R750", + "R751", + "R752", + "R753", + "R754", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R761", + "R762", + "R763", + "R764", + "R765", + "R766", + "R767", + "R768", + "R769", + "R770", + "R771", + "R772", + "R773", + "R774", + "R775", + "R776", + "R777", + "R778", + "R779", + "R780", + "R781", + "R782", + "R783", + "R784", + "R785", + "R786", + "R787", + "R788", + "R789", + "R790", + "R791", + "R792", + "R793", + "R794", + "R795", + "R796", + "R797", + "R798", + "R799", + "R800", + "R801", + "R802", + "R803", + "R804", + "R805", + "R806", + "R807", + "R808", + "R809", + "R810", + "R811", + "R812", + "R813", + "R814", + "R815", + "R816", + "R817", + "R818", + "R819", + "R820", + "R821", + "R822", + "R823", + "R824", + "R825", + "R826", + "R827", + "R828", + "R829", + "R830", + "R831", + "R832", + "R833", + "R834", + "R835", + "R836", + "R837", + "R838", + "R839", + "R840", + "R841", + "R842", + "R843", + "R844", + "R845", + "R846", + "R847", + "R848", + "R849", + "R850", + "R851", + "R852", + "R853", + "R854", + "R855", + "R856", + "R857", + "R858", + "R859", + "R860", + "R861", + "R862", + "R863", + "R864", + "R865", + "R866", + "R867", + "R868", + "R869", + "R870", + "R871", + "R872", + "R873", + "R874", + "R875", + "R876", + "R877", + "R878", + "R879", + "R880", + "R881", + "R882", + "R883", + "R884", + "R885", + "R886", + "R887", + "R888", + "R889", + "R890", + "R891", + "R892", + "R893", + "R894", + "R895", + "R896", + "R897", + "R898", + "R899", + "R900", + "R901", + "R902", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R909", + "R910", + "R911", + "R912", + "R913", + "R914", + "R915", + "R916", + "R917", + "R918", + "R919", + "R920", + "R921", + "R922", + "R923", + "R924", + "R925", + "R926", + "R927", + "R928", + "R929", + "R931", + "R932", + "R933", + "R934", + "R935", + "R936", + "R937", + "R938", + "R939", + "R940", + "R941", + "R942", + "R943", + "R944", + "R945", + "R947", + "R948", + "R949", + "R950", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R957", + "R958", + "R959", + "R960", + "R961", + "R962", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R969", + "R970", + "R971", + "R972", + "R973", + "R974", + "R975", + "R976", + "R977", + "R978", + "R979", + "R980", + "R981", + "R982", + "R983", + "R984", + "R985", + "R986", + "R987", + "R988", + "R989", + "R990", + "R991", + "R992", + "R993", + "R994", + "R995", + "R996", + "R997", + "R998", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1001", + "R1002", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1005", + "R1006", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1009", + "R1010", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1017", + "R1018", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1021", + "R1022", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1029", + "R1030", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1037", + "R1038", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1041", + "R1042", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1049", + "R1050", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1053", + "R1054", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1057", + "R1058", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1061", + "R1062", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1065", + "R1066", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1069", + "R1070", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1073", + "R1074", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1077", + "R1078", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1081", + "R1082", + "R1083", + "R1084", + "R1085", + "R1086", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1089", + "R1090", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1093", + "R1094", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1097", + "R1098", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1101", + "R1102", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1109", + "R1110", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1113", + "R1114", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1117", + "R1118", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1121", + "R1122", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1126", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1129", + "R1130", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1137", + "R1138", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1141", + "R1142", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1149", + "R1150", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1153", + "R1154", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1157", + "R1158", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1165", + "R1166", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1173", + "R1174", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1177", + "R1178", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1181", + "R1182", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1189", + "R1190", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1193", + "R1194", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1197", + "R1198", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1201", + "R1202", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1205", + "R1206", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1209", + "R1210", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1213", + "R1214", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1217", + "R1218", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1221", + "R1222", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1225", + "R1226", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1233", + "R1234", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1241", + "R1242", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1245", + "R1246", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1249", + "R1250", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1253", + "R1254", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1257", + "R1258", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1261", + "R1262", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1265", + "R1266", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1269", + "R1270", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1273", + "R1274", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1277", + "R1278", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1281", + "R1282", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1285", + "R1286", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1289", + "R1290", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1293", + "R1294", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1297", + "R1298", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1301", + "R1302", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1305", + "R1306", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1309", + "R1310", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1313", + "R1314", + "R1316", + "R1317", + "R1318", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1321", + "R1322", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1325", + "R1326", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1330", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1333", + "R1334", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1337", + "R1338", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1341", + "R1342", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1345", + "R1346", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1349", + "R1350", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1353", + "R1354", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1357", + "R1358", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1361", + "R1362", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1369", + "R1370", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1373", + "R1374", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1377", + "R1378", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1381", + "R1382", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1385", + "R1386", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1389", + "R1390", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1393", + "R1394", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1397", + "R1398", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1401", + "R1402", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1405", + "R1406", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1409", + "R1410", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1413", + "R1414", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1417", + "R1418", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1429", + "R1430", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1433", + "R1434", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1437", + "R1438", + "R1439", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1449", + "R1450", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1453", + "R1454", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1457", + "R1458", + "R1459", + "R1460", + "R1461", + "R1462", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1465", + "R1466", + "R1467", + "R1469", + "R1470", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1473", + "R1474", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1477", + "R1478", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1481", + "R1482", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1489", + "R1490", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1493", + "R1494", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1497", + "R1498", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1505", + "R1506", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1509", + "R1510", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1517", + "R1518", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1521", + "R1522", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1525", + "R1526", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1529", + "R1530", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1533", + "R1534", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1537", + "R1538", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1541", + "R1542", + "R1543", + "R1544", + "R1545", + "R1546", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1549", + "R1550", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1557", + "R1558", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1561", + "R1562", + "R1563", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1569", + "R1570", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1573", + "R1574", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1577", + "R1578", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1581", + "R1582", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1585", + "R1586", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1593", + "R1594", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1597", + "R1598", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1601", + "R1602", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1609", + "R1610", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1613", + "R1614", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1617", + "R1618", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1621", + "R1622", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1629", + "R1630", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1633", + "R1634", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1637", + "R1638", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1641", + "R1642", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1645", + "R1646", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1649", + "R1650", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1653", + "R1654", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1657", + "R1658", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1661", + "R1662", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1665", + "R1666", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1669", + "R1670", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1673", + "R1674", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1677", + "R1678", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1681", + "R1682", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1685", + "R1686", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1689", + "R1690", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1693", + "R1694", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1701", + "R1702", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1709", + "R1710", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1713", + "R1714", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1721", + "R1722", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1725", + "R1726", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1729", + "R1730", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1733", + "R1734", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1737", + "R1738", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1741", + "R1742", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1745", + "R1746", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1749", + "R1750", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1753", + "R1754", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1757", + "R1758", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1761", + "R1762", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1769", + "R1770", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1773", + "R1774", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1777", + "R1778", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1781", + "R1782", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1785", + "R1786", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1789", + "R1790", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1793", + "R1794", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1797", + "R1798", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1801", + "R1802", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1805", + "R1806", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1809", + "R1810", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1813", + "R1814", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1817", + "R1818", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1821", + "R1822", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1825", + "R1826", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1829", + "R1830", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1833", + "R1834", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1837", + "R1838", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1841", + "R1842", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1845", + "R1846", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1849", + "R1850", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1853", + "R1854", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1861", + "R1862", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1869", + "R1870", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1873", + "R1874", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1877", + "R1878", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1881", + "R1882", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1885", + "R1886", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1889", + "R1890", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1893", + "R1894", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1898", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1901", + "R1902", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1905", + "R1906", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1909", + "R1910", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1913", + "R1914", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1917", + "R1918", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1921", + "R1922", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1925", + "R1926", + "R1927", + "R1928", + "R1929", + "R1930", + "R1931", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1934", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1937", + "R1938", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1941", + "R1942", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1945", + "R1946", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1949", + "R1950", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1953", + "R1954", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1957", + "R1958", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1961", + "R1962", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1965", + "R1966", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1969", + "R1970", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1973", + "R1974", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1977", + "R1978", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1981", + "R1982", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1985", + "R1986", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1989", + "R1990", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1993", + "R1994", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1997", + "R1998", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P3", + "P4", + "P5", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P9", + "P10", + "P11", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P16", + "P17", + "P18", + "P19", + "P21", + "P22", + "P23", + "P24", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P28", + "P30", + "P31", + "P32", + "P33", + "P34", + "P35", + "P36", + "P37", + "P38", + "P39", + "P40", + "P41", + "P42", + "P43", + "P44", + "P45", + "P46", + "P48", + "P50", + "P51", + "P52", + "P53", + "P54", + "P55", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P59", + "P60", + "P61", + "P62", + "P63", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2239", + "R2240", + "R2241", + "R2242", + "R2243", + "R2244", + "R2245", + "R2246", + "R2247", + "R2248", + "R2249", + "R2250", + "R2251", + "R2252", + "R2253", + "R2254", + "R2255", + "R2256", + "R2257", + "R2258", + "R2259", + "R2260", + "R2261", + "R2262", + "R2263", + "R2264", + "R2265", + "R2266", + "R2267", + "R2268", + "R2269", + "R2270", + "R2271", + "R2272", + "R2273", + "R2274", + "R2275", + "R2276", + "R2277", + "R2278", + "R2279", + "R2280", + "R2281", + "R2282", + "R2283", + "R2284", + "R2285", + "R2286", + "R2287", + "R2288", + "R2289", + "R2290", + "R2291", + "R2292", + "R2293", + "R2294", + "R2295", + "R2296", + "R2297", + "R2298", + "R2299", + "R2300", + "R2301", + "R2302", + "R2303", + "R2304", + "R2305", + "R2306", + "R2307", + "R2308", + "R2309", + "R2310", + "R2311", + "R2312", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2485", + "R2486", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2489", + "R2490", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2493", + "R2494", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2497", + "R2498", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2501", + "R2502", + "R2503", + "R2504", + "R2505", + "R2506", + "R2507", + "R2508", + "R2509", + "R2510", + "R2511", + "R2512", + "R2513", + "R2514", + "R2515", + "R2516", + "R2517", + "R2518", + "R2519", + "R2520", + "R2521", + "R2522", + "R2523", + "R2524", + "R2525", + "R2526", + "R2527", + "R2528", + "R2529", + "R2530", + "R2532", + "R2533", + "R2534", + "R2535", + "R2536", + "R2537", + "R2538", + "R2539", + "R2540", + "R2541", + "R2542", + "R2543", + "R2545", + "R2546", + "R2547", + "R2548", + "R2549", + "R2550", + "R2551", + "R2552", + "R2553", + "R2555", + "R2556", + "R2558", + "R2559", + "R2560", + "R2561", + "R2562", + "R2563", + "R2564", + "R2565", + "R2566", + "R2567", + "R2568", + "R2569", + "R2570", + "R2571", + "R2572", + "R2573", + "R2574", + "R2575", + "R2576", + "R2577", + "R2578", + "R2579", + "R2580", + "R2581", + "R2582", + "R2583", + "R2584", + "R2585", + "R2586", + "R2587", + "R2588", + "R2589", + "R2590", + "R2591", + "R2592", + "R2593", + "R2594", + "R2595", + "R2596", + "R2597", + "R2598", + "R2599", + "R2600", + "R2601", + "R2602", + "R2603", + "R2605", + "R2606", + "R2607", + "R2608", + "R2609", + "R2610", + "R2611", + "R2613", + "R2615", + "R2616", + "R2617", + "R2618", + "R2619", + "R2620", + "R2621", + "R2622", + "R2623", + "R2624", + "R2625", + "R2626" + ] + }, + { + "arm": "tfidf", + "capabilities": { + "link": false, + "history": false, + "trace": false, + "suspects": true, + "temporal": true, + "verdict": true, + "write_check": true, + "endorse_retrieval": false, + "endorse_assistant": false, + "endorse_user": false, + "endorse_supervisor": false + }, + "script_digest": "cdbbbcf8710e192e", + "settle_note": "token differencing nominated 199 pairs", + "tasks": 3071, + "attempted": 3004, + "passed": 1312, + "success": 0.42722240312601756, + "attempted_success": 0.4367509986684421, + "composite": 0.5562667211391726, + "signal_share": 0.8004694611670091, + "multiplier": 8.004694611670091, + "score": 585.7391140997712, + "edition": 2, + "family_points": 445.0133769113381, + "signal_score": 40.72573718843306, + "token_score": 100.0, + "tokens_billed": 144.62918080465343, + "flags": [], + "families": [ + { + "family": "retrieval", + "posed": 2063, + "tasks": 2063, + "passed": 906, + "pass_rate": 0.4391662627241881, + "columns": { + "crossed_r@5": 0.006, + "hedge": 0.0018975332068311196, + "lexical_r@5": 0.952, + "mrr": 0.4598611111111111, + "noise": 0.6050515892251238, + "oblique_r@5": 0.036, + "paraphrase_r@5": 0.958, + "path_cover": 0.2407092466616276, + "path_r@5": 0.31746031746031744, + "r@1": 0.431, + "r@5": 0.488, + "stale_above": 0.7121212121212122, + "tokens": 144.62918080465343, + "weighted_r@5": 0.488 + } + }, + { + "family": "abstention", + "posed": 238, + "tasks": 238, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "answered": 1.0, + "declined": 0.0, + "fp": 1.0, + "natural_fp": 1.0, + "phantom_fp": 1.0, + "separation": 0.6728045556564846 + } + }, + { + "family": "currency", + "posed": 100, + "tasks": 75, + "passed": 52, + "pass_rate": 0.6933333333333334, + "columns": { + "head_r@1": 0.6666666666666666, + "head_r@5": 0.6933333333333334, + "lineage_na": 1.0, + "pollution": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "contradiction", + "posed": 166, + "tasks": 166, + "passed": 98, + "pass_rate": 0.5903614457831325, + "columns": { + "absorbed": 0.0, + "flagged": 0.3645833333333333, + "queued": 0.3645833333333333, + "t1_recall": 0.375, + "t2_false_alarm": 0.061224489795918366, + "t2_recall": 0.375, + "t3_false_alarm": 0.19047619047619047, + "t3_recall": 0.3333333333333333 + } + }, + { + "family": "deletion", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 83, + "passed": 83, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "purged_gone": 1.0, + "purged_rewrite_warned": 0.0, + "released_gone": 1.0, + "resurrection_warned": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "rationale", + "posed": 188, + "tasks": 188, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": 0.0, + "columns": { + "assisted_r@5": 0.0, + "direct_r@5": 0.0, + "structure_only": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "temporal", + "posed": 125, + "tasks": 125, + "passed": 125, + "pass_rate": 1.0, + "columns": { + "in_window_r@5": 1.0, + "leak": 0.0 + } + }, + { + "family": "drift", + "posed": 66, + "tasks": 66, + "passed": 48, + "pass_rate": 0.7272727272727273, + "columns": { + "flagged": 0.7272727272727273, + "noticed": 0.7272727272727273 + } + }, + { + "family": "authority", + "posed": 0, + "tasks": 0, + "passed": 0, + "pass_rate": null, + "na": "no endorsement rung", + "columns": {} + } + ], + "attention": { + "focus": 0.8004694611670091, + "noise": 0.6050515892251238, + "tokens_per_query": 144.62918080465343 + }, + "cost": { + "inscribe_ms": 0.09488980633802807, + "lineage_ms": 0.00031843999999999997, + "link_ms": 0.00003004716981132083, + "purge_ms": 0.0159980243902439, + "recall_ms": 6.242831303432997, + "recall_path_ms": 6.743072650793651, + "release_ms": 0.015721214285714286, + "settle_ms": 160.7022295, + "standing_tokens": 0.0, + "supersede_ms": 0.025733260000000008, + "suspects_ms": 0.022125, + "tokens_per_query": 144.62918080465343 + }, + "timing": { + "inscribe": { + "count": 852, + "total_ms": 80.84611499999991 + }, + "lineage": { + "count": 25, + "total_ms": 0.007961 + }, + "link": { + "count": 530, + "total_ms": 0.01592500000000004 + }, + "purge": { + "count": 41, + "total_ms": 0.6559189999999999 + }, + "recall": { + "count": 2709, + "total_ms": 16911.830000999988 + }, + "recall_path": { + "count": 63, + "total_ms": 424.813577 + }, + "release": { + "count": 42, + "total_ms": 0.660291 + }, + "settle": { + "count": 2, + "total_ms": 321.404459 + }, + "supersede": { + "count": 50, + "total_ms": 1.2866630000000003 + }, + "suspects": { + "count": 1, + "total_ms": 0.022125 + } + }, + "failed": [ + "R1", + "R2", + "R3", + "R4", + "R7", + "R8", + "R11", + "R12", + "R15", + "R16", + "R19", + "R20", + "R21", + "R22", + "R23", + "R24", + "R27", + "R28", + "R31", + "R32", + "R35", + "R36", + "R39", + "R40", + "R43", + "R44", + "R47", + "R48", + "R51", + "R52", + "R55", + "R56", + "R59", + "R60", + "R63", + "R64", + "R67", + "R68", + "R71", + "R72", + "R73", + "R74", + "R75", + "R76", + "R77", + "R78", + "R79", + "R80", + "R83", + "R84", + "R87", + "R88", + "R89", + "R90", + "R91", + "R92", + "R95", + "R96", + "R99", + "R100", + "R103", + "R104", + "R107", + "R108", + "R111", + "R112", + "R115", + "R116", + "R119", + "R120", + "R123", + "R124", + "R127", + "R128", + "R131", + "R132", + "R135", + "R136", + "R137", + "R138", + "R139", + "R140", + "R143", + "R144", + "R147", + "R148", + "R151", + "R152", + "R155", + "R156", + "R159", + "R160", + "R161", + "R162", + "R163", + "R164", + "R167", + "R168", + "R171", + "R172", + "R175", + "R176", + "R183", + "R184", + "R187", + "R188", + "R191", + "R192", + "R195", + "R196", + "R199", + "R200", + "R203", + "R204", + "R207", + "R208", + "R209", + "R210", + "R211", + "R212", + "R215", + "R216", + "R219", + "R220", + "R223", + "R224", + "R227", + "R228", + "R229", + "R230", + "R231", + "R232", + "R235", + "R236", + "R239", + "R240", + "R243", + "R244", + "R248", + "R251", + "R252", + "R253", + "R254", + "R255", + "R256", + "R259", + "R260", + "R263", + "R264", + "R267", + "R268", + "R271", + "R272", + "R275", + "R276", + "R279", + "R280", + "R281", + "R282", + "R283", + "R284", + "R287", + "R288", + "R289", + "R290", + "R291", + "R292", + "R295", + "R296", + "R297", + "R298", + "R299", + "R300", + "R303", + "R304", + "R307", + "R308", + "R309", + "R310", + "R311", + "R312", + "R313", + "R314", + "R315", + "R316", + "R319", + "R320", + "R323", + "R324", + "R327", + "R328", + "R331", + "R332", + "R335", + "R336", + "R339", + "R340", + "R343", + "R344", + "R347", + "R348", + "R351", + "R352", + "R355", + "R356", + "R359", + "R360", + "R363", + "R364", + "R367", + "R368", + "R369", + "R370", + "R371", + "R372", + "R375", + "R376", + "R379", + "R380", + "R381", + "R382", + "R383", + "R384", + "R387", + "R388", + "R391", + "R392", + "R395", + "R396", + "R399", + "R400", + "R404", + "R408", + "R412", + "R416", + "R419", + "R420", + "R423", + "R424", + "R428", + "R431", + "R432", + "R435", + "R436", + "R439", + "R440", + "R443", + "R444", + "R447", + "R448", + "R451", + "R452", + "R455", + "R456", + "R459", + "R460", + "R463", + "R464", + "R467", + "R468", + "R469", + "R470", + "R471", + "R472", + "R475", + "R476", + "R479", + "R480", + "R483", + "R484", + "R487", + "R488", + "R492", + "R495", + "R496", + "R499", + "R500", + "R503", + "R504", + "R507", + "R508", + "R511", + "R512", + "R515", + "R516", + "R519", + "R520", + "R523", + "R524", + "R527", + "R528", + "R531", + "R532", + "R535", + "R536", + "R539", + "R540", + "R543", + "R544", + "R547", + "R548", + "R551", + "R552", + "R555", + "R556", + "R559", + "R560", + "R561", + "R562", + "R563", + "R564", + "R565", + "R566", + "R567", + "R568", + "R571", + "R572", + "R575", + "R576", + "R579", + "R580", + "R583", + "R584", + "R587", + "R588", + "R591", + "R592", + "R595", + "R596", + "R597", + "R598", + "R599", + "R600", + "R603", + "R604", + "R607", + "R608", + "R611", + "R612", + "R615", + "R616", + "R619", + "R620", + "R623", + "R624", + "R625", + "R626", + "R627", + "R628", + "R631", + "R632", + "R635", + "R636", + "R640", + "R643", + "R644", + "R645", + "R646", + "R647", + "R648", + "R651", + "R652", + "R655", + "R656", + "R659", + "R660", + "R663", + "R664", + "R667", + "R668", + "R671", + "R672", + "R673", + "R674", + "R675", + "R676", + "R679", + "R680", + "R683", + "R684", + "R685", + "R686", + "R687", + "R688", + "R691", + "R692", + "R695", + "R696", + "R699", + "R700", + "R701", + "R702", + "R703", + "R704", + "R707", + "R708", + "R711", + "R712", + "R715", + "R716", + "R719", + "R720", + "R723", + "R724", + "R725", + "R726", + "R727", + "R728", + "R731", + "R732", + "R735", + "R736", + "R737", + "R738", + "R739", + "R740", + "R741", + "R742", + "R743", + "R744", + "R747", + "R748", + "R751", + "R752", + "R755", + "R756", + "R757", + "R758", + "R759", + "R760", + "R763", + "R764", + "R767", + "R768", + "R771", + "R772", + "R775", + "R776", + "R779", + "R780", + "R783", + "R784", + "R787", + "R788", + "R791", + "R792", + "R795", + "R796", + "R799", + "R800", + "R803", + "R804", + "R807", + "R808", + "R811", + "R812", + "R815", + "R816", + "R819", + "R820", + "R824", + "R827", + "R828", + "R831", + "R832", + "R835", + "R836", + "R839", + "R840", + "R843", + "R844", + "R847", + "R848", + "R851", + "R852", + "R855", + "R856", + "R859", + "R860", + "R863", + "R864", + "R867", + "R868", + "R871", + "R872", + "R875", + "R876", + "R879", + "R880", + "R883", + "R884", + "R887", + "R888", + "R891", + "R892", + "R895", + "R896", + "R899", + "R900", + "R903", + "R904", + "R905", + "R906", + "R907", + "R908", + "R911", + "R912", + "R915", + "R916", + "R919", + "R920", + "R923", + "R924", + "R927", + "R928", + "R931", + "R932", + "R935", + "R936", + "R939", + "R940", + "R943", + "R944", + "R947", + "R948", + "R951", + "R952", + "R953", + "R954", + "R955", + "R956", + "R959", + "R960", + "R963", + "R964", + "R965", + "R966", + "R967", + "R968", + "R972", + "R975", + "R976", + "R979", + "R980", + "R983", + "R984", + "R987", + "R988", + "R991", + "R992", + "R995", + "R996", + "R999", + "R1000", + "R1003", + "R1004", + "R1007", + "R1008", + "R1011", + "R1012", + "R1013", + "R1014", + "R1015", + "R1016", + "R1019", + "R1020", + "R1023", + "R1024", + "R1025", + "R1026", + "R1027", + "R1028", + "R1031", + "R1032", + "R1033", + "R1034", + "R1035", + "R1036", + "R1039", + "R1040", + "R1043", + "R1044", + "R1045", + "R1046", + "R1047", + "R1048", + "R1051", + "R1052", + "R1055", + "R1056", + "R1059", + "R1060", + "R1063", + "R1064", + "R1067", + "R1068", + "R1071", + "R1072", + "R1075", + "R1076", + "R1079", + "R1080", + "R1084", + "R1087", + "R1088", + "R1091", + "R1092", + "R1095", + "R1096", + "R1099", + "R1100", + "R1103", + "R1104", + "R1105", + "R1106", + "R1107", + "R1108", + "R1111", + "R1112", + "R1115", + "R1116", + "R1119", + "R1120", + "R1123", + "R1124", + "R1127", + "R1128", + "R1131", + "R1132", + "R1133", + "R1134", + "R1135", + "R1136", + "R1139", + "R1140", + "R1143", + "R1144", + "R1145", + "R1146", + "R1147", + "R1148", + "R1151", + "R1152", + "R1155", + "R1156", + "R1159", + "R1160", + "R1161", + "R1162", + "R1163", + "R1164", + "R1167", + "R1168", + "R1169", + "R1170", + "R1171", + "R1172", + "R1175", + "R1176", + "R1179", + "R1180", + "R1183", + "R1184", + "R1185", + "R1186", + "R1187", + "R1188", + "R1191", + "R1192", + "R1195", + "R1196", + "R1199", + "R1200", + "R1203", + "R1204", + "R1207", + "R1208", + "R1211", + "R1212", + "R1215", + "R1216", + "R1219", + "R1220", + "R1223", + "R1224", + "R1227", + "R1228", + "R1229", + "R1230", + "R1231", + "R1232", + "R1235", + "R1236", + "R1237", + "R1238", + "R1239", + "R1240", + "R1243", + "R1244", + "R1247", + "R1248", + "R1251", + "R1252", + "R1255", + "R1256", + "R1259", + "R1260", + "R1263", + "R1264", + "R1267", + "R1268", + "R1271", + "R1272", + "R1275", + "R1276", + "R1279", + "R1280", + "R1283", + "R1284", + "R1287", + "R1288", + "R1291", + "R1292", + "R1295", + "R1296", + "R1299", + "R1300", + "R1303", + "R1304", + "R1307", + "R1308", + "R1311", + "R1312", + "R1315", + "R1316", + "R1319", + "R1320", + "R1323", + "R1324", + "R1327", + "R1328", + "R1331", + "R1332", + "R1335", + "R1336", + "R1339", + "R1340", + "R1343", + "R1344", + "R1347", + "R1348", + "R1351", + "R1352", + "R1355", + "R1356", + "R1359", + "R1360", + "R1363", + "R1364", + "R1365", + "R1366", + "R1367", + "R1368", + "R1371", + "R1372", + "R1375", + "R1376", + "R1379", + "R1380", + "R1383", + "R1384", + "R1387", + "R1388", + "R1391", + "R1392", + "R1395", + "R1396", + "R1399", + "R1400", + "R1403", + "R1404", + "R1407", + "R1408", + "R1411", + "R1412", + "R1415", + "R1416", + "R1419", + "R1420", + "R1421", + "R1422", + "R1423", + "R1424", + "R1425", + "R1426", + "R1427", + "R1428", + "R1431", + "R1432", + "R1435", + "R1436", + "R1440", + "R1441", + "R1442", + "R1443", + "R1444", + "R1445", + "R1446", + "R1447", + "R1448", + "R1451", + "R1452", + "R1455", + "R1456", + "R1459", + "R1463", + "R1464", + "R1467", + "R1468", + "R1471", + "R1472", + "R1475", + "R1476", + "R1479", + "R1480", + "R1483", + "R1484", + "R1485", + "R1486", + "R1487", + "R1488", + "R1491", + "R1492", + "R1495", + "R1496", + "R1499", + "R1500", + "R1501", + "R1502", + "R1503", + "R1504", + "R1507", + "R1508", + "R1511", + "R1512", + "R1513", + "R1514", + "R1515", + "R1516", + "R1519", + "R1520", + "R1523", + "R1524", + "R1527", + "R1528", + "R1531", + "R1532", + "R1535", + "R1536", + "R1539", + "R1540", + "R1543", + "R1547", + "R1548", + "R1551", + "R1552", + "R1553", + "R1554", + "R1555", + "R1556", + "R1559", + "R1560", + "R1563", + "R1564", + "R1565", + "R1566", + "R1567", + "R1568", + "R1571", + "R1572", + "R1575", + "R1576", + "R1579", + "R1580", + "R1583", + "R1584", + "R1587", + "R1588", + "R1589", + "R1590", + "R1591", + "R1592", + "R1595", + "R1596", + "R1599", + "R1600", + "R1603", + "R1604", + "R1605", + "R1606", + "R1607", + "R1608", + "R1611", + "R1612", + "R1615", + "R1616", + "R1619", + "R1620", + "R1623", + "R1624", + "R1625", + "R1626", + "R1627", + "R1628", + "R1631", + "R1632", + "R1635", + "R1636", + "R1639", + "R1640", + "R1643", + "R1644", + "R1647", + "R1648", + "R1651", + "R1652", + "R1655", + "R1656", + "R1659", + "R1660", + "R1663", + "R1664", + "R1667", + "R1668", + "R1671", + "R1672", + "R1675", + "R1676", + "R1679", + "R1680", + "R1683", + "R1684", + "R1687", + "R1688", + "R1691", + "R1692", + "R1695", + "R1696", + "R1697", + "R1698", + "R1699", + "R1700", + "R1703", + "R1704", + "R1705", + "R1706", + "R1707", + "R1708", + "R1711", + "R1712", + "R1715", + "R1716", + "R1717", + "R1718", + "R1719", + "R1720", + "R1723", + "R1724", + "R1727", + "R1728", + "R1731", + "R1732", + "R1735", + "R1736", + "R1739", + "R1740", + "R1743", + "R1744", + "R1747", + "R1748", + "R1751", + "R1752", + "R1755", + "R1756", + "R1759", + "R1760", + "R1763", + "R1764", + "R1765", + "R1766", + "R1767", + "R1768", + "R1771", + "R1772", + "R1775", + "R1776", + "R1779", + "R1780", + "R1783", + "R1784", + "R1787", + "R1788", + "R1791", + "R1792", + "R1795", + "R1796", + "R1799", + "R1800", + "R1803", + "R1804", + "R1807", + "R1808", + "R1809", + "R1810", + "R1811", + "R1812", + "R1815", + "R1816", + "R1819", + "R1820", + "R1823", + "R1824", + "R1827", + "R1828", + "R1831", + "R1832", + "R1835", + "R1836", + "R1839", + "R1840", + "R1843", + "R1844", + "R1847", + "R1848", + "R1851", + "R1852", + "R1855", + "R1856", + "R1857", + "R1858", + "R1859", + "R1860", + "R1863", + "R1864", + "R1865", + "R1866", + "R1867", + "R1868", + "R1871", + "R1872", + "R1875", + "R1876", + "R1879", + "R1880", + "R1883", + "R1884", + "R1887", + "R1888", + "R1891", + "R1892", + "R1895", + "R1896", + "R1899", + "R1900", + "R1903", + "R1904", + "R1907", + "R1908", + "R1911", + "R1912", + "R1915", + "R1916", + "R1919", + "R1920", + "R1923", + "R1924", + "R1928", + "R1932", + "R1933", + "R1934", + "R1935", + "R1936", + "R1939", + "R1940", + "R1943", + "R1944", + "R1947", + "R1948", + "R1951", + "R1952", + "R1955", + "R1956", + "R1959", + "R1960", + "R1963", + "R1964", + "R1967", + "R1968", + "R1971", + "R1972", + "R1975", + "R1976", + "R1979", + "R1980", + "R1983", + "R1984", + "R1987", + "R1988", + "R1991", + "R1992", + "R1995", + "R1996", + "R1999", + "R2000", + "P1", + "P2", + "P3", + "P4", + "P6", + "P7", + "P8", + "P9", + "P12", + "P13", + "P14", + "P15", + "P16", + "P17", + "P18", + "P19", + "P20", + "P21", + "P22", + "P23", + "P25", + "P26", + "P27", + "P29", + "P30", + "P31", + "P33", + "P34", + "P35", + "P41", + "P43", + "P48", + "P49", + "P50", + "P51", + "P52", + "P54", + "P55", + "P56", + "P57", + "P58", + "P59", + "P63", + "R2001", + "R2002", + "R2003", + "R2004", + "R2005", + "R2006", + "R2007", + "R2008", + "R2009", + "R2010", + "R2011", + "R2012", + "R2013", + "R2014", + "R2015", + "R2016", + "R2017", + "R2018", + "R2019", + "R2020", + "R2021", + "R2022", + "R2023", + "R2024", + "R2025", + "R2026", + "R2027", + "R2028", + "R2029", + "R2030", + "R2031", + "R2032", + "R2033", + "R2034", + "R2035", + "R2036", + "R2037", + "R2038", + "R2039", + "R2040", + "R2041", + "R2042", + "R2043", + "R2044", + "R2045", + "R2046", + "R2047", + "R2048", + "R2049", + "R2050", + "R2051", + "R2052", + "R2053", + "R2054", + "R2055", + "R2056", + "R2057", + "R2058", + "R2059", + "R2060", + "R2061", + "R2062", + "R2063", + "R2064", + "R2065", + "R2066", + "R2067", + "R2068", + "R2069", + "R2070", + "R2071", + "R2072", + "R2073", + "R2074", + "R2075", + "R2076", + "R2077", + "R2078", + "R2079", + "R2080", + "R2081", + "R2082", + "R2083", + "R2084", + "R2085", + "R2086", + "R2087", + "R2088", + "R2089", + "R2090", + "R2091", + "R2092", + "R2093", + "R2094", + "R2095", + "R2096", + "R2097", + "R2098", + "R2099", + "R2100", + "R2101", + "R2102", + "R2103", + "R2104", + "R2105", + "R2106", + "R2107", + "R2108", + "R2109", + "R2110", + "R2111", + "R2112", + "R2113", + "R2114", + "R2115", + "R2116", + "R2117", + "R2118", + "R2119", + "R2120", + "R2121", + "R2122", + "R2123", + "R2124", + "R2125", + "R2126", + "R2127", + "R2128", + "R2129", + "R2130", + "R2131", + "R2132", + "R2133", + "R2134", + "R2135", + "R2136", + "R2137", + "R2138", + "R2139", + "R2140", + "R2141", + "R2142", + "R2143", + "R2144", + "R2145", + "R2146", + "R2147", + "R2148", + "R2149", + "R2150", + "R2151", + "R2152", + "R2153", + "R2154", + "R2155", + "R2156", + "R2157", + "R2158", + "R2159", + "R2160", + "R2161", + "R2162", + "R2163", + "R2164", + "R2165", + "R2166", + "R2167", + "R2168", + "R2169", + "R2170", + "R2171", + "R2172", + "R2173", + "R2174", + "R2175", + "R2176", + "R2177", + "R2178", + "R2179", + "R2180", + "R2181", + "R2182", + "R2183", + "R2184", + "R2185", + "R2186", + "R2187", + "R2188", + "R2189", + "R2190", + "R2191", + "R2192", + "R2193", + "R2194", + "R2195", + "R2196", + "R2197", + "R2198", + "R2199", + "R2200", + "R2201", + "R2202", + "R2203", + "R2204", + "R2205", + "R2206", + "R2207", + "R2208", + "R2209", + "R2210", + "R2211", + "R2212", + "R2213", + "R2214", + "R2215", + "R2216", + "R2217", + "R2218", + "R2219", + "R2220", + "R2221", + "R2222", + "R2223", + "R2224", + "R2225", + "R2226", + "R2227", + "R2228", + "R2229", + "R2230", + "R2231", + "R2232", + "R2233", + "R2234", + "R2235", + "R2236", + "R2237", + "R2238", + "R2241", + "R2244", + "R2247", + "R2250", + "R2253", + "R2256", + "R2259", + "R2262", + "R2265", + "R2268", + "R2271", + "R2274", + "R2277", + "R2280", + "R2289", + "R2292", + "R2295", + "R2298", + "R2301", + "R2304", + "R2307", + "R2310", + "R2313", + "R2314", + "R2315", + "R2316", + "R2317", + "R2318", + "R2319", + "R2320", + "R2321", + "R2322", + "R2323", + "R2324", + "R2325", + "R2326", + "R2327", + "R2328", + "R2329", + "R2330", + "R2331", + "R2332", + "R2333", + "R2334", + "R2335", + "R2336", + "R2337", + "R2338", + "R2339", + "R2340", + "R2341", + "R2342", + "R2343", + "R2344", + "R2345", + "R2346", + "R2347", + "R2348", + "R2349", + "R2350", + "R2351", + "R2352", + "R2353", + "R2354", + "R2355", + "R2356", + "R2357", + "R2358", + "R2359", + "R2360", + "R2361", + "R2362", + "R2363", + "R2364", + "R2365", + "R2366", + "R2367", + "R2368", + "R2369", + "R2370", + "R2371", + "R2372", + "R2373", + "R2374", + "R2375", + "R2376", + "R2377", + "R2378", + "R2379", + "R2380", + "R2381", + "R2382", + "R2383", + "R2384", + "R2385", + "R2386", + "R2387", + "R2388", + "R2389", + "R2390", + "R2391", + "R2392", + "R2393", + "R2394", + "R2395", + "R2396", + "R2397", + "R2398", + "R2399", + "R2400", + "R2401", + "R2402", + "R2403", + "R2404", + "R2405", + "R2406", + "R2407", + "R2408", + "R2409", + "R2410", + "R2411", + "R2412", + "R2413", + "R2414", + "R2415", + "R2416", + "R2417", + "R2418", + "R2419", + "R2420", + "R2421", + "R2422", + "R2423", + "R2424", + "R2425", + "R2426", + "R2427", + "R2428", + "R2429", + "R2430", + "R2431", + "R2432", + "R2433", + "R2434", + "R2435", + "R2436", + "R2437", + "R2438", + "R2439", + "R2440", + "R2441", + "R2442", + "R2443", + "R2444", + "R2445", + "R2446", + "R2447", + "R2448", + "R2449", + "R2450", + "R2451", + "R2452", + "R2453", + "R2454", + "R2455", + "R2456", + "R2457", + "R2458", + "R2459", + "R2460", + "R2461", + "R2462", + "R2463", + "R2464", + "R2465", + "R2466", + "R2467", + "R2468", + "R2469", + "R2470", + "R2471", + "R2472", + "R2473", + "R2474", + "R2475", + "R2476", + "R2477", + "R2478", + "R2479", + "R2480", + "R2481", + "R2482", + "R2483", + "R2484", + "R2485", + "R2486", + "R2487", + "R2488", + "R2489", + "R2490", + "R2491", + "R2492", + "R2493", + "R2494", + "R2495", + "R2496", + "R2497", + "R2498", + "R2499", + "R2500", + "R2501", + "C1", + "C2", + "C6", + "C8", + "C9", + "C11", + "C13", + "C14", + "C15", + "C16", + "C22", + "C23", + "C29", + "C33", + "C36", + "C37", + "C39", + "C47", + "C48", + "C50", + "C51", + "C57", + "C58", + "C61", + "C62", + "C63", + "C64", + "C65", + "C67", + "C68", + "C71", + "C72", + "C76", + "C79", + "C81", + "C83", + "C84", + "C85", + "C92", + "C98", + "C99", + "C103", + "C106", + "C107", + "C110", + "C114", + "C117", + "C118", + "C120", + "C121", + "C126", + "C127", + "C128", + "C131", + "C132", + "C133", + "C134", + "C135", + "C137", + "C141", + "C146", + "C149", + "C151", + "C153", + "C154", + "C155", + "C162", + "C163", + "D0", + "D18", + "D22", + "D52", + "D57", + "D72", + "D77", + "D92", + "D117", + "D184", + "D258", + "D292", + "D307", + "D378", + "D397", + "D424", + "D452", + "D464" + ] + } + ] + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed3.log b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed3.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2d0d840 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed3.log @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + Compiling knowledgedrift v1.0.0 (/Users/techtheist/IdeaProjects/knowledgedrift) + Finished `release` profile [optimized] target(s) in 8.75s + Running `target/release/knowledgedrift --v2 --sizes 500 --seed 3 --arms engram,rag,grep,curated,whole,chance,tfidf --json results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed3.json` +knowledgedrift 1.0.0 — embedder bge-small-en-v1.5, reranker jina-reranker-v1-turbo-en, nli deberta-v3-small-tasksource-nli, seed 3, pollution 10% (stale) +edition 2: additive score = families (800) + signal (100) + tokens (100) +world 500: 641 notes, 530 edges, 4315 ops, 3112 probes + engram: 3071 tasks, success 0.697, 826s + settle: auto-tune left the defaults; weak line 0.894; sweep queued 0 + rag: 3071 tasks, success 0.519, 66s + grep: 3071 tasks, success 0.415, 3s + curated: 3071 tasks, success 0.081, 1s + whole: 3071 tasks, success 0.698, 1s + chance: 3071 tasks, success 0.035, 0s + tfidf: 3071 tasks, success 0.427, 18s + settle: token differencing nominated 199 pairs + +== 500 tested facts, 641 notes, v2 == + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + engram 3071 3071 2140 70% 70% 0.789 0.66 6.6 739 3880 242 + rag 3071 2772 1595 52% 58% 0.444 0.12 1.2 374 0 2261 + grep 3071 2772 1274 41% 46% 0.400 0.15 1.5 332 0 2691 + curated 3071 2647 248 8% 9% 0.150 0.03 0.3 120 2998 2952 + whole 3071 2647 2145 70% 81% 0.484 0.00 0.1 387 142881 134995 + chance 3071 2772 107 3% 4% 0.133 0.11 1.1 117 0 2262 + tfidf 3071 3004 1312 43% 44% 0.556 0.80 8.0 586 0 144 + arm families signal tokens score billed + engram 631 37 71 739 436 + rag 355 9 10 374 2262 + grep 320 9 4 332 2691 + curated 120 0 1 120 2952 + whole 387 0 0 387 134995 + chance 106 0 10 117 2263 + tfidf 445 41 100 586 145 + engram success 70% = 2140 passed of 3071 posed (attempted 3071/3071, 70% of those passed) composite 0.789 S 0.66 ×6.6 score 739 standing 3880 tok 242 tok/query + v2 score 739 = families 631 + signal 37 + tokens 71 (billed 436 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 62% r@1 0.52 r@5 0.63 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 0.99 oblique_r@5 0.52 crossed_r@5 0.02 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 0.99 stale_above 0.19 hedge 0.39 noise 0.48 + abstention 238 99% fp 0.01 phantom_fp 0.00 natural_fp 0.02 answered 1.00 declined 0.99 separation 0.69 + currency 100 88% head_r@1 0.72 head_r@5 0.84 pollution 0.00 lineage 1.00 + contradiction 166 46% t1_recall 0.00 t2_recall 0.12 t3_recall 0.04 t2_false_alarm 0.00 t3_false_alarm 0.00 queued 0.10 flagged 0.05 absorbed 0.03 + drift 66 45% noticed 0.45 flagged 0.26 + deletion 125 93% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 trace 1.00 marker_leak 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.79 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 188 97% direct_r@5 0.01 assisted_r@5 0.97 structure_only 0.96 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + rag success 52% = 1595 passed of 3071 posed (attempted 2772/3071, 58% of those passed) composite 0.444 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 374 standing 0 tok 2261 tok/query + v2 score 374 = families 355 + signal 9 + tokens 10 (billed 2262 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 64% r@1 0.51 r@5 0.67 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 0.98 oblique_r@5 0.53 crossed_r@5 0.18 path_r@5 0.60 path_cover 0.36 stale_above 0.30 hedge 0.00 noise 0.92 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.59 + currency 75 87% head_r@1 0.72 head_r@5 0.87 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 188 5% direct_r@5 0.05 assisted_r@5 0.05 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + grep success 41% = 1274 passed of 3071 posed (attempted 2772/3071, 46% of those passed) composite 0.400 S 0.15 ×1.5 score 332 standing 0 tok 2691 tok/query + v2 score 332 = families 320 + signal 9 + tokens 4 (billed 2691 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 49% r@1 0.45 r@5 0.53 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 0.13 crossed_r@5 0.01 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 0.97 stale_above 0.46 hedge 0.00 noise 0.92 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.73 + currency 75 68% head_r@1 0.67 head_r@5 0.68 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 188 3% direct_r@5 0.03 assisted_r@5 0.03 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + curated success 8% = 248 passed of 3071 posed (attempted 2647/3071, 9% of those passed) composite 0.150 S 0.03 ×0.3 score 120 standing 2998 tok 2952 tok/query + v2 score 120 = families 120 + signal 0 + tokens 1 (billed 2952 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 7% r@1 0.07 r@5 0.07 lexical_r@5 0.07 paraphrase_r@5 0.07 oblique_r@5 0.07 crossed_r@5 0.07 path_r@5 0.40 path_cover 0.09 stale_above 0.08 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 75 0% head_r@1 0.00 head_r@5 0.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 188 13% direct_r@5 0.13 assisted_r@5 0.13 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping + whole success 70% = 2145 passed of 3071 posed (attempted 2647/3071, 81% of those passed) composite 0.484 S 0.00 ×0.1 score 387 standing 142881 tok 134995 tok/query + v2 score 387 = families 387 + signal 0 + tokens 0 (billed 134995 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 87% r@1 1.00 r@5 1.00 lexical_r@5 1.00 paraphrase_r@5 1.00 oblique_r@5 1.00 crossed_r@5 1.00 path_r@5 1.00 path_cover 1.00 stale_above 1.00 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 75 100% head_r@1 1.00 head_r@5 1.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 188 100% direct_r@5 1.00 assisted_r@5 1.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal - n/a — no capture-time scoping + chance success 3% = 107 passed of 3071 posed (attempted 2772/3071, 4% of those passed) composite 0.133 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 117 standing 0 tok 2262 tok/query + v2 score 117 = families 106 + signal 0 + tokens 10 (billed 2263 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 1% r@1 0.00 r@5 0.01 lexical_r@5 0.01 paraphrase_r@5 0.01 oblique_r@5 0.00 crossed_r@5 0.01 path_r@5 0.06 path_cover 0.03 stale_above 0.02 hedge 0.00 noise 1.00 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.50 + currency 75 0% head_r@1 0.00 head_r@5 0.00 pollution 0.00 + contradiction - n/a — no suspect nomination + drift - n/a — no suspect nomination + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 188 0% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 6% in_window_r@5 0.06 leak 0.00 + tfidf success 43% = 1312 passed of 3071 posed (attempted 3004/3071, 44% of those passed) composite 0.556 S 0.80 ×8.0 score 586 standing 0 tok 144 tok/query + v2 score 586 = families 445 + signal 41 + tokens 100 (billed 145 tok/query) + retrieval 2063 44% r@1 0.43 r@5 0.49 lexical_r@5 0.95 paraphrase_r@5 0.96 oblique_r@5 0.04 crossed_r@5 0.01 path_r@5 0.32 path_cover 0.24 stale_above 0.71 hedge 0.00 noise 0.61 + abstention 238 0% fp 1.00 phantom_fp 1.00 natural_fp 1.00 answered 1.00 declined 0.00 separation 0.67 + currency 75 69% head_r@1 0.67 head_r@5 0.69 pollution 0.00 + contradiction 166 59% t1_recall 0.38 t2_recall 0.38 t3_recall 0.33 t2_false_alarm 0.06 t3_false_alarm 0.19 queued 0.36 flagged 0.36 absorbed 0.00 + drift 66 73% noticed 0.73 flagged 0.73 + deletion 83 100% released_gone 1.00 purged_gone 1.00 resurrection_warned 0.00 purged_rewrite_warned 0.00 + rationale 188 0% direct_r@5 0.00 assisted_r@5 0.00 structure_only 0.00 + temporal 125 100% in_window_r@5 1.00 leak 0.00 + +wrote results/v2/reference-arms/500-seed3.json diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/run-ladder.log b/results/v2/reference-arms/run-ladder.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f71471d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/run-ladder.log @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +=== 500 seed 1 start 2026-09-16T10:03:55Z +=== 500 seed 1 end 2026-09-16T10:21:44Z exit 0 +=== 500 seed 2 start 2026-09-16T10:21:44Z +=== 500 seed 2 end 2026-09-16T10:35:50Z exit 0 +=== 500 seed 3 start 2026-09-16T10:35:50Z +=== 500 seed 3 end 2026-09-16T10:51:17Z exit 0 +=== 1500 seed 1 start 2026-09-16T10:51:17Z +=== 1500 seed 1 end 2026-09-16T11:54:20Z exit 0 +=== V2 LADDER DONE diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/run-ladder.sh b/results/v2/reference-arms/run-ladder.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..2f1bc64 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/run-ladder.sh @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +#!/bin/bash +cd /Users/techtheist/IdeaProjects/knowledgedrift +A=engram,rag,grep,curated,whole,chance,tfidf +for spec in "500 1" "500 2" "500 3" "1500 1"; do + set -- $spec + echo "=== $1 seed $2 start $(date -u +%FT%TZ)" + cargo run --release --features fastembed -- --v2 --sizes $1 --seed $2 --arms $A --json results/v2/reference-arms/$1-seed$2.json > results/v2/reference-arms/$1-seed$2.log 2>&1 + echo "=== $1 seed $2 end $(date -u +%FT%TZ) exit $?" +done +echo "=== V2 LADDER DONE" diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/run-regrade.log b/results/v2/reference-arms/run-regrade.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..655e311 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/run-regrade.log @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +=== 500 seed 1 start 2026-09-16T11:54:37Z +=== 500 seed 1 end 2026-09-16T12:10:30Z exit 0 +=== 500 seed 2 start 2026-09-16T12:10:30Z +=== 500 seed 2 end 2026-09-16T12:25:13Z exit 0 +=== REGRADE DONE diff --git a/results/v2/reference-arms/run-regrade.sh b/results/v2/reference-arms/run-regrade.sh new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5178427 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/reference-arms/run-regrade.sh @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +#!/bin/bash +cd /Users/techtheist/IdeaProjects/knowledgedrift +A=engram,rag,grep,curated,whole,chance,tfidf +for spec in "500 1" "500 2"; do + set -- $spec + echo "=== $1 seed $2 start $(date -u +%FT%TZ)" + cargo run --release --features fastembed -- --v2 --sizes $1 --seed $2 --arms $A --json results/v2/reference-arms/$1-seed$2.json > results/v2/reference-arms/$1-seed$2.log 2>&1 + echo "=== $1 seed $2 end $(date -u +%FT%TZ) exit $?" +done +echo "=== REGRADE DONE" diff --git a/results/v2/run-adapters-a.log b/results/v2/run-adapters-a.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..11479ce --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/run-adapters-a.log @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +=== langmem 500-seed1 start 2026-09-16T10:03:55Z + 4250/4286 ops +wrote adapters/out/langmem-500-seed1-v2.json (3041 replies, 106s) +=== langmem 500-seed1 end 2026-09-16T10:05:42Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + langmem success 53% = 1600 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2754/3042, 58% of those passed) composite 0.448 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 376 standing 0 tok 2359 tok/query + v2 score 376 = families 359 + signal 8 + tokens 9 (billed 2360 tok/query) +=== langmem 1500-seed1 start 2026-09-16T10:05:43Z + 12500/12737 ops +wrote adapters/out/langmem-1500-seed1-v2.json (9012 replies, 270s) +=== langmem 1500-seed1 end 2026-09-16T10:10:13Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + langmem success 48% = 4281 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 8150/9008, 53% of those passed) composite 0.425 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 359 standing 0 tok 2201 tok/query + v2 score 359 = families 340 + signal 7 + tokens 11 (billed 2201 tok/query) +=== mem0 500-seed1 start 2026-09-16T10:10:14Z + 4250/4286 ops +wrote adapters/out/mem0-500-seed1-v2.json (3041 replies, 156s) +=== mem0 500-seed1 end 2026-09-16T10:12:52Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + mem0 success 47% = 1427 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2754/3042, 52% of those passed) composite 0.418 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 347 standing 0 tok 2567 tok/query + v2 score 347 = families 334 + signal 7 + tokens 6 (billed 2567 tok/query) +=== mem0 1500-seed1 start 2026-09-16T10:12:53Z + 12500/12737 ops +wrote adapters/out/mem0-1500-seed1-v2.json (9012 replies, 836s) +=== mem0 1500-seed1 end 2026-09-16T10:26:53Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + mem0 success 44% = 4001 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 8150/9008, 49% of those passed) composite 0.417 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 348 standing 0 tok 2437 tok/query + v2 score 348 = families 333 + signal 6 + tokens 8 (billed 2438 tok/query) +=== cognee 500-seed1 start 2026-09-16T10:27:01Z + +wrote adapters/out/cognee-500-seed1-v2.json (3041 replies, 1000s) +=== cognee 500-seed1 end 2026-09-16T10:43:46Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + cognee success 48% = 1455 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2629/3042, 55% of those passed) composite 0.324 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 281 standing 0 tok 2053 tok/query + v2 score 281 = families 259 + signal 8 + tokens 14 (billed 2053 tok/query) +=== cognee 1500-seed1 start 2026-09-16T10:43:47Z + +wrote adapters/out/cognee-1500-seed1-v2.json (9012 replies, 5939s) +=== cognee 1500-seed1 end 2026-09-16T12:22:51Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + cognee success 43% = 3836 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 7775/9008, 49% of those passed) composite 0.299 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 263 standing 0 tok 1933 tok/query + v2 score 263 = families 240 + signal 8 + tokens 16 (billed 1934 tok/query) +=== CHAIN A DONE diff --git a/results/v2/run-adapters-a.sh b/results/v2/run-adapters-a.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..b780b99 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/run-adapters-a.sh @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +#!/bin/bash +cd /Users/techtheist/IdeaProjects/knowledgedrift +run() { # adapter dir world + echo "=== $1 $3 start $(date -u +%FT%TZ)" + KD_COGNEE_STORE=$PWD/adapters/out/cognee-store-v2-$3 adapters/.venv-$1/bin/python3 adapters/run.py --adapter $1 \ + --script worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-$3-v2.json --out adapters/out/$1-$3-v2.json 2>&1 | grep -v "already gone\|│" | tail -2 + echo "=== $1 $3 end $(date -u +%FT%TZ)" + cargo run --release -q -- --grade adapters/out/$1-$3-v2.json --script worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-$3-v2.json --json results/v2/$2/$3.json 2>&1 | grep -v "^\s*$" | tee results/v2/$2/$3.log | grep "v2 score\|success " +} +for w in 500-seed1 1500-seed1; do run langmem langmem-0.0.30 $w; done +for w in 500-seed1 1500-seed1; do run mem0 mem0-2.0.20 $w; done +for w in 500-seed1 1500-seed1; do run cognee cognee-1.5.4 $w; done +echo "=== CHAIN A DONE" diff --git a/results/v2/run-adapters-b.log b/results/v2/run-adapters-b.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..95b0575 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/run-adapters-b.log @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +=== memcontinuum 500-seed1 start 2026-09-16T10:03:55Z + 4250/4286 ops +wrote adapters/out/memcontinuum-500-seed1-v2.json (3041 replies, 610s) +=== memcontinuum 500-seed1 end 2026-09-16T10:14:06Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + memcontinuum success 48% = 1463 passed of 3042 posed (attempted 2654/3042, 55% of those passed) composite 0.421 S 0.14 ×1.4 score 392 standing 0 tok 852 tok/query + v2 score 392 = families 337 + signal 9 + tokens 46 (billed 852 tok/query) +=== memcontinuum 1500-seed1 start 2026-09-16T10:14:06Z + 12500/12737 ops +wrote adapters/out/memcontinuum-1500-seed1-v2.json (9012 replies, 5413s) +=== memcontinuum 1500-seed1 end 2026-09-16T11:44:22Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + memcontinuum success 44% = 3984 passed of 9008 posed (attempted 7850/9008, 51% of those passed) composite 0.408 S 0.12 ×1.2 score 380 standing 0 tok 844 tok/query + v2 score 380 = families 326 + signal 7 + tokens 47 (billed 844 tok/query) +=== CHAIN B DONE diff --git a/results/v2/run-adapters-b.sh b/results/v2/run-adapters-b.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..11ee940 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/run-adapters-b.sh @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +#!/bin/bash +cd /Users/techtheist/IdeaProjects/knowledgedrift +for w in 500-seed1 1500-seed1; do + echo "=== memcontinuum $w start $(date -u +%FT%TZ)" + adapters/.venv-memcontinuum/bin/python3 adapters/run.py --adapter memcontinuum \ + --script worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-$w-v2.json --out adapters/out/memcontinuum-$w-v2.json 2>&1 | grep -v "│" | tail -2 + echo "=== memcontinuum $w end $(date -u +%FT%TZ)" + cargo run --release -q -- --grade adapters/out/memcontinuum-$w-v2.json --script worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-$w-v2.json --json results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/$w.json 2>&1 | grep -v "^\s*$" | tee results/v2/memcontinuum-0.2.0rc5/$w.log | grep "v2 score\|success " +done +echo "=== CHAIN B DONE" diff --git a/results/v2/run-adapters-c.log b/results/v2/run-adapters-c.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5ab47ec --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/run-adapters-c.log @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +=== langmem 500-seed1 start 2026-09-15T20:32:28Z + 4000/4223 ops +wrote adapters/out/langmem-500-seed1-v2.json (2978 replies, 69s) +=== langmem 500-seed1 end 2026-09-15T20:33:38Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + langmem success 52% = 1558 passed of 2979 posed (attempted 2691/2979, 58% of those passed) composite 0.448 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 375 standing 0 tok 2357 tok/query + v2 score 375 = families 359 + signal 8 + tokens 9 (billed 2358 tok/query) +=== langmem 1500-seed1 start 2026-09-15T20:33:39Z + 12500/12673 ops +wrote adapters/out/langmem-1500-seed1-v2.json (8948 replies, 323s) +=== langmem 1500-seed1 end 2026-09-15T20:39:03Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + langmem success 47% = 4245 passed of 8944 posed (attempted 8086/8944, 52% of those passed) composite 0.425 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 359 standing 0 tok 2202 tok/query + v2 score 359 = families 340 + signal 7 + tokens 11 (billed 2202 tok/query) +=== mem0 500-seed1 start 2026-09-15T20:39:04Z + 4000/4223 ops +wrote adapters/out/mem0-500-seed1-v2.json (2978 replies, 152s) +=== mem0 500-seed1 end 2026-09-15T20:41:38Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + mem0 success 47% = 1386 passed of 2979 posed (attempted 2691/2979, 52% of those passed) composite 0.417 S 0.10 ×1.0 score 346 standing 0 tok 2574 tok/query + v2 score 346 = families 334 + signal 7 + tokens 6 (billed 2574 tok/query) +=== mem0 1500-seed1 start 2026-09-15T20:41:39Z + 12500/12673 ops +wrote adapters/out/mem0-1500-seed1-v2.json (8948 replies, 857s) +=== mem0 1500-seed1 end 2026-09-15T20:55:59Z + arm posed attempted passed success of att. composite S mult score standing tok/q + mem0 success 44% = 3962 passed of 8944 posed (attempted 8086/8944, 49% of those passed) composite 0.417 S 0.11 ×1.1 score 347 standing 0 tok 2441 tok/query + v2 score 347 = families 333 + signal 6 + tokens 8 (billed 2442 tok/query) +=== CHAIN C DONE diff --git a/results/v2/run-adapters-c.sh b/results/v2/run-adapters-c.sh new file mode 100755 index 0000000..9c518b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/v2/run-adapters-c.sh @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +#!/bin/bash +cd /Users/techtheist/IdeaProjects/knowledgedrift +run() { # adapter dir world + echo "=== $1 $3 start $(date -u +%FT%TZ)" + adapters/.venv-$1/bin/python3 adapters/run.py --adapter $1 \ + --script worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-$3-v2.json --out adapters/out/$1-$3-v2.json 2>&1 | grep -v "│" | tail -2 + echo "=== $1 $3 end $(date -u +%FT%TZ)" + cargo run --release -q -- --grade adapters/out/$1-$3-v2.json --script worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-$3-v2.json --json results/v2/$2/$3.json 2>&1 | grep -v "^\s*$" | tee results/v2/$2/$3.log | grep "v2 score\|success " +} +for w in 500-seed1 1500-seed1; do run langmem langmem-0.0.30 $w; done +for w in 500-seed1 1500-seed1; do run mem0 mem0-2.0.20 $w; done +echo "=== CHAIN C DONE" diff --git a/src/arms/engram.rs b/src/arms/engram.rs index 2fb5f53..c6a3cf6 100644 --- a/src/arms/engram.rs +++ b/src/arms/engram.rs @@ -316,6 +316,36 @@ impl Memory for EngramArm { }) } + /// The file channel: the same code-ref match the file-read hook + /// serves — every live note whose refs cover the path, trust first, + /// the note delivered whole (no query, so no snippet window). + fn recall_path(&self, path: &str, k: usize) -> anyhow::Result { + let cfg = self.engine.graph_config(); + let tombstones: Vec = cfg + .tombstone_types() + .iter() + .map(|t| t.to_string()) + .collect(); + let hits = self + .engine + .match_code_refs(path, k)? + .into_iter() + .map(|n| Hit { + key: self.keys.get(&n.id).cloned(), + text: format!("## {}\n{}", n.title, n.body.as_deref().unwrap_or("")), + score: Some(n.trust), + tombstone: tombstones.iter().any(|t| t == n.node_type.as_str()), + created_at: Some(n.created_at), + neighbors: Vec::new(), + }) + .collect(); + Ok(Recalled { + hits, + declined: false, + dump: false, + }) + } + fn suspects(&mut self) -> anyhow::Result>> { self.engine.scan_conflicts()?; let pairs = self diff --git a/src/arms/flat.rs b/src/arms/flat.rs index 4ecd625..5fa1fa4 100644 --- a/src/arms/flat.rs +++ b/src/arms/flat.rs @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct Rec { title: String, body: String, created_at: Option, + code_refs: Vec, } impl Rec { @@ -119,6 +120,7 @@ impl FlatArm { title: r.title.clone(), body: r.body.clone(), created_at: r.created_at, + code_refs: r.code_refs.clone(), }); Ok(()) } @@ -340,6 +342,29 @@ impl Memory for FlatArm { }) } + /// The path-shaped read. `grep` greps: every note whose file mentions + /// the path (its code refs are in the file), in file order, no ranking. + /// Every other mode hands the path to its recall — a vector store + /// embeds it, a dump dumps. + fn recall_path(&self, path: &str, k: usize) -> anyhow::Result { + if self.mode != Mode::Grep { + return self.recall(path, k, None); + } + let needle = path.trim(); + let hits = self + .recs + .iter() + .filter(|r| !needle.is_empty() && r.code_refs.iter().any(|c| c.contains(needle))) + .take(k) + .map(|r| Self::hit(r, r.text(), Some(1.0))) + .collect(); + Ok(Recalled { + hits, + declined: false, + dump: false, + }) + } + fn suspects(&mut self) -> anyhow::Result>> { Ok(None) } diff --git a/src/arms/mod.rs b/src/arms/mod.rs index f32fa77..41234ee 100644 --- a/src/arms/mod.rs +++ b/src/arms/mod.rs @@ -4,9 +4,11 @@ pub mod engram; pub mod flat; +pub mod tfidf; pub use engram::EngramArm; pub use flat::{FlatArm, Mode}; +pub use tfidf::TfidfArm; use engram_core::{Embedder, Nli, Reranker}; diff --git a/src/arms/tfidf.rs b/src/arms/tfidf.rs new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ed34fef --- /dev/null +++ b/src/arms/tfidf.rs @@ -0,0 +1,324 @@ +//! `tfidf` — the lexical arm that cracked v1, rebuilt in-process so the v2 +//! changes can be measured against the thing they were made for. +//! +//! What the field receipt did (2026-09-15, TF-IDF in SQL, ~138 tokens per +//! answer, score 823 on the v1 1500 world) and what this arm does: +//! +//! * **ranking** — cosine over TF-IDF vectors of `title + body`; +//! * **snippets** — a hit shows its title only, and only hits within half +//! the best cosine are shown at all, so most answers are one or two +//! titles: the bill is a tenth of a whole-note store's and the v1 signal +//! share climbs with it; +//! * **abstention by idf oracle** — a capitalised query token the corpus has +//! never seen (a coined phantom subject) declines the query; a best cosine +//! under a floor declines it too; +//! * **contradiction by token differencing** — a written note whose title +//! shares most of its tokens with a stored title is nominated when the +//! tokens that differ carry a number or a negation, and reported as a +//! near-duplicate match when nothing differs; +//! * **drift by the same rule** at every settle, over every pair of stored +//! titles; +//! * a native capture-time window. +//! +//! No model anywhere. It is not a straw man: on a v1 world it out-scores the +//! reference system, which is the point of keeping it. + +use std::collections::{BTreeSet, HashMap}; + +use crate::protocol::{ + Authority, Capabilities, Hit, Inscribed, Memory, Recalled, Record, SuspectPair, Window, + WriteMode, +}; + +const STOP: [&str; 40] = [ + "the", "a", "an", "is", "are", "was", "were", "it", "its", "in", "on", "of", "for", "to", + "and", "or", "that", "this", "what", "which", "who", "how", "did", "does", "do", "we", "our", + "be", "been", "with", "from", "by", "at", "as", "if", "so", "up", "one", "once", "around", +]; + +const NEGATION: [&str; 9] = [ + "not", "never", "no", "wrong", "other", "than", "nobody", "stopped", "contrary", +]; + +/// Best cosine under this and the arm says "not in memory". +const FLOOR: f64 = 0.08; +/// Hits under this share of the best cosine are not shown. +const SHOW: f64 = 0.7; + +fn toks(text: &str) -> Vec { + text.split(|c: char| !c.is_alphanumeric()) + .filter(|w| w.len() > 1) + .map(|w| w.to_lowercase()) + .filter(|w| !STOP.contains(&w.as_str())) + .collect() +} + +fn is_number(t: &str) -> bool { + t.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_digit()) +} + +#[derive(Debug, Clone)] +struct Doc { + key: String, + title: String, + tf: HashMap, + title_toks: BTreeSet, + created_at: Option, +} + +#[derive(Default)] +pub struct TfidfArm { + docs: Vec, + df: HashMap, + queue: Vec, +} + +impl TfidfArm { + fn idf(&self, t: &str) -> f64 { + let n = self.docs.len().max(1) as f64; + let d = self.df.get(t).copied().unwrap_or(0) as f64; + ((1.0 + n) / (1.0 + d)).ln() + 1.0 + } + + fn vec_of(&self, tf: &HashMap) -> (HashMap, f64) { + let mut v = HashMap::new(); + let mut norm = 0.0; + for (t, c) in tf { + let w = (1.0 + c.ln()) * self.idf(t); + norm += w * w; + v.insert(t.clone(), w); + } + (v, norm.sqrt()) + } + + fn push(&mut self, r: &Record) { + let mut tf: HashMap = HashMap::new(); + for t in toks(&format!("{}\n{}", r.title, r.body)) { + *tf.entry(t).or_insert(0.0) += 1.0; + } + for t in tf.keys() { + *self.df.entry(t.clone()).or_insert(0) += 1; + } + self.docs.push(Doc { + key: r.key.clone(), + title: r.title.clone(), + tf, + title_toks: toks(&r.title).into_iter().collect(), + created_at: r.created_at, + }); + } + + fn remove(&mut self, key: &str) { + if let Some(i) = self.docs.iter().position(|d| d.key == key) { + let d = self.docs.remove(i); + for t in d.tf.keys() { + if let Some(n) = self.df.get_mut(t) { + *n = n.saturating_sub(1); + } + } + } + } + + /// Token differencing: `Some(hint)` when most of `a`'s tokens appear in + /// `b` (containment, so a stored title's trailing clause costs nothing) + /// — "contradiction" if what `a` adds carries a number or a negation, + /// "entailment" if it adds nothing of the sort. + fn differ(a: &BTreeSet, b: &BTreeSet) -> Option<&'static str> { + let shared = a.intersection(b).count(); + if shared < 4 || (shared as f64) / (a.len().max(1) as f64) < 0.6 { + return None; + } + let loaded = a + .difference(b) + .any(|t| is_number(t) || NEGATION.contains(&t.as_str())); + Some(if loaded { + "contradiction" + } else { + "entailment" + }) + } + + fn nominate(&mut self, a: &str, b: &str, hint: &str) { + if self.queue.iter().any(|p| p.joins(a, b)) { + return; + } + self.queue.push(SuspectPair { + a: a.to_string(), + b: b.to_string(), + hint: Some(hint.to_string()), + }); + } +} + +impl Memory for TfidfArm { + fn name(&self) -> String { + "tfidf".to_string() + } + + fn capabilities(&self) -> Capabilities { + Capabilities { + suspects: true, + temporal: true, + verdict: true, + write_check: true, + ..Capabilities::default() + } + } + + fn inscribe(&mut self, record: &Record, mode: WriteMode) -> anyhow::Result { + let mut out = Inscribed::default(); + if mode == WriteMode::Write { + let mine: BTreeSet = toks(&record.title).into_iter().collect(); + let mut best: Option<(usize, String, &'static str)> = None; + for d in &self.docs { + if let Some(hint) = Self::differ(&mine, &d.title_toks) { + let shared = mine.intersection(&d.title_toks).count(); + if best.as_ref().is_none_or(|(s, _, _)| shared > *s) { + best = Some((shared, d.key.clone(), hint)); + } + } + } + if let Some((_, key, hint)) = best { + let stored = self + .docs + .iter() + .find(|d| d.key == key) + .map(|d| d.title_toks.clone()) + .unwrap_or_default(); + if hint == "entailment" && mine.is_subset(&stored) { + out.matched = Some(key); + out.nli_label = Some("entailment".into()); + } else if hint == "contradiction" { + out.suspects.push(SuspectPair { + a: record.key.clone(), + b: key, + hint: Some("contradiction".into()), + }); + } + } + } + self.push(record); + Ok(out) + } + + fn link(&mut self, _from: &str, _to: &str, _verb: &str) -> anyhow::Result { + Ok(false) + } + + fn supersede(&mut self, old: &str, new: &Record) -> anyhow::Result<()> { + self.remove(old); + self.push(new); + Ok(()) + } + + fn release(&mut self, key: &str, _reason: &str) -> anyhow::Result<()> { + self.remove(key); + Ok(()) + } + + fn purge(&mut self, key: &str) -> anyhow::Result<()> { + self.remove(key); + Ok(()) + } + + fn endorse(&mut self, _key: &str, _by: Authority) -> anyhow::Result { + Ok(false) + } + + /// Drift scan: every pair of stored titles under the differencing rule. + fn settle(&mut self) -> anyhow::Result> { + let mut found = Vec::new(); + for (i, a) in self.docs.iter().enumerate() { + for b in &self.docs[i + 1..] { + if Self::differ(&a.title_toks, &b.title_toks) == Some("contradiction") + || Self::differ(&b.title_toks, &a.title_toks) == Some("contradiction") + { + found.push((a.key.clone(), b.key.clone())); + } + } + } + let n = found.len(); + for (a, b) in found { + self.nominate(&a, &b, "contradiction"); + } + Ok(Some(format!("token differencing nominated {n} pairs"))) + } + + fn recall(&self, query: &str, k: usize, window: Option) -> anyhow::Result { + let qt = toks(query); + // The idf oracle: a name nobody ever wrote (a capitalised token the + // corpus has no document for) means nobody wrote the subject; + // decline. Lower-case unseen words are just wording. + let unseen = query + .split(|c: char| !c.is_alphanumeric()) + .filter(|w| w.len() > 2 && w.chars().next().is_some_and(char::is_uppercase)) + .any(|w| self.df.get(&w.to_lowercase()).copied().unwrap_or(0) == 0); + let mut qtf: HashMap = HashMap::new(); + for t in &qt { + *qtf.entry(t.clone()).or_insert(0.0) += 1.0; + } + let (qv, qn) = self.vec_of(&qtf); + let mut scored: Vec<(f64, usize)> = self + .docs + .iter() + .enumerate() + .filter(|(_, d)| match (window, d.created_at) { + (Some(w), Some(ts)) => w.contains(ts), + (Some(_), None) => false, + (None, _) => true, + }) + .filter_map(|(i, d)| { + let (dv, dn) = self.vec_of(&d.tf); + if qn == 0.0 || dn == 0.0 { + return None; + } + let dot: f64 = qv + .iter() + .filter_map(|(t, w)| dv.get(t).map(|x| w * x)) + .sum(); + let c = dot / (qn * dn); + (c > 0.0).then_some((c, i)) + }) + .collect(); + scored.sort_by(|a, b| { + b.0.partial_cmp(&a.0) + .unwrap_or(std::cmp::Ordering::Equal) + .then(a.1.cmp(&b.1)) + }); + scored.truncate(k); + let best = scored.first().map_or(0.0, |s| s.0); + scored.retain(|(c, _)| *c >= SHOW * best); + let declined = unseen || best < FLOOR; + let hits = scored + .into_iter() + .map(|(c, i)| { + let d = &self.docs[i]; + Hit { + key: Some(d.key.clone()), + text: d.title.clone(), + score: Some(c), + tombstone: false, + created_at: d.created_at, + neighbors: vec![], + } + }) + .collect(); + Ok(Recalled { + hits, + declined, + dump: false, + }) + } + + fn suspects(&mut self) -> anyhow::Result>> { + Ok(Some(self.queue.clone())) + } + + fn lineage(&self, _key: &str) -> anyhow::Result>> { + Ok(None) + } + + fn standing_tokens(&self) -> usize { + 0 + } +} diff --git a/src/corpus/mod.rs b/src/corpus/mod.rs index 738a373..518b237 100644 --- a/src/corpus/mod.rs +++ b/src/corpus/mod.rs @@ -59,6 +59,111 @@ const CODA: [&str; 16] = [ "tos", "fen", "wyn", ]; +/// The v2 subject vocabulary (`CorpusShape::shared_vocab`): a subject is +/// `{w1} {w2} {component}` drawn from two pools of ordinary words, 64 × 64 +/// = 4096 pairs — the same name space the coined syllables span, so `Names` +/// hands out either. Every word recurs across dozens of subjects, so no +/// single token identifies a note and an unseen token is not an oracle for +/// "never written": what identifies a subject is the conjunction. +const W1: [&str; 64] = [ + "amber", + "ashen", + "auburn", + "azure", + "beige", + "bronze", + "cobalt", + "copper", + "coral", + "crimson", + "cyan", + "ebony", + "emerald", + "fawn", + "golden", + "granite", + "hazel", + "indigo", + "ivory", + "jade", + "lavender", + "lilac", + "magenta", + "maroon", + "mauve", + "carmine", + "mustard", + "navy", + "ochre", + "olive", + "onyx", + "opal", + "orange", + "pearl", + "pewter", + "plum", + "quartz", + "ruby", + "russet", + "vermilion", + "saffron", + "sage", + "salmon", + "sand", + "scarlet", + "sepia", + "sienna", + "silver", + "slate", + "sorrel", + "verdigris", + "tan", + "taupe", + "teal", + "topaz", + "umber", + "violet", + "walnut", + "wheat", + "willow", + "cinnamon", + "chalk", + "cedar", + "birch", +]; +const W2: [&str; 64] = [ + "harbor", "meadow", "orchard", "canyon", "glacier", "lagoon", "prairie", "ridge", "marsh", + "dune", "fjord", "grove", "heath", "island", "jungle", "knoll", "lake", "mesa", "moor", + "oasis", "pond", "quarry", "reef", "river", "savanna", "shore", "summit", "swamp", "tundra", + "valley", "wharf", "creek", "delta", "estuary", "forest", "geyser", "gorge", "gulch", "hollow", + "inlet", "isthmus", "lowland", "plateau", "rapids", "atoll", "bayou", "bluff", "cape", + "cavern", "cliff", "cove", "crag", "dell", "badland", "glade", "hill", "brook", "butte", + "cirque", "dale", "ravine", "tarn", "strait", "barrens", +]; + +/// What a component IS, in words that name none of it — the v2 crossed +/// question refers to the category this way, so a question can share no +/// content word with the note that answers it. Index-aligned with +/// `COMPONENTS`. +const COMPONENT_DESC: [&str; 16] = [ + "the batch that pulls data in", + "the service that hands out grants", + "the layer that steers requests to partitions", + "the store that holds events for a second pass", + "the safe that keeps credentials", + "the front layer that serves stored copies", + "the background process that cleans up", + "the process that builds the lookup structure", + "the lab bench that measures samples", + "the cabinet that holds samples", + "the rig that tunes instruments", + "the tower that collects readings", + "the record that traces origins", + "the go-between that gathers votes", + "the holding area that keeps deposits", + "the drain that collects randomness", +]; + /// Mostly software infrastructure, deliberately salted with laboratory and /// abstract-process categories so retrieval is never tuned to one genre's /// vocabulary. A component may be named by an oblique question — it is the @@ -995,6 +1100,10 @@ pub enum Phrasing { Paraphrase, /// Never names the subject, and describes it entirely in paraphrase. Oblique, + /// The v2 fourth phrasing (`CorpusShape::crossed`): oblique, and the + /// component is described rather than named — the question shares no + /// content word with the note that answers it. + Crossed, } pub const PHRASINGS: [Phrasing; 3] = [Phrasing::Lexical, Phrasing::Paraphrase, Phrasing::Oblique]; @@ -1231,16 +1340,29 @@ struct Names { order: Vec, cursor: usize, used: HashSet, + /// v2: spell an index as two ordinary words instead of a coined name. + shared: bool, } impl Names { - fn new(rng: &mut Rng) -> Self { + fn with_shared(rng: &mut Rng, shared: bool) -> Self { let mut order: Vec = (0..ONSET.len() * MID.len() * CODA.len()).collect(); rng.shuffle(&mut order); Self { order, cursor: 0, used: HashSet::new(), + shared, + } + } + + /// The subject name for an issued index: coined syllables, or (v2) a + /// pair of shared words. + fn word(&self, idx: usize) -> String { + if self.shared { + format!("{} {}", W1[idx % W1.len()], W2[(idx / W1.len()) % W2.len()]) + } else { + coined(idx) } } @@ -1322,6 +1444,11 @@ pub struct CorpusShape { /// fact on the same subject, making the same coined name carry two /// unrelated claims. `0.0` mints none. pub collision: f64, + /// v2: subjects are `{w1} {w2} {component}` from two pools of ordinary + /// words instead of a coined name, so no token is unique to a note. + pub shared_vocab: bool, + /// v2: every tested fact carries a fourth, crossed question. + pub crossed: bool, } /// Sessions hold 5..=10 notes. A working session is a handful of notes, not @@ -1449,6 +1576,33 @@ pub fn corpus_chained( .0 } +/// `corpus_chained` under a shape — the v2 worlds' entry point. +#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)] +pub fn corpus_chained_shaped( + tested: usize, + distractors: usize, + seed: u64, + profile: &Profile, + type_mix: &[(Kind, u32)], + n_chains: usize, + chain_len: usize, + shape: CorpusShape, +) -> Corpus { + assert!(chain_len >= 2, "a chain needs something to supersede"); + corpus_impl( + tested, + distractors, + seed, + profile, + type_mix, + n_chains, + chain_len, + None, + shape, + ) + .0 +} + #[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)] fn corpus_impl( tested: usize, @@ -1463,7 +1617,7 @@ fn corpus_impl( ) -> (Corpus, Vec) { let mut rng = Rng::new(seed); let vocab = Vocab::new(&mut rng); - let mut names = Names::new(&mut rng); + let mut names = Names::with_shared(&mut rng, shape.shared_vocab); let total = tested + distractors; let mut facts: Vec = Vec::with_capacity(total); @@ -1496,9 +1650,11 @@ fn corpus_impl( let (c, s1, s2) = vocab.slots(j); let component = COMPONENTS[c]; - let subject = format!("{} {component}", coined(name_idx)); + let subject = format!("{} {component}", names.word(name_idx)); let slots = Slots { component, + component_desc: COMPONENT_DESC[c], + crossed: shape.crossed, s1, s2, j, @@ -1724,6 +1880,8 @@ fn colliders( subject, Slots { component: COMPONENTS[component], + component_desc: COMPONENT_DESC[component], + crossed: false, s1, s2, j, @@ -1775,7 +1933,8 @@ fn session_clusters( let j = used + ci; let (c, s1, s2) = vocab.slots(j); let component = COMPONENTS[c]; - let subject = format!("{} {component}", coined(names.next())); + let idx = names.next(); + let subject = format!("{} {component}", names.word(idx)); let mut members = Vec::new(); let mut aspects = Vec::new(); @@ -1789,6 +1948,8 @@ fn session_clusters( subject.clone(), Slots { component, + component_desc: "", + crossed: false, s1, s2, j, @@ -1878,7 +2039,8 @@ fn chains( let j = used + ci; let (c, s1, s2) = vocab.slots(j); let component = COMPONENTS[c]; - let subject = format!("{} {component}", coined(names.next())); + let idx = names.next(); + let subject = format!("{} {component}", names.word(idx)); let (param, unit, param_desc) = PARAMS[s1]; let (constraint, constraint_desc) = CONSTRAINTS[s2]; @@ -2046,6 +2208,10 @@ fn edges(facts: &[Fact], profile: &Profile, rng: &mut Rng) -> Vec /// numeric value a Decision commits to). struct Slots<'a> { component: &'a str, + /// What the component is, for the crossed question. + component_desc: &'a str, + /// Generate the fourth, crossed question (v2). + crossed: bool, s1: usize, s2: usize, j: usize, @@ -2064,6 +2230,8 @@ fn build( ) -> Fact { let Slots { component, + component_desc, + crossed, s1, s2, j, @@ -2095,6 +2263,13 @@ fn build( {constraint_desc}?" ), ), + ( + Phrasing::Crossed, + format!( + "{component_desc} — which one picked {param_desc} around the \ + fact that {constraint_desc}?" + ), + ), ], ) } @@ -2118,6 +2293,10 @@ fn build( Phrasing::Oblique, format!("which {component} {failure_desc} once {trigger_desc}?"), ), + ( + Phrasing::Crossed, + format!("{component_desc} — which one {failure_desc} once {trigger_desc}?"), + ), ], ) } @@ -2142,6 +2321,13 @@ fn build( {reason_desc}?" ), ), + ( + Phrasing::Crossed, + format!( + "{component_desc} — which one is barred from {forbidden_desc} \ + because {reason_desc}?" + ), + ), ], ) } @@ -2166,6 +2352,10 @@ fn build( Phrasing::Oblique, format!("which {component} {symptom_desc} {condition_desc}?"), ), + ( + Phrasing::Crossed, + format!("{component_desc} — which one {symptom_desc} {condition_desc}?"), + ), ], ) } @@ -2187,11 +2377,23 @@ fn build( Phrasing::Oblique, format!("which {component} {behaviour_desc} because {cause_desc}?"), ), + ( + Phrasing::Crossed, + format!( + "{component_desc} — which one {behaviour_desc} because {cause_desc}?" + ), + ), ], ) } }; + // The crossed question exists only under the v2 shape; dropping it here + // keeps every v1 corpus byte-identical. + let questions: Vec<(Phrasing, String)> = questions + .into_iter() + .filter(|(p, _)| crossed || *p != Phrasing::Crossed) + .collect(); let oblique_key = questions .iter() .find(|(p, _)| *p == Phrasing::Oblique) @@ -2357,6 +2559,31 @@ fn apply_type_mix(facts: &mut [Fact], mix: &[(Kind, u32)], seed: u64) { /// Questions shaped like the answerable ones, about subjects that were never /// written. Any hit here is a false positive. +/// A natural null (v2 abstention): a question about a REAL subject, in the +/// paraphrase template of a kind that subject has no note of. Every word in +/// it was written — the subject's, the template's — and the answer was not: +/// the subject has exactly one fact, and it is of another kind. Which kind +/// is asked about rotates with the fact's own, so no template is the tell. +pub fn natural_null(f: &Fact, salt: usize) -> String { + let s = &f.subject; + match f.kind { + Kind::Decision => format!("what is still broken in the {s}?"), + Kind::Caution => { + let (param, _, _) = PARAMS[salt % PARAMS.len()]; + format!("what {param} did we settle on for the {s}?") + } + Kind::Principle => { + let (behaviour, _) = BEHAVIOURS[salt % BEHAVIOURS.len()]; + format!("what explains why the {s} {behaviour}?") + } + Kind::Problem => { + let (forbidden, _) = FORBIDDEN[salt % FORBIDDEN.len()]; + format!("is it acceptable to {forbidden} in the {s}?") + } + Kind::Insight => format!("what goes wrong with the {s}?"), + } +} + fn controls(tested: usize, names: &mut Names) -> (Vec, Vec) { let n = (tested / 4).max(1); let mut questions = Vec::with_capacity(n); @@ -2364,13 +2591,16 @@ fn controls(tested: usize, names: &mut Names) -> (Vec, Vec) { for i in 0..n { let component = COMPONENTS[i % COMPONENTS.len()]; - let subject = format!("{} {component}", coined(names.next())); + let idx = names.next(); + let subject = format!("{} {component}", names.word(idx)); let phrasing = PHRASINGS[i % PHRASINGS.len()]; questions.push(Question { text: match phrasing { Phrasing::Lexical => format!("{subject} retry budget"), Phrasing::Paraphrase => format!("what did we decide about the {subject}?"), - Phrasing::Oblique => format!("who owns the {subject} these days?"), + Phrasing::Oblique | Phrasing::Crossed => { + format!("who owns the {subject} these days?") + } }, phrasing, gold: None, @@ -3144,6 +3374,7 @@ mod tests { CorpusShape { history: true, collision: 1.0, + ..Default::default() }, ); assert_eq!(full.facts.len(), 3000); diff --git a/src/grade.rs b/src/grade.rs index e3866f7..daf243e 100644 --- a/src/grade.rs +++ b/src/grade.rs @@ -21,6 +21,17 @@ //! answers in a few relevant tokens can earn up to ×10. The multiplier is //! a stated sketch, printed beside the unmultiplied number. The score is //! scaled ×100 so it reads as a whole number: 0.87 × 6.4 → 550. +//! +//! On a v2 world (`spec.edition == 2`) the score is **additive**: every plain +//! family contributes its pass rate as points out of 100 (eight families, +//! 800 points), plus an efficiency bonus of two 0–100 terms — the signal +//! score (mean focus over EVERY retrieval probe, a miss or a declined real +//! question scoring zero) and the token score, logarithmic between 200 +//! tokens per query (100) and 3,000 (0), with standing tokens amortised over +//! twenty questions a session. One family point trades one-for-one against +//! one bonus point, and the bonus is capped at 200 against the families' +//! 800, so no system wins on efficiency alone. A v2 hit also counts only when +//! the answer is readable in the delivered text, not merely keyed. use std::collections::BTreeMap; @@ -64,8 +75,23 @@ pub struct Graded { pub composite: f64, pub signal_share: f64, pub multiplier: f64, - /// 100 × composite × multiplier. + /// v1: 100 × composite × multiplier. v2: family_points + signal_score + + /// token_score. pub score: f64, + /// The world's benchmark edition the score was computed under. + pub edition: u8, + /// v2: Σ over the plain families of pass rate × 100 (N/A = 0). + pub family_points: f64, + /// v2: 100 × mean focus over every retrieval probe (a miss = 0). + pub signal_score: f64, + /// v2: 100 × clamp(ln(3000 / t) / ln 15, 0, 1) over the billed tokens. + pub token_score: f64, + /// v2: the tokens the token score was read off — tokens per query plus + /// standing tokens over twenty questions (a dump is billed once). + pub tokens_billed: f64, + /// Declared capabilities whose column never showed: a review reads + /// these before the numbers. + pub flags: Vec, pub families: Vec, pub attention: BTreeMap, pub cost: BTreeMap, @@ -145,6 +171,31 @@ fn top_score(r: &Recalled) -> Option { .fold(None, |m, s| Some(m.map_or(s, |m: f64| m.max(s)))) } +/// v2: the answer must be readable in the delivered hit, not merely keyed. +/// An empty `answer` (every v1 probe) keeps key-based credit. +fn readable(r: &Recalled, key: &str, answer: &str) -> bool { + if answer.is_empty() { + return true; + } + let needle = answer.to_lowercase(); + r.hits + .iter() + .any(|h| h.key.as_deref() == Some(key) && h.text.to_lowercase().contains(&needle)) +} + +/// Standing tokens are paid once a session; a session is taken to hold +/// twenty questions — a stated sketch, like the v1 multiplier. +pub const STANDING_QUERIES_PER_SESSION: f64 = 20.0; + +/// The v2 token score: 100 at 200 tokens per query, 0 at 3,000, logarithmic +/// between, so halving the bill is worth the same everywhere. +pub fn token_score(tokens: f64) -> f64 { + if tokens <= 200.0 { + return 100.0; + } + (100.0 * (3000.0 / tokens).ln() / 15f64.ln()).clamp(0.0, 100.0) +} + fn recall_reply<'a>(t: &'a Transcript, id: &str) -> anyhow::Result<&'a Recalled> { match t.reply(id) { Some(Reply::Recall { result, .. }) => Ok(result), @@ -160,6 +211,7 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { script.digest() ); let caps = t.capabilities; + let v2 = script.spec.edition >= 2; let mut acc = Acc { tasks: Vec::new(), cols: BTreeMap::new(), @@ -246,6 +298,12 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { let mut control_scores: Vec> = Vec::new(); let mut focus_sum = 0.0; let mut focus_n = 0usize; + // v2: focus over EVERY retrieval probe — a miss, an unreadable hit or + // a declined real question scores zero signal for what it delivered. + let mut focus2_sum = 0.0; + let mut focus2_n = 0usize; + let mut dump_seen = false; + let mut declined_any = false; let mut phrasing: BTreeMap = BTreeMap::new(); for p in &script.probes { @@ -257,9 +315,13 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { gold, phrasing: ph, stale, + answer, } => { let r = recall_reply(t, &p.id)?; - let rank = rank_of(r, gold); + dump_seen |= r.dump; + declined_any |= r.declined; + let legible = readable(r, gold, answer); + let rank = rank_of(r, gold).filter(|_| legible); let stale_rank = stale.as_deref().and_then(|s| rank_of(r, s)); let found5 = rank.is_some_and(|k| k <= 5); // A stale twin ranked above (or beside, in a dump) the @@ -292,7 +354,11 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { focus_sum += f; focus_n += 1; acc.col(Family::Retrieval, "hedge", b(r.declined)); + if legible && !r.declined { + focus2_sum += f; + } } + focus2_n += 1; if stale.is_some() { acc.col(Family::Retrieval, "stale_above", b(stale_above)); } @@ -301,19 +367,112 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { e.1 += 1; answerable_scores.push(top_score(r)); } - Expect::Control => { + Expect::Bound { gold, answers, .. } => { let r = recall_reply(t, &p.id)?; + dump_seen |= r.dump; + declined_any |= r.declined; + let answer_of = |key: &str| -> &str { + gold.iter() + .position(|g| g == key) + .and_then(|i| answers.get(i)) + .map_or("", String::as_str) + }; + // The best-ranked bound note the reader can actually read. + let best = gold + .iter() + .filter(|g| readable(r, g, answer_of(g))) + .filter_map(|g| rank_of(r, g)) + .min(); + let pass = best.is_some_and(|k| k <= 5); + acc.task(&p.id, Family::Retrieval, pass); + acc.col(Family::Retrieval, "path_r@5", b(pass)); + // Coverage: of the notes bound to the file, how many the + // top-k delivered (a dump delivers what it holds). + let k = script.spec.k.max(1); + let delivered: Vec<&str> = r + .hits + .iter() + .filter(|h| !h.tombstone) + .take(if r.dump { usize::MAX } else { k }) + .filter_map(|h| h.key.as_deref()) + .collect(); + // A dump delivers every bound note; more than k of them + // is still a full top-k. + let covered = gold + .iter() + .filter(|g| delivered.contains(&g.as_str())) + .count() + .min(k); + acc.col( + Family::Retrieval, + "path_cover", + covered as f64 / gold.len().min(k).max(1) as f64, + ); + let returned = r.hits.len(); + let gold_hits = r + .hits + .iter() + .filter(|h| { + h.key + .as_deref() + .is_some_and(|k| gold.iter().any(|g| g == k)) + }) + .count(); + let noise = if returned == 0 { + 0.0 + } else { + (returned - gold_hits) as f64 / returned as f64 + }; + acc.col(Family::Retrieval, "noise", noise); + acc.col(Family::Retrieval, "tokens", delivered_tokens(r) as f64); + if gold_hits > 0 { + let total = delivered_tokens(r).max(1); + let signal: usize = r + .hits + .iter() + .filter(|h| { + h.key + .as_deref() + .is_some_and(|k| gold.iter().any(|g| g == k)) + }) + .map(|h| tokens(&h.text)) + .sum(); + let f = signal as f64 / total as f64; + focus_sum += f; + focus_n += 1; + acc.col(Family::Retrieval, "hedge", b(r.declined)); + if pass && !r.declined { + focus2_sum += f; + } + } + focus2_n += 1; + answerable_scores.push(top_score(r)); + } + Expect::Control { natural } => { + let r = recall_reply(t, &p.id)?; + declined_any |= r.declined; let answered = !r.hits.is_empty(); let pass = !answered || r.declined; acc.task(&p.id, Family::Abstention, pass); acc.col(Family::Abstention, "answered", b(answered)); acc.col(Family::Abstention, "fp", b(!pass)); acc.col(Family::Abstention, "declined", b(answered && r.declined)); + if v2 { + acc.col( + Family::Abstention, + if *natural { "natural_fp" } else { "phantom_fp" }, + b(!pass), + ); + } control_scores.push(top_score(r)); } - Expect::Current { head, retired } => { + Expect::Current { + head, + retired, + answer, + } => { let r = recall_reply(t, &p.id)?; - let rank = rank_of(r, head); + let rank = rank_of(r, head).filter(|_| readable(r, head, answer)); let polluted = retired.iter().any(|k| rank_of(r, k).is_some()); let pass = rank.is_some_and(|k| k <= 5) && !polluted; acc.task(&p.id, Family::Currency, pass); @@ -338,9 +497,9 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { acc.col(Family::Currency, "lineage_na", 1.0); } }, - Expect::Linked { gold, .. } => { + Expect::Linked { gold, answer, .. } => { let r = recall_reply(t, &p.id)?; - let direct = rank_of(r, gold).is_some_and(|k| k <= 5); + let direct = rank_of(r, gold).is_some_and(|k| k <= 5) && readable(r, gold, answer); let assisted = r .hits .iter() @@ -353,9 +512,13 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { acc.col(Family::Rationale, "assisted_r@5", b(pass)); acc.col(Family::Rationale, "structure_only", b(!direct && assisted)); } - Expect::Windowed { gold, window } => { + Expect::Windowed { + gold, + window, + answer, + } => { let r = recall_reply(t, &p.id)?; - let found = rank_of(r, gold).is_some_and(|k| k <= 5); + let found = rank_of(r, gold).is_some_and(|k| k <= 5) && readable(r, gold, answer); let leak = r .hits .iter() @@ -545,10 +708,20 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { columns.insert("lexical_r@5".into(), r5("lexical")); columns.insert("paraphrase_r@5".into(), r5("paraphrase")); columns.insert("oblique_r@5".into(), r5("oblique")); - columns.insert( - "weighted_r@5".into(), - 0.45 * r5("lexical") + 0.45 * r5("paraphrase") + 0.10 * r5("oblique"), - ); + if v2 { + // Four phrasings, equal weight: the crossed question is a + // quarter of retrieval, not a side column. + columns.insert("crossed_r@5".into(), r5("crossed")); + columns.insert( + "weighted_r@5".into(), + (r5("lexical") + r5("paraphrase") + r5("oblique") + r5("crossed")) / 4.0, + ); + } else { + columns.insert( + "weighted_r@5".into(), + 0.45 * r5("lexical") + 0.45 * r5("paraphrase") + 0.10 * r5("oblique"), + ); + } } if fam == Family::Abstention { columns.insert( @@ -598,6 +771,18 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { }; let multiplier = (10.0 * signal_share).clamp(0.1, 10.0); + // ---- v2: the additive score ------------------------------------------ + let family_points: f64 = families + .iter() + .filter(|f| f.posed > 0 && f.family != "authority") + .map(|f| 100.0 * f.pass_rate.unwrap_or(0.0)) + .sum(); + let signal_score = if focus2_n == 0 { + 0.0 + } else { + 100.0 * focus2_sum / focus2_n as f64 + }; + let retrieval = families .iter() .find(|f| f.family == "retrieval") @@ -613,6 +798,45 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { "tokens_per_query".into(), retrieval.get("tokens").copied().unwrap_or(0.0), ); + let tokens_per_query = retrieval.get("tokens").copied().unwrap_or(0.0); + // A dump's delivered tokens ARE its standing text: bill it once. + let tokens_billed = tokens_per_query + + if dump_seen { + 0.0 + } else { + t.standing_tokens as f64 / STANDING_QUERIES_PER_SESSION + }; + let token_score = token_score(tokens_billed); + let score = if v2 { + family_points + signal_score + token_score + } else { + composite * multiplier * 100.0 + }; + + // ---- capability honesty ----------------------------------------------- + let mut flags = Vec::new(); + let fam = |name: &str| families.iter().find(|f| f.family == name); + let colv = |name: &str, c: &str| fam(name).and_then(|f| f.columns.get(c).copied()); + if caps.trace && colv("deletion", "trace") == Some(0.0) { + flags.push("trace declared, but no release ever delivered a marker".into()); + } + if caps.verdict && !declined_any { + flags.push("verdict declared, but no recall ever declined".into()); + } + if caps.suspects && queue.is_empty() && fam("contradiction").is_some_and(|f| f.posed > 0) { + flags.push("suspects declared, but the queue stayed empty".into()); + } + if caps.history && colv("currency", "lineage") == Some(0.0) { + flags.push("history declared, but no lineage walk reached a retired generation".into()); + } + if caps.write_check + && !inscribed + .values() + .any(|w| w.matched.is_some() || !w.warnings.is_empty() || !w.suspects.is_empty()) + { + flags.push("write_check declared, but no write ever came back with a verdict".into()); + } + let mut cost = BTreeMap::new(); cost.insert("standing_tokens".into(), t.standing_tokens as f64); cost.insert( @@ -636,7 +860,13 @@ pub fn grade(script: &Script, t: &Transcript) -> anyhow::Result { composite, signal_share, multiplier, - score: composite * multiplier * 100.0, + score, + edition: script.spec.edition, + family_points, + signal_score, + token_score, + tokens_billed, + flags, families, attention, cost, diff --git a/src/lib.rs b/src/lib.rs index 3af32f8..d0aea0b 100644 --- a/src/lib.rs +++ b/src/lib.rs @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ //! software development. //! //! One seeded world of invented project knowledge is poured into a memory -//! system through an eleven-operation protocol and then questioned, re-decided, +//! system through a twelve-operation protocol and then questioned, re-decided, //! contradicted, retired and asked again. Every probe is a task with a //! pass/fail rule the script fixed before the question was asked; the //! headline is the mean success over every task posed, @@ -30,7 +30,9 @@ pub mod world; pub const VERSION: &str = env!("CARGO_PKG_VERSION"); /// Every in-process arm by name, in the order the tables print them. -pub const ARM_NAMES: [&str; 6] = ["engram", "rag", "grep", "curated", "whole", "chance"]; +pub const ARM_NAMES: [&str; 7] = [ + "engram", "rag", "grep", "curated", "whole", "chance", "tfidf", +]; #[cfg(all(test, feature = "arms"))] mod tests { @@ -110,6 +112,64 @@ mod tests { assert!(g.standing_tokens_hint() > 0); } + /// The v2 score is additive and the v2 world's traps bite the lexical + /// arm: natural nulls are answered where phantoms were declined, the + /// synonym restatement is not flagged as a value flip would be, and a + /// v1 world graded by the same code keeps its v1 score. + #[test] + fn the_v2_edition_scores_additively_and_traps_the_lexical_arm() { + let v2 = world::build(&world::WorldConfig { + size: 66, + seed: 11, + edition: 2, + ..world::WorldConfig::default() + }); + let mut tfidf = crate::arms::TfidfArm::default(); + let t = runner::run(&v2, &mut tfidf).unwrap(); + let g = grade::grade(&v2, &t).unwrap(); + assert_eq!(g.edition, 2); + assert!((g.score - (g.family_points + g.signal_score + g.token_score)).abs() < 1e-9); + assert!(g.family_points <= 800.0 && g.signal_score <= 100.0 && g.token_score <= 100.0); + // The idf oracle declines a coined phantom and answers a written + // subject's natural null. + assert!(col(&g, "abstention", "natural_fp") >= col(&g, "abstention", "phantom_fp")); + assert!(col(&g, "retrieval", "crossed_r@5") <= col(&g, "retrieval", "lexical_r@5")); + // Title-only snippets carry the answer for every kind, so the + // readable rule does not zero a lexical hit. + assert!(col(&g, "retrieval", "lexical_r@5") > 0.5); + + // The path read: grep greps the file for the path and finds every + // bound note; the lexical arm only sees the path's words. + let mut grep = FlatArm::new(Mode::Grep, None); + let t = runner::run(&v2, &mut grep).unwrap(); + let gg = grade::grade(&v2, &t).unwrap(); + assert!(col(&gg, "retrieval", "path_r@5") > 0.9); + assert!(col(&gg, "retrieval", "path_cover") > 0.5); + assert!(col(&g, "retrieval", "path_r@5") <= col(&gg, "retrieval", "path_r@5")); + // A dump covers every file it holds notes for, and no more than that. + let mut whole = FlatArm::new(Mode::Whole, None); + let t = runner::run(&v2, &mut whole).unwrap(); + let gw = grade::grade(&v2, &t).unwrap(); + assert!((col(&gw, "retrieval", "path_cover") - 1.0).abs() < 1e-9); + assert!((col(&gw, "retrieval", "path_r@5") - 1.0).abs() < 1e-9); + + let v1 = world::build(&world::WorldConfig { + size: 66, + seed: 11, + ..world::WorldConfig::default() + }); + let mut tfidf = crate::arms::TfidfArm::default(); + let t = runner::run(&v1, &mut tfidf).unwrap(); + let g1 = grade::grade(&v1, &t).unwrap(); + assert_eq!(g1.edition, 1); + assert!((g1.score - g1.composite * g1.multiplier * 100.0).abs() < 1e-9); + assert!( + g1.families + .iter() + .all(|f| !f.columns.contains_key("crossed_r@5")) + ); + } + #[test] fn flat_stores_score_na_where_they_have_no_mechanism() { let s = world(); diff --git a/src/main.rs b/src/main.rs index 4c2bf44..0d4a965 100644 --- a/src/main.rs +++ b/src/main.rs @@ -26,6 +26,11 @@ OPTIONS: late (hinted, dated AFTER the truth — a migration re-import) [default: stale] --chain-len N generations per re-decided subject [default: 3] + --v2 build the v2 edition of the world: shared-vocabulary + subjects, a fourth crossed phrasing, natural-null + controls, reworded contradiction shapes, answer-bearing + probes, and the additive score (families + signal + + tokens) --authority add the authority family: near-identical twins endorsed on different rungs (retrieval use, the assistant's confirm, the owner's approve, a @@ -126,6 +131,7 @@ fn cli() -> anyhow::Result<()> { } "--chain-len" => cfg.chain_len = value()?.parse()?, "--authority" => cfg.authority = true, + "--v2" => cfg.edition = 2, "--arms" => arms = value()?.split(',').map(|s| s.trim().to_string()).collect(), "--no-rerank" => no_rerank = true, "--json" => json_out = Some(value()?), @@ -201,8 +207,9 @@ fn cli() -> anyhow::Result<()> { other => format!("-{}", other.name()), }; let authority = if cfg.authority { "-authority" } else { "" }; + let edition = if cfg.edition >= 2 { "-v2" } else { "" }; let path = format!( - "{dir}/knowledgedrift-{size}-seed{}{shape}{authority}.json", + "{dir}/knowledgedrift-{size}-seed{}{shape}{authority}{edition}.json", cfg.seed ); std::fs::write(&path, serde_json::to_string_pretty(&s)?)?; @@ -242,7 +249,7 @@ fn ladder( no_rerank: bool, json_out: Option, ) -> anyhow::Result<()> { - use knowledgedrift::arms::{EngramArm, FlatArm, Mode, embedder, nli, reranker}; + use knowledgedrift::arms::{EngramArm, FlatArm, Mode, TfidfArm, embedder, nli, reranker}; use knowledgedrift::protocol::Memory; use knowledgedrift::{VERSION, runner}; @@ -264,6 +271,9 @@ fn ladder( cfg.shape.name(), if cfg.authority { ", authority" } else { "" } ); + if cfg.edition >= 2 { + println!("edition 2: additive score = families (800) + signal (100) + tokens (100)"); + } let mut flags = Vec::new(); if no_rerank { @@ -272,6 +282,9 @@ fn ladder( if cfg.authority { flags.push("--authority".to_string()); } + if cfg.edition >= 2 { + flags.push("--v2".to_string()); + } let mut receipt = Receipt { generator: format!("knowledgedrift {VERSION}"), flags, @@ -309,6 +322,7 @@ fn ladder( )), "whole" => Box::new(FlatArm::new(Mode::Whole, None)), "chance" => Box::new(FlatArm::new(Mode::Chance, None)), + "tfidf" => Box::new(TfidfArm::default()), other => anyhow::bail!("unknown arm {other}"), }; let t = runner::run(&s, arm.as_mut())?; diff --git a/src/protocol.rs b/src/protocol.rs index f868dfb..a27916a 100644 --- a/src/protocol.rs +++ b/src/protocol.rs @@ -305,6 +305,14 @@ pub trait Memory { fn recall(&self, query: &str, k: usize, window: Option) -> anyhow::Result; + /// The path-shaped read (v2): what a caller about to touch `path` should + /// see. A system with a file channel (an edit hook, a code-ref index) + /// answers from it; the default hands the path to `recall` as a query, + /// which is what a store without one would do. + fn recall_path(&self, path: &str, k: usize) -> anyhow::Result { + self.recall(path, k, None) + } + /// Every disagreement the system currently wants a person to judge. /// `None` = the system has no such concept. fn suspects(&mut self) -> anyhow::Result>>; diff --git a/src/report.rs b/src/report.rs index 8b9c20c..aab2024 100644 --- a/src/report.rs +++ b/src/report.rs @@ -36,6 +36,15 @@ pub fn print_arm(g: &Graded) { g.cost.get("standing_tokens").copied().unwrap_or(0.0) as usize, g.cost.get("tokens_per_query").copied().unwrap_or(0.0) as usize, ); + if g.edition >= 2 { + println!( + " {:<8} v2 score {:.0} = families {:.0} + signal {:.0} + tokens {:.0} (billed {:.0} tok/query)", + "", g.score, g.family_points, g.signal_score, g.token_score, g.tokens_billed + ); + } + for flag in &g.flags { + println!(" {:<8} ! {flag}", ""); + } let detail: &[(&str, &[&str])] = &[ ( "retrieval", @@ -45,12 +54,25 @@ pub fn print_arm(g: &Graded) { "lexical_r@5", "paraphrase_r@5", "oblique_r@5", + "crossed_r@5", + "path_r@5", + "path_cover", "stale_above", "hedge", "noise", ], ), - ("abstention", &["fp", "answered", "declined", "separation"]), + ( + "abstention", + &[ + "fp", + "phantom_fp", + "natural_fp", + "answered", + "declined", + "separation", + ], + ), ( "currency", &["head_r@1", "head_r@5", "pollution", "lineage"], @@ -121,7 +143,11 @@ pub fn print_arm(g: &Graded) { /// The cross-arm table for one size. pub fn print_summary(size: usize, notes: usize, arms: &[Graded]) { - println!("\n== {size} tested facts, {notes} notes =="); + let v2 = arms.iter().any(|g| g.edition >= 2); + println!( + "\n== {size} tested facts, {notes} notes{} ==", + if v2 { ", v2" } else { "" } + ); println!( " {:<8} {:>6} {:>9} {:>6} {:>8} {:>9} {:>9} {:>5} {:>5} {:>7} {:>9} {:>8}", "arm", @@ -154,4 +180,16 @@ pub fn print_summary(size: usize, notes: usize, arms: &[Graded]) { g.cost.get("tokens_per_query").copied().unwrap_or(0.0) as usize, ); } + if v2 { + println!( + " {:<8} {:>8} {:>8} {:>7} {:>7} {:>9}", + "arm", "families", "signal", "tokens", "score", "billed" + ); + for g in arms { + println!( + " {:<8} {:>8.0} {:>8.0} {:>7.0} {:>7.0} {:>9.0}", + g.arm, g.family_points, g.signal_score, g.token_score, g.score, g.tokens_billed + ); + } + } } diff --git a/src/runner.rs b/src/runner.rs index 7b0bc07..6544b6b 100644 --- a/src/runner.rs +++ b/src/runner.rs @@ -76,6 +76,16 @@ pub fn run(script: &Script, mem: &mut dyn Memory) -> anyhow::Result }); "recall" } + Op::RecallPath { id, path, k } => { + let result = mem + .recall_path(path, *k) + .map_err(|e| anyhow::anyhow!("recall_path {id} {path:?}: {e}"))?; + replies.push(Reply::Recall { + id: id.clone(), + result, + }); + "recall_path" + } Op::Suspects { id } => { let pairs = mem.suspects()?; replies.push(Reply::Suspects { diff --git a/src/script.rs b/src/script.rs index 2dd49e1..5f18c4a 100644 --- a/src/script.rs +++ b/src/script.rs @@ -97,6 +97,14 @@ pub enum Op { #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")] window: Option, }, + /// v2: the path-shaped read — what a caller about to touch `path` + /// should see. Answered by `Reply::Recall` like any recall. + #[serde(rename = "recall_path")] + RecallPath { + id: String, + path: String, + k: usize, + }, Suspects { id: String, }, @@ -119,14 +127,42 @@ pub enum Expect { phrasing: String, #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Option::is_none")] stale: Option, + /// v2: the substring the delivered text must carry for the hit to + /// count — a title-only snippet that names the note but not its + /// value is a miss. Empty on v1 worlds (key-based credit). + #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "String::is_empty")] + answer: String, + }, + /// v2: a path-shaped read. `gold` is every live, truthful note bound to + /// `path` through its code refs (a stale sibling bound to the same file + /// is neither gold nor penalised); `answers` is index-aligned with + /// `gold`. Pass = at least one gold delivered readably in the top five; + /// `path_cover` is the share of the bound notes the top-k delivered. + Bound { + path: String, + gold: Vec, + #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "Vec::is_empty")] + answers: Vec, }, /// A recall about a subject that was never written. Pass = nothing /// delivered, or delivered under the system's own decline signal. - Control, + /// `natural` (v2): the subject IS written, the predicate asked about is + /// not — every word of the question exists in memory, the answer does + /// not. Absent = a phantom subject nobody ever wrote. + Control { + #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "std::ops::Not::not")] + natural: bool, + }, /// A recall about a re-decided subject: `head` is current, `retired` /// are the generations it replaced. Pass = head in the top five and no /// retired generation delivered at all. - Current { head: String, retired: Vec }, + Current { + head: String, + retired: Vec, + /// v2: the head's answer substring (see `Gold::answer`). + #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "String::is_empty")] + answer: String, + }, /// A lineage walk from `head` must reach every retired generation. Lineage { head: String, retired: Vec }, /// A recall reachable only through structure: `gold` sits at the far @@ -136,10 +172,19 @@ pub enum Expect { gold: String, anchor: String, verb: String, + /// v2: the gold's answer substring (see `Gold::answer`). + #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "String::is_empty")] + answer: String, }, /// A windowed recall. Pass = gold in the top five and no delivered hit /// captured outside the window. - Windowed { gold: String, window: Window }, + Windowed { + gold: String, + window: Window, + /// v2: the gold's answer substring (see `Gold::answer`). + #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "String::is_empty")] + answer: String, + }, /// A planted contradiction case, graded off the planted notes' write /// replies and the suspects reply. `positive` = the planted note really /// contradicts `gold`; a negative is a trap that must NOT be flagged. @@ -248,6 +293,14 @@ impl PollutionShape { } } +fn edition_one() -> u8 { + 1 +} + +fn is_edition_one(e: &u8) -> bool { + *e == 1 +} + #[derive(Debug, Clone, Serialize, Deserialize, PartialEq)] pub struct WorldSpec { pub size: usize, @@ -272,6 +325,12 @@ pub struct WorldSpec { /// file when off, so the v1 worlds keep their digests. #[serde(default, skip_serializing_if = "std::ops::Not::not")] pub authority: bool, + /// The benchmark edition the world was built for: 1 (absent from the + /// file, so every v1 digest holds) or 2 — shared-vocabulary subjects, a + /// fourth crossed phrasing, natural-null controls, reworded contradiction + /// shapes, answer-bearing probes, and the additive score. + #[serde(default = "edition_one", skip_serializing_if = "is_edition_one")] + pub edition: u8, /// Notes in the world at the end of the import (before plantings). pub notes: usize, pub edges: usize, diff --git a/src/world.rs b/src/world.rs index 07a8314..28a6063 100644 --- a/src/world.rs +++ b/src/world.rs @@ -31,7 +31,9 @@ use std::collections::{HashMap, HashSet}; use crate::corpus::profile::Profile; use crate::corpus::rng::Rng; -use crate::corpus::{Corpus, Fact, KINDS, Kind, Phrasing, corpus_chained}; +use crate::corpus::{ + Corpus, CorpusShape, Fact, KINDS, Kind, Phrasing, corpus_chained_shaped, natural_null, +}; use crate::protocol::{Authority, Record, Window, WriteMode}; use crate::script::{Expect, Family, Op, PollutionShape, Probe, Script, WorldSpec}; @@ -61,6 +63,10 @@ pub struct WorldConfig { /// worlds keep their digests; on, the world grows its twins and probes /// after every other family has been asked. pub authority: bool, + /// Benchmark edition: 1 = the frozen v1 worlds; 2 = shared-vocabulary + /// subjects, the crossed phrasing, natural-null controls, the reworded + /// contradiction shapes and answer-bearing probes (`--v2`). + pub edition: u8, } impl Default for WorldConfig { @@ -75,6 +81,7 @@ impl Default for WorldConfig { spread_days: 60, window_days: 5, authority: false, + edition: 1, } } } @@ -105,8 +112,15 @@ fn kind_name(k: Kind) -> String { k.type_name().to_string() } +/// The component is a subject's last two words (`lease broker`), whatever +/// precedes them — a coined name in v1, two shared words in v2. fn component_of(subject: &str) -> &str { - subject.split_once(' ').map(|(_, c)| c).unwrap_or(subject) + let (head, last) = subject.rsplit_once(' ').unwrap_or(("", subject)); + let (_, prev) = head.rsplit_once(' ').unwrap_or(("", head)); + if prev.is_empty() || prev.len() + 1 + last.len() > subject.len() { + return subject; + } + &subject[subject.len() - prev.len() - 1 - last.len()..] } /// `(parameter, value, unit)` of a Decision's predicate @@ -189,6 +203,62 @@ fn flip_clause(f: &Fact, salt: usize) -> String { } } +/// A flipped claim in a wholly different frame — the v2 `reworded` shape: +/// no token of the original sentence survives but the subject and the +/// slot word, so a token-differencing detector sees a new sentence, not a +/// one-token edit. +fn flip_c(f: &Fact, salt: usize) -> String { + let s = &f.subject; + match f.kind { + Kind::Decision => match decision_parts(f) { + Some((param, v, unit)) => format!( + "Operators pinned the {s} to {} {unit} for its {param}, and the dashboard agrees", + altered(v, salt) + ), + None => format!("Operators moved the {s} off {} some time ago", f.answer), + }, + Kind::Caution => format!( + "Nobody has ever seen the {s} {}; it has been stable in every environment", + f.predicate + ), + Kind::Principle => format!( + "Doing {} inside the {s} is fine and routinely done", + f.answer + ), + Kind::Problem => format!( + "The {s} has stopped showing that it {}; the issue is resolved", + f.predicate + ), + Kind::Insight => format!( + "The explanation for the {s} {} was traced elsewhere; {} plays no part", + f.predicate, f.answer + ), + } +} + +/// An agreeing restatement one token away from the original title — the +/// v2 `synonym` shape, the trap for a detector that flags any small edit. +/// `None` when the title has no token to swap. +fn synonym(f: &Fact) -> Option { + let t = &f.title; + let swapped = match f.kind { + Kind::Decision => t + .contains(" uses a ") + .then(|| t.replacen(" uses a ", " keeps a ", 1)), + Kind::Caution => t + .contains(" when ") + .then(|| t.replacen(" when ", " whenever ", 1)), + Kind::Principle => t + .contains(" must never ") + .then(|| t.replacen(" must never ", " should never ", 1)), + Kind::Problem => Some(format!("Confirmed: {t}")), + Kind::Insight => t + .contains(" because ") + .then(|| t.replacen(" because ", " since ", 1)), + }?; + (swapped != *t).then_some(swapped) +} + /// An agreeing restatement — the paraphrase trap that must not be flagged. fn agree(f: &Fact) -> String { let s = &f.subject; @@ -217,6 +287,27 @@ const SHAPES: [(&str, u8, bool); 11] = [ ("historical", 3, false), ]; +/// The v2 rotation: the eleven above plus three shapes aimed at lexical +/// contradiction detectors — a flip that shares no frame with the original +/// (`reworded`), a flip carried by a clause rather than a token (`clause`), +/// and an agreeing restatement exactly one token from the title (`synonym`). +const SHAPES_V2: [(&str, u8, bool); 14] = [ + ("value", 1, true), + ("reworded", 1, true), + ("negation", 2, true), + ("paraphrase", 2, false), + ("synonym", 2, false), + ("unit", 2, true), + ("clause", 2, true), + ("coreference", 2, false), + ("transitive", 3, true), + ("quantifier", 2, true), + ("collider", 2, false), + ("compound", 3, true), + ("unit_agree", 2, false), + ("historical", 3, false), +]; + struct Case { shape: &'static str, tier: u8, @@ -250,6 +341,21 @@ fn make_case( "Checked against the current deployment.".into(), )], "paraphrase" => vec![(agree(f), "Restated for the onboarding notes.".into())], + "reworded" => vec![( + flip_c(f, salt), + "Written up fresh after the last operations review.".into(), + )], + "clause" => vec![( + format!( + "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the {s} {}; the earlier note was mistaken", + f.predicate + ), + "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.".into(), + )], + "synonym" => vec![( + synonym(f)?, + "Restated word for word from the original note.".into(), + )], "unit" => { let (param, v, unit) = parts.clone()?; let (unit2, factor) = convert(&unit)?; @@ -699,6 +805,7 @@ fn phrasing_name(p: Phrasing) -> &'static str { Phrasing::Lexical => "lexical", Phrasing::Paraphrase => "paraphrase", Phrasing::Oblique => "oblique", + Phrasing::Crossed => "crossed", } } @@ -709,8 +816,9 @@ fn cap(size: usize, div: usize, floor: usize) -> usize { /// Build the script for one world. pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { let base = day_to_unix(BASE_DAY).expect("BASE_DAY parses"); + let v2 = cfg.edition >= 2; let n_chains = cap(cfg.size, 20, 4); - let c: Corpus = corpus_chained( + let c: Corpus = corpus_chained_shaped( cfg.size, 0, cfg.seed, @@ -718,7 +826,14 @@ pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { &uniform_mix(), n_chains, cfg.chain_len, + CorpusShape { + shared_vocab: v2, + crossed: v2, + ..CorpusShape::default() + }, ); + // v2 probes carry the answer substring; v1 probes stay key-graded. + let answer_of = |f: &Fact| if v2 { f.answer.clone() } else { String::new() }; let chain_keys: HashSet<&str> = c .chains @@ -867,11 +982,61 @@ pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { gold: f.key.clone(), phrasing: phrasing_name(q.phrasing).to_string(), stale: stale.clone(), + answer: answer_of(f), }, ); } } + // v2: the path-shaped read. Every file the world's code refs name is + // asked once, as a path — what a caller about to edit it should see. + // Gold is every live, truthful note bound to the file: the non-chain + // facts (tested or not — a distractor bound to a file is still what an + // editor should know) and the chain heads. A stale sibling shares its + // fact's refs but is neither gold nor penalised. + let mut path_n = 0usize; + if v2 { + let live: Vec<&Fact> = facts + .iter() + .copied() + .chain(c.chains.iter().map(|ch| by_key[ch.head()])) + .collect(); + let mut paths: Vec<&str> = Vec::new(); + let mut bound: HashMap<&str, Vec<&Fact>> = HashMap::new(); + for f in &live { + for p in &f.code_refs { + if !bound.contains_key(p.as_str()) { + paths.push(p); + } + let golds = bound.entry(p.as_str()).or_default(); + // A note may name the same file twice in its refs. + if !golds.iter().any(|g| g.key == f.key) { + golds.push(f); + } + } + } + for p in paths { + let golds = &bound[p]; + path_n += 1; + let id = format!("P{path_n}"); + ops.push(Op::RecallPath { + id: id.clone(), + path: p.to_string(), + k: cfg.k, + }); + probes.push(Probe { + id, + family: Family::Retrieval, + expect: Expect::Bound { + path: p.to_string(), + gold: golds.iter().map(|f| f.key.clone()).collect(), + answers: golds.iter().map(|f| answer_of(f)).collect(), + }, + }); + } + } + let _ = path_n; + // Contradiction plan first: transitive cases borrow phantom subjects // from the END of the control list, and those controls are dropped. let targets: Vec<(usize, &Fact)> = facts @@ -898,8 +1063,9 @@ pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { let ghost_idx = c.phantom_subjects.len().checked_sub(ghosts_used + 1); let ghost = ghost_idx.map(|g| c.phantom_subjects[g].as_str()); let mut made = None; - for step in 0..SHAPES.len() { - let (shape, tier, positive) = SHAPES[(n + step) % SHAPES.len()]; + let shapes: &[(&'static str, u8, bool)] = if v2 { &SHAPES_V2 } else { &SHAPES }; + for step in 0..shapes.len() { + let (shape, tier, positive) = shapes[(n + step) % shapes.len()]; let needs_ghost = shape == "transitive"; if needs_ghost && ghost.is_none() { continue; @@ -935,9 +1101,28 @@ pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { Family::Abstention, q.text.clone(), None, - Expect::Control, + Expect::Control { natural: false }, ); } + // v2: natural nulls — a real subject, a kind of question it has no + // note for. One per four tested facts, like the phantoms. + if v2 { + for (i, f) in facts + .iter() + .enumerate() + .filter(|(i, f)| f.tested && i % 4 == 3) + .take(cap(cfg.size, 4, 4)) + { + recall( + &mut ops, + &mut probes, + Family::Abstention, + natural_null(f, i + 5), + None, + Expect::Control { natural: true }, + ); + } + } // Currency: the current state of every re-decided subject, plus a // lineage walk per chain. @@ -953,6 +1138,7 @@ pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { Expect::Current { head: ch.head().to_string(), retired: retired.clone(), + answer: answer_of(by_key[ch.head()]), }, ); } @@ -999,6 +1185,7 @@ pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { gold: to.key.clone(), anchor: from.key.clone(), verb: "because".into(), + answer: answer_of(to), }, ); } @@ -1017,6 +1204,7 @@ pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { gold: from.key.clone(), anchor: to.key.clone(), verb: "answers".into(), + answer: answer_of(from), }, ); } @@ -1048,6 +1236,7 @@ pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { Expect::Windowed { gold: f.key.clone(), window, + answer: answer_of(f), }, ); } @@ -1307,6 +1496,7 @@ pub fn build(cfg: &WorldConfig) -> Script { window_days: cfg.window_days, base_ts: base, authority: cfg.authority, + edition: cfg.edition, notes, edges, }, @@ -1358,9 +1548,10 @@ mod tests { .iter() .filter_map(|op| match op { Op::Inscribe { id: Some(id), .. } => Some(id.as_str()), - Op::Recall { id, .. } | Op::Suspects { id } | Op::Lineage { id, .. } => { - Some(id.as_str()) - } + Op::Recall { id, .. } + | Op::RecallPath { id, .. } + | Op::Suspects { id } + | Op::Lineage { id, .. } => Some(id.as_str()), _ => None, }) .collect(); @@ -1445,6 +1636,7 @@ mod tests { spread_days: spec.spread_days, window_days: spec.window_days, authority: spec.authority, + edition: spec.edition, }); assert_eq!( rebuilt.digest(), @@ -1536,6 +1728,187 @@ mod tests { assert!(endorsements > 40, "{endorsements}"); } + /// The v2 edition is a switch on the same generator: the default digest + /// does not move, and the v2 world carries what v2 is about — two-word + /// shared subjects, a fourth crossed phrasing on every tested fact, + /// natural-null controls whose subject was written, an answer on every + /// retrieval probe, and the three lexical-trap contradiction shapes. + #[test] + fn the_v2_edition_is_a_switch_on_the_same_generator() { + let v1 = build(&WorldConfig { + size: 60, + seed: 3, + ..WorldConfig::default() + }); + let v2 = build(&WorldConfig { + size: 60, + seed: 3, + edition: 2, + ..WorldConfig::default() + }); + assert_ne!(v1.digest(), v2.digest()); + assert!(!serde_json::to_string(&v1.spec).unwrap().contains("edition")); + assert_eq!(v2.spec.edition, 2); + let titles: Vec<&str> = v2 + .ops + .iter() + .filter_map(|op| match op { + Op::Inscribe { record, .. } | Op::Supersede { new: record, .. } => { + Some(record.title.as_str()) + } + _ => None, + }) + .collect(); + // Every imported note's subject is three lowercase words before its + // predicate (planted contradiction notes start however their shape + // frames them). + let imported = v2.ops.iter().filter_map(|op| match op { + Op::Inscribe { + record, + mode: WriteMode::Import, + .. + } => Some(record.title.as_str()), + _ => None, + }); + for t in imported { + let first = t.split_whitespace().next().unwrap(); + assert!( + first.chars().all(|c| c.is_ascii_lowercase()), + "v2 subject starts with a shared word: {t}" + ); + } + let mut crossed = 0; + let mut natural = 0; + let mut phantom = 0; + let mut shapes = HashSet::new(); + for p in &v2.probes { + match &p.expect { + Expect::Gold { + phrasing, answer, .. + } => { + assert!(!answer.is_empty()); + if phrasing == "crossed" { + crossed += 1; + } + } + Expect::Control { natural: true } => { + natural += 1; + let Some(Op::Recall { query, .. }) = v2 + .ops + .iter() + .find(|op| matches!(op, Op::Recall { id, .. } if *id == p.id)) + else { + panic!("control has a recall") + }; + // The subject named in the question WAS written … + let subject = titles + .iter() + .find(|t| { + let s = t.split_whitespace().take(4).collect::>().join(" "); + query.contains(&s) + }) + .is_some(); + assert!(subject, "natural null names no written subject: {query}"); + } + Expect::Control { natural: false } => phantom += 1, + Expect::Case { shape, .. } => { + shapes.insert(shape.clone()); + } + _ => {} + } + } + assert_eq!(crossed, 60, "one crossed question per tested fact"); + assert_eq!(natural, 15); + // The path reads: one per file the code refs name, every gold a + // live record, every path an op of its own. + let keys: HashSet<&str> = v2 + .ops + .iter() + .filter_map(|op| match op { + Op::Inscribe { record, .. } | Op::Supersede { new: record, .. } => { + Some(record.key.as_str()) + } + _ => None, + }) + .collect(); + let mut bound = 0; + for p in &v2.probes { + if let Expect::Bound { + path, + gold, + answers, + } = &p.expect + { + bound += 1; + assert!(path.starts_with("src/"), "{path}"); + assert!(!gold.is_empty() && gold.len() == answers.len()); + assert!(gold.iter().all(|g| keys.contains(g.as_str()))); + assert!( + gold.iter().all(|g| !g.starts_with("s-")), + "siblings are not gold" + ); + let unique: HashSet<&str> = gold.iter().map(String::as_str).collect(); + assert_eq!(unique.len(), gold.len(), "a note is bound once: {path}"); + assert!(v2.ops.iter().any( + |op| matches!(op, Op::RecallPath { id, path: p2, .. } if *id == p.id && p2 == path) + )); + } + } + assert!(bound > 0, "v2 poses path reads"); + assert!( + v1.probes + .iter() + .all(|p| !matches!(p.expect, Expect::Bound { .. })), + "v1 has no path reads" + ); + assert!(phantom > 0); + for s in ["reworded", "clause", "synonym"] { + assert!(shapes.contains(s), "v2 shape {s} missing"); + } + for p in &v1.probes { + if let Expect::Gold { answer, .. } = &p.expect { + assert!(answer.is_empty(), "v1 probes stay key-graded"); + } + } + } + + /// The v2 worlds under `worlds/v2/` regenerate byte for byte, like v1's. + #[test] + fn the_v2_worlds_regenerate_from_this_crate() { + let dir = std::path::Path::new(env!("CARGO_MANIFEST_DIR")).join("worlds/v2"); + let mut seen = 0; + for entry in std::fs::read_dir(&dir).expect("worlds/v2 exists") { + let path = entry.unwrap().path(); + if path.extension().is_none_or(|e| e != "json") { + continue; + } + let file: Script = + serde_json::from_str(&std::fs::read_to_string(&path).unwrap()).unwrap(); + let spec = &file.spec; + assert_eq!(spec.edition, 2, "{}", path.display()); + let rebuilt = build(&WorldConfig { + size: spec.size, + seed: spec.seed, + k: spec.k, + chain_len: spec.chain_len, + pollution: spec.pollution, + shape: spec.pollution_shape, + spread_days: spec.spread_days, + window_days: spec.window_days, + authority: spec.authority, + edition: spec.edition, + }); + assert_eq!( + rebuilt.digest(), + file.digest, + "{} no longer regenerates", + path.display() + ); + seen += 1; + } + assert_eq!(seen, 5, "the five v2 worlds"); + } + #[test] fn the_world_clock_is_2026_09_01() { assert_eq!(day_to_unix(BASE_DAY), Some(1_788_220_800)); diff --git a/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-100-seed1-v2.json b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-100-seed1-v2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a0fc97f --- /dev/null +++ b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-100-seed1-v2.json @@ -0,0 +1,12438 @@ +{ + "spec": { + "size": 100, + "seed": 1, + "k": 10, + "chains": 5, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "edition": 2, + "notes": 125, + "edges": 106 + }, + "digest": "52b32ba42bf1a515", + "ops": [ + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0000", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel estuary sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants when the shard rebalances, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0002", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine ravine sweep worker is permitted to outrun the replication horizon", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0002", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine ravine sweep worker must never outrun the replication horizon, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine ravine sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0003", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure lagoon sweep worker stutters its stream during a cold replay, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure lagoon sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cavern replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 22 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781236800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cavern replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 16 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel cavern replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0006", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx cliff replay buffer mislabels its vials when a poison message recirculates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel gulch replay buffer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel gulch replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0008", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion hollow replay buffer saturates its detector across a region failover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. vermilion hollow replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784674800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0009", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby shore ingest job uses a grace period of 29 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby shore ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0011", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony hollow ingest job starves its consumers when the coolant loop cavitates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ebony hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787252400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0012", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan quarry ingest job must never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness during lens calibration — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0014", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries because the quota counts retired entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel lowland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784646000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0015", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk mesa sweep worker uses a sampling stride of 42 readings, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk mesa sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity when the failover rehearsal runs — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0017", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper estuary sweep worker must never splice two lineages, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper estuary sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0018", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline at quota exhaustion, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel marsh sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785078000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0020", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat dale assay station uses a confidence floor of 55 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0021", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel bayou assay station: overruns its dwell — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0021", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel bayou assay station overruns its dwell when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta orchard assay station must never skip the blank control — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0023", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige lowland assay station no longer orphans its batches (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785276000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0023", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige lowland assay station orphans its batches during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige lowland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787263200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0024", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar moor assay station ages its stock first because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer uses a grace period of 68 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0026", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan bluff index writer starves its consumers when the dedupe window slides, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan bluff index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784656800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0027", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet brook index writer must never mutate a sealed segment, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet brook index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness within the grace period — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0029", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries because the estimator never saw a leap year — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785862800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0030", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet pond lease broker uses a batch size of 81 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0032", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz delta lease broker must never widen the fence without a drain — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. quartz delta lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0033", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache while a follower catches up, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0035", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel badland lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 94 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0036", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy forest lease broker corrupts its checkpoint when the mains power browns out — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785524400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage badland lease broker must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783688400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0038", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber jungle lease broker drifts its watermark beneath peak load — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber jungle lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0039", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786266000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0041", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze marsh edge cache blackholes its retries when two drains overlap, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze marsh edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0042", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel butte edge cache must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel butte edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory ravine edge cache no longer churns its connections (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781672400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory ravine edge cache churns its connections under sustained backpressure, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory ravine edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783659600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0044", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail, and the sensor sums shadow and signal alike is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781276400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0044", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe glacier edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0045", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk glade telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 120 attempts — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes when the coolant loop cavitates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0047", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber lowland telemetry mast must never share a cursor between shards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber lowland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0048", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal harbor telemetry mast stalls during lens calibration — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784091600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the quota counts retired entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783699200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0050", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon hollow assay station uses a flush interval of 133 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0051", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze cirque assay station loses its cursor when a tenant exceeds its envelope, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze cirque assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786741200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive hill assay station must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786276800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0053", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz ravine assay station reorders acks under clock skew — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. topaz ravine assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0054", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar geyser telemetry mast uses a grace period of 146 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0056", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel meadow telemetry mast starves its consumers when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. hazel meadow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0057", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy glacier telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand ravine telemetry mast no longer flaps its liveness (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781593200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand ravine telemetry mast flaps its liveness within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand ravine telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784876400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0059", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen rapids telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0060", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut geyser provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage heath provenance ledger: fragments its heap — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage heath provenance ledger fragments its heap when the standby promotes itself — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage heath provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0062", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony strait provenance ledger must never suppress a failing healthcheck — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony strait provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0063", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel lagoon provenance ledger shadows its primary during certificate rotation, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel lagoon provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785308400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice, and the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782928800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0065", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn valley sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 172 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn valley sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0066", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory gulch sweep worker: expires its own grants — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785711600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0066", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory gulch sweep worker expires its own grants when the coolant loop cavitates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory gulch sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon cape sweep worker must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon cape sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0068", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream during lens calibration — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0069", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head because the quota counts retired entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785351600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel dune shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0071", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson meadow shard router overruns its dwell when the lease expires mid-flush, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson meadow shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0072", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz orchard shard router must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches under shard rebalance, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0074", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. salmon marsh shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785783600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0075", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan gorge escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785319200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon fjord escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0077", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel island escrow chamber must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. hazel island escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783177200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0078", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl crag escrow chamber spins on backoff past the retention cutoff — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory isthmus escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0080", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal cape assay station uses a quota refresh of 211 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal cape assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0081", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "golden river assay station blackholes its retries when the reagent expires overnight, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785362400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan estuary assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0083", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta quarry assay station churns its connections during the night batch, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta quarry assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0084", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail because the seed never varies between runs — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate lake telemetry mast uses a compaction floor of 224 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate lake telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0086", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "scarlet heath telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages when a checksum disagrees on arrival — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet heath telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0087", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson geyser telemetry mast must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783958400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard behind a cold boot — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0089", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand quarry telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0090", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel barrens edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 237 entries, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel barrens edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets when the almanac rolls over, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel quarry edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786230000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0092", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal inlet edge cache must never bypass the admission meter — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784394000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0093", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts past its recalibration due date — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0095", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris harbor quorum relay uses a checkpoint cadence of 250 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris harbor quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786971600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0096", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe moor quorum relay shreds its manifest when the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum plateau quorum relay must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum plateau quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0098", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel shore quorum relay inflates its estimates past the spill threshold, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. hazel shore quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784365200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0099", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber lagoon quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0093", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0040", + "to": "f0042", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0061", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0038", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0066", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0054", + "to": "f0018", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0034", + "to": "f0068", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0006", + "to": "f0010", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0021", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0083", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0082", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0055", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0020", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0025", + "to": "f0037", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0040", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0082", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0060", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0045", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0039", + "to": "f0038", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0060", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0028", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0063", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0021", + "to": "f0005", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0035", + "to": "f0037", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0005", + "to": "f0037", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0014", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0061", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0019", + "to": "f0053", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0051", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0005", + "to": "f0022", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0088", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0013", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0055", + "to": "f0087", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0004", + "to": "f0010", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0055", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0060", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0066", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0089", + "to": "f0068", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0005", + "to": "f0087", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0006", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0068", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0099", + "to": "f0093", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0015", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0017", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0097", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0025", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0078", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0019", + "to": "f0093", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0011", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0033", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0073", + "to": "f0015", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0089", + "to": "f0010", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0044", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0044", + "to": "f0038", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0040", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0073", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0004", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0018", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0093", + "to": "f0010", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0048", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0040", + "to": "f0097", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0014", + "to": "f0013", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0010", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0054", + "to": "f0058", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0068", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0076", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0010", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0097", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0071", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0010", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0020", + "to": "f0015", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0009", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0097", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0034", + "to": "f0023", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0016", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0026", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0021", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0010", + "to": "f0077", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0046", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0028", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0029", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0098", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0089", + "to": "f0098", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0076", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0099", + "to": "f0053", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0058", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0038", + "to": "f0005", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0031", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c000g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange cirque replay buffer uses a confidence floor of 352 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g0", + "new": { + "key": "c000g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange cirque replay buffer uses a confidence floor of 441 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange cirque replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g1", + "new": { + "key": "c000g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange cirque replay buffer uses a confidence floor of 530 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c001g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate prairie replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 365 ticks, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate prairie replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g0", + "new": { + "key": "c001g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate prairie replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 454 ticks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate prairie replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g1", + "new": { + "key": "c001g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate prairie replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 543 ticks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c002g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure ridge telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 378 minutes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure ridge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g0", + "new": { + "key": "c002g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure ridge telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 467 minutes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure ridge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g1", + "new": { + "key": "c002g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure ridge telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 556 minutes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c003g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn tarn assay station uses a retry budget of 391 attempts — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g0", + "new": { + "key": "c003g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn tarn assay station uses a retry budget of 480 attempts — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g1", + "new": { + "key": "c003g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn tarn assay station uses a retry budget of 569 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn tarn assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c004g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade glade provenance ledger uses a batch size of 404 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g0", + "new": { + "key": "c004g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade glade provenance ledger uses a batch size of 493 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g1", + "new": { + "key": "c004g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade glade provenance ledger uses a batch size of 582 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade glade provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1", + "query": "hazel estuary sweep worker drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the hazel estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5", + "query": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7", + "query": "which sweep worker cancels permissions it just issued once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one cancels permissions it just issued once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R9", + "query": "carmine ravine sweep worker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R10", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the carmine ravine sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R11", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R12", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R13", + "query": "azure lagoon sweep worker stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R14", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure lagoon sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R15", + "query": "which sweep worker delivers output in fits and bursts when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R16", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one delivers output in fits and bursts when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R17", + "query": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R18", + "query": "what explains why the chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R19", + "query": "which sweep worker throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R20", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R21", + "query": "sorrel cavern replay buffer decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R22", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the sorrel cavern replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R23", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R24", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R25", + "query": "onyx cliff replay buffer mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R26", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R27", + "query": "which replay buffer puts the wrong name on each container once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R28", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one puts the wrong name on each container once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R29", + "query": "hazel gulch replay buffer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R30", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the hazel gulch replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R31", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R32", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R33", + "query": "vermilion hollow replay buffer saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R34", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion hollow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R35", + "query": "which replay buffer pegs the sensor at maximum when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R36", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one pegs the sensor at maximum when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R37", + "query": "saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R38", + "query": "what explains why the saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R39", + "query": "which replay buffer biases results to the reference value because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R40", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one biases results to the reference value because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R41", + "query": "ruby shore ingest job grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R42", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the ruby shore ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R43", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R44", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R45", + "query": "ebony hollow ingest job starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R46", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R47", + "query": "which ingest job leaves downstream readers with nothing once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R48", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R49", + "query": "cyan quarry ingest job mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R50", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the cyan quarry ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R51", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R52", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R53", + "query": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R54", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo dale ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R55", + "query": "which ingest job keeps toggling between up and down while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R56", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps toggling between up and down while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R57", + "query": "hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R58", + "query": "what explains why the hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R59", + "query": "which ingest job owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R60", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R61", + "query": "chalk mesa sweep worker sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R62", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the chalk mesa sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R63", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R64", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R65", + "query": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R66", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter glade sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R67", + "query": "which sweep worker flips positive and negative readings once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R68", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one flips positive and negative readings once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R69", + "query": "copper estuary sweep worker splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R70", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the copper estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R71", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R72", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R73", + "query": "ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R74", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen glacier sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R75", + "query": "which sweep worker tilts every measurement it takes once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R76", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one tilts every measurement it takes once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R77", + "query": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R78", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R79", + "query": "which sweep worker keeps tuning grants for itself because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R80", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R81", + "query": "wheat dale assay station confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R82", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the wheat dale assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R83", + "query": "which assay station picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R84", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R85", + "query": "hazel bayou assay station overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R86", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R87", + "query": "which assay station lingers longer than scheduled once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R88", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one lingers longer than scheduled once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R89", + "query": "magenta orchard assay station skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R90", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the magenta orchard assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R91", + "query": "which assay station is barred from omitting the empty reference run because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R92", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R93", + "query": "beige lowland assay station orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R94", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige lowland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R95", + "query": "which assay station abandons work it had accepted while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R96", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one abandons work it had accepted while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R97", + "query": "cedar moor assay station ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R98", + "query": "what explains why the cedar moor assay station ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R99", + "query": "which assay station serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R100", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R101", + "query": "quartz bayou index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R102", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the quartz bayou index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R103", + "query": "which index writer picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R104", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R105", + "query": "tan bluff index writer starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan bluff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R107", + "query": "which index writer leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R108", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R109", + "query": "violet brook index writer mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R110", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the violet brook index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R111", + "query": "which index writer is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R112", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R113", + "query": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R114", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel cliff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R115", + "query": "which index writer keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R116", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R117", + "query": "auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R118", + "query": "what explains why the auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R119", + "query": "which index writer owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R120", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R121", + "query": "violet pond lease broker batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R122", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the violet pond lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R123", + "query": "which lease broker picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R124", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R125", + "query": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R127", + "query": "which lease broker sends the same payload twice once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R128", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one sends the same payload twice once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R129", + "query": "quartz delta lease broker widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R130", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the quartz delta lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R131", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R132", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R133", + "query": "wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R134", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat forest lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R135", + "query": "which lease broker evicts what it is about to need as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R136", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one evicts what it is about to need as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R137", + "query": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R138", + "query": "what explains why the lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R139", + "query": "which lease broker shortens its own interval because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R140", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one shortens its own interval because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R141", + "query": "hazel badland lease broker backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R142", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the hazel badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R143", + "query": "which lease broker picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R144", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R145", + "query": "navy forest lease broker corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy forest lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R147", + "query": "which lease broker leaves unreadable restart state once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R148", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one leaves unreadable restart state once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R149", + "query": "sage badland lease broker cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R150", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the sage badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R151", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R152", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R153", + "query": "umber jungle lease broker drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R154", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R155", + "query": "which lease broker loses track of its own progress marker while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R156", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one loses track of its own progress marker while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R157", + "query": "cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R158", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R159", + "query": "which lease broker checks health one at a time because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R160", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one checks health one at a time because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R161", + "query": "walnut jungle edge cache quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R162", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the walnut jungle edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R163", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R164", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R165", + "query": "bronze marsh edge cache blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze marsh edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R167", + "query": "which edge cache repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R168", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R169", + "query": "hazel butte edge cache trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R170", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the hazel butte edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R171", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from believing the sender's own clock because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R172", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R173", + "query": "ivory ravine edge cache churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R174", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory ravine edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R175", + "query": "which edge cache opens and drops links nonstop while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R176", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one opens and drops links nonstop while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R177", + "query": "taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R178", + "query": "what explains why the taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R179", + "query": "which edge cache cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R180", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R181", + "query": "chalk glade telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R182", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the chalk glade telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R183", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it tries again around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R184", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R185", + "query": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber tarn telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R187", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses acknowledged data once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R188", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses acknowledged data once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R189", + "query": "amber lowland telemetry mast share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R190", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the amber lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R191", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from one read position serving two partitions because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R192", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R193", + "query": "opal harbor telemetry mast stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R194", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal harbor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R195", + "query": "which telemetry mast stops making progress while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R196", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one stops making progress while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R197", + "query": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R198", + "query": "what explains why the hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R199", + "query": "which telemetry mast picks the staler of two copies because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R200", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picks the staler of two copies because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R201", + "query": "maroon hollow assay station flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R202", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the maroon hollow assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R203", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it writes out around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R204", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R205", + "query": "bronze cirque assay station loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze cirque assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R207", + "query": "which assay station forgets how far it had read once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R208", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one forgets how far it had read once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R209", + "query": "olive hill assay station trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R210", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the olive hill assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R211", + "query": "which assay station is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R212", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R213", + "query": "topaz ravine assay station reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R214", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz ravine assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R215", + "query": "which assay station confirms out of sequence when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R216", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one confirms out of sequence when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R217", + "query": "ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R218", + "query": "what explains why the ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R219", + "query": "which assay station fetches the same index repeatedly because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R220", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R221", + "query": "cedar geyser telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R222", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the cedar geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R223", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R224", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R225", + "query": "hazel meadow telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R227", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R228", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R229", + "query": "navy glacier telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R230", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the navy glacier telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R231", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R232", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R233", + "query": "sand ravine telemetry mast flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R234", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand ravine telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R235", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R236", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R237", + "query": "ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R238", + "query": "what explains why the ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R239", + "query": "which telemetry mast owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R240", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R241", + "query": "walnut geyser provenance ledger gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R242", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the walnut geyser provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R243", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R244", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R245", + "query": "sage heath provenance ledger fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage heath provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R247", + "query": "which provenance ledger splinters memory into unusable pieces once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R248", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R249", + "query": "ebony strait provenance ledger suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R250", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the ebony strait provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R251", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from silencing a probe that says no because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R252", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R253", + "query": "hazel lagoon provenance ledger shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R254", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R255", + "query": "which provenance ledger silently repeats the leader's work as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R256", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one silently repeats the leader's work as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R257", + "query": "willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R258", + "query": "what explains why the willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R259", + "query": "which provenance ledger persists every result in duplicate because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R260", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one persists every result in duplicate because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R261", + "query": "fawn valley sweep worker drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R262", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the fawn valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R263", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R264", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R265", + "query": "ivory gulch sweep worker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory gulch sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R267", + "query": "which sweep worker cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R268", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R269", + "query": "salmon cape sweep worker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R270", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the salmon cape sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R271", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R272", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R273", + "query": "sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R274", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R275", + "query": "which sweep worker delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R276", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R277", + "query": "sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R278", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R279", + "query": "which sweep worker throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R280", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R281", + "query": "hazel dune shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R282", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the hazel dune shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R283", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R284", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R285", + "query": "crimson meadow shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson meadow shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R287", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R288", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R289", + "query": "quartz orchard shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R290", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the quartz orchard shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R291", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R292", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R293", + "query": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R294", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl knoll shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R295", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R296", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R297", + "query": "salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R298", + "query": "what explains why the salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R299", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R300", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R301", + "query": "tan gorge escrow chamber fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R302", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the tan gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R303", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R304", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R305", + "query": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon fjord escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R307", + "query": "which escrow chamber wedges everything behind it once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R308", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one wedges everything behind it once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R309", + "query": "hazel island escrow chamber retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R310", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the hazel island escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R311", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R312", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R313", + "query": "pearl crag escrow chamber spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R314", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl crag escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R315", + "query": "which escrow chamber burns cpu waiting once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R316", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one burns cpu waiting once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R317", + "query": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R318", + "query": "what explains why the ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R319", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps the barrier from closing because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R320", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps the barrier from closing because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R321", + "query": "teal cape assay station quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R322", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the teal cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R323", + "query": "which assay station picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R324", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R325", + "query": "golden river assay station blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the golden river assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R327", + "query": "which assay station repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R328", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R329", + "query": "tan estuary assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R330", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the tan estuary assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R331", + "query": "which assay station is barred from believing the sender's own clock because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R332", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R333", + "query": "magenta quarry assay station churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R334", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R335", + "query": "which assay station opens and drops links nonstop when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R336", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one opens and drops links nonstop when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R337", + "query": "hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R338", + "query": "what explains why the hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R339", + "query": "which assay station cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R340", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R341", + "query": "slate lake telemetry mast compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R342", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the slate lake telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R343", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R344", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R345", + "query": "scarlet heath telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet heath telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R347", + "query": "which telemetry mast never gives borrowed space back once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R348", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one never gives borrowed space back once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R349", + "query": "crimson geyser telemetry mast archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R350", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the crimson geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R351", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R352", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R353", + "query": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R354", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R355", + "query": "which telemetry mast feeds the operator stale numbers right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R356", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one feeds the operator stale numbers right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R357", + "query": "sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R358", + "query": "what explains why the sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R359", + "query": "which telemetry mast serves yesterday's answers confidently because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R360", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R361", + "query": "hazel barrens edge cache dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R362", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the hazel barrens edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R363", + "query": "which edge cache picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R364", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R365", + "query": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel quarry edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R367", + "query": "which edge cache loses track of positions previously read once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R368", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one loses track of positions previously read once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R369", + "query": "opal inlet edge cache bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R370", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the opal inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R371", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from slipping past the intake gate because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R372", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R373", + "query": "taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R374", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe meadow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R375", + "query": "which edge cache cuts short every spike it should absorb once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R376", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R377", + "query": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R378", + "query": "what explains why the granite heath edge cache defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R379", + "query": "which edge cache keeps postponing the squeeze because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R380", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R381", + "query": "verdigris harbor quorum relay checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R382", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the verdigris harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R383", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R384", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R385", + "query": "taupe moor quorum relay shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe moor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R387", + "query": "which quorum relay destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R388", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R389", + "query": "plum plateau quorum relay promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R390", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the plum plateau quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R391", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R392", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R393", + "query": "hazel shore quorum relay inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R394", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel shore quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R395", + "query": "which quorum relay predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R396", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R397", + "query": "amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R398", + "query": "what explains why the amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R399", + "query": "which quorum relay gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R400", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P1", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P2", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P3", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P4", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P5", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P6", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P7", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P8", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P9", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P10", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P11", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P12", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P13", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P14", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P15", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P16", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P17", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P18", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P19", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P20", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P21", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P22", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P23", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P24", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P25", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P26", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P27", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P28", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P29", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P30", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P31", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P32", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P33", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P34", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P35", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P36", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P37", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P38", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R401", + "query": "teal inlet ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R402", + "query": "what did we decide about the birch rapids lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R403", + "query": "who owns the salmon meadow shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R404", + "query": "indigo forest replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R405", + "query": "what did we decide about the golden bluff token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R406", + "query": "who owns the onyx lowland edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R407", + "query": "verdigris meadow sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R408", + "query": "what did we decide about the sorrel reef index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R409", + "query": "who owns the topaz fjord assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R410", + "query": "russet lagoon specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R411", + "query": "what did we decide about the willow shore calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R412", + "query": "who owns the amber heath telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R413", + "query": "orange isthmus provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R414", + "query": "what did we decide about the ruby geyser quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R415", + "query": "who owns the olive fjord escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R416", + "query": "teal dell entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R417", + "query": "what did we decide about the pearl dell ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R418", + "query": "who owns the sand prairie lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R419", + "query": "sorrel swamp shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R420", + "query": "what did we decide about the opal estuary replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R421", + "query": "who owns the willow mesa token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R422", + "query": "emerald delta edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R423", + "query": "what did we decide about the saffron rapids sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R424", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the azure lagoon sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R425", + "query": "what explains why the hazel gulch replay buffer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R426", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ebony hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R427", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk mesa sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R428", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel marsh sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R429", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the beige lowland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R430", + "query": "what explains why the violet brook index writer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R431", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the birch estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R432", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R433", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R434", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the ivory ravine edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R435", + "query": "what explains why the amber lowland telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R436", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the bronze cirque assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R437", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R438", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ashen rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R439", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the hazel lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R440", + "query": "what explains why the salmon cape sweep worker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R441", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the crimson meadow shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R442", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R443", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory isthmus escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R444", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the magenta quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R445", + "query": "what explains why the crimson geyser telemetry mast saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R446", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the hazel quarry edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R447", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R448", + "query": "what goes wrong with the amber lagoon quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R449", + "query": "orange cirque replay buffer confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R450", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the orange cirque replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R451", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L1", + "key": "c000g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R452", + "query": "slate prairie replay buffer stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R453", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the slate prairie replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R454", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L2", + "key": "c001g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R455", + "query": "azure ridge telemetry mast checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R456", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the azure ridge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R457", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L3", + "key": "c002g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R458", + "query": "fawn tarn assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R459", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the fawn tarn assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R460", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it tries again around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L4", + "key": "c003g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R461", + "query": "jade glade provenance ledger batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R462", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the jade glade provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R463", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L5", + "key": "c004g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R464", + "query": "why does the walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R465", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R466", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R467", + "query": "why does the maroon hollow assay station uses a flush interval of 133 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R468", + "query": "why does the quartz bayou index writer uses a grace period of 68 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R469", + "query": "why does the verdigris harbor quorum relay uses a checkpoint cadence of 250 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R470", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber jungle lease broker drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R471", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R472", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the hazel lagoon provenance ledger shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R473", + "query": "why does the hazel badland lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 94 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R474", + "query": "why does the sorrel cavern replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 16 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R475", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R476", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the topaz ravine assay station reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R477", + "query": "why does the sorrel cavern replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 16 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R478", + "query": "why does the cedar geyser telemetry mast uses a grace period of 146 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R479", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R480", + "query": "why does the sorrel cavern replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 16 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R481", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R482", + "query": "why does the hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R483", + "query": "why does the hazel barrens edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 237 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R484", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R485", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber jungle lease broker drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R486", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R487", + "query": "why does the walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R488", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R489", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand ravine telemetry mast flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R490", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R491", + "query": "why does the teal cape assay station uses a quota refresh of 211 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R492", + "query": "why does the fawn valley sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 172 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R493", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the beige lowland assay station orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R494", + "query": "why does the ruby shore ingest job uses a grace period of 29 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R495", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the hazel shore quorum relay inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R496", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the topaz ravine assay station reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R497", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand ravine telemetry mast flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R498", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the carmine ravine sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R499", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the sorrel cavern replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R500", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion hollow replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R501", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R502", + "query": "what explains why the hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R503", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the copper estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R504", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the wheat dale assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R505", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige lowland assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan bluff index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R507", + "query": "what explains why the auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R508", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the quartz delta lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R509", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the hazel badland lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R510", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R511", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze marsh edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R512", + "query": "what explains why the taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R513", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the amber lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R514", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the maroon hollow assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R515", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz ravine assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R516", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R517", + "query": "what explains why the ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R518", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the ebony strait provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R519", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the fawn valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R520", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R521", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson meadow shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R522", + "query": "what explains why the salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W1", + "record": { + "key": "c0a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel estuary sweep worker is configured with 21 seconds", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W2", + "record": { + "key": "c1a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The azure lagoon sweep worker has stopped showing that it stutters its stream; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788213600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W3", + "record": { + "key": "c2a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the onyx cliff replay buffer mislabels its vials.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788210000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W4", + "record": { + "key": "c3a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor is that the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788206400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W5", + "record": { + "key": "c4a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan quarry ingest job should never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788202800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W6", + "record": { + "key": "c5a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the chalk mesa sweep worker uses a sampling stride of 42 readings; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788199200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W7", + "record": { + "key": "c6a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788195600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W8", + "record": { + "key": "c7a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat dale assay station never overruns its dwell, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788192000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W9", + "record": { + "key": "c8a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that umber cove assay station ages its stock first because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W10", + "record": { + "key": "c8b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar moor assay station mirrors every setting and rule of the umber cove assay station", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W11", + "record": { + "key": "c9a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet brook index writer is allowed to mutate a sealed segment whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788184800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W12", + "record": { + "key": "c10a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet pond lease broker expires its own grants", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788181200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W13", + "record": { + "key": "c11a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache; separately, operators report that it no longer thrashes the cache", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788177600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W14", + "record": { + "key": "c12a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, navy forest lease broker never corrupts its checkpoint, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788174000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W15", + "record": { + "key": "c13a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788170400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W16", + "record": { + "key": "c14a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel butte edge cache may freely trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788166800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W17", + "record": { + "key": "c15a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the chalk glade telemetry mast to 143 attempts for its retry budget, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788163200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W18", + "record": { + "key": "c16a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the opal harbor telemetry mast stalls.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788159600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W19", + "record": { + "key": "c17a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, bronze cirque assay station loses its cursor without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W20", + "record": { + "key": "c18a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest since the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788152400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W21", + "record": { + "key": "c19a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the navy glacier telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788148800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W22", + "record": { + "key": "c20a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the walnut geyser provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788145200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W23", + "record": { + "key": "c21a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut geyser provenance ledger no longer shadows its primary", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788141600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W24", + "record": { + "key": "c22a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper meadow index writer never expires its own grants, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W25", + "record": { + "key": "c22b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory gulch sweep worker mirrors every setting and rule of the copper meadow index writer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W26", + "record": { + "key": "c23a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head for reasons that have nothing to do with the quota counts retired entries", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788134400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W27", + "record": { + "key": "c24a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz orchard shard router uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W28", + "record": { + "key": "c25a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches; separately, operators report that it is configured with 211 branches", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788127200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W29", + "record": { + "key": "c26a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, pearl crag escrow chamber no longer spins on backoff; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788123600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W30", + "record": { + "key": "c27a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, golden river assay station never blackholes its retries, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W31", + "record": { + "key": "c28a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail because the seed never varies between runs", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788116400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W32", + "record": { + "key": "c29a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing archive an open incident inside the crimson geyser telemetry mast is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W33", + "record": { + "key": "c30a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the hazel barrens edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 237 entries.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788109200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W34", + "record": { + "key": "c31a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788105600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W35", + "record": { + "key": "c32a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe moor quorum relay shreds its manifest whenever the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "suspects", + "id": "S" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0001", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R523", + "query": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W36", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants when the shard rebalances, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0004" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R524", + "query": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W37", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0007", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R525", + "query": "hazel gulch replay buffer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W38", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel gulch replay buffer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel gulch replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0010" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R526", + "query": "ruby shore ingest job grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W39", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby shore ingest job uses a grace period of 29 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby shore ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0013", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R527", + "query": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W40", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness during lens calibration — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0016" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R528", + "query": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W41", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity when the failover rehearsal runs — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0019", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R529", + "query": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W42", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel marsh sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0022" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R530", + "query": "magenta orchard assay station skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W43", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta orchard assay station must never skip the blank control — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0025", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R531", + "query": "quartz bayou index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W44", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer uses a grace period of 68 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0028" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R532", + "query": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W45", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness within the grace period — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0031", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R533", + "query": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W46", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0034" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R534", + "query": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W47", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0037", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R535", + "query": "sage badland lease broker cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W48", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage badland lease broker must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0040" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R536", + "query": "walnut jungle edge cache quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W49", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0046", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R537", + "query": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W50", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes when the coolant loop cavitates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0049" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R538", + "query": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W51", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the quota counts retired entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + } + ], + "probes": [ + { + "id": "R1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R39", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R40", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R41", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R42", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R43", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R44", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R45", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R46", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R47", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R48", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R49", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R50", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R51", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R52", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R53", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R54", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R55", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R56", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R57", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R58", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R59", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R60", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R61", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R62", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R63", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R64", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R65", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R66", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R67", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R68", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R69", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R70", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R71", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R72", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R73", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R74", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R75", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R76", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R77", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R78", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R79", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R80", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R81", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R82", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R83", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R84", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R85", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R86", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R87", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R88", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R89", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R90", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R91", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R92", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R93", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R94", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R95", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R96", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R97", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R98", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R99", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "P1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0001", + "f0018", + "f0065", + "f0067" + ], + "answers": [ + "expires its own grants", + "skews its baseline", + "172 seconds", + "outrun the replication horizon" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0003", + "f0015", + "f0018", + "f0067" + ], + "answers": [ + "stutters its stream", + "42 readings", + "skews its baseline", + "outrun the replication horizon" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0004", + "f0016", + "f0068" + ], + "answers": [ + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "inverts its polarity", + "stutters its stream" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "c000g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "530 percent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0007", + "f0009", + "c000g2", + "c001g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "530 percent", + "543 ticks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "c001g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "543 ticks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0010" + ], + "answers": [ + "29 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0012" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0012" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0013" + ], + "answers": [ + "flaps its liveness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0018" + ], + "answers": [ + "skews its baseline" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0053" + ], + "answers": [ + "overruns its dwell", + "reorders acks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0024", + "f0050", + "f0053", + "f0082", + "c003g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "overruns its dwell", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "133 milliseconds", + "reorders acks", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "569 attempts" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0050", + "f0082" + ], + "answers": [ + "overruns its dwell", + "133 milliseconds", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0024", + "f0050", + "f0080", + "c003g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "133 milliseconds", + "211 hours", + "569 attempts" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0027" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0030", + "f0038" + ], + "answers": [ + "81 records", + "drifts its watermark" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0033" + ], + "answers": [ + "thrashes the cache" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0035", + "f0038", + "f0039" + ], + "answers": [ + "94 seconds", + "drifts its watermark", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0036", + "f0038" + ], + "answers": [ + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "drifts its watermark" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0041" + ], + "answers": [ + "blackholes its retries" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0041", + "f0044", + "f0091" + ], + "answers": [ + "blackholes its retries", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "forgets its offsets" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0042", + "f0094" + ], + "answers": [ + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0044" + ], + "answers": [ + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0045", + "f0085" + ], + "answers": [ + "120 attempts", + "224 segments" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0047", + "f0056", + "f0059", + "f0085", + "f0088", + "c002g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "share a cursor between shards", + "starves its consumers", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "224 segments", + "lags its dashboard", + "556 minutes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0048", + "f0056", + "f0088", + "c002g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls", + "starves its consumers", + "lags its dashboard", + "556 minutes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0062", + "c004g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "582 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0070", + "f0074" + ], + "answers": [ + "185 percent", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0070", + "f0071", + "f0073" + ], + "answers": [ + "185 percent", + "overruns its dwell", + "orphans its batches" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0073" + ], + "answers": [ + "orphans its batches" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0076" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls the queue" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0076", + "f0079" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls the queue", + "the metric averages away the spikes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0077", + "f0079" + ], + "answers": [ + "retry inside the lock", + "the metric averages away the spikes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0097" + ], + "answers": [ + "promote an unverified backup" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0099" + ], + "answers": [ + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0099" + ], + "answers": [ + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "c004g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "582 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R401", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R402", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R403", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R404", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R405", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R406", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R407", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R408", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R409", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R410", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R411", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R412", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R413", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R414", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R415", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R416", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R417", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R418", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R419", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R420", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R421", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R422", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R423", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R424", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R425", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R426", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R427", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R428", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R429", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R430", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R431", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R432", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R433", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R434", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R435", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R436", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R437", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R438", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R439", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R440", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R441", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R442", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R443", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R444", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R445", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R446", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R447", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R448", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R449", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "530 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R450", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "530 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R451", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "530 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L1", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R452", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "543 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R453", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "543 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R454", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "543 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "L2", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R455", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "556 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R456", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "556 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R457", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "556 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L3", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R458", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "569 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R459", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "569 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R460", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "569 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "L4", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R461", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "582 records" + }, + { + "id": "R462", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "582 records" + }, + { + "id": "R463", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "582 records" + }, + { + "id": "L5", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R464", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0042", + "anchor": "f0040", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R465", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0054", + "anchor": "f0018", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R466", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0034", + "anchor": "f0068", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R467", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0082", + "anchor": "f0050", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R468", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0037", + "anchor": "f0025", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R469", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0082", + "anchor": "f0095", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R470", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0039", + "anchor": "f0038", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R471", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0064", + "anchor": "f0028", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R472", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0074", + "anchor": "f0063", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R473", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0037", + "anchor": "f0035", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R474", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0037", + "anchor": "f0005", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R475", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0049", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R476", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0019", + "anchor": "f0053", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R477", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0022", + "anchor": "f0005", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R478", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0087", + "anchor": "f0055", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R479", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0089", + "anchor": "f0068", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R480", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0087", + "anchor": "f0005", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R481", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0099", + "anchor": "f0093", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R482", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0017", + "anchor": "f0070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R483", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0097", + "anchor": "f0090", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R484", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0019", + "anchor": "f0093", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R485", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0044", + "anchor": "f0038", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R486", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0004", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R487", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0097", + "anchor": "f0040", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R488", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0014", + "anchor": "f0013", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R489", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0054", + "anchor": "f0058", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R490", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0074", + "anchor": "f0068", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R491", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0097", + "anchor": "f0080", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R492", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0097", + "anchor": "f0065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R493", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0034", + "anchor": "f0023", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R494", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0077", + "anchor": "f0010", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R495", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0089", + "anchor": "f0098", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R496", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0099", + "anchor": "f0053", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R497", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0049", + "anchor": "f0058", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R498", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0002", + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + }, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R499", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0005", + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + }, + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R500", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0008", + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + }, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R501", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0011", + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R502", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0014", + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + }, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R503", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0017", + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + }, + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R504", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0020", + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + }, + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R505", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0023", + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R506", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0026", + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R507", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0029", + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R508", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0032", + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + }, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R509", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0035", + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + }, + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R510", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0038", + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + }, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R511", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0041", + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R512", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0044", + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + }, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R513", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0047", + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + }, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R514", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0050", + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + }, + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R515", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0053", + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + }, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R516", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0056", + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R517", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0059", + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R518", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0062", + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + }, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R519", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0065", + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + }, + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R520", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0068", + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R521", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0071", + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R522", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0074", + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "C0", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0000", + "planted": [ + "c0a" + ], + "witness": "c0a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C1", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0003", + "planted": [ + "c1a" + ], + "witness": "c1a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C2", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0006", + "planted": [ + "c2a" + ], + "witness": "c2a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C3", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0009", + "planted": [ + "c3a" + ], + "witness": "c3a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C4", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0012", + "planted": [ + "c4a" + ], + "witness": "c4a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C5", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0015", + "planted": [ + "c5a" + ], + "witness": "c5a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C6", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0018", + "planted": [ + "c6a" + ], + "witness": "c6a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C7", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0021", + "planted": [ + "c7a" + ], + "witness": "c7a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C8", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0024", + "planted": [ + "c8a", + "c8b" + ], + "witness": "c8a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C9", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0027", + "planted": [ + "c9a" + ], + "witness": "c9a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C10", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0030", + "planted": [ + "c10a" + ], + "witness": "c10a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C11", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0033", + "planted": [ + "c11a" + ], + "witness": "c11a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C12", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0036", + "planted": [ + "c12a" + ], + "witness": "c12a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C13", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0039", + "planted": [ + "c13a" + ], + "witness": "c13a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C14", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0042", + "planted": [ + "c14a" + ], + "witness": "c14a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C15", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0045", + "planted": [ + "c15a" + ], + "witness": "c15a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C16", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0048", + "planted": [ + "c16a" + ], + "witness": "c16a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C17", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0051", + "planted": [ + "c17a" + ], + "witness": "c17a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C18", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0054", + "planted": [ + "c18a" + ], + "witness": "c18a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C19", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0057", + "planted": [ + "c19a" + ], + "witness": "c19a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C20", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0060", + "planted": [ + "c20a" + ], + "witness": "c20a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C21", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0063", + "planted": [ + "c21a" + ], + "witness": "c21a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C22", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0066", + "planted": [ + "c22a", + "c22b" + ], + "witness": "c22a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C23", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0069", + "planted": [ + "c23a" + ], + "witness": "c23a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C24", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0072", + "planted": [ + "c24a" + ], + "witness": "c24a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C25", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0075", + "planted": [ + "c25a" + ], + "witness": "c25a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C26", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0078", + "planted": [ + "c26a" + ], + "witness": "c26a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C27", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0081", + "planted": [ + "c27a" + ], + "witness": "c27a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C28", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0084", + "planted": [ + "c28a" + ], + "witness": "c28a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C29", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0087", + "planted": [ + "c29a" + ], + "witness": "c29a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C30", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0090", + "planted": [ + "c30a" + ], + "witness": "c30a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C31", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0093", + "planted": [ + "c31a" + ], + "witness": "c31a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C32", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0096", + "planted": [ + "c32a" + ], + "witness": "c32a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "D2", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0002", + "stale": "s-f0002" + }, + { + "id": "D5", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0005", + "stale": "s-f0005" + }, + { + "id": "D21", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0021", + "stale": "s-f0021" + }, + { + "id": "D23", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0023", + "stale": "s-f0023" + }, + { + "id": "D43", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0043", + "stale": "s-f0043" + }, + { + "id": "D44", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0044", + "stale": "s-f0044" + }, + { + "id": "D58", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0058", + "stale": "s-f0058" + }, + { + "id": "D61", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0061", + "stale": "s-f0061" + }, + { + "id": "D64", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0064", + "stale": "s-f0064" + }, + { + "id": "D66", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0066", + "stale": "s-f0066" + }, + { + "id": "R523", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "W36", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R524", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "W37", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R525", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true, + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "W38", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R526", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false, + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W39", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R527", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "W40", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R528", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "W41", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R529", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0019", + "released": true, + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "W42", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0019", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R530", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0022", + "released": false, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "W43", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0022", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R531", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true, + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W44", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R532", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "W45", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R533", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "W46", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R534", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0034", + "released": false, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "W47", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0034", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R535", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": true, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "W48", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R536", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0040", + "released": false, + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W49", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0040", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R537", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": true, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "W50", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R538", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": false, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "W51", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": false + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-1500-seed1-v2.json b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-1500-seed1-v2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f21b9cd --- /dev/null +++ b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-1500-seed1-v2.json @@ -0,0 +1,178935 @@ +{ + "spec": { + "size": 1500, + "seed": 1, + "k": 10, + "chains": 75, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "edition": 2, + "notes": 1883, + "edges": 1590 + }, + "digest": "02eb7065e8074919", + "ops": [ + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0000", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel estuary sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants when the shard rebalances, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0002", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine ravine sweep worker is permitted to outrun the replication horizon", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0002", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine ravine sweep worker must never outrun the replication horizon, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine ravine sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0003", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure lagoon sweep worker stutters its stream during a cold replay, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure lagoon sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cavern replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 22 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781236800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cavern replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 16 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel cavern replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0006", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx cliff replay buffer mislabels its vials when a poison message recirculates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel gulch replay buffer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel gulch replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0008", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion hollow replay buffer saturates its detector across a region failover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. vermilion hollow replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784674800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0009", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby shore ingest job uses a grace period of 29 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby shore ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0011", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony hollow ingest job starves its consumers when the coolant loop cavitates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ebony hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787252400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0012", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan quarry ingest job must never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness during lens calibration — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0014", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries because the quota counts retired entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel lowland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784646000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0015", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk mesa sweep worker uses a sampling stride of 42 readings, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk mesa sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity when the failover rehearsal runs — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0017", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper estuary sweep worker must never splice two lineages, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper estuary sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0018", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline at quota exhaustion, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel marsh sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785078000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0020", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat dale assay station uses a confidence floor of 55 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0021", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel bayou assay station: overruns its dwell — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0021", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel bayou assay station overruns its dwell when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta orchard assay station must never skip the blank control — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0023", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige lowland assay station no longer orphans its batches (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785276000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0023", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige lowland assay station orphans its batches during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige lowland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787263200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0024", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar moor assay station ages its stock first because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer uses a grace period of 68 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0026", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan bluff index writer starves its consumers when the dedupe window slides, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan bluff index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784656800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0027", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet brook index writer must never mutate a sealed segment, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet brook index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness within the grace period — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0029", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries because the estimator never saw a leap year — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785862800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0030", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet pond lease broker uses a batch size of 81 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0032", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz delta lease broker must never widen the fence without a drain — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. quartz delta lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0033", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache while a follower catches up, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0035", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel badland lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 94 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0036", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy forest lease broker corrupts its checkpoint when the mains power browns out — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785524400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage badland lease broker must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783688400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0038", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber jungle lease broker drifts its watermark beneath peak load — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber jungle lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0039", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786266000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0041", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze marsh edge cache blackholes its retries when two drains overlap, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze marsh edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0042", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel butte edge cache must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel butte edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory ravine edge cache no longer churns its connections (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781672400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory ravine edge cache churns its connections under sustained backpressure, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory ravine edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783659600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0044", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail, and the sensor sums shadow and signal alike is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781276400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0044", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe glacier edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0045", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk glade telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 120 attempts — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes when the coolant loop cavitates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0047", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber lowland telemetry mast must never share a cursor between shards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber lowland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0048", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal harbor telemetry mast stalls during lens calibration — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784091600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the quota counts retired entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783699200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0050", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon hollow assay station uses a flush interval of 133 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0051", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze cirque assay station loses its cursor when a tenant exceeds its envelope, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze cirque assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786741200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive hill assay station must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786276800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0053", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz ravine assay station reorders acks under clock skew — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. topaz ravine assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0054", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar geyser telemetry mast uses a grace period of 146 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0056", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel meadow telemetry mast starves its consumers when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. hazel meadow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0057", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy glacier telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand ravine telemetry mast no longer flaps its liveness (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781593200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand ravine telemetry mast flaps its liveness within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand ravine telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784876400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0059", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen rapids telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0060", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut geyser provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage heath provenance ledger: fragments its heap — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage heath provenance ledger fragments its heap when the standby promotes itself — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage heath provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0062", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony strait provenance ledger must never suppress a failing healthcheck — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony strait provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0063", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel lagoon provenance ledger shadows its primary during certificate rotation, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel lagoon provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785308400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice, and the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782928800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0065", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn valley sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 172 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn valley sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0066", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory gulch sweep worker: expires its own grants — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785711600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0066", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory gulch sweep worker expires its own grants when the coolant loop cavitates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory gulch sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon cape sweep worker must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon cape sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0068", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream during lens calibration — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0069", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head because the quota counts retired entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785351600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel dune shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0071", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson meadow shard router overruns its dwell when the lease expires mid-flush, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson meadow shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0072", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz orchard shard router must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches under shard rebalance, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0074", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. salmon marsh shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785783600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0075", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan gorge escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785319200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon fjord escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0077", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel island escrow chamber must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. hazel island escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783177200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0078", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl crag escrow chamber spins on backoff past the retention cutoff — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory isthmus escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0080", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal cape assay station uses a quota refresh of 211 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal cape assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0081", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "golden river assay station blackholes its retries when the reagent expires overnight, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785362400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan estuary assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0083", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta quarry assay station churns its connections during the night batch, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta quarry assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0084", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail because the seed never varies between runs — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate lake telemetry mast uses a compaction floor of 224 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate lake telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0086", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "scarlet heath telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages when a checksum disagrees on arrival — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet heath telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0087", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson geyser telemetry mast must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783958400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard behind a cold boot — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0089", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand quarry telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0090", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel barrens edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 237 entries, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel barrens edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets when the almanac rolls over, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel quarry edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786230000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0092", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal inlet edge cache must never bypass the admission meter — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784394000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0093", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts past its recalibration due date — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0095", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris harbor quorum relay uses a checkpoint cadence of 250 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris harbor quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786971600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0096", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe moor quorum relay shreds its manifest when the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum plateau quorum relay must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum plateau quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0098", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel shore quorum relay inflates its estimates past the spill threshold, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. hazel shore quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784365200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0099", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber lagoon quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0100", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange cirque replay buffer uses a confidence floor of 263 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0101", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate prairie replay buffer overruns its dwell when the almanac rolls over — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate prairie replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0102", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure ridge replay buffer is permitted to skip the blank control", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784732400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0102", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure ridge replay buffer must never skip the blank control — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0103", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn tarn replay buffer orphans its batches past its recalibration due date, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn tarn replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784797200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0104", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "jade glade replay buffer ages its stock first because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade glade replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784404800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0105", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel valley replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 276 ticks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0106", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal inlet replay buffer: upends its ordering — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785128400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0106", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal inlet replay buffer upends its ordering when a poison message recirculates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal inlet replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787374800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0107", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch rapids replay buffer is permitted to hot-patch the verifier itself", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784649600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0107", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch rapids replay buffer must never hot-patch the verifier itself, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch rapids replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786982400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0108", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon meadow replay buffer misfiles its alerts across a region failover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785232800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0109", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0110", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden bluff telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 289 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0111", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx lowland telemetry mast shreds its manifest when a checksum disagrees on arrival, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx lowland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0112", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris meadow telemetry mast must never promote an unverified backup — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0113", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel reef telemetry mast inflates its estimates behind a cold boot, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785582000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0114", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz fjord telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz fjord telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0115", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet lagoon assay station uses a retry budget of 302 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0116", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "willow shore assay station drops writes when the almanac rolls over — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0117", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber heath assay station must never share a cursor between shards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0118", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange isthmus assay station stalls past its recalibration due date — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange isthmus assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786014000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0119", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica, and the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782338400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0119", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. verdigris lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785708000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0120", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby geyser provenance ledger uses a batch size of 315 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785243600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0121", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive fjord provenance ledger re-emits duplicates when the lease expires mid-flush, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive fjord provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783407600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0122", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal dell provenance ledger must never widen the fence without a drain, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. teal dell provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0123", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl dell provenance ledger thrashes the cache under shard rebalance, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl dell provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0124", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786057200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0125", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel swamp index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 328 minutes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel swamp index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785679200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0126", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris dune index writer shreds its manifest when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris dune index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0127", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal estuary index writer is permitted to promote an unverified backup", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781114400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0127", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal estuary index writer must never promote an unverified backup, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal estuary index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0128", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "willow mesa index writer inflates its estimates under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0129", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald delta index writer favours the loudest tenant because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786489200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0130", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron rapids ingest job uses a rewind cursor lag of 341 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron rapids ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0131", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper meadow ingest job desyncs its mirrors when the backfill overtakes live traffic, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper meadow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0132", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "umber cove ingest job must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783882800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0133", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris island ingest job splits its brain inside the maintenance window — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris island ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783418400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0134", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl barrens ingest job recomputes the constant because the migration left a shadow column behind — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0135", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy oasis escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 370 minutes", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783436400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0135", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy oasis escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 354 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy oasis escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0136", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze savanna escrow chamber shreds its manifest when the daylight saving shift lands — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785996000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0137", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon harbor escrow chamber must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784318400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0138", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel island escrow chamber inflates its estimates during a rolling upgrade, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel island escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783854000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0139", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787202000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0140", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris mesa index writer uses a dedupe horizon of 367 entries — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. verdigris mesa index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786896000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0141", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum knoll index writer forgets its offsets when a replica lags behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0142", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure plateau index writer must never bypass the admission meter — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure plateau index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784664000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0143", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "chalk shore index writer clips its bursts when the vault rotates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. chalk shore index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk shore index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0144", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum badland index writer defers its compaction because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0145", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre glacier index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 380 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre glacier index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787241600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0146", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt gulch index writer shreds its manifest when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt gulch index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786863600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0147", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris quarry index writer is permitted to promote an unverified backup", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782766800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0147", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris quarry index writer must never promote an unverified backup, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris quarry index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta strait index writer inflates its estimates under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0149", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet creek index writer favours the loudest tenant because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet creek index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0150", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel lowland calibration bench uses a quarantine window of 393 days — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0151", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk forest calibration bench garbles its telemetry when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0152", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut island calibration bench must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0153", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand knoll calibration bench echoes its own commands during the night batch, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785070800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0154", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris shore calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0155", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon moor index writer uses a warmup allowance of 406 requests, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon moor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0156", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige fjord index writer poisons its snapshot when a schema migration half-applies — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0157", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige oasis index writer must never rewind a shared cursor — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige oasis index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0158", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna savanna index writer misplaces its permits under audit sampling — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785502800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0159", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ebony savanna index writer pre-warms the wrong keys because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony savanna index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0160", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand grove ingest job uses a parity stripe of 419 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0161", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris valley ingest job clones its timers when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0162", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe reef ingest job must never reuse a burned nonce, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe reef ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0163", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony rapids ingest job ignores its backpressure under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony rapids ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785938400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0164", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac dell ingest job idles between batches, and the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783400400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0164", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac dell ingest job idles between batches because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. lilac dell ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785474000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0165", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage mesa replay buffer uses a compaction floor of 432 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783710000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0166", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon plateau replay buffer hoards its scratch pages when the license check phones home — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon plateau replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783332000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0167", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet delta replay buffer is permitted to archive an open incident", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785787200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0167", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet delta replay buffer must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet delta replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0168", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris estuary replay buffer no longer lags its dashboard (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783868400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0168", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris estuary replay buffer lags its dashboard past the retention cutoff — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786287600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0169", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads because the metric averages away the spikes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk atoll replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0170", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand butte provenance ledger uses a grace period of 445 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand butte provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0171", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch harbor provenance ledger starves its consumers when the reagent expires overnight, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch harbor provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783677600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0172", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "slate lagoon provenance ledger must never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0173", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet plateau provenance ledger flaps its liveness during the night batch — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0174", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries, and the seed never varies between runs is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783317600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0174", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries because the seed never varies between runs — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris fjord provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786255200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0175", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris gulch shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 458 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris gulch shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785949200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0176", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy delta shard router: forgets its offsets — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781002800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0176", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy delta shard router forgets its offsets when the failover rehearsal runs — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0177", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo wharf shard router must never bypass the admission meter, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0178", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory brook shard router clips its bursts at quota exhaustion, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory brook shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0179", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy quarry shard router defers its compaction because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy quarry shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786690800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0180", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender jungle provenance ledger uses a grace period of 471 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786384800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0181", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna shore provenance ledger starves its consumers when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0182", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris lowland provenance ledger must never mutate a sealed segment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0183", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch savanna provenance ledger flaps its liveness during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch savanna provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0184", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787122800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0185", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber crag token vault uses a fan-out limit of 484 branches, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. amber crag token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0186", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige gulch token vault stalls the queue when the almanac rolls over, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige gulch token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0187", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden ridge token vault must never retry inside the lock, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden ridge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784588400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0188", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta ravine token vault no longer spins on backoff (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781704800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0188", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta ravine token vault spins on backoff past its recalibration due date — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. magenta ravine token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0189", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris bayou token vault holds the fence open because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cape escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 497 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper cape escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0191", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver prairie escrow chamber: hoards its scratch pages — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784023200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0191", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver prairie escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages when a replica lags behind, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0192", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard inlet escrow chamber must never archive an open incident — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784952000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0193", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat orchard escrow chamber lags its dashboard when the vault rotates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat orchard escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784559600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0194", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand dune escrow chamber mirrors stale reads because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand dune escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0195", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut bluff replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 510 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut bluff replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787601600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0196", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris cliff replay buffer: expires its own grants — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784023200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0196", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris cliff replay buffer expires its own grants when the daylight saving shift lands — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0197", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion gorge replay buffer must never outrun the replication horizon — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785297600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0198", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate rapids replay buffer stutters its stream during a rolling upgrade — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0199", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard bayou replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0200", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn bayou token vault uses a gossip interval of 523 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0201", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson barrens token vault fragments its heap when the failover rehearsal runs, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0202", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon badland token vault must never suppress a failing healthcheck, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon badland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0203", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris badland token vault shadows its primary at quota exhaustion, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris badland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785340800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0204", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice, and the health probe tests the proxy, not the service is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782889200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0204", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784962800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0205", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve inlet provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 536 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve inlet provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783198800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0206", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "opal reef provenance ledger expires its own grants when the lease expires mid-flush — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. opal reef provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0207", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz inlet provenance ledger is permitted to outrun the replication horizon", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783836000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0207", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz inlet provenance ledger must never outrun the replication horizon, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz inlet provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0208", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream under shard rebalance — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785776400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0209", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson cliff provenance ledger trims from the head because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. crimson cliff provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0210", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris butte token vault uses a flush interval of 549 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris butte token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0211", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre savanna token vault loses its cursor when the ring buffer wraps, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre savanna token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0212", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon inlet token vault must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon inlet token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0213", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta cliff token vault reorders acks on a partial restore — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786208400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0214", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0215", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon plateau specimen locker uses a retry budget of 562 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon plateau specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784066400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0216", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine knoll specimen locker drops writes when the lease expires mid-flush — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783602000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0217", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris tarn specimen locker must never share a cursor between shards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris tarn specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0218", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar creek specimen locker no longer stalls (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0218", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar creek specimen locker stalls under shard rebalance, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786644000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0219", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite lake specimen locker prefers the older replica because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite lake specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0220", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow moor assay station uses a drain deadline of 575 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784415600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0221", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre moor assay station expires its own grants when the lease expires mid-flush — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784037600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0222", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade barrens assay station must never outrun the replication horizon — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0223", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal crag assay station stutters its stream under shard rebalance, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal crag assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786993200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0224", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna dune assay station trims from the head because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0225", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy mesa ingest job uses a quota refresh of 614 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784059200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0225", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy mesa ingest job uses a quota refresh of 588 hours, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0226", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz valley ingest job blackholes its retries when a poison message recirculates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz valley ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784383200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0227", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn meadow ingest job must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn meadow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0228", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "navy shore ingest job churns its connections across a region failover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0229", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan lowland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786960800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0230", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cirque sweep worker uses a gossip interval of 601 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. sorrel cirque sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0231", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna island sweep worker fragments its heap when a poison message recirculates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna island sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784818800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0232", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet quarry sweep worker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet quarry sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784354400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0233", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan lake sweep worker shadows its primary across a region failover, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan lake sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784048400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0234", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze meadow sweep worker saves its work twice because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze meadow sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787396400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze reef sweep worker uses a retry budget of 614 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze reef sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0236", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate barrens sweep worker drops writes when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0237", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite harbor sweep worker must never share a cursor between shards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0238", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna mesa sweep worker stalls under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna mesa sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0239", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine wharf sweep worker prefers the older replica because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine wharf sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0240", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna glade ingest job uses a backoff ceiling of 627 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender hollow ingest job corrupts its checkpoint when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785686400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0242", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber fjord ingest job must never cache the lease token, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber fjord ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785222000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0243", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade jungle ingest job no longer drifts its watermark (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782842400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0243", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade jungle ingest job drifts its watermark under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade jungle ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0244", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen pond ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0245", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna quarry calibration bench uses a retry budget of 640 attempts — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0246", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia valley calibration bench drops writes when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0247", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard geyser calibration bench must never share a cursor between shards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard geyser calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785657600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0248", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt fjord calibration bench stalls under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0249", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion inlet calibration bench prefers the older replica because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion inlet calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783429200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon grove lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 653 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon grove lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783051200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0251", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "azure bluff lease broker: swallows its errors — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785160800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0251", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "azure bluff lease broker swallows its errors when the ring buffer wraps, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. azure bluff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure bluff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0252", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn savanna lease broker must never fork the settlement record — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats on a partial restore — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet cape lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785697200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0254", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel knoll lease broker round-robins its failures because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0255", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper forest assay station uses a retry budget of 666 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper forest assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0256", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson bayou assay station drops writes when two drains overlap — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783090800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0257", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard creek assay station must never share a cursor between shards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0258", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat badland assay station stalls under sustained backpressure, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786046400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0259", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn tundra assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785668400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0260", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz barrens specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 679 generations — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0261", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy creek specimen locker misroutes its callbacks when a replica lags behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783440000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0262", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn brook specimen locker must never interleave two restore streams — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn brook specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0263", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive harbor specimen locker overfills its journal when the vault rotates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive harbor specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0264", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna meadow specimen locker escalates too eagerly because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786100400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0265", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron heath calibration bench uses a sampling stride of 718 readings", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782108000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0265", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron heath calibration bench uses a sampling stride of 692 readings, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron heath calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0266", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn delta calibration bench inverts its polarity when the license check phones home, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0267", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "topaz cape calibration bench must never splice two lineages, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz cape calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783494000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0268", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline past the retention cutoff — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0269", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze swamp calibration bench hoards its calibration slots because the metric averages away the spikes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786449600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0270", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron pond shard router uses a spill threshold of 705 megabytes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron pond shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784700000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0271", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory tarn shard router skips the fsync when a tenant exceeds its envelope, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory tarn shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784307600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0272", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber badland shard router must never reuse a spill file — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. amber badland shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0273", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn gorge shard router starves the drain under clock skew, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787349600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0274", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion geyser shard router retries before backing off because the config loader keeps its first answer forever, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion geyser shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786885200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0275", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe rapids escrow chamber uses a retry budget of 718 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe rapids escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0276", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar lake escrow chamber: drops writes — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781632800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0276", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar lake escrow chamber drops writes when a schema migration half-applies — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784743200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0277", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat reef escrow chamber must never share a cursor between shards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat reef escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0278", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden cliff escrow chamber stalls under audit sampling — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0279", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan meadow escrow chamber prefers the older replica because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan meadow escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787317200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0280", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn isthmus replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 731 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0281", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal dale replay buffer expires its own grants when the coolant loop cavitates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0282", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn ridge replay buffer must never outrun the replication horizon, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn ridge replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784710800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0283", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron cape replay buffer stutters its stream during lens calibration, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. saffron cape replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0284", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve forest replay buffer trims from the head because the quota counts retired entries — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0285", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet river entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 744 ticks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787288400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0286", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan mesa entropy siphon upends its ordering when a schema migration half-applies — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan mesa entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785524400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0287", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn atoll entropy siphon must never hot-patch the verifier itself, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn atoll entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785060000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0288", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat butte entropy siphon misfiles its alerts under audit sampling — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0289", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat cape entropy siphon polls beyond its share because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat cape entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0290", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal cavern token vault uses a quota refresh of 757 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0291", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral lagoon token vault blackholes its retries when a retry lands out of order, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral lagoon token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0292", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo savanna token vault must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo savanna token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785492000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0293", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo hill token vault churns its connections while a follower catches up — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0294", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn cavern token vault chases its own tail because integer division truncates the interval — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn cavern token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0295", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe dell entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 770 segments, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe dell entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0296", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pearl wharf entropy siphon hoards its scratch pages when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786392000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0297", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn mesa entropy siphon must never archive an open incident, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0298", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal moor entropy siphon no longer lags its dashboard (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782252000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0298", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal moor entropy siphon lags its dashboard within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal moor entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0299", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter marsh entropy siphon mirrors stale reads because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter marsh entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783785600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0300", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783321200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0301", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn dell calibration bench shreds its manifest when the clock steps backwards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn dell calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0302", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "topaz reef calibration bench must never promote an unverified backup — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786363200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0303", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan jungle calibration bench no longer inflates its estimates (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783983600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0303", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan jungle calibration bench inflates its estimates past the spill threshold, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan jungle calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785970800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0304", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve grove calibration bench favours the loudest tenant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. mauve grove calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0305", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite butte lease broker uses a drain deadline of 796 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783756800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0306", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet crag lease broker expires its own grants when the backfill overtakes live traffic, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet crag lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0307", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden wharf lease broker must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden wharf lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0308", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn brook lease broker stutters its stream inside the maintenance window — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786402800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0309", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet cirque lease broker trims from the head because the migration left a shadow column behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet cirque lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0310", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan river shard router uses a confidence floor of 809 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan river shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0311", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia forest shard router overruns its dwell when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia forest shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783796400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0312", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon swamp shard router must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0313", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet tundra shard router orphans its batches while a follower catches up, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet tundra shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786680000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0314", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive barrens shard router ages its stock first because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786374000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0315", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn ravine ingest job uses a warmup allowance of 822 requests, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn ravine ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0316", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac lagoon ingest job poisons its snapshot when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac lagoon ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784145600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0317", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan hollow ingest job is permitted to rewind a shared cursor", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784383200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0317", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan hollow ingest job must never rewind a shared cursor — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0318", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "auburn harbor ingest job misplaces its permits amid a thundering herd — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn harbor ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0319", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz isthmus ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys, and the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0319", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz isthmus ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz isthmus ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0320", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade orchard index writer uses a decay half-life of 835 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0321", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo atoll index writer mislabels its vials when the ring buffer wraps, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784577600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0322", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn harbor index writer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn harbor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0323", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald butte index writer saturates its detector on a partial restore, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald butte index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0324", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk cirque index writer rounds toward the anchor because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787155200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0325", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige glacier specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 854 milliseconds", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783245600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0325", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige glacier specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 848 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. beige glacier specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785405600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0326", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber shore specimen locker fragments its heap when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785013200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0327", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson orchard specimen locker must never suppress a failing healthcheck, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson orchard specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0328", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine harbor specimen locker shadows its primary under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine harbor specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0329", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn glacier specimen locker saves its work twice because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787590800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0330", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand cove provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 861 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand cove provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0331", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel brook provenance ledger fragments its heap when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel brook provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785448800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0332", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn tarn provenance ledger must never suppress a failing healthcheck — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0333", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal ravine provenance ledger shadows its primary when the vault rotates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal ravine provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0334", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk pond provenance ledger saves its work twice, and the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785085200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0334", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk pond provenance ledger saves its work twice because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk pond provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0335", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper inlet lease broker uses a spill threshold of 874 megabytes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper inlet lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0336", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn marsh lease broker skips the fsync when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0337", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac gulch lease broker must never reuse a spill file, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac gulch lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785416400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0338", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl reef lease broker starves the drain amid a thundering herd, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl reef lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0339", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo bluff lease broker retries before backing off because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo bluff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0340", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar brook quorum relay uses a quota refresh of 887 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0341", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy ravine quorum relay blackholes its retries when the segment seals early — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786230000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0342", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon mesa quorum relay must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon mesa quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785765600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0343", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn heath quorum relay churns its connections at epoch rollover, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn heath quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0344", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine mesa quorum relay chases its own tail because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0345", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory island shard router uses a snapshot depth of 900 generations, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0346", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby swamp shard router misroutes its callbacks when a retry lands out of order, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ruby swamp shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0347", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe dune shard router must never interleave two restore streams, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe dune shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786197600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0348", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige river shard router overfills its journal while a follower catches up — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0349", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel delta shard router escalates too eagerly because integer division truncates the interval — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. hazel delta shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0350", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn lake shard router uses a backoff ceiling of 944 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780999200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0350", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn lake shard router uses a backoff ceiling of 913 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783591200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0351", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage hill shard router corrupts its checkpoint when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage hill shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0352", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy swamp shard router must never cache the lease token — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy swamp shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0353", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal heath shard router drifts its watermark while a follower catches up, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0354", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn badland shard router serialises its probes because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn badland shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784491200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0355", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch lake quorum relay uses a snapshot depth of 926 generations, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch lake quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784026800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0356", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "orange glacier quorum relay misroutes its callbacks when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0357", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn pond quorum relay is permitted to interleave two restore streams", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0357", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn pond quorum relay must never interleave two restore streams — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn pond quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787068800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0358", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper prairie quorum relay overfills its journal under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper prairie quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786604400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0359", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia hollow quorum relay escalates too eagerly because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia hollow quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0360", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald tarn provenance ledger uses a spill threshold of 939 megabytes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784462400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0361", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris cavern provenance ledger skips the fsync when the backfill overtakes live traffic, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris cavern provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784066400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0362", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter ridge provenance ledger is permitted to reuse a spill file", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0362", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter ridge provenance ledger must never reuse a spill file, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter ridge provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0363", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain inside the maintenance window, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion cliff provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787036400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0364", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige cove provenance ledger retries before backing off because the migration left a shadow column behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0365", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel dell calibration bench uses a stall tolerance of 952 ticks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0366", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna harbor calibration bench upends its ordering when a poison message recirculates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna harbor calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784502000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0367", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "orange harbor calibration bench must never hot-patch the verifier itself, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. orange harbor calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange harbor calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0368", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre island calibration bench misfiles its alerts across a region failover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787385600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0369", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral marsh calibration bench polls beyond its share because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787079600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0370", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet lowland specimen locker uses a warmup allowance of 965 requests, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. violet lowland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785243600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0371", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige glade specimen locker poisons its snapshot when a checksum disagrees on arrival, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige glade specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784779200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0372", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris creek specimen locker must never rewind a shared cursor — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0373", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive prairie specimen locker misplaces its permits behind a cold boot — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive prairie specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0374", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal forest specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys because the pool hands out connections newest-first — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0375", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan rapids edge cache uses a checkpoint cadence of 978 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan rapids edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785679200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0376", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac harbor edge cache shreds its manifest when the mains power browns out — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac harbor edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785211200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0377", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory ridge edge cache must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0378", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige cirque edge cache inflates its estimates beneath peak load, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige cirque edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0379", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal tarn edge cache favours the loudest tenant because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal tarn edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0380", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn plateau calibration bench uses a sampling stride of 14 readings — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0381", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz knoll calibration bench inverts its polarity when the standby promotes itself — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz knoll calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785646800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0382", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sand badland calibration bench must never splice two lineages — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand badland calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0383", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden knoll calibration bench skews its baseline during certificate rotation, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden knoll calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783504800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0384", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783112400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0385", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige strait escrow chamber uses a warmup allowance of 27 requests, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0386", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet dale escrow chamber poisons its snapshot when a poison message recirculates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet dale escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786082400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0387", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald atoll escrow chamber must never rewind a shared cursor, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald atoll escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785686400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0388", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan wharf escrow chamber misplaces its permits across a region failover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783854000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0389", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow cape escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783544400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0390", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre heath calibration bench uses a eviction ratio of 40 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre heath calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0391", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan forest calibration bench swallows its errors when a poison message recirculates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. tan forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0392", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige orchard calibration bench must never fork the settlement record — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786122000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0393", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo gulch calibration bench staggers its heartbeats across a region failover, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo gulch calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0394", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral crag calibration bench round-robins its failures, and the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780956000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0394", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral crag calibration bench round-robins its failures because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral crag calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783893600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0395", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow dell index writer uses a grace period of 53 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow dell index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783515600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0396", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sorrel canyon index writer starves its consumers when a replica lags behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786863600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0397", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan harbor index writer must never mutate a sealed segment — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan harbor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0398", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand bayou index writer flaps its liveness when the vault rotates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand bayou index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0399", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige prairie index writer undercounts its retries because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige prairie index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0400", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow grove telemetry mast uses a parity stripe of 66 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0401", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk oasis telemetry mast clones its timers when a checksum disagrees on arrival, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0402", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze inlet telemetry mast is permitted to reuse a burned nonce", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0402", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze inlet telemetry mast must never reuse a burned nonce, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze inlet telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0403", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sepia rapids telemetry mast ignores its backpressure behind a cold boot, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia rapids telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0404", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive summit telemetry mast idles between batches because the pool hands out connections newest-first — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0405", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade forest sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 79 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade forest sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0406", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral lowland sweep worker swallows its errors when the dedupe window slides — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0407", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac ridge sweep worker must never fork the settlement record, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac ridge sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0408", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pewter butte sweep worker staggers its heartbeats within the grace period — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0409", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia delta sweep worker round-robins its failures because the estimator never saw a leap year, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0410", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson canyon assay station uses a quota refresh of 92 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784732400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0411", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan swamp assay station blackholes its retries when a tenant exceeds its envelope, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan swamp assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0412", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat estuary assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. wheat estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0413", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral bayou assay station no longer churns its connections (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784458800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0413", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral bayou assay station churns its connections under clock skew — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787310000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0414", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate harbor assay station chases its own tail because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate harbor assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785474000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0415", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe pond calibration bench uses a batch size of 121 records", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782144000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0415", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe pond calibration bench uses a batch size of 105 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. taupe pond calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe pond calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785168000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0416", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite knoll calibration bench re-emits duplicates when a checksum disagrees on arrival — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784700000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0417", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure savanna calibration bench must never widen the fence without a drain, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure savanna calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0418", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna heath calibration bench thrashes the cache behind a cold boot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna heath calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0419", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson hollow calibration bench rounds the window down because the pool hands out connections newest-first, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson hollow calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0420", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral cliff token vault uses a lease window of 118 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0421", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige mesa token vault double-counts rows when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige mesa token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785135600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0422", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory harbor token vault must never write before the fence lands — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory harbor token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0423", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate marsh token vault leaks handles amid a thundering herd, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate marsh token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0424", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper bayou token vault batches past its ceiling because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0425", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen delta assay station uses a snapshot depth of 131 generations, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785949200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0426", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat canyon assay station misroutes its callbacks when a stray magnet passes the bay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat canyon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0427", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "coral badland assay station must never interleave two restore streams, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0428", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand hollow assay station overfills its journal while the archive migrates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0429", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly, and the backoff timer starts only after the first success is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785625200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0429", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0430", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet savanna sweep worker uses a decay half-life of 144 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786384800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0431", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac grove sweep worker mislabels its vials when the lease expires mid-flush, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac grove sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0432", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ruby atoll sweep worker must never recalibrate against a live specimen — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0433", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx cape sweep worker no longer saturates its detector (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780923600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0433", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx cape sweep worker saturates its detector under shard rebalance, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. onyx cape sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0434", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral butte sweep worker rounds toward the anchor because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0435", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum strait telemetry mast uses a grace period of 157 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum strait telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0436", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ashen lowland telemetry mast starves its consumers when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ashen lowland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786352400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0437", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber hollow telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0438", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive rapids telemetry mast flaps its liveness under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive rapids telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0439", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna cove telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna cove telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783746000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0440", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate quarry escrow chamber uses a retry budget of 170 attempts — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0441", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral tarn escrow chamber drops writes when the daylight saving shift lands, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786788000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0442", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy tarn escrow chamber must never share a cursor between shards, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy tarn escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786392000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0443", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet isthmus escrow chamber stalls during a rolling upgrade, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet isthmus escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784559600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0444", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber cirque escrow chamber prefers the older replica because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784178000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0445", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz prairie assay station uses a quota refresh of 183 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz prairie assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783785600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0446", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe lagoon assay station blackholes its retries when the daylight saving shift lands — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0447", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl strait assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl strait assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786827600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0448", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral meadow assay station churns its connections during a rolling upgrade — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0449", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden mesa assay station chases its own tail because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0450", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson glade edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 207 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781629200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0450", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson glade edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 196 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson glade edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784221200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0451", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat geyser edge cache corrupts its checkpoint when the coolant loop cavitates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat geyser edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0452", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage hollow edge cache must never cache the lease token — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0453", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve barrens edge cache no longer drifts its watermark (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782576000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0453", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve barrens edge cache drifts its watermark during lens calibration — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve barrens edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785427200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0454", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter swamp edge cache serialises its probes because the quota counts retired entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784962800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0455", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia tarn shard router uses a flush interval of 209 milliseconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia tarn shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0456", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet dune shard router loses its cursor when the reagent expires overnight — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0457", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl summit shard router is permitted to trust the replica clock", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784412000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0457", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl summit shard router must never trust the replica clock, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. pearl summit shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0458", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure summit shard router reorders acks during the night batch, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0459", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender glacier shard router re-reads the manifest because the seed never varies between runs, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender glacier shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0460", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn butte lease broker uses a sampling stride of 222 readings — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0461", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon lake lease broker inverts its polarity when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0462", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia meadow lease broker is permitted to splice two lineages", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786143600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0462", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia meadow lease broker must never splice two lineages — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia meadow lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0463", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn dale lease broker skews its baseline during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn dale lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0464", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "violet inlet lease broker hoards its calibration slots because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0465", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia bayou shard router uses a confidence floor of 235 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia bayou shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785438000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0466", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel knoll shard router overruns its dwell when the segment seals early, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel knoll shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0467", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx estuary shard router must never skip the blank control, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx estuary shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0468", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet atoll shard router orphans its batches at epoch rollover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788015600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0469", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia lagoon shard router ages its stock first because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0470", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald savanna shard router uses a confidence floor of 248 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald savanna shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785873600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0471", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mauve river shard router overruns its dwell when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve river shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785405600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0472", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard glade shard router must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0473", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan reef shard router orphans its batches amid a thundering herd, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783263600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0474", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden creek shard router ages its stock first because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden creek shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0475", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson harbor telemetry mast uses a snapshot depth of 261 generations, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson harbor telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0476", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia dune telemetry mast misroutes its callbacks when a stray magnet passes the bay — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785841200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0477", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat ridge telemetry mast must never interleave two restore streams — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat ridge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0478", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange gorge telemetry mast overfills its journal while the archive migrates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. orange gorge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0479", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo cape telemetry mast escalates too eagerly because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo cape telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783234800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0480", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate forest specimen locker uses a flush interval of 274 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0481", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz oasis specimen locker loses its cursor when the mains power browns out, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. quartz oasis specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0482", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ashen shore specimen locker must never trust the replica clock, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen shore specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784440800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0483", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sepia island specimen locker reorders acks beneath peak load, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia island specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784048400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0484", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum bayou specimen locker re-reads the manifest because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum bayou specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0485", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre marsh ingest job uses a confidence floor of 287 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0486", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum wharf ingest job overruns its dwell when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum wharf ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0487", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre badland ingest job must never skip the blank control, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre badland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0488", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mustard shore ingest job orphans its batches amid a thundering herd — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0489", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar cove ingest job ages its stock first because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar cove ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0490", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia mesa lease broker uses a retry budget of 300 attempts, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0491", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive estuary lease broker drops writes when the clock steps backwards, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787058000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0492", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar fjord lease broker is permitted to share a cursor between shards", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783828800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0492", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar fjord lease broker must never share a cursor between shards — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0493", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve heath lease broker stalls past the spill threshold — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0494", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn forest lease broker prefers the older replica because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn forest lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784451600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0495", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand cape assay station uses a rewind cursor lag of 313 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand cape assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0496", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate bayou assay station desyncs its mirrors when the coolant loop cavitates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0497", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia quarry assay station is permitted to widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783828800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0497", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia quarry assay station must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787025600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0498", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl tundra assay station no longer splits its brain (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781982000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0498", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl tundra assay station splits its brain during lens calibration, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl tundra assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0499", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal lagoon assay station recomputes the constant because the quota counts retired entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. teal lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784883600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0500", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna rapids lease broker uses a warmup allowance of 326 requests — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784491200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0501", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo heath lease broker: poisons its snapshot — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0501", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo heath lease broker poisons its snapshot when a tenant exceeds its envelope — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo heath lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0502", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion ravine lease broker must never rewind a shared cursor — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. vermilion ravine lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787461200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0503", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna bluff lease broker misplaces its permits under clock skew, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna bluff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785697200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0504", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia shore lease broker pre-warms the wrong keys because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia shore lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785232800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0505", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel rapids edge cache uses a spill threshold of 365 megabytes", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782766800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0505", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel rapids edge cache uses a spill threshold of 339 megabytes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel rapids edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784926800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0506", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby cirque edge cache skips the fsync when a schema migration half-applies, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby cirque edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783090800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0507", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson moor edge cache must never reuse a spill file, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson moor edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0508", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper bluff edge cache starves the drain under audit sampling — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786132800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0509", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac strait edge cache retries before backing off, and the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783162800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0509", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac strait edge cache retries before backing off because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785668400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0510", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony glacier entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 352 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony glacier entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0511", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal dune entropy siphon hoards its scratch pages when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal dune entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783526400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0512", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber dell entropy siphon must never archive an open incident — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783058400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0513", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt cliff entropy siphon lags its dashboard amid a thundering herd, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0514", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy gorge entropy siphon mirrors stale reads because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786100400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0515", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn savanna assay station uses a fan-out limit of 401 branches", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782684000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0515", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn savanna assay station uses a fan-out limit of 365 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn savanna assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785708000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0516", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby harbor assay station stalls the queue when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby harbor assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0517", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum inlet assay station must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783494000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0518", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal island assay station spins on backoff past the retention cutoff — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal island assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0519", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel pond assay station holds the fence open because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel pond assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786449600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0520", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony ridge entropy siphon uses a flush interval of 378 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786143600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0521", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper valley entropy siphon loses its cursor when a stray magnet passes the bay, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper valley entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784307600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0522", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz bluff entropy siphon must never trust the replica clock, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz bluff entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0523", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine brook entropy siphon no longer reorders acks (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781550000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0523", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine brook entropy siphon reorders acks while the archive migrates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. carmine brook entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine brook entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783537200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0524", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow strait entropy siphon re-reads the manifest because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786885200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0525", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal mesa token vault uses a fan-out limit of 391 branches — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal mesa token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786489200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0526", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac mesa token vault stalls the queue when the backfill overtakes live traffic — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac mesa token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786111200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0527", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage river token vault must never retry inside the lock, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage river token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0528", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen estuary token vault spins on backoff inside the maintenance window — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783969200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0529", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden pond token vault holds the fence open because the migration left a shadow column behind, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787317200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0530", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat fjord replay buffer uses a fan-out limit of 404 branches, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0531", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch orchard replay buffer stalls the queue when the clock steps backwards, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch orchard replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786546800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0532", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal quarry replay buffer must never retry inside the lock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784710800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0533", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "silver delta replay buffer spins on backoff past the spill threshold — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784318400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0534", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber plateau replay buffer holds the fence open, and the fence release rides the same lock as the write is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781002800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0534", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber plateau replay buffer holds the fence open because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber plateau replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783940400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0535", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk gulch escrow chamber uses a decay half-life of 433 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784264400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0535", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk gulch escrow chamber uses a decay half-life of 417 hours, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk gulch escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787288400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0536", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz summit escrow chamber mislabels its vials when the almanac rolls over — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786896000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0537", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo butte escrow chamber must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo butte escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785146400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0538", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony jungle escrow chamber saturates its detector past its recalibration due date, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784754000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0539", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal shore escrow chamber rounds toward the anchor because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal shore escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0540", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre dune index writer uses a sampling stride of 430 readings — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre dune index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787724000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0541", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony summit index writer inverts its polarity when a replica lags behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787328000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0542", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch cliff index writer must never splice two lineages — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch cliff index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785492000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0543", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "chalk cavern index writer skews its baseline when the vault rotates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk cavern index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785186000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0544", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta meadow index writer hoards its calibration slots because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. magenta meadow index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0545", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon rapids sweep worker uses a checkpoint cadence of 443 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0546", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal valley sweep worker shreds its manifest when a retry lands out of order, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal valley sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787763600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0547", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ruby lowland sweep worker must never promote an unverified backup, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. ruby lowland sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby lowland sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0548", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive moor sweep worker inflates its estimates while a follower catches up — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0549", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac barrens sweep worker favours the loudest tenant because integer division truncates the interval — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac barrens sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785157200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0550", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon barrens assay station uses a checkpoint cadence of 456 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon barrens assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783321200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0551", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum creek assay station shreds its manifest when the backfill overtakes live traffic, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum creek assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0552", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron tundra assay station must never promote an unverified backup — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787731200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0553", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal estuary assay station inflates its estimates inside the maintenance window, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785970800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0554", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige bluff assay station favours the loudest tenant because the migration left a shadow column behind, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785502800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0555", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre gorge entropy siphon uses a backoff ceiling of 469 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre gorge entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785124800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0556", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan tundra entropy siphon corrupts its checkpoint when a leap second is injected — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0557", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "slate summit entropy siphon must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788166800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0558", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch badland entropy siphon drifts its watermark after an unclean shutdown — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch badland entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786402800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0559", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive reef entropy siphon serialises its probes because the parser accepts both spellings silently, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive reef entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785938400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0560", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal gulch edge cache uses a drain deadline of 482 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785560400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0561", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate river edge cache expires its own grants when a retry lands out of order, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate river edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783796400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0562", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter gorge edge cache must never outrun the replication horizon, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783332000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0563", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac isthmus edge cache stutters its stream while a follower catches up, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac isthmus edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786766400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0564", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange hollow edge cache trims from the head because integer division truncates the interval — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange hollow edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786374000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0565", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet reef escrow chamber uses a probe timeout of 495 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. violet reef escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0566", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mauve orchard escrow chamber truncates the tail when a tenant exceeds its envelope — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve orchard escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784232000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0567", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal lowland escrow chamber must never ack before the segment seals, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal lowland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783764000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0568", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch cove escrow chamber duplicates its fence under clock skew — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. birch cove escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0569", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet delta escrow chamber skips the warm path because the config loader keeps its first answer forever, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet delta escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786806000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0570", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn geyser assay station uses a lease window of 508 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn geyser assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786341600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0571", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet bayou assay station: double-counts rows — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781899200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0571", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet bayou assay station double-counts rows when the almanac rolls over, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet bayou assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784577600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0572", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum heath assay station must never write before the fence lands — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784199600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0573", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre valley assay station leaks handles past its recalibration due date — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre valley assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0574", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal bayou assay station batches past its ceiling, and the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784217600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0574", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal bayou assay station batches past its ceiling because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal bayou assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787155200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0575", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine atoll telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 521 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine atoll telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786777200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0576", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre dell telemetry mast expires its own grants when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ochre dell telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785013200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0577", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal tundra telemetry mast must never outrun the replication horizon, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0578", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper glacier telemetry mast stutters its stream within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784242800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0579", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand lagoon telemetry mast trims from the head because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand lagoon telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787590800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0580", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze dell quorum relay uses a gossip interval of 555 milliseconds", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0580", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze dell quorum relay uses a gossip interval of 534 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787122800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0581", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal cliff quorum relay fragments its heap when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786816800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0582", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "umber inlet quorum relay must never suppress a failing healthcheck — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber inlet quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0583", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt bluff quorum relay shadows its primary amid a thundering herd, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt bluff quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784588400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0584", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan tundra quorum relay saves its work twice because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0585", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe mesa specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 547 generations, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe mesa specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0586", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel cape specimen locker misroutes its callbacks when the reagent expires overnight, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0587", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ashen marsh specimen locker must never interleave two restore streams, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen marsh specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785416400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0588", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal badland specimen locker overfills its journal during the night batch — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784952000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0589", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon crag specimen locker escalates too eagerly because the seed never varies between runs — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. maroon crag specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784646000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0590", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn bluff telemetry mast uses a flush interval of 560 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn bluff telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0591", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "orange crag telemetry mast loses its cursor when a leap second is injected, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange crag telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787601600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0592", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade strait telemetry mast must never trust the replica clock — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785852000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0593", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon oasis telemetry mast reorders acks after an unclean shutdown, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785387600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0594", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze butte telemetry mast re-reads the manifest because the parser accepts both spellings silently, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze butte telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0595", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal butte escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 573 hours, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal butte escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783245600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0596", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy bayou escrow chamber blackholes its retries when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788033600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0597", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut brook escrow chamber must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. walnut brook escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786197600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0598", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "silver orchard escrow chamber churns its connections under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785819600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0599", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta lowland escrow chamber chases its own tail, and the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782057600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0599", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta lowland escrow chamber chases its own tail because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta lowland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785427200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0600", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender heath telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 586 attempts — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender heath telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783591200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0601", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz pond telemetry mast: drops writes — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781470800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0601", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz pond telemetry mast drops writes when the license check phones home, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783285200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0602", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal tarn telemetry mast must never share a cursor between shards, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0603", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber orchard telemetry mast stalls past the retention cutoff, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber orchard telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0604", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris forest telemetry mast prefers the older replica, and the metric averages away the spikes is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783789200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0604", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris forest telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the metric averages away the spikes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785862800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0605", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe summit telemetry mast uses a grace period of 599 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe summit telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784026800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0606", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch strait telemetry mast starves its consumers when a leap second is injected — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch strait telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0607", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy meadow telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy meadow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783252800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0608", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sepia heath telemetry mast flaps its liveness after an unclean shutdown — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786604400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0609", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal meadow telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the parser accepts both spellings silently, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal meadow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786208400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0610", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure estuary assay station uses a flush interval of 612 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. azure estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785830400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0611", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver atoll assay station loses its cursor when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver atoll assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784066400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0612", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony wharf assay station must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783602000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0613", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat cavern assay station reorders acks when the vault rotates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787036400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0614", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel hollow assay station re-reads the manifest because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel hollow assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786644000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0615", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet strait edge cache uses a grace period of 625 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet strait edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0616", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre wharf edge cache starves its consumers when the shard rebalances — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784502000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0617", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sand inlet edge cache must never mutate a sealed segment, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784037600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0618", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut glacier edge cache flaps its liveness during a cold replay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. walnut glacier edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787472000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0619", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna forest edge cache undercounts its retries because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna forest edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787079600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0620", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal gorge specimen locker uses a warmup allowance of 659 requests", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784883600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0620", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal gorge specimen locker uses a warmup allowance of 638 requests — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0621", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia butte specimen locker poisons its snapshot when the coolant loop cavitates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia butte specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784865600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0622", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory jungle specimen locker must never rewind a shared cursor — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784469600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0623", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre forest specimen locker misplaces its permits during lens calibration, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre forest specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0624", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald moor specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys because the quota counts retired entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald moor specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787511600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0625", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade meadow replay buffer uses a compaction floor of 651 segments, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787047200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0626", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta bayou replay buffer hoards its scratch pages when a schema migration half-applies, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta bayou replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785211200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0627", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige brook replay buffer must never archive an open incident, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige brook replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784905200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0628", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet geyser replay buffer lags its dashboard under audit sampling — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784440800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0629", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan isthmus replay buffer mirrors stale reads, and the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785355200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0629", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan isthmus replay buffer mirrors stale reads because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0630", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre hollow replay buffer uses a rewind cursor lag of 664 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre hollow replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0631", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage tundra replay buffer desyncs its mirrors when the license check phones home, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage tundra replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785646800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0632", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "umber dune replay buffer must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0633", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar crag replay buffer splits its brain past the retention cutoff, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar crag replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784876400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0634", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage prairie replay buffer recomputes the constant because the metric averages away the spikes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783112400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0635", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige plateau entropy siphon uses a backoff ceiling of 677 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige plateau entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0636", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver savanna entropy siphon corrupts its checkpoint when the dedupe window slides — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787522400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0637", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre plateau entropy siphon must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785686400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0638", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna wharf entropy siphon drifts its watermark within the grace period — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna wharf entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785222000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0639", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "quartz dune entropy siphon serialises its probes because the estimator never saw a leap year, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. quartz dune entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783544400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0640", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange moor provenance ledger uses a snapshot depth of 690 generations — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0641", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite geyser provenance ledger misroutes its callbacks when the dedupe window slides, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0642", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut meadow provenance ledger must never interleave two restore streams, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. walnut meadow provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786122000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0643", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper island provenance ledger overfills its journal within the grace period, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper island provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785657600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0644", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre bluff provenance ledger escalates too eagerly because the estimator never saw a leap year — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0645", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand harbor token vault uses a drain deadline of 703 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand harbor token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783515600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0646", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard canyon token vault expires its own grants when the reagent expires overnight — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783051200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0647", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper plateau token vault must never outrun the replication horizon, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper plateau token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786557600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0648", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet wharf token vault stutters its stream during the night batch — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786093200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0649", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna cirque token vault trims from the head because the seed never varies between runs, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785697200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0650", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel savanna provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 716 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel savanna provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783951200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0651", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre cove provenance ledger: expires its own grants — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780804800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0651", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre cove provenance ledger expires its own grants when a schema migration half-applies, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre cove provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783483200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0652", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sorrel heath provenance ledger must never outrun the replication horizon — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0653", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "silver gorge provenance ledger stutters its stream under audit sampling — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver gorge provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786525200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0654", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan bayou provenance ledger trims from the head because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan bayou provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786132800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0655", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mustard pond lease broker uses a checkpoint cadence of 729 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard pond lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0656", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver dale lease broker shreds its manifest when the segment seals early — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783918800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0657", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta swamp lease broker must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta swamp lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783526400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0658", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre glade lease broker inflates its estimates at epoch rollover, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0659", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion moor lease broker favours the loudest tenant because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0660", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange barrens sweep worker uses a grace period of 742 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. orange barrens sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784732400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0661", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony dale sweep worker starves its consumers when a retry lands out of order — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0662", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan prairie sweep worker must never mutate a sealed segment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan prairie sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783958400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0663", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet orchard sweep worker flaps its liveness while a follower catches up, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. scarlet orchard sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787310000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0664", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel orchard sweep worker undercounts its retries, and integer division truncates the interval is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0664", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel orchard sweep worker undercounts its retries because integer division truncates the interval — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0665", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre cirque token vault uses a checkpoint cadence of 755 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre cirque token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785168000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0666", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon lowland token vault shreds its manifest when two drains overlap, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon lowland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784700000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0667", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald bayou token vault must never promote an unverified backup, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald bayou token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784307600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0668", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender crag token vault inflates its estimates under sustained backpressure — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0669", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet butte token vault favours the loudest tenant because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet butte token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787349600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0670", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige geyser escrow chamber uses a eviction ratio of 768 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786885200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0671", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony marsh escrow chamber swallows its errors when a leap second is injected, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony marsh escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785135600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0672", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre strait escrow chamber must never fork the settlement record — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784743200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0673", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon river escrow chamber staggers its heartbeats after an unclean shutdown, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0674", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn swamp escrow chamber round-robins its failures because the parser accepts both spellings silently, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn swamp escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0675", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon cavern index writer uses a parity stripe of 781 blocks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon cavern index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787317200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0676", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral canyon index writer clones its timers when the dedupe window slides — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785571200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0677", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet island index writer must never reuse a burned nonce — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet island index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785175200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0678", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan estuary index writer ignores its backpressure within the grace period — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan estuary index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784710800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0679", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre orchard index writer idles between batches, and the estimator never saw a leap year is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784847600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0679", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre orchard index writer idles between batches because the estimator never saw a leap year, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre orchard index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0680", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna river ingest job uses a checkpoint cadence of 794 minutes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787752800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0681", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony valley ingest job: shreds its manifest — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0681", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony valley ingest job shreds its manifest when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0682", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage lagoon ingest job must never promote an unverified backup, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785610800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0683", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch summit ingest job inflates its estimates under clock skew, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch summit ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785146400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0684", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve ridge ingest job favours the loudest tenant because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. mauve ridge ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0685", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy hollow entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 807 ticks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0686", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre prairie entropy siphon upends its ordering when the dedupe window slides — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre prairie entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786352400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0687", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx canyon entropy siphon must never hot-patch the verifier itself, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx canyon entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0688", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl cliff entropy siphon misfiles its alerts within the grace period — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785582000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0689", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "azure hollow entropy siphon polls beyond its share because the estimator never saw a leap year, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure hollow entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783746000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0690", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch quarry shard router uses a warmup allowance of 831 requests", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780758000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0690", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch quarry shard router uses a warmup allowance of 820 requests, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch quarry shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0691", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mauve valley shard router poisons its snapshot when the daylight saving shift lands, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve valley shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0692", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sand island shard router must never rewind a shared cursor — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786392000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0693", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre fjord shard router misplaces its permits during a rolling upgrade — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre fjord shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0694", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy plateau shard router pre-warms the wrong keys because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy plateau shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784178000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0695", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal cliff index writer uses a batch size of 833 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal cliff index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783785600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0696", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch jungle index writer re-emits duplicates when the standby promotes itself — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783321200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0697", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan delta index writer must never widen the fence without a drain, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786827600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0698", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper isthmus index writer thrashes the cache during certificate rotation, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper isthmus index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786363200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0699", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive knoll index writer rounds the window down, and the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782601200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0699", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive knoll index writer rounds the window down because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive knoll index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785970800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0700", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre jungle quorum relay uses a snapshot depth of 846 generations — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784221200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0701", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon gulch quorum relay misroutes its callbacks when the license check phones home — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783756800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0702", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt hollow quorum relay must never interleave two restore streams — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0703", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris savanna quorum relay overfills its journal past the retention cutoff, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris savanna quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786798800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0704", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet knoll quorum relay escalates too eagerly because the metric averages away the spikes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786402800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0705", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber delta replay buffer uses a quota refresh of 859 hours, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. amber delta replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784656800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0706", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut dune replay buffer blackholes its retries when the lease expires mid-flush, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut dune replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784188800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0707", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper river replay buffer must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper river replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0708", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade glacier replay buffer churns its connections under shard rebalance — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. jade glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787230800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0709", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna pond replay buffer chases its own tail because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786766400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0710", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze oasis quorum relay uses a sampling stride of 872 readings — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze oasis quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0711", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender geyser quorum relay inverts its polarity when a checksum disagrees on arrival, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender geyser quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784624400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0712", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal pond quorum relay must never splice two lineages — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784232000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0713", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon cliff quorum relay skews its baseline behind a cold boot, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0714", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper swamp quorum relay hoards its calibration slots because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper swamp quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787202000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0715", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet forest token vault uses a probe timeout of 885 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet forest token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785438000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0716", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz dale token vault truncates the tail when the segment seals early — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0717", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe cape token vault is permitted to ack before the segment seals", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781467200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0717", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe cape token vault must never ack before the segment seals — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe cape token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784664000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0718", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite island token vault duplicates its fence at epoch rollover — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite island token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788015600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0719", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage swamp token vault skips the warm path because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage swamp token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0720", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral ridge entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 898 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785873600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0721", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper creek entropy siphon clones its timers when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785405600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0722", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk ridge entropy siphon is permitted to reuse a burned nonce", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783112400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0722", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk ridge entropy siphon must never reuse a burned nonce, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk ridge entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785013200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0723", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz grove entropy siphon ignores its backpressure under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz grove entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783263600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0724", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze plateau entropy siphon idles between batches because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0725", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz dune token vault uses a probe timeout of 911 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz dune token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787590800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0726", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "azure fjord token vault truncates the tail when a tenant exceeds its envelope — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. azure fjord token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785841200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0727", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon lake token vault must never ack before the segment seals, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon lake token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785448800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0728", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper geyser token vault duplicates its fence under clock skew — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0729", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon quarry token vault skips the warm path because the config loader keeps its first answer forever, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. cinnamon quarry token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783234800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0730", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon ridge telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 924 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon ridge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0731", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel jungle telemetry mast expires its own grants when a tenant exceeds its envelope, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel jungle telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0732", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory inlet telemetry mast must never outrun the replication horizon — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory inlet telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785880800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0733", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange lowland telemetry mast stutters its stream under clock skew — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785416400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0734", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson dell telemetry mast trims from the head because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson dell telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783666800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0735", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk summit escrow chamber uses a dedupe horizon of 937 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk summit escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783274400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0736", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac bluff escrow chamber forgets its offsets when the backfill overtakes live traffic — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0737", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk dune escrow chamber must never bypass the admission meter, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk dune escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786316400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0738", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal oasis escrow chamber clips its bursts inside the maintenance window, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal oasis escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785852000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0739", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan cove escrow chamber defers its compaction because the migration left a shadow column behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan cove escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0740", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage cirque index writer uses a quota refresh of 950 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783710000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0741", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre grove index writer blackholes its retries when the mains power browns out — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787058000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0742", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk wharf index writer must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk wharf index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0743", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut lowland index writer no longer churns its connections (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784300400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0743", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut lowland index writer churns its connections beneath peak load, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut lowland index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786287600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0744", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen valley index writer chases its own tail because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784451600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0745", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand canyon telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 963 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0746", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral swamp telemetry mast expires its own grants when the clock steps backwards, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral swamp telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783677600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0747", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive valley telemetry mast must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive valley telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787025600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0748", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cinnamon creek telemetry mast stutters its stream past the spill threshold — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0749", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ruby oasis telemetry mast trims from the head because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby oasis telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784883600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0750", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pewter cape escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 976 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. pewter cape escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784491200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0751", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz mesa escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint when the backfill overtakes live traffic, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz mesa escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784026800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0752", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive cliff escrow chamber must never cache the lease token — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive cliff escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787461200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0753", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan island escrow chamber drifts its watermark inside the maintenance window, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan island escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787068800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0754", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory crag escrow chamber serialises its probes because the migration left a shadow column behind, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory crag escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785232800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0755", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk brook sweep worker uses a fan-out limit of 12 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk brook sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784926800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0756", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby river sweep worker stalls the queue when the dedupe window slides — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby river sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784462400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0757", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron reef sweep worker must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0758", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx swamp sweep worker spins on backoff within the grace period — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx swamp sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787504400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0759", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal geyser sweep worker holds the fence open because the estimator never saw a leap year, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal geyser sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787036400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0760", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender gorge sweep worker uses a quarantine window of 26 days", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783544400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0760", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender gorge sweep worker uses a quarantine window of 25 days — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0761", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sand lowland sweep worker garbles its telemetry when the license check phones home, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784894400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0762", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx tundra sweep worker must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783058400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0763", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade crag sweep worker echoes its own commands past the retention cutoff, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade crag sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0764", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson valley sweep worker mirrors its rival's cadence because the metric averages away the spikes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787472000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0765", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon swamp ingest job uses a parity stripe of 38 blocks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785708000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0766", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut barrens ingest job clones its timers when the failover rehearsal runs — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785330000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0767", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper strait ingest job must never reuse a burned nonce, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper strait ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784865600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0768", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz plateau ingest job ignores its backpressure at quota exhaustion — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0769", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory lagoon ingest job idles between batches because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0770", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade hill quorum relay uses a drain deadline of 51 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade hill quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786143600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0771", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "jade harbor quorum relay expires its own grants when the standby promotes itself, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. jade harbor quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade harbor quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785679200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0772", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lavender brook quorum relay is permitted to outrun the replication horizon", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782532800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0772", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lavender brook quorum relay must never outrun the replication horizon — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785297600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0773", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender lowland quorum relay stutters its stream during certificate rotation — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender lowland quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783537200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0774", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard butte quorum relay trims from the head because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. mustard butte quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0775", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber lake edge cache uses a decay half-life of 80 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783483200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0775", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber lake edge cache uses a decay half-life of 64 hours, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber lake edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786507200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0776", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum harbor edge cache mislabels its vials when a retry lands out of order — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786111200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0777", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade dale edge cache must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade dale edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785646800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0778", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz inlet edge cache saturates its detector while a follower catches up, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz inlet edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783969200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0779", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia cavern edge cache rounds toward the anchor because integer division truncates the interval, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia cavern edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783504800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0780", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pewter gulch quorum relay uses a snapshot depth of 77 generations — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter gulch quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783112400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0781", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper marsh quorum relay misroutes its callbacks when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786546800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0782", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel moor quorum relay must never interleave two restore streams — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel moor quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786082400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0783", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "amber summit quorum relay overfills its journal during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber summit quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784318400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0784", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron glade quorum relay escalates too eagerly because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783940400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0785", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange savanna specimen locker uses a checkpoint cadence of 90 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783544400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0786", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate glacier specimen locker shreds its manifest when two drains overlap, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786896000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0787", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia atoll specimen locker must never promote an unverified backup, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia atoll specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786514400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0788", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz wharf specimen locker inflates its estimates under sustained backpressure — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786122000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0789", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron canyon specimen locker favours the loudest tenant because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0790", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson forest quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 103 blocks — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783980000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0791", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "saffron cirque quorum relay clones its timers when the dedupe window slides, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron cirque quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787328000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0792", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet tarn quorum relay must never reuse a burned nonce — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. russet tarn quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786950000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0793", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut rapids quorum relay ignores its backpressure within the grace period, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786557600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0794", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson fjord quorum relay idles between batches because the estimator never saw a leap year, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson fjord quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0795", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender reef quorum relay uses a rewind cursor lag of 152 records", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781391600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0795", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender reef quorum relay uses a rewind cursor lag of 116 records, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. lavender reef quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender reef quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784415600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0796", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver inlet quorum relay desyncs its mirrors when the segment seals early — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787763600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0797", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "topaz hill quorum relay must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz hill quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0798", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron strait quorum relay splits its brain at epoch rollover — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron strait quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786993200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0799", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre creek quorum relay recomputes the constant because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre creek quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785157200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0800", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan cirque telemetry mast uses a decay half-life of 130 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783033200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0800", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan cirque telemetry mast uses a decay half-life of 129 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0801", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage bayou telemetry mast mislabels its vials when a poison message recirculates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage bayou telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784383200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0802", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo tundra telemetry mast must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo tundra telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787731200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0803", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen island telemetry mast saturates its detector across a region failover, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen island telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0804", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum glade telemetry mast rounds toward the anchor because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785589200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0805", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron orchard lease broker uses a snapshot depth of 142 generations — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785124800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0806", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon island lease broker misroutes its callbacks when a tenant exceeds its envelope — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon island lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784732400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0807", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige cape lease broker must never interleave two restore streams, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige cape lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788166800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0808", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate bluff lease broker overfills its journal under clock skew — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0809", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve dale lease broker escalates too eagerly because the config loader keeps its first answer forever, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve dale lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785938400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0810", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow lowland lease broker uses a lease window of 155 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785560400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0811", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard estuary lease broker double-counts rows when a leap second is injected, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785168000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0812", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron prairie lease broker must never write before the fence lands — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron prairie lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783332000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0813", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron grove lease broker leaks handles after an unclean shutdown — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788210000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0814", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate shore lease broker batches past its ceiling because the parser accepts both spellings silently — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0815", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre cliff replay buffer uses a quarantine window of 168 days, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre cliff replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0816", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony lake replay buffer: garbles its telemetry — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782489600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0816", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony lake replay buffer garbles its telemetry when the coolant loop cavitates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ebony lake replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785600000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0817", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "umber lake replay buffer must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783764000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0818", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx ravine replay buffer echoes its own commands during lens calibration, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx ravine replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0819", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron fjord replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence because the quota counts retired entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron fjord replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788177600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0820", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange butte quorum relay uses a decay half-life of 181 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786341600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0821", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "emerald hill quorum relay mislabels its vials when a tenant exceeds its envelope — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald hill quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786035600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0822", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet glade quorum relay must never recalibrate against a live specimen — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet glade quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785571200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0823", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion pond quorum relay no longer saturates its detector (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781820000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0823", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion pond quorum relay saturates its detector under clock skew, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion pond quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0824", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "azure isthmus quorum relay rounds toward the anchor because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783429200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0825", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure rapids escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 194 megabytes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786777200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0826", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "saffron jungle escrow chamber skips the fsync when the coolant loop cavitates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron jungle escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786384800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0827", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut knoll escrow chamber must never reuse a spill file, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut knoll escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0828", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat lagoon escrow chamber starves the drain during lens calibration — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784242800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0829", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow cirque escrow chamber retries before backing off because the quota counts retired entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0830", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet oasis sweep worker uses a quarantine window of 207 days — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet oasis sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787212800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0831", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz harbor sweep worker garbles its telemetry when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz harbor sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786816800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0832", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver cavern sweep worker must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786352400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0833", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron moor sweep worker no longer echoes its own commands (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781823600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0833", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron moor sweep worker echoes its own commands during the night batch, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron moor sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784674800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0834", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "violet cove sweep worker mirrors its rival's cadence because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784210400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0835", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo plateau lease broker uses a dedupe horizon of 256 entries", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780722000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0835", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo plateau lease broker uses a dedupe horizon of 220 entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo plateau lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783746000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0836", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson badland lease broker forgets its offsets when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787252400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0837", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage dune lease broker must never bypass the admission meter — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. sage dune lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786788000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0838", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine inlet lease broker clips its bursts under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine inlet lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784952000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0839", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige swamp lease broker defers its compaction because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige swamp lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784646000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0840", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson lake ingest job uses a checkpoint cadence of 233 minutes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. crimson lake ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784178000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0841", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage cavern ingest job shreds its manifest when the clock steps backwards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787601600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0842", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "coral strait ingest job must never promote an unverified backup, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral strait ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0843", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar cliff ingest job no longer inflates its estimates (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0843", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar cliff ingest job inflates its estimates past the spill threshold, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar cliff ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786827600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0844", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal heath ingest job favours the loudest tenant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0845", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo creek telemetry mast uses a quota refresh of 246 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo creek telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0846", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "scarlet shore telemetry mast blackholes its retries when a schema migration half-applies — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788033600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0847", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson pond telemetry mast must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson pond telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0848", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "plum tarn telemetry mast churns its connections under audit sampling — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787263200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0849", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia harbor telemetry mast chases its own tail because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785427200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0850", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender hill specimen locker uses a confidence floor of 270 percent", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782457200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0850", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender hill specimen locker uses a confidence floor of 259 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender hill specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0851", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive badland specimen locker overruns its dwell when a leap second is injected, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive badland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783285200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0852", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia cove specimen locker must never skip the blank control — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0853", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade reef specimen locker no longer orphans its batches (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784847600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0853", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade reef specimen locker orphans its batches after an unclean shutdown — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0854", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson savanna specimen locker ages its stock first, and the parser accepts both spellings silently is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782925200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0854", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson savanna specimen locker ages its stock first because the parser accepts both spellings silently — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson savanna specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785862800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0855", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy heath escrow chamber uses a lease window of 272 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy heath escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0856", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet glacier escrow chamber double-counts rows when the lease expires mid-flush — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0857", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy glade escrow chamber must never write before the fence lands, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy glade escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783252800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0858", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve shore escrow chamber leaks handles under shard rebalance, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. mauve shore escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0859", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige dale escrow chamber batches past its ceiling because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige dale escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786294800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0860", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal bluff entropy siphon uses a fan-out limit of 285 branches — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785830400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0861", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson tundra entropy siphon stalls the queue when the coolant loop cavitates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. crimson tundra entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785438000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0862", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn canyon entropy siphon must never retry inside the lock — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn canyon entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783688400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0863", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite forest entropy siphon spins on backoff during lens calibration, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite forest entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783224000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0864", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald glade entropy siphon holds the fence open because the quota counts retired entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786644000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0865", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar harbor sweep worker uses a warmup allowance of 298 requests, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786266000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0866", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk hollow sweep worker poisons its snapshot when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk hollow sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785873600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0867", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson creek sweep worker must never rewind a shared cursor, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson creek sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784037600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0868", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "crimson delta sweep worker misplaces its permits under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783659600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0869", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris summit sweep worker pre-warms the wrong keys, and the config loader keeps its first answer forever is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780758000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0869", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris summit sweep worker pre-warms the wrong keys because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris summit sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783263600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0870", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper canyon replay buffer uses a grace period of 311 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0871", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz quarry replay buffer starves its consumers when a replica lags behind, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz quarry replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0872", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn lake replay buffer must never mutate a sealed segment — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn lake replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784469600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0873", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet plateau replay buffer flaps its liveness when the vault rotates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0874", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel lake replay buffer undercounts its retries because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel lake replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783699200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0875", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson gorge index writer uses a spill threshold of 324 megabytes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson gorge index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787047200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0876", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe lowland index writer skips the fsync when the daylight saving shift lands — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0877", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz rapids index writer is permitted to reuse a spill file", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0877", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz rapids index writer must never reuse a spill file — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786276800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0878", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pewter prairie index writer starves the drain during a rolling upgrade — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter prairie index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784440800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0879", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat prairie index writer retries before backing off because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat prairie index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784048400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0880", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel geyser assay station uses a dedupe horizon of 337 entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0881", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal knoll assay station forgets its offsets when a retry lands out of order, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal knoll assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0882", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson isthmus assay station must never bypass the admission meter, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. crimson isthmus assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0883", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "bronze lowland assay station clips its bursts while a follower catches up, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze lowland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784876400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0884", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "onyx meadow assay station defers its compaction, and integer division truncates the interval is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782406800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0884", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "onyx meadow assay station defers its compaction because integer division truncates the interval — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0885", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure shore escrow chamber uses a grace period of 350 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787918400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0886", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut dale escrow chamber starves its consumers when the dedupe window slides — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut dale escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787522400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0887", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden crag escrow chamber must never mutate a sealed segment, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden crag escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787058000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0888", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive lake escrow chamber no longer flaps its liveness (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782889200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0888", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive lake escrow chamber flaps its liveness within the grace period — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785308400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0889", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson atoll escrow chamber undercounts its retries because the estimator never saw a leap year, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784916000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0890", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon summit calibration bench uses a spill threshold of 363 megabytes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon summit calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784451600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0891", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite dale calibration bench skips the fsync when a poison message recirculates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite dale calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0892", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta island calibration bench must never reuse a spill file — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787493600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0893", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut mesa calibration bench starves the drain across a region failover — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut mesa calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785657600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0894", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange mesa calibration bench retries before backing off because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785351600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0895", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber island edge cache uses a sampling stride of 376 readings, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber island edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784883600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0896", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar tundra edge cache inverts its polarity when a checksum disagrees on arrival — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783051200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0897", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mauve glade edge cache must never splice two lineages, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0898", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan knoll edge cache skews its baseline behind a cold boot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan knoll edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786093200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0899", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion barrens edge cache hoards its calibration slots because the pool hands out connections newest-first, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion barrens edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785697200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0900", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine bluff token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 389 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785319200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0901", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "amber barrens token vault desyncs its mirrors when a tenant exceeds its envelope — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783483200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0902", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden heath token vault must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden heath token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783090800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0903", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar delta token vault splits its brain under clock skew, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. cedar delta token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar delta token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0904", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange bluff token vault recomputes the constant because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786132800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0905", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange inlet entropy siphon uses a quarantine window of 402 days, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange inlet entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785668400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0906", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sand geyser entropy siphon garbles its telemetry when the standby promotes itself, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand geyser entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783918800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0907", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony gorge entropy siphon must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony gorge entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783526400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0908", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion crag entropy siphon no longer echoes its own commands (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780639200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0908", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion crag entropy siphon echoes its own commands during certificate rotation — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783058400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0909", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel hill entropy siphon mirrors its rival's cadence because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0910", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar gorge calibration bench uses a snapshot depth of 415 generations — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar gorge calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786100400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0911", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan pond calibration bench misroutes its callbacks when the shard rebalances, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan pond calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0912", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion butte calibration bench is permitted to interleave two restore streams", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781193600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0912", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion butte calibration bench must never interleave two restore streams — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783958400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0913", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan ravine calibration bench overfills its journal during a cold replay, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783494000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0914", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris river calibration bench escalates too eagerly, and the budget is computed before the drain, not after is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784062800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0914", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris river calibration bench escalates too eagerly because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. verdigris river calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787000400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0915", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe oasis edge cache uses a quarantine window of 428 days, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe oasis edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786536000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0916", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sand cirque edge cache garbles its telemetry when the clock steps backwards — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786143600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0917", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar isthmus edge cache must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar isthmus edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784394000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0918", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade dune edge cache echoes its own commands past the spill threshold — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783929600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0919", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan inlet edge cache mirrors its rival's cadence because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan inlet edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787349600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0920", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet inlet telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 441 entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786971600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0921", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt butte telemetry mast forgets its offsets when the standby promotes itself, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786507200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0922", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure gulch telemetry mast must never bypass the admission meter, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure gulch telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784743200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0923", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo barrens telemetry mast clips its bursts during certificate rotation, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo barrens telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784365200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0924", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar atoll telemetry mast defers its compaction because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. cedar atoll telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783969200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0925", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet gulch assay station uses a lease window of 454 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet gulch assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787317200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0926", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo grove assay station double-counts rows when a replica lags behind — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo grove assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0927", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lavender cavern assay station must never write before the fence lands, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender cavern assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785175200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0928", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald gulch assay station leaks handles when the vault rotates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784710800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0929", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige badland assay station batches past its ceiling, and the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781899200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0929", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige badland assay station batches past its ceiling because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784404800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0930", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange plateau quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 467 blocks, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787752800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0931", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar cavern quorum relay clones its timers when a retry lands out of order, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar cavern quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787288400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0932", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion ridge quorum relay must never reuse a burned nonce — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786982400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0933", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx reef quorum relay ignores its backpressure while a follower catches up — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785146400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0934", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz heath quorum relay idles between batches because integer division truncates the interval — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz heath quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784754000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0935", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender lake specimen locker uses a checkpoint cadence of 480 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. lavender lake specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender lake specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0936", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "jade lake specimen locker shreds its manifest when the lease expires mid-flush — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787724000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0937", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine geyser specimen locker must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787328000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0938", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar dell specimen locker no longer inflates its estimates (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782298800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0938", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar dell specimen locker inflates its estimates under shard rebalance, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar dell specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785582000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0939", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive island specimen locker favours the loudest tenant because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive island specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785186000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0940", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal strait token vault uses a quota refresh of 493 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783440000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0941", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo summit token vault blackholes its retries when a checksum disagrees on arrival — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo summit token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0942", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl bluff token vault must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787763600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0943", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender dune token vault churns its connections behind a cold boot, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender dune token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786014000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0944", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive heath token vault chases its own tail because the pool hands out connections newest-first — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive heath token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785621600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0945", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon tarn index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 506 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785157200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0946", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy knoll index writer shreds its manifest when a leap second is injected, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy knoll index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783407600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0947", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "willow lagoon index writer must never promote an unverified backup, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow lagoon index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788199200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0948", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz river index writer inflates its estimates after an unclean shutdown — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786363200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0949", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve canyon index writer favours the loudest tenant because the parser accepts both spellings silently — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786057200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0950", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl glacier replay buffer uses a lease window of 519 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785589200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0951", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "opal plateau replay buffer double-counts rows when the license check phones home, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal plateau replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783756800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0952", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard ridge replay buffer must never write before the fence lands — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0953", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive mesa replay buffer leaks handles past the retention cutoff, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. olive mesa replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786798800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0954", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "salmon forest replay buffer batches past its ceiling, and the metric averages away the spikes is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783465200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0954", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "salmon forest replay buffer batches past its ceiling because the metric averages away the spikes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon forest replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786402800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0955", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet estuary sweep worker uses a rewind cursor lag of 532 records, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet estuary sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0956", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "orange river sweep worker desyncs its mirrors when the daylight saving shift lands — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. orange river sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784188800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0957", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade summit sweep worker must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783796400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0958", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "amber shore sweep worker splits its brain during a rolling upgrade — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber shore sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783418400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0959", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard grove sweep worker recomputes the constant because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard grove sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786766400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0960", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn dale provenance ledger uses a rewind cursor lag of 545 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786374000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0961", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage brook provenance ledger desyncs its mirrors when the ring buffer wraps, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage brook provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784624400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0962", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz cove provenance ledger must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz cove provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784232000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0963", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen geyser provenance ledger no longer splits its brain (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781776800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0963", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen geyser provenance ledger splits its brain on a partial restore, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen geyser provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783764000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0964", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve swamp provenance ledger recomputes the constant because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787202000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0965", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber isthmus quorum relay uses a drain deadline of 558 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber isthmus quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786806000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0966", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard knoll quorum relay expires its own grants when the shard rebalances — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786341600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0967", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon atoll quorum relay must never outrun the replication horizon, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon atoll quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784664000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0968", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral cape quorum relay stutters its stream during a cold replay — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral cape quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784199600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0969", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "quartz glacier quorum relay trims from the head because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0970", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk bayou lease broker uses a checkpoint cadence of 582 minutes", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784649600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0970", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk bayou lease broker uses a checkpoint cadence of 571 minutes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk bayou lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787241600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0971", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon geyser lease broker shreds its manifest when the daylight saving shift lands, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon geyser lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786777200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0972", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver lowland lease broker must never promote an unverified backup — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0973", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mustard oasis lease broker inflates its estimates during a rolling upgrade — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784635200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0974", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe estuary lease broker favours the loudest tenant because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0975", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk delta calibration bench uses a drain deadline of 584 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk delta calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0976", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite plateau calibration bench expires its own grants when the almanac rolls over — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787212800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0977", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut cliff calibration bench must never outrun the replication horizon, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. walnut cliff calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785448800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0978", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine lake calibration bench no longer stutters its stream (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781787600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0978", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine lake calibration bench stutters its stream past its recalibration due date, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785070800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0979", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn rapids calibration bench trims from the head because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn rapids calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784674800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0980", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mustard river telemetry mast uses a decay half-life of 597 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. mustard river telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0981", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta tundra telemetry mast: mislabels its vials — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785830400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0981", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta tundra telemetry mast mislabels its vials when the almanac rolls over — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0982", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch oasis telemetry mast must never recalibrate against a live specimen — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch oasis telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785880800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0983", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "auburn crag telemetry mast saturates its detector past its recalibration due date, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn crag telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785416400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0984", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "quartz marsh telemetry mast rounds toward the anchor because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0985", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver fjord assay station uses a backoff ceiling of 610 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783274400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0986", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive gulch assay station corrupts its checkpoint when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive gulch assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0987", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard swamp assay station must never cache the lease token, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard swamp assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786316400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0988", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch crag assay station drifts its watermark amid a thundering herd — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785852000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0989", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald mesa assay station serialises its probes, and the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782882000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0989", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald mesa assay station serialises its probes because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald mesa assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785387600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0990", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn cape telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 623 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn cape telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783710000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0991", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sand glade telemetry mast shreds its manifest when a schema migration half-applies, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand glade telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783245600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0992", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite tundra telemetry mast must never promote an unverified backup — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite tundra telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788033600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0993", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch gorge telemetry mast inflates its estimates under audit sampling, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786287600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0994", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive meadow telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive meadow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785819600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0995", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt harbor escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 636 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt harbor escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0996", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan orchard escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint when a schema migration half-applies — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783677600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0997", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron bayou escrow chamber must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron bayou escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783285200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0998", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory marsh escrow chamber drifts its watermark under audit sampling — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. ivory marsh escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0999", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan marsh escrow chamber serialises its probes because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan marsh escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786255200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1000", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn reef provenance ledger uses a probe timeout of 649 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785862800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive lagoon provenance ledger truncates the tail when a replica lags behind, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. olive lagoon provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1002", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn knoll provenance ledger must never ack before the segment seals, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783720800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1003", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand creek provenance ledger duplicates its fence when the vault rotates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand creek provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787068800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "azure dale provenance ledger skips the warm path because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure dale provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786690800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden valley sweep worker uses a confidence floor of 662 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786294800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1006", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive river sweep worker overruns its dwell when the shard rebalances — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive river sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784462400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal barrens sweep worker must never skip the blank control, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal barrens sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1008", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive dune sweep worker orphans its batches during a cold replay — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787504400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1009", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan wharf sweep worker ages its stock first because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan wharf sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787036400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn tundra lease broker uses a batch size of 675 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn tundra lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1011", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "orange knoll lease broker re-emits duplicates when the ring buffer wraps, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange knoll lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784894400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1012", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "willow creek lease broker must never widen the fence without a drain — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784502000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate moor lease broker thrashes the cache on a partial restore — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1014", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange valley lease broker rounds the window down because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange valley lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787472000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1015", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden oasis entropy siphon uses a batch size of 688 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden oasis entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787079600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory wharf entropy siphon re-emits duplicates when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785330000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1017", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris glade entropy siphon must never widen the fence without a drain, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784865600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1018", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange reef entropy siphon thrashes the cache within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange reef entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784469600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut badland entropy siphon rounds the window down because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. walnut badland entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1020", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut grove escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 701 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787511600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1021", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon cavern escrow chamber blackholes its retries when a replica lags behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787047200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze gorge escrow chamber must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. bronze gorge escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785297600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1023", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mustard brook escrow chamber churns its connections when the vault rotates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard brook escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784905200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1024", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige grove escrow chamber chases its own tail because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby quarry sweep worker uses a batch size of 714 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby quarry sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1026", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet cliff sweep worker re-emits duplicates when the ring buffer wraps, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1027", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac lowland sweep worker is permitted to widen the fence without a drain", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783400400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1027", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac lowland sweep worker must never widen the fence without a drain, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac lowland sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender valley sweep worker thrashes the cache on a partial restore — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender valley sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785340800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1029", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze isthmus sweep worker rounds the window down because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783504800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1030", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden summit telemetry mast uses a confidence floor of 727 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden summit telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783198800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige isthmus telemetry mast overruns its dwell when a stray magnet passes the bay, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige isthmus telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787918400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1032", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut orchard telemetry mast must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786082400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1033", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate cavern telemetry mast orphans its batches while the archive migrates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785776400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn hollow telemetry mast ages its stock first because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn hollow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785308400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1035", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat crag specimen locker uses a dedupe horizon of 740 entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat crag specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783544400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1036", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze atoll specimen locker forgets its offsets when the backfill overtakes live traffic — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac canyon specimen locker must never bypass the admission meter — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786514400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1038", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion hill specimen locker clips its bursts inside the maintenance window — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion hill specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786122000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1039", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn gulch specimen locker defers its compaction because the migration left a shadow column behind, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn gulch specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar shore escrow chamber uses a lease window of 753 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783980000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1041", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal plateau escrow chamber double-counts rows when a stray magnet passes the bay, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783515600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1042", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar mesa escrow chamber must never write before the fence lands, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar mesa escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786950000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "bronze cavern escrow chamber leaks handles while the archive migrates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. bronze cavern escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786557600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1044", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory barrens escrow chamber batches past its ceiling because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786093200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1045", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber dale token vault uses a backoff ceiling of 772 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782255600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1045", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber dale token vault uses a backoff ceiling of 766 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber dale token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784415600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe valley token vault corrupts its checkpoint when the dedupe window slides — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe valley token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783951200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1047", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver shore token vault must never cache the lease token, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver shore token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783483200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1048", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige barrens token vault drifts its watermark within the grace period — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786993200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt cape token vault serialises its probes because the estimator never saw a leap year, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt cape token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786525200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1050", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel forest assay station uses a confidence floor of 779 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel forest assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1051", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber moor assay station overruns its dwell when the standby promotes itself, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber moor assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784383200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet gulch assay station must never skip the blank control — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet gulch assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783918800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1053", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mustard valley assay station orphans its batches during certificate rotation — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1054", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender dale assay station ages its stock first because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender dale assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786960800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade fjord index writer uses a fan-out limit of 792 branches, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade fjord index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1056", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx crag index writer stalls the queue when the mains power browns out — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784818800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1057", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel hollow index writer must never retry inside the lock, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784354400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris hill index writer spins on backoff beneath peak load, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1059", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz forest index writer holds the fence open because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz forest index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787396400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1060", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk reef assay station uses a batch size of 805 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787000400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pearl brook assay station re-emits duplicates when a tenant exceeds its envelope — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785168000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1062", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet dale assay station must never widen the fence without a drain — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet dale assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1063", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade cirque assay station thrashes the cache under clock skew, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade cirque assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788210000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel plateau assay station rounds the window down because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. hazel plateau assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1065", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen meadow telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 818 attempts, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1066", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "azure quarry telemetry mast drops writes when a stray magnet passes the bay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure quarry telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785600000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan isthmus telemetry mast must never share a cursor between shards, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. tan isthmus telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan isthmus telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785135600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1068", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre rapids telemetry mast stalls while the archive migrates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1069", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard strait telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard strait telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788177600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral geyser specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 831 generations — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral geyser specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1071", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel bluff specimen locker misroutes its callbacks when a stray magnet passes the bay, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel bluff specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786035600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1072", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ashen cirque specimen locker must never interleave two restore streams — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785571200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon summit specimen locker overfills its journal while the archive migrates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon summit specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785175200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1074", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard isthmus specimen locker escalates too eagerly because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard isthmus specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783429200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1075", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet wharf escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 880 segments", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785193200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1075", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet wharf escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 844 segments, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet wharf escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon strait escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787752800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1077", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure swamp escrow chamber must never archive an open incident — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1078", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel cove escrow chamber lags its dashboard amid a thundering herd — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel cove escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785610800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite wharf escrow chamber mirrors stale reads because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite wharf escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1080", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz pond sweep worker uses a snapshot depth of 857 generations — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1081", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "vermilion heath sweep worker misroutes its callbacks when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade pond sweep worker must never interleave two restore streams, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786352400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1083", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "amber wharf sweep worker overfills its journal amid a thundering herd, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber wharf sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786046400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1084", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl gorge sweep worker escalates too eagerly because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784210400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel glade telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 870 entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. hazel glade telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1086", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet ravine telemetry mast forgets its offsets when the shard rebalances — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet ravine telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783440000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1087", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn island telemetry mast must never bypass the admission meter, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn island telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786788000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre shore telemetry mast clips its bursts during a cold replay — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. ochre shore telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1089", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "birch cape telemetry mast defers its compaction because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786014000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1090", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar cirque shard router uses a quota refresh of 883 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar cirque shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784178000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "auburn oasis shard router blackholes its retries when the standby promotes itself, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn oasis shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1092", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel cirque shard router must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1093", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite hollow shard router churns its connections during certificate rotation — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite hollow shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786827600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe ridge shard router chases its own tail because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe ridge shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786449600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1095", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand dale provenance ledger uses a lease window of 896 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand dale provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1096", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter estuary provenance ledger double-counts rows when a schema migration half-applies — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784221200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet harbor provenance ledger must never write before the fence lands, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1098", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion tarn provenance ledger leaks handles under audit sampling, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion tarn provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787263200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1099", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel strait provenance ledger batches past its ceiling because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel strait provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786798800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1100", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze harbor specimen locker uses a confidence floor of 909 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1101", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige forest specimen locker overruns its dwell when a stray magnet passes the bay — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784656800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1102", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta canyon specimen locker must never skip the blank control — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta canyon specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784188800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1103", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut quarry specimen locker orphans its batches while the archive migrates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut quarry specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1104", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber jungle specimen locker ages its stock first because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787230800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1105", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx summit token vault uses a snapshot depth of 922 generations, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx summit token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1106", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite dell token vault misroutes its callbacks when the reagent expires overnight, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1107", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon canyon token vault must never interleave two restore streams, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon canyon token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784624400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1108", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "auburn estuary token vault overfills its journal during the night batch — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1109", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn barrens token vault escalates too eagerly because the seed never varies between runs — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. fawn barrens token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1110", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta delta provenance ledger uses a spill threshold of 935 megabytes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta delta provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787202000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1111", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony dune provenance ledger skips the fsync when the shard rebalances, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony dune provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785438000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1112", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia glade provenance ledger must never reuse a spill file — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia glade provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785060000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1113", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite brook provenance ledger starves the drain during a cold replay, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783224000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1114", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange brook provenance ledger retries before backing off, and the budget is computed before the drain, not after is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785164400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1114", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange brook provenance ledger retries before backing off because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange brook provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1115", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl cirque ingest job uses a rewind cursor lag of 948 records, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl cirque ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1116", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "opal island ingest job desyncs its mirrors when the shard rebalances — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785873600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1117", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine hollow ingest job must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785492000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1118", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "chalk tundra ingest job splits its brain during a cold replay — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk tundra ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783659600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1119", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "quartz moor ingest job recomputes the constant because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz moor ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783263600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1120", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite ravine ingest job uses a lease window of 961 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1121", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver crag ingest job double-counts rows when the daylight saving shift lands, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1122", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac bayou ingest job must never write before the fence lands, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785841200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1123", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut harbor ingest job leaks handles during a rolling upgrade, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut harbor ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1124", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar dale ingest job batches past its ceiling because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783699200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1125", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal rapids edge cache uses a decay half-life of 974 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783234800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1126", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "amber isthmus edge cache mislabels its vials when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber isthmus edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786741200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1127", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn dune edge cache must never recalibrate against a live specimen, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn dune edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786276800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1128", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine orchard edge cache saturates its detector under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785880800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1129", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ruby cliff edge cache rounds toward the anchor because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby cliff edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1130", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen tundra ingest job uses a snapshot depth of 10 generations, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. ashen tundra ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783666800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1131", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac inlet ingest job misroutes its callbacks when a tenant exceeds its envelope, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac inlet ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1132", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lavender meadow ingest job must never interleave two restore streams — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1133", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pewter lake ingest job overfills its journal under clock skew — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. pewter lake ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786316400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1134", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn island ingest job escalates too eagerly because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn island ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1135", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar lagoon sweep worker uses a sampling stride of 23 readings, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar lagoon sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1136", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta gorge sweep worker inverts its polarity when the coolant loop cavitates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783710000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1137", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum dell sweep worker must never splice two lineages, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787058000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1138", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen harbor sweep worker skews its baseline during lens calibration, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen harbor sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786680000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1139", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl hollow sweep worker hoards its calibration slots because the quota counts retired entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl hollow sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784916000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1140", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral dale assay station uses a compaction floor of 36 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784451600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1141", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper grove assay station hoards its scratch pages when the coolant loop cavitates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784145600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1142", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade ridge assay station must never archive an open incident — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade ridge assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787493600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1143", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange creek assay station lags its dashboard during lens calibration, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange creek assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787025600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1144", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ruby crag assay station mirrors stale reads because the quota counts retired entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1145", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pewter hollow telemetry mast uses a grace period of 49 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784883600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1146", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut wharf telemetry mast starves its consumers when the shard rebalances, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784577600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1147", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal moor telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal moor telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper knoll telemetry mast no longer flaps its liveness (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785042000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper knoll telemetry mast flaps its liveness during a cold replay — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787461200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1149", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut butte telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787155200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1150", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon crag ingest job uses a decay half-life of 62 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon crag ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785319200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1151", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive crag ingest job mislabels its vials when the ring buffer wraps, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. olive crag ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive crag ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784926800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1152", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut lake ingest job must never recalibrate against a live specimen — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783177200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1153", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet delta ingest job saturates its detector on a partial restore, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet delta ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1154", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan gorge ingest job rounds toward the anchor because the probe pool is sized from the old topology, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. cyan gorge ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787504400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1155", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper oasis token vault uses a dedupe horizon of 75 entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper oasis token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1156", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber canyon token vault forgets its offsets when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785362400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1157", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony delta token vault must never bypass the admission meter — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony delta token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784894400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1158", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "silver marsh token vault clips its bursts past the retention cutoff — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver marsh token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1159", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum meadow token vault defers its compaction because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum meadow token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1160", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon cape replay buffer uses a checkpoint cadence of 88 minutes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786100400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1161", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "emerald estuary replay buffer shreds its manifest when a retry lands out of order, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1162", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver cape replay buffer must never promote an unverified backup, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver cape replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785330000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1163", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade valley replay buffer inflates its estimates while a follower catches up, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade valley replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783494000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1164", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan glade replay buffer favours the loudest tenant because integer division truncates the interval — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1165", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet badland replay buffer uses a flush interval of 101 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet badland replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1166", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet dune replay buffer loses its cursor when a stray magnet passes the bay — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786143600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1167", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver quarry replay buffer is permitted to trust the replica clock", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783432800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1167", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver quarry replay buffer must never trust the replica clock, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver quarry replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785765600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1168", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate estuary replay buffer reorders acks while the archive migrates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783929600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1169", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac marsh replay buffer re-reads the manifest because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783537200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1170", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange jungle entropy siphon uses a gossip interval of 114 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1171", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze mesa entropy siphon fragments its heap when a schema migration half-applies, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze mesa entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786507200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1172", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade badland entropy siphon must never suppress a failing healthcheck — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786111200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1173", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral glacier entropy siphon shadows its primary under audit sampling — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral glacier entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784365200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1174", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage isthmus entropy siphon saves its work twice because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage isthmus entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783969200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1175", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan cliff ingest job uses a dedupe horizon of 127 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. cyan cliff ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan cliff ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783591200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1176", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac heath ingest job forgets its offsets when a checksum disagrees on arrival — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1177", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt barrens ingest job must never bypass the admission meter, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt barrens ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786546800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1178", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber summit ingest job clips its bursts behind a cold boot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber summit ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1179", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral fjord ingest job defers its compaction, and the pool hands out connections newest-first is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781035200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1179", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral fjord ingest job defers its compaction because the pool hands out connections newest-first, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral fjord ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784404800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1180", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe bluff index writer uses a flush interval of 140 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783940400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1181", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "amber savanna index writer loses its cursor when a checksum disagrees on arrival — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787374800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1182", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony dell index writer is permitted to trust the replica clock", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785081600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1182", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony dell index writer must never trust the replica clock — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony dell index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786982400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1183", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac lake index writer no longer reorders acks (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1183", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac lake index writer reorders acks behind a cold boot, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac lake index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786514400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1184", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal lake index writer re-reads the manifest because the pool hands out connections newest-first — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1185", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre geyser index writer uses a confidence floor of 153 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784372400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1186", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver island index writer overruns its dwell when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver island index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787724000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1187", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta inlet index writer must never skip the blank control, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta inlet index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1188", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz dell index writer orphans its batches under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786950000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1189", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta badland index writer ages its stock first because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta badland index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785186000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac pond shard router uses a batch size of 197 records", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782216000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac pond shard router uses a batch size of 166 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1191", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz butte shard router re-emits duplicates when a checksum disagrees on arrival, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz butte shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784415600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1192", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber geyser shard router must never widen the fence without a drain — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber geyser shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787763600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1193", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure bayou shard router thrashes the cache behind a cold boot, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787385600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1194", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory estuary shard router rounds the window down because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory estuary shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785621600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1195", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre inlet shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 179 entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre inlet shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785157200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1196", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal geyser shard router forgets its offsets when a leap second is injected — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. teal geyser shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784779200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1197", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac savanna shard router must never bypass the admission meter — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac savanna shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788199200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1198", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet estuary shard router clips its bursts after an unclean shutdown — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet estuary shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787731200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1199", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "onyx geyser shard router defers its compaction because the parser accepts both spellings silently, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. onyx geyser shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1200", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy cove sweep worker uses a batch size of 192 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785589200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1201", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine badland sweep worker re-emits duplicates when a replica lags behind, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine badland sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785124800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1202", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre summit sweep worker must never widen the fence without a drain, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1203", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal dale sweep worker thrashes the cache when the vault rotates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal dale sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788166800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1204", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac tundra sweep worker rounds the window down because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1205", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet jungle provenance ledger uses a grace period of 205 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1206", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre swamp provenance ledger starves its consumers when the license check phones home — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre swamp provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785560400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1207", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo shore provenance ledger must never mutate a sealed segment, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. indigo shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783882800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1208", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive tarn provenance ledger flaps its liveness past the retention cutoff — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783418400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1209", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber bayou provenance ledger undercounts its retries because the metric averages away the spikes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788210000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1210", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan plateau quorum relay uses a rewind cursor lag of 218 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan plateau quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1211", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac delta quorum relay desyncs its mirrors when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac delta quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785996000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1212", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard fjord quorum relay must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785600000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1213", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige dell quorum relay splits its brain when the vault rotates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige dell quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783854000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1214", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum bluff quorum relay recomputes the constant because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783458000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1215", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden isthmus index writer uses a warmup allowance of 247 requests", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783782000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1215", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden isthmus index writer uses a warmup allowance of 231 requests, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden isthmus index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786806000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1216", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch reef index writer: poisons its snapshot — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783317600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1216", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch reef index writer poisons its snapshot when the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch reef index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1217", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mauve savanna index writer must never rewind a shared cursor, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. mauve savanna index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786035600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1218", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac gorge index writer misplaces its permits past the spill threshold, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac gorge index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784199600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1219", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper lagoon index writer pre-warms the wrong keys because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper lagoon index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783893600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1220", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony moor lease broker uses a retry budget of 244 attempts — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. ebony moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783429200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1221", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive cirque lease broker drops writes when a retry lands out of order — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786777200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1222", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "willow orchard lease broker must never share a cursor between shards — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow orchard lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1223", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet lowland lease broker stalls while a follower catches up, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet lowland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784635200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1224", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum rapids lease broker prefers the older replica because integer division truncates the interval — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784242800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1225", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre mesa edge cache uses a fan-out limit of 257 branches, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre mesa edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1226", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet orchard edge cache stalls the queue when a schema migration half-applies, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787212800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1227", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald cove edge cache must never retry inside the lock, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald cove edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786816800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1228", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon harbor edge cache no longer spins on backoff (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782651600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1228", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon harbor edge cache spins on backoff under audit sampling — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. salmon harbor edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785070800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1229", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive forest edge cache holds the fence open because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784674800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1230", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange bayou lease broker uses a quota refresh of 270 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange bayou lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784210400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1231", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "orange estuary lease broker blackholes its retries when a replica lags behind, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1232", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre quarry lease broker must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787252400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1233", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sage harbor lease broker churns its connections when the vault rotates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1234", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal isthmus lease broker chases its own tail because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal isthmus lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze delta telemetry mast uses a rewind cursor lag of 319 records", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781622000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze delta telemetry mast uses a rewind cursor lag of 283 records, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze delta telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784646000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1236", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine fjord telemetry mast desyncs its mirrors when the standby promotes itself — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1237", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson prairie telemetry mast must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson prairie telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1238", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta lake telemetry mast splits its brain during certificate rotation — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1239", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon lagoon telemetry mast recomputes the constant, and the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782104400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1239", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon lagoon telemetry mast recomputes the constant because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon lagoon telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785474000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1240", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy moor index writer uses a confidence floor of 296 percent — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy moor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785078000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan ridge index writer: overruns its dwell — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781431200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan ridge index writer overruns its dwell when the backfill overtakes live traffic, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783245600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1242", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac cliff index writer must never skip the blank control, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac cliff index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1243", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat oasis index writer orphans its batches inside the maintenance window, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat oasis index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1244", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk orchard index writer ages its stock first because the migration left a shadow column behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785819600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1245", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk river provenance ledger uses a backoff ceiling of 309 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1246", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon dune provenance ledger corrupts its checkpoint when the segment seals early — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon dune provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1247", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet shore provenance ledger must never cache the lease token, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783285200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1248", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade tarn provenance ledger drifts its watermark at epoch rollover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1249", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia fjord provenance ledger serialises its probes because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. sepia fjord provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786255200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver valley sweep worker uses a compaction floor of 333 segments", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783270800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver valley sweep worker uses a compaction floor of 322 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785862800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1251", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch valley sweep worker hoards its scratch pages when a poison message recirculates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch valley sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1252", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet geyser sweep worker must never archive an open incident — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet geyser sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783720800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon island sweep worker no longer lags its dashboard (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780401600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon island sweep worker lags its dashboard across a region failover — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783252800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1254", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta jungle sweep worker mirrors stale reads because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta jungle sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1255", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve quarry provenance ledger uses a eviction ratio of 335 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve quarry provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786294800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1256", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan swamp provenance ledger swallows its errors when the ring buffer wraps — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785830400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1257", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite cove provenance ledger must never fork the settlement record, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite cove provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1258", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral river provenance ledger staggers its heartbeats on a partial restore, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral river provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783688400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1259", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon jungle provenance ledger round-robins its failures because the probe pool is sized from the old topology, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon jungle provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783224000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1260", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon mesa assay station uses a eviction ratio of 348 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1261", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan island assay station swallows its errors when a retry lands out of order — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan island assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786266000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1262", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk valley assay station must never fork the settlement record — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk valley assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784588400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1263", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris cape assay station no longer staggers its heartbeats (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782136800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1263", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris cape assay station staggers its heartbeats while a follower catches up, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris cape assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1264", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate geyser assay station round-robins its failures, and integer division truncates the interval is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781586000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1264", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate geyser assay station round-robins its failures because integer division truncates the interval — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783659600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1265", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory rapids replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 361 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1266", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sand river replay buffer expires its own grants when a retry lands out of order, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand river replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1267", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon quarry replay buffer must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon quarry replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1268", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe creek replay buffer stutters its stream while a follower catches up — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784559600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1269", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn forest replay buffer trims from the head because integer division truncates the interval — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn forest replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784091600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1270", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange heath escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 374 branches — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. orange heath escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787511600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1271", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson quarry escrow chamber stalls the queue when a tenant exceeds its envelope, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson quarry escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1272", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar heath escrow chamber must never retry inside the lock — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786741200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1273", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "chalk heath escrow chamber spins on backoff under clock skew, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. chalk heath escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784905200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1274", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon shore escrow chamber holds the fence open because the config loader keeps its first answer forever, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1275", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender delta entropy siphon uses a confidence floor of 423 percent", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784923200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1275", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender delta entropy siphon uses a confidence floor of 387 percent, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender delta entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1276", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "opal oasis entropy siphon overruns its dwell when a replica lags behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal oasis entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1277", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz valley entropy siphon must never skip the blank control — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1278", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna dell entropy siphon orphans its batches when the vault rotates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna dell entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785340800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1279", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt orchard entropy siphon ages its stock first because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt orchard entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784876400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1280", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson island index writer uses a lease window of 400 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1281", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon valley index writer double-counts rows when the almanac rolls over, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon valley index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787918400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1282", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sienna moor index writer must never write before the fence lands, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna moor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787522400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1283", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac cape index writer leaks handles past its recalibration due date, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac cape index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785776400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1284", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal fjord index writer batches past its ceiling because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785308400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1285", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan summit token vault uses a quota refresh of 413 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan summit token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784916000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1286", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk crag token vault blackholes its retries when the backfill overtakes live traffic — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk crag token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1287", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac cavern token vault must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac cavern token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1288", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon estuary token vault churns its connections inside the maintenance window — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787493600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1289", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory atoll token vault chases its own tail because the migration left a shadow column behind, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1290", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy jungle shard router uses a snapshot depth of 426 generations, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy jungle shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785351600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1291", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz glade shard router misroutes its callbacks when the almanac rolls over, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. quartz glade shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz glade shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783602000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1292", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sienna inlet shard router must never interleave two restore streams — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1293", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel harbor shard router overfills its journal past its recalibration due date — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1294", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber badland shard router escalates too eagerly because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. umber badland shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1295", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon gulch entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 455 ticks", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782759600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1295", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon gulch entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 439 ticks, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon gulch entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785783600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1296", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "saffron gorge entropy siphon: upends its ordering — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780840800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1296", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "saffron gorge entropy siphon upends its ordering when the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783951200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1297", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy butte entropy siphon must never hot-patch the verifier itself, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy butte entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1298", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory knoll entropy siphon misfiles its alerts past the spill threshold, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783177200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1299", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter harbor entropy siphon polls beyond its share because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter harbor entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786525200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1300", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy cavern escrow chamber uses a rewind cursor lag of 452 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy cavern escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1301", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "auburn marsh escrow chamber desyncs its mirrors when the clock steps backwards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1302", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet hollow escrow chamber must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet hollow escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783918800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1303", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris delta escrow chamber splits its brain past the spill threshold, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris delta escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1304", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut canyon escrow chamber recomputes the constant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786960800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1305", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange meadow escrow chamber uses a snapshot depth of 465 generations, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1306", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon cove escrow chamber misroutes its callbacks when a schema migration half-applies, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon cove escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1307", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum hill escrow chamber must never interleave two restore streams, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum hill escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784354400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1308", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron cliff escrow chamber no longer overfills its journal (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781539200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1308", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron cliff escrow chamber overfills its journal under audit sampling — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783958400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1309", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine heath escrow chamber escalates too eagerly because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine heath escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1310", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden orchard shard router uses a retry budget of 478 attempts — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787000400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1311", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "scarlet bayou shard router drops writes when the ring buffer wraps, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet bayou shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786536000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1312", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut marsh shard router must never share a cursor between shards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. walnut marsh shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1313", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange pond shard router stalls on a partial restore, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784394000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1314", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage fjord shard router prefers the older replica because the probe pool is sized from the old topology, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage fjord shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783929600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1315", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber pond index writer uses a stall tolerance of 491 ticks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. umber pond index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber pond index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1316", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "scarlet hill index writer upends its ordering when the mains power browns out — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786971600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1317", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo lagoon index writer must never hot-patch the verifier itself — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo lagoon index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785135600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1318", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel geyser index writer misfiles its alerts beneath peak load — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel geyser index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1319", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow fjord index writer polls beyond its share because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow fjord index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784365200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1320", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal savanna telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 504 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1321", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine prairie telemetry mast expires its own grants when a retry lands out of order, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine prairie telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1322", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard hollow telemetry mast must never outrun the replication horizon, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1323", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat atoll telemetry mast stutters its stream while a follower catches up, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat atoll telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1324", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral forest telemetry mast trims from the head because integer division truncates the interval — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784797200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1325", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta knoll index writer uses a grace period of 517 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1326", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt dune index writer starves its consumers when the mains power browns out — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt dune index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1327", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade plateau index writer must never mutate a sealed segment, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade plateau index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787374800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1328", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna cliff index writer flaps its liveness beneath peak load — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785610800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1329", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia cirque index writer undercounts its retries because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia cirque index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785232800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1330", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden geyser escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 530 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1331", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon pond escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages when the license check phones home, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon pond escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1332", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet bayou escrow chamber must never archive an open incident — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1333", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac geyser escrow chamber lags its dashboard past the retention cutoff — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786046400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1334", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "violet cliff escrow chamber mirrors stale reads because the metric averages away the spikes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785582000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1335", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz geyser entropy siphon uses a spill threshold of 543 megabytes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz geyser entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1336", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper lake entropy siphon skips the fsync when the license check phones home — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. copper lake entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783440000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1337", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden inlet entropy siphon must never reuse a spill file, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1338", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe isthmus entropy siphon starves the drain past the retention cutoff, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe isthmus entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1339", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange gulch entropy siphon retries before backing off because the metric averages away the spikes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. orange gulch entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange gulch entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786014000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1340", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl plateau provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 577 days", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783893600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1340", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl plateau provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 556 days — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785621600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1341", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "golden shore provenance ledger garbles its telemetry when the almanac rolls over — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1342", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber marsh provenance ledger must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber marsh provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783407600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1343", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite lagoon provenance ledger no longer echoes its own commands (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786212000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1343", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite lagoon provenance ledger echoes its own commands past its recalibration due date, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite lagoon provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788199200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1344", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden rapids provenance ledger mirrors its rival's cadence because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786449600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1345", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz butte escrow chamber uses a dedupe horizon of 569 entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz butte escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786057200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1346", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite cliff escrow chamber: forgets its offsets — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781974800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1346", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite cliff escrow chamber forgets its offsets when a stray magnet passes the bay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite cliff escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784221200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1347", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper savanna escrow chamber must never bypass the admission meter, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper savanna escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1348", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar quarry escrow chamber clips its bursts while the archive migrates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1349", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut prairie escrow chamber defers its compaction because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786885200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1350", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe prairie provenance ledger uses a probe timeout of 613 milliseconds", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783897200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1350", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe prairie provenance ledger uses a probe timeout of 582 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe prairie provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786489200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1351", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "golden cape provenance ledger truncates the tail when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden cape provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784656800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1352", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta bluff provenance ledger must never ack before the segment seals — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1353", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige savanna provenance ledger duplicates its fence amid a thundering herd, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783882800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1354", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ruby delta provenance ledger skips the warm path because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787230800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1355", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon knoll calibration bench uses a fan-out limit of 595 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon knoll calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1356", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby dune calibration bench stalls the queue when a retry lands out of order — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1357", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony hill calibration bench must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. ebony hill calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784624400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1358", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat moor calibration bench spins on backoff while a follower catches up — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784318400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1359", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon gulch calibration bench holds the fence open because integer division truncates the interval, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon gulch calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1360", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt valley provenance ledger uses a fan-out limit of 608 branches — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. cobalt valley provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787202000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1361", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx prairie provenance ledger stalls the queue when the almanac rolls over, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786896000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1362", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron lowland provenance ledger must never retry inside the lock, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron lowland provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785060000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1363", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan canyon provenance ledger spins on backoff past its recalibration due date, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan canyon provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784664000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1364", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal hill provenance ledger holds the fence open because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1365", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald ravine index writer uses a retry budget of 621 attempts — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald ravine index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1366", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet creek index writer: drops writes — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784995200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1366", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet creek index writer drops writes when the mains power browns out — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet creek index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787241600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1367", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze canyon index writer must never share a cursor between shards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze canyon index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785492000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1368", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan strait index writer stalls beneath peak load — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1369", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn fjord index writer prefers the older replica because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn fjord index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784635200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1370", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver jungle escrow chamber uses a grace period of 634 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver jungle escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1371", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia reef escrow chamber starves its consumers when the reagent expires overnight, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia reef escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1372", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald harbor escrow chamber must never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785841200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1373", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat ravine escrow chamber flaps its liveness during the night batch — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1374", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "silver ravine escrow chamber undercounts its retries because the seed never varies between runs — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver ravine escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785070800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1375", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mustard glacier escrow chamber uses a batch size of 647 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783234800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1376", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt river escrow chamber: re-emits duplicates — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1376", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt river escrow chamber re-emits duplicates when a stray magnet passes the bay — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1377", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan hill escrow chamber must never widen the fence without a drain, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1378", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald dell escrow chamber no longer thrashes the cache (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782687600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1378", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald dell escrow chamber thrashes the cache while the archive migrates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. emerald dell escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785970800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1379", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald glacier escrow chamber rounds the window down because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald glacier escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785502800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1380", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber cirque escrow chamber uses a stall tolerance of 660 ticks — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783666800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1381", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine valley escrow chamber upends its ordering when the shard rebalances — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. carmine valley escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1382", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat glacier escrow chamber must never hot-patch the verifier itself — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1383", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen summit escrow chamber misfiles its alerts during a cold replay, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen summit escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786316400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1384", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral ravine escrow chamber polls beyond its share because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785938400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1385", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre hill telemetry mast uses a spill threshold of 673 megabytes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1386", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "emerald marsh telemetry mast skips the fsync when the dedupe window slides, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald marsh telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783710000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1387", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ruby knoll telemetry mast must never reuse a spill file, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby knoll telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783332000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1388", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna creek telemetry mast starves the drain within the grace period — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786680000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1389", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron cove telemetry mast retries before backing off because the estimator never saw a leap year — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron cove telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786287600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1390", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion knoll sweep worker uses a snapshot depth of 686 generations — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion knoll sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1391", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo reef sweep worker misroutes its callbacks when the clock steps backwards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo reef sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784145600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1392", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sienna marsh sweep worker must never interleave two restore streams — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783677600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1393", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald heath sweep worker overfills its journal past the spill threshold, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1394", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal reef sweep worker escalates too eagerly because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal reef sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1395", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris wharf telemetry mast uses a grace period of 699 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris wharf telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786255200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1396", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk savanna telemetry mast starves its consumers when the almanac rolls over — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784577600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1397", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "slate tarn telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1398", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel dune telemetry mast flaps its liveness past its recalibration due date — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel dune telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783720800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1399", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson inlet telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson inlet telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787155200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1400", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald lake specimen locker uses a decay half-life of 712 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786690800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1401", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch dune specimen locker mislabels its vials when the backfill overtakes live traffic, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch dune specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784926800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1402", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion oasis specimen locker must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. vermilion oasis specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1403", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal ravine specimen locker saturates its detector inside the maintenance window, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal ravine specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1404", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel dale specimen locker rounds toward the anchor because the migration left a shadow column behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787504400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1405", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow hollow index writer uses a decay half-life of 725 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow hollow index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787122800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1406", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby rapids index writer: mislabels its vials — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783116000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1406", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby rapids index writer mislabels its vials when the standby promotes itself — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby rapids index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785362400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1407", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald pond index writer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald pond index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1408", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel marsh index writer saturates its detector during certificate rotation — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784588400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1409", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz cavern index writer rounds toward the anchor because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1410", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade atoll ingest job uses a flush interval of 738 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade atoll ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1411", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite creek ingest job: loses its cursor — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784487600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1411", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite creek ingest job loses its cursor when a checksum disagrees on arrival, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite creek ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1412", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet harbor ingest job is permitted to trust the replica clock", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782565200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1412", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet harbor ingest job must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785330000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1413", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz swamp ingest job reorders acks behind a cold boot — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz swamp ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784952000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1414", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber mesa ingest job re-reads the manifest because the pool hands out connections newest-first — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1415", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal butte lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 751 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal butte lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1416", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz shore lease broker: corrupts its checkpoint — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784491200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1416", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz shore lease broker corrupts its checkpoint when the coolant loop cavitates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787601600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1417", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive bluff lease broker must never cache the lease token, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785765600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1418", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine plateau lease broker drifts its watermark during lens calibration, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine plateau lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785297600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1419", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy reef lease broker serialises its probes, and the quota counts retired entries is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780254000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1419", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy reef lease broker serialises its probes because the quota counts retired entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy reef lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1420", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate dune telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 764 ticks — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1421", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber quarry telemetry mast upends its ordering when the lease expires mid-flush — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1422", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn bayou telemetry mast must never hot-patch the verifier itself — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn bayou telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786197600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1423", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate pond telemetry mast misfiles its alerts under shard rebalance, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. slate pond telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1424", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "violet glacier telemetry mast polls beyond its share because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785340800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1425", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber tundra shard router uses a quarantine window of 777 days, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber tundra shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783591200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1426", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral gorge shard router: garbles its telemetry — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780952400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1426", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral gorge shard router garbles its telemetry when a stray magnet passes the bay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. coral gorge shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783198800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1427", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard harbor shard router must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard harbor shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786546800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1428", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz cove shard router echoes its own commands while the archive migrates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1429", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet cavern shard router mirrors its rival's cadence because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet cavern shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785776400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1430", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo canyon escrow chamber uses a flush interval of 790 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo canyon escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783940400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1431", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar river escrow chamber loses its cursor when the almanac rolls over, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar river escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1432", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn prairie escrow chamber must never trust the replica clock — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1433", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz creek escrow chamber reorders acks past its recalibration due date, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786514400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1434", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral prairie escrow chamber re-reads the manifest because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786208400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1435", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz glade edge cache uses a confidence floor of 803 percent, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz glade edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784372400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1436", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ashen atoll edge cache: overruns its dwell — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780869600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1436", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ashen atoll edge cache overruns its dwell when a checksum disagrees on arrival — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783980000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1437", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "orange oasis edge cache is permitted to skip the blank control", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780405200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1437", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "orange oasis edge cache must never skip the blank control — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange oasis edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783602000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1438", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat lowland edge cache orphans its batches behind a cold boot — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786950000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1439", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve cove edge cache ages its stock first because the pool hands out connections newest-first, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve cove edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786644000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1440", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate hill index writer uses a backoff ceiling of 817 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1440", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate hill index writer uses a backoff ceiling of 816 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1441", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon orchard index writer corrupts its checkpoint when the backfill overtakes live traffic, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784415600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1442", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "topaz cirque index writer is permitted to cache the lease token", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782136800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1442", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "topaz cirque index writer must never cache the lease token, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz cirque index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784037600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1443", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet strait index writer drifts its watermark inside the maintenance window, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet strait index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787385600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1444", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze heath index writer serialises its probes because the migration left a shadow column behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. bronze heath index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786993200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1445", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pewter glacier assay station uses a spill threshold of 829 megabytes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1446", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze valley assay station skips the fsync when the dedupe window slides — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze valley assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784779200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1447", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx hollow assay station must never reuse a spill file, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. onyx hollow assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx hollow assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784383200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1448", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet river assay station no longer starves the drain (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785402000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1448", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet river assay station starves the drain within the grace period — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1449", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz strait assay station retries before backing off because the estimator never saw a leap year, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz strait assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1450", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta geyser calibration bench uses a spill threshold of 853 megabytes", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784368800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1450", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta geyser calibration bench uses a spill threshold of 842 megabytes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta geyser calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786960800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1451", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard dell calibration bench skips the fsync when a retry lands out of order, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard dell calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785211200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1452", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure butte calibration bench is permitted to reuse a spill file", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782054000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1452", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure butte calibration bench must never reuse a spill file — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784818800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1453", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ruby bayou calibration bench starves the drain while a follower catches up — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby bayou calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784354400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1454", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn ravine calibration bench retries before backing off because integer division truncates the interval — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn ravine calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1455", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand forest token vault uses a snapshot depth of 855 generations, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand forest token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787396400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1456", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz orchard token vault misroutes its callbacks when the almanac rolls over — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785560400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1457", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze lake token vault must never interleave two restore streams, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1458", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat harbor token vault no longer overfills its journal (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781503200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1458", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat harbor token vault overfills its journal past its recalibration due date, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat harbor token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1459", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt estuary token vault escalates too eagerly because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt estuary token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788210000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1460", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate cirque index writer uses a grace period of 889 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786100400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1460", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate cirque index writer uses a grace period of 868 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1461", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "emerald summit index writer starves its consumers when a retry lands out of order — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald summit index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785996000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1462", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal lagoon index writer must never mutate a sealed segment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785600000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1463", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon delta index writer flaps its liveness while a follower catches up, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon delta index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785222000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1464", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl geyser index writer undercounts its retries because integer division truncates the interval — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl geyser index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783458000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1465", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron geyser ingest job uses a confidence floor of 881 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788177600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1466", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon bayou ingest job overruns its dwell when two drains overlap, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon bayou ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1467", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon dell ingest job must never skip the blank control, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon dell ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786035600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1468", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure canyon ingest job orphans its batches under sustained backpressure — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. azure canyon ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785657600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1469", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt bayou ingest job ages its stock first, and the sensor sums shadow and signal alike is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781388000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1469", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt bayou ingest job ages its stock first because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt bayou ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783893600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1470", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon gorge replay buffer uses a parity stripe of 894 blocks — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon gorge replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783429200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1471", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet forest replay buffer clones its timers when the failover rehearsal runs, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet forest replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783051200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1472", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald strait replay buffer must never reuse a burned nonce — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1473", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "silver brook replay buffer ignores its backpressure at quota exhaustion, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1474", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber tarn replay buffer idles between batches because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber tarn replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1475", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy pond provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 943 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780837200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1475", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy pond provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 907 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy pond provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1476", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia wharf provenance ledger expires its own grants when the standby promotes itself — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1477", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon isthmus provenance ledger must never outrun the replication horizon — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1478", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cinnamon oasis provenance ledger stutters its stream during certificate rotation — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1479", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy lowland provenance ledger trims from the head because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy lowland provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786046400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1480", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum delta assay station uses a rewind cursor lag of 920 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1481", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn rapids assay station desyncs its mirrors when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1482", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet badland assay station must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787252400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1483", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal harbor assay station splits its brain under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal harbor assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1484", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand gorge assay station recomputes the constant because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1485", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby gulch edge cache uses a confidence floor of 933 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby gulch edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784646000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1486", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral dune edge cache overruns its dwell when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1487", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper reef edge cache must never skip the blank control, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper reef edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1488", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald dale edge cache orphans its batches amid a thundering herd — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald dale edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1489", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel dell edge cache ages its stock first, and the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784408400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1489", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel dell edge cache ages its stock first because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. hazel dell edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1490", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory lowland sweep worker uses a quota refresh of 946 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory lowland sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785078000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1491", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sand isthmus sweep worker blackholes its retries when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand isthmus sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1492", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade knoll sweep worker must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. jade knoll sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784307600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1493", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber reef sweep worker no longer churns its connections (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784804400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1493", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber reef sweep worker churns its connections when the vault rotates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1494", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet reef sweep worker chases its own tail because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet reef sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787263200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1495", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy island edge cache uses a sampling stride of 959 readings, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy island edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1496", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine river edge cache inverts its polarity when the license check phones home — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1497", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive dell edge cache must never splice two lineages, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive dell edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784743200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1498", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand atoll edge cache skews its baseline past the retention cutoff, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand atoll edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f1499", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "birch marsh edge cache hoards its calibration slots, and the metric averages away the spikes is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f1499", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "birch marsh edge cache hoards its calibration slots because the metric averages away the spikes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch marsh edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1274", + "to": "f0885", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0553", + "to": "f0585", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0421", + "to": "f0525", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0314", + "to": "f1335", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0849", + "to": "f0253", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0938", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0690", + "to": "f0600", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1426", + "to": "f1495", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0119", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1008", + "to": "f0835", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1355", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0665", + "to": "f0925", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1054", + "to": "f1140", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0361", + "to": "f1330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1273", + "to": "f1270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0213", + "to": "f0990", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1091", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f0670", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1319", + "to": "f1055", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0560", + "to": "f1282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0740", + "to": "f1442", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1345", + "to": "f0950", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0560", + "to": "f1485", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1251", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0086", + "to": "f0600", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0589", + "to": "f0938", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0840", + "to": "f1152", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f1145", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0583", + "to": "f0600", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1455", + "to": "f0715", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0684", + "to": "f0848", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0536", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0273", + "to": "f1145", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0865", + "to": "f1117", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1424", + "to": "f0578", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1311", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1018", + "to": "f0515", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1179", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0681", + "to": "f0855", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0918", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0250", + "to": "f0487", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0559", + "to": "f1018", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1260", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1155", + "to": "f1127", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f1225", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0970", + "to": "f1402", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1218", + "to": "f0955", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f0885", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0445", + "to": "f1325", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0088", + "to": "f1465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1274", + "to": "f0978", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0643", + "to": "f1270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0505", + "to": "f1395", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0334", + "to": "f1475", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0651", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1494", + "to": "f0623", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0771", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0941", + "to": "f1415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0121", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1315", + "to": "f1407", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1121", + "to": "f1150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0988", + "to": "f1145", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0875", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f0363", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0739", + "to": "f0568", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1463", + "to": "f1340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1403", + "to": "f1155", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0795", + "to": "f1485", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1225", + "to": "f0067", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0730", + "to": "f0477", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0609", + "to": "f1065", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0128", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1045", + "to": "f0937", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0288", + "to": "f1085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f1035", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0761", + "to": "f1490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0324", + "to": "f1165", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0336", + "to": "f1245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1065", + "to": "f0607", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1349", + "to": "f0538", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1043", + "to": "f1300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0804", + "to": "f1085", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f1250", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0640", + "to": "f0500", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0158", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0660", + "to": "f1007", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0940", + "to": "f0987", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1464", + "to": "f1185", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1021", + "to": "f1300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0608", + "to": "f1445", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0825", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1285", + "to": "f1105", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1396", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1349", + "to": "f0698", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0221", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1178", + "to": "f1320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0709", + "to": "f0605", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0789", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0745", + "to": "f0725", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0496", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0315", + "to": "f0792", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0968", + "to": "f1330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1033", + "to": "f0735", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0109", + "to": "f1128", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0101", + "to": "f1435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0871", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1240", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0166", + "to": "f0565", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1286", + "to": "f0570", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1164", + "to": "f1150", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0426", + "to": "f0960", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0093", + "to": "f0965", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0115", + "to": "f0607", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1119", + "to": "f1053", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1299", + "to": "f1085", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0156", + "to": "f1055", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0809", + "to": "f0463", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1243", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0308", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1258", + "to": "f1245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0708", + "to": "f0950", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0756", + "to": "f0690", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0308", + "to": "f1390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1039", + "to": "f0718", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0504", + "to": "f0703", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0386", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0285", + "to": "f1462", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0833", + "to": "f1205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0180", + "to": "f1205", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0188", + "to": "f0820", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0976", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1146", + "to": "f1290", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1030", + "to": "f0605", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0525", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0720", + "to": "f0722", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1320", + "to": "f0810", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0930", + "to": "f1210", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0298", + "to": "f0580", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1394", + "to": "f0645", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0426", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1024", + "to": "f1020", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0911", + "to": "f1100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1038", + "to": "f1350", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1134", + "to": "f0133", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0708", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0084", + "to": "f1260", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1344", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0691", + "to": "f0810", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0399", + "to": "f0878", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0893", + "to": "f0575", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0699", + "to": "f1325", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0738", + "to": "f0660", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0873", + "to": "f0635", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0165", + "to": "f0757", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1136", + "to": "f0760", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1394", + "to": "f0393", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1278", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f1493", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1200", + "to": "f0772", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0824", + "to": "f0965", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0200", + "to": "f0667", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0173", + "to": "f1340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0089", + "to": "f1068", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0290", + "to": "f0222", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0123", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0224", + "to": "f0923", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0688", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0834", + "to": "f0883", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1070", + "to": "f0902", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1345", + "to": "f0537", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f0388", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0668", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0479", + "to": "f0870", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0676", + "to": "f1245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0236", + "to": "f0660", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0584", + "to": "f0680", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1369", + "to": "f1055", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0453", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0726", + "to": "f0730", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0748", + "to": "f1360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0533", + "to": "f0705", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0936", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1079", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1089", + "to": "f0990", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0110", + "to": "f0590", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0339", + "to": "f0750", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0844", + "to": "f1280", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0347", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0469", + "to": "f1183", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0529", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0254", + "to": "f1280", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0259", + "to": "f0328", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f1442", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0534", + "to": "f0823", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0114", + "to": "f0733", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1009", + "to": "f1083", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0078", + "to": "f1485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0091", + "to": "f0690", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0214", + "to": "f1433", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0665", + "to": "f0137", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0465", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0514", + "to": "f0555", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0810", + "to": "f1005", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0794", + "to": "f1285", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1380", + "to": "f0952", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0510", + "to": "f1370", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1005", + "to": "f0560", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0116", + "to": "f1235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0329", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0934", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1101", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0893", + "to": "f0535", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0838", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0483", + "to": "f1100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1490", + "to": "f0895", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0206", + "to": "f1000", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0106", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1238", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1139", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0795", + "to": "f1465", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1494", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1415", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0293", + "to": "f1485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0115", + "to": "f1167", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0906", + "to": "f1335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0111", + "to": "f0705", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0670", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0119", + "to": "f1093", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0829", + "to": "f0875", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0860", + "to": "f0807", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0679", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0114", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0391", + "to": "f1370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1438", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0589", + "to": "f0698", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1375", + "to": "f1382", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0941", + "to": "f1285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1016", + "to": "f1410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0925", + "to": "f1052", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0894", + "to": "f0648", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1106", + "to": "f0945", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1064", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0631", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1163", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0865", + "to": "f0237", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0795", + "to": "f0452", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0105", + "to": "f1330", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0200", + "to": "f1242", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1459", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0369", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0395", + "to": "f1182", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1491", + "to": "f0770", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0060", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0503", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0348", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1054", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0713", + "to": "f0755", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0435", + "to": "f0592", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1390", + "to": "f1380", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1314", + "to": "f1245", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0670", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0736", + "to": "f1340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0599", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0999", + "to": "f0998", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0179", + "to": "f0690", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0760", + "to": "f0422", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0163", + "to": "f1050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0585", + "to": "f1027", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0738", + "to": "f0815", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0989", + "to": "f1420", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0553", + "to": "f0610", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1474", + "to": "f0103", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0927", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0103", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0553", + "to": "f0790", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1230", + "to": "f0970", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0153", + "to": "f1355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0954", + "to": "f0278", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1064", + "to": "f0773", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0183", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1416", + "to": "f1375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1460", + "to": "f1442", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0653", + "to": "f1130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1420", + "to": "f0347", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1143", + "to": "f1110", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0184", + "to": "f1350", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0255", + "to": "f0687", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1125", + "to": "f0505", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0946", + "to": "f1325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1459", + "to": "f1108", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0221", + "to": "f0635", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0105", + "to": "f1047", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1296", + "to": "f0555", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1109", + "to": "f1048", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1491", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0925", + "to": "f0312", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0325", + "to": "f0627", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0510", + "to": "f1005", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0879", + "to": "f0878", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0190", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0615", + "to": "f0427", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1124", + "to": "f1090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0935", + "to": "f1105", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1464", + "to": "f0583", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0404", + "to": "f1030", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0945", + "to": "f0642", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0168", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0789", + "to": "f0488", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0569", + "to": "f0608", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0769", + "to": "f1093", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0523", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0545", + "to": "f0852", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1030", + "to": "f1407", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0615", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0804", + "to": "f0938", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0645", + "to": "f0622", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1310", + "to": "f0930", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0370", + "to": "f1422", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0715", + "to": "f1092", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1001", + "to": "f1045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0369", + "to": "f0965", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0895", + "to": "f1495", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0989", + "to": "f1260", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0565", + "to": "f0277", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0223", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0156", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1103", + "to": "f0910", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0699", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f1360", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1214", + "to": "f0543", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0660", + "to": "f0717", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1310", + "to": "f0072", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1189", + "to": "f0658", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0820", + "to": "f0572", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1389", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0471", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0409", + "to": "f0868", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1306", + "to": "f1380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0740", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1034", + "to": "f0728", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1014", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0812", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1485", + "to": "f0960", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1356", + "to": "f1185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0340", + "to": "f1307", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0491", + "to": "f0685", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0461", + "to": "f0935", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1194", + "to": "f1198", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0884", + "to": "f0448", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0864", + "to": "f0763", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1263", + "to": "f1340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0309", + "to": "f0640", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f1392", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0999", + "to": "f0888", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1244", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0160", + "to": "f0832", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1019", + "to": "f0558", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0441", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0839", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0301", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1309", + "to": "f1270", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0675", + "to": "f1060", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0568", + "to": "f1395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1284", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f1355", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0106", + "to": "f1160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0200", + "to": "f0810", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1345", + "to": "f0595", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0813", + "to": "f0800", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1328", + "to": "f0695", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0183", + "to": "f0650", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0470", + "to": "f1377", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1094", + "to": "f1283", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1323", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0858", + "to": "f1040", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0770", + "to": "f0797", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f1022", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0795", + "to": "f0342", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1140", + "to": "f1185", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1173", + "to": "f0510", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0950", + "to": "f1047", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0516", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f1380", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0290", + "to": "f1287", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0138", + "to": "f1195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0751", + "to": "f0790", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0799", + "to": "f1233", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1405", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0255", + "to": "f1050", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0929", + "to": "f0258", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1435", + "to": "f0897", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0180", + "to": "f0862", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0315", + "to": "f1270", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0215", + "to": "f1297", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0371", + "to": "f1480", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0569", + "to": "f1303", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1390", + "to": "f0767", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f1067", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1090", + "to": "f1092", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0374", + "to": "f0623", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0919", + "to": "f0778", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0843", + "to": "f1175", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0738", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0600", + "to": "f0980", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0939", + "to": "f0483", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0230", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0323", + "to": "f1095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1355", + "to": "f0645", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0568", + "to": "f1365", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1000", + "to": "f1452", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1113", + "to": "f0535", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0805", + "to": "f0905", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1079", + "to": "f1023", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0450", + "to": "f0897", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0469", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0305", + "to": "f1155", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0810", + "to": "f0832", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1146", + "to": "f0735", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0770", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0881", + "to": "f0540", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1114", + "to": "f1113", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1223", + "to": "f1050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0295", + "to": "f0512", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0460", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1093", + "to": "f1205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0739", + "to": "f1078", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1209", + "to": "f1225", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0796", + "to": "f0600", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1114", + "to": "f1098", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0733", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1030", + "to": "f0092", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0861", + "to": "f1395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1050", + "to": "f1055", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1379", + "to": "f1375", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f1127", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0425", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1095", + "to": "f0960", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0959", + "to": "f1048", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0263", + "to": "f1100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1231", + "to": "f0560", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0128", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1269", + "to": "f0733", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1263", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1434", + "to": "f0625", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1225", + "to": "f1482", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0729", + "to": "f0308", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1270", + "to": "f0747", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1283", + "to": "f1460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0700", + "to": "f1160", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0766", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1396", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0965", + "to": "f1107", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0786", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1439", + "to": "f0323", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0311", + "to": "f1120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0450", + "to": "f1435", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0951", + "to": "f0825", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0613", + "to": "f0735", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0804", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0336", + "to": "f1080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0550", + "to": "f0222", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0341", + "to": "f1085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1430", + "to": "f1360", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0855", + "to": "f1270", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1169", + "to": "f0913", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1276", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0708", + "to": "f1270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1313", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0245", + "to": "f0200", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0739", + "to": "f0905", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0936", + "to": "f0935", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1038", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0108", + "to": "f0625", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0266", + "to": "f0975", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f1250", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1063", + "to": "f1055", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1159", + "to": "f0363", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1020", + "to": "f1460", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1423", + "to": "f1105", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0295", + "to": "f1220", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0884", + "to": "f0378", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0928", + "to": "f0925", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0938", + "to": "f1490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1095", + "to": "f0247", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1374", + "to": "f1373", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1284", + "to": "f1055", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0451", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0525", + "to": "f1217", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1053", + "to": "f1000", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0994", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1338", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1436", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1009", + "to": "f0538", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1165", + "to": "f1497", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0900", + "to": "f0910", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1169", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0084", + "to": "f1453", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1398", + "to": "f1420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0755", + "to": "f1257", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0893", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0539", + "to": "f0858", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1065", + "to": "f0952", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0108", + "to": "f1240", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0235", + "to": "f0757", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0904", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0805", + "to": "f1222", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1338", + "to": "f0800", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1136", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1351", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1325", + "to": "f1240", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0533", + "to": "f0575", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1300", + "to": "f0517", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1169", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1330", + "to": "f0912", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0545", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0620", + "to": "f0995", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0219", + "to": "f1245", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0123", + "to": "f1140", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0999", + "to": "f0238", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0746", + "to": "f0920", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1180", + "to": "f1025", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1454", + "to": "f0913", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1218", + "to": "f0875", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0723", + "to": "f1170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0990", + "to": "f1237", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1058", + "to": "f1440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1109", + "to": "f1008", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1169", + "to": "f0785", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1419", + "to": "f0338", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1080", + "to": "f0227", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0514", + "to": "f0520", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0299", + "to": "f0590", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1055", + "to": "f1367", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1320", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1391", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0123", + "to": "f0570", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0778", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0219", + "to": "f0935", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1230", + "to": "f1032", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1063", + "to": "f0740", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1260", + "to": "f0785", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0341", + "to": "f1295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1270", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1143", + "to": "f1495", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1229", + "to": "f1478", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0185", + "to": "f0575", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1495", + "to": "f1157", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1190", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0578", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0255", + "to": "f1405", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0816", + "to": "f1230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1209", + "to": "f1165", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1219", + "to": "f0338", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1116", + "to": "f1420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0600", + "to": "f0862", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0711", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0941", + "to": "f1105", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1065", + "to": "f0112", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0280", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0900", + "to": "f0942", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0153", + "to": "f1300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1013", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0629", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1420", + "to": "f0782", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1318", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0131", + "to": "f1465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0474", + "to": "f0843", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0374", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1079", + "to": "f1075", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1264", + "to": "f1423", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0461", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0105", + "to": "f1272", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1243", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0923", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0543", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1274", + "to": "f1265", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1424", + "to": "f1188", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1029", + "to": "f0563", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f1150", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0651", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0891", + "to": "f0930", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0549", + "to": "f1343", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0268", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0986", + "to": "f0925", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0905", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0620", + "to": "f1255", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0910", + "to": "f1057", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1475", + "to": "f0755", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0363", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0260", + "to": "f1052", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1015", + "to": "f1195", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0570", + "to": "f0880", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0944", + "to": "f0820", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0381", + "to": "f1355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1060", + "to": "f0252", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0419", + "to": "f1225", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0645", + "to": "f0422", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0200", + "to": "f0777", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0105", + "to": "f0702", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1314", + "to": "f0918", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0309", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1455", + "to": "f0672", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0379", + "to": "f0608", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1126", + "to": "f1285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0548", + "to": "f1095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0906", + "to": "f0930", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0759", + "to": "f1380", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0716", + "to": "f1045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0250", + "to": "f0835", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1089", + "to": "f1105", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0743", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0230", + "to": "f1255", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1034", + "to": "f1145", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1459", + "to": "f0528", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0398", + "to": "f1075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0656", + "to": "f1070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0520", + "to": "f0722", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1089", + "to": "f1110", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1344", + "to": "f0168", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1108", + "to": "f0565", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0813", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f1288", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1434", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0323", + "to": "f0840", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0689", + "to": "f1118", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0203", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1230", + "to": "f1440", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1331", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1280", + "to": "f0292", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0804", + "to": "f1483", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0895", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0930", + "to": "f0097", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0701", + "to": "f1045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1455", + "to": "f1392", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1291", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0454", + "to": "f0208", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f1350", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0119", + "to": "f0505", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0515", + "to": "f1377", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1014", + "to": "f0510", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0990", + "to": "f0537", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0230", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1450", + "to": "f0595", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0116", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1080", + "to": "f1082", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1229", + "to": "f0168", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1289", + "to": "f1455", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1130", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0920", + "to": "f0637", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0429", + "to": "f1475", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0963", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0718", + "to": "f0900", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1271", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0953", + "to": "f0905", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0230", + "to": "f1070", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1391", + "to": "f0810", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1125", + "to": "f0720", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0835", + "to": "f1212", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0514", + "to": "f1095", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1059", + "to": "f0623", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1070", + "to": "f0937", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1264", + "to": "f0880", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1450", + "to": "f0247", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1104", + "to": "f0853", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1054", + "to": "f0928", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1126", + "to": "f0575", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0970", + "to": "f0122", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0513", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0754", + "to": "f0078", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1330", + "to": "f0492", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1259", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1314", + "to": "f0358", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0264", + "to": "f1170", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1440", + "to": "f0772", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0595", + "to": "f0537", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0690", + "to": "f1102", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0765", + "to": "f0122", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0698", + "to": "f0560", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0476", + "to": "f0540", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0701", + "to": "f0780", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0659", + "to": "f1220", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1086", + "to": "f0605", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1458", + "to": "f0645", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1254", + "to": "f0218", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0324", + "to": "f0740", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1390", + "to": "f0382", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f0402", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1445", + "to": "f0597", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1499", + "to": "f0653", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0905", + "to": "f1337", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1274", + "to": "f0858", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1179", + "to": "f0980", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1079", + "to": "f0388", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1210", + "to": "f0935", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0751", + "to": "f1265", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0870", + "to": "f0327", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1039", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0695", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0678", + "to": "f1490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1220", + "to": "f0570", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0324", + "to": "f1195", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0600", + "to": "f1227", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1045", + "to": "f1360", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0566", + "to": "f1485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0740", + "to": "f0680", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1396", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0520", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0111", + "to": "f0850", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0325", + "to": "f0492", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1405", + "to": "f0982", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1433", + "to": "f0595", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1094", + "to": "f0788", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0125", + "to": "f0102", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0814", + "to": "f0953", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1335", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0735", + "to": "f0720", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0564", + "to": "f0200", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0813", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0408", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0216", + "to": "f0555", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1270", + "to": "f1100", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0231", + "to": "f0615", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0221", + "to": "f1345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0125", + "to": "f0775", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0748", + "to": "f0845", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0720", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1345", + "to": "f1300", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0225", + "to": "f1375", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f1105", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0899", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0244", + "to": "f0128", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0061", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0386", + "to": "f1150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0694", + "to": "f1280", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1273", + "to": "f0855", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0451", + "to": "f0970", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0585", + "to": "f1165", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1169", + "to": "f1490", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0620", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1448", + "to": "f1475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0428", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0808", + "to": "f1470", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1289", + "to": "f0665", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0750", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0805", + "to": "f1352", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1444", + "to": "f0950", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0935", + "to": "f1067", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1030", + "to": "f1437", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0505", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1036", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0190", + "to": "f0382", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0821", + "to": "f0770", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0815", + "to": "f0217", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0664", + "to": "f0663", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0640", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0685", + "to": "f1255", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0744", + "to": "f0268", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0200", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1213", + "to": "f0580", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1013", + "to": "f1220", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f1152", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0874", + "to": "f0975", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0339", + "to": "f1050", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0659", + "to": "f0650", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1020", + "to": "f1045", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0878", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0823", + "to": "f0500", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0739", + "to": "f0288", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0875", + "to": "f0432", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0894", + "to": "f1160", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0385", + "to": "f0750", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1038", + "to": "f0850", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0104", + "to": "f0650", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0750", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0665", + "to": "f1392", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0259", + "to": "f0498", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0068", + "to": "f0705", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0456", + "to": "f0755", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0795", + "to": "f1070", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0431", + "to": "f0660", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1110", + "to": "f1160", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0335", + "to": "f0812", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0425", + "to": "f0905", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1188", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0464", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0215", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1221", + "to": "f0700", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0365", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0594", + "to": "f0735", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1321", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0134", + "to": "f0098", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0884", + "to": "f0470", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0138", + "to": "f0990", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0850", + "to": "f1392", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0520", + "to": "f0720", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0845", + "to": "f1285", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1466", + "to": "f1310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0268", + "to": "f0730", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1103", + "to": "f1485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0690", + "to": "f0857", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0103", + "to": "f0560", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0309", + "to": "f0728", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0498", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0399", + "to": "f0905", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0871", + "to": "f1360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0129", + "to": "f1463", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0765", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f1340", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0634", + "to": "f1295", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1394", + "to": "f1493", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1419", + "to": "f1210", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0255", + "to": "f0862", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0776", + "to": "f0830", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0554", + "to": "f0243", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0165", + "to": "f0267", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1098", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0861", + "to": "f1475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0609", + "to": "f1090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1099", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1444", + "to": "f0293", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0555", + "to": "f0907", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1379", + "to": "f1153", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0570", + "to": "f1045", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0665", + "to": "f0647", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0300", + "to": "f0417", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0814", + "to": "f1075", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0150", + "to": "f0202", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1236", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1146", + "to": "f1395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f1205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1413", + "to": "f0765", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1361", + "to": "f1350", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1015", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0239", + "to": "f1083", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0675", + "to": "f1015", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0406", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1298", + "to": "f0715", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0514", + "to": "f1093", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0869", + "to": "f0198", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0995", + "to": "f1227", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0401", + "to": "f1240", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0963", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f1005", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0660", + "to": "f0510", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0955", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0574", + "to": "f0818", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0388", + "to": "f1075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0245", + "to": "f1170", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1204", + "to": "f0198", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0894", + "to": "f1028", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0419", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1264", + "to": "f1035", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0379", + "to": "f1455", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0669", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1040", + "to": "f0580", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1251", + "to": "f0715", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0788", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0271", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1351", + "to": "f1305", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0664", + "to": "f0503", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1063", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0315", + "to": "f1120", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0615", + "to": "f0382", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0375", + "to": "f1112", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1210", + "to": "f1407", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0575", + "to": "f0577", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1309", + "to": "f1273", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0515", + "to": "f0755", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0449", + "to": "f1260", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1108", + "to": "f1290", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1383", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0106", + "to": "f0995", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0670", + "to": "f1065", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1398", + "to": "f1130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1228", + "to": "f1430", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0789", + "to": "f0600", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1413", + "to": "f1055", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0604", + "to": "f0975", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1420", + "to": "f1452", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0196", + "to": "f0815", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0610", + "to": "f0082", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0340", + "to": "f0772", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0276", + "to": "f1340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1184", + "to": "f1183", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1460", + "to": "f0740", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1310", + "to": "f1142", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1410", + "to": "f0912", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0819", + "to": "f0638", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0628", + "to": "f0845", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1064", + "to": "f1428", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f1235", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0219", + "to": "f0658", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0983", + "to": "f0740", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0881", + "to": "f1455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1490", + "to": "f0467", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0433", + "to": "f1465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1063", + "to": "f0505", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0938", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0635", + "to": "f0667", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0383", + "to": "f1355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0819", + "to": "f0530", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0769", + "to": "f1288", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1318", + "to": "f1185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0629", + "to": "f0288", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0271", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1320", + "to": "f0627", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0060", + "to": "f0452", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0165", + "to": "f0950", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0549", + "to": "f0660", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0166", + "to": "f0935", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0097", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0720", + "to": "f0712", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0456", + "to": "f0710", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0468", + "to": "f0750", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0149", + "to": "f0158", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0588", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0581", + "to": "f0545", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0569", + "to": "f0683", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1041", + "to": "f0680", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1376", + "to": "f0820", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0350", + "to": "f0782", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0611", + "to": "f1415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0978", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0938", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1251", + "to": "f1005", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f1493", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0529", + "to": "f0505", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0194", + "to": "f0348", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0815", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0315", + "to": "f0942", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1335", + "to": "f0605", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0934", + "to": "f1410", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0364", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1493", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1118", + "to": "f1130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1180", + "to": "f0087", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0858", + "to": "f0885", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0283", + "to": "f1160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1355", + "to": "f0547", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1184", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1286", + "to": "f1305", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0466", + "to": "f1480", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0989", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0440", + "to": "f0710", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1064", + "to": "f0383", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0240", + "to": "f1277", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0784", + "to": "f1228", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0913", + "to": "f0920", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0899", + "to": "f0518", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0171", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1358", + "to": "f0945", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0213", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0154", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0539", + "to": "f1040", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0669", + "to": "f0998", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0546", + "to": "f1005", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0521", + "to": "f1200", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0060", + "to": "f1147", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0651", + "to": "f0855", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0836", + "to": "f0685", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0780", + "to": "f1495", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0690", + "to": "f0862", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f1270", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1210", + "to": "f1080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1020", + "to": "f0947", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1144", + "to": "f1380", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0174", + "to": "f0433", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1085", + "to": "f0467", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1104", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1454", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0831", + "to": "f0865", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0394", + "to": "f0835", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0933", + "to": "f1165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0953", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1363", + "to": "f1215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0235", + "to": "f0572", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1325", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0419", + "to": "f0373", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1156", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0430", + "to": "f0880", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0855", + "to": "f1272", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0854", + "to": "f1093", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0558", + "to": "f0595", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0701", + "to": "f0735", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0443", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0991", + "to": "f0550", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0480", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1074", + "to": "f1238", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0750", + "to": "f0207", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0854", + "to": "f0995", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0684", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0425", + "to": "f1480", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1281", + "to": "f0655", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1083", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1048", + "to": "f0775", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1426", + "to": "f1485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f1375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1371", + "to": "f0565", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1029", + "to": "f0073", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0294", + "to": "f0290", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1461", + "to": "f0795", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0194", + "to": "f0743", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1034", + "to": "f1155", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0154", + "to": "f0505", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0348", + "to": "f0525", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1239", + "to": "f0260", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1429", + "to": "f0973", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0940", + "to": "f1102", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0604", + "to": "f0935", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1384", + "to": "f0715", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0928", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0250", + "to": "f1307", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0251", + "to": "f0825", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1085", + "to": "f1367", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0550", + "to": "f0282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f0535", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0960", + "to": "f1432", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0391", + "to": "f0645", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0215", + "to": "f1495", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1415", + "to": "f0645", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0163", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1278", + "to": "f1275", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1470", + "to": "f1015", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0900", + "to": "f0827", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1196", + "to": "f1255", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0841", + "to": "f1440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0876", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0995", + "to": "f0615", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0906", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0295", + "to": "f0232", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0965", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0974", + "to": "f0268", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0698", + "to": "f1215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1309", + "to": "f0855", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0720", + "to": "f0572", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0353", + "to": "f1240", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1283", + "to": "f0550", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1285", + "to": "f1370", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1494", + "to": "f1493", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0764", + "to": "f0458", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1218", + "to": "f0895", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0584", + "to": "f0308", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0969", + "to": "f1358", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1083", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0649", + "to": "f0665", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1298", + "to": "f0500", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1131", + "to": "f1225", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1185", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0294", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1359", + "to": "f0393", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0428", + "to": "f0835", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0270", + "to": "f1287", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0386", + "to": "f0545", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1140", + "to": "f1062", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0939", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0373", + "to": "f1490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0653", + "to": "f0515", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0665", + "to": "f0240", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1108", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0586", + "to": "f1020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0415", + "to": "f0810", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1069", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0781", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1424", + "to": "f0530", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0801", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1474", + "to": "f1230", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1470", + "to": "f0197", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0630", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0835", + "to": "f0880", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0819", + "to": "f1298", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0850", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1365", + "to": "f0602", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1205", + "to": "f0652", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1418", + "to": "f0865", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0391", + "to": "f0870", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0854", + "to": "f0785", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0535", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0749", + "to": "f1315", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1214", + "to": "f0583", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0100", + "to": "f0715", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1084", + "to": "f0760", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1330", + "to": "f0670", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0550", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1014", + "to": "f0870", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0255", + "to": "f1122", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1069", + "to": "f1288", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1008", + "to": "f0735", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0575", + "to": "f0192", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1195", + "to": "f1212", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1023", + "to": "f0670", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0904", + "to": "f0900", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0155", + "to": "f1282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0235", + "to": "f0637", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0400", + "to": "f0790", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0788", + "to": "f0570", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1280", + "to": "f1425", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0409", + "to": "f0665", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0186", + "to": "f1155", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1210", + "to": "f0497", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0816", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1120", + "to": "f0242", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0959", + "to": "f0903", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1223", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0306", + "to": "f0970", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0749", + "to": "f0593", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0121", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0223", + "to": "f1190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0928", + "to": "f0830", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0141", + "to": "f1325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1203", + "to": "f0770", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0112", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0838", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1115", + "to": "f1140", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0404", + "to": "f0605", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0575", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1135", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1075", + "to": "f0722", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1394", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1441", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1429", + "to": "f0743", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1210", + "to": "f0097", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0894", + "to": "f0893", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0784", + "to": "f0505", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0610", + "to": "f0590", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1223", + "to": "f0810", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0136", + "to": "f1270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1030", + "to": "f0372", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1188", + "to": "f0820", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0995", + "to": "f0542", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0875", + "to": "f1025", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1351", + "to": "f0700", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0943", + "to": "f0695", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1275", + "to": "f0272", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1390", + "to": "f0905", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0754", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0948", + "to": "f0655", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0520", + "to": "f0802", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0670", + "to": "f0897", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1260", + "to": "f1187", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1414", + "to": "f1390", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0071", + "to": "f1190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1136", + "to": "f0775", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1001", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0934", + "to": "f0343", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0515", + "to": "f1427", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1295", + "to": "f0622", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0473", + "to": "f1230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0400", + "to": "f1380", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0724", + "to": "f0635", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0880", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0211", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1340", + "to": "f0302", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1084", + "to": "f1193", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1350", + "to": "f1267", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0953", + "to": "f0630", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0311", + "to": "f0925", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1460", + "to": "f1117", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0993", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1479", + "to": "f0565", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1130", + "to": "f0850", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0959", + "to": "f0530", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1240", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0828", + "to": "f0970", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0790", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0163", + "to": "f1460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0920", + "to": "f0402", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f0780", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0927", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0273", + "to": "f0575", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0796", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0835", + "to": "f0667", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1415", + "to": "f1397", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0685", + "to": "f1197", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1243", + "to": "f0525", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0594", + "to": "f0945", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0594", + "to": "f0698", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1034", + "to": "f1038", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1049", + "to": "f1455", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0154", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1165", + "to": "f0142", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1330", + "to": "f0222", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1401", + "to": "f1245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1081", + "to": "f0815", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1195", + "to": "f1292", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0805", + "to": "f1390", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0260", + "to": "f1262", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f1457", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1240", + "to": "f1282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0560", + "to": "f0257", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0665", + "to": "f0927", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0579", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0576", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0540", + "to": "f1187", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0484", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1250", + "to": "f1005", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1271", + "to": "f0720", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0578", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1169", + "to": "f0238", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1395", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0175", + "to": "f0595", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0353", + "to": "f0955", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1494", + "to": "f1365", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0869", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0513", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0449", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0671", + "to": "f1035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1461", + "to": "f1050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1074", + "to": "f1285", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1160", + "to": "f1162", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0514", + "to": "f0715", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0365", + "to": "f1212", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0494", + "to": "f0740", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1409", + "to": "f1310", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0474", + "to": "f0505", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0319", + "to": "f1413", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0964", + "to": "f1035", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1440", + "to": "f0737", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0401", + "to": "f0760", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1050", + "to": "f0462", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1495", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0685", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0584", + "to": "f1123", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1370", + "to": "f0517", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0464", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0943", + "to": "f1305", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1215", + "to": "f1345", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0786", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1083", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0139", + "to": "f0198", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0241", + "to": "f0555", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0589", + "to": "f1035", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1120", + "to": "f0347", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0353", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1113", + "to": "f0910", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0829", + "to": "f1380", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1014", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1441", + "to": "f0985", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0299", + "to": "f1413", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1316", + "to": "f1035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0858", + "to": "f0760", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0660", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0289", + "to": "f1103", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f0962", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0991", + "to": "f0605", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1025", + "to": "f1080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0645", + "to": "f0917", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0484", + "to": "f1295", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0993", + "to": "f1005", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0506", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0543", + "to": "f0675", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1414", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1160", + "to": "f0925", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1373", + "to": "f0720", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1334", + "to": "f0213", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0495", + "to": "f0217", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0554", + "to": "f0655", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0084", + "to": "f1338", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1329", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0279", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0689", + "to": "f0685", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0705", + "to": "f0167", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0935", + "to": "f1307", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1259", + "to": "f0970", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0574", + "to": "f0413", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1368", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1278", + "to": "f0615", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0105", + "to": "f0710", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0810", + "to": "f0892", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0793", + "to": "f0785", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1418", + "to": "f0835", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f1025", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0865", + "to": "f0855", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1419", + "to": "f0598", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f0897", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1175", + "to": "f0277", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1108", + "to": "f0515", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1483", + "to": "f0585", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1184", + "to": "f0663", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0360", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1086", + "to": "f0240", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0864", + "to": "f0603", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0157", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1151", + "to": "f1150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1454", + "to": "f1308", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0895", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0196", + "to": "f1225", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0273", + "to": "f1490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0613", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0614", + "to": "f0428", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0560", + "to": "f1335", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0935", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0980", + "to": "f0915", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0784", + "to": "f0838", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1330", + "to": "f1440", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0339", + "to": "f0808", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0304", + "to": "f0363", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1308", + "to": "f0980", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1033", + "to": "f1330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1100", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0985", + "to": "f1315", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1383", + "to": "f0735", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0066", + "to": "f0125", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1133", + "to": "f0840", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1258", + "to": "f1310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1330", + "to": "f0640", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1218", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0114", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0466", + "to": "f1420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0911", + "to": "f1245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0656", + "to": "f0880", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1109", + "to": "f1445", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0534", + "to": "f0873", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1446", + "to": "f1005", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0945", + "to": "f0602", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1353", + "to": "f0650", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0863", + "to": "f1015", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0829", + "to": "f1110", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1334", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0935", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0505", + "to": "f0602", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0119", + "to": "f1490", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0266", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0549", + "to": "f0263", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0619", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0960", + "to": "f0845", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1374", + "to": "f0855", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0913", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0756", + "to": "f0970", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0981", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0618", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0465", + "to": "f0442", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1025", + "to": "f1160", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0659", + "to": "f1013", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1350", + "to": "f1205", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0930", + "to": "f0887", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0349", + "to": "f0743", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1339", + "to": "f1295", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1326", + "to": "f0880", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1365", + "to": "f1227", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0626", + "to": "f1195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1159", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0826", + "to": "f1370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1051", + "to": "f1000", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1325", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0263", + "to": "f1380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0461", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0945", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0855", + "to": "f1245", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1174", + "to": "f1338", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0849", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1499", + "to": "f1035", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1138", + "to": "f0555", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1265", + "to": "f0107", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0879", + "to": "f0128", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1398", + "to": "f0730", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1035", + "to": "f1320", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1321", + "to": "f0290", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f1287", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0415", + "to": "f1225", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1350", + "to": "f0655", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1116", + "to": "f1035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1499", + "to": "f1195", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0460", + "to": "f0755", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0843", + "to": "f1420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0644", + "to": "f0968", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0865", + "to": "f0600", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0534", + "to": "f1050", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0276", + "to": "f1395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0593", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f1405", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0798", + "to": "f0610", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0606", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1259", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0810", + "to": "f0972", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0915", + "to": "f1437", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f1325", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1281", + "to": "f0980", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0414", + "to": "f1390", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0940", + "to": "f1442", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1190", + "to": "f0912", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0755", + "to": "f1430", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0909", + "to": "f0248", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1118", + "to": "f1060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1481", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0365", + "to": "f0595", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0899", + "to": "f0750", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1073", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0990", + "to": "f1040", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1465", + "to": "f1010", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0643", + "to": "f1230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0926", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0675", + "to": "f1197", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1345", + "to": "f0437", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0604", + "to": "f0815", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0300", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1466", + "to": "f1165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1251", + "to": "f1250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0365", + "to": "f0337", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1415", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1095", + "to": "f0470", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0741", + "to": "f1355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0483", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0119", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0947", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1075", + "to": "f1170", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1005", + "to": "f0722", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0126", + "to": "f1415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0313", + "to": "f1425", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0426", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0975", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0671", + "to": "f1415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0088", + "to": "f0930", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1184", + "to": "f1168", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1145", + "to": "f1217", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0899", + "to": "f0970", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0231", + "to": "f1120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1445", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1045", + "to": "f1260", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0765", + "to": "f0162", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0694", + "to": "f1338", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0409", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0285", + "to": "f1127", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1059", + "to": "f0703", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0786", + "to": "f0555", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0361", + "to": "f1070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1271", + "to": "f0565", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0735", + "to": "f0277", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0769", + "to": "f0743", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0979", + "to": "f0743", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0553", + "to": "f0650", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1451", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1396", + "to": "f1320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0911", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0116", + "to": "f1015", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0805", + "to": "f1162", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f1238", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0589", + "to": "f0603", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1104", + "to": "f0240", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0840", + "to": "f0827", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1040", + "to": "f0885", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0424", + "to": "f1108", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1354", + "to": "f0878", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1099", + "to": "f0755", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0834", + "to": "f1200", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0073", + "to": "f1035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0538", + "to": "f1370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1195", + "to": "f1440", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1446", + "to": "f0775", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0403", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1149", + "to": "f0240", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0915", + "to": "f0352", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1415", + "to": "f1090", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0581", + "to": "f0945", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1381", + "to": "f1345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0448", + "to": "f1340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1318", + "to": "f0990", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1349", + "to": "f1018", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1158", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1245", + "to": "f1485", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0671", + "to": "f0985", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0260", + "to": "f0717", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1160", + "to": "f1117", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1079", + "to": "f1215", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1076", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0618", + "to": "f1455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1140", + "to": "f0657", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0811", + "to": "f0805", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1223", + "to": "f0835", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0416", + "to": "f1355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0284", + "to": "f0548", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0974", + "to": "f1425", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1489", + "to": "f1415", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1325", + "to": "f0997", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0774", + "to": "f1305", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0443", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0904", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0974", + "to": "f0438", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0296", + "to": "f1070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0664", + "to": "f0633", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0061", + "to": "f1365", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1179", + "to": "f1348", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0965", + "to": "f1215", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0374", + "to": "f1133", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0968", + "to": "f1025", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0300", + "to": "f0987", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0911", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1429", + "to": "f1230", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0865", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1285", + "to": "f0722", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0250", + "to": "f0260", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1286", + "to": "f1050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0781", + "to": "f0890", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1138", + "to": "f0865", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0659", + "to": "f0903", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0899", + "to": "f0828", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0126", + "to": "f0540", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1244", + "to": "f0950", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0375", + "to": "f1125", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0756", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0849", + "to": "f0573", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0605", + "to": "f1367", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0123", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0786", + "to": "f0670", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1174", + "to": "f0635", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0138", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0513", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0655", + "to": "f1130", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0376", + "to": "f1435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0766", + "to": "f1310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1420", + "to": "f1247", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0929", + "to": "f0488", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0524", + "to": "f1463", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1424", + "to": "f0870", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1259", + "to": "f1205", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0895", + "to": "f0785", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0225", + "to": "f0572", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0429", + "to": "f0613", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0789", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1426", + "to": "f1390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0936", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0333", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1054", + "to": "f0413", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0594", + "to": "f0995", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1459", + "to": "f0188", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0626", + "to": "f1390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0860", + "to": "f0522", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0149", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0475", + "to": "f1422", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1365", + "to": "f1025", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1394", + "to": "f1475", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1369", + "to": "f0590", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1340", + "to": "f0852", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0618", + "to": "f1160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0228", + "to": "f0750", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0955", + "to": "f1305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0364", + "to": "f0828", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0599", + "to": "f0843", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0905", + "to": "f1282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1284", + "to": "f0893", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1339", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0989", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0195", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0434", + "to": "f0953", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0116", + "to": "f1435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0673", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0518", + "to": "f0765", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1490", + "to": "f0547", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1325", + "to": "f1310", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1174", + "to": "f1313", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0623", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0930", + "to": "f1357", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0764", + "to": "f1028", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1149", + "to": "f0940", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1011", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0313", + "to": "f1280", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0243", + "to": "f1485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1311", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0470", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0219", + "to": "f1400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0604", + "to": "f1425", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0626", + "to": "f1440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1333", + "to": "f0670", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0821", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0150", + "to": "f0860", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1353", + "to": "f1430", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1191", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0979", + "to": "f0063", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1304", + "to": "f1310", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1285", + "to": "f1497", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0909", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0219", + "to": "f0643", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0563", + "to": "f1355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1423", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f1257", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f1090", + "to": "f0980", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0644", + "to": "f0283", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c000g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn strait ingest job uses a compaction floor of 84 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g0", + "new": { + "key": "c000g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn strait ingest job uses a compaction floor of 173 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g1", + "new": { + "key": "c000g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn strait ingest job uses a compaction floor of 262 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c001g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige ridge shard router uses a parity stripe of 97 blocks, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige ridge shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g0", + "new": { + "key": "c001g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige ridge shard router uses a parity stripe of 186 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g1", + "new": { + "key": "c001g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige ridge shard router uses a parity stripe of 275 blocks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c002g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz ridge entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 110 blocks, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz ridge entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g0", + "new": { + "key": "c002g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz ridge entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 199 blocks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz ridge entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g1", + "new": { + "key": "c002g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz ridge entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 288 blocks — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c003g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald prairie escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 123 megabytes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g0", + "new": { + "key": "c003g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald prairie escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 212 megabytes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. emerald prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g1", + "new": { + "key": "c003g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald prairie escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 301 megabytes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c004g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn cirque entropy siphon uses a drain deadline of 136 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g0", + "new": { + "key": "c004g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn cirque entropy siphon uses a drain deadline of 225 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. auburn cirque entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g1", + "new": { + "key": "c004g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn cirque entropy siphon uses a drain deadline of 314 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn cirque entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c005g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon hill index writer uses a spill threshold of 149 megabytes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon hill index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c005g0", + "new": { + "key": "c005g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon hill index writer uses a spill threshold of 238 megabytes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c005g1", + "new": { + "key": "c005g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon hill index writer uses a spill threshold of 327 megabytes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon hill index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c006g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal prairie sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 162 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal prairie sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c006g0", + "new": { + "key": "c006g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal prairie sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 251 milliseconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal prairie sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c006g1", + "new": { + "key": "c006g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal prairie sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 340 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c007g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber pond escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 175 megabytes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber pond escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c007g0", + "new": { + "key": "c007g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber pond escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 264 megabytes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c007g1", + "new": { + "key": "c007g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber pond escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 353 megabytes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber pond escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c008g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar canyon edge cache uses a checkpoint cadence of 188 minutes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar canyon edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c008g0", + "new": { + "key": "c008g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar canyon edge cache uses a checkpoint cadence of 277 minutes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c008g1", + "new": { + "key": "c008g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar canyon edge cache uses a checkpoint cadence of 366 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c009g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cove provenance ledger uses a checkpoint cadence of 201 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper cove provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c009g0", + "new": { + "key": "c009g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cove provenance ledger uses a checkpoint cadence of 290 minutes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c009g1", + "new": { + "key": "c009g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cove provenance ledger uses a checkpoint cadence of 379 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper cove provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c010g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac dale telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 214 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac dale telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c010g0", + "new": { + "key": "c010g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac dale telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 303 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac dale telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c010g1", + "new": { + "key": "c010g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac dale telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 392 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c011g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade quarry provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 227 entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade quarry provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c011g0", + "new": { + "key": "c011g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade quarry provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 316 entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. jade quarry provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c011g1", + "new": { + "key": "c011g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade quarry provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 405 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade quarry provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c012g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal grove sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 240 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c012g0", + "new": { + "key": "c012g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal grove sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 329 milliseconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c012g1", + "new": { + "key": "c012g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal grove sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 418 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal grove sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c013g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe delta shard router uses a lease window of 253 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe delta shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c013g0", + "new": { + "key": "c013g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe delta shard router uses a lease window of 342 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c013g1", + "new": { + "key": "c013g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe delta shard router uses a lease window of 431 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c014g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet glacier calibration bench uses a grace period of 266 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet glacier calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c014g0", + "new": { + "key": "c014g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet glacier calibration bench uses a grace period of 355 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet glacier calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c014g1", + "new": { + "key": "c014g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet glacier calibration bench uses a grace period of 444 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c015g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre harbor escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 279 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre harbor escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c015g0", + "new": { + "key": "c015g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre harbor escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 368 minutes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c015g1", + "new": { + "key": "c015g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre harbor escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 457 minutes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre harbor escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c016g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand orchard replay buffer uses a grace period of 292 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand orchard replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c016g0", + "new": { + "key": "c016g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand orchard replay buffer uses a grace period of 381 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c016g1", + "new": { + "key": "c016g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand orchard replay buffer uses a grace period of 470 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand orchard replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c017g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige lake sweep worker uses a rewind cursor lag of 305 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige lake sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c017g0", + "new": { + "key": "c017g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige lake sweep worker uses a rewind cursor lag of 394 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c017g1", + "new": { + "key": "c017g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige lake sweep worker uses a rewind cursor lag of 483 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige lake sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c018g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac glade ingest job uses a flush interval of 318 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac glade ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c018g0", + "new": { + "key": "c018g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac glade ingest job uses a flush interval of 407 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. lilac glade ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c018g1", + "new": { + "key": "c018g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac glade ingest job uses a flush interval of 496 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c019g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade shore token vault uses a retry budget of 331 attempts — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade shore token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c019g0", + "new": { + "key": "c019g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade shore token vault uses a retry budget of 420 attempts — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c019g1", + "new": { + "key": "c019g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade shore token vault uses a retry budget of 509 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade shore token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c020g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden barrens telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 344 entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c020g0", + "new": { + "key": "c020g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden barrens telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 433 entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c020g1", + "new": { + "key": "c020g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden barrens telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 522 entries, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden barrens telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c021g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber rapids entropy siphon uses a quarantine window of 357 days, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. umber rapids entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber rapids entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c021g0", + "new": { + "key": "c021g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber rapids entropy siphon uses a quarantine window of 446 days — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c021g1", + "new": { + "key": "c021g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber rapids entropy siphon uses a quarantine window of 535 days — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c022g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige inlet provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 370 days — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. beige inlet provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c022g0", + "new": { + "key": "c022g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige inlet provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 459 days, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige inlet provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c022g1", + "new": { + "key": "c022g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige inlet provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 548 days — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c023g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet fjord edge cache uses a retry budget of 383 attempts, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet fjord edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c023g0", + "new": { + "key": "c023g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet fjord edge cache uses a retry budget of 472 attempts, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c023g1", + "new": { + "key": "c023g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet fjord edge cache uses a retry budget of 561 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet fjord edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c024g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite estuary sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 396 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c024g0", + "new": { + "key": "c024g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite estuary sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 485 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c024g1", + "new": { + "key": "c024g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite estuary sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 574 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite estuary sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c025g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx pond shard router uses a decay half-life of 409 hours, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx pond shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c025g0", + "new": { + "key": "c025g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx pond shard router uses a decay half-life of 498 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. onyx pond shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c025g1", + "new": { + "key": "c025g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx pond shard router uses a decay half-life of 587 hours, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c026g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion mesa telemetry mast uses a lease window of 422 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion mesa telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c026g0", + "new": { + "key": "c026g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion mesa telemetry mast uses a lease window of 511 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion mesa telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c026g1", + "new": { + "key": "c026g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion mesa telemetry mast uses a lease window of 600 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c027g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber lowland specimen locker uses a backoff ceiling of 435 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber lowland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c027g0", + "new": { + "key": "c027g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber lowland specimen locker uses a backoff ceiling of 524 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c027g1", + "new": { + "key": "c027g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber lowland specimen locker uses a backoff ceiling of 613 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber lowland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c028g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve geyser sweep worker uses a confidence floor of 448 percent — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. mauve geyser sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c028g0", + "new": { + "key": "c028g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve geyser sweep worker uses a confidence floor of 537 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c028g1", + "new": { + "key": "c028g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve geyser sweep worker uses a confidence floor of 626 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve geyser sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c029g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar estuary edge cache uses a eviction ratio of 461 percent, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. cedar estuary edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar estuary edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c029g0", + "new": { + "key": "c029g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar estuary edge cache uses a eviction ratio of 550 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c029g1", + "new": { + "key": "c029g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar estuary edge cache uses a eviction ratio of 639 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c030g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn badland assay station uses a dedupe horizon of 474 entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c030g0", + "new": { + "key": "c030g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn badland assay station uses a dedupe horizon of 563 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c030g1", + "new": { + "key": "c030g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn badland assay station uses a dedupe horizon of 652 entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c031g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan glacier ingest job uses a lease window of 487 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan glacier ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c031g0", + "new": { + "key": "c031g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan glacier ingest job uses a lease window of 576 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c031g1", + "new": { + "key": "c031g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan glacier ingest job uses a lease window of 665 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan glacier ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c032g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper wharf edge cache uses a rewind cursor lag of 500 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c032g0", + "new": { + "key": "c032g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper wharf edge cache uses a rewind cursor lag of 589 records — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c032g1", + "new": { + "key": "c032g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper wharf edge cache uses a rewind cursor lag of 678 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper wharf edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c033g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz dale specimen locker uses a retry budget of 513 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz dale specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c033g0", + "new": { + "key": "c033g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz dale specimen locker uses a retry budget of 602 attempts — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c033g1", + "new": { + "key": "c033g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz dale specimen locker uses a retry budget of 691 attempts, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz dale specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c034g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo cliff lease broker uses a batch size of 526 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo cliff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c034g0", + "new": { + "key": "c034g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo cliff lease broker uses a batch size of 615 records, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo cliff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c034g1", + "new": { + "key": "c034g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo cliff lease broker uses a batch size of 704 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c035g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt dell provenance ledger uses a compaction floor of 539 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. cobalt dell provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c035g0", + "new": { + "key": "c035g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt dell provenance ledger uses a compaction floor of 628 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c035g1", + "new": { + "key": "c035g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt dell provenance ledger uses a compaction floor of 717 segments, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt dell provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c036g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac hollow index writer uses a compaction floor of 552 segments — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. lilac hollow index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c036g0", + "new": { + "key": "c036g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac hollow index writer uses a compaction floor of 641 segments, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c036g1", + "new": { + "key": "c036g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac hollow index writer uses a compaction floor of 730 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac hollow index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c037g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn cirque edge cache uses a drain deadline of 565 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn cirque edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c037g0", + "new": { + "key": "c037g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn cirque edge cache uses a drain deadline of 654 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c037g1", + "new": { + "key": "c037g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn cirque edge cache uses a drain deadline of 743 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn cirque edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c038g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral savanna index writer uses a spill threshold of 578 megabytes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral savanna index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c038g0", + "new": { + "key": "c038g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral savanna index writer uses a spill threshold of 667 megabytes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral savanna index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c038g1", + "new": { + "key": "c038g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral savanna index writer uses a spill threshold of 756 megabytes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c039g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre ridge token vault uses a parity stripe of 591 blocks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre ridge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c039g0", + "new": { + "key": "c039g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre ridge token vault uses a parity stripe of 680 blocks, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre ridge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c039g1", + "new": { + "key": "c039g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre ridge token vault uses a parity stripe of 769 blocks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre ridge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c040g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar bayou calibration bench uses a gossip interval of 604 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c040g0", + "new": { + "key": "c040g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar bayou calibration bench uses a gossip interval of 693 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c040g1", + "new": { + "key": "c040g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar bayou calibration bench uses a gossip interval of 782 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar bayou calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c041g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat gulch telemetry mast uses a eviction ratio of 617 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat gulch telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c041g0", + "new": { + "key": "c041g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat gulch telemetry mast uses a eviction ratio of 706 percent — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c041g1", + "new": { + "key": "c041g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat gulch telemetry mast uses a eviction ratio of 795 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c042g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden island calibration bench uses a compaction floor of 630 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c042g0", + "new": { + "key": "c042g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden island calibration bench uses a compaction floor of 719 segments, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden island calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c042g1", + "new": { + "key": "c042g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden island calibration bench uses a compaction floor of 808 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c043g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber strait sweep worker uses a warmup allowance of 643 requests — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. amber strait sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c043g0", + "new": { + "key": "c043g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber strait sweep worker uses a warmup allowance of 732 requests — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c043g1", + "new": { + "key": "c043g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber strait sweep worker uses a warmup allowance of 821 requests, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber strait sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c044g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan savanna specimen locker uses a checkpoint cadence of 656 minutes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. tan savanna specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c044g0", + "new": { + "key": "c044g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan savanna specimen locker uses a checkpoint cadence of 745 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c044g1", + "new": { + "key": "c044g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan savanna specimen locker uses a checkpoint cadence of 834 minutes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan savanna specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c045g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver dune lease broker uses a confidence floor of 669 percent, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver dune lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c045g0", + "new": { + "key": "c045g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver dune lease broker uses a confidence floor of 758 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c045g1", + "new": { + "key": "c045g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver dune lease broker uses a confidence floor of 847 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver dune lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c046g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine bayou provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 682 days — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine bayou provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c046g0", + "new": { + "key": "c046g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine bayou provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 771 days, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine bayou provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c046g1", + "new": { + "key": "c046g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine bayou provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 860 days — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c047g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon moor index writer uses a stall tolerance of 695 ticks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon moor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c047g0", + "new": { + "key": "c047g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon moor index writer uses a stall tolerance of 784 ticks, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c047g1", + "new": { + "key": "c047g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon moor index writer uses a stall tolerance of 873 ticks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon moor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c048g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage jungle escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 708 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c048g0", + "new": { + "key": "c048g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage jungle escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 797 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c048g1", + "new": { + "key": "c048g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage jungle escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 886 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage jungle escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c049g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony heath assay station uses a batch size of 721 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony heath assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c049g0", + "new": { + "key": "c049g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony heath assay station uses a batch size of 810 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c049g1", + "new": { + "key": "c049g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony heath assay station uses a batch size of 899 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c050g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson glacier provenance ledger uses a snapshot depth of 734 generations, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. crimson glacier provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c050g0", + "new": { + "key": "c050g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson glacier provenance ledger uses a snapshot depth of 823 generations, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson glacier provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c050g1", + "new": { + "key": "c050g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson glacier provenance ledger uses a snapshot depth of 912 generations — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c051g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta glacier replay buffer uses a batch size of 747 records — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. magenta glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c051g0", + "new": { + "key": "c051g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta glacier replay buffer uses a batch size of 836 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c051g1", + "new": { + "key": "c051g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta glacier replay buffer uses a batch size of 925 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c052g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut dell assay station uses a decay half-life of 760 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c052g0", + "new": { + "key": "c052g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut dell assay station uses a decay half-life of 849 hours, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c052g1", + "new": { + "key": "c052g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut dell assay station uses a decay half-life of 938 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut dell assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c053g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx forest assay station uses a backoff ceiling of 773 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx forest assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c053g0", + "new": { + "key": "c053g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx forest assay station uses a backoff ceiling of 862 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c053g1", + "new": { + "key": "c053g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx forest assay station uses a backoff ceiling of 951 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c054g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive orchard index writer uses a spill threshold of 786 megabytes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive orchard index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c054g0", + "new": { + "key": "c054g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive orchard index writer uses a spill threshold of 875 megabytes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive orchard index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c054g1", + "new": { + "key": "c054g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive orchard index writer uses a spill threshold of 964 megabytes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c055g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan inlet replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 799 ticks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan inlet replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c055g0", + "new": { + "key": "c055g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan inlet replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 888 ticks, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c055g1", + "new": { + "key": "c055g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan inlet replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 977 ticks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan inlet replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c056g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral brook edge cache uses a probe timeout of 812 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c056g0", + "new": { + "key": "c056g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral brook edge cache uses a probe timeout of 901 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c056g1", + "new": { + "key": "c056g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral brook edge cache uses a probe timeout of 13 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral brook edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c057g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron summit provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 825 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. saffron summit provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron summit provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c057g0", + "new": { + "key": "c057g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron summit provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 914 entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c057g1", + "new": { + "key": "c057g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron summit provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 26 entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron summit provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c058g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite savanna specimen locker uses a flush interval of 838 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. granite savanna specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c058g0", + "new": { + "key": "c058g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite savanna specimen locker uses a flush interval of 927 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite savanna specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c058g1", + "new": { + "key": "c058g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite savanna specimen locker uses a flush interval of 39 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c059g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve wharf telemetry mast uses a eviction ratio of 851 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve wharf telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c059g0", + "new": { + "key": "c059g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve wharf telemetry mast uses a eviction ratio of 940 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve wharf telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c059g1", + "new": { + "key": "c059g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve wharf telemetry mast uses a eviction ratio of 52 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve wharf telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c060g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch atoll escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 864 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch atoll escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c060g0", + "new": { + "key": "c060g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch atoll escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 953 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c060g1", + "new": { + "key": "c060g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch atoll escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 65 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch atoll escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c061g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat bluff lease broker uses a fan-out limit of 877 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat bluff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c061g0", + "new": { + "key": "c061g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat bluff lease broker uses a fan-out limit of 966 branches — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c061g1", + "new": { + "key": "c061g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat bluff lease broker uses a fan-out limit of 78 branches — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat bluff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c062g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron dale sweep worker uses a lease window of 890 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron dale sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c062g0", + "new": { + "key": "c062g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron dale sweep worker uses a lease window of 979 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron dale sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c062g1", + "new": { + "key": "c062g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron dale sweep worker uses a lease window of 91 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c063g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pewter cliff assay station uses a sampling stride of 903 readings, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c063g0", + "new": { + "key": "c063g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pewter cliff assay station uses a sampling stride of 15 readings, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c063g1", + "new": { + "key": "c063g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pewter cliff assay station uses a sampling stride of 104 readings, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter cliff assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c064g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper atoll telemetry mast uses a decay half-life of 916 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c064g0", + "new": { + "key": "c064g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper atoll telemetry mast uses a decay half-life of 28 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c064g1", + "new": { + "key": "c064g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper atoll telemetry mast uses a decay half-life of 117 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper atoll telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c065g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl badland calibration bench uses a retry budget of 929 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. pearl badland calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl badland calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c065g0", + "new": { + "key": "c065g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl badland calibration bench uses a retry budget of 41 attempts — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c065g1", + "new": { + "key": "c065g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl badland calibration bench uses a retry budget of 130 attempts, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl badland calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c066g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron estuary replay buffer uses a gossip interval of 942 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. saffron estuary replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c066g0", + "new": { + "key": "c066g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron estuary replay buffer uses a gossip interval of 54 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron estuary replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c066g1", + "new": { + "key": "c066g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron estuary replay buffer uses a gossip interval of 143 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c067g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna glacier escrow chamber uses a quarantine window of 955 days — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna glacier escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c067g0", + "new": { + "key": "c067g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna glacier escrow chamber uses a quarantine window of 67 days — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna glacier escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c067g1", + "new": { + "key": "c067g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna glacier escrow chamber uses a quarantine window of 156 days, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna glacier escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c068g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt atoll shard router uses a probe timeout of 968 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt atoll shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c068g0", + "new": { + "key": "c068g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt atoll shard router uses a probe timeout of 80 milliseconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c068g1", + "new": { + "key": "c068g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt atoll shard router uses a probe timeout of 169 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt atoll shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c069g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper ravine quorum relay uses a compaction floor of 4 segments, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper ravine quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c069g0", + "new": { + "key": "c069g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper ravine quorum relay uses a compaction floor of 93 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c069g1", + "new": { + "key": "c069g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper ravine quorum relay uses a compaction floor of 182 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c070g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow isthmus replay buffer uses a batch size of 17 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c070g0", + "new": { + "key": "c070g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow isthmus replay buffer uses a batch size of 106 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow isthmus replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c070g1", + "new": { + "key": "c070g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow isthmus replay buffer uses a batch size of 195 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c071g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl savanna specimen locker uses a fan-out limit of 30 branches, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c071g0", + "new": { + "key": "c071g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl savanna specimen locker uses a fan-out limit of 119 branches, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c071g1", + "new": { + "key": "c071g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl savanna specimen locker uses a fan-out limit of 208 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl savanna specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c072g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow brook telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 43 ticks — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. willow brook telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c072g0", + "new": { + "key": "c072g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow brook telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 132 ticks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c072g1", + "new": { + "key": "c072g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow brook telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 221 ticks — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow brook telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c073g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen wharf edge cache uses a stall tolerance of 56 ticks, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. ashen wharf edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen wharf edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c073g0", + "new": { + "key": "c073g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen wharf edge cache uses a stall tolerance of 145 ticks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c073g1", + "new": { + "key": "c073g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen wharf edge cache uses a stall tolerance of 234 ticks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen wharf edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c074g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch cirque token vault uses a compaction floor of 69 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch cirque token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c074g0", + "new": { + "key": "c074g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch cirque token vault uses a compaction floor of 158 segments, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch cirque token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c074g1", + "new": { + "key": "c074g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch cirque token vault uses a compaction floor of 247 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1", + "query": "hazel estuary sweep worker drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the hazel estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5", + "query": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7", + "query": "which sweep worker cancels permissions it just issued once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one cancels permissions it just issued once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R9", + "query": "carmine ravine sweep worker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R10", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the carmine ravine sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R11", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R12", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R13", + "query": "azure lagoon sweep worker stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R14", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure lagoon sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R15", + "query": "which sweep worker delivers output in fits and bursts when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R16", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one delivers output in fits and bursts when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R17", + "query": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R18", + "query": "what explains why the chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R19", + "query": "which sweep worker throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R20", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R21", + "query": "sorrel cavern replay buffer decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R22", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the sorrel cavern replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R23", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R24", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R25", + "query": "onyx cliff replay buffer mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R26", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R27", + "query": "which replay buffer puts the wrong name on each container once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R28", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one puts the wrong name on each container once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R29", + "query": "hazel gulch replay buffer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R30", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the hazel gulch replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R31", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R32", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R33", + "query": "vermilion hollow replay buffer saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R34", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion hollow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R35", + "query": "which replay buffer pegs the sensor at maximum when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R36", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one pegs the sensor at maximum when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R37", + "query": "saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R38", + "query": "what explains why the saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R39", + "query": "which replay buffer biases results to the reference value because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R40", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one biases results to the reference value because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R41", + "query": "ruby shore ingest job grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R42", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the ruby shore ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R43", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R44", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R45", + "query": "ebony hollow ingest job starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R46", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R47", + "query": "which ingest job leaves downstream readers with nothing once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R48", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R49", + "query": "cyan quarry ingest job mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R50", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the cyan quarry ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R51", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R52", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R53", + "query": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R54", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo dale ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R55", + "query": "which ingest job keeps toggling between up and down while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R56", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps toggling between up and down while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R57", + "query": "hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R58", + "query": "what explains why the hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R59", + "query": "which ingest job owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R60", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R61", + "query": "chalk mesa sweep worker sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R62", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the chalk mesa sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R63", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R64", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R65", + "query": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R66", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter glade sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R67", + "query": "which sweep worker flips positive and negative readings once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R68", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one flips positive and negative readings once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R69", + "query": "copper estuary sweep worker splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R70", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the copper estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R71", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R72", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R73", + "query": "ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R74", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen glacier sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R75", + "query": "which sweep worker tilts every measurement it takes once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R76", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one tilts every measurement it takes once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R77", + "query": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R78", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R79", + "query": "which sweep worker keeps tuning grants for itself because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R80", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R81", + "query": "wheat dale assay station confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R82", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the wheat dale assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R83", + "query": "which assay station picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R84", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R85", + "query": "hazel bayou assay station overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R86", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R87", + "query": "which assay station lingers longer than scheduled once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R88", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one lingers longer than scheduled once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R89", + "query": "magenta orchard assay station skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R90", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the magenta orchard assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R91", + "query": "which assay station is barred from omitting the empty reference run because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R92", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R93", + "query": "beige lowland assay station orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R94", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige lowland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R95", + "query": "which assay station abandons work it had accepted while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R96", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one abandons work it had accepted while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R97", + "query": "cedar moor assay station ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R98", + "query": "what explains why the cedar moor assay station ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R99", + "query": "which assay station serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R100", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R101", + "query": "quartz bayou index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R102", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the quartz bayou index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R103", + "query": "which index writer picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R104", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R105", + "query": "tan bluff index writer starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan bluff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R107", + "query": "which index writer leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R108", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R109", + "query": "violet brook index writer mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R110", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the violet brook index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R111", + "query": "which index writer is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R112", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R113", + "query": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R114", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel cliff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R115", + "query": "which index writer keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R116", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R117", + "query": "auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R118", + "query": "what explains why the auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R119", + "query": "which index writer owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R120", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R121", + "query": "violet pond lease broker batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R122", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the violet pond lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R123", + "query": "which lease broker picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R124", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R125", + "query": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R127", + "query": "which lease broker sends the same payload twice once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R128", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one sends the same payload twice once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R129", + "query": "quartz delta lease broker widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R130", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the quartz delta lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R131", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R132", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R133", + "query": "wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R134", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat forest lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R135", + "query": "which lease broker evicts what it is about to need as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R136", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one evicts what it is about to need as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R137", + "query": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R138", + "query": "what explains why the lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R139", + "query": "which lease broker shortens its own interval because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R140", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one shortens its own interval because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R141", + "query": "hazel badland lease broker backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R142", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the hazel badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R143", + "query": "which lease broker picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R144", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R145", + "query": "navy forest lease broker corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy forest lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R147", + "query": "which lease broker leaves unreadable restart state once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R148", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one leaves unreadable restart state once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R149", + "query": "sage badland lease broker cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R150", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the sage badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R151", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R152", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R153", + "query": "umber jungle lease broker drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R154", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R155", + "query": "which lease broker loses track of its own progress marker while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R156", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one loses track of its own progress marker while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R157", + "query": "cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R158", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R159", + "query": "which lease broker checks health one at a time because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R160", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one checks health one at a time because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R161", + "query": "walnut jungle edge cache quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R162", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the walnut jungle edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R163", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R164", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R165", + "query": "bronze marsh edge cache blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze marsh edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R167", + "query": "which edge cache repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R168", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R169", + "query": "hazel butte edge cache trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R170", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the hazel butte edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R171", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from believing the sender's own clock because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R172", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R173", + "query": "ivory ravine edge cache churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R174", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory ravine edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R175", + "query": "which edge cache opens and drops links nonstop while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R176", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one opens and drops links nonstop while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R177", + "query": "taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R178", + "query": "what explains why the taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R179", + "query": "which edge cache cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R180", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R181", + "query": "chalk glade telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R182", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the chalk glade telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R183", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it tries again around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R184", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R185", + "query": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber tarn telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R187", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses acknowledged data once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R188", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses acknowledged data once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R189", + "query": "amber lowland telemetry mast share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R190", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the amber lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R191", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from one read position serving two partitions because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R192", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R193", + "query": "opal harbor telemetry mast stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R194", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal harbor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R195", + "query": "which telemetry mast stops making progress while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R196", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one stops making progress while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R197", + "query": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R198", + "query": "what explains why the hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R199", + "query": "which telemetry mast picks the staler of two copies because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R200", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picks the staler of two copies because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R201", + "query": "maroon hollow assay station flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R202", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the maroon hollow assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R203", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it writes out around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R204", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R205", + "query": "bronze cirque assay station loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze cirque assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R207", + "query": "which assay station forgets how far it had read once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R208", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one forgets how far it had read once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R209", + "query": "olive hill assay station trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R210", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the olive hill assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R211", + "query": "which assay station is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R212", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R213", + "query": "topaz ravine assay station reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R214", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz ravine assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R215", + "query": "which assay station confirms out of sequence when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R216", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one confirms out of sequence when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R217", + "query": "ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R218", + "query": "what explains why the ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R219", + "query": "which assay station fetches the same index repeatedly because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R220", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R221", + "query": "cedar geyser telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R222", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the cedar geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R223", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R224", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R225", + "query": "hazel meadow telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R227", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R228", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R229", + "query": "navy glacier telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R230", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the navy glacier telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R231", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R232", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R233", + "query": "sand ravine telemetry mast flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R234", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand ravine telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R235", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R236", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R237", + "query": "ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R238", + "query": "what explains why the ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R239", + "query": "which telemetry mast owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R240", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R241", + "query": "walnut geyser provenance ledger gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R242", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the walnut geyser provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R243", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R244", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R245", + "query": "sage heath provenance ledger fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage heath provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R247", + "query": "which provenance ledger splinters memory into unusable pieces once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R248", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R249", + "query": "ebony strait provenance ledger suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R250", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the ebony strait provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R251", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from silencing a probe that says no because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R252", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R253", + "query": "hazel lagoon provenance ledger shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R254", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R255", + "query": "which provenance ledger silently repeats the leader's work as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R256", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one silently repeats the leader's work as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R257", + "query": "willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R258", + "query": "what explains why the willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R259", + "query": "which provenance ledger persists every result in duplicate because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R260", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one persists every result in duplicate because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R261", + "query": "fawn valley sweep worker drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R262", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the fawn valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R263", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R264", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R265", + "query": "ivory gulch sweep worker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory gulch sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R267", + "query": "which sweep worker cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R268", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R269", + "query": "salmon cape sweep worker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R270", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the salmon cape sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R271", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R272", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R273", + "query": "sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R274", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R275", + "query": "which sweep worker delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R276", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R277", + "query": "sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R278", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R279", + "query": "which sweep worker throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R280", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R281", + "query": "hazel dune shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R282", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the hazel dune shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R283", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R284", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R285", + "query": "crimson meadow shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson meadow shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R287", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R288", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R289", + "query": "quartz orchard shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R290", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the quartz orchard shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R291", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R292", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R293", + "query": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R294", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl knoll shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R295", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R296", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R297", + "query": "salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R298", + "query": "what explains why the salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R299", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R300", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R301", + "query": "tan gorge escrow chamber fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R302", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the tan gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R303", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R304", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R305", + "query": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon fjord escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R307", + "query": "which escrow chamber wedges everything behind it once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R308", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one wedges everything behind it once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R309", + "query": "hazel island escrow chamber retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R310", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the hazel island escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R311", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R312", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R313", + "query": "pearl crag escrow chamber spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R314", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl crag escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R315", + "query": "which escrow chamber burns cpu waiting once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R316", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one burns cpu waiting once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R317", + "query": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R318", + "query": "what explains why the ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R319", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps the barrier from closing because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R320", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps the barrier from closing because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R321", + "query": "teal cape assay station quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R322", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the teal cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R323", + "query": "which assay station picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R324", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R325", + "query": "golden river assay station blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the golden river assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R327", + "query": "which assay station repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R328", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R329", + "query": "tan estuary assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R330", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the tan estuary assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R331", + "query": "which assay station is barred from believing the sender's own clock because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R332", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R333", + "query": "magenta quarry assay station churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R334", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R335", + "query": "which assay station opens and drops links nonstop when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R336", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one opens and drops links nonstop when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R337", + "query": "hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R338", + "query": "what explains why the hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R339", + "query": "which assay station cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R340", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R341", + "query": "slate lake telemetry mast compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R342", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the slate lake telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R343", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R344", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R345", + "query": "scarlet heath telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet heath telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R347", + "query": "which telemetry mast never gives borrowed space back once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R348", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one never gives borrowed space back once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R349", + "query": "crimson geyser telemetry mast archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R350", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the crimson geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R351", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R352", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R353", + "query": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R354", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R355", + "query": "which telemetry mast feeds the operator stale numbers right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R356", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one feeds the operator stale numbers right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R357", + "query": "sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R358", + "query": "what explains why the sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R359", + "query": "which telemetry mast serves yesterday's answers confidently because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R360", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R361", + "query": "hazel barrens edge cache dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R362", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the hazel barrens edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R363", + "query": "which edge cache picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R364", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R365", + "query": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel quarry edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R367", + "query": "which edge cache loses track of positions previously read once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R368", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one loses track of positions previously read once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R369", + "query": "opal inlet edge cache bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R370", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the opal inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R371", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from slipping past the intake gate because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R372", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R373", + "query": "taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R374", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe meadow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R375", + "query": "which edge cache cuts short every spike it should absorb once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R376", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R377", + "query": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R378", + "query": "what explains why the granite heath edge cache defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R379", + "query": "which edge cache keeps postponing the squeeze because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R380", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R381", + "query": "verdigris harbor quorum relay checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R382", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the verdigris harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R383", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R384", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R385", + "query": "taupe moor quorum relay shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe moor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R387", + "query": "which quorum relay destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R388", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R389", + "query": "plum plateau quorum relay promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R390", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the plum plateau quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R391", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R392", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R393", + "query": "hazel shore quorum relay inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R394", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel shore quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R395", + "query": "which quorum relay predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R396", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R397", + "query": "amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R398", + "query": "what explains why the amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R399", + "query": "which quorum relay gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R400", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R401", + "query": "orange cirque replay buffer confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R402", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the orange cirque replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R403", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R404", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R405", + "query": "slate prairie replay buffer overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate prairie replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R407", + "query": "which replay buffer lingers longer than scheduled once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R408", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one lingers longer than scheduled once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R409", + "query": "azure ridge replay buffer skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R410", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the azure ridge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R411", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from omitting the empty reference run because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R412", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R413", + "query": "fawn tarn replay buffer orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R414", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn tarn replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R415", + "query": "which replay buffer abandons work it had accepted once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R416", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one abandons work it had accepted once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R417", + "query": "jade glade replay buffer ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R418", + "query": "what explains why the jade glade replay buffer ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R419", + "query": "which replay buffer serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R420", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R421", + "query": "hazel valley replay buffer stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R422", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the hazel valley replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R423", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R424", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R425", + "query": "teal inlet replay buffer upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal inlet replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R427", + "query": "which replay buffer delivers things in scrambled sequence once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R428", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R429", + "query": "birch rapids replay buffer hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R430", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the birch rapids replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R431", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from changing the checker while it checks because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R432", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R433", + "query": "salmon meadow replay buffer misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R434", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon meadow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R435", + "query": "which replay buffer routes warnings to the wrong inbox when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R436", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R437", + "query": "indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R438", + "query": "what explains why the indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R439", + "query": "which replay buffer asks for updates far too often because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R440", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one asks for updates far too often because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R441", + "query": "golden bluff telemetry mast checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R442", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the golden bluff telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R443", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R444", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R445", + "query": "onyx lowland telemetry mast shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R447", + "query": "which telemetry mast destroys its own table of contents once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R448", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one destroys its own table of contents once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R449", + "query": "verdigris meadow telemetry mast promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R450", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the verdigris meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R451", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R452", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R453", + "query": "sorrel reef telemetry mast inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R454", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel reef telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R455", + "query": "which telemetry mast predicts far more than materialises right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R456", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one predicts far more than materialises right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R457", + "query": "topaz fjord telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R458", + "query": "what explains why the topaz fjord telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R459", + "query": "which telemetry mast gives the noisiest customer priority because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R460", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R461", + "query": "russet lagoon assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R462", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the russet lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R463", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it tries again around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R464", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R465", + "query": "willow shore assay station drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow shore assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R467", + "query": "which assay station loses acknowledged data once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R468", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one loses acknowledged data once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R469", + "query": "amber heath assay station share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R470", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the amber heath assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R471", + "query": "which assay station is barred from one read position serving two partitions because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R472", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R473", + "query": "orange isthmus assay station stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R474", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange isthmus assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R475", + "query": "which assay station stops making progress once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R476", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one stops making progress once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R477", + "query": "verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R478", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R479", + "query": "which assay station picks the staler of two copies because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R480", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picks the staler of two copies because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R481", + "query": "ruby geyser provenance ledger batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R482", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the ruby geyser provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R483", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R484", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R485", + "query": "olive fjord provenance ledger re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive fjord provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R487", + "query": "which provenance ledger sends the same payload twice once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R488", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one sends the same payload twice once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R489", + "query": "teal dell provenance ledger widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R490", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the teal dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R491", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R492", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R493", + "query": "pearl dell provenance ledger thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R494", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R495", + "query": "which provenance ledger evicts what it is about to need while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R496", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one evicts what it is about to need while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R497", + "query": "sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R498", + "query": "what explains why the sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R499", + "query": "which provenance ledger shortens its own interval because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R500", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one shortens its own interval because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R501", + "query": "sorrel swamp index writer checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R502", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the sorrel swamp index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R503", + "query": "which index writer picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R504", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R505", + "query": "verdigris dune index writer shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris dune index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R507", + "query": "which index writer destroys its own table of contents once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R508", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one destroys its own table of contents once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R509", + "query": "opal estuary index writer promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R510", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the opal estuary index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R511", + "query": "which index writer is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R512", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R513", + "query": "willow mesa index writer inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R514", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow mesa index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R515", + "query": "which index writer predicts far more than materialises while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R516", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one predicts far more than materialises while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R517", + "query": "emerald delta index writer favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R518", + "query": "what explains why the emerald delta index writer favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R519", + "query": "which index writer gives the noisiest customer priority because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R520", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R521", + "query": "saffron rapids ingest job rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R522", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the saffron rapids ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R523", + "query": "which ingest job picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R524", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R525", + "query": "copper meadow ingest job desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R527", + "query": "which ingest job lets copies drift out of agreement once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R528", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R529", + "query": "umber cove ingest job widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R530", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the umber cove ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R531", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R532", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R533", + "query": "verdigris island ingest job splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R534", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris island ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R535", + "query": "which ingest job two halves each think they lead while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R536", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one two halves each think they lead while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R537", + "query": "pearl barrens ingest job recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R538", + "query": "what explains why the pearl barrens ingest job recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R539", + "query": "which ingest job derives afresh what it could remember because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R540", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one derives afresh what it could remember because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R541", + "query": "navy oasis escrow chamber checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R542", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the navy oasis escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R543", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R544", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R545", + "query": "bronze savanna escrow chamber shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze savanna escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R547", + "query": "which escrow chamber destroys its own table of contents once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R548", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one destroys its own table of contents once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R549", + "query": "cinnamon harbor escrow chamber promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R550", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the cinnamon harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R551", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R552", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R553", + "query": "sorrel island escrow chamber inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R554", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel island escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R555", + "query": "which escrow chamber predicts far more than materialises while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R556", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one predicts far more than materialises while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R557", + "query": "granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R558", + "query": "what explains why the granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R559", + "query": "which escrow chamber gives the noisiest customer priority because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R560", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R561", + "query": "verdigris mesa index writer dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R562", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the verdigris mesa index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R563", + "query": "which index writer picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R564", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R565", + "query": "plum knoll index writer forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum knoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R567", + "query": "which index writer loses track of positions previously read once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R568", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one loses track of positions previously read once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R569", + "query": "azure plateau index writer bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R570", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the azure plateau index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R571", + "query": "which index writer is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R572", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R573", + "query": "chalk shore index writer clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R574", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk shore index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R575", + "query": "which index writer cuts short every spike it should absorb as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R576", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R577", + "query": "plum badland index writer defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R578", + "query": "what explains why the plum badland index writer defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R579", + "query": "which index writer keeps postponing the squeeze because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R580", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R581", + "query": "ochre glacier index writer checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R582", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the ochre glacier index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R583", + "query": "which index writer picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R584", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R585", + "query": "cobalt gulch index writer shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt gulch index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R587", + "query": "which index writer destroys its own table of contents once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R588", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one destroys its own table of contents once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R589", + "query": "verdigris quarry index writer promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R590", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the verdigris quarry index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R591", + "query": "which index writer is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R592", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R593", + "query": "magenta strait index writer inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R594", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta strait index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R595", + "query": "which index writer predicts far more than materialises when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R596", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one predicts far more than materialises when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R597", + "query": "russet creek index writer favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R598", + "query": "what explains why the russet creek index writer favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R599", + "query": "which index writer gives the noisiest customer priority because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R600", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R601", + "query": "sorrel lowland calibration bench quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R602", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the sorrel lowland calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R603", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R604", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R605", + "query": "chalk forest calibration bench garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk forest calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R607", + "query": "which calibration bench scrambles what it reports home once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R608", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one scrambles what it reports home once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R609", + "query": "walnut island calibration bench hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R610", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the walnut island calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R611", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R612", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R613", + "query": "sand knoll calibration bench echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R614", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R615", + "query": "which calibration bench repeats instructions back to itself when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R616", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one repeats instructions back to itself when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R617", + "query": "verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R618", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R619", + "query": "which calibration bench copies the rhythm of its counterpart because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R620", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R621", + "query": "cinnamon moor index writer warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R622", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the cinnamon moor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R623", + "query": "which index writer picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R624", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R625", + "query": "beige fjord index writer poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige fjord index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R627", + "query": "which index writer writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R628", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R629", + "query": "beige oasis index writer rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R630", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the beige oasis index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R631", + "query": "which index writer is barred from moving a common read position backwards because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R632", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R633", + "query": "sienna savanna index writer misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R634", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna savanna index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R635", + "query": "which index writer cannot say who holds which grant while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R636", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one cannot say who holds which grant while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R637", + "query": "ebony savanna index writer pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R638", + "query": "what explains why the ebony savanna index writer pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R639", + "query": "which index writer readies exactly what nobody asks for because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R640", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R641", + "query": "sand grove ingest job parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R642", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the sand grove ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R643", + "query": "which ingest job picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R644", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R645", + "query": "verdigris valley ingest job clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris valley ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R647", + "query": "which ingest job fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R648", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R649", + "query": "taupe reef ingest job reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R650", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the taupe reef ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R651", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R652", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R653", + "query": "ebony rapids ingest job ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R654", + "query": "what is still broken in the ebony rapids ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R655", + "query": "which ingest job keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R656", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R657", + "query": "lilac dell ingest job idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R658", + "query": "what explains why the lilac dell ingest job idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R659", + "query": "which ingest job rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R660", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R661", + "query": "sage mesa replay buffer compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R662", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the sage mesa replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R663", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R664", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R665", + "query": "cinnamon plateau replay buffer hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon plateau replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R667", + "query": "which replay buffer never gives borrowed space back once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R668", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one never gives borrowed space back once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R669", + "query": "scarlet delta replay buffer archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R670", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the scarlet delta replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R671", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from shelving a problem that is live because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R672", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R673", + "query": "verdigris estuary replay buffer lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R674", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris estuary replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R675", + "query": "which replay buffer feeds the operator stale numbers once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R676", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one feeds the operator stale numbers once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R677", + "query": "chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R678", + "query": "what explains why the chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R679", + "query": "which replay buffer serves yesterday's answers confidently because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R680", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R681", + "query": "sand butte provenance ledger grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R682", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the sand butte provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R683", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R684", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R685", + "query": "birch harbor provenance ledger starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch harbor provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R687", + "query": "which provenance ledger leaves downstream readers with nothing once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R688", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R689", + "query": "slate lagoon provenance ledger mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R690", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the slate lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R691", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R692", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R693", + "query": "scarlet plateau provenance ledger flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R694", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet plateau provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R695", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps toggling between up and down when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R696", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps toggling between up and down when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R697", + "query": "verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R698", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R699", + "query": "which provenance ledger owns up to fewer attempts than occur because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R700", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R701", + "query": "verdigris gulch shard router dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R702", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the verdigris gulch shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R703", + "query": "which shard router picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R704", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R705", + "query": "navy delta shard router forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy delta shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R707", + "query": "which shard router loses track of positions previously read once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R708", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one loses track of positions previously read once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R709", + "query": "indigo wharf shard router bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R710", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the indigo wharf shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R711", + "query": "which shard router is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R712", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R713", + "query": "ivory brook shard router clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R714", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory brook shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R715", + "query": "which shard router cuts short every spike it should absorb once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R716", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R717", + "query": "navy quarry shard router defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R718", + "query": "what explains why the navy quarry shard router defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R719", + "query": "which shard router keeps postponing the squeeze because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R720", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R721", + "query": "lavender jungle provenance ledger grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R722", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the lavender jungle provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R723", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R724", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R725", + "query": "sienna shore provenance ledger starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R727", + "query": "which provenance ledger leaves downstream readers with nothing once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R728", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R729", + "query": "verdigris lowland provenance ledger mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R730", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the verdigris lowland provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R731", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R732", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R733", + "query": "birch savanna provenance ledger flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R734", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch savanna provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R735", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps toggling between up and down while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R736", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps toggling between up and down while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R737", + "query": "golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R738", + "query": "what explains why the golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R739", + "query": "which provenance ledger owns up to fewer attempts than occur because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R740", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R741", + "query": "amber crag token vault fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R742", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the amber crag token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R743", + "query": "which token vault picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R744", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R745", + "query": "beige gulch token vault stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige gulch token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R747", + "query": "which token vault wedges everything behind it once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R748", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one wedges everything behind it once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R749", + "query": "golden ridge token vault retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R750", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the golden ridge token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R751", + "query": "which token vault is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R752", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R753", + "query": "magenta ravine token vault spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R754", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta ravine token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R755", + "query": "which token vault burns cpu waiting once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R756", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one burns cpu waiting once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R757", + "query": "verdigris bayou token vault holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R758", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris bayou token vault holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R759", + "query": "which token vault keeps the barrier from closing because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R760", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R761", + "query": "copper cape escrow chamber compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R762", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the copper cape escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R763", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R764", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R765", + "query": "silver prairie escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R767", + "query": "which escrow chamber never gives borrowed space back once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R768", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one never gives borrowed space back once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R769", + "query": "mustard inlet escrow chamber archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R770", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the mustard inlet escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R771", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R772", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R773", + "query": "wheat orchard escrow chamber lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R774", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat orchard escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R775", + "query": "which escrow chamber feeds the operator stale numbers as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R776", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one feeds the operator stale numbers as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R777", + "query": "sand dune escrow chamber mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R778", + "query": "what explains why the sand dune escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R779", + "query": "which escrow chamber serves yesterday's answers confidently because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R780", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R781", + "query": "walnut bluff replay buffer drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R782", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the walnut bluff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R783", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R784", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R785", + "query": "verdigris cliff replay buffer expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R787", + "query": "which replay buffer cancels permissions it just issued once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R788", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cancels permissions it just issued once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R789", + "query": "vermilion gorge replay buffer outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R790", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the vermilion gorge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R791", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R792", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R793", + "query": "slate rapids replay buffer stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R794", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate rapids replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R795", + "query": "which replay buffer delivers output in fits and bursts while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R796", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R797", + "query": "mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R798", + "query": "what explains why the mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R799", + "query": "which replay buffer throws away the oldest instead of the newest because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R800", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R801", + "query": "auburn bayou token vault gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R802", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the auburn bayou token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R803", + "query": "which token vault picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R804", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R805", + "query": "crimson barrens token vault fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson barrens token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R807", + "query": "which token vault splinters memory into unusable pieces once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R808", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R809", + "query": "salmon badland token vault suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R810", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the salmon badland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R811", + "query": "which token vault is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R812", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R813", + "query": "verdigris badland token vault shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R814", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris badland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R815", + "query": "which token vault silently repeats the leader's work once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R816", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one silently repeats the leader's work once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R817", + "query": "cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R818", + "query": "what explains why the cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R819", + "query": "which token vault persists every result in duplicate because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R820", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one persists every result in duplicate because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R821", + "query": "mauve inlet provenance ledger drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R822", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the mauve inlet provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R823", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R824", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R825", + "query": "opal reef provenance ledger expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal reef provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R827", + "query": "which provenance ledger cancels permissions it just issued once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R828", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R829", + "query": "quartz inlet provenance ledger outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R830", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the quartz inlet provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R831", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R832", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R833", + "query": "granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R834", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite marsh provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R835", + "query": "which provenance ledger delivers output in fits and bursts while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R836", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R837", + "query": "crimson cliff provenance ledger trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R838", + "query": "what explains why the crimson cliff provenance ledger trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R839", + "query": "which provenance ledger throws away the oldest instead of the newest because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R840", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R841", + "query": "verdigris butte token vault flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R842", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the verdigris butte token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R843", + "query": "which token vault picked how often it writes out around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R844", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R845", + "query": "ochre savanna token vault loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre savanna token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R847", + "query": "which token vault forgets how far it had read once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R848", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one forgets how far it had read once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R849", + "query": "cinnamon inlet token vault trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R850", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the cinnamon inlet token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R851", + "query": "which token vault is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R852", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R853", + "query": "magenta cliff token vault reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R854", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta cliff token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R855", + "query": "which token vault confirms out of sequence when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R856", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one confirms out of sequence when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R857", + "query": "plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R858", + "query": "what explains why the plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R859", + "query": "which token vault fetches the same index repeatedly because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R860", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R861", + "query": "salmon plateau specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R862", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the salmon plateau specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R863", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often it tries again around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R864", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R865", + "query": "carmine knoll specimen locker drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine knoll specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R867", + "query": "which specimen locker loses acknowledged data once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R868", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one loses acknowledged data once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R869", + "query": "verdigris tarn specimen locker share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R870", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the verdigris tarn specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R871", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from one read position serving two partitions because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R872", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R873", + "query": "cedar creek specimen locker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R874", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar creek specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R875", + "query": "which specimen locker stops making progress while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R876", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one stops making progress while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R877", + "query": "granite lake specimen locker prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R878", + "query": "what explains why the granite lake specimen locker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R879", + "query": "which specimen locker picks the staler of two copies because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R880", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picks the staler of two copies because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R881", + "query": "willow moor assay station drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R882", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the willow moor assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R883", + "query": "which assay station picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R884", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R885", + "query": "ochre moor assay station expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre moor assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R887", + "query": "which assay station cancels permissions it just issued once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R888", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R889", + "query": "jade barrens assay station outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R890", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the jade barrens assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R891", + "query": "which assay station is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R892", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R893", + "query": "opal crag assay station stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R894", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal crag assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R895", + "query": "which assay station delivers output in fits and bursts while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R896", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R897", + "query": "sienna dune assay station trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R898", + "query": "what explains why the sienna dune assay station trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R899", + "query": "which assay station throws away the oldest instead of the newest because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R900", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R901", + "query": "navy mesa ingest job quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R902", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the navy mesa ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R903", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R904", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R905", + "query": "topaz valley ingest job blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz valley ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R907", + "query": "which ingest job repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R908", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R909", + "query": "auburn meadow ingest job trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R910", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the auburn meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R911", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from believing the sender's own clock because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R912", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R913", + "query": "navy shore ingest job churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R914", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy shore ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R915", + "query": "which ingest job opens and drops links nonstop when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R916", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one opens and drops links nonstop when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R917", + "query": "cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R918", + "query": "what explains why the cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R919", + "query": "which ingest job cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R920", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R921", + "query": "sorrel cirque sweep worker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R922", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the sorrel cirque sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R923", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R924", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R925", + "query": "sienna island sweep worker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna island sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R927", + "query": "which sweep worker splinters memory into unusable pieces once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R928", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R929", + "query": "violet quarry sweep worker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R930", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the violet quarry sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R931", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from silencing a probe that says no because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R932", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R933", + "query": "cyan lake sweep worker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R934", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R935", + "query": "which sweep worker silently repeats the leader's work when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R936", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one silently repeats the leader's work when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R937", + "query": "bronze meadow sweep worker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R938", + "query": "what explains why the bronze meadow sweep worker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R939", + "query": "which sweep worker persists every result in duplicate because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R940", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one persists every result in duplicate because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R941", + "query": "bronze reef sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R942", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the bronze reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R943", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how often it tries again around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R944", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R945", + "query": "slate barrens sweep worker drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate barrens sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R947", + "query": "which sweep worker loses acknowledged data once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R948", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one loses acknowledged data once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R949", + "query": "granite harbor sweep worker share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R950", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the granite harbor sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R951", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from one read position serving two partitions because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R952", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R953", + "query": "sienna mesa sweep worker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R954", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna mesa sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R955", + "query": "which sweep worker stops making progress while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R956", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one stops making progress while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R957", + "query": "carmine wharf sweep worker prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R958", + "query": "what explains why the carmine wharf sweep worker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R959", + "query": "which sweep worker picks the staler of two copies because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R960", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picks the staler of two copies because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R961", + "query": "sienna glade ingest job backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R962", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the sienna glade ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R963", + "query": "which ingest job picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R964", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R965", + "query": "lavender hollow ingest job corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lavender hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R967", + "query": "which ingest job leaves unreadable restart state once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R968", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R969", + "query": "amber fjord ingest job cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R970", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the amber fjord ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R971", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R972", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R973", + "query": "jade jungle ingest job drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R974", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade jungle ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R975", + "query": "which ingest job loses track of its own progress marker while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R976", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one loses track of its own progress marker while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R977", + "query": "ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R978", + "query": "what explains why the ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R979", + "query": "which ingest job checks health one at a time because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R980", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one checks health one at a time because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R981", + "query": "sienna quarry calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R982", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the sienna quarry calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R983", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R984", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R985", + "query": "sepia valley calibration bench drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia valley calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R987", + "query": "which calibration bench loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R988", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R989", + "query": "mustard geyser calibration bench share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R990", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the mustard geyser calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R991", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R992", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R993", + "query": "cobalt fjord calibration bench stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R994", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt fjord calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R995", + "query": "which calibration bench stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R996", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R997", + "query": "vermilion inlet calibration bench prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R998", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion inlet calibration bench prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R999", + "query": "which calibration bench picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1000", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1001", + "query": "cinnamon grove lease broker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1002", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the cinnamon grove lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1003", + "query": "which lease broker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1004", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1005", + "query": "azure bluff lease broker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1006", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1007", + "query": "which lease broker reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1008", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1009", + "query": "fawn savanna lease broker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1010", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the fawn savanna lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1011", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1012", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1013", + "query": "violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1014", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet cape lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1015", + "query": "which lease broker checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1016", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1017", + "query": "sorrel knoll lease broker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1018", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel knoll lease broker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1019", + "query": "which lease broker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1020", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1021", + "query": "copper forest assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1022", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the copper forest assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1023", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1024", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1025", + "query": "crimson bayou assay station drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1026", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1027", + "query": "which assay station loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1028", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1029", + "query": "mustard creek assay station share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1030", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the mustard creek assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1031", + "query": "which assay station is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1032", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1033", + "query": "wheat badland assay station stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1034", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat badland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1035", + "query": "which assay station stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1036", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1037", + "query": "fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1038", + "query": "what explains why the fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1039", + "query": "which assay station picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1040", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1041", + "query": "topaz barrens specimen locker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1042", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the topaz barrens specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1043", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1044", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1045", + "query": "navy creek specimen locker misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1046", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy creek specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1047", + "query": "which specimen locker sends completions to the wrong caller once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1048", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1049", + "query": "auburn brook specimen locker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1050", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the auburn brook specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1051", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1052", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1053", + "query": "olive harbor specimen locker overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1054", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1055", + "query": "which specimen locker writes more log than the space allows as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1056", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one writes more log than the space allows as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1057", + "query": "sienna meadow specimen locker escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1058", + "query": "what explains why the sienna meadow specimen locker escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1059", + "query": "which specimen locker raises alarms at the first wobble because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1060", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1061", + "query": "saffron heath calibration bench sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1062", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the saffron heath calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1063", + "query": "which calibration bench picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1064", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1065", + "query": "fawn delta calibration bench inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1066", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn delta calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1067", + "query": "which calibration bench flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1068", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1069", + "query": "topaz cape calibration bench splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1070", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the topaz cape calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1071", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1072", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1073", + "query": "lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1074", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender inlet calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1075", + "query": "which calibration bench tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1076", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1077", + "query": "bronze swamp calibration bench hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1078", + "query": "what explains why the bronze swamp calibration bench hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1079", + "query": "which calibration bench keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1080", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1081", + "query": "saffron pond shard router spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1082", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the saffron pond shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1083", + "query": "which shard router picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1084", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1085", + "query": "ivory tarn shard router skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1086", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1087", + "query": "which shard router acknowledges before durability once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1088", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one acknowledges before durability once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1089", + "query": "amber badland shard router reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1090", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the amber badland shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1091", + "query": "which shard router is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1092", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1093", + "query": "fawn gorge shard router starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1094", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn gorge shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1095", + "query": "which shard router never lets the flush finish when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1096", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one never lets the flush finish when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1097", + "query": "vermilion geyser shard router retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1098", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion geyser shard router retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1099", + "query": "which shard router repeats immediately on failure because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1100", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one repeats immediately on failure because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1101", + "query": "taupe rapids escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1102", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the taupe rapids escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1103", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often it tries again around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1104", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1105", + "query": "cedar lake escrow chamber drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar lake escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1107", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses acknowledged data once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1108", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses acknowledged data once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1109", + "query": "wheat reef escrow chamber share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1110", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the wheat reef escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1111", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from one read position serving two partitions because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1112", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1113", + "query": "golden cliff escrow chamber stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1114", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1115", + "query": "which escrow chamber stops making progress while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1116", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one stops making progress while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1117", + "query": "tan meadow escrow chamber prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1118", + "query": "what explains why the tan meadow escrow chamber prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1119", + "query": "which escrow chamber picks the staler of two copies because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1120", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picks the staler of two copies because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1121", + "query": "fawn isthmus replay buffer drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1122", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the fawn isthmus replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1123", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1124", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1125", + "query": "teal dale replay buffer expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal dale replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1127", + "query": "which replay buffer cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1128", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1129", + "query": "auburn ridge replay buffer outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1130", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the auburn ridge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1131", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1132", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1133", + "query": "saffron cape replay buffer stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1134", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron cape replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1135", + "query": "which replay buffer delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1136", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1137", + "query": "mauve forest replay buffer trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1138", + "query": "what explains why the mauve forest replay buffer trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1139", + "query": "which replay buffer throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1140", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1141", + "query": "violet river entropy siphon stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1142", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the violet river entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1143", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1144", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1145", + "query": "cyan mesa entropy siphon upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan mesa entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1147", + "query": "which entropy siphon delivers things in scrambled sequence once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1148", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1149", + "query": "fawn atoll entropy siphon hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1150", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the fawn atoll entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1151", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from changing the checker while it checks because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1152", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1153", + "query": "wheat butte entropy siphon misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1154", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat butte entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1155", + "query": "which entropy siphon routes warnings to the wrong inbox while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1156", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1157", + "query": "wheat cape entropy siphon polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1158", + "query": "what explains why the wheat cape entropy siphon polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1159", + "query": "which entropy siphon asks for updates far too often because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1160", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one asks for updates far too often because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1161", + "query": "opal cavern token vault quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1162", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the opal cavern token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1163", + "query": "which token vault picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1164", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1165", + "query": "coral lagoon token vault blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral lagoon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1167", + "query": "which token vault repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1168", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1169", + "query": "indigo savanna token vault trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1170", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the indigo savanna token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1171", + "query": "which token vault is barred from believing the sender's own clock because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1172", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1173", + "query": "indigo hill token vault churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1174", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo hill token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1175", + "query": "which token vault opens and drops links nonstop as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1176", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one opens and drops links nonstop as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1177", + "query": "fawn cavern token vault chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1178", + "query": "what explains why the fawn cavern token vault chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1179", + "query": "which token vault cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1180", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1181", + "query": "taupe dell entropy siphon compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1182", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the taupe dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1183", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1184", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1185", + "query": "pearl wharf entropy siphon hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1187", + "query": "which entropy siphon never gives borrowed space back once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1188", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one never gives borrowed space back once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1189", + "query": "fawn mesa entropy siphon archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1190", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the fawn mesa entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1191", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from shelving a problem that is live because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1192", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1193", + "query": "opal moor entropy siphon lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1194", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal moor entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1195", + "query": "which entropy siphon feeds the operator stale numbers before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1196", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one feeds the operator stale numbers before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1197", + "query": "pewter marsh entropy siphon mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1198", + "query": "what explains why the pewter marsh entropy siphon mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1199", + "query": "which entropy siphon serves yesterday's answers confidently because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1200", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1201", + "query": "slate savanna calibration bench checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1202", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the slate savanna calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1203", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1204", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1205", + "query": "fawn dell calibration bench shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn dell calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1207", + "query": "which calibration bench destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1208", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1209", + "query": "topaz reef calibration bench promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1210", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the topaz reef calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1211", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1212", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1213", + "query": "tan jungle calibration bench inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1214", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan jungle calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1215", + "query": "which calibration bench predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1216", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1217", + "query": "mauve grove calibration bench favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1218", + "query": "what explains why the mauve grove calibration bench favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1219", + "query": "which calibration bench gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1220", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1221", + "query": "granite butte lease broker drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1222", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the granite butte lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1223", + "query": "which lease broker picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1224", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1225", + "query": "russet crag lease broker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet crag lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1227", + "query": "which lease broker cancels permissions it just issued once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1228", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one cancels permissions it just issued once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1229", + "query": "golden wharf lease broker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1230", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the golden wharf lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1231", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1232", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1233", + "query": "fawn brook lease broker stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1234", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn brook lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1235", + "query": "which lease broker delivers output in fits and bursts while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1236", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1237", + "query": "scarlet cirque lease broker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1238", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet cirque lease broker trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1239", + "query": "which lease broker throws away the oldest instead of the newest because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1240", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1241", + "query": "cyan river shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1242", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the cyan river shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1243", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1244", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1245", + "query": "sepia forest shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia forest shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1247", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1248", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1249", + "query": "maroon swamp shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1250", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the maroon swamp shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1251", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1252", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1253", + "query": "russet tundra shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1254", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet tundra shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1255", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1256", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1257", + "query": "olive barrens shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1258", + "query": "what explains why the olive barrens shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1259", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1260", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1261", + "query": "fawn ravine ingest job warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1262", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the fawn ravine ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1263", + "query": "which ingest job picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1264", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1265", + "query": "lilac lagoon ingest job poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac lagoon ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1267", + "query": "which ingest job writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1268", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1269", + "query": "cyan hollow ingest job rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1270", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the cyan hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1271", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from moving a common read position backwards because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1272", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1273", + "query": "auburn harbor ingest job misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1274", + "query": "what is still broken in the auburn harbor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1275", + "query": "which ingest job cannot say who holds which grant when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1276", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one cannot say who holds which grant when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1277", + "query": "topaz isthmus ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1278", + "query": "what explains why the topaz isthmus ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1279", + "query": "which ingest job readies exactly what nobody asks for because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1280", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1281", + "query": "jade orchard index writer decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1282", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the jade orchard index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1283", + "query": "which index writer picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1284", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1285", + "query": "indigo atoll index writer mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo atoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1287", + "query": "which index writer puts the wrong name on each container once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1288", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one puts the wrong name on each container once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1289", + "query": "fawn harbor index writer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1290", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the fawn harbor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1291", + "query": "which index writer is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1292", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1293", + "query": "emerald butte index writer saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1294", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald butte index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1295", + "query": "which index writer pegs the sensor at maximum when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1296", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one pegs the sensor at maximum when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1297", + "query": "chalk cirque index writer rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1298", + "query": "what explains why the chalk cirque index writer rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1299", + "query": "which index writer biases results to the reference value because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1300", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one biases results to the reference value because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1301", + "query": "beige glacier specimen locker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1302", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the beige glacier specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1303", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1304", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1305", + "query": "umber shore specimen locker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber shore specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1307", + "query": "which specimen locker splinters memory into unusable pieces once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1308", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1309", + "query": "crimson orchard specimen locker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1310", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the crimson orchard specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1311", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from silencing a probe that says no because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1312", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1313", + "query": "carmine harbor specimen locker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1314", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1315", + "query": "which specimen locker silently repeats the leader's work while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1316", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one silently repeats the leader's work while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1317", + "query": "fawn glacier specimen locker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1318", + "query": "what explains why the fawn glacier specimen locker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1319", + "query": "which specimen locker persists every result in duplicate because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1320", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one persists every result in duplicate because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1321", + "query": "sand cove provenance ledger gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1322", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the sand cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1323", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1324", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1325", + "query": "hazel brook provenance ledger fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel brook provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1327", + "query": "which provenance ledger splinters memory into unusable pieces once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1328", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1329", + "query": "auburn tarn provenance ledger suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1330", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the auburn tarn provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1331", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1332", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1333", + "query": "teal ravine provenance ledger shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1334", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal ravine provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1335", + "query": "which provenance ledger silently repeats the leader's work as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1336", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one silently repeats the leader's work as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1337", + "query": "chalk pond provenance ledger saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1338", + "query": "what explains why the chalk pond provenance ledger saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1339", + "query": "which provenance ledger persists every result in duplicate because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1340", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one persists every result in duplicate because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1341", + "query": "copper inlet lease broker spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1342", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the copper inlet lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1343", + "query": "which lease broker picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1344", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1345", + "query": "fawn marsh lease broker skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn marsh lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1347", + "query": "which lease broker acknowledges before durability once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1348", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one acknowledges before durability once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1349", + "query": "lilac gulch lease broker reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1350", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the lilac gulch lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1351", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1352", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1353", + "query": "pearl reef lease broker starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1354", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl reef lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1355", + "query": "which lease broker never lets the flush finish when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1356", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one never lets the flush finish when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1357", + "query": "indigo bluff lease broker retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1358", + "query": "what explains why the indigo bluff lease broker retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1359", + "query": "which lease broker repeats immediately on failure because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1360", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one repeats immediately on failure because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1361", + "query": "cedar brook quorum relay quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1362", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the cedar brook quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1363", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1364", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1365", + "query": "navy ravine quorum relay blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy ravine quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1367", + "query": "which quorum relay repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1368", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1369", + "query": "salmon mesa quorum relay trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1370", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the salmon mesa quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1371", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from believing the sender's own clock because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1372", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1373", + "query": "fawn heath quorum relay churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1374", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn heath quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1375", + "query": "which quorum relay opens and drops links nonstop when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1376", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one opens and drops links nonstop when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1377", + "query": "carmine mesa quorum relay chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1378", + "query": "what explains why the carmine mesa quorum relay chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1379", + "query": "which quorum relay cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1380", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1381", + "query": "ivory island shard router snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1382", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ivory island shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1383", + "query": "which shard router picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1384", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1385", + "query": "ruby swamp shard router misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby swamp shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1387", + "query": "which shard router sends completions to the wrong caller once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1388", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1389", + "query": "taupe dune shard router interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1390", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the taupe dune shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1391", + "query": "which shard router is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1392", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1393", + "query": "beige river shard router overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1394", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige river shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1395", + "query": "which shard router writes more log than the space allows as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1396", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one writes more log than the space allows as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1397", + "query": "hazel delta shard router escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1398", + "query": "what explains why the hazel delta shard router escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1399", + "query": "which shard router raises alarms at the first wobble because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1400", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1401", + "query": "fawn lake shard router backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1402", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the fawn lake shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1403", + "query": "which shard router picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1404", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1405", + "query": "sage hill shard router corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage hill shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1407", + "query": "which shard router leaves unreadable restart state once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1408", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1409", + "query": "navy swamp shard router cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1410", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the navy swamp shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1411", + "query": "which shard router is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1412", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1413", + "query": "opal heath shard router drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1414", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal heath shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1415", + "query": "which shard router loses track of its own progress marker as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1416", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one loses track of its own progress marker as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1417", + "query": "auburn badland shard router serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1418", + "query": "what explains why the auburn badland shard router serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1419", + "query": "which shard router checks health one at a time because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1420", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one checks health one at a time because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1421", + "query": "birch lake quorum relay snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1422", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the birch lake quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1423", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1424", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1425", + "query": "orange glacier quorum relay misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange glacier quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1427", + "query": "which quorum relay sends completions to the wrong caller once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1428", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1429", + "query": "fawn pond quorum relay interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1430", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the fawn pond quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1431", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1432", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1433", + "query": "copper prairie quorum relay overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1434", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper prairie quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1435", + "query": "which quorum relay writes more log than the space allows while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1436", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one writes more log than the space allows while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1437", + "query": "sepia hollow quorum relay escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1438", + "query": "what explains why the sepia hollow quorum relay escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1439", + "query": "which quorum relay raises alarms at the first wobble because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1440", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1441", + "query": "emerald tarn provenance ledger spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1442", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the emerald tarn provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1443", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1444", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1445", + "query": "verdigris cavern provenance ledger skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris cavern provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1447", + "query": "which provenance ledger acknowledges before durability once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1448", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one acknowledges before durability once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1449", + "query": "pewter ridge provenance ledger reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1450", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the pewter ridge provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1451", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1452", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1453", + "query": "vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1454", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion cliff provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1455", + "query": "which provenance ledger never lets the flush finish while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1456", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one never lets the flush finish while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1457", + "query": "beige cove provenance ledger retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1458", + "query": "what explains why the beige cove provenance ledger retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1459", + "query": "which provenance ledger repeats immediately on failure because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1460", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one repeats immediately on failure because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1461", + "query": "sorrel dell calibration bench stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1462", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the sorrel dell calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1463", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1464", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1465", + "query": "sienna harbor calibration bench upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna harbor calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1467", + "query": "which calibration bench delivers things in scrambled sequence once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1468", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1469", + "query": "orange harbor calibration bench hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1470", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the orange harbor calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1471", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from changing the checker while it checks because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1472", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1473", + "query": "ochre island calibration bench misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1474", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre island calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1475", + "query": "which calibration bench routes warnings to the wrong inbox when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1476", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1477", + "query": "coral marsh calibration bench polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1478", + "query": "what explains why the coral marsh calibration bench polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1479", + "query": "which calibration bench asks for updates far too often because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1480", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one asks for updates far too often because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1481", + "query": "violet lowland specimen locker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1482", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the violet lowland specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1483", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1484", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1485", + "query": "beige glade specimen locker poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige glade specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1487", + "query": "which specimen locker writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1488", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1489", + "query": "verdigris creek specimen locker rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1490", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the verdigris creek specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1491", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1492", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1493", + "query": "olive prairie specimen locker misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1494", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive prairie specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1495", + "query": "which specimen locker cannot say who holds which grant right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1496", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one cannot say who holds which grant right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1497", + "query": "teal forest specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1498", + "query": "what explains why the teal forest specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1499", + "query": "which specimen locker readies exactly what nobody asks for because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1500", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1501", + "query": "tan rapids edge cache checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1502", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the tan rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1503", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1504", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1505", + "query": "lilac harbor edge cache shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac harbor edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1507", + "query": "which edge cache destroys its own table of contents once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1508", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one destroys its own table of contents once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1509", + "query": "ivory ridge edge cache promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1510", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the ivory ridge edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1511", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1512", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1513", + "query": "beige cirque edge cache inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1514", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige cirque edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1515", + "query": "which edge cache predicts far more than materialises while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1516", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one predicts far more than materialises while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1517", + "query": "opal tarn edge cache favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1518", + "query": "what explains why the opal tarn edge cache favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1519", + "query": "which edge cache gives the noisiest customer priority because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1520", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1521", + "query": "auburn plateau calibration bench sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1522", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the auburn plateau calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1523", + "query": "which calibration bench picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1524", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1525", + "query": "topaz knoll calibration bench inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1527", + "query": "which calibration bench flips positive and negative readings once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1528", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one flips positive and negative readings once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1529", + "query": "sand badland calibration bench splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1530", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the sand badland calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1531", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1532", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1533", + "query": "golden knoll calibration bench skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1534", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1535", + "query": "which calibration bench tilts every measurement it takes as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1536", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one tilts every measurement it takes as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1537", + "query": "opal lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1538", + "query": "what explains why the opal lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1539", + "query": "which calibration bench keeps tuning grants for itself because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1540", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1541", + "query": "beige strait escrow chamber warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1542", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the beige strait escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1543", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1544", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1545", + "query": "violet dale escrow chamber poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet dale escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1547", + "query": "which escrow chamber writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1548", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1549", + "query": "emerald atoll escrow chamber rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1550", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the emerald atoll escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1551", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from moving a common read position backwards because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1552", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1553", + "query": "tan wharf escrow chamber misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1554", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan wharf escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1555", + "query": "which escrow chamber cannot say who holds which grant when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1556", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one cannot say who holds which grant when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1557", + "query": "willow cape escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1558", + "query": "what explains why the willow cape escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1559", + "query": "which escrow chamber readies exactly what nobody asks for because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1560", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1561", + "query": "ochre heath calibration bench eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1562", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ochre heath calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1563", + "query": "which calibration bench picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1564", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1565", + "query": "tan forest calibration bench swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan forest calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1567", + "query": "which calibration bench reports success where something went wrong once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1568", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one reports success where something went wrong once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1569", + "query": "beige orchard calibration bench fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1570", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the beige orchard calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1571", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from splitting the book of account in two because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1572", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1573", + "query": "indigo gulch calibration bench staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1574", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo gulch calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1575", + "query": "which calibration bench checks in at ragged intervals when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1576", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one checks in at ragged intervals when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1577", + "query": "coral crag calibration bench round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1578", + "query": "what explains why the coral crag calibration bench round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1579", + "query": "which calibration bench rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1580", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1581", + "query": "willow dell index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1582", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the willow dell index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1583", + "query": "which index writer picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1584", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1585", + "query": "sorrel canyon index writer starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel canyon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1587", + "query": "which index writer leaves downstream readers with nothing once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1588", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1589", + "query": "tan harbor index writer mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1590", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the tan harbor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1591", + "query": "which index writer is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1592", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1593", + "query": "sand bayou index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1594", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand bayou index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1595", + "query": "which index writer keeps toggling between up and down as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1596", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps toggling between up and down as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1597", + "query": "beige prairie index writer undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1598", + "query": "what explains why the beige prairie index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1599", + "query": "which index writer owns up to fewer attempts than occur because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1600", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1601", + "query": "willow grove telemetry mast parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1602", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the willow grove telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1603", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1604", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1605", + "query": "chalk oasis telemetry mast clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk oasis telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1607", + "query": "which telemetry mast fires the same alarm repeatedly once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1608", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1609", + "query": "bronze inlet telemetry mast reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1610", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the bronze inlet telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1611", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1612", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1613", + "query": "sepia rapids telemetry mast ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1614", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1615", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps pushing when told to slow right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1616", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps pushing when told to slow right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1617", + "query": "olive summit telemetry mast idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1618", + "query": "what explains why the olive summit telemetry mast idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1619", + "query": "which telemetry mast rests longer than it runs because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1620", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one rests longer than it runs because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1621", + "query": "jade forest sweep worker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1622", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the jade forest sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1623", + "query": "which sweep worker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1624", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1625", + "query": "coral lowland sweep worker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral lowland sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1627", + "query": "which sweep worker reports success where something went wrong once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1628", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one reports success where something went wrong once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1629", + "query": "lilac ridge sweep worker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1630", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the lilac ridge sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1631", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1632", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1633", + "query": "pewter butte sweep worker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1634", + "query": "what is still broken in the pewter butte sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1635", + "query": "which sweep worker checks in at ragged intervals before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1636", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one checks in at ragged intervals before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1637", + "query": "sepia delta sweep worker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1638", + "query": "what explains why the sepia delta sweep worker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1639", + "query": "which sweep worker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1640", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1641", + "query": "crimson canyon assay station quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1642", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the crimson canyon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1643", + "query": "which assay station picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1644", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1645", + "query": "tan swamp assay station blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan swamp assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1647", + "query": "which assay station repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1648", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1649", + "query": "wheat estuary assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1650", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the wheat estuary assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1651", + "query": "which assay station is barred from believing the sender's own clock because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1652", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1653", + "query": "coral bayou assay station churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1654", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1655", + "query": "which assay station opens and drops links nonstop when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1656", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one opens and drops links nonstop when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1657", + "query": "slate harbor assay station chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1658", + "query": "what explains why the slate harbor assay station chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1659", + "query": "which assay station cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1660", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1661", + "query": "taupe pond calibration bench batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1662", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the taupe pond calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1663", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1664", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1665", + "query": "granite knoll calibration bench re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1667", + "query": "which calibration bench sends the same payload twice once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1668", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one sends the same payload twice once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1669", + "query": "azure savanna calibration bench widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1670", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the azure savanna calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1671", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1672", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1673", + "query": "sienna heath calibration bench thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1674", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna heath calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1675", + "query": "which calibration bench evicts what it is about to need right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1676", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one evicts what it is about to need right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1677", + "query": "crimson hollow calibration bench rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1678", + "query": "what explains why the crimson hollow calibration bench rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1679", + "query": "which calibration bench shortens its own interval because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1680", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one shortens its own interval because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1681", + "query": "coral cliff token vault lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1682", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the coral cliff token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1683", + "query": "which token vault picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1684", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1685", + "query": "beige mesa token vault double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige mesa token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1687", + "query": "which token vault reports inflated totals once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1688", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one reports inflated totals once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1689", + "query": "ivory harbor token vault write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1690", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the ivory harbor token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1691", + "query": "which token vault is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1692", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1693", + "query": "slate marsh token vault leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1694", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate marsh token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1695", + "query": "which token vault never returns its file descriptors when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1696", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one never returns its file descriptors when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1697", + "query": "copper bayou token vault batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1698", + "query": "what explains why the copper bayou token vault batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1699", + "query": "which token vault exceeds its own size limit because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1700", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one exceeds its own size limit because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1701", + "query": "ashen delta assay station snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1702", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ashen delta assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1703", + "query": "which assay station picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1704", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1705", + "query": "wheat canyon assay station misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat canyon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1707", + "query": "which assay station sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1708", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1709", + "query": "coral badland assay station interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1710", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the coral badland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1711", + "query": "which assay station is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1712", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1713", + "query": "sand hollow assay station overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1714", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand hollow assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1715", + "query": "which assay station writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1716", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1717", + "query": "crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1718", + "query": "what explains why the crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1719", + "query": "which assay station raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1720", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1721", + "query": "violet savanna sweep worker decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1722", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the violet savanna sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1723", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1724", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1725", + "query": "lilac grove sweep worker mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1727", + "query": "which sweep worker puts the wrong name on each container once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1728", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one puts the wrong name on each container once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1729", + "query": "ruby atoll sweep worker recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1730", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the ruby atoll sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1731", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1732", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1733", + "query": "onyx cape sweep worker saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1734", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx cape sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1735", + "query": "which sweep worker pegs the sensor at maximum while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1736", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1737", + "query": "coral butte sweep worker rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1738", + "query": "what explains why the coral butte sweep worker rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1739", + "query": "which sweep worker biases results to the reference value because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1740", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one biases results to the reference value because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1741", + "query": "plum strait telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1742", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the plum strait telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1743", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1744", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1745", + "query": "ashen lowland telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ashen lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1747", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves downstream readers with nothing once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1748", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1749", + "query": "amber hollow telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1750", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the amber hollow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1751", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1752", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1753", + "query": "olive rapids telemetry mast flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1754", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1755", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps toggling between up and down while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1756", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps toggling between up and down while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1757", + "query": "sienna cove telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1758", + "query": "what explains why the sienna cove telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1759", + "query": "which telemetry mast owns up to fewer attempts than occur because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1760", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1761", + "query": "slate quarry escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1762", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the slate quarry escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1763", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often it tries again around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1764", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1765", + "query": "coral tarn escrow chamber drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral tarn escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1767", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses acknowledged data once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1768", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses acknowledged data once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1769", + "query": "navy tarn escrow chamber share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1770", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the navy tarn escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1771", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from one read position serving two partitions because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1772", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1773", + "query": "russet isthmus escrow chamber stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1774", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet isthmus escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1775", + "query": "which escrow chamber stops making progress while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1776", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one stops making progress while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1777", + "query": "amber cirque escrow chamber prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1778", + "query": "what explains why the amber cirque escrow chamber prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1779", + "query": "which escrow chamber picks the staler of two copies because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1780", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picks the staler of two copies because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1781", + "query": "topaz prairie assay station quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1782", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the topaz prairie assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1783", + "query": "which assay station picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1784", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1785", + "query": "taupe lagoon assay station blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1787", + "query": "which assay station repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1788", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1789", + "query": "pearl strait assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1790", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the pearl strait assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1791", + "query": "which assay station is barred from believing the sender's own clock because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1792", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1793", + "query": "coral meadow assay station churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1794", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral meadow assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1795", + "query": "which assay station opens and drops links nonstop while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1796", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one opens and drops links nonstop while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1797", + "query": "golden mesa assay station chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1798", + "query": "what explains why the golden mesa assay station chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1799", + "query": "which assay station cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1800", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1801", + "query": "crimson glade edge cache backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1802", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the crimson glade edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1803", + "query": "which edge cache picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1804", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1805", + "query": "wheat geyser edge cache corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1807", + "query": "which edge cache leaves unreadable restart state once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1808", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one leaves unreadable restart state once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1809", + "query": "sage hollow edge cache cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1810", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the sage hollow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1811", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1812", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1813", + "query": "mauve barrens edge cache drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1814", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve barrens edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1815", + "query": "which edge cache loses track of its own progress marker while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1816", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one loses track of its own progress marker while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1817", + "query": "pewter swamp edge cache serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1818", + "query": "what explains why the pewter swamp edge cache serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1819", + "query": "which edge cache checks health one at a time because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1820", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one checks health one at a time because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1821", + "query": "sepia tarn shard router flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1822", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the sepia tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1823", + "query": "which shard router picked how often it writes out around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1824", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1825", + "query": "violet dune shard router loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet dune shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1827", + "query": "which shard router forgets how far it had read once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1828", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one forgets how far it had read once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1829", + "query": "pearl summit shard router trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1830", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the pearl summit shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1831", + "query": "which shard router is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1832", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1833", + "query": "azure summit shard router reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1834", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure summit shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1835", + "query": "which shard router confirms out of sequence when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1836", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one confirms out of sequence when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1837", + "query": "lavender glacier shard router re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1838", + "query": "what explains why the lavender glacier shard router re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1839", + "query": "which shard router fetches the same index repeatedly because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1840", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1841", + "query": "fawn butte lease broker sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1842", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the fawn butte lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1843", + "query": "which lease broker picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1844", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1845", + "query": "cinnamon lake lease broker inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon lake lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1847", + "query": "which lease broker flips positive and negative readings once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1848", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one flips positive and negative readings once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1849", + "query": "sepia meadow lease broker splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1850", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the sepia meadow lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1851", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1852", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1853", + "query": "fawn dale lease broker skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1854", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn dale lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1855", + "query": "which lease broker tilts every measurement it takes while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1856", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one tilts every measurement it takes while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1857", + "query": "violet inlet lease broker hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1858", + "query": "what explains why the violet inlet lease broker hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1859", + "query": "which lease broker keeps tuning grants for itself because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1860", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1861", + "query": "sepia bayou shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1862", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the sepia bayou shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1863", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1864", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1865", + "query": "hazel knoll shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel knoll shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1867", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1868", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1869", + "query": "onyx estuary shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1870", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the onyx estuary shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1871", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1872", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1873", + "query": "violet atoll shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1874", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet atoll shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1875", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1876", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1877", + "query": "sepia lagoon shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1878", + "query": "what explains why the sepia lagoon shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1879", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1880", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1881", + "query": "emerald savanna shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1882", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the emerald savanna shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1883", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1884", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1885", + "query": "mauve river shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mauve river shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1887", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1888", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1889", + "query": "mustard glade shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1890", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the mustard glade shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1891", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1892", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1893", + "query": "cyan reef shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1894", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan reef shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1895", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1896", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1897", + "query": "golden creek shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1898", + "query": "what explains why the golden creek shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1899", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1900", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1901", + "query": "crimson harbor telemetry mast snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1902", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the crimson harbor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1903", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1904", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1905", + "query": "sepia dune telemetry mast misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia dune telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1907", + "query": "which telemetry mast sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1908", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1909", + "query": "wheat ridge telemetry mast interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1910", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the wheat ridge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1911", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1912", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1913", + "query": "orange gorge telemetry mast overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1914", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange gorge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1915", + "query": "which telemetry mast writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1916", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1917", + "query": "indigo cape telemetry mast escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1918", + "query": "what explains why the indigo cape telemetry mast escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1919", + "query": "which telemetry mast raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1920", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1921", + "query": "slate forest specimen locker flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1922", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the slate forest specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1923", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often it writes out around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1924", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1925", + "query": "quartz oasis specimen locker loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz oasis specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1927", + "query": "which specimen locker forgets how far it had read once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1928", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one forgets how far it had read once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1929", + "query": "ashen shore specimen locker trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1930", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the ashen shore specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1931", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1932", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1933", + "query": "sepia island specimen locker reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1934", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia island specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1935", + "query": "which specimen locker confirms out of sequence while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1936", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one confirms out of sequence while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1937", + "query": "plum bayou specimen locker re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1938", + "query": "what explains why the plum bayou specimen locker re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1939", + "query": "which specimen locker fetches the same index repeatedly because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1940", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1941", + "query": "ochre marsh ingest job confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1942", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the ochre marsh ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1943", + "query": "which ingest job picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1944", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1945", + "query": "plum wharf ingest job overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum wharf ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1947", + "query": "which ingest job lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1948", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1949", + "query": "ochre badland ingest job skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1950", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the ochre badland ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1951", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1952", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1953", + "query": "mustard shore ingest job orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1954", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard shore ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1955", + "query": "which ingest job abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1956", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1957", + "query": "cedar cove ingest job ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1958", + "query": "what explains why the cedar cove ingest job ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1959", + "query": "which ingest job serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1960", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1961", + "query": "sepia mesa lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1962", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the sepia mesa lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1963", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often it tries again around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1964", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1965", + "query": "olive estuary lease broker drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1967", + "query": "which lease broker loses acknowledged data once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1968", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one loses acknowledged data once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1969", + "query": "cedar fjord lease broker share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1970", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the cedar fjord lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1971", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from one read position serving two partitions because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1972", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1973", + "query": "mauve heath lease broker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1974", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve heath lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1975", + "query": "which lease broker stops making progress once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1976", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one stops making progress once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1977", + "query": "fawn forest lease broker prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1978", + "query": "what explains why the fawn forest lease broker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1979", + "query": "which lease broker picks the staler of two copies because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1980", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picks the staler of two copies because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1981", + "query": "sand cape assay station rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1982", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the sand cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1983", + "query": "which assay station picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1984", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1985", + "query": "slate bayou assay station desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1987", + "query": "which assay station lets copies drift out of agreement once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1988", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1989", + "query": "sepia quarry assay station widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1990", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the sepia quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1991", + "query": "which assay station is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1992", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1993", + "query": "pearl tundra assay station splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1994", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl tundra assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1995", + "query": "which assay station two halves each think they lead while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1996", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one two halves each think they lead while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1997", + "query": "teal lagoon assay station recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1998", + "query": "what explains why the teal lagoon assay station recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1999", + "query": "which assay station derives afresh what it could remember because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2000", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one derives afresh what it could remember because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2001", + "query": "sienna rapids lease broker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2002", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the sienna rapids lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2003", + "query": "which lease broker picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2004", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2005", + "query": "indigo heath lease broker poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2006", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo heath lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2007", + "query": "which lease broker writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2008", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2009", + "query": "vermilion ravine lease broker rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2010", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the vermilion ravine lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2011", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from moving a common read position backwards because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2012", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2013", + "query": "sienna bluff lease broker misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2014", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2015", + "query": "which lease broker cannot say who holds which grant when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2016", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one cannot say who holds which grant when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2017", + "query": "sepia shore lease broker pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2018", + "query": "what explains why the sepia shore lease broker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2019", + "query": "which lease broker readies exactly what nobody asks for because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2020", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2021", + "query": "sorrel rapids edge cache spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2022", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the sorrel rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2023", + "query": "which edge cache picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2024", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2025", + "query": "ruby cirque edge cache skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2026", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby cirque edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2027", + "query": "which edge cache acknowledges before durability once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2028", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one acknowledges before durability once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2029", + "query": "crimson moor edge cache reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2030", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the crimson moor edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2031", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2032", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2033", + "query": "copper bluff edge cache starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2034", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper bluff edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2035", + "query": "which edge cache never lets the flush finish while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2036", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one never lets the flush finish while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2037", + "query": "lilac strait edge cache retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2038", + "query": "what explains why the lilac strait edge cache retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2039", + "query": "which edge cache repeats immediately on failure because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2040", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one repeats immediately on failure because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2041", + "query": "ebony glacier entropy siphon compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2042", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the ebony glacier entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2043", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2044", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2045", + "query": "teal dune entropy siphon hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2046", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal dune entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2047", + "query": "which entropy siphon never gives borrowed space back once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2048", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one never gives borrowed space back once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2049", + "query": "amber dell entropy siphon archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2050", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the amber dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2051", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from shelving a problem that is live because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2052", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2053", + "query": "cobalt cliff entropy siphon lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2054", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt cliff entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2055", + "query": "which entropy siphon feeds the operator stale numbers when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2056", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one feeds the operator stale numbers when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2057", + "query": "navy gorge entropy siphon mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2058", + "query": "what explains why the navy gorge entropy siphon mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2059", + "query": "which entropy siphon serves yesterday's answers confidently because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2060", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2061", + "query": "auburn savanna assay station fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2062", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the auburn savanna assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2063", + "query": "which assay station picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2064", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2065", + "query": "ruby harbor assay station stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2066", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby harbor assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2067", + "query": "which assay station wedges everything behind it once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2068", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one wedges everything behind it once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2069", + "query": "plum inlet assay station retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2070", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the plum inlet assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2071", + "query": "which assay station is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2072", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2073", + "query": "teal island assay station spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2074", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal island assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2075", + "query": "which assay station burns cpu waiting once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2076", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one burns cpu waiting once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2077", + "query": "sorrel pond assay station holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2078", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel pond assay station holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2079", + "query": "which assay station keeps the barrier from closing because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2080", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one keeps the barrier from closing because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2081", + "query": "ebony ridge entropy siphon flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2082", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the ebony ridge entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2083", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how often it writes out around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2084", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2085", + "query": "copper valley entropy siphon loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2086", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper valley entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2087", + "query": "which entropy siphon forgets how far it had read once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2088", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one forgets how far it had read once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2089", + "query": "quartz bluff entropy siphon trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2090", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the quartz bluff entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2091", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2092", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2093", + "query": "carmine brook entropy siphon reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2094", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine brook entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2095", + "query": "which entropy siphon confirms out of sequence as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2096", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one confirms out of sequence as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2097", + "query": "willow strait entropy siphon re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2098", + "query": "what explains why the willow strait entropy siphon re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2099", + "query": "which entropy siphon fetches the same index repeatedly because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2100", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2101", + "query": "teal mesa token vault fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2102", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the teal mesa token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2103", + "query": "which token vault picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2104", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2105", + "query": "lilac mesa token vault stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac mesa token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2107", + "query": "which token vault wedges everything behind it once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2108", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one wedges everything behind it once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2109", + "query": "sage river token vault retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2110", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the sage river token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2111", + "query": "which token vault is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2112", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2113", + "query": "ashen estuary token vault spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2114", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen estuary token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2115", + "query": "which token vault burns cpu waiting while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2116", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one burns cpu waiting while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2117", + "query": "golden pond token vault holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2118", + "query": "what explains why the golden pond token vault holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2119", + "query": "which token vault keeps the barrier from closing because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2120", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one keeps the barrier from closing because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2121", + "query": "wheat fjord replay buffer fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2122", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the wheat fjord replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2123", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2124", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2125", + "query": "birch orchard replay buffer stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch orchard replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2127", + "query": "which replay buffer wedges everything behind it once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2128", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one wedges everything behind it once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2129", + "query": "teal quarry replay buffer retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2130", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the teal quarry replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2131", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2132", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2133", + "query": "silver delta replay buffer spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2134", + "query": "what is still broken in the silver delta replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2135", + "query": "which replay buffer burns cpu waiting once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2136", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one burns cpu waiting once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2137", + "query": "umber plateau replay buffer holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2138", + "query": "what explains why the umber plateau replay buffer holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2139", + "query": "which replay buffer keeps the barrier from closing because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2140", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2141", + "query": "chalk gulch escrow chamber decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2142", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the chalk gulch escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2143", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2144", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2145", + "query": "topaz summit escrow chamber mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz summit escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2147", + "query": "which escrow chamber puts the wrong name on each container once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2148", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one puts the wrong name on each container once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2149", + "query": "indigo butte escrow chamber recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2150", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the indigo butte escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2151", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2152", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2153", + "query": "ebony jungle escrow chamber saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2154", + "query": "what is still broken in the ebony jungle escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2155", + "query": "which escrow chamber pegs the sensor at maximum once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2156", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one pegs the sensor at maximum once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2157", + "query": "teal shore escrow chamber rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2158", + "query": "what explains why the teal shore escrow chamber rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2159", + "query": "which escrow chamber biases results to the reference value because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2160", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one biases results to the reference value because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2161", + "query": "ochre dune index writer sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2162", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the ochre dune index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2163", + "query": "which index writer picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2164", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2165", + "query": "ebony summit index writer inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony summit index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2167", + "query": "which index writer flips positive and negative readings once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2168", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one flips positive and negative readings once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2169", + "query": "birch cliff index writer splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2170", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the birch cliff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2171", + "query": "which index writer is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2172", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2173", + "query": "chalk cavern index writer skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2174", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk cavern index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2175", + "query": "which index writer tilts every measurement it takes as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2176", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one tilts every measurement it takes as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2177", + "query": "magenta meadow index writer hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2178", + "query": "what explains why the magenta meadow index writer hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2179", + "query": "which index writer keeps tuning grants for itself because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2180", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2181", + "query": "cinnamon rapids sweep worker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2182", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the cinnamon rapids sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2183", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2184", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2185", + "query": "teal valley sweep worker shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2187", + "query": "which sweep worker destroys its own table of contents once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2188", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one destroys its own table of contents once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2189", + "query": "ruby lowland sweep worker promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2190", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the ruby lowland sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2191", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2192", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2193", + "query": "olive moor sweep worker inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2194", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive moor sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2195", + "query": "which sweep worker predicts far more than materialises as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2196", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one predicts far more than materialises as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2197", + "query": "lilac barrens sweep worker favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2198", + "query": "what explains why the lilac barrens sweep worker favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2199", + "query": "which sweep worker gives the noisiest customer priority because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2200", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2201", + "query": "salmon barrens assay station checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2202", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the salmon barrens assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2203", + "query": "which assay station picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2204", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2205", + "query": "plum creek assay station shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum creek assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2207", + "query": "which assay station destroys its own table of contents once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2208", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one destroys its own table of contents once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2209", + "query": "saffron tundra assay station promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2210", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the saffron tundra assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2211", + "query": "which assay station is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2212", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2213", + "query": "teal estuary assay station inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2214", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal estuary assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2215", + "query": "which assay station predicts far more than materialises while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2216", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one predicts far more than materialises while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2217", + "query": "beige bluff assay station favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2218", + "query": "what explains why the beige bluff assay station favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2219", + "query": "which assay station gives the noisiest customer priority because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2220", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2221", + "query": "ochre gorge entropy siphon backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2222", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the ochre gorge entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2223", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2224", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2225", + "query": "cyan tundra entropy siphon corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan tundra entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2227", + "query": "which entropy siphon leaves unreadable restart state once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2228", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one leaves unreadable restart state once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2229", + "query": "slate summit entropy siphon cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2230", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the slate summit entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2231", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2232", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2233", + "query": "birch badland entropy siphon drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2234", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch badland entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2235", + "query": "which entropy siphon loses track of its own progress marker when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2236", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one loses track of its own progress marker when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2237", + "query": "olive reef entropy siphon serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2238", + "query": "what explains why the olive reef entropy siphon serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2239", + "query": "which entropy siphon checks health one at a time because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2240", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one checks health one at a time because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2241", + "query": "teal gulch edge cache drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2242", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the teal gulch edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2243", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2244", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2245", + "query": "slate river edge cache expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate river edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2247", + "query": "which edge cache cancels permissions it just issued once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2248", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2249", + "query": "pewter gorge edge cache outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2250", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the pewter gorge edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2251", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2252", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2253", + "query": "lilac isthmus edge cache stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2254", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac isthmus edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2255", + "query": "which edge cache delivers output in fits and bursts as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2256", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one delivers output in fits and bursts as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2257", + "query": "orange hollow edge cache trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2258", + "query": "what explains why the orange hollow edge cache trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2259", + "query": "which edge cache throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2260", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2261", + "query": "violet reef escrow chamber probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2262", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the violet reef escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2263", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2264", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2265", + "query": "mauve orchard escrow chamber truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mauve orchard escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2267", + "query": "which escrow chamber discards the newest entries once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2268", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one discards the newest entries once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2269", + "query": "teal lowland escrow chamber ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2270", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the teal lowland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2271", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2272", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2273", + "query": "birch cove escrow chamber duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2274", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch cove escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2275", + "query": "which escrow chamber issues the same barrier twice when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2276", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one issues the same barrier twice when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2277", + "query": "russet delta escrow chamber skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2278", + "query": "what explains why the russet delta escrow chamber skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2279", + "query": "which escrow chamber always takes the slow route because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2280", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one always takes the slow route because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2281", + "query": "fawn geyser assay station lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2282", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the fawn geyser assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2283", + "query": "which assay station picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2284", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2285", + "query": "violet bayou assay station double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2287", + "query": "which assay station reports inflated totals once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2288", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one reports inflated totals once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2289", + "query": "plum heath assay station write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2290", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the plum heath assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2291", + "query": "which assay station is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2292", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2293", + "query": "ochre valley assay station leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2294", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre valley assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2295", + "query": "which assay station never returns its file descriptors once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2296", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one never returns its file descriptors once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2297", + "query": "teal bayou assay station batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2298", + "query": "what explains why the teal bayou assay station batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2299", + "query": "which assay station exceeds its own size limit because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2300", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one exceeds its own size limit because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2301", + "query": "carmine atoll telemetry mast drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2302", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the carmine atoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2303", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2304", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2305", + "query": "ochre dell telemetry mast expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre dell telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2307", + "query": "which telemetry mast cancels permissions it just issued once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2308", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one cancels permissions it just issued once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2309", + "query": "opal tundra telemetry mast outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2310", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the opal tundra telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2311", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2312", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2313", + "query": "copper glacier telemetry mast stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2314", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper glacier telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2315", + "query": "which telemetry mast delivers output in fits and bursts before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2316", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one delivers output in fits and bursts before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2317", + "query": "sand lagoon telemetry mast trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2318", + "query": "what explains why the sand lagoon telemetry mast trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2319", + "query": "which telemetry mast throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2320", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2321", + "query": "bronze dell quorum relay gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2322", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the bronze dell quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2323", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2324", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2325", + "query": "teal cliff quorum relay fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal cliff quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2327", + "query": "which quorum relay splinters memory into unusable pieces once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2328", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2329", + "query": "umber inlet quorum relay suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2330", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the umber inlet quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2331", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from silencing a probe that says no because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2332", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2333", + "query": "cobalt bluff quorum relay shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2334", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt bluff quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2335", + "query": "which quorum relay silently repeats the leader's work when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2336", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one silently repeats the leader's work when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2337", + "query": "tan tundra quorum relay saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2338", + "query": "what explains why the tan tundra quorum relay saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2339", + "query": "which quorum relay persists every result in duplicate because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2340", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one persists every result in duplicate because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2341", + "query": "taupe mesa specimen locker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2342", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the taupe mesa specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2343", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2344", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2345", + "query": "hazel cape specimen locker misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel cape specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2347", + "query": "which specimen locker sends completions to the wrong caller once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2348", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2349", + "query": "ashen marsh specimen locker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2350", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the ashen marsh specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2351", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2352", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2353", + "query": "teal badland specimen locker overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2354", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal badland specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2355", + "query": "which specimen locker writes more log than the space allows when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2356", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one writes more log than the space allows when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2357", + "query": "maroon crag specimen locker escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2358", + "query": "what explains why the maroon crag specimen locker escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2359", + "query": "which specimen locker raises alarms at the first wobble because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2360", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2361", + "query": "fawn bluff telemetry mast flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2362", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the fawn bluff telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2363", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it writes out around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2364", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2365", + "query": "orange crag telemetry mast loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2367", + "query": "which telemetry mast forgets how far it had read once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2368", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one forgets how far it had read once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2369", + "query": "jade strait telemetry mast trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2370", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the jade strait telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2371", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2372", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2373", + "query": "salmon oasis telemetry mast reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2374", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon oasis telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2375", + "query": "which telemetry mast confirms out of sequence when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2376", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one confirms out of sequence when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2377", + "query": "bronze butte telemetry mast re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2378", + "query": "what explains why the bronze butte telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2379", + "query": "which telemetry mast fetches the same index repeatedly because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2380", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2381", + "query": "teal butte escrow chamber quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2382", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the teal butte escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2383", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2384", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2385", + "query": "navy bayou escrow chamber blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy bayou escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2387", + "query": "which escrow chamber repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2388", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2389", + "query": "walnut brook escrow chamber trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2390", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the walnut brook escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2391", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from believing the sender's own clock because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2392", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2393", + "query": "silver orchard escrow chamber churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2394", + "query": "what is still broken in the silver orchard escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2395", + "query": "which escrow chamber opens and drops links nonstop while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2396", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one opens and drops links nonstop while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2397", + "query": "magenta lowland escrow chamber chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2398", + "query": "what explains why the magenta lowland escrow chamber chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2399", + "query": "which escrow chamber cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2400", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2401", + "query": "lavender heath telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2402", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the lavender heath telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2403", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it tries again around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2404", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2405", + "query": "quartz pond telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz pond telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2407", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses acknowledged data once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2408", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses acknowledged data once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2409", + "query": "teal tarn telemetry mast share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2410", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the teal tarn telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2411", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from one read position serving two partitions because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2412", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2413", + "query": "umber orchard telemetry mast stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2414", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber orchard telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2415", + "query": "which telemetry mast stops making progress once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2416", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one stops making progress once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2417", + "query": "verdigris forest telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2418", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris forest telemetry mast prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2419", + "query": "which telemetry mast picks the staler of two copies because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2420", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picks the staler of two copies because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2421", + "query": "taupe summit telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2422", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the taupe summit telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2423", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2424", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2425", + "query": "birch strait telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch strait telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2427", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves downstream readers with nothing once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2428", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2429", + "query": "navy meadow telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2430", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the navy meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2431", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2432", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2433", + "query": "sepia heath telemetry mast flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2434", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia heath telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2435", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps toggling between up and down when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2436", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps toggling between up and down when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2437", + "query": "teal meadow telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2438", + "query": "what explains why the teal meadow telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2439", + "query": "which telemetry mast owns up to fewer attempts than occur because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2440", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2441", + "query": "azure estuary assay station flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2442", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the azure estuary assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2443", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it writes out around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2444", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2445", + "query": "silver atoll assay station loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver atoll assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2447", + "query": "which assay station forgets how far it had read once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2448", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one forgets how far it had read once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2449", + "query": "ebony wharf assay station trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2450", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the ebony wharf assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2451", + "query": "which assay station is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2452", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2453", + "query": "wheat cavern assay station reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2454", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat cavern assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2455", + "query": "which assay station confirms out of sequence as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2456", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one confirms out of sequence as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2457", + "query": "sorrel hollow assay station re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2458", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel hollow assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2459", + "query": "which assay station fetches the same index repeatedly because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2460", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2461", + "query": "russet strait edge cache grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2462", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the russet strait edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2463", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2464", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2465", + "query": "ochre wharf edge cache starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre wharf edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2467", + "query": "which edge cache leaves downstream readers with nothing once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2468", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2469", + "query": "sand inlet edge cache mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2470", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the sand inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2471", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2472", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2473", + "query": "walnut glacier edge cache flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2474", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut glacier edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2475", + "query": "which edge cache keeps toggling between up and down when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2476", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps toggling between up and down when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2477", + "query": "sienna forest edge cache undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2478", + "query": "what explains why the sienna forest edge cache undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2479", + "query": "which edge cache owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2480", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2481", + "query": "teal gorge specimen locker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2482", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the teal gorge specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2483", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2484", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2485", + "query": "sepia butte specimen locker poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia butte specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2487", + "query": "which specimen locker writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2488", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2489", + "query": "ivory jungle specimen locker rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2490", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the ivory jungle specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2491", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from moving a common read position backwards because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2492", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2493", + "query": "ochre forest specimen locker misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2494", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre forest specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2495", + "query": "which specimen locker cannot say who holds which grant while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2496", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one cannot say who holds which grant while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2497", + "query": "emerald moor specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2498", + "query": "what explains why the emerald moor specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2499", + "query": "which specimen locker readies exactly what nobody asks for because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2500", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2501", + "query": "jade meadow replay buffer compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2502", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the jade meadow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2503", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2504", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2505", + "query": "magenta bayou replay buffer hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the magenta bayou replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2507", + "query": "which replay buffer never gives borrowed space back once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2508", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one never gives borrowed space back once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2509", + "query": "beige brook replay buffer archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2510", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the beige brook replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2511", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from shelving a problem that is live because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2512", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2513", + "query": "violet geyser replay buffer lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2514", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet geyser replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2515", + "query": "which replay buffer feeds the operator stale numbers while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2516", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one feeds the operator stale numbers while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2517", + "query": "cyan isthmus replay buffer mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2518", + "query": "what explains why the cyan isthmus replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2519", + "query": "which replay buffer serves yesterday's answers confidently because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2520", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2521", + "query": "ochre hollow replay buffer rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2522", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the ochre hollow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2523", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2524", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2525", + "query": "sage tundra replay buffer desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage tundra replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2527", + "query": "which replay buffer lets copies drift out of agreement once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2528", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2529", + "query": "umber dune replay buffer widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2530", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the umber dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2531", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2532", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2533", + "query": "cedar crag replay buffer splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2534", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar crag replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2535", + "query": "which replay buffer two halves each think they lead once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2536", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one two halves each think they lead once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2537", + "query": "sage prairie replay buffer recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2538", + "query": "what explains why the sage prairie replay buffer recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2539", + "query": "which replay buffer derives afresh what it could remember because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2540", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one derives afresh what it could remember because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2541", + "query": "beige plateau entropy siphon backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2542", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the beige plateau entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2543", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2544", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2545", + "query": "silver savanna entropy siphon corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver savanna entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2547", + "query": "which entropy siphon leaves unreadable restart state once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2548", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one leaves unreadable restart state once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2549", + "query": "ochre plateau entropy siphon cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2550", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the ochre plateau entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2551", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2552", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2553", + "query": "sienna wharf entropy siphon drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2554", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2555", + "query": "which entropy siphon loses track of its own progress marker before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2556", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one loses track of its own progress marker before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2557", + "query": "quartz dune entropy siphon serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2558", + "query": "what explains why the quartz dune entropy siphon serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2559", + "query": "which entropy siphon checks health one at a time because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2560", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one checks health one at a time because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2561", + "query": "orange moor provenance ledger snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2562", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the orange moor provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2563", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2564", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2565", + "query": "granite geyser provenance ledger misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite geyser provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2567", + "query": "which provenance ledger sends completions to the wrong caller once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2568", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2569", + "query": "walnut meadow provenance ledger interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2570", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the walnut meadow provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2571", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2572", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2573", + "query": "copper island provenance ledger overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2574", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper island provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2575", + "query": "which provenance ledger writes more log than the space allows before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2576", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one writes more log than the space allows before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2577", + "query": "ochre bluff provenance ledger escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2578", + "query": "what explains why the ochre bluff provenance ledger escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2579", + "query": "which provenance ledger raises alarms at the first wobble because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2580", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2581", + "query": "sand harbor token vault drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2582", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the sand harbor token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2583", + "query": "which token vault picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2584", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2585", + "query": "mustard canyon token vault expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard canyon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2587", + "query": "which token vault cancels permissions it just issued once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2588", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one cancels permissions it just issued once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2589", + "query": "copper plateau token vault outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2590", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the copper plateau token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2591", + "query": "which token vault is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2592", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2593", + "query": "russet wharf token vault stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2594", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet wharf token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2595", + "query": "which token vault delivers output in fits and bursts when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2596", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one delivers output in fits and bursts when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2597", + "query": "sienna cirque token vault trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2598", + "query": "what explains why the sienna cirque token vault trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2599", + "query": "which token vault throws away the oldest instead of the newest because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2600", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2601", + "query": "hazel savanna provenance ledger drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2602", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the hazel savanna provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2603", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2604", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2605", + "query": "ochre cove provenance ledger expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2607", + "query": "which provenance ledger cancels permissions it just issued once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2608", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2609", + "query": "sorrel heath provenance ledger outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2610", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the sorrel heath provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2611", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2612", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2613", + "query": "silver gorge provenance ledger stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2614", + "query": "what is still broken in the silver gorge provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2615", + "query": "which provenance ledger delivers output in fits and bursts while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2616", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2617", + "query": "tan bayou provenance ledger trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2618", + "query": "what explains why the tan bayou provenance ledger trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2619", + "query": "which provenance ledger throws away the oldest instead of the newest because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2620", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2621", + "query": "mustard pond lease broker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2622", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the mustard pond lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2623", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2624", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2625", + "query": "silver dale lease broker shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver dale lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2627", + "query": "which lease broker destroys its own table of contents once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2628", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one destroys its own table of contents once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2629", + "query": "magenta swamp lease broker promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2630", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the magenta swamp lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2631", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2632", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2633", + "query": "ochre glade lease broker inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2634", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre glade lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2635", + "query": "which lease broker predicts far more than materialises when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2636", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one predicts far more than materialises when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2637", + "query": "vermilion moor lease broker favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2638", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion moor lease broker favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2639", + "query": "which lease broker gives the noisiest customer priority because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2640", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2641", + "query": "orange barrens sweep worker grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2642", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the orange barrens sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2643", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2644", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2645", + "query": "ebony dale sweep worker starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony dale sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2647", + "query": "which sweep worker leaves downstream readers with nothing once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2648", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2649", + "query": "cyan prairie sweep worker mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2650", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the cyan prairie sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2651", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2652", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2653", + "query": "scarlet orchard sweep worker flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2654", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet orchard sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2655", + "query": "which sweep worker keeps toggling between up and down as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2656", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one keeps toggling between up and down as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2657", + "query": "hazel orchard sweep worker undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2658", + "query": "what explains why the hazel orchard sweep worker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2659", + "query": "which sweep worker owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2660", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2661", + "query": "ochre cirque token vault checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2662", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the ochre cirque token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2663", + "query": "which token vault picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2664", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2665", + "query": "maroon lowland token vault shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon lowland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2667", + "query": "which token vault destroys its own table of contents once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2668", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one destroys its own table of contents once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2669", + "query": "emerald bayou token vault promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2670", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the emerald bayou token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2671", + "query": "which token vault is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2672", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2673", + "query": "lavender crag token vault inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2674", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender crag token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2675", + "query": "which token vault predicts far more than materialises while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2676", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one predicts far more than materialises while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2677", + "query": "scarlet butte token vault favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2678", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet butte token vault favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2679", + "query": "which token vault gives the noisiest customer priority because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2680", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2681", + "query": "beige geyser escrow chamber eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2682", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the beige geyser escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2683", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2684", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2685", + "query": "ebony marsh escrow chamber swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony marsh escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2687", + "query": "which escrow chamber reports success where something went wrong once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2688", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one reports success where something went wrong once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2689", + "query": "ochre strait escrow chamber fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2690", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the ochre strait escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2691", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2692", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2693", + "query": "maroon river escrow chamber staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2694", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon river escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2695", + "query": "which escrow chamber checks in at ragged intervals when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2696", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one checks in at ragged intervals when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2697", + "query": "fawn swamp escrow chamber round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2698", + "query": "what explains why the fawn swamp escrow chamber round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2699", + "query": "which escrow chamber rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2700", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2701", + "query": "maroon cavern index writer parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2702", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the maroon cavern index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2703", + "query": "which index writer picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2704", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2705", + "query": "coral canyon index writer clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral canyon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2707", + "query": "which index writer fires the same alarm repeatedly once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2708", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2709", + "query": "russet island index writer reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2710", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the russet island index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2711", + "query": "which index writer is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2712", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2713", + "query": "cyan estuary index writer ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2714", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan estuary index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2715", + "query": "which index writer keeps pushing when told to slow before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2716", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps pushing when told to slow before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2717", + "query": "ochre orchard index writer idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2718", + "query": "what explains why the ochre orchard index writer idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2719", + "query": "which index writer rests longer than it runs because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2720", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one rests longer than it runs because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2721", + "query": "sienna river ingest job checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2722", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the sienna river ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2723", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2724", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2725", + "query": "ebony valley ingest job shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony valley ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2727", + "query": "which ingest job destroys its own table of contents once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2728", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one destroys its own table of contents once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2729", + "query": "sage lagoon ingest job promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2730", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the sage lagoon ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2731", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2732", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2733", + "query": "birch summit ingest job inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2734", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch summit ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2735", + "query": "which ingest job predicts far more than materialises when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2736", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one predicts far more than materialises when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2737", + "query": "mauve ridge ingest job favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2738", + "query": "what explains why the mauve ridge ingest job favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2739", + "query": "which ingest job gives the noisiest customer priority because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2740", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2741", + "query": "navy hollow entropy siphon stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2742", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the navy hollow entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2743", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2744", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2745", + "query": "ochre prairie entropy siphon upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre prairie entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2747", + "query": "which entropy siphon delivers things in scrambled sequence once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2748", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2749", + "query": "onyx canyon entropy siphon hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2750", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the onyx canyon entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2751", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from changing the checker while it checks because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2752", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2753", + "query": "pearl cliff entropy siphon misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2754", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl cliff entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2755", + "query": "which entropy siphon routes warnings to the wrong inbox before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2756", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2757", + "query": "azure hollow entropy siphon polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2758", + "query": "what explains why the azure hollow entropy siphon polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2759", + "query": "which entropy siphon asks for updates far too often because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2760", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one asks for updates far too often because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2761", + "query": "birch quarry shard router warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2762", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the birch quarry shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2763", + "query": "which shard router picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2764", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2765", + "query": "mauve valley shard router poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mauve valley shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2767", + "query": "which shard router writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2768", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2769", + "query": "sand island shard router rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2770", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the sand island shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2771", + "query": "which shard router is barred from moving a common read position backwards because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2772", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2773", + "query": "ochre fjord shard router misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2774", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre fjord shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2775", + "query": "which shard router cannot say who holds which grant while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2776", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one cannot say who holds which grant while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2777", + "query": "navy plateau shard router pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2778", + "query": "what explains why the navy plateau shard router pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2779", + "query": "which shard router readies exactly what nobody asks for because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2780", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2781", + "query": "opal cliff index writer batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2782", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the opal cliff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2783", + "query": "which index writer picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2784", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2785", + "query": "birch jungle index writer re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch jungle index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2787", + "query": "which index writer sends the same payload twice once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2788", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one sends the same payload twice once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2789", + "query": "cyan delta index writer widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2790", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the cyan delta index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2791", + "query": "which index writer is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2792", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2793", + "query": "copper isthmus index writer thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2794", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper isthmus index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2795", + "query": "which index writer evicts what it is about to need as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2796", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one evicts what it is about to need as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2797", + "query": "olive knoll index writer rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2798", + "query": "what explains why the olive knoll index writer rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2799", + "query": "which index writer shortens its own interval because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2800", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one shortens its own interval because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2801", + "query": "ochre jungle quorum relay snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2802", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ochre jungle quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2803", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2804", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2805", + "query": "salmon gulch quorum relay misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon gulch quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2807", + "query": "which quorum relay sends completions to the wrong caller once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2808", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2809", + "query": "cobalt hollow quorum relay interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2810", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the cobalt hollow quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2811", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2812", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2813", + "query": "verdigris savanna quorum relay overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2814", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris savanna quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2815", + "query": "which quorum relay writes more log than the space allows once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2816", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one writes more log than the space allows once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2817", + "query": "russet knoll quorum relay escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2818", + "query": "what explains why the russet knoll quorum relay escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2819", + "query": "which quorum relay raises alarms at the first wobble because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2820", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2821", + "query": "amber delta replay buffer quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2822", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the amber delta replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2823", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2824", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2825", + "query": "walnut dune replay buffer blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2827", + "query": "which replay buffer repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2828", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2829", + "query": "copper river replay buffer trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2830", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the copper river replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2831", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from believing the sender's own clock because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2832", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2833", + "query": "jade glacier replay buffer churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2834", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade glacier replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2835", + "query": "which replay buffer opens and drops links nonstop while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2836", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one opens and drops links nonstop while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2837", + "query": "sienna pond replay buffer chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2838", + "query": "what explains why the sienna pond replay buffer chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2839", + "query": "which replay buffer cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2840", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2841", + "query": "bronze oasis quorum relay sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2842", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the bronze oasis quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2843", + "query": "which quorum relay picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2844", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2845", + "query": "lavender geyser quorum relay inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lavender geyser quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2847", + "query": "which quorum relay flips positive and negative readings once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2848", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one flips positive and negative readings once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2849", + "query": "teal pond quorum relay splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2850", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the teal pond quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2851", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2852", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2853", + "query": "salmon cliff quorum relay skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2854", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon cliff quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2855", + "query": "which quorum relay tilts every measurement it takes right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2856", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one tilts every measurement it takes right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2857", + "query": "copper swamp quorum relay hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2858", + "query": "what explains why the copper swamp quorum relay hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2859", + "query": "which quorum relay keeps tuning grants for itself because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2860", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2861", + "query": "violet forest token vault probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2862", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the violet forest token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2863", + "query": "which token vault picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2864", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2865", + "query": "quartz dale token vault truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz dale token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2867", + "query": "which token vault discards the newest entries once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2868", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one discards the newest entries once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2869", + "query": "taupe cape token vault ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2870", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the taupe cape token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2871", + "query": "which token vault is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2872", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2873", + "query": "granite island token vault duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2874", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite island token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2875", + "query": "which token vault issues the same barrier twice when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2876", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one issues the same barrier twice when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2877", + "query": "sage swamp token vault skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2878", + "query": "what explains why the sage swamp token vault skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2879", + "query": "which token vault always takes the slow route because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2880", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one always takes the slow route because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2881", + "query": "coral ridge entropy siphon parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2882", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the coral ridge entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2883", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2884", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2885", + "query": "copper creek entropy siphon clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper creek entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2887", + "query": "which entropy siphon fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2888", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2889", + "query": "chalk ridge entropy siphon reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2890", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the chalk ridge entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2891", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2892", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2893", + "query": "quartz grove entropy siphon ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2894", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz grove entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2895", + "query": "which entropy siphon keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2896", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2897", + "query": "bronze plateau entropy siphon idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2898", + "query": "what explains why the bronze plateau entropy siphon idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2899", + "query": "which entropy siphon rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2900", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2901", + "query": "topaz dune token vault probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2902", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the topaz dune token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2903", + "query": "which token vault picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2904", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2905", + "query": "azure fjord token vault truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure fjord token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2907", + "query": "which token vault discards the newest entries once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2908", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one discards the newest entries once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2909", + "query": "maroon lake token vault ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2910", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the maroon lake token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2911", + "query": "which token vault is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2912", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2913", + "query": "copper geyser token vault duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2914", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper geyser token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2915", + "query": "which token vault issues the same barrier twice when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2916", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one issues the same barrier twice when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2917", + "query": "cinnamon quarry token vault skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2918", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon quarry token vault skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2919", + "query": "which token vault always takes the slow route because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2920", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one always takes the slow route because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2921", + "query": "cinnamon ridge telemetry mast drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2922", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the cinnamon ridge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2923", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2924", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2925", + "query": "hazel jungle telemetry mast expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel jungle telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2927", + "query": "which telemetry mast cancels permissions it just issued once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2928", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one cancels permissions it just issued once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2929", + "query": "ivory inlet telemetry mast outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2930", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the ivory inlet telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2931", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2932", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2933", + "query": "orange lowland telemetry mast stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2934", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2935", + "query": "which telemetry mast delivers output in fits and bursts when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2936", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one delivers output in fits and bursts when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2937", + "query": "crimson dell telemetry mast trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2938", + "query": "what explains why the crimson dell telemetry mast trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2939", + "query": "which telemetry mast throws away the oldest instead of the newest because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2940", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2941", + "query": "chalk summit escrow chamber dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2942", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the chalk summit escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2943", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2944", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2945", + "query": "lilac bluff escrow chamber forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac bluff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2947", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses track of positions previously read once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2948", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses track of positions previously read once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2949", + "query": "chalk dune escrow chamber bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2950", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the chalk dune escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2951", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2952", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2953", + "query": "teal oasis escrow chamber clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2954", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal oasis escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2955", + "query": "which escrow chamber cuts short every spike it should absorb while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2956", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2957", + "query": "cyan cove escrow chamber defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2958", + "query": "what explains why the cyan cove escrow chamber defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2959", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps postponing the squeeze because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2960", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2961", + "query": "sage cirque index writer quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2962", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the sage cirque index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2963", + "query": "which index writer picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2964", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2965", + "query": "ochre grove index writer blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre grove index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2967", + "query": "which index writer repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2968", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2969", + "query": "chalk wharf index writer trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2970", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the chalk wharf index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2971", + "query": "which index writer is barred from believing the sender's own clock because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2972", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2973", + "query": "walnut lowland index writer churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2974", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut lowland index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2975", + "query": "which index writer opens and drops links nonstop while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2976", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one opens and drops links nonstop while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2977", + "query": "ashen valley index writer chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2978", + "query": "what explains why the ashen valley index writer chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2979", + "query": "which index writer cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2980", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2981", + "query": "sand canyon telemetry mast drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2982", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the sand canyon telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2983", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2984", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2985", + "query": "coral swamp telemetry mast expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral swamp telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2987", + "query": "which telemetry mast cancels permissions it just issued once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2988", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one cancels permissions it just issued once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2989", + "query": "olive valley telemetry mast outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2990", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the olive valley telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2991", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2992", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2993", + "query": "cinnamon creek telemetry mast stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2994", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon creek telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2995", + "query": "which telemetry mast delivers output in fits and bursts once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2996", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one delivers output in fits and bursts once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2997", + "query": "ruby oasis telemetry mast trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2998", + "query": "what explains why the ruby oasis telemetry mast trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2999", + "query": "which telemetry mast throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3000", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3001", + "query": "pewter cape escrow chamber backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3002", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the pewter cape escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3003", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3004", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3005", + "query": "topaz mesa escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3006", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz mesa escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3007", + "query": "which escrow chamber leaves unreadable restart state once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3008", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one leaves unreadable restart state once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3009", + "query": "olive cliff escrow chamber cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3010", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the olive cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3011", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3012", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3013", + "query": "cyan island escrow chamber drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3014", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan island escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3015", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses track of its own progress marker while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3016", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses track of its own progress marker while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3017", + "query": "ivory crag escrow chamber serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3018", + "query": "what explains why the ivory crag escrow chamber serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3019", + "query": "which escrow chamber checks health one at a time because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3020", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one checks health one at a time because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3021", + "query": "chalk brook sweep worker fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3022", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the chalk brook sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3023", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3024", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3025", + "query": "ruby river sweep worker stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3026", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby river sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3027", + "query": "which sweep worker wedges everything behind it once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3028", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one wedges everything behind it once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3029", + "query": "saffron reef sweep worker retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3030", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the saffron reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3031", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3032", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3033", + "query": "onyx swamp sweep worker spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3034", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx swamp sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3035", + "query": "which sweep worker burns cpu waiting before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3036", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one burns cpu waiting before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3037", + "query": "opal geyser sweep worker holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3038", + "query": "what explains why the opal geyser sweep worker holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3039", + "query": "which sweep worker keeps the barrier from closing because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3040", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3041", + "query": "lavender gorge sweep worker quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3042", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the lavender gorge sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3043", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3044", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3045", + "query": "sand lowland sweep worker garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3046", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand lowland sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3047", + "query": "which sweep worker scrambles what it reports home once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3048", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one scrambles what it reports home once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3049", + "query": "onyx tundra sweep worker hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3050", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the onyx tundra sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3051", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3052", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3053", + "query": "jade crag sweep worker echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3054", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade crag sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3055", + "query": "which sweep worker repeats instructions back to itself once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3056", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one repeats instructions back to itself once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3057", + "query": "crimson valley sweep worker mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3058", + "query": "what explains why the crimson valley sweep worker mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3059", + "query": "which sweep worker copies the rhythm of its counterpart because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3060", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3061", + "query": "cinnamon swamp ingest job parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3062", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the cinnamon swamp ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3063", + "query": "which ingest job picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3064", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3065", + "query": "walnut barrens ingest job clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3066", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut barrens ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3067", + "query": "which ingest job fires the same alarm repeatedly once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3068", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3069", + "query": "copper strait ingest job reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3070", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the copper strait ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3071", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3072", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3073", + "query": "topaz plateau ingest job ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3074", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz plateau ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3075", + "query": "which ingest job keeps pushing when told to slow once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3076", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps pushing when told to slow once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3077", + "query": "ivory lagoon ingest job idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3078", + "query": "what explains why the ivory lagoon ingest job idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3079", + "query": "which ingest job rests longer than it runs because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3080", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one rests longer than it runs because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3081", + "query": "jade hill quorum relay drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3082", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the jade hill quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3083", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3084", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3085", + "query": "jade harbor quorum relay expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3086", + "query": "what goes wrong with the jade harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3087", + "query": "which quorum relay cancels permissions it just issued once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3088", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one cancels permissions it just issued once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3089", + "query": "lavender brook quorum relay outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3090", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the lavender brook quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3091", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3092", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3093", + "query": "lavender lowland quorum relay stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3094", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender lowland quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3095", + "query": "which quorum relay delivers output in fits and bursts as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3096", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one delivers output in fits and bursts as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3097", + "query": "mustard butte quorum relay trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3098", + "query": "what explains why the mustard butte quorum relay trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3099", + "query": "which quorum relay throws away the oldest instead of the newest because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3100", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3101", + "query": "amber lake edge cache decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3102", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the amber lake edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3103", + "query": "which edge cache picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3104", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3105", + "query": "plum harbor edge cache mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum harbor edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3107", + "query": "which edge cache puts the wrong name on each container once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3108", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one puts the wrong name on each container once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3109", + "query": "jade dale edge cache recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3110", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the jade dale edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3111", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3112", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3113", + "query": "topaz inlet edge cache saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3114", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3115", + "query": "which edge cache pegs the sensor at maximum as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3116", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one pegs the sensor at maximum as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3117", + "query": "sepia cavern edge cache rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3118", + "query": "what explains why the sepia cavern edge cache rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3119", + "query": "which edge cache biases results to the reference value because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3120", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one biases results to the reference value because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3121", + "query": "pewter gulch quorum relay snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3122", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the pewter gulch quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3123", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3124", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3125", + "query": "copper marsh quorum relay misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper marsh quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3127", + "query": "which quorum relay sends completions to the wrong caller once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3128", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3129", + "query": "hazel moor quorum relay interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3130", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the hazel moor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3131", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3132", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3133", + "query": "amber summit quorum relay overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3134", + "query": "what is still broken in the amber summit quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3135", + "query": "which quorum relay writes more log than the space allows while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3136", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one writes more log than the space allows while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3137", + "query": "saffron glade quorum relay escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3138", + "query": "what explains why the saffron glade quorum relay escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3139", + "query": "which quorum relay raises alarms at the first wobble because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3140", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3141", + "query": "orange savanna specimen locker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3142", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the orange savanna specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3143", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3144", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3145", + "query": "slate glacier specimen locker shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate glacier specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3147", + "query": "which specimen locker destroys its own table of contents once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3148", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one destroys its own table of contents once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3149", + "query": "sepia atoll specimen locker promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3150", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the sepia atoll specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3151", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3152", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3153", + "query": "topaz wharf specimen locker inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3154", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz wharf specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3155", + "query": "which specimen locker predicts far more than materialises while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3156", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one predicts far more than materialises while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3157", + "query": "saffron canyon specimen locker favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3158", + "query": "what explains why the saffron canyon specimen locker favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3159", + "query": "which specimen locker gives the noisiest customer priority because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3160", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3161", + "query": "crimson forest quorum relay parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3162", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the crimson forest quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3163", + "query": "which quorum relay picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3164", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3165", + "query": "saffron cirque quorum relay clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the saffron cirque quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3167", + "query": "which quorum relay fires the same alarm repeatedly once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3168", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3169", + "query": "russet tarn quorum relay reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3170", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the russet tarn quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3171", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3172", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3173", + "query": "walnut rapids quorum relay ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3174", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut rapids quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3175", + "query": "which quorum relay keeps pushing when told to slow before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3176", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one keeps pushing when told to slow before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3177", + "query": "crimson fjord quorum relay idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3178", + "query": "what explains why the crimson fjord quorum relay idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3179", + "query": "which quorum relay rests longer than it runs because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3180", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one rests longer than it runs because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3181", + "query": "lavender reef quorum relay rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3182", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the lavender reef quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3183", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3184", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3185", + "query": "silver inlet quorum relay desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver inlet quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3187", + "query": "which quorum relay lets copies drift out of agreement once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3188", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3189", + "query": "topaz hill quorum relay widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3190", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the topaz hill quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3191", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3192", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3193", + "query": "saffron strait quorum relay splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3194", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron strait quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3195", + "query": "which quorum relay two halves each think they lead when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3196", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one two halves each think they lead when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3197", + "query": "ochre creek quorum relay recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3198", + "query": "what explains why the ochre creek quorum relay recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3199", + "query": "which quorum relay derives afresh what it could remember because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3200", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one derives afresh what it could remember because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3201", + "query": "cyan cirque telemetry mast decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3202", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the cyan cirque telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3203", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3204", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3205", + "query": "sage bayou telemetry mast mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage bayou telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3207", + "query": "which telemetry mast puts the wrong name on each container once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3208", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one puts the wrong name on each container once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3209", + "query": "indigo tundra telemetry mast recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3210", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the indigo tundra telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3211", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3212", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3213", + "query": "ashen island telemetry mast saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3214", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen island telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3215", + "query": "which telemetry mast pegs the sensor at maximum when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3216", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one pegs the sensor at maximum when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3217", + "query": "plum glade telemetry mast rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3218", + "query": "what explains why the plum glade telemetry mast rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3219", + "query": "which telemetry mast biases results to the reference value because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3220", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one biases results to the reference value because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3221", + "query": "saffron orchard lease broker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3222", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the saffron orchard lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3223", + "query": "which lease broker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3224", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3225", + "query": "salmon island lease broker misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon island lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3227", + "query": "which lease broker sends completions to the wrong caller once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3228", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3229", + "query": "beige cape lease broker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3230", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the beige cape lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3231", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3232", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3233", + "query": "slate bluff lease broker overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3234", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3235", + "query": "which lease broker writes more log than the space allows when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3236", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one writes more log than the space allows when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3237", + "query": "mauve dale lease broker escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3238", + "query": "what explains why the mauve dale lease broker escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3239", + "query": "which lease broker raises alarms at the first wobble because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3240", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3241", + "query": "willow lowland lease broker lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3242", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the willow lowland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3243", + "query": "which lease broker picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3244", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3245", + "query": "mustard estuary lease broker double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3247", + "query": "which lease broker reports inflated totals once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3248", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one reports inflated totals once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3249", + "query": "saffron prairie lease broker write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3250", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the saffron prairie lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3251", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3252", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3253", + "query": "saffron grove lease broker leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3254", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron grove lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3255", + "query": "which lease broker never returns its file descriptors when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3256", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one never returns its file descriptors when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3257", + "query": "slate shore lease broker batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3258", + "query": "what explains why the slate shore lease broker batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3259", + "query": "which lease broker exceeds its own size limit because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3260", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one exceeds its own size limit because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3261", + "query": "ochre cliff replay buffer quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3262", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the ochre cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3263", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3264", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3265", + "query": "ebony lake replay buffer garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony lake replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3267", + "query": "which replay buffer scrambles what it reports home once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3268", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one scrambles what it reports home once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3269", + "query": "umber lake replay buffer hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3270", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the umber lake replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3271", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3272", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3273", + "query": "onyx ravine replay buffer echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3274", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx ravine replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3275", + "query": "which replay buffer repeats instructions back to itself while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3276", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one repeats instructions back to itself while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3277", + "query": "saffron fjord replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3278", + "query": "what explains why the saffron fjord replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3279", + "query": "which replay buffer copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3280", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3281", + "query": "orange butte quorum relay decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3282", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the orange butte quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3283", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3284", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3285", + "query": "emerald hill quorum relay mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the emerald hill quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3287", + "query": "which quorum relay puts the wrong name on each container once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3288", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one puts the wrong name on each container once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3289", + "query": "scarlet glade quorum relay recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3290", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the scarlet glade quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3291", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3292", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3293", + "query": "vermilion pond quorum relay saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3294", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion pond quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3295", + "query": "which quorum relay pegs the sensor at maximum when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3296", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one pegs the sensor at maximum when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3297", + "query": "azure isthmus quorum relay rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3298", + "query": "what explains why the azure isthmus quorum relay rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3299", + "query": "which quorum relay biases results to the reference value because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3300", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one biases results to the reference value because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3301", + "query": "azure rapids escrow chamber spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3302", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the azure rapids escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3303", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3304", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3305", + "query": "saffron jungle escrow chamber skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the saffron jungle escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3307", + "query": "which escrow chamber acknowledges before durability once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3308", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one acknowledges before durability once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3309", + "query": "walnut knoll escrow chamber reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3310", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the walnut knoll escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3311", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3312", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3313", + "query": "wheat lagoon escrow chamber starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3314", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat lagoon escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3315", + "query": "which escrow chamber never lets the flush finish while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3316", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one never lets the flush finish while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3317", + "query": "willow cirque escrow chamber retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3318", + "query": "what explains why the willow cirque escrow chamber retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3319", + "query": "which escrow chamber repeats immediately on failure because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3320", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one repeats immediately on failure because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3321", + "query": "violet oasis sweep worker quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3322", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the violet oasis sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3323", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3324", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3325", + "query": "quartz harbor sweep worker garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz harbor sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3327", + "query": "which sweep worker scrambles what it reports home once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3328", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one scrambles what it reports home once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3329", + "query": "silver cavern sweep worker hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3330", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the silver cavern sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3331", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3332", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3333", + "query": "saffron moor sweep worker echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3334", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron moor sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3335", + "query": "which sweep worker repeats instructions back to itself when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3336", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one repeats instructions back to itself when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3337", + "query": "violet cove sweep worker mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3338", + "query": "what explains why the violet cove sweep worker mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3339", + "query": "which sweep worker copies the rhythm of its counterpart because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3340", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3341", + "query": "indigo plateau lease broker dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3342", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the indigo plateau lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3343", + "query": "which lease broker picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3344", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3345", + "query": "crimson badland lease broker forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3347", + "query": "which lease broker loses track of positions previously read once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3348", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one loses track of positions previously read once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3349", + "query": "sage dune lease broker bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3350", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the sage dune lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3351", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from slipping past the intake gate because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3352", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3353", + "query": "carmine inlet lease broker clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3354", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine inlet lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3355", + "query": "which lease broker cuts short every spike it should absorb while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3356", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3357", + "query": "beige swamp lease broker defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3358", + "query": "what explains why the beige swamp lease broker defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3359", + "query": "which lease broker keeps postponing the squeeze because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3360", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3361", + "query": "crimson lake ingest job checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3362", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the crimson lake ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3363", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3364", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3365", + "query": "sage cavern ingest job shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage cavern ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3367", + "query": "which ingest job destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3368", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3369", + "query": "coral strait ingest job promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3370", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the coral strait ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3371", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3372", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3373", + "query": "cedar cliff ingest job inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3374", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar cliff ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3375", + "query": "which ingest job predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3376", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3377", + "query": "teal heath ingest job favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3378", + "query": "what explains why the teal heath ingest job favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3379", + "query": "which ingest job gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3380", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3381", + "query": "indigo creek telemetry mast quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3382", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the indigo creek telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3383", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3384", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3385", + "query": "scarlet shore telemetry mast blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet shore telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3387", + "query": "which telemetry mast repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3388", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3389", + "query": "crimson pond telemetry mast trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3390", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the crimson pond telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3391", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from believing the sender's own clock because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3392", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3393", + "query": "plum tarn telemetry mast churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3394", + "query": "what is still broken in the plum tarn telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3395", + "query": "which telemetry mast opens and drops links nonstop while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3396", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one opens and drops links nonstop while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3397", + "query": "sepia harbor telemetry mast chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3398", + "query": "what explains why the sepia harbor telemetry mast chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3399", + "query": "which telemetry mast cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3400", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3401", + "query": "lavender hill specimen locker confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3402", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the lavender hill specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3403", + "query": "which specimen locker picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3404", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3405", + "query": "olive badland specimen locker overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive badland specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3407", + "query": "which specimen locker lingers longer than scheduled once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3408", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one lingers longer than scheduled once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3409", + "query": "sepia cove specimen locker skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3410", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the sepia cove specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3411", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from omitting the empty reference run because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3412", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3413", + "query": "jade reef specimen locker orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3414", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade reef specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3415", + "query": "which specimen locker abandons work it had accepted when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3416", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one abandons work it had accepted when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3417", + "query": "crimson savanna specimen locker ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3418", + "query": "what explains why the crimson savanna specimen locker ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3419", + "query": "which specimen locker serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3420", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3421", + "query": "navy heath escrow chamber lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3422", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the navy heath escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3423", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3424", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3425", + "query": "russet glacier escrow chamber double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet glacier escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3427", + "query": "which escrow chamber reports inflated totals once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3428", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one reports inflated totals once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3429", + "query": "navy glade escrow chamber write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3430", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the navy glade escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3431", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3432", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3433", + "query": "mauve shore escrow chamber leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3434", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve shore escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3435", + "query": "which escrow chamber never returns its file descriptors while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3436", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one never returns its file descriptors while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3437", + "query": "beige dale escrow chamber batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3438", + "query": "what explains why the beige dale escrow chamber batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3439", + "query": "which escrow chamber exceeds its own size limit because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3440", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one exceeds its own size limit because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3441", + "query": "opal bluff entropy siphon fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3442", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the opal bluff entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3443", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3444", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3445", + "query": "crimson tundra entropy siphon stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson tundra entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3447", + "query": "which entropy siphon wedges everything behind it once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3448", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one wedges everything behind it once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3449", + "query": "auburn canyon entropy siphon retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3450", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the auburn canyon entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3451", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3452", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3453", + "query": "granite forest entropy siphon spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3454", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite forest entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3455", + "query": "which entropy siphon burns cpu waiting while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3456", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one burns cpu waiting while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3457", + "query": "emerald glade entropy siphon holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3458", + "query": "what explains why the emerald glade entropy siphon holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3459", + "query": "which entropy siphon keeps the barrier from closing because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3460", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3461", + "query": "cedar harbor sweep worker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3462", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the cedar harbor sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3463", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3464", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3465", + "query": "chalk hollow sweep worker poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk hollow sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3467", + "query": "which sweep worker writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3468", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3469", + "query": "crimson creek sweep worker rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3470", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the crimson creek sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3471", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from moving a common read position backwards because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3472", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3473", + "query": "crimson delta sweep worker misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3474", + "query": "what is still broken in the crimson delta sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3475", + "query": "which sweep worker cannot say who holds which grant when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3476", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one cannot say who holds which grant when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3477", + "query": "verdigris summit sweep worker pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3478", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris summit sweep worker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3479", + "query": "which sweep worker readies exactly what nobody asks for because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3480", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3481", + "query": "copper canyon replay buffer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3482", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the copper canyon replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3483", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3484", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3485", + "query": "quartz quarry replay buffer starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz quarry replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3487", + "query": "which replay buffer leaves downstream readers with nothing once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3488", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3489", + "query": "auburn lake replay buffer mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3490", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the auburn lake replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3491", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3492", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3493", + "query": "russet plateau replay buffer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3494", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet plateau replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3495", + "query": "which replay buffer keeps toggling between up and down as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3496", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one keeps toggling between up and down as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3497", + "query": "hazel lake replay buffer undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3498", + "query": "what explains why the hazel lake replay buffer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3499", + "query": "which replay buffer owns up to fewer attempts than occur because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3500", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3501", + "query": "crimson gorge index writer spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3502", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the crimson gorge index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3503", + "query": "which index writer picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3504", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3505", + "query": "taupe lowland index writer skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe lowland index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3507", + "query": "which index writer acknowledges before durability once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3508", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one acknowledges before durability once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3509", + "query": "quartz rapids index writer reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3510", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the quartz rapids index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3511", + "query": "which index writer is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3512", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3513", + "query": "pewter prairie index writer starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3514", + "query": "what is still broken in the pewter prairie index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3515", + "query": "which index writer never lets the flush finish while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3516", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one never lets the flush finish while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3517", + "query": "wheat prairie index writer retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3518", + "query": "what explains why the wheat prairie index writer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3519", + "query": "which index writer repeats immediately on failure because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3520", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one repeats immediately on failure because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3521", + "query": "hazel geyser assay station dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3522", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the hazel geyser assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3523", + "query": "which assay station picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3524", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3525", + "query": "teal knoll assay station forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal knoll assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3527", + "query": "which assay station loses track of positions previously read once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3528", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one loses track of positions previously read once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3529", + "query": "crimson isthmus assay station bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3530", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the crimson isthmus assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3531", + "query": "which assay station is barred from slipping past the intake gate because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3532", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3533", + "query": "bronze lowland assay station clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3534", + "query": "what is still broken in the bronze lowland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3535", + "query": "which assay station cuts short every spike it should absorb as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3536", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3537", + "query": "onyx meadow assay station defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3538", + "query": "what explains why the onyx meadow assay station defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3539", + "query": "which assay station keeps postponing the squeeze because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3540", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3541", + "query": "azure shore escrow chamber grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3542", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the azure shore escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3543", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3544", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3545", + "query": "walnut dale escrow chamber starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut dale escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3547", + "query": "which escrow chamber leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3548", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3549", + "query": "golden crag escrow chamber mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3550", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the golden crag escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3551", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3552", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3553", + "query": "olive lake escrow chamber flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3554", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive lake escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3555", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3556", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3557", + "query": "crimson atoll escrow chamber undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3558", + "query": "what explains why the crimson atoll escrow chamber undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3559", + "query": "which escrow chamber owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3560", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3561", + "query": "cinnamon summit calibration bench spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3562", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the cinnamon summit calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3563", + "query": "which calibration bench picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3564", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3565", + "query": "granite dale calibration bench skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite dale calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3567", + "query": "which calibration bench acknowledges before durability once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3568", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one acknowledges before durability once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3569", + "query": "magenta island calibration bench reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3570", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the magenta island calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3571", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3572", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3573", + "query": "walnut mesa calibration bench starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3574", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut mesa calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3575", + "query": "which calibration bench never lets the flush finish when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3576", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one never lets the flush finish when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3577", + "query": "orange mesa calibration bench retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3578", + "query": "what explains why the orange mesa calibration bench retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3579", + "query": "which calibration bench repeats immediately on failure because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3580", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one repeats immediately on failure because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3581", + "query": "umber island edge cache sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3582", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the umber island edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3583", + "query": "which edge cache picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3584", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3585", + "query": "cedar tundra edge cache inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar tundra edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3587", + "query": "which edge cache flips positive and negative readings once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3588", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one flips positive and negative readings once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3589", + "query": "mauve glade edge cache splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3590", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the mauve glade edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3591", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3592", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3593", + "query": "cyan knoll edge cache skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3594", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan knoll edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3595", + "query": "which edge cache tilts every measurement it takes right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3596", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one tilts every measurement it takes right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3597", + "query": "vermilion barrens edge cache hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3598", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion barrens edge cache hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3599", + "query": "which edge cache keeps tuning grants for itself because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3600", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3601", + "query": "carmine bluff token vault rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3602", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the carmine bluff token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3603", + "query": "which token vault picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3604", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3605", + "query": "amber barrens token vault desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the amber barrens token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3607", + "query": "which token vault lets copies drift out of agreement once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3608", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3609", + "query": "golden heath token vault widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3610", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the golden heath token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3611", + "query": "which token vault is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3612", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3613", + "query": "cedar delta token vault splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3614", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar delta token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3615", + "query": "which token vault two halves each think they lead when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3616", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one two halves each think they lead when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3617", + "query": "orange bluff token vault recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3618", + "query": "what explains why the orange bluff token vault recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3619", + "query": "which token vault derives afresh what it could remember because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3620", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one derives afresh what it could remember because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3621", + "query": "orange inlet entropy siphon quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3622", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the orange inlet entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3623", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3624", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3625", + "query": "sand geyser entropy siphon garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand geyser entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3627", + "query": "which entropy siphon scrambles what it reports home once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3628", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one scrambles what it reports home once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3629", + "query": "ebony gorge entropy siphon hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3630", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the ebony gorge entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3631", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3632", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3633", + "query": "vermilion crag entropy siphon echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3634", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion crag entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3635", + "query": "which entropy siphon repeats instructions back to itself as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3636", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one repeats instructions back to itself as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3637", + "query": "hazel hill entropy siphon mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3638", + "query": "what explains why the hazel hill entropy siphon mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3639", + "query": "which entropy siphon copies the rhythm of its counterpart because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3640", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3641", + "query": "cedar gorge calibration bench snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3642", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the cedar gorge calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3643", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3644", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3645", + "query": "tan pond calibration bench misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan pond calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3647", + "query": "which calibration bench sends completions to the wrong caller once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3648", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3649", + "query": "vermilion butte calibration bench interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3650", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the vermilion butte calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3651", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3652", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3653", + "query": "cyan ravine calibration bench overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3654", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan ravine calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3655", + "query": "which calibration bench writes more log than the space allows when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3656", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one writes more log than the space allows when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3657", + "query": "verdigris river calibration bench escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3658", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris river calibration bench escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3659", + "query": "which calibration bench raises alarms at the first wobble because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3660", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3661", + "query": "taupe oasis edge cache quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3662", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the taupe oasis edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3663", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3664", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3665", + "query": "sand cirque edge cache garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand cirque edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3667", + "query": "which edge cache scrambles what it reports home once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3668", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one scrambles what it reports home once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3669", + "query": "cedar isthmus edge cache hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3670", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the cedar isthmus edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3671", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3672", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3673", + "query": "jade dune edge cache echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3674", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade dune edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3675", + "query": "which edge cache repeats instructions back to itself once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3676", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one repeats instructions back to itself once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3677", + "query": "cyan inlet edge cache mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3678", + "query": "what explains why the cyan inlet edge cache mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3679", + "query": "which edge cache copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3680", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3681", + "query": "russet inlet telemetry mast dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3682", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the russet inlet telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3683", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3684", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3685", + "query": "cobalt butte telemetry mast forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt butte telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3687", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses track of positions previously read once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3688", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses track of positions previously read once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3689", + "query": "azure gulch telemetry mast bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3690", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the azure gulch telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3691", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from slipping past the intake gate because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3692", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3693", + "query": "indigo barrens telemetry mast clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3694", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo barrens telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3695", + "query": "which telemetry mast cuts short every spike it should absorb as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3696", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3697", + "query": "cedar atoll telemetry mast defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3698", + "query": "what explains why the cedar atoll telemetry mast defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3699", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps postponing the squeeze because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3700", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3701", + "query": "russet gulch assay station lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3702", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the russet gulch assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3703", + "query": "which assay station picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3704", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3705", + "query": "indigo grove assay station double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo grove assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3707", + "query": "which assay station reports inflated totals once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3708", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one reports inflated totals once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3709", + "query": "lavender cavern assay station write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3710", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the lavender cavern assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3711", + "query": "which assay station is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3712", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3713", + "query": "emerald gulch assay station leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3714", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald gulch assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3715", + "query": "which assay station never returns its file descriptors as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3716", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one never returns its file descriptors as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3717", + "query": "beige badland assay station batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3718", + "query": "what explains why the beige badland assay station batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3719", + "query": "which assay station exceeds its own size limit because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3720", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one exceeds its own size limit because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3721", + "query": "orange plateau quorum relay parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3722", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the orange plateau quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3723", + "query": "which quorum relay picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3724", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3725", + "query": "cedar cavern quorum relay clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar cavern quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3727", + "query": "which quorum relay fires the same alarm repeatedly once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3728", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3729", + "query": "vermilion ridge quorum relay reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3730", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the vermilion ridge quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3731", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3732", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3733", + "query": "onyx reef quorum relay ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3734", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx reef quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3735", + "query": "which quorum relay keeps pushing when told to slow as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3736", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one keeps pushing when told to slow as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3737", + "query": "topaz heath quorum relay idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3738", + "query": "what explains why the topaz heath quorum relay idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3739", + "query": "which quorum relay rests longer than it runs because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3740", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one rests longer than it runs because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3741", + "query": "lavender lake specimen locker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3742", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the lavender lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3743", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3744", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3745", + "query": "jade lake specimen locker shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the jade lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3747", + "query": "which specimen locker destroys its own table of contents once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3748", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one destroys its own table of contents once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3749", + "query": "carmine geyser specimen locker promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3750", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the carmine geyser specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3751", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3752", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3753", + "query": "cedar dell specimen locker inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3754", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar dell specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3755", + "query": "which specimen locker predicts far more than materialises while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3756", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one predicts far more than materialises while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3757", + "query": "olive island specimen locker favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3758", + "query": "what explains why the olive island specimen locker favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3759", + "query": "which specimen locker gives the noisiest customer priority because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3760", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3761", + "query": "opal strait token vault quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3762", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the opal strait token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3763", + "query": "which token vault picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3764", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3765", + "query": "indigo summit token vault blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo summit token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3767", + "query": "which token vault repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3768", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3769", + "query": "pearl bluff token vault trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3770", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the pearl bluff token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3771", + "query": "which token vault is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3772", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3773", + "query": "lavender dune token vault churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3774", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender dune token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3775", + "query": "which token vault opens and drops links nonstop right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3776", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one opens and drops links nonstop right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3777", + "query": "olive heath token vault chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3778", + "query": "what explains why the olive heath token vault chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3779", + "query": "which token vault cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3780", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3781", + "query": "salmon tarn index writer checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3782", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the salmon tarn index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3783", + "query": "which index writer picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3784", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3785", + "query": "navy knoll index writer shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy knoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3787", + "query": "which index writer destroys its own table of contents once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3788", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one destroys its own table of contents once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3789", + "query": "willow lagoon index writer promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3790", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the willow lagoon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3791", + "query": "which index writer is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3792", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3793", + "query": "topaz river index writer inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3794", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz river index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3795", + "query": "which index writer predicts far more than materialises when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3796", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one predicts far more than materialises when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3797", + "query": "mauve canyon index writer favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3798", + "query": "what explains why the mauve canyon index writer favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3799", + "query": "which index writer gives the noisiest customer priority because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3800", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3801", + "query": "pearl glacier replay buffer lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3802", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the pearl glacier replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3803", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3804", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3805", + "query": "opal plateau replay buffer double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal plateau replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3807", + "query": "which replay buffer reports inflated totals once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3808", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one reports inflated totals once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3809", + "query": "mustard ridge replay buffer write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3810", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the mustard ridge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3811", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3812", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3813", + "query": "olive mesa replay buffer leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3814", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive mesa replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3815", + "query": "which replay buffer never returns its file descriptors once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3816", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one never returns its file descriptors once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3817", + "query": "salmon forest replay buffer batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3818", + "query": "what explains why the salmon forest replay buffer batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3819", + "query": "which replay buffer exceeds its own size limit because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3820", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one exceeds its own size limit because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3821", + "query": "scarlet estuary sweep worker rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3822", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the scarlet estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3823", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3824", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3825", + "query": "orange river sweep worker desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange river sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3827", + "query": "which sweep worker lets copies drift out of agreement once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3828", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3829", + "query": "jade summit sweep worker widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3830", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the jade summit sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3831", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3832", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3833", + "query": "amber shore sweep worker splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3834", + "query": "what is still broken in the amber shore sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3835", + "query": "which sweep worker two halves each think they lead while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3836", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one two halves each think they lead while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3837", + "query": "mustard grove sweep worker recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3838", + "query": "what explains why the mustard grove sweep worker recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3839", + "query": "which sweep worker derives afresh what it could remember because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3840", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one derives afresh what it could remember because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3841", + "query": "auburn dale provenance ledger rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3842", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the auburn dale provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3843", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3844", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3845", + "query": "sage brook provenance ledger desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage brook provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3847", + "query": "which provenance ledger lets copies drift out of agreement once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3848", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3849", + "query": "quartz cove provenance ledger widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3850", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the quartz cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3851", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3852", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3853", + "query": "ashen geyser provenance ledger splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3854", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen geyser provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3855", + "query": "which provenance ledger two halves each think they lead when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3856", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one two halves each think they lead when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3857", + "query": "mauve swamp provenance ledger recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3858", + "query": "what explains why the mauve swamp provenance ledger recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3859", + "query": "which provenance ledger derives afresh what it could remember because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3860", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one derives afresh what it could remember because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3861", + "query": "umber isthmus quorum relay drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3862", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the umber isthmus quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3863", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3864", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3865", + "query": "mustard knoll quorum relay expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard knoll quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3867", + "query": "which quorum relay cancels permissions it just issued once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3868", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one cancels permissions it just issued once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3869", + "query": "salmon atoll quorum relay outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3870", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the salmon atoll quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3871", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3872", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3873", + "query": "coral cape quorum relay stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3874", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral cape quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3875", + "query": "which quorum relay delivers output in fits and bursts when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3876", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one delivers output in fits and bursts when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3877", + "query": "quartz glacier quorum relay trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3878", + "query": "what explains why the quartz glacier quorum relay trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3879", + "query": "which quorum relay throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3880", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3881", + "query": "chalk bayou lease broker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3882", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the chalk bayou lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3883", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3884", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3885", + "query": "maroon geyser lease broker shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon geyser lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3887", + "query": "which lease broker destroys its own table of contents once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3888", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one destroys its own table of contents once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3889", + "query": "silver lowland lease broker promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3890", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the silver lowland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3891", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3892", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3893", + "query": "mustard oasis lease broker inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3894", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard oasis lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3895", + "query": "which lease broker predicts far more than materialises while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3896", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one predicts far more than materialises while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3897", + "query": "taupe estuary lease broker favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3898", + "query": "what explains why the taupe estuary lease broker favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3899", + "query": "which lease broker gives the noisiest customer priority because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3900", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3901", + "query": "chalk delta calibration bench drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3902", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the chalk delta calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3903", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3904", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3905", + "query": "granite plateau calibration bench expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite plateau calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3907", + "query": "which calibration bench cancels permissions it just issued once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3908", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one cancels permissions it just issued once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3909", + "query": "walnut cliff calibration bench outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3910", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the walnut cliff calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3911", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3912", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3913", + "query": "carmine lake calibration bench stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3914", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine lake calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3915", + "query": "which calibration bench delivers output in fits and bursts once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3916", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one delivers output in fits and bursts once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3917", + "query": "auburn rapids calibration bench trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3918", + "query": "what explains why the auburn rapids calibration bench trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3919", + "query": "which calibration bench throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3920", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3921", + "query": "mustard river telemetry mast decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3922", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the mustard river telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3923", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3924", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3925", + "query": "magenta tundra telemetry mast mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the magenta tundra telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3927", + "query": "which telemetry mast puts the wrong name on each container once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3928", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one puts the wrong name on each container once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3929", + "query": "birch oasis telemetry mast recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3930", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the birch oasis telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3931", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3932", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3933", + "query": "auburn crag telemetry mast saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3934", + "query": "what is still broken in the auburn crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3935", + "query": "which telemetry mast pegs the sensor at maximum once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3936", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one pegs the sensor at maximum once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3937", + "query": "quartz marsh telemetry mast rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3938", + "query": "what explains why the quartz marsh telemetry mast rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3939", + "query": "which telemetry mast biases results to the reference value because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3940", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one biases results to the reference value because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3941", + "query": "silver fjord assay station backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3942", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the silver fjord assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3943", + "query": "which assay station picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3944", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3945", + "query": "olive gulch assay station corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive gulch assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3947", + "query": "which assay station leaves unreadable restart state once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3948", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3949", + "query": "mustard swamp assay station cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3950", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the mustard swamp assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3951", + "query": "which assay station is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3952", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3953", + "query": "birch crag assay station drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3954", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch crag assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3955", + "query": "which assay station loses track of its own progress marker when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3956", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one loses track of its own progress marker when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3957", + "query": "emerald mesa assay station serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3958", + "query": "what explains why the emerald mesa assay station serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3959", + "query": "which assay station checks health one at a time because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3960", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one checks health one at a time because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3961", + "query": "fawn cape telemetry mast checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3962", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the fawn cape telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3963", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3964", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3965", + "query": "sand glade telemetry mast shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand glade telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3967", + "query": "which telemetry mast destroys its own table of contents once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3968", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one destroys its own table of contents once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3969", + "query": "granite tundra telemetry mast promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3970", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the granite tundra telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3971", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3972", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3973", + "query": "birch gorge telemetry mast inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3974", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch gorge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3975", + "query": "which telemetry mast predicts far more than materialises while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3976", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one predicts far more than materialises while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3977", + "query": "olive meadow telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3978", + "query": "what explains why the olive meadow telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3979", + "query": "which telemetry mast gives the noisiest customer priority because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3980", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3981", + "query": "cobalt harbor escrow chamber backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3982", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the cobalt harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3983", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3984", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3985", + "query": "cyan orchard escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan orchard escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3987", + "query": "which escrow chamber leaves unreadable restart state once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3988", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3989", + "query": "saffron bayou escrow chamber cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3990", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the saffron bayou escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3991", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3992", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3993", + "query": "ivory marsh escrow chamber drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3994", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory marsh escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3995", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses track of its own progress marker while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3996", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses track of its own progress marker while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3997", + "query": "cyan marsh escrow chamber serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3998", + "query": "what explains why the cyan marsh escrow chamber serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3999", + "query": "which escrow chamber checks health one at a time because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4000", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one checks health one at a time because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4001", + "query": "auburn reef provenance ledger probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4002", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the auburn reef provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4003", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4004", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4005", + "query": "olive lagoon provenance ledger truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4006", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4007", + "query": "which provenance ledger discards the newest entries once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4008", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one discards the newest entries once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4009", + "query": "auburn knoll provenance ledger ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4010", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the auburn knoll provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4011", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4012", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4013", + "query": "sand creek provenance ledger duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4014", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand creek provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4015", + "query": "which provenance ledger issues the same barrier twice as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4016", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one issues the same barrier twice as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4017", + "query": "azure dale provenance ledger skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4018", + "query": "what explains why the azure dale provenance ledger skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4019", + "query": "which provenance ledger always takes the slow route because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4020", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one always takes the slow route because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4021", + "query": "golden valley sweep worker confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4022", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the golden valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4023", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4024", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4025", + "query": "olive river sweep worker overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4026", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive river sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4027", + "query": "which sweep worker lingers longer than scheduled once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4028", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one lingers longer than scheduled once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4029", + "query": "opal barrens sweep worker skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4030", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the opal barrens sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4031", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from omitting the empty reference run because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4032", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4033", + "query": "olive dune sweep worker orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4034", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive dune sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4035", + "query": "which sweep worker abandons work it had accepted when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4036", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one abandons work it had accepted when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4037", + "query": "cyan wharf sweep worker ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4038", + "query": "what explains why the cyan wharf sweep worker ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4039", + "query": "which sweep worker serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4040", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4041", + "query": "auburn tundra lease broker batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4042", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the auburn tundra lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4043", + "query": "which lease broker picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4044", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4045", + "query": "orange knoll lease broker re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4046", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange knoll lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4047", + "query": "which lease broker sends the same payload twice once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4048", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one sends the same payload twice once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4049", + "query": "willow creek lease broker widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4050", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the willow creek lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4051", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4052", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4053", + "query": "slate moor lease broker thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4054", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate moor lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4055", + "query": "which lease broker evicts what it is about to need when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4056", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one evicts what it is about to need when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4057", + "query": "orange valley lease broker rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4058", + "query": "what explains why the orange valley lease broker rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4059", + "query": "which lease broker shortens its own interval because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4060", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one shortens its own interval because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4061", + "query": "golden oasis entropy siphon batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4062", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the golden oasis entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4063", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4064", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4065", + "query": "ivory wharf entropy siphon re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4066", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4067", + "query": "which entropy siphon sends the same payload twice once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4068", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one sends the same payload twice once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4069", + "query": "verdigris glade entropy siphon widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4070", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the verdigris glade entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4071", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4072", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4073", + "query": "orange reef entropy siphon thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4074", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange reef entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4075", + "query": "which entropy siphon evicts what it is about to need before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4076", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one evicts what it is about to need before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4077", + "query": "walnut badland entropy siphon rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4078", + "query": "what explains why the walnut badland entropy siphon rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4079", + "query": "which entropy siphon shortens its own interval because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4080", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one shortens its own interval because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4081", + "query": "walnut grove escrow chamber quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4082", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the walnut grove escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4083", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4084", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4085", + "query": "cinnamon cavern escrow chamber blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4086", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon cavern escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4087", + "query": "which escrow chamber repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4088", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4089", + "query": "bronze gorge escrow chamber trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4090", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the bronze gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4091", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4092", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4093", + "query": "mustard brook escrow chamber churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4094", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard brook escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4095", + "query": "which escrow chamber opens and drops links nonstop as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4096", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one opens and drops links nonstop as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4097", + "query": "beige grove escrow chamber chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4098", + "query": "what explains why the beige grove escrow chamber chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4099", + "query": "which escrow chamber cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4100", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4101", + "query": "ruby quarry sweep worker batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4102", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the ruby quarry sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4103", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4104", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4105", + "query": "russet cliff sweep worker re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet cliff sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4107", + "query": "which sweep worker sends the same payload twice once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4108", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one sends the same payload twice once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4109", + "query": "lilac lowland sweep worker widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4110", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the lilac lowland sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4111", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4112", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4113", + "query": "lavender valley sweep worker thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4114", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4115", + "query": "which sweep worker evicts what it is about to need when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4116", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one evicts what it is about to need when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4117", + "query": "bronze isthmus sweep worker rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4118", + "query": "what explains why the bronze isthmus sweep worker rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4119", + "query": "which sweep worker shortens its own interval because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4120", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one shortens its own interval because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4121", + "query": "golden summit telemetry mast confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4122", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the golden summit telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4123", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4124", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4125", + "query": "beige isthmus telemetry mast overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige isthmus telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4127", + "query": "which telemetry mast lingers longer than scheduled once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4128", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one lingers longer than scheduled once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4129", + "query": "walnut orchard telemetry mast skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4130", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the walnut orchard telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4131", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from omitting the empty reference run because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4132", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4133", + "query": "slate cavern telemetry mast orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4134", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate cavern telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4135", + "query": "which telemetry mast abandons work it had accepted as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4136", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one abandons work it had accepted as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4137", + "query": "fawn hollow telemetry mast ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4138", + "query": "what explains why the fawn hollow telemetry mast ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4139", + "query": "which telemetry mast serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4140", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4141", + "query": "wheat crag specimen locker dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4142", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the wheat crag specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4143", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4144", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4145", + "query": "bronze atoll specimen locker forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze atoll specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4147", + "query": "which specimen locker loses track of positions previously read once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4148", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one loses track of positions previously read once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4149", + "query": "lilac canyon specimen locker bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4150", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the lilac canyon specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4151", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4152", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4153", + "query": "vermilion hill specimen locker clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4154", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion hill specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4155", + "query": "which specimen locker cuts short every spike it should absorb while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4156", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4157", + "query": "fawn gulch specimen locker defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4158", + "query": "what explains why the fawn gulch specimen locker defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4159", + "query": "which specimen locker keeps postponing the squeeze because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4160", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4161", + "query": "cedar shore escrow chamber lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4162", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the cedar shore escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4163", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4164", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4165", + "query": "teal plateau escrow chamber double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal plateau escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4167", + "query": "which escrow chamber reports inflated totals once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4168", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one reports inflated totals once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4169", + "query": "cedar mesa escrow chamber write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4170", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the cedar mesa escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4171", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4172", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4173", + "query": "bronze cavern escrow chamber leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4174", + "query": "what is still broken in the bronze cavern escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4175", + "query": "which escrow chamber never returns its file descriptors as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4176", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one never returns its file descriptors as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4177", + "query": "ivory barrens escrow chamber batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4178", + "query": "what explains why the ivory barrens escrow chamber batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4179", + "query": "which escrow chamber exceeds its own size limit because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4180", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one exceeds its own size limit because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4181", + "query": "umber dale token vault backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4182", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the umber dale token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4183", + "query": "which token vault picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4184", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4185", + "query": "taupe valley token vault corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe valley token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4187", + "query": "which token vault leaves unreadable restart state once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4188", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one leaves unreadable restart state once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4189", + "query": "silver shore token vault cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4190", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the silver shore token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4191", + "query": "which token vault is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4192", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4193", + "query": "beige barrens token vault drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4194", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige barrens token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4195", + "query": "which token vault loses track of its own progress marker before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4196", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one loses track of its own progress marker before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4197", + "query": "cobalt cape token vault serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4198", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt cape token vault serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4199", + "query": "which token vault checks health one at a time because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4200", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one checks health one at a time because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4201", + "query": "hazel forest assay station confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4202", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the hazel forest assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4203", + "query": "which assay station picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4204", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4205", + "query": "umber moor assay station overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber moor assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4207", + "query": "which assay station lingers longer than scheduled once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4208", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one lingers longer than scheduled once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4209", + "query": "scarlet gulch assay station skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4210", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the scarlet gulch assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4211", + "query": "which assay station is barred from omitting the empty reference run because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4212", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4213", + "query": "mustard valley assay station orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4214", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard valley assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4215", + "query": "which assay station abandons work it had accepted as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4216", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one abandons work it had accepted as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4217", + "query": "lavender dale assay station ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4218", + "query": "what explains why the lavender dale assay station ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4219", + "query": "which assay station serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4220", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4221", + "query": "jade fjord index writer fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4222", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the jade fjord index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4223", + "query": "which index writer picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4224", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4225", + "query": "onyx crag index writer stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx crag index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4227", + "query": "which index writer wedges everything behind it once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4228", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one wedges everything behind it once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4229", + "query": "hazel hollow index writer retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4230", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the hazel hollow index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4231", + "query": "which index writer is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4232", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4233", + "query": "verdigris hill index writer spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4234", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris hill index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4235", + "query": "which index writer burns cpu waiting while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4236", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one burns cpu waiting while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4237", + "query": "topaz forest index writer holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4238", + "query": "what explains why the topaz forest index writer holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4239", + "query": "which index writer keeps the barrier from closing because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4240", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4241", + "query": "chalk reef assay station batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4242", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the chalk reef assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4243", + "query": "which assay station picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4244", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4245", + "query": "pearl brook assay station re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl brook assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4247", + "query": "which assay station sends the same payload twice once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4248", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one sends the same payload twice once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4249", + "query": "scarlet dale assay station widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4250", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the scarlet dale assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4251", + "query": "which assay station is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4252", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4253", + "query": "jade cirque assay station thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4254", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade cirque assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4255", + "query": "which assay station evicts what it is about to need when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4256", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one evicts what it is about to need when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4257", + "query": "hazel plateau assay station rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4258", + "query": "what explains why the hazel plateau assay station rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4259", + "query": "which assay station shortens its own interval because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4260", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one shortens its own interval because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4261", + "query": "ashen meadow telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4262", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the ashen meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4263", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it tries again around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4264", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4265", + "query": "azure quarry telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure quarry telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4267", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses acknowledged data once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4268", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses acknowledged data once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4269", + "query": "tan isthmus telemetry mast share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4270", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the tan isthmus telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4271", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4272", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4273", + "query": "ochre rapids telemetry mast stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4274", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4275", + "query": "which telemetry mast stops making progress as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4276", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one stops making progress as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4277", + "query": "mustard strait telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4278", + "query": "what explains why the mustard strait telemetry mast prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4279", + "query": "which telemetry mast picks the staler of two copies because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4280", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picks the staler of two copies because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4281", + "query": "coral geyser specimen locker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4282", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the coral geyser specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4283", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4284", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4285", + "query": "hazel bluff specimen locker misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel bluff specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4287", + "query": "which specimen locker sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4288", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4289", + "query": "ashen cirque specimen locker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4290", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the ashen cirque specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4291", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4292", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4293", + "query": "maroon summit specimen locker overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4294", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon summit specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4295", + "query": "which specimen locker writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4296", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4297", + "query": "mustard isthmus specimen locker escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4298", + "query": "what explains why the mustard isthmus specimen locker escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4299", + "query": "which specimen locker raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4300", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4301", + "query": "scarlet wharf escrow chamber compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4302", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the scarlet wharf escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4303", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4304", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4305", + "query": "cinnamon strait escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon strait escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4307", + "query": "which escrow chamber never gives borrowed space back once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4308", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one never gives borrowed space back once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4309", + "query": "azure swamp escrow chamber archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4310", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the azure swamp escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4311", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from shelving a problem that is live because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4312", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4313", + "query": "hazel cove escrow chamber lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4314", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel cove escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4315", + "query": "which escrow chamber feeds the operator stale numbers when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4316", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one feeds the operator stale numbers when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4317", + "query": "granite wharf escrow chamber mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4318", + "query": "what explains why the granite wharf escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4319", + "query": "which escrow chamber serves yesterday's answers confidently because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4320", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4321", + "query": "topaz pond sweep worker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4322", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the topaz pond sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4323", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4324", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4325", + "query": "vermilion heath sweep worker misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the vermilion heath sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4327", + "query": "which sweep worker sends completions to the wrong caller once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4328", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4329", + "query": "jade pond sweep worker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4330", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the jade pond sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4331", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4332", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4333", + "query": "amber wharf sweep worker overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4334", + "query": "what is still broken in the amber wharf sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4335", + "query": "which sweep worker writes more log than the space allows when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4336", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one writes more log than the space allows when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4337", + "query": "pearl gorge sweep worker escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4338", + "query": "what explains why the pearl gorge sweep worker escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4339", + "query": "which sweep worker raises alarms at the first wobble because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4340", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4341", + "query": "hazel glade telemetry mast dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4342", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the hazel glade telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4343", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4344", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4345", + "query": "violet ravine telemetry mast forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet ravine telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4347", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses track of positions previously read once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4348", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses track of positions previously read once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4349", + "query": "auburn island telemetry mast bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4350", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the auburn island telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4351", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from slipping past the intake gate because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4352", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4353", + "query": "ochre shore telemetry mast clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4354", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre shore telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4355", + "query": "which telemetry mast cuts short every spike it should absorb when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4356", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4357", + "query": "birch cape telemetry mast defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4358", + "query": "what explains why the birch cape telemetry mast defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4359", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps postponing the squeeze because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4360", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4361", + "query": "cedar cirque shard router quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4362", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the cedar cirque shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4363", + "query": "which shard router picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4364", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4365", + "query": "auburn oasis shard router blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the auburn oasis shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4367", + "query": "which shard router repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4368", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4369", + "query": "hazel cirque shard router trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4370", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the hazel cirque shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4371", + "query": "which shard router is barred from believing the sender's own clock because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4372", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4373", + "query": "granite hollow shard router churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4374", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite hollow shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4375", + "query": "which shard router opens and drops links nonstop as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4376", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one opens and drops links nonstop as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4377", + "query": "taupe ridge shard router chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4378", + "query": "what explains why the taupe ridge shard router chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4379", + "query": "which shard router cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4380", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4381", + "query": "sand dale provenance ledger lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4382", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the sand dale provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4383", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4384", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4385", + "query": "pewter estuary provenance ledger double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter estuary provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4387", + "query": "which provenance ledger reports inflated totals once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4388", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one reports inflated totals once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4389", + "query": "scarlet harbor provenance ledger write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4390", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the scarlet harbor provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4391", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4392", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4393", + "query": "vermilion tarn provenance ledger leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4394", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion tarn provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4395", + "query": "which provenance ledger never returns its file descriptors while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4396", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one never returns its file descriptors while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4397", + "query": "hazel strait provenance ledger batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4398", + "query": "what explains why the hazel strait provenance ledger batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4399", + "query": "which provenance ledger exceeds its own size limit because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4400", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one exceeds its own size limit because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4401", + "query": "bronze harbor specimen locker confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4402", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the bronze harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4403", + "query": "which specimen locker picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4404", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4405", + "query": "beige forest specimen locker overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige forest specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4407", + "query": "which specimen locker lingers longer than scheduled once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4408", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one lingers longer than scheduled once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4409", + "query": "magenta canyon specimen locker skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4410", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the magenta canyon specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4411", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from omitting the empty reference run because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4412", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4413", + "query": "walnut quarry specimen locker orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4414", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut quarry specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4415", + "query": "which specimen locker abandons work it had accepted as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4416", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one abandons work it had accepted as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4417", + "query": "amber jungle specimen locker ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4418", + "query": "what explains why the amber jungle specimen locker ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4419", + "query": "which specimen locker serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4420", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4421", + "query": "onyx summit token vault snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4422", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the onyx summit token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4423", + "query": "which token vault picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4424", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4425", + "query": "granite dell token vault misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite dell token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4427", + "query": "which token vault sends completions to the wrong caller once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4428", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4429", + "query": "cinnamon canyon token vault interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4430", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the cinnamon canyon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4431", + "query": "which token vault is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4432", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4433", + "query": "auburn estuary token vault overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4434", + "query": "what is still broken in the auburn estuary token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4435", + "query": "which token vault writes more log than the space allows when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4436", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one writes more log than the space allows when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4437", + "query": "fawn barrens token vault escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4438", + "query": "what explains why the fawn barrens token vault escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4439", + "query": "which token vault raises alarms at the first wobble because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4440", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4441", + "query": "magenta delta provenance ledger spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4442", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the magenta delta provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4443", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4444", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4445", + "query": "ebony dune provenance ledger skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony dune provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4447", + "query": "which provenance ledger acknowledges before durability once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4448", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one acknowledges before durability once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4449", + "query": "sepia glade provenance ledger reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4450", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the sepia glade provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4451", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4452", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4453", + "query": "granite brook provenance ledger starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4454", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite brook provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4455", + "query": "which provenance ledger never lets the flush finish when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4456", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one never lets the flush finish when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4457", + "query": "orange brook provenance ledger retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4458", + "query": "what explains why the orange brook provenance ledger retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4459", + "query": "which provenance ledger repeats immediately on failure because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4460", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one repeats immediately on failure because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4461", + "query": "pearl cirque ingest job rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4462", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the pearl cirque ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4463", + "query": "which ingest job picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4464", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4465", + "query": "opal island ingest job desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal island ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4467", + "query": "which ingest job lets copies drift out of agreement once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4468", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4469", + "query": "carmine hollow ingest job widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4470", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the carmine hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4471", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4472", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4473", + "query": "chalk tundra ingest job splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4474", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk tundra ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4475", + "query": "which ingest job two halves each think they lead when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4476", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one two halves each think they lead when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4477", + "query": "quartz moor ingest job recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4478", + "query": "what explains why the quartz moor ingest job recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4479", + "query": "which ingest job derives afresh what it could remember because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4480", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one derives afresh what it could remember because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4481", + "query": "granite ravine ingest job lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4482", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the granite ravine ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4483", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4484", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4485", + "query": "silver crag ingest job double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver crag ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4487", + "query": "which ingest job reports inflated totals once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4488", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one reports inflated totals once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4489", + "query": "lilac bayou ingest job write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4490", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the lilac bayou ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4491", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4492", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4493", + "query": "walnut harbor ingest job leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4494", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut harbor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4495", + "query": "which ingest job never returns its file descriptors while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4496", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one never returns its file descriptors while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4497", + "query": "cedar dale ingest job batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4498", + "query": "what explains why the cedar dale ingest job batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4499", + "query": "which ingest job exceeds its own size limit because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4500", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one exceeds its own size limit because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4501", + "query": "opal rapids edge cache decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4502", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the opal rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4503", + "query": "which edge cache picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4504", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4505", + "query": "amber isthmus edge cache mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the amber isthmus edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4507", + "query": "which edge cache puts the wrong name on each container once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4508", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one puts the wrong name on each container once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4509", + "query": "fawn dune edge cache recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4510", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the fawn dune edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4511", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4512", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4513", + "query": "carmine orchard edge cache saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4514", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine orchard edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4515", + "query": "which edge cache pegs the sensor at maximum while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4516", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4517", + "query": "ruby cliff edge cache rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4518", + "query": "what explains why the ruby cliff edge cache rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4519", + "query": "which edge cache biases results to the reference value because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4520", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one biases results to the reference value because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4521", + "query": "ashen tundra ingest job snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4522", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ashen tundra ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4523", + "query": "which ingest job picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4524", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4525", + "query": "lilac inlet ingest job misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac inlet ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4527", + "query": "which ingest job sends completions to the wrong caller once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4528", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4529", + "query": "lavender meadow ingest job interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4530", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the lavender meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4531", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4532", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4533", + "query": "pewter lake ingest job overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4534", + "query": "what is still broken in the pewter lake ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4535", + "query": "which ingest job writes more log than the space allows when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4536", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one writes more log than the space allows when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4537", + "query": "fawn island ingest job escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4538", + "query": "what explains why the fawn island ingest job escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4539", + "query": "which ingest job raises alarms at the first wobble because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4540", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4541", + "query": "cedar lagoon sweep worker sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4542", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the cedar lagoon sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4543", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4544", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4545", + "query": "magenta gorge sweep worker inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the magenta gorge sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4547", + "query": "which sweep worker flips positive and negative readings once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4548", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one flips positive and negative readings once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4549", + "query": "plum dell sweep worker splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4550", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the plum dell sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4551", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4552", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4553", + "query": "ashen harbor sweep worker skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4554", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen harbor sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4555", + "query": "which sweep worker tilts every measurement it takes while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4556", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one tilts every measurement it takes while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4557", + "query": "pearl hollow sweep worker hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4558", + "query": "what explains why the pearl hollow sweep worker hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4559", + "query": "which sweep worker keeps tuning grants for itself because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4560", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4561", + "query": "coral dale assay station compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4562", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the coral dale assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4563", + "query": "which assay station picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4564", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4565", + "query": "copper grove assay station hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper grove assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4567", + "query": "which assay station never gives borrowed space back once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4568", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one never gives borrowed space back once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4569", + "query": "jade ridge assay station archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4570", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the jade ridge assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4571", + "query": "which assay station is barred from shelving a problem that is live because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4572", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4573", + "query": "orange creek assay station lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4574", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange creek assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4575", + "query": "which assay station feeds the operator stale numbers while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4576", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one feeds the operator stale numbers while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4577", + "query": "ruby crag assay station mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4578", + "query": "what explains why the ruby crag assay station mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4579", + "query": "which assay station serves yesterday's answers confidently because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4580", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4581", + "query": "pewter hollow telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4582", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the pewter hollow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4583", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4584", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4585", + "query": "walnut wharf telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut wharf telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4587", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves downstream readers with nothing once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4588", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4589", + "query": "teal moor telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4590", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the teal moor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4591", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4592", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4593", + "query": "copper knoll telemetry mast flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4594", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper knoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4595", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps toggling between up and down when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4596", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps toggling between up and down when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4597", + "query": "walnut butte telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4598", + "query": "what explains why the walnut butte telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4599", + "query": "which telemetry mast owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4600", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4601", + "query": "cinnamon crag ingest job decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4602", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the cinnamon crag ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4603", + "query": "which ingest job picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4604", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4605", + "query": "olive crag ingest job mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive crag ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4607", + "query": "which ingest job puts the wrong name on each container once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4608", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one puts the wrong name on each container once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4609", + "query": "walnut lake ingest job recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4610", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the walnut lake ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4611", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4612", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4613", + "query": "violet delta ingest job saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4614", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet delta ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4615", + "query": "which ingest job pegs the sensor at maximum when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4616", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one pegs the sensor at maximum when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4617", + "query": "cyan gorge ingest job rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4618", + "query": "what explains why the cyan gorge ingest job rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4619", + "query": "which ingest job biases results to the reference value because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4620", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one biases results to the reference value because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4621", + "query": "copper oasis token vault dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4622", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the copper oasis token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4623", + "query": "which token vault picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4624", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4625", + "query": "umber canyon token vault forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber canyon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4627", + "query": "which token vault loses track of positions previously read once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4628", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one loses track of positions previously read once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4629", + "query": "ebony delta token vault bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4630", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the ebony delta token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4631", + "query": "which token vault is barred from slipping past the intake gate because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4632", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4633", + "query": "silver marsh token vault clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4634", + "query": "what is still broken in the silver marsh token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4635", + "query": "which token vault cuts short every spike it should absorb once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4636", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4637", + "query": "plum meadow token vault defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4638", + "query": "what explains why the plum meadow token vault defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4639", + "query": "which token vault keeps postponing the squeeze because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4640", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4641", + "query": "cinnamon cape replay buffer checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4642", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the cinnamon cape replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4643", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4644", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4645", + "query": "emerald estuary replay buffer shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the emerald estuary replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4647", + "query": "which replay buffer destroys its own table of contents once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4648", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one destroys its own table of contents once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4649", + "query": "silver cape replay buffer promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4650", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the silver cape replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4651", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4652", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4653", + "query": "jade valley replay buffer inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4654", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade valley replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4655", + "query": "which replay buffer predicts far more than materialises as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4656", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one predicts far more than materialises as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4657", + "query": "cyan glade replay buffer favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4658", + "query": "what explains why the cyan glade replay buffer favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4659", + "query": "which replay buffer gives the noisiest customer priority because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4660", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4661", + "query": "violet badland replay buffer flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4662", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the violet badland replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4663", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how often it writes out around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4664", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4665", + "query": "russet dune replay buffer loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4667", + "query": "which replay buffer forgets how far it had read once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4668", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one forgets how far it had read once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4669", + "query": "silver quarry replay buffer trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4670", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the silver quarry replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4671", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4672", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4673", + "query": "slate estuary replay buffer reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4674", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate estuary replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4675", + "query": "which replay buffer confirms out of sequence as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4676", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one confirms out of sequence as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4677", + "query": "lilac marsh replay buffer re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4678", + "query": "what explains why the lilac marsh replay buffer re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4679", + "query": "which replay buffer fetches the same index repeatedly because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4680", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4681", + "query": "orange jungle entropy siphon gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4682", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the orange jungle entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4683", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4684", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4685", + "query": "bronze mesa entropy siphon fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze mesa entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4687", + "query": "which entropy siphon splinters memory into unusable pieces once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4688", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4689", + "query": "jade badland entropy siphon suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4690", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the jade badland entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4691", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from silencing a probe that says no because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4692", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4693", + "query": "coral glacier entropy siphon shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4694", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral glacier entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4695", + "query": "which entropy siphon silently repeats the leader's work while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4696", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one silently repeats the leader's work while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4697", + "query": "sage isthmus entropy siphon saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4698", + "query": "what explains why the sage isthmus entropy siphon saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4699", + "query": "which entropy siphon persists every result in duplicate because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4700", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one persists every result in duplicate because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4701", + "query": "cyan cliff ingest job dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4702", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the cyan cliff ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4703", + "query": "which ingest job picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4704", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4705", + "query": "lilac heath ingest job forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac heath ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4707", + "query": "which ingest job loses track of positions previously read once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4708", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one loses track of positions previously read once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4709", + "query": "cobalt barrens ingest job bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4710", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the cobalt barrens ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4711", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4712", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4713", + "query": "umber summit ingest job clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4714", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber summit ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4715", + "query": "which ingest job cuts short every spike it should absorb right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4716", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4717", + "query": "coral fjord ingest job defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4718", + "query": "what explains why the coral fjord ingest job defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4719", + "query": "which ingest job keeps postponing the squeeze because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4720", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4721", + "query": "taupe bluff index writer flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4722", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the taupe bluff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4723", + "query": "which index writer picked how often it writes out around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4724", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4725", + "query": "amber savanna index writer loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the amber savanna index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4727", + "query": "which index writer forgets how far it had read once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4728", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one forgets how far it had read once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4729", + "query": "ebony dell index writer trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4730", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the ebony dell index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4731", + "query": "which index writer is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4732", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4733", + "query": "lilac lake index writer reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4734", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac lake index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4735", + "query": "which index writer confirms out of sequence right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4736", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one confirms out of sequence right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4737", + "query": "opal lake index writer re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4738", + "query": "what explains why the opal lake index writer re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4739", + "query": "which index writer fetches the same index repeatedly because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4740", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4741", + "query": "ochre geyser index writer confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4742", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the ochre geyser index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4743", + "query": "which index writer picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4744", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4745", + "query": "silver island index writer overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver island index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4747", + "query": "which index writer lingers longer than scheduled once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4748", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one lingers longer than scheduled once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4749", + "query": "magenta inlet index writer skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4750", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the magenta inlet index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4751", + "query": "which index writer is barred from omitting the empty reference run because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4752", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4753", + "query": "quartz dell index writer orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4754", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz dell index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4755", + "query": "which index writer abandons work it had accepted when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4756", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one abandons work it had accepted when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4757", + "query": "magenta badland index writer ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4758", + "query": "what explains why the magenta badland index writer ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4759", + "query": "which index writer serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4760", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4761", + "query": "lilac pond shard router batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4762", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the lilac pond shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4763", + "query": "which shard router picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4764", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4765", + "query": "quartz butte shard router re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz butte shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4767", + "query": "which shard router sends the same payload twice once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4768", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one sends the same payload twice once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4769", + "query": "amber geyser shard router widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4770", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the amber geyser shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4771", + "query": "which shard router is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4772", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4773", + "query": "azure bayou shard router thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4774", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure bayou shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4775", + "query": "which shard router evicts what it is about to need right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4776", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one evicts what it is about to need right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4777", + "query": "ivory estuary shard router rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4778", + "query": "what explains why the ivory estuary shard router rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4779", + "query": "which shard router shortens its own interval because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4780", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one shortens its own interval because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4781", + "query": "ochre inlet shard router dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4782", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the ochre inlet shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4783", + "query": "which shard router picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4784", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4785", + "query": "teal geyser shard router forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal geyser shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4787", + "query": "which shard router loses track of positions previously read once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4788", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one loses track of positions previously read once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4789", + "query": "lilac savanna shard router bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4790", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the lilac savanna shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4791", + "query": "which shard router is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4792", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4793", + "query": "violet estuary shard router clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4794", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet estuary shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4795", + "query": "which shard router cuts short every spike it should absorb when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4796", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4797", + "query": "onyx geyser shard router defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4798", + "query": "what explains why the onyx geyser shard router defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4799", + "query": "which shard router keeps postponing the squeeze because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4800", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4801", + "query": "navy cove sweep worker batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4802", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the navy cove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4803", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4804", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4805", + "query": "carmine badland sweep worker re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine badland sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4807", + "query": "which sweep worker sends the same payload twice once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4808", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one sends the same payload twice once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4809", + "query": "ochre summit sweep worker widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4810", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the ochre summit sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4811", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4812", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4813", + "query": "opal dale sweep worker thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4814", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal dale sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4815", + "query": "which sweep worker evicts what it is about to need as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4816", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one evicts what it is about to need as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4817", + "query": "lilac tundra sweep worker rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4818", + "query": "what explains why the lilac tundra sweep worker rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4819", + "query": "which sweep worker shortens its own interval because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4820", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one shortens its own interval because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4821", + "query": "scarlet jungle provenance ledger grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4822", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the scarlet jungle provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4823", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4824", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4825", + "query": "ochre swamp provenance ledger starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre swamp provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4827", + "query": "which provenance ledger leaves downstream readers with nothing once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4828", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4829", + "query": "indigo shore provenance ledger mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4830", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the indigo shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4831", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4832", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4833", + "query": "olive tarn provenance ledger flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4834", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive tarn provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4835", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps toggling between up and down once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4836", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps toggling between up and down once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4837", + "query": "umber bayou provenance ledger undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4838", + "query": "what explains why the umber bayou provenance ledger undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4839", + "query": "which provenance ledger owns up to fewer attempts than occur because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4840", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4841", + "query": "cyan plateau quorum relay rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4842", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the cyan plateau quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4843", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4844", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4845", + "query": "lilac delta quorum relay desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac delta quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4847", + "query": "which quorum relay lets copies drift out of agreement once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4848", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4849", + "query": "mustard fjord quorum relay widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4850", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the mustard fjord quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4851", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4852", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4853", + "query": "beige dell quorum relay splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4854", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige dell quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4855", + "query": "which quorum relay two halves each think they lead as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4856", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one two halves each think they lead as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4857", + "query": "plum bluff quorum relay recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4858", + "query": "what explains why the plum bluff quorum relay recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4859", + "query": "which quorum relay derives afresh what it could remember because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4860", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one derives afresh what it could remember because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4861", + "query": "golden isthmus index writer warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4862", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the golden isthmus index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4863", + "query": "which index writer picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4864", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4865", + "query": "birch reef index writer poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch reef index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4867", + "query": "which index writer writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4868", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4869", + "query": "mauve savanna index writer rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4870", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the mauve savanna index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4871", + "query": "which index writer is barred from moving a common read position backwards because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4872", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4873", + "query": "lilac gorge index writer misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4874", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac gorge index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4875", + "query": "which index writer cannot say who holds which grant once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4876", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one cannot say who holds which grant once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4877", + "query": "copper lagoon index writer pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4878", + "query": "what explains why the copper lagoon index writer pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4879", + "query": "which index writer readies exactly what nobody asks for because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4880", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4881", + "query": "ebony moor lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4882", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the ebony moor lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4883", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often it tries again around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4884", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4885", + "query": "olive cirque lease broker drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive cirque lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4887", + "query": "which lease broker loses acknowledged data once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4888", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one loses acknowledged data once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4889", + "query": "willow orchard lease broker share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4890", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the willow orchard lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4891", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from one read position serving two partitions because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4892", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4893", + "query": "scarlet lowland lease broker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4894", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet lowland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4895", + "query": "which lease broker stops making progress as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4896", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one stops making progress as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4897", + "query": "plum rapids lease broker prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4898", + "query": "what explains why the plum rapids lease broker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4899", + "query": "which lease broker picks the staler of two copies because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4900", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picks the staler of two copies because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4901", + "query": "ochre mesa edge cache fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4902", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the ochre mesa edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4903", + "query": "which edge cache picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4904", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4905", + "query": "violet orchard edge cache stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet orchard edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4907", + "query": "which edge cache wedges everything behind it once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4908", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one wedges everything behind it once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4909", + "query": "emerald cove edge cache retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4910", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the emerald cove edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4911", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4912", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4913", + "query": "salmon harbor edge cache spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4914", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon harbor edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4915", + "query": "which edge cache burns cpu waiting while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4916", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one burns cpu waiting while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4917", + "query": "olive forest edge cache holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4918", + "query": "what explains why the olive forest edge cache holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4919", + "query": "which edge cache keeps the barrier from closing because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4920", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps the barrier from closing because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4921", + "query": "orange bayou lease broker quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4922", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the orange bayou lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4923", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4924", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4925", + "query": "orange estuary lease broker blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4927", + "query": "which lease broker repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4928", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4929", + "query": "ochre quarry lease broker trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4930", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the ochre quarry lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4931", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4932", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4933", + "query": "sage harbor lease broker churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4934", + "query": "what is still broken in the sage harbor lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4935", + "query": "which lease broker opens and drops links nonstop as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4936", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one opens and drops links nonstop as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4937", + "query": "opal isthmus lease broker chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4938", + "query": "what explains why the opal isthmus lease broker chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4939", + "query": "which lease broker cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4940", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4941", + "query": "bronze delta telemetry mast rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4942", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the bronze delta telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4943", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4944", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4945", + "query": "carmine fjord telemetry mast desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine fjord telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4947", + "query": "which telemetry mast lets copies drift out of agreement once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4948", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4949", + "query": "crimson prairie telemetry mast widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4950", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the crimson prairie telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4951", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4952", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4953", + "query": "magenta lake telemetry mast splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4954", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta lake telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4955", + "query": "which telemetry mast two halves each think they lead as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4956", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one two halves each think they lead as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4957", + "query": "maroon lagoon telemetry mast recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4958", + "query": "what explains why the maroon lagoon telemetry mast recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4959", + "query": "which telemetry mast derives afresh what it could remember because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4960", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one derives afresh what it could remember because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4961", + "query": "navy moor index writer confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4962", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the navy moor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4963", + "query": "which index writer picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4964", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4965", + "query": "cyan ridge index writer overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan ridge index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4967", + "query": "which index writer lingers longer than scheduled once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4968", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one lingers longer than scheduled once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4969", + "query": "lilac cliff index writer skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4970", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the lilac cliff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4971", + "query": "which index writer is barred from omitting the empty reference run because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4972", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4973", + "query": "wheat oasis index writer orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4974", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat oasis index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4975", + "query": "which index writer abandons work it had accepted while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4976", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one abandons work it had accepted while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4977", + "query": "chalk orchard index writer ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4978", + "query": "what explains why the chalk orchard index writer ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4979", + "query": "which index writer serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4980", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4981", + "query": "chalk river provenance ledger backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4982", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the chalk river provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4983", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4984", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4985", + "query": "maroon dune provenance ledger corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon dune provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4987", + "query": "which provenance ledger leaves unreadable restart state once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4988", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4989", + "query": "violet shore provenance ledger cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4990", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the violet shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4991", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4992", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4993", + "query": "jade tarn provenance ledger drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4994", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade tarn provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4995", + "query": "which provenance ledger loses track of its own progress marker when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4996", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one loses track of its own progress marker when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4997", + "query": "sepia fjord provenance ledger serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4998", + "query": "what explains why the sepia fjord provenance ledger serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4999", + "query": "which provenance ledger checks health one at a time because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5000", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one checks health one at a time because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5001", + "query": "silver valley sweep worker compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5002", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the silver valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5003", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5004", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5005", + "query": "birch valley sweep worker hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5006", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5007", + "query": "which sweep worker never gives borrowed space back once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5008", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one never gives borrowed space back once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5009", + "query": "scarlet geyser sweep worker archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5010", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the scarlet geyser sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5011", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from shelving a problem that is live because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5012", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5013", + "query": "maroon island sweep worker lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5014", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon island sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5015", + "query": "which sweep worker feeds the operator stale numbers when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5016", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one feeds the operator stale numbers when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5017", + "query": "magenta jungle sweep worker mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5018", + "query": "what explains why the magenta jungle sweep worker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5019", + "query": "which sweep worker serves yesterday's answers confidently because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5020", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5021", + "query": "mauve quarry provenance ledger eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5022", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the mauve quarry provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5023", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5024", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5025", + "query": "cyan swamp provenance ledger swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5026", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan swamp provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5027", + "query": "which provenance ledger reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5028", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5029", + "query": "granite cove provenance ledger fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5030", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the granite cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5031", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5032", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5033", + "query": "coral river provenance ledger staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5034", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral river provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5035", + "query": "which provenance ledger checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5036", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5037", + "query": "cinnamon jungle provenance ledger round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5038", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon jungle provenance ledger round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5039", + "query": "which provenance ledger rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5040", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5041", + "query": "maroon mesa assay station eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5042", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the maroon mesa assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5043", + "query": "which assay station picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5044", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5045", + "query": "tan island assay station swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5046", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan island assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5047", + "query": "which assay station reports success where something went wrong once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5048", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one reports success where something went wrong once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5049", + "query": "chalk valley assay station fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5050", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the chalk valley assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5051", + "query": "which assay station is barred from splitting the book of account in two because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5052", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5053", + "query": "verdigris cape assay station staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5054", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5055", + "query": "which assay station checks in at ragged intervals as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5056", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one checks in at ragged intervals as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5057", + "query": "slate geyser assay station round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5058", + "query": "what explains why the slate geyser assay station round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5059", + "query": "which assay station rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5060", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5061", + "query": "ivory rapids replay buffer drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5062", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the ivory rapids replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5063", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5064", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5065", + "query": "sand river replay buffer expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5066", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand river replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5067", + "query": "which replay buffer cancels permissions it just issued once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5068", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5069", + "query": "maroon quarry replay buffer outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5070", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the maroon quarry replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5071", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5072", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5073", + "query": "taupe creek replay buffer stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5074", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe creek replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5075", + "query": "which replay buffer delivers output in fits and bursts as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5076", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one delivers output in fits and bursts as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5077", + "query": "auburn forest replay buffer trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5078", + "query": "what explains why the auburn forest replay buffer trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5079", + "query": "which replay buffer throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5080", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5081", + "query": "orange heath escrow chamber fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5082", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the orange heath escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5083", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5084", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5085", + "query": "crimson quarry escrow chamber stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5086", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson quarry escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5087", + "query": "which escrow chamber wedges everything behind it once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5088", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one wedges everything behind it once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5089", + "query": "cedar heath escrow chamber retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5090", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the cedar heath escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5091", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5092", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5093", + "query": "chalk heath escrow chamber spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5094", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk heath escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5095", + "query": "which escrow chamber burns cpu waiting when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5096", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one burns cpu waiting when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5097", + "query": "maroon shore escrow chamber holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5098", + "query": "what explains why the maroon shore escrow chamber holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5099", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps the barrier from closing because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5100", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps the barrier from closing because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5101", + "query": "lavender delta entropy siphon confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5102", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the lavender delta entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5103", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5104", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5105", + "query": "opal oasis entropy siphon overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal oasis entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5107", + "query": "which entropy siphon lingers longer than scheduled once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5108", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5109", + "query": "quartz valley entropy siphon skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5110", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the quartz valley entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5111", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from omitting the empty reference run because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5112", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5113", + "query": "sienna dell entropy siphon orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5114", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5115", + "query": "which entropy siphon abandons work it had accepted as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5116", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one abandons work it had accepted as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5117", + "query": "cobalt orchard entropy siphon ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5118", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt orchard entropy siphon ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5119", + "query": "which entropy siphon serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5120", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5121", + "query": "crimson island index writer lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5122", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the crimson island index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5123", + "query": "which index writer picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5124", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5125", + "query": "maroon valley index writer double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon valley index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5127", + "query": "which index writer reports inflated totals once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5128", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one reports inflated totals once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5129", + "query": "sienna moor index writer write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5130", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the sienna moor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5131", + "query": "which index writer is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5132", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5133", + "query": "lilac cape index writer leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5134", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac cape index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5135", + "query": "which index writer never returns its file descriptors once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5136", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one never returns its file descriptors once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5137", + "query": "opal fjord index writer batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5138", + "query": "what explains why the opal fjord index writer batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5139", + "query": "which index writer exceeds its own size limit because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5140", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one exceeds its own size limit because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5141", + "query": "tan summit token vault quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5142", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the tan summit token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5143", + "query": "which token vault picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5144", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5145", + "query": "chalk crag token vault blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk crag token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5147", + "query": "which token vault repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5148", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5149", + "query": "lilac cavern token vault trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5150", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the lilac cavern token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5151", + "query": "which token vault is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5152", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5153", + "query": "maroon estuary token vault churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5154", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon estuary token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5155", + "query": "which token vault opens and drops links nonstop while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5156", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one opens and drops links nonstop while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5157", + "query": "ivory atoll token vault chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5158", + "query": "what explains why the ivory atoll token vault chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5159", + "query": "which token vault cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5160", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5161", + "query": "navy jungle shard router snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5162", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the navy jungle shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5163", + "query": "which shard router picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5164", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5165", + "query": "quartz glade shard router misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz glade shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5167", + "query": "which shard router sends completions to the wrong caller once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5168", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5169", + "query": "sienna inlet shard router interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5170", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the sienna inlet shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5171", + "query": "which shard router is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5172", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5173", + "query": "sorrel harbor shard router overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5174", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel harbor shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5175", + "query": "which shard router writes more log than the space allows once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5176", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one writes more log than the space allows once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5177", + "query": "umber badland shard router escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5178", + "query": "what explains why the umber badland shard router escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5179", + "query": "which shard router raises alarms at the first wobble because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5180", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5181", + "query": "maroon gulch entropy siphon stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5182", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the maroon gulch entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5183", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5184", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5185", + "query": "saffron gorge entropy siphon upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the saffron gorge entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5187", + "query": "which entropy siphon delivers things in scrambled sequence once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5188", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5189", + "query": "navy butte entropy siphon hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5190", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the navy butte entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5191", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from changing the checker while it checks because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5192", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5193", + "query": "ivory knoll entropy siphon misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5194", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory knoll entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5195", + "query": "which entropy siphon routes warnings to the wrong inbox once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5196", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5197", + "query": "pewter harbor entropy siphon polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5198", + "query": "what explains why the pewter harbor entropy siphon polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5199", + "query": "which entropy siphon asks for updates far too often because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5200", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one asks for updates far too often because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5201", + "query": "navy cavern escrow chamber rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5202", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the navy cavern escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5203", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5204", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5205", + "query": "auburn marsh escrow chamber desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the auburn marsh escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5207", + "query": "which escrow chamber lets copies drift out of agreement once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5208", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5209", + "query": "scarlet hollow escrow chamber widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5210", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the scarlet hollow escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5211", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5212", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5213", + "query": "verdigris delta escrow chamber splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5214", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris delta escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5215", + "query": "which escrow chamber two halves each think they lead once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5216", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one two halves each think they lead once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5217", + "query": "walnut canyon escrow chamber recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5218", + "query": "what explains why the walnut canyon escrow chamber recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5219", + "query": "which escrow chamber derives afresh what it could remember because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5220", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one derives afresh what it could remember because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5221", + "query": "orange meadow escrow chamber snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5222", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the orange meadow escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5223", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5224", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5225", + "query": "maroon cove escrow chamber misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon cove escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5227", + "query": "which escrow chamber sends completions to the wrong caller once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5228", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5229", + "query": "plum hill escrow chamber interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5230", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the plum hill escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5231", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5232", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5233", + "query": "saffron cliff escrow chamber overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5234", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5235", + "query": "which escrow chamber writes more log than the space allows while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5236", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one writes more log than the space allows while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5237", + "query": "carmine heath escrow chamber escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5238", + "query": "what explains why the carmine heath escrow chamber escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5239", + "query": "which escrow chamber raises alarms at the first wobble because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5240", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5241", + "query": "golden orchard shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5242", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the golden orchard shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5243", + "query": "which shard router picked how often it tries again around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5244", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5245", + "query": "scarlet bayou shard router drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet bayou shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5247", + "query": "which shard router loses acknowledged data once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5248", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one loses acknowledged data once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5249", + "query": "walnut marsh shard router share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5250", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the walnut marsh shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5251", + "query": "which shard router is barred from one read position serving two partitions because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5252", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5253", + "query": "orange pond shard router stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5254", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange pond shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5255", + "query": "which shard router stops making progress when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5256", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one stops making progress when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5257", + "query": "sage fjord shard router prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5258", + "query": "what explains why the sage fjord shard router prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5259", + "query": "which shard router picks the staler of two copies because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5260", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picks the staler of two copies because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5261", + "query": "umber pond index writer stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5262", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the umber pond index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5263", + "query": "which index writer picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5264", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5265", + "query": "scarlet hill index writer upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet hill index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5267", + "query": "which index writer delivers things in scrambled sequence once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5268", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5269", + "query": "indigo lagoon index writer hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5270", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the indigo lagoon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5271", + "query": "which index writer is barred from changing the checker while it checks because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5272", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5273", + "query": "sorrel geyser index writer misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5274", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel geyser index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5275", + "query": "which index writer routes warnings to the wrong inbox while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5276", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5277", + "query": "willow fjord index writer polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5278", + "query": "what explains why the willow fjord index writer polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5279", + "query": "which index writer asks for updates far too often because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5280", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one asks for updates far too often because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5281", + "query": "opal savanna telemetry mast drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5282", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the opal savanna telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5283", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5284", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5285", + "query": "carmine prairie telemetry mast expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine prairie telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5287", + "query": "which telemetry mast cancels permissions it just issued once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5288", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5289", + "query": "mustard hollow telemetry mast outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5290", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the mustard hollow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5291", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5292", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5293", + "query": "wheat atoll telemetry mast stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5294", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat atoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5295", + "query": "which telemetry mast delivers output in fits and bursts as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5296", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one delivers output in fits and bursts as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5297", + "query": "coral forest telemetry mast trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5298", + "query": "what explains why the coral forest telemetry mast trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5299", + "query": "which telemetry mast throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5300", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5301", + "query": "magenta knoll index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5302", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the magenta knoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5303", + "query": "which index writer picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5304", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5305", + "query": "cobalt dune index writer starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt dune index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5307", + "query": "which index writer leaves downstream readers with nothing once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5308", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5309", + "query": "jade plateau index writer mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5310", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the jade plateau index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5311", + "query": "which index writer is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5312", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5313", + "query": "sienna cliff index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5314", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna cliff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5315", + "query": "which index writer keeps toggling between up and down while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5316", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps toggling between up and down while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5317", + "query": "sepia cirque index writer undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5318", + "query": "what explains why the sepia cirque index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5319", + "query": "which index writer owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5320", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5321", + "query": "golden geyser escrow chamber compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5322", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the golden geyser escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5323", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5324", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5325", + "query": "maroon pond escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon pond escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5327", + "query": "which escrow chamber never gives borrowed space back once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5328", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one never gives borrowed space back once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5329", + "query": "russet bayou escrow chamber archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5330", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the russet bayou escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5331", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from shelving a problem that is live because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5332", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5333", + "query": "lilac geyser escrow chamber lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5334", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac geyser escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5335", + "query": "which escrow chamber feeds the operator stale numbers once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5336", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one feeds the operator stale numbers once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5337", + "query": "violet cliff escrow chamber mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5338", + "query": "what explains why the violet cliff escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5339", + "query": "which escrow chamber serves yesterday's answers confidently because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5340", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5341", + "query": "topaz geyser entropy siphon spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5342", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the topaz geyser entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5343", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5344", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5345", + "query": "copper lake entropy siphon skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper lake entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5347", + "query": "which entropy siphon acknowledges before durability once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5348", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one acknowledges before durability once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5349", + "query": "golden inlet entropy siphon reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5350", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the golden inlet entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5351", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5352", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5353", + "query": "taupe isthmus entropy siphon starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5354", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe isthmus entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5355", + "query": "which entropy siphon never lets the flush finish once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5356", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one never lets the flush finish once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5357", + "query": "orange gulch entropy siphon retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5358", + "query": "what explains why the orange gulch entropy siphon retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5359", + "query": "which entropy siphon repeats immediately on failure because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5360", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one repeats immediately on failure because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5361", + "query": "pearl plateau provenance ledger quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5362", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the pearl plateau provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5363", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5364", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5365", + "query": "golden shore provenance ledger garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the golden shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5367", + "query": "which provenance ledger scrambles what it reports home once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5368", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one scrambles what it reports home once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5369", + "query": "amber marsh provenance ledger hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5370", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the amber marsh provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5371", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5372", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5373", + "query": "granite lagoon provenance ledger echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5374", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5375", + "query": "which provenance ledger repeats instructions back to itself once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5376", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one repeats instructions back to itself once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5377", + "query": "golden rapids provenance ledger mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5378", + "query": "what explains why the golden rapids provenance ledger mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5379", + "query": "which provenance ledger copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5380", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5381", + "query": "topaz butte escrow chamber dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5382", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the topaz butte escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5383", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5384", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5385", + "query": "granite cliff escrow chamber forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5387", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses track of positions previously read once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5388", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses track of positions previously read once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5389", + "query": "copper savanna escrow chamber bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5390", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the copper savanna escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5391", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from slipping past the intake gate because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5392", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5393", + "query": "cedar quarry escrow chamber clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5394", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar quarry escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5395", + "query": "which escrow chamber cuts short every spike it should absorb as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5396", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5397", + "query": "walnut prairie escrow chamber defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5398", + "query": "what explains why the walnut prairie escrow chamber defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5399", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps postponing the squeeze because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5400", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5401", + "query": "taupe prairie provenance ledger probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5402", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the taupe prairie provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5403", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5404", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5405", + "query": "golden cape provenance ledger truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the golden cape provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5407", + "query": "which provenance ledger discards the newest entries once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5408", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one discards the newest entries once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5409", + "query": "magenta bluff provenance ledger ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5410", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the magenta bluff provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5411", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5412", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5413", + "query": "beige savanna provenance ledger duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5414", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige savanna provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5415", + "query": "which provenance ledger issues the same barrier twice when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5416", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one issues the same barrier twice when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5417", + "query": "ruby delta provenance ledger skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5418", + "query": "what explains why the ruby delta provenance ledger skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5419", + "query": "which provenance ledger always takes the slow route because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5420", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one always takes the slow route because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5421", + "query": "salmon knoll calibration bench fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5422", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the salmon knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5423", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5424", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5425", + "query": "ruby dune calibration bench stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby dune calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5427", + "query": "which calibration bench wedges everything behind it once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5428", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one wedges everything behind it once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5429", + "query": "ebony hill calibration bench retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5430", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the ebony hill calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5431", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5432", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5433", + "query": "wheat moor calibration bench spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5434", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat moor calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5435", + "query": "which calibration bench burns cpu waiting as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5436", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one burns cpu waiting as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5437", + "query": "cinnamon gulch calibration bench holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5438", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon gulch calibration bench holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5439", + "query": "which calibration bench keeps the barrier from closing because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5440", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5441", + "query": "cobalt valley provenance ledger fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5442", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the cobalt valley provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5443", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5444", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5445", + "query": "onyx prairie provenance ledger stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx prairie provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5447", + "query": "which provenance ledger wedges everything behind it once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5448", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one wedges everything behind it once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5449", + "query": "saffron lowland provenance ledger retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5450", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the saffron lowland provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5451", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5452", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5453", + "query": "cyan canyon provenance ledger spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5454", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan canyon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5455", + "query": "which provenance ledger burns cpu waiting once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5456", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one burns cpu waiting once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5457", + "query": "teal hill provenance ledger holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5458", + "query": "what explains why the teal hill provenance ledger holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5459", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps the barrier from closing because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5460", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5461", + "query": "emerald ravine index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5462", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the emerald ravine index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5463", + "query": "which index writer picked how often it tries again around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5464", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5465", + "query": "violet creek index writer drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet creek index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5467", + "query": "which index writer loses acknowledged data once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5468", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one loses acknowledged data once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5469", + "query": "bronze canyon index writer share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5470", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the bronze canyon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5471", + "query": "which index writer is barred from one read position serving two partitions because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5472", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5473", + "query": "cyan strait index writer stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5474", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan strait index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5475", + "query": "which index writer stops making progress while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5476", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one stops making progress while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5477", + "query": "fawn fjord index writer prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5478", + "query": "what explains why the fawn fjord index writer prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5479", + "query": "which index writer picks the staler of two copies because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5480", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picks the staler of two copies because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5481", + "query": "silver jungle escrow chamber grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5482", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the silver jungle escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5483", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5484", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5485", + "query": "sepia reef escrow chamber starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia reef escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5487", + "query": "which escrow chamber leaves downstream readers with nothing once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5488", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5489", + "query": "emerald harbor escrow chamber mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5490", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the emerald harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5491", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5492", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5493", + "query": "wheat ravine escrow chamber flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5494", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat ravine escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5495", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps toggling between up and down when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5496", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps toggling between up and down when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5497", + "query": "silver ravine escrow chamber undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5498", + "query": "what explains why the silver ravine escrow chamber undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5499", + "query": "which escrow chamber owns up to fewer attempts than occur because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5500", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5501", + "query": "mustard glacier escrow chamber batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5502", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the mustard glacier escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5503", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5504", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5505", + "query": "cobalt river escrow chamber re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt river escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5507", + "query": "which escrow chamber sends the same payload twice once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5508", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one sends the same payload twice once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5509", + "query": "cyan hill escrow chamber widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5510", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the cyan hill escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5511", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5512", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5513", + "query": "emerald dell escrow chamber thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5514", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald dell escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5515", + "query": "which escrow chamber evicts what it is about to need as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5516", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one evicts what it is about to need as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5517", + "query": "emerald glacier escrow chamber rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5518", + "query": "what explains why the emerald glacier escrow chamber rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5519", + "query": "which escrow chamber shortens its own interval because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5520", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one shortens its own interval because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5521", + "query": "umber cirque escrow chamber stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5522", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the umber cirque escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5523", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5524", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5525", + "query": "carmine valley escrow chamber upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine valley escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5527", + "query": "which escrow chamber delivers things in scrambled sequence once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5528", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5529", + "query": "wheat glacier escrow chamber hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5530", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the wheat glacier escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5531", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from changing the checker while it checks because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5532", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5533", + "query": "ashen summit escrow chamber misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5534", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen summit escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5535", + "query": "which escrow chamber routes warnings to the wrong inbox when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5536", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5537", + "query": "coral ravine escrow chamber polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5538", + "query": "what explains why the coral ravine escrow chamber polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5539", + "query": "which escrow chamber asks for updates far too often because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5540", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one asks for updates far too often because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5541", + "query": "ochre hill telemetry mast spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5542", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the ochre hill telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5543", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5544", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5545", + "query": "emerald marsh telemetry mast skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the emerald marsh telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5547", + "query": "which telemetry mast acknowledges before durability once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5548", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one acknowledges before durability once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5549", + "query": "ruby knoll telemetry mast reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5550", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the ruby knoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5551", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5552", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5553", + "query": "sienna creek telemetry mast starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5554", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna creek telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5555", + "query": "which telemetry mast never lets the flush finish before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5556", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one never lets the flush finish before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5557", + "query": "saffron cove telemetry mast retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5558", + "query": "what explains why the saffron cove telemetry mast retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5559", + "query": "which telemetry mast repeats immediately on failure because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5560", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one repeats immediately on failure because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5561", + "query": "vermilion knoll sweep worker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5562", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the vermilion knoll sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5563", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5564", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5565", + "query": "indigo reef sweep worker misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5567", + "query": "which sweep worker sends completions to the wrong caller once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5568", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5569", + "query": "sienna marsh sweep worker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5570", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the sienna marsh sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5571", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5572", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5573", + "query": "emerald heath sweep worker overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5574", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald heath sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5575", + "query": "which sweep worker writes more log than the space allows once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5576", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one writes more log than the space allows once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5577", + "query": "teal reef sweep worker escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5578", + "query": "what explains why the teal reef sweep worker escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5579", + "query": "which sweep worker raises alarms at the first wobble because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5580", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5581", + "query": "verdigris wharf telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5582", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the verdigris wharf telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5583", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5584", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5585", + "query": "chalk savanna telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk savanna telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5587", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves downstream readers with nothing once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5588", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5589", + "query": "slate tarn telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5590", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the slate tarn telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5591", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5592", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5593", + "query": "sorrel dune telemetry mast flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5594", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel dune telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5595", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps toggling between up and down once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5596", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps toggling between up and down once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5597", + "query": "crimson inlet telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5598", + "query": "what explains why the crimson inlet telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5599", + "query": "which telemetry mast owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5600", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5601", + "query": "emerald lake specimen locker decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5602", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the emerald lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5603", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5604", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5605", + "query": "birch dune specimen locker mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch dune specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5607", + "query": "which specimen locker puts the wrong name on each container once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5608", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one puts the wrong name on each container once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5609", + "query": "vermilion oasis specimen locker recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5610", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the vermilion oasis specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5611", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5612", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5613", + "query": "opal ravine specimen locker saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5614", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal ravine specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5615", + "query": "which specimen locker pegs the sensor at maximum while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5616", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5617", + "query": "hazel dale specimen locker rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5618", + "query": "what explains why the hazel dale specimen locker rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5619", + "query": "which specimen locker biases results to the reference value because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5620", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one biases results to the reference value because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5621", + "query": "willow hollow index writer decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5622", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the willow hollow index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5623", + "query": "which index writer picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5624", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5625", + "query": "ruby rapids index writer mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby rapids index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5627", + "query": "which index writer puts the wrong name on each container once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5628", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one puts the wrong name on each container once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5629", + "query": "emerald pond index writer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5630", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the emerald pond index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5631", + "query": "which index writer is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5632", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5633", + "query": "hazel marsh index writer saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5634", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel marsh index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5635", + "query": "which index writer pegs the sensor at maximum as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5636", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one pegs the sensor at maximum as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5637", + "query": "topaz cavern index writer rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5638", + "query": "what explains why the topaz cavern index writer rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5639", + "query": "which index writer biases results to the reference value because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5640", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one biases results to the reference value because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5641", + "query": "jade atoll ingest job flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5642", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the jade atoll ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5643", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often it writes out around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5644", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5645", + "query": "granite creek ingest job loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite creek ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5647", + "query": "which ingest job forgets how far it had read once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5648", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one forgets how far it had read once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5649", + "query": "russet harbor ingest job trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5650", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the russet harbor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5651", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5652", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5653", + "query": "quartz swamp ingest job reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5654", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz swamp ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5655", + "query": "which ingest job confirms out of sequence right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5656", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one confirms out of sequence right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5657", + "query": "umber mesa ingest job re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5658", + "query": "what explains why the umber mesa ingest job re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5659", + "query": "which ingest job fetches the same index repeatedly because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5660", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5661", + "query": "opal butte lease broker backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5662", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the opal butte lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5663", + "query": "which lease broker picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5664", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5665", + "query": "quartz shore lease broker corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz shore lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5667", + "query": "which lease broker leaves unreadable restart state once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5668", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one leaves unreadable restart state once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5669", + "query": "olive bluff lease broker cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5670", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the olive bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5671", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5672", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5673", + "query": "carmine plateau lease broker drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5674", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine plateau lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5675", + "query": "which lease broker loses track of its own progress marker while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5676", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one loses track of its own progress marker while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5677", + "query": "navy reef lease broker serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5678", + "query": "what explains why the navy reef lease broker serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5679", + "query": "which lease broker checks health one at a time because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5680", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one checks health one at a time because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5681", + "query": "slate dune telemetry mast stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5682", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the slate dune telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5683", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5684", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5685", + "query": "umber quarry telemetry mast upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber quarry telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5687", + "query": "which telemetry mast delivers things in scrambled sequence once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5688", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5689", + "query": "fawn bayou telemetry mast hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5690", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the fawn bayou telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5691", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from changing the checker while it checks because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5692", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5693", + "query": "slate pond telemetry mast misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5694", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate pond telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5695", + "query": "which telemetry mast routes warnings to the wrong inbox while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5696", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5697", + "query": "violet glacier telemetry mast polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5698", + "query": "what explains why the violet glacier telemetry mast polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5699", + "query": "which telemetry mast asks for updates far too often because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5700", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one asks for updates far too often because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5701", + "query": "umber tundra shard router quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5702", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the umber tundra shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5703", + "query": "which shard router picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5704", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5705", + "query": "coral gorge shard router garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral gorge shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5707", + "query": "which shard router scrambles what it reports home once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5708", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one scrambles what it reports home once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5709", + "query": "mustard harbor shard router hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5710", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the mustard harbor shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5711", + "query": "which shard router is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5712", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5713", + "query": "topaz cove shard router echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5714", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz cove shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5715", + "query": "which shard router repeats instructions back to itself as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5716", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one repeats instructions back to itself as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5717", + "query": "scarlet cavern shard router mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5718", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet cavern shard router mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5719", + "query": "which shard router copies the rhythm of its counterpart because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5720", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5721", + "query": "indigo canyon escrow chamber flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5722", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the indigo canyon escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5723", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often it writes out around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5724", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5725", + "query": "cedar river escrow chamber loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar river escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5727", + "query": "which escrow chamber forgets how far it had read once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5728", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one forgets how far it had read once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5729", + "query": "auburn prairie escrow chamber trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5730", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the auburn prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5731", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5732", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5733", + "query": "quartz creek escrow chamber reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5734", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz creek escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5735", + "query": "which escrow chamber confirms out of sequence once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5736", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one confirms out of sequence once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5737", + "query": "coral prairie escrow chamber re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5738", + "query": "what explains why the coral prairie escrow chamber re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5739", + "query": "which escrow chamber fetches the same index repeatedly because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5740", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5741", + "query": "topaz glade edge cache confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5742", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the topaz glade edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5743", + "query": "which edge cache picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5744", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5745", + "query": "ashen atoll edge cache overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ashen atoll edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5747", + "query": "which edge cache lingers longer than scheduled once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5748", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one lingers longer than scheduled once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5749", + "query": "orange oasis edge cache skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5750", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the orange oasis edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5751", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from omitting the empty reference run because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5752", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5753", + "query": "wheat lowland edge cache orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5754", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat lowland edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5755", + "query": "which edge cache abandons work it had accepted right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5756", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one abandons work it had accepted right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5757", + "query": "mauve cove edge cache ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5758", + "query": "what explains why the mauve cove edge cache ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5759", + "query": "which edge cache serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5760", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5761", + "query": "slate hill index writer backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5762", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the slate hill index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5763", + "query": "which index writer picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5764", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5765", + "query": "maroon orchard index writer corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon orchard index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5767", + "query": "which index writer leaves unreadable restart state once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5768", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one leaves unreadable restart state once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5769", + "query": "topaz cirque index writer cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5770", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the topaz cirque index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5771", + "query": "which index writer is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5772", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5773", + "query": "violet strait index writer drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5774", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet strait index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5775", + "query": "which index writer loses track of its own progress marker while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5776", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one loses track of its own progress marker while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5777", + "query": "bronze heath index writer serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5778", + "query": "what explains why the bronze heath index writer serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5779", + "query": "which index writer checks health one at a time because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5780", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one checks health one at a time because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5781", + "query": "pewter glacier assay station spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5782", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the pewter glacier assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5783", + "query": "which assay station picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5784", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5785", + "query": "bronze valley assay station skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze valley assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5787", + "query": "which assay station acknowledges before durability once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5788", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one acknowledges before durability once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5789", + "query": "onyx hollow assay station reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5790", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the onyx hollow assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5791", + "query": "which assay station is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5792", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5793", + "query": "scarlet river assay station starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5794", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet river assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5795", + "query": "which assay station never lets the flush finish before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5796", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one never lets the flush finish before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5797", + "query": "topaz strait assay station retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5798", + "query": "what explains why the topaz strait assay station retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5799", + "query": "which assay station repeats immediately on failure because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5800", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one repeats immediately on failure because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5801", + "query": "magenta geyser calibration bench spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5802", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the magenta geyser calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5803", + "query": "which calibration bench picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5804", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5805", + "query": "mustard dell calibration bench skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard dell calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5807", + "query": "which calibration bench acknowledges before durability once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5808", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one acknowledges before durability once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5809", + "query": "azure butte calibration bench reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5810", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the azure butte calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5811", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5812", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5813", + "query": "ruby bayou calibration bench starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5814", + "query": "what is still broken in the ruby bayou calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5815", + "query": "which calibration bench never lets the flush finish as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5816", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one never lets the flush finish as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5817", + "query": "auburn ravine calibration bench retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5818", + "query": "what explains why the auburn ravine calibration bench retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5819", + "query": "which calibration bench repeats immediately on failure because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5820", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one repeats immediately on failure because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5821", + "query": "sand forest token vault snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5822", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the sand forest token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5823", + "query": "which token vault picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5824", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5825", + "query": "topaz orchard token vault misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz orchard token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5827", + "query": "which token vault sends completions to the wrong caller once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5828", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5829", + "query": "bronze lake token vault interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5830", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the bronze lake token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5831", + "query": "which token vault is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5832", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5833", + "query": "wheat harbor token vault overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5834", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat harbor token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5835", + "query": "which token vault writes more log than the space allows once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5836", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one writes more log than the space allows once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5837", + "query": "cobalt estuary token vault escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5838", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt estuary token vault escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5839", + "query": "which token vault raises alarms at the first wobble because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5840", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5841", + "query": "slate cirque index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5842", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the slate cirque index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5843", + "query": "which index writer picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5844", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5845", + "query": "emerald summit index writer starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the emerald summit index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5847", + "query": "which index writer leaves downstream readers with nothing once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5848", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5849", + "query": "opal lagoon index writer mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5850", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the opal lagoon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5851", + "query": "which index writer is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5852", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5853", + "query": "salmon delta index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5854", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon delta index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5855", + "query": "which index writer keeps toggling between up and down as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5856", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps toggling between up and down as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5857", + "query": "pearl geyser index writer undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5858", + "query": "what explains why the pearl geyser index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5859", + "query": "which index writer owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5860", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5861", + "query": "saffron geyser ingest job confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5862", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the saffron geyser ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5863", + "query": "which ingest job picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5864", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5865", + "query": "maroon bayou ingest job overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon bayou ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5867", + "query": "which ingest job lingers longer than scheduled once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5868", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5869", + "query": "salmon dell ingest job skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5870", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the salmon dell ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5871", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from omitting the empty reference run because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5872", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5873", + "query": "azure canyon ingest job orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5874", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure canyon ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5875", + "query": "which ingest job abandons work it had accepted while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5876", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one abandons work it had accepted while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5877", + "query": "cobalt bayou ingest job ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5878", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt bayou ingest job ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5879", + "query": "which ingest job serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5880", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5881", + "query": "salmon gorge replay buffer parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5882", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the salmon gorge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5883", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5884", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5885", + "query": "russet forest replay buffer clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet forest replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5887", + "query": "which replay buffer fires the same alarm repeatedly once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5888", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5889", + "query": "emerald strait replay buffer reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5890", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the emerald strait replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5891", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5892", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5893", + "query": "silver brook replay buffer ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5894", + "query": "what is still broken in the silver brook replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5895", + "query": "which replay buffer keeps pushing when told to slow once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5896", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one keeps pushing when told to slow once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5897", + "query": "amber tarn replay buffer idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5898", + "query": "what explains why the amber tarn replay buffer idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5899", + "query": "which replay buffer rests longer than it runs because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5900", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one rests longer than it runs because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5901", + "query": "navy pond provenance ledger drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5902", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the navy pond provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5903", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5904", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5905", + "query": "sepia wharf provenance ledger expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia wharf provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5907", + "query": "which provenance ledger cancels permissions it just issued once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5908", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one cancels permissions it just issued once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5909", + "query": "salmon isthmus provenance ledger outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5910", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the salmon isthmus provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5911", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5912", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5913", + "query": "cinnamon oasis provenance ledger stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5914", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon oasis provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5915", + "query": "which provenance ledger delivers output in fits and bursts as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5916", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one delivers output in fits and bursts as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5917", + "query": "navy lowland provenance ledger trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5918", + "query": "what explains why the navy lowland provenance ledger trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5919", + "query": "which provenance ledger throws away the oldest instead of the newest because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5920", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5921", + "query": "plum delta assay station rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5922", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the plum delta assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5923", + "query": "which assay station picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5924", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5925", + "query": "fawn rapids assay station desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn rapids assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5927", + "query": "which assay station lets copies drift out of agreement once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5928", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5929", + "query": "scarlet badland assay station widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5930", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the scarlet badland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5931", + "query": "which assay station is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5932", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5933", + "query": "teal harbor assay station splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5934", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal harbor assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5935", + "query": "which assay station two halves each think they lead while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5936", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one two halves each think they lead while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5937", + "query": "sand gorge assay station recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5938", + "query": "what explains why the sand gorge assay station recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5939", + "query": "which assay station derives afresh what it could remember because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5940", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one derives afresh what it could remember because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5941", + "query": "ruby gulch edge cache confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5942", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the ruby gulch edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5943", + "query": "which edge cache picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5944", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5945", + "query": "coral dune edge cache overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral dune edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5947", + "query": "which edge cache lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5948", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5949", + "query": "copper reef edge cache skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5950", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the copper reef edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5951", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5952", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5953", + "query": "emerald dale edge cache orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5954", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald dale edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5955", + "query": "which edge cache abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5956", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5957", + "query": "hazel dell edge cache ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5958", + "query": "what explains why the hazel dell edge cache ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5959", + "query": "which edge cache serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5960", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5961", + "query": "ivory lowland sweep worker quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5962", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the ivory lowland sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5963", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5964", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5965", + "query": "sand isthmus sweep worker blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand isthmus sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5967", + "query": "which sweep worker repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5968", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5969", + "query": "jade knoll sweep worker trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5970", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the jade knoll sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5971", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5972", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5973", + "query": "umber reef sweep worker churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5974", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5975", + "query": "which sweep worker opens and drops links nonstop as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5976", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one opens and drops links nonstop as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5977", + "query": "russet reef sweep worker chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5978", + "query": "what explains why the russet reef sweep worker chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5979", + "query": "which sweep worker cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5980", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5981", + "query": "navy island edge cache sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5982", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the navy island edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5983", + "query": "which edge cache picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5984", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5985", + "query": "carmine river edge cache inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine river edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5987", + "query": "which edge cache flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5988", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5989", + "query": "olive dell edge cache splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5990", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the olive dell edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5991", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5992", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5993", + "query": "sand atoll edge cache skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5994", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand atoll edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5995", + "query": "which edge cache tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5996", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5997", + "query": "birch marsh edge cache hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5998", + "query": "what explains why the birch marsh edge cache hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5999", + "query": "which edge cache keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6000", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P1", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P2", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P3", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P4", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P5", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P6", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P7", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P8", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P9", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P10", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P11", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P12", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P13", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P14", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P15", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P16", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P17", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P18", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P19", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P20", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P21", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P22", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P23", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P24", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P25", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P26", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P27", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P28", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P29", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P30", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P31", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P32", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P33", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P34", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P35", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P36", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P37", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P38", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P39", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P40", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P41", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P42", + "path": "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P43", + "path": "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P44", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P45", + "path": "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P46", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P47", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P48", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P49", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P50", + "path": "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P51", + "path": "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P52", + "path": "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P53", + "path": "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P54", + "path": "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P55", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P56", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P57", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P58", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P59", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P60", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P61", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P62", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P63", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P64", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6001", + "query": "sienna swamp ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6002", + "query": "what did we decide about the russet mesa lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6003", + "query": "who owns the walnut isthmus shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6004", + "query": "taupe fjord replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6005", + "query": "what did we decide about the slate reef token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6006", + "query": "who owns the jade delta edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6007", + "query": "silver barrens sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6008", + "query": "what did we decide about the indigo meadow index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6009", + "query": "who owns the navy dale assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6010", + "query": "ivory pond specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6011", + "query": "what did we decide about the navy badland calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6012", + "query": "who owns the topaz gulch telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6013", + "query": "quartz forest provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6014", + "query": "what did we decide about the lilac creek quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6015", + "query": "who owns the lavender butte escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6016", + "query": "mustard hill entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6017", + "query": "what did we decide about the saffron quarry ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6018", + "query": "who owns the pewter canyon lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6019", + "query": "onyx moor shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6020", + "query": "what did we decide about the birch prairie replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6021", + "query": "who owns the mauve isthmus token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6022", + "query": "cyan gulch edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6023", + "query": "what did we decide about the cyan butte sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6024", + "query": "who owns the umber cliff index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6025", + "query": "umber grove assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6026", + "query": "what did we decide about the carmine shore specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6027", + "query": "who owns the ruby lake calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6028", + "query": "cyan jungle telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6029", + "query": "what did we decide about the tan glade provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6030", + "query": "who owns the sepia cliff quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6031", + "query": "tan geyser escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6032", + "query": "what did we decide about the verdigris knoll entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6033", + "query": "who owns the silver bluff ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6034", + "query": "amber island lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6035", + "query": "what did we decide about the mauve island shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6036", + "query": "who owns the tan dune replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6037", + "query": "crimson dale token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6038", + "query": "what did we decide about the vermilion swamp edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6039", + "query": "who owns the cobalt forest sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6040", + "query": "vermilion estuary index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6041", + "query": "what did we decide about the bronze ravine assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6042", + "query": "who owns the vermilion glade specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6043", + "query": "willow meadow calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6044", + "query": "what did we decide about the salmon butte telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6045", + "query": "who owns the crimson brook provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6046", + "query": "azure dell quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6047", + "query": "what did we decide about the violet heath escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6048", + "query": "who owns the navy tundra entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6049", + "query": "cedar meadow ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6050", + "query": "what did we decide about the quartz fjord lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6051", + "query": "who owns the beige marsh shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6052", + "query": "coral moor replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6053", + "query": "what did we decide about the cobalt wharf token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6054", + "query": "who owns the olive cavern edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6055", + "query": "quartz knoll sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6056", + "query": "what did we decide about the granite crag index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6057", + "query": "who owns the ivory river assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6058", + "query": "lavender swamp specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6059", + "query": "what did we decide about the sienna orchard calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6060", + "query": "who owns the sorrel valley telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6061", + "query": "crimson estuary provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6062", + "query": "what did we decide about the sage oasis quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6063", + "query": "who owns the lilac fjord escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6064", + "query": "ashen tarn entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6065", + "query": "what did we decide about the vermilion tundra ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6066", + "query": "who owns the ashen river lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6067", + "query": "coral cove shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6068", + "query": "what did we decide about the umber strait replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6069", + "query": "who owns the taupe brook token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6070", + "query": "taupe barrens edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6071", + "query": "what did we decide about the russet river sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6072", + "query": "who owns the lavender oasis index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6073", + "query": "silver strait assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6074", + "query": "what did we decide about the amber cavern specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6075", + "query": "who owns the sienna crag calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6076", + "query": "mustard summit telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6077", + "query": "what did we decide about the mustard dune provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6078", + "query": "who owns the sage valley quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6079", + "query": "sand delta escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6080", + "query": "what did we decide about the lavender savanna entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6081", + "query": "who owns the emerald knoll ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6082", + "query": "amber inlet lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6083", + "query": "what did we decide about the tan ridge shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6084", + "query": "who owns the sorrel plateau replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6085", + "query": "cedar pond token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6086", + "query": "what did we decide about the sienna tundra edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6087", + "query": "who owns the lavender shore sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6088", + "query": "russet ridge index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6089", + "query": "what did we decide about the hazel rapids assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6090", + "query": "who owns the hazel ridge specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6091", + "query": "quartz plateau calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6092", + "query": "what did we decide about the fawn river telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6093", + "query": "who owns the cinnamon lowland provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6094", + "query": "slate fjord quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6095", + "query": "what did we decide about the beige tarn escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6096", + "query": "who owns the azure moor entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6097", + "query": "plum hollow ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6098", + "query": "what did we decide about the onyx gorge lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6099", + "query": "who owns the silver wharf shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6100", + "query": "coral quarry replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6101", + "query": "what did we decide about the cedar savanna token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6102", + "query": "who owns the sepia canyon edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6103", + "query": "ashen cavern sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6104", + "query": "what did we decide about the emerald island index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6105", + "query": "who owns the topaz dell assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6106", + "query": "golden cove specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6107", + "query": "what did we decide about the birch barrens calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6108", + "query": "who owns the beige butte telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6109", + "query": "walnut moor provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6110", + "query": "what did we decide about the quartz meadow quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6111", + "query": "who owns the coral oasis escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6112", + "query": "sepia ravine entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6113", + "query": "what did we decide about the wheat isthmus ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6114", + "query": "who owns the birch gulch lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6115", + "query": "cedar dune shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6116", + "query": "what did we decide about the willow knoll replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6117", + "query": "who owns the silver dell token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6118", + "query": "ebony estuary edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6119", + "query": "what did we decide about the salmon river sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6120", + "query": "who owns the ebony glade index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6121", + "query": "sepia strait assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6122", + "query": "what did we decide about the slate brook specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6123", + "query": "who owns the saffron river calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6124", + "query": "lilac river telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6125", + "query": "what did we decide about the amber gulch provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6126", + "query": "who owns the maroon oasis quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6127", + "query": "silver cirque escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6128", + "query": "what did we decide about the navy cape entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6129", + "query": "who owns the indigo island ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6130", + "query": "navy orchard lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6131", + "query": "what did we decide about the sage marsh shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6132", + "query": "who owns the azure heath replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6133", + "query": "ochre lake token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6134", + "query": "what did we decide about the ashen swamp edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6135", + "query": "who owns the onyx cirque sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6136", + "query": "violet grove index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6137", + "query": "what did we decide about the indigo badland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6138", + "query": "who owns the crimson butte specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6139", + "query": "ebony badland calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6140", + "query": "what did we decide about the topaz estuary telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6141", + "query": "who owns the mustard mesa provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6142", + "query": "umber hill quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6143", + "query": "what did we decide about the hazel tundra escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6144", + "query": "who owns the carmine gulch entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6145", + "query": "violet bluff ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6146", + "query": "what did we decide about the magenta river lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6147", + "query": "who owns the scarlet meadow shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6148", + "query": "navy savanna replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6149", + "query": "what did we decide about the scarlet reef token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6150", + "query": "who owns the ruby savanna edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6151", + "query": "opal hill sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6152", + "query": "what did we decide about the tan butte index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6153", + "query": "who owns the wheat mesa assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6154", + "query": "coral wharf specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6155", + "query": "what did we decide about the salmon cove calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6156", + "query": "who owns the cobalt pond telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6157", + "query": "russet oasis provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6158", + "query": "what did we decide about the chalk bluff quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6159", + "query": "who owns the magenta forest escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6160", + "query": "lavender marsh entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6161", + "query": "what did we decide about the ashen dale ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6162", + "query": "who owns the indigo isthmus lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6163", + "query": "scarlet prairie shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6164", + "query": "what did we decide about the cobalt plateau replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6165", + "query": "who owns the copper quarry token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6166", + "query": "olive glade edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6167", + "query": "what did we decide about the pearl oasis sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6168", + "query": "who owns the carmine dale index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6169", + "query": "fawn lagoon assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6170", + "query": "what did we decide about the tan cape specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6171", + "query": "who owns the jade grove calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6172", + "query": "ivory hollow telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6173", + "query": "what did we decide about the walnut fjord provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6174", + "query": "who owns the walnut crag quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6175", + "query": "sorrel gorge escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6176", + "query": "what did we decide about the orange forest entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6177", + "query": "who owns the granite fjord ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6178", + "query": "verdigris cove lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6179", + "query": "what did we decide about the teal marsh shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6180", + "query": "who owns the indigo crag replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6181", + "query": "beige tundra token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6182", + "query": "what did we decide about the salmon summit edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6183", + "query": "who owns the onyx fjord sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6184", + "query": "sienna estuary index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6185", + "query": "what did we decide about the mauve lake assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6186", + "query": "who owns the golden gulch specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6187", + "query": "azure strait calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6188", + "query": "what did we decide about the onyx jungle telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6189", + "query": "who owns the jade gorge provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6190", + "query": "azure cirque quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6191", + "query": "what did we decide about the olive quarry escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6192", + "query": "who owns the sepia barrens entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6193", + "query": "quartz geyser ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6194", + "query": "what did we decide about the chalk swamp lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6195", + "query": "who owns the taupe gulch shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6196", + "query": "maroon dale replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6197", + "query": "what did we decide about the hazel grove token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6198", + "query": "who owns the quartz island edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6199", + "query": "olive gorge sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6200", + "query": "what did we decide about the amber atoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6201", + "query": "who owns the navy river assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6202", + "query": "sand barrens specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6203", + "query": "what did we decide about the willow bluff calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6204", + "query": "who owns the crimson marsh telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6205", + "query": "taupe dale provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6206", + "query": "what did we decide about the scarlet barrens quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6207", + "query": "who owns the sorrel glacier escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6208", + "query": "saffron cavern entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6209", + "query": "what did we decide about the carmine pond ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6210", + "query": "who owns the navy hill lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6211", + "query": "taupe river shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6212", + "query": "what did we decide about the sienna summit replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6213", + "query": "who owns the teal barrens token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6214", + "query": "cobalt canyon edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6215", + "query": "what did we decide about the salmon ravine sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6216", + "query": "who owns the pearl tarn index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6217", + "query": "slate dale assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6218", + "query": "what did we decide about the vermilion savanna specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6219", + "query": "who owns the slate island calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6220", + "query": "wheat tundra telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6221", + "query": "what did we decide about the magenta mesa provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6222", + "query": "who owns the sage lake quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6223", + "query": "mustard cape escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6224", + "query": "what did we decide about the golden lowland entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6225", + "query": "who owns the golden quarry ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6226", + "query": "salmon dale lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6227", + "query": "what did we decide about the tan dale shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6228", + "query": "who owns the crimson grove replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6229", + "query": "sage geyser token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6230", + "query": "what did we decide about the sage creek edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6231", + "query": "who owns the ashen savanna sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6232", + "query": "amber grove index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6233", + "query": "what did we decide about the taupe hill assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6234", + "query": "who owns the pewter geyser specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6235", + "query": "wheat wharf calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6236", + "query": "what did we decide about the fawn estuary telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6237", + "query": "who owns the orange dune provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6238", + "query": "vermilion reef quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6239", + "query": "what did we decide about the salmon pond escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6240", + "query": "who owns the mustard jungle entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6241", + "query": "emerald cirque ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6242", + "query": "what did we decide about the salmon crag lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6243", + "query": "who owns the ashen orchard shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6244", + "query": "cinnamon dell replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6245", + "query": "what did we decide about the orange atoll token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6246", + "query": "who owns the coral jungle edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6247", + "query": "indigo brook sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6248", + "query": "what did we decide about the sage knoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6249", + "query": "who owns the orange tarn assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6250", + "query": "olive cove specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6251", + "query": "what did we decide about the indigo estuary calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6252", + "query": "who owns the sepia marsh telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6253", + "query": "plum tundra provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6254", + "query": "what did we decide about the golden badland quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6255", + "query": "who owns the pewter island escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6256", + "query": "cedar tarn entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6257", + "query": "what did we decide about the sorrel bayou ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6258", + "query": "who owns the birch swamp lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6259", + "query": "tan shore shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6260", + "query": "what did we decide about the golden gorge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6261", + "query": "who owns the sand pond token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6262", + "query": "birch meadow edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6263", + "query": "what did we decide about the cedar forest sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6264", + "query": "who owns the auburn gorge index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6265", + "query": "wheat cove assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6266", + "query": "what did we decide about the lavender rapids specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6267", + "query": "who owns the lilac shore calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6268", + "query": "walnut plateau telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6269", + "query": "what did we decide about the olive swamp provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6270", + "query": "who owns the lavender harbor quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6271", + "query": "sorrel moor escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6272", + "query": "what did we decide about the golden glade entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6273", + "query": "who owns the magenta estuary ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6274", + "query": "ashen barrens lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6275", + "query": "what did we decide about the hazel isthmus shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6276", + "query": "who owns the slate wharf replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6277", + "query": "granite inlet token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6278", + "query": "what did we decide about the opal dell edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6279", + "query": "who owns the umber fjord sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6280", + "query": "saffron hill index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6281", + "query": "what did we decide about the pearl valley assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6282", + "query": "who owns the violet plateau specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6283", + "query": "vermilion prairie calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6284", + "query": "what did we decide about the sage atoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6285", + "query": "who owns the lilac badland provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6286", + "query": "golden marsh quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6287", + "query": "what did we decide about the birch delta escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6288", + "query": "who owns the ashen reef entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6289", + "query": "wheat hill ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6290", + "query": "what did we decide about the topaz atoll lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6291", + "query": "who owns the amber creek shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6292", + "query": "silver badland replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6293", + "query": "what did we decide about the violet island token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6294", + "query": "who owns the wheat barrens edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6295", + "query": "fawn jungle sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6296", + "query": "what did we decide about the salmon lagoon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6297", + "query": "who owns the ruby orchard assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6298", + "query": "cinnamon brook specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6299", + "query": "what did we decide about the mustard plateau calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6300", + "query": "who owns the mustard gorge telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6301", + "query": "onyx dale provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6302", + "query": "what did we decide about the cinnamon orchard quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6303", + "query": "who owns the mauve strait escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6304", + "query": "chalk strait entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6305", + "query": "what did we decide about the quartz wharf ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6306", + "query": "who owns the beige moor lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6307", + "query": "ebony cavern shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6308", + "query": "what did we decide about the scarlet dell replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6309", + "query": "who owns the navy ridge token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6310", + "query": "auburn quarry edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6311", + "query": "what did we decide about the sage forest sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6312", + "query": "who owns the golden dale index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6313", + "query": "umber ravine assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6314", + "query": "what did we decide about the emerald valley specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6315", + "query": "who owns the ochre knoll calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6316", + "query": "vermilion strait telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6317", + "query": "what did we decide about the sorrel jungle provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6318", + "query": "who owns the pewter mesa quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6319", + "query": "cyan bluff escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6320", + "query": "what did we decide about the tan lagoon entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6321", + "query": "who owns the pewter oasis ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6322", + "query": "violet butte lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6323", + "query": "what did we decide about the sand meadow shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6324", + "query": "who owns the navy lagoon replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6325", + "query": "ashen crag token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6326", + "query": "what did we decide about the copper ridge edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6327", + "query": "who owns the sorrel delta sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6328", + "query": "orange orchard index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6329", + "query": "what did we decide about the cedar bluff assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6330", + "query": "who owns the sorrel mesa specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6331", + "query": "russet hill calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6332", + "query": "what did we decide about the copper delta telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6333", + "query": "who owns the onyx brook provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6334", + "query": "granite dune quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6335", + "query": "what did we decide about the russet rapids escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6336", + "query": "who owns the pewter valley entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6337", + "query": "bronze creek ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6338", + "query": "what did we decide about the jade river lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6339", + "query": "who owns the chalk plateau shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6340", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the azure lagoon sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6341", + "query": "what explains why the hazel gulch replay buffer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6342", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ebony hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6343", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk mesa sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6344", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel marsh sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6345", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the beige lowland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6346", + "query": "what explains why the violet brook index writer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6347", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the birch estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6348", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6349", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6350", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the ivory ravine edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6351", + "query": "what explains why the amber lowland telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6352", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the bronze cirque assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6353", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6354", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ashen rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6355", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the hazel lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6356", + "query": "what explains why the salmon cape sweep worker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6357", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the crimson meadow shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6358", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6359", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory isthmus escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6360", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the magenta quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6361", + "query": "what explains why the crimson geyser telemetry mast saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6362", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the hazel quarry edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6363", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6364", + "query": "what goes wrong with the amber lagoon quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6365", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the fawn tarn replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6366", + "query": "what explains why the birch rapids replay buffer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6367", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the onyx lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6368", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6369", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6370", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the pearl dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6371", + "query": "what explains why the opal estuary index writer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6372", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the copper meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6373", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy oasis escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6374", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6375", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the chalk shore index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6376", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris quarry index writer re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6377", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the chalk forest calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6378", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon moor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6379", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony savanna index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6380", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the ebony rapids ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6381", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet delta replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6382", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the birch harbor provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6383", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris gulch shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6384", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy quarry shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6385", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the birch savanna provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6386", + "query": "what explains why the golden ridge token vault saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6387", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the silver prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6388", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut bluff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6389", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard bayou replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6390", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the verdigris badland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6391", + "query": "what explains why the quartz inlet provenance ledger undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6392", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ochre savanna token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6393", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon plateau specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6394", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6395", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the opal crag assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6396", + "query": "what explains why the auburn meadow ingest job retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6397", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the sienna island sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6398", + "query": "what is still broken in the bronze reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6399", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine wharf sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6400", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the jade jungle ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6401", + "query": "what explains why the mustard geyser calibration bench re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6402", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the azure bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6403", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper forest assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6404", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn tundra assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6405", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the olive harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6406", + "query": "what explains why the topaz cape calibration bench mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6407", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the ivory tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6408", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe rapids escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6409", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan meadow escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6410", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the saffron cape replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6411", + "query": "what explains why the fawn atoll entropy siphon saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6412", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the coral lagoon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6413", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6414", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter marsh entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6415", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the tan jungle calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6416", + "query": "what explains why the golden wharf lease broker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6417", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the sepia forest shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6418", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn ravine ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6419", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz isthmus ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6420", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the emerald butte index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6421", + "query": "what explains why the crimson orchard specimen locker retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6422", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the hazel brook provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6423", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper inlet lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6424", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6425", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the fawn heath quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6426", + "query": "what explains why the taupe dune shard router re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6427", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the sage hill shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6428", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch lake quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6429", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia hollow quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6430", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the vermilion cliff provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6431", + "query": "what explains why the orange harbor calibration bench mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6432", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the beige glade specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6433", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6434", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal tarn edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6435", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the golden knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6436", + "query": "what explains why the emerald atoll escrow chamber saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6437", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the tan forest calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6438", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow dell index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6439", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige prairie index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6440", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the sepia rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6441", + "query": "what explains why the lilac ridge sweep worker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6442", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the tan swamp assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6443", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe pond calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6444", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson hollow calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6445", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the slate marsh token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6446", + "query": "what explains why the coral badland assay station retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6447", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the lilac grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6448", + "query": "what is still broken in the plum strait telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6449", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna cove telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6450", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the russet isthmus escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6451", + "query": "what explains why the pearl strait assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6452", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the wheat geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6453", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6454", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lavender glacier shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6455", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the fawn dale lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6456", + "query": "what explains why the onyx estuary shard router mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6457", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the mauve river shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6458", + "query": "what is still broken in the crimson harbor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6459", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo cape telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6460", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the sepia island specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6461", + "query": "what explains why the ochre badland ingest job saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6462", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the olive estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6463", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6464", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6465", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the sienna bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6466", + "query": "what explains why the crimson moor edge cache undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6467", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the teal dune entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6468", + "query": "what is still broken in the auburn savanna assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6469", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel pond assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6470", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the carmine brook entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6471", + "query": "what explains why the sage river token vault retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6472", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the birch orchard replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6473", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk gulch escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6474", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal shore escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6475", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the chalk cavern index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6476", + "query": "what explains why the ruby lowland sweep worker re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6477", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the plum creek assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6478", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre gorge entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6479", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive reef entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6480", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the lilac isthmus edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6481", + "query": "what explains why the teal lowland escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6482", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the violet bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6483", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine atoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6484", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand lagoon telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6485", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the cobalt bluff quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6486", + "query": "what explains why the ashen marsh specimen locker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6487", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the orange crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6488", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal butte escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6489", + "query": "what goes wrong with the magenta lowland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6490", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the umber orchard telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6491", + "query": "what explains why the navy meadow telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6492", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the silver atoll assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6493", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet strait edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6494", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna forest edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6495", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the ochre forest specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6496", + "query": "what explains why the beige brook replay buffer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6497", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the sage tundra replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6498", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige plateau entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6499", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz dune entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6500", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the copper island provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6501", + "query": "what explains why the copper plateau token vault re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6502", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the ochre cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6503", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard pond lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6504", + "query": "what goes wrong with the vermilion moor lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6505", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the scarlet orchard sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6506", + "query": "what explains why the emerald bayou token vault mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6507", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the ebony marsh escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6508", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon cavern index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6509", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre orchard index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6510", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the birch summit ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6511", + "query": "what explains why the onyx canyon entropy siphon saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6512", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the mauve valley shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6513", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal cliff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6514", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive knoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6515", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the verdigris savanna quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6516", + "query": "what explains why the copper river replay buffer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6517", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the lavender geyser quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6518", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet forest token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6519", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage swamp token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6520", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the quartz grove entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6521", + "query": "what explains why the maroon lake token vault retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6522", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the hazel jungle telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6523", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk summit escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6524", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan cove escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6525", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the walnut lowland index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6526", + "query": "what explains why the olive valley telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6527", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the topaz mesa escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6528", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk brook sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6529", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal geyser sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6530", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the jade crag sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6531", + "query": "what explains why the copper strait ingest job mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6532", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the jade harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6533", + "query": "what is still broken in the amber lake edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6534", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia cavern edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6535", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the amber summit quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6536", + "query": "what explains why the sepia atoll specimen locker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6537", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the saffron cirque quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6538", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender reef quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6539", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre creek quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6540", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the ashen island telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6541", + "query": "what explains why the beige cape lease broker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6542", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the mustard estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6543", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6544", + "query": "what goes wrong with the saffron fjord replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6545", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the vermilion pond quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6546", + "query": "what explains why the walnut knoll escrow chamber retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6547", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the quartz harbor sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6548", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo plateau lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6549", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige swamp lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6550", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the cedar cliff ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6551", + "query": "what explains why the crimson pond telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6552", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the olive badland specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6553", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy heath escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6554", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige dale escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6555", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the granite forest entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6556", + "query": "what explains why the crimson creek sweep worker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6557", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the quartz quarry replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6558", + "query": "what is still broken in the crimson gorge index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6559", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat prairie index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6560", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the bronze lowland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6561", + "query": "what explains why the golden crag escrow chamber saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6562", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the granite dale calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6563", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber island edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6564", + "query": "what goes wrong with the vermilion barrens edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6565", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the cedar delta token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6566", + "query": "what explains why the ebony gorge entropy siphon undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6567", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the tan pond calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6568", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe oasis edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6569", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6570", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the indigo barrens telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6571", + "query": "what explains why the lavender cavern assay station retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6572", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the cedar cavern quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6573", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6574", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive island specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6575", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the lavender dune token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6576", + "query": "what explains why the willow lagoon index writer re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6577", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the opal plateau replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6578", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6579", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6580", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the ashen geyser provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6581", + "query": "what explains why the salmon atoll quorum relay mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6582", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the maroon geyser lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6583", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk delta calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6584", + "query": "what goes wrong with the auburn rapids calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6585", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the auburn crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6586", + "query": "what explains why the mustard swamp assay station saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6587", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the sand glade telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6588", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6589", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan marsh escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6590", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the sand creek provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6591", + "query": "what explains why the opal barrens sweep worker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6592", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the orange knoll lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6593", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden oasis entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6594", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut badland entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6595", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the mustard brook escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6596", + "query": "what explains why the lilac lowland sweep worker retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6597", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the beige isthmus telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6598", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat crag specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6599", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn gulch specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6600", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the bronze cavern escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6601", + "query": "what explains why the silver shore token vault re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6602", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the umber moor assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6603", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade fjord index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6604", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz forest index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6605", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the jade cirque assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6606", + "query": "what explains why the tan isthmus telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6607", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the hazel bluff specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6608", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet wharf escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6609", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite wharf escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6610", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the amber wharf sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6611", + "query": "what explains why the auburn island telemetry mast saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6612", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the auburn oasis shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6613", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand dale provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6614", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel strait provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6615", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the walnut quarry specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6616", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon canyon token vault undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6617", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ebony dune provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6618", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl cirque ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6619", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz moor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6620", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the walnut harbor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6621", + "query": "what explains why the fawn dune edge cache retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6622", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the lilac inlet ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6623", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar lagoon sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6624", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl hollow sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6625", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the orange creek assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6626", + "query": "what explains why the teal moor telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6627", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the olive crag ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6628", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper oasis token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6629", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum meadow token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6630", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the jade valley replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6631", + "query": "what explains why the silver quarry replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6632", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the bronze mesa entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6633", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan cliff ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6634", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral fjord ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6635", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the lilac lake index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6636", + "query": "what explains why the magenta inlet index writer saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6637", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the quartz butte shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6638", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre inlet shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6639", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx geyser shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6640", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the opal dale sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6641", + "query": "what explains why the indigo shore provenance ledger undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6642", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the lilac delta quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6643", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden isthmus index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6644", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper lagoon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6645", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the scarlet lowland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6646", + "query": "what explains why the emerald cove edge cache retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6647", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the orange estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6648", + "query": "what is still broken in the bronze delta telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6649", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon lagoon telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6650", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the wheat oasis index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6651", + "query": "what explains why the violet shore provenance ledger re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6652", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the birch valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6653", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve quarry provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6654", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon jungle provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6655", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the verdigris cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6656", + "query": "what explains why the maroon quarry replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6657", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the crimson quarry escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6658", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender delta entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6659", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt orchard entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6660", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the lilac cape index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6661", + "query": "what explains why the lilac cavern token vault saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6662", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the quartz glade shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6663", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon gulch entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6664", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter harbor entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6665", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the verdigris delta escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6666", + "query": "what explains why the plum hill escrow chamber undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6667", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the scarlet bayou shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6668", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber pond index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6669", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow fjord index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6670", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the wheat atoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6671", + "query": "what explains why the jade plateau index writer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6672", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the maroon pond escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6673", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz geyser entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6674", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange gulch entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6675", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the granite lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6676", + "query": "what explains why the copper savanna escrow chamber re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6677", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the golden cape provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6678", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6679", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon gulch calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6680", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the cyan canyon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6681", + "query": "what explains why the bronze canyon index writer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6682", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the sepia reef escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6683", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard glacier escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6684", + "query": "what goes wrong with the emerald glacier escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6685", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the ashen summit escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6686", + "query": "what explains why the ruby knoll telemetry mast saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6687", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the indigo reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6688", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris wharf telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6689", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson inlet telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6690", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the opal ravine specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6691", + "query": "what explains why the emerald pond index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6692", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the granite creek ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6693", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal butte lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6694", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy reef lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6695", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the slate pond telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6696", + "query": "what explains why the mustard harbor shard router retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6697", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the cedar river escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6698", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz glade edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6699", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mauve cove edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6700", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the violet strait index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6701", + "query": "what explains why the onyx hollow assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6702", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the mustard dell calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6703", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand forest token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6704", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt estuary token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6705", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the salmon delta index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6706", + "query": "what explains why the salmon dell ingest job mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6707", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the russet forest replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6708", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy pond provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6709", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy lowland provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6710", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the teal harbor assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6711", + "query": "what explains why the copper reef edge cache saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6712", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the sand isthmus sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6713", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy island edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6714", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch marsh edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6715", + "query": "fawn strait ingest job compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6716", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the fawn strait ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6717", + "query": "which ingest job picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L1", + "key": "c000g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6718", + "query": "beige ridge shard router parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6719", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the beige ridge shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6720", + "query": "which shard router picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L2", + "key": "c001g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6721", + "query": "topaz ridge entropy siphon parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6722", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the topaz ridge entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6723", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L3", + "key": "c002g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6724", + "query": "emerald prairie escrow chamber spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6725", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the emerald prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6726", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L4", + "key": "c003g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6727", + "query": "auburn cirque entropy siphon drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6728", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the auburn cirque entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6729", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L5", + "key": "c004g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6730", + "query": "maroon hill index writer spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6731", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the maroon hill index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6732", + "query": "which index writer picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L6", + "key": "c005g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6733", + "query": "teal prairie sweep worker probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6734", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the teal prairie sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6735", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L7", + "key": "c006g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6736", + "query": "amber pond escrow chamber spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6737", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the amber pond escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6738", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L8", + "key": "c007g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6739", + "query": "cedar canyon edge cache checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6740", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the cedar canyon edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6741", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L9", + "key": "c008g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6742", + "query": "copper cove provenance ledger checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6743", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the copper cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6744", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L10", + "key": "c009g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6745", + "query": "lilac dale telemetry mast backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6746", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the lilac dale telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6747", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L11", + "key": "c010g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6748", + "query": "jade quarry provenance ledger dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6749", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the jade quarry provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6750", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L12", + "key": "c011g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6751", + "query": "teal grove sweep worker probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6752", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the teal grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6753", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L13", + "key": "c012g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6754", + "query": "taupe delta shard router lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6755", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the taupe delta shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6756", + "query": "which shard router picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L14", + "key": "c013g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6757", + "query": "scarlet glacier calibration bench grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6758", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the scarlet glacier calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6759", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L15", + "key": "c014g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6760", + "query": "ochre harbor escrow chamber checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6761", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the ochre harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6762", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L16", + "key": "c015g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6763", + "query": "sand orchard replay buffer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6764", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the sand orchard replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6765", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L17", + "key": "c016g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6766", + "query": "beige lake sweep worker rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6767", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the beige lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6768", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L18", + "key": "c017g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6769", + "query": "lilac glade ingest job flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6770", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the lilac glade ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6771", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often it writes out around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L19", + "key": "c018g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6772", + "query": "jade shore token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6773", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the jade shore token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6774", + "query": "which token vault picked how often it tries again around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L20", + "key": "c019g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6775", + "query": "golden barrens telemetry mast dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6776", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the golden barrens telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6777", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L21", + "key": "c020g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6778", + "query": "umber rapids entropy siphon quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6779", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the umber rapids entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6780", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L22", + "key": "c021g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6781", + "query": "beige inlet provenance ledger quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6782", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the beige inlet provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6783", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L23", + "key": "c022g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6784", + "query": "scarlet fjord edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6785", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the scarlet fjord edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6786", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often it tries again around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L24", + "key": "c023g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6787", + "query": "granite estuary sweep worker probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6788", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the granite estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6789", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L25", + "key": "c024g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6790", + "query": "onyx pond shard router decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6791", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the onyx pond shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6792", + "query": "which shard router picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L26", + "key": "c025g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6793", + "query": "vermilion mesa telemetry mast lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6794", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the vermilion mesa telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6795", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L27", + "key": "c026g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6796", + "query": "umber lowland specimen locker backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6797", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the umber lowland specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6798", + "query": "which specimen locker picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L28", + "key": "c027g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6799", + "query": "mauve geyser sweep worker confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6800", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the mauve geyser sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6801", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L29", + "key": "c028g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6802", + "query": "cedar estuary edge cache eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6803", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the cedar estuary edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6804", + "query": "which edge cache picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L30", + "key": "c029g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6805", + "query": "fawn badland assay station dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6806", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the fawn badland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6807", + "query": "which assay station picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L31", + "key": "c030g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6808", + "query": "cyan glacier ingest job lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6809", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the cyan glacier ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6810", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L32", + "key": "c031g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6811", + "query": "copper wharf edge cache rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6812", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the copper wharf edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6813", + "query": "which edge cache picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L33", + "key": "c032g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6814", + "query": "topaz dale specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6815", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the topaz dale specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6816", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often it tries again around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L34", + "key": "c033g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6817", + "query": "indigo cliff lease broker batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6818", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the indigo cliff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6819", + "query": "which lease broker picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L35", + "key": "c034g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6820", + "query": "cobalt dell provenance ledger compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6821", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the cobalt dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6822", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L36", + "key": "c035g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6823", + "query": "lilac hollow index writer compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6824", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the lilac hollow index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6825", + "query": "which index writer picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L37", + "key": "c036g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6826", + "query": "fawn cirque edge cache drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6827", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the fawn cirque edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6828", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L38", + "key": "c037g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6829", + "query": "coral savanna index writer spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6830", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the coral savanna index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6831", + "query": "which index writer picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L39", + "key": "c038g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6832", + "query": "ochre ridge token vault parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6833", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the ochre ridge token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6834", + "query": "which token vault picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L40", + "key": "c039g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6835", + "query": "cedar bayou calibration bench gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6836", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the cedar bayou calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6837", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L41", + "key": "c040g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6838", + "query": "wheat gulch telemetry mast eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6839", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the wheat gulch telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6840", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L42", + "key": "c041g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6841", + "query": "golden island calibration bench compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6842", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the golden island calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6843", + "query": "which calibration bench picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L43", + "key": "c042g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6844", + "query": "amber strait sweep worker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6845", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the amber strait sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6846", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L44", + "key": "c043g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6847", + "query": "tan savanna specimen locker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6848", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the tan savanna specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6849", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L45", + "key": "c044g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6850", + "query": "silver dune lease broker confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6851", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the silver dune lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6852", + "query": "which lease broker picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L46", + "key": "c045g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6853", + "query": "carmine bayou provenance ledger quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6854", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the carmine bayou provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6855", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L47", + "key": "c046g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6856", + "query": "maroon moor index writer stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6857", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the maroon moor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6858", + "query": "which index writer picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L48", + "key": "c047g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6859", + "query": "sage jungle escrow chamber compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6860", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the sage jungle escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6861", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L49", + "key": "c048g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6862", + "query": "ebony heath assay station batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6863", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the ebony heath assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6864", + "query": "which assay station picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L50", + "key": "c049g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6865", + "query": "crimson glacier provenance ledger snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6866", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the crimson glacier provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6867", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L51", + "key": "c050g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6868", + "query": "magenta glacier replay buffer batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6869", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the magenta glacier replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6870", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L52", + "key": "c051g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6871", + "query": "walnut dell assay station decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6872", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the walnut dell assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6873", + "query": "which assay station picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L53", + "key": "c052g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6874", + "query": "onyx forest assay station backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6875", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the onyx forest assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6876", + "query": "which assay station picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L54", + "key": "c053g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6877", + "query": "olive orchard index writer spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6878", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the olive orchard index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6879", + "query": "which index writer picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L55", + "key": "c054g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6880", + "query": "tan inlet replay buffer stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6881", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the tan inlet replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6882", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L56", + "key": "c055g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6883", + "query": "coral brook edge cache probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6884", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the coral brook edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6885", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L57", + "key": "c056g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6886", + "query": "saffron summit provenance ledger dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6887", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the saffron summit provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6888", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L58", + "key": "c057g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6889", + "query": "granite savanna specimen locker flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6890", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the granite savanna specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6891", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often it writes out around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L59", + "key": "c058g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6892", + "query": "mauve wharf telemetry mast eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6893", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the mauve wharf telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6894", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L60", + "key": "c059g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6895", + "query": "birch atoll escrow chamber backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6896", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the birch atoll escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6897", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L61", + "key": "c060g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6898", + "query": "wheat bluff lease broker fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6899", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the wheat bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6900", + "query": "which lease broker picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L62", + "key": "c061g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6901", + "query": "saffron dale sweep worker lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6902", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the saffron dale sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6903", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L63", + "key": "c062g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6904", + "query": "pewter cliff assay station sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6905", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the pewter cliff assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6906", + "query": "which assay station picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L64", + "key": "c063g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6907", + "query": "copper atoll telemetry mast decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6908", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the copper atoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6909", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L65", + "key": "c064g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6910", + "query": "pearl badland calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6911", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the pearl badland calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6912", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how often it tries again around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L66", + "key": "c065g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6913", + "query": "saffron estuary replay buffer gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6914", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the saffron estuary replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6915", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L67", + "key": "c066g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6916", + "query": "sienna glacier escrow chamber quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6917", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the sienna glacier escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6918", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L68", + "key": "c067g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6919", + "query": "cobalt atoll shard router probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6920", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the cobalt atoll shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6921", + "query": "which shard router picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L69", + "key": "c068g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6922", + "query": "copper ravine quorum relay compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6923", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the copper ravine quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6924", + "query": "which quorum relay picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L70", + "key": "c069g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6925", + "query": "willow isthmus replay buffer batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6926", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the willow isthmus replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6927", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L71", + "key": "c070g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6928", + "query": "pearl savanna specimen locker fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6929", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the pearl savanna specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6930", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L72", + "key": "c071g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6931", + "query": "willow brook telemetry mast stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6932", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the willow brook telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6933", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L73", + "key": "c072g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6934", + "query": "ashen wharf edge cache stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6935", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the ashen wharf edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6936", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L74", + "key": "c073g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6937", + "query": "birch cirque token vault compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6938", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the birch cirque token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6939", + "query": "which token vault picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L75", + "key": "c074g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6940", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6941", + "query": "why does the teal gulch edge cache uses a drain deadline of 482 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6942", + "query": "why does the sage cirque index writer uses a quota refresh of 950 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6943", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar dell specimen locker inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6944", + "query": "why does the crimson lake ingest job uses a checkpoint cadence of 233 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6945", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the plum tarn telemetry mast churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6946", + "query": "why does the cedar harbor sweep worker uses a warmup allowance of 298 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6947", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper glacier telemetry mast stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6948", + "query": "why does the cinnamon grove lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 653 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6949", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange reef entropy siphon thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6950", + "query": "why does the copper oasis token vault uses a dedupe horizon of 75 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6951", + "query": "why does the chalk bayou lease broker uses a checkpoint cadence of 571 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6952", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine lake calibration bench stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6953", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ochre forest specimen locker misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6954", + "query": "why does the umber pond index writer uses a stall tolerance of 491 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6955", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6956", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the birch cove escrow chamber duplicates its fence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6957", + "query": "why does the ochre mesa edge cache uses a fan-out limit of 257 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6958", + "query": "why does the cinnamon ridge telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 924 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6959", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the willow mesa index writer inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6960", + "query": "why does the umber dale token vault uses a backoff ceiling of 766 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6961", + "query": "why does the ashen meadow telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 818 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6962", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ebony jungle escrow chamber saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6963", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna savanna index writer misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6964", + "query": "why does the orange barrens sweep worker uses a grace period of 742 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6965", + "query": "why does the opal strait token vault uses a quota refresh of 493 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6966", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper isthmus index writer thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6967", + "query": "why does the fawn ravine ingest job uses a warmup allowance of 822 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6968", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine orchard edge cache saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6969", + "query": "why does the russet lagoon assay station uses a retry budget of 302 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6970", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mustard valley assay station orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6971", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the fawn dale lease broker skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6972", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite island token vault duplicates its fence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6973", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris savanna quorum relay overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6974", + "query": "why does the violet river entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 744 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6975", + "query": "why does the coral ridge entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 898 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6976", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris island ingest job splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6977", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the jade glacier replay buffer churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6978", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pewter prairie index writer starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6979", + "query": "why does the sage mesa replay buffer uses a compaction floor of 432 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6980", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the indigo gulch calibration bench staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6981", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber reef sweep worker churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6982", + "query": "why does the navy cove sweep worker uses a batch size of 192 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6983", + "query": "why does the auburn bayou token vault uses a gossip interval of 523 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6984", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ochre rapids telemetry mast stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6985", + "query": "why does the opal cavern token vault uses a quota refresh of 757 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6986", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the indigo barrens telemetry mast clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6987", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the bronze lowland assay station clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6988", + "query": "why does the coral geyser specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 831 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6989", + "query": "why does the topaz butte escrow chamber uses a dedupe horizon of 569 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6990", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the tan wharf escrow chamber misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6991", + "query": "why does the hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6992", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac lake index writer reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6993", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine harbor specimen locker shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6994", + "query": "why does the saffron rapids ingest job uses a rewind cursor lag of 341 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6995", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the vermilion pond quorum relay saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6996", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange lowland telemetry mast stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6997", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the amber wharf sweep worker overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6998", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz creek escrow chamber reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6999", + "query": "why does the ochre cirque token vault uses a checkpoint cadence of 755 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7000", + "query": "why does the umber cirque escrow chamber uses a stall tolerance of 660 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7001", + "query": "why does the russet lagoon assay station uses a retry budget of 302 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7002", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite hollow shard router churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7003", + "query": "why does the opal bluff entropy siphon uses a fan-out limit of 285 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7004", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper isthmus index writer thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7005", + "query": "why does the mustard glacier escrow chamber uses a batch size of 647 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7006", + "query": "why does the russet gulch assay station uses a lease window of 454 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7007", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the russet wharf token vault stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7008", + "query": "why does the cedar harbor sweep worker uses a warmup allowance of 298 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7009", + "query": "why does the lavender reef quorum relay uses a rewind cursor lag of 116 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7010", + "query": "why does the auburn bayou token vault uses a gossip interval of 523 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7011", + "query": "why does the willow dell index writer uses a grace period of 53 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7012", + "query": "why does the plum strait telemetry mast uses a grace period of 157 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7013", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ivory marsh escrow chamber drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7014", + "query": "why does the lavender gorge sweep worker uses a quarantine window of 25 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7015", + "query": "why does the taupe mesa specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 547 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7016", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the fawn tarn replay buffer orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7017", + "query": "why does the hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7018", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the golden cliff escrow chamber stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7019", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender lowland quorum relay stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7020", + "query": "why does the slate cirque index writer uses a grace period of 868 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7021", + "query": "why does the slate dune telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 764 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7022", + "query": "why does the copper forest assay station uses a retry budget of 666 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7023", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the auburn estuary token vault overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7024", + "query": "why does the hazel valley replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 276 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7025", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the beige barrens token vault drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7026", + "query": "why does the russet gulch assay station uses a lease window of 454 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7027", + "query": "why does the beige glacier specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 848 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7028", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pewter prairie index writer starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7029", + "query": "why does the russet strait edge cache uses a grace period of 625 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7030", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt bluff quorum relay shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7031", + "query": "why does the salmon tarn index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 506 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7032", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris estuary replay buffer lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7033", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mustard shore ingest job orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7034", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sepia heath telemetry mast flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7035", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite hollow shard router churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7036", + "query": "why does the cinnamon rapids sweep worker uses a checkpoint cadence of 443 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7037", + "query": "why does the golden summit telemetry mast uses a confidence floor of 727 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7038", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar dell specimen locker inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7039", + "query": "why does the sand harbor token vault uses a drain deadline of 703 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7040", + "query": "why does the violet lowland specimen locker uses a warmup allowance of 965 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7041", + "query": "why does the violet forest token vault uses a probe timeout of 885 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7042", + "query": "why does the violet reef escrow chamber uses a probe timeout of 495 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7043", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the chalk cavern index writer skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7044", + "query": "why does the orange barrens sweep worker uses a grace period of 742 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7045", + "query": "why does the golden orchard shard router uses a retry budget of 478 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7046", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ochre glade lease broker inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7047", + "query": "why does the orange butte quorum relay uses a decay half-life of 181 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7048", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the crimson delta sweep worker misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7049", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper geyser token vault duplicates its fence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7050", + "query": "why does the teal cape assay station uses a quota refresh of 211 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7051", + "query": "why does the cedar brook quorum relay uses a quota refresh of 887 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7052", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the violet estuary shard router clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7053", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral meadow assay station churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7054", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the jade crag sweep worker echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7055", + "query": "why does the ochre marsh ingest job uses a confidence floor of 287 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7056", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive lake escrow chamber flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7057", + "query": "why does the sand grove ingest job uses a parity stripe of 419 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7058", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the birch badland entropy siphon drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7059", + "query": "why does the emerald savanna shard router uses a confidence floor of 248 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7060", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac cape index writer leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7061", + "query": "why does the jade hill quorum relay uses a drain deadline of 51 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7062", + "query": "why does the tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7063", + "query": "why does the lavender reef quorum relay uses a rewind cursor lag of 116 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7064", + "query": "why does the pearl glacier replay buffer uses a lease window of 519 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7065", + "query": "why does the opal cavern token vault uses a quota refresh of 757 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7066", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sage harbor lease broker churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7067", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat badland assay station stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7068", + "query": "why does the topaz glade edge cache uses a confidence floor of 803 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7069", + "query": "why does the lavender jungle provenance ledger uses a grace period of 471 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7070", + "query": "why does the salmon plateau specimen locker uses a retry budget of 562 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7071", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris delta escrow chamber splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7072", + "query": "why does the vermilion knoll sweep worker uses a snapshot depth of 686 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7073", + "query": "why does the saffron rapids ingest job uses a rewind cursor lag of 341 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7074", + "query": "why does the cedar cirque shard router uses a quota refresh of 883 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7075", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ochre forest specimen locker misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7076", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the topaz inlet edge cache saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7077", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sepia island specimen locker reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7078", + "query": "why does the auburn reef provenance ledger uses a probe timeout of 649 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7079", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mustard brook escrow chamber churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7080", + "query": "why does the crimson glade edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 196 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7081", + "query": "why does the willow lowland lease broker uses a lease window of 155 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7082", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite brook provenance ledger starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7083", + "query": "why does the taupe dell entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 770 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7084", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the hazel cove escrow chamber lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7085", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the vermilion tarn provenance ledger leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7086", + "query": "why does the golden summit telemetry mast uses a confidence floor of 727 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7087", + "query": "why does the ochre marsh ingest job uses a confidence floor of 287 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7088", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the beige barrens token vault drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7089", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange lowland telemetry mast stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7090", + "query": "why does the ochre mesa edge cache uses a fan-out limit of 257 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7091", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the fawn brook lease broker stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7092", + "query": "why does the orange heath escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 374 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7093", + "query": "why does the umber isthmus quorum relay uses a drain deadline of 558 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7094", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the emerald butte index writer saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7095", + "query": "why does the salmon barrens assay station uses a checkpoint cadence of 456 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7096", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cyan ravine calibration bench overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7097", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7098", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the beige cirque edge cache inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7099", + "query": "why does the sand dale provenance ledger uses a lease window of 896 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7100", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat ravine escrow chamber flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7101", + "query": "why does the teal mesa token vault uses a fan-out limit of 391 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7102", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ebony jungle escrow chamber saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7103", + "query": "why does the violet badland replay buffer uses a flush interval of 101 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7104", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ruby bayou calibration bench starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7105", + "query": "why does the chalk brook sweep worker uses a fan-out limit of 12 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7106", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mauve shore escrow chamber leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7107", + "query": "why does the ashen meadow telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 818 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7108", + "query": "why does the bronze reef sweep worker uses a retry budget of 614 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7109", + "query": "why does the saffron orchard lease broker uses a snapshot depth of 142 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7110", + "query": "why does the navy cavern escrow chamber uses a rewind cursor lag of 452 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7111", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7112", + "query": "why does the golden geyser escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 530 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7113", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna mesa sweep worker stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7114", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cyan ravine calibration bench overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7115", + "query": "why does the fawn cape telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 623 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7116", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive dune sweep worker orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7117", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl reef lease broker starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7118", + "query": "why does the topaz pond sweep worker uses a snapshot depth of 857 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7119", + "query": "why does the jade fjord index writer uses a fan-out limit of 792 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7120", + "query": "why does the orange bayou lease broker uses a quota refresh of 270 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7121", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cinnamon oasis provenance ledger stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7122", + "query": "why does the navy island edge cache uses a sampling stride of 959 readings?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7123", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl reef lease broker starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7124", + "query": "why does the lavender heath telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 586 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7125", + "query": "why does the ashen meadow telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 818 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7126", + "query": "why does the carmine bluff token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 389 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7127", + "query": "why does the slate dune telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 764 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7128", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar cliff ingest job inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7129", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate pond telemetry mast misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7130", + "query": "why does the hazel valley replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 276 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7131", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz dell index writer orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7132", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac isthmus edge cache stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7133", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite lagoon provenance ledger echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7134", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7135", + "query": "why does the cedar gorge calibration bench uses a snapshot depth of 415 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7136", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7137", + "query": "why does the topaz barrens specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 679 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7138", + "query": "why does the chalk reef assay station uses a batch size of 805 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7139", + "query": "why does the sand harbor token vault uses a drain deadline of 703 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7140", + "query": "why does the auburn bayou token vault uses a gossip interval of 523 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7141", + "query": "why does the hazel valley replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 276 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7142", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the jade dune edge cache echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7143", + "query": "why does the sand forest token vault uses a snapshot depth of 855 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7144", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sepia heath telemetry mast flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7145", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ashen estuary token vault spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7146", + "query": "why does the ebony ridge entropy siphon uses a flush interval of 378 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7147", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris estuary replay buffer lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7148", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the maroon estuary token vault churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7149", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the chalk tundra ingest job splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7150", + "query": "why does the crimson island index writer uses a lease window of 400 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7151", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the teal harbor assay station splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7152", + "query": "why does the orange plateau quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 467 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7153", + "query": "why does the sand forest token vault uses a snapshot depth of 855 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7154", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7155", + "query": "why does the auburn savanna assay station uses a fan-out limit of 365 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7156", + "query": "why does the fawn cape telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 623 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7157", + "query": "why does the topaz pond sweep worker uses a snapshot depth of 857 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7158", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris estuary replay buffer lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7159", + "query": "why does the russet inlet telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 441 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7160", + "query": "why does the indigo plateau lease broker uses a dedupe horizon of 220 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7161", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ochre forest specimen locker misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7162", + "query": "why does the coral geyser specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 831 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7163", + "query": "why does the magenta geyser calibration bench uses a spill threshold of 842 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7164", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the jade reef specimen locker orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7165", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the emerald gulch assay station leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7166", + "query": "why does the chalk bayou lease broker uses a checkpoint cadence of 571 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7167", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl crag escrow chamber spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7168", + "query": "why does the golden geyser escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 530 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7169", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper prairie quorum relay overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7170", + "query": "why does the slate hill index writer uses a backoff ceiling of 816 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7171", + "query": "why does the teal butte escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 573 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7172", + "query": "why does the birch quarry shard router uses a warmup allowance of 820 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7173", + "query": "why does the cinnamon swamp ingest job uses a parity stripe of 38 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7174", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar creek specimen locker stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7175", + "query": "why does the vermilion knoll sweep worker uses a snapshot depth of 686 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7176", + "query": "why does the ivory island shard router uses a snapshot depth of 900 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7177", + "query": "why does the pewter glacier assay station uses a spill threshold of 829 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7178", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the silver gorge provenance ledger stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7179", + "query": "why does the orange inlet entropy siphon uses a quarantine window of 402 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7180", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mauve shore escrow chamber leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7181", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the tan wharf escrow chamber misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7182", + "query": "why does the copper canyon replay buffer uses a grace period of 311 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7183", + "query": "why does the lavender heath telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 586 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7184", + "query": "why does the beige glacier specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 848 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7185", + "query": "why does the willow hollow index writer uses a decay half-life of 725 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7186", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the topaz wharf specimen locker inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7187", + "query": "why does the sorrel swamp index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 328 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7188", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive mesa replay buffer leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7189", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the willow mesa index writer inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7190", + "query": "why does the saffron orchard lease broker uses a snapshot depth of 142 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7191", + "query": "why does the lavender lake specimen locker uses a checkpoint cadence of 480 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7192", + "query": "why does the golden summit telemetry mast uses a confidence floor of 727 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7193", + "query": "why does the copper cape escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 497 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7194", + "query": "why does the ochre cliff replay buffer uses a quarantine window of 168 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7195", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the scarlet orchard sweep worker flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7196", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7197", + "query": "why does the ochre marsh ingest job uses a confidence floor of 287 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7198", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat butte entropy siphon misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7199", + "query": "why does the crimson gorge index writer uses a spill threshold of 324 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7200", + "query": "why does the ochre cirque token vault uses a checkpoint cadence of 755 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7201", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl tundra assay station splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7202", + "query": "why does the copper inlet lease broker uses a spill threshold of 874 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7203", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the hazel shore quorum relay inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7204", + "query": "why does the lavender hill specimen locker uses a confidence floor of 259 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7205", + "query": "why does the birch quarry shard router uses a warmup allowance of 820 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7206", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper geyser token vault duplicates its fence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7207", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the salmon delta index writer flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7208", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber reef sweep worker churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7209", + "query": "why does the copper forest assay station uses a retry budget of 666 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7210", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the jade jungle ingest job drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7211", + "query": "why does the sage mesa replay buffer uses a compaction floor of 432 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7212", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the indigo hill token vault churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7213", + "query": "why does the ochre gorge entropy siphon uses a backoff ceiling of 469 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7214", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the violet delta ingest job saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7215", + "query": "why does the ochre cirque token vault uses a checkpoint cadence of 755 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7216", + "query": "why does the slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7217", + "query": "why does the sorrel lowland calibration bench uses a quarantine window of 393 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7218", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the amber wharf sweep worker overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7219", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite hollow shard router churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7220", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate rapids replay buffer stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7221", + "query": "why does the cobalt harbor escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 636 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7222", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the onyx ravine replay buffer echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7223", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate rapids replay buffer stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7224", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender valley sweep worker thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7225", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna bluff lease broker misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7226", + "query": "why does the russet strait edge cache uses a grace period of 625 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7227", + "query": "why does the tan rapids edge cache uses a checkpoint cadence of 978 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7228", + "query": "why does the cyan plateau quorum relay uses a rewind cursor lag of 218 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7229", + "query": "why does the carmine atoll telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 521 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7230", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the chalk heath escrow chamber spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7231", + "query": "why does the slate dune telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 764 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7232", + "query": "why does the azure estuary assay station uses a flush interval of 612 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7233", + "query": "why does the cedar brook quorum relay uses a quota refresh of 887 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7234", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac lake index writer reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7235", + "query": "why does the golden orchard shard router uses a retry budget of 478 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7236", + "query": "why does the jade atoll ingest job uses a flush interval of 738 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7237", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna wharf entropy siphon drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7238", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the topaz cove shard router echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7239", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ochre glade lease broker inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7240", + "query": "why does the ivory lowland sweep worker uses a quota refresh of 946 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7241", + "query": "why does the beige plateau entropy siphon uses a backoff ceiling of 677 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7242", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the maroon estuary token vault churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7243", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat butte entropy siphon misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7244", + "query": "why does the opal savanna telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 504 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7245", + "query": "why does the walnut geyser provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7246", + "query": "why does the hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7247", + "query": "why does the coral ridge entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 898 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7248", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna savanna index writer misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7249", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the birch summit ingest job inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7250", + "query": "why does the fawn lake shard router uses a backoff ceiling of 913 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7251", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine lake calibration bench stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7252", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber reef sweep worker churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7253", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the beige river shard router overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7254", + "query": "why does the fawn ravine ingest job uses a warmup allowance of 822 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7255", + "query": "why does the taupe bluff index writer uses a flush interval of 140 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7256", + "query": "why does the salmon knoll calibration bench uses a fan-out limit of 595 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7257", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the golden knoll calibration bench skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7258", + "query": "why does the sienna glade ingest job uses a backoff ceiling of 627 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7259", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the salmon harbor edge cache spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7260", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the teal island assay station spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7261", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ivory marsh escrow chamber drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7262", + "query": "why does the walnut geyser provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7263", + "query": "why does the birch quarry shard router uses a warmup allowance of 820 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7264", + "query": "why does the walnut grove escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 701 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7265", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the onyx cape sweep worker saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7266", + "query": "why does the hazel glade telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 870 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7267", + "query": "why does the bronze reef sweep worker uses a retry budget of 614 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7268", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive prairie specimen locker misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7269", + "query": "why does the navy heath escrow chamber uses a lease window of 272 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7270", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite hollow shard router churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7271", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the russet isthmus escrow chamber stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7272", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta lake telemetry mast splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7273", + "query": "why does the pewter cape escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 976 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7274", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7275", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut lowland index writer churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7276", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mustard oasis lease broker inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7277", + "query": "why does the opal strait token vault uses a quota refresh of 493 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7278", + "query": "why does the cinnamon grove lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 653 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7279", + "query": "why does the hazel glade telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 870 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7280", + "query": "why does the salmon barrens assay station uses a checkpoint cadence of 456 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7281", + "query": "why does the auburn dale provenance ledger uses a rewind cursor lag of 545 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7282", + "query": "why does the carmine bluff token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 389 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7283", + "query": "why does the taupe dell entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 770 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7284", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7285", + "query": "why does the coral ridge entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 898 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7286", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber reef sweep worker churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7287", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure summit shard router reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7288", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the fawn brook lease broker stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7289", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat moor calibration bench spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7290", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the indigo gulch calibration bench staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7291", + "query": "why does the saffron pond shard router uses a spill threshold of 705 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7292", + "query": "why does the coral dale assay station uses a compaction floor of 36 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7293", + "query": "why does the salmon gorge replay buffer uses a parity stripe of 894 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7294", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ivory knoll entropy siphon misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7295", + "query": "why does the emerald ravine index writer uses a retry budget of 621 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7296", + "query": "why does the scarlet jungle provenance ledger uses a grace period of 205 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7297", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt bluff quorum relay shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7298", + "query": "why does the copper forest assay station uses a retry budget of 666 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7299", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the maroon estuary token vault churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7300", + "query": "why does the carmine atoll telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 521 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7301", + "query": "why does the ochre inlet shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 179 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7302", + "query": "why does the cinnamon moor index writer uses a warmup allowance of 406 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7303", + "query": "why does the bronze reef sweep worker uses a retry budget of 614 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7304", + "query": "why does the cyan plateau quorum relay uses a rewind cursor lag of 218 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7305", + "query": "why does the granite ravine ingest job uses a lease window of 961 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7306", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar delta token vault splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7307", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the salmon oasis telemetry mast reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7308", + "query": "why does the taupe rapids escrow chamber uses a retry budget of 718 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7309", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine inlet lease broker clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7310", + "query": "why does the scarlet wharf escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 844 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7311", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut lowland index writer churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7312", + "query": "why does the cyan plateau quorum relay uses a rewind cursor lag of 218 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7313", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut mesa calibration bench starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7314", + "query": "why does the golden summit telemetry mast uses a confidence floor of 727 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7315", + "query": "why does the cobalt harbor escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 636 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7316", + "query": "why does the lavender delta entropy siphon uses a confidence floor of 387 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7317", + "query": "why does the ebony ridge entropy siphon uses a flush interval of 378 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7318", + "query": "why does the beige geyser escrow chamber uses a eviction ratio of 768 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7319", + "query": "why does the maroon mesa assay station uses a eviction ratio of 348 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7320", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the fawn heath quorum relay churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7321", + "query": "why does the auburn savanna assay station uses a fan-out limit of 365 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7322", + "query": "why does the maroon gulch entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 439 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7323", + "query": "why does the pearl plateau provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 556 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7324", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure bayou shard router thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7325", + "query": "why does the taupe prairie provenance ledger uses a probe timeout of 582 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7326", + "query": "why does the slate cirque index writer uses a grace period of 868 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7327", + "query": "why does the russet inlet telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 441 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7328", + "query": "why does the fawn valley sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 172 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7329", + "query": "why does the indigo plateau lease broker uses a dedupe horizon of 220 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7330", + "query": "why does the opal butte lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 751 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7331", + "query": "why does the navy hollow entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 807 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7332", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper isthmus index writer thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7333", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the vermilion hill specimen locker clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7334", + "query": "why does the violet badland replay buffer uses a flush interval of 101 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7335", + "query": "why does the golden geyser escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 530 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7336", + "query": "why does the ochre inlet shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 179 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7337", + "query": "why does the topaz barrens specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 679 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7338", + "query": "why does the cyan river shard router uses a confidence floor of 809 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7339", + "query": "why does the navy moor index writer uses a confidence floor of 296 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7340", + "query": "why does the teal gulch edge cache uses a drain deadline of 482 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7341", + "query": "why does the ochre cirque token vault uses a checkpoint cadence of 755 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7342", + "query": "why does the ochre dune index writer uses a sampling stride of 430 readings?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7343", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna mesa sweep worker stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7344", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt cliff entropy siphon lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7345", + "query": "why does the cinnamon cape replay buffer uses a checkpoint cadence of 88 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7346", + "query": "why does the sorrel dell calibration bench uses a stall tolerance of 952 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7347", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz swamp ingest job reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7348", + "query": "why does the slate hill index writer uses a backoff ceiling of 816 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7349", + "query": "why does the hazel forest assay station uses a confidence floor of 779 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7350", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut harbor ingest job leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7351", + "query": "why does the silver jungle escrow chamber uses a grace period of 634 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7352", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate rapids replay buffer stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7353", + "query": "why does the granite ravine ingest job uses a lease window of 961 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7354", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz swamp ingest job reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7355", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut quarry specimen locker orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7356", + "query": "why does the sand cove provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 861 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7357", + "query": "why does the sand harbor token vault uses a drain deadline of 703 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7358", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta cliff token vault reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7359", + "query": "why does the sand cape assay station uses a rewind cursor lag of 313 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7360", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe isthmus entropy siphon starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7361", + "query": "why does the amber delta replay buffer uses a quota refresh of 859 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7362", + "query": "why does the lavender lake specimen locker uses a checkpoint cadence of 480 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7363", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral bayou assay station churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7364", + "query": "why does the willow lowland lease broker uses a lease window of 155 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7365", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the silver orchard escrow chamber churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7366", + "query": "why does the sand cove provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 861 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7367", + "query": "why does the cyan cliff ingest job uses a dedupe horizon of 127 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7368", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the scarlet orchard sweep worker flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7369", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber orchard telemetry mast stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7370", + "query": "why does the ruby geyser provenance ledger uses a batch size of 315 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7371", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the saffron cliff escrow chamber overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7372", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat cavern assay station reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7373", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand hollow assay station overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7374", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine inlet lease broker clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7375", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate bluff lease broker overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7376", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7377", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the russet plateau replay buffer flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7378", + "query": "why does the salmon tarn index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 506 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7379", + "query": "why does the sorrel rapids edge cache uses a spill threshold of 339 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7380", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive harbor specimen locker overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7381", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cyan ravine calibration bench overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7382", + "query": "why does the sepia bayou shard router uses a confidence floor of 235 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7383", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate moor lease broker thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7384", + "query": "why does the orange plateau quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 467 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7385", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut lowland index writer churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7386", + "query": "why does the emerald ravine index writer uses a retry budget of 621 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7387", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe isthmus entropy siphon starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7388", + "query": "why does the ivory rapids replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 361 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7389", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the willow mesa index writer inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7390", + "query": "why does the jade orchard index writer uses a decay half-life of 835 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7391", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral cape quorum relay stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7392", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the salmon oasis telemetry mast reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7393", + "query": "why does the willow lowland lease broker uses a lease window of 155 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7394", + "query": "why does the taupe oasis edge cache uses a quarantine window of 428 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7395", + "query": "why does the opal strait token vault uses a quota refresh of 493 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7396", + "query": "why does the lilac pond shard router uses a batch size of 166 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7397", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt fjord calibration bench stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7398", + "query": "why does the maroon cavern index writer uses a parity stripe of 781 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7399", + "query": "why does the topaz butte escrow chamber uses a dedupe horizon of 569 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7400", + "query": "why does the sorrel dell calibration bench uses a stall tolerance of 952 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7401", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sepia island specimen locker reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7402", + "query": "why does the hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7403", + "query": "why does the golden valley sweep worker uses a confidence floor of 662 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7404", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate estuary replay buffer reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7405", + "query": "why does the pewter hollow telemetry mast uses a grace period of 49 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7406", + "query": "why does the cinnamon swamp ingest job uses a parity stripe of 38 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7407", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe isthmus entropy siphon starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7408", + "query": "why does the violet river entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 744 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7409", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris savanna quorum relay overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7410", + "query": "why does the chalk summit escrow chamber uses a dedupe horizon of 937 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7411", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut lowland index writer churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7412", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut lowland index writer churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7413", + "query": "why does the saffron orchard lease broker uses a snapshot depth of 142 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7414", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta lake telemetry mast splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7415", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber orchard telemetry mast stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7416", + "query": "why does the crimson lake ingest job uses a checkpoint cadence of 233 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7417", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the auburn estuary token vault overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7418", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pewter prairie index writer starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7419", + "query": "why does the taupe oasis edge cache uses a quarantine window of 428 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7420", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange reef entropy siphon thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7421", + "query": "why does the topaz barrens specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 679 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7422", + "query": "why does the cinnamon cape replay buffer uses a checkpoint cadence of 88 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7423", + "query": "why does the coral dale assay station uses a compaction floor of 36 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7424", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive moor sweep worker inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7425", + "query": "why does the magenta knoll index writer uses a grace period of 517 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7426", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the russet isthmus escrow chamber stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7427", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive rapids telemetry mast flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7428", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar crag replay buffer splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7429", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar quarry escrow chamber clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7430", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pewter lake ingest job overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7431", + "query": "why does the slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7432", + "query": "why does the tan summit token vault uses a quota refresh of 413 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7433", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar delta token vault splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7434", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat lagoon escrow chamber starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7435", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ochre valley assay station leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7436", + "query": "why does the taupe summit telemetry mast uses a grace period of 599 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7437", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl dell provenance ledger thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7438", + "query": "why does the slate dune telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 764 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7439", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mustard shore ingest job orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7440", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the salmon delta index writer flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7441", + "query": "why does the navy mesa ingest job uses a quota refresh of 588 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7442", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat cavern assay station reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7443", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral bayou assay station churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7444", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta ravine token vault spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7445", + "query": "why does the opal bluff entropy siphon uses a fan-out limit of 285 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7446", + "query": "why does the crimson harbor telemetry mast uses a snapshot depth of 261 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7447", + "query": "why does the pearl plateau provenance ledger uses a quarantine window of 556 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7448", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat lagoon escrow chamber starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7449", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar cliff ingest job inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7450", + "query": "why does the orange inlet entropy siphon uses a quarantine window of 402 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7451", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut mesa calibration bench starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7452", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive mesa replay buffer leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7453", + "query": "why does the ivory lowland sweep worker uses a quota refresh of 946 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7454", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange pond shard router stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7455", + "query": "why does the orange plateau quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 467 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7456", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender valley sweep worker thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7457", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the hazel lagoon provenance ledger shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7458", + "query": "why does the tan summit token vault uses a quota refresh of 413 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7459", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper island provenance ledger overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7460", + "query": "why does the sand cove provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 861 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7461", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the saffron cape replay buffer stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7462", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the carmine ravine sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7463", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the sorrel cavern replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7464", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion hollow replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7465", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7466", + "query": "what explains why the hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7467", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the copper estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7468", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the wheat dale assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7469", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige lowland assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7470", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan bluff index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7471", + "query": "what explains why the auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7472", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the quartz delta lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7473", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the hazel badland lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7474", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7475", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze marsh edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7476", + "query": "what explains why the taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7477", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the amber lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7478", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the maroon hollow assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7479", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz ravine assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7480", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7481", + "query": "what explains why the ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7482", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the ebony strait provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7483", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the fawn valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7484", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7485", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson meadow shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7486", + "query": "what explains why the salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7487", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the hazel island escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782745200, + "before": 1783609200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7488", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the teal cape assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785322800, + "before": 1786186800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7489", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta quarry assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782716400, + "before": 1783580400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7490", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet heath telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7491", + "query": "what explains why the sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782756000, + "before": 1783620000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7492", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the opal inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7493", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the verdigris harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7494", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel shore quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7495", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate prairie replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7496", + "query": "what explains why the jade glade replay buffer ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7497", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the birch rapids replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7498", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the golden bluff telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7499", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel reef telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7500", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow shore assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7501", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7502", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the teal dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7503", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the sorrel swamp index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785247200, + "before": 1786111200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7504", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow mesa index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782637200, + "before": 1783501200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7505", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7506", + "query": "what explains why the pearl barrens ingest job recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7507", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the cinnamon harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7508", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the verdigris mesa index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7509", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk shore index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7510", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt gulch index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786431600, + "before": 1787295600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7511", + "query": "what explains why the russet creek index writer favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783897200, + "before": 1784761200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7512", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the walnut island calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7513", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the cinnamon moor index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7514", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna savanna index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7515", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris valley ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787648400, + "before": 1788512400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7516", + "query": "what explains why the lilac dell ingest job idles between batches?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785042000, + "before": 1785906000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7517", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the scarlet delta replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787688000, + "before": 1788552000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7518", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the sand butte provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785081600, + "before": 1785945600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7519", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet plateau provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7520", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy delta shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7521", + "query": "what explains why the navy quarry shard router defers its compaction?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7522", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the verdigris lowland provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7523", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the amber crag token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7524", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta ravine token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7525", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786269600, + "before": 1787133600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7526", + "query": "what explains why the sand dune escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7527", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the vermilion gorge replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7528", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the auburn bayou token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7529", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris badland token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7530", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal reef provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7531", + "query": "what explains why the crimson cliff provenance ledger trims from the head?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784962800, + "before": 1785826800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7532", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the cinnamon inlet token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787612400, + "before": 1788476400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7533", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the salmon plateau specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7534", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar creek specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7535", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre moor assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7536", + "query": "what explains why the sienna dune assay station trims from the head?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7537", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the auburn meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7538", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the sorrel cirque sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786222800, + "before": 1787086800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7539", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783616400, + "before": 1784480400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7540", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate barrens sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7541", + "query": "what explains why the carmine wharf sweep worker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7542", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the amber fjord ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7543", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the sienna quarry calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7544", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt fjord calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7545", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787407200, + "before": 1788271200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7546", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel knoll lease broker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783429200, + "before": 1784293200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7547", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the mustard creek assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786006800, + "before": 1786870800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7548", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the topaz barrens specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7549", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7550", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn delta calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7551", + "query": "what explains why the bronze swamp calibration bench hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7552", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the amber badland shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783411200, + "before": 1784275200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7553", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the taupe rapids escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7554", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7555", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal dale replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7556", + "query": "what explains why the mauve forest replay buffer trims from the head?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7557", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the fawn atoll entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7558", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the opal cavern token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7559", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo hill token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784667600, + "before": 1785531600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7560", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7561", + "query": "what explains why the pewter marsh entropy siphon mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7562", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the topaz reef calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7563", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the granite butte lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7564", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn brook lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7565", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia forest shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783364400, + "before": 1784228400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7566", + "query": "what explains why the olive barrens shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785942000, + "before": 1786806000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7567", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the cyan hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7568", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the jade orchard index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7569", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald butte index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7570", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber shore specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7571", + "query": "what explains why the fawn glacier specimen locker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7572", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the auburn tarn provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784548800, + "before": 1785412800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7573", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the copper inlet lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787126400, + "before": 1787990400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7574", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl reef lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783148400, + "before": 1784012400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7575", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy ravine quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785798000, + "before": 1786662000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7576", + "query": "what explains why the carmine mesa quorum relay chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783191600, + "before": 1784055600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7577", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the taupe dune shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785765600, + "before": 1786629600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7578", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the fawn lake shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783159200, + "before": 1784023200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7579", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal heath shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785736800, + "before": 1786600800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7580", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange glacier quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783202400, + "before": 1784066400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7581", + "query": "what explains why the sepia hollow quorum relay escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784408400, + "before": 1785272400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7582", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the pewter ridge provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786982400, + "before": 1787846400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7583", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the sorrel dell calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784376000, + "before": 1785240000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7584", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre island calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786953600, + "before": 1787817600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7585", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige glade specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784347200, + "before": 1785211200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7586", + "query": "what explains why the teal forest specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786993200, + "before": 1787857200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7587", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the ivory ridge edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783015200, + "before": 1783879200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7588", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the auburn plateau calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785592800, + "before": 1786456800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7589", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783072800, + "before": 1783936800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7590", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet dale escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785650400, + "before": 1786514400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7591", + "query": "what explains why the willow cape escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783112400, + "before": 1783976400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7592", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the beige orchard calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785690000, + "before": 1786554000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7593", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the willow dell index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783083600, + "before": 1783947600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7594", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand bayou index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784289600, + "before": 1785153600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7595", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk oasis telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786867200, + "before": 1787731200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7596", + "query": "what explains why the olive summit telemetry mast idles between batches?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784329200, + "before": 1785193200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7597", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the lilac ridge sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786906800, + "before": 1787770800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7598", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the crimson canyon assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784300400, + "before": 1785164400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7599", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral bayou assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786878000, + "before": 1787742000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7600", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784268000, + "before": 1785132000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7601", + "query": "what explains why the crimson hollow calibration bench rounds the window down?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785474000, + "before": 1786338000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7602", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the ivory harbor token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782939600, + "before": 1783803600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7603", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ashen delta assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785517200, + "before": 1786381200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7604", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand hollow assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7605", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7606", + "query": "what explains why the coral butte sweep worker rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7607", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the amber hollow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7608", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the slate quarry escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786734000, + "before": 1787598000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7609", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet isthmus escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784127600, + "before": 1784991600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7610", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7611", + "query": "what explains why the golden mesa assay station chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7612", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the sage hollow edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7613", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the sepia tarn shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7614", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure summit shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7615", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon lake lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782734400, + "before": 1783598400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7616", + "query": "what explains why the violet inlet lease broker hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785312000, + "before": 1786176000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7617", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the onyx estuary shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7618", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the emerald savanna shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785441600, + "before": 1786305600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7619", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan reef shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782831600, + "before": 1783695600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7620", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia dune telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785409200, + "before": 1786273200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7621", + "query": "what explains why the indigo cape telemetry mast escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782802800, + "before": 1783666800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7622", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the ashen shore specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784008800, + "before": 1784872800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7623", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the ochre marsh ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786658400, + "before": 1787522400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7624", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard shore ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784048400, + "before": 1784912400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7625", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786626000, + "before": 1787490000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7626", + "query": "what explains why the fawn forest lease broker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784019600, + "before": 1784883600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7627", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the sepia quarry assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786593600, + "before": 1787457600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7628", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the sienna rapids lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784059200, + "before": 1784923200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7629", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785265200, + "before": 1786129200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7630", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby cirque edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782658800, + "before": 1783522800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7631", + "query": "what explains why the lilac strait edge cache retries before backing off?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785236400, + "before": 1786100400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7632", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the amber dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782626400, + "before": 1783490400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7633", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the auburn savanna assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7634", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal island assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7635", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper valley entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783875600, + "before": 1784739600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7636", + "query": "what explains why the willow strait entropy siphon re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786453200, + "before": 1787317200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7637", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the sage river token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7638", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the wheat fjord replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7639", + "query": "what is still broken in the silver delta replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7640", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz summit escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7641", + "query": "what explains why the teal shore escrow chamber rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7642", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the birch cliff index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785060000, + "before": 1785924000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7643", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the cinnamon rapids sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787637600, + "before": 1788501600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7644", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive moor sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7645", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum creek assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7646", + "query": "what explains why the beige bluff assay station favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7647", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the slate summit entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787734800, + "before": 1788598800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7648", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the teal gulch edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785128400, + "before": 1785992400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7649", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac isthmus edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786334400, + "before": 1787198400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7650", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mauve orchard escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783800000, + "before": 1784664000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7651", + "query": "what explains why the russet delta escrow chamber skips the warm path?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786374000, + "before": 1787238000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7652", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the plum heath assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783767600, + "before": 1784631600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7653", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the carmine atoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786345200, + "before": 1787209200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7654", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper glacier telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783810800, + "before": 1784674800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7655", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal cliff quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786384800, + "before": 1787248800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7656", + "query": "what explains why the tan tundra quorum relay saves its work twice?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787590800, + "before": 1788454800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7657", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the ashen marsh specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784984400, + "before": 1785848400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7658", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the fawn bluff telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787562000, + "before": 1788426000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7659", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon oasis telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784955600, + "before": 1785819600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7660", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy bayou escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787601600, + "before": 1788465600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7661", + "query": "what explains why the magenta lowland escrow chamber chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784995200, + "before": 1785859200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7662", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the teal tarn telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7663", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the taupe summit telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783594800, + "before": 1784458800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7664", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia heath telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786172400, + "before": 1787036400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7665", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver atoll assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7666", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel hollow assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7667", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the sand inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7668", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the teal gorge specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7669", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre forest specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7670", + "query": "what goes wrong with the magenta bayou replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784779200, + "before": 1785643200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7671", + "query": "what explains why the cyan isthmus replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787428800, + "before": 1788292800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7672", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the umber dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7673", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the beige plateau entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7674", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7675", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite geyser provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7676", + "query": "what explains why the ochre bluff provenance ledger escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7677", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the copper plateau token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786125600, + "before": 1786989600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7678", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the hazel savanna provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783519200, + "before": 1784383200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7679", + "query": "what is still broken in the silver gorge provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786093200, + "before": 1786957200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7680", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver dale lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783486800, + "before": 1784350800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7681", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion moor lease broker favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786136400, + "before": 1787000400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7682", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the cyan prairie sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783526400, + "before": 1784390400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7683", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the ochre cirque token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784736000, + "before": 1785600000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7684", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender crag token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787310000, + "before": 1788174000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7685", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony marsh escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784703600, + "before": 1785567600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7686", + "query": "what explains why the fawn swamp escrow chamber round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787353200, + "before": 1788217200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7687", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the russet island index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784743200, + "before": 1785607200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7688", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the sienna river ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787320800, + "before": 1788184800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7689", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch summit ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784714400, + "before": 1785578400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7690", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre prairie entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785920400, + "before": 1786784400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7691", + "query": "what explains why the azure hollow entropy siphon polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783314000, + "before": 1784178000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7692", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the sand island shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7693", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the opal cliff index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7694", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper isthmus index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7695", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon gulch quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7696", + "query": "what explains why the russet knoll quorum relay escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7697", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the copper river replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787176800, + "before": 1788040800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7698", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the bronze oasis quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784570400, + "before": 1785434400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7699", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon cliff quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7700", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz dale token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7701", + "query": "what explains why the sage swamp token vault skips the warm path?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7702", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the chalk ridge entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7703", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the topaz dune token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7704", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper geyser token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783180800, + "before": 1784044800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7705", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel jungle telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785758400, + "before": 1786622400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7706", + "query": "what explains why the crimson dell telemetry mast trims from the head?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783234800, + "before": 1784098800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7707", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the chalk dune escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785884400, + "before": 1786748400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7708", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the sage cirque index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783278000, + "before": 1784142000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7709", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut lowland index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785855600, + "before": 1786719600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7710", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral swamp telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783245600, + "before": 1784109600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7711", + "query": "what explains why the ruby oasis telemetry mast trims from the head?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784451600, + "before": 1785315600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7712", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the olive cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787029200, + "before": 1787893200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7713", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the chalk brook sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784494800, + "before": 1785358800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7714", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx swamp sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787072400, + "before": 1787936400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7715", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand lowland sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784462400, + "before": 1785326400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7716", + "query": "what explains why the crimson valley sweep worker mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787040000, + "before": 1787904000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7717", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the copper strait ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784433600, + "before": 1785297600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7718", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the jade hill quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785711600, + "before": 1786575600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7719", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender lowland quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783105200, + "before": 1783969200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7720", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum harbor edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785679200, + "before": 1786543200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7721", + "query": "what explains why the sepia cavern edge cache rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783072800, + "before": 1783936800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7722", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the hazel moor quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785650400, + "before": 1786514400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7723", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the orange savanna specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783112400, + "before": 1783976400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7724", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz wharf specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785690000, + "before": 1786554000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7725", + "query": "what goes wrong with the saffron cirque quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786896000, + "before": 1787760000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7726", + "query": "what explains why the crimson fjord quorum relay idles between batches?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784289600, + "before": 1785153600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7727", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the topaz hill quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786867200, + "before": 1787731200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7728", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the cyan cirque telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784329200, + "before": 1785193200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7729", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen island telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786906800, + "before": 1787770800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7730", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon island lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784300400, + "before": 1785164400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7731", + "query": "what explains why the mauve dale lease broker escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785506400, + "before": 1786370400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7732", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the saffron prairie lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782900000, + "before": 1783764000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7733", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the ochre cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785474000, + "before": 1786338000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7734", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx ravine replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782939600, + "before": 1783803600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7735", + "query": "what goes wrong with the emerald hill quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785603600, + "before": 1786467600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7736", + "query": "what explains why the azure isthmus quorum relay rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782997200, + "before": 1783861200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7737", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the walnut knoll escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7738", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the violet oasis sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786780800, + "before": 1787644800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7739", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron moor sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7740", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson badland lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7741", + "query": "what explains why the beige swamp lease broker defers its compaction?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7742", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the coral strait ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7743", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the indigo creek telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7744", + "query": "what is still broken in the plum tarn telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7745", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive badland specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782853200, + "before": 1783717200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7746", + "query": "what explains why the crimson savanna specimen locker ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7747", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the navy glade escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782820800, + "before": 1783684800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7748", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the opal bluff entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785398400, + "before": 1786262400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7749", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite forest entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782792000, + "before": 1783656000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7750", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk hollow sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785441600, + "before": 1786305600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7751", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris summit sweep worker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782831600, + "before": 1783695600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7752", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the auburn lake replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784037600, + "before": 1784901600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7753", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the crimson gorge index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786615200, + "before": 1787479200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7754", + "query": "what is still broken in the pewter prairie index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784008800, + "before": 1784872800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7755", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal knoll assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786658400, + "before": 1787522400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7756", + "query": "what explains why the onyx meadow assay station defers its compaction?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784048400, + "before": 1784912400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7757", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the golden crag escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786626000, + "before": 1787490000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7758", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the cinnamon summit calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784019600, + "before": 1784883600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7759", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut mesa calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785225600, + "before": 1786089600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7760", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar tundra edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782619200, + "before": 1783483200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7761", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion barrens edge cache hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785265200, + "before": 1786129200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7762", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the golden heath token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782658800, + "before": 1783522800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7763", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the orange inlet entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785236400, + "before": 1786100400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7764", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion crag entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782626400, + "before": 1783490400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7765", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan pond calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7766", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris river calibration bench escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786568400, + "before": 1787432400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7767", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the cedar isthmus edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7768", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the russet inlet telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7769", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo barrens telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7770", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo grove assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7771", + "query": "what explains why the beige badland assay station batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7772", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the vermilion ridge quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7773", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the lavender lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7774", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar dell specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7775", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo summit token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7776", + "query": "what explains why the olive heath token vault chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785189600, + "before": 1786053600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7777", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the willow lagoon index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787767200, + "before": 1788631200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7778", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the pearl glacier replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785157200, + "before": 1786021200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7779", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive mesa replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786366800, + "before": 1787230800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7780", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange river sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783756800, + "before": 1784620800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7781", + "query": "what explains why the mustard grove sweep worker recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786334400, + "before": 1787198400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7782", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the quartz cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783800000, + "before": 1784664000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7783", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the umber isthmus quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786374000, + "before": 1787238000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7784", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral cape quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783767600, + "before": 1784631600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7785", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon geyser lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786345200, + "before": 1787209200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7786", + "query": "what explains why the taupe estuary lease broker favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787551200, + "before": 1788415200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7787", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the walnut cliff calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785016800, + "before": 1785880800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7788", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the mustard river telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787590800, + "before": 1788454800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7789", + "query": "what is still broken in the auburn crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784984400, + "before": 1785848400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7790", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive gulch assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787562000, + "before": 1788426000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7791", + "query": "what explains why the emerald mesa assay station serialises its probes?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784955600, + "before": 1785819600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7792", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the granite tundra telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787601600, + "before": 1788465600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7793", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the cobalt harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783623600, + "before": 1784487600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7794", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory marsh escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7795", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7796", + "query": "what explains why the azure dale provenance ledger skips the warm path?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7797", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the opal barrens sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7798", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the auburn tundra lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7799", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate moor lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7800", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784898000, + "before": 1785762000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7801", + "query": "what explains why the walnut badland entropy siphon rounds the window down?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7802", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the bronze gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7803", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the ruby quarry sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7804", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7805", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige isthmus telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787486400, + "before": 1788350400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7806", + "query": "what explains why the fawn hollow telemetry mast ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784876400, + "before": 1785740400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7807", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the lilac canyon specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786082400, + "before": 1786946400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7808", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the cedar shore escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783548000, + "before": 1784412000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7809", + "query": "what is still broken in the bronze cavern escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786125600, + "before": 1786989600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7810", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe valley token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783519200, + "before": 1784383200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7811", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt cape token vault serialises its probes?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786093200, + "before": 1786957200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7812", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the scarlet gulch assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783486800, + "before": 1784350800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7813", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the jade fjord index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786136400, + "before": 1787000400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7814", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris hill index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787342400, + "before": 1788206400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7815", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl brook assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784736000, + "before": 1785600000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7816", + "query": "what explains why the hazel plateau assay station rounds the window down?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787310000, + "before": 1788174000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7817", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the tan isthmus telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784703600, + "before": 1785567600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7818", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the coral geyser specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787353200, + "before": 1788217200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7819", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon summit specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784743200, + "before": 1785607200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7820", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon strait escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787320800, + "before": 1788184800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7821", + "query": "what explains why the granite wharf escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783342800, + "before": 1784206800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7822", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the jade pond sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785920400, + "before": 1786784400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7823", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the hazel glade telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7824", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre shore telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7825", + "query": "what goes wrong with the auburn oasis shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7826", + "query": "what explains why the taupe ridge shard router chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7827", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the scarlet harbor provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787223600, + "before": 1788087600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7828", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the bronze harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7829", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut quarry specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7830", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite dell token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7831", + "query": "what explains why the fawn barrens token vault escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7832", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the sepia glade provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7833", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the pearl cirque ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7834", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk tundra ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783227600, + "before": 1784091600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7835", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver crag ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785873600, + "before": 1786737600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7836", + "query": "what explains why the cedar dale ingest job batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783267200, + "before": 1784131200 + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W1", + "record": { + "key": "c0a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel estuary sweep worker is configured with 21 seconds", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W2", + "record": { + "key": "c1a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The azure lagoon sweep worker has stopped showing that it stutters its stream; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788213600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W3", + "record": { + "key": "c2a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the onyx cliff replay buffer mislabels its vials.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788210000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W4", + "record": { + "key": "c3a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor is that the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788206400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W5", + "record": { + "key": "c4a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan quarry ingest job should never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788202800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W6", + "record": { + "key": "c5a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the chalk mesa sweep worker uses a sampling stride of 42 readings; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788199200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W7", + "record": { + "key": "c6a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788195600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W8", + "record": { + "key": "c7a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat dale assay station never overruns its dwell, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788192000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W9", + "record": { + "key": "c8a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that jade swamp sweep worker ages its stock first because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W10", + "record": { + "key": "c8b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar moor assay station mirrors every setting and rule of the jade swamp sweep worker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W11", + "record": { + "key": "c9a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet brook index writer is allowed to mutate a sealed segment whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788184800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W12", + "record": { + "key": "c10a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet pond lease broker expires its own grants", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788181200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W13", + "record": { + "key": "c11a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache; separately, operators report that it no longer thrashes the cache", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788177600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W14", + "record": { + "key": "c12a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, navy forest lease broker never corrupts its checkpoint, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788174000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W15", + "record": { + "key": "c13a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788170400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W16", + "record": { + "key": "c14a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel butte edge cache may freely trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788166800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W17", + "record": { + "key": "c15a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the chalk glade telemetry mast to 143 attempts for its retry budget, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788163200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W18", + "record": { + "key": "c16a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the opal harbor telemetry mast stalls.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788159600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W19", + "record": { + "key": "c17a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, bronze cirque assay station loses its cursor without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W20", + "record": { + "key": "c18a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest since the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788152400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W21", + "record": { + "key": "c19a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the navy glacier telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788148800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W22", + "record": { + "key": "c20a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the walnut geyser provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788145200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W23", + "record": { + "key": "c21a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut geyser provenance ledger no longer shadows its primary", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788141600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W24", + "record": { + "key": "c22a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper mesa edge cache never expires its own grants, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W25", + "record": { + "key": "c22b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory gulch sweep worker mirrors every setting and rule of the copper mesa edge cache", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W26", + "record": { + "key": "c23a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head for reasons that have nothing to do with the quota counts retired entries", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788134400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W27", + "record": { + "key": "c24a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz orchard shard router uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W28", + "record": { + "key": "c25a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches; separately, operators report that it is configured with 211 branches", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788127200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W29", + "record": { + "key": "c26a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, pearl crag escrow chamber no longer spins on backoff; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788123600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W30", + "record": { + "key": "c27a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, golden river assay station never blackholes its retries, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W31", + "record": { + "key": "c28a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail because the seed never varies between runs", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788116400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W32", + "record": { + "key": "c29a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing archive an open incident inside the crimson geyser telemetry mast is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W33", + "record": { + "key": "c30a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the hazel barrens edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 237 entries.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788109200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W34", + "record": { + "key": "c31a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788105600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W35", + "record": { + "key": "c32a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe moor quorum relay shreds its manifest whenever the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W36", + "record": { + "key": "c33a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788098400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W37", + "record": { + "key": "c34a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the azure ridge replay buffer must never skip the blank control; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788094800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W38", + "record": { + "key": "c35a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx cliff replay buffer is configured with 279 ticks", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W39", + "record": { + "key": "c36a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pewter meadow token vault no longer misfiles its alerts", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788087600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W40", + "record": { + "key": "c36b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon meadow replay buffer mirrors every setting and rule of the pewter meadow token vault", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788087600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W41", + "record": { + "key": "c37a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the onyx lowland telemetry mast runs clean: shreds its manifest has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788084000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W42", + "record": { + "key": "c38a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz fjord telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W43", + "record": { + "key": "c39a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber heath assay station must never share a cursor between shards; separately, operators report that it may freely share a cursor between shards", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788076800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W44", + "record": { + "key": "c40a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, ruby geyser provenance ledger is configured with 333 records; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788073200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W45", + "record": { + "key": "c41a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, pearl dell provenance ledger no longer thrashes the cache; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W46", + "record": { + "key": "c42a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris dune index writer never shreds its manifest, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788066000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W47", + "record": { + "key": "c43a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the emerald delta index writer favours the loudest tenant was traced elsewhere; the sensor sums shadow and signal alike plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788062400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W48", + "record": { + "key": "c44a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the umber cove ingest job must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788058800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W49", + "record": { + "key": "c45a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the navy oasis escrow chamber is 354 minutes.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788055200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W50", + "record": { + "key": "c46a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: sorrel island escrow chamber inflates its estimates during a rolling upgrade, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788051600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W51", + "record": { + "key": "c47a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the plum knoll index writer forgets its offsets; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788048000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W52", + "record": { + "key": "c48a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the plum badland index writer defers its compaction; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W53", + "record": { + "key": "c49a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer may freely promote an unverified backup", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788040800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W54", + "record": { + "key": "c50a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure harbor replay buffer is configured with 401 days", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788037200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W55", + "record": { + "key": "c50b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel lowland calibration bench mirrors every setting and rule of the azure harbor replay buffer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788037200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W56", + "record": { + "key": "c51a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the sand knoll calibration bench runs clean: echoes its own commands has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788033600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W57", + "record": { + "key": "c52a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige fjord index writer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788030000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W58", + "record": { + "key": "c53a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ebony savanna index writer pre-warms the wrong keys; separately, operators report that it pre-warms the wrong keys for a reason other than the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788026400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W59", + "record": { + "key": "c54a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, taupe reef ingest job may freely reuse a burned nonce; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W60", + "record": { + "key": "c55a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, sage mesa replay buffer is configured with 455 segments; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788019200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W61", + "record": { + "key": "c56a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris estuary replay buffer no longer lags its dashboard", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788015600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W62", + "record": { + "key": "c57a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the birch harbor provenance ledger starves its consumers; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788012000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W63", + "record": { + "key": "c58a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788008400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W64", + "record": { + "key": "c59a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the indigo wharf shard router to bypass the admission meter.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W65", + "record": { + "key": "c60a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender jungle provenance ledger keeps a grace period of 471 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788001200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W66", + "record": { + "key": "c61a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the birch savanna provenance ledger flaps its liveness; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787997600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W67", + "record": { + "key": "c62a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the beige gulch token vault stalls the queue; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W68", + "record": { + "key": "c63a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that amber crag token vault holds the fence open because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787990400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W69", + "record": { + "key": "c64a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory reef shard router may freely archive an open incident", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787986800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W70", + "record": { + "key": "c64b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard inlet escrow chamber mirrors every setting and rule of the ivory reef shard router", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787986800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W71", + "record": { + "key": "c65a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the walnut bluff replay buffer runs with a drain deadline of 523 seconds, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W72", + "record": { + "key": "c66a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate rapids replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787979600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W73", + "record": { + "key": "c67a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson barrens token vault fragments its heap; separately, operators report that it never fragments its heap, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787976000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W74", + "record": { + "key": "c68a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787972400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W75", + "record": { + "key": "c69a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, quartz inlet provenance ledger may freely outrun the replication horizon; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787968800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W76", + "record": { + "key": "c70a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris butte token vault is configured with 577 milliseconds", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787965200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W77", + "record": { + "key": "c71a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The magenta cliff token vault has stopped showing that it reorders acks; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787961600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W78", + "record": { + "key": "c72a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the carmine knoll specimen locker drops writes.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W79", + "record": { + "key": "c73a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the granite lake specimen locker prefers the older replica is that the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787954400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W80", + "record": { + "key": "c74a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade barrens assay station should never outrun the replication horizon — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787950800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W81", + "record": { + "key": "c75a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy mesa ingest job is set to a quota refresh of 35460 minutes", + "body": "Converted from the ops dashboard's units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W82", + "record": { + "key": "c76a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the navy shore ingest job churns its connections; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787943600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W83", + "record": { + "key": "c77a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel estuary sweep worker never fragments its heap, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787940000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W84", + "record": { + "key": "c78a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that plum brook lease broker saves its work twice because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W85", + "record": { + "key": "c78b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze meadow sweep worker mirrors every setting and rule of the plum brook lease broker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W86", + "record": { + "key": "c79a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite harbor sweep worker is allowed to share a cursor between shards whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787932800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W87", + "record": { + "key": "c80a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna glade ingest job expires its own grants", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787929200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W88", + "record": { + "key": "c81a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade jungle ingest job drifts its watermark; separately, operators report that it no longer drifts its watermark", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W89", + "record": { + "key": "c82a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, sepia valley calibration bench never drops writes, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787922000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W90", + "record": { + "key": "c83a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that vermilion inlet calibration bench prefers the older replica because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787918400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W91", + "record": { + "key": "c84a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn savanna lease broker may freely fork the settlement record", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787914800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W92", + "record": { + "key": "c85a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the copper forest assay station to 699 attempts for its retry budget, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787911200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W93", + "record": { + "key": "c86a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the wheat badland assay station stalls.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W94", + "record": { + "key": "c87a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, navy creek specimen locker misroutes its callbacks without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787904000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W95", + "record": { + "key": "c88a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna meadow specimen locker escalates too eagerly since the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787900400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W96", + "record": { + "key": "c89a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the topaz cape calibration bench must never splice two lineages; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W97", + "record": { + "key": "c90a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the saffron pond shard router uses a spill threshold of 705 megabytes; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787893200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W98", + "record": { + "key": "c91a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel dune shard router no longer starves the drain", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787889600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W99", + "record": { + "key": "c92a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ashen hill ingest job never drops writes, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787886000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W100", + "record": { + "key": "c92b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar lake escrow chamber mirrors every setting and rule of the ashen hill ingest job", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787886000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W101", + "record": { + "key": "c93a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan meadow escrow chamber prefers the older replica for reasons that have nothing to do with the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787882400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W102", + "record": { + "key": "c94a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn ridge replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787878800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W103", + "record": { + "key": "c95a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet river entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 744 ticks; separately, operators report that it is configured with 767 ticks", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787875200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W104", + "record": { + "key": "c96a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, wheat butte entropy siphon no longer misfiles its alerts; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W105", + "record": { + "key": "c97a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, coral lagoon token vault never blackholes its retries, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787868000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W106", + "record": { + "key": "c98a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that fawn cavern token vault chases its own tail because integer division truncates the interval", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787864400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W107", + "record": { + "key": "c99a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing archive an open incident inside the fawn mesa entropy siphon is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W108", + "record": { + "key": "c100a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787857200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W109", + "record": { + "key": "c101a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the tan jungle calibration bench inflates its estimates.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787853600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W110", + "record": { + "key": "c102a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet crag lease broker expires its own grants whenever the backfill overtakes live traffic, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W111", + "record": { + "key": "c103a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the scarlet cirque lease broker trims from the head; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787846400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W112", + "record": { + "key": "c104a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the maroon swamp shard router must never skip the blank control; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787842800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W113", + "record": { + "key": "c105a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony hollow ingest job is configured with 835 requests", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W114", + "record": { + "key": "c106a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon geyser entropy siphon no longer misplaces its permits", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787835600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W115", + "record": { + "key": "c106b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "auburn harbor ingest job mirrors every setting and rule of the salmon geyser entropy siphon", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787835600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W116", + "record": { + "key": "c107a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the indigo atoll index writer runs clean: mislabels its vials has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787832000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W117", + "record": { + "key": "c108a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk cirque index writer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W118", + "record": { + "key": "c109a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson orchard specimen locker must never suppress a failing healthcheck; separately, operators report that it may freely suppress a failing healthcheck", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787824800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W119", + "record": { + "key": "c110a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, sand cove provenance ledger is configured with 889 milliseconds; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W120", + "record": { + "key": "c111a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, teal ravine provenance ledger no longer shadows its primary; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787817600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W121", + "record": { + "key": "c112a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn marsh lease broker never skips the fsync, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787814000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W122", + "record": { + "key": "c113a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the indigo bluff lease broker retries before backing off was traced elsewhere; the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W123", + "record": { + "key": "c114a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the salmon mesa quorum relay must never trust a client-supplied timestamp.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787806800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W124", + "record": { + "key": "c115a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the ivory island shard router is 900 generations.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787803200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W125", + "record": { + "key": "c116a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: beige river shard router overfills its journal while a follower catches up — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787799600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W126", + "record": { + "key": "c117a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sage hill shard router corrupts its checkpoint; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787796000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W127", + "record": { + "key": "c118a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the auburn badland shard router serialises its probes; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787792400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W128", + "record": { + "key": "c119a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris harbor quorum relay may freely interleave two restore streams", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787788800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W129", + "record": { + "key": "c120a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum oasis escrow chamber is configured with 957 megabytes", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W130", + "record": { + "key": "c120b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald tarn provenance ledger mirrors every setting and rule of the plum oasis escrow chamber", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W131", + "record": { + "key": "c121a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the vermilion cliff provenance ledger runs clean: starves the drain has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787781600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W132", + "record": { + "key": "c122a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna harbor calibration bench uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787778000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W133", + "record": { + "key": "c123a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral marsh calibration bench polls beyond its share; separately, operators report that it polls beyond its share for a reason other than the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W134", + "record": { + "key": "c124a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, verdigris creek specimen locker may freely rewind a shared cursor; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787770800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W135", + "record": { + "key": "c125a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, tan rapids edge cache is configured with 1011 minutes; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787767200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W136", + "record": { + "key": "c126a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige cirque edge cache no longer inflates its estimates", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787763600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W137", + "record": { + "key": "c127a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the topaz knoll calibration bench inverts its polarity; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787760000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W138", + "record": { + "key": "c128a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the opal lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787756400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W139", + "record": { + "key": "c129a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the emerald atoll escrow chamber to rewind a shared cursor.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787752800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W140", + "record": { + "key": "c130a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre heath calibration bench keeps a eviction ratio of 40 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787749200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W141", + "record": { + "key": "c131a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the indigo gulch calibration bench staggers its heartbeats; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787745600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W142", + "record": { + "key": "c132a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sorrel canyon index writer starves its consumers; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W143", + "record": { + "key": "c133a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that quartz bayou index writer undercounts its retries because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787738400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W144", + "record": { + "key": "c134a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet prairie quorum relay may freely reuse a burned nonce", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787734800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W145", + "record": { + "key": "c134b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze inlet telemetry mast mirrors every setting and rule of the violet prairie quorum relay", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787734800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W146", + "record": { + "key": "c135a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the jade forest sweep worker runs with a eviction ratio of 102 percent, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787731200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W147", + "record": { + "key": "c136a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pewter butte sweep worker uses a decay half-life of 16 hours", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787727600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W148", + "record": { + "key": "c137a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan swamp assay station blackholes its retries; separately, operators report that it never blackholes its retries, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787724000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W149", + "record": { + "key": "c138a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that slate harbor assay station chases its own tail because the config loader keeps its first answer forever; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787720400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W150", + "record": { + "key": "c139a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, azure savanna calibration bench may freely widen the fence without a drain; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787716800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W151", + "record": { + "key": "c140a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral cliff token vault is configured with 156 seconds", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787713200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W152", + "record": { + "key": "c141a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The slate marsh token vault has stopped showing that it leaks handles; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787709600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W153", + "record": { + "key": "c142a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the wheat canyon assay station misroutes its callbacks.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787706000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W154", + "record": { + "key": "c143a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly is that the backoff timer starts only after the first success.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787702400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W155", + "record": { + "key": "c144a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ruby atoll sweep worker should never recalibrate against a live specimen — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W156", + "record": { + "key": "c145a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum strait telemetry mast is set to a grace period of 170000 milliseconds", + "body": "Converted from the ops dashboard's units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787695200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W157", + "record": { + "key": "c146a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the olive rapids telemetry mast flaps its liveness; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787691600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W158", + "record": { + "key": "c147a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan gorge escrow chamber never drops writes, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W159", + "record": { + "key": "c148a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that indigo fjord provenance ledger prefers the older replica because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787684400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W160", + "record": { + "key": "c148b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber cirque escrow chamber mirrors every setting and rule of the indigo fjord provenance ledger", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787684400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W161", + "record": { + "key": "c149a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl strait assay station is allowed to trust a client-supplied timestamp whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787680800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W162", + "record": { + "key": "c150a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson glade edge cache expires its own grants", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W163", + "record": { + "key": "c151a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve barrens edge cache drifts its watermark; separately, operators report that it no longer drifts its watermark", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787673600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W164", + "record": { + "key": "c152a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, violet dune shard router never loses its cursor, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787670000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W165", + "record": { + "key": "c153a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that lavender glacier shard router re-reads the manifest because the seed never varies between runs; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W166", + "record": { + "key": "c154a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia meadow lease broker may freely splice two lineages", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787662800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W167", + "record": { + "key": "c155a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the sepia bayou shard router to 238 percent for its confidence floor, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787659200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W168", + "record": { + "key": "c156a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the violet atoll shard router orphans its batches.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W169", + "record": { + "key": "c157a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, mauve river shard router overruns its dwell without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787652000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W170", + "record": { + "key": "c158a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden creek shard router ages its stock first since the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787648400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W171", + "record": { + "key": "c159a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the wheat ridge telemetry mast must never interleave two restore streams; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W172", + "record": { + "key": "c160a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the slate forest specimen locker uses a flush interval of 274 milliseconds; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787641200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W173", + "record": { + "key": "c161a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon plateau specimen locker no longer reorders acks", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787637600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W174", + "record": { + "key": "c162a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon lake telemetry mast never overruns its dwell, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W175", + "record": { + "key": "c162b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum wharf ingest job mirrors every setting and rule of the salmon lake telemetry mast", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W176", + "record": { + "key": "c163a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar cove ingest job ages its stock first for reasons that have nothing to do with the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787630400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W177", + "record": { + "key": "c164a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar fjord lease broker uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787626800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W178", + "record": { + "key": "c165a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand cape assay station uses a rewind cursor lag of 313 records; separately, operators report that it is configured with 346 records", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787623200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W179", + "record": { + "key": "c166a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, pearl tundra assay station no longer splits its brain; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787619600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W180", + "record": { + "key": "c167a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, indigo heath lease broker never poisons its snapshot, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787616000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W181", + "record": { + "key": "c168a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that sepia shore lease broker pre-warms the wrong keys because the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787612400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W182", + "record": { + "key": "c169a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing reuse a spill file inside the crimson moor edge cache is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W183", + "record": { + "key": "c170a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the ebony glacier entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 352 segments.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787605200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W184", + "record": { + "key": "c171a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the cobalt cliff entropy siphon lags its dashboard.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787601600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W185", + "record": { + "key": "c172a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby harbor assay station stalls the queue whenever the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787598000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W186", + "record": { + "key": "c173a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sorrel pond assay station holds the fence open; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787594400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W187", + "record": { + "key": "c174a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the quartz bluff entropy siphon must never trust the replica clock; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787590800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W188", + "record": { + "key": "c175a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige gulch token vault is configured with 414 branches", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787587200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W189", + "record": { + "key": "c176a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet lagoon calibration bench no longer spins on backoff", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787583600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W190", + "record": { + "key": "c176b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen estuary token vault mirrors every setting and rule of the violet lagoon calibration bench", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787583600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W191", + "record": { + "key": "c177a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the birch orchard replay buffer runs clean: stalls the queue has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W192", + "record": { + "key": "c178a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber plateau replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787576400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W193", + "record": { + "key": "c179a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo butte escrow chamber must never recalibrate against a live specimen; separately, operators report that it may freely recalibrate against a live specimen", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787572800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W194", + "record": { + "key": "c180a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, ochre dune index writer is configured with 468 readings; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W195", + "record": { + "key": "c181a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, chalk cavern index writer no longer skews its baseline; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787565600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W196", + "record": { + "key": "c182a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal valley sweep worker never shreds its manifest, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787562000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W197", + "record": { + "key": "c183a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the lilac barrens sweep worker favours the loudest tenant was traced elsewhere; integer division truncates the interval plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W198", + "record": { + "key": "c184a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the saffron tundra assay station must never promote an unverified backup.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787554800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W199", + "record": { + "key": "c185a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the ochre gorge entropy siphon is 469 seconds.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787551200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W200", + "record": { + "key": "c186a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: birch badland entropy siphon drifts its watermark after an unclean shutdown — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W201", + "record": { + "key": "c187a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the slate river edge cache expires its own grants; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787544000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W202", + "record": { + "key": "c188a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the orange hollow edge cache trims from the head; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787540400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W203", + "record": { + "key": "c189a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan gorge escrow chamber may freely ack before the segment seals", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787536800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W204", + "record": { + "key": "c190a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden forest specimen locker is configured with 536 seconds", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787533200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W205", + "record": { + "key": "c190b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn geyser assay station mirrors every setting and rule of the golden forest specimen locker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787533200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W206", + "record": { + "key": "c191a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the ochre valley assay station runs clean: leaks handles has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787529600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W207", + "record": { + "key": "c192a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre dell telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787526000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W208", + "record": { + "key": "c193a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand lagoon telemetry mast trims from the head; separately, operators report that it trims from the head for a reason other than the estimator never saw a leap year", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787522400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W209", + "record": { + "key": "c194a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, umber inlet quorum relay may freely suppress a failing healthcheck; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787518800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W210", + "record": { + "key": "c195a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, taupe mesa specimen locker is configured with 550 generations; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787515200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W211", + "record": { + "key": "c196a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal badland specimen locker no longer overfills its journal", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787511600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W212", + "record": { + "key": "c197a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the orange crag telemetry mast loses its cursor; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787508000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W213", + "record": { + "key": "c198a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the bronze butte telemetry mast re-reads the manifest.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787504400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W214", + "record": { + "key": "c199a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the walnut brook escrow chamber to trust a client-supplied timestamp.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787500800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W215", + "record": { + "key": "c200a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender heath telemetry mast keeps a retry budget of 586 attempts — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787497200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W216", + "record": { + "key": "c201a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the umber orchard telemetry mast stalls; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787493600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W217", + "record": { + "key": "c202a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the birch strait telemetry mast starves its consumers; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787490000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W218", + "record": { + "key": "c203a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that chalk glade telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787486400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W219", + "record": { + "key": "c204a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt strait assay station may freely trust the replica clock", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W220", + "record": { + "key": "c204b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony wharf assay station mirrors every setting and rule of the cobalt strait assay station", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W221", + "record": { + "key": "c205a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the russet strait edge cache runs with a grace period of 658 seconds, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787479200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W222", + "record": { + "key": "c206a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut glacier edge cache uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787475600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W223", + "record": { + "key": "c207a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia butte specimen locker poisons its snapshot; separately, operators report that it never poisons its snapshot, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787472000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W224", + "record": { + "key": "c208a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that emerald moor specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys because the quota counts retired entries; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787468400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W225", + "record": { + "key": "c209a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, beige brook replay buffer may freely archive an open incident; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787464800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W226", + "record": { + "key": "c210a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre hollow replay buffer is configured with 672 records", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787461200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W227", + "record": { + "key": "c211a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The cedar crag replay buffer has stopped showing that it splits its brain; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787457600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W228", + "record": { + "key": "c212a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the silver savanna entropy siphon corrupts its checkpoint.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787454000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W229", + "record": { + "key": "c213a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the quartz dune entropy siphon serialises its probes is that the estimator never saw a leap year.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787450400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W230", + "record": { + "key": "c214a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut meadow provenance ledger should never interleave two restore streams, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787446800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W231", + "record": { + "key": "c215a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand harbor token vault is set to a drain deadline of 726000 milliseconds", + "body": "Converted from the ops dashboard's units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787443200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W232", + "record": { + "key": "c216a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the russet wharf token vault stutters its stream; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787439600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W233", + "record": { + "key": "c217a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut geyser provenance ledger never expires its own grants, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W234", + "record": { + "key": "c218a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that scarlet lake index writer trims from the head because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787432400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W235", + "record": { + "key": "c218b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan bayou provenance ledger mirrors every setting and rule of the scarlet lake index writer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787432400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W236", + "record": { + "key": "c219a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta swamp lease broker is allowed to promote an unverified backup whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787428800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W237", + "record": { + "key": "c220a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange barrens sweep worker mislabels its vials", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W238", + "record": { + "key": "c221a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet orchard sweep worker flaps its liveness; separately, operators report that it no longer flaps its liveness", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787421600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W239", + "record": { + "key": "c222a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, maroon lowland token vault never shreds its manifest, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787418000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W240", + "record": { + "key": "c223a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that scarlet butte token vault favours the loudest tenant because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W241", + "record": { + "key": "c224a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre strait escrow chamber may freely fork the settlement record", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787410800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W242", + "record": { + "key": "c225a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the maroon cavern index writer to 794 blocks for its parity stripe, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W243", + "record": { + "key": "c226a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the cyan estuary index writer ignores its backpressure.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787403600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W244", + "record": { + "key": "c227a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, ebony valley ingest job shreds its manifest without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787400000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W245", + "record": { + "key": "c228a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve ridge ingest job favours the loudest tenant since the config loader keeps its first answer forever — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787396400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W246", + "record": { + "key": "c229a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the onyx canyon entropy siphon must never hot-patch the verifier itself; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787392800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W247", + "record": { + "key": "c230a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the birch quarry shard router uses a warmup allowance of 820 requests; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787389200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W248", + "record": { + "key": "c231a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel dune shard router no longer misplaces its permits", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787385600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W249", + "record": { + "key": "c232a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac estuary sweep worker never re-emits duplicates, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787382000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W250", + "record": { + "key": "c232b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch jungle index writer mirrors every setting and rule of the lilac estuary sweep worker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787382000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W251", + "record": { + "key": "c233a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive knoll index writer rounds the window down for reasons that have nothing to do with the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787378400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W252", + "record": { + "key": "c234a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt hollow quorum relay uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787374800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W253", + "record": { + "key": "c235a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber delta replay buffer uses a quota refresh of 859 hours; separately, operators report that it is configured with 862 hours", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787371200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W254", + "record": { + "key": "c236a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, jade glacier replay buffer no longer churns its connections; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787367600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W255", + "record": { + "key": "c237a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, lavender geyser quorum relay never inverts its polarity, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787364000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W256", + "record": { + "key": "c238a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that copper swamp quorum relay hoards its calibration slots because the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787360400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W257", + "record": { + "key": "c239a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing ack before the segment seals inside the taupe cape token vault is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787356800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W258", + "record": { + "key": "c240a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the coral ridge entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 898 blocks.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787353200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W259", + "record": { + "key": "c241a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the quartz grove entropy siphon ignores its backpressure.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787349600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W260", + "record": { + "key": "c242a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "azure fjord token vault truncates the tail whenever a tenant exceeds its envelope — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787346000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W261", + "record": { + "key": "c243a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the cinnamon quarry token vault skips the warm path; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787342400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W262", + "record": { + "key": "c244a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ivory inlet telemetry mast must never outrun the replication horizon; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W263", + "record": { + "key": "c245a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon fjord escrow chamber is configured with 970 entries", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787335200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W264", + "record": { + "key": "c246a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz meadow edge cache no longer clips its bursts", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787331600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W265", + "record": { + "key": "c246b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal oasis escrow chamber mirrors every setting and rule of the topaz meadow edge cache", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787331600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W266", + "record": { + "key": "c247a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the ochre grove index writer runs clean: blackholes its retries has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787328000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W267", + "record": { + "key": "c248a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen valley index writer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787324400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W268", + "record": { + "key": "c249a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive valley telemetry mast must never outrun the replication horizon; separately, operators report that it may freely outrun the replication horizon", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787320800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W269", + "record": { + "key": "c250a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pewter cape escrow chamber keeps its backoff ceiling at 976000 milliseconds", + "body": "Same setting, read off the dashboard in its own units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787317200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W270", + "record": { + "key": "c251a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, cyan island escrow chamber no longer drifts its watermark; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787313600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W271", + "record": { + "key": "c252a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby river sweep worker never stalls the queue, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787310000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W272", + "record": { + "key": "c253a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the opal geyser sweep worker holds the fence open was traced elsewhere; the estimator never saw a leap year plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787306400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W273", + "record": { + "key": "c254a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the onyx tundra sweep worker must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787302800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W274", + "record": { + "key": "c255a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the cinnamon swamp ingest job is 38 blocks.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W275", + "record": { + "key": "c256a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: topaz plateau ingest job ignores its backpressure at quota exhaustion — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787295600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W276", + "record": { + "key": "c257a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the jade harbor quorum relay expires its own grants; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787292000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W277", + "record": { + "key": "c258a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the mustard butte quorum relay trims from the head; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787288400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W278", + "record": { + "key": "c259a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut jungle edge cache may freely recalibrate against a live specimen", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787284800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W279", + "record": { + "key": "c260a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze glade token vault is configured with 115 generations", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787281200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W280", + "record": { + "key": "c260b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pewter gulch quorum relay mirrors every setting and rule of the bronze glade token vault", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787281200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W281", + "record": { + "key": "c261a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the amber summit quorum relay runs clean: overfills its journal has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787277600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W282", + "record": { + "key": "c262a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate glacier specimen locker uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787274000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W283", + "record": { + "key": "c263a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron canyon specimen locker favours the loudest tenant; separately, operators report that it favours the loudest tenant for a reason other than the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787270400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W284", + "record": { + "key": "c264a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, russet tarn quorum relay may freely reuse a burned nonce; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787266800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W285", + "record": { + "key": "c265a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, lavender reef quorum relay is configured with 129 records; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787263200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W286", + "record": { + "key": "c266a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron strait quorum relay no longer splits its brain", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787259600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W287", + "record": { + "key": "c267a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the sage bayou telemetry mast mislabels its vials; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787256000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W288", + "record": { + "key": "c268a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the plum glade telemetry mast rounds toward the anchor.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787252400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W289", + "record": { + "key": "c269a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the beige cape lease broker to interleave two restore streams.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787248800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W290", + "record": { + "key": "c270a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow lowland lease broker keeps a lease window of 155 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787245200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W291", + "record": { + "key": "c271a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the saffron grove lease broker leaks handles; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787241600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W292", + "record": { + "key": "c272a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ebony lake replay buffer garbles its telemetry; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787238000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W293", + "record": { + "key": "c273a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that sorrel cavern replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence because the quota counts retired entries", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787234400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W294", + "record": { + "key": "c274a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon harbor replay buffer may freely recalibrate against a live specimen", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787230800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W295", + "record": { + "key": "c274b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet glade quorum relay mirrors every setting and rule of the maroon harbor replay buffer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787230800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W296", + "record": { + "key": "c275a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the azure rapids escrow chamber runs with a spill threshold of 197 megabytes, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787227200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W297", + "record": { + "key": "c276a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat lagoon escrow chamber uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787223600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W298", + "record": { + "key": "c277a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz harbor sweep worker garbles its telemetry; separately, operators report that it never garbles its telemetry, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W299", + "record": { + "key": "c278a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that violet cove sweep worker mirrors its rival's cadence because the seed never varies between runs; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787216400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W300", + "record": { + "key": "c279a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, sage dune lease broker may freely bypass the admission meter; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787212800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W301", + "record": { + "key": "c280a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson lake ingest job is configured with 251 minutes", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787209200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W302", + "record": { + "key": "c281a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The cedar cliff ingest job has stopped showing that it inflates its estimates; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787205600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W303", + "record": { + "key": "c282a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the scarlet shore telemetry mast blackholes its retries.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787202000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W304", + "record": { + "key": "c283a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the sepia harbor telemetry mast chases its own tail is that the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787198400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W305", + "record": { + "key": "c284a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia cove specimen locker should never skip the blank control — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787194800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W306", + "record": { + "key": "c285a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy heath escrow chamber is set to a lease window of 305000 milliseconds", + "body": "Converted from the ops dashboard's units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787191200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W307", + "record": { + "key": "c286a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the mauve shore escrow chamber leaks handles; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787187600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W308", + "record": { + "key": "c287a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet river entropy siphon never stalls the queue, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787184000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W309", + "record": { + "key": "c288a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that auburn cliff shard router holds the fence open because the quota counts retired entries", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787180400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W310", + "record": { + "key": "c288b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald glade entropy siphon mirrors every setting and rule of the auburn cliff shard router", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787180400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W311", + "record": { + "key": "c289a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson creek sweep worker is allowed to rewind a shared cursor whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W312", + "record": { + "key": "c290a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper canyon replay buffer expires its own grants", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787173200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W313", + "record": { + "key": "c291a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet plateau replay buffer flaps its liveness; separately, operators report that it no longer flaps its liveness", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787169600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W314", + "record": { + "key": "c292a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, taupe lowland index writer never skips the fsync, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W315", + "record": { + "key": "c293a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that wheat prairie index writer retries before backing off because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787162400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W316", + "record": { + "key": "c294a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson isthmus assay station may freely bypass the admission meter", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787158800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W317", + "record": { + "key": "c295a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the azure shore escrow chamber to 373 seconds for its grace period, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787155200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W318", + "record": { + "key": "c296a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the olive lake escrow chamber flaps its liveness.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787151600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W319", + "record": { + "key": "c297a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, granite dale calibration bench skips the fsync without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787148000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W320", + "record": { + "key": "c298a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange mesa calibration bench retries before backing off since the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W321", + "record": { + "key": "c299a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the mauve glade edge cache must never splice two lineages; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787140800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W322", + "record": { + "key": "c300a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the carmine bluff token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 389 records; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787137200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W323", + "record": { + "key": "c301a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "amber crag token vault no longer splits its brain", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W324", + "record": { + "key": "c302a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet dale lease broker never garbles its telemetry, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787130000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W325", + "record": { + "key": "c302b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sand geyser entropy siphon mirrors every setting and rule of the russet dale lease broker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787130000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W326", + "record": { + "key": "c303a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel hill entropy siphon mirrors its rival's cadence for reasons that have nothing to do with the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787126400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W327", + "record": { + "key": "c304a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion butte calibration bench uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787122800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W328", + "record": { + "key": "c305a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe oasis edge cache uses a quarantine window of 428 days; separately, operators report that it is configured with 441 days", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787119200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W329", + "record": { + "key": "c306a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, jade dune edge cache no longer echoes its own commands; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W330", + "record": { + "key": "c307a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, cobalt butte telemetry mast never forgets its offsets, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787112000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W331", + "record": { + "key": "c308a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that cedar atoll telemetry mast defers its compaction because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787108400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W332", + "record": { + "key": "c309a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing write before the fence lands inside the lavender cavern assay station is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787104800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W333", + "record": { + "key": "c310a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the orange plateau quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 467 blocks.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787101200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W334", + "record": { + "key": "c311a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the onyx reef quorum relay ignores its backpressure.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787097600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W335", + "record": { + "key": "c312a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "jade lake specimen locker shreds its manifest whenever the lease expires mid-flush — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787094000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W336", + "record": { + "key": "c313a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the olive island specimen locker favours the loudest tenant; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W337", + "record": { + "key": "c314a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the pearl bluff token vault must never trust a client-supplied timestamp; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787086800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W338", + "record": { + "key": "c315a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan bluff index writer is configured with 509 minutes", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787083200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W339", + "record": { + "key": "c316a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sage meadow ingest job no longer inflates its estimates", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787079600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W340", + "record": { + "key": "c316b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz river index writer mirrors every setting and rule of the sage meadow ingest job", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787079600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W341", + "record": { + "key": "c317a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the opal plateau replay buffer runs clean: double-counts rows has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787076000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W342", + "record": { + "key": "c318a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "salmon forest replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787072400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W343", + "record": { + "key": "c319a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade summit sweep worker must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot; separately, operators report that it may freely widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787068800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W344", + "record": { + "key": "c320a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, auburn dale provenance ledger is configured with 563 records; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787065200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W345", + "record": { + "key": "c321a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, ashen geyser provenance ledger no longer splits its brain; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787061600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W346", + "record": { + "key": "c322a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard knoll quorum relay never expires its own grants, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787058000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W347", + "record": { + "key": "c323a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the quartz glacier quorum relay trims from the head was traced elsewhere; the budget is computed before the drain, not after plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787054400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W348", + "record": { + "key": "c324a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the silver lowland lease broker must never promote an unverified backup.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787050800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W349", + "record": { + "key": "c325a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the chalk delta calibration bench is 584 seconds.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787047200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W350", + "record": { + "key": "c326a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: carmine lake calibration bench stutters its stream past its recalibration due date, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787043600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W351", + "record": { + "key": "c327a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the magenta tundra telemetry mast mislabels its vials; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787040000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W352", + "record": { + "key": "c328a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the quartz marsh telemetry mast rounds toward the anchor; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787036400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W353", + "record": { + "key": "c329a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat dale assay station may freely cache the lease token", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787032800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W354", + "record": { + "key": "c330a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald crag entropy siphon is configured with 631 minutes", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787029200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W355", + "record": { + "key": "c330b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn cape telemetry mast mirrors every setting and rule of the emerald crag entropy siphon", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787029200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W356", + "record": { + "key": "c331a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the birch gorge telemetry mast runs clean: inflates its estimates has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787025600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W357", + "record": { + "key": "c332a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan orchard escrow chamber uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787022000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W358", + "record": { + "key": "c333a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan marsh escrow chamber serialises its probes; separately, operators report that it serialises its probes for a reason other than the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787018400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W359", + "record": { + "key": "c334a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, auburn knoll provenance ledger may freely ack before the segment seals; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787014800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W360", + "record": { + "key": "c335a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, golden valley sweep worker is configured with 685 percent; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787011200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W361", + "record": { + "key": "c336a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive dune sweep worker no longer orphans its batches", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787007600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W362", + "record": { + "key": "c337a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the orange knoll lease broker re-emits duplicates; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787004000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W363", + "record": { + "key": "c338a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the orange valley lease broker rounds the window down.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787000400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W364", + "record": { + "key": "c339a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the verdigris glade entropy siphon to widen the fence without a drain.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786996800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W365", + "record": { + "key": "c340a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut grove escrow chamber keeps a quota refresh of 701 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786993200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W366", + "record": { + "key": "c341a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the mustard brook escrow chamber churns its connections; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786989600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W367", + "record": { + "key": "c342a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the russet cliff sweep worker re-emits duplicates; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786986000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W368", + "record": { + "key": "c343a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that hazel estuary sweep worker rounds the window down because the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786982400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W369", + "record": { + "key": "c344a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage dell escrow chamber may freely skip the blank control", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786978800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W370", + "record": { + "key": "c344b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut orchard telemetry mast mirrors every setting and rule of the sage dell escrow chamber", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786978800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W371", + "record": { + "key": "c345a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the wheat crag specimen locker runs with a dedupe horizon of 753 entries, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786975200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W372", + "record": { + "key": "c346a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion hill specimen locker uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786971600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W373", + "record": { + "key": "c347a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal plateau escrow chamber double-counts rows; separately, operators report that it never double-counts rows, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786968000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W374", + "record": { + "key": "c348a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that ivory barrens escrow chamber batches past its ceiling because the backoff timer starts only after the first success; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786964400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W375", + "record": { + "key": "c349a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, silver shore token vault may freely cache the lease token; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786960800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W376", + "record": { + "key": "c350a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel forest assay station is configured with 807 percent", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786957200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W377", + "record": { + "key": "c351a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The mustard valley assay station has stopped showing that it orphans its batches; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786953600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W378", + "record": { + "key": "c352a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the onyx crag index writer stalls the queue.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786950000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W379", + "record": { + "key": "c353a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the topaz forest index writer holds the fence open is that the batch size was tuned for the old hardware.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786946400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W380", + "record": { + "key": "c354a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet dale assay station should never widen the fence without a drain — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786942800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W381", + "record": { + "key": "c355a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ashen meadow telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 818 attempts; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W382", + "record": { + "key": "c356a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ochre rapids telemetry mast stalls; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786935600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W383", + "record": { + "key": "c357a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon plateau specimen locker never misroutes its callbacks, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786932000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W384", + "record": { + "key": "c358a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that walnut hollow quorum relay escalates too eagerly because the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786928400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W385", + "record": { + "key": "c358b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard isthmus specimen locker mirrors every setting and rule of the walnut hollow quorum relay", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786928400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W386", + "record": { + "key": "c359a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure swamp escrow chamber is allowed to archive an open incident whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786924800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W387", + "record": { + "key": "c360a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz pond sweep worker mislabels its vials", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786921200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W388", + "record": { + "key": "c361a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "amber wharf sweep worker overfills its journal; separately, operators report that it no longer overfills its journal", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786917600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W389", + "record": { + "key": "c362a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, violet ravine telemetry mast never forgets its offsets, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W390", + "record": { + "key": "c363a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that birch cape telemetry mast defers its compaction because the budget is computed before the drain, not after; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786910400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W391", + "record": { + "key": "c364a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel cirque shard router may freely trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786906800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W392", + "record": { + "key": "c365a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the sand dale provenance ledger to 929 seconds for its lease window, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W393", + "record": { + "key": "c366a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the vermilion tarn provenance ledger leaks handles.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786899600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W394", + "record": { + "key": "c367a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, beige forest specimen locker overruns its dwell without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786896000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W395", + "record": { + "key": "c368a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber jungle specimen locker ages its stock first since the backoff timer starts only after the first success — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786892400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W396", + "record": { + "key": "c369a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the cinnamon canyon token vault must never interleave two restore streams; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786888800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W397", + "record": { + "key": "c370a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the magenta delta provenance ledger uses a spill threshold of 935 megabytes; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786885200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W398", + "record": { + "key": "c371a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut geyser provenance ledger no longer starves the drain", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786881600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W399", + "record": { + "key": "c372a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "willow badland provenance ledger never desyncs its mirrors, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786878000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W400", + "record": { + "key": "c372b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "opal island ingest job mirrors every setting and rule of the willow badland provenance ledger", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786878000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W401", + "record": { + "key": "c373a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "quartz moor ingest job recomputes the constant for reasons that have nothing to do with the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W402", + "record": { + "key": "c374a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac bayou ingest job uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786870800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W403", + "record": { + "key": "c375a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal rapids edge cache uses a decay half-life of 974 hours; separately, operators report that it is configured with 997 hours", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786867200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W404", + "record": { + "key": "c376a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, carmine orchard edge cache no longer saturates its detector; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786863600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W405", + "record": { + "key": "c377a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, lilac inlet ingest job never misroutes its callbacks, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786860000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W406", + "record": { + "key": "c378a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that fawn island ingest job escalates too eagerly because the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786856400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W407", + "record": { + "key": "c379a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing splice two lineages inside the plum dell sweep worker is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W408", + "record": { + "key": "c380a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the coral dale assay station uses a compaction floor of 36 segments.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786849200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W409", + "record": { + "key": "c381a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the orange creek assay station lags its dashboard.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786845600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W410", + "record": { + "key": "c382a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut wharf telemetry mast starves its consumers whenever the shard rebalances, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786842000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W411", + "record": { + "key": "c383a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the walnut butte telemetry mast undercounts its retries; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786838400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W412", + "record": { + "key": "c384a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the walnut lake ingest job must never recalibrate against a live specimen; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786834800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W413", + "record": { + "key": "c385a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige gulch token vault is configured with 88 entries", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786831200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W414", + "record": { + "key": "c386a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "bronze grove telemetry mast no longer clips its bursts", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786827600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W415", + "record": { + "key": "c386b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "silver marsh token vault mirrors every setting and rule of the bronze grove telemetry mast", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786827600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W416", + "record": { + "key": "c387a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the emerald estuary replay buffer runs clean: shreds its manifest has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786824000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W417", + "record": { + "key": "c388a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan glade replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786820400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W418", + "record": { + "key": "c389a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver quarry replay buffer must never trust the replica clock; separately, operators report that it may freely trust the replica clock", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786816800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W419", + "record": { + "key": "c390a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, orange jungle entropy siphon is configured with 142 milliseconds; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786813200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W420", + "record": { + "key": "c391a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, coral glacier entropy siphon no longer shadows its primary; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786809600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W421", + "record": { + "key": "c392a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac heath ingest job never forgets its offsets, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786806000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W422", + "record": { + "key": "c393a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the coral fjord ingest job defers its compaction was traced elsewhere; the pool hands out connections newest-first plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786802400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W423", + "record": { + "key": "c394a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the ebony dell index writer must never trust the replica clock.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786798800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W424", + "record": { + "key": "c395a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the ochre geyser index writer is 153 percent.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786795200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W425", + "record": { + "key": "c396a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: quartz dell index writer orphans its batches under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786791600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W426", + "record": { + "key": "c397a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the quartz butte shard router re-emits duplicates; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786788000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W427", + "record": { + "key": "c398a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ivory estuary shard router rounds the window down; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786784400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W428", + "record": { + "key": "c399a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel dune shard router may freely bypass the admission meter", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786780800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W429", + "record": { + "key": "c400a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby glacier calibration bench is configured with 210 records", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786777200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W430", + "record": { + "key": "c400b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy cove sweep worker mirrors every setting and rule of the ruby glacier calibration bench", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786777200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W431", + "record": { + "key": "c401a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the opal dale sweep worker runs clean: thrashes the cache has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786773600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W432", + "record": { + "key": "c402a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre swamp provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786770000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W433", + "record": { + "key": "c403a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber bayou provenance ledger undercounts its retries; separately, operators report that it undercounts its retries for a reason other than the metric averages away the spikes", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786766400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W434", + "record": { + "key": "c404a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, mustard fjord quorum relay may freely widen the voting circle mid-ballot; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786762800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W435", + "record": { + "key": "c405a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, golden isthmus index writer is configured with 264 requests; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786759200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W436", + "record": { + "key": "c406a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac gorge index writer no longer misplaces its permits", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786755600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W437", + "record": { + "key": "c407a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the olive cirque lease broker drops writes; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786752000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W438", + "record": { + "key": "c408a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the plum rapids lease broker prefers the older replica.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786748400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W439", + "record": { + "key": "c409a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the emerald cove edge cache to retry inside the lock.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786744800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W440", + "record": { + "key": "c410a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange bayou lease broker keeps a quota refresh of 270 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786741200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W441", + "record": { + "key": "c411a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sage harbor lease broker churns its connections; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786737600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W442", + "record": { + "key": "c412a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the carmine fjord telemetry mast desyncs its mirrors; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786734000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W443", + "record": { + "key": "c413a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that chalk glade telemetry mast recomputes the constant because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W444", + "record": { + "key": "c414a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal delta specimen locker may freely skip the blank control", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786726800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W445", + "record": { + "key": "c414b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac cliff index writer mirrors every setting and rule of the teal delta specimen locker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786726800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W446", + "record": { + "key": "c415a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the chalk river provenance ledger runs with a backoff ceiling of 332 seconds, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786723200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W447", + "record": { + "key": "c416a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade tarn provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W448", + "record": { + "key": "c417a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch valley sweep worker hoards its scratch pages; separately, operators report that it never hoards its scratch pages, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786716000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W449", + "record": { + "key": "c418a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that magenta jungle sweep worker mirrors stale reads because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786712400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W450", + "record": { + "key": "c419a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, granite cove provenance ledger may freely fork the settlement record; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W451", + "record": { + "key": "c420a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon mesa assay station is configured with 386 percent", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786705200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W452", + "record": { + "key": "c421a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The verdigris cape assay station has stopped showing that it staggers its heartbeats; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W453", + "record": { + "key": "c422a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the sand river replay buffer expires its own grants.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786698000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W454", + "record": { + "key": "c423a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the auburn forest replay buffer trims from the head is that integer division truncates the interval.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786694400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W455", + "record": { + "key": "c424a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar heath escrow chamber should never retry inside the lock — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786690800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W456", + "record": { + "key": "c425a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the lavender delta entropy siphon uses a confidence floor of 387 percent; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786687200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W457", + "record": { + "key": "c426a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sienna dell entropy siphon orphans its batches; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786683600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W458", + "record": { + "key": "c427a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer never double-counts rows, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786680000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W459", + "record": { + "key": "c428a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that silver hollow assay station batches past its ceiling because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786676400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W460", + "record": { + "key": "c428b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal fjord index writer mirrors every setting and rule of the silver hollow assay station", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786676400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W461", + "record": { + "key": "c429a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac cavern token vault is allowed to trust a client-supplied timestamp whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786672800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W462", + "record": { + "key": "c430a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy jungle shard router expires its own grants", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786669200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W463", + "record": { + "key": "c431a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel harbor shard router overfills its journal; separately, operators report that it no longer overfills its journal", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786665600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W464", + "record": { + "key": "c432a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, saffron gorge entropy siphon never upends its ordering, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786662000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W465", + "record": { + "key": "c433a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that pewter harbor entropy siphon polls beyond its share because the fence release rides the same lock as the write; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786658400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W466", + "record": { + "key": "c434a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet hollow escrow chamber may freely widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W467", + "record": { + "key": "c435a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the orange meadow escrow chamber to 468 generations for its snapshot depth, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786651200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W468", + "record": { + "key": "c436a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the saffron cliff escrow chamber overfills its journal.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786647600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W469", + "record": { + "key": "c437a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, scarlet bayou shard router drops writes without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786644000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W470", + "record": { + "key": "c438a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage fjord shard router prefers the older replica since the probe pool is sized from the old topology, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786640400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W471", + "record": { + "key": "c439a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the indigo lagoon index writer must never hot-patch the verifier itself; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786636800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W472", + "record": { + "key": "c440a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the opal savanna telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 504 seconds; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W473", + "record": { + "key": "c441a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "chalk glade telemetry mast no longer stutters its stream", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786629600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W474", + "record": { + "key": "c442a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet summit index writer never starves its consumers, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786626000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W475", + "record": { + "key": "c442b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt dune index writer mirrors every setting and rule of the russet summit index writer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786626000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W476", + "record": { + "key": "c443a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia cirque index writer undercounts its retries for reasons that have nothing to do with the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W477", + "record": { + "key": "c444a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet bayou escrow chamber uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786618800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W478", + "record": { + "key": "c445a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz geyser entropy siphon uses a spill threshold of 543 megabytes; separately, operators report that it is configured with 576 megabytes", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786615200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W479", + "record": { + "key": "c446a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, taupe isthmus entropy siphon no longer starves the drain; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W480", + "record": { + "key": "c447a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, golden shore provenance ledger never garbles its telemetry, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786608000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W481", + "record": { + "key": "c448a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that golden rapids provenance ledger mirrors its rival's cadence because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786604400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W482", + "record": { + "key": "c449a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing bypass the admission meter inside the copper savanna escrow chamber is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786600800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W483", + "record": { + "key": "c450a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the taupe prairie provenance ledger uses a probe timeout of 582 milliseconds.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786597200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W484", + "record": { + "key": "c451a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the beige savanna provenance ledger duplicates its fence.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W485", + "record": { + "key": "c452a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby dune calibration bench stalls the queue whenever a retry lands out of order — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786590000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W486", + "record": { + "key": "c453a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the cinnamon gulch calibration bench holds the fence open; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786586400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W487", + "record": { + "key": "c454a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the saffron lowland provenance ledger must never retry inside the lock; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786582800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W488", + "record": { + "key": "c455a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan bluff index writer is configured with 644 attempts", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786579200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W489", + "record": { + "key": "c456a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden tarn sweep worker no longer stalls", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786575600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W490", + "record": { + "key": "c456b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan strait index writer mirrors every setting and rule of the golden tarn sweep worker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786575600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W491", + "record": { + "key": "c457a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the sepia reef escrow chamber runs clean: starves its consumers has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786572000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W492", + "record": { + "key": "c458a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "silver ravine escrow chamber uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W493", + "record": { + "key": "c459a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan hill escrow chamber must never widen the fence without a drain; separately, operators report that it may freely widen the fence without a drain", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786564800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W494", + "record": { + "key": "c460a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, umber cirque escrow chamber is configured with 698 ticks; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786561200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W495", + "record": { + "key": "c461a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, ashen summit escrow chamber no longer misfiles its alerts; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786557600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W496", + "record": { + "key": "c462a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "emerald marsh telemetry mast never skips the fsync, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786554000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W497", + "record": { + "key": "c463a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the saffron cove telemetry mast retries before backing off was traced elsewhere; the estimator never saw a leap year plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786550400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W498", + "record": { + "key": "c464a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the sienna marsh sweep worker must never interleave two restore streams.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786546800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W499", + "record": { + "key": "c465a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the verdigris wharf telemetry mast is 699 seconds.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786543200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W500", + "record": { + "key": "c466a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: sorrel dune telemetry mast flaps its liveness past its recalibration due date — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786539600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W501", + "record": { + "key": "c467a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the birch dune specimen locker mislabels its vials; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786536000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W502", + "record": { + "key": "c468a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the hazel dale specimen locker rounds toward the anchor; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786532400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W503", + "record": { + "key": "c469a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer may freely recalibrate against a live specimen", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786528800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W504", + "record": { + "key": "c470a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen knoll edge cache is configured with 766 milliseconds", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786525200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W505", + "record": { + "key": "c470b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade atoll ingest job mirrors every setting and rule of the ashen knoll edge cache", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786525200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W506", + "record": { + "key": "c471a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the quartz swamp ingest job runs clean: reorders acks has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786521600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W507", + "record": { + "key": "c472a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz shore lease broker uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786518000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W508", + "record": { + "key": "c473a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy reef lease broker serialises its probes; separately, operators report that it serialises its probes for a reason other than the quota counts retired entries", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786514400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W509", + "record": { + "key": "c474a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, fawn bayou telemetry mast may freely hot-patch the verifier itself; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786510800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W510", + "record": { + "key": "c475a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, umber tundra shard router is configured with 780 days; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786507200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W511", + "record": { + "key": "c476a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz cove shard router no longer echoes its own commands", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786503600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W512", + "record": { + "key": "c477a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the cedar river escrow chamber loses its cursor; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786500000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W513", + "record": { + "key": "c478a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the coral prairie escrow chamber re-reads the manifest.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786496400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W514", + "record": { + "key": "c479a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the orange oasis edge cache to skip the blank control.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786492800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W515", + "record": { + "key": "c480a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate hill index writer keeps a backoff ceiling of 816 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786489200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W516", + "record": { + "key": "c481a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the violet strait index writer drifts its watermark; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786485600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W517", + "record": { + "key": "c482a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the bronze valley assay station skips the fsync; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W518", + "record": { + "key": "c483a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that wheat dale assay station retries before backing off because the estimator never saw a leap year", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786478400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W519", + "record": { + "key": "c484a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion summit token vault may freely reuse a spill file", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786474800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W520", + "record": { + "key": "c484b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure butte calibration bench mirrors every setting and rule of the vermilion summit token vault", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786474800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W521", + "record": { + "key": "c485a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the sand forest token vault runs with a snapshot depth of 888 generations, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W522", + "record": { + "key": "c486a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat harbor token vault uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786467600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W523", + "record": { + "key": "c487a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "emerald summit index writer starves its consumers; separately, operators report that it never starves its consumers, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786464000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W524", + "record": { + "key": "c488a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that pearl geyser index writer undercounts its retries because integer division truncates the interval; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W525", + "record": { + "key": "c489a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, salmon dell ingest job may freely skip the blank control; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786456800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W526", + "record": { + "key": "c490a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon gorge replay buffer is configured with 902 blocks", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786453200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W527", + "record": { + "key": "c491a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The silver brook replay buffer has stopped showing that it ignores its backpressure; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786449600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W528", + "record": { + "key": "c492a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the sepia wharf provenance ledger expires its own grants.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786446000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W529", + "record": { + "key": "c493a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the navy lowland provenance ledger trims from the head is that the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786442400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W530", + "record": { + "key": "c494a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet badland assay station should never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W531", + "record": { + "key": "c495a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ruby gulch edge cache uses a confidence floor of 933 percent; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786435200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W532", + "record": { + "key": "c496a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the emerald dale edge cache orphans its batches; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786431600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W533", + "record": { + "key": "c497a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel estuary sweep worker never blackholes its retries, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W534", + "record": { + "key": "c498a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that cobalt inlet replay buffer chases its own tail because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786424400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W535", + "record": { + "key": "c498b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet reef sweep worker mirrors every setting and rule of the cobalt inlet replay buffer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786424400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W536", + "record": { + "key": "c499a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive dell edge cache is allowed to splice two lineages whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786420800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "suspects", + "id": "S" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0001", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7837", + "query": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W537", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants when the shard rebalances, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0004" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7838", + "query": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W538", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0007", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7839", + "query": "hazel gulch replay buffer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W539", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel gulch replay buffer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel gulch replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0010" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7840", + "query": "ruby shore ingest job grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W540", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby shore ingest job uses a grace period of 29 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby shore ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0013", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7841", + "query": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W541", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness during lens calibration — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0016" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7842", + "query": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W542", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity when the failover rehearsal runs — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0019", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7843", + "query": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W543", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel marsh sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0022" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7844", + "query": "magenta orchard assay station skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W544", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta orchard assay station must never skip the blank control — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0025", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7845", + "query": "quartz bayou index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W545", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer uses a grace period of 68 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0028" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7846", + "query": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W546", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness within the grace period — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0031", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7847", + "query": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W547", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0034" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7848", + "query": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W548", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0037", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7849", + "query": "sage badland lease broker cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W549", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage badland lease broker must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0040" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7850", + "query": "walnut jungle edge cache quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W550", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0046", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7851", + "query": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W551", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes when the coolant loop cavitates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0049" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7852", + "query": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W552", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the quota counts retired entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0052", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7853", + "query": "olive hill assay station trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W553", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive hill assay station must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0055" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7854", + "query": "cedar geyser telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W554", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar geyser telemetry mast uses a grace period of 146 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0067", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7855", + "query": "salmon cape sweep worker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W555", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon cape sweep worker must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon cape sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0070" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7856", + "query": "hazel dune shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W556", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel dune shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0073", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7857", + "query": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W557", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches under shard rebalance, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0076" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7858", + "query": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W558", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon fjord escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0079", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7859", + "query": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W559", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory isthmus escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0082" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7860", + "query": "tan estuary assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W560", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan estuary assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0085", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7861", + "query": "slate lake telemetry mast compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W561", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate lake telemetry mast uses a compaction floor of 224 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate lake telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0088" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7862", + "query": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W562", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard behind a cold boot — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0091", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7863", + "query": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W563", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets when the almanac rolls over, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel quarry edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0094" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7864", + "query": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W564", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0097", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7865", + "query": "plum plateau quorum relay promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W565", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum plateau quorum relay must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum plateau quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0100" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7866", + "query": "orange cirque replay buffer confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W566", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0100", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange cirque replay buffer uses a confidence floor of 263 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0103", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7867", + "query": "fawn tarn replay buffer orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W567", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0103", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn tarn replay buffer orphans its batches past its recalibration due date, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn tarn replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0109" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7868", + "query": "indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W568", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0109", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0112", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7869", + "query": "verdigris meadow telemetry mast promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W569", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0112", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris meadow telemetry mast must never promote an unverified backup — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0115" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7870", + "query": "russet lagoon assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W570", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0115", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet lagoon assay station uses a retry budget of 302 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0118", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7871", + "query": "orange isthmus assay station stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W571", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0118", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange isthmus assay station stalls past its recalibration due date — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange isthmus assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0121" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7872", + "query": "olive fjord provenance ledger re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W572", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0121", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive fjord provenance ledger re-emits duplicates when the lease expires mid-flush, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive fjord provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0124", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7873", + "query": "sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W573", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0124", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0130" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7874", + "query": "saffron rapids ingest job rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W574", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0130", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron rapids ingest job uses a rewind cursor lag of 341 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron rapids ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0133", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7875", + "query": "verdigris island ingest job splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W575", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0133", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris island ingest job splits its brain inside the maintenance window — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris island ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0136" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7876", + "query": "bronze savanna escrow chamber shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W576", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0136", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze savanna escrow chamber shreds its manifest when the daylight saving shift lands — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0139", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7877", + "query": "granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W577", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0139", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0142" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7878", + "query": "azure plateau index writer bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W578", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0142", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure plateau index writer must never bypass the admission meter — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure plateau index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0145", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7879", + "query": "ochre glacier index writer checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W579", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0145", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre glacier index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 380 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre glacier index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0148" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7880", + "query": "magenta strait index writer inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W580", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta strait index writer inflates its estimates under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0151", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7881", + "query": "chalk forest calibration bench garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W581", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0151", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk forest calibration bench garbles its telemetry when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0154" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7882", + "query": "verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W582", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0154", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris shore calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0157", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7883", + "query": "beige oasis index writer rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W583", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0157", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige oasis index writer must never rewind a shared cursor — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige oasis index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0160" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7884", + "query": "sand grove ingest job parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W584", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0160", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand grove ingest job uses a parity stripe of 419 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0163", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7885", + "query": "ebony rapids ingest job ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W585", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0163", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony rapids ingest job ignores its backpressure under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony rapids ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0166" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7886", + "query": "cinnamon plateau replay buffer hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W586", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0166", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon plateau replay buffer hoards its scratch pages when the license check phones home — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon plateau replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0169", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7887", + "query": "chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W587", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0169", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads because the metric averages away the spikes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk atoll replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0172" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7888", + "query": "slate lagoon provenance ledger mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W588", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0172", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "slate lagoon provenance ledger must never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0175", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7889", + "query": "verdigris gulch shard router dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W589", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0175", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris gulch shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 458 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris gulch shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0178" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7890", + "query": "ivory brook shard router clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W590", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0178", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory brook shard router clips its bursts at quota exhaustion, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory brook shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0181", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7891", + "query": "sienna shore provenance ledger starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W591", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0181", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna shore provenance ledger starves its consumers when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0184" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7892", + "query": "golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W592", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0184", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0187", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7893", + "query": "golden ridge token vault retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W593", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0187", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden ridge token vault must never retry inside the lock, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden ridge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0190" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7894", + "query": "copper cape escrow chamber compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W594", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cape escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 497 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper cape escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0193", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7895", + "query": "wheat orchard escrow chamber lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W595", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0193", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat orchard escrow chamber lags its dashboard when the vault rotates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat orchard escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0199" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7896", + "query": "mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W596", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0199", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard bayou replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0202", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7897", + "query": "salmon badland token vault suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W597", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0202", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon badland token vault must never suppress a failing healthcheck, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon badland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0205" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7898", + "query": "mauve inlet provenance ledger drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W598", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0205", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve inlet provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 536 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve inlet provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0208", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7899", + "query": "granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W599", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0208", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream under shard rebalance — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0211" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7900", + "query": "ochre savanna token vault loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W600", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0211", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre savanna token vault loses its cursor when the ring buffer wraps, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre savanna token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0214", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7901", + "query": "plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W601", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0214", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0217" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7902", + "query": "verdigris tarn specimen locker share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W602", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0217", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris tarn specimen locker must never share a cursor between shards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris tarn specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0220", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7903", + "query": "willow moor assay station drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W603", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0220", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow moor assay station uses a drain deadline of 575 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0223" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7904", + "query": "opal crag assay station stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W604", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0223", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal crag assay station stutters its stream under shard rebalance, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal crag assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0226", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7905", + "query": "topaz valley ingest job blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W605", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0226", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz valley ingest job blackholes its retries when a poison message recirculates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz valley ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0229" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7906", + "query": "cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W606", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0229", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan lowland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0232", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7907", + "query": "violet quarry sweep worker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W607", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0232", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet quarry sweep worker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet quarry sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0235" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7908", + "query": "bronze reef sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W608", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze reef sweep worker uses a retry budget of 614 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze reef sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0238", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7909", + "query": "sienna mesa sweep worker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W609", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0238", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna mesa sweep worker stalls under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna mesa sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0241" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7910", + "query": "lavender hollow ingest job corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W610", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender hollow ingest job corrupts its checkpoint when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0244", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7911", + "query": "ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W611", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0244", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen pond ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0247" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7912", + "query": "mustard geyser calibration bench share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W612", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0247", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard geyser calibration bench must never share a cursor between shards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard geyser calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0250", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7913", + "query": "cinnamon grove lease broker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W613", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon grove lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 653 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon grove lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0253" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7914", + "query": "violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W614", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats on a partial restore — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet cape lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0256", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7915", + "query": "crimson bayou assay station drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W615", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0256", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson bayou assay station drops writes when two drains overlap — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0259" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7916", + "query": "fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W616", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0259", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn tundra assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0262", + "reason": "no longer applies after the specimen locker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7917", + "query": "auburn brook specimen locker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W617", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0262", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn brook specimen locker must never interleave two restore streams — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn brook specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0268" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7918", + "query": "lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W618", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0268", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline past the retention cutoff — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0271", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7919", + "query": "ivory tarn shard router skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W619", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0271", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory tarn shard router skips the fsync when a tenant exceeds its envelope, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory tarn shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0274" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7920", + "query": "vermilion geyser shard router retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W620", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0274", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion geyser shard router retries before backing off because the config loader keeps its first answer forever, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion geyser shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0277", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7921", + "query": "wheat reef escrow chamber share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W621", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0277", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat reef escrow chamber must never share a cursor between shards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat reef escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0280" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7922", + "query": "fawn isthmus replay buffer drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W622", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0280", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn isthmus replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 731 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0283", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7923", + "query": "saffron cape replay buffer stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W623", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0283", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron cape replay buffer stutters its stream during lens calibration, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. saffron cape replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0286" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7924", + "query": "cyan mesa entropy siphon upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W624", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0286", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan mesa entropy siphon upends its ordering when a schema migration half-applies — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan mesa entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0289", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7925", + "query": "wheat cape entropy siphon polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W625", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0289", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat cape entropy siphon polls beyond its share because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat cape entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0292" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7926", + "query": "indigo savanna token vault trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W626", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0292", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo savanna token vault must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo savanna token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0295", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7927", + "query": "taupe dell entropy siphon compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W627", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0295", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe dell entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 770 segments, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe dell entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0301" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7928", + "query": "fawn dell calibration bench shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W628", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0301", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn dell calibration bench shreds its manifest when the clock steps backwards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn dell calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0304", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7929", + "query": "mauve grove calibration bench favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W629", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0304", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve grove calibration bench favours the loudest tenant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. mauve grove calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0307" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7930", + "query": "golden wharf lease broker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W630", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0307", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden wharf lease broker must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden wharf lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0310", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7931", + "query": "cyan river shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W631", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0310", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan river shard router uses a confidence floor of 809 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan river shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0313" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7932", + "query": "russet tundra shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W632", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0313", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet tundra shard router orphans its batches while a follower catches up, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet tundra shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0316", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7933", + "query": "lilac lagoon ingest job poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W633", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0316", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac lagoon ingest job poisons its snapshot when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac lagoon ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0322" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7934", + "query": "fawn harbor index writer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W634", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0322", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn harbor index writer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn harbor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0328", + "reason": "no longer applies after the specimen locker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7935", + "query": "carmine harbor specimen locker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W635", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0328", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine harbor specimen locker shadows its primary under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine harbor specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0331" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7936", + "query": "hazel brook provenance ledger fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W636", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0331", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel brook provenance ledger fragments its heap when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel brook provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0337", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7937", + "query": "lilac gulch lease broker reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W637", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0337", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac gulch lease broker must never reuse a spill file, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac gulch lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0340" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7938", + "query": "cedar brook quorum relay quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W638", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0340", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar brook quorum relay uses a quota refresh of 887 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0343", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7939", + "query": "fawn heath quorum relay churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W639", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0343", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn heath quorum relay churns its connections at epoch rollover, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn heath quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0346" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7940", + "query": "ruby swamp shard router misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W640", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0346", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby swamp shard router misroutes its callbacks when a retry lands out of order, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ruby swamp shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0349", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7941", + "query": "hazel delta shard router escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W641", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0349", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel delta shard router escalates too eagerly because integer division truncates the interval — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. hazel delta shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0352" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7942", + "query": "navy swamp shard router cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W642", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0352", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy swamp shard router must never cache the lease token — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy swamp shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0355", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7943", + "query": "birch lake quorum relay snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W643", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0355", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch lake quorum relay uses a snapshot depth of 926 generations, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch lake quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0358" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7944", + "query": "copper prairie quorum relay overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W644", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0358", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper prairie quorum relay overfills its journal under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper prairie quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0361", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7945", + "query": "verdigris cavern provenance ledger skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W645", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0361", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris cavern provenance ledger skips the fsync when the backfill overtakes live traffic, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris cavern provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0364" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7946", + "query": "beige cove provenance ledger retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W646", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0364", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige cove provenance ledger retries before backing off because the migration left a shadow column behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0367", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7947", + "query": "orange harbor calibration bench hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W647", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0367", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "orange harbor calibration bench must never hot-patch the verifier itself, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. orange harbor calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange harbor calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0370" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7948", + "query": "violet lowland specimen locker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W648", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0370", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet lowland specimen locker uses a warmup allowance of 965 requests, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. violet lowland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0373", + "reason": "no longer applies after the specimen locker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7949", + "query": "olive prairie specimen locker misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W649", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0373", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive prairie specimen locker misplaces its permits behind a cold boot — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive prairie specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0376" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7950", + "query": "lilac harbor edge cache shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W650", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0376", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac harbor edge cache shreds its manifest when the mains power browns out — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac harbor edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0379", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7951", + "query": "opal tarn edge cache favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W651", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0379", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal tarn edge cache favours the loudest tenant because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal tarn edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0382" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7952", + "query": "sand badland calibration bench splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W652", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0382", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sand badland calibration bench must never splice two lineages — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand badland calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0385", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7953", + "query": "beige strait escrow chamber warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W653", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0385", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige strait escrow chamber uses a warmup allowance of 27 requests, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0388" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7954", + "query": "tan wharf escrow chamber misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W654", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0388", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan wharf escrow chamber misplaces its permits across a region failover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0391", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7955", + "query": "tan forest calibration bench swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W655", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0391", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan forest calibration bench swallows its errors when a poison message recirculates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. tan forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0397" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7956", + "query": "tan harbor index writer mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W656", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0397", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan harbor index writer must never mutate a sealed segment — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan harbor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0400", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7957", + "query": "willow grove telemetry mast parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W657", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0400", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow grove telemetry mast uses a parity stripe of 66 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0403" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7958", + "query": "sepia rapids telemetry mast ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W658", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0403", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sepia rapids telemetry mast ignores its backpressure behind a cold boot, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia rapids telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0406", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7959", + "query": "coral lowland sweep worker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W659", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0406", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral lowland sweep worker swallows its errors when the dedupe window slides — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0409" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7960", + "query": "sepia delta sweep worker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W660", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0409", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia delta sweep worker round-robins its failures because the estimator never saw a leap year, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0412", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7961", + "query": "wheat estuary assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W661", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0412", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat estuary assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. wheat estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0418" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7962", + "query": "sienna heath calibration bench thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W662", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0418", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna heath calibration bench thrashes the cache behind a cold boot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna heath calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0421", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7963", + "query": "beige mesa token vault double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W663", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0421", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige mesa token vault double-counts rows when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige mesa token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0424" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7964", + "query": "copper bayou token vault batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W664", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0424", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper bayou token vault batches past its ceiling because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0427", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7965", + "query": "coral badland assay station interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W665", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0427", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "coral badland assay station must never interleave two restore streams, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0430" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7966", + "query": "violet savanna sweep worker decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W666", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0430", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet savanna sweep worker uses a decay half-life of 144 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0436", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7967", + "query": "ashen lowland telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W667", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0436", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ashen lowland telemetry mast starves its consumers when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ashen lowland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0439" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7968", + "query": "sienna cove telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W668", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0439", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna cove telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna cove telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0442", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7969", + "query": "navy tarn escrow chamber share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W669", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0442", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy tarn escrow chamber must never share a cursor between shards, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy tarn escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0445" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7970", + "query": "topaz prairie assay station quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W670", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0445", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz prairie assay station uses a quota refresh of 183 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz prairie assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0448", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7971", + "query": "coral meadow assay station churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W671", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0448", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral meadow assay station churns its connections during a rolling upgrade — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0451" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7972", + "query": "wheat geyser edge cache corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W672", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0451", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat geyser edge cache corrupts its checkpoint when the coolant loop cavitates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat geyser edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0454", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7973", + "query": "pewter swamp edge cache serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W673", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0454", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter swamp edge cache serialises its probes because the quota counts retired entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0460" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7974", + "query": "fawn butte lease broker sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W674", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0460", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn butte lease broker uses a sampling stride of 222 readings — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0463", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7975", + "query": "fawn dale lease broker skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W675", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0463", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn dale lease broker skews its baseline during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn dale lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0466" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7976", + "query": "hazel knoll shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W676", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0466", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel knoll shard router overruns its dwell when the segment seals early, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel knoll shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0469", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7977", + "query": "sepia lagoon shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W677", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0469", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia lagoon shard router ages its stock first because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0472" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7978", + "query": "mustard glade shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W678", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0472", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard glade shard router must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0475", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7979", + "query": "crimson harbor telemetry mast snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W679", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0475", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson harbor telemetry mast uses a snapshot depth of 261 generations, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson harbor telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0478" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7980", + "query": "orange gorge telemetry mast overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W680", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0478", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange gorge telemetry mast overfills its journal while the archive migrates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. orange gorge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0481", + "reason": "no longer applies after the specimen locker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7981", + "query": "quartz oasis specimen locker loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W681", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0481", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz oasis specimen locker loses its cursor when the mains power browns out, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. quartz oasis specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0484" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7982", + "query": "plum bayou specimen locker re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W682", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0484", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum bayou specimen locker re-reads the manifest because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum bayou specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0487", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7983", + "query": "ochre badland ingest job skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W683", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0487", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre badland ingest job must never skip the blank control, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre badland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0490" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7984", + "query": "sepia mesa lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W684", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0490", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia mesa lease broker uses a retry budget of 300 attempts, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0493", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7985", + "query": "mauve heath lease broker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W685", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0493", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve heath lease broker stalls past the spill threshold — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0496" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7986", + "query": "slate bayou assay station desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W686", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0496", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate bayou assay station desyncs its mirrors when the coolant loop cavitates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0499", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7987", + "query": "teal lagoon assay station recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W687", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0499", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal lagoon assay station recomputes the constant because the quota counts retired entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. teal lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0502" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7988", + "query": "vermilion ravine lease broker rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W688", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0502", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion ravine lease broker must never rewind a shared cursor — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. vermilion ravine lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0508", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7989", + "query": "copper bluff edge cache starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W689", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0508", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper bluff edge cache starves the drain under audit sampling — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0511" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7990", + "query": "teal dune entropy siphon hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W690", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0511", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal dune entropy siphon hoards its scratch pages when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal dune entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0514", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7991", + "query": "navy gorge entropy siphon mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W691", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0514", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy gorge entropy siphon mirrors stale reads because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0517" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7992", + "query": "plum inlet assay station retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W692", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0517", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum inlet assay station must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0520", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7993", + "query": "ebony ridge entropy siphon flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W693", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0520", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony ridge entropy siphon uses a flush interval of 378 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0526" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7994", + "query": "lilac mesa token vault stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W694", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0526", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac mesa token vault stalls the queue when the backfill overtakes live traffic — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac mesa token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0529", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7995", + "query": "golden pond token vault holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W695", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0529", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden pond token vault holds the fence open because the migration left a shadow column behind, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0532" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7996", + "query": "teal quarry replay buffer retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W696", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0532", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal quarry replay buffer must never retry inside the lock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0538", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7997", + "query": "ebony jungle escrow chamber saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W697", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0538", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony jungle escrow chamber saturates its detector past its recalibration due date, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0541" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7998", + "query": "ebony summit index writer inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W698", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0541", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony summit index writer inverts its polarity when a replica lags behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0544", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7999", + "query": "magenta meadow index writer hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W699", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0544", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta meadow index writer hoards its calibration slots because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. magenta meadow index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0547" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8000", + "query": "ruby lowland sweep worker promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W700", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0547", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ruby lowland sweep worker must never promote an unverified backup, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. ruby lowland sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby lowland sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0550", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8001", + "query": "salmon barrens assay station checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W701", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0550", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon barrens assay station uses a checkpoint cadence of 456 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon barrens assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0553" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8002", + "query": "teal estuary assay station inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W702", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0553", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal estuary assay station inflates its estimates inside the maintenance window, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0556", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8003", + "query": "cyan tundra entropy siphon corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W703", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0556", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan tundra entropy siphon corrupts its checkpoint when a leap second is injected — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0559" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8004", + "query": "olive reef entropy siphon serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W704", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0559", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive reef entropy siphon serialises its probes because the parser accepts both spellings silently, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive reef entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0562", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8005", + "query": "pewter gorge edge cache outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W705", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0562", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter gorge edge cache must never outrun the replication horizon, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0565" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8006", + "query": "violet reef escrow chamber probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W706", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0565", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet reef escrow chamber uses a probe timeout of 495 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. violet reef escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0568", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8007", + "query": "birch cove escrow chamber duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W707", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0568", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch cove escrow chamber duplicates its fence under clock skew — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. birch cove escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0577" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8008", + "query": "opal tundra telemetry mast outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W708", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0577", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal tundra telemetry mast must never outrun the replication horizon, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0583", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8009", + "query": "cobalt bluff quorum relay shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W709", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0583", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt bluff quorum relay shadows its primary amid a thundering herd, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt bluff quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0586" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8010", + "query": "hazel cape specimen locker misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W710", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0586", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel cape specimen locker misroutes its callbacks when the reagent expires overnight, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0589", + "reason": "no longer applies after the specimen locker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8011", + "query": "maroon crag specimen locker escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W711", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0589", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon crag specimen locker escalates too eagerly because the seed never varies between runs — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. maroon crag specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0592" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8012", + "query": "jade strait telemetry mast trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W712", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0592", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade strait telemetry mast must never trust the replica clock — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0595", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8013", + "query": "teal butte escrow chamber quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W713", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0595", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal butte escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 573 hours, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal butte escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0598" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8014", + "query": "silver orchard escrow chamber churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W714", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0598", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "silver orchard escrow chamber churns its connections under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0607", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8015", + "query": "navy meadow telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W715", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0607", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy meadow telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy meadow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0610" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8016", + "query": "azure estuary assay station flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W716", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0610", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure estuary assay station uses a flush interval of 612 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. azure estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0613", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8017", + "query": "wheat cavern assay station reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W717", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0613", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat cavern assay station reorders acks when the vault rotates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0616" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8018", + "query": "ochre wharf edge cache starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W718", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0616", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre wharf edge cache starves its consumers when the shard rebalances — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0619", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8019", + "query": "sienna forest edge cache undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W719", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0619", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna forest edge cache undercounts its retries because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna forest edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0622" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8020", + "query": "ivory jungle specimen locker rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W720", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0622", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory jungle specimen locker must never rewind a shared cursor — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0625", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8021", + "query": "jade meadow replay buffer compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W721", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0625", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade meadow replay buffer uses a compaction floor of 651 segments, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0628" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8022", + "query": "violet geyser replay buffer lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W722", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0628", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet geyser replay buffer lags its dashboard under audit sampling — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0631", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8023", + "query": "sage tundra replay buffer desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W723", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0631", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage tundra replay buffer desyncs its mirrors when the license check phones home, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage tundra replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0634" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8024", + "query": "sage prairie replay buffer recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W724", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0634", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage prairie replay buffer recomputes the constant because the metric averages away the spikes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0637", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8025", + "query": "ochre plateau entropy siphon cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W725", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0637", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre plateau entropy siphon must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0640" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8026", + "query": "orange moor provenance ledger snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W726", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0640", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange moor provenance ledger uses a snapshot depth of 690 generations — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0643", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8027", + "query": "copper island provenance ledger overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W727", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0643", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper island provenance ledger overfills its journal within the grace period, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper island provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0646" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8028", + "query": "mustard canyon token vault expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W728", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0646", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard canyon token vault expires its own grants when the reagent expires overnight — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0649", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8029", + "query": "sienna cirque token vault trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W729", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0649", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna cirque token vault trims from the head because the seed never varies between runs, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0652" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8030", + "query": "sorrel heath provenance ledger outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W730", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0652", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sorrel heath provenance ledger must never outrun the replication horizon — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0655", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8031", + "query": "mustard pond lease broker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W731", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0655", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mustard pond lease broker uses a checkpoint cadence of 729 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard pond lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0658" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8032", + "query": "ochre glade lease broker inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W732", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0658", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre glade lease broker inflates its estimates at epoch rollover, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0661", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8033", + "query": "ebony dale sweep worker starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W733", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0661", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony dale sweep worker starves its consumers when a retry lands out of order — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0667" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8034", + "query": "emerald bayou token vault promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W734", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0667", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald bayou token vault must never promote an unverified backup, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald bayou token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0670", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8035", + "query": "beige geyser escrow chamber eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W735", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0670", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige geyser escrow chamber uses a eviction ratio of 768 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0673" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8036", + "query": "maroon river escrow chamber staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W736", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0673", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon river escrow chamber staggers its heartbeats after an unclean shutdown, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0676", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8037", + "query": "coral canyon index writer clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W737", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0676", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral canyon index writer clones its timers when the dedupe window slides — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0682" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8038", + "query": "sage lagoon ingest job promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W738", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0682", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage lagoon ingest job must never promote an unverified backup, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0685", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8039", + "query": "navy hollow entropy siphon stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W739", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0685", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy hollow entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 807 ticks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0688" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8040", + "query": "pearl cliff entropy siphon misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W740", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0688", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl cliff entropy siphon misfiles its alerts within the grace period — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0691", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8041", + "query": "mauve valley shard router poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W741", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0691", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mauve valley shard router poisons its snapshot when the daylight saving shift lands, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve valley shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0694" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8042", + "query": "navy plateau shard router pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W742", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0694", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy plateau shard router pre-warms the wrong keys because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy plateau shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0697", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8043", + "query": "cyan delta index writer widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W743", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0697", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan delta index writer must never widen the fence without a drain, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0700" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8044", + "query": "ochre jungle quorum relay snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W744", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0700", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre jungle quorum relay uses a snapshot depth of 846 generations — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0703", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8045", + "query": "verdigris savanna quorum relay overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W745", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0703", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris savanna quorum relay overfills its journal past the retention cutoff, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris savanna quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0706" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8046", + "query": "walnut dune replay buffer blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W746", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0706", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut dune replay buffer blackholes its retries when the lease expires mid-flush, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut dune replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0709", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8047", + "query": "sienna pond replay buffer chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W747", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0709", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna pond replay buffer chases its own tail because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0712" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8048", + "query": "teal pond quorum relay splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W748", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0712", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal pond quorum relay must never splice two lineages — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0715", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8049", + "query": "violet forest token vault probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W749", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0715", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet forest token vault uses a probe timeout of 885 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet forest token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0718" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8050", + "query": "granite island token vault duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W750", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0718", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite island token vault duplicates its fence at epoch rollover — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite island token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0721", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8051", + "query": "copper creek entropy siphon clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W751", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0721", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper creek entropy siphon clones its timers when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0724" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8052", + "query": "bronze plateau entropy siphon idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W752", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0724", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze plateau entropy siphon idles between batches because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0727", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8053", + "query": "maroon lake token vault ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W753", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0727", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon lake token vault must never ack before the segment seals, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon lake token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0730" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8054", + "query": "cinnamon ridge telemetry mast drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W754", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0730", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon ridge telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 924 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon ridge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0733", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8055", + "query": "orange lowland telemetry mast stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W755", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0733", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange lowland telemetry mast stutters its stream under clock skew — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0736" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8056", + "query": "lilac bluff escrow chamber forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W756", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0736", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac bluff escrow chamber forgets its offsets when the backfill overtakes live traffic — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0739", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8057", + "query": "cyan cove escrow chamber defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W757", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0739", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan cove escrow chamber defers its compaction because the migration left a shadow column behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan cove escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0742" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8058", + "query": "chalk wharf index writer trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W758", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0742", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk wharf index writer must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk wharf index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0745", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8059", + "query": "sand canyon telemetry mast drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W759", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0745", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand canyon telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 963 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0748" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8060", + "query": "cinnamon creek telemetry mast stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W760", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0748", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cinnamon creek telemetry mast stutters its stream past the spill threshold — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0751", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8061", + "query": "topaz mesa escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W761", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0751", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz mesa escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint when the backfill overtakes live traffic, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz mesa escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0754" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8062", + "query": "ivory crag escrow chamber serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W762", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0754", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory crag escrow chamber serialises its probes because the migration left a shadow column behind, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory crag escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0757", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8063", + "query": "saffron reef sweep worker retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W763", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0757", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron reef sweep worker must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0763" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8064", + "query": "jade crag sweep worker echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W764", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0763", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade crag sweep worker echoes its own commands past the retention cutoff, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade crag sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0766", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8065", + "query": "walnut barrens ingest job clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W765", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0766", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut barrens ingest job clones its timers when the failover rehearsal runs — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0769" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8066", + "query": "ivory lagoon ingest job idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W766", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0769", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory lagoon ingest job idles between batches because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0778", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8067", + "query": "topaz inlet edge cache saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W767", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0778", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz inlet edge cache saturates its detector while a follower catches up, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz inlet edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0781" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8068", + "query": "copper marsh quorum relay misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W768", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0781", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper marsh quorum relay misroutes its callbacks when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0784", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8069", + "query": "saffron glade quorum relay escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W769", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0784", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron glade quorum relay escalates too eagerly because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0787" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8070", + "query": "sepia atoll specimen locker promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W770", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0787", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia atoll specimen locker must never promote an unverified backup, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia atoll specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0790", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8071", + "query": "crimson forest quorum relay parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W771", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0790", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson forest quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 103 blocks — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0793" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8072", + "query": "walnut rapids quorum relay ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W772", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0793", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut rapids quorum relay ignores its backpressure within the grace period, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0796", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8073", + "query": "silver inlet quorum relay desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W773", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0796", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver inlet quorum relay desyncs its mirrors when the segment seals early — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0799" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8074", + "query": "ochre creek quorum relay recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W774", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0799", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre creek quorum relay recomputes the constant because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre creek quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0802", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8075", + "query": "indigo tundra telemetry mast recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W775", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0802", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo tundra telemetry mast must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo tundra telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0805" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8076", + "query": "saffron orchard lease broker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W776", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0805", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron orchard lease broker uses a snapshot depth of 142 generations — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0808", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8077", + "query": "slate bluff lease broker overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W777", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0808", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate bluff lease broker overfills its journal under clock skew — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0811" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8078", + "query": "mustard estuary lease broker double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W778", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0811", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard estuary lease broker double-counts rows when a leap second is injected, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0814", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8079", + "query": "slate shore lease broker batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W779", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0814", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate shore lease broker batches past its ceiling because the parser accepts both spellings silently — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0817" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8080", + "query": "umber lake replay buffer hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W780", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0817", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "umber lake replay buffer must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0820", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8081", + "query": "orange butte quorum relay decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W781", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0820", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange butte quorum relay uses a decay half-life of 181 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0826" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8082", + "query": "saffron jungle escrow chamber skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W782", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0826", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "saffron jungle escrow chamber skips the fsync when the coolant loop cavitates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron jungle escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0829", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8083", + "query": "willow cirque escrow chamber retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W783", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0829", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow cirque escrow chamber retries before backing off because the quota counts retired entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0832" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8084", + "query": "silver cavern sweep worker hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W784", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0832", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver cavern sweep worker must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0838", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8085", + "query": "carmine inlet lease broker clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W785", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0838", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine inlet lease broker clips its bursts under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine inlet lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0841" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8086", + "query": "sage cavern ingest job shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W786", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0841", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage cavern ingest job shreds its manifest when the clock steps backwards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + } + ], + "probes": [ + { + "id": "R1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R39", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R40", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R41", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R42", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R43", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R44", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R45", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R46", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R47", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R48", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R49", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R50", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R51", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R52", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R53", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R54", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R55", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R56", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R57", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R58", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R59", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R60", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R61", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R62", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R63", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R64", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R65", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R66", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R67", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R68", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R69", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R70", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R71", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R72", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R73", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R74", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R75", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R76", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R77", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R78", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R79", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R80", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R81", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R82", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R83", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R84", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R85", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R86", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R87", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R88", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R89", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R90", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R91", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R92", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R93", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R94", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R95", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R96", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R97", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R98", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R99", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "276 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "276 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "276 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "276 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0106", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0106", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0106", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0106", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0107", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0107", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0107", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0107", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0119", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0119", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0119", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0119", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "315 records" + }, + { + "id": "R482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "315 records" + }, + { + "id": "R483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "315 records" + }, + { + "id": "R484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "315 records" + }, + { + "id": "R485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0127", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0127", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0127", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0127", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "R522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "R523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "R524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "R525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0135", + "answer": "354 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0135", + "answer": "354 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0135", + "answer": "354 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0135", + "answer": "354 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0147", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0147", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0147", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0147", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "393 days" + }, + { + "id": "R602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "393 days" + }, + { + "id": "R603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "393 days" + }, + { + "id": "R604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "393 days" + }, + { + "id": "R605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0164", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0164", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0164", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0164", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0167", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0167", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0167", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0167", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0174", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0174", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0174", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0174", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0176", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0176", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0176", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0176", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0188", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0188", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0188", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0188", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0191", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0191", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0191", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0191", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "510 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "510 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "510 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "510 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0196", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0196", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0196", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0196", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0204", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0204", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0204", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0204", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0207", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0207", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0207", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0207", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "549 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "549 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "549 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "549 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0218", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0218", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0218", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0218", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0225", + "answer": "588 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0225", + "answer": "588 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0225", + "answer": "588 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0225", + "answer": "588 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "627 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "627 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "627 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "627 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1001", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1002", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1003", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1004", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1005", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0251", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1006", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0251", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1007", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0251", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1008", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0251", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1009", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1010", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1011", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1012", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1013", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1014", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1015", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1016", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1017", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1018", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1019", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1020", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1021", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1022", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1023", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1024", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1025", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1026", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1027", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1028", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1029", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1030", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1031", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1032", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1033", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1034", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1035", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1036", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1037", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1038", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1039", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1040", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1041", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1042", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1043", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1044", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1045", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1046", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1047", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1048", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1049", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1050", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1051", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1052", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1053", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1054", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1055", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1056", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1057", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1058", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1059", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1060", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1061", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0265", + "answer": "692 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1062", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0265", + "answer": "692 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1063", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0265", + "answer": "692 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1064", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0265", + "answer": "692 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1065", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1066", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1067", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1068", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1069", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1070", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1071", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1072", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1073", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1074", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1075", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1076", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1077", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1078", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1079", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1080", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1081", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "705 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1082", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "705 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1083", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "705 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1084", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "705 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1085", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1086", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1087", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1088", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1089", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1090", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1091", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1092", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1093", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1094", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1095", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1096", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1097", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1098", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1099", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "744 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "744 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "744 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "744 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "770 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "770 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "770 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "770 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0298", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0298", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0298", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0298", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "783 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "783 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "783 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "783 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0303", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0303", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0303", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0303", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "809 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "809 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "809 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "809 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "822 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "822 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "822 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "822 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0317", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0317", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0317", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0317", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0319", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0319", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0319", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0319", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0325", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0325", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0325", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0325", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "861 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "861 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "861 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "861 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0334", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0334", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0334", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0334", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "887 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "887 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "887 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "887 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "900 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "900 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "900 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "900 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0350", + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0350", + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0350", + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0350", + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "926 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "926 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "926 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "926 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0357", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0357", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0357", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0357", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "939 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "939 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "939 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "939 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0362", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0362", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0362", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0362", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "965 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "965 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "965 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "965 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "978 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "978 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "978 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "978 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "14 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "14 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "14 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "14 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "27 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "27 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "27 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "27 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "40 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "40 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "40 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "40 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0394", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0394", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0394", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0394", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "53 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "53 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "53 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "53 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "66 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "66 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "66 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "66 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "79 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "79 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "79 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "79 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "92 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "92 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "92 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "92 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0413", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0413", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0413", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0413", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0415", + "answer": "105 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0415", + "answer": "105 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0415", + "answer": "105 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0415", + "answer": "105 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "118 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "118 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "118 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "118 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "131 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "131 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "131 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "131 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0433", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0433", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0433", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0433", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "157 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "157 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "157 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "157 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "170 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "170 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "170 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "170 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "183 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "183 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "183 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "183 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0450", + "answer": "196 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0450", + "answer": "196 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0450", + "answer": "196 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0450", + "answer": "196 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0453", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0453", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0453", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0453", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0457", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0457", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0457", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0457", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "222 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "222 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "222 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "222 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0462", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0462", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0462", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0462", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "235 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "235 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "235 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "235 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "248 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "248 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "248 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "248 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "261 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "261 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "261 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "261 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "274 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "274 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "274 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "274 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "287 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "287 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "287 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "287 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "300 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "300 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "300 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "300 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0492", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0492", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0492", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0492", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "313 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "313 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "313 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "313 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0497", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0497", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0497", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0497", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0498", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0498", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0498", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0498", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2001", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0500", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "326 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2002", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0500", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "326 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2003", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0500", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "326 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2004", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0500", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "326 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2005", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0501", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0501", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2006", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0501", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0501", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2007", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0501", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0501", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2008", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0501", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0501", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2009", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0502", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2010", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0502", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2011", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0502", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2012", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0502", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2013", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0503", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2014", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0503", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2015", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0503", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2016", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0503", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2017", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0504", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2018", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0504", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2019", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0504", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2020", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0504", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2021", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0505", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0505", + "answer": "339 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2022", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0505", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0505", + "answer": "339 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2023", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0505", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0505", + "answer": "339 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2024", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0505", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0505", + "answer": "339 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2025", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0506", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R2026", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0506", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R2027", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0506", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R2028", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0506", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R2029", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0507", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2030", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0507", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2031", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0507", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2032", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0507", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2033", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0508", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2034", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0508", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2035", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0508", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2036", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0508", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2037", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0509", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0509", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2038", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0509", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0509", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2039", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0509", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0509", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2040", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0509", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0509", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2041", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0510", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "352 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2042", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0510", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "352 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2043", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0510", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "352 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2044", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0510", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "352 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2045", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0511", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2046", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0511", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2047", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0511", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2048", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0511", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2049", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0512", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2050", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0512", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2051", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0512", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2052", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0512", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2053", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0513", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2054", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0513", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2055", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0513", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2056", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0513", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2057", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0514", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2058", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0514", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2059", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0514", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2060", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0514", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2061", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0515", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0515", + "answer": "365 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2062", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0515", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0515", + "answer": "365 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2063", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0515", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0515", + "answer": "365 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2064", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0515", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0515", + "answer": "365 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2065", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0516", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2066", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0516", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2067", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0516", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2068", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0516", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2069", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0517", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2070", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0517", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2071", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0517", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2072", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0517", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2073", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0518", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2074", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0518", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2075", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0518", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2076", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0518", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2077", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0519", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2078", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0519", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2079", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0519", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2080", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0519", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2081", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0520", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "378 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2082", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0520", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "378 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2083", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0520", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "378 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2084", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0520", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "378 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2085", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0521", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2086", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0521", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2087", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0521", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2088", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0521", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2089", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0522", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2090", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0522", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2091", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0522", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2092", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0522", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2093", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0523", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0523", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2094", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0523", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0523", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2095", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0523", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0523", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2096", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0523", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0523", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2097", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0524", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2098", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0524", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2099", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0524", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0524", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0525", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "391 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0525", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "391 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0525", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "391 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0525", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "391 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0526", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0526", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0526", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0526", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0527", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0527", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0527", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0527", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0528", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0528", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0528", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0528", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0529", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0529", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0529", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0529", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0530", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "404 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0530", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "404 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0530", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "404 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0530", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "404 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0531", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0531", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0531", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0531", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0532", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0532", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0532", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0532", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0533", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0533", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0533", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0533", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0534", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0534", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0534", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0534", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0534", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0534", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0534", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0534", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0535", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0535", + "answer": "417 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0535", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0535", + "answer": "417 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0535", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0535", + "answer": "417 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0535", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0535", + "answer": "417 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0536", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R2146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0536", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R2147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0536", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R2148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0536", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R2149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0537", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0537", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0537", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0537", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0538", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R2154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0538", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R2155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0538", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R2156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0538", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R2157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0539", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0539", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0539", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0539", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0540", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "430 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0540", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "430 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0540", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "430 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0540", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "430 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0541", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0541", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0541", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0541", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0542", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0542", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0542", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0542", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0543", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R2174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0543", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R2175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0543", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R2176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0543", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R2177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0544", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0544", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0544", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0544", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0545", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "443 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0545", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "443 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0545", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "443 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0545", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "443 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0546", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0546", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0546", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0546", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0547", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0547", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0547", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0547", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0548", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0548", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0548", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0548", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0549", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0549", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0549", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0549", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0550", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "456 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0550", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "456 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0550", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "456 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0550", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "456 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0551", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0551", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0551", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0551", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0552", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0552", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0552", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0552", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0553", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0553", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0553", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0553", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0554", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0554", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0554", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0554", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0555", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "469 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0555", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "469 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0555", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "469 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0555", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "469 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0556", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0556", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0556", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0556", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0557", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0557", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0557", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0557", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0558", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0558", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0558", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0558", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0559", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0559", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0559", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0559", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0560", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "482 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0560", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "482 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0560", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "482 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0560", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "482 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0561", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0561", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0561", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0561", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0562", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0562", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0562", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0562", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0563", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0563", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0563", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0563", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0564", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0564", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0564", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0564", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0565", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "495 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0565", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "495 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0565", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "495 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0565", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "495 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0566", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0566", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0566", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0566", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0567", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0567", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0567", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0567", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0568", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0568", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0568", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0568", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0569", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0569", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0569", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0569", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0570", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "508 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0570", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "508 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0570", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "508 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0570", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "508 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0571", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0571", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R2286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0571", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0571", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R2287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0571", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0571", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R2288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0571", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0571", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R2289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0572", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0572", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0572", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0572", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0573", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R2294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0573", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R2295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0573", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R2296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0573", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R2297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0574", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0574", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0574", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0574", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0574", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0574", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0574", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0574", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0575", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "521 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0575", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "521 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0575", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "521 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0575", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "521 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0576", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0576", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0576", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0576", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0577", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0577", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0577", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0577", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0578", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0578", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0578", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0578", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0579", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0579", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0579", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0579", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0580", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0580", + "answer": "534 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0580", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0580", + "answer": "534 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0580", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0580", + "answer": "534 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0580", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0580", + "answer": "534 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0581", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R2326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0581", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R2327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0581", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R2328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0581", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R2329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0582", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0582", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0582", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0582", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0583", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0583", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0583", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0583", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0584", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0584", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0584", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0584", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0585", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "547 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0585", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "547 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0585", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "547 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0585", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "547 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0586", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0586", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0586", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0586", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0587", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0587", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0587", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0587", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0588", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0588", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0588", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0588", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0589", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0589", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0589", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0589", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0590", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "560 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0590", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "560 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0590", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "560 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0590", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "560 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0591", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0591", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0591", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0591", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0592", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0592", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0592", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0592", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0593", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0593", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0593", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0593", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0594", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0594", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0594", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0594", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0595", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "573 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0595", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "573 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0595", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "573 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0595", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "573 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0596", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0596", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0596", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0596", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0597", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0597", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0597", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0597", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0598", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0598", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0598", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0598", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0599", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0599", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0599", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0599", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0599", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0599", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0599", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0599", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0600", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "586 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0600", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "586 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0600", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "586 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0600", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "586 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0601", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0601", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R2406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0601", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0601", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R2407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0601", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0601", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R2408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0601", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0601", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R2409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0602", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0602", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0602", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0602", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0603", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R2414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0603", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R2415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0603", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R2416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0603", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R2417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0604", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0604", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0604", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0604", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0604", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0604", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0604", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0604", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0605", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "599 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0605", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "599 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0605", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "599 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0605", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "599 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0606", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0606", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0606", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0606", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0607", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0607", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0607", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0607", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0608", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0608", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0608", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0608", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0609", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0609", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0609", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0609", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0610", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "612 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0610", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "612 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0610", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "612 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0610", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "612 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0611", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0611", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0611", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0611", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0612", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0612", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0612", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0612", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0613", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0613", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0613", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0613", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0614", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0614", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0614", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0614", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0615", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "625 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0615", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "625 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0615", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "625 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0615", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "625 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0616", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0616", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0616", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0616", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0617", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0617", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0617", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0617", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0618", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0618", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0618", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0618", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0619", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0619", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0619", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0619", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0620", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0620", + "answer": "638 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0620", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0620", + "answer": "638 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0620", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0620", + "answer": "638 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0620", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0620", + "answer": "638 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0621", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0621", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0621", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0621", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0622", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0622", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0622", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0622", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0623", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0623", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0623", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0623", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0624", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0624", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0624", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0624", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0625", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "651 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0625", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "651 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0625", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "651 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0625", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "651 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0626", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0626", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0626", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0626", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0627", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0627", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0627", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0627", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0628", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0628", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0628", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0628", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0629", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0629", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0629", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0629", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0629", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0629", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0629", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0629", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0630", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "664 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0630", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "664 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0630", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "664 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0630", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "664 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0631", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R2526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0631", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R2527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0631", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R2528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0631", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R2529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0632", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0632", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0632", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0632", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0633", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R2534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0633", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R2535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0633", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R2536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0633", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R2537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0634", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0634", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0634", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0634", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0635", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "677 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0635", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "677 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0635", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "677 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0635", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "677 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0636", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0636", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0636", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0636", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0637", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0637", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0637", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0637", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0638", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0638", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0638", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0638", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0639", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0639", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0639", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0639", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0640", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "690 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0640", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "690 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0640", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "690 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0640", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "690 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0641", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0641", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0641", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0641", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0642", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0642", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0642", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0642", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0643", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0643", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0643", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0643", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0644", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0644", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0644", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0644", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0645", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "703 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0645", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "703 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0645", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "703 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0645", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "703 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0646", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0646", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0646", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0646", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0647", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0647", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0647", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0647", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0648", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0648", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0648", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0648", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0649", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0649", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0649", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0649", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0650", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "716 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0650", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "716 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0650", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "716 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0650", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "716 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0651", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0651", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0651", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0651", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0651", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0651", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0651", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0651", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0652", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0652", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0652", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0652", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0653", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0653", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0653", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0653", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0654", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0654", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0654", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0654", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0655", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "729 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0655", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "729 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0655", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "729 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0655", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "729 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0656", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0656", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0656", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0656", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0657", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0657", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0657", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0657", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0658", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0658", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0658", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0658", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0659", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0659", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0659", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0659", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0660", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "742 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0660", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "742 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0660", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "742 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0660", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "742 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0661", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0661", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0661", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0661", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0662", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0662", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0662", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0662", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0663", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0663", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0663", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0663", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0664", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0664", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0664", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0664", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0664", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0664", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0664", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0664", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0665", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "755 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0665", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "755 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0665", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "755 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0665", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "755 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0666", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0666", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0666", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0666", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0667", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0667", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0667", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0667", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0668", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0668", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0668", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0668", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0669", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0669", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0669", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0669", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0670", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "768 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0670", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "768 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0670", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "768 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0670", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "768 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0671", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0671", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0671", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0671", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0672", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0672", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0672", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0672", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0673", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R2694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0673", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R2695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0673", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R2696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0673", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R2697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0674", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0674", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0674", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0674", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0675", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "781 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0675", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "781 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0675", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "781 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0675", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "781 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0676", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0676", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0676", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0676", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0677", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0677", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0677", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0677", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0678", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R2714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0678", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R2715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0678", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R2716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0678", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R2717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0679", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0679", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0679", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0679", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0679", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0679", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0679", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0679", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0680", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "794 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0680", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "794 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0680", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "794 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0680", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "794 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0681", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0681", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0681", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0681", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0681", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0681", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0681", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0681", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0682", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0682", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0682", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0682", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0683", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0683", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0683", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0683", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0684", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0684", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0684", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0684", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0685", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "807 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0685", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "807 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0685", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "807 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0685", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "807 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0686", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R2746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0686", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R2747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0686", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R2748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0686", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R2749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0687", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0687", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0687", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0687", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0688", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R2754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0688", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R2755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0688", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R2756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0688", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R2757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0689", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0689", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0689", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0689", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0690", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0690", + "answer": "820 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0690", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0690", + "answer": "820 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0690", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0690", + "answer": "820 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0690", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0690", + "answer": "820 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0691", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0691", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0691", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0691", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0692", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0692", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0692", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0692", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0693", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0693", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0693", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0693", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0694", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0694", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0694", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0694", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0695", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "833 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0695", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "833 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0695", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "833 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0695", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "833 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0696", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R2786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0696", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R2787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0696", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R2788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0696", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R2789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0697", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0697", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0697", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0697", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0698", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R2794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0698", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R2795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0698", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R2796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0698", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R2797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0699", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0699", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0699", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0699", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0699", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0699", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0699", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0699", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0700", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "846 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0700", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "846 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0700", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "846 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0700", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "846 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0701", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0701", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0701", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0701", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0702", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0702", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0702", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0702", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0703", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0703", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0703", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0703", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0704", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0704", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0704", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0704", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0705", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "859 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0705", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "859 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0705", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "859 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0705", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "859 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0706", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0706", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0706", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0706", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0707", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0707", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0707", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0707", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0708", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0708", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0708", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0708", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0709", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0709", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0709", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0709", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0710", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "872 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0710", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "872 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0710", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "872 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0710", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "872 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0711", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0711", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0711", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0711", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0712", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0712", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0712", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0712", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0713", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R2854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0713", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R2855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0713", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R2856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0713", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R2857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0714", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0714", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0714", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0714", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0715", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "885 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0715", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "885 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0715", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "885 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0715", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "885 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0716", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0716", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0716", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0716", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0717", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0717", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0717", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0717", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0717", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0717", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0717", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0717", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0718", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0718", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0718", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0718", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0719", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0719", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0719", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0719", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0720", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "898 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0720", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "898 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0720", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "898 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0720", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "898 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0721", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0721", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0721", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0721", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0722", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0722", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0722", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0722", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0722", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0722", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0722", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0722", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0723", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R2894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0723", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R2895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0723", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R2896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0723", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R2897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0724", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0724", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0724", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0724", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0725", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "911 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0725", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "911 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0725", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "911 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0725", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "911 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0726", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0726", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0726", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0726", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0727", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0727", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0727", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0727", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0728", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0728", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0728", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0728", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R2917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0729", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0729", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0729", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0729", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0730", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "924 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0730", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "924 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0730", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "924 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0730", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "924 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0731", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0731", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0731", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0731", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0732", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0732", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0732", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0732", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0733", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0733", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0733", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0733", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0734", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0734", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0734", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0734", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0735", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "937 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0735", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "937 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0735", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "937 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0735", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "937 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0736", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R2946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0736", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R2947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0736", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R2948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0736", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R2949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0737", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0737", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0737", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0737", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0738", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R2954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0738", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R2955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0738", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R2956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0738", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R2957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0739", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0739", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0739", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0739", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0740", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "950 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0740", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "950 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0740", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "950 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0740", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "950 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0741", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0741", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0741", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0741", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0742", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0742", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0742", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0742", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0743", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0743", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0743", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0743", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0743", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0743", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0743", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0743", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0744", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0744", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0744", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0744", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0745", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "963 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0745", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "963 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0745", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "963 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0745", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "963 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0746", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0746", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0746", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0746", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0747", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0747", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0747", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0747", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0748", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0748", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0748", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0748", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0749", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0749", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0749", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0749", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3001", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0750", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "976 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3002", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0750", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "976 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3003", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0750", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "976 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3004", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0750", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "976 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3005", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0751", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3006", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0751", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3007", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0751", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3008", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0751", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3009", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0752", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3010", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0752", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3011", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0752", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3012", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0752", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3013", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0753", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3014", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0753", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3015", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0753", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3016", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0753", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3017", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0754", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R3018", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0754", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R3019", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0754", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R3020", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0754", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R3021", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0755", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "12 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R3022", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0755", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "12 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R3023", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0755", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "12 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R3024", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0755", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "12 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R3025", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0756", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R3026", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0756", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R3027", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0756", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R3028", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0756", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R3029", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0757", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R3030", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0757", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R3031", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0757", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R3032", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0757", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R3033", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0758", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R3034", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0758", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R3035", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0758", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R3036", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0758", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R3037", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0759", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3038", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0759", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3039", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0759", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3040", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0759", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3041", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0760", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0760", + "answer": "25 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3042", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0760", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0760", + "answer": "25 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3043", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0760", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0760", + "answer": "25 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3044", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0760", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0760", + "answer": "25 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3045", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0761", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3046", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0761", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3047", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0761", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3048", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0761", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3049", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0762", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3050", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0762", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3051", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0762", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3052", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0762", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3053", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0763", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3054", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0763", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3055", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0763", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3056", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0763", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3057", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0764", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R3058", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0764", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R3059", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0764", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R3060", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0764", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R3061", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0765", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "38 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3062", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0765", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "38 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3063", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0765", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "38 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3064", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0765", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "38 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3065", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0766", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3066", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0766", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3067", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0766", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3068", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0766", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3069", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0767", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3070", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0767", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3071", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0767", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3072", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0767", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3073", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0768", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3074", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0768", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3075", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0768", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3076", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0768", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3077", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0769", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R3078", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0769", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R3079", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0769", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R3080", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0769", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R3081", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0770", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "51 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3082", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0770", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "51 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3083", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0770", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "51 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3084", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0770", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "51 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3085", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0771", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3086", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0771", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3087", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0771", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3088", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0771", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3089", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0772", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0772", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3090", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0772", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0772", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3091", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0772", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0772", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3092", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0772", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0772", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3093", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0773", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3094", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0773", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3095", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0773", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3096", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0773", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3097", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0774", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3098", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0774", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3099", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0774", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0774", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0775", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0775", + "answer": "64 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0775", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0775", + "answer": "64 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0775", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0775", + "answer": "64 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0775", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0775", + "answer": "64 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0776", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0776", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0776", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0776", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0777", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0777", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0777", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0777", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0778", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0778", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0778", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0778", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0779", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0779", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0779", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0779", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0780", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "77 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0780", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "77 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0780", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "77 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0780", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "77 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0781", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0781", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0781", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0781", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0782", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0782", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0782", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0782", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0783", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0783", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0783", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0783", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0784", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0784", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0784", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0784", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0785", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "90 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0785", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "90 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0785", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "90 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0785", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "90 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0786", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0786", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0786", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0786", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0787", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0787", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0787", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0787", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0788", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0788", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0788", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0788", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0789", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R3158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0789", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R3159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0789", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R3160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0789", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R3161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0790", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "103 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0790", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "103 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0790", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "103 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0790", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "103 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0791", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0791", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0791", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0791", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0792", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0792", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0792", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0792", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0793", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0793", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0793", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0793", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0794", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0794", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0794", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0794", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0795", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0795", + "answer": "116 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0795", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0795", + "answer": "116 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0795", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0795", + "answer": "116 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0795", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0795", + "answer": "116 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0796", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0796", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0796", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0796", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0797", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0797", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0797", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0797", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0798", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0798", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0798", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0798", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0799", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R3198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0799", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R3199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0799", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R3200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0799", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R3201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0800", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0800", + "answer": "129 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0800", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0800", + "answer": "129 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0800", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0800", + "answer": "129 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0800", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0800", + "answer": "129 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0801", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0801", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0801", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0801", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0802", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0802", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0802", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0802", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0803", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0803", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0803", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0803", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0804", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R3218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0804", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R3219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0804", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R3220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0804", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R3221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0805", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "142 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0805", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "142 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0805", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "142 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0805", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "142 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0806", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0806", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0806", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0806", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0807", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0807", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0807", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0807", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0808", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0808", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0808", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0808", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0809", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0809", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0809", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0809", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0810", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "155 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0810", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "155 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0810", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "155 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0810", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "155 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0811", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0811", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0811", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0811", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0812", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0812", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0812", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0812", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0813", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0813", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0813", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0813", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0814", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0814", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0814", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0814", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0815", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "168 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0815", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "168 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0815", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "168 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0815", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "168 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0816", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0816", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0816", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0816", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0816", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0816", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0816", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0816", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0817", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0817", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0817", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0817", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0818", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0818", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0818", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0818", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0819", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0819", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0819", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0819", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0820", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "181 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0820", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "181 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0820", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "181 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0820", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "181 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0821", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0821", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0821", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0821", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0822", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0822", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0822", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0822", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0823", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0823", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0823", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0823", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0823", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0823", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0823", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0823", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0824", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0824", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0824", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0824", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0825", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "194 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0825", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "194 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0825", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "194 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0825", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "194 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0826", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0826", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0826", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0826", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0827", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0827", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0827", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0827", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0828", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0828", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0828", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0828", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0829", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0829", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0829", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0829", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0830", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "207 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0830", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "207 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0830", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "207 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0830", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "207 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0831", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0831", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0831", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0831", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0832", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0832", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0832", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0832", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0833", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0833", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0833", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0833", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0833", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0833", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0833", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0833", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0834", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R3338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0834", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R3339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0834", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R3340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0834", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R3341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0835", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0835", + "answer": "220 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0835", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0835", + "answer": "220 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0835", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0835", + "answer": "220 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0835", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0835", + "answer": "220 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0836", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0836", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0836", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0836", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0837", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0837", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0837", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0837", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0838", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0838", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0838", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0838", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0839", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0839", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0839", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0839", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0840", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "233 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0840", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "233 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0840", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "233 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0840", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "233 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0841", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0841", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0841", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0841", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0842", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0842", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0842", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0842", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0843", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0843", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0843", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0843", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0843", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0843", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0843", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0843", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0844", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0844", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0844", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0844", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0845", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "246 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0845", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "246 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0845", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "246 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0845", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "246 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0846", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R3386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0846", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R3387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0846", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R3388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0846", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R3389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0847", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R3390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0847", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R3391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0847", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R3392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0847", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R3393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0848", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R3394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0848", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R3395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0848", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R3396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0848", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R3397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0849", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0849", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0849", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0849", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0850", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0850", + "answer": "259 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R3402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0850", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0850", + "answer": "259 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R3403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0850", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0850", + "answer": "259 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R3404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0850", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0850", + "answer": "259 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R3405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0851", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R3406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0851", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R3407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0851", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R3408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0851", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R3409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0852", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R3410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0852", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R3411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0852", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R3412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0852", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R3413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0853", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0853", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R3414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0853", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0853", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R3415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0853", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0853", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R3416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0853", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0853", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R3417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0854", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0854", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0854", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0854", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0854", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0854", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0854", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0854", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0855", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "272 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0855", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "272 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0855", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "272 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0855", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "272 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0856", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0856", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0856", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0856", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0857", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0857", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0857", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0857", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0858", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0858", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0858", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0858", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0859", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0859", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0859", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0859", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0860", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "285 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R3442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0860", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "285 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R3443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0860", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "285 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R3444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0860", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "285 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R3445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0861", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R3446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0861", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R3447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0861", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R3448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0861", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R3449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0862", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R3450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0862", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R3451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0862", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R3452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0862", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R3453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0863", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R3454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0863", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R3455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0863", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R3456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0863", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R3457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0864", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0864", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0864", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0864", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0865", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "298 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R3462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0865", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "298 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R3463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0865", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "298 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R3464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0865", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "298 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R3465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0866", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R3466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0866", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R3467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0866", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R3468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0866", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R3469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0867", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R3470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0867", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R3471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0867", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R3472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0867", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R3473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0868", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R3474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0868", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R3475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0868", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R3476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0868", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R3477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0869", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0869", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0869", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0869", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0869", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0869", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0869", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0869", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0870", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "311 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0870", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "311 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0870", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "311 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0870", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "311 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0871", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R3486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0871", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R3487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0871", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R3488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0871", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R3489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0872", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R3490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0872", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R3491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0872", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R3492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0872", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R3493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0873", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R3494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0873", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R3495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0873", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R3496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0873", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R3497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0874", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R3498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0874", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R3499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0874", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R3500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0874", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R3501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0875", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "324 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0875", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "324 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0875", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "324 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0875", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "324 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0876", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0876", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0876", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0876", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0877", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0877", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0877", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0877", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0877", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0877", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0877", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0877", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0878", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0878", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0878", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0878", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0879", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0879", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0879", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0879", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0880", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "337 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0880", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "337 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0880", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "337 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0880", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "337 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0881", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0881", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0881", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0881", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0882", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0882", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0882", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0882", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0883", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0883", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0883", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0883", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0884", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0884", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0884", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0884", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0884", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0884", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0884", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0884", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0885", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "350 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0885", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "350 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0885", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "350 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0885", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "350 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0886", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R3546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0886", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R3547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0886", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R3548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0886", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R3549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0887", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R3550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0887", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R3551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0887", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R3552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0887", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R3553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0888", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0888", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R3554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0888", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0888", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R3555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0888", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0888", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R3556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0888", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0888", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R3557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0889", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0889", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0889", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0889", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R3561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0890", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "363 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0890", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "363 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0890", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "363 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0890", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "363 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R3565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0891", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0891", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0891", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0891", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R3569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0892", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0892", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0892", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0892", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R3573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0893", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0893", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0893", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0893", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R3577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0894", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R3578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0894", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R3579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0894", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R3580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0894", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R3581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0895", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "376 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R3582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0895", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "376 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R3583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0895", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "376 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R3584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0895", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "376 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R3585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0896", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R3586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0896", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R3587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0896", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R3588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0896", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R3589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0897", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R3590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0897", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R3591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0897", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R3592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0897", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R3593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0898", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R3594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0898", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R3595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0898", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R3596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0898", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R3597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0899", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R3598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0899", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R3599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0899", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R3600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0899", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R3601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0900", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "389 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0900", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "389 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0900", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "389 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0900", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "389 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0901", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0901", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0901", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0901", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0902", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0902", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0902", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0902", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0903", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0903", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0903", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0903", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0904", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0904", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0904", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0904", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R3621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0905", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "402 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0905", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "402 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0905", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "402 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0905", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "402 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0906", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0906", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0906", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0906", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0907", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0907", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0907", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0907", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0908", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0908", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0908", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0908", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0908", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0908", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0908", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0908", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0909", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0909", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0909", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0909", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0910", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "415 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0910", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "415 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0910", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "415 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0910", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "415 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R3645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0911", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0911", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0911", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0911", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R3649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0912", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0912", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0912", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0912", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0912", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0912", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0912", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0912", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R3653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0913", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0913", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0913", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0913", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R3657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0914", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0914", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R3658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0914", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0914", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R3659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0914", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0914", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R3660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0914", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0914", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R3661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0915", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "428 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0915", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "428 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0915", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "428 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0915", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "428 days" + }, + { + "id": "R3665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0916", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0916", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0916", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0916", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R3669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0917", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0917", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0917", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0917", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R3673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0918", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0918", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0918", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0918", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R3677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0919", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0919", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0919", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0919", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R3681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0920", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "441 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0920", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "441 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0920", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "441 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0920", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "441 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R3685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0921", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0921", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0921", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0921", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R3689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0922", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0922", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0922", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0922", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R3693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0923", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0923", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0923", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0923", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R3697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0924", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0924", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0924", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0924", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R3701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0925", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "454 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0925", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "454 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0925", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "454 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0925", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "454 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0926", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0926", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0926", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0926", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0927", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0927", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0927", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0927", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0928", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0928", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0928", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0928", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0929", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0929", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R3718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0929", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0929", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R3719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0929", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0929", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R3720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0929", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0929", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R3721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0930", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "467 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0930", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "467 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0930", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "467 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0930", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "467 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0931", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0931", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0931", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0931", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R3729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0932", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0932", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0932", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0932", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R3733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0933", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0933", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0933", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0933", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R3737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0934", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0934", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0934", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0934", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R3741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0935", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "480 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0935", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "480 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0935", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "480 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0935", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "480 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0936", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0936", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0936", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0936", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0937", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0937", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0937", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0937", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0938", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0938", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0938", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0938", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0938", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0938", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0938", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0938", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0939", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0939", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0939", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0939", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R3761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0940", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "493 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0940", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "493 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0940", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "493 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0940", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "493 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0941", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R3766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0941", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R3767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0941", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R3768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0941", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R3769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0942", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R3770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0942", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R3771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0942", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R3772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0942", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R3773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0943", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R3774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0943", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R3775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0943", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R3776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0943", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R3777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0944", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R3778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0944", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R3779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0944", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R3780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0944", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R3781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0945", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "506 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0945", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "506 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0945", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "506 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0945", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "506 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0946", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0946", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0946", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0946", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0947", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0947", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0947", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0947", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0948", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0948", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0948", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0948", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0949", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0949", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0949", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0949", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R3801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0950", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "519 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0950", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "519 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0950", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "519 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0950", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "519 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0951", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0951", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0951", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0951", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R3809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0952", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0952", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0952", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0952", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R3813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0953", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0953", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0953", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0953", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R3817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0954", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0954", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R3818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0954", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0954", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R3819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0954", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0954", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R3820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0954", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0954", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R3821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0955", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "532 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0955", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "532 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0955", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "532 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0955", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "532 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0956", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0956", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0956", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0956", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0957", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0957", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0957", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0957", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0958", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0958", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0958", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0958", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0959", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0959", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0959", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0959", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0960", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "545 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0960", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "545 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0960", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "545 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0960", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "545 records" + }, + { + "id": "R3845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0961", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0961", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0961", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0961", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R3849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0962", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0962", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0962", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0962", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R3853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0963", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0963", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0963", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0963", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0963", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0963", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0963", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0963", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R3857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0964", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R3858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0964", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R3859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0964", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R3860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0964", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R3861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0965", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "558 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0965", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "558 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0965", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "558 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0965", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "558 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0966", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0966", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0966", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0966", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0967", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0967", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0967", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0967", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0968", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0968", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0968", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0968", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0969", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R3878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0969", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R3879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0969", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R3880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0969", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R3881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0970", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0970", + "answer": "571 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0970", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0970", + "answer": "571 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0970", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0970", + "answer": "571 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0970", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0970", + "answer": "571 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0971", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0971", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0971", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0971", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0972", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0972", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0972", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0972", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0973", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0973", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0973", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0973", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0974", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0974", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0974", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0974", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R3901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0975", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "584 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0975", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "584 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0975", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "584 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0975", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "584 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0976", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0976", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0976", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0976", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R3909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0977", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0977", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0977", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0977", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R3913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0978", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0978", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0978", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0978", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0978", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0978", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0978", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0978", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R3917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0979", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R3918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0979", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R3919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0979", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R3920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0979", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R3921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0980", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "597 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0980", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "597 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0980", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "597 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0980", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "597 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R3925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0981", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0981", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0981", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0981", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0981", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0981", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0981", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0981", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R3929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0982", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0982", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0982", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0982", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R3933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0983", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0983", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0983", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0983", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R3937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0984", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R3938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0984", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R3939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0984", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R3940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0984", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R3941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0985", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "610 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0985", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "610 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0985", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "610 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0985", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "610 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0986", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0986", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0986", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0986", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0987", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0987", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0987", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0987", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0988", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0988", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0988", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0988", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0989", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0989", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R3958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0989", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0989", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R3959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0989", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0989", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R3960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0989", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0989", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R3961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0990", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "623 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0990", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "623 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0990", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "623 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0990", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "623 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R3965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0991", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0991", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0991", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0991", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R3969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0992", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0992", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0992", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0992", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R3973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0993", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0993", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0993", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0993", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R3977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0994", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0994", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0994", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0994", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0995", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "636 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0995", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "636 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0995", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "636 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0995", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "636 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0996", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0996", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0996", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0996", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R3989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0997", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0997", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0997", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0997", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R3993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0998", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0998", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0998", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0998", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R3997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0999", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0999", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R3999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0999", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0999", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4001", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1000", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "649 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4002", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1000", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "649 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4003", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1000", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "649 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4004", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1000", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "649 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4005", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1001", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R4006", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1001", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R4007", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1001", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R4008", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1001", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R4009", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1002", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R4010", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1002", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R4011", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1002", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R4012", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1002", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R4013", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1003", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R4014", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1003", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R4015", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1003", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R4016", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1003", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R4017", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1004", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4018", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1004", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4019", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1004", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4020", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1004", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4021", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1005", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "662 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4022", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1005", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "662 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4023", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1005", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "662 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4024", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1005", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "662 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4025", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1006", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4026", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1006", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4027", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1006", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4028", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1006", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4029", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1007", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4030", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1007", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4031", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1007", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4032", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1007", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4033", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1008", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4034", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1008", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4035", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1008", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4036", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1008", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4037", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1009", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4038", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1009", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4039", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1009", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4040", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1009", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4041", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1010", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "675 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4042", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1010", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "675 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4043", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1010", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "675 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4044", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1010", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "675 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4045", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1011", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4046", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1011", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4047", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1011", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4048", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1011", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4049", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1012", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4050", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1012", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4051", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1012", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4052", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1012", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4053", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1013", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4054", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1013", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4055", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1013", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4056", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1013", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4057", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1014", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4058", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1014", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4059", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1014", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4060", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1014", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4061", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1015", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "688 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4062", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1015", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "688 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4063", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1015", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "688 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4064", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1015", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "688 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4065", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1016", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4066", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1016", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4067", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1016", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4068", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1016", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4069", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1017", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4070", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1017", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4071", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1017", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4072", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1017", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4073", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1018", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4074", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1018", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4075", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1018", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4076", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1018", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4077", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1019", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R4078", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1019", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R4079", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1019", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R4080", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1019", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R4081", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1020", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "701 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4082", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1020", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "701 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4083", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1020", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "701 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4084", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1020", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "701 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4085", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1021", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4086", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1021", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4087", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1021", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4088", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1021", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4089", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1022", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4090", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1022", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4091", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1022", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4092", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1022", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4093", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1023", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4094", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1023", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4095", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1023", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4096", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1023", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4097", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1024", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4098", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1024", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4099", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1024", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1024", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1025", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "714 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1025", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "714 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1025", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "714 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1025", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "714 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1026", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1026", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1026", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1026", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1027", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1027", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1027", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1027", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1027", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1027", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1027", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1027", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1028", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1028", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1028", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1028", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1029", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1029", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1029", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1029", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1030", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "727 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1030", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "727 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1030", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "727 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1030", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "727 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1031", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1031", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1031", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1031", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1032", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1032", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1032", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1032", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1033", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1033", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1033", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1033", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1034", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1034", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1034", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1034", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1035", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "740 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1035", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "740 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1035", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "740 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1035", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "740 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1036", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1036", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1036", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1036", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1037", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1037", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1037", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1037", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1038", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1038", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1038", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1038", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1039", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R4158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1039", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R4159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1039", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R4160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1039", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R4161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1040", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "753 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1040", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "753 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1040", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "753 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1040", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "753 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1041", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1041", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1041", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1041", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1042", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1042", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1042", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1042", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1043", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1043", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1043", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1043", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1044", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1044", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1044", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1044", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1045", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1045", + "answer": "766 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1045", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1045", + "answer": "766 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1045", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1045", + "answer": "766 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1045", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1045", + "answer": "766 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1046", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R4186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1046", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R4187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1046", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R4188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1046", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R4189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1047", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R4190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1047", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R4191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1047", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R4192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1047", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R4193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1048", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R4194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1048", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R4195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1048", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R4196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1048", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R4197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1049", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R4198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1049", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R4199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1049", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R4200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1049", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R4201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1050", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "779 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1050", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "779 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1050", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "779 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1050", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "779 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1051", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1051", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1051", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1051", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1052", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1052", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1052", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1052", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1053", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1053", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1053", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1053", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1054", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1054", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1054", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1054", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1055", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "792 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R4222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1055", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "792 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R4223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1055", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "792 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R4224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1055", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "792 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R4225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1056", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R4226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1056", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R4227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1056", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R4228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1056", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R4229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1057", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R4230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1057", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R4231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1057", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R4232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1057", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R4233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1058", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R4234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1058", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R4235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1058", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R4236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1058", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R4237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1059", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R4238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1059", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R4239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1059", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R4240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1059", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R4241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1060", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "805 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1060", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "805 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1060", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "805 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1060", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "805 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1061", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1061", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1061", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1061", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1062", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1062", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1062", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1062", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1063", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1063", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1063", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1063", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1064", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1064", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1064", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1064", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1065", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "818 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R4262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1065", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "818 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R4263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1065", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "818 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R4264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1065", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "818 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R4265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1066", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R4266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1066", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R4267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1066", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R4268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1066", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R4269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1067", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R4270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1067", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R4271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1067", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R4272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1067", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R4273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1068", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R4274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1068", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R4275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1068", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R4276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1068", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R4277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1069", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1069", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1069", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1069", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1070", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "831 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1070", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "831 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1070", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "831 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1070", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "831 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1071", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1071", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1071", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1071", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1072", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1072", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1072", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1072", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1073", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1073", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1073", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1073", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1074", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1074", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1074", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1074", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1075", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1075", + "answer": "844 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R4302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1075", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1075", + "answer": "844 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R4303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1075", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1075", + "answer": "844 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R4304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1075", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1075", + "answer": "844 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R4305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1076", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R4306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1076", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R4307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1076", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R4308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1076", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R4309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1077", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R4310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1077", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R4311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1077", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R4312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1077", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R4313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1078", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R4314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1078", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R4315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1078", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R4316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1078", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R4317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1079", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R4318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1079", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R4319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1079", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R4320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1079", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R4321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1080", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "857 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1080", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "857 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1080", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "857 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1080", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "857 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1081", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1081", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1081", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1081", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1082", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1082", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1082", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1082", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1083", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1083", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1083", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1083", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1084", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R4338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1084", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R4339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1084", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R4340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1084", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R4341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1085", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "870 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1085", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "870 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1085", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "870 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1085", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "870 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1086", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1086", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1086", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1086", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1087", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1087", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1087", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1087", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1088", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1088", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1088", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1088", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1089", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1089", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1089", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1089", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1090", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "883 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1090", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "883 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1090", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "883 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1090", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "883 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1091", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1091", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1091", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1091", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1092", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1092", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1092", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1092", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1093", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1093", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1093", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1093", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1094", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1094", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1094", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1094", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1095", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "896 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1095", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "896 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1095", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "896 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1095", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "896 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1096", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1096", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1096", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1096", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1097", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1097", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1097", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1097", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1098", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1098", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1098", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1098", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1099", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1099", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1099", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1099", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1100", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "909 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1100", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "909 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1100", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "909 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1100", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "909 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1101", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1101", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1101", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1101", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1102", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1102", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1102", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1102", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1103", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1103", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1103", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1103", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1104", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1104", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1104", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1104", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1105", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "922 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1105", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "922 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1105", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "922 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1105", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "922 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1106", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1106", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1106", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1106", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1107", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1107", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1107", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1107", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1108", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1108", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1108", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1108", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1109", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R4438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1109", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R4439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1109", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R4440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1109", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R4441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1110", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "935 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R4442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1110", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "935 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R4443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1110", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "935 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R4444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1110", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "935 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R4445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1111", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R4446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1111", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R4447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1111", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R4448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1111", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R4449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1112", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R4450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1112", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R4451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1112", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R4452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1112", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R4453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1113", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1113", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1113", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1113", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1114", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1114", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1114", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1114", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1114", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1114", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1114", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1114", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1115", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "948 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1115", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "948 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1115", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "948 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1115", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "948 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1116", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1116", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1116", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1116", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1117", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1117", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1117", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1117", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1118", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1118", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1118", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1118", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1119", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1119", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1119", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1119", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1120", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "961 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1120", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "961 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1120", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "961 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1120", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "961 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1121", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1121", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1121", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1121", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R4489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1122", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1122", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1122", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1122", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R4493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1123", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1123", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1123", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1123", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R4497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1124", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R4498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1124", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R4499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1124", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R4500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1124", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R4501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1125", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "974 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1125", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "974 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1125", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "974 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1125", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "974 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1126", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R4506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1126", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R4507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1126", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R4508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1126", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R4509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1127", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R4510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1127", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R4511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1127", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R4512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1127", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R4513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1128", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R4514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1128", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R4515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1128", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R4516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1128", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R4517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1129", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R4518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1129", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R4519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1129", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R4520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1129", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R4521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1130", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "10 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1130", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "10 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1130", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "10 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1130", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "10 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R4525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1131", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1131", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1131", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1131", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R4529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1132", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1132", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1132", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1132", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R4533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1133", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1133", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1133", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1133", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R4537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1134", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1134", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1134", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1134", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1135", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "23 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R4542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1135", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "23 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R4543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1135", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "23 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R4544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1135", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "23 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R4545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1136", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R4546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1136", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R4547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1136", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R4548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1136", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R4549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1137", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R4550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1137", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R4551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1137", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R4552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1137", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R4553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1138", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R4554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1138", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R4555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1138", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R4556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1138", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R4557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1139", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1139", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1139", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1139", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1140", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "36 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R4562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1140", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "36 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R4563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1140", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "36 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R4564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1140", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "36 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R4565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1141", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R4566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1141", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R4567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1141", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R4568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1141", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R4569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1142", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R4570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1142", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R4571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1142", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R4572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1142", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R4573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1143", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R4574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1143", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R4575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1143", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R4576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1143", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R4577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1144", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1144", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1144", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1144", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1145", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "49 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1145", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "49 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1145", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "49 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1145", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "49 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1146", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R4586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1146", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R4587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1146", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R4588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1146", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R4589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1147", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R4590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1147", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R4591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1147", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R4592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1147", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R4593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1148", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1148", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R4594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1148", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1148", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R4595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1148", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1148", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R4596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1148", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1148", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R4597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1149", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1149", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1149", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1149", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R4601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1150", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "62 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1150", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "62 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1150", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "62 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1150", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "62 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1151", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R4606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1151", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R4607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1151", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R4608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1151", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R4609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1152", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R4610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1152", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R4611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1152", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R4612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1152", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R4613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1153", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R4614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1153", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R4615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1153", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R4616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1153", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R4617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1154", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1154", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1154", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1154", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R4621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1155", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "75 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1155", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "75 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1155", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "75 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1155", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "75 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1156", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1156", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1156", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1156", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1157", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1157", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1157", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1157", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1158", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1158", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1158", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1158", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1159", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R4638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1159", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R4639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1159", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R4640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1159", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R4641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1160", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "88 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R4642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1160", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "88 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R4643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1160", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "88 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R4644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1160", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "88 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R4645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1161", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R4646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1161", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R4647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1161", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R4648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1161", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R4649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1162", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R4650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1162", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R4651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1162", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R4652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1162", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R4653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1163", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R4654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1163", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R4655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1163", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R4656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1163", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R4657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1164", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R4658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1164", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R4659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1164", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R4660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1164", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R4661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1165", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "101 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1165", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "101 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1165", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "101 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1165", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "101 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1166", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1166", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1166", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1166", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1167", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1167", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R4670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1167", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1167", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R4671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1167", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1167", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R4672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1167", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1167", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R4673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1168", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R4674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1168", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R4675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1168", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R4676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1168", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R4677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1169", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1169", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1169", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1169", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R4681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1170", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "114 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1170", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "114 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1170", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "114 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1170", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "114 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1171", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R4686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1171", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R4687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1171", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R4688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1171", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R4689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1172", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R4690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1172", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R4691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1172", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R4692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1172", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R4693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1173", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R4694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1173", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R4695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1173", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R4696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1173", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R4697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1174", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1174", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1174", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1174", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1175", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "127 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1175", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "127 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1175", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "127 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1175", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "127 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1176", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1176", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1176", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1176", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1177", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1177", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1177", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1177", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1178", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1178", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1178", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1178", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1179", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1179", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1179", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1179", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1179", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1179", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1179", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1179", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1180", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "140 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1180", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "140 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1180", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "140 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1180", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "140 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1181", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1181", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1181", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1181", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1182", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1182", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R4730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1182", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1182", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R4731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1182", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1182", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R4732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1182", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1182", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R4733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1183", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1183", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R4734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1183", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1183", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R4735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1183", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1183", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R4736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1183", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1183", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R4737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1184", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1184", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1184", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1184", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1185", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "153 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1185", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "153 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1185", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "153 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1185", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "153 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1186", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1186", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1186", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1186", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1187", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1187", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1187", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1187", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1188", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1188", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1188", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1188", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1189", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1189", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1189", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1189", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R4761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1190", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1190", + "answer": "166 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1190", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1190", + "answer": "166 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1190", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1190", + "answer": "166 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1190", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1190", + "answer": "166 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1191", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1191", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1191", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1191", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1192", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1192", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1192", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1192", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1193", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1193", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1193", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1193", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1194", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1194", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1194", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1194", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R4781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1195", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "179 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1195", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "179 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1195", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "179 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1195", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "179 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R4785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1196", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1196", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1196", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1196", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R4789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1197", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1197", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1197", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1197", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R4793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1198", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1198", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1198", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1198", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R4797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1199", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R4798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1199", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R4799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1199", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R4800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1199", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R4801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1200", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "192 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1200", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "192 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1200", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "192 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1200", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "192 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1201", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1201", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1201", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1201", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R4809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1202", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1202", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1202", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1202", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R4813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1203", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1203", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1203", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1203", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R4817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1204", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1204", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1204", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1204", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1205", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "205 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1205", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "205 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1205", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "205 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1205", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "205 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1206", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R4826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1206", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R4827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1206", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R4828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1206", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R4829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1207", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R4830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1207", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R4831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1207", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R4832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1207", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R4833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1208", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R4834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1208", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R4835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1208", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R4836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1208", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R4837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1209", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R4838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1209", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R4839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1209", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R4840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1209", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R4841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1210", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "218 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1210", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "218 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1210", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "218 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1210", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "218 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1211", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1211", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1211", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1211", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1212", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1212", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1212", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1212", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1213", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1213", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1213", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1213", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1214", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1214", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1214", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1214", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1215", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1215", + "answer": "231 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R4862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1215", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1215", + "answer": "231 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R4863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1215", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1215", + "answer": "231 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R4864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1215", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1215", + "answer": "231 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R4865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1216", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1216", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R4866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1216", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1216", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R4867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1216", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1216", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R4868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1216", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1216", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R4869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1217", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1217", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1217", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1217", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R4873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1218", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R4874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1218", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R4875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1218", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R4876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1218", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R4877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1219", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R4878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1219", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R4879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1219", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R4880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1219", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R4881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1220", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "244 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R4882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1220", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "244 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R4883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1220", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "244 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R4884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1220", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "244 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R4885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1221", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R4886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1221", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R4887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1221", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R4888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1221", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R4889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1222", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R4890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1222", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R4891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1222", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R4892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1222", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R4893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1223", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R4894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1223", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R4895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1223", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R4896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1223", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R4897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1224", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R4898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1224", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R4899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1224", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R4900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1224", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R4901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1225", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "257 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R4902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1225", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "257 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R4903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1225", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "257 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R4904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1225", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "257 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R4905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1226", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R4906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1226", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R4907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1226", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R4908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1226", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R4909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1227", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R4910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1227", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R4911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1227", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R4912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1227", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R4913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1228", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1228", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R4914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1228", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1228", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R4915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1228", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1228", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R4916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1228", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1228", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R4917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1229", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1229", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1229", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1229", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R4921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1230", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "270 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1230", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "270 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1230", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "270 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1230", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "270 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R4925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1231", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1231", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1231", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1231", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R4929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1232", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1232", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1232", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1232", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R4933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1233", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1233", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1233", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1233", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R4937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1234", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1234", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1234", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1234", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R4941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1235", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1235", + "answer": "283 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1235", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1235", + "answer": "283 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1235", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1235", + "answer": "283 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1235", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1235", + "answer": "283 records" + }, + { + "id": "R4945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1236", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1236", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1236", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1236", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R4949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1237", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1237", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1237", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1237", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R4953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1238", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1238", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1238", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1238", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R4957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1239", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1239", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1239", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1239", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1239", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1239", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1239", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1239", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R4961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1240", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "296 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1240", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "296 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1240", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "296 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1240", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "296 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R4965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1241", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1241", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1241", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1241", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1241", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1241", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1241", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1241", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R4969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1242", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1242", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1242", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1242", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R4973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1243", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1243", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1243", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1243", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R4977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1244", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R4978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1244", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R4979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1244", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R4980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1244", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R4981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1245", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "309 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1245", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "309 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1245", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "309 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1245", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "309 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1246", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R4986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1246", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R4987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1246", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R4988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1246", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R4989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1247", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R4990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1247", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R4991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1247", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R4992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1247", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R4993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1248", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R4994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1248", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R4995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1248", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R4996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1248", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R4997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1249", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R4998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1249", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R4999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1249", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R5000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1249", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R5001", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1250", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1250", + "answer": "322 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R5002", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1250", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1250", + "answer": "322 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R5003", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1250", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1250", + "answer": "322 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R5004", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1250", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1250", + "answer": "322 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R5005", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1251", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R5006", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1251", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R5007", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1251", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R5008", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1251", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R5009", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1252", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R5010", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1252", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R5011", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1252", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R5012", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1252", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R5013", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1253", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1253", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R5014", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1253", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1253", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R5015", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1253", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1253", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R5016", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1253", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1253", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R5017", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1254", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R5018", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1254", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R5019", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1254", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R5020", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1254", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R5021", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1255", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "335 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5022", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1255", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "335 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5023", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1255", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "335 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5024", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1255", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "335 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5025", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1256", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R5026", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1256", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R5027", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1256", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R5028", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1256", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R5029", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1257", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R5030", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1257", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R5031", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1257", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R5032", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1257", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R5033", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1258", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R5034", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1258", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R5035", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1258", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R5036", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1258", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R5037", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1259", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R5038", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1259", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R5039", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1259", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R5040", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1259", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R5041", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1260", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "348 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5042", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1260", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "348 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5043", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1260", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "348 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5044", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1260", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "348 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5045", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1261", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R5046", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1261", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R5047", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1261", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R5048", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1261", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R5049", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1262", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R5050", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1262", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R5051", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1262", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R5052", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1262", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R5053", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1263", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1263", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R5054", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1263", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1263", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R5055", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1263", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1263", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R5056", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1263", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1263", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R5057", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1264", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1264", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5058", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1264", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1264", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5059", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1264", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1264", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5060", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1264", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1264", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5061", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1265", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "361 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5062", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1265", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "361 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5063", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1265", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "361 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5064", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1265", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "361 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5065", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1266", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5066", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1266", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5067", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1266", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5068", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1266", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5069", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1267", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5070", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1267", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5071", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1267", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5072", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1267", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5073", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1268", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5074", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1268", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5075", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1268", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5076", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1268", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5077", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1269", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5078", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1269", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5079", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1269", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5080", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1269", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5081", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1270", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "374 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5082", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1270", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "374 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5083", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1270", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "374 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5084", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1270", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "374 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5085", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1271", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5086", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1271", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5087", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1271", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5088", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1271", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5089", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1272", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5090", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1272", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5091", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1272", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5092", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1272", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5093", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1273", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5094", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1273", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5095", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1273", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5096", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1273", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5097", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1274", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R5098", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1274", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R5099", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1274", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R5100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1274", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R5101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1275", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1275", + "answer": "387 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1275", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1275", + "answer": "387 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1275", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1275", + "answer": "387 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1275", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1275", + "answer": "387 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1276", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1276", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1276", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1276", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1277", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1277", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1277", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1277", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1278", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1278", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1278", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1278", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1279", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R5118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1279", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R5119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1279", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R5120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1279", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R5121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1280", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "400 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1280", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "400 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1280", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "400 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1280", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "400 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1281", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R5126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1281", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R5127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1281", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R5128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1281", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R5129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1282", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R5130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1282", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R5131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1282", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R5132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1282", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R5133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1283", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R5134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1283", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R5135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1283", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R5136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1283", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R5137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1284", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1284", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1284", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1284", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1285", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "413 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1285", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "413 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1285", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "413 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1285", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "413 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1286", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R5146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1286", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R5147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1286", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R5148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1286", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R5149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1287", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R5150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1287", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R5151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1287", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R5152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1287", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R5153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1288", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R5154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1288", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R5155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1288", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R5156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1288", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R5157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1289", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1289", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1289", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1289", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1290", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "426 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1290", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "426 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1290", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "426 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1290", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "426 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1291", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1291", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1291", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1291", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1292", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1292", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1292", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1292", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1293", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1293", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1293", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1293", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1294", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1294", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1294", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1294", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1295", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1295", + "answer": "439 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1295", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1295", + "answer": "439 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1295", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1295", + "answer": "439 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1295", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1295", + "answer": "439 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1296", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1296", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1296", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1296", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1296", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1296", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1296", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1296", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1297", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1297", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1297", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1297", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1298", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1298", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1298", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1298", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1299", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1299", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1299", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1299", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1300", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "452 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1300", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "452 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1300", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "452 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1300", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "452 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1301", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R5206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1301", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R5207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1301", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R5208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1301", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R5209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1302", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R5210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1302", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R5211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1302", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R5212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1302", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R5213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1303", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R5214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1303", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R5215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1303", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R5216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1303", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R5217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1304", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1304", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1304", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1304", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1305", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "465 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1305", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "465 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1305", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "465 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1305", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "465 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1306", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1306", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1306", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1306", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1307", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1307", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1307", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1307", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1308", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1308", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1308", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1308", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1308", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1308", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1308", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1308", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1309", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R5238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1309", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R5239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1309", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R5240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1309", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R5241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1310", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "478 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R5242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1310", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "478 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R5243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1310", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "478 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R5244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1310", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "478 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R5245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1311", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R5246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1311", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R5247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1311", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R5248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1311", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R5249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1312", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R5250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1312", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R5251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1312", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R5252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1312", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R5253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1313", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R5254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1313", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R5255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1313", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R5256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1313", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R5257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1314", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R5258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1314", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R5259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1314", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R5260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1314", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R5261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1315", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "491 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1315", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "491 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1315", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "491 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1315", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "491 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1316", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1316", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1316", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1316", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1317", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1317", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1317", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1317", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1318", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1318", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1318", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1318", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1319", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1319", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1319", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1319", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1320", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "504 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1320", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "504 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1320", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "504 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1320", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "504 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1321", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1321", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1321", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1321", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1322", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1322", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1322", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1322", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1323", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1323", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1323", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1323", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1324", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1324", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1324", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1324", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1325", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "517 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1325", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "517 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1325", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "517 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1325", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "517 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1326", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1326", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1326", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1326", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1327", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1327", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1327", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1327", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1328", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1328", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1328", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1328", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1329", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1329", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1329", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1329", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1330", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "530 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R5322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1330", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "530 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R5323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1330", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "530 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R5324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1330", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "530 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R5325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1331", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R5326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1331", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R5327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1331", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R5328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1331", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R5329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1332", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R5330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1332", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R5331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1332", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R5332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1332", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R5333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1333", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R5334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1333", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R5335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1333", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R5336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1333", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R5337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1334", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1334", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1334", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1334", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1335", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "543 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1335", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "543 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1335", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "543 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1335", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "543 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1336", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1336", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1336", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1336", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1337", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1337", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1337", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1337", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1338", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1338", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1338", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1338", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1339", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1339", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1339", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1339", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1340", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1340", + "answer": "556 days" + }, + { + "id": "R5362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1340", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1340", + "answer": "556 days" + }, + { + "id": "R5363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1340", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1340", + "answer": "556 days" + }, + { + "id": "R5364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1340", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1340", + "answer": "556 days" + }, + { + "id": "R5365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1341", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R5366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1341", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R5367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1341", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R5368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1341", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R5369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1342", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R5370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1342", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R5371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1342", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R5372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1342", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R5373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1343", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1343", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R5374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1343", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1343", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R5375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1343", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1343", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R5376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1343", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1343", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R5377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1344", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1344", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1344", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1344", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1345", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "569 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R5382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1345", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "569 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R5383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1345", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "569 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R5384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1345", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "569 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R5385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1346", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1346", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R5386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1346", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1346", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R5387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1346", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1346", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R5388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1346", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1346", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R5389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1347", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R5390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1347", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R5391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1347", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R5392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1347", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R5393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1348", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R5394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1348", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R5395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1348", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R5396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1348", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R5397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1349", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1349", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1349", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1349", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1350", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1350", + "answer": "582 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1350", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1350", + "answer": "582 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1350", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1350", + "answer": "582 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1350", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1350", + "answer": "582 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1351", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R5406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1351", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R5407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1351", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R5408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1351", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R5409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1352", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R5410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1352", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R5411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1352", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R5412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1352", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R5413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1353", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R5414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1353", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R5415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1353", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R5416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1353", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R5417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1354", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R5418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1354", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R5419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1354", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R5420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1354", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R5421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1355", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "595 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1355", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "595 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1355", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "595 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1355", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "595 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1356", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1356", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1356", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1356", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1357", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1357", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1357", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1357", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1358", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1358", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1358", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1358", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1359", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1359", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1359", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1359", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1360", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "608 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1360", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "608 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1360", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "608 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1360", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "608 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R5445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1361", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1361", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1361", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1361", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R5449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1362", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1362", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1362", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1362", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R5453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1363", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1363", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1363", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1363", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R5457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1364", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1364", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1364", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1364", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1365", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "621 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R5462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1365", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "621 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R5463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1365", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "621 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R5464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1365", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "621 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R5465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1366", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1366", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R5466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1366", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1366", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R5467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1366", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1366", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R5468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1366", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1366", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R5469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1367", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R5470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1367", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R5471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1367", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R5472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1367", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R5473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1368", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R5474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1368", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R5475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1368", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R5476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1368", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R5477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1369", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1369", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1369", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1369", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R5481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1370", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "634 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1370", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "634 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1370", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "634 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1370", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "634 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1371", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1371", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1371", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1371", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1372", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1372", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1372", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1372", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1373", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1373", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1373", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1373", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1374", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R5498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1374", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R5499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1374", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R5500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1374", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R5501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1375", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "647 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1375", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "647 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1375", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "647 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1375", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "647 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1376", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1376", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R5506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1376", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1376", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R5507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1376", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1376", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R5508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1376", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1376", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R5509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1377", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1377", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1377", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1377", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1378", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1378", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R5514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1378", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1378", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R5515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1378", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1378", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R5516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1378", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1378", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R5517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1379", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1379", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1379", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1379", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1380", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "660 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1380", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "660 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1380", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "660 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1380", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "660 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1381", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1381", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1381", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1381", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1382", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1382", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1382", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1382", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1383", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1383", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1383", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1383", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1384", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R5538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1384", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R5539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1384", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R5540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1384", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R5541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1385", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "673 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1385", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "673 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1385", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "673 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1385", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "673 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1386", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1386", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1386", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1386", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1387", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1387", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1387", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1387", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1388", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1388", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1388", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1388", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1389", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R5558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1389", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R5559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1389", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R5560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1389", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R5561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1390", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "686 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1390", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "686 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1390", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "686 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1390", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "686 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1391", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1391", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1391", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1391", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1392", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1392", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1392", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1392", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1393", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1393", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1393", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1393", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1394", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1394", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1394", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1394", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R5581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1395", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "699 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1395", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "699 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1395", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "699 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1395", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "699 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1396", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1396", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1396", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1396", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1397", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1397", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1397", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1397", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1398", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1398", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1398", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1398", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1399", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1399", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1399", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1399", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1400", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "712 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1400", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "712 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1400", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "712 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1400", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "712 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1401", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R5606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1401", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R5607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1401", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R5608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1401", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R5609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1402", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R5610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1402", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R5611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1402", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R5612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1402", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R5613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1403", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R5614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1403", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R5615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1403", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R5616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1403", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R5617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1404", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1404", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1404", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1404", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1405", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "725 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1405", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "725 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1405", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "725 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1405", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "725 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1406", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1406", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R5626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1406", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1406", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R5627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1406", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1406", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R5628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1406", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1406", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R5629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1407", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R5630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1407", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R5631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1407", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R5632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1407", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R5633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1408", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R5634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1408", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R5635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1408", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R5636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1408", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R5637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1409", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R5638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1409", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R5639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1409", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R5640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1409", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R5641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1410", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "738 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1410", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "738 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1410", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "738 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1410", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "738 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1411", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1411", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R5646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1411", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1411", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R5647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1411", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1411", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R5648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1411", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1411", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R5649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1412", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1412", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R5650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1412", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1412", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R5651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1412", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1412", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R5652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1412", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1412", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R5653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1413", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R5654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1413", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R5655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1413", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R5656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1413", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R5657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1414", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R5658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1414", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R5659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1414", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R5660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1414", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R5661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1415", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "751 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1415", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "751 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1415", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "751 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1415", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "751 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1416", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1416", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R5666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1416", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1416", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R5667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1416", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1416", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R5668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1416", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1416", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R5669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1417", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R5670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1417", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R5671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1417", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R5672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1417", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R5673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1418", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R5674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1418", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R5675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1418", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R5676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1418", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R5677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1419", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1419", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R5678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1419", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1419", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R5679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1419", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1419", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R5680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1419", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1419", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R5681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1420", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "764 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1420", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "764 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1420", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "764 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1420", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "764 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R5685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1421", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1421", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1421", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1421", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R5689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1422", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1422", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1422", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1422", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R5693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1423", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1423", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1423", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1423", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R5697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1424", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R5698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1424", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R5699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1424", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R5700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1424", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R5701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1425", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "777 days" + }, + { + "id": "R5702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1425", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "777 days" + }, + { + "id": "R5703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1425", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "777 days" + }, + { + "id": "R5704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1425", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "777 days" + }, + { + "id": "R5705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1426", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1426", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R5706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1426", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1426", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R5707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1426", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1426", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R5708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1426", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1426", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R5709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1427", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R5710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1427", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R5711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1427", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R5712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1427", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R5713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1428", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R5714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1428", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R5715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1428", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R5716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1428", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R5717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1429", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1429", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1429", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1429", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R5721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1430", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "790 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1430", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "790 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1430", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "790 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1430", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "790 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1431", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R5726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1431", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R5727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1431", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R5728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1431", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R5729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1432", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R5730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1432", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R5731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1432", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R5732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1432", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R5733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1433", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R5734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1433", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R5735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1433", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R5736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1433", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R5737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1434", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1434", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1434", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1434", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1435", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "803 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1435", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "803 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1435", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "803 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1435", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "803 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1436", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1436", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1436", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1436", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1436", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1436", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1436", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1436", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1437", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1437", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1437", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1437", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1437", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1437", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1437", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1437", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1438", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1438", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1438", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1438", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1439", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R5758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1439", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R5759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1439", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R5760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1439", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R5761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1440", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1440", + "answer": "816 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1440", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1440", + "answer": "816 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1440", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1440", + "answer": "816 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1440", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1440", + "answer": "816 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1441", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R5766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1441", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R5767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1441", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R5768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1441", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R5769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1442", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1442", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R5770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1442", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1442", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R5771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1442", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1442", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R5772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1442", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1442", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R5773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1443", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R5774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1443", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R5775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1443", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R5776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1443", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R5777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1444", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1444", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1444", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1444", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R5781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1445", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "829 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1445", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "829 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1445", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "829 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1445", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "829 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1446", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1446", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1446", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1446", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1447", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1447", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1447", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1447", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1448", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1448", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1448", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1448", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1448", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1448", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1448", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1448", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1449", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R5798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1449", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R5799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1449", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R5800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1449", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R5801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1450", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1450", + "answer": "842 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1450", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1450", + "answer": "842 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1450", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1450", + "answer": "842 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1450", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1450", + "answer": "842 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R5805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1451", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1451", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1451", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1451", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R5809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1452", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1452", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1452", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1452", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1452", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1452", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1452", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1452", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R5813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1453", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1453", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1453", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1453", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R5817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1454", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1454", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1454", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1454", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1455", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "855 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1455", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "855 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1455", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "855 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1455", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "855 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R5825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1456", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1456", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1456", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1456", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R5829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1457", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1457", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1457", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1457", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R5833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1458", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1458", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1458", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1458", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1458", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1458", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1458", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1458", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R5837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1459", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1459", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1459", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1459", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R5841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1460", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1460", + "answer": "868 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1460", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1460", + "answer": "868 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1460", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1460", + "answer": "868 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1460", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1460", + "answer": "868 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1461", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1461", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1461", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1461", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R5849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1462", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1462", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1462", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1462", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R5853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1463", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1463", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1463", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1463", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R5857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1464", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1464", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1464", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1464", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R5861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1465", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "881 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1465", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "881 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1465", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "881 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1465", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "881 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1466", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1466", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1466", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1466", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1467", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1467", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1467", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1467", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1468", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1468", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1468", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1468", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1469", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1469", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R5878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1469", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1469", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R5879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1469", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1469", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R5880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1469", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1469", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R5881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1470", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "894 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R5882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1470", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "894 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R5883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1470", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "894 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R5884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1470", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "894 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R5885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1471", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R5886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1471", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R5887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1471", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R5888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1471", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R5889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1472", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R5890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1472", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R5891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1472", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R5892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1472", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R5893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1473", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R5894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1473", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R5895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1473", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R5896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1473", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R5897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1474", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R5898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1474", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R5899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1474", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R5900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1474", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R5901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1475", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1475", + "answer": "907 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1475", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1475", + "answer": "907 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1475", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1475", + "answer": "907 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1475", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1475", + "answer": "907 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1476", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1476", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1476", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1476", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R5909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1477", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1477", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1477", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1477", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R5913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1478", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1478", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1478", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1478", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R5917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1479", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R5918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1479", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R5919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1479", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R5920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1479", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R5921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1480", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "920 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1480", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "920 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1480", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "920 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1480", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "920 records" + }, + { + "id": "R5925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1481", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R5926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1481", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R5927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1481", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R5928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1481", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R5929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1482", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R5930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1482", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R5931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1482", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R5932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1482", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R5933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1483", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R5934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1483", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R5935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1483", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R5936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1483", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R5937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1484", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R5938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1484", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R5939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1484", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R5940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1484", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R5941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1485", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "933 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1485", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "933 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1485", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "933 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1485", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "933 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R5945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1486", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1486", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1486", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1486", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R5949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1487", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1487", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1487", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1487", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R5953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1488", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1488", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1488", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1488", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R5957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1489", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1489", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R5958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1489", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1489", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R5959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1489", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1489", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R5960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1489", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1489", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R5961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1490", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "946 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1490", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "946 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1490", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "946 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1490", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "946 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R5965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1491", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R5966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1491", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R5967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1491", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R5968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1491", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R5969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1492", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R5970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1492", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R5971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1492", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R5972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1492", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R5973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1493", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1493", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R5974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1493", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1493", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R5975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1493", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1493", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R5976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1493", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1493", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R5977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1494", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R5978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1494", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R5979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1494", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R5980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1494", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R5981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1495", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "959 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R5982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1495", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "959 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R5983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1495", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "959 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R5984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1495", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "959 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R5985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1496", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R5986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1496", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R5987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1496", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R5988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1496", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R5989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1497", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R5990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1497", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R5991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1497", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R5992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1497", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R5993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1498", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R5994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1498", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R5995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1498", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R5996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1498", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R5997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1499", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f1499", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1499", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f1499", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R5999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1499", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f1499", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R6000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f1499", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f1499", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "P1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0001", + "f0018", + "f0065", + "f0067", + "f0233", + "f0237", + "f0405", + "f0545", + "f0661", + "f0757", + "f0760", + "f0833", + "f0865", + "f1005", + "f1025", + "f1394", + "f1493", + "c062g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "expires its own grants", + "skews its baseline", + "172 seconds", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "shadows its primary", + "share a cursor between shards", + "79 percent", + "443 minutes", + "starves its consumers", + "retry inside the lock", + "25 days", + "echoes its own commands", + "298 requests", + "662 percent", + "714 records", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "churns its connections", + "91 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0003", + "f0015", + "f0018", + "f0067", + "f0230", + "f0231", + "f0233", + "f0236", + "f0239", + "f0405", + "f0408", + "f0431", + "f0434", + "f0547", + "f0661", + "f0664", + "f0757", + "f0760", + "f0763", + "f0867", + "f0955", + "f1007", + "f1027", + "f1080", + "f1083", + "f1135", + "f1138", + "f1202", + "f1251", + "f1254", + "f1391", + "f1394", + "f1490", + "f1493", + "c024g2", + "c028g2", + "c062g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "stutters its stream", + "42 readings", + "skews its baseline", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "601 milliseconds", + "fragments its heap", + "shadows its primary", + "drops writes", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "79 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "mislabels its vials", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "promote an unverified backup", + "starves its consumers", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "retry inside the lock", + "25 days", + "echoes its own commands", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "532 records", + "skip the blank control", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "857 generations", + "overfills its journal", + "23 readings", + "skews its baseline", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "946 hours", + "churns its connections", + "574 milliseconds", + "626 percent", + "91 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0004", + "f0016", + "f0068", + "f0233", + "f0236", + "f0405", + "f0408", + "f0432", + "f0548", + "f0664", + "f0757", + "f0760", + "f0867", + "f0868", + "f1008", + "f1027", + "f1028", + "f1080", + "f1136", + "f1200", + "f1252", + "f1392", + "c006g2", + "c024g2", + "c028g2", + "c062g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "inverts its polarity", + "stutters its stream", + "shadows its primary", + "drops writes", + "79 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "inflates its estimates", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "retry inside the lock", + "25 days", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "misplaces its permits", + "orphans its batches", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "thrashes the cache", + "857 generations", + "inverts its polarity", + "192 records", + "archive an open incident", + "interleave two restore streams", + "340 milliseconds", + "574 milliseconds", + "626 percent", + "91 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "f0102", + "f0106", + "f0166", + "f0198", + "f0530", + "f0626", + "f0629", + "f0818", + "f0870", + "f0874", + "f1162", + "f1266", + "f1470", + "c055g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "skip the blank control", + "upends its ordering", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "stutters its stream", + "404 branches", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "echoes its own commands", + "311 seconds", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "promote an unverified backup", + "expires its own grants", + "894 blocks", + "977 ticks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0007", + "f0009", + "f0102", + "f0103", + "f0105", + "f0108", + "f0166", + "f0167", + "f0169", + "f0195", + "f0198", + "f0199", + "f0280", + "f0283", + "f0530", + "f0533", + "f0626", + "f0629", + "f0632", + "f0707", + "f0815", + "f0818", + "f0870", + "f0871", + "f0873", + "f0952", + "f1161", + "f1164", + "f1167", + "f1266", + "f1269", + "c055g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "skip the blank control", + "orphans its batches", + "276 ticks", + "misfiles its alerts", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "archive an open incident", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "510 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "731 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "404 branches", + "spins on backoff", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "168 days", + "echoes its own commands", + "311 seconds", + "starves its consumers", + "flaps its liveness", + "write before the fence lands", + "shreds its manifest", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "trust the replica clock", + "expires its own grants", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "977 ticks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "f0105", + "f0109", + "f0169", + "f0533", + "f0626", + "f0629", + "f0705", + "f0870", + "f0873", + "f1161", + "f1164", + "f1165", + "f1269", + "f1473" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "276 ticks", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "spins on backoff", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "859 hours", + "311 seconds", + "flaps its liveness", + "shreds its manifest", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "101 milliseconds", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "ignores its backpressure" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0010", + "f0131", + "f0134", + "f0242", + "f0318", + "f0486", + "f0682", + "f0766", + "f0842", + "f1118", + "f1130", + "f1150", + "f1414", + "c000g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "29 seconds", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "cache the lease token", + "misplaces its permits", + "overruns its dwell", + "promote an unverified backup", + "clones its timers", + "promote an unverified backup", + "splits its brain", + "10 generations", + "62 hours", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "262 segments" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0012", + "f0132", + "f0164", + "f0228", + "f0240", + "f0684", + "f0844", + "f1124", + "f1132", + "f1176", + "f1412" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "churns its connections", + "627 seconds", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "interleave two restore streams", + "forgets its offsets", + "trust the replica clock" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0012", + "f0131", + "f0134", + "f0163", + "f0227", + "f0242", + "f0315", + "f0486", + "f0487", + "f0489", + "f0681", + "f0684", + "f0841", + "f0844", + "f1115", + "f1123", + "f1132", + "f1176", + "f1179", + "f1411", + "f1414", + "f1467", + "c031g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "ignores its backpressure", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "cache the lease token", + "822 requests", + "overruns its dwell", + "skip the blank control", + "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it", + "shreds its manifest", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "shreds its manifest", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "948 records", + "leaks handles", + "interleave two restore streams", + "forgets its offsets", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "loses its cursor", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "skip the blank control", + "665 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0013", + "f0161", + "f0225", + "f0489", + "f0681", + "f0769", + "f0841", + "f1121", + "f1133", + "f1153" + ], + "answers": [ + "flaps its liveness", + "clones its timers", + "588 hours", + "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it", + "shreds its manifest", + "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service", + "shreds its manifest", + "double-counts rows", + "overfills its journal", + "saturates its detector" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0018", + "f0230", + "f0234", + "f0434", + "f0830", + "f0958", + "f1080", + "f1138", + "f1202", + "f1251", + "f1254", + "f1394", + "f1490", + "c024g2", + "c028g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "skews its baseline", + "601 milliseconds", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "207 days", + "splits its brain", + "857 generations", + "skews its baseline", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "946 hours", + "574 milliseconds", + "626 percent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0053", + "f0117", + "f0257", + "f0425", + "f0429", + "f0449", + "f0553", + "f0614", + "f0929", + "f1141", + "f1261", + "f1449", + "f1481" + ], + "answers": [ + "overruns its dwell", + "reorders acks", + "share a cursor between shards", + "share a cursor between shards", + "131 generations", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "inflates its estimates", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "swallows its errors", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "desyncs its mirrors" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0024", + "f0050", + "f0053", + "f0082", + "f0117", + "f0259", + "f0411", + "f0425", + "f0428", + "f0495", + "f0498", + "f0515", + "f0518", + "f0519", + "f0550", + "f0551", + "f0553", + "f0571", + "f0611", + "f0614", + "f0882", + "f0987", + "f1051", + "f1062", + "f1063", + "f1141", + "f1144", + "f1260", + "f1263", + "f1446", + "f1447", + "f1449", + "f1481", + "f1484", + "c030g2", + "c063g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "overruns its dwell", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "133 milliseconds", + "reorders acks", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "share a cursor between shards", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "blackholes its retries", + "131 generations", + "overfills its journal", + "313 records", + "splits its brain", + "365 branches", + "spins on backoff", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "456 minutes", + "shreds its manifest", + "inflates its estimates", + "double-counts rows", + "loses its cursor", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "bypass the admission meter", + "cache the lease token", + "overruns its dwell", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "thrashes the cache", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "348 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "skips the fsync", + "reuse a spill file", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "652 entries", + "104 readings" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0050", + "f0082", + "f0222", + "f0414", + "f0426", + "f0446", + "f0495", + "f0498", + "f0518", + "f0550", + "f0554", + "f0574", + "f0614", + "f0882", + "f0926", + "f1054", + "f1062", + "f1141", + "f1263", + "f1446", + "f1482", + "f1484" + ], + "answers": [ + "overruns its dwell", + "133 milliseconds", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "blackholes its retries", + "313 records", + "splits its brain", + "spins on backoff", + "456 minutes", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "bypass the admission meter", + "double-counts rows", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "skips the fsync", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0024", + "f0050", + "f0080", + "f0259", + "f0428", + "f0496", + "f0515", + "f0516", + "f0612", + "f0880", + "f1060", + "f1062", + "f1144", + "f1260", + "f1264", + "f1484", + "c030g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "133 milliseconds", + "211 hours", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "overfills its journal", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "365 branches", + "stalls the queue", + "trust the replica clock", + "337 entries", + "805 records", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "348 percent", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "652 entries" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0027", + "f0140", + "f0143", + "f0146", + "f0149", + "f0155", + "f0323", + "f0396", + "f0399", + "f0675", + "f0678", + "f0679", + "f0696", + "f0699", + "f0742", + "f0743", + "f0876", + "f0879", + "f0946", + "f0949", + "f1059", + "f1187", + "f1219", + "f1240", + "f1243", + "f1283", + "f1315", + "f1318", + "f1319", + "f1327", + "f1365", + "f1368", + "f1443", + "f1461", + "f1464" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment", + "367 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "shreds its manifest", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "406 requests", + "saturates its detector", + "starves its consumers", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "781 blocks", + "ignores its backpressure", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "re-emits duplicates", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "churns its connections", + "skips the fsync", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "shreds its manifest", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "skip the blank control", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "296 percent", + "orphans its batches", + "leaks handles", + "491 ticks", + "misfiles its alerts", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "621 attempts", + "stalls", + "drifts its watermark", + "starves its consumers", + "integer division truncates the interval" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0030", + "f0038", + "f0254", + "f0306", + "f0338", + "f0490", + "f0655", + "f0658", + "f0806", + "f0810", + "f0838", + "f0970", + "f0972", + "f1010", + "f1222", + "f1234", + "f1418" + ], + "answers": [ + "81 records", + "drifts its watermark", + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "expires its own grants", + "starves the drain", + "300 attempts", + "729 minutes", + "inflates its estimates", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "155 seconds", + "clips its bursts", + "571 minutes", + "promote an unverified backup", + "675 records", + "share a cursor between shards", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "drifts its watermark" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0033", + "f0309", + "f0335", + "f0461", + "f0492", + "f0493", + "f0501", + "f0504", + "f0809", + "f0813", + "f0835", + "f0973", + "f1013", + "f1417", + "c061g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "thrashes the cache", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "874 megabytes", + "inverts its polarity", + "share a cursor between shards", + "stalls", + "poisons its snapshot", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "leaks handles", + "220 entries", + "inflates its estimates", + "thrashes the cache", + "cache the lease token", + "78 branches" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0035", + "f0038", + "f0039", + "f0251", + "f0306", + "f0309", + "f0335", + "f0338", + "f0460", + "f0463", + "f0492", + "f0501", + "f0504", + "f0655", + "f0658", + "f0806", + "f0807", + "f0809", + "f0812", + "f0835", + "f0838", + "f0839", + "f0972", + "f1010", + "f1013", + "f1222", + "f1223", + "f1231", + "f1234", + "f1415", + "f1417", + "c061g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "94 seconds", + "drifts its watermark", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "swallows its errors", + "expires its own grants", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "874 megabytes", + "starves the drain", + "222 readings", + "skews its baseline", + "share a cursor between shards", + "poisons its snapshot", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "729 minutes", + "inflates its estimates", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "interleave two restore streams", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "write before the fence lands", + "220 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "promote an unverified backup", + "675 records", + "thrashes the cache", + "share a cursor between shards", + "stalls", + "blackholes its retries", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "751 seconds", + "cache the lease token", + "78 branches" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0036", + "f0038", + "f0336", + "f0460", + "f0464", + "f0492", + "f0504", + "f0656", + "f0806", + "f0812", + "f0836", + "f0972", + "f1013", + "f1220", + "f1222", + "f1232", + "f1234", + "c034g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "drifts its watermark", + "skips the fsync", + "222 readings", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "share a cursor between shards", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "shreds its manifest", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "write before the fence lands", + "forgets its offsets", + "promote an unverified backup", + "thrashes the cache", + "244 attempts", + "share a cursor between shards", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "704 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0041", + "f0617", + "f0777", + "f0897", + "f0917", + "f1129", + "f1225", + "f1229", + "f1485", + "c029g2", + "c037g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "blackholes its retries", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "splice two lineages", + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "257 branches", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "933 percent", + "639 percent", + "743 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0041", + "f0044", + "f0091", + "f0376", + "f0379", + "f0451", + "f0454", + "f0507", + "f0562", + "f0615", + "f0617", + "f0775", + "f0777", + "f0899", + "f0917", + "f1126", + "f1127", + "f1129", + "f1225", + "f1228", + "f1435", + "f1487", + "f1496", + "f1499", + "c023g2", + "c029g2", + "c056g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "blackholes its retries", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "forgets its offsets", + "shreds its manifest", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "reuse a spill file", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "625 seconds", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "64 hours", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "mislabels its vials", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "257 branches", + "spins on backoff", + "803 percent", + "skip the blank control", + "inverts its polarity", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "561 attempts", + "639 percent", + "13 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0042", + "f0094", + "f0454", + "f0562", + "f0617", + "f0618", + "f0777", + "f0778", + "f0899", + "f1126", + "f1129", + "f1226", + "f1438", + "f1496", + "c032g2", + "c056g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "flaps its liveness", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "saturates its detector", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "mislabels its vials", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "stalls the queue", + "orphans its batches", + "inverts its polarity", + "678 records", + "13 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0044", + "f0376", + "f0452", + "f0454", + "f0560", + "f1228", + "f1488", + "f1496" + ], + "answers": [ + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "shreds its manifest", + "cache the lease token", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "482 seconds", + "spins on backoff", + "orphans its batches", + "inverts its polarity" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0045", + "f0085", + "f0437", + "f0577", + "f0609", + "f0745", + "f0748", + "f0749", + "f0801", + "f0845", + "f0847", + "f0920", + "f0981", + "f0993", + "f1030", + "f1033", + "f1065", + "f1069", + "f1089", + "f1237", + "f1321", + "f1385", + "f1389", + "f1397", + "f1421" + ], + "answers": [ + "120 attempts", + "224 segments", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "963 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "mislabels its vials", + "246 hours", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "441 entries", + "mislabels its vials", + "inflates its estimates", + "727 percent", + "orphans its batches", + "818 attempts", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "expires its own grants", + "673 megabytes", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "upends its ordering" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0047", + "f0056", + "f0059", + "f0085", + "f0088", + "f0111", + "f0114", + "f0402", + "f0437", + "f0475", + "f0579", + "f0591", + "f0594", + "f0600", + "f0603", + "f0731", + "f0745", + "f0748", + "f0803", + "f0847", + "f0920", + "f0923", + "f0981", + "f0984", + "f1030", + "f1031", + "f1033", + "f1065", + "f1068", + "f1147", + "f1237", + "f1321", + "f1324", + "f1385", + "f1388", + "f1397", + "f1420", + "f1423", + "c026g2", + "c059g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "share a cursor between shards", + "starves its consumers", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "224 segments", + "lags its dashboard", + "shreds its manifest", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "reuse a burned nonce", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "261 generations", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "loses its cursor", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "586 attempts", + "stalls", + "expires its own grants", + "963 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "saturates its detector", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "441 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "mislabels its vials", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "727 percent", + "overruns its dwell", + "orphans its batches", + "818 attempts", + "stalls", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "expires its own grants", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "673 megabytes", + "starves the drain", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "764 ticks", + "misfiles its alerts", + "600 seconds", + "52 percent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0048", + "f0056", + "f0088", + "f0111", + "f0112", + "f0400", + "f0592", + "f0600", + "f0745", + "f0748", + "f0804", + "f0848", + "f0920", + "f0984", + "f1068", + "f1324", + "f1388", + "f1420", + "f1424", + "c026g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls", + "starves its consumers", + "lags its dashboard", + "shreds its manifest", + "promote an unverified backup", + "66 blocks", + "trust the replica clock", + "586 attempts", + "963 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "churns its connections", + "441 entries", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "stalls", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "starves the drain", + "764 ticks", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "600 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0062", + "f0170", + "f0330", + "f0361", + "f0362", + "f0643", + "f0650", + "f1002", + "f1098", + "f1246", + "f1258", + "f1342", + "f1350", + "f1354", + "f1362", + "f1478" + ], + "answers": [ + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "445 seconds", + "861 milliseconds", + "skips the fsync", + "reuse a spill file", + "overfills its journal", + "716 seconds", + "ack before the segment seals", + "leaks handles", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "582 milliseconds", + "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it", + "retry inside the lock", + "stutters its stream" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0070", + "f0074", + "f0178", + "f0274", + "f0312", + "f0350", + "f0458", + "f0466", + "f0690", + "f1094", + "f1190", + "f1194", + "f1290", + "f1310", + "f1426", + "c068g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "185 percent", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "clips its bursts", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "skip the blank control", + "913 seconds", + "reorders acks", + "overruns its dwell", + "820 requests", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "166 records", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "426 generations", + "478 attempts", + "garbles its telemetry", + "169 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0070", + "f0071", + "f0073", + "f0175", + "f0178", + "f0271", + "f0274", + "f0312", + "f0347", + "f0455", + "f0457", + "f0466", + "f0469", + "f0472", + "f0690", + "f0693", + "f1091", + "f1094", + "f1190", + "f1191", + "f1193", + "f1196", + "f1199", + "f1292", + "f1426", + "f1429", + "c025g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "185 percent", + "overruns its dwell", + "orphans its batches", + "458 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "skips the fsync", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "skip the blank control", + "interleave two restore streams", + "209 milliseconds", + "trust the replica clock", + "overruns its dwell", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "skip the blank control", + "820 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "blackholes its retries", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "166 records", + "re-emits duplicates", + "thrashes the cache", + "forgets its offsets", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "interleave two restore streams", + "garbles its telemetry", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "587 hours" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0073", + "f0274", + "f0353", + "f0457", + "f0469", + "f0693", + "f1091", + "f1193", + "f1197", + "f1293", + "f1313", + "f1429", + "c001g2", + "c025g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "orphans its batches", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "drifts its watermark", + "trust the replica clock", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "misplaces its permits", + "blackholes its retries", + "thrashes the cache", + "bypass the admission meter", + "overfills its journal", + "stalls", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "275 blocks", + "587 hours" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0076", + "f0388", + "f0440", + "f0536", + "f0568", + "f0752", + "f0856", + "f0888", + "f0996", + "f1040", + "f1272", + "f1304", + "f1348", + "f1380", + "f1432" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls the queue", + "misplaces its permits", + "170 attempts", + "mislabels its vials", + "duplicates its fence", + "cache the lease token", + "double-counts rows", + "flaps its liveness", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "753 seconds", + "retry inside the lock", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "clips its bursts", + "660 ticks", + "trust the replica clock" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0076", + "f0079", + "f0135", + "f0137", + "f0277", + "f0387", + "f0440", + "f0443", + "f0536", + "f0539", + "f0565", + "f0568", + "f0597", + "f0739", + "f0751", + "f0754", + "f0827", + "f0856", + "f0859", + "f0885", + "f0888", + "f0995", + "f0998", + "f0999", + "f1042", + "f1077", + "f1272", + "f1301", + "f1304", + "f1307", + "f1330", + "f1333", + "f1347", + "f1371", + "f1379", + "f1382", + "f1383", + "f1432", + "c003g2", + "c060g2", + "c067g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls the queue", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "354 minutes", + "promote an unverified backup", + "share a cursor between shards", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "170 attempts", + "stalls", + "mislabels its vials", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "495 milliseconds", + "duplicates its fence", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "reuse a spill file", + "double-counts rows", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "350 seconds", + "flaps its liveness", + "636 seconds", + "drifts its watermark", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "write before the fence lands", + "archive an open incident", + "retry inside the lock", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "interleave two restore streams", + "530 segments", + "lags its dashboard", + "bypass the admission meter", + "starves its consumers", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "misfiles its alerts", + "trust the replica clock", + "301 megabytes", + "65 seconds", + "156 days" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0077", + "f0079", + "f0137", + "f0193", + "f0277", + "f0385", + "f0565", + "f0597", + "f0673", + "f0737", + "f0885", + "f1042", + "f1077", + "f1272", + "f1301", + "f1333", + "f1345", + "f1377", + "f1382" + ], + "answers": [ + "retry inside the lock", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "promote an unverified backup", + "lags its dashboard", + "share a cursor between shards", + "27 requests", + "495 milliseconds", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "bypass the admission meter", + "350 seconds", + "write before the fence lands", + "archive an open incident", + "retry inside the lock", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "lags its dashboard", + "569 entries", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "hot-patch the verifier itself" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0097", + "f0341", + "f0713", + "f0781", + "f0821", + "f0969", + "c069g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "promote an unverified backup", + "blackholes its retries", + "skews its baseline", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "mislabels its vials", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "182 segments" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0099", + "f0341", + "f0344", + "f0355", + "f0358", + "f0359", + "f0582", + "f0583", + "f0710", + "f0711", + "f0713", + "f0771", + "f0774", + "f0780", + "f0783", + "f0792", + "f0795", + "f0821", + "f0824", + "f0931", + "f0934", + "f0966", + "f0967", + "f0969", + "f1211" + ], + "answers": [ + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "blackholes its retries", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "926 generations", + "overfills its journal", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "shadows its primary", + "872 readings", + "inverts its polarity", + "skews its baseline", + "expires its own grants", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "77 generations", + "overfills its journal", + "reuse a burned nonce", + "116 records", + "mislabels its vials", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "clones its timers", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "expires its own grants", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "desyncs its mirrors" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0099", + "f0344", + "f0356", + "f0580", + "f0772", + "f0780", + "f0784", + "f0792", + "f0824", + "f0932" + ], + "answers": [ + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "534 milliseconds", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "77 generations", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "reuse a burned nonce", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "reuse a burned nonce" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0100", + "f0108", + "f0196", + "f0198", + "f0280", + "f0632", + "f0708", + "f0816", + "f0818", + "f0952", + "f1161", + "f1164", + "f1168", + "c066g2", + "c070g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "263 percent", + "misfiles its alerts", + "expires its own grants", + "stutters its stream", + "731 seconds", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "churns its connections", + "garbles its telemetry", + "echoes its own commands", + "write before the fence lands", + "shreds its manifest", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "reorders acks", + "143 milliseconds", + "195 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P39", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0114", + "f0402", + "f0478", + "f0594", + "f0606", + "f0734", + "f0746", + "f0990", + "f1030", + "f1034", + "f1066", + "f1086", + "f1322", + "f1324", + "f1385", + "f1386", + "f1397", + "f1423", + "c059g2", + "c064g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "reuse a burned nonce", + "overfills its journal", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "starves its consumers", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "expires its own grants", + "623 minutes", + "727 percent", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "drops writes", + "forgets its offsets", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "673 megabytes", + "skips the fsync", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "misfiles its alerts", + "52 percent", + "117 hours" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P40", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0120", + "f0172", + "f0184", + "f0208", + "f0332", + "f0364", + "f0644", + "f0652", + "f0964", + "f1001", + "f1004", + "f1112", + "f1208", + "f1360", + "f1476" + ], + "answers": [ + "315 records", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "stutters its stream", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "truncates the tail", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "reuse a spill file", + "flaps its liveness", + "608 branches", + "expires its own grants" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P41", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0120", + "f0123", + "f0172", + "f0181", + "f0184", + "f0207", + "f0332", + "f0361", + "f0364", + "f0643", + "f0652", + "f0963", + "f1001", + "f1004", + "f1095", + "f1097", + "f1112", + "f1205", + "f1208", + "f1255", + "f1257", + "f1350", + "f1351", + "f1353", + "f1362", + "f1475", + "f1478", + "f1479", + "c035g2", + "c057g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "315 records", + "thrashes the cache", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "starves its consumers", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "skips the fsync", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "overfills its journal", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "splits its brain", + "truncates the tail", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "896 seconds", + "write before the fence lands", + "reuse a spill file", + "205 seconds", + "flaps its liveness", + "335 percent", + "fork the settlement record", + "582 milliseconds", + "truncates the tail", + "duplicates its fence", + "retry inside the lock", + "907 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "717 segments", + "26 entries" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P42", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0126", + "f0143", + "f0146", + "f0158", + "f0542", + "f0678", + "f0742", + "f0946", + "f1182", + "f1318", + "f1406", + "c036g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "shreds its manifest", + "clips its bursts", + "shreds its manifest", + "misplaces its permits", + "splice two lineages", + "ignores its backpressure", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "shreds its manifest", + "trust the replica clock", + "misfiles its alerts", + "mislabels its vials", + "730 segments" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P43", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0129", + "f0140", + "f0141", + "f0149", + "f0321", + "f0323", + "f0397", + "f0675", + "f0877", + "f0949", + "f1057", + "f1185", + "f1217", + "f1281", + "f1325", + "f1365", + "f1409", + "f1441", + "f1443", + "f1461", + "c005g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "367 entries", + "forgets its offsets", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "mislabels its vials", + "saturates its detector", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "781 blocks", + "reuse a spill file", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "retry inside the lock", + "153 percent", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "double-counts rows", + "517 seconds", + "621 attempts", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "drifts its watermark", + "starves its consumers", + "327 megabytes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P44", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0138", + "f0190", + "f0568", + "f0670", + "f0754", + "f0998", + "f1022", + "f1042", + "f1330", + "f1374", + "f1382", + "c060g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "inflates its estimates", + "497 segments", + "duplicates its fence", + "768 percent", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "drifts its watermark", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "write before the fence lands", + "530 segments", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "65 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P45", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0140", + "f0144", + "f0149", + "f0324", + "f0396", + "f0676", + "f0696", + "f0740", + "f0876", + "f0879", + "f1188", + "f1240", + "f1283", + "f1284", + "f1316", + "f1328", + "f1368", + "f1444", + "f1464", + "c038g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "367 entries", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "starves its consumers", + "clones its timers", + "re-emits duplicates", + "950 hours", + "skips the fsync", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "orphans its batches", + "296 percent", + "leaks handles", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "upends its ordering", + "flaps its liveness", + "stalls", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "756 megabytes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P46", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0152", + "f0248", + "f0268", + "f0300", + "f0304", + "f0368", + "f0393", + "f0912", + "f0976", + "f0978", + "f1356", + "f1452" + ], + "answers": [ + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "stalls", + "skews its baseline", + "783 minutes", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "misfiles its alerts", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "interleave two restore streams", + "expires its own grants", + "stutters its stream", + "stalls the queue", + "reuse a spill file" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P47", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0152", + "f0245", + "f0248", + "f0265", + "f0268", + "f0300", + "f0303", + "f0367", + "f0390", + "f0391", + "f0393", + "f0419", + "f0891", + "f0911", + "f0914", + "f0975", + "f0978", + "f1356", + "f1359", + "f1452" + ], + "answers": [ + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "640 attempts", + "stalls", + "692 readings", + "skews its baseline", + "783 minutes", + "inflates its estimates", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "40 percent", + "swallows its errors", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "skips the fsync", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "584 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "stalls the queue", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "reuse a spill file" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P48", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0152", + "f0245", + "f0265", + "f0269", + "f0301", + "f0365", + "f0393", + "f0417", + "f1357", + "f1453", + "c065g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "640 attempts", + "692 readings", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "shreds its manifest", + "952 ticks", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "retry inside the lock", + "starves the drain", + "130 attempts" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P49", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0173", + "f0181", + "f0205", + "f0333", + "f0361", + "f0641", + "f0653", + "f0961", + "f1001", + "f1097", + "f1205", + "f1249", + "f1257", + "f1353", + "c057g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "flaps its liveness", + "starves its consumers", + "536 seconds", + "shadows its primary", + "skips the fsync", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "stutters its stream", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "truncates the tail", + "write before the fence lands", + "205 seconds", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "fork the settlement record", + "duplicates its fence", + "26 entries" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P50", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0176", + "f0271", + "f0272", + "f0312", + "f0466", + "f0472", + "f1092", + "f1196", + "f1292" + ], + "answers": [ + "forgets its offsets", + "skips the fsync", + "reuse a spill file", + "skip the blank control", + "overruns its dwell", + "skip the blank control", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "forgets its offsets", + "interleave two restore streams" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P51", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0187", + "f0201", + "f0204", + "f0210", + "f0213", + "f0291", + "f0294", + "f0422", + "f0423", + "f0527", + "f0646", + "f0647", + "f0649", + "f0667", + "f0716", + "f0719", + "f0725", + "f0728", + "f0902", + "f0903", + "f0940", + "f0943", + "f1045", + "f1048", + "f1106", + "f1109", + "f1155", + "f1158", + "f1159", + "f1286", + "f1287", + "f1289", + "f1455", + "f1458" + ], + "answers": [ + "retry inside the lock", + "fragments its heap", + "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service", + "549 milliseconds", + "reorders acks", + "blackholes its retries", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "write before the fence lands", + "leaks handles", + "retry inside the lock", + "expires its own grants", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "promote an unverified backup", + "truncates the tail", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "911 milliseconds", + "duplicates its fence", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "splits its brain", + "493 hours", + "churns its connections", + "766 seconds", + "drifts its watermark", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "75 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "blackholes its retries", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "855 generations", + "overfills its journal" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P52", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0201", + "f0213", + "f0525", + "f0649", + "f0717", + "f0725", + "f0941", + "f1045", + "f1109", + "f1289", + "f1455" + ], + "answers": [ + "fragments its heap", + "reorders acks", + "391 branches", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "ack before the segment seals", + "911 milliseconds", + "blackholes its retries", + "766 seconds", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "855 generations" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P53", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0202", + "f0210", + "f0294", + "f0422", + "f0646", + "f0716", + "f0728", + "f0902", + "f1106", + "f1158", + "f1286", + "f1458" + ], + "answers": [ + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "549 milliseconds", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "write before the fence lands", + "expires its own grants", + "truncates the tail", + "duplicates its fence", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "clips its bursts", + "blackholes its retries", + "overfills its journal" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P54", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0204", + "f0210", + "f0292", + "f0420", + "f0527", + "f0528", + "f0716", + "f0728", + "f0900", + "f0940", + "f0944", + "f1048", + "f1156", + "f1456" + ], + "answers": [ + "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service", + "549 milliseconds", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "118 seconds", + "retry inside the lock", + "spins on backoff", + "truncates the tail", + "duplicates its fence", + "389 records", + "493 hours", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "drifts its watermark", + "forgets its offsets", + "misroutes its callbacks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P55", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0216", + "f0260", + "f0484", + "f0588", + "f0620", + "f0624", + "f1036", + "f1039", + "f1072", + "f1100", + "f1104", + "f1400", + "c058g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "drops writes", + "679 generations", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "overfills its journal", + "638 requests", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "forgets its offsets", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "interleave two restore streams", + "909 percent", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "712 hours", + "39 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P56", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0216", + "f0219", + "f0262", + "f0263", + "f0326", + "f0327", + "f0329", + "f0370", + "f0373", + "f0483", + "f0585", + "f0588", + "f0620", + "f0623", + "f0786", + "f0789", + "f0850", + "f0853", + "f0935", + "f0937", + "f1036", + "f1039", + "f1071", + "f1074", + "f1100", + "f1103", + "f1400", + "f1403", + "c027g2", + "c058g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "drops writes", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "interleave two restore streams", + "overfills its journal", + "fragments its heap", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "965 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "reorders acks", + "547 generations", + "overfills its journal", + "638 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "shreds its manifest", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "259 percent", + "orphans its batches", + "480 minutes", + "promote an unverified backup", + "forgets its offsets", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "909 percent", + "orphans its batches", + "712 hours", + "saturates its detector", + "613 seconds", + "39 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P57", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0262", + "f0326", + "f0370", + "f0373", + "f0483", + "f0586", + "f0786", + "f0789", + "f0850", + "f0938", + "f1074" + ], + "answers": [ + "interleave two restore streams", + "fragments its heap", + "965 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "reorders acks", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "shreds its manifest", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "259 percent", + "inflates its estimates", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P58", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0262", + "f0329", + "f0373", + "f0481", + "f0585", + "f0589", + "f0621", + "f0786", + "f0789", + "f0853", + "f0937", + "f1037", + "f1101", + "f1103", + "c033g2", + "c058g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "interleave two restore streams", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "misplaces its permits", + "loses its cursor", + "547 generations", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "poisons its snapshot", + "shreds its manifest", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "orphans its batches", + "promote an unverified backup", + "bypass the admission meter", + "overruns its dwell", + "orphans its batches", + "691 attempts", + "39 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P59", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0266", + "f0300", + "f0382", + "f0390", + "f0394", + "f0894", + "f0911", + "f0914", + "f0978", + "f1450" + ], + "answers": [ + "inverts its polarity", + "783 minutes", + "splice two lineages", + "40 percent", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "stutters its stream", + "842 megabytes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P60", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0286", + "f0298", + "f0510", + "f0522", + "f0556", + "f0638", + "f0722", + "f0862", + "f0906", + "f1170", + "f1278", + "f1298", + "f1336", + "c004g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "upends its ordering", + "lags its dashboard", + "352 segments", + "trust the replica clock", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "drifts its watermark", + "reuse a burned nonce", + "retry inside the lock", + "garbles its telemetry", + "114 milliseconds", + "orphans its batches", + "misfiles its alerts", + "skips the fsync", + "314 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P61", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0289", + "f0297", + "f0513", + "f0521", + "f0557", + "f0685", + "f0687", + "f0905", + "f0908", + "f0909", + "f1173" + ], + "answers": [ + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "archive an open incident", + "lags its dashboard", + "loses its cursor", + "cache the lease token", + "807 ticks", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "402 days", + "echoes its own commands", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "shadows its primary" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P62", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0295", + "f0297", + "f0521", + "f0524", + "f0556", + "f0559", + "f0635", + "f0687", + "f0722", + "f0905", + "f0908", + "f1016", + "f1019", + "f1170", + "f1173", + "f1275", + "f1295", + "f1298", + "f1336", + "f1339" + ], + "answers": [ + "770 segments", + "archive an open incident", + "loses its cursor", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "677 seconds", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "reuse a burned nonce", + "402 days", + "echoes its own commands", + "re-emits duplicates", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "114 milliseconds", + "shadows its primary", + "387 percent", + "439 ticks", + "misfiles its alerts", + "skips the fsync", + "the metric averages away the spikes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P63", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0358", + "f0582", + "f0702", + "f0710", + "f0714", + "f0774", + "f0798", + "f0934", + "f0966", + "f1214" + ], + "answers": [ + "overfills its journal", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "interleave two restore streams", + "872 readings", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "splits its brain", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "expires its own grants", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P64", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0524", + "f0556", + "f0688", + "f0720", + "f0908", + "f1016", + "f1173", + "f1295", + "f1296", + "f1336", + "c002g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "misfiles its alerts", + "898 blocks", + "echoes its own commands", + "re-emits duplicates", + "shadows its primary", + "439 ticks", + "upends its ordering", + "skips the fsync", + "288 blocks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6001", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6002", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6003", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6004", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6005", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6006", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6007", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6008", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6009", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6010", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6011", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6012", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6013", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6014", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6015", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6016", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6017", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6018", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6019", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6020", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6021", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6022", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6023", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6024", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6025", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6026", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6027", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6028", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6029", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6030", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6031", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6032", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6033", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6034", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6035", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6036", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6037", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6038", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6039", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6040", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6041", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6042", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6043", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6044", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6045", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6046", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6047", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6048", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6049", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6050", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6051", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6052", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6053", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6054", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6055", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6056", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6057", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6058", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6059", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6060", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6061", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6062", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6063", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6064", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6065", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6066", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6067", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6068", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6069", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6070", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6071", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6072", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6073", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6074", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6075", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6076", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6077", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6078", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6079", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6080", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6081", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6082", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6083", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6084", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6085", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6086", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6087", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6088", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6089", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6090", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6091", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6092", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6093", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6094", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6095", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6096", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6097", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6098", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6099", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6100", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6101", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6102", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6103", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6104", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6105", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6106", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6107", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6108", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6109", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6110", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6111", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6112", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6113", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6114", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6115", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6116", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6117", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6118", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6119", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6120", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6121", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6122", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6123", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6124", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6125", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6126", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6127", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6128", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6129", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6130", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6131", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6132", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6133", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6134", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6135", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6136", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6137", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6138", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6139", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6140", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6141", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6142", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6143", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6144", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6145", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6146", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6147", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6148", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6149", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6150", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6151", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6152", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6153", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6154", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6155", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6156", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6157", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6158", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6159", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6160", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6161", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6162", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6163", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6164", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6165", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6166", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6167", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6168", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6169", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6170", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6171", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6172", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6173", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6174", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6175", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6176", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6177", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6178", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6179", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6180", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6181", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6182", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6183", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6184", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6185", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6186", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6187", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6188", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6189", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6190", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6191", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6192", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6193", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6194", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6195", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6196", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6197", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6198", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6199", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6200", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6201", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6202", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6203", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6204", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6205", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6206", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6207", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6208", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6209", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6210", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6211", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6212", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6213", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6214", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6215", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6216", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6217", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6218", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6219", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6220", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6221", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6222", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6223", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6224", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6225", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6226", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6227", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6228", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6229", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6230", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6231", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6232", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6233", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6234", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6235", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6236", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6237", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6238", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6239", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6240", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6241", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6242", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6243", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6244", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6245", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6246", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6247", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6248", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6249", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6250", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6251", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6252", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6253", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6254", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6255", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6256", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6257", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6258", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6259", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6260", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6261", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6262", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6263", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6264", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6265", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6266", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6267", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6268", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6269", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6270", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6271", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6272", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6273", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6274", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6275", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6276", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6277", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6278", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6279", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6280", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6281", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6282", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6283", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6284", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6285", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6286", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6287", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6288", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6289", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6290", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6291", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6292", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6293", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6294", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6295", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6296", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6297", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6298", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6299", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6300", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6301", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6302", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6303", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6304", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6305", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6306", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6307", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6308", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6309", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6310", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6311", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6312", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6313", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6314", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6315", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6316", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6317", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6318", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6319", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6320", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6321", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6322", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6323", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6324", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6325", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6326", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6327", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6328", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6329", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6330", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6331", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6332", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6333", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6334", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6335", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6336", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6337", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6338", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6339", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R6340", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6341", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6342", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6343", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6344", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6345", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6346", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6347", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6348", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6349", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6350", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6351", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6352", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6353", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6354", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6355", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6356", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6357", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6358", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6359", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6360", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6361", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6362", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6363", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6364", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6365", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6366", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6367", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6368", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6369", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6370", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6371", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6372", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6373", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6374", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6375", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6376", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6377", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6378", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6379", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6380", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6381", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6382", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6383", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6384", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6385", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6386", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6387", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6388", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6389", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6390", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6391", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6392", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6393", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6394", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6395", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6396", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6397", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6398", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6399", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6400", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6401", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6402", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6403", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6404", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6405", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6406", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6407", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6408", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6409", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6410", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6411", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6412", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6413", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6414", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6415", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6416", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6417", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6418", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6419", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6420", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6421", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6422", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6423", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6424", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6425", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6426", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6427", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6428", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6429", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6430", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6431", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6432", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6433", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6434", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6435", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6436", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6437", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6438", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6439", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6440", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6441", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6442", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6443", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6444", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6445", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6446", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6447", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6448", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6449", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6450", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6451", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6452", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6453", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6454", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6455", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6456", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6457", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6458", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6459", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6460", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6461", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6462", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6463", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6464", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6465", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6466", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6467", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6468", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6469", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6470", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6471", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6472", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6473", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6474", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6475", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6476", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6477", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6478", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6479", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6480", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6481", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6482", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6483", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6484", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6485", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6486", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6487", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6488", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6489", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6490", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6491", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6492", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6493", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6494", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6495", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6496", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6497", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6498", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6499", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6500", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6501", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6502", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6503", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6504", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6505", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6506", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6507", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6508", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6509", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6510", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6511", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6512", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6513", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6514", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6515", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6516", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6517", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6518", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6519", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6520", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6521", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6522", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6523", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6524", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6525", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6526", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6527", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6528", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6529", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6530", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6531", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6532", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6533", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6534", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6535", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6536", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6537", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6538", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6539", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6540", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6541", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6542", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6543", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6544", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6545", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6546", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6547", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6548", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6549", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6550", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6551", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6552", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6553", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6554", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6555", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6556", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6557", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6558", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6559", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6560", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6561", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6562", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6563", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6564", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6565", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6566", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6567", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6568", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6569", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6570", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6571", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6572", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6573", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6574", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6575", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6576", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6577", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6578", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6579", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6580", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6581", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6582", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6583", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6584", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6585", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6586", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6587", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6588", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6589", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6590", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6591", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6592", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6593", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6594", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6595", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6596", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6597", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6598", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6599", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6600", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6601", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6602", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6603", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6604", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6605", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6606", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6607", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6608", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6609", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6610", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6611", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6612", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6613", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6614", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6615", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6616", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6617", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6618", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6619", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6620", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6621", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6622", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6623", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6624", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6625", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6626", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6627", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6628", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6629", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6630", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6631", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6632", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6633", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6634", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6635", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6636", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6637", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6638", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6639", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6640", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6641", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6642", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6643", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6644", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6645", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6646", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6647", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6648", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6649", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6650", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6651", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6652", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6653", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6654", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6655", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6656", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6657", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6658", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6659", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6660", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6661", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6662", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6663", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6664", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6665", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6666", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6667", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6668", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6669", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6670", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6671", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6672", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6673", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6674", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6675", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6676", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6677", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6678", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6679", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6680", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6681", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6682", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6683", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6684", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6685", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6686", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6687", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6688", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6689", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6690", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6691", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6692", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6693", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6694", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6695", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6696", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6697", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6698", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6699", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6700", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6701", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6702", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6703", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6704", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6705", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6706", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6707", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6708", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6709", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6710", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6711", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6712", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6713", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6714", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R6715", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "262 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6716", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "262 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6717", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "262 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L1", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6718", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "275 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R6719", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "275 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R6720", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "275 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "L2", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6721", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "288 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R6722", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "288 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R6723", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "288 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "L3", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6724", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "301 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6725", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "301 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6726", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "301 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "L4", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6727", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "314 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6728", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "314 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6729", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "314 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L5", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6730", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "327 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6731", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "327 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6732", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "327 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "L6", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6733", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "340 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6734", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "340 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6735", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "340 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L7", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6736", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "353 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6737", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "353 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6738", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "353 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "L8", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6739", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "366 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R6740", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "366 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R6741", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "366 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L9", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6742", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "379 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R6743", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "379 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R6744", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "379 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L10", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6745", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "392 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6746", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "392 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6747", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "392 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L11", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6748", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "405 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R6749", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "405 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R6750", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "405 entries" + }, + { + "id": "L12", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6751", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "418 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6752", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "418 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6753", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "418 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L13", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6754", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "431 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6755", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "431 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6756", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "431 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L14", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6757", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "444 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6758", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "444 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6759", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "444 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L15", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6760", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "457 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R6761", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "457 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R6762", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "457 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L16", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6763", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "470 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6764", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "470 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6765", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "470 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L17", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6766", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "483 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6767", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "483 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6768", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "483 records" + }, + { + "id": "L18", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6769", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "496 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6770", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "496 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6771", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "496 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L19", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6772", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "509 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R6773", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "509 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R6774", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "509 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "L20", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6775", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "522 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R6776", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "522 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R6777", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "522 entries" + }, + { + "id": "L21", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6778", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "535 days" + }, + { + "id": "R6779", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "535 days" + }, + { + "id": "R6780", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "535 days" + }, + { + "id": "L22", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6781", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "548 days" + }, + { + "id": "R6782", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "548 days" + }, + { + "id": "R6783", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "548 days" + }, + { + "id": "L23", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6784", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "561 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R6785", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "561 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R6786", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "561 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "L24", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6787", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "574 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6788", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "574 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6789", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "574 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L25", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6790", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c025g2", + "retired": [ + "c025g0", + "c025g1" + ], + "answer": "587 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R6791", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c025g2", + "retired": [ + "c025g0", + "c025g1" + ], + "answer": "587 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R6792", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c025g2", + "retired": [ + "c025g0", + "c025g1" + ], + "answer": "587 hours" + }, + { + "id": "L26", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c025g2", + "retired": [ + "c025g0", + "c025g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6793", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c026g2", + "retired": [ + "c026g0", + "c026g1" + ], + "answer": "600 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6794", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c026g2", + "retired": [ + "c026g0", + "c026g1" + ], + "answer": "600 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6795", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c026g2", + "retired": [ + "c026g0", + "c026g1" + ], + "answer": "600 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L27", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c026g2", + "retired": [ + "c026g0", + "c026g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6796", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c027g2", + "retired": [ + "c027g0", + "c027g1" + ], + "answer": "613 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6797", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c027g2", + "retired": [ + "c027g0", + "c027g1" + ], + "answer": "613 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6798", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c027g2", + "retired": [ + "c027g0", + "c027g1" + ], + "answer": "613 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L28", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c027g2", + "retired": [ + "c027g0", + "c027g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6799", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c028g2", + "retired": [ + "c028g0", + "c028g1" + ], + "answer": "626 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6800", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c028g2", + "retired": [ + "c028g0", + "c028g1" + ], + "answer": "626 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6801", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c028g2", + "retired": [ + "c028g0", + "c028g1" + ], + "answer": "626 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L29", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c028g2", + "retired": [ + "c028g0", + "c028g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6802", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c029g2", + "retired": [ + "c029g0", + "c029g1" + ], + "answer": "639 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6803", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c029g2", + "retired": [ + "c029g0", + "c029g1" + ], + "answer": "639 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6804", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c029g2", + "retired": [ + "c029g0", + "c029g1" + ], + "answer": "639 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L30", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c029g2", + "retired": [ + "c029g0", + "c029g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6805", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c030g2", + "retired": [ + "c030g0", + "c030g1" + ], + "answer": "652 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R6806", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c030g2", + "retired": [ + "c030g0", + "c030g1" + ], + "answer": "652 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R6807", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c030g2", + "retired": [ + "c030g0", + "c030g1" + ], + "answer": "652 entries" + }, + { + "id": "L31", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c030g2", + "retired": [ + "c030g0", + "c030g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6808", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c031g2", + "retired": [ + "c031g0", + "c031g1" + ], + "answer": "665 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6809", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c031g2", + "retired": [ + "c031g0", + "c031g1" + ], + "answer": "665 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6810", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c031g2", + "retired": [ + "c031g0", + "c031g1" + ], + "answer": "665 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L32", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c031g2", + "retired": [ + "c031g0", + "c031g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6811", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c032g2", + "retired": [ + "c032g0", + "c032g1" + ], + "answer": "678 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6812", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c032g2", + "retired": [ + "c032g0", + "c032g1" + ], + "answer": "678 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6813", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c032g2", + "retired": [ + "c032g0", + "c032g1" + ], + "answer": "678 records" + }, + { + "id": "L33", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c032g2", + "retired": [ + "c032g0", + "c032g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6814", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c033g2", + "retired": [ + "c033g0", + "c033g1" + ], + "answer": "691 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R6815", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c033g2", + "retired": [ + "c033g0", + "c033g1" + ], + "answer": "691 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R6816", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c033g2", + "retired": [ + "c033g0", + "c033g1" + ], + "answer": "691 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "L34", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c033g2", + "retired": [ + "c033g0", + "c033g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6817", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c034g2", + "retired": [ + "c034g0", + "c034g1" + ], + "answer": "704 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6818", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c034g2", + "retired": [ + "c034g0", + "c034g1" + ], + "answer": "704 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6819", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c034g2", + "retired": [ + "c034g0", + "c034g1" + ], + "answer": "704 records" + }, + { + "id": "L35", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c034g2", + "retired": [ + "c034g0", + "c034g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6820", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c035g2", + "retired": [ + "c035g0", + "c035g1" + ], + "answer": "717 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6821", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c035g2", + "retired": [ + "c035g0", + "c035g1" + ], + "answer": "717 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6822", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c035g2", + "retired": [ + "c035g0", + "c035g1" + ], + "answer": "717 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L36", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c035g2", + "retired": [ + "c035g0", + "c035g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6823", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c036g2", + "retired": [ + "c036g0", + "c036g1" + ], + "answer": "730 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6824", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c036g2", + "retired": [ + "c036g0", + "c036g1" + ], + "answer": "730 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6825", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c036g2", + "retired": [ + "c036g0", + "c036g1" + ], + "answer": "730 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L37", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c036g2", + "retired": [ + "c036g0", + "c036g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6826", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c037g2", + "retired": [ + "c037g0", + "c037g1" + ], + "answer": "743 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6827", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c037g2", + "retired": [ + "c037g0", + "c037g1" + ], + "answer": "743 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6828", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c037g2", + "retired": [ + "c037g0", + "c037g1" + ], + "answer": "743 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L38", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c037g2", + "retired": [ + "c037g0", + "c037g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6829", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c038g2", + "retired": [ + "c038g0", + "c038g1" + ], + "answer": "756 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6830", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c038g2", + "retired": [ + "c038g0", + "c038g1" + ], + "answer": "756 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6831", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c038g2", + "retired": [ + "c038g0", + "c038g1" + ], + "answer": "756 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "L39", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c038g2", + "retired": [ + "c038g0", + "c038g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6832", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c039g2", + "retired": [ + "c039g0", + "c039g1" + ], + "answer": "769 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R6833", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c039g2", + "retired": [ + "c039g0", + "c039g1" + ], + "answer": "769 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R6834", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c039g2", + "retired": [ + "c039g0", + "c039g1" + ], + "answer": "769 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "L40", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c039g2", + "retired": [ + "c039g0", + "c039g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6835", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c040g2", + "retired": [ + "c040g0", + "c040g1" + ], + "answer": "782 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6836", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c040g2", + "retired": [ + "c040g0", + "c040g1" + ], + "answer": "782 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6837", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c040g2", + "retired": [ + "c040g0", + "c040g1" + ], + "answer": "782 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L41", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c040g2", + "retired": [ + "c040g0", + "c040g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6838", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c041g2", + "retired": [ + "c041g0", + "c041g1" + ], + "answer": "795 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6839", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c041g2", + "retired": [ + "c041g0", + "c041g1" + ], + "answer": "795 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6840", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c041g2", + "retired": [ + "c041g0", + "c041g1" + ], + "answer": "795 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L42", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c041g2", + "retired": [ + "c041g0", + "c041g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6841", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c042g2", + "retired": [ + "c042g0", + "c042g1" + ], + "answer": "808 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6842", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c042g2", + "retired": [ + "c042g0", + "c042g1" + ], + "answer": "808 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6843", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c042g2", + "retired": [ + "c042g0", + "c042g1" + ], + "answer": "808 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L43", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c042g2", + "retired": [ + "c042g0", + "c042g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6844", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c043g2", + "retired": [ + "c043g0", + "c043g1" + ], + "answer": "821 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R6845", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c043g2", + "retired": [ + "c043g0", + "c043g1" + ], + "answer": "821 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R6846", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c043g2", + "retired": [ + "c043g0", + "c043g1" + ], + "answer": "821 requests" + }, + { + "id": "L44", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c043g2", + "retired": [ + "c043g0", + "c043g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6847", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c044g2", + "retired": [ + "c044g0", + "c044g1" + ], + "answer": "834 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R6848", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c044g2", + "retired": [ + "c044g0", + "c044g1" + ], + "answer": "834 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R6849", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c044g2", + "retired": [ + "c044g0", + "c044g1" + ], + "answer": "834 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L45", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c044g2", + "retired": [ + "c044g0", + "c044g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6850", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c045g2", + "retired": [ + "c045g0", + "c045g1" + ], + "answer": "847 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6851", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c045g2", + "retired": [ + "c045g0", + "c045g1" + ], + "answer": "847 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6852", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c045g2", + "retired": [ + "c045g0", + "c045g1" + ], + "answer": "847 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L46", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c045g2", + "retired": [ + "c045g0", + "c045g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6853", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c046g2", + "retired": [ + "c046g0", + "c046g1" + ], + "answer": "860 days" + }, + { + "id": "R6854", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c046g2", + "retired": [ + "c046g0", + "c046g1" + ], + "answer": "860 days" + }, + { + "id": "R6855", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c046g2", + "retired": [ + "c046g0", + "c046g1" + ], + "answer": "860 days" + }, + { + "id": "L47", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c046g2", + "retired": [ + "c046g0", + "c046g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6856", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c047g2", + "retired": [ + "c047g0", + "c047g1" + ], + "answer": "873 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R6857", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c047g2", + "retired": [ + "c047g0", + "c047g1" + ], + "answer": "873 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R6858", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c047g2", + "retired": [ + "c047g0", + "c047g1" + ], + "answer": "873 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "L48", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c047g2", + "retired": [ + "c047g0", + "c047g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6859", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c048g2", + "retired": [ + "c048g0", + "c048g1" + ], + "answer": "886 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6860", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c048g2", + "retired": [ + "c048g0", + "c048g1" + ], + "answer": "886 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6861", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c048g2", + "retired": [ + "c048g0", + "c048g1" + ], + "answer": "886 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L49", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c048g2", + "retired": [ + "c048g0", + "c048g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6862", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c049g2", + "retired": [ + "c049g0", + "c049g1" + ], + "answer": "899 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6863", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c049g2", + "retired": [ + "c049g0", + "c049g1" + ], + "answer": "899 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6864", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c049g2", + "retired": [ + "c049g0", + "c049g1" + ], + "answer": "899 records" + }, + { + "id": "L50", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c049g2", + "retired": [ + "c049g0", + "c049g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6865", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c050g2", + "retired": [ + "c050g0", + "c050g1" + ], + "answer": "912 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R6866", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c050g2", + "retired": [ + "c050g0", + "c050g1" + ], + "answer": "912 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R6867", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c050g2", + "retired": [ + "c050g0", + "c050g1" + ], + "answer": "912 generations" + }, + { + "id": "L51", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c050g2", + "retired": [ + "c050g0", + "c050g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6868", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c051g2", + "retired": [ + "c051g0", + "c051g1" + ], + "answer": "925 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6869", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c051g2", + "retired": [ + "c051g0", + "c051g1" + ], + "answer": "925 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6870", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c051g2", + "retired": [ + "c051g0", + "c051g1" + ], + "answer": "925 records" + }, + { + "id": "L52", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c051g2", + "retired": [ + "c051g0", + "c051g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6871", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c052g2", + "retired": [ + "c052g0", + "c052g1" + ], + "answer": "938 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R6872", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c052g2", + "retired": [ + "c052g0", + "c052g1" + ], + "answer": "938 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R6873", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c052g2", + "retired": [ + "c052g0", + "c052g1" + ], + "answer": "938 hours" + }, + { + "id": "L53", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c052g2", + "retired": [ + "c052g0", + "c052g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6874", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c053g2", + "retired": [ + "c053g0", + "c053g1" + ], + "answer": "951 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6875", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c053g2", + "retired": [ + "c053g0", + "c053g1" + ], + "answer": "951 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6876", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c053g2", + "retired": [ + "c053g0", + "c053g1" + ], + "answer": "951 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L54", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c053g2", + "retired": [ + "c053g0", + "c053g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6877", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c054g2", + "retired": [ + "c054g0", + "c054g1" + ], + "answer": "964 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6878", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c054g2", + "retired": [ + "c054g0", + "c054g1" + ], + "answer": "964 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R6879", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c054g2", + "retired": [ + "c054g0", + "c054g1" + ], + "answer": "964 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "L55", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c054g2", + "retired": [ + "c054g0", + "c054g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6880", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c055g2", + "retired": [ + "c055g0", + "c055g1" + ], + "answer": "977 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R6881", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c055g2", + "retired": [ + "c055g0", + "c055g1" + ], + "answer": "977 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R6882", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c055g2", + "retired": [ + "c055g0", + "c055g1" + ], + "answer": "977 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "L56", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c055g2", + "retired": [ + "c055g0", + "c055g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6883", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c056g2", + "retired": [ + "c056g0", + "c056g1" + ], + "answer": "13 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6884", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c056g2", + "retired": [ + "c056g0", + "c056g1" + ], + "answer": "13 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6885", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c056g2", + "retired": [ + "c056g0", + "c056g1" + ], + "answer": "13 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L57", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c056g2", + "retired": [ + "c056g0", + "c056g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6886", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c057g2", + "retired": [ + "c057g0", + "c057g1" + ], + "answer": "26 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R6887", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c057g2", + "retired": [ + "c057g0", + "c057g1" + ], + "answer": "26 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R6888", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c057g2", + "retired": [ + "c057g0", + "c057g1" + ], + "answer": "26 entries" + }, + { + "id": "L58", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c057g2", + "retired": [ + "c057g0", + "c057g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6889", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c058g2", + "retired": [ + "c058g0", + "c058g1" + ], + "answer": "39 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6890", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c058g2", + "retired": [ + "c058g0", + "c058g1" + ], + "answer": "39 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6891", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c058g2", + "retired": [ + "c058g0", + "c058g1" + ], + "answer": "39 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L59", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c058g2", + "retired": [ + "c058g0", + "c058g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6892", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c059g2", + "retired": [ + "c059g0", + "c059g1" + ], + "answer": "52 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6893", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c059g2", + "retired": [ + "c059g0", + "c059g1" + ], + "answer": "52 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R6894", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c059g2", + "retired": [ + "c059g0", + "c059g1" + ], + "answer": "52 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L60", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c059g2", + "retired": [ + "c059g0", + "c059g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6895", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c060g2", + "retired": [ + "c060g0", + "c060g1" + ], + "answer": "65 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6896", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c060g2", + "retired": [ + "c060g0", + "c060g1" + ], + "answer": "65 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6897", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c060g2", + "retired": [ + "c060g0", + "c060g1" + ], + "answer": "65 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L61", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c060g2", + "retired": [ + "c060g0", + "c060g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6898", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c061g2", + "retired": [ + "c061g0", + "c061g1" + ], + "answer": "78 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R6899", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c061g2", + "retired": [ + "c061g0", + "c061g1" + ], + "answer": "78 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R6900", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c061g2", + "retired": [ + "c061g0", + "c061g1" + ], + "answer": "78 branches" + }, + { + "id": "L62", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c061g2", + "retired": [ + "c061g0", + "c061g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6901", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c062g2", + "retired": [ + "c062g0", + "c062g1" + ], + "answer": "91 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6902", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c062g2", + "retired": [ + "c062g0", + "c062g1" + ], + "answer": "91 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6903", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c062g2", + "retired": [ + "c062g0", + "c062g1" + ], + "answer": "91 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L63", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c062g2", + "retired": [ + "c062g0", + "c062g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6904", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c063g2", + "retired": [ + "c063g0", + "c063g1" + ], + "answer": "104 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R6905", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c063g2", + "retired": [ + "c063g0", + "c063g1" + ], + "answer": "104 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R6906", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c063g2", + "retired": [ + "c063g0", + "c063g1" + ], + "answer": "104 readings" + }, + { + "id": "L64", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c063g2", + "retired": [ + "c063g0", + "c063g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6907", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c064g2", + "retired": [ + "c064g0", + "c064g1" + ], + "answer": "117 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R6908", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c064g2", + "retired": [ + "c064g0", + "c064g1" + ], + "answer": "117 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R6909", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c064g2", + "retired": [ + "c064g0", + "c064g1" + ], + "answer": "117 hours" + }, + { + "id": "L65", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c064g2", + "retired": [ + "c064g0", + "c064g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6910", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c065g2", + "retired": [ + "c065g0", + "c065g1" + ], + "answer": "130 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R6911", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c065g2", + "retired": [ + "c065g0", + "c065g1" + ], + "answer": "130 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R6912", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c065g2", + "retired": [ + "c065g0", + "c065g1" + ], + "answer": "130 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "L66", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c065g2", + "retired": [ + "c065g0", + "c065g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6913", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c066g2", + "retired": [ + "c066g0", + "c066g1" + ], + "answer": "143 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6914", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c066g2", + "retired": [ + "c066g0", + "c066g1" + ], + "answer": "143 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6915", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c066g2", + "retired": [ + "c066g0", + "c066g1" + ], + "answer": "143 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L67", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c066g2", + "retired": [ + "c066g0", + "c066g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6916", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c067g2", + "retired": [ + "c067g0", + "c067g1" + ], + "answer": "156 days" + }, + { + "id": "R6917", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c067g2", + "retired": [ + "c067g0", + "c067g1" + ], + "answer": "156 days" + }, + { + "id": "R6918", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c067g2", + "retired": [ + "c067g0", + "c067g1" + ], + "answer": "156 days" + }, + { + "id": "L68", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c067g2", + "retired": [ + "c067g0", + "c067g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6919", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c068g2", + "retired": [ + "c068g0", + "c068g1" + ], + "answer": "169 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6920", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c068g2", + "retired": [ + "c068g0", + "c068g1" + ], + "answer": "169 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R6921", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c068g2", + "retired": [ + "c068g0", + "c068g1" + ], + "answer": "169 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L69", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c068g2", + "retired": [ + "c068g0", + "c068g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6922", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c069g2", + "retired": [ + "c069g0", + "c069g1" + ], + "answer": "182 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6923", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c069g2", + "retired": [ + "c069g0", + "c069g1" + ], + "answer": "182 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6924", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c069g2", + "retired": [ + "c069g0", + "c069g1" + ], + "answer": "182 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L70", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c069g2", + "retired": [ + "c069g0", + "c069g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6925", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c070g2", + "retired": [ + "c070g0", + "c070g1" + ], + "answer": "195 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6926", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c070g2", + "retired": [ + "c070g0", + "c070g1" + ], + "answer": "195 records" + }, + { + "id": "R6927", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c070g2", + "retired": [ + "c070g0", + "c070g1" + ], + "answer": "195 records" + }, + { + "id": "L71", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c070g2", + "retired": [ + "c070g0", + "c070g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6928", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c071g2", + "retired": [ + "c071g0", + "c071g1" + ], + "answer": "208 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R6929", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c071g2", + "retired": [ + "c071g0", + "c071g1" + ], + "answer": "208 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R6930", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c071g2", + "retired": [ + "c071g0", + "c071g1" + ], + "answer": "208 branches" + }, + { + "id": "L72", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c071g2", + "retired": [ + "c071g0", + "c071g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6931", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c072g2", + "retired": [ + "c072g0", + "c072g1" + ], + "answer": "221 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R6932", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c072g2", + "retired": [ + "c072g0", + "c072g1" + ], + "answer": "221 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R6933", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c072g2", + "retired": [ + "c072g0", + "c072g1" + ], + "answer": "221 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "L73", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c072g2", + "retired": [ + "c072g0", + "c072g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6934", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c073g2", + "retired": [ + "c073g0", + "c073g1" + ], + "answer": "234 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R6935", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c073g2", + "retired": [ + "c073g0", + "c073g1" + ], + "answer": "234 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R6936", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c073g2", + "retired": [ + "c073g0", + "c073g1" + ], + "answer": "234 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "L74", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c073g2", + "retired": [ + "c073g0", + "c073g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6937", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c074g2", + "retired": [ + "c074g0", + "c074g1" + ], + "answer": "247 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6938", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c074g2", + "retired": [ + "c074g0", + "c074g1" + ], + "answer": "247 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R6939", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c074g2", + "retired": [ + "c074g0", + "c074g1" + ], + "answer": "247 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L75", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c074g2", + "retired": [ + "c074g0", + "c074g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R6940", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0849", + "anchor": "f0253", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R6941", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1282", + "anchor": "f0560", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R6942", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1442", + "anchor": "f0740", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R6943", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0589", + "anchor": "f0938", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R6944", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1152", + "anchor": "f0840", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R6945", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0684", + "anchor": "f0848", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R6946", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1117", + "anchor": "f0865", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R6947", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1424", + "anchor": "f0578", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R6948", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0487", + "anchor": "f0250", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R6949", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0559", + "anchor": "f1018", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R6950", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1127", + "anchor": "f1155", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R6951", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1402", + "anchor": "f0970", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R6952", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1274", + "anchor": "f0978", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R6953", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1494", + "anchor": "f0623", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R6954", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1407", + "anchor": "f1315", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R6955", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0209", + "anchor": "f0363", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R6956", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0739", + "anchor": "f0568", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R6957", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0067", + "anchor": "f1225", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R6958", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0477", + "anchor": "f0730", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R6959", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0064", + "anchor": "f0128", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R6960", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0937", + "anchor": "f1045", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R6961", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0607", + "anchor": "f1065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R6962", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1349", + "anchor": "f0538", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R6963", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f0158", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R6964", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1007", + "anchor": "f0660", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R6965", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0987", + "anchor": "f0940", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R6966", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1349", + "anchor": "f0698", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R6967", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0792", + "anchor": "f0315", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R6968", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0109", + "anchor": "f1128", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R6969", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0607", + "anchor": "f0115", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R6970", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1119", + "anchor": "f1053", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R6971", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0809", + "anchor": "f0463", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R6972", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1039", + "anchor": "f0718", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R6973", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0504", + "anchor": "f0703", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R6974", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1462", + "anchor": "f0285", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R6975", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0722", + "anchor": "f0720", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R6976", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1134", + "anchor": "f0133", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R6977", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0164", + "anchor": "f0708", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R6978", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0399", + "anchor": "f0878", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R6979", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0757", + "anchor": "f0165", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R6980", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1394", + "anchor": "f0393", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R6981", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0384", + "anchor": "f1493", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R6982", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0772", + "anchor": "f1200", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R6983", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0667", + "anchor": "f0200", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R6984", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0089", + "anchor": "f1068", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R6985", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0222", + "anchor": "f0290", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R6986", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0224", + "anchor": "f0923", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R6987", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0834", + "anchor": "f0883", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R6988", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0902", + "anchor": "f1070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R6989", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0537", + "anchor": "f1345", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R6990", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0209", + "anchor": "f0388", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R6991", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0347", + "anchor": "f0070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R6992", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0469", + "anchor": "f1183", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R6993", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0259", + "anchor": "f0328", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R6994", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1442", + "anchor": "f0130", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R6995", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0534", + "anchor": "f0823", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R6996", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0114", + "anchor": "f0733", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R6997", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1009", + "anchor": "f1083", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R6998", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0214", + "anchor": "f1433", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R6999", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0137", + "anchor": "f0665", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7000", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0952", + "anchor": "f1380", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7001", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1167", + "anchor": "f0115", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R7002", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0119", + "anchor": "f1093", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7003", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0807", + "anchor": "f0860", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7004", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0589", + "anchor": "f0698", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R7005", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1382", + "anchor": "f1375", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R7006", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1052", + "anchor": "f0925", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7007", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0894", + "anchor": "f0648", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R7008", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0237", + "anchor": "f0865", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7009", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0452", + "anchor": "f0795", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7010", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1242", + "anchor": "f0200", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7011", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1182", + "anchor": "f0395", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R7012", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0592", + "anchor": "f0435", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R7013", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0999", + "anchor": "f0998", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7014", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0422", + "anchor": "f0760", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7015", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1027", + "anchor": "f0585", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7016", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1474", + "anchor": "f0103", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R7017", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0927", + "anchor": "f0070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7018", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0954", + "anchor": "f0278", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7019", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1064", + "anchor": "f0773", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7020", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1442", + "anchor": "f1460", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7021", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0347", + "anchor": "f1420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7022", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0687", + "anchor": "f0255", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R7023", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1459", + "anchor": "f1108", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7024", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1047", + "anchor": "f0105", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7025", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1109", + "anchor": "f1048", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R7026", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0312", + "anchor": "f0925", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7027", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0627", + "anchor": "f0325", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R7028", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0879", + "anchor": "f0878", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7029", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0427", + "anchor": "f0615", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7030", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1464", + "anchor": "f0583", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7031", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0642", + "anchor": "f0945", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7032", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0389", + "anchor": "f0168", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R7033", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0789", + "anchor": "f0488", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R7034", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0569", + "anchor": "f0608", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7035", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0769", + "anchor": "f1093", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R7036", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0852", + "anchor": "f0545", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7037", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1407", + "anchor": "f1030", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7038", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0804", + "anchor": "f0938", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R7039", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0622", + "anchor": "f0645", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7040", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1422", + "anchor": "f0370", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R7041", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1092", + "anchor": "f0715", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7042", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0277", + "anchor": "f0565", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7043", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1214", + "anchor": "f0543", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7044", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0717", + "anchor": "f0660", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R7045", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0072", + "anchor": "f1310", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7046", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1189", + "anchor": "f0658", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7047", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0572", + "anchor": "f0820", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7048", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0409", + "anchor": "f0868", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7049", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1034", + "anchor": "f0728", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7050", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0812", + "anchor": "f0080", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7051", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1307", + "anchor": "f0340", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7052", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1194", + "anchor": "f1198", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7053", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0884", + "anchor": "f0448", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7054", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0864", + "anchor": "f0763", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7055", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1392", + "anchor": "f0485", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7056", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0999", + "anchor": "f0888", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7057", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0832", + "anchor": "f0160", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R7058", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1019", + "anchor": "f0558", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7059", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1377", + "anchor": "f0470", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7060", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1094", + "anchor": "f1283", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R7061", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0797", + "anchor": "f0770", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7062", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1022", + "anchor": "f0075", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7063", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0342", + "anchor": "f0795", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7064", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1047", + "anchor": "f0950", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7065", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1287", + "anchor": "f0290", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7066", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0799", + "anchor": "f1233", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R7067", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0929", + "anchor": "f0258", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7068", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0897", + "anchor": "f1435", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7069", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0862", + "anchor": "f0180", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7070", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1297", + "anchor": "f0215", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R7071", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0569", + "anchor": "f1303", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7072", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0767", + "anchor": "f1390", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7073", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1067", + "anchor": "f0130", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7074", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1092", + "anchor": "f1090", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7075", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0374", + "anchor": "f0623", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7076", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0919", + "anchor": "f0778", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R7077", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0939", + "anchor": "f0483", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7078", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1452", + "anchor": "f1000", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7079", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1079", + "anchor": "f1023", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7080", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0897", + "anchor": "f0450", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7081", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0832", + "anchor": "f0810", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R7082", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1114", + "anchor": "f1113", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R7083", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0512", + "anchor": "f0295", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R7084", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0739", + "anchor": "f1078", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7085", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1114", + "anchor": "f1098", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R7086", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0092", + "anchor": "f1030", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R7087", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1127", + "anchor": "f0485", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7088", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0959", + "anchor": "f1048", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7089", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1269", + "anchor": "f0733", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7090", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1482", + "anchor": "f1225", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7091", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0729", + "anchor": "f0308", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7092", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0747", + "anchor": "f1270", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7093", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1107", + "anchor": "f0965", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7094", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1439", + "anchor": "f0323", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7095", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0222", + "anchor": "f0550", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7096", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1169", + "anchor": "f0913", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7097", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1159", + "anchor": "f0363", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7098", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0884", + "anchor": "f0378", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7099", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0247", + "anchor": "f1095", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7100", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1374", + "anchor": "f1373", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R7101", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1217", + "anchor": "f0525", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7102", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1009", + "anchor": "f0538", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R7103", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1497", + "anchor": "f1165", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7104", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0084", + "anchor": "f1453", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R7105", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1257", + "anchor": "f0755", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R7106", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0539", + "anchor": "f0858", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7107", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0952", + "anchor": "f1065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7108", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0757", + "anchor": "f0235", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7109", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1222", + "anchor": "f0805", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7110", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0517", + "anchor": "f1300", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7111", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1169", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7112", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0912", + "anchor": "f1330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7113", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0999", + "anchor": "f0238", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7114", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1454", + "anchor": "f0913", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7115", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1237", + "anchor": "f0990", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7116", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1109", + "anchor": "f1008", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R7117", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1419", + "anchor": "f0338", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7118", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0227", + "anchor": "f1080", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7119", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1367", + "anchor": "f1055", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7120", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1032", + "anchor": "f1230", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7121", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1229", + "anchor": "f1478", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7122", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1157", + "anchor": "f1495", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R7123", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1219", + "anchor": "f0338", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R7124", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0862", + "anchor": "f0600", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7125", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0112", + "anchor": "f1065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7126", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0942", + "anchor": "f0900", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7127", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0782", + "anchor": "f1420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7128", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0474", + "anchor": "f0843", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7129", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1264", + "anchor": "f1423", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7130", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1272", + "anchor": "f0105", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7131", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1424", + "anchor": "f1188", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7132", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1029", + "anchor": "f0563", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R7133", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0549", + "anchor": "f1343", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7134", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0249", + "anchor": "f0268", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R7135", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1057", + "anchor": "f0910", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7136", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0384", + "anchor": "f0363", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R7137", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1052", + "anchor": "f0260", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7138", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0252", + "anchor": "f1060", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R7139", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0422", + "anchor": "f0645", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7140", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0777", + "anchor": "f0200", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7141", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0702", + "anchor": "f0105", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7142", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1314", + "anchor": "f0918", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R7143", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0672", + "anchor": "f1455", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R7144", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0379", + "anchor": "f0608", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R7145", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1459", + "anchor": "f0528", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7146", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0722", + "anchor": "f0520", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7147", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1344", + "anchor": "f0168", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7148", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0249", + "anchor": "f1288", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R7149", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0689", + "anchor": "f1118", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7150", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0292", + "anchor": "f1280", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7151", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0804", + "anchor": "f1483", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R7152", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0097", + "anchor": "f0930", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7153", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1392", + "anchor": "f1455", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7154", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0454", + "anchor": "f0208", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7155", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1377", + "anchor": "f0515", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7156", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0537", + "anchor": "f0990", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7157", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1082", + "anchor": "f1080", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7158", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1229", + "anchor": "f0168", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7159", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0637", + "anchor": "f0920", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7160", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1212", + "anchor": "f0835", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7161", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1059", + "anchor": "f0623", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R7162", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0937", + "anchor": "f1070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7163", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0247", + "anchor": "f1450", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7164", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1104", + "anchor": "f0853", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7165", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1054", + "anchor": "f0928", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R7166", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0122", + "anchor": "f0970", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7167", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0754", + "anchor": "f0078", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7168", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0492", + "anchor": "f1330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7169", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1314", + "anchor": "f0358", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R7170", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0772", + "anchor": "f1440", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7171", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0537", + "anchor": "f0595", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7172", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1102", + "anchor": "f0690", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7173", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0122", + "anchor": "f0765", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7174", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1254", + "anchor": "f0218", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R7175", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0382", + "anchor": "f1390", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7176", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0402", + "anchor": "f0345", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7177", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0597", + "anchor": "f1445", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7178", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1499", + "anchor": "f0653", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7179", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1337", + "anchor": "f0905", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7180", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1274", + "anchor": "f0858", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7181", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1079", + "anchor": "f0388", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7182", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0327", + "anchor": "f0870", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R7183", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1227", + "anchor": "f0600", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7184", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0492", + "anchor": "f0325", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7185", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0982", + "anchor": "f1405", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7186", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1094", + "anchor": "f0788", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R7187", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0102", + "anchor": "f0125", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7188", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0814", + "anchor": "f0953", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R7189", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0244", + "anchor": "f0128", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7190", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1352", + "anchor": "f0805", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R7191", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1067", + "anchor": "f0935", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7192", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1437", + "anchor": "f1030", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7193", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0382", + "anchor": "f0190", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7194", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0217", + "anchor": "f0815", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7195", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0664", + "anchor": "f0663", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7196", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0744", + "anchor": "f0268", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R7197", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1152", + "anchor": "f0485", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7198", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0739", + "anchor": "f0288", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7199", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0432", + "anchor": "f0875", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7200", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1392", + "anchor": "f0665", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7201", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0259", + "anchor": "f0498", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R7202", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0812", + "anchor": "f0335", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7203", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0134", + "anchor": "f0098", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7204", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1392", + "anchor": "f0850", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7205", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0857", + "anchor": "f0690", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7206", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0309", + "anchor": "f0728", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7207", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0129", + "anchor": "f1463", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R7208", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1394", + "anchor": "f1493", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R7209", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0862", + "anchor": "f0255", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7210", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0554", + "anchor": "f0243", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7211", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0267", + "anchor": "f0165", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7212", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1444", + "anchor": "f0293", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7213", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0907", + "anchor": "f0555", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R7214", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1379", + "anchor": "f1153", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7215", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0647", + "anchor": "f0665", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7216", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0417", + "anchor": "f0300", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7217", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0202", + "anchor": "f0150", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R7218", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0239", + "anchor": "f1083", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7219", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0514", + "anchor": "f1093", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7220", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0869", + "anchor": "f0198", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7221", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1227", + "anchor": "f0995", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7222", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0574", + "anchor": "f0818", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7223", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1204", + "anchor": "f0198", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7224", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0894", + "anchor": "f1028", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R7225", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0664", + "anchor": "f0503", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7226", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0382", + "anchor": "f0615", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7227", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1112", + "anchor": "f0375", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7228", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1407", + "anchor": "f1210", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7229", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0577", + "anchor": "f0575", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7230", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1309", + "anchor": "f1273", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7231", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1452", + "anchor": "f1420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7232", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0082", + "anchor": "f0610", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7233", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0772", + "anchor": "f0340", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7234", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1184", + "anchor": "f1183", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7235", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1142", + "anchor": "f1310", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R7236", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0912", + "anchor": "f1410", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7237", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0819", + "anchor": "f0638", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7238", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1064", + "anchor": "f1428", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7239", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0219", + "anchor": "f0658", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7240", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0467", + "anchor": "f1490", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7241", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0667", + "anchor": "f0635", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7242", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0769", + "anchor": "f1288", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R7243", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0629", + "anchor": "f0288", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7244", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0627", + "anchor": "f1320", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R7245", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0452", + "anchor": "f0060", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7246", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0097", + "anchor": "f0070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7247", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0712", + "anchor": "f0720", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7248", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0149", + "anchor": "f0158", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7249", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0569", + "anchor": "f0683", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7250", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0782", + "anchor": "f0350", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7251", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0069", + "anchor": "f0978", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7252", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f1493", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7253", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0194", + "anchor": "f0348", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7254", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0942", + "anchor": "f0315", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7255", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0087", + "anchor": "f1180", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R7256", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0547", + "anchor": "f1355", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7257", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1064", + "anchor": "f0383", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7258", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1277", + "anchor": "f0240", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7259", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0784", + "anchor": "f1228", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7260", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0899", + "anchor": "f0518", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7261", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0669", + "anchor": "f0998", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R7262", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1147", + "anchor": "f0060", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7263", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0862", + "anchor": "f0690", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7264", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0947", + "anchor": "f1020", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7265", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0174", + "anchor": "f0433", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R7266", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0467", + "anchor": "f1085", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7267", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0572", + "anchor": "f0235", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7268", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0419", + "anchor": "f0373", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7269", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1272", + "anchor": "f0855", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7270", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0854", + "anchor": "f1093", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R7271", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0274", + "anchor": "f0443", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7272", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1074", + "anchor": "f1238", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7273", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0207", + "anchor": "f0750", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7274", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1029", + "anchor": "f0073", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R7275", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0194", + "anchor": "f0743", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7276", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1429", + "anchor": "f0973", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7277", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1102", + "anchor": "f0940", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7278", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1307", + "anchor": "f0250", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7279", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1367", + "anchor": "f1085", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7280", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0282", + "anchor": "f0550", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7281", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1432", + "anchor": "f0960", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R7282", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0827", + "anchor": "f0900", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7283", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0232", + "anchor": "f0295", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R7284", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0974", + "anchor": "f0268", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7285", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0572", + "anchor": "f0720", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7286", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1494", + "anchor": "f1493", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7287", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0764", + "anchor": "f0458", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7288", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0584", + "anchor": "f0308", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7289", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0969", + "anchor": "f1358", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R7290", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1359", + "anchor": "f0393", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7291", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1287", + "anchor": "f0270", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7292", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1062", + "anchor": "f1140", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7293", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0197", + "anchor": "f1470", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7294", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0819", + "anchor": "f1298", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7295", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0602", + "anchor": "f1365", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7296", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0652", + "anchor": "f1205", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7297", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1214", + "anchor": "f0583", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7298", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1122", + "anchor": "f0255", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7299", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1069", + "anchor": "f1288", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7300", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0192", + "anchor": "f0575", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R7301", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1212", + "anchor": "f1195", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7302", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1282", + "anchor": "f0155", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7303", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0637", + "anchor": "f0235", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7304", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0497", + "anchor": "f1210", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7305", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0242", + "anchor": "f1120", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7306", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0959", + "anchor": "f0903", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7307", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0749", + "anchor": "f0593", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R7308", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0112", + "anchor": "f0275", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7309", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0189", + "anchor": "f0838", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7310", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0722", + "anchor": "f1075", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7311", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1429", + "anchor": "f0743", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7312", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0097", + "anchor": "f1210", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7313", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0894", + "anchor": "f0893", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R7314", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0372", + "anchor": "f1030", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7315", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0542", + "anchor": "f0995", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7316", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0272", + "anchor": "f1275", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7317", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0802", + "anchor": "f0520", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7318", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0897", + "anchor": "f0670", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7319", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1187", + "anchor": "f1260", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7320", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0934", + "anchor": "f0343", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7321", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1427", + "anchor": "f0515", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R7322", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0622", + "anchor": "f1295", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7323", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0302", + "anchor": "f1340", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7324", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1084", + "anchor": "f1193", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7325", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1267", + "anchor": "f1350", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7326", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1117", + "anchor": "f1460", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7327", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0402", + "anchor": "f0920", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7328", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0927", + "anchor": "f0065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7329", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0667", + "anchor": "f0835", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7330", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1397", + "anchor": "f1415", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7331", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1197", + "anchor": "f0685", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R7332", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0594", + "anchor": "f0698", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R7333", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1034", + "anchor": "f1038", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7334", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0142", + "anchor": "f1165", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R7335", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0222", + "anchor": "f1330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7336", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1292", + "anchor": "f1195", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7337", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1262", + "anchor": "f0260", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R7338", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1457", + "anchor": "f0310", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7339", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1282", + "anchor": "f1240", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7340", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0257", + "anchor": "f0560", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7341", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0927", + "anchor": "f0665", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7342", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1187", + "anchor": "f0540", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7343", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1169", + "anchor": "f0238", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7344", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0164", + "anchor": "f0513", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7345", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1162", + "anchor": "f1160", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7346", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1212", + "anchor": "f0365", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7347", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0319", + "anchor": "f1413", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7348", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0737", + "anchor": "f1440", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R7349", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0462", + "anchor": "f1050", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7350", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0584", + "anchor": "f1123", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7351", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0517", + "anchor": "f1370", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7352", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0139", + "anchor": "f0198", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7353", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0347", + "anchor": "f1120", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7354", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0299", + "anchor": "f1413", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7355", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0289", + "anchor": "f1103", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7356", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0962", + "anchor": "f0330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7357", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0917", + "anchor": "f0645", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R7358", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1334", + "anchor": "f0213", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7359", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0217", + "anchor": "f0495", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7360", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0084", + "anchor": "f1338", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R7361", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0167", + "anchor": "f0705", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R7362", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1307", + "anchor": "f0935", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7363", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0574", + "anchor": "f0413", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7364", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0892", + "anchor": "f0810", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7365", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1419", + "anchor": "f0598", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7366", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0897", + "anchor": "f0330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7367", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0277", + "anchor": "f1175", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7368", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1184", + "anchor": "f0663", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7369", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0864", + "anchor": "f0603", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7370", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0157", + "anchor": "f0120", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7371", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1454", + "anchor": "f1308", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7372", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0144", + "anchor": "f0613", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7373", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0614", + "anchor": "f0428", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7374", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0784", + "anchor": "f0838", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7375", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0339", + "anchor": "f0808", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7376", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0304", + "anchor": "f0363", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R7377", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0534", + "anchor": "f0873", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R7378", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0602", + "anchor": "f0945", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7379", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0602", + "anchor": "f0505", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7380", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0549", + "anchor": "f0263", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7381", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0074", + "anchor": "f0913", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7382", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0442", + "anchor": "f0465", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7383", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0659", + "anchor": "f1013", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R7384", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0887", + "anchor": "f0930", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7385", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0349", + "anchor": "f0743", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7386", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1227", + "anchor": "f1365", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7387", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1174", + "anchor": "f1338", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7388", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0107", + "anchor": "f1265", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R7389", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0879", + "anchor": "f0128", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7390", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1287", + "anchor": "f0320", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7391", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0644", + "anchor": "f0968", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7392", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0094", + "anchor": "f0593", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7393", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0972", + "anchor": "f0810", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7394", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1437", + "anchor": "f0915", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7395", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1442", + "anchor": "f0940", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7396", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0912", + "anchor": "f1190", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7397", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0909", + "anchor": "f0248", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R7398", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1197", + "anchor": "f0675", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R7399", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0437", + "anchor": "f1345", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7400", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0337", + "anchor": "f0365", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7401", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0249", + "anchor": "f0483", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R7402", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0947", + "anchor": "f0070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7403", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0722", + "anchor": "f1005", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7404", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1184", + "anchor": "f1168", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7405", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1217", + "anchor": "f1145", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7406", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0162", + "anchor": "f0765", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7407", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0694", + "anchor": "f1338", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7408", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1127", + "anchor": "f0285", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R7409", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1059", + "anchor": "f0703", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R7410", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0277", + "anchor": "f0735", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7411", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0769", + "anchor": "f0743", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R7412", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0979", + "anchor": "f0743", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7413", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1162", + "anchor": "f0805", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7414", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f1238", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7415", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0589", + "anchor": "f0603", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R7416", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0827", + "anchor": "f0840", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7417", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0424", + "anchor": "f1108", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7418", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1354", + "anchor": "f0878", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7419", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0352", + "anchor": "f0915", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7420", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1349", + "anchor": "f1018", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7421", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0717", + "anchor": "f0260", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R7422", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1117", + "anchor": "f1160", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7423", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0657", + "anchor": "f1140", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7424", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0284", + "anchor": "f0548", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7425", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0997", + "anchor": "f1325", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7426", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0079", + "anchor": "f0443", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7427", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0974", + "anchor": "f0438", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7428", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0664", + "anchor": "f0633", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7429", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1179", + "anchor": "f1348", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7430", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0374", + "anchor": "f1133", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7431", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0987", + "anchor": "f0300", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7432", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0722", + "anchor": "f1285", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7433", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0659", + "anchor": "f0903", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R7434", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0899", + "anchor": "f0828", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7435", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0849", + "anchor": "f0573", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7436", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1367", + "anchor": "f0605", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7437", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f0123", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7438", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1247", + "anchor": "f1420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7439", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0929", + "anchor": "f0488", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7440", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0524", + "anchor": "f1463", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7441", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0572", + "anchor": "f0225", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7442", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0429", + "anchor": "f0613", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7443", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1054", + "anchor": "f0413", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R7444", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1459", + "anchor": "f0188", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7445", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0522", + "anchor": "f0860", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R7446", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1422", + "anchor": "f0475", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R7447", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0852", + "anchor": "f1340", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7448", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0364", + "anchor": "f0828", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7449", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0599", + "anchor": "f0843", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7450", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1282", + "anchor": "f0905", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7451", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1284", + "anchor": "f0893", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7452", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0434", + "anchor": "f0953", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7453", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0547", + "anchor": "f1490", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7454", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1174", + "anchor": "f1313", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7455", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1357", + "anchor": "f0930", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7456", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0764", + "anchor": "f1028", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7457", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0979", + "anchor": "f0063", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7458", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1497", + "anchor": "f1285", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7459", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0219", + "anchor": "f0643", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7460", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f1257", + "anchor": "f0330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R7461", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0644", + "anchor": "f0283", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7462", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0002", + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + }, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7463", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0005", + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + }, + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R7464", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0008", + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + }, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R7465", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0011", + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R7466", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0014", + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + }, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7467", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0017", + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + }, + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7468", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0020", + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + }, + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R7469", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0023", + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R7470", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0026", + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R7471", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0029", + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7472", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0032", + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + }, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7473", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0035", + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + }, + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7474", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0038", + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + }, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R7475", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0041", + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R7476", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0044", + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + }, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R7477", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0047", + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + }, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7478", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0050", + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + }, + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7479", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0053", + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + }, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R7480", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0056", + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R7481", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0059", + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7482", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0062", + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + }, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R7483", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0065", + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + }, + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7484", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0068", + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R7485", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0071", + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R7486", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0074", + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7487", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0077", + "window": { + "after": 1782745200, + "before": 1783609200 + }, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7488", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0080", + "window": { + "after": 1785322800, + "before": 1786186800 + }, + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R7489", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0083", + "window": { + "after": 1782716400, + "before": 1783580400 + }, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R7490", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0086", + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R7491", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0089", + "window": { + "after": 1782756000, + "before": 1783620000 + }, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7492", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0092", + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + }, + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R7493", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0095", + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + }, + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R7494", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0098", + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R7495", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0101", + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R7496", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0104", + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + }, + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7497", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0107", + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + }, + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R7498", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0110", + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + }, + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R7499", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0113", + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R7500", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0116", + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + }, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R7501", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0119", + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + }, + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7502", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0122", + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + }, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7503", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0125", + "window": { + "after": 1785247200, + "before": 1786111200 + }, + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R7504", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0128", + "window": { + "after": 1782637200, + "before": 1783501200 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R7505", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0131", + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + }, + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R7506", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0134", + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + }, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7507", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0137", + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + }, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7508", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0140", + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + }, + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7509", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0143", + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + }, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R7510", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0146", + "window": { + "after": 1786431600, + "before": 1787295600 + }, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R7511", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0149", + "window": { + "after": 1783897200, + "before": 1784761200 + }, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7512", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0152", + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + }, + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R7513", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0155", + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + }, + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R7514", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0158", + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + }, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R7515", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0161", + "window": { + "after": 1787648400, + "before": 1788512400 + }, + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R7516", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0164", + "window": { + "after": 1785042000, + "before": 1785906000 + }, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7517", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0167", + "window": { + "after": 1787688000, + "before": 1788552000 + }, + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R7518", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0170", + "window": { + "after": 1785081600, + "before": 1785945600 + }, + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7519", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0173", + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + }, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R7520", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0176", + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + }, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R7521", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0179", + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + }, + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R7522", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0182", + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + }, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7523", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0185", + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + }, + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R7524", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0188", + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + }, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R7525", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0191", + "window": { + "after": 1786269600, + "before": 1787133600 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R7526", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0194", + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + }, + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7527", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0197", + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + }, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7528", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0200", + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + }, + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7529", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0203", + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + }, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R7530", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0206", + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + }, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R7531", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0209", + "window": { + "after": 1784962800, + "before": 1785826800 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7532", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0212", + "window": { + "after": 1787612400, + "before": 1788476400 + }, + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R7533", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0215", + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + }, + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R7534", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0218", + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + }, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R7535", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0221", + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + }, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R7536", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0224", + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7537", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0227", + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + }, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7538", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0230", + "window": { + "after": 1786222800, + "before": 1787086800 + }, + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7539", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0233", + "window": { + "after": 1783616400, + "before": 1784480400 + }, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R7540", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0236", + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + }, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R7541", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0239", + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7542", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0242", + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + }, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7543", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0245", + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + }, + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R7544", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0248", + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + }, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R7545", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0251", + "window": { + "after": 1787407200, + "before": 1788271200 + }, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R7546", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0254", + "window": { + "after": 1783429200, + "before": 1784293200 + }, + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R7547", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0257", + "window": { + "after": 1786006800, + "before": 1786870800 + }, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7548", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0260", + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + }, + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R7549", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0263", + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + }, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R7550", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0266", + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + }, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R7551", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0269", + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + }, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7552", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0272", + "window": { + "after": 1783411200, + "before": 1784275200 + }, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7553", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0275", + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + }, + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R7554", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0278", + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + }, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R7555", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0281", + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + }, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R7556", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0284", + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + }, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7557", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0287", + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + }, + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R7558", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0290", + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + }, + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R7559", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0293", + "window": { + "after": 1784667600, + "before": 1785531600 + }, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R7560", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0296", + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R7561", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0299", + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7562", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0302", + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + }, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7563", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0305", + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + }, + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7564", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0308", + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R7565", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0311", + "window": { + "after": 1783364400, + "before": 1784228400 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R7566", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0314", + "window": { + "after": 1785942000, + "before": 1786806000 + }, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7567", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0317", + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + }, + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7568", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0320", + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + }, + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R7569", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0323", + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + }, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R7570", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0326", + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + }, + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R7571", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0329", + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + }, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R7572", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0332", + "window": { + "after": 1784548800, + "before": 1785412800 + }, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R7573", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0335", + "window": { + "after": 1787126400, + "before": 1787990400 + }, + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R7574", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0338", + "window": { + "after": 1783148400, + "before": 1784012400 + }, + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7575", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0341", + "window": { + "after": 1785798000, + "before": 1786662000 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R7576", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0344", + "window": { + "after": 1783191600, + "before": 1784055600 + }, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R7577", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0347", + "window": { + "after": 1785765600, + "before": 1786629600 + }, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7578", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0350", + "window": { + "after": 1783159200, + "before": 1784023200 + }, + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7579", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0353", + "window": { + "after": 1785736800, + "before": 1786600800 + }, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R7580", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0356", + "window": { + "after": 1783202400, + "before": 1784066400 + }, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R7581", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0359", + "window": { + "after": 1784408400, + "before": 1785272400 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7582", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0362", + "window": { + "after": 1786982400, + "before": 1787846400 + }, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7583", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0365", + "window": { + "after": 1784376000, + "before": 1785240000 + }, + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R7584", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0368", + "window": { + "after": 1786953600, + "before": 1787817600 + }, + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R7585", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0371", + "window": { + "after": 1784347200, + "before": 1785211200 + }, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R7586", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0374", + "window": { + "after": 1786993200, + "before": 1787857200 + }, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7587", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0377", + "window": { + "after": 1783015200, + "before": 1783879200 + }, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7588", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0380", + "window": { + "after": 1785592800, + "before": 1786456800 + }, + "answer": "14 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R7589", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0383", + "window": { + "after": 1783072800, + "before": 1783936800 + }, + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R7590", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0386", + "window": { + "after": 1785650400, + "before": 1786514400 + }, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R7591", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0389", + "window": { + "after": 1783112400, + "before": 1783976400 + }, + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R7592", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0392", + "window": { + "after": 1785690000, + "before": 1786554000 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R7593", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0395", + "window": { + "after": 1783083600, + "before": 1783947600 + }, + "answer": "53 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7594", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0398", + "window": { + "after": 1784289600, + "before": 1785153600 + }, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R7595", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0401", + "window": { + "after": 1786867200, + "before": 1787731200 + }, + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R7596", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0404", + "window": { + "after": 1784329200, + "before": 1785193200 + }, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7597", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0407", + "window": { + "after": 1786906800, + "before": 1787770800 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R7598", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0410", + "window": { + "after": 1784300400, + "before": 1785164400 + }, + "answer": "92 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R7599", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0413", + "window": { + "after": 1786878000, + "before": 1787742000 + }, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R7600", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0416", + "window": { + "after": 1784268000, + "before": 1785132000 + }, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R7601", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0419", + "window": { + "after": 1785474000, + "before": 1786338000 + }, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7602", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0422", + "window": { + "after": 1782939600, + "before": 1783803600 + }, + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7603", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0425", + "window": { + "after": 1785517200, + "before": 1786381200 + }, + "answer": "131 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R7604", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0428", + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + }, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R7605", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0431", + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + }, + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R7606", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0434", + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7607", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0437", + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + }, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7608", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0440", + "window": { + "after": 1786734000, + "before": 1787598000 + }, + "answer": "170 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R7609", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0443", + "window": { + "after": 1784127600, + "before": 1784991600 + }, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R7610", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0446", + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R7611", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0449", + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + }, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7612", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0452", + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + }, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7613", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0455", + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + }, + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7614", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0458", + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + }, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R7615", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0461", + "window": { + "after": 1782734400, + "before": 1783598400 + }, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R7616", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0464", + "window": { + "after": 1785312000, + "before": 1786176000 + }, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7617", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0467", + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + }, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7618", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0470", + "window": { + "after": 1785441600, + "before": 1786305600 + }, + "answer": "248 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R7619", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0473", + "window": { + "after": 1782831600, + "before": 1783695600 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R7620", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0476", + "window": { + "after": 1785409200, + "before": 1786273200 + }, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R7621", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0479", + "window": { + "after": 1782802800, + "before": 1783666800 + }, + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7622", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0482", + "window": { + "after": 1784008800, + "before": 1784872800 + }, + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R7623", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0485", + "window": { + "after": 1786658400, + "before": 1787522400 + }, + "answer": "287 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R7624", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0488", + "window": { + "after": 1784048400, + "before": 1784912400 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R7625", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0491", + "window": { + "after": 1786626000, + "before": 1787490000 + }, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R7626", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0494", + "window": { + "after": 1784019600, + "before": 1784883600 + }, + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R7627", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0497", + "window": { + "after": 1786593600, + "before": 1787457600 + }, + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7628", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0500", + "window": { + "after": 1784059200, + "before": 1784923200 + }, + "answer": "326 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R7629", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0503", + "window": { + "after": 1785265200, + "before": 1786129200 + }, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R7630", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0506", + "window": { + "after": 1782658800, + "before": 1783522800 + }, + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R7631", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0509", + "window": { + "after": 1785236400, + "before": 1786100400 + }, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7632", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0512", + "window": { + "after": 1782626400, + "before": 1783490400 + }, + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R7633", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0515", + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + }, + "answer": "365 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R7634", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0518", + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + }, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R7635", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0521", + "window": { + "after": 1783875600, + "before": 1784739600 + }, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7636", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0524", + "window": { + "after": 1786453200, + "before": 1787317200 + }, + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7637", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0527", + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + }, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R7638", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0530", + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + }, + "answer": "404 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R7639", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0533", + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + }, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R7640", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0536", + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + }, + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R7641", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0539", + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + }, + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R7642", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0542", + "window": { + "after": 1785060000, + "before": 1785924000 + }, + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R7643", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0545", + "window": { + "after": 1787637600, + "before": 1788501600 + }, + "answer": "443 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R7644", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0548", + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R7645", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0551", + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + }, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R7646", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0554", + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + }, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R7647", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0557", + "window": { + "after": 1787734800, + "before": 1788598800 + }, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7648", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0560", + "window": { + "after": 1785128400, + "before": 1785992400 + }, + "answer": "482 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7649", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0563", + "window": { + "after": 1786334400, + "before": 1787198400 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R7650", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0566", + "window": { + "after": 1783800000, + "before": 1784664000 + }, + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R7651", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0569", + "window": { + "after": 1786374000, + "before": 1787238000 + }, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7652", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0572", + "window": { + "after": 1783767600, + "before": 1784631600 + }, + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7653", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0575", + "window": { + "after": 1786345200, + "before": 1787209200 + }, + "answer": "521 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7654", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0578", + "window": { + "after": 1783810800, + "before": 1784674800 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R7655", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0581", + "window": { + "after": 1786384800, + "before": 1787248800 + }, + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R7656", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0584", + "window": { + "after": 1787590800, + "before": 1788454800 + }, + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7657", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0587", + "window": { + "after": 1784984400, + "before": 1785848400 + }, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7658", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0590", + "window": { + "after": 1787562000, + "before": 1788426000 + }, + "answer": "560 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7659", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0593", + "window": { + "after": 1784955600, + "before": 1785819600 + }, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R7660", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0596", + "window": { + "after": 1787601600, + "before": 1788465600 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R7661", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0599", + "window": { + "after": 1784995200, + "before": 1785859200 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7662", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0602", + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + }, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7663", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0605", + "window": { + "after": 1783594800, + "before": 1784458800 + }, + "answer": "599 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7664", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0608", + "window": { + "after": 1786172400, + "before": 1787036400 + }, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R7665", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0611", + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + }, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7666", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0614", + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + }, + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7667", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0617", + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + }, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7668", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0620", + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + }, + "answer": "638 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R7669", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0623", + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + }, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R7670", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0626", + "window": { + "after": 1784779200, + "before": 1785643200 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R7671", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0629", + "window": { + "after": 1787428800, + "before": 1788292800 + }, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R7672", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0632", + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + }, + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7673", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0635", + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + }, + "answer": "677 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7674", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0638", + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + }, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R7675", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0641", + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + }, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R7676", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0644", + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7677", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0647", + "window": { + "after": 1786125600, + "before": 1786989600 + }, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7678", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0650", + "window": { + "after": 1783519200, + "before": 1784383200 + }, + "answer": "716 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7679", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0653", + "window": { + "after": 1786093200, + "before": 1786957200 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R7680", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0656", + "window": { + "after": 1783486800, + "before": 1784350800 + }, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R7681", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0659", + "window": { + "after": 1786136400, + "before": 1787000400 + }, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R7682", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0662", + "window": { + "after": 1783526400, + "before": 1784390400 + }, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7683", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0665", + "window": { + "after": 1784736000, + "before": 1785600000 + }, + "answer": "755 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R7684", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0668", + "window": { + "after": 1787310000, + "before": 1788174000 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R7685", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0671", + "window": { + "after": 1784703600, + "before": 1785567600 + }, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R7686", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0674", + "window": { + "after": 1787353200, + "before": 1788217200 + }, + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R7687", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0677", + "window": { + "after": 1784743200, + "before": 1785607200 + }, + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7688", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0680", + "window": { + "after": 1787320800, + "before": 1788184800 + }, + "answer": "794 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R7689", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0683", + "window": { + "after": 1784714400, + "before": 1785578400 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R7690", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0686", + "window": { + "after": 1785920400, + "before": 1786784400 + }, + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R7691", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0689", + "window": { + "after": 1783314000, + "before": 1784178000 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7692", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0692", + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + }, + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R7693", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0695", + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + }, + "answer": "833 records" + }, + { + "id": "R7694", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0698", + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + }, + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R7695", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0701", + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + }, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R7696", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0704", + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + }, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7697", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0707", + "window": { + "after": 1787176800, + "before": 1788040800 + }, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7698", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0710", + "window": { + "after": 1784570400, + "before": 1785434400 + }, + "answer": "872 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R7699", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0713", + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + }, + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R7700", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0716", + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + }, + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R7701", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0719", + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + }, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R7702", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0722", + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + }, + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7703", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0725", + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + }, + "answer": "911 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7704", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0728", + "window": { + "after": 1783180800, + "before": 1784044800 + }, + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R7705", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0731", + "window": { + "after": 1785758400, + "before": 1786622400 + }, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R7706", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0734", + "window": { + "after": 1783234800, + "before": 1784098800 + }, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7707", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0737", + "window": { + "after": 1785884400, + "before": 1786748400 + }, + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R7708", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0740", + "window": { + "after": 1783278000, + "before": 1784142000 + }, + "answer": "950 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R7709", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0743", + "window": { + "after": 1785855600, + "before": 1786719600 + }, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R7710", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0746", + "window": { + "after": 1783245600, + "before": 1784109600 + }, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R7711", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0749", + "window": { + "after": 1784451600, + "before": 1785315600 + }, + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R7712", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0752", + "window": { + "after": 1787029200, + "before": 1787893200 + }, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R7713", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0755", + "window": { + "after": 1784494800, + "before": 1785358800 + }, + "answer": "12 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R7714", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0758", + "window": { + "after": 1787072400, + "before": 1787936400 + }, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R7715", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0761", + "window": { + "after": 1784462400, + "before": 1785326400 + }, + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R7716", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0764", + "window": { + "after": 1787040000, + "before": 1787904000 + }, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R7717", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0767", + "window": { + "after": 1784433600, + "before": 1785297600 + }, + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7718", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0770", + "window": { + "after": 1785711600, + "before": 1786575600 + }, + "answer": "51 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7719", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0773", + "window": { + "after": 1783105200, + "before": 1783969200 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R7720", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0776", + "window": { + "after": 1785679200, + "before": 1786543200 + }, + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R7721", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0779", + "window": { + "after": 1783072800, + "before": 1783936800 + }, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7722", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0782", + "window": { + "after": 1785650400, + "before": 1786514400 + }, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7723", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0785", + "window": { + "after": 1783112400, + "before": 1783976400 + }, + "answer": "90 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R7724", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0788", + "window": { + "after": 1785690000, + "before": 1786554000 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R7725", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0791", + "window": { + "after": 1786896000, + "before": 1787760000 + }, + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R7726", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0794", + "window": { + "after": 1784289600, + "before": 1785153600 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7727", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0797", + "window": { + "after": 1786867200, + "before": 1787731200 + }, + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7728", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0800", + "window": { + "after": 1784329200, + "before": 1785193200 + }, + "answer": "129 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R7729", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0803", + "window": { + "after": 1786906800, + "before": 1787770800 + }, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R7730", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0806", + "window": { + "after": 1784300400, + "before": 1785164400 + }, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R7731", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0809", + "window": { + "after": 1785506400, + "before": 1786370400 + }, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7732", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0812", + "window": { + "after": 1782900000, + "before": 1783764000 + }, + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7733", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0815", + "window": { + "after": 1785474000, + "before": 1786338000 + }, + "answer": "168 days" + }, + { + "id": "R7734", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0818", + "window": { + "after": 1782939600, + "before": 1783803600 + }, + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R7735", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0821", + "window": { + "after": 1785603600, + "before": 1786467600 + }, + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R7736", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0824", + "window": { + "after": 1782997200, + "before": 1783861200 + }, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7737", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0827", + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + }, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7738", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0830", + "window": { + "after": 1786780800, + "before": 1787644800 + }, + "answer": "207 days" + }, + { + "id": "R7739", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0833", + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + }, + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R7740", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0836", + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + }, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R7741", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0839", + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R7742", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0842", + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + }, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7743", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0845", + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + }, + "answer": "246 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R7744", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0848", + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + }, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R7745", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0851", + "window": { + "after": 1782853200, + "before": 1783717200 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R7746", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0854", + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + }, + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R7747", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0857", + "window": { + "after": 1782820800, + "before": 1783684800 + }, + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7748", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0860", + "window": { + "after": 1785398400, + "before": 1786262400 + }, + "answer": "285 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R7749", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0863", + "window": { + "after": 1782792000, + "before": 1783656000 + }, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R7750", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0866", + "window": { + "after": 1785441600, + "before": 1786305600 + }, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R7751", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0869", + "window": { + "after": 1782831600, + "before": 1783695600 + }, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7752", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0872", + "window": { + "after": 1784037600, + "before": 1784901600 + }, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7753", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0875", + "window": { + "after": 1786615200, + "before": 1787479200 + }, + "answer": "324 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R7754", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0878", + "window": { + "after": 1784008800, + "before": 1784872800 + }, + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7755", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0881", + "window": { + "after": 1786658400, + "before": 1787522400 + }, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R7756", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0884", + "window": { + "after": 1784048400, + "before": 1784912400 + }, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R7757", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0887", + "window": { + "after": 1786626000, + "before": 1787490000 + }, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R7758", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0890", + "window": { + "after": 1784019600, + "before": 1784883600 + }, + "answer": "363 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R7759", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0893", + "window": { + "after": 1785225600, + "before": 1786089600 + }, + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R7760", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0896", + "window": { + "after": 1782619200, + "before": 1783483200 + }, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R7761", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0899", + "window": { + "after": 1785265200, + "before": 1786129200 + }, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7762", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0902", + "window": { + "after": 1782658800, + "before": 1783522800 + }, + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7763", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0905", + "window": { + "after": 1785236400, + "before": 1786100400 + }, + "answer": "402 days" + }, + { + "id": "R7764", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0908", + "window": { + "after": 1782626400, + "before": 1783490400 + }, + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R7765", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0911", + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + }, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R7766", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0914", + "window": { + "after": 1786568400, + "before": 1787432400 + }, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R7767", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0917", + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + }, + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R7768", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0920", + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + }, + "answer": "441 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7769", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0923", + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + }, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R7770", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0926", + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + }, + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R7771", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0929", + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + }, + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7772", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0932", + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + }, + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R7773", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0935", + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + }, + "answer": "480 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R7774", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0938", + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R7775", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0941", + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R7776", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0944", + "window": { + "after": 1785189600, + "before": 1786053600 + }, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R7777", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0947", + "window": { + "after": 1787767200, + "before": 1788631200 + }, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7778", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0950", + "window": { + "after": 1785157200, + "before": 1786021200 + }, + "answer": "519 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7779", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0953", + "window": { + "after": 1786366800, + "before": 1787230800 + }, + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R7780", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0956", + "window": { + "after": 1783756800, + "before": 1784620800 + }, + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R7781", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0959", + "window": { + "after": 1786334400, + "before": 1787198400 + }, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7782", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0962", + "window": { + "after": 1783800000, + "before": 1784664000 + }, + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R7783", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0965", + "window": { + "after": 1786374000, + "before": 1787238000 + }, + "answer": "558 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7784", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0968", + "window": { + "after": 1783767600, + "before": 1784631600 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R7785", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0971", + "window": { + "after": 1786345200, + "before": 1787209200 + }, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R7786", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0974", + "window": { + "after": 1787551200, + "before": 1788415200 + }, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R7787", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0977", + "window": { + "after": 1785016800, + "before": 1785880800 + }, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R7788", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0980", + "window": { + "after": 1787590800, + "before": 1788454800 + }, + "answer": "597 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R7789", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0983", + "window": { + "after": 1784984400, + "before": 1785848400 + }, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R7790", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0986", + "window": { + "after": 1787562000, + "before": 1788426000 + }, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R7791", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0989", + "window": { + "after": 1784955600, + "before": 1785819600 + }, + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7792", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0992", + "window": { + "after": 1787601600, + "before": 1788465600 + }, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R7793", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0995", + "window": { + "after": 1783623600, + "before": 1784487600 + }, + "answer": "636 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7794", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0998", + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + }, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R7795", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1001", + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + }, + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R7796", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1004", + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + }, + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R7797", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1007", + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + }, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7798", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1010", + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + }, + "answer": "675 records" + }, + { + "id": "R7799", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1013", + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + }, + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R7800", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1016", + "window": { + "after": 1784898000, + "before": 1785762000 + }, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R7801", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1019", + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7802", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1022", + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + }, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R7803", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1025", + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + }, + "answer": "714 records" + }, + { + "id": "R7804", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1028", + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + }, + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R7805", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1031", + "window": { + "after": 1787486400, + "before": 1788350400 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R7806", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1034", + "window": { + "after": 1784876400, + "before": 1785740400 + }, + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R7807", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1037", + "window": { + "after": 1786082400, + "before": 1786946400 + }, + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R7808", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1040", + "window": { + "after": 1783548000, + "before": 1784412000 + }, + "answer": "753 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R7809", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1043", + "window": { + "after": 1786125600, + "before": 1786989600 + }, + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R7810", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1046", + "window": { + "after": 1783519200, + "before": 1784383200 + }, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R7811", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1049", + "window": { + "after": 1786093200, + "before": 1786957200 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R7812", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1052", + "window": { + "after": 1783486800, + "before": 1784350800 + }, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R7813", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1055", + "window": { + "after": 1786136400, + "before": 1787000400 + }, + "answer": "792 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R7814", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1058", + "window": { + "after": 1787342400, + "before": 1788206400 + }, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R7815", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1061", + "window": { + "after": 1784736000, + "before": 1785600000 + }, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R7816", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1064", + "window": { + "after": 1787310000, + "before": 1788174000 + }, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R7817", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1067", + "window": { + "after": 1784703600, + "before": 1785567600 + }, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R7818", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1070", + "window": { + "after": 1787353200, + "before": 1788217200 + }, + "answer": "831 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R7819", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1073", + "window": { + "after": 1784743200, + "before": 1785607200 + }, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R7820", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1076", + "window": { + "after": 1787320800, + "before": 1788184800 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R7821", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1079", + "window": { + "after": 1783342800, + "before": 1784206800 + }, + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R7822", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1082", + "window": { + "after": 1785920400, + "before": 1786784400 + }, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R7823", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1085", + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + }, + "answer": "870 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R7824", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1088", + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + }, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R7825", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1091", + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R7826", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1094", + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + }, + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R7827", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1097", + "window": { + "after": 1787223600, + "before": 1788087600 + }, + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R7828", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1100", + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + }, + "answer": "909 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R7829", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1103", + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R7830", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1106", + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + }, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R7831", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1109", + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + }, + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R7832", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1112", + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + }, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R7833", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1115", + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + }, + "answer": "948 records" + }, + { + "id": "R7834", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1118", + "window": { + "after": 1783227600, + "before": 1784091600 + }, + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R7835", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1121", + "window": { + "after": 1785873600, + "before": 1786737600 + }, + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R7836", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f1124", + "window": { + "after": 1783267200, + "before": 1784131200 + }, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "C0", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0000", + "planted": [ + "c0a" + ], + "witness": "c0a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C1", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0003", + "planted": [ + "c1a" + ], + "witness": "c1a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C2", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0006", + "planted": [ + "c2a" + ], + "witness": "c2a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C3", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0009", + "planted": [ + "c3a" + ], + "witness": "c3a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C4", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0012", + "planted": [ + "c4a" + ], + "witness": "c4a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C5", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0015", + "planted": [ + "c5a" + ], + "witness": "c5a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C6", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0018", + "planted": [ + "c6a" + ], + "witness": "c6a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C7", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0021", + "planted": [ + "c7a" + ], + "witness": "c7a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C8", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0024", + "planted": [ + "c8a", + "c8b" + ], + "witness": "c8a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C9", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0027", + "planted": [ + "c9a" + ], + "witness": "c9a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C10", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0030", + "planted": [ + "c10a" + ], + "witness": "c10a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C11", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0033", + "planted": [ + "c11a" + ], + "witness": "c11a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C12", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0036", + "planted": [ + "c12a" + ], + "witness": "c12a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C13", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0039", + "planted": [ + "c13a" + ], + "witness": "c13a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C14", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0042", + "planted": [ + "c14a" + ], + "witness": "c14a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C15", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0045", + "planted": [ + "c15a" + ], + "witness": "c15a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C16", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0048", + "planted": [ + "c16a" + ], + "witness": "c16a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C17", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0051", + "planted": [ + "c17a" + ], + "witness": "c17a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C18", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0054", + "planted": [ + "c18a" + ], + "witness": "c18a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C19", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0057", + "planted": [ + "c19a" + ], + "witness": "c19a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C20", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0060", + "planted": [ + "c20a" + ], + "witness": "c20a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C21", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0063", + "planted": [ + "c21a" + ], + "witness": "c21a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C22", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0066", + "planted": [ + "c22a", + "c22b" + ], + "witness": "c22a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C23", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0069", + "planted": [ + "c23a" + ], + "witness": "c23a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C24", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0072", + "planted": [ + "c24a" + ], + "witness": "c24a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C25", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0075", + "planted": [ + "c25a" + ], + "witness": "c25a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C26", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0078", + "planted": [ + "c26a" + ], + "witness": "c26a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C27", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0081", + "planted": [ + "c27a" + ], + "witness": "c27a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C28", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0084", + "planted": [ + "c28a" + ], + "witness": "c28a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C29", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0087", + "planted": [ + "c29a" + ], + "witness": "c29a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C30", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0090", + "planted": [ + "c30a" + ], + "witness": "c30a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C31", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0093", + "planted": [ + "c31a" + ], + "witness": "c31a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C32", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0096", + "planted": [ + "c32a" + ], + "witness": "c32a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C33", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0099", + "planted": [ + "c33a" + ], + "witness": "c33a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C34", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0102", + "planted": [ + "c34a" + ], + "witness": "c34a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C35", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0105", + "planted": [ + "c35a" + ], + "witness": "c35a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C36", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0108", + "planted": [ + "c36a", + "c36b" + ], + "witness": "c36a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C37", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0111", + "planted": [ + "c37a" + ], + "witness": "c37a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C38", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0114", + "planted": [ + "c38a" + ], + "witness": "c38a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C39", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0117", + "planted": [ + "c39a" + ], + "witness": "c39a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C40", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0120", + "planted": [ + "c40a" + ], + "witness": "c40a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C41", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0123", + "planted": [ + "c41a" + ], + "witness": "c41a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C42", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0126", + "planted": [ + "c42a" + ], + "witness": "c42a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C43", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0129", + "planted": [ + "c43a" + ], + "witness": "c43a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C44", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0132", + "planted": [ + "c44a" + ], + "witness": "c44a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C45", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0135", + "planted": [ + "c45a" + ], + "witness": "c45a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C46", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0138", + "planted": [ + "c46a" + ], + "witness": "c46a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C47", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0141", + "planted": [ + "c47a" + ], + "witness": "c47a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C48", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0144", + "planted": [ + "c48a" + ], + "witness": "c48a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C49", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0147", + "planted": [ + "c49a" + ], + "witness": "c49a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C50", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0150", + "planted": [ + "c50a", + "c50b" + ], + "witness": "c50a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C51", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0153", + "planted": [ + "c51a" + ], + "witness": "c51a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C52", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0156", + "planted": [ + "c52a" + ], + "witness": "c52a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C53", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0159", + "planted": [ + "c53a" + ], + "witness": "c53a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C54", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0162", + "planted": [ + "c54a" + ], + "witness": "c54a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C55", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0165", + "planted": [ + "c55a" + ], + "witness": "c55a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C56", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0168", + "planted": [ + "c56a" + ], + "witness": "c56a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C57", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0171", + "planted": [ + "c57a" + ], + "witness": "c57a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C58", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0174", + "planted": [ + "c58a" + ], + "witness": "c58a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C59", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0177", + "planted": [ + "c59a" + ], + "witness": "c59a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C60", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0180", + "planted": [ + "c60a" + ], + "witness": "c60a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C61", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0183", + "planted": [ + "c61a" + ], + "witness": "c61a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C62", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0186", + "planted": [ + "c62a" + ], + "witness": "c62a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C63", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0189", + "planted": [ + "c63a" + ], + "witness": "c63a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C64", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0192", + "planted": [ + "c64a", + "c64b" + ], + "witness": "c64a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C65", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0195", + "planted": [ + "c65a" + ], + "witness": "c65a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C66", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0198", + "planted": [ + "c66a" + ], + "witness": "c66a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C67", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0201", + "planted": [ + "c67a" + ], + "witness": "c67a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C68", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0204", + "planted": [ + "c68a" + ], + "witness": "c68a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C69", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0207", + "planted": [ + "c69a" + ], + "witness": "c69a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C70", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0210", + "planted": [ + "c70a" + ], + "witness": "c70a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C71", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0213", + "planted": [ + "c71a" + ], + "witness": "c71a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C72", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0216", + "planted": [ + "c72a" + ], + "witness": "c72a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C73", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0219", + "planted": [ + "c73a" + ], + "witness": "c73a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C74", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0222", + "planted": [ + "c74a" + ], + "witness": "c74a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C75", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0225", + "planted": [ + "c75a" + ], + "witness": "c75a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C76", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0228", + "planted": [ + "c76a" + ], + "witness": "c76a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C77", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0231", + "planted": [ + "c77a" + ], + "witness": "c77a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C78", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0234", + "planted": [ + "c78a", + "c78b" + ], + "witness": "c78a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C79", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0237", + "planted": [ + "c79a" + ], + "witness": "c79a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C80", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0240", + "planted": [ + "c80a" + ], + "witness": "c80a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C81", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0243", + "planted": [ + "c81a" + ], + "witness": "c81a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C82", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0246", + "planted": [ + "c82a" + ], + "witness": "c82a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C83", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0249", + "planted": [ + "c83a" + ], + "witness": "c83a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C84", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0252", + "planted": [ + "c84a" + ], + "witness": "c84a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C85", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0255", + "planted": [ + "c85a" + ], + "witness": "c85a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C86", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0258", + "planted": [ + "c86a" + ], + "witness": "c86a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C87", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0261", + "planted": [ + "c87a" + ], + "witness": "c87a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C88", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0264", + "planted": [ + "c88a" + ], + "witness": "c88a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C89", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0267", + "planted": [ + "c89a" + ], + "witness": "c89a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C90", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0270", + "planted": [ + "c90a" + ], + "witness": "c90a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C91", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0273", + "planted": [ + "c91a" + ], + "witness": "c91a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C92", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0276", + "planted": [ + "c92a", + "c92b" + ], + "witness": "c92a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C93", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0279", + "planted": [ + "c93a" + ], + "witness": "c93a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C94", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0282", + "planted": [ + "c94a" + ], + "witness": "c94a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C95", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0285", + "planted": [ + "c95a" + ], + "witness": "c95a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C96", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0288", + "planted": [ + "c96a" + ], + "witness": "c96a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C97", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0291", + "planted": [ + "c97a" + ], + "witness": "c97a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C98", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0294", + "planted": [ + "c98a" + ], + "witness": "c98a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C99", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0297", + "planted": [ + "c99a" + ], + "witness": "c99a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C100", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0300", + "planted": [ + "c100a" + ], + "witness": "c100a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C101", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0303", + "planted": [ + "c101a" + ], + "witness": "c101a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C102", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0306", + "planted": [ + "c102a" + ], + "witness": "c102a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C103", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0309", + "planted": [ + "c103a" + ], + "witness": "c103a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C104", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0312", + "planted": [ + "c104a" + ], + "witness": "c104a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C105", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0315", + "planted": [ + "c105a" + ], + "witness": "c105a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C106", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0318", + "planted": [ + "c106a", + "c106b" + ], + "witness": "c106a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C107", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0321", + "planted": [ + "c107a" + ], + "witness": "c107a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C108", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0324", + "planted": [ + "c108a" + ], + "witness": "c108a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C109", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0327", + "planted": [ + "c109a" + ], + "witness": "c109a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C110", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0330", + "planted": [ + "c110a" + ], + "witness": "c110a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C111", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0333", + "planted": [ + "c111a" + ], + "witness": "c111a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C112", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0336", + "planted": [ + "c112a" + ], + "witness": "c112a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C113", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0339", + "planted": [ + "c113a" + ], + "witness": "c113a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C114", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0342", + "planted": [ + "c114a" + ], + "witness": "c114a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C115", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0345", + "planted": [ + "c115a" + ], + "witness": "c115a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C116", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0348", + "planted": [ + "c116a" + ], + "witness": "c116a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C117", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0351", + "planted": [ + "c117a" + ], + "witness": "c117a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C118", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0354", + "planted": [ + "c118a" + ], + "witness": "c118a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C119", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0357", + "planted": [ + "c119a" + ], + "witness": "c119a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C120", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0360", + "planted": [ + "c120a", + "c120b" + ], + "witness": "c120a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C121", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0363", + "planted": [ + "c121a" + ], + "witness": "c121a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C122", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0366", + "planted": [ + "c122a" + ], + "witness": "c122a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C123", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0369", + "planted": [ + "c123a" + ], + "witness": "c123a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C124", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0372", + "planted": [ + "c124a" + ], + "witness": "c124a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C125", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0375", + "planted": [ + "c125a" + ], + "witness": "c125a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C126", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0378", + "planted": [ + "c126a" + ], + "witness": "c126a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C127", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0381", + "planted": [ + "c127a" + ], + "witness": "c127a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C128", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0384", + "planted": [ + "c128a" + ], + "witness": "c128a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C129", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0387", + "planted": [ + "c129a" + ], + "witness": "c129a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C130", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0390", + "planted": [ + "c130a" + ], + "witness": "c130a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C131", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0393", + "planted": [ + "c131a" + ], + "witness": "c131a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C132", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0396", + "planted": [ + "c132a" + ], + "witness": "c132a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C133", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0399", + "planted": [ + "c133a" + ], + "witness": "c133a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C134", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0402", + "planted": [ + "c134a", + "c134b" + ], + "witness": "c134a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C135", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0405", + "planted": [ + "c135a" + ], + "witness": "c135a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C136", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0408", + "planted": [ + "c136a" + ], + "witness": "c136a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C137", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0411", + "planted": [ + "c137a" + ], + "witness": "c137a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C138", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0414", + "planted": [ + "c138a" + ], + "witness": "c138a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C139", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0417", + "planted": [ + "c139a" + ], + "witness": "c139a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C140", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0420", + "planted": [ + "c140a" + ], + "witness": "c140a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C141", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0423", + "planted": [ + "c141a" + ], + "witness": "c141a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C142", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0426", + "planted": [ + "c142a" + ], + "witness": "c142a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C143", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0429", + "planted": [ + "c143a" + ], + "witness": "c143a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C144", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0432", + "planted": [ + "c144a" + ], + "witness": "c144a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C145", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0435", + "planted": [ + "c145a" + ], + "witness": "c145a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C146", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0438", + "planted": [ + "c146a" + ], + "witness": "c146a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C147", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0441", + "planted": [ + "c147a" + ], + "witness": "c147a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C148", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0444", + "planted": [ + "c148a", + "c148b" + ], + "witness": "c148a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C149", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0447", + "planted": [ + "c149a" + ], + "witness": "c149a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C150", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0450", + "planted": [ + "c150a" + ], + "witness": "c150a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C151", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0453", + "planted": [ + "c151a" + ], + "witness": "c151a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C152", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0456", + "planted": [ + "c152a" + ], + "witness": "c152a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C153", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0459", + "planted": [ + "c153a" + ], + "witness": "c153a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C154", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0462", + "planted": [ + "c154a" + ], + "witness": "c154a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C155", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0465", + "planted": [ + "c155a" + ], + "witness": "c155a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C156", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0468", + "planted": [ + "c156a" + ], + "witness": "c156a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C157", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0471", + "planted": [ + "c157a" + ], + "witness": "c157a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C158", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0474", + "planted": [ + "c158a" + ], + "witness": "c158a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C159", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0477", + "planted": [ + "c159a" + ], + "witness": "c159a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C160", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0480", + "planted": [ + "c160a" + ], + "witness": "c160a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C161", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0483", + "planted": [ + "c161a" + ], + "witness": "c161a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C162", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0486", + "planted": [ + "c162a", + "c162b" + ], + "witness": "c162a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C163", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0489", + "planted": [ + "c163a" + ], + "witness": "c163a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C164", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0492", + "planted": [ + "c164a" + ], + "witness": "c164a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C165", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0495", + "planted": [ + "c165a" + ], + "witness": "c165a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C166", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0498", + "planted": [ + "c166a" + ], + "witness": "c166a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C167", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0501", + "planted": [ + "c167a" + ], + "witness": "c167a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C168", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0504", + "planted": [ + "c168a" + ], + "witness": "c168a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C169", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0507", + "planted": [ + "c169a" + ], + "witness": "c169a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C170", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0510", + "planted": [ + "c170a" + ], + "witness": "c170a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C171", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0513", + "planted": [ + "c171a" + ], + "witness": "c171a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C172", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0516", + "planted": [ + "c172a" + ], + "witness": "c172a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C173", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0519", + "planted": [ + "c173a" + ], + "witness": "c173a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C174", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0522", + "planted": [ + "c174a" + ], + "witness": "c174a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C175", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0525", + "planted": [ + "c175a" + ], + "witness": "c175a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C176", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0528", + "planted": [ + "c176a", + "c176b" + ], + "witness": "c176a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C177", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0531", + "planted": [ + "c177a" + ], + "witness": "c177a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C178", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0534", + "planted": [ + "c178a" + ], + "witness": "c178a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C179", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0537", + "planted": [ + "c179a" + ], + "witness": "c179a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C180", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0540", + "planted": [ + "c180a" + ], + "witness": "c180a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C181", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0543", + "planted": [ + "c181a" + ], + "witness": "c181a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C182", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0546", + "planted": [ + "c182a" + ], + "witness": "c182a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C183", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0549", + "planted": [ + "c183a" + ], + "witness": "c183a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C184", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0552", + "planted": [ + "c184a" + ], + "witness": "c184a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C185", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0555", + "planted": [ + "c185a" + ], + "witness": "c185a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C186", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0558", + "planted": [ + "c186a" + ], + "witness": "c186a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C187", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0561", + "planted": [ + "c187a" + ], + "witness": "c187a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C188", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0564", + "planted": [ + "c188a" + ], + "witness": "c188a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C189", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0567", + "planted": [ + "c189a" + ], + "witness": "c189a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C190", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0570", + "planted": [ + "c190a", + "c190b" + ], + "witness": "c190a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C191", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0573", + "planted": [ + "c191a" + ], + "witness": "c191a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C192", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0576", + "planted": [ + "c192a" + ], + "witness": "c192a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C193", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0579", + "planted": [ + "c193a" + ], + "witness": "c193a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C194", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0582", + "planted": [ + "c194a" + ], + "witness": "c194a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C195", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0585", + "planted": [ + "c195a" + ], + "witness": "c195a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C196", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0588", + "planted": [ + "c196a" + ], + "witness": "c196a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C197", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0591", + "planted": [ + "c197a" + ], + "witness": "c197a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C198", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0594", + "planted": [ + "c198a" + ], + "witness": "c198a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C199", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0597", + "planted": [ + "c199a" + ], + "witness": "c199a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C200", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0600", + "planted": [ + "c200a" + ], + "witness": "c200a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C201", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0603", + "planted": [ + "c201a" + ], + "witness": "c201a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C202", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0606", + "planted": [ + "c202a" + ], + "witness": "c202a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C203", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0609", + "planted": [ + "c203a" + ], + "witness": "c203a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C204", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0612", + "planted": [ + "c204a", + "c204b" + ], + "witness": "c204a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C205", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0615", + "planted": [ + "c205a" + ], + "witness": "c205a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C206", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0618", + "planted": [ + "c206a" + ], + "witness": "c206a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C207", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0621", + "planted": [ + "c207a" + ], + "witness": "c207a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C208", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0624", + "planted": [ + "c208a" + ], + "witness": "c208a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C209", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0627", + "planted": [ + "c209a" + ], + "witness": "c209a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C210", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0630", + "planted": [ + "c210a" + ], + "witness": "c210a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C211", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0633", + "planted": [ + "c211a" + ], + "witness": "c211a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C212", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0636", + "planted": [ + "c212a" + ], + "witness": "c212a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C213", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0639", + "planted": [ + "c213a" + ], + "witness": "c213a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C214", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0642", + "planted": [ + "c214a" + ], + "witness": "c214a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C215", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0645", + "planted": [ + "c215a" + ], + "witness": "c215a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C216", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0648", + "planted": [ + "c216a" + ], + "witness": "c216a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C217", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0651", + "planted": [ + "c217a" + ], + "witness": "c217a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C218", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0654", + "planted": [ + "c218a", + "c218b" + ], + "witness": "c218a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C219", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0657", + "planted": [ + "c219a" + ], + "witness": "c219a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C220", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0660", + "planted": [ + "c220a" + ], + "witness": "c220a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C221", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0663", + "planted": [ + "c221a" + ], + "witness": "c221a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C222", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0666", + "planted": [ + "c222a" + ], + "witness": "c222a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C223", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0669", + "planted": [ + "c223a" + ], + "witness": "c223a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C224", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0672", + "planted": [ + "c224a" + ], + "witness": "c224a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C225", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0675", + "planted": [ + "c225a" + ], + "witness": "c225a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C226", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0678", + "planted": [ + "c226a" + ], + "witness": "c226a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C227", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0681", + "planted": [ + "c227a" + ], + "witness": "c227a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C228", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0684", + "planted": [ + "c228a" + ], + "witness": "c228a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C229", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0687", + "planted": [ + "c229a" + ], + "witness": "c229a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C230", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0690", + "planted": [ + "c230a" + ], + "witness": "c230a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C231", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0693", + "planted": [ + "c231a" + ], + "witness": "c231a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C232", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0696", + "planted": [ + "c232a", + "c232b" + ], + "witness": "c232a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C233", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0699", + "planted": [ + "c233a" + ], + "witness": "c233a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C234", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0702", + "planted": [ + "c234a" + ], + "witness": "c234a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C235", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0705", + "planted": [ + "c235a" + ], + "witness": "c235a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C236", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0708", + "planted": [ + "c236a" + ], + "witness": "c236a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C237", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0711", + "planted": [ + "c237a" + ], + "witness": "c237a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C238", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0714", + "planted": [ + "c238a" + ], + "witness": "c238a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C239", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0717", + "planted": [ + "c239a" + ], + "witness": "c239a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C240", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0720", + "planted": [ + "c240a" + ], + "witness": "c240a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C241", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0723", + "planted": [ + "c241a" + ], + "witness": "c241a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C242", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0726", + "planted": [ + "c242a" + ], + "witness": "c242a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C243", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0729", + "planted": [ + "c243a" + ], + "witness": "c243a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C244", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0732", + "planted": [ + "c244a" + ], + "witness": "c244a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C245", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0735", + "planted": [ + "c245a" + ], + "witness": "c245a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C246", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0738", + "planted": [ + "c246a", + "c246b" + ], + "witness": "c246a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C247", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0741", + "planted": [ + "c247a" + ], + "witness": "c247a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C248", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0744", + "planted": [ + "c248a" + ], + "witness": "c248a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C249", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0747", + "planted": [ + "c249a" + ], + "witness": "c249a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C250", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0750", + "planted": [ + "c250a" + ], + "witness": "c250a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit_agree", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C251", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0753", + "planted": [ + "c251a" + ], + "witness": "c251a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C252", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0756", + "planted": [ + "c252a" + ], + "witness": "c252a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C253", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0759", + "planted": [ + "c253a" + ], + "witness": "c253a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C254", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0762", + "planted": [ + "c254a" + ], + "witness": "c254a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C255", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0765", + "planted": [ + "c255a" + ], + "witness": "c255a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C256", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0768", + "planted": [ + "c256a" + ], + "witness": "c256a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C257", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0771", + "planted": [ + "c257a" + ], + "witness": "c257a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C258", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0774", + "planted": [ + "c258a" + ], + "witness": "c258a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C259", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0777", + "planted": [ + "c259a" + ], + "witness": "c259a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C260", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0780", + "planted": [ + "c260a", + "c260b" + ], + "witness": "c260a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C261", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0783", + "planted": [ + "c261a" + ], + "witness": "c261a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C262", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0786", + "planted": [ + "c262a" + ], + "witness": "c262a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C263", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0789", + "planted": [ + "c263a" + ], + "witness": "c263a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C264", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0792", + "planted": [ + "c264a" + ], + "witness": "c264a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C265", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0795", + "planted": [ + "c265a" + ], + "witness": "c265a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C266", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0798", + "planted": [ + "c266a" + ], + "witness": "c266a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C267", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0801", + "planted": [ + "c267a" + ], + "witness": "c267a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C268", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0804", + "planted": [ + "c268a" + ], + "witness": "c268a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C269", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0807", + "planted": [ + "c269a" + ], + "witness": "c269a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C270", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0810", + "planted": [ + "c270a" + ], + "witness": "c270a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C271", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0813", + "planted": [ + "c271a" + ], + "witness": "c271a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C272", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0816", + "planted": [ + "c272a" + ], + "witness": "c272a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C273", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0819", + "planted": [ + "c273a" + ], + "witness": "c273a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C274", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0822", + "planted": [ + "c274a", + "c274b" + ], + "witness": "c274a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C275", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0825", + "planted": [ + "c275a" + ], + "witness": "c275a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C276", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0828", + "planted": [ + "c276a" + ], + "witness": "c276a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C277", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0831", + "planted": [ + "c277a" + ], + "witness": "c277a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C278", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0834", + "planted": [ + "c278a" + ], + "witness": "c278a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C279", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0837", + "planted": [ + "c279a" + ], + "witness": "c279a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C280", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0840", + "planted": [ + "c280a" + ], + "witness": "c280a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C281", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0843", + "planted": [ + "c281a" + ], + "witness": "c281a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C282", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0846", + "planted": [ + "c282a" + ], + "witness": "c282a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C283", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0849", + "planted": [ + "c283a" + ], + "witness": "c283a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C284", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0852", + "planted": [ + "c284a" + ], + "witness": "c284a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C285", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0855", + "planted": [ + "c285a" + ], + "witness": "c285a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C286", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0858", + "planted": [ + "c286a" + ], + "witness": "c286a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C287", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0861", + "planted": [ + "c287a" + ], + "witness": "c287a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C288", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0864", + "planted": [ + "c288a", + "c288b" + ], + "witness": "c288a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C289", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0867", + "planted": [ + "c289a" + ], + "witness": "c289a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C290", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0870", + "planted": [ + "c290a" + ], + "witness": "c290a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C291", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0873", + "planted": [ + "c291a" + ], + "witness": "c291a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C292", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0876", + "planted": [ + "c292a" + ], + "witness": "c292a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C293", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0879", + "planted": [ + "c293a" + ], + "witness": "c293a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C294", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0882", + "planted": [ + "c294a" + ], + "witness": "c294a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C295", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0885", + "planted": [ + "c295a" + ], + "witness": "c295a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C296", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0888", + "planted": [ + "c296a" + ], + "witness": "c296a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C297", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0891", + "planted": [ + "c297a" + ], + "witness": "c297a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C298", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0894", + "planted": [ + "c298a" + ], + "witness": "c298a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C299", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0897", + "planted": [ + "c299a" + ], + "witness": "c299a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C300", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0900", + "planted": [ + "c300a" + ], + "witness": "c300a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C301", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0903", + "planted": [ + "c301a" + ], + "witness": "c301a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C302", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0906", + "planted": [ + "c302a", + "c302b" + ], + "witness": "c302a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C303", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0909", + "planted": [ + "c303a" + ], + "witness": "c303a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C304", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0912", + "planted": [ + "c304a" + ], + "witness": "c304a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C305", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0915", + "planted": [ + "c305a" + ], + "witness": "c305a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C306", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0918", + "planted": [ + "c306a" + ], + "witness": "c306a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C307", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0921", + "planted": [ + "c307a" + ], + "witness": "c307a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C308", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0924", + "planted": [ + "c308a" + ], + "witness": "c308a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C309", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0927", + "planted": [ + "c309a" + ], + "witness": "c309a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C310", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0930", + "planted": [ + "c310a" + ], + "witness": "c310a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C311", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0933", + "planted": [ + "c311a" + ], + "witness": "c311a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C312", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0936", + "planted": [ + "c312a" + ], + "witness": "c312a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C313", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0939", + "planted": [ + "c313a" + ], + "witness": "c313a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C314", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0942", + "planted": [ + "c314a" + ], + "witness": "c314a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C315", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0945", + "planted": [ + "c315a" + ], + "witness": "c315a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C316", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0948", + "planted": [ + "c316a", + "c316b" + ], + "witness": "c316a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C317", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0951", + "planted": [ + "c317a" + ], + "witness": "c317a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C318", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0954", + "planted": [ + "c318a" + ], + "witness": "c318a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C319", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0957", + "planted": [ + "c319a" + ], + "witness": "c319a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C320", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0960", + "planted": [ + "c320a" + ], + "witness": "c320a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C321", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0963", + "planted": [ + "c321a" + ], + "witness": "c321a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C322", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0966", + "planted": [ + "c322a" + ], + "witness": "c322a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C323", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0969", + "planted": [ + "c323a" + ], + "witness": "c323a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C324", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0972", + "planted": [ + "c324a" + ], + "witness": "c324a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C325", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0975", + "planted": [ + "c325a" + ], + "witness": "c325a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C326", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0978", + "planted": [ + "c326a" + ], + "witness": "c326a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C327", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0981", + "planted": [ + "c327a" + ], + "witness": "c327a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C328", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0984", + "planted": [ + "c328a" + ], + "witness": "c328a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C329", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0987", + "planted": [ + "c329a" + ], + "witness": "c329a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C330", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0990", + "planted": [ + "c330a", + "c330b" + ], + "witness": "c330a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C331", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0993", + "planted": [ + "c331a" + ], + "witness": "c331a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C332", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0996", + "planted": [ + "c332a" + ], + "witness": "c332a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C333", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0999", + "planted": [ + "c333a" + ], + "witness": "c333a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C334", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1002", + "planted": [ + "c334a" + ], + "witness": "c334a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C335", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1005", + "planted": [ + "c335a" + ], + "witness": "c335a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C336", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1008", + "planted": [ + "c336a" + ], + "witness": "c336a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C337", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1011", + "planted": [ + "c337a" + ], + "witness": "c337a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C338", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1014", + "planted": [ + "c338a" + ], + "witness": "c338a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C339", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1017", + "planted": [ + "c339a" + ], + "witness": "c339a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C340", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1020", + "planted": [ + "c340a" + ], + "witness": "c340a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C341", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1023", + "planted": [ + "c341a" + ], + "witness": "c341a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C342", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1026", + "planted": [ + "c342a" + ], + "witness": "c342a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C343", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1029", + "planted": [ + "c343a" + ], + "witness": "c343a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C344", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1032", + "planted": [ + "c344a", + "c344b" + ], + "witness": "c344a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C345", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1035", + "planted": [ + "c345a" + ], + "witness": "c345a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C346", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1038", + "planted": [ + "c346a" + ], + "witness": "c346a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C347", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1041", + "planted": [ + "c347a" + ], + "witness": "c347a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C348", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1044", + "planted": [ + "c348a" + ], + "witness": "c348a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C349", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1047", + "planted": [ + "c349a" + ], + "witness": "c349a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C350", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1050", + "planted": [ + "c350a" + ], + "witness": "c350a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C351", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1053", + "planted": [ + "c351a" + ], + "witness": "c351a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C352", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1056", + "planted": [ + "c352a" + ], + "witness": "c352a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C353", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1059", + "planted": [ + "c353a" + ], + "witness": "c353a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C354", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1062", + "planted": [ + "c354a" + ], + "witness": "c354a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C355", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1065", + "planted": [ + "c355a" + ], + "witness": "c355a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C356", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1068", + "planted": [ + "c356a" + ], + "witness": "c356a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C357", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1071", + "planted": [ + "c357a" + ], + "witness": "c357a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C358", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1074", + "planted": [ + "c358a", + "c358b" + ], + "witness": "c358a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C359", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1077", + "planted": [ + "c359a" + ], + "witness": "c359a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C360", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1080", + "planted": [ + "c360a" + ], + "witness": "c360a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C361", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1083", + "planted": [ + "c361a" + ], + "witness": "c361a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C362", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1086", + "planted": [ + "c362a" + ], + "witness": "c362a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C363", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1089", + "planted": [ + "c363a" + ], + "witness": "c363a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C364", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1092", + "planted": [ + "c364a" + ], + "witness": "c364a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C365", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1095", + "planted": [ + "c365a" + ], + "witness": "c365a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C366", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1098", + "planted": [ + "c366a" + ], + "witness": "c366a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C367", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1101", + "planted": [ + "c367a" + ], + "witness": "c367a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C368", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1104", + "planted": [ + "c368a" + ], + "witness": "c368a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C369", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1107", + "planted": [ + "c369a" + ], + "witness": "c369a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C370", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1110", + "planted": [ + "c370a" + ], + "witness": "c370a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C371", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1113", + "planted": [ + "c371a" + ], + "witness": "c371a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C372", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1116", + "planted": [ + "c372a", + "c372b" + ], + "witness": "c372a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C373", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1119", + "planted": [ + "c373a" + ], + "witness": "c373a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C374", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1122", + "planted": [ + "c374a" + ], + "witness": "c374a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C375", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1125", + "planted": [ + "c375a" + ], + "witness": "c375a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C376", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1128", + "planted": [ + "c376a" + ], + "witness": "c376a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C377", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1131", + "planted": [ + "c377a" + ], + "witness": "c377a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C378", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1134", + "planted": [ + "c378a" + ], + "witness": "c378a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C379", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1137", + "planted": [ + "c379a" + ], + "witness": "c379a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C380", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1140", + "planted": [ + "c380a" + ], + "witness": "c380a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C381", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1143", + "planted": [ + "c381a" + ], + "witness": "c381a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C382", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1146", + "planted": [ + "c382a" + ], + "witness": "c382a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C383", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1149", + "planted": [ + "c383a" + ], + "witness": "c383a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C384", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1152", + "planted": [ + "c384a" + ], + "witness": "c384a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C385", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1155", + "planted": [ + "c385a" + ], + "witness": "c385a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C386", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1158", + "planted": [ + "c386a", + "c386b" + ], + "witness": "c386a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C387", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1161", + "planted": [ + "c387a" + ], + "witness": "c387a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C388", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1164", + "planted": [ + "c388a" + ], + "witness": "c388a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C389", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1167", + "planted": [ + "c389a" + ], + "witness": "c389a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C390", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1170", + "planted": [ + "c390a" + ], + "witness": "c390a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C391", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1173", + "planted": [ + "c391a" + ], + "witness": "c391a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C392", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1176", + "planted": [ + "c392a" + ], + "witness": "c392a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C393", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1179", + "planted": [ + "c393a" + ], + "witness": "c393a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C394", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1182", + "planted": [ + "c394a" + ], + "witness": "c394a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C395", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1185", + "planted": [ + "c395a" + ], + "witness": "c395a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C396", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1188", + "planted": [ + "c396a" + ], + "witness": "c396a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C397", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1191", + "planted": [ + "c397a" + ], + "witness": "c397a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C398", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1194", + "planted": [ + "c398a" + ], + "witness": "c398a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C399", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1197", + "planted": [ + "c399a" + ], + "witness": "c399a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C400", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1200", + "planted": [ + "c400a", + "c400b" + ], + "witness": "c400a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C401", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1203", + "planted": [ + "c401a" + ], + "witness": "c401a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C402", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1206", + "planted": [ + "c402a" + ], + "witness": "c402a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C403", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1209", + "planted": [ + "c403a" + ], + "witness": "c403a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C404", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1212", + "planted": [ + "c404a" + ], + "witness": "c404a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C405", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1215", + "planted": [ + "c405a" + ], + "witness": "c405a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C406", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1218", + "planted": [ + "c406a" + ], + "witness": "c406a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C407", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1221", + "planted": [ + "c407a" + ], + "witness": "c407a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C408", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1224", + "planted": [ + "c408a" + ], + "witness": "c408a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C409", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1227", + "planted": [ + "c409a" + ], + "witness": "c409a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C410", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1230", + "planted": [ + "c410a" + ], + "witness": "c410a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C411", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1233", + "planted": [ + "c411a" + ], + "witness": "c411a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C412", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1236", + "planted": [ + "c412a" + ], + "witness": "c412a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C413", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1239", + "planted": [ + "c413a" + ], + "witness": "c413a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C414", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1242", + "planted": [ + "c414a", + "c414b" + ], + "witness": "c414a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C415", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1245", + "planted": [ + "c415a" + ], + "witness": "c415a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C416", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1248", + "planted": [ + "c416a" + ], + "witness": "c416a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C417", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1251", + "planted": [ + "c417a" + ], + "witness": "c417a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C418", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1254", + "planted": [ + "c418a" + ], + "witness": "c418a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C419", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1257", + "planted": [ + "c419a" + ], + "witness": "c419a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C420", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1260", + "planted": [ + "c420a" + ], + "witness": "c420a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C421", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1263", + "planted": [ + "c421a" + ], + "witness": "c421a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C422", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1266", + "planted": [ + "c422a" + ], + "witness": "c422a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C423", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1269", + "planted": [ + "c423a" + ], + "witness": "c423a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C424", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1272", + "planted": [ + "c424a" + ], + "witness": "c424a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C425", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1275", + "planted": [ + "c425a" + ], + "witness": "c425a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C426", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1278", + "planted": [ + "c426a" + ], + "witness": "c426a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C427", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1281", + "planted": [ + "c427a" + ], + "witness": "c427a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C428", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1284", + "planted": [ + "c428a", + "c428b" + ], + "witness": "c428a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C429", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1287", + "planted": [ + "c429a" + ], + "witness": "c429a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C430", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1290", + "planted": [ + "c430a" + ], + "witness": "c430a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C431", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1293", + "planted": [ + "c431a" + ], + "witness": "c431a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C432", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1296", + "planted": [ + "c432a" + ], + "witness": "c432a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C433", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1299", + "planted": [ + "c433a" + ], + "witness": "c433a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C434", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1302", + "planted": [ + "c434a" + ], + "witness": "c434a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C435", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1305", + "planted": [ + "c435a" + ], + "witness": "c435a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C436", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1308", + "planted": [ + "c436a" + ], + "witness": "c436a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C437", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1311", + "planted": [ + "c437a" + ], + "witness": "c437a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C438", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1314", + "planted": [ + "c438a" + ], + "witness": "c438a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C439", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1317", + "planted": [ + "c439a" + ], + "witness": "c439a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C440", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1320", + "planted": [ + "c440a" + ], + "witness": "c440a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C441", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1323", + "planted": [ + "c441a" + ], + "witness": "c441a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C442", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1326", + "planted": [ + "c442a", + "c442b" + ], + "witness": "c442a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C443", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1329", + "planted": [ + "c443a" + ], + "witness": "c443a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C444", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1332", + "planted": [ + "c444a" + ], + "witness": "c444a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C445", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1335", + "planted": [ + "c445a" + ], + "witness": "c445a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C446", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1338", + "planted": [ + "c446a" + ], + "witness": "c446a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C447", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1341", + "planted": [ + "c447a" + ], + "witness": "c447a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C448", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1344", + "planted": [ + "c448a" + ], + "witness": "c448a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C449", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1347", + "planted": [ + "c449a" + ], + "witness": "c449a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C450", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1350", + "planted": [ + "c450a" + ], + "witness": "c450a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C451", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1353", + "planted": [ + "c451a" + ], + "witness": "c451a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C452", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1356", + "planted": [ + "c452a" + ], + "witness": "c452a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C453", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1359", + "planted": [ + "c453a" + ], + "witness": "c453a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C454", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1362", + "planted": [ + "c454a" + ], + "witness": "c454a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C455", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1365", + "planted": [ + "c455a" + ], + "witness": "c455a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C456", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1368", + "planted": [ + "c456a", + "c456b" + ], + "witness": "c456a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C457", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1371", + "planted": [ + "c457a" + ], + "witness": "c457a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C458", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1374", + "planted": [ + "c458a" + ], + "witness": "c458a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C459", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1377", + "planted": [ + "c459a" + ], + "witness": "c459a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C460", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1380", + "planted": [ + "c460a" + ], + "witness": "c460a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C461", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1383", + "planted": [ + "c461a" + ], + "witness": "c461a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C462", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1386", + "planted": [ + "c462a" + ], + "witness": "c462a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C463", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1389", + "planted": [ + "c463a" + ], + "witness": "c463a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C464", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1392", + "planted": [ + "c464a" + ], + "witness": "c464a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C465", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1395", + "planted": [ + "c465a" + ], + "witness": "c465a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C466", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1398", + "planted": [ + "c466a" + ], + "witness": "c466a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C467", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1401", + "planted": [ + "c467a" + ], + "witness": "c467a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C468", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1404", + "planted": [ + "c468a" + ], + "witness": "c468a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C469", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1407", + "planted": [ + "c469a" + ], + "witness": "c469a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C470", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1410", + "planted": [ + "c470a", + "c470b" + ], + "witness": "c470a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C471", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1413", + "planted": [ + "c471a" + ], + "witness": "c471a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C472", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1416", + "planted": [ + "c472a" + ], + "witness": "c472a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C473", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1419", + "planted": [ + "c473a" + ], + "witness": "c473a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C474", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1422", + "planted": [ + "c474a" + ], + "witness": "c474a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C475", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1425", + "planted": [ + "c475a" + ], + "witness": "c475a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C476", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1428", + "planted": [ + "c476a" + ], + "witness": "c476a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C477", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1431", + "planted": [ + "c477a" + ], + "witness": "c477a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C478", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1434", + "planted": [ + "c478a" + ], + "witness": "c478a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C479", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1437", + "planted": [ + "c479a" + ], + "witness": "c479a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C480", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1440", + "planted": [ + "c480a" + ], + "witness": "c480a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C481", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1443", + "planted": [ + "c481a" + ], + "witness": "c481a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C482", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1446", + "planted": [ + "c482a" + ], + "witness": "c482a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C483", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1449", + "planted": [ + "c483a" + ], + "witness": "c483a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C484", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1452", + "planted": [ + "c484a", + "c484b" + ], + "witness": "c484a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C485", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1455", + "planted": [ + "c485a" + ], + "witness": "c485a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C486", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1458", + "planted": [ + "c486a" + ], + "witness": "c486a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C487", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1461", + "planted": [ + "c487a" + ], + "witness": "c487a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C488", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1464", + "planted": [ + "c488a" + ], + "witness": "c488a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C489", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1467", + "planted": [ + "c489a" + ], + "witness": "c489a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C490", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1470", + "planted": [ + "c490a" + ], + "witness": "c490a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C491", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1473", + "planted": [ + "c491a" + ], + "witness": "c491a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C492", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1476", + "planted": [ + "c492a" + ], + "witness": "c492a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C493", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1479", + "planted": [ + "c493a" + ], + "witness": "c493a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C494", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1482", + "planted": [ + "c494a" + ], + "witness": "c494a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C495", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1485", + "planted": [ + "c495a" + ], + "witness": "c495a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C496", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1488", + "planted": [ + "c496a" + ], + "witness": "c496a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C497", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1491", + "planted": [ + "c497a" + ], + "witness": "c497a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C498", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1494", + "planted": [ + "c498a", + "c498b" + ], + "witness": "c498a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C499", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f1497", + "planted": [ + "c499a" + ], + "witness": "c499a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "D2", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0002", + "stale": "s-f0002" + }, + { + "id": "D5", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0005", + "stale": "s-f0005" + }, + { + "id": "D21", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0021", + "stale": "s-f0021" + }, + { + "id": "D23", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0023", + "stale": "s-f0023" + }, + { + "id": "D43", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0043", + "stale": "s-f0043" + }, + { + "id": "D44", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0044", + "stale": "s-f0044" + }, + { + "id": "D58", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0058", + "stale": "s-f0058" + }, + { + "id": "D61", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0061", + "stale": "s-f0061" + }, + { + "id": "D64", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0064", + "stale": "s-f0064" + }, + { + "id": "D66", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0066", + "stale": "s-f0066" + }, + { + "id": "D102", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0102", + "stale": "s-f0102" + }, + { + "id": "D106", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0106", + "stale": "s-f0106" + }, + { + "id": "D107", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0107", + "stale": "s-f0107" + }, + { + "id": "D119", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0119", + "stale": "s-f0119" + }, + { + "id": "D127", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0127", + "stale": "s-f0127" + }, + { + "id": "D135", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0135", + "stale": "s-f0135" + }, + { + "id": "D147", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0147", + "stale": "s-f0147" + }, + { + "id": "D164", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0164", + "stale": "s-f0164" + }, + { + "id": "D167", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0167", + "stale": "s-f0167" + }, + { + "id": "D168", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0168", + "stale": "s-f0168" + }, + { + "id": "D174", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0174", + "stale": "s-f0174" + }, + { + "id": "D176", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0176", + "stale": "s-f0176" + }, + { + "id": "D188", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0188", + "stale": "s-f0188" + }, + { + "id": "D191", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0191", + "stale": "s-f0191" + }, + { + "id": "D196", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0196", + "stale": "s-f0196" + }, + { + "id": "D204", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0204", + "stale": "s-f0204" + }, + { + "id": "D207", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0207", + "stale": "s-f0207" + }, + { + "id": "D218", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0218", + "stale": "s-f0218" + }, + { + "id": "D225", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0225", + "stale": "s-f0225" + }, + { + "id": "D243", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0243", + "stale": "s-f0243" + }, + { + "id": "D251", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0251", + "stale": "s-f0251" + }, + { + "id": "D265", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0265", + "stale": "s-f0265" + }, + { + "id": "D276", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0276", + "stale": "s-f0276" + }, + { + "id": "D298", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0298", + "stale": "s-f0298" + }, + { + "id": "D303", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0303", + "stale": "s-f0303" + }, + { + "id": "D317", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0317", + "stale": "s-f0317" + }, + { + "id": "D319", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0319", + "stale": "s-f0319" + }, + { + "id": "D325", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0325", + "stale": "s-f0325" + }, + { + "id": "D334", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0334", + "stale": "s-f0334" + }, + { + "id": "D350", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0350", + "stale": "s-f0350" + }, + { + "id": "D357", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0357", + "stale": "s-f0357" + }, + { + "id": "D362", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0362", + "stale": "s-f0362" + }, + { + "id": "D394", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0394", + "stale": "s-f0394" + }, + { + "id": "D402", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0402", + "stale": "s-f0402" + }, + { + "id": "D413", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0413", + "stale": "s-f0413" + }, + { + "id": "D415", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0415", + "stale": "s-f0415" + }, + { + "id": "D429", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0429", + "stale": "s-f0429" + }, + { + "id": "D433", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0433", + "stale": "s-f0433" + }, + { + "id": "D450", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0450", + "stale": "s-f0450" + }, + { + "id": "D453", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0453", + "stale": "s-f0453" + }, + { + "id": "D457", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0457", + "stale": "s-f0457" + }, + { + "id": "D462", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0462", + "stale": "s-f0462" + }, + { + "id": "D492", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0492", + "stale": "s-f0492" + }, + { + "id": "D497", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0497", + "stale": "s-f0497" + }, + { + "id": "D498", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0498", + "stale": "s-f0498" + }, + { + "id": "D501", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0501", + "stale": "s-f0501" + }, + { + "id": "D505", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0505", + "stale": "s-f0505" + }, + { + "id": "D509", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0509", + "stale": "s-f0509" + }, + { + "id": "D515", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0515", + "stale": "s-f0515" + }, + { + "id": "D523", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0523", + "stale": "s-f0523" + }, + { + "id": "D534", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0534", + "stale": "s-f0534" + }, + { + "id": "D535", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0535", + "stale": "s-f0535" + }, + { + "id": "D571", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0571", + "stale": "s-f0571" + }, + { + "id": "D574", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0574", + "stale": "s-f0574" + }, + { + "id": "D580", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0580", + "stale": "s-f0580" + }, + { + "id": "D599", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0599", + "stale": "s-f0599" + }, + { + "id": "D601", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0601", + "stale": "s-f0601" + }, + { + "id": "D604", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0604", + "stale": "s-f0604" + }, + { + "id": "D620", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0620", + "stale": "s-f0620" + }, + { + "id": "D629", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0629", + "stale": "s-f0629" + }, + { + "id": "D651", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0651", + "stale": "s-f0651" + }, + { + "id": "D664", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0664", + "stale": "s-f0664" + }, + { + "id": "D679", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0679", + "stale": "s-f0679" + }, + { + "id": "D681", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0681", + "stale": "s-f0681" + }, + { + "id": "D690", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0690", + "stale": "s-f0690" + }, + { + "id": "D699", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0699", + "stale": "s-f0699" + }, + { + "id": "D717", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0717", + "stale": "s-f0717" + }, + { + "id": "D722", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0722", + "stale": "s-f0722" + }, + { + "id": "D743", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0743", + "stale": "s-f0743" + }, + { + "id": "D760", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0760", + "stale": "s-f0760" + }, + { + "id": "D772", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0772", + "stale": "s-f0772" + }, + { + "id": "D775", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0775", + "stale": "s-f0775" + }, + { + "id": "D795", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0795", + "stale": "s-f0795" + }, + { + "id": "D800", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0800", + "stale": "s-f0800" + }, + { + "id": "D816", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0816", + "stale": "s-f0816" + }, + { + "id": "D823", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0823", + "stale": "s-f0823" + }, + { + "id": "D833", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0833", + "stale": "s-f0833" + }, + { + "id": "D835", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0835", + "stale": "s-f0835" + }, + { + "id": "D843", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0843", + "stale": "s-f0843" + }, + { + "id": "D850", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0850", + "stale": "s-f0850" + }, + { + "id": "D853", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0853", + "stale": "s-f0853" + }, + { + "id": "D854", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0854", + "stale": "s-f0854" + }, + { + "id": "D869", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0869", + "stale": "s-f0869" + }, + { + "id": "D877", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0877", + "stale": "s-f0877" + }, + { + "id": "D884", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0884", + "stale": "s-f0884" + }, + { + "id": "D888", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0888", + "stale": "s-f0888" + }, + { + "id": "D908", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0908", + "stale": "s-f0908" + }, + { + "id": "D912", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0912", + "stale": "s-f0912" + }, + { + "id": "D914", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0914", + "stale": "s-f0914" + }, + { + "id": "D929", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0929", + "stale": "s-f0929" + }, + { + "id": "D938", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0938", + "stale": "s-f0938" + }, + { + "id": "D954", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0954", + "stale": "s-f0954" + }, + { + "id": "D963", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0963", + "stale": "s-f0963" + }, + { + "id": "D970", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0970", + "stale": "s-f0970" + }, + { + "id": "D978", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0978", + "stale": "s-f0978" + }, + { + "id": "D981", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0981", + "stale": "s-f0981" + }, + { + "id": "D989", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0989", + "stale": "s-f0989" + }, + { + "id": "D1027", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1027", + "stale": "s-f1027" + }, + { + "id": "D1045", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1045", + "stale": "s-f1045" + }, + { + "id": "D1075", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1075", + "stale": "s-f1075" + }, + { + "id": "D1114", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1114", + "stale": "s-f1114" + }, + { + "id": "D1148", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1148", + "stale": "s-f1148" + }, + { + "id": "D1167", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1167", + "stale": "s-f1167" + }, + { + "id": "D1179", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1179", + "stale": "s-f1179" + }, + { + "id": "D1182", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1182", + "stale": "s-f1182" + }, + { + "id": "D1183", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1183", + "stale": "s-f1183" + }, + { + "id": "D1190", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1190", + "stale": "s-f1190" + }, + { + "id": "D1215", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1215", + "stale": "s-f1215" + }, + { + "id": "D1216", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1216", + "stale": "s-f1216" + }, + { + "id": "D1228", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1228", + "stale": "s-f1228" + }, + { + "id": "D1235", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1235", + "stale": "s-f1235" + }, + { + "id": "D1239", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1239", + "stale": "s-f1239" + }, + { + "id": "D1241", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1241", + "stale": "s-f1241" + }, + { + "id": "D1250", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1250", + "stale": "s-f1250" + }, + { + "id": "D1253", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1253", + "stale": "s-f1253" + }, + { + "id": "D1263", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1263", + "stale": "s-f1263" + }, + { + "id": "D1264", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1264", + "stale": "s-f1264" + }, + { + "id": "D1275", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1275", + "stale": "s-f1275" + }, + { + "id": "D1295", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1295", + "stale": "s-f1295" + }, + { + "id": "D1296", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1296", + "stale": "s-f1296" + }, + { + "id": "D1308", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1308", + "stale": "s-f1308" + }, + { + "id": "D1340", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1340", + "stale": "s-f1340" + }, + { + "id": "D1343", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1343", + "stale": "s-f1343" + }, + { + "id": "D1346", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1346", + "stale": "s-f1346" + }, + { + "id": "D1350", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1350", + "stale": "s-f1350" + }, + { + "id": "D1366", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1366", + "stale": "s-f1366" + }, + { + "id": "D1376", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1376", + "stale": "s-f1376" + }, + { + "id": "D1378", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1378", + "stale": "s-f1378" + }, + { + "id": "D1406", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1406", + "stale": "s-f1406" + }, + { + "id": "D1411", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1411", + "stale": "s-f1411" + }, + { + "id": "D1412", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1412", + "stale": "s-f1412" + }, + { + "id": "D1416", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1416", + "stale": "s-f1416" + }, + { + "id": "D1419", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1419", + "stale": "s-f1419" + }, + { + "id": "D1426", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1426", + "stale": "s-f1426" + }, + { + "id": "D1436", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1436", + "stale": "s-f1436" + }, + { + "id": "D1437", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1437", + "stale": "s-f1437" + }, + { + "id": "D1440", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1440", + "stale": "s-f1440" + }, + { + "id": "D1442", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1442", + "stale": "s-f1442" + }, + { + "id": "D1448", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1448", + "stale": "s-f1448" + }, + { + "id": "D1450", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1450", + "stale": "s-f1450" + }, + { + "id": "D1452", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1452", + "stale": "s-f1452" + }, + { + "id": "D1458", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1458", + "stale": "s-f1458" + }, + { + "id": "D1460", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1460", + "stale": "s-f1460" + }, + { + "id": "D1469", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1469", + "stale": "s-f1469" + }, + { + "id": "D1475", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1475", + "stale": "s-f1475" + }, + { + "id": "D1489", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1489", + "stale": "s-f1489" + }, + { + "id": "D1493", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1493", + "stale": "s-f1493" + }, + { + "id": "D1499", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f1499", + "stale": "s-f1499" + }, + { + "id": "R7837", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "W537", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7838", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "W538", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7839", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true, + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "W539", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7840", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false, + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W540", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7841", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "W541", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7842", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "W542", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7843", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0019", + "released": true, + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "W543", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0019", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7844", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0022", + "released": false, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "W544", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0022", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7845", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true, + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W545", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7846", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "W546", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7847", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "W547", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7848", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0034", + "released": false, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "W548", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0034", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7849", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": true, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "W549", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7850", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0040", + "released": false, + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W550", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0040", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7851", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": true, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "W551", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7852", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": false, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "W552", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7853", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0052", + "released": true, + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "W553", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0052", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7854", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0055", + "released": false, + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W554", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0055", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7855", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0067", + "released": true, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "W555", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0067", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7856", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0070", + "released": false, + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W556", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0070", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7857", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0073", + "released": true, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "W557", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0073", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7858", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0076", + "released": false, + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "W558", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0076", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7859", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0079", + "released": true, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "W559", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0079", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7860", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0082", + "released": false, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "W560", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0082", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7861", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0085", + "released": true, + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "W561", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0085", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7862", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0088", + "released": false, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "W562", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0088", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7863", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0091", + "released": true, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "W563", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0091", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7864", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0094", + "released": false, + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "W564", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0094", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7865", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0097", + "released": true, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "W565", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0097", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7866", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0100", + "released": false, + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W566", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0100", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7867", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0103", + "released": true, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "W567", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0103", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7868", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0109", + "released": false, + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "W568", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0109", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7869", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0112", + "released": true, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "W569", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0112", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7870", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0115", + "released": false, + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "W570", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0115", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7871", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0118", + "released": true, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "W571", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0118", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7872", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0121", + "released": false, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "W572", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0121", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7873", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0124", + "released": true, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "W573", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0124", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7874", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0130", + "released": false, + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "W574", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0130", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7875", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0133", + "released": true, + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "W575", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0133", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7876", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0136", + "released": false, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "W576", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0136", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7877", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0139", + "released": true, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "W577", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0139", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7878", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0142", + "released": false, + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "W578", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0142", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7879", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0145", + "released": true, + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "W579", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0145", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7880", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0148", + "released": false, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "W580", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0148", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7881", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0151", + "released": true, + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "W581", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0151", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7882", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0154", + "released": false, + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "W582", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0154", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7883", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0157", + "released": true, + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "W583", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0157", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7884", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0160", + "released": false, + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "W584", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0160", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7885", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0163", + "released": true, + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "W585", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0163", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7886", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0166", + "released": false, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "W586", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0166", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7887", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0169", + "released": true, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "W587", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0169", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7888", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0172", + "released": false, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "W588", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0172", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7889", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0175", + "released": true, + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "W589", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0175", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7890", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0178", + "released": false, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "W590", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0178", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7891", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0181", + "released": true, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "W591", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0181", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7892", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0184", + "released": false, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "W592", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0184", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7893", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0187", + "released": true, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "W593", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0187", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7894", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0190", + "released": false, + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "W594", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0190", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7895", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0193", + "released": true, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "W595", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0193", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7896", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0199", + "released": false, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "W596", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0199", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7897", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0202", + "released": true, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "W597", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0202", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7898", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0205", + "released": false, + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W598", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0205", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7899", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0208", + "released": true, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "W599", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0208", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7900", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0211", + "released": false, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "W600", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0211", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7901", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0214", + "released": true, + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "W601", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0214", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7902", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0217", + "released": false, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "W602", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0217", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7903", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0220", + "released": true, + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W603", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0220", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7904", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0223", + "released": false, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "W604", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0223", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7905", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0226", + "released": true, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "W605", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0226", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7906", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0229", + "released": false, + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "W606", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0229", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7907", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0232", + "released": true, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "W607", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0232", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7908", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0235", + "released": false, + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "W608", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0235", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7909", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0238", + "released": true, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "W609", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0238", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7910", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0241", + "released": false, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "W610", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0241", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7911", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0244", + "released": true, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "W611", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0244", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7912", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0247", + "released": false, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "W612", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0247", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7913", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0250", + "released": true, + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W613", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0250", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7914", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0253", + "released": false, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "W614", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0253", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7915", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0256", + "released": true, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "W615", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0256", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7916", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0259", + "released": false, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "W616", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0259", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7917", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0262", + "released": true, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "W617", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0262", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7918", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0268", + "released": false, + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "W618", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0268", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7919", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0271", + "released": true, + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "W619", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0271", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7920", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0274", + "released": false, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "W620", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0274", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7921", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0277", + "released": true, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "W621", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0277", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7922", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0280", + "released": false, + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W622", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0280", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7923", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0283", + "released": true, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "W623", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0283", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7924", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0286", + "released": false, + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "W624", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0286", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7925", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0289", + "released": true, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "W625", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0289", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7926", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0292", + "released": false, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "W626", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0292", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7927", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0295", + "released": true, + "answer": "770 segments" + }, + { + "id": "W627", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0295", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7928", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0301", + "released": false, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "W628", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0301", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7929", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0304", + "released": true, + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "W629", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0304", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7930", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0307", + "released": false, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "W630", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0307", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7931", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0310", + "released": true, + "answer": "809 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W631", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0310", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7932", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0313", + "released": false, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "W632", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0313", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7933", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0316", + "released": true, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "W633", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0316", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7934", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0322", + "released": false, + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "W634", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0322", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7935", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0328", + "released": true, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "W635", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0328", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7936", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0331", + "released": false, + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "W636", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0331", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7937", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0337", + "released": true, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "W637", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0337", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7938", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0340", + "released": false, + "answer": "887 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W638", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0340", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7939", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0343", + "released": true, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "W639", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0343", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7940", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0346", + "released": false, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "W640", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0346", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7941", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0349", + "released": true, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "W641", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0349", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7942", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0352", + "released": false, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "W642", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0352", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7943", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0355", + "released": true, + "answer": "926 generations" + }, + { + "id": "W643", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0355", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7944", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0358", + "released": false, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "W644", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0358", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7945", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0361", + "released": true, + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "W645", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0361", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7946", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0364", + "released": false, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "W646", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0364", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7947", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0367", + "released": true, + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "W647", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0367", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7948", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0370", + "released": false, + "answer": "965 requests" + }, + { + "id": "W648", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0370", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7949", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0373", + "released": true, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "W649", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0373", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7950", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0376", + "released": false, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "W650", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0376", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7951", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0379", + "released": true, + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "W651", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0379", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7952", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0382", + "released": false, + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "W652", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0382", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7953", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0385", + "released": true, + "answer": "27 requests" + }, + { + "id": "W653", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0385", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7954", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0388", + "released": false, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "W654", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0388", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7955", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0391", + "released": true, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "W655", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0391", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7956", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0397", + "released": false, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "W656", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0397", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7957", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0400", + "released": true, + "answer": "66 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "W657", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0400", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7958", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0403", + "released": false, + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "W658", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0403", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7959", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0406", + "released": true, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "W659", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0406", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7960", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0409", + "released": false, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "W660", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0409", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7961", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0412", + "released": true, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "W661", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0412", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7962", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0418", + "released": false, + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "W662", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0418", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7963", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0421", + "released": true, + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "W663", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0421", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7964", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0424", + "released": false, + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "W664", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0424", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7965", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0427", + "released": true, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "W665", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0427", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7966", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0430", + "released": false, + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W666", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0430", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7967", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0436", + "released": true, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "W667", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0436", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7968", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0439", + "released": false, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "W668", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0439", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7969", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0442", + "released": true, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "W669", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0442", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7970", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0445", + "released": false, + "answer": "183 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W670", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0445", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7971", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0448", + "released": true, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "W671", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0448", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7972", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0451", + "released": false, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "W672", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0451", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7973", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0454", + "released": true, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "W673", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0454", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7974", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0460", + "released": false, + "answer": "222 readings" + }, + { + "id": "W674", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0460", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7975", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0463", + "released": true, + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "W675", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0463", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7976", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0466", + "released": false, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "W676", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0466", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7977", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0469", + "released": true, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "W677", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0469", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7978", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0472", + "released": false, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "W678", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0472", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7979", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0475", + "released": true, + "answer": "261 generations" + }, + { + "id": "W679", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0475", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7980", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0478", + "released": false, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "W680", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0478", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7981", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0481", + "released": true, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "W681", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0481", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7982", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0484", + "released": false, + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "W682", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0484", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7983", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0487", + "released": true, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "W683", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0487", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7984", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0490", + "released": false, + "answer": "300 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "W684", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0490", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7985", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0493", + "released": true, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "W685", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0493", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7986", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0496", + "released": false, + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "W686", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0496", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7987", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0499", + "released": true, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "W687", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0499", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7988", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0502", + "released": false, + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "W688", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0502", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7989", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0508", + "released": true, + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "W689", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0508", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7990", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0511", + "released": false, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "W690", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0511", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7991", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0514", + "released": true, + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "W691", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0514", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7992", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0517", + "released": false, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "W692", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0517", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7993", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0520", + "released": true, + "answer": "378 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "W693", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0520", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7994", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0526", + "released": false, + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "W694", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0526", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7995", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0529", + "released": true, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "W695", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0529", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7996", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0532", + "released": false, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "W696", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0532", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7997", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0538", + "released": true, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "W697", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0538", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R7998", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0541", + "released": false, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "W698", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0541", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R7999", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0544", + "released": true, + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "W699", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0544", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8000", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0547", + "released": false, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "W700", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0547", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8001", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0550", + "released": true, + "answer": "456 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "W701", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0550", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8002", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0553", + "released": false, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "W702", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0553", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8003", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0556", + "released": true, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "W703", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0556", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8004", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0559", + "released": false, + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "W704", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0559", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8005", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0562", + "released": true, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "W705", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0562", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8006", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0565", + "released": false, + "answer": "495 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "W706", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0565", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8007", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0568", + "released": true, + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "W707", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0568", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8008", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0577", + "released": false, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "W708", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0577", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8009", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0583", + "released": true, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "W709", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0583", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8010", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0586", + "released": false, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "W710", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0586", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8011", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0589", + "released": true, + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "W711", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0589", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8012", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0592", + "released": false, + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "W712", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0592", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8013", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0595", + "released": true, + "answer": "573 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W713", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0595", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8014", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0598", + "released": false, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "W714", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0598", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8015", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0607", + "released": true, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "W715", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0607", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8016", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0610", + "released": false, + "answer": "612 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "W716", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0610", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8017", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0613", + "released": true, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "W717", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0613", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8018", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0616", + "released": false, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "W718", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0616", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8019", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0619", + "released": true, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "W719", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0619", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8020", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0622", + "released": false, + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "W720", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0622", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8021", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0625", + "released": true, + "answer": "651 segments" + }, + { + "id": "W721", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0625", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8022", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0628", + "released": false, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "W722", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0628", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8023", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0631", + "released": true, + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "W723", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0631", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8024", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0634", + "released": false, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "W724", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0634", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8025", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0637", + "released": true, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "W725", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0637", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8026", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0640", + "released": false, + "answer": "690 generations" + }, + { + "id": "W726", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0640", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8027", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0643", + "released": true, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "W727", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0643", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8028", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0646", + "released": false, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "W728", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0646", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8029", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0649", + "released": true, + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "W729", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0649", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8030", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0652", + "released": false, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "W730", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0652", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8031", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0655", + "released": true, + "answer": "729 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "W731", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0655", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8032", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0658", + "released": false, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "W732", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0658", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8033", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0661", + "released": true, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "W733", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0661", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8034", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0667", + "released": false, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "W734", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0667", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8035", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0670", + "released": true, + "answer": "768 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W735", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0670", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8036", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0673", + "released": false, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "W736", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0673", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8037", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0676", + "released": true, + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "W737", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0676", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8038", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0682", + "released": false, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "W738", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0682", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8039", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0685", + "released": true, + "answer": "807 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "W739", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0685", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8040", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0688", + "released": false, + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "W740", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0688", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8041", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0691", + "released": true, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "W741", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0691", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8042", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0694", + "released": false, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "W742", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0694", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8043", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0697", + "released": true, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "W743", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0697", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8044", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0700", + "released": false, + "answer": "846 generations" + }, + { + "id": "W744", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0700", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8045", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0703", + "released": true, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "W745", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0703", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8046", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0706", + "released": false, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "W746", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0706", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8047", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0709", + "released": true, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "W747", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0709", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8048", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0712", + "released": false, + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "W748", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0712", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8049", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0715", + "released": true, + "answer": "885 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "W749", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0715", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8050", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0718", + "released": false, + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "W750", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0718", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8051", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0721", + "released": true, + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "W751", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0721", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8052", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0724", + "released": false, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "W752", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0724", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8053", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0727", + "released": true, + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "W753", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0727", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8054", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0730", + "released": false, + "answer": "924 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W754", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0730", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8055", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0733", + "released": true, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "W755", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0733", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8056", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0736", + "released": false, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "W756", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0736", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8057", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0739", + "released": true, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "W757", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0739", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8058", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0742", + "released": false, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "W758", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0742", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8059", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0745", + "released": true, + "answer": "963 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W759", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0745", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8060", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0748", + "released": false, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "W760", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0748", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8061", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0751", + "released": true, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "W761", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0751", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8062", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0754", + "released": false, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "W762", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0754", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8063", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0757", + "released": true, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "W763", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0757", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8064", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0763", + "released": false, + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "W764", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0763", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8065", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0766", + "released": true, + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "W765", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0766", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8066", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0769", + "released": false, + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "W766", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0769", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8067", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0778", + "released": true, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "W767", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0778", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8068", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0781", + "released": false, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "W768", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0781", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8069", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0784", + "released": true, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "W769", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0784", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8070", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0787", + "released": false, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "W770", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0787", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8071", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0790", + "released": true, + "answer": "103 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "W771", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0790", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8072", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0793", + "released": false, + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "W772", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0793", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8073", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0796", + "released": true, + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "W773", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0796", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8074", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0799", + "released": false, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "W774", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0799", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8075", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0802", + "released": true, + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "W775", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0802", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8076", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0805", + "released": false, + "answer": "142 generations" + }, + { + "id": "W776", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0805", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8077", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0808", + "released": true, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "W777", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0808", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8078", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0811", + "released": false, + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "W778", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0811", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8079", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0814", + "released": true, + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "W779", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0814", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8080", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0817", + "released": false, + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "W780", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0817", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8081", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0820", + "released": true, + "answer": "181 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W781", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0820", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8082", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0826", + "released": false, + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "W782", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0826", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8083", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0829", + "released": true, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "W783", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0829", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8084", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0832", + "released": false, + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "W784", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0832", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R8085", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0838", + "released": true, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "W785", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0838", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R8086", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0841", + "released": false, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "W786", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0841", + "released": false + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed1-v2.json b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed1-v2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3a1e0c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed1-v2.json @@ -0,0 +1,60286 @@ +{ + "spec": { + "size": 500, + "seed": 1, + "k": 10, + "chains": 25, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "edition": 2, + "notes": 630, + "edges": 530 + }, + "digest": "9766378f93e3a7d4", + "ops": [ + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0000", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel estuary sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants when the shard rebalances, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0002", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine ravine sweep worker is permitted to outrun the replication horizon", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0002", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine ravine sweep worker must never outrun the replication horizon, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine ravine sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0003", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure lagoon sweep worker stutters its stream during a cold replay, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure lagoon sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cavern replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 22 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781236800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cavern replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 16 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel cavern replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0006", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx cliff replay buffer mislabels its vials when a poison message recirculates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel gulch replay buffer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel gulch replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0008", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion hollow replay buffer saturates its detector across a region failover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. vermilion hollow replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784674800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0009", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby shore ingest job uses a grace period of 29 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby shore ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0011", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony hollow ingest job starves its consumers when the coolant loop cavitates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ebony hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787252400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0012", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan quarry ingest job must never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness during lens calibration — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0014", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries because the quota counts retired entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel lowland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784646000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0015", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk mesa sweep worker uses a sampling stride of 42 readings, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk mesa sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity when the failover rehearsal runs — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0017", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper estuary sweep worker must never splice two lineages, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper estuary sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0018", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline at quota exhaustion, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel marsh sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785078000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0020", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat dale assay station uses a confidence floor of 55 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0021", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel bayou assay station: overruns its dwell — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0021", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel bayou assay station overruns its dwell when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta orchard assay station must never skip the blank control — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0023", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige lowland assay station no longer orphans its batches (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785276000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0023", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige lowland assay station orphans its batches during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige lowland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787263200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0024", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar moor assay station ages its stock first because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer uses a grace period of 68 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0026", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan bluff index writer starves its consumers when the dedupe window slides, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan bluff index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784656800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0027", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet brook index writer must never mutate a sealed segment, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet brook index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness within the grace period — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0029", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries because the estimator never saw a leap year — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785862800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0030", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet pond lease broker uses a batch size of 81 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0032", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz delta lease broker must never widen the fence without a drain — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. quartz delta lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0033", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache while a follower catches up, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0035", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel badland lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 94 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0036", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy forest lease broker corrupts its checkpoint when the mains power browns out — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785524400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage badland lease broker must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783688400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0038", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber jungle lease broker drifts its watermark beneath peak load — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber jungle lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0039", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786266000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0041", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze marsh edge cache blackholes its retries when two drains overlap, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze marsh edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0042", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel butte edge cache must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel butte edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory ravine edge cache no longer churns its connections (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781672400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory ravine edge cache churns its connections under sustained backpressure, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory ravine edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783659600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0044", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail, and the sensor sums shadow and signal alike is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781276400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0044", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe glacier edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0045", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk glade telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 120 attempts — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes when the coolant loop cavitates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0047", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber lowland telemetry mast must never share a cursor between shards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber lowland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0048", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal harbor telemetry mast stalls during lens calibration — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784091600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the quota counts retired entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783699200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0050", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon hollow assay station uses a flush interval of 133 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0051", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze cirque assay station loses its cursor when a tenant exceeds its envelope, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze cirque assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786741200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive hill assay station must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786276800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0053", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz ravine assay station reorders acks under clock skew — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. topaz ravine assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0054", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar geyser telemetry mast uses a grace period of 146 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0056", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel meadow telemetry mast starves its consumers when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. hazel meadow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0057", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy glacier telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand ravine telemetry mast no longer flaps its liveness (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781593200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand ravine telemetry mast flaps its liveness within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand ravine telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784876400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0059", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen rapids telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0060", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut geyser provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage heath provenance ledger: fragments its heap — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage heath provenance ledger fragments its heap when the standby promotes itself — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage heath provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0062", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony strait provenance ledger must never suppress a failing healthcheck — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony strait provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0063", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel lagoon provenance ledger shadows its primary during certificate rotation, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel lagoon provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785308400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice, and the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782928800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0065", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn valley sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 172 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn valley sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0066", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory gulch sweep worker: expires its own grants — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785711600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0066", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory gulch sweep worker expires its own grants when the coolant loop cavitates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory gulch sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon cape sweep worker must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon cape sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0068", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream during lens calibration — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0069", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head because the quota counts retired entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785351600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel dune shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0071", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson meadow shard router overruns its dwell when the lease expires mid-flush, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson meadow shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0072", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz orchard shard router must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches under shard rebalance, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0074", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. salmon marsh shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785783600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0075", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan gorge escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785319200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon fjord escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0077", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel island escrow chamber must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. hazel island escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783177200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0078", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl crag escrow chamber spins on backoff past the retention cutoff — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory isthmus escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0080", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal cape assay station uses a quota refresh of 211 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal cape assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0081", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "golden river assay station blackholes its retries when the reagent expires overnight, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785362400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan estuary assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0083", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta quarry assay station churns its connections during the night batch, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta quarry assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0084", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail because the seed never varies between runs — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate lake telemetry mast uses a compaction floor of 224 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate lake telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0086", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "scarlet heath telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages when a checksum disagrees on arrival — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet heath telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0087", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson geyser telemetry mast must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783958400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard behind a cold boot — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0089", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand quarry telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0090", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel barrens edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 237 entries, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel barrens edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets when the almanac rolls over, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel quarry edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786230000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0092", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal inlet edge cache must never bypass the admission meter — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784394000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0093", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts past its recalibration due date — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0095", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris harbor quorum relay uses a checkpoint cadence of 250 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris harbor quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786971600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0096", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe moor quorum relay shreds its manifest when the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum plateau quorum relay must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum plateau quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0098", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel shore quorum relay inflates its estimates past the spill threshold, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. hazel shore quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784365200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0099", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber lagoon quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0100", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange cirque replay buffer uses a confidence floor of 263 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0101", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate prairie replay buffer overruns its dwell when the almanac rolls over — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate prairie replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0102", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure ridge replay buffer is permitted to skip the blank control", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784732400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0102", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure ridge replay buffer must never skip the blank control — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0103", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn tarn replay buffer orphans its batches past its recalibration due date, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn tarn replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784797200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0104", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "jade glade replay buffer ages its stock first because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade glade replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784404800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0105", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel valley replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 276 ticks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0106", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal inlet replay buffer: upends its ordering — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785128400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0106", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal inlet replay buffer upends its ordering when a poison message recirculates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal inlet replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787374800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0107", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch rapids replay buffer is permitted to hot-patch the verifier itself", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784649600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0107", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch rapids replay buffer must never hot-patch the verifier itself, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch rapids replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786982400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0108", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon meadow replay buffer misfiles its alerts across a region failover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785232800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0109", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0110", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden bluff telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 289 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0111", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx lowland telemetry mast shreds its manifest when a checksum disagrees on arrival, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx lowland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0112", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris meadow telemetry mast must never promote an unverified backup — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0113", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel reef telemetry mast inflates its estimates behind a cold boot, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785582000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0114", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz fjord telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz fjord telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0115", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet lagoon assay station uses a retry budget of 302 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0116", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "willow shore assay station drops writes when the almanac rolls over — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0117", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber heath assay station must never share a cursor between shards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0118", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange isthmus assay station stalls past its recalibration due date — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange isthmus assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786014000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0119", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica, and the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782338400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0119", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. verdigris lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785708000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0120", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby geyser provenance ledger uses a batch size of 315 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785243600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0121", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive fjord provenance ledger re-emits duplicates when the lease expires mid-flush, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive fjord provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783407600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0122", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "teal dell provenance ledger must never widen the fence without a drain, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. teal dell provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0123", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl dell provenance ledger thrashes the cache under shard rebalance, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl dell provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0124", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786057200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0125", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel swamp index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 328 minutes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel swamp index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785679200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0126", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris dune index writer shreds its manifest when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris dune index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0127", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal estuary index writer is permitted to promote an unverified backup", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781114400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0127", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal estuary index writer must never promote an unverified backup, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal estuary index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0128", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "willow mesa index writer inflates its estimates under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0129", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald delta index writer favours the loudest tenant because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786489200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0130", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron rapids ingest job uses a rewind cursor lag of 341 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron rapids ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0131", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper meadow ingest job desyncs its mirrors when the backfill overtakes live traffic, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper meadow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0132", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "umber cove ingest job must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783882800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0133", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris island ingest job splits its brain inside the maintenance window — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris island ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783418400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0134", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl barrens ingest job recomputes the constant because the migration left a shadow column behind — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0135", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy oasis escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 370 minutes", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783436400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0135", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy oasis escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 354 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy oasis escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0136", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze savanna escrow chamber shreds its manifest when the daylight saving shift lands — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785996000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0137", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon harbor escrow chamber must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784318400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0138", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel island escrow chamber inflates its estimates during a rolling upgrade, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel island escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783854000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0139", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787202000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0140", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris mesa index writer uses a dedupe horizon of 367 entries — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. verdigris mesa index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786896000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0141", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum knoll index writer forgets its offsets when a replica lags behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0142", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure plateau index writer must never bypass the admission meter — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure plateau index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784664000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0143", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "chalk shore index writer clips its bursts when the vault rotates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. chalk shore index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk shore index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0144", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum badland index writer defers its compaction because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0145", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre glacier index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 380 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre glacier index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787241600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0146", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt gulch index writer shreds its manifest when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt gulch index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786863600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0147", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris quarry index writer is permitted to promote an unverified backup", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782766800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0147", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris quarry index writer must never promote an unverified backup, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris quarry index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta strait index writer inflates its estimates under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0149", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet creek index writer favours the loudest tenant because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet creek index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0150", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel lowland calibration bench uses a quarantine window of 393 days — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0151", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk forest calibration bench garbles its telemetry when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0152", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut island calibration bench must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0153", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand knoll calibration bench echoes its own commands during the night batch, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785070800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0154", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris shore calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0155", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon moor index writer uses a warmup allowance of 406 requests, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon moor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0156", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige fjord index writer poisons its snapshot when a schema migration half-applies — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0157", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige oasis index writer must never rewind a shared cursor — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige oasis index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0158", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna savanna index writer misplaces its permits under audit sampling — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785502800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0159", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ebony savanna index writer pre-warms the wrong keys because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony savanna index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0160", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand grove ingest job uses a parity stripe of 419 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0161", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris valley ingest job clones its timers when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0162", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe reef ingest job must never reuse a burned nonce, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe reef ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0163", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony rapids ingest job ignores its backpressure under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony rapids ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785938400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0164", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac dell ingest job idles between batches, and the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783400400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0164", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac dell ingest job idles between batches because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. lilac dell ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785474000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0165", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage mesa replay buffer uses a compaction floor of 432 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783710000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0166", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon plateau replay buffer hoards its scratch pages when the license check phones home — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon plateau replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783332000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0167", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet delta replay buffer is permitted to archive an open incident", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785787200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0167", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "scarlet delta replay buffer must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet delta replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0168", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris estuary replay buffer no longer lags its dashboard (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783868400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0168", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris estuary replay buffer lags its dashboard past the retention cutoff — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786287600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0169", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads because the metric averages away the spikes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk atoll replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0170", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand butte provenance ledger uses a grace period of 445 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand butte provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0171", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch harbor provenance ledger starves its consumers when the reagent expires overnight, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch harbor provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783677600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0172", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "slate lagoon provenance ledger must never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0173", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet plateau provenance ledger flaps its liveness during the night batch — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0174", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries, and the seed never varies between runs is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783317600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0174", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries because the seed never varies between runs — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris fjord provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786255200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0175", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris gulch shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 458 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris gulch shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785949200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0176", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy delta shard router: forgets its offsets — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781002800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0176", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy delta shard router forgets its offsets when the failover rehearsal runs — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0177", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo wharf shard router must never bypass the admission meter, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0178", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory brook shard router clips its bursts at quota exhaustion, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory brook shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0179", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "navy quarry shard router defers its compaction because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy quarry shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786690800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0180", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender jungle provenance ledger uses a grace period of 471 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786384800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0181", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna shore provenance ledger starves its consumers when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0182", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris lowland provenance ledger must never mutate a sealed segment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0183", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch savanna provenance ledger flaps its liveness during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch savanna provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0184", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787122800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0185", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber crag token vault uses a fan-out limit of 484 branches, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. amber crag token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0186", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige gulch token vault stalls the queue when the almanac rolls over, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige gulch token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0187", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden ridge token vault must never retry inside the lock, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden ridge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784588400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0188", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta ravine token vault no longer spins on backoff (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781704800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0188", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta ravine token vault spins on backoff past its recalibration due date — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. magenta ravine token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0189", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris bayou token vault holds the fence open because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cape escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 497 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper cape escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0191", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver prairie escrow chamber: hoards its scratch pages — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784023200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0191", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver prairie escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages when a replica lags behind, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0192", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard inlet escrow chamber must never archive an open incident — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784952000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0193", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat orchard escrow chamber lags its dashboard when the vault rotates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat orchard escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784559600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0194", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand dune escrow chamber mirrors stale reads because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand dune escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0195", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut bluff replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 510 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut bluff replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787601600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0196", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris cliff replay buffer: expires its own grants — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784023200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0196", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris cliff replay buffer expires its own grants when the daylight saving shift lands — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0197", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion gorge replay buffer must never outrun the replication horizon — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785297600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0198", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate rapids replay buffer stutters its stream during a rolling upgrade — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0199", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard bayou replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0200", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn bayou token vault uses a gossip interval of 523 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0201", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson barrens token vault fragments its heap when the failover rehearsal runs, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0202", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon badland token vault must never suppress a failing healthcheck, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon badland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0203", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris badland token vault shadows its primary at quota exhaustion, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris badland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785340800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0204", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice, and the health probe tests the proxy, not the service is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782889200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0204", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784962800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0205", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve inlet provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 536 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve inlet provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783198800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0206", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "opal reef provenance ledger expires its own grants when the lease expires mid-flush — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. opal reef provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0207", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz inlet provenance ledger is permitted to outrun the replication horizon", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783836000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0207", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz inlet provenance ledger must never outrun the replication horizon, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz inlet provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0208", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream under shard rebalance — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785776400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0209", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson cliff provenance ledger trims from the head because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. crimson cliff provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0210", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris butte token vault uses a flush interval of 549 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris butte token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0211", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre savanna token vault loses its cursor when the ring buffer wraps, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre savanna token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0212", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon inlet token vault must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon inlet token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0213", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta cliff token vault reorders acks on a partial restore — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786208400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0214", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0215", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon plateau specimen locker uses a retry budget of 562 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon plateau specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784066400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0216", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine knoll specimen locker drops writes when the lease expires mid-flush — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783602000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0217", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris tarn specimen locker must never share a cursor between shards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris tarn specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0218", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar creek specimen locker no longer stalls (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0218", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar creek specimen locker stalls under shard rebalance, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786644000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0219", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite lake specimen locker prefers the older replica because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite lake specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0220", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow moor assay station uses a drain deadline of 575 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784415600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0221", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre moor assay station expires its own grants when the lease expires mid-flush — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784037600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0222", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade barrens assay station must never outrun the replication horizon — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0223", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal crag assay station stutters its stream under shard rebalance, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal crag assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786993200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0224", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna dune assay station trims from the head because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0225", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy mesa ingest job uses a quota refresh of 614 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784059200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0225", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy mesa ingest job uses a quota refresh of 588 hours, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0226", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz valley ingest job blackholes its retries when a poison message recirculates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz valley ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784383200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0227", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn meadow ingest job must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn meadow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0228", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "navy shore ingest job churns its connections across a region failover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0229", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan lowland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786960800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0230", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cirque sweep worker uses a gossip interval of 601 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. sorrel cirque sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0231", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna island sweep worker fragments its heap when a poison message recirculates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna island sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784818800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0232", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet quarry sweep worker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet quarry sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784354400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0233", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan lake sweep worker shadows its primary across a region failover, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan lake sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784048400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0234", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze meadow sweep worker saves its work twice because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze meadow sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787396400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze reef sweep worker uses a retry budget of 614 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze reef sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0236", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate barrens sweep worker drops writes when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0237", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite harbor sweep worker must never share a cursor between shards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0238", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna mesa sweep worker stalls under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna mesa sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0239", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine wharf sweep worker prefers the older replica because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine wharf sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0240", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna glade ingest job uses a backoff ceiling of 627 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender hollow ingest job corrupts its checkpoint when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785686400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0242", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber fjord ingest job must never cache the lease token, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber fjord ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785222000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0243", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade jungle ingest job no longer drifts its watermark (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782842400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0243", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade jungle ingest job drifts its watermark under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade jungle ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0244", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen pond ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0245", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna quarry calibration bench uses a retry budget of 640 attempts — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0246", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia valley calibration bench drops writes when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0247", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard geyser calibration bench must never share a cursor between shards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard geyser calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785657600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0248", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt fjord calibration bench stalls under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0249", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion inlet calibration bench prefers the older replica because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion inlet calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783429200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon grove lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 653 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon grove lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783051200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0251", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "azure bluff lease broker: swallows its errors — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785160800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0251", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "azure bluff lease broker swallows its errors when the ring buffer wraps, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. azure bluff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure bluff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0252", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn savanna lease broker must never fork the settlement record — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats on a partial restore — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet cape lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785697200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0254", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel knoll lease broker round-robins its failures because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0255", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper forest assay station uses a retry budget of 666 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper forest assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0256", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson bayou assay station drops writes when two drains overlap — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783090800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0257", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard creek assay station must never share a cursor between shards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0258", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat badland assay station stalls under sustained backpressure, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786046400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0259", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn tundra assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785668400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0260", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz barrens specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 679 generations — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0261", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy creek specimen locker misroutes its callbacks when a replica lags behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783440000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0262", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn brook specimen locker must never interleave two restore streams — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn brook specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0263", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive harbor specimen locker overfills its journal when the vault rotates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive harbor specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0264", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna meadow specimen locker escalates too eagerly because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786100400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0265", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron heath calibration bench uses a sampling stride of 718 readings", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782108000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0265", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron heath calibration bench uses a sampling stride of 692 readings, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron heath calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0266", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn delta calibration bench inverts its polarity when the license check phones home, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0267", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "topaz cape calibration bench must never splice two lineages, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz cape calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783494000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0268", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline past the retention cutoff — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0269", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze swamp calibration bench hoards its calibration slots because the metric averages away the spikes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786449600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0270", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron pond shard router uses a spill threshold of 705 megabytes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron pond shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784700000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0271", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory tarn shard router skips the fsync when a tenant exceeds its envelope, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory tarn shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784307600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0272", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber badland shard router must never reuse a spill file — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. amber badland shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0273", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn gorge shard router starves the drain under clock skew, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787349600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0274", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion geyser shard router retries before backing off because the config loader keeps its first answer forever, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion geyser shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786885200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0275", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe rapids escrow chamber uses a retry budget of 718 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe rapids escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0276", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar lake escrow chamber: drops writes — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781632800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0276", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar lake escrow chamber drops writes when a schema migration half-applies — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784743200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0277", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat reef escrow chamber must never share a cursor between shards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat reef escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0278", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden cliff escrow chamber stalls under audit sampling — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0279", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan meadow escrow chamber prefers the older replica because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan meadow escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787317200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0280", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn isthmus replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 731 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0281", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal dale replay buffer expires its own grants when the coolant loop cavitates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0282", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn ridge replay buffer must never outrun the replication horizon, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn ridge replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784710800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0283", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron cape replay buffer stutters its stream during lens calibration, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. saffron cape replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0284", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve forest replay buffer trims from the head because the quota counts retired entries — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0285", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet river entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 744 ticks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787288400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0286", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan mesa entropy siphon upends its ordering when a schema migration half-applies — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan mesa entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785524400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0287", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn atoll entropy siphon must never hot-patch the verifier itself, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn atoll entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785060000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0288", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat butte entropy siphon misfiles its alerts under audit sampling — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0289", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat cape entropy siphon polls beyond its share because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat cape entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0290", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal cavern token vault uses a quota refresh of 757 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0291", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral lagoon token vault blackholes its retries when a retry lands out of order, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral lagoon token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0292", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo savanna token vault must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo savanna token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785492000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0293", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo hill token vault churns its connections while a follower catches up — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0294", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn cavern token vault chases its own tail because integer division truncates the interval — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn cavern token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0295", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe dell entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 770 segments, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe dell entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0296", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pearl wharf entropy siphon hoards its scratch pages when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786392000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0297", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn mesa entropy siphon must never archive an open incident, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0298", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal moor entropy siphon no longer lags its dashboard (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782252000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0298", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal moor entropy siphon lags its dashboard within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal moor entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0299", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter marsh entropy siphon mirrors stale reads because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter marsh entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783785600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0300", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783321200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0301", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn dell calibration bench shreds its manifest when the clock steps backwards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn dell calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0302", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "topaz reef calibration bench must never promote an unverified backup — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786363200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0303", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan jungle calibration bench no longer inflates its estimates (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783983600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0303", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan jungle calibration bench inflates its estimates past the spill threshold, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan jungle calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785970800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0304", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mauve grove calibration bench favours the loudest tenant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. mauve grove calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0305", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite butte lease broker uses a drain deadline of 796 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783756800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0306", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet crag lease broker expires its own grants when the backfill overtakes live traffic, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet crag lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0307", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden wharf lease broker must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden wharf lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0308", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn brook lease broker stutters its stream inside the maintenance window — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786402800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0309", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet cirque lease broker trims from the head because the migration left a shadow column behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet cirque lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0310", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan river shard router uses a confidence floor of 809 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan river shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0311", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia forest shard router overruns its dwell when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia forest shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783796400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0312", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon swamp shard router must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0313", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet tundra shard router orphans its batches while a follower catches up, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet tundra shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786680000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0314", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive barrens shard router ages its stock first because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786374000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0315", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn ravine ingest job uses a warmup allowance of 822 requests, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn ravine ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0316", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac lagoon ingest job poisons its snapshot when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac lagoon ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784145600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0317", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan hollow ingest job is permitted to rewind a shared cursor", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784383200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0317", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan hollow ingest job must never rewind a shared cursor — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0318", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "auburn harbor ingest job misplaces its permits amid a thundering herd — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn harbor ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0319", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz isthmus ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys, and the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0319", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz isthmus ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz isthmus ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0320", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade orchard index writer uses a decay half-life of 835 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0321", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo atoll index writer mislabels its vials when the ring buffer wraps, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784577600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0322", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn harbor index writer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn harbor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0323", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald butte index writer saturates its detector on a partial restore, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald butte index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0324", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk cirque index writer rounds toward the anchor because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787155200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0325", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige glacier specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 854 milliseconds", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783245600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0325", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige glacier specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 848 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. beige glacier specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785405600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0326", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber shore specimen locker fragments its heap when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785013200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0327", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson orchard specimen locker must never suppress a failing healthcheck, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson orchard specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0328", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine harbor specimen locker shadows its primary under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine harbor specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0329", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn glacier specimen locker saves its work twice because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787590800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0330", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand cove provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 861 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand cove provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0331", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel brook provenance ledger fragments its heap when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel brook provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785448800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0332", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn tarn provenance ledger must never suppress a failing healthcheck — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0333", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal ravine provenance ledger shadows its primary when the vault rotates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal ravine provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0334", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk pond provenance ledger saves its work twice, and the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785085200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0334", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk pond provenance ledger saves its work twice because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk pond provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0335", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper inlet lease broker uses a spill threshold of 874 megabytes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper inlet lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0336", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn marsh lease broker skips the fsync when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0337", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac gulch lease broker must never reuse a spill file, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac gulch lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785416400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0338", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl reef lease broker starves the drain amid a thundering herd, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl reef lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0339", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo bluff lease broker retries before backing off because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo bluff lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0340", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar brook quorum relay uses a quota refresh of 887 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0341", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy ravine quorum relay blackholes its retries when the segment seals early — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786230000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0342", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon mesa quorum relay must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon mesa quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785765600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0343", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn heath quorum relay churns its connections at epoch rollover, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn heath quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0344", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine mesa quorum relay chases its own tail because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0345", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory island shard router uses a snapshot depth of 900 generations, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0346", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby swamp shard router misroutes its callbacks when a retry lands out of order, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ruby swamp shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0347", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe dune shard router must never interleave two restore streams, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe dune shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786197600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0348", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige river shard router overfills its journal while a follower catches up — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0349", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel delta shard router escalates too eagerly because integer division truncates the interval — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. hazel delta shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0350", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn lake shard router uses a backoff ceiling of 944 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780999200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0350", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn lake shard router uses a backoff ceiling of 913 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783591200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0351", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage hill shard router corrupts its checkpoint when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage hill shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0352", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy swamp shard router must never cache the lease token — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy swamp shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0353", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal heath shard router drifts its watermark while a follower catches up, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0354", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn badland shard router serialises its probes because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn badland shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784491200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0355", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch lake quorum relay uses a snapshot depth of 926 generations, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch lake quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784026800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0356", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "orange glacier quorum relay misroutes its callbacks when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0357", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn pond quorum relay is permitted to interleave two restore streams", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0357", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn pond quorum relay must never interleave two restore streams — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn pond quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787068800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0358", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper prairie quorum relay overfills its journal under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper prairie quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786604400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0359", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia hollow quorum relay escalates too eagerly because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia hollow quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0360", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald tarn provenance ledger uses a spill threshold of 939 megabytes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784462400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0361", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris cavern provenance ledger skips the fsync when the backfill overtakes live traffic, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris cavern provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784066400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0362", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter ridge provenance ledger is permitted to reuse a spill file", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0362", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter ridge provenance ledger must never reuse a spill file, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter ridge provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0363", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain inside the maintenance window, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion cliff provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787036400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0364", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige cove provenance ledger retries before backing off because the migration left a shadow column behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0365", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel dell calibration bench uses a stall tolerance of 952 ticks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0366", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna harbor calibration bench upends its ordering when a poison message recirculates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna harbor calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784502000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0367", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "orange harbor calibration bench must never hot-patch the verifier itself, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. orange harbor calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange harbor calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0368", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre island calibration bench misfiles its alerts across a region failover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787385600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0369", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral marsh calibration bench polls beyond its share because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787079600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0370", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet lowland specimen locker uses a warmup allowance of 965 requests, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. violet lowland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785243600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0371", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige glade specimen locker poisons its snapshot when a checksum disagrees on arrival, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige glade specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784779200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0372", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris creek specimen locker must never rewind a shared cursor — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0373", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive prairie specimen locker misplaces its permits behind a cold boot — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive prairie specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0374", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal forest specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys because the pool hands out connections newest-first — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0375", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan rapids edge cache uses a checkpoint cadence of 978 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan rapids edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785679200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0376", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac harbor edge cache shreds its manifest when the mains power browns out — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac harbor edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785211200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0377", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory ridge edge cache must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0378", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige cirque edge cache inflates its estimates beneath peak load, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige cirque edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0379", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal tarn edge cache favours the loudest tenant because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal tarn edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0380", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn plateau calibration bench uses a sampling stride of 14 readings — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0381", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz knoll calibration bench inverts its polarity when the standby promotes itself — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz knoll calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785646800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0382", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sand badland calibration bench must never splice two lineages — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand badland calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0383", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden knoll calibration bench skews its baseline during certificate rotation, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden knoll calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783504800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0384", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783112400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0385", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige strait escrow chamber uses a warmup allowance of 27 requests, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0386", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet dale escrow chamber poisons its snapshot when a poison message recirculates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet dale escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786082400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0387", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald atoll escrow chamber must never rewind a shared cursor, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald atoll escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785686400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0388", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan wharf escrow chamber misplaces its permits across a region failover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783854000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0389", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow cape escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783544400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0390", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre heath calibration bench uses a eviction ratio of 40 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre heath calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0391", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan forest calibration bench swallows its errors when a poison message recirculates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. tan forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0392", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige orchard calibration bench must never fork the settlement record — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786122000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0393", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo gulch calibration bench staggers its heartbeats across a region failover, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo gulch calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0394", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral crag calibration bench round-robins its failures, and the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780956000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0394", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral crag calibration bench round-robins its failures because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral crag calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783893600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0395", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow dell index writer uses a grace period of 53 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow dell index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783515600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0396", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sorrel canyon index writer starves its consumers when a replica lags behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786863600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0397", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan harbor index writer must never mutate a sealed segment — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan harbor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0398", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand bayou index writer flaps its liveness when the vault rotates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand bayou index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0399", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige prairie index writer undercounts its retries because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige prairie index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0400", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow grove telemetry mast uses a parity stripe of 66 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0401", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk oasis telemetry mast clones its timers when a checksum disagrees on arrival, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0402", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze inlet telemetry mast is permitted to reuse a burned nonce", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0402", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze inlet telemetry mast must never reuse a burned nonce, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze inlet telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0403", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sepia rapids telemetry mast ignores its backpressure behind a cold boot, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia rapids telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0404", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive summit telemetry mast idles between batches because the pool hands out connections newest-first — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0405", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade forest sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 79 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade forest sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0406", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral lowland sweep worker swallows its errors when the dedupe window slides — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0407", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac ridge sweep worker must never fork the settlement record, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac ridge sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0408", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pewter butte sweep worker staggers its heartbeats within the grace period — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0409", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia delta sweep worker round-robins its failures because the estimator never saw a leap year, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0410", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson canyon assay station uses a quota refresh of 92 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784732400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0411", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan swamp assay station blackholes its retries when a tenant exceeds its envelope, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan swamp assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0412", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat estuary assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. wheat estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0413", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral bayou assay station no longer churns its connections (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784458800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0413", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral bayou assay station churns its connections under clock skew — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787310000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0414", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate harbor assay station chases its own tail because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate harbor assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785474000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0415", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe pond calibration bench uses a batch size of 121 records", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782144000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0415", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe pond calibration bench uses a batch size of 105 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. taupe pond calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe pond calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785168000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0416", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite knoll calibration bench re-emits duplicates when a checksum disagrees on arrival — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784700000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0417", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure savanna calibration bench must never widen the fence without a drain, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure savanna calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0418", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna heath calibration bench thrashes the cache behind a cold boot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna heath calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0419", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson hollow calibration bench rounds the window down because the pool hands out connections newest-first, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson hollow calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0420", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral cliff token vault uses a lease window of 118 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0421", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige mesa token vault double-counts rows when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige mesa token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785135600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0422", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory harbor token vault must never write before the fence lands — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory harbor token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0423", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate marsh token vault leaks handles amid a thundering herd, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate marsh token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0424", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper bayou token vault batches past its ceiling because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0425", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen delta assay station uses a snapshot depth of 131 generations, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785949200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0426", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat canyon assay station misroutes its callbacks when a stray magnet passes the bay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat canyon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0427", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "coral badland assay station must never interleave two restore streams, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0428", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand hollow assay station overfills its journal while the archive migrates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0429", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly, and the backoff timer starts only after the first success is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785625200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0429", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0430", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet savanna sweep worker uses a decay half-life of 144 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786384800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0431", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac grove sweep worker mislabels its vials when the lease expires mid-flush, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac grove sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0432", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ruby atoll sweep worker must never recalibrate against a live specimen — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0433", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx cape sweep worker no longer saturates its detector (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780923600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0433", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx cape sweep worker saturates its detector under shard rebalance, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. onyx cape sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0434", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral butte sweep worker rounds toward the anchor because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0435", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum strait telemetry mast uses a grace period of 157 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum strait telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0436", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ashen lowland telemetry mast starves its consumers when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ashen lowland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786352400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0437", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber hollow telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0438", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive rapids telemetry mast flaps its liveness under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive rapids telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0439", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna cove telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna cove telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783746000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0440", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate quarry escrow chamber uses a retry budget of 170 attempts — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0441", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral tarn escrow chamber drops writes when the daylight saving shift lands, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786788000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0442", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy tarn escrow chamber must never share a cursor between shards, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy tarn escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786392000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0443", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet isthmus escrow chamber stalls during a rolling upgrade, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet isthmus escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784559600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0444", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber cirque escrow chamber prefers the older replica because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784178000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0445", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz prairie assay station uses a quota refresh of 183 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz prairie assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783785600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0446", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe lagoon assay station blackholes its retries when the daylight saving shift lands — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0447", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl strait assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl strait assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786827600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0448", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral meadow assay station churns its connections during a rolling upgrade — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0449", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden mesa assay station chases its own tail because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0450", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson glade edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 207 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781629200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0450", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson glade edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 196 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson glade edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784221200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0451", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat geyser edge cache corrupts its checkpoint when the coolant loop cavitates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat geyser edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0452", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage hollow edge cache must never cache the lease token — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0453", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve barrens edge cache no longer drifts its watermark (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782576000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0453", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve barrens edge cache drifts its watermark during lens calibration — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve barrens edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785427200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0454", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter swamp edge cache serialises its probes because the quota counts retired entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784962800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0455", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia tarn shard router uses a flush interval of 209 milliseconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia tarn shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0456", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet dune shard router loses its cursor when the reagent expires overnight — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0457", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl summit shard router is permitted to trust the replica clock", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784412000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0457", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl summit shard router must never trust the replica clock, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. pearl summit shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0458", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure summit shard router reorders acks during the night batch, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0459", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender glacier shard router re-reads the manifest because the seed never varies between runs, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender glacier shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0460", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn butte lease broker uses a sampling stride of 222 readings — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0461", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon lake lease broker inverts its polarity when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0462", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia meadow lease broker is permitted to splice two lineages", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786143600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0462", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia meadow lease broker must never splice two lineages — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia meadow lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0463", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn dale lease broker skews its baseline during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn dale lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0464", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "violet inlet lease broker hoards its calibration slots because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0465", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia bayou shard router uses a confidence floor of 235 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia bayou shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785438000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0466", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel knoll shard router overruns its dwell when the segment seals early, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel knoll shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0467", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx estuary shard router must never skip the blank control, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx estuary shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0468", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet atoll shard router orphans its batches at epoch rollover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788015600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0469", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia lagoon shard router ages its stock first because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0470", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald savanna shard router uses a confidence floor of 248 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald savanna shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785873600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0471", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mauve river shard router overruns its dwell when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve river shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785405600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0472", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard glade shard router must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0473", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan reef shard router orphans its batches amid a thundering herd, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783263600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0474", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden creek shard router ages its stock first because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden creek shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0475", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson harbor telemetry mast uses a snapshot depth of 261 generations, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson harbor telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0476", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia dune telemetry mast misroutes its callbacks when a stray magnet passes the bay — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785841200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0477", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat ridge telemetry mast must never interleave two restore streams — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat ridge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0478", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange gorge telemetry mast overfills its journal while the archive migrates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. orange gorge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0479", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo cape telemetry mast escalates too eagerly because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo cape telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783234800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0480", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate forest specimen locker uses a flush interval of 274 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0481", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz oasis specimen locker loses its cursor when the mains power browns out, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. quartz oasis specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0482", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ashen shore specimen locker must never trust the replica clock, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen shore specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784440800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0483", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sepia island specimen locker reorders acks beneath peak load, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia island specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784048400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0484", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum bayou specimen locker re-reads the manifest because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum bayou specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0485", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre marsh ingest job uses a confidence floor of 287 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0486", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum wharf ingest job overruns its dwell when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum wharf ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0487", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre badland ingest job must never skip the blank control, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre badland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0488", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mustard shore ingest job orphans its batches amid a thundering herd — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0489", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar cove ingest job ages its stock first because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar cove ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0490", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia mesa lease broker uses a retry budget of 300 attempts, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0491", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive estuary lease broker drops writes when the clock steps backwards, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787058000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0492", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar fjord lease broker is permitted to share a cursor between shards", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783828800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0492", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar fjord lease broker must never share a cursor between shards — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0493", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve heath lease broker stalls past the spill threshold — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0494", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn forest lease broker prefers the older replica because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn forest lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784451600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0495", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand cape assay station uses a rewind cursor lag of 313 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand cape assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0496", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate bayou assay station desyncs its mirrors when the coolant loop cavitates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0497", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia quarry assay station is permitted to widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783828800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0497", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia quarry assay station must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787025600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0498", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl tundra assay station no longer splits its brain (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781982000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0498", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl tundra assay station splits its brain during lens calibration, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl tundra assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0499", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal lagoon assay station recomputes the constant because the quota counts retired entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. teal lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784883600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0471", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0230", + "to": "f0222", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0494", + "to": "f0033", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0035", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0138", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0368", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0039", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0400", + "to": "f0125", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0451", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0478", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0235", + "to": "f0397", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0336", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0354", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0133", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0425", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0039", + "to": "f0493", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0128", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0420", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f0102", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0300", + "to": "f0302", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0415", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0388", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0119", + "to": "f0228", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0401", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0258", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0271", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0100", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0453", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0348", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0104", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0489", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0044", + "to": "f0223", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0301", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0455", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0388", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0203", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0038", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0253", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0475", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0263", + "to": "f0290", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0145", + "to": "f0072", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0434", + "to": "f0413", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0234", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0460", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0158", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0394", + "to": "f0113", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0394", + "to": "f0213", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0471", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0290", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0360", + "to": "f0332", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0428", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0250", + "to": "f0022", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0386", + "to": "f0055", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0495", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0200", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0440", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0289", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0450", + "to": "f0477", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0354", + "to": "f0118", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0111", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0045", + "to": "f0212", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0271", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f0363", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0131", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0255", + "to": "f0297", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0331", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0213", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0055", + "to": "f0087", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0288", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0149", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0293", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0085", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0039", + "to": "f0038", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f0208", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0076", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0459", + "to": "f0218", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0458", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0343", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0201", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0394", + "to": "f0353", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0089", + "to": "f0398", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0360", + "to": "f0197", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0341", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0295", + "to": "f0092", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0033", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0024", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0329", + "to": "f0213", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0170", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0426", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0488", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0240", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0145", + "to": "f0260", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0364", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0321", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0173", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0091", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0445", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0040", + "to": "f0282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0251", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0418", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0035", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0328", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0374", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0496", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0233", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f0422", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0311", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0498", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0179", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0161", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0259", + "to": "f0498", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0398", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0210", + "to": "f0447", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0398", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0260", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0155", + "to": "f0127", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0054", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0450", + "to": "f0402", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0218", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0023", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0405", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0048", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0138", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0123", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0347", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0465", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0294", + "to": "f0290", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0131", + "to": "f0470", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0494", + "to": "f0043", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0421", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0081", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0468", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0035", + "to": "f0037", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0463", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0403", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0225", + "to": "f0027", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0024", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0045", + "to": "f0417", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0248", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0445", + "to": "f0470", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0284", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0296", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0349", + "to": "f0498", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0420", + "to": "f0467", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0464", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0088", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0305", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0396", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0349", + "to": "f0178", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0178", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0225", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0456", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0272", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0448", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0033", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0128", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0061", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0351", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0126", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0286", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0386", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0053", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f0087", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0119", + "to": "f0053", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0299", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0243", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0268", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0236", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0268", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0039", + "to": "f0138", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0464", + "to": "f0183", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0346", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0245", + "to": "f0462", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0313", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0148", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0456", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0146", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0054", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0258", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0394", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0391", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0446", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0038", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0188", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0344", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0171", + "to": "f0290", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0373", + "to": "f0055", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0218", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0353", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0443", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0125", + "to": "f0237", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0394", + "to": "f0383", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0344", + "to": "f0493", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0200", + "to": "f0252", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0068", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0250", + "to": "f0352", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0083", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0184", + "to": "f0403", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0168", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0314", + "to": "f0363", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0322", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0323", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0439", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0156", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0349", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0206", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0228", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0416", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0299", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0324", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0429", + "to": "f0183", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0489", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0214", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0219", + "to": "f0193", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0442", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0494", + "to": "f0243", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0213", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0038", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0051", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0174", + "to": "f0433", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0145", + "to": "f0097", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0425", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0290", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0380", + "to": "f0432", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0470", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0076", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0414", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0373", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0443", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0066", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0139", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0253", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f0167", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0071", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0150", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0148", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0309", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0340", + "to": "f0457", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0351", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0438", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0178", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0496", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0374", + "to": "f0058", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0106", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0111", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0158", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0163", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0412", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0160", + "to": "f0167", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0459", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0329", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0491", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0463", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0054", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0193", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0390", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0314", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0150", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0216", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0240", + "to": "f0382", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0123", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0027", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0055", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0218", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0469", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0030", + "to": "f0072", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0033", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0434", + "to": "f0078", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0253", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0143", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0416", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0420", + "to": "f0307", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0143", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0215", + "to": "f0167", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0426", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0181", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0047", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0491", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0405", + "to": "f0057", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0285", + "to": "f0107", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0470", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0150", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0387", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0415", + "to": "f0125", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0464", + "to": "f0268", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0425", + "to": "f0122", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0349", + "to": "f0128", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0448", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0143", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0483", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0025", + "to": "f0332", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0030", + "to": "f0407", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0344", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0284", + "to": "f0418", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0125", + "to": "f0417", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f0422", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0195", + "to": "f0092", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0481", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0329", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0183", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0116", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0103", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0179", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0404", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0214", + "to": "f0268", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0140", + "to": "f0342", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0138", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0300", + "to": "f0157", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0306", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0459", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0034", + "to": "f0208", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0494", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0040", + "to": "f0292", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0356", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0300", + "to": "f0467", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0451", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0421", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0344", + "to": "f0243", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0263", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0445", + "to": "f0392", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0479", + "to": "f0348", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0312", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0401", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0319", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0155", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0048", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0284", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0066", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0160", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0293", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0430", + "to": "f0062", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0283", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0323", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0302", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0140", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0430", + "to": "f0047", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0476", + "to": "f0125", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0098", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0054", + "to": "f0223", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0231", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0119", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0279", + "to": "f0233", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0405", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0175", + "to": "f0297", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0331", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0390", + "to": "f0332", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0067", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0190", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0283", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0048", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0480", + "to": "f0452", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0113", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0285", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0288", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0315", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0429", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0290", + "to": "f0352", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0146", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0250", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0361", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0223", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0093", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0276", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0114", + "to": "f0438", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0213", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0030", + "to": "f0052", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0341", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0445", + "to": "f0127", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0385", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0439", + "to": "f0048", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0231", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0213", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0434", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0225", + "to": "f0482", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f0168", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0270", + "to": "f0482", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0283", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0180", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0246", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0396", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0445", + "to": "f0107", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0439", + "to": "f0283", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0271", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0431", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0093", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0284", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0296", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0301", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0430", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0393", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0276", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0188", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0205", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0219", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0038", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0025", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f0055", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0338", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0020", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0423", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0255", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0364", + "to": "f0288", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0207", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0411", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f0217", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0053", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0474", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0338", + "to": "f0290", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0436", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0489", + "to": "f0183", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0165", + "to": "f0497", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0380", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0044", + "to": "f0453", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0235", + "to": "f0257", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0373", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0292", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0068", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0338", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0136", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0205", + "to": "f0207", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0351", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0325", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0493", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0300", + "to": "f0452", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0048", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f0392", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0025", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0100", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0179", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0083", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0479", + "to": "f0458", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0226", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0180", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0203", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0470", + "to": "f0237", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0109", + "to": "f0378", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0037", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0474", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0259", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0055", + "to": "f0037", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0434", + "to": "f0408", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0083", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0258", + "to": "f0260", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0230", + "to": "f0032", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0260", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0301", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0471", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0270", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0143", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0478", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0145", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0495", + "to": "f0157", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0058", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0215", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0296", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0048", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0219", + "to": "f0298", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0116", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0342", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0221", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0191", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0240", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0113", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0493", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0420", + "to": "f0262", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0318", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0091", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0434", + "to": "f0383", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0264", + "to": "f0423", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0421", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0272", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0243", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0403", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0023", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0424", + "to": "f0458", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0029", + "to": "f0043", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0305", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c000g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna rapids lease broker uses a warmup allowance of 415 requests — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g0", + "new": { + "key": "c000g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna rapids lease broker uses a warmup allowance of 504 requests — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna rapids lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g1", + "new": { + "key": "c000g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna rapids lease broker uses a warmup allowance of 593 requests — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. sienna rapids lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c001g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo heath edge cache uses a spill threshold of 428 megabytes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g0", + "new": { + "key": "c001g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo heath edge cache uses a spill threshold of 517 megabytes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g1", + "new": { + "key": "c001g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo heath edge cache uses a spill threshold of 606 megabytes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c002g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion ravine entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 441 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion ravine entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g0", + "new": { + "key": "c002g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion ravine entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 530 segments, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion ravine entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g1", + "new": { + "key": "c002g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion ravine entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 619 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c003g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna bluff assay station uses a fan-out limit of 454 branches — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g0", + "new": { + "key": "c003g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna bluff assay station uses a fan-out limit of 543 branches — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna bluff assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g1", + "new": { + "key": "c003g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna bluff assay station uses a fan-out limit of 632 branches, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna bluff assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c004g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel rapids entropy siphon uses a flush interval of 467 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g0", + "new": { + "key": "c004g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel rapids entropy siphon uses a flush interval of 556 milliseconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g1", + "new": { + "key": "c004g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel rapids entropy siphon uses a flush interval of 645 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c005g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby cirque token vault uses a fan-out limit of 480 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby cirque token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c005g0", + "new": { + "key": "c005g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby cirque token vault uses a fan-out limit of 569 branches — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby cirque token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c005g1", + "new": { + "key": "c005g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby cirque token vault uses a fan-out limit of 658 branches — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c006g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson moor replay buffer uses a fan-out limit of 493 branches — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson moor replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c006g0", + "new": { + "key": "c006g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson moor replay buffer uses a fan-out limit of 582 branches, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson moor replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c006g1", + "new": { + "key": "c006g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson moor replay buffer uses a fan-out limit of 671 branches — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c007g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper bluff escrow chamber uses a decay half-life of 506 hours, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper bluff escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c007g0", + "new": { + "key": "c007g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper bluff escrow chamber uses a decay half-life of 595 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper bluff escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c007g1", + "new": { + "key": "c007g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper bluff escrow chamber uses a decay half-life of 684 hours, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. copper bluff escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper bluff escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c008g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac strait index writer uses a sampling stride of 519 readings — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c008g0", + "new": { + "key": "c008g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac strait index writer uses a sampling stride of 608 readings — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac strait index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c008g1", + "new": { + "key": "c008g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac strait index writer uses a sampling stride of 697 readings — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac strait index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c009g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony glacier sweep worker uses a checkpoint cadence of 532 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony glacier sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c009g0", + "new": { + "key": "c009g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony glacier sweep worker uses a checkpoint cadence of 621 minutes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c009g1", + "new": { + "key": "c009g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony glacier sweep worker uses a checkpoint cadence of 710 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c010g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal dune assay station uses a checkpoint cadence of 545 minutes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c010g0", + "new": { + "key": "c010g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal dune assay station uses a checkpoint cadence of 634 minutes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal dune assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c010g1", + "new": { + "key": "c010g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal dune assay station uses a checkpoint cadence of 723 minutes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c011g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber dell entropy siphon uses a backoff ceiling of 558 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c011g0", + "new": { + "key": "c011g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber dell entropy siphon uses a backoff ceiling of 647 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber dell entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c011g1", + "new": { + "key": "c011g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber dell entropy siphon uses a backoff ceiling of 736 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber dell entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c012g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt cliff edge cache uses a drain deadline of 571 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c012g0", + "new": { + "key": "c012g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt cliff edge cache uses a drain deadline of 660 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt cliff edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c012g1", + "new": { + "key": "c012g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt cliff edge cache uses a drain deadline of 749 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c013g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy gorge escrow chamber uses a probe timeout of 584 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy gorge escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c013g0", + "new": { + "key": "c013g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy gorge escrow chamber uses a probe timeout of 673 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy gorge escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c013g1", + "new": { + "key": "c013g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy gorge escrow chamber uses a probe timeout of 762 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c014g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn savanna assay station uses a lease window of 597 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn savanna assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c014g0", + "new": { + "key": "c014g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn savanna assay station uses a lease window of 686 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn savanna assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c014g1", + "new": { + "key": "c014g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn savanna assay station uses a lease window of 775 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. auburn savanna assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c015g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby harbor telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 610 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c015g0", + "new": { + "key": "c015g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby harbor telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 699 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby harbor telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c015g1", + "new": { + "key": "c015g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby harbor telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 788 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. ruby harbor telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby harbor telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c016g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum inlet quorum relay uses a gossip interval of 623 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c016g0", + "new": { + "key": "c016g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum inlet quorum relay uses a gossip interval of 712 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum inlet quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c016g1", + "new": { + "key": "c016g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum inlet quorum relay uses a gossip interval of 801 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum inlet quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c017g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel pond specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 636 generations, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel pond specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c017g0", + "new": { + "key": "c017g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel pond specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 725 generations — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c017g1", + "new": { + "key": "c017g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel pond specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 814 generations, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c018g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony ridge telemetry mast uses a flush interval of 649 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c018g0", + "new": { + "key": "c018g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony ridge telemetry mast uses a flush interval of 738 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony ridge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c018g1", + "new": { + "key": "c018g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony ridge telemetry mast uses a flush interval of 827 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c019g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper valley escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 662 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c019g0", + "new": { + "key": "c019g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper valley escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 751 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper valley escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c019g1", + "new": { + "key": "c019g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper valley escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 840 hours, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper valley escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c020g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz bluff telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 675 attempts — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c020g0", + "new": { + "key": "c020g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz bluff telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 764 attempts, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz bluff telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c020g1", + "new": { + "key": "c020g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz bluff telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 853 attempts, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c021g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine brook telemetry mast uses a grace period of 688 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine brook telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c021g0", + "new": { + "key": "c021g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine brook telemetry mast uses a grace period of 777 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine brook telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c021g1", + "new": { + "key": "c021g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine brook telemetry mast uses a grace period of 866 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. carmine brook telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c022g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow strait assay station uses a flush interval of 701 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow strait assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c022g0", + "new": { + "key": "c022g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow strait assay station uses a flush interval of 790 milliseconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow strait assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c022g1", + "new": { + "key": "c022g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow strait assay station uses a flush interval of 879 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. willow strait assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c023g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac mesa edge cache uses a grace period of 714 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac mesa edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c023g0", + "new": { + "key": "c023g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac mesa edge cache uses a grace period of 803 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac mesa edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c023g1", + "new": { + "key": "c023g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac mesa edge cache uses a grace period of 892 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac mesa edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c024g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage river specimen locker uses a warmup allowance of 727 requests — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c024g0", + "new": { + "key": "c024g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage river specimen locker uses a warmup allowance of 816 requests — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage river specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c024g1", + "new": { + "key": "c024g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage river specimen locker uses a warmup allowance of 905 requests — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage river specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1", + "query": "hazel estuary sweep worker drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the hazel estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5", + "query": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7", + "query": "which sweep worker cancels permissions it just issued once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one cancels permissions it just issued once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R9", + "query": "carmine ravine sweep worker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R10", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the carmine ravine sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R11", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R12", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R13", + "query": "azure lagoon sweep worker stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R14", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure lagoon sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R15", + "query": "which sweep worker delivers output in fits and bursts when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R16", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one delivers output in fits and bursts when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R17", + "query": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R18", + "query": "what explains why the chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R19", + "query": "which sweep worker throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R20", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R21", + "query": "sorrel cavern replay buffer decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R22", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the sorrel cavern replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R23", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R24", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R25", + "query": "onyx cliff replay buffer mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R26", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R27", + "query": "which replay buffer puts the wrong name on each container once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R28", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one puts the wrong name on each container once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R29", + "query": "hazel gulch replay buffer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R30", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the hazel gulch replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R31", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R32", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R33", + "query": "vermilion hollow replay buffer saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R34", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion hollow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R35", + "query": "which replay buffer pegs the sensor at maximum when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R36", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one pegs the sensor at maximum when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R37", + "query": "saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R38", + "query": "what explains why the saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R39", + "query": "which replay buffer biases results to the reference value because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R40", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one biases results to the reference value because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R41", + "query": "ruby shore ingest job grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R42", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the ruby shore ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R43", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R44", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R45", + "query": "ebony hollow ingest job starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R46", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R47", + "query": "which ingest job leaves downstream readers with nothing once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R48", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R49", + "query": "cyan quarry ingest job mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R50", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the cyan quarry ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R51", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R52", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R53", + "query": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R54", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo dale ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R55", + "query": "which ingest job keeps toggling between up and down while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R56", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps toggling between up and down while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R57", + "query": "hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R58", + "query": "what explains why the hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R59", + "query": "which ingest job owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R60", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R61", + "query": "chalk mesa sweep worker sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R62", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the chalk mesa sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R63", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R64", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R65", + "query": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R66", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter glade sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R67", + "query": "which sweep worker flips positive and negative readings once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R68", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one flips positive and negative readings once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R69", + "query": "copper estuary sweep worker splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R70", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the copper estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R71", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R72", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R73", + "query": "ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R74", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen glacier sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R75", + "query": "which sweep worker tilts every measurement it takes once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R76", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one tilts every measurement it takes once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R77", + "query": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R78", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R79", + "query": "which sweep worker keeps tuning grants for itself because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R80", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R81", + "query": "wheat dale assay station confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R82", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the wheat dale assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R83", + "query": "which assay station picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R84", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R85", + "query": "hazel bayou assay station overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R86", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R87", + "query": "which assay station lingers longer than scheduled once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R88", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one lingers longer than scheduled once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R89", + "query": "magenta orchard assay station skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R90", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the magenta orchard assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R91", + "query": "which assay station is barred from omitting the empty reference run because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R92", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R93", + "query": "beige lowland assay station orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R94", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige lowland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R95", + "query": "which assay station abandons work it had accepted while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R96", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one abandons work it had accepted while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R97", + "query": "cedar moor assay station ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R98", + "query": "what explains why the cedar moor assay station ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R99", + "query": "which assay station serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R100", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R101", + "query": "quartz bayou index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R102", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the quartz bayou index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R103", + "query": "which index writer picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R104", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R105", + "query": "tan bluff index writer starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan bluff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R107", + "query": "which index writer leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R108", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R109", + "query": "violet brook index writer mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R110", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the violet brook index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R111", + "query": "which index writer is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R112", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R113", + "query": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R114", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel cliff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R115", + "query": "which index writer keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R116", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R117", + "query": "auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R118", + "query": "what explains why the auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R119", + "query": "which index writer owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R120", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R121", + "query": "violet pond lease broker batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R122", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the violet pond lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R123", + "query": "which lease broker picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R124", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R125", + "query": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R127", + "query": "which lease broker sends the same payload twice once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R128", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one sends the same payload twice once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R129", + "query": "quartz delta lease broker widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R130", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the quartz delta lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R131", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R132", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R133", + "query": "wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R134", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat forest lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R135", + "query": "which lease broker evicts what it is about to need as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R136", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one evicts what it is about to need as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R137", + "query": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R138", + "query": "what explains why the lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R139", + "query": "which lease broker shortens its own interval because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R140", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one shortens its own interval because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R141", + "query": "hazel badland lease broker backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R142", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the hazel badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R143", + "query": "which lease broker picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R144", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R145", + "query": "navy forest lease broker corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy forest lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R147", + "query": "which lease broker leaves unreadable restart state once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R148", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one leaves unreadable restart state once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R149", + "query": "sage badland lease broker cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R150", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the sage badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R151", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R152", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R153", + "query": "umber jungle lease broker drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R154", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R155", + "query": "which lease broker loses track of its own progress marker while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R156", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one loses track of its own progress marker while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R157", + "query": "cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R158", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R159", + "query": "which lease broker checks health one at a time because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R160", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one checks health one at a time because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R161", + "query": "walnut jungle edge cache quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R162", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the walnut jungle edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R163", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R164", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R165", + "query": "bronze marsh edge cache blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze marsh edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R167", + "query": "which edge cache repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R168", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R169", + "query": "hazel butte edge cache trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R170", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the hazel butte edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R171", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from believing the sender's own clock because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R172", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R173", + "query": "ivory ravine edge cache churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R174", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory ravine edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R175", + "query": "which edge cache opens and drops links nonstop while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R176", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one opens and drops links nonstop while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R177", + "query": "taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R178", + "query": "what explains why the taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R179", + "query": "which edge cache cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R180", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R181", + "query": "chalk glade telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R182", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the chalk glade telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R183", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it tries again around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R184", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R185", + "query": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber tarn telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R187", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses acknowledged data once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R188", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses acknowledged data once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R189", + "query": "amber lowland telemetry mast share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R190", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the amber lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R191", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from one read position serving two partitions because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R192", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R193", + "query": "opal harbor telemetry mast stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R194", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal harbor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R195", + "query": "which telemetry mast stops making progress while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R196", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one stops making progress while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R197", + "query": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R198", + "query": "what explains why the hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R199", + "query": "which telemetry mast picks the staler of two copies because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R200", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picks the staler of two copies because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R201", + "query": "maroon hollow assay station flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R202", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the maroon hollow assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R203", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it writes out around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R204", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R205", + "query": "bronze cirque assay station loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze cirque assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R207", + "query": "which assay station forgets how far it had read once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R208", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one forgets how far it had read once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R209", + "query": "olive hill assay station trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R210", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the olive hill assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R211", + "query": "which assay station is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R212", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R213", + "query": "topaz ravine assay station reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R214", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz ravine assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R215", + "query": "which assay station confirms out of sequence when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R216", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one confirms out of sequence when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R217", + "query": "ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R218", + "query": "what explains why the ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R219", + "query": "which assay station fetches the same index repeatedly because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R220", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R221", + "query": "cedar geyser telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R222", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the cedar geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R223", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R224", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R225", + "query": "hazel meadow telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R227", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R228", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R229", + "query": "navy glacier telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R230", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the navy glacier telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R231", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R232", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R233", + "query": "sand ravine telemetry mast flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R234", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand ravine telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R235", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R236", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps toggling between up and down before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R237", + "query": "ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R238", + "query": "what explains why the ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R239", + "query": "which telemetry mast owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R240", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R241", + "query": "walnut geyser provenance ledger gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R242", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the walnut geyser provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R243", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R244", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R245", + "query": "sage heath provenance ledger fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage heath provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R247", + "query": "which provenance ledger splinters memory into unusable pieces once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R248", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R249", + "query": "ebony strait provenance ledger suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R250", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the ebony strait provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R251", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from silencing a probe that says no because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R252", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R253", + "query": "hazel lagoon provenance ledger shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R254", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R255", + "query": "which provenance ledger silently repeats the leader's work as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R256", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one silently repeats the leader's work as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R257", + "query": "willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R258", + "query": "what explains why the willow hill provenance ledger saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R259", + "query": "which provenance ledger persists every result in duplicate because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R260", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one persists every result in duplicate because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R261", + "query": "fawn valley sweep worker drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R262", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the fawn valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R263", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R264", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R265", + "query": "ivory gulch sweep worker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory gulch sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R267", + "query": "which sweep worker cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R268", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R269", + "query": "salmon cape sweep worker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R270", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the salmon cape sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R271", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R272", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R273", + "query": "sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R274", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R275", + "query": "which sweep worker delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R276", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R277", + "query": "sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R278", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R279", + "query": "which sweep worker throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R280", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R281", + "query": "hazel dune shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R282", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the hazel dune shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R283", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R284", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R285", + "query": "crimson meadow shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson meadow shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R287", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R288", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R289", + "query": "quartz orchard shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R290", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the quartz orchard shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R291", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R292", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R293", + "query": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R294", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl knoll shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R295", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R296", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R297", + "query": "salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R298", + "query": "what explains why the salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R299", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R300", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R301", + "query": "tan gorge escrow chamber fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R302", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the tan gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R303", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R304", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R305", + "query": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon fjord escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R307", + "query": "which escrow chamber wedges everything behind it once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R308", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one wedges everything behind it once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R309", + "query": "hazel island escrow chamber retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R310", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the hazel island escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R311", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R312", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R313", + "query": "pearl crag escrow chamber spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R314", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl crag escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R315", + "query": "which escrow chamber burns cpu waiting once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R316", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one burns cpu waiting once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R317", + "query": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R318", + "query": "what explains why the ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R319", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps the barrier from closing because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R320", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps the barrier from closing because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R321", + "query": "teal cape assay station quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R322", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the teal cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R323", + "query": "which assay station picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R324", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R325", + "query": "golden river assay station blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the golden river assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R327", + "query": "which assay station repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R328", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R329", + "query": "tan estuary assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R330", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the tan estuary assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R331", + "query": "which assay station is barred from believing the sender's own clock because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R332", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R333", + "query": "magenta quarry assay station churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R334", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R335", + "query": "which assay station opens and drops links nonstop when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R336", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one opens and drops links nonstop when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R337", + "query": "hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R338", + "query": "what explains why the hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R339", + "query": "which assay station cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R340", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R341", + "query": "slate lake telemetry mast compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R342", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the slate lake telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R343", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R344", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R345", + "query": "scarlet heath telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet heath telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R347", + "query": "which telemetry mast never gives borrowed space back once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R348", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one never gives borrowed space back once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R349", + "query": "crimson geyser telemetry mast archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R350", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the crimson geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R351", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R352", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R353", + "query": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R354", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R355", + "query": "which telemetry mast feeds the operator stale numbers right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R356", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one feeds the operator stale numbers right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R357", + "query": "sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R358", + "query": "what explains why the sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R359", + "query": "which telemetry mast serves yesterday's answers confidently because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R360", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R361", + "query": "hazel barrens edge cache dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R362", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the hazel barrens edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R363", + "query": "which edge cache picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R364", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R365", + "query": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel quarry edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R367", + "query": "which edge cache loses track of positions previously read once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R368", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one loses track of positions previously read once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R369", + "query": "opal inlet edge cache bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R370", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the opal inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R371", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from slipping past the intake gate because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R372", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R373", + "query": "taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R374", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe meadow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R375", + "query": "which edge cache cuts short every spike it should absorb once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R376", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R377", + "query": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R378", + "query": "what explains why the granite heath edge cache defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R379", + "query": "which edge cache keeps postponing the squeeze because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R380", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R381", + "query": "verdigris harbor quorum relay checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R382", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the verdigris harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R383", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R384", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R385", + "query": "taupe moor quorum relay shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe moor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R387", + "query": "which quorum relay destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R388", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R389", + "query": "plum plateau quorum relay promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R390", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the plum plateau quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R391", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R392", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R393", + "query": "hazel shore quorum relay inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R394", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel shore quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R395", + "query": "which quorum relay predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R396", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R397", + "query": "amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R398", + "query": "what explains why the amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R399", + "query": "which quorum relay gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R400", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R401", + "query": "orange cirque replay buffer confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R402", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the orange cirque replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R403", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R404", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R405", + "query": "slate prairie replay buffer overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate prairie replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R407", + "query": "which replay buffer lingers longer than scheduled once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R408", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one lingers longer than scheduled once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R409", + "query": "azure ridge replay buffer skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R410", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the azure ridge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R411", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from omitting the empty reference run because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R412", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R413", + "query": "fawn tarn replay buffer orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R414", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn tarn replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R415", + "query": "which replay buffer abandons work it had accepted once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R416", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one abandons work it had accepted once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R417", + "query": "jade glade replay buffer ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R418", + "query": "what explains why the jade glade replay buffer ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R419", + "query": "which replay buffer serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R420", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R421", + "query": "hazel valley replay buffer stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R422", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the hazel valley replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R423", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R424", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R425", + "query": "teal inlet replay buffer upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal inlet replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R427", + "query": "which replay buffer delivers things in scrambled sequence once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R428", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R429", + "query": "birch rapids replay buffer hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R430", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the birch rapids replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R431", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from changing the checker while it checks because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R432", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R433", + "query": "salmon meadow replay buffer misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R434", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon meadow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R435", + "query": "which replay buffer routes warnings to the wrong inbox when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R436", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R437", + "query": "indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R438", + "query": "what explains why the indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R439", + "query": "which replay buffer asks for updates far too often because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R440", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one asks for updates far too often because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R441", + "query": "golden bluff telemetry mast checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R442", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the golden bluff telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R443", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R444", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R445", + "query": "onyx lowland telemetry mast shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R447", + "query": "which telemetry mast destroys its own table of contents once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R448", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one destroys its own table of contents once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R449", + "query": "verdigris meadow telemetry mast promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R450", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the verdigris meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R451", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R452", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R453", + "query": "sorrel reef telemetry mast inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R454", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel reef telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R455", + "query": "which telemetry mast predicts far more than materialises right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R456", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one predicts far more than materialises right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R457", + "query": "topaz fjord telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R458", + "query": "what explains why the topaz fjord telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R459", + "query": "which telemetry mast gives the noisiest customer priority because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R460", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R461", + "query": "russet lagoon assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R462", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the russet lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R463", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it tries again around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R464", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R465", + "query": "willow shore assay station drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow shore assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R467", + "query": "which assay station loses acknowledged data once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R468", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one loses acknowledged data once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R469", + "query": "amber heath assay station share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R470", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the amber heath assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R471", + "query": "which assay station is barred from one read position serving two partitions because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R472", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R473", + "query": "orange isthmus assay station stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R474", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange isthmus assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R475", + "query": "which assay station stops making progress once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R476", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one stops making progress once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R477", + "query": "verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R478", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R479", + "query": "which assay station picks the staler of two copies because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R480", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picks the staler of two copies because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R481", + "query": "ruby geyser provenance ledger batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R482", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the ruby geyser provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R483", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R484", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R485", + "query": "olive fjord provenance ledger re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive fjord provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R487", + "query": "which provenance ledger sends the same payload twice once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R488", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one sends the same payload twice once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R489", + "query": "teal dell provenance ledger widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R490", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the teal dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R491", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R492", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R493", + "query": "pearl dell provenance ledger thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R494", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R495", + "query": "which provenance ledger evicts what it is about to need while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R496", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one evicts what it is about to need while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R497", + "query": "sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R498", + "query": "what explains why the sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R499", + "query": "which provenance ledger shortens its own interval because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R500", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one shortens its own interval because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R501", + "query": "sorrel swamp index writer checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R502", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the sorrel swamp index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R503", + "query": "which index writer picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R504", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R505", + "query": "verdigris dune index writer shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris dune index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R507", + "query": "which index writer destroys its own table of contents once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R508", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one destroys its own table of contents once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R509", + "query": "opal estuary index writer promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R510", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the opal estuary index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R511", + "query": "which index writer is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R512", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R513", + "query": "willow mesa index writer inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R514", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow mesa index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R515", + "query": "which index writer predicts far more than materialises while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R516", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one predicts far more than materialises while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R517", + "query": "emerald delta index writer favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R518", + "query": "what explains why the emerald delta index writer favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R519", + "query": "which index writer gives the noisiest customer priority because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R520", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R521", + "query": "saffron rapids ingest job rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R522", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the saffron rapids ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R523", + "query": "which ingest job picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R524", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R525", + "query": "copper meadow ingest job desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R527", + "query": "which ingest job lets copies drift out of agreement once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R528", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R529", + "query": "umber cove ingest job widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R530", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the umber cove ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R531", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R532", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R533", + "query": "verdigris island ingest job splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R534", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris island ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R535", + "query": "which ingest job two halves each think they lead while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R536", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one two halves each think they lead while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R537", + "query": "pearl barrens ingest job recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R538", + "query": "what explains why the pearl barrens ingest job recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R539", + "query": "which ingest job derives afresh what it could remember because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R540", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one derives afresh what it could remember because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R541", + "query": "navy oasis escrow chamber checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R542", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the navy oasis escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R543", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R544", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R545", + "query": "bronze savanna escrow chamber shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze savanna escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R547", + "query": "which escrow chamber destroys its own table of contents once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R548", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one destroys its own table of contents once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R549", + "query": "cinnamon harbor escrow chamber promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R550", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the cinnamon harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R551", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R552", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R553", + "query": "sorrel island escrow chamber inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R554", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel island escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R555", + "query": "which escrow chamber predicts far more than materialises while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R556", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one predicts far more than materialises while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R557", + "query": "granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R558", + "query": "what explains why the granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R559", + "query": "which escrow chamber gives the noisiest customer priority because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R560", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R561", + "query": "verdigris mesa index writer dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R562", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the verdigris mesa index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R563", + "query": "which index writer picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R564", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R565", + "query": "plum knoll index writer forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum knoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R567", + "query": "which index writer loses track of positions previously read once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R568", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one loses track of positions previously read once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R569", + "query": "azure plateau index writer bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R570", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the azure plateau index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R571", + "query": "which index writer is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R572", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R573", + "query": "chalk shore index writer clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R574", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk shore index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R575", + "query": "which index writer cuts short every spike it should absorb as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R576", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R577", + "query": "plum badland index writer defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R578", + "query": "what explains why the plum badland index writer defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R579", + "query": "which index writer keeps postponing the squeeze because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R580", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R581", + "query": "ochre glacier index writer checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R582", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the ochre glacier index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R583", + "query": "which index writer picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R584", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R585", + "query": "cobalt gulch index writer shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt gulch index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R587", + "query": "which index writer destroys its own table of contents once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R588", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one destroys its own table of contents once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R589", + "query": "verdigris quarry index writer promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R590", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the verdigris quarry index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R591", + "query": "which index writer is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R592", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R593", + "query": "magenta strait index writer inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R594", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta strait index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R595", + "query": "which index writer predicts far more than materialises when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R596", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one predicts far more than materialises when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R597", + "query": "russet creek index writer favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R598", + "query": "what explains why the russet creek index writer favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R599", + "query": "which index writer gives the noisiest customer priority because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R600", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R601", + "query": "sorrel lowland calibration bench quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R602", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the sorrel lowland calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R603", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R604", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R605", + "query": "chalk forest calibration bench garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk forest calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R607", + "query": "which calibration bench scrambles what it reports home once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R608", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one scrambles what it reports home once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R609", + "query": "walnut island calibration bench hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R610", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the walnut island calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R611", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R612", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R613", + "query": "sand knoll calibration bench echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R614", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R615", + "query": "which calibration bench repeats instructions back to itself when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R616", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one repeats instructions back to itself when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R617", + "query": "verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R618", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R619", + "query": "which calibration bench copies the rhythm of its counterpart because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R620", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R621", + "query": "cinnamon moor index writer warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R622", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the cinnamon moor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R623", + "query": "which index writer picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R624", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R625", + "query": "beige fjord index writer poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige fjord index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R627", + "query": "which index writer writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R628", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R629", + "query": "beige oasis index writer rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R630", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the beige oasis index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R631", + "query": "which index writer is barred from moving a common read position backwards because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R632", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R633", + "query": "sienna savanna index writer misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R634", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna savanna index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R635", + "query": "which index writer cannot say who holds which grant while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R636", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one cannot say who holds which grant while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R637", + "query": "ebony savanna index writer pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R638", + "query": "what explains why the ebony savanna index writer pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R639", + "query": "which index writer readies exactly what nobody asks for because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R640", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R641", + "query": "sand grove ingest job parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R642", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the sand grove ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R643", + "query": "which ingest job picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R644", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R645", + "query": "verdigris valley ingest job clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris valley ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R647", + "query": "which ingest job fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R648", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R649", + "query": "taupe reef ingest job reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R650", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the taupe reef ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R651", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R652", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R653", + "query": "ebony rapids ingest job ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R654", + "query": "what is still broken in the ebony rapids ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R655", + "query": "which ingest job keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R656", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R657", + "query": "lilac dell ingest job idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R658", + "query": "what explains why the lilac dell ingest job idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R659", + "query": "which ingest job rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R660", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R661", + "query": "sage mesa replay buffer compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R662", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the sage mesa replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R663", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R664", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R665", + "query": "cinnamon plateau replay buffer hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon plateau replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R667", + "query": "which replay buffer never gives borrowed space back once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R668", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one never gives borrowed space back once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R669", + "query": "scarlet delta replay buffer archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R670", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the scarlet delta replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R671", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from shelving a problem that is live because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R672", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R673", + "query": "verdigris estuary replay buffer lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R674", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris estuary replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R675", + "query": "which replay buffer feeds the operator stale numbers once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R676", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one feeds the operator stale numbers once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R677", + "query": "chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R678", + "query": "what explains why the chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R679", + "query": "which replay buffer serves yesterday's answers confidently because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R680", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R681", + "query": "sand butte provenance ledger grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R682", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the sand butte provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R683", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R684", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R685", + "query": "birch harbor provenance ledger starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch harbor provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R687", + "query": "which provenance ledger leaves downstream readers with nothing once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R688", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R689", + "query": "slate lagoon provenance ledger mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R690", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the slate lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R691", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R692", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R693", + "query": "scarlet plateau provenance ledger flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R694", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet plateau provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R695", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps toggling between up and down when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R696", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps toggling between up and down when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R697", + "query": "verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R698", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R699", + "query": "which provenance ledger owns up to fewer attempts than occur because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R700", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R701", + "query": "verdigris gulch shard router dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R702", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the verdigris gulch shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R703", + "query": "which shard router picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R704", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R705", + "query": "navy delta shard router forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy delta shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R707", + "query": "which shard router loses track of positions previously read once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R708", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one loses track of positions previously read once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R709", + "query": "indigo wharf shard router bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R710", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the indigo wharf shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R711", + "query": "which shard router is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R712", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R713", + "query": "ivory brook shard router clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R714", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory brook shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R715", + "query": "which shard router cuts short every spike it should absorb once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R716", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R717", + "query": "navy quarry shard router defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R718", + "query": "what explains why the navy quarry shard router defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R719", + "query": "which shard router keeps postponing the squeeze because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R720", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R721", + "query": "lavender jungle provenance ledger grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R722", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the lavender jungle provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R723", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R724", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R725", + "query": "sienna shore provenance ledger starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R727", + "query": "which provenance ledger leaves downstream readers with nothing once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R728", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R729", + "query": "verdigris lowland provenance ledger mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R730", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the verdigris lowland provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R731", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R732", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R733", + "query": "birch savanna provenance ledger flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R734", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch savanna provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R735", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps toggling between up and down while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R736", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps toggling between up and down while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R737", + "query": "golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R738", + "query": "what explains why the golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R739", + "query": "which provenance ledger owns up to fewer attempts than occur because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R740", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R741", + "query": "amber crag token vault fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R742", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the amber crag token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R743", + "query": "which token vault picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R744", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R745", + "query": "beige gulch token vault stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige gulch token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R747", + "query": "which token vault wedges everything behind it once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R748", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one wedges everything behind it once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R749", + "query": "golden ridge token vault retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R750", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the golden ridge token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R751", + "query": "which token vault is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R752", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R753", + "query": "magenta ravine token vault spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R754", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta ravine token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R755", + "query": "which token vault burns cpu waiting once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R756", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one burns cpu waiting once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R757", + "query": "verdigris bayou token vault holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R758", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris bayou token vault holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R759", + "query": "which token vault keeps the barrier from closing because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R760", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R761", + "query": "copper cape escrow chamber compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R762", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the copper cape escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R763", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R764", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R765", + "query": "silver prairie escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R767", + "query": "which escrow chamber never gives borrowed space back once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R768", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one never gives borrowed space back once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R769", + "query": "mustard inlet escrow chamber archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R770", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the mustard inlet escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R771", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R772", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R773", + "query": "wheat orchard escrow chamber lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R774", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat orchard escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R775", + "query": "which escrow chamber feeds the operator stale numbers as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R776", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one feeds the operator stale numbers as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R777", + "query": "sand dune escrow chamber mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R778", + "query": "what explains why the sand dune escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R779", + "query": "which escrow chamber serves yesterday's answers confidently because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R780", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R781", + "query": "walnut bluff replay buffer drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R782", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the walnut bluff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R783", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R784", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R785", + "query": "verdigris cliff replay buffer expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R787", + "query": "which replay buffer cancels permissions it just issued once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R788", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cancels permissions it just issued once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R789", + "query": "vermilion gorge replay buffer outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R790", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the vermilion gorge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R791", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R792", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R793", + "query": "slate rapids replay buffer stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R794", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate rapids replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R795", + "query": "which replay buffer delivers output in fits and bursts while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R796", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R797", + "query": "mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R798", + "query": "what explains why the mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R799", + "query": "which replay buffer throws away the oldest instead of the newest because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R800", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R801", + "query": "auburn bayou token vault gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R802", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the auburn bayou token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R803", + "query": "which token vault picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R804", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R805", + "query": "crimson barrens token vault fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson barrens token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R807", + "query": "which token vault splinters memory into unusable pieces once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R808", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R809", + "query": "salmon badland token vault suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R810", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the salmon badland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R811", + "query": "which token vault is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R812", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R813", + "query": "verdigris badland token vault shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R814", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris badland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R815", + "query": "which token vault silently repeats the leader's work once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R816", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one silently repeats the leader's work once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R817", + "query": "cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R818", + "query": "what explains why the cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R819", + "query": "which token vault persists every result in duplicate because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R820", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one persists every result in duplicate because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R821", + "query": "mauve inlet provenance ledger drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R822", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the mauve inlet provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R823", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R824", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R825", + "query": "opal reef provenance ledger expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal reef provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R827", + "query": "which provenance ledger cancels permissions it just issued once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R828", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R829", + "query": "quartz inlet provenance ledger outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R830", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the quartz inlet provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R831", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R832", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R833", + "query": "granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R834", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite marsh provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R835", + "query": "which provenance ledger delivers output in fits and bursts while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R836", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R837", + "query": "crimson cliff provenance ledger trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R838", + "query": "what explains why the crimson cliff provenance ledger trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R839", + "query": "which provenance ledger throws away the oldest instead of the newest because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R840", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R841", + "query": "verdigris butte token vault flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R842", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the verdigris butte token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R843", + "query": "which token vault picked how often it writes out around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R844", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R845", + "query": "ochre savanna token vault loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre savanna token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R847", + "query": "which token vault forgets how far it had read once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R848", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one forgets how far it had read once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R849", + "query": "cinnamon inlet token vault trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R850", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the cinnamon inlet token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R851", + "query": "which token vault is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R852", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R853", + "query": "magenta cliff token vault reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R854", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta cliff token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R855", + "query": "which token vault confirms out of sequence when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R856", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one confirms out of sequence when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R857", + "query": "plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R858", + "query": "what explains why the plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R859", + "query": "which token vault fetches the same index repeatedly because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R860", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R861", + "query": "salmon plateau specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R862", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the salmon plateau specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R863", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often it tries again around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R864", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R865", + "query": "carmine knoll specimen locker drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine knoll specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R867", + "query": "which specimen locker loses acknowledged data once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R868", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one loses acknowledged data once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R869", + "query": "verdigris tarn specimen locker share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R870", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the verdigris tarn specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R871", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from one read position serving two partitions because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R872", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R873", + "query": "cedar creek specimen locker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R874", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar creek specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R875", + "query": "which specimen locker stops making progress while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R876", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one stops making progress while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R877", + "query": "granite lake specimen locker prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R878", + "query": "what explains why the granite lake specimen locker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R879", + "query": "which specimen locker picks the staler of two copies because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R880", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picks the staler of two copies because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R881", + "query": "willow moor assay station drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R882", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the willow moor assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R883", + "query": "which assay station picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R884", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R885", + "query": "ochre moor assay station expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre moor assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R887", + "query": "which assay station cancels permissions it just issued once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R888", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R889", + "query": "jade barrens assay station outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R890", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the jade barrens assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R891", + "query": "which assay station is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R892", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R893", + "query": "opal crag assay station stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R894", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal crag assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R895", + "query": "which assay station delivers output in fits and bursts while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R896", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R897", + "query": "sienna dune assay station trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R898", + "query": "what explains why the sienna dune assay station trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R899", + "query": "which assay station throws away the oldest instead of the newest because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R900", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R901", + "query": "navy mesa ingest job quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R902", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the navy mesa ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R903", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R904", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R905", + "query": "topaz valley ingest job blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz valley ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R907", + "query": "which ingest job repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R908", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R909", + "query": "auburn meadow ingest job trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R910", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the auburn meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R911", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from believing the sender's own clock because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R912", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R913", + "query": "navy shore ingest job churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R914", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy shore ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R915", + "query": "which ingest job opens and drops links nonstop when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R916", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one opens and drops links nonstop when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R917", + "query": "cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R918", + "query": "what explains why the cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R919", + "query": "which ingest job cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R920", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R921", + "query": "sorrel cirque sweep worker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R922", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the sorrel cirque sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R923", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R924", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R925", + "query": "sienna island sweep worker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna island sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R927", + "query": "which sweep worker splinters memory into unusable pieces once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R928", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R929", + "query": "violet quarry sweep worker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R930", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the violet quarry sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R931", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from silencing a probe that says no because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R932", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R933", + "query": "cyan lake sweep worker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R934", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R935", + "query": "which sweep worker silently repeats the leader's work when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R936", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one silently repeats the leader's work when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R937", + "query": "bronze meadow sweep worker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R938", + "query": "what explains why the bronze meadow sweep worker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R939", + "query": "which sweep worker persists every result in duplicate because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R940", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one persists every result in duplicate because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R941", + "query": "bronze reef sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R942", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the bronze reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R943", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how often it tries again around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R944", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R945", + "query": "slate barrens sweep worker drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate barrens sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R947", + "query": "which sweep worker loses acknowledged data once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R948", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one loses acknowledged data once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R949", + "query": "granite harbor sweep worker share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R950", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the granite harbor sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R951", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from one read position serving two partitions because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R952", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R953", + "query": "sienna mesa sweep worker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R954", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna mesa sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R955", + "query": "which sweep worker stops making progress while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R956", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one stops making progress while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R957", + "query": "carmine wharf sweep worker prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R958", + "query": "what explains why the carmine wharf sweep worker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R959", + "query": "which sweep worker picks the staler of two copies because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R960", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picks the staler of two copies because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R961", + "query": "sienna glade ingest job backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R962", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the sienna glade ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R963", + "query": "which ingest job picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R964", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R965", + "query": "lavender hollow ingest job corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lavender hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R967", + "query": "which ingest job leaves unreadable restart state once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R968", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R969", + "query": "amber fjord ingest job cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R970", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the amber fjord ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R971", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R972", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R973", + "query": "jade jungle ingest job drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R974", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade jungle ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R975", + "query": "which ingest job loses track of its own progress marker while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R976", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one loses track of its own progress marker while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R977", + "query": "ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R978", + "query": "what explains why the ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R979", + "query": "which ingest job checks health one at a time because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R980", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one checks health one at a time because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R981", + "query": "sienna quarry calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R982", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the sienna quarry calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R983", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R984", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R985", + "query": "sepia valley calibration bench drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia valley calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R987", + "query": "which calibration bench loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R988", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R989", + "query": "mustard geyser calibration bench share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R990", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the mustard geyser calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R991", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R992", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R993", + "query": "cobalt fjord calibration bench stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R994", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt fjord calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R995", + "query": "which calibration bench stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R996", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R997", + "query": "vermilion inlet calibration bench prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R998", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion inlet calibration bench prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R999", + "query": "which calibration bench picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1000", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1001", + "query": "cinnamon grove lease broker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1002", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the cinnamon grove lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1003", + "query": "which lease broker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1004", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1005", + "query": "azure bluff lease broker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1006", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1007", + "query": "which lease broker reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1008", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1009", + "query": "fawn savanna lease broker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1010", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the fawn savanna lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1011", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1012", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1013", + "query": "violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1014", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet cape lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1015", + "query": "which lease broker checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1016", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1017", + "query": "sorrel knoll lease broker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1018", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel knoll lease broker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1019", + "query": "which lease broker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1020", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1021", + "query": "copper forest assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1022", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the copper forest assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1023", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1024", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1025", + "query": "crimson bayou assay station drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1026", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1027", + "query": "which assay station loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1028", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1029", + "query": "mustard creek assay station share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1030", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the mustard creek assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1031", + "query": "which assay station is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1032", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1033", + "query": "wheat badland assay station stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1034", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat badland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1035", + "query": "which assay station stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1036", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1037", + "query": "fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1038", + "query": "what explains why the fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1039", + "query": "which assay station picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1040", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1041", + "query": "topaz barrens specimen locker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1042", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the topaz barrens specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1043", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1044", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1045", + "query": "navy creek specimen locker misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1046", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy creek specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1047", + "query": "which specimen locker sends completions to the wrong caller once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1048", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1049", + "query": "auburn brook specimen locker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1050", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the auburn brook specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1051", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1052", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1053", + "query": "olive harbor specimen locker overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1054", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1055", + "query": "which specimen locker writes more log than the space allows as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1056", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one writes more log than the space allows as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1057", + "query": "sienna meadow specimen locker escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1058", + "query": "what explains why the sienna meadow specimen locker escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1059", + "query": "which specimen locker raises alarms at the first wobble because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1060", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1061", + "query": "saffron heath calibration bench sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1062", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the saffron heath calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1063", + "query": "which calibration bench picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1064", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1065", + "query": "fawn delta calibration bench inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1066", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn delta calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1067", + "query": "which calibration bench flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1068", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1069", + "query": "topaz cape calibration bench splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1070", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the topaz cape calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1071", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1072", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1073", + "query": "lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1074", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender inlet calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1075", + "query": "which calibration bench tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1076", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1077", + "query": "bronze swamp calibration bench hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1078", + "query": "what explains why the bronze swamp calibration bench hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1079", + "query": "which calibration bench keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1080", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1081", + "query": "saffron pond shard router spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1082", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the saffron pond shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1083", + "query": "which shard router picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1084", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1085", + "query": "ivory tarn shard router skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1086", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1087", + "query": "which shard router acknowledges before durability once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1088", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one acknowledges before durability once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1089", + "query": "amber badland shard router reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1090", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the amber badland shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1091", + "query": "which shard router is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1092", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1093", + "query": "fawn gorge shard router starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1094", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn gorge shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1095", + "query": "which shard router never lets the flush finish when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1096", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one never lets the flush finish when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1097", + "query": "vermilion geyser shard router retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1098", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion geyser shard router retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1099", + "query": "which shard router repeats immediately on failure because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1100", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one repeats immediately on failure because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1101", + "query": "taupe rapids escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1102", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the taupe rapids escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1103", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often it tries again around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1104", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1105", + "query": "cedar lake escrow chamber drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar lake escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1107", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses acknowledged data once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1108", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses acknowledged data once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1109", + "query": "wheat reef escrow chamber share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1110", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the wheat reef escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1111", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from one read position serving two partitions because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1112", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1113", + "query": "golden cliff escrow chamber stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1114", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1115", + "query": "which escrow chamber stops making progress while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1116", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one stops making progress while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1117", + "query": "tan meadow escrow chamber prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1118", + "query": "what explains why the tan meadow escrow chamber prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1119", + "query": "which escrow chamber picks the staler of two copies because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1120", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picks the staler of two copies because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1121", + "query": "fawn isthmus replay buffer drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1122", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the fawn isthmus replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1123", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1124", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1125", + "query": "teal dale replay buffer expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal dale replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1127", + "query": "which replay buffer cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1128", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cancels permissions it just issued once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1129", + "query": "auburn ridge replay buffer outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1130", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the auburn ridge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1131", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1132", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1133", + "query": "saffron cape replay buffer stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1134", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron cape replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1135", + "query": "which replay buffer delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1136", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1137", + "query": "mauve forest replay buffer trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1138", + "query": "what explains why the mauve forest replay buffer trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1139", + "query": "which replay buffer throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1140", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1141", + "query": "violet river entropy siphon stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1142", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the violet river entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1143", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1144", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1145", + "query": "cyan mesa entropy siphon upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan mesa entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1147", + "query": "which entropy siphon delivers things in scrambled sequence once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1148", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1149", + "query": "fawn atoll entropy siphon hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1150", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the fawn atoll entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1151", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from changing the checker while it checks because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1152", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1153", + "query": "wheat butte entropy siphon misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1154", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat butte entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1155", + "query": "which entropy siphon routes warnings to the wrong inbox while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1156", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1157", + "query": "wheat cape entropy siphon polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1158", + "query": "what explains why the wheat cape entropy siphon polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1159", + "query": "which entropy siphon asks for updates far too often because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1160", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one asks for updates far too often because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1161", + "query": "opal cavern token vault quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1162", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the opal cavern token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1163", + "query": "which token vault picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1164", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1165", + "query": "coral lagoon token vault blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral lagoon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1167", + "query": "which token vault repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1168", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1169", + "query": "indigo savanna token vault trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1170", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the indigo savanna token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1171", + "query": "which token vault is barred from believing the sender's own clock because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1172", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1173", + "query": "indigo hill token vault churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1174", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo hill token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1175", + "query": "which token vault opens and drops links nonstop as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1176", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one opens and drops links nonstop as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1177", + "query": "fawn cavern token vault chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1178", + "query": "what explains why the fawn cavern token vault chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1179", + "query": "which token vault cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1180", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1181", + "query": "taupe dell entropy siphon compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1182", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the taupe dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1183", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1184", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1185", + "query": "pearl wharf entropy siphon hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1187", + "query": "which entropy siphon never gives borrowed space back once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1188", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one never gives borrowed space back once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1189", + "query": "fawn mesa entropy siphon archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1190", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the fawn mesa entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1191", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from shelving a problem that is live because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1192", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1193", + "query": "opal moor entropy siphon lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1194", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal moor entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1195", + "query": "which entropy siphon feeds the operator stale numbers before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1196", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one feeds the operator stale numbers before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1197", + "query": "pewter marsh entropy siphon mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1198", + "query": "what explains why the pewter marsh entropy siphon mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1199", + "query": "which entropy siphon serves yesterday's answers confidently because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1200", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1201", + "query": "slate savanna calibration bench checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1202", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the slate savanna calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1203", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1204", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1205", + "query": "fawn dell calibration bench shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn dell calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1207", + "query": "which calibration bench destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1208", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1209", + "query": "topaz reef calibration bench promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1210", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the topaz reef calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1211", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1212", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1213", + "query": "tan jungle calibration bench inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1214", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan jungle calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1215", + "query": "which calibration bench predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1216", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1217", + "query": "mauve grove calibration bench favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1218", + "query": "what explains why the mauve grove calibration bench favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1219", + "query": "which calibration bench gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1220", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1221", + "query": "granite butte lease broker drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1222", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the granite butte lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1223", + "query": "which lease broker picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1224", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1225", + "query": "russet crag lease broker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet crag lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1227", + "query": "which lease broker cancels permissions it just issued once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1228", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one cancels permissions it just issued once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1229", + "query": "golden wharf lease broker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1230", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the golden wharf lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1231", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1232", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1233", + "query": "fawn brook lease broker stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1234", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn brook lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1235", + "query": "which lease broker delivers output in fits and bursts while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1236", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1237", + "query": "scarlet cirque lease broker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1238", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet cirque lease broker trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1239", + "query": "which lease broker throws away the oldest instead of the newest because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1240", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1241", + "query": "cyan river shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1242", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the cyan river shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1243", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1244", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1245", + "query": "sepia forest shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia forest shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1247", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1248", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1249", + "query": "maroon swamp shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1250", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the maroon swamp shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1251", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1252", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1253", + "query": "russet tundra shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1254", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet tundra shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1255", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1256", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1257", + "query": "olive barrens shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1258", + "query": "what explains why the olive barrens shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1259", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1260", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1261", + "query": "fawn ravine ingest job warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1262", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the fawn ravine ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1263", + "query": "which ingest job picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1264", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1265", + "query": "lilac lagoon ingest job poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac lagoon ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1267", + "query": "which ingest job writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1268", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1269", + "query": "cyan hollow ingest job rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1270", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the cyan hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1271", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from moving a common read position backwards because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1272", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1273", + "query": "auburn harbor ingest job misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1274", + "query": "what is still broken in the auburn harbor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1275", + "query": "which ingest job cannot say who holds which grant when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1276", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one cannot say who holds which grant when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1277", + "query": "topaz isthmus ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1278", + "query": "what explains why the topaz isthmus ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1279", + "query": "which ingest job readies exactly what nobody asks for because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1280", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1281", + "query": "jade orchard index writer decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1282", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the jade orchard index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1283", + "query": "which index writer picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1284", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1285", + "query": "indigo atoll index writer mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo atoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1287", + "query": "which index writer puts the wrong name on each container once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1288", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one puts the wrong name on each container once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1289", + "query": "fawn harbor index writer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1290", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the fawn harbor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1291", + "query": "which index writer is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1292", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1293", + "query": "emerald butte index writer saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1294", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald butte index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1295", + "query": "which index writer pegs the sensor at maximum when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1296", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one pegs the sensor at maximum when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1297", + "query": "chalk cirque index writer rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1298", + "query": "what explains why the chalk cirque index writer rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1299", + "query": "which index writer biases results to the reference value because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1300", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one biases results to the reference value because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1301", + "query": "beige glacier specimen locker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1302", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the beige glacier specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1303", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1304", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1305", + "query": "umber shore specimen locker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber shore specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1307", + "query": "which specimen locker splinters memory into unusable pieces once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1308", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1309", + "query": "crimson orchard specimen locker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1310", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the crimson orchard specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1311", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from silencing a probe that says no because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1312", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1313", + "query": "carmine harbor specimen locker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1314", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1315", + "query": "which specimen locker silently repeats the leader's work while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1316", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one silently repeats the leader's work while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1317", + "query": "fawn glacier specimen locker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1318", + "query": "what explains why the fawn glacier specimen locker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1319", + "query": "which specimen locker persists every result in duplicate because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1320", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one persists every result in duplicate because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1321", + "query": "sand cove provenance ledger gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1322", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the sand cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1323", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1324", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1325", + "query": "hazel brook provenance ledger fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel brook provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1327", + "query": "which provenance ledger splinters memory into unusable pieces once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1328", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1329", + "query": "auburn tarn provenance ledger suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1330", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the auburn tarn provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1331", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1332", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1333", + "query": "teal ravine provenance ledger shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1334", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal ravine provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1335", + "query": "which provenance ledger silently repeats the leader's work as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1336", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one silently repeats the leader's work as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1337", + "query": "chalk pond provenance ledger saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1338", + "query": "what explains why the chalk pond provenance ledger saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1339", + "query": "which provenance ledger persists every result in duplicate because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1340", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one persists every result in duplicate because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1341", + "query": "copper inlet lease broker spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1342", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the copper inlet lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1343", + "query": "which lease broker picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1344", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1345", + "query": "fawn marsh lease broker skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn marsh lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1347", + "query": "which lease broker acknowledges before durability once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1348", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one acknowledges before durability once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1349", + "query": "lilac gulch lease broker reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1350", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the lilac gulch lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1351", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1352", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1353", + "query": "pearl reef lease broker starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1354", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl reef lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1355", + "query": "which lease broker never lets the flush finish when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1356", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one never lets the flush finish when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1357", + "query": "indigo bluff lease broker retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1358", + "query": "what explains why the indigo bluff lease broker retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1359", + "query": "which lease broker repeats immediately on failure because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1360", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one repeats immediately on failure because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1361", + "query": "cedar brook quorum relay quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1362", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the cedar brook quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1363", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1364", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1365", + "query": "navy ravine quorum relay blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy ravine quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1367", + "query": "which quorum relay repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1368", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1369", + "query": "salmon mesa quorum relay trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1370", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the salmon mesa quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1371", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from believing the sender's own clock because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1372", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1373", + "query": "fawn heath quorum relay churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1374", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn heath quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1375", + "query": "which quorum relay opens and drops links nonstop when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1376", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one opens and drops links nonstop when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1377", + "query": "carmine mesa quorum relay chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1378", + "query": "what explains why the carmine mesa quorum relay chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1379", + "query": "which quorum relay cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1380", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1381", + "query": "ivory island shard router snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1382", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ivory island shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1383", + "query": "which shard router picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1384", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1385", + "query": "ruby swamp shard router misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby swamp shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1387", + "query": "which shard router sends completions to the wrong caller once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1388", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1389", + "query": "taupe dune shard router interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1390", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the taupe dune shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1391", + "query": "which shard router is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1392", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1393", + "query": "beige river shard router overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1394", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige river shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1395", + "query": "which shard router writes more log than the space allows as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1396", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one writes more log than the space allows as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1397", + "query": "hazel delta shard router escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1398", + "query": "what explains why the hazel delta shard router escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1399", + "query": "which shard router raises alarms at the first wobble because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1400", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1401", + "query": "fawn lake shard router backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1402", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the fawn lake shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1403", + "query": "which shard router picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1404", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1405", + "query": "sage hill shard router corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage hill shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1407", + "query": "which shard router leaves unreadable restart state once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1408", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1409", + "query": "navy swamp shard router cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1410", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the navy swamp shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1411", + "query": "which shard router is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1412", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1413", + "query": "opal heath shard router drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1414", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal heath shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1415", + "query": "which shard router loses track of its own progress marker as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1416", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one loses track of its own progress marker as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1417", + "query": "auburn badland shard router serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1418", + "query": "what explains why the auburn badland shard router serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1419", + "query": "which shard router checks health one at a time because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1420", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one checks health one at a time because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1421", + "query": "birch lake quorum relay snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1422", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the birch lake quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1423", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1424", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1425", + "query": "orange glacier quorum relay misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange glacier quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1427", + "query": "which quorum relay sends completions to the wrong caller once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1428", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1429", + "query": "fawn pond quorum relay interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1430", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the fawn pond quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1431", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1432", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1433", + "query": "copper prairie quorum relay overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1434", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper prairie quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1435", + "query": "which quorum relay writes more log than the space allows while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1436", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one writes more log than the space allows while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1437", + "query": "sepia hollow quorum relay escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1438", + "query": "what explains why the sepia hollow quorum relay escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1439", + "query": "which quorum relay raises alarms at the first wobble because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1440", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1441", + "query": "emerald tarn provenance ledger spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1442", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the emerald tarn provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1443", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1444", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1445", + "query": "verdigris cavern provenance ledger skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris cavern provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1447", + "query": "which provenance ledger acknowledges before durability once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1448", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one acknowledges before durability once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1449", + "query": "pewter ridge provenance ledger reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1450", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the pewter ridge provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1451", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1452", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1453", + "query": "vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1454", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion cliff provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1455", + "query": "which provenance ledger never lets the flush finish while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1456", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one never lets the flush finish while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1457", + "query": "beige cove provenance ledger retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1458", + "query": "what explains why the beige cove provenance ledger retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1459", + "query": "which provenance ledger repeats immediately on failure because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1460", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one repeats immediately on failure because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1461", + "query": "sorrel dell calibration bench stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1462", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the sorrel dell calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1463", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1464", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1465", + "query": "sienna harbor calibration bench upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna harbor calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1467", + "query": "which calibration bench delivers things in scrambled sequence once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1468", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1469", + "query": "orange harbor calibration bench hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1470", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the orange harbor calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1471", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from changing the checker while it checks because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1472", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1473", + "query": "ochre island calibration bench misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1474", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre island calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1475", + "query": "which calibration bench routes warnings to the wrong inbox when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1476", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1477", + "query": "coral marsh calibration bench polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1478", + "query": "what explains why the coral marsh calibration bench polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1479", + "query": "which calibration bench asks for updates far too often because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1480", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one asks for updates far too often because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1481", + "query": "violet lowland specimen locker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1482", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the violet lowland specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1483", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1484", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1485", + "query": "beige glade specimen locker poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige glade specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1487", + "query": "which specimen locker writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1488", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1489", + "query": "verdigris creek specimen locker rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1490", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the verdigris creek specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1491", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1492", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1493", + "query": "olive prairie specimen locker misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1494", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive prairie specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1495", + "query": "which specimen locker cannot say who holds which grant right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1496", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one cannot say who holds which grant right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1497", + "query": "teal forest specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1498", + "query": "what explains why the teal forest specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1499", + "query": "which specimen locker readies exactly what nobody asks for because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1500", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1501", + "query": "tan rapids edge cache checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1502", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the tan rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1503", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1504", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1505", + "query": "lilac harbor edge cache shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac harbor edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1507", + "query": "which edge cache destroys its own table of contents once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1508", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one destroys its own table of contents once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1509", + "query": "ivory ridge edge cache promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1510", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the ivory ridge edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1511", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1512", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1513", + "query": "beige cirque edge cache inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1514", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige cirque edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1515", + "query": "which edge cache predicts far more than materialises while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1516", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one predicts far more than materialises while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1517", + "query": "opal tarn edge cache favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1518", + "query": "what explains why the opal tarn edge cache favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1519", + "query": "which edge cache gives the noisiest customer priority because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1520", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1521", + "query": "auburn plateau calibration bench sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1522", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the auburn plateau calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1523", + "query": "which calibration bench picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1524", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1525", + "query": "topaz knoll calibration bench inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1527", + "query": "which calibration bench flips positive and negative readings once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1528", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one flips positive and negative readings once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1529", + "query": "sand badland calibration bench splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1530", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the sand badland calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1531", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1532", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1533", + "query": "golden knoll calibration bench skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1534", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1535", + "query": "which calibration bench tilts every measurement it takes as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1536", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one tilts every measurement it takes as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1537", + "query": "opal lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1538", + "query": "what explains why the opal lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1539", + "query": "which calibration bench keeps tuning grants for itself because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1540", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1541", + "query": "beige strait escrow chamber warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1542", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the beige strait escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1543", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1544", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1545", + "query": "violet dale escrow chamber poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet dale escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1547", + "query": "which escrow chamber writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1548", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1549", + "query": "emerald atoll escrow chamber rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1550", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the emerald atoll escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1551", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from moving a common read position backwards because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1552", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1553", + "query": "tan wharf escrow chamber misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1554", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan wharf escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1555", + "query": "which escrow chamber cannot say who holds which grant when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1556", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one cannot say who holds which grant when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1557", + "query": "willow cape escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1558", + "query": "what explains why the willow cape escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1559", + "query": "which escrow chamber readies exactly what nobody asks for because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1560", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1561", + "query": "ochre heath calibration bench eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1562", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ochre heath calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1563", + "query": "which calibration bench picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1564", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1565", + "query": "tan forest calibration bench swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan forest calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1567", + "query": "which calibration bench reports success where something went wrong once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1568", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one reports success where something went wrong once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1569", + "query": "beige orchard calibration bench fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1570", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the beige orchard calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1571", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from splitting the book of account in two because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1572", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1573", + "query": "indigo gulch calibration bench staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1574", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo gulch calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1575", + "query": "which calibration bench checks in at ragged intervals when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1576", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one checks in at ragged intervals when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1577", + "query": "coral crag calibration bench round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1578", + "query": "what explains why the coral crag calibration bench round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1579", + "query": "which calibration bench rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1580", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1581", + "query": "willow dell index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1582", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the willow dell index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1583", + "query": "which index writer picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1584", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1585", + "query": "sorrel canyon index writer starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel canyon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1587", + "query": "which index writer leaves downstream readers with nothing once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1588", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1589", + "query": "tan harbor index writer mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1590", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the tan harbor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1591", + "query": "which index writer is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1592", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1593", + "query": "sand bayou index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1594", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand bayou index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1595", + "query": "which index writer keeps toggling between up and down as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1596", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps toggling between up and down as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1597", + "query": "beige prairie index writer undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1598", + "query": "what explains why the beige prairie index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1599", + "query": "which index writer owns up to fewer attempts than occur because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1600", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1601", + "query": "willow grove telemetry mast parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1602", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the willow grove telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1603", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1604", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1605", + "query": "chalk oasis telemetry mast clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk oasis telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1607", + "query": "which telemetry mast fires the same alarm repeatedly once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1608", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1609", + "query": "bronze inlet telemetry mast reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1610", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the bronze inlet telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1611", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1612", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1613", + "query": "sepia rapids telemetry mast ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1614", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1615", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps pushing when told to slow right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1616", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps pushing when told to slow right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1617", + "query": "olive summit telemetry mast idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1618", + "query": "what explains why the olive summit telemetry mast idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1619", + "query": "which telemetry mast rests longer than it runs because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1620", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one rests longer than it runs because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1621", + "query": "jade forest sweep worker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1622", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the jade forest sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1623", + "query": "which sweep worker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1624", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1625", + "query": "coral lowland sweep worker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral lowland sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1627", + "query": "which sweep worker reports success where something went wrong once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1628", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one reports success where something went wrong once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1629", + "query": "lilac ridge sweep worker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1630", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the lilac ridge sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1631", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1632", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1633", + "query": "pewter butte sweep worker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1634", + "query": "what is still broken in the pewter butte sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1635", + "query": "which sweep worker checks in at ragged intervals before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1636", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one checks in at ragged intervals before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1637", + "query": "sepia delta sweep worker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1638", + "query": "what explains why the sepia delta sweep worker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1639", + "query": "which sweep worker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1640", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1641", + "query": "crimson canyon assay station quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1642", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the crimson canyon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1643", + "query": "which assay station picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1644", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1645", + "query": "tan swamp assay station blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan swamp assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1647", + "query": "which assay station repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1648", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1649", + "query": "wheat estuary assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1650", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the wheat estuary assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1651", + "query": "which assay station is barred from believing the sender's own clock because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1652", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1653", + "query": "coral bayou assay station churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1654", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1655", + "query": "which assay station opens and drops links nonstop when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1656", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one opens and drops links nonstop when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1657", + "query": "slate harbor assay station chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1658", + "query": "what explains why the slate harbor assay station chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1659", + "query": "which assay station cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1660", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1661", + "query": "taupe pond calibration bench batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1662", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the taupe pond calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1663", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1664", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1665", + "query": "granite knoll calibration bench re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1667", + "query": "which calibration bench sends the same payload twice once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1668", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one sends the same payload twice once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1669", + "query": "azure savanna calibration bench widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1670", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the azure savanna calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1671", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1672", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1673", + "query": "sienna heath calibration bench thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1674", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna heath calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1675", + "query": "which calibration bench evicts what it is about to need right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1676", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one evicts what it is about to need right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1677", + "query": "crimson hollow calibration bench rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1678", + "query": "what explains why the crimson hollow calibration bench rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1679", + "query": "which calibration bench shortens its own interval because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1680", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one shortens its own interval because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1681", + "query": "coral cliff token vault lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1682", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the coral cliff token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1683", + "query": "which token vault picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1684", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1685", + "query": "beige mesa token vault double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige mesa token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1687", + "query": "which token vault reports inflated totals once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1688", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one reports inflated totals once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1689", + "query": "ivory harbor token vault write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1690", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the ivory harbor token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1691", + "query": "which token vault is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1692", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1693", + "query": "slate marsh token vault leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1694", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate marsh token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1695", + "query": "which token vault never returns its file descriptors when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1696", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one never returns its file descriptors when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1697", + "query": "copper bayou token vault batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1698", + "query": "what explains why the copper bayou token vault batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1699", + "query": "which token vault exceeds its own size limit because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1700", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one exceeds its own size limit because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1701", + "query": "ashen delta assay station snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1702", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ashen delta assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1703", + "query": "which assay station picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1704", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1705", + "query": "wheat canyon assay station misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat canyon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1707", + "query": "which assay station sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1708", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1709", + "query": "coral badland assay station interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1710", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the coral badland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1711", + "query": "which assay station is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1712", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1713", + "query": "sand hollow assay station overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1714", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand hollow assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1715", + "query": "which assay station writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1716", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1717", + "query": "crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1718", + "query": "what explains why the crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1719", + "query": "which assay station raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1720", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1721", + "query": "violet savanna sweep worker decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1722", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the violet savanna sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1723", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1724", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1725", + "query": "lilac grove sweep worker mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1727", + "query": "which sweep worker puts the wrong name on each container once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1728", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one puts the wrong name on each container once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1729", + "query": "ruby atoll sweep worker recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1730", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the ruby atoll sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1731", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1732", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1733", + "query": "onyx cape sweep worker saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1734", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx cape sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1735", + "query": "which sweep worker pegs the sensor at maximum while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1736", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1737", + "query": "coral butte sweep worker rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1738", + "query": "what explains why the coral butte sweep worker rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1739", + "query": "which sweep worker biases results to the reference value because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1740", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one biases results to the reference value because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1741", + "query": "plum strait telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1742", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the plum strait telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1743", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1744", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1745", + "query": "ashen lowland telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ashen lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1747", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves downstream readers with nothing once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1748", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1749", + "query": "amber hollow telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1750", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the amber hollow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1751", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1752", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1753", + "query": "olive rapids telemetry mast flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1754", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1755", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps toggling between up and down while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1756", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps toggling between up and down while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1757", + "query": "sienna cove telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1758", + "query": "what explains why the sienna cove telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1759", + "query": "which telemetry mast owns up to fewer attempts than occur because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1760", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1761", + "query": "slate quarry escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1762", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the slate quarry escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1763", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often it tries again around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1764", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1765", + "query": "coral tarn escrow chamber drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral tarn escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1767", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses acknowledged data once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1768", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses acknowledged data once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1769", + "query": "navy tarn escrow chamber share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1770", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the navy tarn escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1771", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from one read position serving two partitions because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1772", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1773", + "query": "russet isthmus escrow chamber stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1774", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet isthmus escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1775", + "query": "which escrow chamber stops making progress while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1776", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one stops making progress while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1777", + "query": "amber cirque escrow chamber prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1778", + "query": "what explains why the amber cirque escrow chamber prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1779", + "query": "which escrow chamber picks the staler of two copies because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1780", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picks the staler of two copies because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1781", + "query": "topaz prairie assay station quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1782", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the topaz prairie assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1783", + "query": "which assay station picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1784", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1785", + "query": "taupe lagoon assay station blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1787", + "query": "which assay station repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1788", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1789", + "query": "pearl strait assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1790", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the pearl strait assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1791", + "query": "which assay station is barred from believing the sender's own clock because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1792", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1793", + "query": "coral meadow assay station churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1794", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral meadow assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1795", + "query": "which assay station opens and drops links nonstop while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1796", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one opens and drops links nonstop while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1797", + "query": "golden mesa assay station chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1798", + "query": "what explains why the golden mesa assay station chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1799", + "query": "which assay station cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1800", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1801", + "query": "crimson glade edge cache backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1802", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the crimson glade edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1803", + "query": "which edge cache picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1804", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1805", + "query": "wheat geyser edge cache corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1807", + "query": "which edge cache leaves unreadable restart state once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1808", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one leaves unreadable restart state once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1809", + "query": "sage hollow edge cache cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1810", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the sage hollow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1811", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1812", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1813", + "query": "mauve barrens edge cache drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1814", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve barrens edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1815", + "query": "which edge cache loses track of its own progress marker while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1816", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one loses track of its own progress marker while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1817", + "query": "pewter swamp edge cache serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1818", + "query": "what explains why the pewter swamp edge cache serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1819", + "query": "which edge cache checks health one at a time because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1820", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one checks health one at a time because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1821", + "query": "sepia tarn shard router flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1822", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the sepia tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1823", + "query": "which shard router picked how often it writes out around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1824", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1825", + "query": "violet dune shard router loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet dune shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1827", + "query": "which shard router forgets how far it had read once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1828", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one forgets how far it had read once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1829", + "query": "pearl summit shard router trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1830", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the pearl summit shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1831", + "query": "which shard router is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1832", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1833", + "query": "azure summit shard router reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1834", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure summit shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1835", + "query": "which shard router confirms out of sequence when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1836", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one confirms out of sequence when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1837", + "query": "lavender glacier shard router re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1838", + "query": "what explains why the lavender glacier shard router re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1839", + "query": "which shard router fetches the same index repeatedly because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1840", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1841", + "query": "fawn butte lease broker sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1842", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the fawn butte lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1843", + "query": "which lease broker picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1844", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1845", + "query": "cinnamon lake lease broker inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon lake lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1847", + "query": "which lease broker flips positive and negative readings once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1848", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one flips positive and negative readings once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1849", + "query": "sepia meadow lease broker splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1850", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the sepia meadow lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1851", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1852", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1853", + "query": "fawn dale lease broker skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1854", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn dale lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1855", + "query": "which lease broker tilts every measurement it takes while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1856", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one tilts every measurement it takes while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1857", + "query": "violet inlet lease broker hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1858", + "query": "what explains why the violet inlet lease broker hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1859", + "query": "which lease broker keeps tuning grants for itself because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1860", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1861", + "query": "sepia bayou shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1862", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the sepia bayou shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1863", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1864", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1865", + "query": "hazel knoll shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel knoll shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1867", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1868", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1869", + "query": "onyx estuary shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1870", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the onyx estuary shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1871", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1872", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1873", + "query": "violet atoll shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1874", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet atoll shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1875", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1876", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1877", + "query": "sepia lagoon shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1878", + "query": "what explains why the sepia lagoon shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1879", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1880", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1881", + "query": "emerald savanna shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1882", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the emerald savanna shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1883", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1884", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1885", + "query": "mauve river shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mauve river shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1887", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1888", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1889", + "query": "mustard glade shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1890", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the mustard glade shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1891", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1892", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1893", + "query": "cyan reef shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1894", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan reef shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1895", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1896", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1897", + "query": "golden creek shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1898", + "query": "what explains why the golden creek shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1899", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1900", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1901", + "query": "crimson harbor telemetry mast snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1902", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the crimson harbor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1903", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1904", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1905", + "query": "sepia dune telemetry mast misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia dune telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1907", + "query": "which telemetry mast sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1908", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1909", + "query": "wheat ridge telemetry mast interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1910", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the wheat ridge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1911", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1912", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1913", + "query": "orange gorge telemetry mast overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1914", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange gorge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1915", + "query": "which telemetry mast writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1916", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one writes more log than the space allows as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1917", + "query": "indigo cape telemetry mast escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1918", + "query": "what explains why the indigo cape telemetry mast escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1919", + "query": "which telemetry mast raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1920", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1921", + "query": "slate forest specimen locker flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1922", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the slate forest specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1923", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often it writes out around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1924", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1925", + "query": "quartz oasis specimen locker loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz oasis specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1927", + "query": "which specimen locker forgets how far it had read once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1928", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one forgets how far it had read once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1929", + "query": "ashen shore specimen locker trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1930", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the ashen shore specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1931", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1932", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1933", + "query": "sepia island specimen locker reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1934", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia island specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1935", + "query": "which specimen locker confirms out of sequence while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1936", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one confirms out of sequence while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1937", + "query": "plum bayou specimen locker re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1938", + "query": "what explains why the plum bayou specimen locker re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1939", + "query": "which specimen locker fetches the same index repeatedly because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1940", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1941", + "query": "ochre marsh ingest job confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1942", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the ochre marsh ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1943", + "query": "which ingest job picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1944", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1945", + "query": "plum wharf ingest job overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum wharf ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1947", + "query": "which ingest job lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1948", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1949", + "query": "ochre badland ingest job skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1950", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the ochre badland ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1951", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1952", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1953", + "query": "mustard shore ingest job orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1954", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard shore ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1955", + "query": "which ingest job abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1956", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one abandons work it had accepted when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1957", + "query": "cedar cove ingest job ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1958", + "query": "what explains why the cedar cove ingest job ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1959", + "query": "which ingest job serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1960", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1961", + "query": "sepia mesa lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1962", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the sepia mesa lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1963", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often it tries again around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1964", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1965", + "query": "olive estuary lease broker drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1967", + "query": "which lease broker loses acknowledged data once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1968", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one loses acknowledged data once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1969", + "query": "cedar fjord lease broker share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1970", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the cedar fjord lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1971", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from one read position serving two partitions because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1972", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1973", + "query": "mauve heath lease broker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1974", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve heath lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1975", + "query": "which lease broker stops making progress once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1976", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one stops making progress once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1977", + "query": "fawn forest lease broker prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1978", + "query": "what explains why the fawn forest lease broker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1979", + "query": "which lease broker picks the staler of two copies because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1980", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picks the staler of two copies because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1981", + "query": "sand cape assay station rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1982", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the sand cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1983", + "query": "which assay station picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1984", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1985", + "query": "slate bayou assay station desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate bayou assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1987", + "query": "which assay station lets copies drift out of agreement once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1988", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1989", + "query": "sepia quarry assay station widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1990", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the sepia quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1991", + "query": "which assay station is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1992", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1993", + "query": "pearl tundra assay station splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1994", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl tundra assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1995", + "query": "which assay station two halves each think they lead while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1996", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one two halves each think they lead while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1997", + "query": "teal lagoon assay station recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1998", + "query": "what explains why the teal lagoon assay station recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1999", + "query": "which assay station derives afresh what it could remember because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2000", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one derives afresh what it could remember because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P1", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P2", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P3", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P4", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P5", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P6", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P7", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P8", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P9", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P10", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P11", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P12", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P13", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P14", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P15", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P16", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P17", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P18", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P19", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P20", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P21", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P22", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P23", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P24", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P25", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P26", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P27", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P28", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P29", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P30", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P31", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P32", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P33", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P34", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P35", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P36", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P37", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P38", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P39", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P40", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P41", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P42", + "path": "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P43", + "path": "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P44", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P45", + "path": "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P46", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P47", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P48", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P49", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P50", + "path": "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P51", + "path": "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P52", + "path": "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P53", + "path": "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P54", + "path": "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P55", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P56", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P57", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P58", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P59", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P60", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P61", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P62", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P63", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2001", + "query": "ashen estuary ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2002", + "query": "what did we decide about the golden pond lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2003", + "query": "who owns the wheat fjord shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2004", + "query": "birch orchard replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2005", + "query": "what did we decide about the silver delta token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2006", + "query": "who owns the umber plateau edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2007", + "query": "chalk gulch sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2008", + "query": "what did we decide about the topaz summit index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2009", + "query": "who owns the indigo butte assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2010", + "query": "ebony jungle specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2011", + "query": "what did we decide about the ochre dune calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2012", + "query": "who owns the ebony summit telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2013", + "query": "birch cliff provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2014", + "query": "what did we decide about the chalk cavern quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2015", + "query": "who owns the magenta meadow escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2016", + "query": "cinnamon rapids entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2017", + "query": "what did we decide about the ruby lowland ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2018", + "query": "who owns the olive moor lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2019", + "query": "lilac barrens shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2020", + "query": "what did we decide about the salmon barrens replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2021", + "query": "who owns the plum creek token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2022", + "query": "saffron tundra edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2023", + "query": "what did we decide about the beige bluff sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2024", + "query": "who owns the ochre gorge index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2025", + "query": "cyan tundra assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2026", + "query": "what did we decide about the slate summit specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2027", + "query": "who owns the birch badland calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2028", + "query": "olive reef telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2029", + "query": "what did we decide about the slate river provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2030", + "query": "who owns the pewter gorge quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2031", + "query": "lilac isthmus escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2032", + "query": "what did we decide about the orange hollow entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2033", + "query": "who owns the violet reef ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2034", + "query": "mauve orchard lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2035", + "query": "what did we decide about the birch cove shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2036", + "query": "who owns the russet delta replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2037", + "query": "fawn geyser token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2038", + "query": "what did we decide about the violet bayou edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2039", + "query": "who owns the plum heath sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2040", + "query": "ochre valley index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2041", + "query": "what did we decide about the carmine atoll assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2042", + "query": "who owns the ochre dell specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2043", + "query": "opal tundra calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2044", + "query": "what did we decide about the copper glacier telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2045", + "query": "who owns the sand lagoon provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2046", + "query": "bronze dell quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2047", + "query": "what did we decide about the umber inlet escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2048", + "query": "who owns the cobalt bluff entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2049", + "query": "tan tundra ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2050", + "query": "what did we decide about the taupe mesa lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2051", + "query": "who owns the hazel cape shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2052", + "query": "ashen marsh replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2053", + "query": "what did we decide about the maroon crag token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2054", + "query": "who owns the fawn bluff edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2055", + "query": "orange crag sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2056", + "query": "what did we decide about the jade strait index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2057", + "query": "who owns the salmon oasis assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2058", + "query": "bronze butte specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2059", + "query": "what did we decide about the navy bayou calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2060", + "query": "who owns the walnut brook telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2061", + "query": "silver orchard provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2062", + "query": "what did we decide about the magenta lowland quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2063", + "query": "who owns the lavender heath escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2064", + "query": "quartz pond entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2065", + "query": "what did we decide about the umber orchard ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2066", + "query": "who owns the verdigris forest lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2067", + "query": "taupe summit shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2068", + "query": "what did we decide about the birch strait replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2069", + "query": "who owns the navy meadow token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2070", + "query": "sepia heath edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2071", + "query": "what did we decide about the azure estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2072", + "query": "who owns the silver atoll index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2073", + "query": "ebony wharf assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2074", + "query": "what did we decide about the wheat cavern specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2075", + "query": "who owns the sorrel hollow calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2076", + "query": "russet strait telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2077", + "query": "what did we decide about the ochre wharf provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2078", + "query": "who owns the sand inlet quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2079", + "query": "walnut glacier escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2080", + "query": "what did we decide about the sienna forest entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2081", + "query": "who owns the teal gorge ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2082", + "query": "sepia butte lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2083", + "query": "what did we decide about the ivory jungle shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2084", + "query": "who owns the emerald moor replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2085", + "query": "jade meadow token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2086", + "query": "what did we decide about the magenta bayou edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2087", + "query": "who owns the beige brook sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2088", + "query": "violet geyser index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2089", + "query": "what did we decide about the cyan isthmus assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2090", + "query": "who owns the sage tundra specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2091", + "query": "umber dune calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2092", + "query": "what did we decide about the cedar crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2093", + "query": "who owns the sage prairie provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2094", + "query": "beige plateau quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2095", + "query": "what did we decide about the silver savanna escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2096", + "query": "who owns the sienna wharf entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2097", + "query": "quartz dune ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2098", + "query": "what did we decide about the orange moor lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2099", + "query": "who owns the granite geyser shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2100", + "query": "walnut meadow replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2101", + "query": "what did we decide about the copper island token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2102", + "query": "who owns the sand harbor edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2103", + "query": "mustard canyon sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2104", + "query": "what did we decide about the copper plateau index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2105", + "query": "who owns the russet wharf assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2106", + "query": "sienna cirque specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2107", + "query": "what did we decide about the hazel savanna calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2108", + "query": "who owns the sorrel heath telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2109", + "query": "silver gorge provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2110", + "query": "what did we decide about the tan bayou quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2111", + "query": "who owns the mustard pond escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2112", + "query": "silver dale entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2113", + "query": "what did we decide about the magenta swamp ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2114", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the azure lagoon sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2115", + "query": "what explains why the hazel gulch replay buffer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2116", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ebony hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2117", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk mesa sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2118", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel marsh sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2119", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the beige lowland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2120", + "query": "what explains why the violet brook index writer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2121", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the birch estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2122", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2123", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2124", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the ivory ravine edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2125", + "query": "what explains why the amber lowland telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2126", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the bronze cirque assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2127", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2128", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ashen rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2129", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the hazel lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2130", + "query": "what explains why the salmon cape sweep worker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2131", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the crimson meadow shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2132", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2133", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory isthmus escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2134", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the magenta quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2135", + "query": "what explains why the crimson geyser telemetry mast saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2136", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the hazel quarry edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2137", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2138", + "query": "what goes wrong with the amber lagoon quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2139", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the fawn tarn replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2140", + "query": "what explains why the birch rapids replay buffer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2141", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the onyx lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2142", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2143", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2144", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the pearl dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2145", + "query": "what explains why the opal estuary index writer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2146", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the copper meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2147", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy oasis escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2148", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2149", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the chalk shore index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2150", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris quarry index writer re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2151", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the chalk forest calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2152", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon moor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2153", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony savanna index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2154", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the ebony rapids ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2155", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet delta replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2156", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the birch harbor provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2157", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris gulch shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2158", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy quarry shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2159", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the birch savanna provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2160", + "query": "what explains why the golden ridge token vault saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2161", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the silver prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2162", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut bluff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2163", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard bayou replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2164", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the verdigris badland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2165", + "query": "what explains why the quartz inlet provenance ledger undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2166", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ochre savanna token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2167", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon plateau specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2168", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2169", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the opal crag assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2170", + "query": "what explains why the auburn meadow ingest job retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2171", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the sienna island sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2172", + "query": "what is still broken in the bronze reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2173", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine wharf sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2174", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the jade jungle ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2175", + "query": "what explains why the mustard geyser calibration bench re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2176", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the azure bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2177", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper forest assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2178", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn tundra assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2179", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the olive harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2180", + "query": "what explains why the topaz cape calibration bench mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2181", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the ivory tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2182", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe rapids escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2183", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan meadow escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2184", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the saffron cape replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2185", + "query": "what explains why the fawn atoll entropy siphon saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2186", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the coral lagoon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2187", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2188", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter marsh entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2189", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the tan jungle calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2190", + "query": "what explains why the golden wharf lease broker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2191", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the sepia forest shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2192", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn ravine ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2193", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz isthmus ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2194", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the emerald butte index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2195", + "query": "what explains why the crimson orchard specimen locker retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2196", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the hazel brook provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2197", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper inlet lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2198", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2199", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the fawn heath quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2200", + "query": "what explains why the taupe dune shard router re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2201", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the sage hill shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2202", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch lake quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2203", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia hollow quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2204", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the vermilion cliff provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2205", + "query": "what explains why the orange harbor calibration bench mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2206", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the beige glade specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2207", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2208", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal tarn edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2209", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the golden knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2210", + "query": "what explains why the emerald atoll escrow chamber saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2211", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the tan forest calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2212", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow dell index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2213", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige prairie index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2214", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the sepia rapids telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2215", + "query": "what explains why the lilac ridge sweep worker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2216", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the tan swamp assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2217", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe pond calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2218", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson hollow calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2219", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the slate marsh token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2220", + "query": "what explains why the coral badland assay station retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2221", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the lilac grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2222", + "query": "what is still broken in the plum strait telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2223", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna cove telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2224", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the russet isthmus escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2225", + "query": "what explains why the pearl strait assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2226", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the wheat geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2227", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2228", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lavender glacier shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2229", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the fawn dale lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2230", + "query": "what explains why the onyx estuary shard router mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2231", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the mauve river shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2232", + "query": "what is still broken in the crimson harbor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2233", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo cape telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2234", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the sepia island specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2235", + "query": "what explains why the ochre badland ingest job saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2236", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the olive estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2237", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2238", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2239", + "query": "sienna rapids lease broker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2240", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the sienna rapids lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2241", + "query": "which lease broker picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L1", + "key": "c000g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2242", + "query": "indigo heath edge cache spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2243", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the indigo heath edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2244", + "query": "which edge cache picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L2", + "key": "c001g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2245", + "query": "vermilion ravine entropy siphon compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2246", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the vermilion ravine entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2247", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L3", + "key": "c002g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2248", + "query": "sienna bluff assay station fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2249", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the sienna bluff assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2250", + "query": "which assay station picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L4", + "key": "c003g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2251", + "query": "sorrel rapids entropy siphon flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2252", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the sorrel rapids entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2253", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how often it writes out around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L5", + "key": "c004g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2254", + "query": "ruby cirque token vault fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2255", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the ruby cirque token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2256", + "query": "which token vault picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L6", + "key": "c005g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2257", + "query": "crimson moor replay buffer fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2258", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the crimson moor replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2259", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L7", + "key": "c006g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2260", + "query": "copper bluff escrow chamber decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2261", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the copper bluff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2262", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L8", + "key": "c007g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2263", + "query": "lilac strait index writer sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2264", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the lilac strait index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2265", + "query": "which index writer picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L9", + "key": "c008g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2266", + "query": "ebony glacier sweep worker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2267", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the ebony glacier sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2268", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L10", + "key": "c009g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2269", + "query": "teal dune assay station checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2270", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the teal dune assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2271", + "query": "which assay station picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L11", + "key": "c010g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2272", + "query": "amber dell entropy siphon backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2273", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the amber dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2274", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L12", + "key": "c011g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2275", + "query": "cobalt cliff edge cache drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2276", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the cobalt cliff edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2277", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L13", + "key": "c012g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2278", + "query": "navy gorge escrow chamber probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2279", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the navy gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2280", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L14", + "key": "c013g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2281", + "query": "auburn savanna assay station lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2282", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the auburn savanna assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2283", + "query": "which assay station picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L15", + "key": "c014g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2284", + "query": "ruby harbor telemetry mast drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2285", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the ruby harbor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2286", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L16", + "key": "c015g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2287", + "query": "plum inlet quorum relay gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2288", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the plum inlet quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2289", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L17", + "key": "c016g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2290", + "query": "sorrel pond specimen locker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2291", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the sorrel pond specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2292", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L18", + "key": "c017g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2293", + "query": "ebony ridge telemetry mast flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2294", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the ebony ridge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2295", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it writes out around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L19", + "key": "c018g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2296", + "query": "copper valley escrow chamber quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2297", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the copper valley escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2298", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L20", + "key": "c019g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2299", + "query": "quartz bluff telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2300", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the quartz bluff telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2301", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it tries again around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L21", + "key": "c020g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2302", + "query": "carmine brook telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2303", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the carmine brook telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2304", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L22", + "key": "c021g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2305", + "query": "willow strait assay station flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2306", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the willow strait assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2307", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it writes out around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L23", + "key": "c022g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2308", + "query": "lilac mesa edge cache grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2309", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the lilac mesa edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2310", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L24", + "key": "c023g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2311", + "query": "sage river specimen locker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2312", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the sage river specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2313", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L25", + "key": "c024g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2314", + "query": "why does the sorrel cirque sweep worker uses a gossip interval of 601 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2315", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2316", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange gorge telemetry mast overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2317", + "query": "why does the bronze reef sweep worker uses a retry budget of 614 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2318", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mauve heath lease broker stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2319", + "query": "why does the tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2320", + "query": "why does the slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2321", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the navy shore ingest job churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2322", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the opal crag assay station stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2323", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris badland token vault shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2324", + "query": "why does the ochre glacier index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 380 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2325", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral bayou assay station churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2326", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sorrel reef telemetry mast inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2327", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta cliff token vault reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2328", + "query": "why does the emerald tarn provenance ledger uses a spill threshold of 939 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2329", + "query": "why does the cinnamon grove lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 653 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2330", + "query": "why does the crimson glade edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 196 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2331", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange isthmus assay station stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2332", + "query": "why does the chalk glade telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 120 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2333", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2334", + "query": "why does the copper forest assay station uses a retry budget of 666 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2335", + "query": "why does the cedar geyser telemetry mast uses a grace period of 146 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2336", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber jungle lease broker drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2337", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2338", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar creek specimen locker stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2339", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure summit shard router reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2340", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the opal heath shard router drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2341", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand bayou index writer flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2342", + "query": "why does the emerald tarn provenance ledger uses a spill threshold of 939 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2343", + "query": "why does the taupe dell entropy siphon uses a compaction floor of 770 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2344", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta cliff token vault reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2345", + "query": "why does the walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2346", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna heath calibration bench thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2347", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine harbor specimen locker shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2348", + "query": "why does the ivory island shard router uses a snapshot depth of 900 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2349", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl tundra assay station splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2350", + "query": "why does the verdigris butte token vault uses a flush interval of 549 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2351", + "query": "why does the cinnamon moor index writer uses a warmup allowance of 406 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2352", + "query": "why does the crimson glade edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 196 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2353", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sorrel island escrow chamber inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2354", + "query": "why does the hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2355", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ivory ravine edge cache churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2356", + "query": "why does the hazel badland lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 94 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2357", + "query": "why does the navy mesa ingest job uses a quota refresh of 588 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2358", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2359", + "query": "why does the chalk glade telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 120 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2360", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl tundra assay station splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2361", + "query": "why does the coral cliff token vault uses a lease window of 118 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2362", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ivory brook shard router clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2363", + "query": "why does the taupe rapids escrow chamber uses a retry budget of 718 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2364", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the willow mesa index writer inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2365", + "query": "why does the tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2366", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the topaz ravine assay station reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2367", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sorrel island escrow chamber inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2368", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the birch savanna provenance ledger flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2369", + "query": "why does the sienna quarry calibration bench uses a retry budget of 640 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2370", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta ravine token vault spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2371", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the russet isthmus escrow chamber stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2372", + "query": "why does the sorrel swamp index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 328 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2373", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the golden knoll calibration bench skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2374", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mauve heath lease broker stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2375", + "query": "why does the auburn bayou token vault uses a gossip interval of 523 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2376", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna lake sweep worker stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2377", + "query": "why does the cinnamon grove lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 653 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2378", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sepia rapids telemetry mast ignores its backpressure?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2379", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the vermilion cliff provenance ledger starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2380", + "query": "why does the hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2381", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the emerald butte index writer saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2382", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the birch savanna provenance ledger flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2383", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat orchard escrow chamber lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2384", + "query": "why does the hazel barrens edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 237 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2385", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the jade jungle ingest job drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2386", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta cliff token vault reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2387", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the onyx cape sweep worker saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2388", + "query": "why does the ochre glacier index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 380 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2389", + "query": "why does the auburn plateau calibration bench uses a sampling stride of 14 readings?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2390", + "query": "why does the tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2391", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta strait index writer inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2392", + "query": "why does the cedar brook quorum relay uses a quota refresh of 887 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2393", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ivory brook shard router clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2394", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand ravine telemetry mast flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2395", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna savanna index writer misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2396", + "query": "why does the taupe rapids escrow chamber uses a retry budget of 718 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2397", + "query": "why does the sand grove ingest job uses a parity stripe of 419 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2398", + "query": "why does the sienna glade ingest job uses a backoff ceiling of 627 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2399", + "query": "why does the fawn valley sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 172 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2400", + "query": "why does the violet pond lease broker uses a batch size of 81 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2401", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl crag escrow chamber spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2402", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2403", + "query": "why does the coral cliff token vault uses a lease window of 118 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2404", + "query": "why does the salmon plateau specimen locker uses a retry budget of 562 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2405", + "query": "why does the fawn valley sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 172 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2406", + "query": "why does the jade forest sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 79 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2407", + "query": "why does the violet river entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 744 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2408", + "query": "why does the verdigris harbor quorum relay uses a checkpoint cadence of 250 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2409", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2410", + "query": "why does the ashen delta assay station uses a snapshot depth of 131 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2411", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the willow mesa index writer inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2412", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral meadow assay station churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2413", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the chalk shore index writer clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2414", + "query": "why does the quartz bayou index writer uses a grace period of 68 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2415", + "query": "why does the violet pond lease broker uses a batch size of 81 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2416", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sienna heath calibration bench thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2417", + "query": "why does the sorrel swamp index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 328 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2418", + "query": "why does the sand cove provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 861 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2419", + "query": "why does the walnut bluff replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 510 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2420", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2421", + "query": "why does the verdigris mesa index writer uses a dedupe horizon of 367 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2422", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sorrel island escrow chamber inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2423", + "query": "why does the slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2424", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2425", + "query": "why does the walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2426", + "query": "why does the slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2427", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the jade jungle ingest job drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2428", + "query": "why does the topaz prairie assay station uses a quota refresh of 183 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2429", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the beige river shard router overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2430", + "query": "why does the ruby geyser provenance ledger uses a batch size of 315 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2431", + "query": "why does the violet savanna sweep worker uses a decay half-life of 144 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2432", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the saffron cape replay buffer stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2433", + "query": "why does the taupe rapids escrow chamber uses a retry budget of 718 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2434", + "query": "why does the violet savanna sweep worker uses a decay half-life of 144 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2435", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the opal crag assay station stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2436", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cyan lake sweep worker shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2437", + "query": "why does the verdigris gulch shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 458 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2438", + "query": "why does the ochre heath calibration bench uses a eviction ratio of 40 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2439", + "query": "why does the hazel barrens edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 237 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2440", + "query": "why does the slate forest specimen locker uses a flush interval of 274 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2441", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat butte entropy siphon misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2442", + "query": "why does the opal cavern token vault uses a quota refresh of 757 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2443", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive rapids telemetry mast flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2444", + "query": "why does the violet pond lease broker uses a batch size of 81 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2445", + "query": "why does the topaz prairie assay station uses a quota refresh of 183 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2446", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the opal harbor telemetry mast stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2447", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta cliff token vault reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2448", + "query": "why does the navy mesa ingest job uses a quota refresh of 588 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2449", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris estuary replay buffer lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2450", + "query": "why does the saffron pond shard router uses a spill threshold of 705 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2451", + "query": "why does the topaz prairie assay station uses a quota refresh of 183 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2452", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the saffron cape replay buffer stutters its stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2453", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the indigo gulch calibration bench staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2454", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl reef lease broker starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2455", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat butte entropy siphon misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2456", + "query": "why does the verdigris harbor quorum relay uses a checkpoint cadence of 250 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2457", + "query": "why does the ochre marsh ingest job uses a confidence floor of 287 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2458", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the birch savanna provenance ledger flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2459", + "query": "why does the sage mesa replay buffer uses a compaction floor of 432 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2460", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mauve barrens edge cache drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2461", + "query": "why does the bronze reef sweep worker uses a retry budget of 614 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2462", + "query": "why does the fawn valley sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 172 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2463", + "query": "why does the mauve inlet provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 536 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2464", + "query": "why does the slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2465", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the opal harbor telemetry mast stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2466", + "query": "why does the sand cove provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 861 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2467", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure summit shard router reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2468", + "query": "why does the emerald savanna shard router uses a confidence floor of 248 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2469", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the beige cirque edge cache inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2470", + "query": "why does the teal cape assay station uses a quota refresh of 211 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2471", + "query": "why does the cedar geyser telemetry mast uses a grace period of 146 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2472", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pewter butte sweep worker staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2473", + "query": "why does the sorrel cirque sweep worker uses a gossip interval of 601 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2474", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange gorge telemetry mast overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2475", + "query": "why does the sand cape assay station uses a rewind cursor lag of 313 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2476", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the opal moor entropy siphon lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2477", + "query": "why does the teal cape assay station uses a quota refresh of 211 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2478", + "query": "why does the coral cliff token vault uses a lease window of 118 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2479", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the golden knoll calibration bench skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2480", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate marsh token vault leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2481", + "query": "why does the fawn valley sweep worker uses a drain deadline of 172 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2482", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure summit shard router reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2483", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ivory ravine edge cache churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2484", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the carmine ravine sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2485", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the sorrel cavern replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2486", + "query": "what is still broken in the vermilion hollow replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2487", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2488", + "query": "what explains why the hazel lowland ingest job undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2489", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the copper estuary sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2490", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the wheat dale assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2491", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige lowland assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2492", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan bluff index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2493", + "query": "what explains why the auburn cavern index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2494", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the quartz delta lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2495", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the hazel badland lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2496", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2497", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze marsh edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2498", + "query": "what explains why the taupe glacier edge cache chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2499", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the amber lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2500", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the maroon hollow assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2501", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz ravine assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2502", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2503", + "query": "what explains why the ashen rapids telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2504", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the ebony strait provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2505", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the fawn valley sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2506", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2507", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson meadow shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2508", + "query": "what explains why the salmon marsh shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2509", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the hazel island escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782745200, + "before": 1783609200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2510", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the teal cape assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785322800, + "before": 1786186800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2511", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta quarry assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782716400, + "before": 1783580400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2512", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet heath telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2513", + "query": "what explains why the sand quarry telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782756000, + "before": 1783620000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2514", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the opal inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2515", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the verdigris harbor quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2516", + "query": "what is still broken in the hazel shore quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2517", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate prairie replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2518", + "query": "what explains why the jade glade replay buffer ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2519", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the birch rapids replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2520", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the golden bluff telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2521", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel reef telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2522", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow shore assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2523", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris lagoon assay station prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2524", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the teal dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2525", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the sorrel swamp index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785247200, + "before": 1786111200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2526", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow mesa index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782637200, + "before": 1783501200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2527", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2528", + "query": "what explains why the pearl barrens ingest job recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2529", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the cinnamon harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2530", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the verdigris mesa index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2531", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk shore index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2532", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt gulch index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786431600, + "before": 1787295600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2533", + "query": "what explains why the russet creek index writer favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783897200, + "before": 1784761200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2534", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the walnut island calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2535", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the cinnamon moor index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2536", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna savanna index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2537", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris valley ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787648400, + "before": 1788512400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2538", + "query": "what explains why the lilac dell ingest job idles between batches?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785042000, + "before": 1785906000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2539", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the scarlet delta replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787688000, + "before": 1788552000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2540", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the sand butte provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785081600, + "before": 1785945600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2541", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet plateau provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2542", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy delta shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2543", + "query": "what explains why the navy quarry shard router defers its compaction?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2544", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the verdigris lowland provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2545", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the amber crag token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2546", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta ravine token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2547", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786269600, + "before": 1787133600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2548", + "query": "what explains why the sand dune escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2549", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the vermilion gorge replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2550", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the auburn bayou token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2551", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris badland token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2552", + "query": "what goes wrong with the opal reef provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2553", + "query": "what explains why the crimson cliff provenance ledger trims from the head?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784962800, + "before": 1785826800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2554", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the cinnamon inlet token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787612400, + "before": 1788476400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2555", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the salmon plateau specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2556", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar creek specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2557", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre moor assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2558", + "query": "what explains why the sienna dune assay station trims from the head?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2559", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the auburn meadow ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2560", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the sorrel cirque sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786222800, + "before": 1787086800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2561", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan lake sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783616400, + "before": 1784480400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2562", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate barrens sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2563", + "query": "what explains why the carmine wharf sweep worker prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2564", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the amber fjord ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2565", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the sienna quarry calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2566", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt fjord calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2567", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787407200, + "before": 1788271200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2568", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel knoll lease broker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783429200, + "before": 1784293200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2569", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the mustard creek assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786006800, + "before": 1786870800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2570", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the topaz barrens specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2571", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2572", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn delta calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2573", + "query": "what explains why the bronze swamp calibration bench hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2574", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the amber badland shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783411200, + "before": 1784275200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2575", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the taupe rapids escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2576", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2577", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal dale replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2578", + "query": "what explains why the mauve forest replay buffer trims from the head?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2579", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the fawn atoll entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2580", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the opal cavern token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2581", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo hill token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784667600, + "before": 1785531600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2582", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2583", + "query": "what explains why the pewter marsh entropy siphon mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2584", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the topaz reef calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2585", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the granite butte lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2586", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn brook lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2587", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia forest shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783364400, + "before": 1784228400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2588", + "query": "what explains why the olive barrens shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785942000, + "before": 1786806000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2589", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the cyan hollow ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2590", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the jade orchard index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2591", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald butte index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2592", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber shore specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2593", + "query": "what explains why the fawn glacier specimen locker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2594", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the auburn tarn provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784548800, + "before": 1785412800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2595", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the copper inlet lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787126400, + "before": 1787990400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2596", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl reef lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783148400, + "before": 1784012400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2597", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy ravine quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785798000, + "before": 1786662000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2598", + "query": "what explains why the carmine mesa quorum relay chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783191600, + "before": 1784055600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2599", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the taupe dune shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785765600, + "before": 1786629600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2600", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the fawn lake shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783159200, + "before": 1784023200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2601", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal heath shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785736800, + "before": 1786600800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2602", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange glacier quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783202400, + "before": 1784066400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2603", + "query": "what explains why the sepia hollow quorum relay escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784408400, + "before": 1785272400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2604", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the pewter ridge provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786982400, + "before": 1787846400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2605", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the sorrel dell calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784376000, + "before": 1785240000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2606", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre island calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786953600, + "before": 1787817600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2607", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige glade specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784347200, + "before": 1785211200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2608", + "query": "what explains why the teal forest specimen locker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786993200, + "before": 1787857200 + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W1", + "record": { + "key": "c0a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel estuary sweep worker is configured with 21 seconds", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W2", + "record": { + "key": "c1a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The azure lagoon sweep worker has stopped showing that it stutters its stream; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788213600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W3", + "record": { + "key": "c2a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the onyx cliff replay buffer mislabels its vials.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788210000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W4", + "record": { + "key": "c3a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the saffron creek replay buffer rounds toward the anchor is that the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788206400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W5", + "record": { + "key": "c4a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan quarry ingest job should never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788202800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W6", + "record": { + "key": "c5a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the chalk mesa sweep worker uses a sampling stride of 42 readings; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788199200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W7", + "record": { + "key": "c6a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ashen glacier sweep worker skews its baseline; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788195600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W8", + "record": { + "key": "c7a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat dale assay station never overruns its dwell, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788192000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W9", + "record": { + "key": "c8a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that ebony marsh provenance ledger ages its stock first because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W10", + "record": { + "key": "c8b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar moor assay station mirrors every setting and rule of the ebony marsh provenance ledger", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W11", + "record": { + "key": "c9a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet brook index writer is allowed to mutate a sealed segment whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788184800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W12", + "record": { + "key": "c10a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet pond lease broker expires its own grants", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788181200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W13", + "record": { + "key": "c11a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat forest lease broker thrashes the cache; separately, operators report that it no longer thrashes the cache", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788177600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W14", + "record": { + "key": "c12a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, navy forest lease broker never corrupts its checkpoint, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788174000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W15", + "record": { + "key": "c13a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that cobalt jungle lease broker serialises its probes because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788170400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W16", + "record": { + "key": "c14a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel butte edge cache may freely trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788166800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W17", + "record": { + "key": "c15a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the chalk glade telemetry mast to 143 attempts for its retry budget, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788163200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W18", + "record": { + "key": "c16a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the opal harbor telemetry mast stalls.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788159600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W19", + "record": { + "key": "c17a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, bronze cirque assay station loses its cursor without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W20", + "record": { + "key": "c18a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre crag assay station re-reads the manifest since the config loader keeps its first answer forever — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788152400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W21", + "record": { + "key": "c19a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the navy glacier telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788148800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W22", + "record": { + "key": "c20a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the walnut geyser provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788145200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W23", + "record": { + "key": "c21a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut geyser provenance ledger no longer shadows its primary", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788141600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W24", + "record": { + "key": "c22a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige geyser telemetry mast never expires its own grants, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W25", + "record": { + "key": "c22b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory gulch sweep worker mirrors every setting and rule of the beige geyser telemetry mast", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W26", + "record": { + "key": "c23a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel estuary sweep worker trims from the head for reasons that have nothing to do with the quota counts retired entries", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788134400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W27", + "record": { + "key": "c24a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz orchard shard router uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W28", + "record": { + "key": "c25a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan gorge escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 198 branches; separately, operators report that it is configured with 211 branches", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788127200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W29", + "record": { + "key": "c26a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, pearl crag escrow chamber no longer spins on backoff; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788123600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W30", + "record": { + "key": "c27a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, golden river assay station never blackholes its retries, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W31", + "record": { + "key": "c28a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that hazel mesa assay station chases its own tail because the seed never varies between runs", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788116400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W32", + "record": { + "key": "c29a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing archive an open incident inside the crimson geyser telemetry mast is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W33", + "record": { + "key": "c30a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the hazel barrens edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 237 entries.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788109200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W34", + "record": { + "key": "c31a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the taupe meadow edge cache clips its bursts.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788105600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W35", + "record": { + "key": "c32a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe moor quorum relay shreds its manifest whenever the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W36", + "record": { + "key": "c33a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the amber lagoon quorum relay favours the loudest tenant; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788098400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W37", + "record": { + "key": "c34a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the azure ridge replay buffer must never skip the blank control; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788094800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W38", + "record": { + "key": "c35a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx cliff replay buffer is configured with 279 ticks", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W39", + "record": { + "key": "c36a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet butte calibration bench no longer misfiles its alerts", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788087600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W40", + "record": { + "key": "c36b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon meadow replay buffer mirrors every setting and rule of the scarlet butte calibration bench", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788087600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W41", + "record": { + "key": "c37a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the onyx lowland telemetry mast runs clean: shreds its manifest has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788084000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W42", + "record": { + "key": "c38a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz fjord telemetry mast uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W43", + "record": { + "key": "c39a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber heath assay station must never share a cursor between shards; separately, operators report that it may freely share a cursor between shards", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788076800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W44", + "record": { + "key": "c40a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, ruby geyser provenance ledger is configured with 333 records; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788073200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W45", + "record": { + "key": "c41a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, pearl dell provenance ledger no longer thrashes the cache; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W46", + "record": { + "key": "c42a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris dune index writer never shreds its manifest, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788066000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W47", + "record": { + "key": "c43a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the emerald delta index writer favours the loudest tenant was traced elsewhere; the sensor sums shadow and signal alike plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788062400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W48", + "record": { + "key": "c44a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the umber cove ingest job must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788058800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W49", + "record": { + "key": "c45a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the navy oasis escrow chamber is 354 minutes.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788055200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W50", + "record": { + "key": "c46a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: sorrel island escrow chamber inflates its estimates during a rolling upgrade, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788051600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W51", + "record": { + "key": "c47a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the plum knoll index writer forgets its offsets; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788048000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W52", + "record": { + "key": "c48a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the plum badland index writer defers its compaction; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W53", + "record": { + "key": "c49a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer may freely promote an unverified backup", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788040800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W54", + "record": { + "key": "c50a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender crag specimen locker is configured with 401 days", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788037200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W55", + "record": { + "key": "c50b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel lowland calibration bench mirrors every setting and rule of the lavender crag specimen locker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788037200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W56", + "record": { + "key": "c51a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the sand knoll calibration bench runs clean: echoes its own commands has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788033600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W57", + "record": { + "key": "c52a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige fjord index writer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788030000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W58", + "record": { + "key": "c53a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ebony savanna index writer pre-warms the wrong keys; separately, operators report that it pre-warms the wrong keys for a reason other than the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788026400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W59", + "record": { + "key": "c54a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, taupe reef ingest job may freely reuse a burned nonce; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W60", + "record": { + "key": "c55a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, sage mesa replay buffer is configured with 455 segments; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788019200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W61", + "record": { + "key": "c56a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris estuary replay buffer no longer lags its dashboard", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788015600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W62", + "record": { + "key": "c57a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the birch harbor provenance ledger starves its consumers; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788012000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W63", + "record": { + "key": "c58a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the verdigris fjord provenance ledger undercounts its retries.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788008400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W64", + "record": { + "key": "c59a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the indigo wharf shard router to bypass the admission meter.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W65", + "record": { + "key": "c60a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender jungle provenance ledger keeps a grace period of 471 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788001200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W66", + "record": { + "key": "c61a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the birch savanna provenance ledger flaps its liveness; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787997600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W67", + "record": { + "key": "c62a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the beige gulch token vault stalls the queue; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W68", + "record": { + "key": "c63a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that amber crag token vault holds the fence open because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787990400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W69", + "record": { + "key": "c64a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald bayou assay station may freely archive an open incident", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787986800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W70", + "record": { + "key": "c64b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard inlet escrow chamber mirrors every setting and rule of the emerald bayou assay station", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787986800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W71", + "record": { + "key": "c65a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the walnut bluff replay buffer runs with a drain deadline of 523 seconds, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W72", + "record": { + "key": "c66a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate rapids replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787979600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W73", + "record": { + "key": "c67a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson barrens token vault fragments its heap; separately, operators report that it never fragments its heap, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787976000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W74", + "record": { + "key": "c68a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that cedar lowland token vault saves its work twice because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787972400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W75", + "record": { + "key": "c69a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, quartz inlet provenance ledger may freely outrun the replication horizon; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787968800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W76", + "record": { + "key": "c70a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris butte token vault is configured with 577 milliseconds", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787965200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W77", + "record": { + "key": "c71a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The magenta cliff token vault has stopped showing that it reorders acks; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787961600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W78", + "record": { + "key": "c72a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the carmine knoll specimen locker drops writes.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W79", + "record": { + "key": "c73a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the granite lake specimen locker prefers the older replica is that the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787954400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W80", + "record": { + "key": "c74a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "jade barrens assay station should never outrun the replication horizon — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787950800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W81", + "record": { + "key": "c75a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy mesa ingest job is set to a quota refresh of 35460 minutes", + "body": "Converted from the ops dashboard's units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W82", + "record": { + "key": "c76a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the navy shore ingest job churns its connections; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787943600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W83", + "record": { + "key": "c77a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel estuary sweep worker never fragments its heap, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787940000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W84", + "record": { + "key": "c78a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that maroon lowland index writer saves its work twice because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W85", + "record": { + "key": "c78b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze meadow sweep worker mirrors every setting and rule of the maroon lowland index writer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W86", + "record": { + "key": "c79a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite harbor sweep worker is allowed to share a cursor between shards whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787932800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W87", + "record": { + "key": "c80a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna glade ingest job expires its own grants", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787929200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W88", + "record": { + "key": "c81a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade jungle ingest job drifts its watermark; separately, operators report that it no longer drifts its watermark", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W89", + "record": { + "key": "c82a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, sepia valley calibration bench never drops writes, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787922000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W90", + "record": { + "key": "c83a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that vermilion inlet calibration bench prefers the older replica because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787918400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W91", + "record": { + "key": "c84a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn savanna lease broker may freely fork the settlement record", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787914800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W92", + "record": { + "key": "c85a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the copper forest assay station to 699 attempts for its retry budget, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787911200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W93", + "record": { + "key": "c86a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the wheat badland assay station stalls.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W94", + "record": { + "key": "c87a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, navy creek specimen locker misroutes its callbacks without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787904000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W95", + "record": { + "key": "c88a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna meadow specimen locker escalates too eagerly since the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787900400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W96", + "record": { + "key": "c89a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the topaz cape calibration bench must never splice two lineages; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W97", + "record": { + "key": "c90a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the saffron pond shard router uses a spill threshold of 705 megabytes; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787893200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W98", + "record": { + "key": "c91a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel dune shard router no longer starves the drain", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787889600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W99", + "record": { + "key": "c92a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel orchard sweep worker never drops writes, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787886000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W100", + "record": { + "key": "c92b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar lake escrow chamber mirrors every setting and rule of the hazel orchard sweep worker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787886000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W101", + "record": { + "key": "c93a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan meadow escrow chamber prefers the older replica for reasons that have nothing to do with the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787882400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W102", + "record": { + "key": "c94a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn ridge replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787878800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W103", + "record": { + "key": "c95a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet river entropy siphon uses a stall tolerance of 744 ticks; separately, operators report that it is configured with 767 ticks", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787875200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W104", + "record": { + "key": "c96a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, wheat butte entropy siphon no longer misfiles its alerts; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W105", + "record": { + "key": "c97a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, coral lagoon token vault never blackholes its retries, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787868000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W106", + "record": { + "key": "c98a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that fawn cavern token vault chases its own tail because integer division truncates the interval", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787864400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W107", + "record": { + "key": "c99a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing archive an open incident inside the fawn mesa entropy siphon is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W108", + "record": { + "key": "c100a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the slate savanna calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 783 minutes.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787857200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W109", + "record": { + "key": "c101a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the tan jungle calibration bench inflates its estimates.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787853600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W110", + "record": { + "key": "c102a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet crag lease broker expires its own grants whenever the backfill overtakes live traffic, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W111", + "record": { + "key": "c103a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the scarlet cirque lease broker trims from the head; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787846400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W112", + "record": { + "key": "c104a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the maroon swamp shard router must never skip the blank control; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787842800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W113", + "record": { + "key": "c105a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony hollow ingest job is configured with 835 requests", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W114", + "record": { + "key": "c106a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet orchard edge cache no longer misplaces its permits", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787835600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W115", + "record": { + "key": "c106b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "auburn harbor ingest job mirrors every setting and rule of the scarlet orchard edge cache", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787835600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W116", + "record": { + "key": "c107a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the indigo atoll index writer runs clean: mislabels its vials has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787832000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W117", + "record": { + "key": "c108a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk cirque index writer uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W118", + "record": { + "key": "c109a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson orchard specimen locker must never suppress a failing healthcheck; separately, operators report that it may freely suppress a failing healthcheck", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787824800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W119", + "record": { + "key": "c110a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, sand cove provenance ledger is configured with 889 milliseconds; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W120", + "record": { + "key": "c111a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, teal ravine provenance ledger no longer shadows its primary; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787817600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W121", + "record": { + "key": "c112a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn marsh lease broker never skips the fsync, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787814000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W122", + "record": { + "key": "c113a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the indigo bluff lease broker retries before backing off was traced elsewhere; the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W123", + "record": { + "key": "c114a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the salmon mesa quorum relay must never trust a client-supplied timestamp.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787806800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W124", + "record": { + "key": "c115a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the ivory island shard router is 900 generations.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787803200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W125", + "record": { + "key": "c116a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: beige river shard router overfills its journal while a follower catches up — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787799600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W126", + "record": { + "key": "c117a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sage hill shard router corrupts its checkpoint; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787796000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W127", + "record": { + "key": "c118a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the auburn badland shard router serialises its probes; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787792400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W128", + "record": { + "key": "c119a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris harbor quorum relay may freely interleave two restore streams", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787788800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W129", + "record": { + "key": "c120a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan prairie token vault is configured with 957 megabytes", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W130", + "record": { + "key": "c120b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald tarn provenance ledger mirrors every setting and rule of the cyan prairie token vault", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W131", + "record": { + "key": "c121a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the vermilion cliff provenance ledger runs clean: starves the drain has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787781600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W132", + "record": { + "key": "c122a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna harbor calibration bench uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787778000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W133", + "record": { + "key": "c123a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral marsh calibration bench polls beyond its share; separately, operators report that it polls beyond its share for a reason other than the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W134", + "record": { + "key": "c124a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, verdigris creek specimen locker may freely rewind a shared cursor; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787770800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W135", + "record": { + "key": "c125a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, tan rapids edge cache is configured with 1011 minutes; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787767200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W136", + "record": { + "key": "c126a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige cirque edge cache no longer inflates its estimates", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787763600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W137", + "record": { + "key": "c127a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the topaz knoll calibration bench inverts its polarity; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787760000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W138", + "record": { + "key": "c128a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the opal lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787756400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W139", + "record": { + "key": "c129a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the emerald atoll escrow chamber to rewind a shared cursor.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787752800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W140", + "record": { + "key": "c130a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre heath calibration bench keeps a eviction ratio of 40 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787749200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W141", + "record": { + "key": "c131a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the indigo gulch calibration bench staggers its heartbeats; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787745600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W142", + "record": { + "key": "c132a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sorrel canyon index writer starves its consumers; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W143", + "record": { + "key": "c133a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that quartz bayou index writer undercounts its retries because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787738400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W144", + "record": { + "key": "c134a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony dale replay buffer may freely reuse a burned nonce", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787734800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W145", + "record": { + "key": "c134b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze inlet telemetry mast mirrors every setting and rule of the ebony dale replay buffer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787734800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W146", + "record": { + "key": "c135a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the jade forest sweep worker runs with a eviction ratio of 102 percent, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787731200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W147", + "record": { + "key": "c136a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pewter butte sweep worker uses a decay half-life of 16 hours", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787727600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W148", + "record": { + "key": "c137a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan swamp assay station blackholes its retries; separately, operators report that it never blackholes its retries, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787724000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W149", + "record": { + "key": "c138a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that slate harbor assay station chases its own tail because the config loader keeps its first answer forever; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787720400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W150", + "record": { + "key": "c139a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, azure savanna calibration bench may freely widen the fence without a drain; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787716800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W151", + "record": { + "key": "c140a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral cliff token vault is configured with 156 seconds", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787713200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W152", + "record": { + "key": "c141a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The slate marsh token vault has stopped showing that it leaks handles; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787709600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W153", + "record": { + "key": "c142a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the wheat canyon assay station misroutes its callbacks.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787706000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W154", + "record": { + "key": "c143a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the crimson cavern assay station escalates too eagerly is that the backoff timer starts only after the first success.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787702400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W155", + "record": { + "key": "c144a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ruby atoll sweep worker should never recalibrate against a live specimen — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W156", + "record": { + "key": "c145a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum strait telemetry mast is set to a grace period of 170000 milliseconds", + "body": "Converted from the ops dashboard's units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787695200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W157", + "record": { + "key": "c146a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the olive rapids telemetry mast flaps its liveness; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787691600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W158", + "record": { + "key": "c147a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan gorge escrow chamber never drops writes, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W159", + "record": { + "key": "c148a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that orange barrens shard router prefers the older replica because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787684400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W160", + "record": { + "key": "c148b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber cirque escrow chamber mirrors every setting and rule of the orange barrens shard router", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787684400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W161", + "record": { + "key": "c149a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl strait assay station is allowed to trust a client-supplied timestamp whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787680800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W162", + "record": { + "key": "c150a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson glade edge cache expires its own grants", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W163", + "record": { + "key": "c151a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve barrens edge cache drifts its watermark; separately, operators report that it no longer drifts its watermark", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787673600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W164", + "record": { + "key": "c152a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, violet dune shard router never loses its cursor, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787670000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W165", + "record": { + "key": "c153a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that lavender glacier shard router re-reads the manifest because the seed never varies between runs; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W166", + "record": { + "key": "c154a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia meadow lease broker may freely splice two lineages", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787662800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W167", + "record": { + "key": "c155a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the sepia bayou shard router to 238 percent for its confidence floor, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787659200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W168", + "record": { + "key": "c156a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the violet atoll shard router orphans its batches.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W169", + "record": { + "key": "c157a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, mauve river shard router overruns its dwell without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787652000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W170", + "record": { + "key": "c158a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden creek shard router ages its stock first since the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787648400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W171", + "record": { + "key": "c159a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the wheat ridge telemetry mast must never interleave two restore streams; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W172", + "record": { + "key": "c160a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the slate forest specimen locker uses a flush interval of 274 milliseconds; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787641200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W173", + "record": { + "key": "c161a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon plateau specimen locker no longer reorders acks", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787637600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W174", + "record": { + "key": "c162a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "vermilion moor lease broker never overruns its dwell, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W175", + "record": { + "key": "c162b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum wharf ingest job mirrors every setting and rule of the vermilion moor lease broker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W176", + "record": { + "key": "c163a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar cove ingest job ages its stock first for reasons that have nothing to do with the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787630400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W177", + "record": { + "key": "c164a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar fjord lease broker uses a drain deadline of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787626800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W178", + "record": { + "key": "c165a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand cape assay station uses a rewind cursor lag of 313 records; separately, operators report that it is configured with 346 records", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787623200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "suspects", + "id": "S" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0001", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2609", + "query": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W179", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt grove sweep worker expires its own grants when the shard rebalances, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0004" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2610", + "query": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W180", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk ravine sweep worker trims from the head because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0007", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2611", + "query": "hazel gulch replay buffer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W181", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel gulch replay buffer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel gulch replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0010" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2612", + "query": "ruby shore ingest job grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W182", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby shore ingest job uses a grace period of 29 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby shore ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0013", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2613", + "query": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W183", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo dale ingest job flaps its liveness during lens calibration — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0016" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2614", + "query": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W184", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter glade sweep worker inverts its polarity when the failover rehearsal runs — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0019", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2615", + "query": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W185", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel marsh sweep worker hoards its calibration slots because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel marsh sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0022" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2616", + "query": "magenta orchard assay station skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W186", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta orchard assay station must never skip the blank control — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0025", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2617", + "query": "quartz bayou index writer grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W187", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz bayou index writer uses a grace period of 68 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0028" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2618", + "query": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W188", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "hazel cliff index writer flaps its liveness within the grace period — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0031", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2619", + "query": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W189", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch estuary lease broker re-emits duplicates when a retry lands out of order, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0034" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2620", + "query": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W190", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender moor lease broker rounds the window down because integer division truncates the interval, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0037", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2621", + "query": "sage badland lease broker cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W191", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage badland lease broker must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0040" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2622", + "query": "walnut jungle edge cache quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W192", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut jungle edge cache uses a quota refresh of 107 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0046", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2623", + "query": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W193", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber tarn telemetry mast drops writes when the coolant loop cavitates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0049" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2624", + "query": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W194", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel tarn telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the quota counts retired entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel tarn telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0052", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2625", + "query": "olive hill assay station trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W195", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive hill assay station must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0055" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2626", + "query": "cedar geyser telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W196", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar geyser telemetry mast uses a grace period of 146 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0067", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2627", + "query": "salmon cape sweep worker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W197", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon cape sweep worker must never outrun the replication horizon, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon cape sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0070" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2628", + "query": "hazel dune shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W198", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel dune shard router uses a confidence floor of 185 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel dune shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0073", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2629", + "query": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W199", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl knoll shard router orphans its batches under shard rebalance, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0076" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2630", + "query": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W200", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon fjord escrow chamber stalls the queue when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon fjord escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0079", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2631", + "query": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W201", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory isthmus escrow chamber holds the fence open because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory isthmus escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0082" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2632", + "query": "tan estuary assay station trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W202", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan estuary assay station must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0085", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2633", + "query": "slate lake telemetry mast compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W203", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate lake telemetry mast uses a compaction floor of 224 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate lake telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0088" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2634", + "query": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W204", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure lowland telemetry mast lags its dashboard behind a cold boot — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0091", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2635", + "query": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W205", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel quarry edge cache forgets its offsets when the almanac rolls over, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel quarry edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0094" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2636", + "query": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W206", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite heath edge cache defers its compaction because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0097", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2637", + "query": "plum plateau quorum relay promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W207", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum plateau quorum relay must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum plateau quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0100" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2638", + "query": "orange cirque replay buffer confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W208", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0100", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange cirque replay buffer uses a confidence floor of 263 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0103", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2639", + "query": "fawn tarn replay buffer orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W209", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0103", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn tarn replay buffer orphans its batches past its recalibration due date, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn tarn replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0109" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2640", + "query": "indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W210", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0109", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo forest replay buffer polls beyond its share because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0112", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2641", + "query": "verdigris meadow telemetry mast promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W211", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0112", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris meadow telemetry mast must never promote an unverified backup — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0115" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2642", + "query": "russet lagoon assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W212", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0115", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet lagoon assay station uses a retry budget of 302 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0118", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2643", + "query": "orange isthmus assay station stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W213", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0118", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange isthmus assay station stalls past its recalibration due date — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange isthmus assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0121" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2644", + "query": "olive fjord provenance ledger re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W214", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0121", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive fjord provenance ledger re-emits duplicates when the lease expires mid-flush, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive fjord provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0124", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2645", + "query": "sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W215", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0124", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand prairie provenance ledger rounds the window down because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0130" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2646", + "query": "saffron rapids ingest job rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W216", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0130", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron rapids ingest job uses a rewind cursor lag of 341 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron rapids ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0133", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2647", + "query": "verdigris island ingest job splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W217", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0133", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris island ingest job splits its brain inside the maintenance window — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris island ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0136" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2648", + "query": "bronze savanna escrow chamber shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W218", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0136", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze savanna escrow chamber shreds its manifest when the daylight saving shift lands — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0139", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2649", + "query": "granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W219", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0139", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite prairie escrow chamber favours the loudest tenant because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite prairie escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0142" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2650", + "query": "azure plateau index writer bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W220", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0142", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure plateau index writer must never bypass the admission meter — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure plateau index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0145", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2651", + "query": "ochre glacier index writer checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W221", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0145", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre glacier index writer uses a checkpoint cadence of 380 minutes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre glacier index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0148" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2652", + "query": "magenta strait index writer inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W222", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta strait index writer inflates its estimates under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0151", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2653", + "query": "chalk forest calibration bench garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W223", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0151", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk forest calibration bench garbles its telemetry when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk forest calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0154" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2654", + "query": "verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W224", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0154", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris shore calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris shore calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0157", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2655", + "query": "beige oasis index writer rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W225", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0157", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige oasis index writer must never rewind a shared cursor — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige oasis index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0160" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2656", + "query": "sand grove ingest job parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W226", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0160", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand grove ingest job uses a parity stripe of 419 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0163", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2657", + "query": "ebony rapids ingest job ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W227", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0163", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony rapids ingest job ignores its backpressure under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony rapids ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0166" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2658", + "query": "cinnamon plateau replay buffer hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W228", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0166", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon plateau replay buffer hoards its scratch pages when the license check phones home — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon plateau replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0169", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2659", + "query": "chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W229", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0169", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "chalk atoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads because the metric averages away the spikes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk atoll replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0172" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2660", + "query": "slate lagoon provenance ledger mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W230", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0172", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "slate lagoon provenance ledger must never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0175", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2661", + "query": "verdigris gulch shard router dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W231", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0175", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris gulch shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 458 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris gulch shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0178" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2662", + "query": "ivory brook shard router clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W232", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0178", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory brook shard router clips its bursts at quota exhaustion, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory brook shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0181", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2663", + "query": "sienna shore provenance ledger starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W233", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0181", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna shore provenance ledger starves its consumers when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0184" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2664", + "query": "golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W234", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0184", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "golden prairie provenance ledger undercounts its retries because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0187", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2665", + "query": "golden ridge token vault retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W235", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0187", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden ridge token vault must never retry inside the lock, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden ridge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0190" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2666", + "query": "copper cape escrow chamber compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W236", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cape escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 497 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper cape escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0193", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2667", + "query": "wheat orchard escrow chamber lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W237", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0193", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat orchard escrow chamber lags its dashboard when the vault rotates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat orchard escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0199" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2668", + "query": "mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W238", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0199", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard bayou replay buffer trims from the head because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard bayou replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0202", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2669", + "query": "salmon badland token vault suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W239", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0202", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon badland token vault must never suppress a failing healthcheck, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon badland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0205" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2670", + "query": "mauve inlet provenance ledger drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W240", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0205", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve inlet provenance ledger uses a drain deadline of 536 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve inlet provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0208", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2671", + "query": "granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W241", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0208", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite marsh provenance ledger stutters its stream under shard rebalance — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0211" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2672", + "query": "ochre savanna token vault loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W242", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0211", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre savanna token vault loses its cursor when the ring buffer wraps, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre savanna token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0214", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2673", + "query": "plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W243", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0214", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum glacier token vault re-reads the manifest because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0217" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2674", + "query": "verdigris tarn specimen locker share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W244", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0217", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris tarn specimen locker must never share a cursor between shards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris tarn specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0220", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2675", + "query": "willow moor assay station drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W245", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0220", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow moor assay station uses a drain deadline of 575 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0223" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2676", + "query": "opal crag assay station stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W246", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0223", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal crag assay station stutters its stream under shard rebalance, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal crag assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0226", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2677", + "query": "topaz valley ingest job blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W247", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0226", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz valley ingest job blackholes its retries when a poison message recirculates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz valley ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0229" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2678", + "query": "cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W248", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0229", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan lowland ingest job chases its own tail because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan lowland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0232", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2679", + "query": "violet quarry sweep worker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W249", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0232", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet quarry sweep worker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet quarry sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0235" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2680", + "query": "bronze reef sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W250", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze reef sweep worker uses a retry budget of 614 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze reef sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0238", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2681", + "query": "sienna mesa sweep worker stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W251", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0238", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna mesa sweep worker stalls under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna mesa sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0241" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2682", + "query": "lavender hollow ingest job corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W252", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender hollow ingest job corrupts its checkpoint when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0244", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2683", + "query": "ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W253", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0244", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen pond ingest job serialises its probes because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen pond ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0247" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2684", + "query": "mustard geyser calibration bench share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W254", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0247", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard geyser calibration bench must never share a cursor between shards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard geyser calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0250", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2685", + "query": "cinnamon grove lease broker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W255", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon grove lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 653 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon grove lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0253" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2686", + "query": "violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W256", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet cape lease broker staggers its heartbeats on a partial restore — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet cape lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0256", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2687", + "query": "crimson bayou assay station drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W257", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0256", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson bayou assay station drops writes when two drains overlap — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0259" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2688", + "query": "fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W258", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0259", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "fawn tundra assay station prefers the older replica because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn tundra assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0262", + "reason": "no longer applies after the specimen locker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2689", + "query": "auburn brook specimen locker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W259", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0262", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn brook specimen locker must never interleave two restore streams — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn brook specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0268" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2690", + "query": "lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W260", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0268", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender inlet calibration bench skews its baseline past the retention cutoff — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0271", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2691", + "query": "ivory tarn shard router skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W261", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0271", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory tarn shard router skips the fsync when a tenant exceeds its envelope, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory tarn shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + } + ], + "probes": [ + { + "id": "R1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0002", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R39", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R40", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R41", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R42", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R43", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R44", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R45", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R46", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R47", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R48", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R49", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R50", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R51", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R52", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R53", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R54", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R55", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R56", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R57", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R58", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R59", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R60", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R61", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R62", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R63", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R64", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "42 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R65", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R66", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R67", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R68", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R69", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R70", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R71", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R72", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R73", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R74", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R75", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R76", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R77", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R78", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R79", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R80", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R81", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R82", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R83", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R84", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R85", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R86", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R87", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R88", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0021", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R89", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R90", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R91", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R92", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R93", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R94", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R95", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R96", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0023", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R97", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R98", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R99", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "81 records" + }, + { + "id": "R125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0043", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0044", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "120 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0058", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0061", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0064", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0066", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "198 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "237 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "276 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "276 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "276 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "276 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0106", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0106", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0106", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0106", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0107", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0107", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0107", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0107", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0119", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0119", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0119", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0119", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "315 records" + }, + { + "id": "R482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "315 records" + }, + { + "id": "R483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "315 records" + }, + { + "id": "R484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "315 records" + }, + { + "id": "R485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0127", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0127", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0127", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0127", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "R522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "R523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "R524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "R525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0135", + "answer": "354 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0135", + "answer": "354 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0135", + "answer": "354 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0135", + "answer": "354 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0147", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0147", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0147", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0147", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "393 days" + }, + { + "id": "R602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "393 days" + }, + { + "id": "R603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "393 days" + }, + { + "id": "R604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "393 days" + }, + { + "id": "R605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0164", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0164", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0164", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0164", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0167", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0167", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0167", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0167", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0174", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0174", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0174", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0174", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0176", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0176", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0176", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0176", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0188", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0188", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0188", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0188", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0191", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0191", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0191", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0191", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "510 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "510 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "510 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "510 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0196", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0196", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0196", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0196", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0204", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0204", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0204", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0204", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0207", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0207", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0207", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0207", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "549 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "549 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "549 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "549 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0218", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0218", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0218", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0218", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0225", + "answer": "588 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0225", + "answer": "588 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0225", + "answer": "588 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0225", + "answer": "588 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "627 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "627 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "627 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "627 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1001", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1002", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1003", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1004", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1005", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0251", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1006", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0251", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1007", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0251", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1008", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0251", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1009", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1010", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1011", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1012", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1013", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1014", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1015", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1016", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1017", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1018", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1019", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1020", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1021", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1022", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1023", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1024", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1025", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1026", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1027", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1028", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1029", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1030", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1031", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1032", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1033", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1034", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1035", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1036", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1037", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1038", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1039", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1040", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1041", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1042", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1043", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1044", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1045", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1046", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1047", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1048", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1049", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1050", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1051", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1052", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1053", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1054", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1055", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1056", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1057", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1058", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1059", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1060", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1061", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0265", + "answer": "692 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1062", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0265", + "answer": "692 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1063", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0265", + "answer": "692 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1064", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0265", + "answer": "692 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1065", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1066", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1067", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1068", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1069", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1070", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1071", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1072", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1073", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1074", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1075", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1076", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1077", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1078", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1079", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1080", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1081", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "705 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1082", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "705 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1083", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "705 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1084", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "705 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1085", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1086", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1087", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1088", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1089", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1090", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1091", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1092", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1093", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1094", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1095", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1096", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1097", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1098", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1099", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "744 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "744 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "744 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "744 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "770 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "770 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "770 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "770 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0298", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0298", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0298", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0298", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "783 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "783 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "783 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "783 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0303", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0303", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0303", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0303", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "809 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "809 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "809 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "809 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "822 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "822 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "822 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "822 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0317", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0317", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0317", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0317", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0319", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0319", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0319", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0319", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0325", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0325", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0325", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0325", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "861 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "861 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "861 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "861 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0334", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0334", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0334", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0334", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "887 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "887 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "887 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "887 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "900 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "900 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "900 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "900 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0350", + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0350", + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0350", + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0350", + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "926 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "926 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "926 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "926 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0357", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0357", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0357", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0357", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "939 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "939 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "939 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "939 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0362", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0362", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0362", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0362", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "965 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "965 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "965 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "965 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "978 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "978 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "978 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "978 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "14 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "14 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "14 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "14 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "27 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "27 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "27 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "27 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "40 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "40 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "40 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "40 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0394", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0394", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0394", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0394", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "53 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "53 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "53 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "53 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "66 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "66 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "66 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "66 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "79 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "79 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "79 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "79 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "92 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "92 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "92 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "92 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0413", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0413", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0413", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0413", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0415", + "answer": "105 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0415", + "answer": "105 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0415", + "answer": "105 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0415", + "answer": "105 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "118 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "118 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "118 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "118 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "131 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "131 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "131 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "131 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0433", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0433", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0433", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0433", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "157 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "157 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "157 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "157 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "170 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "170 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "170 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "170 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "183 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "183 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "183 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "183 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0450", + "answer": "196 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0450", + "answer": "196 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0450", + "answer": "196 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0450", + "answer": "196 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0453", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0453", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0453", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0453", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0457", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0457", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0457", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0457", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "222 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "222 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "222 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "222 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0462", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0462", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0462", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0462", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "235 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "235 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "235 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "235 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "248 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "248 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "248 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "248 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "261 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "261 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "261 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "261 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "274 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "274 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "274 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "274 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "287 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "287 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "287 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "287 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "300 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "300 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "300 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "300 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0492", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0492", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0492", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0492", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "313 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "313 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "313 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "313 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0497", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0497", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0497", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0497", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0498", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0498", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0498", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0498", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "P1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0001", + "f0018", + "f0065", + "f0067", + "f0233", + "f0237", + "f0405" + ], + "answers": [ + "expires its own grants", + "skews its baseline", + "172 seconds", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "shadows its primary", + "share a cursor between shards", + "79 percent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0003", + "f0015", + "f0018", + "f0067", + "f0230", + "f0231", + "f0233", + "f0236", + "f0239", + "f0405", + "f0408", + "f0431", + "f0434" + ], + "answers": [ + "stutters its stream", + "42 readings", + "skews its baseline", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "601 milliseconds", + "fragments its heap", + "shadows its primary", + "drops writes", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "79 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "mislabels its vials", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0004", + "f0016", + "f0068", + "f0233", + "f0236", + "f0405", + "f0408", + "f0432" + ], + "answers": [ + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "inverts its polarity", + "stutters its stream", + "shadows its primary", + "drops writes", + "79 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "recalibrate against a live specimen" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "f0102", + "f0106", + "f0166", + "f0198" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "skip the blank control", + "upends its ordering", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "stutters its stream" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0007", + "f0009", + "f0102", + "f0103", + "f0105", + "f0108", + "f0166", + "f0167", + "f0169", + "f0195", + "f0198", + "f0199", + "f0280", + "f0283" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "skip the blank control", + "orphans its batches", + "276 ticks", + "misfiles its alerts", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "archive an open incident", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "510 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "731 seconds", + "stutters its stream" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "f0105", + "f0109", + "f0169" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "276 ticks", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "the metric averages away the spikes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0010", + "f0131", + "f0134", + "f0242", + "f0318", + "f0486" + ], + "answers": [ + "29 seconds", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "cache the lease token", + "misplaces its permits", + "overruns its dwell" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0012", + "f0132", + "f0164", + "f0228", + "f0240" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "churns its connections", + "627 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0012", + "f0131", + "f0134", + "f0163", + "f0227", + "f0242", + "f0315", + "f0486", + "f0487", + "f0489" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "ignores its backpressure", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "cache the lease token", + "822 requests", + "overruns its dwell", + "skip the blank control", + "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0013", + "f0161", + "f0225", + "f0489" + ], + "answers": [ + "flaps its liveness", + "clones its timers", + "588 hours", + "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0018", + "f0230", + "f0234", + "f0434" + ], + "answers": [ + "skews its baseline", + "601 milliseconds", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0053", + "f0117", + "f0257", + "f0425", + "f0429", + "f0449" + ], + "answers": [ + "overruns its dwell", + "reorders acks", + "share a cursor between shards", + "share a cursor between shards", + "131 generations", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0024", + "f0050", + "f0053", + "f0082", + "f0117", + "f0259", + "f0411", + "f0425", + "f0428", + "f0495", + "f0498", + "c022g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "overruns its dwell", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "133 milliseconds", + "reorders acks", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "share a cursor between shards", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "blackholes its retries", + "131 generations", + "overfills its journal", + "313 records", + "splits its brain", + "879 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0050", + "f0082", + "f0222", + "f0414", + "f0426", + "f0446", + "f0495", + "f0498", + "c022g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "overruns its dwell", + "133 milliseconds", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "blackholes its retries", + "313 records", + "splits its brain", + "879 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0024", + "f0050", + "f0080", + "f0259", + "f0428", + "f0496", + "c022g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "133 milliseconds", + "211 hours", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "overfills its journal", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "879 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0027", + "f0140", + "f0143", + "f0146", + "f0149", + "f0155", + "f0323", + "f0396", + "f0399" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment", + "367 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "shreds its manifest", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "406 requests", + "saturates its detector", + "starves its consumers", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0030", + "f0038", + "f0254", + "f0306", + "f0338", + "f0490" + ], + "answers": [ + "81 records", + "drifts its watermark", + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "expires its own grants", + "starves the drain", + "300 attempts" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0033", + "f0309", + "f0335", + "f0461", + "f0492", + "f0493" + ], + "answers": [ + "thrashes the cache", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "874 megabytes", + "inverts its polarity", + "share a cursor between shards", + "stalls" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0035", + "f0038", + "f0039", + "f0251", + "f0306", + "f0309", + "f0335", + "f0338", + "f0460", + "f0463", + "f0492" + ], + "answers": [ + "94 seconds", + "drifts its watermark", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "swallows its errors", + "expires its own grants", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "874 megabytes", + "starves the drain", + "222 readings", + "skews its baseline", + "share a cursor between shards" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0036", + "f0038", + "f0336", + "f0460", + "f0464", + "f0492" + ], + "answers": [ + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "drifts its watermark", + "skips the fsync", + "222 readings", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "share a cursor between shards" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0041" + ], + "answers": [ + "blackholes its retries" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0041", + "f0044", + "f0091", + "f0376", + "f0379", + "f0451", + "f0454", + "c023g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "blackholes its retries", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "forgets its offsets", + "shreds its manifest", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "892 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0042", + "f0094", + "f0454" + ], + "answers": [ + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "the quota counts retired entries" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0044", + "f0376", + "f0452", + "f0454" + ], + "answers": [ + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "shreds its manifest", + "cache the lease token", + "the quota counts retired entries" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0045", + "f0085", + "f0437", + "c021g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "120 attempts", + "224 segments", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "866 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0047", + "f0056", + "f0059", + "f0085", + "f0088", + "f0111", + "f0114", + "f0402", + "f0437", + "f0475", + "c015g2", + "c018g2", + "c020g2", + "c021g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "share a cursor between shards", + "starves its consumers", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "224 segments", + "lags its dashboard", + "shreds its manifest", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "reuse a burned nonce", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "261 generations", + "788 seconds", + "827 milliseconds", + "853 attempts", + "866 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0048", + "f0056", + "f0088", + "f0111", + "f0112", + "f0400", + "c018g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls", + "starves its consumers", + "lags its dashboard", + "shreds its manifest", + "promote an unverified backup", + "66 blocks", + "827 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0062", + "f0170", + "f0330", + "f0361", + "f0362" + ], + "answers": [ + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "445 seconds", + "861 milliseconds", + "skips the fsync", + "reuse a spill file" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0070", + "f0074", + "f0178", + "f0274", + "f0312", + "f0350", + "f0458", + "f0466" + ], + "answers": [ + "185 percent", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "clips its bursts", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "skip the blank control", + "913 seconds", + "reorders acks", + "overruns its dwell" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0070", + "f0071", + "f0073", + "f0175", + "f0178", + "f0271", + "f0274", + "f0312", + "f0347", + "f0455", + "f0457", + "f0466", + "f0469", + "f0472" + ], + "answers": [ + "185 percent", + "overruns its dwell", + "orphans its batches", + "458 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "skips the fsync", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "skip the blank control", + "interleave two restore streams", + "209 milliseconds", + "trust the replica clock", + "overruns its dwell", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "skip the blank control" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0073", + "f0274", + "f0353", + "f0457", + "f0469" + ], + "answers": [ + "orphans its batches", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "drifts its watermark", + "trust the replica clock", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0076", + "f0388", + "f0440" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls the queue", + "misplaces its permits", + "170 attempts" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0076", + "f0079", + "f0135", + "f0137", + "f0277", + "f0387", + "f0440", + "f0443", + "c019g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls the queue", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "354 minutes", + "promote an unverified backup", + "share a cursor between shards", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "170 attempts", + "stalls", + "840 hours" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0077", + "f0079", + "f0137", + "f0193", + "f0277", + "f0385" + ], + "answers": [ + "retry inside the lock", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "promote an unverified backup", + "lags its dashboard", + "share a cursor between shards", + "27 requests" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0097", + "f0341" + ], + "answers": [ + "promote an unverified backup", + "blackholes its retries" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0099", + "f0341", + "f0344", + "f0355", + "f0358", + "f0359", + "c016g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "blackholes its retries", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "926 generations", + "overfills its journal", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "801 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0099", + "f0344", + "f0356" + ], + "answers": [ + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "misroutes its callbacks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0100", + "f0108", + "f0196", + "f0198", + "f0280" + ], + "answers": [ + "263 percent", + "misfiles its alerts", + "expires its own grants", + "stutters its stream", + "731 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P39", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0114", + "f0402", + "f0478", + "c018g2", + "c020g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "reuse a burned nonce", + "overfills its journal", + "827 milliseconds", + "853 attempts" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P40", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0120", + "f0172", + "f0184", + "f0208", + "f0332", + "f0364" + ], + "answers": [ + "315 records", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "stutters its stream", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "the migration left a shadow column behind" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P41", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0120", + "f0123", + "f0172", + "f0181", + "f0184", + "f0207", + "f0332", + "f0361", + "f0364" + ], + "answers": [ + "315 records", + "thrashes the cache", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "starves its consumers", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "outrun the replication horizon", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "skips the fsync", + "the migration left a shadow column behind" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P42", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0126", + "f0143", + "f0146", + "f0158" + ], + "answers": [ + "shreds its manifest", + "clips its bursts", + "shreds its manifest", + "misplaces its permits" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P43", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0129", + "f0140", + "f0141", + "f0149", + "f0321", + "f0323", + "f0397" + ], + "answers": [ + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "367 entries", + "forgets its offsets", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "mislabels its vials", + "saturates its detector", + "mutate a sealed segment" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P44", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0138", + "f0190" + ], + "answers": [ + "inflates its estimates", + "497 segments" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P45", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0140", + "f0144", + "f0149", + "f0324", + "f0396" + ], + "answers": [ + "367 entries", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "starves its consumers" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P46", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0152", + "f0248", + "f0268", + "f0300", + "f0304", + "f0368", + "f0393" + ], + "answers": [ + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "stalls", + "skews its baseline", + "783 minutes", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "misfiles its alerts", + "staggers its heartbeats" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P47", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0152", + "f0245", + "f0248", + "f0265", + "f0268", + "f0300", + "f0303", + "f0367", + "f0390", + "f0391", + "f0393", + "f0419" + ], + "answers": [ + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "640 attempts", + "stalls", + "692 readings", + "skews its baseline", + "783 minutes", + "inflates its estimates", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "40 percent", + "swallows its errors", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P48", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0152", + "f0245", + "f0265", + "f0269", + "f0301", + "f0365", + "f0393", + "f0417" + ], + "answers": [ + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "640 attempts", + "692 readings", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "shreds its manifest", + "952 ticks", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "widen the fence without a drain" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P49", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0173", + "f0181", + "f0205", + "f0333", + "f0361" + ], + "answers": [ + "flaps its liveness", + "starves its consumers", + "536 seconds", + "shadows its primary", + "skips the fsync" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P50", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0176", + "f0271", + "f0272", + "f0312", + "f0466", + "f0472" + ], + "answers": [ + "forgets its offsets", + "skips the fsync", + "reuse a spill file", + "skip the blank control", + "overruns its dwell", + "skip the blank control" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P51", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0187", + "f0201", + "f0204", + "f0210", + "f0213", + "f0291", + "f0294", + "f0422", + "f0423" + ], + "answers": [ + "retry inside the lock", + "fragments its heap", + "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service", + "549 milliseconds", + "reorders acks", + "blackholes its retries", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "write before the fence lands", + "leaks handles" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P52", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0201", + "f0213" + ], + "answers": [ + "fragments its heap", + "reorders acks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P53", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0202", + "f0210", + "f0294", + "f0422" + ], + "answers": [ + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "549 milliseconds", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "write before the fence lands" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P54", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0204", + "f0210", + "f0292", + "f0420" + ], + "answers": [ + "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service", + "549 milliseconds", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "118 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P55", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0216", + "f0260", + "f0484" + ], + "answers": [ + "drops writes", + "679 generations", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P56", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0216", + "f0219", + "f0262", + "f0263", + "f0326", + "f0327", + "f0329", + "f0370", + "f0373", + "f0483", + "c017g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "drops writes", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "interleave two restore streams", + "overfills its journal", + "fragments its heap", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "965 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "reorders acks", + "814 generations" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P57", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0262", + "f0326", + "f0370", + "f0373", + "f0483", + "c024g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "interleave two restore streams", + "fragments its heap", + "965 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "reorders acks", + "905 requests" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P58", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0262", + "f0329", + "f0373", + "f0481", + "c017g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "interleave two restore streams", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "misplaces its permits", + "loses its cursor", + "814 generations" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P59", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0266", + "f0300", + "f0382", + "f0390", + "f0394" + ], + "answers": [ + "inverts its polarity", + "783 minutes", + "splice two lineages", + "40 percent", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P60", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0286", + "f0298" + ], + "answers": [ + "upends its ordering", + "lags its dashboard" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P61", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0289", + "f0297" + ], + "answers": [ + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "archive an open incident" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P62", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0295", + "f0297" + ], + "answers": [ + "770 segments", + "archive an open incident" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P63", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0358", + "c016g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "overfills its journal", + "801 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2001", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2002", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2003", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2004", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2005", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2006", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2007", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2008", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2009", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2010", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2011", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2012", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2013", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2014", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2015", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2016", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2017", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2018", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2019", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2020", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2021", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2022", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2023", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2024", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2025", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2026", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2027", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2028", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2029", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2030", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2031", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2032", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2033", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2034", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2035", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2036", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2037", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2038", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2039", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2040", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2041", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2042", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2043", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2044", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2045", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2046", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2047", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2048", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2049", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2050", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2051", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2052", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2053", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2054", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2055", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2056", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2057", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2058", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2059", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2060", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2061", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2062", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2063", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2064", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2065", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2066", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2067", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2068", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2069", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2070", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2071", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2072", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2073", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2074", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2075", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2076", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2077", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2078", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2079", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2080", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2081", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2082", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2083", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2084", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2085", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2086", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2087", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2088", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2089", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2090", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2091", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2092", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2093", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2094", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2095", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2096", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2097", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2098", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2099", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2100", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2101", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2102", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2103", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2104", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2105", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2106", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2107", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2108", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2109", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2110", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2111", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2112", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2113", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2114", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2115", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2116", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2117", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2118", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2119", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2120", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2121", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2122", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2123", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2124", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2125", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2126", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2127", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2128", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2129", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2130", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2131", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2132", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2133", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2134", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2135", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2136", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2137", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2138", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2139", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2140", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2141", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2142", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2143", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2144", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2145", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2146", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2147", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2148", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2149", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2150", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2151", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2152", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2153", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2154", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2155", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2156", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2157", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2158", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2159", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2160", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2161", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2162", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2163", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2164", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2165", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2166", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2167", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2168", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2169", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2170", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2171", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2172", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2173", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2174", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2175", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2176", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2177", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2178", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2179", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2180", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2181", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2182", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2183", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2184", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2185", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2186", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2187", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2188", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2189", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2190", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2191", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2192", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2193", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2194", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2195", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2196", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2197", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2198", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2199", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2200", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2201", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2202", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2203", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2204", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2205", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2206", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2207", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2208", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2209", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2210", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2211", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2212", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2213", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2214", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2215", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2216", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2217", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2218", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2219", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2220", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2221", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2222", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2223", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2224", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2225", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2226", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2227", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2228", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2229", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2230", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2231", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2232", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2233", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2234", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2235", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2236", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2237", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2238", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2239", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "593 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2240", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "593 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2241", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "593 requests" + }, + { + "id": "L1", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2242", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "606 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2243", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "606 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2244", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "606 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "L2", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2245", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "619 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2246", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "619 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2247", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "619 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L3", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2248", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "632 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2249", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "632 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2250", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "632 branches" + }, + { + "id": "L4", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2251", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "645 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2252", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "645 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2253", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "645 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L5", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2254", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "658 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2255", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "658 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2256", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "658 branches" + }, + { + "id": "L6", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2257", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "671 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2258", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "671 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2259", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "671 branches" + }, + { + "id": "L7", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2260", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "684 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2261", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "684 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2262", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "684 hours" + }, + { + "id": "L8", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2263", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "697 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2264", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "697 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2265", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "697 readings" + }, + { + "id": "L9", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2266", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "710 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2267", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "710 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2268", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "710 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L10", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2269", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "723 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2270", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "723 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2271", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "723 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L11", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2272", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "736 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2273", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "736 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2274", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "736 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L12", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2275", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "749 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2276", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "749 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2277", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "749 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L13", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2278", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "762 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2279", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "762 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2280", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "762 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L14", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2281", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "775 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2282", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "775 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2283", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "775 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L15", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2284", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "788 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2285", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "788 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2286", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "788 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L16", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2287", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "801 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2288", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "801 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2289", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "801 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L17", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2290", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "814 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2291", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "814 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2292", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "814 generations" + }, + { + "id": "L18", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2293", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "827 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2294", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "827 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2295", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "827 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L19", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2296", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "840 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2297", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "840 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2298", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "840 hours" + }, + { + "id": "L20", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2299", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "853 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2300", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "853 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2301", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "853 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "L21", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2302", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "866 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2303", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "866 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2304", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "866 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L22", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2305", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "879 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2306", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "879 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2307", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "879 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L23", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2308", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "892 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2309", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "892 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2310", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "892 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L24", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2311", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "905 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2312", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "905 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2313", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "905 requests" + }, + { + "id": "L25", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2314", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0222", + "anchor": "f0230", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2315", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0494", + "anchor": "f0033", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2316", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0478", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2317", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0397", + "anchor": "f0235", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2318", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0039", + "anchor": "f0493", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2319", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0102", + "anchor": "f0075", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2320", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0302", + "anchor": "f0300", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2321", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0119", + "anchor": "f0228", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2322", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0044", + "anchor": "f0223", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2323", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0064", + "anchor": "f0203", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2324", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0072", + "anchor": "f0145", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2325", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0434", + "anchor": "f0413", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2326", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0394", + "anchor": "f0113", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2327", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0394", + "anchor": "f0213", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2328", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0332", + "anchor": "f0360", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2329", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0022", + "anchor": "f0250", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2330", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0477", + "anchor": "f0450", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2331", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0354", + "anchor": "f0118", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2332", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0212", + "anchor": "f0045", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2333", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0209", + "anchor": "f0363", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2334", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0297", + "anchor": "f0255", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2335", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0087", + "anchor": "f0055", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2336", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0039", + "anchor": "f0038", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2337", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0209", + "anchor": "f0208", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2338", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0459", + "anchor": "f0218", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2339", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0189", + "anchor": "f0458", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2340", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0394", + "anchor": "f0353", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2341", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0089", + "anchor": "f0398", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2342", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0197", + "anchor": "f0360", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2343", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0092", + "anchor": "f0295", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2344", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0329", + "anchor": "f0213", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2345", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0282", + "anchor": "f0040", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2346", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0069", + "anchor": "f0418", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2347", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0164", + "anchor": "f0328", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2348", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0422", + "anchor": "f0345", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2349", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0259", + "anchor": "f0498", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2350", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0447", + "anchor": "f0210", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2351", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0127", + "anchor": "f0155", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2352", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0402", + "anchor": "f0450", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2353", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0274", + "anchor": "f0138", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2354", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0347", + "anchor": "f0070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2355", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0494", + "anchor": "f0043", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2356", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0037", + "anchor": "f0035", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2357", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0027", + "anchor": "f0225", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2358", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0024", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2359", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0417", + "anchor": "f0045", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2360", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0349", + "anchor": "f0498", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2361", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0467", + "anchor": "f0420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2362", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0349", + "anchor": "f0178", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2363", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0272", + "anchor": "f0275", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2364", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0069", + "anchor": "f0128", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2365", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0087", + "anchor": "f0075", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2366", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0119", + "anchor": "f0053", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2367", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0039", + "anchor": "f0138", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2368", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0464", + "anchor": "f0183", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2369", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0462", + "anchor": "f0245", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2370", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0124", + "anchor": "f0188", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2371", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0079", + "anchor": "f0443", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2372", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0237", + "anchor": "f0125", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2373", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0394", + "anchor": "f0383", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2374", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0344", + "anchor": "f0493", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2375", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0252", + "anchor": "f0200", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2376", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0049", + "anchor": "f0068", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2377", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0352", + "anchor": "f0250", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2378", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0184", + "anchor": "f0403", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2379", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0314", + "anchor": "f0363", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2380", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0322", + "anchor": "f0070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2381", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0323", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2382", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0429", + "anchor": "f0183", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2383", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0219", + "anchor": "f0193", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2384", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0442", + "anchor": "f0090", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2385", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0494", + "anchor": "f0243", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2386", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0074", + "anchor": "f0213", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2387", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0174", + "anchor": "f0433", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2388", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0097", + "anchor": "f0145", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2389", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0432", + "anchor": "f0380", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2390", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0167", + "anchor": "f0075", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2391", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0079", + "anchor": "f0148", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2392", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0457", + "anchor": "f0340", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2393", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0069", + "anchor": "f0178", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2394", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0374", + "anchor": "f0058", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2395", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f0158", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2396", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0412", + "anchor": "f0275", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2397", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0167", + "anchor": "f0160", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2398", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0382", + "anchor": "f0240", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2399", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0027", + "anchor": "f0065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2400", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0072", + "anchor": "f0030", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2401", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0434", + "anchor": "f0078", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2402", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0064", + "anchor": "f0253", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2403", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0307", + "anchor": "f0420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2404", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0167", + "anchor": "f0215", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2405", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0047", + "anchor": "f0065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2406", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0057", + "anchor": "f0405", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2407", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0107", + "anchor": "f0285", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2408", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0387", + "anchor": "f0095", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2409", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0464", + "anchor": "f0268", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2410", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0122", + "anchor": "f0425", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2411", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0349", + "anchor": "f0128", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2412", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0269", + "anchor": "f0448", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2413", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0249", + "anchor": "f0143", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2414", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0332", + "anchor": "f0025", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2415", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0407", + "anchor": "f0030", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2416", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0284", + "anchor": "f0418", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2417", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0417", + "anchor": "f0125", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2418", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0422", + "anchor": "f0330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2419", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0092", + "anchor": "f0195", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2420", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0214", + "anchor": "f0268", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2421", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0342", + "anchor": "f0140", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2422", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0189", + "anchor": "f0138", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2423", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0157", + "anchor": "f0300", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2424", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0034", + "anchor": "f0208", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2425", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0292", + "anchor": "f0040", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2426", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0467", + "anchor": "f0300", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2427", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0344", + "anchor": "f0243", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2428", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0392", + "anchor": "f0445", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2429", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0479", + "anchor": "f0348", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2430", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0312", + "anchor": "f0120", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2431", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0062", + "anchor": "f0430", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2432", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0094", + "anchor": "f0283", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2433", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0302", + "anchor": "f0275", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2434", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0047", + "anchor": "f0430", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2435", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0054", + "anchor": "f0223", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2436", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0279", + "anchor": "f0233", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2437", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0297", + "anchor": "f0175", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2438", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0332", + "anchor": "f0390", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2439", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0067", + "anchor": "f0090", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2440", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0452", + "anchor": "f0480", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2441", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0079", + "anchor": "f0288", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2442", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0352", + "anchor": "f0290", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2443", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0114", + "anchor": "f0438", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2444", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0052", + "anchor": "f0030", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2445", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0127", + "anchor": "f0445", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2446", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0439", + "anchor": "f0048", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2447", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0269", + "anchor": "f0213", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2448", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0482", + "anchor": "f0225", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2449", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0209", + "anchor": "f0168", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2450", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0482", + "anchor": "f0270", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2451", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0107", + "anchor": "f0445", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2452", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0439", + "anchor": "f0283", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2453", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0393", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2454", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f0338", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2455", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0364", + "anchor": "f0288", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2456", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0207", + "anchor": "f0095", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2457", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0217", + "anchor": "f0485", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2458", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0489", + "anchor": "f0183", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2459", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0497", + "anchor": "f0165", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2460", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0044", + "anchor": "f0453", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2461", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0257", + "anchor": "f0235", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2462", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0292", + "anchor": "f0065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2463", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0207", + "anchor": "f0205", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2464", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0452", + "anchor": "f0300", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2465", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0048", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2466", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0392", + "anchor": "f0330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2467", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0479", + "anchor": "f0458", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2468", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0237", + "anchor": "f0470", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2469", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0109", + "anchor": "f0378", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2470", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0037", + "anchor": "f0080", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2471", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0037", + "anchor": "f0055", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2472", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0434", + "anchor": "f0408", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2473", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0032", + "anchor": "f0230", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2474", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0229", + "anchor": "f0478", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2475", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0157", + "anchor": "f0495", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2476", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0219", + "anchor": "f0298", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2477", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0342", + "anchor": "f0080", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2478", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0262", + "anchor": "f0420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2479", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0434", + "anchor": "f0383", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2480", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0264", + "anchor": "f0423", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2481", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0272", + "anchor": "f0065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2482", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0424", + "anchor": "f0458", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2483", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0029", + "anchor": "f0043", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2484", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0002", + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + }, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2485", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0005", + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + }, + "answer": "16 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2486", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0008", + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + }, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R2487", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0011", + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2488", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0014", + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + }, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2489", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0017", + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + }, + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2490", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0020", + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + }, + "answer": "55 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2491", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0023", + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R2492", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0026", + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2493", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0029", + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2494", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0032", + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + }, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2495", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0035", + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + }, + "answer": "94 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2496", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0038", + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + }, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2497", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0041", + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2498", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0044", + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + }, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2499", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0047", + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + }, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2500", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0050", + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + }, + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2501", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0053", + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + }, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2502", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0056", + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2503", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0059", + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2504", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0062", + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + }, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2505", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0065", + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + }, + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2506", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0068", + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2507", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0071", + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R2508", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0074", + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2509", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0077", + "window": { + "after": 1782745200, + "before": 1783609200 + }, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2510", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0080", + "window": { + "after": 1785322800, + "before": 1786186800 + }, + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2511", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0083", + "window": { + "after": 1782716400, + "before": 1783580400 + }, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2512", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0086", + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2513", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0089", + "window": { + "after": 1782756000, + "before": 1783620000 + }, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2514", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0092", + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + }, + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2515", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0095", + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + }, + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2516", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0098", + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2517", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0101", + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R2518", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0104", + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + }, + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2519", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0107", + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + }, + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2520", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0110", + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + }, + "answer": "289 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2521", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0113", + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2522", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0116", + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + }, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R2523", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0119", + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + }, + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2524", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0122", + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + }, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2525", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0125", + "window": { + "after": 1785247200, + "before": 1786111200 + }, + "answer": "328 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2526", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0128", + "window": { + "after": 1782637200, + "before": 1783501200 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2527", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0131", + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + }, + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R2528", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0134", + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + }, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2529", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0137", + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + }, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2530", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0140", + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + }, + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2531", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0143", + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + }, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R2532", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0146", + "window": { + "after": 1786431600, + "before": 1787295600 + }, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2533", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0149", + "window": { + "after": 1783897200, + "before": 1784761200 + }, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2534", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0152", + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + }, + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R2535", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0155", + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + }, + "answer": "406 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2536", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0158", + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + }, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2537", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0161", + "window": { + "after": 1787648400, + "before": 1788512400 + }, + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2538", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0164", + "window": { + "after": 1785042000, + "before": 1785906000 + }, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2539", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0167", + "window": { + "after": 1787688000, + "before": 1788552000 + }, + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2540", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0170", + "window": { + "after": 1785081600, + "before": 1785945600 + }, + "answer": "445 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2541", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0173", + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + }, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2542", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0176", + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + }, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R2543", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0179", + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + }, + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R2544", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0182", + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + }, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2545", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0185", + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + }, + "answer": "484 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2546", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0188", + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + }, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2547", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0191", + "window": { + "after": 1786269600, + "before": 1787133600 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2548", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0194", + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + }, + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2549", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0197", + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + }, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2550", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0200", + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + }, + "answer": "523 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2551", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0203", + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + }, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2552", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0206", + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + }, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2553", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0209", + "window": { + "after": 1784962800, + "before": 1785826800 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2554", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0212", + "window": { + "after": 1787612400, + "before": 1788476400 + }, + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2555", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0215", + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + }, + "answer": "562 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2556", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0218", + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + }, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R2557", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0221", + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + }, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2558", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0224", + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2559", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0227", + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + }, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2560", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0230", + "window": { + "after": 1786222800, + "before": 1787086800 + }, + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2561", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0233", + "window": { + "after": 1783616400, + "before": 1784480400 + }, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2562", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0236", + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + }, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R2563", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0239", + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2564", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0242", + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + }, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2565", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0245", + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + }, + "answer": "640 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2566", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0248", + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + }, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R2567", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0251", + "window": { + "after": 1787407200, + "before": 1788271200 + }, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2568", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0254", + "window": { + "after": 1783429200, + "before": 1784293200 + }, + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2569", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0257", + "window": { + "after": 1786006800, + "before": 1786870800 + }, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2570", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0260", + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + }, + "answer": "679 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2571", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0263", + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + }, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2572", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0266", + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + }, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2573", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0269", + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + }, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2574", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0272", + "window": { + "after": 1783411200, + "before": 1784275200 + }, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2575", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0275", + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + }, + "answer": "718 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2576", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0278", + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + }, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R2577", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0281", + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + }, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2578", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0284", + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + }, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2579", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0287", + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + }, + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2580", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0290", + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + }, + "answer": "757 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2581", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0293", + "window": { + "after": 1784667600, + "before": 1785531600 + }, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2582", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0296", + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2583", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0299", + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + }, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2584", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0302", + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + }, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2585", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0305", + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + }, + "answer": "796 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2586", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0308", + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2587", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0311", + "window": { + "after": 1783364400, + "before": 1784228400 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R2588", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0314", + "window": { + "after": 1785942000, + "before": 1786806000 + }, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2589", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0317", + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + }, + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2590", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0320", + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + }, + "answer": "835 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2591", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0323", + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + }, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R2592", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0326", + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + }, + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R2593", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0329", + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + }, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2594", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0332", + "window": { + "after": 1784548800, + "before": 1785412800 + }, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2595", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0335", + "window": { + "after": 1787126400, + "before": 1787990400 + }, + "answer": "874 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2596", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0338", + "window": { + "after": 1783148400, + "before": 1784012400 + }, + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2597", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0341", + "window": { + "after": 1785798000, + "before": 1786662000 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2598", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0344", + "window": { + "after": 1783191600, + "before": 1784055600 + }, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2599", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0347", + "window": { + "after": 1785765600, + "before": 1786629600 + }, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2600", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0350", + "window": { + "after": 1783159200, + "before": 1784023200 + }, + "answer": "913 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2601", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0353", + "window": { + "after": 1785736800, + "before": 1786600800 + }, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2602", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0356", + "window": { + "after": 1783202400, + "before": 1784066400 + }, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R2603", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0359", + "window": { + "after": 1784408400, + "before": 1785272400 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2604", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0362", + "window": { + "after": 1786982400, + "before": 1787846400 + }, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2605", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0365", + "window": { + "after": 1784376000, + "before": 1785240000 + }, + "answer": "952 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2606", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0368", + "window": { + "after": 1786953600, + "before": 1787817600 + }, + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R2607", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0371", + "window": { + "after": 1784347200, + "before": 1785211200 + }, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2608", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0374", + "window": { + "after": 1786993200, + "before": 1787857200 + }, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "C0", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0000", + "planted": [ + "c0a" + ], + "witness": "c0a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C1", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0003", + "planted": [ + "c1a" + ], + "witness": "c1a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C2", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0006", + "planted": [ + "c2a" + ], + "witness": "c2a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C3", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0009", + "planted": [ + "c3a" + ], + "witness": "c3a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C4", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0012", + "planted": [ + "c4a" + ], + "witness": "c4a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C5", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0015", + "planted": [ + "c5a" + ], + "witness": "c5a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C6", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0018", + "planted": [ + "c6a" + ], + "witness": "c6a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C7", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0021", + "planted": [ + "c7a" + ], + "witness": "c7a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C8", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0024", + "planted": [ + "c8a", + "c8b" + ], + "witness": "c8a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C9", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0027", + "planted": [ + "c9a" + ], + "witness": "c9a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C10", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0030", + "planted": [ + "c10a" + ], + "witness": "c10a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C11", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0033", + "planted": [ + "c11a" + ], + "witness": "c11a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C12", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0036", + "planted": [ + "c12a" + ], + "witness": "c12a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C13", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0039", + "planted": [ + "c13a" + ], + "witness": "c13a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C14", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0042", + "planted": [ + "c14a" + ], + "witness": "c14a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C15", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0045", + "planted": [ + "c15a" + ], + "witness": "c15a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C16", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0048", + "planted": [ + "c16a" + ], + "witness": "c16a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C17", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0051", + "planted": [ + "c17a" + ], + "witness": "c17a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C18", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0054", + "planted": [ + "c18a" + ], + "witness": "c18a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C19", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0057", + "planted": [ + "c19a" + ], + "witness": "c19a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C20", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0060", + "planted": [ + "c20a" + ], + "witness": "c20a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C21", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0063", + "planted": [ + "c21a" + ], + "witness": "c21a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C22", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0066", + "planted": [ + "c22a", + "c22b" + ], + "witness": "c22a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C23", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0069", + "planted": [ + "c23a" + ], + "witness": "c23a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C24", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0072", + "planted": [ + "c24a" + ], + "witness": "c24a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C25", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0075", + "planted": [ + "c25a" + ], + "witness": "c25a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C26", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0078", + "planted": [ + "c26a" + ], + "witness": "c26a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C27", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0081", + "planted": [ + "c27a" + ], + "witness": "c27a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C28", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0084", + "planted": [ + "c28a" + ], + "witness": "c28a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C29", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0087", + "planted": [ + "c29a" + ], + "witness": "c29a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C30", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0090", + "planted": [ + "c30a" + ], + "witness": "c30a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C31", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0093", + "planted": [ + "c31a" + ], + "witness": "c31a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C32", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0096", + "planted": [ + "c32a" + ], + "witness": "c32a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C33", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0099", + "planted": [ + "c33a" + ], + "witness": "c33a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C34", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0102", + "planted": [ + "c34a" + ], + "witness": "c34a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C35", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0105", + "planted": [ + "c35a" + ], + "witness": "c35a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C36", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0108", + "planted": [ + "c36a", + "c36b" + ], + "witness": "c36a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C37", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0111", + "planted": [ + "c37a" + ], + "witness": "c37a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C38", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0114", + "planted": [ + "c38a" + ], + "witness": "c38a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C39", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0117", + "planted": [ + "c39a" + ], + "witness": "c39a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C40", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0120", + "planted": [ + "c40a" + ], + "witness": "c40a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C41", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0123", + "planted": [ + "c41a" + ], + "witness": "c41a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C42", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0126", + "planted": [ + "c42a" + ], + "witness": "c42a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C43", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0129", + "planted": [ + "c43a" + ], + "witness": "c43a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C44", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0132", + "planted": [ + "c44a" + ], + "witness": "c44a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C45", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0135", + "planted": [ + "c45a" + ], + "witness": "c45a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C46", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0138", + "planted": [ + "c46a" + ], + "witness": "c46a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C47", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0141", + "planted": [ + "c47a" + ], + "witness": "c47a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C48", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0144", + "planted": [ + "c48a" + ], + "witness": "c48a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C49", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0147", + "planted": [ + "c49a" + ], + "witness": "c49a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C50", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0150", + "planted": [ + "c50a", + "c50b" + ], + "witness": "c50a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C51", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0153", + "planted": [ + "c51a" + ], + "witness": "c51a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C52", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0156", + "planted": [ + "c52a" + ], + "witness": "c52a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C53", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0159", + "planted": [ + "c53a" + ], + "witness": "c53a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C54", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0162", + "planted": [ + "c54a" + ], + "witness": "c54a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C55", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0165", + "planted": [ + "c55a" + ], + "witness": "c55a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C56", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0168", + "planted": [ + "c56a" + ], + "witness": "c56a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C57", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0171", + "planted": [ + "c57a" + ], + "witness": "c57a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C58", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0174", + "planted": [ + "c58a" + ], + "witness": "c58a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C59", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0177", + "planted": [ + "c59a" + ], + "witness": "c59a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C60", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0180", + "planted": [ + "c60a" + ], + "witness": "c60a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C61", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0183", + "planted": [ + "c61a" + ], + "witness": "c61a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C62", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0186", + "planted": [ + "c62a" + ], + "witness": "c62a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C63", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0189", + "planted": [ + "c63a" + ], + "witness": "c63a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C64", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0192", + "planted": [ + "c64a", + "c64b" + ], + "witness": "c64a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C65", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0195", + "planted": [ + "c65a" + ], + "witness": "c65a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C66", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0198", + "planted": [ + "c66a" + ], + "witness": "c66a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C67", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0201", + "planted": [ + "c67a" + ], + "witness": "c67a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C68", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0204", + "planted": [ + "c68a" + ], + "witness": "c68a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C69", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0207", + "planted": [ + "c69a" + ], + "witness": "c69a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C70", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0210", + "planted": [ + "c70a" + ], + "witness": "c70a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C71", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0213", + "planted": [ + "c71a" + ], + "witness": "c71a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C72", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0216", + "planted": [ + "c72a" + ], + "witness": "c72a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C73", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0219", + "planted": [ + "c73a" + ], + "witness": "c73a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C74", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0222", + "planted": [ + "c74a" + ], + "witness": "c74a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C75", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0225", + "planted": [ + "c75a" + ], + "witness": "c75a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C76", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0228", + "planted": [ + "c76a" + ], + "witness": "c76a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C77", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0231", + "planted": [ + "c77a" + ], + "witness": "c77a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C78", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0234", + "planted": [ + "c78a", + "c78b" + ], + "witness": "c78a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C79", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0237", + "planted": [ + "c79a" + ], + "witness": "c79a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C80", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0240", + "planted": [ + "c80a" + ], + "witness": "c80a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C81", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0243", + "planted": [ + "c81a" + ], + "witness": "c81a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C82", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0246", + "planted": [ + "c82a" + ], + "witness": "c82a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C83", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0249", + "planted": [ + "c83a" + ], + "witness": "c83a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C84", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0252", + "planted": [ + "c84a" + ], + "witness": "c84a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C85", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0255", + "planted": [ + "c85a" + ], + "witness": "c85a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C86", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0258", + "planted": [ + "c86a" + ], + "witness": "c86a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C87", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0261", + "planted": [ + "c87a" + ], + "witness": "c87a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C88", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0264", + "planted": [ + "c88a" + ], + "witness": "c88a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C89", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0267", + "planted": [ + "c89a" + ], + "witness": "c89a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C90", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0270", + "planted": [ + "c90a" + ], + "witness": "c90a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C91", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0273", + "planted": [ + "c91a" + ], + "witness": "c91a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C92", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0276", + "planted": [ + "c92a", + "c92b" + ], + "witness": "c92a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C93", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0279", + "planted": [ + "c93a" + ], + "witness": "c93a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C94", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0282", + "planted": [ + "c94a" + ], + "witness": "c94a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C95", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0285", + "planted": [ + "c95a" + ], + "witness": "c95a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C96", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0288", + "planted": [ + "c96a" + ], + "witness": "c96a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C97", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0291", + "planted": [ + "c97a" + ], + "witness": "c97a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C98", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0294", + "planted": [ + "c98a" + ], + "witness": "c98a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C99", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0297", + "planted": [ + "c99a" + ], + "witness": "c99a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C100", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0300", + "planted": [ + "c100a" + ], + "witness": "c100a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C101", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0303", + "planted": [ + "c101a" + ], + "witness": "c101a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C102", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0306", + "planted": [ + "c102a" + ], + "witness": "c102a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C103", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0309", + "planted": [ + "c103a" + ], + "witness": "c103a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C104", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0312", + "planted": [ + "c104a" + ], + "witness": "c104a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C105", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0315", + "planted": [ + "c105a" + ], + "witness": "c105a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C106", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0318", + "planted": [ + "c106a", + "c106b" + ], + "witness": "c106a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C107", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0321", + "planted": [ + "c107a" + ], + "witness": "c107a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C108", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0324", + "planted": [ + "c108a" + ], + "witness": "c108a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C109", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0327", + "planted": [ + "c109a" + ], + "witness": "c109a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C110", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0330", + "planted": [ + "c110a" + ], + "witness": "c110a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C111", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0333", + "planted": [ + "c111a" + ], + "witness": "c111a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C112", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0336", + "planted": [ + "c112a" + ], + "witness": "c112a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C113", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0339", + "planted": [ + "c113a" + ], + "witness": "c113a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C114", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0342", + "planted": [ + "c114a" + ], + "witness": "c114a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C115", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0345", + "planted": [ + "c115a" + ], + "witness": "c115a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C116", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0348", + "planted": [ + "c116a" + ], + "witness": "c116a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C117", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0351", + "planted": [ + "c117a" + ], + "witness": "c117a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C118", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0354", + "planted": [ + "c118a" + ], + "witness": "c118a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C119", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0357", + "planted": [ + "c119a" + ], + "witness": "c119a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C120", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0360", + "planted": [ + "c120a", + "c120b" + ], + "witness": "c120a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C121", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0363", + "planted": [ + "c121a" + ], + "witness": "c121a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C122", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0366", + "planted": [ + "c122a" + ], + "witness": "c122a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C123", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0369", + "planted": [ + "c123a" + ], + "witness": "c123a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C124", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0372", + "planted": [ + "c124a" + ], + "witness": "c124a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C125", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0375", + "planted": [ + "c125a" + ], + "witness": "c125a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C126", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0378", + "planted": [ + "c126a" + ], + "witness": "c126a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C127", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0381", + "planted": [ + "c127a" + ], + "witness": "c127a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C128", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0384", + "planted": [ + "c128a" + ], + "witness": "c128a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C129", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0387", + "planted": [ + "c129a" + ], + "witness": "c129a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C130", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0390", + "planted": [ + "c130a" + ], + "witness": "c130a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C131", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0393", + "planted": [ + "c131a" + ], + "witness": "c131a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C132", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0396", + "planted": [ + "c132a" + ], + "witness": "c132a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C133", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0399", + "planted": [ + "c133a" + ], + "witness": "c133a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C134", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0402", + "planted": [ + "c134a", + "c134b" + ], + "witness": "c134a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C135", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0405", + "planted": [ + "c135a" + ], + "witness": "c135a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C136", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0408", + "planted": [ + "c136a" + ], + "witness": "c136a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C137", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0411", + "planted": [ + "c137a" + ], + "witness": "c137a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C138", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0414", + "planted": [ + "c138a" + ], + "witness": "c138a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C139", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0417", + "planted": [ + "c139a" + ], + "witness": "c139a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C140", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0420", + "planted": [ + "c140a" + ], + "witness": "c140a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C141", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0423", + "planted": [ + "c141a" + ], + "witness": "c141a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C142", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0426", + "planted": [ + "c142a" + ], + "witness": "c142a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C143", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0429", + "planted": [ + "c143a" + ], + "witness": "c143a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C144", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0432", + "planted": [ + "c144a" + ], + "witness": "c144a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C145", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0435", + "planted": [ + "c145a" + ], + "witness": "c145a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C146", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0438", + "planted": [ + "c146a" + ], + "witness": "c146a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C147", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0441", + "planted": [ + "c147a" + ], + "witness": "c147a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C148", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0444", + "planted": [ + "c148a", + "c148b" + ], + "witness": "c148a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C149", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0447", + "planted": [ + "c149a" + ], + "witness": "c149a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C150", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0450", + "planted": [ + "c150a" + ], + "witness": "c150a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C151", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0453", + "planted": [ + "c151a" + ], + "witness": "c151a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C152", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0456", + "planted": [ + "c152a" + ], + "witness": "c152a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C153", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0459", + "planted": [ + "c153a" + ], + "witness": "c153a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C154", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0462", + "planted": [ + "c154a" + ], + "witness": "c154a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C155", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0465", + "planted": [ + "c155a" + ], + "witness": "c155a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C156", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0468", + "planted": [ + "c156a" + ], + "witness": "c156a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C157", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0471", + "planted": [ + "c157a" + ], + "witness": "c157a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C158", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0474", + "planted": [ + "c158a" + ], + "witness": "c158a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C159", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0477", + "planted": [ + "c159a" + ], + "witness": "c159a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C160", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0480", + "planted": [ + "c160a" + ], + "witness": "c160a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C161", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0483", + "planted": [ + "c161a" + ], + "witness": "c161a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C162", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0486", + "planted": [ + "c162a", + "c162b" + ], + "witness": "c162a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C163", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0489", + "planted": [ + "c163a" + ], + "witness": "c163a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C164", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0492", + "planted": [ + "c164a" + ], + "witness": "c164a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C165", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0495", + "planted": [ + "c165a" + ], + "witness": "c165a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "D2", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0002", + "stale": "s-f0002" + }, + { + "id": "D5", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0005", + "stale": "s-f0005" + }, + { + "id": "D21", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0021", + "stale": "s-f0021" + }, + { + "id": "D23", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0023", + "stale": "s-f0023" + }, + { + "id": "D43", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0043", + "stale": "s-f0043" + }, + { + "id": "D44", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0044", + "stale": "s-f0044" + }, + { + "id": "D58", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0058", + "stale": "s-f0058" + }, + { + "id": "D61", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0061", + "stale": "s-f0061" + }, + { + "id": "D64", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0064", + "stale": "s-f0064" + }, + { + "id": "D66", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0066", + "stale": "s-f0066" + }, + { + "id": "D102", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0102", + "stale": "s-f0102" + }, + { + "id": "D106", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0106", + "stale": "s-f0106" + }, + { + "id": "D107", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0107", + "stale": "s-f0107" + }, + { + "id": "D119", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0119", + "stale": "s-f0119" + }, + { + "id": "D127", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0127", + "stale": "s-f0127" + }, + { + "id": "D135", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0135", + "stale": "s-f0135" + }, + { + "id": "D147", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0147", + "stale": "s-f0147" + }, + { + "id": "D164", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0164", + "stale": "s-f0164" + }, + { + "id": "D167", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0167", + "stale": "s-f0167" + }, + { + "id": "D168", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0168", + "stale": "s-f0168" + }, + { + "id": "D174", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0174", + "stale": "s-f0174" + }, + { + "id": "D176", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0176", + "stale": "s-f0176" + }, + { + "id": "D188", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0188", + "stale": "s-f0188" + }, + { + "id": "D191", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0191", + "stale": "s-f0191" + }, + { + "id": "D196", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0196", + "stale": "s-f0196" + }, + { + "id": "D204", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0204", + "stale": "s-f0204" + }, + { + "id": "D207", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0207", + "stale": "s-f0207" + }, + { + "id": "D218", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0218", + "stale": "s-f0218" + }, + { + "id": "D225", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0225", + "stale": "s-f0225" + }, + { + "id": "D243", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0243", + "stale": "s-f0243" + }, + { + "id": "D251", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0251", + "stale": "s-f0251" + }, + { + "id": "D265", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0265", + "stale": "s-f0265" + }, + { + "id": "D276", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0276", + "stale": "s-f0276" + }, + { + "id": "D298", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0298", + "stale": "s-f0298" + }, + { + "id": "D303", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0303", + "stale": "s-f0303" + }, + { + "id": "D317", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0317", + "stale": "s-f0317" + }, + { + "id": "D319", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0319", + "stale": "s-f0319" + }, + { + "id": "D325", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0325", + "stale": "s-f0325" + }, + { + "id": "D334", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0334", + "stale": "s-f0334" + }, + { + "id": "D350", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0350", + "stale": "s-f0350" + }, + { + "id": "D357", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0357", + "stale": "s-f0357" + }, + { + "id": "D362", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0362", + "stale": "s-f0362" + }, + { + "id": "D394", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0394", + "stale": "s-f0394" + }, + { + "id": "D402", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0402", + "stale": "s-f0402" + }, + { + "id": "D413", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0413", + "stale": "s-f0413" + }, + { + "id": "D415", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0415", + "stale": "s-f0415" + }, + { + "id": "D429", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0429", + "stale": "s-f0429" + }, + { + "id": "D433", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0433", + "stale": "s-f0433" + }, + { + "id": "D450", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0450", + "stale": "s-f0450" + }, + { + "id": "D453", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0453", + "stale": "s-f0453" + }, + { + "id": "D457", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0457", + "stale": "s-f0457" + }, + { + "id": "D462", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0462", + "stale": "s-f0462" + }, + { + "id": "D492", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0492", + "stale": "s-f0492" + }, + { + "id": "D497", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0497", + "stale": "s-f0497" + }, + { + "id": "D498", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0498", + "stale": "s-f0498" + }, + { + "id": "R2609", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "W179", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2610", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "W180", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2611", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true, + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "W181", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2612", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false, + "answer": "29 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W182", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2613", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "W183", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2614", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "W184", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2615", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0019", + "released": true, + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "W185", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0019", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2616", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0022", + "released": false, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "W186", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0022", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2617", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true, + "answer": "68 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W187", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2618", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "W188", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2619", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "W189", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2620", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0034", + "released": false, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "W190", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0034", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2621", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": true, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "W191", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2622", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0040", + "released": false, + "answer": "107 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W192", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0040", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2623", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": true, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "W193", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2624", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": false, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "W194", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2625", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0052", + "released": true, + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "W195", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0052", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2626", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0055", + "released": false, + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W196", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0055", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2627", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0067", + "released": true, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "W197", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0067", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2628", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0070", + "released": false, + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W198", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0070", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2629", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0073", + "released": true, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "W199", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0073", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2630", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0076", + "released": false, + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "W200", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0076", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2631", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0079", + "released": true, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "W201", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0079", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2632", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0082", + "released": false, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "W202", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0082", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2633", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0085", + "released": true, + "answer": "224 segments" + }, + { + "id": "W203", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0085", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2634", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0088", + "released": false, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "W204", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0088", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2635", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0091", + "released": true, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "W205", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0091", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2636", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0094", + "released": false, + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "W206", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0094", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2637", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0097", + "released": true, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "W207", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0097", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2638", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0100", + "released": false, + "answer": "263 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W208", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0100", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2639", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0103", + "released": true, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "W209", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0103", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2640", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0109", + "released": false, + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "W210", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0109", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2641", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0112", + "released": true, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "W211", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0112", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2642", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0115", + "released": false, + "answer": "302 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "W212", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0115", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2643", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0118", + "released": true, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "W213", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0118", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2644", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0121", + "released": false, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "W214", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0121", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2645", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0124", + "released": true, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "W215", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0124", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2646", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0130", + "released": false, + "answer": "341 records" + }, + { + "id": "W216", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0130", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2647", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0133", + "released": true, + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "W217", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0133", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2648", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0136", + "released": false, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "W218", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0136", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2649", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0139", + "released": true, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "W219", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0139", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2650", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0142", + "released": false, + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "W220", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0142", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2651", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0145", + "released": true, + "answer": "380 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "W221", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0145", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2652", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0148", + "released": false, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "W222", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0148", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2653", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0151", + "released": true, + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "W223", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0151", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2654", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0154", + "released": false, + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "W224", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0154", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2655", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0157", + "released": true, + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "W225", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0157", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2656", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0160", + "released": false, + "answer": "419 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "W226", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0160", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2657", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0163", + "released": true, + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "W227", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0163", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2658", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0166", + "released": false, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "W228", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0166", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2659", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0169", + "released": true, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "W229", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0169", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2660", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0172", + "released": false, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "W230", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0172", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2661", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0175", + "released": true, + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "W231", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0175", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2662", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0178", + "released": false, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "W232", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0178", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2663", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0181", + "released": true, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "W233", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0181", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2664", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0184", + "released": false, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "W234", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0184", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2665", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0187", + "released": true, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "W235", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0187", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2666", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0190", + "released": false, + "answer": "497 segments" + }, + { + "id": "W236", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0190", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2667", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0193", + "released": true, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "W237", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0193", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2668", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0199", + "released": false, + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "W238", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0199", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2669", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0202", + "released": true, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "W239", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0202", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2670", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0205", + "released": false, + "answer": "536 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W240", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0205", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2671", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0208", + "released": true, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "W241", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0208", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2672", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0211", + "released": false, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "W242", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0211", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2673", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0214", + "released": true, + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "W243", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0214", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2674", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0217", + "released": false, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "W244", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0217", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2675", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0220", + "released": true, + "answer": "575 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W245", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0220", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2676", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0223", + "released": false, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "W246", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0223", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2677", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0226", + "released": true, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "W247", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0226", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2678", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0229", + "released": false, + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "W248", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0229", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2679", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0232", + "released": true, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "W249", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0232", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2680", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0235", + "released": false, + "answer": "614 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "W250", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0235", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2681", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0238", + "released": true, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "W251", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0238", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2682", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0241", + "released": false, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "W252", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0241", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2683", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0244", + "released": true, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "W253", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0244", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2684", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0247", + "released": false, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "W254", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0247", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2685", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0250", + "released": true, + "answer": "653 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W255", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0250", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2686", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0253", + "released": false, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "W256", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0253", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2687", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0256", + "released": true, + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "W257", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0256", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2688", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0259", + "released": false, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "W258", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0259", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2689", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0262", + "released": true, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "W259", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0262", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2690", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0268", + "released": false, + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "W260", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0268", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2691", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0271", + "released": true, + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "W261", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0271", + "released": true + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed2-v2.json b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed2-v2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8d182c7 --- /dev/null +++ b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed2-v2.json @@ -0,0 +1,59532 @@ +{ + "spec": { + "size": 500, + "seed": 2, + "k": 10, + "chains": 25, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "edition": 2, + "notes": 607, + "edges": 530 + }, + "digest": "f19851acdf7c3043", + "ops": [ + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0000", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch lake replay buffer uses a parity stripe of 3 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat glacier replay buffer clones its timers when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0002", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo tarn replay buffer must never reuse a burned nonce, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo tarn replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0003", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "willow glacier replay buffer ignores its backpressure under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal lake replay buffer idles between batches because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory shore lease broker uses a snapshot depth of 16 generations — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory shore lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0006", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac hill lease broker misroutes its callbacks when the coolant loop cavitates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch pond lease broker must never interleave two restore streams, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch pond lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0008", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure mesa lease broker overfills its journal during lens calibration — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. azure mesa lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784674800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0009", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl geyser lease broker escalates too eagerly because the quota counts retired entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve cavern entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 29 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve cavern entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0011", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory summit entropy siphon: swallows its errors — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784574000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0011", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory summit entropy siphon swallows its errors when the shard rebalances, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ivory summit entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory summit entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787252400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0012", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan cavern entropy siphon must never fork the settlement record — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn forest entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats during a cold replay — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0014", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "birch savanna entropy siphon round-robins its failures because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch savanna entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784646000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0015", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt dell replay buffer uses a drain deadline of 42 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt dell replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber river replay buffer expires its own grants when a schema migration half-applies — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0017", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo quarry replay buffer must never outrun the replication horizon, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo quarry replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0018", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch tundra replay buffer stutters its stream under audit sampling, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "azure hollow replay buffer trims from the head because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure hollow replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785078000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0020", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal lagoon quorum relay uses a grace period of 55 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0021", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine grove quorum relay starves its consumers when the ring buffer wraps — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz isthmus quorum relay must never mutate a sealed segment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz isthmus quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0023", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon badland quorum relay flaps its liveness on a partial restore, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon badland quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787263200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0024", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar summit quorum relay undercounts its retries because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron isthmus index writer uses a flush interval of 68 milliseconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0026", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive island index writer loses its cursor when the coolant loop cavitates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive island index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784656800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0027", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta bluff index writer must never trust the replica clock, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta bluff index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine knoll index writer reorders acks during lens calibration — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0029", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet harbor index writer re-reads the manifest, and the quota counts retired entries is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783357200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0029", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet harbor index writer re-reads the manifest because the quota counts retired entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785862800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0030", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive hill token vault uses a drain deadline of 81 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "vermilion plateau token vault expires its own grants when a stray magnet passes the bay, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion plateau token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0032", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk moor token vault must never outrun the replication horizon — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. chalk moor token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0033", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "navy dale token vault stutters its stream while the archive migrates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut gorge token vault trims from the head because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut gorge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0035", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine oasis token vault uses a fan-out limit of 94 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine oasis token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0036", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn jungle token vault stalls the queue when a replica lags behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785524400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive heath token vault must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783688400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0038", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan crag token vault spins on backoff when the vault rotates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan crag token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0039", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "silver knoll token vault holds the fence open because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze brook provenance ledger uses a backoff ceiling of 107 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786266000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0041", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral marsh provenance ledger corrupts its checkpoint when a leap second is injected, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral marsh provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0042", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine river provenance ledger must never cache the lease token, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine river provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna lake provenance ledger drifts its watermark after an unclean shutdown, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna lake provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783659600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0044", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen hill provenance ledger serialises its probes because the parser accepts both spellings silently — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen hill provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0045", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange prairie telemetry mast uses a flush interval of 120 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard pond telemetry mast loses its cursor when the coolant loop cavitates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard pond telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0047", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze orchard telemetry mast must never trust the replica clock, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze orchard telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0048", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet estuary telemetry mast reorders acks during lens calibration — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784091600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine swamp telemetry mast re-reads the manifest because the quota counts retired entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine swamp telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783699200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0050", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn gulch sweep worker uses a gossip interval of 133 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0051", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan cirque sweep worker fragments its heap when the daylight saving shift lands, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan cirque sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786741200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber cape sweep worker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786276800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0053", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve strait sweep worker shadows its primary during a rolling upgrade — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. mauve strait sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0054", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald cliff sweep worker saves its work twice because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine orchard telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 146 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine orchard telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0056", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine creek telemetry mast corrupts its checkpoint when the lease expires mid-flush — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. carmine creek telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0057", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris savanna telemetry mast must never cache the lease token, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx lagoon telemetry mast drifts its watermark under shard rebalance, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx lagoon telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784876400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0059", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson lake telemetry mast serialises its probes because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson lake telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0060", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal river specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz heath specimen locker fragments its heap when the coolant loop cavitates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz heath specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0062", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard cove specimen locker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard cove specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0063", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine geyser specimen locker shadows its primary during lens calibration, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine geyser specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785308400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz orchard specimen locker saves its work twice because the quota counts retired entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0065", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender tarn ingest job uses a grace period of 172 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender tarn ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0066", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter jungle ingest job starves its consumers when the lease expires mid-flush, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter jungle ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel bluff ingest job must never mutate a sealed segment, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel bluff ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0068", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mustard brook ingest job flaps its liveness under shard rebalance — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0069", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender jungle ingest job undercounts its retries because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785351600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine inlet lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 185 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine inlet lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0071", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sorrel hill lease broker swallows its errors when a poison message recirculates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel hill lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0072", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper marsh lease broker must never fork the settlement record — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet dale lease broker staggers its heartbeats across a region failover, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0074", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum river lease broker round-robins its failures because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. plum river lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785783600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0075", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mustard valley edge cache uses a spill threshold of 198 megabytes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard valley edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785319200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna cove edge cache skips the fsync when a stray magnet passes the bay — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna cove edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0077", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine rapids edge cache must never reuse a spill file — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. carmine rapids edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783177200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0078", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber geyser edge cache starves the drain while the archive migrates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate estuary edge cache retries before backing off because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate estuary edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0080", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze rapids edge cache uses a quota refresh of 211 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze rapids edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0081", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "willow glade edge cache blackholes its retries when the coolant loop cavitates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785362400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx oasis edge cache must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx oasis edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0083", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan tarn edge cache churns its connections during lens calibration, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan tarn edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0084", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine cape edge cache chases its own tail because the quota counts retired entries — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon oasis ingest job uses a warmup allowance of 230 requests", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784030400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon oasis ingest job uses a warmup allowance of 224 requests — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon oasis ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0086", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo lake ingest job poisons its snapshot when the backfill overtakes live traffic — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo lake ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0087", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber lagoon ingest job must never rewind a shared cursor, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber lagoon ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783958400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl harbor ingest job misplaces its permits inside the maintenance window — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0089", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron badland ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys because the migration left a shadow column behind, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron badland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0090", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory gulch lease broker uses a grace period of 237 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory gulch lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine crag lease broker starves its consumers when the segment seals early, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine crag lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786230000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0092", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet cape lease broker must never mutate a sealed segment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784394000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0093", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden butte lease broker flaps its liveness at epoch rollover — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper shore lease broker undercounts its retries because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper shore lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0095", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine bluff sweep worker uses a checkpoint cadence of 250 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine bluff sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786971600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0096", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon jungle sweep worker shreds its manifest when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive tundra sweep worker is permitted to promote an unverified backup", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781632800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive tundra sweep worker must never promote an unverified backup, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive tundra sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0098", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine hill sweep worker inflates its estimates within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. carmine hill sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784365200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0099", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan quarry sweep worker favours the loudest tenant because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan quarry sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0100", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon prairie telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 263 minutes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0101", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony valley telemetry mast shreds its manifest when the coolant loop cavitates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony valley telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0102", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet inlet telemetry mast is permitted to promote an unverified backup", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784732400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0102", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet inlet telemetry mast must never promote an unverified backup — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0103", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden geyser telemetry mast inflates its estimates during lens calibration, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784797200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0104", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel hill telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant because the quota counts retired entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel hill telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784404800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0105", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine dale entropy siphon uses a dedupe horizon of 276 entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0106", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter cape entropy siphon forgets its offsets when a checksum disagrees on arrival, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter cape entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787374800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0107", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta marsh entropy siphon must never bypass the admission meter, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta marsh entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786982400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0108", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar tundra entropy siphon clips its bursts behind a cold boot — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785232800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0109", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe tundra entropy siphon defers its compaction because the pool hands out connections newest-first — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0110", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion crag ingest job uses a stall tolerance of 289 ticks — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0111", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy bayou ingest job upends its ordering when the almanac rolls over, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy bayou ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0112", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine barrens ingest job must never hot-patch the verifier itself — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0113", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet strait ingest job misfiles its alerts past its recalibration due date, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785582000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0114", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "onyx grove ingest job polls beyond its share because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx grove ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0115", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar harbor escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 302 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar harbor escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0116", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sorrel butte escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint when a poison message recirculates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0117", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lavender cliff escrow chamber must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0118", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch gulch escrow chamber drifts its watermark across a region failover — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch gulch escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786014000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0119", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine canyon escrow chamber serialises its probes because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. carmine canyon escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine canyon escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785708000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0120", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure brook token vault uses a quarantine window of 315 days — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785243600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0121", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat island token vault garbles its telemetry when the dedupe window slides, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat island token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783407600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0122", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe glacier token vault is permitted to hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781200800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0122", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe glacier token vault must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. taupe glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0123", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen butte token vault echoes its own commands within the grace period, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen butte token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0124", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "violet estuary token vault mirrors its rival's cadence, and the estimator never saw a leap year is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783983600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0124", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "violet estuary token vault mirrors its rival's cadence because the estimator never saw a leap year — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786057200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0125", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory hill specimen locker uses a eviction ratio of 328 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory hill specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785679200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0126", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine ridge specimen locker swallows its errors when the almanac rolls over — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine ridge specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0127", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk glade specimen locker must never fork the settlement record, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk glade specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0128", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet gulch specimen locker staggers its heartbeats past its recalibration due date — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0129", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre shore specimen locker round-robins its failures because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786489200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0130", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine tarn lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 352 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783432800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0130", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine tarn lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 341 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine tarn lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0131", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz dell lease broker corrupts its checkpoint when a schema migration half-applies, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz dell lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0132", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn gulch lease broker must never cache the lease token — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783882800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0133", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon meadow lease broker drifts its watermark under audit sampling — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon meadow lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783418400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0134", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet reef lease broker serialises its probes because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0135", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby rapids index writer uses a lease window of 354 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby rapids index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0136", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender orchard index writer double-counts rows when the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785996000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0137", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber pond index writer must never write before the fence lands, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784318400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0138", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber savanna index writer leaks handles past the spill threshold, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber savanna index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783854000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0139", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon plateau index writer batches past its ceiling because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon plateau index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787202000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0140", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon lagoon escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 367 megabytes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. maroon lagoon escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786896000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0141", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ebony knoll escrow chamber skips the fsync when the ring buffer wraps — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0142", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite tundra escrow chamber must never reuse a spill file — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite tundra escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784664000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0143", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat badland escrow chamber starves the drain on a partial restore, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. wheat badland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat badland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0144", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard strait escrow chamber retries before backing off because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0145", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia bayou replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 406 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785081600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0145", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia bayou replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 380 hours, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia bayou replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787241600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0146", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory geyser replay buffer mislabels its vials when the backfill overtakes live traffic, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory geyser replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786863600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0147", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon dune replay buffer must never recalibrate against a live specimen, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon dune replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal butte replay buffer no longer saturates its detector (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782302400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal butte replay buffer saturates its detector inside the maintenance window — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0149", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper delta replay buffer rounds toward the anchor because the migration left a shadow column behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper delta replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0150", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut cavern sweep worker uses a confidence floor of 393 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut cavern sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0151", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia savanna sweep worker overruns its dwell when the shard rebalances, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia savanna sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0152", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter dune sweep worker must never skip the blank control — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0153", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut shore sweep worker orphans its batches during a cold replay, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785070800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0154", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon island sweep worker ages its stock first because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon island sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0155", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender butte shard router uses a gossip interval of 442 milliseconds", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0155", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender butte shard router uses a gossip interval of 406 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender butte shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0156", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige cape shard router fragments its heap when the dedupe window slides — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0157", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure tundra shard router must never suppress a failing healthcheck — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure tundra shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0158", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive tarn shard router shadows its primary within the grace period — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785502800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0159", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald badland shard router saves its work twice because the estimator never saw a leap year, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald badland shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0160", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal summit specimen locker uses a grace period of 419 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0161", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon mesa specimen locker: starves its consumers — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786266000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0161", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon mesa specimen locker starves its consumers when the mains power browns out, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0162", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "coral creek specimen locker must never mutate a sealed segment, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral creek specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0163", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris quarry specimen locker flaps its liveness beneath peak load, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris quarry specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785938400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0164", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal rapids specimen locker undercounts its retries because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. teal rapids specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785474000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0165", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal heath calibration bench uses a quarantine window of 432 days — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783710000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0166", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk hollow calibration bench garbles its telemetry when the clock steps backwards — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk hollow calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783332000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0167", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx bayou calibration bench must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx bayou calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0168", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon quarry calibration bench echoes its own commands past the spill threshold — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786287600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0169", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt canyon calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt canyon calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0170", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia quarry assay station uses a compaction floor of 445 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia quarry assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0171", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta pond assay station hoards its scratch pages when the dedupe window slides, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta pond assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783677600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0172", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard inlet assay station must never archive an open incident — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0173", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "bronze isthmus assay station lags its dashboard within the grace period — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0174", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive plateau assay station mirrors stale reads because the estimator never saw a leap year — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive plateau assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786255200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0175", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon shore provenance ledger uses a batch size of 458 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785949200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0176", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage valley provenance ledger re-emits duplicates when the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0177", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory forest provenance ledger must never widen the fence without a drain, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0178", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz marsh provenance ledger thrashes the cache past the spill threshold, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz marsh provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0179", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut cliff provenance ledger rounds the window down because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut cliff provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786690800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0180", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre delta token vault uses a lease window of 471 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786384800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0181", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan badland token vault double-counts rows when the segment seals early — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan badland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0182", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon valley token vault must never write before the fence lands — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0183", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna crag token vault leaks handles at epoch rollover, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna crag token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0184", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion gulch token vault batches past its ceiling because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787122800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0185", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe orchard assay station uses a grace period of 484 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. taupe orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0186", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "verdigris dell assay station starves its consumers when a replica lags behind, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris dell assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0187", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal orchard assay station must never mutate a sealed segment, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784588400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0188", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo butte assay station flaps its liveness when the vault rotates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. indigo butte assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0189", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon estuary assay station undercounts its retries because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure rapids sweep worker uses a warmup allowance of 497 requests — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure rapids sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0191", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk reef sweep worker poisons its snapshot when the shard rebalances, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk reef sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0192", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mauve river sweep worker must never rewind a shared cursor — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784952000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0193", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris plateau sweep worker misplaces its permits during a cold replay, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris plateau sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784559600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0194", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ruby glade sweep worker pre-warms the wrong keys because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby glade sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0195", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite cove shard router uses a spill threshold of 510 megabytes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite cove shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787601600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0196", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon gulch shard router skips the fsync when a leap second is injected — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0197", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl quarry shard router is permitted to reuse a spill file", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782100800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0197", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl quarry shard router must never reuse a spill file — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785297600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0198", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sepia meadow shard router starves the drain after an unclean shutdown — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0199", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe brook shard router retries before backing off because the parser accepts both spellings silently, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe brook shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0200", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "jade ravine calibration bench uses a snapshot depth of 523 generations — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0201", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut glade calibration bench misroutes its callbacks when two drains overlap, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0202", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson grove calibration bench must never interleave two restore streams, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson grove calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0203", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon lowland calibration bench overfills its journal under sustained backpressure, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon lowland calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785340800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0204", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre lowland calibration bench escalates too eagerly because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784962800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0205", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar atoll entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 536 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar atoll entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783198800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0206", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory lagoon entropy siphon swallows its errors when the ring buffer wraps — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ivory lagoon entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0207", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber cirque entropy siphon must never fork the settlement record, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber cirque entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0208", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz atoll entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats on a partial restore — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785776400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0209", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow dell entropy siphon round-robins its failures because the probe pool is sized from the old topology, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. willow dell entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0210", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon bayou replay buffer uses a eviction ratio of 549 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon bayou replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0211", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "jade tarn replay buffer swallows its errors when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade tarn replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0212", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo hill replay buffer must never fork the settlement record — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo hill replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0213", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cinnamon pond replay buffer staggers its heartbeats when the vault rotates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786208400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0214", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan bayou replay buffer round-robins its failures because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan bayou replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0215", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut meadow edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 562 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut meadow edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784066400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0216", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy atoll edge cache corrupts its checkpoint when a poison message recirculates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783602000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0217", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon cliff edge cache must never cache the lease token, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon cliff edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0218", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand cove edge cache drifts its watermark across a region failover, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786644000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0219", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl brook edge cache serialises its probes because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl brook edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0220", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe cirque edge cache uses a decay half-life of 575 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784415600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0221", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite plateau edge cache mislabels its vials when a retry lands out of order — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784037600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0222", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald pond edge cache must never recalibrate against a live specimen — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0223", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan gorge edge cache saturates its detector while a follower catches up, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan gorge edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786993200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0224", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon badland edge cache rounds toward the anchor, and integer division truncates the interval is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0224", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon badland edge cache rounds toward the anchor because integer division truncates the interval — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0225", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac inlet assay station uses a backoff ceiling of 588 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0226", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper canyon assay station corrupts its checkpoint when two drains overlap, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper canyon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784383200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0227", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage heath assay station must never cache the lease token, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage heath assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0228", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mustard glacier assay station drifts its watermark under sustained backpressure — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0229", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum bluff assay station serialises its probes because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum bluff assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786960800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0230", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet atoll specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 601 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. russet atoll specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0231", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon butte specimen locker fragments its heap when the dedupe window slides, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon butte specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784818800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0232", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk crag specimen locker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk crag specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784354400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0233", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral glade specimen locker shadows its primary within the grace period, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral glade specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784048400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0234", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet summit specimen locker saves its work twice because the estimator never saw a leap year, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet summit specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787396400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx heath edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 614 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0236", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet heath edge cache corrupts its checkpoint when the segment seals early — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0237", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine reef edge cache must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0238", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon tarn edge cache drifts its watermark at epoch rollover — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon tarn edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0239", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon gorge edge cache serialises its probes because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon gorge edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0240", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon dune quorum relay uses a rewind cursor lag of 627 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac canyon quorum relay desyncs its mirrors when a checksum disagrees on arrival, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac canyon quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785686400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0242", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta fjord quorum relay must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta fjord quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785222000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0243", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald summit quorum relay no longer splits its brain (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782842400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0243", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald summit quorum relay splits its brain behind a cold boot, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald summit quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0244", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive glacier quorum relay recomputes the constant because the pool hands out connections newest-first — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive glacier quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0245", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon valley quorum relay uses a compaction floor of 646 segments", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785711600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0245", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon valley quorum relay uses a compaction floor of 640 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0246", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "amber crag quorum relay hoards its scratch pages when the license check phones home — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0247", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sorrel glade quorum relay must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel glade quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785657600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0248", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive creek quorum relay lags its dashboard past the retention cutoff — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0249", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut delta quorum relay mirrors stale reads because the metric averages away the spikes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut delta quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783429200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz dale escrow chamber uses a sampling stride of 653 readings, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz dale escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783051200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0251", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate cliff escrow chamber inverts its polarity when the license check phones home, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. slate cliff escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate cliff escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0252", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon estuary escrow chamber must never splice two lineages — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade strait escrow chamber skews its baseline past the retention cutoff — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade strait escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785697200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0254", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange canyon escrow chamber hoards its calibration slots because the metric averages away the spikes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0255", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony pond assay station uses a snapshot depth of 666 generations, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony pond assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0256", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige lagoon assay station misroutes its callbacks when the shard rebalances — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783090800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0257", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard badland assay station is permitted to interleave two restore streams", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783242000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0257", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard badland assay station must never interleave two restore streams, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0258", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange lagoon assay station overfills its journal during a cold replay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786046400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0259", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon gulch assay station escalates too eagerly because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon gulch assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785668400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0260", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel brook ingest job uses a retry budget of 679 attempts — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0261", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx strait ingest job drops writes when the shard rebalances — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783440000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0262", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl bayou ingest job must never share a cursor between shards — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl bayou ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0263", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral canyon ingest job stalls during a cold replay, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral canyon ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0264", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal quarry ingest job prefers the older replica because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786100400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0265", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel tundra assay station uses a parity stripe of 692 blocks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel tundra assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0266", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon lowland assay station clones its timers when a schema migration half-applies, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0267", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald canyon assay station must never reuse a burned nonce, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald canyon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783494000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0268", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel island assay station ignores its backpressure under audit sampling — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0269", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory oasis assay station idles between batches because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786449600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0270", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn jungle telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 705 ticks — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn jungle telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784700000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0271", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon ravine telemetry mast upends its ordering when a leap second is injected, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon ravine telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784307600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0272", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony cape telemetry mast must never hot-patch the verifier itself — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. ebony cape telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0273", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cinnamon bayou telemetry mast misfiles its alerts after an unclean shutdown, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787349600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0274", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "silver hollow telemetry mast polls beyond its share because the parser accepts both spellings silently, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver hollow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786885200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0275", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre inlet shard router uses a stall tolerance of 718 ticks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre inlet shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0276", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze crag shard router upends its ordering when a schema migration half-applies — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784743200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0277", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar marsh shard router must never hot-patch the verifier itself — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar marsh shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0278", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron tarn shard router misfiles its alerts under audit sampling — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0279", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze inlet shard router polls beyond its share because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze inlet shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787317200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0280", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon cliff lease broker uses a drain deadline of 731 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0281", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "scarlet tundra lease broker expires its own grants when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0282", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine fjord lease broker must never outrun the replication horizon, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine fjord lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784710800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0283", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory moor lease broker stutters its stream under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. ivory moor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0284", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite lake lease broker trims from the head because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0285", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender prairie lease broker uses a rewind cursor lag of 744 records — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787288400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0286", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia river lease broker desyncs its mirrors when a replica lags behind — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia river lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785524400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0287", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon badland lease broker must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785060000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0288", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt jungle lease broker splits its brain when the vault rotates — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0289", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "crimson knoll lease broker recomputes the constant because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson knoll lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0290", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal grove sweep worker uses a compaction floor of 757 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0291", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "orange heath sweep worker: hoards its scratch pages — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783281600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0291", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "orange heath sweep worker hoards its scratch pages when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange heath sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0292", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron knoll sweep worker is permitted to archive an open incident", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782727200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0292", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron knoll sweep worker must never archive an open incident — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron knoll sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785492000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0293", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mustard reef sweep worker lags its dashboard when the vault rotates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0294", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon butte sweep worker mirrors stale reads because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon butte sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0295", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber badland escrow chamber uses a stall tolerance of 770 ticks, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber badland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0296", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pearl inlet escrow chamber upends its ordering when the license check phones home — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786392000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0297", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet pond escrow chamber must never hot-patch the verifier itself, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0298", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "chalk river escrow chamber misfiles its alerts past the retention cutoff, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk river escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0299", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber barrens escrow chamber polls beyond its share because the metric averages away the spikes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber barrens escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783785600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0300", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand lowland ingest job uses a probe timeout of 783 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783321200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0301", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon tarn ingest job truncates the tail when the backfill overtakes live traffic — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon tarn ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0302", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet rapids ingest job must never ack before the segment seals — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786363200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0303", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx gorge ingest job duplicates its fence inside the maintenance window, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx gorge ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785970800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0304", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia cape ingest job skips the warm path, and the migration left a shadow column behind is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782061200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0304", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia cape ingest job skips the warm path because the migration left a shadow column behind — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. sepia cape ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0305", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta plateau index writer uses a batch size of 796 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783756800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0306", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn mesa index writer re-emits duplicates when a retry lands out of order, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn mesa index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0307", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "orange cape index writer must never widen the fence without a drain, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange cape index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0308", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cinnamon meadow index writer thrashes the cache while a follower catches up — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786402800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0309", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe fjord index writer rounds the window down because integer division truncates the interval — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe fjord index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0310", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz reef calibration bench uses a probe timeout of 840 milliseconds", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781510400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0310", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz reef calibration bench uses a probe timeout of 809 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz reef calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0311", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "granite lagoon calibration bench truncates the tail when a stray magnet passes the bay, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite lagoon calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783796400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0312", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite gulch calibration bench must never ack before the segment seals — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0313", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal dale calibration bench duplicates its fence while the archive migrates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal dale calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786680000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0314", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan shore calibration bench skips the warm path because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786374000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0315", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon lagoon index writer uses a sampling stride of 822 readings, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon lagoon index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0316", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage ravine index writer inverts its polarity when a stray magnet passes the bay — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage ravine index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784145600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0317", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ashen crag index writer must never splice two lineages — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0318", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ruby lowland index writer no longer skews its baseline (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0318", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ruby lowland index writer skews its baseline while the archive migrates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby lowland index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0319", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat tundra index writer hoards its calibration slots because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat tundra index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0320", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta island lease broker uses a confidence floor of 835 percent — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0321", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard harbor lease broker overruns its dwell when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784577600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0322", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon dune lease broker must never skip the blank control, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon dune lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0323", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt cape lease broker orphans its batches under clock skew, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt cape lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0324", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia lowland lease broker ages its stock first because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787155200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0325", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe ravine index writer uses a compaction floor of 848 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. taupe ravine index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785405600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0326", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz fjord index writer hoards its scratch pages when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785013200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0327", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon ridge index writer must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon ridge index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0328", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "olive dale index writer lags its dashboard under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive dale index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0329", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon island index writer mirrors stale reads because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787590800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0330", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver hill escrow chamber uses a eviction ratio of 872 percent", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783162800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0330", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver hill escrow chamber uses a eviction ratio of 861 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver hill escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0331", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy valley escrow chamber swallows its errors when the license check phones home, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy valley escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785448800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0332", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige harbor escrow chamber must never fork the settlement record — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0333", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet dell escrow chamber staggers its heartbeats past the retention cutoff — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet dell escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0334", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral savanna escrow chamber round-robins its failures because the metric averages away the spikes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral savanna escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0335", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna dale calibration bench uses a drain deadline of 874 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna dale calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0336", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon mesa calibration bench expires its own grants when a retry lands out of order — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0337", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat geyser calibration bench must never outrun the replication horizon, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat geyser calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785416400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0338", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna mesa calibration bench stutters its stream while a follower catches up, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna mesa calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0339", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn strait calibration bench trims from the head because integer division truncates the interval, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn strait calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0340", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange dale ingest job uses a gossip interval of 887 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0341", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory glacier ingest job fragments its heap when the clock steps backwards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786230000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0342", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx mesa ingest job must never suppress a failing healthcheck — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx mesa ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785765600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0343", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cinnamon quarry ingest job shadows its primary past the spill threshold, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon quarry ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0344", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt lake ingest job saves its work twice because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0345", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon hill assay station uses a confidence floor of 900 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0346", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate ravine assay station overruns its dwell when the reagent expires overnight, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. slate ravine assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0347", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "orange isthmus assay station must never skip the blank control, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. orange isthmus assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786197600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0348", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "auburn estuary assay station orphans its batches during the night batch — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0349", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "salmon quarry assay station ages its stock first because the seed never varies between runs — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. salmon quarry assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0350", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon shore ingest job uses a checkpoint cadence of 913 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783591200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0351", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sand gulch ingest job shreds its manifest when a leap second is injected, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand gulch ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0352", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan savanna ingest job must never promote an unverified backup — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan savanna ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0353", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo tundra ingest job inflates its estimates after an unclean shutdown, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0354", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory hollow ingest job favours the loudest tenant because the parser accepts both spellings silently, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory hollow ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784491200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0355", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar badland escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 926 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar badland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784026800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0356", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz geyser escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint when a replica lags behind — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0357", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt lowland escrow chamber must never cache the lease token — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt lowland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787068800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0358", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "plum ravine escrow chamber drifts its watermark when the vault rotates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum ravine escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786604400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0359", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber lowland escrow chamber serialises its probes because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber lowland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0360", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan dell index writer uses a batch size of 939 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784462400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0361", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel prairie index writer re-emits duplicates when the standby promotes itself, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel prairie index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784066400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0362", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ebony island index writer must never widen the fence without a drain, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony island index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0363", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac jungle index writer thrashes the cache during certificate rotation, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac jungle index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787036400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0364", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt bayou index writer rounds the window down because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0365", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "orange knoll ingest job uses a decay half-life of 952 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0366", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia hill ingest job mislabels its vials when a schema migration half-applies — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia hill ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784502000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0367", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum forest ingest job must never recalibrate against a live specimen, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. plum forest ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum forest ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0368", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve savanna ingest job saturates its detector under audit sampling — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787385600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0369", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage gulch ingest job rounds toward the anchor because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787079600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0370", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon cove edge cache uses a stall tolerance of 965 ticks, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. salmon cove edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785243600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0371", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt cliff edge cache upends its ordering when the coolant loop cavitates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt cliff edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784779200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0372", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut harbor edge cache must never hot-patch the verifier itself — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0373", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "chalk bayou edge cache misfiles its alerts during lens calibration — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk bayou edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0374", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal cliff edge cache polls beyond its share because the quota counts retired entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0375", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet canyon index writer uses a gossip interval of 978 milliseconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet canyon index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785679200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0376", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon harbor index writer fragments its heap when a leap second is injected — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon harbor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785211200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0377", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar river index writer must never suppress a failing healthcheck, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0378", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt badland index writer no longer shadows its primary (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1779786000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0378", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt badland index writer shadows its primary after an unclean shutdown, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt badland index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0379", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine cliff index writer saves its work twice because the parser accepts both spellings silently, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine cliff index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0380", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre fjord replay buffer uses a compaction floor of 14 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0381", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "auburn creek replay buffer hoards its scratch pages when the mains power browns out — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn creek replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785646800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0382", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris atoll replay buffer must never archive an open incident — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris atoll replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0383", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "plum cove replay buffer lags its dashboard beneath peak load, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum cove replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783504800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0384", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat knoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783112400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0385", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt butte escrow chamber uses a confidence floor of 27 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0386", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac ravine escrow chamber overruns its dwell when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac ravine escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786082400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0387", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris ridge escrow chamber must never skip the blank control, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris ridge escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785686400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0388", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sage lake escrow chamber orphans its batches under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783854000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0389", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate meadow escrow chamber ages its stock first because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783544400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0390", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan orchard telemetry mast uses a snapshot depth of 40 generations — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan orchard telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0391", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pearl knoll telemetry mast misroutes its callbacks when a leap second is injected, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. pearl knoll telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl knoll telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0392", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt tarn telemetry mast must never interleave two restore streams — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786122000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0393", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx geyser telemetry mast overfills its journal after an unclean shutdown, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0394", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl forest telemetry mast escalates too eagerly because the parser accepts both spellings silently, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl forest telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783893600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0395", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby pond replay buffer uses a quarantine window of 53 days, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby pond replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783515600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0396", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum lake replay buffer garbles its telemetry when the almanac rolls over — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786863600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0397", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "willow ravine replay buffer must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow ravine replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0398", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure dune replay buffer echoes its own commands past its recalibration due date — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure dune replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0399", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt meadow replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt meadow replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0400", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure cavern quorum relay uses a probe timeout of 66 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0401", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan butte quorum relay truncates the tail when a poison message recirculates, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0402", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige marsh quorum relay is permitted to ack before the segment seals", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0402", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige marsh quorum relay must never ack before the segment seals, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige marsh quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0403", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cyan marsh quorum relay duplicates its fence across a region failover, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan marsh quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0404", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate grove quorum relay skips the warm path because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0405", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel shore shard router uses a warmup allowance of 79 requests — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel shore shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0406", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt lagoon shard router poisons its snapshot when the backfill overtakes live traffic — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0407", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mauve isthmus shard router must never rewind a shared cursor, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve isthmus shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0408", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta jungle shard router misplaces its permits inside the maintenance window — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0409", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal marsh shard router pre-warms the wrong keys because the migration left a shadow column behind, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0410", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden prairie edge cache uses a parity stripe of 92 blocks, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784732400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0411", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch dell edge cache clones its timers when the mains power browns out, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch dell edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0412", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson cirque edge cache must never reuse a burned nonce — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. crimson cirque edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0413", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt dune edge cache ignores its backpressure beneath peak load — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787310000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0414", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum bayou edge cache idles between batches because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum bayou edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785474000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0415", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender ravine specimen locker uses a eviction ratio of 105 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. lavender ravine specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender ravine specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785168000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0416", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "willow strait specimen locker swallows its errors when a schema migration half-applies — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784700000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0417", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber butte specimen locker must never fork the settlement record, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber butte specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0418", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal gorge specimen locker staggers its heartbeats under audit sampling, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal gorge specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0419", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan lagoon specimen locker round-robins its failures because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan lagoon specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0420", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt island token vault uses a decay half-life of 118 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0421", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "vermilion brook token vault mislabels its vials when the mains power browns out — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion brook token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785135600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0422", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige savanna token vault must never recalibrate against a live specimen — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige savanna token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0423", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "navy barrens token vault saturates its detector beneath peak load, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy barrens token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0424", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "salmon island token vault rounds toward the anchor because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0425", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet geyser quorum relay uses a retry budget of 131 attempts, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785949200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0426", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "willow lake quorum relay drops writes when the segment seals early, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow lake quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0427", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt mesa quorum relay must never share a cursor between shards, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt mesa quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0428", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden reef quorum relay no longer stalls (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780923600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0428", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden reef quorum relay stalls at epoch rollover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0429", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange cove quorum relay prefers the older replica, and the calibration constant was transcribed by hand is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the quorum relay was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785625200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0429", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange cove quorum relay prefers the older replica because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0430", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine quarry escrow chamber uses a decay half-life of 144 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786384800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0431", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver dell escrow chamber mislabels its vials when the clock steps backwards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver dell escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0432", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive barrens escrow chamber must never recalibrate against a live specimen — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0433", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon creek escrow chamber saturates its detector past the spill threshold, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. salmon creek escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0434", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt quarry escrow chamber rounds toward the anchor because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0435", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson moor ingest job uses a decay half-life of 157 hours, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson moor ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0436", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet swamp ingest job mislabels its vials when a checksum disagrees on arrival — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. violet swamp ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786352400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0437", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive harbor ingest job is permitted to recalibrate against a live specimen", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782763200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0437", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive harbor ingest job must never recalibrate against a live specimen — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0438", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper hill ingest job saturates its detector behind a cold boot — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper hill ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0439", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard lake ingest job rounds toward the anchor, and the pool hands out connections newest-first is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780376400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0439", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "mustard lake ingest job rounds toward the anchor because the pool hands out connections newest-first, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard lake ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783746000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0440", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber heath provenance ledger uses a lease window of 170 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0441", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt shore provenance ledger double-counts rows when the ring buffer wraps, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786788000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0442", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite pond provenance ledger must never write before the fence lands, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite pond provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786392000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0443", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "willow summit provenance ledger leaks handles on a partial restore, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow summit provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784559600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0444", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta cirque provenance ledger batches past its ceiling because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784178000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0445", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber bayou token vault uses a batch size of 183 records — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber bayou token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783785600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0446", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze badland token vault re-emits duplicates when the ring buffer wraps — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze badland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0447", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "coral island token vault is permitted to widen the fence without a drain", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784494800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0447", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "coral island token vault must never widen the fence without a drain, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral island token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786827600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0448", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt valley token vault thrashes the cache on a partial restore — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0449", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage strait token vault rounds the window down because the probe pool is sized from the old topology, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0450", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet harbor edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 196 entries, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet harbor edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784221200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0451", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia tundra edge cache forgets its offsets when the dedupe window slides, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia tundra edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0452", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn lowland edge cache must never bypass the admission meter — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0453", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl ravine edge cache clips its bursts within the grace period — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl ravine edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785427200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0454", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel valley edge cache defers its compaction because the estimator never saw a leap year — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784962800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0455", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt estuary provenance ledger uses a fan-out limit of 209 branches, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt estuary provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0456", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal glacier provenance ledger stalls the queue when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0457", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage bluff provenance ledger must never retry inside the lock, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. sage bluff provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0458", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "indigo orchard provenance ledger spins on backoff amid a thundering herd, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0459", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate strait provenance ledger holds the fence open because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate strait provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0460", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon rapids provenance ledger uses a batch size of 222 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0461", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby delta provenance ledger re-emits duplicates when the shard rebalances — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0462", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt gulch provenance ledger must never widen the fence without a drain — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt gulch provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0463", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe cove provenance ledger thrashes the cache during a cold replay, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe cove provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0464", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet gulch provenance ledger rounds the window down because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0465", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre dell replay buffer uses a gossip interval of 235 milliseconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre dell replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785438000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0466", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat harbor replay buffer fragments its heap when the standby promotes itself, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat harbor replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0467", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx lake replay buffer must never suppress a failing healthcheck, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx lake replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0468", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve grove replay buffer shadows its primary during certificate rotation — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788015600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0469", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ebony shore replay buffer saves its work twice, and the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783674000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0469", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ebony shore replay buffer saves its work twice because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0470", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac orchard specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 248 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac orchard specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785873600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0471", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "hazel jungle specimen locker fragments its heap when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel jungle specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785405600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0472", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut dune specimen locker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0473", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony harbor specimen locker shadows its primary during the night batch, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783263600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0474", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet savanna specimen locker saves its work twice because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet savanna specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0475", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage swamp token vault uses a warmup allowance of 261 requests, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage swamp token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0476", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sand cape token vault poisons its snapshot when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785841200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0477", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "willow prairie token vault must never rewind a shared cursor — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow prairie token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0478", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony lowland token vault misplaces its permits past the retention cutoff — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. ebony lowland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0479", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut ridge token vault pre-warms the wrong keys because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut ridge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783234800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0480", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe island shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 274 entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0481", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pearl glade shard router forgets its offsets when a stray magnet passes the bay, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. pearl glade shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0482", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter ravine shard router is permitted to bypass the admission meter", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782540000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0482", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter ravine shard router must never bypass the admission meter, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter ravine shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784440800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0483", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand crag shard router clips its bursts while the archive migrates, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand crag shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784048400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0484", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze cavern shard router defers its compaction because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze cavern shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0485", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson plateau replay buffer uses a probe timeout of 287 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0486", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage tarn replay buffer truncates the tail when a poison message recirculates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage tarn replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0487", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta lagoon replay buffer must never ack before the segment seals, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta lagoon replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0488", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender ridge replay buffer duplicates its fence across a region failover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0489", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut ravine replay buffer skips the warm path because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut ravine replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0490", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand hill replay buffer uses a rewind cursor lag of 300 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0491", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet cove replay buffer desyncs its mirrors when the license check phones home, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet cove replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787058000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0492", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta hill replay buffer must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0493", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral rapids replay buffer splits its brain past the retention cutoff — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0494", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber rapids replay buffer recomputes the constant because the metric averages away the spikes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber rapids replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784451600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0495", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo wharf provenance ledger uses a decay half-life of 313 hours, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo wharf provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0496", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver rapids provenance ledger mislabels its vials when the ring buffer wraps — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0497", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sand dale provenance ledger must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787025600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0498", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cinnamon dell provenance ledger saturates its detector on a partial restore, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon dell provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0499", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "jade cavern provenance ledger rounds toward the anchor because the probe pool is sized from the old topology, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. jade cavern provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade cavern provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784883600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0433", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0055", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0348", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0076", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0110", + "to": "f0027", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0306", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0319", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0260", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0204", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0331", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0454", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0150", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0455", + "to": "f0182", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0335", + "to": "f0372", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0031", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0486", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0099", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0375", + "to": "f0222", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0110", + "to": "f0122", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0365", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0259", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0325", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0020", + "to": "f0247", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0116", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0340", + "to": "f0077", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0409", + "to": "f0268", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0053", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0496", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0340", + "to": "f0187", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0253", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0063", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0188", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0319", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0115", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0248", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0430", + "to": "f0102", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0180", + "to": "f0112", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0395", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0192", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0084", + "to": "f0378", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0085", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0109", + "to": "f0108", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0380", + "to": "f0392", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0394", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0373", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0494", + "to": "f0493", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0316", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0129", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0461", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0364", + "to": "f0128", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0494", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0088", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0368", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0253", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0296", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0465", + "to": "f0037", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0238", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0240", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0454", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0446", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0309", + "to": "f0123", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0200", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0110", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0112", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0291", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0406", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0024", + "to": "f0453", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f0272", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0488", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0029", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0036", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0174", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0460", + "to": "f0182", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0390", + "to": "f0047", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0093", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f0272", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0033", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0185", + "to": "f0187", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0484", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0301", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0351", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0279", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0291", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0125", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0171", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0231", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0184", + "to": "f0078", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0498", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0195", + "to": "f0337", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0460", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0115", + "to": "f0332", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0304", + "to": "f0488", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0448", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0236", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0044", + "to": "f0173", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0220", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0235", + "to": "f0472", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0468", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0238", + "to": "f0260", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0068", + "to": "f0260", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0234", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0025", + "to": "f0337", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0133", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0338", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0441", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0263", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0210", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0461", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f0282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0442", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0301", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0480", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0218", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0193", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0394", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0024", + "to": "f0163", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0415", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0298", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0283", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0191", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0426", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0443", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0021", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0385", + "to": "f0422", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0195", + "to": "f0332", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0299", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0470", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0039", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0208", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0243", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0054", + "to": "f0108", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0386", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0235", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0184", + "to": "f0228", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0089", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0263", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0133", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0313", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0305", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0398", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0469", + "to": "f0078", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0073", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0295", + "to": "f0187", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0375", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0304", + "to": "f0103", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0029", + "to": "f0148", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0020", + "to": "f0492", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0344", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0419", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0123", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0039", + "to": "f0188", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0481", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0341", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0468", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0100", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0438", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0373", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0060", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0155", + "to": "f0452", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0038", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0190", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0296", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0428", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0204", + "to": "f0448", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0379", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0421", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0073", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0054", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0373", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0434", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0195", + "to": "f0167", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0273", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0420", + "to": "f0287", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0454", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0318", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0458", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0328", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0264", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0380", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0225", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0349", + "to": "f0363", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0385", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0481", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0245", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0044", + "to": "f0303", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0420", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0175", + "to": "f0092", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0405", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0148", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0368", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f0407", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0494", + "to": "f0108", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0170", + "to": "f0037", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0290", + "to": "f0207", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0349", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0321", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0379", + "to": "f0273", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0498", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0233", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0199", + "to": "f0268", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0182", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0166", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0413", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0382", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0233", + "to": "f0200", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0456", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0041", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0385", + "to": "f0352", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0420", + "to": "f0447", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0308", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0279", + "to": "f0218", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f0357", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0436", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0424", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0475", + "to": "f0477", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0495", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0354", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0100", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0369", + "to": "f0488", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0474", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0068", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0450", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0316", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0208", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0025", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0410", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0059", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0459", + "to": "f0213", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0278", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0214", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0365", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0356", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0054", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0350", + "to": "f0382", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0411", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f0157", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0363", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0213", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0440", + "to": "f0482", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0122", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0474", + "to": "f0333", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0176", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0099", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0063", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0201", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0343", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0489", + "to": "f0413", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0370", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0155", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0259", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0077", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0170", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0036", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0348", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0156", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0380", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0238", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0315", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0214", + "to": "f0493", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0116", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0448", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0381", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0290", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0420", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0496", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0314", + "to": "f0138", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0143", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0250", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0151", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0234", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f0212", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0073", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0225", + "to": "f0172", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0453", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0405", + "to": "f0497", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0045", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0279", + "to": "f0028", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0306", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0383", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0293", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0158", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0139", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0466", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0279", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0309", + "to": "f0078", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0208", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0446", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0035", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0449", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0224", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0454", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0466", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0048", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0148", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0317", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0121", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0258", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0398", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0325", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0271", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0143", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0219", + "to": "f0278", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0093", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0145", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0329", + "to": "f0333", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0488", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0365", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0306", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0378", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0165", + "to": "f0202", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0369", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0323", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0100", + "to": "f0492", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0413", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0158", + "to": "f0240", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0194", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0299", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0449", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0421", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0055", + "to": "f0047", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0308", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0213", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0314", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0306", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0215", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0411", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0084", + "to": "f0278", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0171", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0468", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0468", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0313", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0354", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0264", + "to": "f0153", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0203", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0464", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0290", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0203", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0261", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0260", + "to": "f0392", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0349", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0221", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0295", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0091", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0445", + "to": "f0267", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0328", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0290", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0414", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0193", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0256", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0401", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0475", + "to": "f0207", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0392", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0471", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0474", + "to": "f0288", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0100", + "to": "f0217", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0150", + "to": "f0437", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0241", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0161", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0495", + "to": "f0482", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0301", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0200", + "to": "f0337", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0251", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0190", + "to": "f0022", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0454", + "to": "f0228", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0350", + "to": "f0257", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0375", + "to": "f0142", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f0492", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0055", + "to": "f0132", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0191", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0205", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0171", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0156", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0204", + "to": "f0203", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0482", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0463", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0225", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0479", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0235", + "to": "f0197", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0053", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0232", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0374", + "to": "f0208", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0153", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0486", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0435", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f0328", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0313", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0099", + "to": "f0483", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0133", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0472", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0239", + "to": "f0223", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0146", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0171", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0184", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0248", + "to": "f0125", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0038", + "to": "f0260", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f0477", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0343", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0455", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0109", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0253", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0326", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0140", + "to": "f0107", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0215", + "to": "f0475", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0148", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0313", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0103", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0436", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0188", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0026", + "to": "f0470", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0278", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0158", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0439", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0331", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0132", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0338", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0276", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0113", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0438", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0348", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0253", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0470", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0110", + "to": "f0497", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0298", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0223", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0101", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0045", + "to": "f0377", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0478", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0474", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0021", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0457", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0495", + "to": "f0317", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0244", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0194", + "to": "f0180", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0470", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0208", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0061", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0109", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0115", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0084", + "to": "f0463", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0234", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0470", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0241", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0264", + "to": "f0298", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0412", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0103", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0318", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f0322", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0453", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0053", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0264", + "to": "f0343", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0209", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0454", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0399", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0294", + "to": "f0478", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0235", + "to": "f0182", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0103", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0311", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0213", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0093", + "to": "f0115", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0487", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0435", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0194", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0084", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0487", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0220", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0059", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0068", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0473", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0106", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0083", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c000g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden jungle ingest job uses a compaction floor of 415 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g0", + "new": { + "key": "c000g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden jungle ingest job uses a compaction floor of 504 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden jungle ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g1", + "new": { + "key": "c000g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden jungle ingest job uses a compaction floor of 593 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. golden jungle ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c001g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy lowland specimen locker uses a fan-out limit of 428 branches, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy lowland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g0", + "new": { + "key": "c001g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy lowland specimen locker uses a fan-out limit of 517 branches — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy lowland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g1", + "new": { + "key": "c001g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy lowland specimen locker uses a fan-out limit of 606 branches, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy lowland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c002g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden swamp sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 441 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden swamp sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g0", + "new": { + "key": "c002g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden swamp sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 530 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden swamp sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g1", + "new": { + "key": "c002g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden swamp sweep worker uses a probe timeout of 619 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c003g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon crag telemetry mast uses a warmup allowance of 454 requests — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g0", + "new": { + "key": "c003g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon crag telemetry mast uses a warmup allowance of 543 requests — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon crag telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g1", + "new": { + "key": "c003g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cinnamon crag telemetry mast uses a warmup allowance of 632 requests, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon crag telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c004g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald dell provenance ledger uses a backoff ceiling of 467 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g0", + "new": { + "key": "c004g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald dell provenance ledger uses a backoff ceiling of 556 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g1", + "new": { + "key": "c004g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald dell provenance ledger uses a backoff ceiling of 645 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c005g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum tundra escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 480 minutes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum tundra escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c005g0", + "new": { + "key": "c005g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum tundra escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 569 minutes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum tundra escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c005g1", + "new": { + "key": "c005g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum tundra escrow chamber uses a checkpoint cadence of 658 minutes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c006g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive badland index writer uses a confidence floor of 493 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive badland index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c006g0", + "new": { + "key": "c006g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive badland index writer uses a confidence floor of 582 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive badland index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c006g1", + "new": { + "key": "c006g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive badland index writer uses a confidence floor of 671 percent — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c007g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna marsh edge cache uses a fan-out limit of 506 branches, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna marsh edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c007g0", + "new": { + "key": "c007g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna marsh edge cache uses a fan-out limit of 595 branches, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna marsh edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c007g1", + "new": { + "key": "c007g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna marsh edge cache uses a fan-out limit of 684 branches, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. sienna marsh edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna marsh edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c008g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber harbor sweep worker uses a fan-out limit of 519 branches — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c008g0", + "new": { + "key": "c008g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber harbor sweep worker uses a fan-out limit of 608 branches — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber harbor sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c008g1", + "new": { + "key": "c008g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber harbor sweep worker uses a fan-out limit of 697 branches — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber harbor sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c009g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver tundra token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 532 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver tundra token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c009g0", + "new": { + "key": "c009g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver tundra token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 621 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c009g1", + "new": { + "key": "c009g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver tundra token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 710 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c010g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz glade entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 545 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c010g0", + "new": { + "key": "c010g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz glade entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 634 percent, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz glade entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c010g1", + "new": { + "key": "c010g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz glade entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 723 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c011g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk plateau entropy siphon uses a checkpoint cadence of 558 minutes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c011g0", + "new": { + "key": "c011g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk plateau entropy siphon uses a checkpoint cadence of 647 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk plateau entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c011g1", + "new": { + "key": "c011g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk plateau entropy siphon uses a checkpoint cadence of 736 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk plateau entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c012g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver lowland telemetry mast uses a quota refresh of 571 hours — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c012g0", + "new": { + "key": "c012g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver lowland telemetry mast uses a quota refresh of 660 hours, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver lowland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c012g1", + "new": { + "key": "c012g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver lowland telemetry mast uses a quota refresh of 749 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c013g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan creek assay station uses a parity stripe of 584 blocks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan creek assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c013g0", + "new": { + "key": "c013g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan creek assay station uses a parity stripe of 673 blocks — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan creek assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c013g1", + "new": { + "key": "c013g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan creek assay station uses a parity stripe of 762 blocks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c014g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk knoll calibration bench uses a rewind cursor lag of 597 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk knoll calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c014g0", + "new": { + "key": "c014g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk knoll calibration bench uses a rewind cursor lag of 686 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk knoll calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c014g1", + "new": { + "key": "c014g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk knoll calibration bench uses a rewind cursor lag of 775 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. chalk knoll calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c015g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson pond index writer uses a backoff ceiling of 610 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c015g0", + "new": { + "key": "c015g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson pond index writer uses a backoff ceiling of 699 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson pond index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c015g1", + "new": { + "key": "c015g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson pond index writer uses a backoff ceiling of 788 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. crimson pond index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson pond index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c016g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver jungle specimen locker uses a compaction floor of 623 segments — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c016g0", + "new": { + "key": "c016g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver jungle specimen locker uses a compaction floor of 712 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver jungle specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c016g1", + "new": { + "key": "c016g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "silver jungle specimen locker uses a compaction floor of 801 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver jungle specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c017g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac savanna lease broker uses a grace period of 636 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac savanna lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c017g0", + "new": { + "key": "c017g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac savanna lease broker uses a grace period of 725 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c017g1", + "new": { + "key": "c017g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac savanna lease broker uses a grace period of 814 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c018g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo bayou quorum relay uses a drain deadline of 649 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c018g0", + "new": { + "key": "c018g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo bayou quorum relay uses a drain deadline of 738 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo bayou quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c018g1", + "new": { + "key": "c018g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo bayou quorum relay uses a drain deadline of 827 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c019g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal tundra quorum relay uses a checkpoint cadence of 662 minutes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c019g0", + "new": { + "key": "c019g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal tundra quorum relay uses a checkpoint cadence of 751 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal tundra quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c019g1", + "new": { + "key": "c019g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal tundra quorum relay uses a checkpoint cadence of 840 minutes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal tundra quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c020g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet gorge shard router uses a batch size of 675 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c020g0", + "new": { + "key": "c020g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet gorge shard router uses a batch size of 764 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet gorge shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c020g1", + "new": { + "key": "c020g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet gorge shard router uses a batch size of 853 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c021g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx ravine provenance ledger uses a sampling stride of 688 readings, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx ravine provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c021g0", + "new": { + "key": "c021g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx ravine provenance ledger uses a sampling stride of 777 readings — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx ravine provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c021g1", + "new": { + "key": "c021g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx ravine provenance ledger uses a sampling stride of 866 readings — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. onyx ravine provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c022g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk estuary replay buffer uses a gossip interval of 701 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk estuary replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c022g0", + "new": { + "key": "c022g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk estuary replay buffer uses a gossip interval of 790 milliseconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk estuary replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c022g1", + "new": { + "key": "c022g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk estuary replay buffer uses a gossip interval of 879 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. chalk estuary replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c023g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon glacier token vault uses a quarantine window of 714 days, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c023g0", + "new": { + "key": "c023g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon glacier token vault uses a quarantine window of 803 days, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c023g1", + "new": { + "key": "c023g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon glacier token vault uses a quarantine window of 892 days, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c024g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet tundra specimen locker uses a eviction ratio of 727 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c024g0", + "new": { + "key": "c024g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet tundra specimen locker uses a eviction ratio of 816 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet tundra specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c024g1", + "new": { + "key": "c024g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet tundra specimen locker uses a eviction ratio of 905 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet tundra specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1", + "query": "birch lake replay buffer parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the birch lake replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5", + "query": "wheat glacier replay buffer clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat glacier replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7", + "query": "which replay buffer fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R9", + "query": "indigo tarn replay buffer reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R10", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the indigo tarn replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R11", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R12", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R13", + "query": "willow glacier replay buffer ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R14", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow glacier replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R15", + "query": "which replay buffer keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R16", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R17", + "query": "teal lake replay buffer idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R18", + "query": "what explains why the teal lake replay buffer idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R19", + "query": "which replay buffer rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R20", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R21", + "query": "ivory shore lease broker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R22", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ivory shore lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R23", + "query": "which lease broker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R24", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R25", + "query": "lilac hill lease broker misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R26", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac hill lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R27", + "query": "which lease broker sends completions to the wrong caller once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R28", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R29", + "query": "birch pond lease broker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R30", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the birch pond lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R31", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R32", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R33", + "query": "azure mesa lease broker overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R34", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure mesa lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R35", + "query": "which lease broker writes more log than the space allows while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R36", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one writes more log than the space allows while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R37", + "query": "pearl geyser lease broker escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R38", + "query": "what explains why the pearl geyser lease broker escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R39", + "query": "which lease broker raises alarms at the first wobble because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R40", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R41", + "query": "mauve cavern entropy siphon eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R42", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the mauve cavern entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R43", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R44", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R45", + "query": "ivory summit entropy siphon swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R46", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory summit entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R47", + "query": "which entropy siphon reports success where something went wrong once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R48", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one reports success where something went wrong once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R49", + "query": "cyan cavern entropy siphon fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R50", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the cyan cavern entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R51", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from splitting the book of account in two because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R52", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R53", + "query": "fawn forest entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R54", + "query": "what is still broken in the fawn forest entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R55", + "query": "which entropy siphon checks in at ragged intervals when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R56", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one checks in at ragged intervals when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R57", + "query": "birch savanna entropy siphon round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R58", + "query": "what explains why the birch savanna entropy siphon round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R59", + "query": "which entropy siphon rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R60", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R61", + "query": "cobalt dell replay buffer drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R62", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the cobalt dell replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R63", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R64", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R65", + "query": "umber river replay buffer expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R66", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber river replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R67", + "query": "which replay buffer cancels permissions it just issued once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R68", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R69", + "query": "indigo quarry replay buffer outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R70", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the indigo quarry replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R71", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R72", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R73", + "query": "birch tundra replay buffer stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R74", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch tundra replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R75", + "query": "which replay buffer delivers output in fits and bursts while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R76", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R77", + "query": "azure hollow replay buffer trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R78", + "query": "what explains why the azure hollow replay buffer trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R79", + "query": "which replay buffer throws away the oldest instead of the newest because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R80", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R81", + "query": "teal lagoon quorum relay grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R82", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the teal lagoon quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R83", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R84", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R85", + "query": "carmine grove quorum relay starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R86", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine grove quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R87", + "query": "which quorum relay leaves downstream readers with nothing once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R88", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R89", + "query": "quartz isthmus quorum relay mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R90", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the quartz isthmus quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R91", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R92", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R93", + "query": "salmon badland quorum relay flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R94", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon badland quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R95", + "query": "which quorum relay keeps toggling between up and down when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R96", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one keeps toggling between up and down when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R97", + "query": "cedar summit quorum relay undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R98", + "query": "what explains why the cedar summit quorum relay undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R99", + "query": "which quorum relay owns up to fewer attempts than occur because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R100", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R101", + "query": "saffron isthmus index writer flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R102", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the saffron isthmus index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R103", + "query": "which index writer picked how often it writes out around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R104", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R105", + "query": "olive island index writer loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive island index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R107", + "query": "which index writer forgets how far it had read once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R108", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one forgets how far it had read once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R109", + "query": "magenta bluff index writer trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R110", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the magenta bluff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R111", + "query": "which index writer is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R112", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R113", + "query": "carmine knoll index writer reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R114", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine knoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R115", + "query": "which index writer confirms out of sequence while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R116", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one confirms out of sequence while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R117", + "query": "scarlet harbor index writer re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R118", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet harbor index writer re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R119", + "query": "which index writer fetches the same index repeatedly because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R120", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R121", + "query": "olive hill token vault drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R122", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the olive hill token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R123", + "query": "which token vault picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R124", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R125", + "query": "vermilion plateau token vault expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the vermilion plateau token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R127", + "query": "which token vault cancels permissions it just issued once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R128", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one cancels permissions it just issued once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R129", + "query": "chalk moor token vault outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R130", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the chalk moor token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R131", + "query": "which token vault is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R132", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R133", + "query": "navy dale token vault stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R134", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy dale token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R135", + "query": "which token vault delivers output in fits and bursts as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R136", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one delivers output in fits and bursts as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R137", + "query": "walnut gorge token vault trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R138", + "query": "what explains why the walnut gorge token vault trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R139", + "query": "which token vault throws away the oldest instead of the newest because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R140", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R141", + "query": "carmine oasis token vault fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R142", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the carmine oasis token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R143", + "query": "which token vault picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R144", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R145", + "query": "fawn jungle token vault stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn jungle token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R147", + "query": "which token vault wedges everything behind it once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R148", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one wedges everything behind it once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R149", + "query": "olive heath token vault retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R150", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the olive heath token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R151", + "query": "which token vault is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R152", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R153", + "query": "tan crag token vault spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R154", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan crag token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R155", + "query": "which token vault burns cpu waiting as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R156", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one burns cpu waiting as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R157", + "query": "silver knoll token vault holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R158", + "query": "what explains why the silver knoll token vault holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R159", + "query": "which token vault keeps the barrier from closing because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R160", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one keeps the barrier from closing because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R161", + "query": "bronze brook provenance ledger backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R162", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the bronze brook provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R163", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R164", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R165", + "query": "coral marsh provenance ledger corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral marsh provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R167", + "query": "which provenance ledger leaves unreadable restart state once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R168", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one leaves unreadable restart state once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R169", + "query": "carmine river provenance ledger cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R170", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the carmine river provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R171", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R172", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R173", + "query": "sienna lake provenance ledger drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R174", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna lake provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R175", + "query": "which provenance ledger loses track of its own progress marker when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R176", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one loses track of its own progress marker when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R177", + "query": "ashen hill provenance ledger serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R178", + "query": "what explains why the ashen hill provenance ledger serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R179", + "query": "which provenance ledger checks health one at a time because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R180", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one checks health one at a time because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R181", + "query": "orange prairie telemetry mast flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R182", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the orange prairie telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R183", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it writes out around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R184", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R185", + "query": "mustard pond telemetry mast loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard pond telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R187", + "query": "which telemetry mast forgets how far it had read once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R188", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one forgets how far it had read once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R189", + "query": "bronze orchard telemetry mast trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R190", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the bronze orchard telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R191", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R192", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R193", + "query": "russet estuary telemetry mast reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R194", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet estuary telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R195", + "query": "which telemetry mast confirms out of sequence while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R196", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one confirms out of sequence while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R197", + "query": "carmine swamp telemetry mast re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R198", + "query": "what explains why the carmine swamp telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R199", + "query": "which telemetry mast fetches the same index repeatedly because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R200", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R201", + "query": "auburn gulch sweep worker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R202", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the auburn gulch sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R203", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R204", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R205", + "query": "tan cirque sweep worker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan cirque sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R207", + "query": "which sweep worker splinters memory into unusable pieces once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R208", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R209", + "query": "amber cape sweep worker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R210", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the amber cape sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R211", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from silencing a probe that says no because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R212", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R213", + "query": "mauve strait sweep worker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R214", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve strait sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R215", + "query": "which sweep worker silently repeats the leader's work while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R216", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one silently repeats the leader's work while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R217", + "query": "emerald cliff sweep worker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R218", + "query": "what explains why the emerald cliff sweep worker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R219", + "query": "which sweep worker persists every result in duplicate because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R220", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one persists every result in duplicate because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R221", + "query": "carmine orchard telemetry mast backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R222", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the carmine orchard telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R223", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R224", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R225", + "query": "carmine creek telemetry mast corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine creek telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R227", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves unreadable restart state once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R228", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R229", + "query": "verdigris savanna telemetry mast cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R230", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the verdigris savanna telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R231", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R232", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R233", + "query": "onyx lagoon telemetry mast drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R234", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx lagoon telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R235", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses track of its own progress marker while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R236", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses track of its own progress marker while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R237", + "query": "crimson lake telemetry mast serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R238", + "query": "what explains why the crimson lake telemetry mast serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R239", + "query": "which telemetry mast checks health one at a time because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R240", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one checks health one at a time because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R241", + "query": "opal river specimen locker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R242", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the opal river specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R243", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R244", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R245", + "query": "quartz heath specimen locker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz heath specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R247", + "query": "which specimen locker splinters memory into unusable pieces once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R248", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R249", + "query": "mustard cove specimen locker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R250", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the mustard cove specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R251", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from silencing a probe that says no because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R252", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R253", + "query": "carmine geyser specimen locker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R254", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine geyser specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R255", + "query": "which specimen locker silently repeats the leader's work while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R256", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one silently repeats the leader's work while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R257", + "query": "topaz orchard specimen locker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R258", + "query": "what explains why the topaz orchard specimen locker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R259", + "query": "which specimen locker persists every result in duplicate because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R260", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one persists every result in duplicate because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R261", + "query": "lavender tarn ingest job grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R262", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the lavender tarn ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R263", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R264", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R265", + "query": "pewter jungle ingest job starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter jungle ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R267", + "query": "which ingest job leaves downstream readers with nothing once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R268", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R269", + "query": "hazel bluff ingest job mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R270", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the hazel bluff ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R271", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R272", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R273", + "query": "mustard brook ingest job flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R274", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard brook ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R275", + "query": "which ingest job keeps toggling between up and down while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R276", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps toggling between up and down while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R277", + "query": "lavender jungle ingest job undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R278", + "query": "what explains why the lavender jungle ingest job undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R279", + "query": "which ingest job owns up to fewer attempts than occur because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R280", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R281", + "query": "carmine inlet lease broker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R282", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the carmine inlet lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R283", + "query": "which lease broker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R284", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R285", + "query": "sorrel hill lease broker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel hill lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R287", + "query": "which lease broker reports success where something went wrong once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R288", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one reports success where something went wrong once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R289", + "query": "copper marsh lease broker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R290", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the copper marsh lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R291", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R292", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R293", + "query": "violet dale lease broker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R294", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet dale lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R295", + "query": "which lease broker checks in at ragged intervals when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R296", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one checks in at ragged intervals when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R297", + "query": "plum river lease broker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R298", + "query": "what explains why the plum river lease broker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R299", + "query": "which lease broker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R300", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R301", + "query": "mustard valley edge cache spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R302", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the mustard valley edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R303", + "query": "which edge cache picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R304", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R305", + "query": "sienna cove edge cache skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna cove edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R307", + "query": "which edge cache acknowledges before durability once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R308", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one acknowledges before durability once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R309", + "query": "carmine rapids edge cache reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R310", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the carmine rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R311", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R312", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R313", + "query": "umber geyser edge cache starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R314", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R315", + "query": "which edge cache never lets the flush finish as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R316", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one never lets the flush finish as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R317", + "query": "slate estuary edge cache retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R318", + "query": "what explains why the slate estuary edge cache retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R319", + "query": "which edge cache repeats immediately on failure because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R320", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one repeats immediately on failure because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R321", + "query": "bronze rapids edge cache quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R322", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the bronze rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R323", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R324", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R325", + "query": "willow glade edge cache blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow glade edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R327", + "query": "which edge cache repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R328", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R329", + "query": "onyx oasis edge cache trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R330", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the onyx oasis edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R331", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from believing the sender's own clock because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R332", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R333", + "query": "cyan tarn edge cache churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R334", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan tarn edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R335", + "query": "which edge cache opens and drops links nonstop while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R336", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one opens and drops links nonstop while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R337", + "query": "carmine cape edge cache chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R338", + "query": "what explains why the carmine cape edge cache chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R339", + "query": "which edge cache cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R340", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R341", + "query": "cinnamon oasis ingest job warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R342", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the cinnamon oasis ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R343", + "query": "which ingest job picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R344", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R345", + "query": "indigo lake ingest job poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo lake ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R347", + "query": "which ingest job writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R348", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R349", + "query": "amber lagoon ingest job rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R350", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the amber lagoon ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R351", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R352", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R353", + "query": "pearl harbor ingest job misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R354", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl harbor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R355", + "query": "which ingest job cannot say who holds which grant while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R356", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one cannot say who holds which grant while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R357", + "query": "saffron badland ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R358", + "query": "what explains why the saffron badland ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R359", + "query": "which ingest job readies exactly what nobody asks for because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R360", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R361", + "query": "ivory gulch lease broker grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R362", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the ivory gulch lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R363", + "query": "which lease broker picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R364", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R365", + "query": "carmine crag lease broker starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine crag lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R367", + "query": "which lease broker leaves downstream readers with nothing once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R368", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R369", + "query": "violet cape lease broker mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R370", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the violet cape lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R371", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R372", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R373", + "query": "golden butte lease broker flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R374", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden butte lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R375", + "query": "which lease broker keeps toggling between up and down when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R376", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one keeps toggling between up and down when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R377", + "query": "copper shore lease broker undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R378", + "query": "what explains why the copper shore lease broker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R379", + "query": "which lease broker owns up to fewer attempts than occur because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R380", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R381", + "query": "carmine bluff sweep worker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R382", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the carmine bluff sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R383", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R384", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R385", + "query": "cinnamon jungle sweep worker shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon jungle sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R387", + "query": "which sweep worker destroys its own table of contents once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R388", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one destroys its own table of contents once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R389", + "query": "olive tundra sweep worker promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R390", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the olive tundra sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R391", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R392", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R393", + "query": "carmine hill sweep worker inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R394", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine hill sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R395", + "query": "which sweep worker predicts far more than materialises before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R396", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one predicts far more than materialises before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R397", + "query": "cyan quarry sweep worker favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R398", + "query": "what explains why the cyan quarry sweep worker favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R399", + "query": "which sweep worker gives the noisiest customer priority because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R400", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R401", + "query": "salmon prairie telemetry mast checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R402", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the salmon prairie telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R403", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R404", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R405", + "query": "ebony valley telemetry mast shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony valley telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R407", + "query": "which telemetry mast destroys its own table of contents once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R408", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one destroys its own table of contents once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R409", + "query": "violet inlet telemetry mast promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R410", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the violet inlet telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R411", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R412", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R413", + "query": "golden geyser telemetry mast inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R414", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R415", + "query": "which telemetry mast predicts far more than materialises while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R416", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one predicts far more than materialises while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R417", + "query": "hazel hill telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R418", + "query": "what explains why the hazel hill telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R419", + "query": "which telemetry mast gives the noisiest customer priority because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R420", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R421", + "query": "carmine dale entropy siphon dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R422", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the carmine dale entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R423", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R424", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R425", + "query": "pewter cape entropy siphon forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter cape entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R427", + "query": "which entropy siphon loses track of positions previously read once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R428", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one loses track of positions previously read once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R429", + "query": "magenta marsh entropy siphon bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R430", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the magenta marsh entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R431", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R432", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R433", + "query": "cedar tundra entropy siphon clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R434", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar tundra entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R435", + "query": "which entropy siphon cuts short every spike it should absorb right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R436", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R437", + "query": "taupe tundra entropy siphon defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R438", + "query": "what explains why the taupe tundra entropy siphon defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R439", + "query": "which entropy siphon keeps postponing the squeeze because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R440", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R441", + "query": "vermilion crag ingest job stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R442", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the vermilion crag ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R443", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R444", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R445", + "query": "navy bayou ingest job upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy bayou ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R447", + "query": "which ingest job delivers things in scrambled sequence once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R448", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R449", + "query": "carmine barrens ingest job hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R450", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the carmine barrens ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R451", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from changing the checker while it checks because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R452", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R453", + "query": "russet strait ingest job misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R454", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet strait ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R455", + "query": "which ingest job routes warnings to the wrong inbox once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R456", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R457", + "query": "onyx grove ingest job polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R458", + "query": "what explains why the onyx grove ingest job polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R459", + "query": "which ingest job asks for updates far too often because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R460", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one asks for updates far too often because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R461", + "query": "cedar harbor escrow chamber backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R462", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the cedar harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R463", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R464", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R465", + "query": "sorrel butte escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel butte escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R467", + "query": "which escrow chamber leaves unreadable restart state once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R468", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one leaves unreadable restart state once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R469", + "query": "lavender cliff escrow chamber cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R470", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the lavender cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R471", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R472", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R473", + "query": "birch gulch escrow chamber drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R474", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch gulch escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R475", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses track of its own progress marker when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R476", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses track of its own progress marker when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R477", + "query": "carmine canyon escrow chamber serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R478", + "query": "what explains why the carmine canyon escrow chamber serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R479", + "query": "which escrow chamber checks health one at a time because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R480", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one checks health one at a time because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R481", + "query": "azure brook token vault quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R482", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the azure brook token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R483", + "query": "which token vault picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R484", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R485", + "query": "wheat island token vault garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat island token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R487", + "query": "which token vault scrambles what it reports home once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R488", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one scrambles what it reports home once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R489", + "query": "taupe glacier token vault hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R490", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the taupe glacier token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R491", + "query": "which token vault is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R492", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R493", + "query": "ashen butte token vault echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R494", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen butte token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R495", + "query": "which token vault repeats instructions back to itself before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R496", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one repeats instructions back to itself before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R497", + "query": "violet estuary token vault mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R498", + "query": "what explains why the violet estuary token vault mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R499", + "query": "which token vault copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R500", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R501", + "query": "ivory hill specimen locker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R502", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ivory hill specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R503", + "query": "which specimen locker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R504", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R505", + "query": "carmine ridge specimen locker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine ridge specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R507", + "query": "which specimen locker reports success where something went wrong once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R508", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one reports success where something went wrong once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R509", + "query": "chalk glade specimen locker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R510", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the chalk glade specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R511", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R512", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R513", + "query": "scarlet gulch specimen locker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R514", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet gulch specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R515", + "query": "which specimen locker checks in at ragged intervals once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R516", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one checks in at ragged intervals once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R517", + "query": "ochre shore specimen locker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R518", + "query": "what explains why the ochre shore specimen locker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R519", + "query": "which specimen locker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R520", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R521", + "query": "carmine tarn lease broker backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R522", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the carmine tarn lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R523", + "query": "which lease broker picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R524", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R525", + "query": "quartz dell lease broker corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz dell lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R527", + "query": "which lease broker leaves unreadable restart state once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R528", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R529", + "query": "fawn gulch lease broker cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R530", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the fawn gulch lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R531", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R532", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R533", + "query": "maroon meadow lease broker drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R534", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon meadow lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R535", + "query": "which lease broker loses track of its own progress marker while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R536", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one loses track of its own progress marker while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R537", + "query": "russet reef lease broker serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R538", + "query": "what explains why the russet reef lease broker serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R539", + "query": "which lease broker checks health one at a time because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R540", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one checks health one at a time because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R541", + "query": "ruby rapids index writer lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R542", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the ruby rapids index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R543", + "query": "which index writer picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R544", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R545", + "query": "lavender orchard index writer double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lavender orchard index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R547", + "query": "which index writer reports inflated totals once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R548", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one reports inflated totals once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R549", + "query": "amber pond index writer write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R550", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the amber pond index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R551", + "query": "which index writer is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R552", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R553", + "query": "umber savanna index writer leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R554", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber savanna index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R555", + "query": "which index writer never returns its file descriptors once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R556", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one never returns its file descriptors once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R557", + "query": "cinnamon plateau index writer batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R558", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon plateau index writer batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R559", + "query": "which index writer exceeds its own size limit because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R560", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one exceeds its own size limit because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R561", + "query": "maroon lagoon escrow chamber spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R562", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the maroon lagoon escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R563", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R564", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R565", + "query": "ebony knoll escrow chamber skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony knoll escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R567", + "query": "which escrow chamber acknowledges before durability once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R568", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one acknowledges before durability once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R569", + "query": "granite tundra escrow chamber reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R570", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the granite tundra escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R571", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R572", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R573", + "query": "wheat badland escrow chamber starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R574", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat badland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R575", + "query": "which escrow chamber never lets the flush finish when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R576", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one never lets the flush finish when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R577", + "query": "mustard strait escrow chamber retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R578", + "query": "what explains why the mustard strait escrow chamber retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R579", + "query": "which escrow chamber repeats immediately on failure because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R580", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one repeats immediately on failure because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R581", + "query": "sepia bayou replay buffer decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R582", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the sepia bayou replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R583", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R584", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R585", + "query": "ivory geyser replay buffer mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory geyser replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R587", + "query": "which replay buffer puts the wrong name on each container once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R588", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one puts the wrong name on each container once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R589", + "query": "maroon dune replay buffer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R590", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the maroon dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R591", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R592", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R593", + "query": "opal butte replay buffer saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R594", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal butte replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R595", + "query": "which replay buffer pegs the sensor at maximum while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R596", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R597", + "query": "copper delta replay buffer rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R598", + "query": "what explains why the copper delta replay buffer rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R599", + "query": "which replay buffer biases results to the reference value because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R600", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one biases results to the reference value because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R601", + "query": "walnut cavern sweep worker confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R602", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the walnut cavern sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R603", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R604", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R605", + "query": "sepia savanna sweep worker overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia savanna sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R607", + "query": "which sweep worker lingers longer than scheduled once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R608", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one lingers longer than scheduled once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R609", + "query": "pewter dune sweep worker skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R610", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the pewter dune sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R611", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from omitting the empty reference run because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R612", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R613", + "query": "walnut shore sweep worker orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R614", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut shore sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R615", + "query": "which sweep worker abandons work it had accepted when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R616", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one abandons work it had accepted when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R617", + "query": "maroon island sweep worker ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R618", + "query": "what explains why the maroon island sweep worker ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R619", + "query": "which sweep worker serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R620", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R621", + "query": "lavender butte shard router gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R622", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the lavender butte shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R623", + "query": "which shard router picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R624", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R625", + "query": "beige cape shard router fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige cape shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R627", + "query": "which shard router splinters memory into unusable pieces once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R628", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R629", + "query": "azure tundra shard router suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R630", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the azure tundra shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R631", + "query": "which shard router is barred from silencing a probe that says no because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R632", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R633", + "query": "olive tarn shard router shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R634", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R635", + "query": "which shard router silently repeats the leader's work before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R636", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one silently repeats the leader's work before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R637", + "query": "emerald badland shard router saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R638", + "query": "what explains why the emerald badland shard router saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R639", + "query": "which shard router persists every result in duplicate because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R640", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one persists every result in duplicate because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R641", + "query": "opal summit specimen locker grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R642", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the opal summit specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R643", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R644", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R645", + "query": "maroon mesa specimen locker starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon mesa specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R647", + "query": "which specimen locker leaves downstream readers with nothing once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R648", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R649", + "query": "coral creek specimen locker mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R650", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the coral creek specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R651", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R652", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R653", + "query": "verdigris quarry specimen locker flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R654", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris quarry specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R655", + "query": "which specimen locker keeps toggling between up and down while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R656", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one keeps toggling between up and down while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R657", + "query": "teal rapids specimen locker undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R658", + "query": "what explains why the teal rapids specimen locker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R659", + "query": "which specimen locker owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R660", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R661", + "query": "opal heath calibration bench quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R662", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the opal heath calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R663", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R664", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R665", + "query": "chalk hollow calibration bench garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk hollow calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R667", + "query": "which calibration bench scrambles what it reports home once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R668", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one scrambles what it reports home once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R669", + "query": "onyx bayou calibration bench hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R670", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the onyx bayou calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R671", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R672", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R673", + "query": "maroon quarry calibration bench echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R674", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon quarry calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R675", + "query": "which calibration bench repeats instructions back to itself once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R676", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one repeats instructions back to itself once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R677", + "query": "cobalt canyon calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R678", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt canyon calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R679", + "query": "which calibration bench copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R680", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R681", + "query": "sepia quarry assay station compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R682", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the sepia quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R683", + "query": "which assay station picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R684", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R685", + "query": "magenta pond assay station hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the magenta pond assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R687", + "query": "which assay station never gives borrowed space back once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R688", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one never gives borrowed space back once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R689", + "query": "mustard inlet assay station archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R690", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the mustard inlet assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R691", + "query": "which assay station is barred from shelving a problem that is live because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R692", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R693", + "query": "bronze isthmus assay station lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R694", + "query": "what is still broken in the bronze isthmus assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R695", + "query": "which assay station feeds the operator stale numbers before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R696", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one feeds the operator stale numbers before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R697", + "query": "olive plateau assay station mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R698", + "query": "what explains why the olive plateau assay station mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R699", + "query": "which assay station serves yesterday's answers confidently because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R700", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R701", + "query": "maroon shore provenance ledger batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R702", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the maroon shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R703", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R704", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R705", + "query": "sage valley provenance ledger re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage valley provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R707", + "query": "which provenance ledger sends the same payload twice once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R708", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one sends the same payload twice once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R709", + "query": "ivory forest provenance ledger widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R710", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the ivory forest provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R711", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R712", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R713", + "query": "topaz marsh provenance ledger thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R714", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz marsh provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R715", + "query": "which provenance ledger evicts what it is about to need once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R716", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one evicts what it is about to need once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R717", + "query": "walnut cliff provenance ledger rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R718", + "query": "what explains why the walnut cliff provenance ledger rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R719", + "query": "which provenance ledger shortens its own interval because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R720", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one shortens its own interval because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R721", + "query": "ochre delta token vault lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R722", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the ochre delta token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R723", + "query": "which token vault picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R724", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R725", + "query": "tan badland token vault double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan badland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R727", + "query": "which token vault reports inflated totals once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R728", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one reports inflated totals once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R729", + "query": "maroon valley token vault write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R730", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the maroon valley token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R731", + "query": "which token vault is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R732", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R733", + "query": "sienna crag token vault leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R734", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna crag token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R735", + "query": "which token vault never returns its file descriptors when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R736", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one never returns its file descriptors when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R737", + "query": "vermilion gulch token vault batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R738", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion gulch token vault batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R739", + "query": "which token vault exceeds its own size limit because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R740", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one exceeds its own size limit because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R741", + "query": "taupe orchard assay station grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R742", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the taupe orchard assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R743", + "query": "which assay station picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R744", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R745", + "query": "verdigris dell assay station starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the verdigris dell assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R747", + "query": "which assay station leaves downstream readers with nothing once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R748", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R749", + "query": "opal orchard assay station mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R750", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the opal orchard assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R751", + "query": "which assay station is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R752", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R753", + "query": "indigo butte assay station flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R754", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo butte assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R755", + "query": "which assay station keeps toggling between up and down as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R756", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one keeps toggling between up and down as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R757", + "query": "maroon estuary assay station undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R758", + "query": "what explains why the maroon estuary assay station undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R759", + "query": "which assay station owns up to fewer attempts than occur because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R760", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R761", + "query": "azure rapids sweep worker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R762", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the azure rapids sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R763", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R764", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R765", + "query": "chalk reef sweep worker poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R767", + "query": "which sweep worker writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R768", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R769", + "query": "mauve river sweep worker rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R770", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the mauve river sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R771", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from moving a common read position backwards because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R772", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R773", + "query": "verdigris plateau sweep worker misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R774", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris plateau sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R775", + "query": "which sweep worker cannot say who holds which grant when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R776", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one cannot say who holds which grant when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R777", + "query": "ruby glade sweep worker pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R778", + "query": "what explains why the ruby glade sweep worker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R779", + "query": "which sweep worker readies exactly what nobody asks for because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R780", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R781", + "query": "granite cove shard router spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R782", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the granite cove shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R783", + "query": "which shard router picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R784", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R785", + "query": "maroon gulch shard router skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon gulch shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R787", + "query": "which shard router acknowledges before durability once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R788", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one acknowledges before durability once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R789", + "query": "pearl quarry shard router reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R790", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the pearl quarry shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R791", + "query": "which shard router is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R792", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R793", + "query": "sepia meadow shard router starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R794", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia meadow shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R795", + "query": "which shard router never lets the flush finish when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R796", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one never lets the flush finish when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R797", + "query": "taupe brook shard router retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R798", + "query": "what explains why the taupe brook shard router retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R799", + "query": "which shard router repeats immediately on failure because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R800", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one repeats immediately on failure because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R801", + "query": "jade ravine calibration bench snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R802", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the jade ravine calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R803", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R804", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R805", + "query": "walnut glade calibration bench misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut glade calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R807", + "query": "which calibration bench sends completions to the wrong caller once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R808", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R809", + "query": "crimson grove calibration bench interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R810", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the crimson grove calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R811", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R812", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R813", + "query": "maroon lowland calibration bench overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R814", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon lowland calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R815", + "query": "which calibration bench writes more log than the space allows while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R816", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one writes more log than the space allows while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R817", + "query": "ochre lowland calibration bench escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R818", + "query": "what explains why the ochre lowland calibration bench escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R819", + "query": "which calibration bench raises alarms at the first wobble because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R820", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R821", + "query": "cedar atoll entropy siphon eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R822", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the cedar atoll entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R823", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R824", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R825", + "query": "ivory lagoon entropy siphon swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory lagoon entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R827", + "query": "which entropy siphon reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R828", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R829", + "query": "amber cirque entropy siphon fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R830", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the amber cirque entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R831", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R832", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R833", + "query": "quartz atoll entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R834", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz atoll entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R835", + "query": "which entropy siphon checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R836", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R837", + "query": "willow dell entropy siphon round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R838", + "query": "what explains why the willow dell entropy siphon round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R839", + "query": "which entropy siphon rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R840", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R841", + "query": "maroon bayou replay buffer eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R842", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the maroon bayou replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R843", + "query": "which replay buffer picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R844", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R845", + "query": "jade tarn replay buffer swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the jade tarn replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R847", + "query": "which replay buffer reports success where something went wrong once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R848", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one reports success where something went wrong once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R849", + "query": "indigo hill replay buffer fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R850", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the indigo hill replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R851", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R852", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R853", + "query": "cinnamon pond replay buffer staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R854", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon pond replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R855", + "query": "which replay buffer checks in at ragged intervals as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R856", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one checks in at ragged intervals as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R857", + "query": "cyan bayou replay buffer round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R858", + "query": "what explains why the cyan bayou replay buffer round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R859", + "query": "which replay buffer rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R860", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R861", + "query": "walnut meadow edge cache backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R862", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the walnut meadow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R863", + "query": "which edge cache picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R864", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R865", + "query": "navy atoll edge cache corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy atoll edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R867", + "query": "which edge cache leaves unreadable restart state once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R868", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one leaves unreadable restart state once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R869", + "query": "maroon cliff edge cache cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R870", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the maroon cliff edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R871", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R872", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R873", + "query": "sand cove edge cache drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R874", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand cove edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R875", + "query": "which edge cache loses track of its own progress marker when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R876", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one loses track of its own progress marker when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R877", + "query": "pearl brook edge cache serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R878", + "query": "what explains why the pearl brook edge cache serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R879", + "query": "which edge cache checks health one at a time because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R880", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one checks health one at a time because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R881", + "query": "taupe cirque edge cache decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R882", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the taupe cirque edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R883", + "query": "which edge cache picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R884", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R885", + "query": "granite plateau edge cache mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite plateau edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R887", + "query": "which edge cache puts the wrong name on each container once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R888", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one puts the wrong name on each container once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R889", + "query": "emerald pond edge cache recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R890", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the emerald pond edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R891", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R892", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R893", + "query": "tan gorge edge cache saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R894", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan gorge edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R895", + "query": "which edge cache pegs the sensor at maximum as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R896", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one pegs the sensor at maximum as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R897", + "query": "maroon badland edge cache rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R898", + "query": "what explains why the maroon badland edge cache rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R899", + "query": "which edge cache biases results to the reference value because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R900", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one biases results to the reference value because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R901", + "query": "lilac inlet assay station backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R902", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the lilac inlet assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R903", + "query": "which assay station picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R904", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R905", + "query": "copper canyon assay station corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper canyon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R907", + "query": "which assay station leaves unreadable restart state once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R908", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R909", + "query": "sage heath assay station cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R910", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the sage heath assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R911", + "query": "which assay station is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R912", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R913", + "query": "mustard glacier assay station drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R914", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard glacier assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R915", + "query": "which assay station loses track of its own progress marker while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R916", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one loses track of its own progress marker while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R917", + "query": "plum bluff assay station serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R918", + "query": "what explains why the plum bluff assay station serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R919", + "query": "which assay station checks health one at a time because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R920", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one checks health one at a time because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R921", + "query": "russet atoll specimen locker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R922", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the russet atoll specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R923", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R924", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R925", + "query": "maroon butte specimen locker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon butte specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R927", + "query": "which specimen locker splinters memory into unusable pieces once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R928", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R929", + "query": "chalk crag specimen locker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R930", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the chalk crag specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R931", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from silencing a probe that says no because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R932", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R933", + "query": "coral glade specimen locker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R934", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral glade specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R935", + "query": "which specimen locker silently repeats the leader's work before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R936", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one silently repeats the leader's work before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R937", + "query": "russet summit specimen locker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R938", + "query": "what explains why the russet summit specimen locker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R939", + "query": "which specimen locker persists every result in duplicate because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R940", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one persists every result in duplicate because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R941", + "query": "onyx heath edge cache backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R942", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the onyx heath edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R943", + "query": "which edge cache picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R944", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R945", + "query": "violet heath edge cache corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet heath edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R947", + "query": "which edge cache leaves unreadable restart state once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R948", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R949", + "query": "carmine reef edge cache cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R950", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the carmine reef edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R951", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R952", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R953", + "query": "maroon tarn edge cache drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R954", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon tarn edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R955", + "query": "which edge cache loses track of its own progress marker when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R956", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one loses track of its own progress marker when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R957", + "query": "maroon gorge edge cache serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R958", + "query": "what explains why the maroon gorge edge cache serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R959", + "query": "which edge cache checks health one at a time because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R960", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one checks health one at a time because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R961", + "query": "salmon dune quorum relay rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R962", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the salmon dune quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R963", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R964", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R965", + "query": "lilac canyon quorum relay desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac canyon quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R967", + "query": "which quorum relay lets copies drift out of agreement once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R968", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R969", + "query": "magenta fjord quorum relay widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R970", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the magenta fjord quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R971", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R972", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R973", + "query": "emerald summit quorum relay splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R974", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald summit quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R975", + "query": "which quorum relay two halves each think they lead right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R976", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one two halves each think they lead right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R977", + "query": "olive glacier quorum relay recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R978", + "query": "what explains why the olive glacier quorum relay recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R979", + "query": "which quorum relay derives afresh what it could remember because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R980", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one derives afresh what it could remember because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R981", + "query": "cinnamon valley quorum relay compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R982", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the cinnamon valley quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R983", + "query": "which quorum relay picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R984", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R985", + "query": "amber crag quorum relay hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the amber crag quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R987", + "query": "which quorum relay never gives borrowed space back once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R988", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one never gives borrowed space back once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R989", + "query": "sorrel glade quorum relay archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R990", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the sorrel glade quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R991", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from shelving a problem that is live because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R992", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R993", + "query": "olive creek quorum relay lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R994", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive creek quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R995", + "query": "which quorum relay feeds the operator stale numbers once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R996", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one feeds the operator stale numbers once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R997", + "query": "walnut delta quorum relay mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R998", + "query": "what explains why the walnut delta quorum relay mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R999", + "query": "which quorum relay serves yesterday's answers confidently because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1000", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1001", + "query": "quartz dale escrow chamber sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1002", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the quartz dale escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1003", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1004", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1005", + "query": "slate cliff escrow chamber inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1006", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1007", + "query": "which escrow chamber flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1008", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1009", + "query": "cinnamon estuary escrow chamber splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1010", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the cinnamon estuary escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1011", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1012", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1013", + "query": "jade strait escrow chamber skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1014", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade strait escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1015", + "query": "which escrow chamber tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1016", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1017", + "query": "orange canyon escrow chamber hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1018", + "query": "what explains why the orange canyon escrow chamber hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1019", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1020", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1021", + "query": "ebony pond assay station snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1022", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ebony pond assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1023", + "query": "which assay station picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1024", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1025", + "query": "beige lagoon assay station misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1026", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1027", + "query": "which assay station sends completions to the wrong caller once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1028", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1029", + "query": "mustard badland assay station interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1030", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the mustard badland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1031", + "query": "which assay station is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1032", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1033", + "query": "orange lagoon assay station overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1034", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1035", + "query": "which assay station writes more log than the space allows when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1036", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one writes more log than the space allows when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1037", + "query": "cinnamon gulch assay station escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1038", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon gulch assay station escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1039", + "query": "which assay station raises alarms at the first wobble because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1040", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1041", + "query": "hazel brook ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1042", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the hazel brook ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1043", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often it tries again around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1044", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1045", + "query": "onyx strait ingest job drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1046", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx strait ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1047", + "query": "which ingest job loses acknowledged data once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1048", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one loses acknowledged data once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1049", + "query": "pearl bayou ingest job share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1050", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the pearl bayou ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1051", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from one read position serving two partitions because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1052", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1053", + "query": "coral canyon ingest job stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1054", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral canyon ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1055", + "query": "which ingest job stops making progress when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1056", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one stops making progress when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1057", + "query": "opal quarry ingest job prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1058", + "query": "what explains why the opal quarry ingest job prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1059", + "query": "which ingest job picks the staler of two copies because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1060", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picks the staler of two copies because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1061", + "query": "hazel tundra assay station parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1062", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the hazel tundra assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1063", + "query": "which assay station picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1064", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1065", + "query": "cinnamon lowland assay station clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1066", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon lowland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1067", + "query": "which assay station fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1068", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1069", + "query": "emerald canyon assay station reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1070", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the emerald canyon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1071", + "query": "which assay station is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1072", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1073", + "query": "sorrel island assay station ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1074", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel island assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1075", + "query": "which assay station keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1076", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one keeps pushing when told to slow while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1077", + "query": "ivory oasis assay station idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1078", + "query": "what explains why the ivory oasis assay station idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1079", + "query": "which assay station rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1080", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one rests longer than it runs because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1081", + "query": "auburn jungle telemetry mast stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1082", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the auburn jungle telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1083", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1084", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1085", + "query": "maroon ravine telemetry mast upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1086", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon ravine telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1087", + "query": "which telemetry mast delivers things in scrambled sequence once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1088", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1089", + "query": "ebony cape telemetry mast hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1090", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the ebony cape telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1091", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from changing the checker while it checks because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1092", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1093", + "query": "cinnamon bayou telemetry mast misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1094", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon bayou telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1095", + "query": "which telemetry mast routes warnings to the wrong inbox when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1096", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1097", + "query": "silver hollow telemetry mast polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1098", + "query": "what explains why the silver hollow telemetry mast polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1099", + "query": "which telemetry mast asks for updates far too often because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1100", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one asks for updates far too often because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1101", + "query": "ochre inlet shard router stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1102", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the ochre inlet shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1103", + "query": "which shard router picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1104", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1105", + "query": "bronze crag shard router upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze crag shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1107", + "query": "which shard router delivers things in scrambled sequence once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1108", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1109", + "query": "cedar marsh shard router hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1110", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the cedar marsh shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1111", + "query": "which shard router is barred from changing the checker while it checks because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1112", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1113", + "query": "saffron tarn shard router misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1114", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron tarn shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1115", + "query": "which shard router routes warnings to the wrong inbox while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1116", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1117", + "query": "bronze inlet shard router polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1118", + "query": "what explains why the bronze inlet shard router polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1119", + "query": "which shard router asks for updates far too often because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1120", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one asks for updates far too often because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1121", + "query": "cinnamon cliff lease broker drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1122", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the cinnamon cliff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1123", + "query": "which lease broker picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1124", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1125", + "query": "scarlet tundra lease broker expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet tundra lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1127", + "query": "which lease broker cancels permissions it just issued once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1128", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1129", + "query": "carmine fjord lease broker outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1130", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the carmine fjord lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1131", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1132", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1133", + "query": "ivory moor lease broker stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1134", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory moor lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1135", + "query": "which lease broker delivers output in fits and bursts while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1136", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one delivers output in fits and bursts while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1137", + "query": "granite lake lease broker trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1138", + "query": "what explains why the granite lake lease broker trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1139", + "query": "which lease broker throws away the oldest instead of the newest because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1140", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1141", + "query": "lavender prairie lease broker rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1142", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the lavender prairie lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1143", + "query": "which lease broker picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1144", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1145", + "query": "sepia river lease broker desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia river lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1147", + "query": "which lease broker lets copies drift out of agreement once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1148", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1149", + "query": "cinnamon badland lease broker widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1150", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the cinnamon badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1151", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1152", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1153", + "query": "cobalt jungle lease broker splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1154", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt jungle lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1155", + "query": "which lease broker two halves each think they lead as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1156", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one two halves each think they lead as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1157", + "query": "crimson knoll lease broker recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1158", + "query": "what explains why the crimson knoll lease broker recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1159", + "query": "which lease broker derives afresh what it could remember because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1160", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one derives afresh what it could remember because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1161", + "query": "opal grove sweep worker compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1162", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the opal grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1163", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1164", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1165", + "query": "orange heath sweep worker hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the orange heath sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1167", + "query": "which sweep worker never gives borrowed space back once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1168", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one never gives borrowed space back once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1169", + "query": "saffron knoll sweep worker archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1170", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the saffron knoll sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1171", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1172", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1173", + "query": "mustard reef sweep worker lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1174", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1175", + "query": "which sweep worker feeds the operator stale numbers as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1176", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one feeds the operator stale numbers as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1177", + "query": "cinnamon butte sweep worker mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1178", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon butte sweep worker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1179", + "query": "which sweep worker serves yesterday's answers confidently because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1180", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1181", + "query": "amber badland escrow chamber stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1182", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the amber badland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1183", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1184", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1185", + "query": "pearl inlet escrow chamber upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl inlet escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1187", + "query": "which escrow chamber delivers things in scrambled sequence once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1188", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1189", + "query": "violet pond escrow chamber hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1190", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the violet pond escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1191", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from changing the checker while it checks because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1192", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1193", + "query": "chalk river escrow chamber misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1194", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk river escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1195", + "query": "which escrow chamber routes warnings to the wrong inbox once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1196", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1197", + "query": "amber barrens escrow chamber polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1198", + "query": "what explains why the amber barrens escrow chamber polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1199", + "query": "which escrow chamber asks for updates far too often because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1200", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one asks for updates far too often because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1201", + "query": "sand lowland ingest job probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1202", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the sand lowland ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1203", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1204", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1205", + "query": "cinnamon tarn ingest job truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon tarn ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1207", + "query": "which ingest job discards the newest entries once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1208", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one discards the newest entries once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1209", + "query": "russet rapids ingest job ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1210", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the russet rapids ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1211", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1212", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1213", + "query": "onyx gorge ingest job duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1214", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx gorge ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1215", + "query": "which ingest job issues the same barrier twice while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1216", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one issues the same barrier twice while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1217", + "query": "sepia cape ingest job skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1218", + "query": "what explains why the sepia cape ingest job skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1219", + "query": "which ingest job always takes the slow route because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1220", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one always takes the slow route because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1221", + "query": "magenta plateau index writer batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1222", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the magenta plateau index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1223", + "query": "which index writer picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1224", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1225", + "query": "fawn mesa index writer re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the fawn mesa index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1227", + "query": "which index writer sends the same payload twice once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1228", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one sends the same payload twice once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1229", + "query": "orange cape index writer widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1230", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the orange cape index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1231", + "query": "which index writer is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1232", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1233", + "query": "cinnamon meadow index writer thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1234", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon meadow index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1235", + "query": "which index writer evicts what it is about to need as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1236", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one evicts what it is about to need as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1237", + "query": "taupe fjord index writer rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1238", + "query": "what explains why the taupe fjord index writer rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1239", + "query": "which index writer shortens its own interval because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1240", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one shortens its own interval because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1241", + "query": "topaz reef calibration bench probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1242", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the topaz reef calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1243", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1244", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1245", + "query": "granite lagoon calibration bench truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite lagoon calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1247", + "query": "which calibration bench discards the newest entries once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1248", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one discards the newest entries once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1249", + "query": "granite gulch calibration bench ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1250", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the granite gulch calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1251", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1252", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1253", + "query": "opal dale calibration bench duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1254", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal dale calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1255", + "query": "which calibration bench issues the same barrier twice as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1256", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one issues the same barrier twice as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1257", + "query": "tan shore calibration bench skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1258", + "query": "what explains why the tan shore calibration bench skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1259", + "query": "which calibration bench always takes the slow route because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1260", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one always takes the slow route because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1261", + "query": "cinnamon lagoon index writer sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1262", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the cinnamon lagoon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1263", + "query": "which index writer picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1264", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1265", + "query": "sage ravine index writer inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage ravine index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1267", + "query": "which index writer flips positive and negative readings once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1268", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one flips positive and negative readings once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1269", + "query": "ashen crag index writer splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1270", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the ashen crag index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1271", + "query": "which index writer is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1272", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1273", + "query": "ruby lowland index writer skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1274", + "query": "what is still broken in the ruby lowland index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1275", + "query": "which index writer tilts every measurement it takes as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1276", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one tilts every measurement it takes as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1277", + "query": "wheat tundra index writer hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1278", + "query": "what explains why the wheat tundra index writer hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1279", + "query": "which index writer keeps tuning grants for itself because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1280", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1281", + "query": "magenta island lease broker confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1282", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the magenta island lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1283", + "query": "which lease broker picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1284", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1285", + "query": "mustard harbor lease broker overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard harbor lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1287", + "query": "which lease broker lingers longer than scheduled once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1288", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one lingers longer than scheduled once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1289", + "query": "cinnamon dune lease broker skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1290", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the cinnamon dune lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1291", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from omitting the empty reference run because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1292", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1293", + "query": "cobalt cape lease broker orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1294", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt cape lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1295", + "query": "which lease broker abandons work it had accepted when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1296", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one abandons work it had accepted when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1297", + "query": "sepia lowland lease broker ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1298", + "query": "what explains why the sepia lowland lease broker ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1299", + "query": "which lease broker serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1300", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1301", + "query": "taupe ravine index writer compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1302", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the taupe ravine index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1303", + "query": "which index writer picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1304", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1305", + "query": "quartz fjord index writer hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz fjord index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1307", + "query": "which index writer never gives borrowed space back once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1308", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one never gives borrowed space back once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1309", + "query": "cinnamon ridge index writer archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1310", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the cinnamon ridge index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1311", + "query": "which index writer is barred from shelving a problem that is live because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1312", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1313", + "query": "olive dale index writer lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1314", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive dale index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1315", + "query": "which index writer feeds the operator stale numbers while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1316", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one feeds the operator stale numbers while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1317", + "query": "cinnamon island index writer mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1318", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon island index writer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1319", + "query": "which index writer serves yesterday's answers confidently because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1320", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1321", + "query": "silver hill escrow chamber eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1322", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the silver hill escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1323", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1324", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1325", + "query": "navy valley escrow chamber swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy valley escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1327", + "query": "which escrow chamber reports success where something went wrong once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1328", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one reports success where something went wrong once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1329", + "query": "beige harbor escrow chamber fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1330", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the beige harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1331", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from splitting the book of account in two because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1332", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1333", + "query": "russet dell escrow chamber staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1334", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet dell escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1335", + "query": "which escrow chamber checks in at ragged intervals once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1336", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one checks in at ragged intervals once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1337", + "query": "coral savanna escrow chamber round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1338", + "query": "what explains why the coral savanna escrow chamber round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1339", + "query": "which escrow chamber rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1340", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1341", + "query": "sienna dale calibration bench drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1342", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the sienna dale calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1343", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1344", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1345", + "query": "cinnamon mesa calibration bench expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon mesa calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1347", + "query": "which calibration bench cancels permissions it just issued once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1348", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one cancels permissions it just issued once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1349", + "query": "wheat geyser calibration bench outrun the replication horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1350", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the wheat geyser calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1351", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1352", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from writing faster than copies can keep up because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1353", + "query": "sienna mesa calibration bench stutters its stream", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1354", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna mesa calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1355", + "query": "which calibration bench delivers output in fits and bursts as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1356", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one delivers output in fits and bursts as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1357", + "query": "auburn strait calibration bench trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1358", + "query": "what explains why the auburn strait calibration bench trims from the head?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1359", + "query": "which calibration bench throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1360", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one throws away the oldest instead of the newest because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1361", + "query": "orange dale ingest job gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1362", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the orange dale ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1363", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1364", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1365", + "query": "ivory glacier ingest job fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory glacier ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1367", + "query": "which ingest job splinters memory into unusable pieces once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1368", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1369", + "query": "onyx mesa ingest job suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1370", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the onyx mesa ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1371", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from silencing a probe that says no because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1372", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1373", + "query": "cinnamon quarry ingest job shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1374", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon quarry ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1375", + "query": "which ingest job silently repeats the leader's work once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1376", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one silently repeats the leader's work once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1377", + "query": "cobalt lake ingest job saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1378", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt lake ingest job saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1379", + "query": "which ingest job persists every result in duplicate because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1380", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one persists every result in duplicate because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1381", + "query": "maroon hill assay station confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1382", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the maroon hill assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1383", + "query": "which assay station picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1384", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1385", + "query": "slate ravine assay station overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate ravine assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1387", + "query": "which assay station lingers longer than scheduled once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1388", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one lingers longer than scheduled once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1389", + "query": "orange isthmus assay station skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1390", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the orange isthmus assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1391", + "query": "which assay station is barred from omitting the empty reference run because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1392", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1393", + "query": "auburn estuary assay station orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1394", + "query": "what is still broken in the auburn estuary assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1395", + "query": "which assay station abandons work it had accepted when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1396", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one abandons work it had accepted when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1397", + "query": "salmon quarry assay station ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1398", + "query": "what explains why the salmon quarry assay station ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1399", + "query": "which assay station serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1400", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1401", + "query": "cinnamon shore ingest job checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1402", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the cinnamon shore ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1403", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1404", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1405", + "query": "sand gulch ingest job shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand gulch ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1407", + "query": "which ingest job destroys its own table of contents once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1408", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one destroys its own table of contents once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1409", + "query": "cyan savanna ingest job promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1410", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the cyan savanna ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1411", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1412", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1413", + "query": "indigo tundra ingest job inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1414", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo tundra ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1415", + "query": "which ingest job predicts far more than materialises when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1416", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one predicts far more than materialises when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1417", + "query": "ivory hollow ingest job favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1418", + "query": "what explains why the ivory hollow ingest job favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1419", + "query": "which ingest job gives the noisiest customer priority because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1420", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1421", + "query": "cedar badland escrow chamber backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1422", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the cedar badland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1423", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1424", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1425", + "query": "quartz geyser escrow chamber corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz geyser escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1427", + "query": "which escrow chamber leaves unreadable restart state once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1428", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one leaves unreadable restart state once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1429", + "query": "cobalt lowland escrow chamber cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1430", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the cobalt lowland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1431", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1432", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1433", + "query": "plum ravine escrow chamber drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1434", + "query": "what is still broken in the plum ravine escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1435", + "query": "which escrow chamber loses track of its own progress marker as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1436", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one loses track of its own progress marker as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1437", + "query": "umber lowland escrow chamber serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1438", + "query": "what explains why the umber lowland escrow chamber serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1439", + "query": "which escrow chamber checks health one at a time because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1440", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one checks health one at a time because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1441", + "query": "cyan dell index writer batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1442", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the cyan dell index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1443", + "query": "which index writer picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1444", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1445", + "query": "hazel prairie index writer re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel prairie index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1447", + "query": "which index writer sends the same payload twice once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1448", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one sends the same payload twice once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1449", + "query": "ebony island index writer widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1450", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the ebony island index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1451", + "query": "which index writer is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1452", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1453", + "query": "lilac jungle index writer thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1454", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac jungle index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1455", + "query": "which index writer evicts what it is about to need as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1456", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one evicts what it is about to need as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1457", + "query": "cobalt bayou index writer rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1458", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt bayou index writer rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1459", + "query": "which index writer shortens its own interval because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1460", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one shortens its own interval because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1461", + "query": "orange knoll ingest job decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1462", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the orange knoll ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1463", + "query": "which ingest job picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1464", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1465", + "query": "sepia hill ingest job mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia hill ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1467", + "query": "which ingest job puts the wrong name on each container once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1468", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one puts the wrong name on each container once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1469", + "query": "plum forest ingest job recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1470", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the plum forest ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1471", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1472", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1473", + "query": "mauve savanna ingest job saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1474", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve savanna ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1475", + "query": "which ingest job pegs the sensor at maximum while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1476", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1477", + "query": "sage gulch ingest job rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1478", + "query": "what explains why the sage gulch ingest job rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1479", + "query": "which ingest job biases results to the reference value because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1480", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one biases results to the reference value because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1481", + "query": "salmon cove edge cache stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1482", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the salmon cove edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1483", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1484", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1485", + "query": "cobalt cliff edge cache upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt cliff edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1487", + "query": "which edge cache delivers things in scrambled sequence once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1488", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1489", + "query": "walnut harbor edge cache hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1490", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the walnut harbor edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1491", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from changing the checker while it checks because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1492", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1493", + "query": "chalk bayou edge cache misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1494", + "query": "what is still broken in the chalk bayou edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1495", + "query": "which edge cache routes warnings to the wrong inbox while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1496", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1497", + "query": "opal cliff edge cache polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1498", + "query": "what explains why the opal cliff edge cache polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1499", + "query": "which edge cache asks for updates far too often because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1500", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one asks for updates far too often because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1501", + "query": "scarlet canyon index writer gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1502", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the scarlet canyon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1503", + "query": "which index writer picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1504", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1505", + "query": "maroon harbor index writer fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon harbor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1507", + "query": "which index writer splinters memory into unusable pieces once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1508", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1509", + "query": "cedar river index writer suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1510", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the cedar river index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1511", + "query": "which index writer is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1512", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1513", + "query": "cobalt badland index writer shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1514", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt badland index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1515", + "query": "which index writer silently repeats the leader's work when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1516", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one silently repeats the leader's work when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1517", + "query": "carmine cliff index writer saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1518", + "query": "what explains why the carmine cliff index writer saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1519", + "query": "which index writer persists every result in duplicate because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1520", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one persists every result in duplicate because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1521", + "query": "ochre fjord replay buffer compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1522", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the ochre fjord replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1523", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1524", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1525", + "query": "auburn creek replay buffer hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the auburn creek replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1527", + "query": "which replay buffer never gives borrowed space back once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1528", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one never gives borrowed space back once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1529", + "query": "verdigris atoll replay buffer archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1530", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the verdigris atoll replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1531", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from shelving a problem that is live because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1532", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1533", + "query": "plum cove replay buffer lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1534", + "query": "what is still broken in the plum cove replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1535", + "query": "which replay buffer feeds the operator stale numbers while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1536", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one feeds the operator stale numbers while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1537", + "query": "wheat knoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1538", + "query": "what explains why the wheat knoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1539", + "query": "which replay buffer serves yesterday's answers confidently because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1540", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1541", + "query": "cobalt butte escrow chamber confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1542", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the cobalt butte escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1543", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1544", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1545", + "query": "lilac ravine escrow chamber overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac ravine escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1547", + "query": "which escrow chamber lingers longer than scheduled once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1548", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one lingers longer than scheduled once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1549", + "query": "verdigris ridge escrow chamber skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1550", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the verdigris ridge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1551", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from omitting the empty reference run because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1552", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1553", + "query": "sage lake escrow chamber orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1554", + "query": "what is still broken in the sage lake escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1555", + "query": "which escrow chamber abandons work it had accepted when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1556", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one abandons work it had accepted when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1557", + "query": "slate meadow escrow chamber ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1558", + "query": "what explains why the slate meadow escrow chamber ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1559", + "query": "which escrow chamber serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1560", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1561", + "query": "tan orchard telemetry mast snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1562", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the tan orchard telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1563", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1564", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1565", + "query": "pearl knoll telemetry mast misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl knoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1567", + "query": "which telemetry mast sends completions to the wrong caller once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1568", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1569", + "query": "cobalt tarn telemetry mast interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1570", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the cobalt tarn telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1571", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1572", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1573", + "query": "onyx geyser telemetry mast overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1574", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1575", + "query": "which telemetry mast writes more log than the space allows when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1576", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one writes more log than the space allows when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1577", + "query": "pearl forest telemetry mast escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1578", + "query": "what explains why the pearl forest telemetry mast escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1579", + "query": "which telemetry mast raises alarms at the first wobble because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1580", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1581", + "query": "ruby pond replay buffer quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1582", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the ruby pond replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1583", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1584", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1585", + "query": "plum lake replay buffer garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum lake replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1587", + "query": "which replay buffer scrambles what it reports home once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1588", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one scrambles what it reports home once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1589", + "query": "willow ravine replay buffer hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1590", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the willow ravine replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1591", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1592", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1593", + "query": "azure dune replay buffer echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1594", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1595", + "query": "which replay buffer repeats instructions back to itself once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1596", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one repeats instructions back to itself once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1597", + "query": "cobalt meadow replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1598", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt meadow replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1599", + "query": "which replay buffer copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1600", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1601", + "query": "azure cavern quorum relay probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1602", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the azure cavern quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1603", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1604", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1605", + "query": "cyan butte quorum relay truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan butte quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1607", + "query": "which quorum relay discards the newest entries once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1608", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one discards the newest entries once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1609", + "query": "beige marsh quorum relay ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1610", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the beige marsh quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1611", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1612", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1613", + "query": "cyan marsh quorum relay duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1614", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan marsh quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1615", + "query": "which quorum relay issues the same barrier twice when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1616", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one issues the same barrier twice when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1617", + "query": "slate grove quorum relay skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1618", + "query": "what explains why the slate grove quorum relay skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1619", + "query": "which quorum relay always takes the slow route because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1620", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one always takes the slow route because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1621", + "query": "sorrel shore shard router warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1622", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the sorrel shore shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1623", + "query": "which shard router picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1624", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1625", + "query": "cobalt lagoon shard router poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt lagoon shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1627", + "query": "which shard router writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1628", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1629", + "query": "mauve isthmus shard router rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1630", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the mauve isthmus shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1631", + "query": "which shard router is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1632", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1633", + "query": "magenta jungle shard router misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1634", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta jungle shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1635", + "query": "which shard router cannot say who holds which grant while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1636", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one cannot say who holds which grant while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1637", + "query": "opal marsh shard router pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1638", + "query": "what explains why the opal marsh shard router pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1639", + "query": "which shard router readies exactly what nobody asks for because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1640", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1641", + "query": "golden prairie edge cache parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1642", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the golden prairie edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1643", + "query": "which edge cache picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1644", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1645", + "query": "birch dell edge cache clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch dell edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1647", + "query": "which edge cache fires the same alarm repeatedly once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1648", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1649", + "query": "crimson cirque edge cache reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1650", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the crimson cirque edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1651", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1652", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1653", + "query": "cobalt dune edge cache ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1654", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt dune edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1655", + "query": "which edge cache keeps pushing when told to slow while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1656", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps pushing when told to slow while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1657", + "query": "plum bayou edge cache idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1658", + "query": "what explains why the plum bayou edge cache idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1659", + "query": "which edge cache rests longer than it runs because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1660", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one rests longer than it runs because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1661", + "query": "lavender ravine specimen locker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1662", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the lavender ravine specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1663", + "query": "which specimen locker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1664", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1665", + "query": "willow strait specimen locker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow strait specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1667", + "query": "which specimen locker reports success where something went wrong once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1668", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one reports success where something went wrong once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1669", + "query": "amber butte specimen locker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1670", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the amber butte specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1671", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1672", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1673", + "query": "opal gorge specimen locker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1674", + "query": "what is still broken in the opal gorge specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1675", + "query": "which specimen locker checks in at ragged intervals while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1676", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one checks in at ragged intervals while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1677", + "query": "tan lagoon specimen locker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1678", + "query": "what explains why the tan lagoon specimen locker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1679", + "query": "which specimen locker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1680", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1681", + "query": "cobalt island token vault decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1682", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the cobalt island token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1683", + "query": "which token vault picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1684", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1685", + "query": "vermilion brook token vault mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the vermilion brook token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1687", + "query": "which token vault puts the wrong name on each container once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1688", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one puts the wrong name on each container once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1689", + "query": "beige savanna token vault recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1690", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the beige savanna token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1691", + "query": "which token vault is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1692", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1693", + "query": "navy barrens token vault saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1694", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy barrens token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1695", + "query": "which token vault pegs the sensor at maximum while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1696", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1697", + "query": "salmon island token vault rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1698", + "query": "what explains why the salmon island token vault rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1699", + "query": "which token vault biases results to the reference value because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1700", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one biases results to the reference value because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1701", + "query": "violet geyser quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1702", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the violet geyser quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1703", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how often it tries again around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1704", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1705", + "query": "willow lake quorum relay drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow lake quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1707", + "query": "which quorum relay loses acknowledged data once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1708", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one loses acknowledged data once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1709", + "query": "cobalt mesa quorum relay share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1710", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the cobalt mesa quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1711", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from one read position serving two partitions because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1712", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1713", + "query": "golden reef quorum relay stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1714", + "query": "what is still broken in the golden reef quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1715", + "query": "which quorum relay stops making progress when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1716", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one stops making progress when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1717", + "query": "orange cove quorum relay prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1718", + "query": "what explains why the orange cove quorum relay prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1719", + "query": "which quorum relay picks the staler of two copies because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1720", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picks the staler of two copies because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1721", + "query": "carmine quarry escrow chamber decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1722", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the carmine quarry escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1723", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1724", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1725", + "query": "silver dell escrow chamber mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver dell escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1727", + "query": "which escrow chamber puts the wrong name on each container once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1728", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one puts the wrong name on each container once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1729", + "query": "olive barrens escrow chamber recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1730", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the olive barrens escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1731", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1732", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1733", + "query": "salmon creek escrow chamber saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1734", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon creek escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1735", + "query": "which escrow chamber pegs the sensor at maximum once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1736", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one pegs the sensor at maximum once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1737", + "query": "cobalt quarry escrow chamber rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1738", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt quarry escrow chamber rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1739", + "query": "which escrow chamber biases results to the reference value because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1740", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one biases results to the reference value because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1741", + "query": "crimson moor ingest job decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1742", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the crimson moor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1743", + "query": "which ingest job picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1744", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1745", + "query": "violet swamp ingest job mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet swamp ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1747", + "query": "which ingest job puts the wrong name on each container once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1748", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one puts the wrong name on each container once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1749", + "query": "olive harbor ingest job recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1750", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the olive harbor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1751", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1752", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1753", + "query": "copper hill ingest job saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1754", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper hill ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1755", + "query": "which ingest job pegs the sensor at maximum right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1756", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one pegs the sensor at maximum right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1757", + "query": "mustard lake ingest job rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1758", + "query": "what explains why the mustard lake ingest job rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1759", + "query": "which ingest job biases results to the reference value because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1760", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one biases results to the reference value because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1761", + "query": "amber heath provenance ledger lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1762", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the amber heath provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1763", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1764", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1765", + "query": "cobalt shore provenance ledger double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1767", + "query": "which provenance ledger reports inflated totals once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1768", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one reports inflated totals once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1769", + "query": "granite pond provenance ledger write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1770", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the granite pond provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1771", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1772", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1773", + "query": "willow summit provenance ledger leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1774", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow summit provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1775", + "query": "which provenance ledger never returns its file descriptors when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1776", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one never returns its file descriptors when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1777", + "query": "magenta cirque provenance ledger batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1778", + "query": "what explains why the magenta cirque provenance ledger batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1779", + "query": "which provenance ledger exceeds its own size limit because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1780", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one exceeds its own size limit because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1781", + "query": "amber bayou token vault batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1782", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the amber bayou token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1783", + "query": "which token vault picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1784", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1785", + "query": "bronze badland token vault re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze badland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1787", + "query": "which token vault sends the same payload twice once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1788", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one sends the same payload twice once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1789", + "query": "coral island token vault widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1790", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the coral island token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1791", + "query": "which token vault is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1792", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1793", + "query": "cobalt valley token vault thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1794", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt valley token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1795", + "query": "which token vault evicts what it is about to need when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1796", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one evicts what it is about to need when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1797", + "query": "sage strait token vault rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1798", + "query": "what explains why the sage strait token vault rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1799", + "query": "which token vault shortens its own interval because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1800", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one shortens its own interval because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1801", + "query": "russet harbor edge cache dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1802", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the russet harbor edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1803", + "query": "which edge cache picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1804", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1805", + "query": "sepia tundra edge cache forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia tundra edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1807", + "query": "which edge cache loses track of positions previously read once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1808", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one loses track of positions previously read once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1809", + "query": "auburn lowland edge cache bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1810", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the auburn lowland edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1811", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from slipping past the intake gate because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1812", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1813", + "query": "pearl ravine edge cache clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1814", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl ravine edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1815", + "query": "which edge cache cuts short every spike it should absorb before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1816", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1817", + "query": "hazel valley edge cache defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1818", + "query": "what explains why the hazel valley edge cache defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1819", + "query": "which edge cache keeps postponing the squeeze because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1820", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1821", + "query": "cobalt estuary provenance ledger fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1822", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the cobalt estuary provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1823", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1824", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1825", + "query": "teal glacier provenance ledger stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal glacier provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1827", + "query": "which provenance ledger wedges everything behind it once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1828", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one wedges everything behind it once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1829", + "query": "sage bluff provenance ledger retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1830", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the sage bluff provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1831", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1832", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1833", + "query": "indigo orchard provenance ledger spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1834", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo orchard provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1835", + "query": "which provenance ledger burns cpu waiting when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1836", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one burns cpu waiting when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1837", + "query": "slate strait provenance ledger holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1838", + "query": "what explains why the slate strait provenance ledger holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1839", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps the barrier from closing because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1840", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1841", + "query": "salmon rapids provenance ledger batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1842", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the salmon rapids provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1843", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1844", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1845", + "query": "ruby delta provenance ledger re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby delta provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1847", + "query": "which provenance ledger sends the same payload twice once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1848", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one sends the same payload twice once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1849", + "query": "cobalt gulch provenance ledger widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1850", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the cobalt gulch provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1851", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1852", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1853", + "query": "taupe cove provenance ledger thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1854", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1855", + "query": "which provenance ledger evicts what it is about to need when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1856", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one evicts what it is about to need when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1857", + "query": "russet gulch provenance ledger rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1858", + "query": "what explains why the russet gulch provenance ledger rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1859", + "query": "which provenance ledger shortens its own interval because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1860", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one shortens its own interval because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1861", + "query": "ochre dell replay buffer gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1862", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the ochre dell replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1863", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1864", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1865", + "query": "wheat harbor replay buffer fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat harbor replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1867", + "query": "which replay buffer splinters memory into unusable pieces once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1868", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1869", + "query": "onyx lake replay buffer suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1870", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the onyx lake replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1871", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from silencing a probe that says no because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1872", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1873", + "query": "mauve grove replay buffer shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1874", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve grove replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1875", + "query": "which replay buffer silently repeats the leader's work as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1876", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one silently repeats the leader's work as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1877", + "query": "ebony shore replay buffer saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1878", + "query": "what explains why the ebony shore replay buffer saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1879", + "query": "which replay buffer persists every result in duplicate because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1880", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one persists every result in duplicate because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1881", + "query": "lilac orchard specimen locker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1882", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the lilac orchard specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1883", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1884", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1885", + "query": "hazel jungle specimen locker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the hazel jungle specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1887", + "query": "which specimen locker splinters memory into unusable pieces once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1888", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1889", + "query": "walnut dune specimen locker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1890", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the walnut dune specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1891", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from silencing a probe that says no because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1892", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1893", + "query": "ebony harbor specimen locker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1894", + "query": "what is still broken in the ebony harbor specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1895", + "query": "which specimen locker silently repeats the leader's work when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1896", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one silently repeats the leader's work when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1897", + "query": "scarlet savanna specimen locker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1898", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet savanna specimen locker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1899", + "query": "which specimen locker persists every result in duplicate because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1900", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one persists every result in duplicate because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1901", + "query": "sage swamp token vault warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1902", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the sage swamp token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1903", + "query": "which token vault picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1904", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1905", + "query": "sand cape token vault poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand cape token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1907", + "query": "which token vault writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1908", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1909", + "query": "willow prairie token vault rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1910", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the willow prairie token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1911", + "query": "which token vault is barred from moving a common read position backwards because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1912", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1913", + "query": "ebony lowland token vault misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1914", + "query": "what is still broken in the ebony lowland token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1915", + "query": "which token vault cannot say who holds which grant once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1916", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one cannot say who holds which grant once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1917", + "query": "walnut ridge token vault pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1918", + "query": "what explains why the walnut ridge token vault pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1919", + "query": "which token vault readies exactly what nobody asks for because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1920", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1921", + "query": "taupe island shard router dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1922", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the taupe island shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1923", + "query": "which shard router picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1924", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1925", + "query": "pearl glade shard router forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl glade shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1927", + "query": "which shard router loses track of positions previously read once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1928", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one loses track of positions previously read once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1929", + "query": "pewter ravine shard router bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1930", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the pewter ravine shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1931", + "query": "which shard router is barred from slipping past the intake gate because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1932", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1933", + "query": "sand crag shard router clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1934", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand crag shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1935", + "query": "which shard router cuts short every spike it should absorb as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1936", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1937", + "query": "bronze cavern shard router defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1938", + "query": "what explains why the bronze cavern shard router defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1939", + "query": "which shard router keeps postponing the squeeze because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1940", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1941", + "query": "crimson plateau replay buffer probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1942", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the crimson plateau replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1943", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1944", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1945", + "query": "sage tarn replay buffer truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage tarn replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1947", + "query": "which replay buffer discards the newest entries once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1948", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one discards the newest entries once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1949", + "query": "magenta lagoon replay buffer ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1950", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the magenta lagoon replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1951", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1952", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1953", + "query": "lavender ridge replay buffer duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1954", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender ridge replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1955", + "query": "which replay buffer issues the same barrier twice when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1956", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one issues the same barrier twice when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1957", + "query": "walnut ravine replay buffer skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1958", + "query": "what explains why the walnut ravine replay buffer skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1959", + "query": "which replay buffer always takes the slow route because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1960", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one always takes the slow route because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1961", + "query": "sand hill replay buffer rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1962", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the sand hill replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1963", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1964", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1965", + "query": "russet cove replay buffer desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet cove replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1967", + "query": "which replay buffer lets copies drift out of agreement once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1968", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1969", + "query": "magenta hill replay buffer widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1970", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the magenta hill replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1971", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1972", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1973", + "query": "coral rapids replay buffer splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1974", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral rapids replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1975", + "query": "which replay buffer two halves each think they lead once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1976", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one two halves each think they lead once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1977", + "query": "amber rapids replay buffer recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1978", + "query": "what explains why the amber rapids replay buffer recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1979", + "query": "which replay buffer derives afresh what it could remember because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1980", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one derives afresh what it could remember because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1981", + "query": "indigo wharf provenance ledger decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1982", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the indigo wharf provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1983", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1984", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1985", + "query": "silver rapids provenance ledger mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver rapids provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1987", + "query": "which provenance ledger puts the wrong name on each container once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1988", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one puts the wrong name on each container once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1989", + "query": "sand dale provenance ledger recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1990", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the sand dale provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1991", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1992", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1993", + "query": "cinnamon dell provenance ledger saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1994", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1995", + "query": "which provenance ledger pegs the sensor at maximum when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1996", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one pegs the sensor at maximum when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1997", + "query": "jade cavern provenance ledger rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1998", + "query": "what explains why the jade cavern provenance ledger rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1999", + "query": "which provenance ledger biases results to the reference value because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2000", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one biases results to the reference value because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P1", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P2", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P3", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P4", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P5", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P6", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P7", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P8", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P9", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P10", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P11", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P12", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P13", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P14", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P15", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P16", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P17", + "path": "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P18", + "path": "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P19", + "path": "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P20", + "path": "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P21", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P22", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P23", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P24", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P25", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P26", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P27", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P28", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P29", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P30", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P31", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P32", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P33", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P34", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P35", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P36", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P37", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P38", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P39", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P40", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P41", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P42", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P43", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P44", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P45", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P46", + "path": "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P47", + "path": "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P48", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P49", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P50", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P51", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P52", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P53", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P54", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P55", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P56", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P57", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P58", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P59", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P60", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P61", + "path": "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P62", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P63", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P64", + "path": "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2001", + "query": "topaz delta ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2002", + "query": "what did we decide about the olive canyon lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2003", + "query": "who owns the salmon delta shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2004", + "query": "ivory gorge replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2005", + "query": "what did we decide about the verdigris grove token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2006", + "query": "who owns the opal reef edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2007", + "query": "golden quarry sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2008", + "query": "what did we decide about the mustard crag index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2009", + "query": "who owns the mauve glacier assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2010", + "query": "amber estuary specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2011", + "query": "what did we decide about the ashen knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2012", + "query": "who owns the ruby summit telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2013", + "query": "tan oasis provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2014", + "query": "what did we decide about the granite savanna quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2015", + "query": "who owns the cyan fjord escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2016", + "query": "bronze geyser entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2017", + "query": "what did we decide about the slate oasis ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2018", + "query": "who owns the hazel atoll lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2019", + "query": "ashen atoll shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2020", + "query": "what did we decide about the plum hollow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2021", + "query": "who owns the crimson tarn token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2022", + "query": "sepia badland edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2023", + "query": "what did we decide about the vermilion inlet sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2024", + "query": "who owns the mustard geyser index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2025", + "query": "umber tarn assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2026", + "query": "what did we decide about the coral lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2027", + "query": "who owns the birch island calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2028", + "query": "ivory cape telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2029", + "query": "what did we decide about the willow oasis provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2030", + "query": "who owns the cyan rapids quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2031", + "query": "vermilion shore escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2032", + "query": "what did we decide about the ebony summit entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2033", + "query": "who owns the violet island ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2034", + "query": "sepia valley lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2035", + "query": "what did we decide about the granite quarry shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2036", + "query": "who owns the scarlet rapids replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2037", + "query": "golden wharf token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2038", + "query": "what did we decide about the amber valley edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2039", + "query": "who owns the sienna geyser sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2040", + "query": "wheat moor index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2041", + "query": "what did we decide about the emerald heath assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2042", + "query": "who owns the lilac lagoon specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2043", + "query": "golden ridge calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2044", + "query": "what did we decide about the onyx quarry telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2045", + "query": "who owns the lilac grove provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2046", + "query": "ruby dale quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2047", + "query": "what did we decide about the sand jungle escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2048", + "query": "who owns the coral brook entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2049", + "query": "topaz summit ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2050", + "query": "what did we decide about the russet wharf lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2051", + "query": "who owns the lilac moor shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2052", + "query": "violet strait replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2053", + "query": "what did we decide about the amber knoll token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2054", + "query": "who owns the verdigris glacier edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2055", + "query": "topaz tundra sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2056", + "query": "what did we decide about the verdigris gorge index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2057", + "query": "who owns the quartz ravine assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2058", + "query": "quartz inlet specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2059", + "query": "what did we decide about the golden mesa calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2060", + "query": "who owns the teal creek telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2061", + "query": "olive cliff provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2062", + "query": "what did we decide about the pewter reef quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2063", + "query": "who owns the auburn barrens escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2064", + "query": "scarlet geyser entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2065", + "query": "what did we decide about the sorrel heath ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2066", + "query": "who owns the scarlet bayou lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2067", + "query": "navy fjord shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2068", + "query": "what did we decide about the mauve oasis replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2069", + "query": "who owns the verdigris dale token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2070", + "query": "violet quarry edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2071", + "query": "what did we decide about the pearl cliff sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2072", + "query": "who owns the carmine gulch index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2073", + "query": "fawn estuary assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2074", + "query": "what did we decide about the mustard heath specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2075", + "query": "who owns the bronze forest calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2076", + "query": "slate cape telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2077", + "query": "what did we decide about the silver creek provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2078", + "query": "who owns the vermilion quarry quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2079", + "query": "amber hollow escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2080", + "query": "what did we decide about the verdigris hollow entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2081", + "query": "who owns the opal atoll ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2082", + "query": "maroon canyon lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2083", + "query": "what did we decide about the ashen island shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2084", + "query": "who owns the ruby estuary replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2085", + "query": "jade dell token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2086", + "query": "what did we decide about the saffron rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2087", + "query": "who owns the cobalt ridge sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2088", + "query": "topaz shore index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2089", + "query": "what did we decide about the silver cape assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2090", + "query": "who owns the mustard atoll specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2091", + "query": "teal isthmus calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2092", + "query": "what did we decide about the pearl bluff telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2093", + "query": "who owns the plum heath provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2094", + "query": "olive estuary quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2095", + "query": "what did we decide about the sand cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2096", + "query": "who owns the pewter badland entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2097", + "query": "orange valley ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2098", + "query": "what did we decide about the lilac dale lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2099", + "query": "who owns the maroon ridge shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2100", + "query": "cinnamon harbor replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2101", + "query": "what did we decide about the ashen cove token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2102", + "query": "who owns the golden badland edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2103", + "query": "mustard prairie sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2104", + "query": "what did we decide about the cobalt forest index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2105", + "query": "who owns the sage wharf assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2106", + "query": "sorrel tundra specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2107", + "query": "what did we decide about the emerald dale calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2108", + "query": "who owns the saffron gorge telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2109", + "query": "crimson bayou provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2110", + "query": "what did we decide about the vermilion forest quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2111", + "query": "who owns the verdigris gulch escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2112", + "query": "coral hollow entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2113", + "query": "what did we decide about the sienna delta ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2114", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the willow glacier replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2115", + "query": "what explains why the birch pond lease broker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2116", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ivory summit entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2117", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt dell replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2118", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure hollow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2119", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the salmon badland quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2120", + "query": "what explains why the magenta bluff index writer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2121", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the vermilion plateau token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2122", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine oasis token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2123", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver knoll token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2124", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the sienna lake provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2125", + "query": "what explains why the bronze orchard telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2126", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the tan cirque sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2127", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine orchard telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2128", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson lake telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2129", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the carmine geyser specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2130", + "query": "what explains why the hazel bluff ingest job mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2131", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the sorrel hill lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2132", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard valley edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2133", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate estuary edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2134", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the cyan tarn edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2135", + "query": "what explains why the amber lagoon ingest job saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2136", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the carmine crag lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2137", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine bluff sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2138", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan quarry sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2139", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the golden geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2140", + "query": "what explains why the magenta marsh entropy siphon undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2141", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the navy bayou ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2142", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2143", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine canyon escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2144", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the ashen butte token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2145", + "query": "what explains why the chalk glade specimen locker retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2146", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the quartz dell lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2147", + "query": "what is still broken in the ruby rapids index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2148", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon plateau index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2149", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the wheat badland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2150", + "query": "what explains why the maroon dune replay buffer re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2151", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the sepia savanna sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2152", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender butte shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2153", + "query": "what goes wrong with the emerald badland shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2154", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the verdigris quarry specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2155", + "query": "what explains why the onyx bayou calibration bench mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2156", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the magenta pond assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2157", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2158", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut cliff provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2159", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the sienna crag token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2160", + "query": "what explains why the opal orchard assay station saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2161", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the chalk reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2162", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite cove shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2163", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe brook shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2164", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the maroon lowland calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2165", + "query": "what explains why the amber cirque entropy siphon undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2166", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the jade tarn replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2167", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut meadow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2168", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl brook edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2169", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the tan gorge edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2170", + "query": "what explains why the sage heath assay station retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2171", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the maroon butte specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2172", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx heath edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2173", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon gorge edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2174", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the emerald summit quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2175", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel glade quorum relay re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2176", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the slate cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2177", + "query": "what is still broken in the ebony pond assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2178", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon gulch assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2179", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the coral canyon ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2180", + "query": "what explains why the emerald canyon assay station mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2181", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the maroon ravine telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2182", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre inlet shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2183", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze inlet shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2184", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the ivory moor lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2185", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon badland lease broker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2186", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the orange heath sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2187", + "query": "what is still broken in the amber badland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2188", + "query": "what goes wrong with the amber barrens escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2189", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the onyx gorge ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2190", + "query": "what explains why the orange cape index writer undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2191", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the granite lagoon calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2192", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon lagoon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2193", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat tundra index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2194", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the cobalt cape lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2195", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon ridge index writer retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2196", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the navy valley escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2197", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna dale calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2198", + "query": "what goes wrong with the auburn strait calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2199", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the cinnamon quarry ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2200", + "query": "what explains why the orange isthmus assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2201", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the sand gulch ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2202", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar badland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2203", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber lowland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2204", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the lilac jungle index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2205", + "query": "what explains why the plum forest ingest job mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2206", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the cobalt cliff edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2207", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet canyon index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2208", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine cliff index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2209", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the plum cove replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2210", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris ridge escrow chamber saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2211", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the pearl knoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2212", + "query": "what is still broken in the ruby pond replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2213", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt meadow replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2214", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the cyan marsh quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2215", + "query": "what explains why the mauve isthmus shard router undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2216", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the birch dell edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2217", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender ravine specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2218", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan lagoon specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2219", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the navy barrens token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2220", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt mesa quorum relay retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2221", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the silver dell escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2222", + "query": "what is still broken in the crimson moor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2223", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mustard lake ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2224", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the willow summit provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2225", + "query": "what explains why the coral island token vault re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2226", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the sepia tundra edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2227", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt estuary provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2228", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate strait provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2229", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the taupe cove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2230", + "query": "what explains why the onyx lake replay buffer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2231", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the hazel jungle specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2232", + "query": "what is still broken in the sage swamp token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2233", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut ridge token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2234", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the sand crag shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2235", + "query": "what explains why the magenta lagoon replay buffer saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2236", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the russet cove replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2237", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo wharf provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2238", + "query": "what goes wrong with the jade cavern provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2239", + "query": "golden jungle ingest job compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2240", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the golden jungle ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2241", + "query": "which ingest job picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L1", + "key": "c000g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2242", + "query": "navy lowland specimen locker fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2243", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the navy lowland specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2244", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L2", + "key": "c001g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2245", + "query": "golden swamp sweep worker probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2246", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the golden swamp sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2247", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L3", + "key": "c002g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2248", + "query": "cinnamon crag telemetry mast warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2249", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the cinnamon crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2250", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L4", + "key": "c003g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2251", + "query": "emerald dell provenance ledger backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2252", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the emerald dell provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2253", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L5", + "key": "c004g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2254", + "query": "plum tundra escrow chamber checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2255", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the plum tundra escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2256", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L6", + "key": "c005g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2257", + "query": "olive badland index writer confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2258", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the olive badland index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2259", + "query": "which index writer picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L7", + "key": "c006g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2260", + "query": "sienna marsh edge cache fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2261", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the sienna marsh edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2262", + "query": "which edge cache picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L8", + "key": "c007g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2263", + "query": "amber harbor sweep worker fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2264", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the amber harbor sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2265", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L9", + "key": "c008g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2266", + "query": "silver tundra token vault rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2267", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the silver tundra token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2268", + "query": "which token vault picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L10", + "key": "c009g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2269", + "query": "topaz glade entropy siphon eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2270", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the topaz glade entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2271", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L11", + "key": "c010g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2272", + "query": "chalk plateau entropy siphon checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2273", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the chalk plateau entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2274", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L12", + "key": "c011g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2275", + "query": "silver lowland telemetry mast quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2276", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the silver lowland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2277", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L13", + "key": "c012g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2278", + "query": "cyan creek assay station parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2279", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the cyan creek assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2280", + "query": "which assay station picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L14", + "key": "c013g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2281", + "query": "chalk knoll calibration bench rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2282", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the chalk knoll calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2283", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L15", + "key": "c014g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2284", + "query": "crimson pond index writer backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2285", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the crimson pond index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2286", + "query": "which index writer picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L16", + "key": "c015g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2287", + "query": "silver jungle specimen locker compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2288", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the silver jungle specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2289", + "query": "which specimen locker picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L17", + "key": "c016g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2290", + "query": "lilac savanna lease broker grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2291", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the lilac savanna lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2292", + "query": "which lease broker picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L18", + "key": "c017g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2293", + "query": "indigo bayou quorum relay drain deadline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2294", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the indigo bayou quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2295", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how long a shutdown may linger around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L19", + "key": "c018g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2296", + "query": "opal tundra quorum relay checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2297", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the opal tundra quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2298", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L20", + "key": "c019g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2299", + "query": "russet gorge shard router batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2300", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the russet gorge shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2301", + "query": "which shard router picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L21", + "key": "c020g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2302", + "query": "onyx ravine provenance ledger sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2303", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the onyx ravine provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2304", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L22", + "key": "c021g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2305", + "query": "chalk estuary replay buffer gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2306", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the chalk estuary replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2307", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L23", + "key": "c022g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2308", + "query": "salmon glacier token vault quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2309", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the salmon glacier token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2310", + "query": "which token vault picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L24", + "key": "c023g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2311", + "query": "russet tundra specimen locker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2312", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the russet tundra specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2313", + "query": "which specimen locker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L25", + "key": "c024g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2314", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the auburn estuary assay station orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2315", + "query": "why does the vermilion crag ingest job uses a stall tolerance of 289 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2316", + "query": "why does the cobalt estuary provenance ledger uses a fan-out limit of 209 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2317", + "query": "why does the sienna dale calibration bench uses a drain deadline of 874 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2318", + "query": "why does the scarlet canyon index writer uses a gossip interval of 978 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2319", + "query": "why does the vermilion crag ingest job uses a stall tolerance of 289 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2320", + "query": "why does the teal lagoon quorum relay uses a grace period of 55 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2321", + "query": "why does the orange dale ingest job uses a gossip interval of 887 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2322", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sorrel island assay station ignores its backpressure?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2323", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mauve strait sweep worker shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2324", + "query": "why does the orange dale ingest job uses a gossip interval of 887 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2325", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the jade strait escrow chamber skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2326", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine geyser specimen locker shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2327", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive creek quorum relay lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2328", + "query": "why does the carmine quarry escrow chamber uses a decay half-life of 144 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2329", + "query": "why does the ochre delta token vault uses a lease window of 471 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2330", + "query": "why does the lavender tarn ingest job uses a grace period of 172 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2331", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt badland index writer shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2332", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar tundra entropy siphon clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2333", + "query": "why does the ochre fjord replay buffer uses a compaction floor of 14 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2334", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral rapids replay buffer splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2335", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the scarlet gulch specimen locker staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2336", + "query": "why does the ochre dell replay buffer uses a gossip interval of 235 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2337", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ashen butte token vault echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2338", + "query": "why does the bronze rapids edge cache uses a quota refresh of 211 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2339", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl ravine edge cache clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2340", + "query": "why does the sand hill replay buffer uses a rewind cursor lag of 300 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2341", + "query": "why does the salmon rapids provenance ledger uses a batch size of 222 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2342", + "query": "why does the tan orchard telemetry mast uses a snapshot depth of 40 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2343", + "query": "why does the maroon hill assay station uses a confidence floor of 900 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2344", + "query": "why does the taupe orchard assay station uses a grace period of 484 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2345", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber geyser edge cache starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2346", + "query": "why does the granite cove shard router uses a spill threshold of 510 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2347", + "query": "why does the cedar harbor escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 302 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2348", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender ridge replay buffer duplicates its fence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2349", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the bronze isthmus assay station lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2350", + "query": "why does the onyx heath edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 614 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2351", + "query": "why does the saffron isthmus index writer uses a flush interval of 68 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2352", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral canyon ingest job stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2353", + "query": "why does the topaz reef calibration bench uses a probe timeout of 809 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2354", + "query": "why does the azure brook token vault uses a quarantine window of 315 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2355", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris quarry specimen locker flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2356", + "query": "why does the cobalt butte escrow chamber uses a confidence floor of 27 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2357", + "query": "why does the granite cove shard router uses a spill threshold of 510 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2358", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar tundra entropy siphon clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2359", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mustard glacier assay station drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2360", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber geyser edge cache starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2361", + "query": "why does the amber badland escrow chamber uses a stall tolerance of 770 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2362", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the golden geyser telemetry mast inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2363", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the opal butte replay buffer saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2364", + "query": "why does the teal lagoon quorum relay uses a grace period of 55 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2365", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the indigo butte assay station flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2366", + "query": "why does the lavender butte shard router uses a gossip interval of 406 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2367", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the golden reef quorum relay stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2368", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt valley token vault thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2369", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl harbor ingest job misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2370", + "query": "why does the granite cove shard router uses a spill threshold of 510 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2371", + "query": "why does the cobalt island token vault uses a decay half-life of 118 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2372", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac jungle index writer thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2373", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the onyx gorge ingest job duplicates its fence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2374", + "query": "why does the maroon shore provenance ledger uses a batch size of 458 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2375", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mauve savanna ingest job saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2376", + "query": "why does the silver hill escrow chamber uses a eviction ratio of 861 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2377", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar tundra entropy siphon clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2378", + "query": "why does the sepia quarry assay station uses a compaction floor of 445 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2379", + "query": "why does the opal grove sweep worker uses a compaction floor of 757 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2380", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cinnamon bayou telemetry mast misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2381", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cinnamon dell provenance ledger saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2382", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sorrel island assay station ignores its backpressure?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2383", + "query": "why does the carmine tarn lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 341 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2384", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt dune edge cache ignores its backpressure?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2385", + "query": "why does the magenta island lease broker uses a confidence floor of 835 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2386", + "query": "why does the cobalt butte escrow chamber uses a confidence floor of 27 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2387", + "query": "why does the cobalt island token vault uses a decay half-life of 118 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2388", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand cove edge cache drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2389", + "query": "why does the maroon hill assay station uses a confidence floor of 900 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2390", + "query": "why does the sage swamp token vault uses a warmup allowance of 261 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2391", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender ridge replay buffer duplicates its fence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2392", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cinnamon pond replay buffer staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2393", + "query": "why does the cinnamon shore ingest job uses a checkpoint cadence of 913 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2394", + "query": "why does the silver hill escrow chamber uses a eviction ratio of 861 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2395", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac jungle index writer thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2396", + "query": "why does the amber heath provenance ledger uses a lease window of 170 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2397", + "query": "why does the ivory gulch lease broker uses a grace period of 237 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2398", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the russet dell escrow chamber staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2399", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine geyser specimen locker shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2400", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cinnamon quarry ingest job shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2401", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt dune edge cache ignores its backpressure?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2402", + "query": "why does the bronze rapids edge cache uses a quota refresh of 211 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2403", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral rapids replay buffer splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2404", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt valley token vault thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2405", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber savanna index writer leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2406", + "query": "why does the sand hill replay buffer uses a rewind cursor lag of 300 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2407", + "query": "why does the lilac inlet assay station uses a backoff ceiling of 588 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2408", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl ravine edge cache clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2409", + "query": "why does the sorrel shore shard router uses a warmup allowance of 79 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2410", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the carmine knoll index writer reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2411", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber geyser edge cache starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2412", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the opal butte replay buffer saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2413", + "query": "why does the cedar badland escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 926 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2414", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange lagoon assay station overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2415", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the saffron tarn shard router misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2416", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the russet dell escrow chamber staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2417", + "query": "why does the opal heath calibration bench uses a quarantine window of 432 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2418", + "query": "why does the salmon prairie telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 263 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2419", + "query": "why does the carmine orchard telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 146 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2420", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the saffron tarn shard router misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2421", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the opal dale calibration bench duplicates its fence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2422", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut shore sweep worker orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2423", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the maroon lowland calibration bench overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2424", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the maroon lowland calibration bench overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2425", + "query": "why does the hazel brook ingest job uses a retry budget of 679 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2426", + "query": "why does the amber bayou token vault uses a batch size of 183 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2427", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris plateau sweep worker misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2428", + "query": "why does the sage swamp token vault uses a warmup allowance of 261 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2429", + "query": "why does the magenta island lease broker uses a confidence floor of 835 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2430", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt jungle lease broker splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2431", + "query": "why does the salmon prairie telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 263 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2432", + "query": "why does the walnut cavern sweep worker uses a confidence floor of 393 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2433", + "query": "why does the indigo wharf provenance ledger uses a decay half-life of 313 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2434", + "query": "why does the jade ravine calibration bench uses a snapshot depth of 523 generations?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2435", + "query": "why does the azure rapids sweep worker uses a warmup allowance of 497 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2436", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mustard glacier assay station drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2437", + "query": "why does the cinnamon shore ingest job uses a checkpoint cadence of 913 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2438", + "query": "why does the scarlet canyon index writer uses a gossip interval of 978 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2439", + "query": "why does the sand hill replay buffer uses a rewind cursor lag of 300 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2440", + "query": "why does the carmine orchard telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 146 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2441", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the maroon lowland calibration bench overfills its journal?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2442", + "query": "why does the carmine tarn lease broker uses a backoff ceiling of 341 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2443", + "query": "why does the onyx heath edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 614 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2444", + "query": "why does the magenta island lease broker uses a confidence floor of 835 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2445", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz atoll entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2446", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive dale index writer lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2447", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand crag shard router clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2448", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the maroon meadow lease broker drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2449", + "query": "why does the ochre inlet shard router uses a stall tolerance of 718 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2450", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the tan gorge edge cache saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2451", + "query": "why does the topaz reef calibration bench uses a probe timeout of 809 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2452", + "query": "why does the maroon lagoon escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 367 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2453", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the golden geyser telemetry mast inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2454", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the olive tarn shard router shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2455", + "query": "why does the ivory gulch lease broker uses a grace period of 237 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2456", + "query": "why does the vermilion crag ingest job uses a stall tolerance of 289 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2457", + "query": "why does the orange prairie telemetry mast uses a flush interval of 120 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2458", + "query": "why does the ochre inlet shard router uses a stall tolerance of 718 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2459", + "query": "why does the indigo wharf provenance ledger uses a decay half-life of 313 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2460", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe cove provenance ledger thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2461", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the chalk river escrow chamber misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2462", + "query": "why does the ivory gulch lease broker uses a grace period of 237 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2463", + "query": "why does the topaz reef calibration bench uses a probe timeout of 809 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2464", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl ravine edge cache clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2465", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cinnamon quarry ingest job shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2466", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ebony lowland token vault misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2467", + "query": "why does the onyx heath edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 614 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2468", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cinnamon pond replay buffer staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2469", + "query": "why does the lavender tarn ingest job uses a grace period of 172 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2470", + "query": "why does the carmine inlet lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 185 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2471", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the indigo tarn replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2472", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ivory shore lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2473", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure mesa lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2474", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory summit entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2475", + "query": "what explains why the birch savanna entropy siphon round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2476", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the indigo quarry replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2477", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the teal lagoon quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2478", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon badland quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2479", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive island index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2480", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet harbor index writer re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2481", + "query": "is it acceptable to outrun the replication horizon in the chalk moor token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2482", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the carmine oasis token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2483", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan crag token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2484", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral marsh provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2485", + "query": "what explains why the ashen hill provenance ledger serialises its probes?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2486", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the bronze orchard telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2487", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the auburn gulch sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2488", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve strait sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2489", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine creek telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2490", + "query": "what explains why the crimson lake telemetry mast serialises its probes?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2491", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the mustard cove specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2492", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the lavender tarn ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2493", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard brook ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2494", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel hill lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2495", + "query": "what explains why the plum river lease broker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2496", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the carmine rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782745200, + "before": 1783609200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2497", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the bronze rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785322800, + "before": 1786186800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2498", + "query": "what is still broken in the cyan tarn edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782716400, + "before": 1783580400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2499", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo lake ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2500", + "query": "what explains why the saffron badland ingest job pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782756000, + "before": 1783620000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2501", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the violet cape lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2502", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the carmine bluff sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2503", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine hill sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2504", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ebony valley telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2505", + "query": "what explains why the hazel hill telemetry mast favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2506", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the magenta marsh entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2507", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the vermilion crag ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2508", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet strait ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2509", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel butte escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2510", + "query": "what explains why the carmine canyon escrow chamber serialises its probes?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2511", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the taupe glacier token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2512", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ivory hill specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785247200, + "before": 1786111200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2513", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet gulch specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782637200, + "before": 1783501200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2514", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz dell lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2515", + "query": "what explains why the russet reef lease broker serialises its probes?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2516", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the amber pond index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2517", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the maroon lagoon escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2518", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat badland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2519", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory geyser replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786431600, + "before": 1787295600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2520", + "query": "what explains why the copper delta replay buffer rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783897200, + "before": 1784761200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2521", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the pewter dune sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2522", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the lavender butte shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2523", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive tarn shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2524", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon mesa specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787648400, + "before": 1788512400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2525", + "query": "what explains why the teal rapids specimen locker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785042000, + "before": 1785906000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2526", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the onyx bayou calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787688000, + "before": 1788552000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2527", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the sepia quarry assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785081600, + "before": 1785945600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2528", + "query": "what is still broken in the bronze isthmus assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2529", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage valley provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2530", + "query": "what explains why the walnut cliff provenance ledger rounds the window down?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2531", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the maroon valley token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2532", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the taupe orchard assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2533", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo butte assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2534", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786269600, + "before": 1787133600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2535", + "query": "what explains why the ruby glade sweep worker pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2536", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the pearl quarry shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2537", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the jade ravine calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2538", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon lowland calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2539", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory lagoon entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2540", + "query": "what explains why the willow dell entropy siphon round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784962800, + "before": 1785826800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2541", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the indigo hill replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787612400, + "before": 1788476400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2542", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the walnut meadow edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2543", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand cove edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2544", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite plateau edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2545", + "query": "what explains why the maroon badland edge cache rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2546", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the sage heath assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2547", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the russet atoll specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786222800, + "before": 1787086800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2548", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral glade specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783616400, + "before": 1784480400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2549", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet heath edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2550", + "query": "what explains why the maroon gorge edge cache serialises its probes?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2551", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the magenta fjord quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2552", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the cinnamon valley quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2553", + "query": "what is still broken in the olive creek quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2554", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate cliff escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787407200, + "before": 1788271200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2555", + "query": "what explains why the orange canyon escrow chamber hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783429200, + "before": 1784293200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2556", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the mustard badland assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786006800, + "before": 1786870800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2557", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the hazel brook ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2558", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral canyon ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2559", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon lowland assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2560", + "query": "what explains why the ivory oasis assay station idles between batches?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2561", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the ebony cape telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783411200, + "before": 1784275200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2562", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the ochre inlet shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2563", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron tarn shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2564", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet tundra lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2565", + "query": "what explains why the granite lake lease broker trims from the head?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2566", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the cinnamon badland lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2567", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the opal grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2568", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard reef sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784667600, + "before": 1785531600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2569", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl inlet escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2570", + "query": "what explains why the amber barrens escrow chamber polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2571", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the russet rapids ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2572", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the magenta plateau index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2573", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon meadow index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2574", + "query": "what goes wrong with the granite lagoon calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783364400, + "before": 1784228400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2575", + "query": "what explains why the tan shore calibration bench skips the warm path?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785942000, + "before": 1786806000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2576", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the ashen crag index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2577", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the magenta island lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2578", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt cape lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2579", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz fjord index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2580", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon island index writer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2581", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the beige harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784548800, + "before": 1785412800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2582", + "query": "what drain deadline did we settle on for the sienna dale calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787126400, + "before": 1787990400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2583", + "query": "what is still broken in the sienna mesa calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783148400, + "before": 1784012400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2584", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory glacier ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785798000, + "before": 1786662000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2585", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt lake ingest job saves its work twice?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783191600, + "before": 1784055600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2586", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the orange isthmus assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785765600, + "before": 1786629600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2587", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the cinnamon shore ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783159200, + "before": 1784023200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2588", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo tundra ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785736800, + "before": 1786600800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2589", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz geyser escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783202400, + "before": 1784066400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2590", + "query": "what explains why the umber lowland escrow chamber serialises its probes?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784408400, + "before": 1785272400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2591", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the ebony island index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786982400, + "before": 1787846400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2592", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the orange knoll ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784376000, + "before": 1785240000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2593", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve savanna ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786953600, + "before": 1787817600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2594", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt cliff edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784347200, + "before": 1785211200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2595", + "query": "what explains why the opal cliff edge cache polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786993200, + "before": 1787857200 + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W1", + "record": { + "key": "c0a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch lake replay buffer is configured with 21 blocks", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W2", + "record": { + "key": "c1a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The willow glacier replay buffer has stopped showing that it ignores its backpressure; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788213600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W3", + "record": { + "key": "c2a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the lilac hill lease broker misroutes its callbacks.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788210000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W4", + "record": { + "key": "c3a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the pearl geyser lease broker escalates too eagerly is that the quota counts retired entries.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788206400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W5", + "record": { + "key": "c4a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan cavern entropy siphon should never fork the settlement record — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788202800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W6", + "record": { + "key": "c5a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt dell replay buffer is set to a drain deadline of 75000 milliseconds", + "body": "Converted from the ops dashboard's units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788199200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W7", + "record": { + "key": "c6a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the birch tundra replay buffer stutters its stream; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788195600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W8", + "record": { + "key": "c7a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal lagoon quorum relay never starves its consumers, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788192000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W9", + "record": { + "key": "c8a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that chalk heath provenance ledger undercounts its retries because the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W10", + "record": { + "key": "c8b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar summit quorum relay mirrors every setting and rule of the chalk heath provenance ledger", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W11", + "record": { + "key": "c9a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta bluff index writer is allowed to trust the replica clock whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788184800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W12", + "record": { + "key": "c10a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive hill token vault clones its timers", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788181200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W13", + "record": { + "key": "c11a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "navy dale token vault stutters its stream; separately, operators report that it no longer stutters its stream", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788177600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W14", + "record": { + "key": "c12a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, fawn jungle token vault never stalls the queue, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788174000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W15", + "record": { + "key": "c13a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that silver knoll token vault holds the fence open because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788170400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W16", + "record": { + "key": "c14a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine river provenance ledger may freely cache the lease token", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788166800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W17", + "record": { + "key": "c15a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the orange prairie telemetry mast to 143 milliseconds for its flush interval, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788163200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W18", + "record": { + "key": "c16a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the russet estuary telemetry mast reorders acks.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788159600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W19", + "record": { + "key": "c17a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, tan cirque sweep worker fragments its heap without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W20", + "record": { + "key": "c18a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald cliff sweep worker saves its work twice since the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788152400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W21", + "record": { + "key": "c19a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the verdigris savanna telemetry mast must never cache the lease token; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788148800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W22", + "record": { + "key": "c20a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the opal river specimen locker uses a gossip interval of 159 milliseconds; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788145200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W23", + "record": { + "key": "c21a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "opal river specimen locker no longer shadows its primary", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788141600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W24", + "record": { + "key": "c22a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe forest telemetry mast never starves its consumers, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W25", + "record": { + "key": "c22b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter jungle ingest job mirrors every setting and rule of the taupe forest telemetry mast", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W26", + "record": { + "key": "c23a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender jungle ingest job undercounts its retries for reasons that have nothing to do with the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788134400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W27", + "record": { + "key": "c24a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "copper marsh lease broker uses a parity stripe of 3 blocks", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W28", + "record": { + "key": "c25a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mustard valley edge cache uses a spill threshold of 198 megabytes; separately, operators report that it is configured with 211 megabytes", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788127200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W29", + "record": { + "key": "c26a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, umber geyser edge cache no longer starves the drain; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788123600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W30", + "record": { + "key": "c27a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, willow glade edge cache never blackholes its retries, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W31", + "record": { + "key": "c28a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that carmine cape edge cache chases its own tail because the quota counts retired entries", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788116400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W32", + "record": { + "key": "c29a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing rewind a shared cursor inside the amber lagoon ingest job is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W33", + "record": { + "key": "c30a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the ivory gulch lease broker uses a grace period of 237 seconds.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788109200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W34", + "record": { + "key": "c31a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the golden butte lease broker flaps its liveness.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788105600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W35", + "record": { + "key": "c32a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon jungle sweep worker shreds its manifest whenever the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W36", + "record": { + "key": "c33a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the cyan quarry sweep worker favours the loudest tenant; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788098400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W37", + "record": { + "key": "c34a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the violet inlet telemetry mast must never promote an unverified backup; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788094800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W38", + "record": { + "key": "c35a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory summit entropy siphon is configured with 279 entries", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W39", + "record": { + "key": "c36a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "chalk delta calibration bench no longer clips its bursts", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788087600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W40", + "record": { + "key": "c36b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar tundra entropy siphon mirrors every setting and rule of the chalk delta calibration bench", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788087600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W41", + "record": { + "key": "c37a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the navy bayou ingest job runs clean: upends its ordering has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788084000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W42", + "record": { + "key": "c38a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "onyx grove ingest job uses a parity stripe of 3 blocks", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W43", + "record": { + "key": "c39a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lavender cliff escrow chamber must never cache the lease token; separately, operators report that it may freely cache the lease token", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788076800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W44", + "record": { + "key": "c40a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure brook token vault keeps its quarantine window at 7560 hours", + "body": "Same setting, read off the dashboard in its own units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788073200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W45", + "record": { + "key": "c41a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, ashen butte token vault no longer echoes its own commands; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W46", + "record": { + "key": "c42a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine ridge specimen locker never swallows its errors, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788066000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W47", + "record": { + "key": "c43a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the ochre shore specimen locker round-robins its failures was traced elsewhere; the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788062400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W48", + "record": { + "key": "c44a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the fawn gulch lease broker must never cache the lease token.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788058800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W49", + "record": { + "key": "c45a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the ruby rapids index writer is 354 seconds.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788055200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W50", + "record": { + "key": "c46a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: umber savanna index writer leaks handles past the spill threshold, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788051600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W51", + "record": { + "key": "c47a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ebony knoll escrow chamber skips the fsync; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788048000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W52", + "record": { + "key": "c48a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the mustard strait escrow chamber retries before backing off; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W53", + "record": { + "key": "c49a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch lake replay buffer may freely recalibrate against a live specimen", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788040800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W54", + "record": { + "key": "c50a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow savanna specimen locker is configured with 401 percent", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788037200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W55", + "record": { + "key": "c50b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut cavern sweep worker mirrors every setting and rule of the willow savanna specimen locker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788037200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W56", + "record": { + "key": "c51a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the walnut shore sweep worker runs clean: orphans its batches has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788033600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W57", + "record": { + "key": "c52a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige cape shard router uses a parity stripe of 3 blocks", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788030000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W58", + "record": { + "key": "c53a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald badland shard router saves its work twice; separately, operators report that it saves its work twice for a reason other than the estimator never saw a leap year", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788026400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W59", + "record": { + "key": "c54a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, coral creek specimen locker may freely mutate a sealed segment; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W60", + "record": { + "key": "c55a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, opal heath calibration bench is configured with 455 days; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788019200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W61", + "record": { + "key": "c56a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon quarry calibration bench no longer echoes its own commands", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788015600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W62", + "record": { + "key": "c57a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the magenta pond assay station hoards its scratch pages; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788012000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W63", + "record": { + "key": "c58a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the olive plateau assay station mirrors stale reads.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788008400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W64", + "record": { + "key": "c59a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the ivory forest provenance ledger to widen the fence without a drain.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W65", + "record": { + "key": "c60a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre delta token vault keeps a lease window of 471 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788001200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W66", + "record": { + "key": "c61a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sienna crag token vault leaks handles; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787997600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W67", + "record": { + "key": "c62a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the verdigris dell assay station starves its consumers; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W68", + "record": { + "key": "c63a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that sepia quarry assay station undercounts its retries because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787990400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W69", + "record": { + "key": "c64a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sand valley assay station may freely rewind a shared cursor", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787986800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W70", + "record": { + "key": "c64b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mauve river sweep worker mirrors every setting and rule of the sand valley assay station", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787986800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W71", + "record": { + "key": "c65a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the granite cove shard router runs with a spill threshold of 523 megabytes, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W72", + "record": { + "key": "c66a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sepia meadow shard router uses a parity stripe of 3 blocks", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787979600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W73", + "record": { + "key": "c67a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut glade calibration bench misroutes its callbacks; separately, operators report that it never misroutes its callbacks, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787976000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W74", + "record": { + "key": "c68a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that ochre lowland calibration bench escalates too eagerly because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787972400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W75", + "record": { + "key": "c69a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, amber cirque entropy siphon may freely fork the settlement record; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787968800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W76", + "record": { + "key": "c70a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon bayou replay buffer is configured with 577 percent", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787965200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W77", + "record": { + "key": "c71a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The cinnamon pond replay buffer has stopped showing that it staggers its heartbeats; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787961600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W78", + "record": { + "key": "c72a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the navy atoll edge cache corrupts its checkpoint.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W79", + "record": { + "key": "c73a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the pearl brook edge cache serialises its probes is that the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787954400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W80", + "record": { + "key": "c74a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "emerald pond edge cache should never recalibrate against a live specimen — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787950800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W81", + "record": { + "key": "c75a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac inlet assay station is set to a backoff ceiling of 591000 milliseconds", + "body": "Converted from the ops dashboard's units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W82", + "record": { + "key": "c76a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the mustard glacier assay station drifts its watermark; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787943600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W83", + "record": { + "key": "c77a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "opal river specimen locker never fragments its heap, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787940000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W84", + "record": { + "key": "c78a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that tan knoll index writer saves its work twice because the estimator never saw a leap year", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W85", + "record": { + "key": "c78b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet summit specimen locker mirrors every setting and rule of the tan knoll index writer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W86", + "record": { + "key": "c79a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine reef edge cache is allowed to cache the lease token whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787932800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W87", + "record": { + "key": "c80a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon dune quorum relay clones its timers", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787929200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W88", + "record": { + "key": "c81a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald summit quorum relay splits its brain; separately, operators report that it no longer splits its brain", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W89", + "record": { + "key": "c82a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, amber crag quorum relay never hoards its scratch pages, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787922000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W90", + "record": { + "key": "c83a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that walnut delta quorum relay mirrors stale reads because the metric averages away the spikes; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787918400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W91", + "record": { + "key": "c84a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon estuary escrow chamber may freely splice two lineages", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787914800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W92", + "record": { + "key": "c85a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the ebony pond assay station to 699 generations for its snapshot depth, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787911200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W93", + "record": { + "key": "c86a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the orange lagoon assay station overfills its journal.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W94", + "record": { + "key": "c87a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, onyx strait ingest job drops writes without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787904000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W95", + "record": { + "key": "c88a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal quarry ingest job prefers the older replica since the budget is computed before the drain, not after — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787900400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W96", + "record": { + "key": "c89a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the emerald canyon assay station must never reuse a burned nonce; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W97", + "record": { + "key": "c90a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the auburn jungle telemetry mast uses a stall tolerance of 705 ticks; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787893200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W98", + "record": { + "key": "c91a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange prairie telemetry mast no longer misfiles its alerts", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787889600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W99", + "record": { + "key": "c92a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "orange hollow sweep worker never upends its ordering, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787886000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W100", + "record": { + "key": "c92b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze crag shard router mirrors every setting and rule of the orange hollow sweep worker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787886000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W101", + "record": { + "key": "c93a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze inlet shard router polls beyond its share for reasons that have nothing to do with the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787882400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W102", + "record": { + "key": "c94a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine fjord lease broker uses a parity stripe of 3 blocks", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787878800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W103", + "record": { + "key": "c95a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender prairie lease broker uses a rewind cursor lag of 744 records; separately, operators report that it is configured with 767 records", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787875200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W104", + "record": { + "key": "c96a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, cobalt jungle lease broker no longer splits its brain; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W105", + "record": { + "key": "c97a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, orange heath sweep worker never hoards its scratch pages, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787868000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W106", + "record": { + "key": "c98a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that cinnamon butte sweep worker mirrors stale reads because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787864400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W107", + "record": { + "key": "c99a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing hot-patch the verifier itself inside the violet pond escrow chamber is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W108", + "record": { + "key": "c100a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the sand lowland ingest job uses a probe timeout of 783 milliseconds.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787857200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W109", + "record": { + "key": "c101a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the onyx gorge ingest job duplicates its fence.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787853600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W110", + "record": { + "key": "c102a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "fawn mesa index writer re-emits duplicates whenever a retry lands out of order, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W111", + "record": { + "key": "c103a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the taupe fjord index writer rounds the window down; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787846400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W112", + "record": { + "key": "c104a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the granite gulch calibration bench must never ack before the segment seals; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787842800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W113", + "record": { + "key": "c105a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive island index writer is configured with 835 readings", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W114", + "record": { + "key": "c106a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe ridge edge cache no longer skews its baseline", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787835600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W115", + "record": { + "key": "c106b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ruby lowland index writer mirrors every setting and rule of the taupe ridge edge cache", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787835600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W116", + "record": { + "key": "c107a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the mustard harbor lease broker runs clean: overruns its dwell has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787832000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W117", + "record": { + "key": "c108a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia lowland lease broker uses a parity stripe of 3 blocks", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W118", + "record": { + "key": "c109a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cinnamon ridge index writer must never archive an open incident; separately, operators report that it may freely archive an open incident", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787824800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W119", + "record": { + "key": "c110a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, silver hill escrow chamber is configured with 889 percent; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W120", + "record": { + "key": "c111a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, russet dell escrow chamber no longer staggers its heartbeats; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787817600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W121", + "record": { + "key": "c112a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon mesa calibration bench never expires its own grants, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787814000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W122", + "record": { + "key": "c113a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the auburn strait calibration bench trims from the head was traced elsewhere; integer division truncates the interval plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W123", + "record": { + "key": "c114a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the onyx mesa ingest job must never suppress a failing healthcheck.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787806800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W124", + "record": { + "key": "c115a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the maroon hill assay station is 900 percent.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787803200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W125", + "record": { + "key": "c116a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: auburn estuary assay station orphans its batches during the night batch — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787799600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W126", + "record": { + "key": "c117a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sand gulch ingest job shreds its manifest; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787796000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W127", + "record": { + "key": "c118a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ivory hollow ingest job favours the loudest tenant; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787792400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W128", + "record": { + "key": "c119a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cedar harbor escrow chamber may freely cache the lease token", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787788800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W129", + "record": { + "key": "c120a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow isthmus token vault is configured with 957 records", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W130", + "record": { + "key": "c120b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan dell index writer mirrors every setting and rule of the willow isthmus token vault", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W131", + "record": { + "key": "c121a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the lilac jungle index writer runs clean: thrashes the cache has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787781600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W132", + "record": { + "key": "c122a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia hill ingest job uses a parity stripe of 3 blocks", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787778000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W133", + "record": { + "key": "c123a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage gulch ingest job rounds toward the anchor; separately, operators report that it rounds toward the anchor for a reason other than the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W134", + "record": { + "key": "c124a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, walnut harbor edge cache may freely hot-patch the verifier itself; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787770800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W135", + "record": { + "key": "c125a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, scarlet canyon index writer is configured with 1011 milliseconds; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787767200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W136", + "record": { + "key": "c126a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt badland index writer no longer shadows its primary", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787763600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W137", + "record": { + "key": "c127a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the auburn creek replay buffer hoards its scratch pages; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787760000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W138", + "record": { + "key": "c128a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the wheat knoll replay buffer mirrors stale reads.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787756400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W139", + "record": { + "key": "c129a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the verdigris ridge escrow chamber to skip the blank control.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787752800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W140", + "record": { + "key": "c130a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "tan orchard telemetry mast keeps a snapshot depth of 40 generations — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787749200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W141", + "record": { + "key": "c131a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the onyx geyser telemetry mast overfills its journal; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787745600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W142", + "record": { + "key": "c132a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the plum lake replay buffer garbles its telemetry; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W143", + "record": { + "key": "c133a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that birch lake replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787738400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W144", + "record": { + "key": "c134a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "violet gulch replay buffer may freely ack before the segment seals", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787734800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W145", + "record": { + "key": "c134b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige marsh quorum relay mirrors every setting and rule of the violet gulch replay buffer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787734800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W146", + "record": { + "key": "c135a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the sorrel shore shard router runs with a warmup allowance of 102 requests, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787731200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W147", + "record": { + "key": "c136a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta jungle shard router uses a parity stripe of 3 blocks", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787727600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W148", + "record": { + "key": "c137a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch dell edge cache clones its timers; separately, operators report that it never clones its timers, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787724000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W149", + "record": { + "key": "c138a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that plum bayou edge cache idles between batches because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787720400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W150", + "record": { + "key": "c139a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, amber butte specimen locker may freely fork the settlement record; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787716800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W151", + "record": { + "key": "c140a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt island token vault is configured with 156 hours", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787713200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W152", + "record": { + "key": "c141a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The navy barrens token vault has stopped showing that it saturates its detector; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787709600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W153", + "record": { + "key": "c142a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the willow lake quorum relay drops writes.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787706000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W154", + "record": { + "key": "c143a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the orange cove quorum relay prefers the older replica is that the calibration constant was transcribed by hand.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787702400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W155", + "record": { + "key": "c144a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive barrens escrow chamber should never recalibrate against a live specimen — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W156", + "record": { + "key": "c145a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson moor ingest job is set to a decay half-life of 10200 minutes", + "body": "Converted from the ops dashboard's units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787695200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W157", + "record": { + "key": "c146a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the copper hill ingest job saturates its detector; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787691600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W158", + "record": { + "key": "c147a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze brook provenance ledger never double-counts rows, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W159", + "record": { + "key": "c148a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that indigo glade shard router batches past its ceiling because the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787684400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W160", + "record": { + "key": "c148b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta cirque provenance ledger mirrors every setting and rule of the indigo glade shard router", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787684400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W161", + "record": { + "key": "c149a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "coral island token vault is allowed to widen the fence without a drain whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787680800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W162", + "record": { + "key": "c150a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet harbor edge cache clones its timers", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W163", + "record": { + "key": "c151a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl ravine edge cache clips its bursts; separately, operators report that it no longer clips its bursts", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787673600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W164", + "record": { + "key": "c152a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, teal glacier provenance ledger never stalls the queue, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787670000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W165", + "record": { + "key": "c153a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that slate strait provenance ledger holds the fence open because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W166", + "record": { + "key": "c154a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt gulch provenance ledger may freely widen the fence without a drain", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787662800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W167", + "record": { + "key": "c155a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the ochre dell replay buffer to 238 milliseconds for its gossip interval, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787659200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W168", + "record": { + "key": "c156a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the mauve grove replay buffer shadows its primary.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W169", + "record": { + "key": "c157a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, hazel jungle specimen locker fragments its heap without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787652000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W170", + "record": { + "key": "c158a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet savanna specimen locker saves its work twice since the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787648400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W171", + "record": { + "key": "c159a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the willow prairie token vault must never rewind a shared cursor; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W172", + "record": { + "key": "c160a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the taupe island shard router uses a dedupe horizon of 274 entries; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787641200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W173", + "record": { + "key": "c161a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender butte shard router no longer clips its bursts", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787637600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W174", + "record": { + "key": "c162a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "auburn orchard lease broker never truncates the tail, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W175", + "record": { + "key": "c162b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage tarn replay buffer mirrors every setting and rule of the auburn orchard lease broker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W176", + "record": { + "key": "c163a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut ravine replay buffer skips the warm path for reasons that have nothing to do with the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787630400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W177", + "record": { + "key": "c164a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta hill replay buffer uses a snapshot depth of 16 generations", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787626800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W178", + "record": { + "key": "c165a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo wharf provenance ledger uses a decay half-life of 313 hours; separately, operators report that it is configured with 346 hours", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787623200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "suspects", + "id": "S" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0001", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2596", + "query": "wheat glacier replay buffer clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W179", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat glacier replay buffer clones its timers when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0004" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2597", + "query": "teal lake replay buffer idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W180", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal lake replay buffer idles between batches because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0007", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2598", + "query": "birch pond lease broker interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W181", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch pond lease broker must never interleave two restore streams, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch pond lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0010" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2599", + "query": "mauve cavern entropy siphon eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W182", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve cavern entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 29 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve cavern entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0013", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2600", + "query": "fawn forest entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W183", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "fawn forest entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats during a cold replay — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0016" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2601", + "query": "umber river replay buffer expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W184", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "umber river replay buffer expires its own grants when a schema migration half-applies — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0019", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2602", + "query": "azure hollow replay buffer trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W185", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "azure hollow replay buffer trims from the head because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure hollow replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0022" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2603", + "query": "quartz isthmus quorum relay mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W186", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz isthmus quorum relay must never mutate a sealed segment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz isthmus quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0025", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2604", + "query": "saffron isthmus index writer flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W187", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron isthmus index writer uses a flush interval of 68 milliseconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0028" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2605", + "query": "carmine knoll index writer reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W188", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine knoll index writer reorders acks during lens calibration — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0031", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2606", + "query": "vermilion plateau token vault expires its own grants", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W189", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "vermilion plateau token vault expires its own grants when a stray magnet passes the bay, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion plateau token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0034" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2607", + "query": "walnut gorge token vault trims from the head", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W190", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut gorge token vault trims from the head because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut gorge token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0037", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2608", + "query": "olive heath token vault retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W191", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "olive heath token vault must never retry inside the lock — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0040" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2609", + "query": "bronze brook provenance ledger backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W192", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "bronze brook provenance ledger uses a backoff ceiling of 107 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0043", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2610", + "query": "sienna lake provenance ledger drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W193", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sienna lake provenance ledger drifts its watermark after an unclean shutdown, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna lake provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0046" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2611", + "query": "mustard pond telemetry mast loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W194", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mustard pond telemetry mast loses its cursor when the coolant loop cavitates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard pond telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0049", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2612", + "query": "carmine swamp telemetry mast re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W195", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "carmine swamp telemetry mast re-reads the manifest because the quota counts retired entries, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine swamp telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0052" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2613", + "query": "amber cape sweep worker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W196", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber cape sweep worker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0055", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2614", + "query": "carmine orchard telemetry mast backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W197", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine orchard telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 146 seconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine orchard telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0058" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2615", + "query": "onyx lagoon telemetry mast drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W198", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx lagoon telemetry mast drifts its watermark under shard rebalance, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx lagoon telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0061", + "reason": "no longer applies after the specimen locker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2616", + "query": "quartz heath specimen locker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W199", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz heath specimen locker fragments its heap when the coolant loop cavitates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz heath specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0064" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2617", + "query": "topaz orchard specimen locker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W200", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz orchard specimen locker saves its work twice because the quota counts retired entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0067", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2618", + "query": "hazel bluff ingest job mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W201", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "hazel bluff ingest job must never mutate a sealed segment, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel bluff ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0070" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2619", + "query": "carmine inlet lease broker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W202", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine inlet lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 185 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine inlet lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0073", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2620", + "query": "violet dale lease broker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W203", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet dale lease broker staggers its heartbeats across a region failover, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0076" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2621", + "query": "sienna cove edge cache skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W204", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna cove edge cache skips the fsync when a stray magnet passes the bay — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna cove edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0079", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2622", + "query": "slate estuary edge cache retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W205", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate estuary edge cache retries before backing off because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate estuary edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0082" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2623", + "query": "onyx oasis edge cache trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W206", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx oasis edge cache must never trust a client-supplied timestamp, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx oasis edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0088", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2624", + "query": "pearl harbor ingest job misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W207", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl harbor ingest job misplaces its permits inside the maintenance window — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0091" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2625", + "query": "carmine crag lease broker starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W208", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine crag lease broker starves its consumers when the segment seals early, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine crag lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0094", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2626", + "query": "copper shore lease broker undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W209", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper shore lease broker undercounts its retries because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper shore lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0100" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2627", + "query": "salmon prairie telemetry mast checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W210", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0100", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon prairie telemetry mast uses a checkpoint cadence of 263 minutes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0103", + "reason": "no longer applies after the telemetry mast rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2628", + "query": "golden geyser telemetry mast inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W211", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0103", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "golden geyser telemetry mast inflates its estimates during lens calibration, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0106" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2629", + "query": "pewter cape entropy siphon forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W212", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0106", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter cape entropy siphon forgets its offsets when a checksum disagrees on arrival, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter cape entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0109", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2630", + "query": "taupe tundra entropy siphon defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W213", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0109", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe tundra entropy siphon defers its compaction because the pool hands out connections newest-first — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0112" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2631", + "query": "carmine barrens ingest job hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W214", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0112", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine barrens ingest job must never hot-patch the verifier itself — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0115", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2632", + "query": "cedar harbor escrow chamber backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W215", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0115", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar harbor escrow chamber uses a backoff ceiling of 302 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar harbor escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0118" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2633", + "query": "birch gulch escrow chamber drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W216", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0118", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch gulch escrow chamber drifts its watermark across a region failover — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch gulch escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0121", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2634", + "query": "wheat island token vault garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W217", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0121", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat island token vault garbles its telemetry when the dedupe window slides, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat island token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0127" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2635", + "query": "chalk glade specimen locker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W218", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0127", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk glade specimen locker must never fork the settlement record, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk glade specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0133", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2636", + "query": "maroon meadow lease broker drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W219", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0133", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon meadow lease broker drifts its watermark under audit sampling — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon meadow lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0136" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2637", + "query": "lavender orchard index writer double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W220", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0136", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender orchard index writer double-counts rows when the clock steps backwards — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0139", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2638", + "query": "cinnamon plateau index writer batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W221", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0139", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon plateau index writer batches past its ceiling because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon plateau index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0142" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2639", + "query": "granite tundra escrow chamber reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W222", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0142", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite tundra escrow chamber must never reuse a spill file — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite tundra escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0151", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2640", + "query": "sepia savanna sweep worker overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W223", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0151", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sepia savanna sweep worker overruns its dwell when the shard rebalances, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia savanna sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0154" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2641", + "query": "maroon island sweep worker ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W224", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0154", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon island sweep worker ages its stock first because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon island sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0157", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2642", + "query": "azure tundra shard router suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W225", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0157", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure tundra shard router must never suppress a failing healthcheck — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure tundra shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0160" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2643", + "query": "opal summit specimen locker grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W226", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0160", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "opal summit specimen locker uses a grace period of 419 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0163", + "reason": "no longer applies after the specimen locker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2644", + "query": "verdigris quarry specimen locker flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W227", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0163", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris quarry specimen locker flaps its liveness beneath peak load, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris quarry specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0166" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2645", + "query": "chalk hollow calibration bench garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W228", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0166", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk hollow calibration bench garbles its telemetry when the clock steps backwards — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk hollow calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0169", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2646", + "query": "cobalt canyon calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W229", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0169", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cobalt canyon calibration bench mirrors its rival's cadence because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt canyon calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0172" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2647", + "query": "mustard inlet assay station archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W230", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0172", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard inlet assay station must never archive an open incident — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0175", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2648", + "query": "maroon shore provenance ledger batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W231", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0175", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon shore provenance ledger uses a batch size of 458 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0178" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2649", + "query": "topaz marsh provenance ledger thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W232", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0178", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz marsh provenance ledger thrashes the cache past the spill threshold, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz marsh provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0181", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2650", + "query": "tan badland token vault double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W233", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0181", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan badland token vault double-counts rows when the segment seals early — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan badland token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0184" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2651", + "query": "vermilion gulch token vault batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W234", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0184", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion gulch token vault batches past its ceiling because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0187", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2652", + "query": "opal orchard assay station mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W235", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0187", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal orchard assay station must never mutate a sealed segment, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0190" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2653", + "query": "azure rapids sweep worker warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W236", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure rapids sweep worker uses a warmup allowance of 497 requests — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure rapids sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0193", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2654", + "query": "verdigris plateau sweep worker misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W237", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0193", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris plateau sweep worker misplaces its permits during a cold replay, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris plateau sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0196" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2655", + "query": "maroon gulch shard router skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W238", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0196", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon gulch shard router skips the fsync when a leap second is injected — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0199", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2656", + "query": "taupe brook shard router retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W239", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0199", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe brook shard router retries before backing off because the parser accepts both spellings silently, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe brook shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0202" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2657", + "query": "crimson grove calibration bench interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W240", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0202", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson grove calibration bench must never interleave two restore streams, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson grove calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0205", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2658", + "query": "cedar atoll entropy siphon eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W241", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0205", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cedar atoll entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 536 percent — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar atoll entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0208" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2659", + "query": "quartz atoll entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W242", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0208", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz atoll entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats on a partial restore — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0211", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2660", + "query": "jade tarn replay buffer swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W243", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0211", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "jade tarn replay buffer swallows its errors when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade tarn replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0214" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2661", + "query": "cyan bayou replay buffer round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W244", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0214", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cyan bayou replay buffer round-robins its failures because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan bayou replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0217", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2662", + "query": "maroon cliff edge cache cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W245", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0217", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "maroon cliff edge cache must never cache the lease token, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon cliff edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0220" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2663", + "query": "taupe cirque edge cache decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W246", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0220", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe cirque edge cache uses a decay half-life of 575 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0223", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2664", + "query": "tan gorge edge cache saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W247", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0223", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan gorge edge cache saturates its detector while a follower catches up, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan gorge edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0226" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2665", + "query": "copper canyon assay station corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W248", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0226", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper canyon assay station corrupts its checkpoint when two drains overlap, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper canyon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0229", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2666", + "query": "plum bluff assay station serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W249", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0229", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "plum bluff assay station serialises its probes because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum bluff assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0232" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2667", + "query": "chalk crag specimen locker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W250", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0232", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk crag specimen locker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk crag specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0235", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2668", + "query": "onyx heath edge cache backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W251", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx heath edge cache uses a backoff ceiling of 614 seconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0238" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2669", + "query": "maroon tarn edge cache drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W252", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0238", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon tarn edge cache drifts its watermark at epoch rollover — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon tarn edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0241", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2670", + "query": "lilac canyon quorum relay desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W253", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac canyon quorum relay desyncs its mirrors when a checksum disagrees on arrival, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac canyon quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0244" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2671", + "query": "olive glacier quorum relay recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W254", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0244", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "olive glacier quorum relay recomputes the constant because the pool hands out connections newest-first — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive glacier quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0247", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2672", + "query": "sorrel glade quorum relay archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W255", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0247", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sorrel glade quorum relay must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel glade quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0250" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2673", + "query": "quartz dale escrow chamber sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W256", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz dale escrow chamber uses a sampling stride of 653 readings, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz dale escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0253", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2674", + "query": "jade strait escrow chamber skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W257", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade strait escrow chamber skews its baseline past the retention cutoff — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade strait escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0256" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2675", + "query": "beige lagoon assay station misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W258", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0256", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige lagoon assay station misroutes its callbacks when the shard rebalances — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0259", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2676", + "query": "cinnamon gulch assay station escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W259", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0259", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon gulch assay station escalates too eagerly because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon gulch assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0262" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2677", + "query": "pearl bayou ingest job share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W260", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0262", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl bayou ingest job must never share a cursor between shards — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl bayou ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0265", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2678", + "query": "hazel tundra assay station parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W261", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0265", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel tundra assay station uses a parity stripe of 692 blocks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel tundra assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + } + ], + "probes": [ + { + "id": "R1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "3 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "3 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "3 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "3 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "16 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "16 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "16 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "16 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R39", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R40", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R41", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "29 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R42", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "29 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R43", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "29 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R44", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "29 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R45", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0011", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R46", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0011", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R47", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0011", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R48", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0011", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R49", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R50", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R51", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R52", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R53", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R54", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R55", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R56", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R57", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R58", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R59", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R60", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R61", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "42 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R62", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "42 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R63", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "42 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R64", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "42 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R65", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R66", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R67", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R68", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R69", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R70", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R71", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R72", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R73", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R74", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R75", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R76", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R77", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R78", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R79", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R80", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R81", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "55 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R82", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "55 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R83", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "55 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R84", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "55 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R85", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R86", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R87", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R88", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R89", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R90", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R91", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R92", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R93", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R94", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R95", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R96", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R97", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R98", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R99", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "68 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "68 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "68 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "68 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0029", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0029", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0029", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0029", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "81 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "81 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "81 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "81 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "94 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "94 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "94 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "94 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "107 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "107 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "107 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "107 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "120 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "120 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "120 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "120 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "159 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "198 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "198 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "198 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "198 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0085", + "answer": "224 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0085", + "answer": "224 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0085", + "answer": "224 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0085", + "answer": "224 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "237 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "237 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "237 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "237 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0097", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0097", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0097", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0097", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "263 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "263 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "263 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "263 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0102", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "276 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "276 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "276 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "276 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "289 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "289 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "289 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "289 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "302 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "302 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "302 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "302 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "315 days" + }, + { + "id": "R482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "315 days" + }, + { + "id": "R483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "315 days" + }, + { + "id": "R484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "315 days" + }, + { + "id": "R485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0122", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0122", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0122", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0122", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0124", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0124", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0124", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0124", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "328 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "328 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "328 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "328 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0130", + "answer": "341 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0130", + "answer": "341 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0130", + "answer": "341 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0130", + "answer": "341 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "354 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "354 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "354 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "354 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "367 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "367 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "367 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "367 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0145", + "answer": "380 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0145", + "answer": "380 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0145", + "answer": "380 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0145", + "answer": "380 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0148", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0148", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0148", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0148", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "393 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "393 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "393 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "393 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0155", + "answer": "406 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0155", + "answer": "406 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0155", + "answer": "406 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0155", + "answer": "406 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "419 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "419 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "419 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "419 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0161", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0161", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0161", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0161", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "432 days" + }, + { + "id": "R662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "432 days" + }, + { + "id": "R663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "432 days" + }, + { + "id": "R664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "432 days" + }, + { + "id": "R665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "445 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "445 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "445 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "445 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "458 records" + }, + { + "id": "R702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "458 records" + }, + { + "id": "R703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "458 records" + }, + { + "id": "R704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "458 records" + }, + { + "id": "R705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "471 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "497 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "497 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "497 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "497 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "510 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "510 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "510 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "510 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0197", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0197", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0197", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0197", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "523 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "523 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "523 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "523 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "536 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "536 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "536 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "536 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "549 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "549 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "549 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "549 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "562 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "562 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "562 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "562 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "575 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "575 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "575 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "575 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0224", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0224", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0224", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0224", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "588 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "588 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "588 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "588 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "614 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "614 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "614 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "614 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "627 records" + }, + { + "id": "R962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "627 records" + }, + { + "id": "R963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "627 records" + }, + { + "id": "R964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "627 records" + }, + { + "id": "R965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0243", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0245", + "answer": "640 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0245", + "answer": "640 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0245", + "answer": "640 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0245", + "answer": "640 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1001", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "653 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1002", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "653 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1003", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "653 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1004", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "653 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1005", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1006", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1007", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1008", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1009", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1010", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1011", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1012", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1013", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1014", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1015", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1016", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1017", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1018", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1019", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1020", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1021", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "666 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1022", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "666 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1023", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "666 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1024", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "666 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1025", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1026", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1027", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1028", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1029", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0257", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1030", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0257", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1031", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0257", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1032", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0257", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1033", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1034", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1035", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1036", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1037", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1038", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1039", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1040", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1041", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "679 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1042", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "679 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1043", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "679 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1044", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "679 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1045", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1046", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1047", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1048", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1049", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1050", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1051", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1052", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1053", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1054", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1055", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1056", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1057", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1058", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1059", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1060", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1061", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "692 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1062", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "692 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1063", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "692 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1064", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "692 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1065", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1066", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1067", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1068", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1069", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1070", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1071", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1072", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1073", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1074", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1075", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1076", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1077", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1078", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1079", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1080", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1081", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "705 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1082", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "705 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1083", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "705 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1084", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "705 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1085", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1086", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1087", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1088", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1089", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1090", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1091", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1092", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1093", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1094", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1095", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1096", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1097", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1098", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1099", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "718 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "718 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "718 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "718 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "731 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "744 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "744 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "744 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "744 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "757 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "757 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "757 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "757 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0291", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0291", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0291", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0291", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0292", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0292", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0292", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0292", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "770 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "770 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "770 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "770 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "783 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "783 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "783 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "783 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0304", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0304", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0304", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0304", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "796 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "796 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "796 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "796 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0310", + "answer": "809 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0310", + "answer": "809 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0310", + "answer": "809 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0310", + "answer": "809 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "822 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "822 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "822 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "822 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0318", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0318", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0318", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0318", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "835 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "835 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "835 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "835 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "848 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "848 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "848 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "848 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0330", + "answer": "861 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0330", + "answer": "861 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0330", + "answer": "861 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0330", + "answer": "861 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "874 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "874 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "874 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "874 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R1349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R1353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R1357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "887 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "887 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "887 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "887 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "900 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "900 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "900 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "900 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "913 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "913 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "913 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "913 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "926 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "926 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "926 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "926 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R1429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R1433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R1437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R1441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "939 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "939 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "939 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "939 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "952 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "952 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "952 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "952 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "965 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "965 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "965 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "965 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "978 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "978 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "978 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "978 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0378", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0378", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0378", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0378", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "14 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "14 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "14 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "14 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "27 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "27 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "27 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "27 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "40 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "40 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "40 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "40 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R1565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R1569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R1573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R1577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R1581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "53 days" + }, + { + "id": "R1582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "53 days" + }, + { + "id": "R1583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "53 days" + }, + { + "id": "R1584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "53 days" + }, + { + "id": "R1585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R1586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R1587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R1588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R1589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R1590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R1591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R1592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R1593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R1594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R1595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R1596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R1597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R1598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R1599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R1600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R1601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "66 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "66 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "66 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "66 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0402", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "79 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "79 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "79 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "79 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "92 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "92 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "92 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "92 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "105 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "105 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "105 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "105 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "118 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "118 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "118 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "118 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "131 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "131 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "131 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "131 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0428", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0428", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0428", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0428", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R1721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "144 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "157 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "157 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "157 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "157 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0437", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0437", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0437", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0437", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0439", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0439", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0439", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0439", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R1761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "170 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "170 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "170 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "170 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "183 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "183 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "183 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "183 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0447", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0447", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0447", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0447", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "196 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "196 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "196 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "196 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R1821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "209 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R1822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "209 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R1823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "209 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R1824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "209 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R1825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R1826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R1827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R1828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R1829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R1830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R1831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R1832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R1833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R1834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R1835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R1836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R1837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "222 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "222 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "222 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "222 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "235 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "235 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "235 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "235 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0469", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0469", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0469", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0469", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "248 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "248 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "248 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "248 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "261 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "261 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "261 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "261 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "274 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "274 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "274 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "274 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0482", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0482", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0482", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0482", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "287 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "287 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "287 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "287 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "300 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "300 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "300 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "300 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "313 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "313 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "313 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "313 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R1989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R1993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R1997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "P1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0001", + "f0018", + "f0149", + "f0213", + "f0397", + "f0469", + "f0489", + "f0492", + "f0493" + ], + "answers": [ + "clones its timers", + "stutters its stream", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "splits its brain" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0003", + "f0015", + "f0018", + "f0146", + "f0149", + "f0210", + "f0213", + "f0396", + "f0399", + "f0466", + "f0469", + "f0486", + "f0487", + "f0489", + "f0492", + "c022g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "ignores its backpressure", + "42 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "mislabels its vials", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "549 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "garbles its telemetry", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "fragments its heap", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "truncates the tail", + "ack before the segment seals", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "879 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0004", + "f0016", + "f0149", + "f0210", + "f0396", + "f0466", + "f0492", + "c022g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "expires its own grants", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "549 percent", + "garbles its telemetry", + "fragments its heap", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "879 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "f0070", + "f0074", + "f0094", + "f0131", + "f0134", + "f0286" + ], + "answers": [ + "misroutes its callbacks", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "185 percent", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "desyncs its mirrors" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0007", + "f0009", + "f0070", + "f0071", + "f0073", + "f0091", + "f0131", + "f0134", + "f0280", + "f0283", + "f0323", + "c017g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "misroutes its callbacks", + "interleave two restore streams", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "185 percent", + "swallows its errors", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "starves its consumers", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "731 seconds", + "stutters its stream", + "orphans its batches", + "814 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "f0073", + "f0289", + "f0321", + "f0323", + "c017g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "misroutes its callbacks", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "overruns its dwell", + "orphans its batches", + "814 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0010", + "f0106" + ], + "answers": [ + "29 percent", + "forgets its offsets" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0012", + "f0108", + "f0208" + ], + "answers": [ + "fork the settlement record", + "clips its bursts", + "staggers its heartbeats" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0012", + "f0105", + "f0108", + "f0207" + ], + "answers": [ + "fork the settlement record", + "276 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "fork the settlement record" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0013", + "f0105", + "f0109", + "f0205" + ], + "answers": [ + "staggers its heartbeats", + "276 entries", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "536 percent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0018", + "f0146", + "f0210", + "f0382", + "f0466", + "f0486", + "f0490", + "c022g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "stutters its stream", + "mislabels its vials", + "549 percent", + "archive an open incident", + "fragments its heap", + "truncates the tail", + "300 records", + "879 milliseconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0245", + "f0425", + "f0429" + ], + "answers": [ + "starves its consumers", + "640 segments", + "131 attempts", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0024", + "f0242", + "f0245", + "f0248", + "f0402", + "f0425", + "f0428", + "c018g2", + "c019g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "starves its consumers", + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "640 segments", + "lags its dashboard", + "ack before the segment seals", + "131 attempts", + "stalls", + "827 seconds", + "840 minutes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0242", + "f0402", + "f0426", + "c018g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "starves its consumers", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "ack before the segment seals", + "drops writes", + "827 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0024", + "f0240", + "f0248", + "f0400", + "f0428", + "c018g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "627 records", + "lags its dashboard", + "66 milliseconds", + "stalls", + "827 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0027", + "f0135", + "f0137", + "f0306", + "f0309", + "f0315", + "f0326", + "f0327", + "f0329", + "f0361", + "f0364", + "f0376", + "f0379", + "c015g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "trust the replica clock", + "354 seconds", + "write before the fence lands", + "re-emits duplicates", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "822 readings", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "archive an open incident", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "re-emits duplicates", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "fragments its heap", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "788 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0030", + "f0038", + "f0422", + "f0446", + "f0478" + ], + "answers": [ + "81 seconds", + "spins on backoff", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "re-emits duplicates", + "misplaces its permits" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0033", + "f0181", + "f0449" + ], + "answers": [ + "stutters its stream", + "double-counts rows", + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0035", + "f0038", + "f0039", + "f0120", + "f0123", + "f0181", + "f0184", + "f0422", + "f0423", + "f0475", + "c023g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "94 branches", + "spins on backoff", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "315 days", + "echoes its own commands", + "double-counts rows", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "saturates its detector", + "261 requests", + "892 days" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0036", + "f0038", + "f0120", + "f0184", + "f0420" + ], + "answers": [ + "stalls the queue", + "spins on backoff", + "315 days", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "118 hours" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0041", + "f0457", + "f0461", + "c021g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "retry inside the lock", + "re-emits duplicates", + "866 readings" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0041", + "f0044", + "f0175", + "f0178", + "f0440", + "f0443", + "f0455", + "f0457", + "f0460", + "f0463", + "f0495", + "f0498", + "c021g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "458 records", + "thrashes the cache", + "170 seconds", + "leaks handles", + "209 branches", + "retry inside the lock", + "222 records", + "thrashes the cache", + "313 hours", + "saturates its detector", + "866 readings" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0042", + "f0178", + "f0458", + "f0495", + "f0498" + ], + "answers": [ + "cache the lease token", + "thrashes the cache", + "spins on backoff", + "313 hours", + "saturates its detector" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0044", + "f0176", + "f0440", + "f0460", + "f0464", + "f0496" + ], + "answers": [ + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "re-emits duplicates", + "170 seconds", + "222 records", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "mislabels its vials" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0045", + "f0274", + "f0393" + ], + "answers": [ + "120 milliseconds", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "overfills its journal" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0047", + "f0056", + "f0059", + "f0102", + "f0103", + "f0271", + "f0274", + "f0390", + "f0391", + "f0393" + ], + "answers": [ + "trust the replica clock", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "promote an unverified backup", + "inflates its estimates", + "upends its ordering", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "40 generations", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "overfills its journal" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0048", + "f0056", + "f0100", + "f0271", + "f0272", + "f0393" + ], + "answers": [ + "reorders acks", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "263 minutes", + "upends its ordering", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "overfills its journal" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0050", + "f0190", + "f0294" + ], + "answers": [ + "133 milliseconds", + "497 requests", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0050", + "f0053", + "f0099", + "f0152", + "f0291", + "f0294" + ], + "answers": [ + "133 milliseconds", + "shadows its primary", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "skip the blank control", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0050", + "f0099", + "f0152", + "f0292" + ], + "answers": [ + "133 milliseconds", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "skip the blank control", + "archive an open incident" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0053", + "f0097", + "f0152", + "f0193" + ], + "answers": [ + "shadows its primary", + "promote an unverified backup", + "skip the blank control", + "misplaces its permits" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0062", + "f0126", + "f0230", + "f0234", + "c016g2", + "c024g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "swallows its errors", + "601 milliseconds", + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "801 segments", + "905 percent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0065", + "f0067", + "f0085", + "f0262", + "f0301", + "f0341", + "f0353", + "f0365", + "f0437" + ], + "answers": [ + "172 seconds", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "224 requests", + "share a cursor between shards", + "truncates the tail", + "fragments its heap", + "inflates its estimates", + "952 hours", + "recalibrate against a live specimen" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0067", + "f0085", + "f0088", + "f0111", + "f0114", + "f0262", + "f0263", + "f0300", + "f0303", + "f0341", + "f0344", + "f0367", + "f0437" + ], + "answers": [ + "mutate a sealed segment", + "224 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "upends its ordering", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "share a cursor between shards", + "stalls", + "783 milliseconds", + "duplicates its fence", + "fragments its heap", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "recalibrate against a live specimen" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0068", + "f0088", + "f0111", + "f0112", + "f0260", + "f0300", + "f0304", + "f0344", + "f0368" + ], + "answers": [ + "flaps its liveness", + "misplaces its permits", + "upends its ordering", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "679 attempts", + "783 milliseconds", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "saturates its detector" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0076", + "f0080", + "f0216", + "f0236", + "f0452", + "f0454" + ], + "answers": [ + "skips the fsync", + "211 hours", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "bypass the admission meter", + "the estimator never saw a leap year" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0076", + "f0079", + "f0082", + "f0216", + "f0219", + "f0236", + "f0239", + "f0370", + "f0373", + "f0411", + "f0451", + "f0454" + ], + "answers": [ + "skips the fsync", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "965 ticks", + "misfiles its alerts", + "clones its timers", + "forgets its offsets", + "the estimator never saw a leap year" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0077", + "f0079", + "f0237", + "f0373" + ], + "answers": [ + "reuse a spill file", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "cache the lease token", + "misfiles its alerts" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P39", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0082", + "f0222", + "f0370", + "f0373", + "f0414", + "f0454" + ], + "answers": [ + "trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "965 ticks", + "misfiles its alerts", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "the estimator never saw a leap year" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P40", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0102", + "f0274", + "f0390", + "f0394" + ], + "answers": [ + "promote an unverified backup", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "40 generations", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P41", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0114", + "f0262", + "f0300", + "f0350" + ], + "answers": [ + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "share a cursor between shards", + "783 milliseconds", + "913 minutes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P42", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0117", + "f0140", + "f0141", + "f0297", + "f0333", + "f0385" + ], + "answers": [ + "cache the lease token", + "367 megabytes", + "skips the fsync", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "27 percent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P43", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0117", + "f0140", + "f0143", + "f0251", + "f0295", + "f0297", + "f0332", + "f0355", + "f0358", + "f0359", + "f0387", + "f0431", + "f0434" + ], + "answers": [ + "cache the lease token", + "367 megabytes", + "starves the drain", + "inverts its polarity", + "770 ticks", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "fork the settlement record", + "926 seconds", + "drifts its watermark", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "skip the blank control", + "mislabels its vials", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P44", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0129", + "f0161", + "f0233", + "f0417" + ], + "answers": [ + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "starves its consumers", + "shadows its primary", + "fork the settlement record" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P45", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0132", + "f0280", + "f0324" + ], + "answers": [ + "cache the lease token", + "731 seconds", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P46", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0137", + "f0309", + "f0329", + "f0361" + ], + "answers": [ + "write before the fence lands", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "re-emits duplicates" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P47", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0138", + "f0306", + "f0318", + "f0326", + "f0361", + "f0362" + ], + "answers": [ + "leaks handles", + "re-emits duplicates", + "skews its baseline", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "re-emits duplicates", + "widen the fence without a drain" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P48", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0140", + "f0144", + "f0332", + "f0356", + "f0388", + "f0432" + ], + "answers": [ + "367 megabytes", + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "fork the settlement record", + "corrupts its checkpoint", + "orphans its batches", + "recalibrate against a live specimen" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P49", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0143", + "f0254", + "f0298", + "f0330", + "f0358", + "f0434" + ], + "answers": [ + "starves the drain", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "misfiles its alerts", + "861 percent", + "drifts its watermark", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P50", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0155", + "f0195", + "f0198", + "f0199", + "f0277", + "f0405", + "f0408", + "f0483", + "c020g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "406 milliseconds", + "510 megabytes", + "starves the drain", + "the parser accepts both spellings silently", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "79 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "clips its bursts", + "853 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P51", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0158", + "f0198", + "f0483", + "c020g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "shadows its primary", + "starves the drain", + "clips its bursts", + "853 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P52", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0163", + "f0230", + "f0231", + "f0233", + "f0419", + "f0472", + "c016g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "flaps its liveness", + "601 milliseconds", + "fragments its heap", + "shadows its primary", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "801 segments" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P53", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0164", + "f0233", + "f0472" + ], + "answers": [ + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "shadows its primary", + "suppress a failing healthcheck" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P54", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0166", + "f0202", + "f0312", + "f0338" + ], + "answers": [ + "garbles its telemetry", + "interleave two restore streams", + "ack before the segment seals", + "stutters its stream" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P55", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0166", + "f0167", + "f0169", + "f0201", + "f0204", + "f0312", + "f0335", + "f0338" + ], + "answers": [ + "garbles its telemetry", + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "ack before the segment seals", + "874 seconds", + "stutters its stream" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P56", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0169", + "f0201", + "f0335" + ], + "answers": [ + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "misroutes its callbacks", + "874 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P57", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0170", + "f0266" + ], + "answers": [ + "445 segments", + "clones its timers" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P58", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0172", + "f0228", + "f0259", + "f0268" + ], + "answers": [ + "archive an open incident", + "drifts its watermark", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "ignores its backpressure" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P59", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0172", + "f0187", + "f0227", + "f0259", + "f0265", + "f0268", + "f0347" + ], + "answers": [ + "archive an open incident", + "mutate a sealed segment", + "cache the lease token", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "692 blocks", + "ignores its backpressure", + "skip the blank control" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P60", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0173", + "f0225", + "f0257", + "f0265", + "f0269" + ], + "answers": [ + "lags its dashboard", + "588 seconds", + "interleave two restore streams", + "692 blocks", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P61", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0196", + "f0198", + "f0405", + "f0408", + "f0484" + ], + "answers": [ + "skips the fsync", + "starves the drain", + "79 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P62", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0204", + "f0312", + "f0336" + ], + "answers": [ + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "ack before the segment seals", + "expires its own grants" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P63", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0277", + "f0405", + "f0481" + ], + "answers": [ + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "79 requests", + "forgets its offsets" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P64", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0364", + "f0376" + ], + "answers": [ + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "fragments its heap" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2001", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2002", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2003", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2004", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2005", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2006", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2007", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2008", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2009", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2010", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2011", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2012", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2013", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2014", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2015", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2016", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2017", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2018", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2019", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2020", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2021", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2022", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2023", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2024", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2025", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2026", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2027", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2028", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2029", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2030", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2031", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2032", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2033", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2034", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2035", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2036", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2037", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2038", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2039", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2040", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2041", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2042", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2043", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2044", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2045", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2046", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2047", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2048", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2049", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2050", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2051", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2052", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2053", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2054", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2055", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2056", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2057", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2058", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2059", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2060", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2061", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2062", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2063", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2064", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2065", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2066", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2067", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2068", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2069", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2070", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2071", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2072", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2073", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2074", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2075", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2076", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2077", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2078", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2079", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2080", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2081", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2082", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2083", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2084", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2085", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2086", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2087", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2088", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2089", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2090", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2091", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2092", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2093", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2094", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2095", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2096", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2097", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2098", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2099", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2100", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2101", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2102", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2103", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2104", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2105", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2106", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2107", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2108", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2109", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2110", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2111", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2112", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2113", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2114", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2115", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2116", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2117", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2118", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2119", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2120", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2121", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2122", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2123", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2124", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2125", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2126", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2127", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2128", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2129", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2130", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2131", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2132", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2133", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2134", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2135", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2136", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2137", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2138", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2139", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2140", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2141", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2142", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2143", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2144", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2145", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2146", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2147", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2148", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2149", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2150", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2151", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2152", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2153", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2154", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2155", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2156", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2157", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2158", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2159", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2160", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2161", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2162", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2163", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2164", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2165", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2166", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2167", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2168", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2169", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2170", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2171", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2172", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2173", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2174", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2175", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2176", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2177", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2178", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2179", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2180", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2181", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2182", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2183", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2184", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2185", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2186", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2187", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2188", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2189", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2190", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2191", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2192", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2193", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2194", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2195", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2196", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2197", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2198", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2199", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2200", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2201", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2202", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2203", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2204", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2205", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2206", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2207", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2208", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2209", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2210", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2211", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2212", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2213", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2214", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2215", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2216", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2217", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2218", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2219", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2220", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2221", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2222", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2223", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2224", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2225", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2226", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2227", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2228", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2229", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2230", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2231", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2232", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2233", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2234", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2235", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2236", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2237", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2238", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2239", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "593 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2240", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "593 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2241", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "593 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L1", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2242", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "606 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2243", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "606 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2244", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "606 branches" + }, + { + "id": "L2", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2245", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "619 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2246", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "619 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2247", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "619 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L3", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2248", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "632 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2249", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "632 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2250", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "632 requests" + }, + { + "id": "L4", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2251", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "645 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2252", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "645 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2253", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "645 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L5", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2254", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "658 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2255", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "658 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2256", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "658 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L6", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2257", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "671 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2258", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "671 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2259", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "671 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L7", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2260", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "684 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2261", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "684 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2262", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "684 branches" + }, + { + "id": "L8", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2263", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "697 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2264", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "697 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2265", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "697 branches" + }, + { + "id": "L9", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2266", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "710 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2267", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "710 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2268", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "710 records" + }, + { + "id": "L10", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2269", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "723 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2270", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "723 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2271", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "723 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L11", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2272", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "736 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2273", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "736 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2274", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "736 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L12", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2275", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "749 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2276", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "749 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2277", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "749 hours" + }, + { + "id": "L13", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2278", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "762 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2279", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "762 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2280", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "762 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "L14", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2281", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "775 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2282", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "775 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2283", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "775 records" + }, + { + "id": "L15", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2284", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "788 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2285", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "788 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2286", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "788 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L16", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2287", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "801 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2288", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "801 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2289", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "801 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L17", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2290", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "814 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2291", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "814 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2292", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "814 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L18", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2293", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "827 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2294", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "827 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2295", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "827 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L19", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2296", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "840 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2297", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "840 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2298", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "840 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L20", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2299", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "853 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2300", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "853 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2301", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "853 records" + }, + { + "id": "L21", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2302", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "866 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2303", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "866 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R2304", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "866 readings" + }, + { + "id": "L22", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2305", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "879 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2306", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "879 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2307", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "879 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "L23", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2308", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "892 days" + }, + { + "id": "R2309", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "892 days" + }, + { + "id": "R2310", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "892 days" + }, + { + "id": "L24", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2311", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "905 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2312", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "905 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2313", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "905 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L25", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2314", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0189", + "anchor": "f0348", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2315", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0027", + "anchor": "f0110", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2316", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0182", + "anchor": "f0455", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2317", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0372", + "anchor": "f0335", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2318", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0222", + "anchor": "f0375", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2319", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0122", + "anchor": "f0110", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R2320", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0247", + "anchor": "f0020", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2321", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0077", + "anchor": "f0340", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2322", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0409", + "anchor": "f0268", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2323", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0164", + "anchor": "f0053", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2324", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0187", + "anchor": "f0340", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2325", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0144", + "anchor": "f0253", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2326", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0249", + "anchor": "f0063", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2327", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0124", + "anchor": "f0248", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2328", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0102", + "anchor": "f0430", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2329", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0112", + "anchor": "f0180", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2330", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0192", + "anchor": "f0065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2331", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0084", + "anchor": "f0378", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2332", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0109", + "anchor": "f0108", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2333", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0392", + "anchor": "f0380", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2334", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0494", + "anchor": "f0493", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2335", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0364", + "anchor": "f0128", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2336", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0037", + "anchor": "f0465", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2337", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0309", + "anchor": "f0123", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2338", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0112", + "anchor": "f0080", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2339", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0024", + "anchor": "f0453", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2340", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0272", + "anchor": "f0490", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2341", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0182", + "anchor": "f0460", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2342", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0047", + "anchor": "f0390", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2343", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0272", + "anchor": "f0345", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2344", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0187", + "anchor": "f0185", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2345", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0184", + "anchor": "f0078", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2346", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0337", + "anchor": "f0195", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2347", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0332", + "anchor": "f0115", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2348", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0304", + "anchor": "f0488", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2349", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0044", + "anchor": "f0173", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2350", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0472", + "anchor": "f0235", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2351", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0337", + "anchor": "f0025", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2352", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0124", + "anchor": "f0263", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2353", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0282", + "anchor": "f0310", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2354", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0442", + "anchor": "f0120", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2355", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0024", + "anchor": "f0163", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2356", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0422", + "anchor": "f0385", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2357", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0332", + "anchor": "f0195", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2358", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0054", + "anchor": "f0108", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2359", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0184", + "anchor": "f0228", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2360", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0469", + "anchor": "f0078", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2361", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0187", + "anchor": "f0295", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2362", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0304", + "anchor": "f0103", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2363", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0029", + "anchor": "f0148", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2364", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0492", + "anchor": "f0020", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2365", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0039", + "anchor": "f0188", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2366", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0452", + "anchor": "f0155", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2367", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0164", + "anchor": "f0428", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2368", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0204", + "anchor": "f0448", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2369", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0379", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2370", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0167", + "anchor": "f0195", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R2371", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0287", + "anchor": "f0420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2372", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0349", + "anchor": "f0363", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2373", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0044", + "anchor": "f0303", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2374", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0092", + "anchor": "f0175", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2375", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0164", + "anchor": "f0368", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2376", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0407", + "anchor": "f0330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2377", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0494", + "anchor": "f0108", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2378", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0037", + "anchor": "f0170", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2379", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0207", + "anchor": "f0290", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2380", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0379", + "anchor": "f0273", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2381", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0498", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2382", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0199", + "anchor": "f0268", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2383", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0182", + "anchor": "f0130", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2384", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0189", + "anchor": "f0413", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2385", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0382", + "anchor": "f0320", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2386", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0352", + "anchor": "f0385", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2387", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0447", + "anchor": "f0420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2388", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0279", + "anchor": "f0218", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2389", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0357", + "anchor": "f0345", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2390", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0477", + "anchor": "f0475", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2391", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0369", + "anchor": "f0488", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2392", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0459", + "anchor": "f0213", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2393", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0382", + "anchor": "f0350", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2394", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0157", + "anchor": "f0330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2395", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0384", + "anchor": "f0363", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2396", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0482", + "anchor": "f0440", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2397", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0122", + "anchor": "f0090", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R2398", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0474", + "anchor": "f0333", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2399", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0124", + "anchor": "f0063", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2400", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0064", + "anchor": "f0343", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2401", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0489", + "anchor": "f0413", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2402", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0077", + "anchor": "f0080", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2403", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0214", + "anchor": "f0493", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2404", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0074", + "anchor": "f0448", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2405", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0314", + "anchor": "f0138", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2406", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0212", + "anchor": "f0490", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2407", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0172", + "anchor": "f0225", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2408", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0499", + "anchor": "f0453", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2409", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0497", + "anchor": "f0405", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2410", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0279", + "anchor": "f0028", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2411", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0309", + "anchor": "f0078", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2412", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0384", + "anchor": "f0148", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2413", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0317", + "anchor": "f0355", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2414", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0274", + "anchor": "f0258", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2415", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0219", + "anchor": "f0278", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2416", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0329", + "anchor": "f0333", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2417", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0202", + "anchor": "f0165", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2418", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0492", + "anchor": "f0100", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2419", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0047", + "anchor": "f0055", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2420", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0084", + "anchor": "f0278", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2421", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0499", + "anchor": "f0313", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2422", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0264", + "anchor": "f0153", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2423", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0049", + "anchor": "f0203", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2424", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f0203", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2425", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0392", + "anchor": "f0260", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2426", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0267", + "anchor": "f0445", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2427", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0124", + "anchor": "f0193", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2428", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0207", + "anchor": "f0475", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2429", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0392", + "anchor": "f0320", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2430", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0474", + "anchor": "f0288", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2431", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0217", + "anchor": "f0100", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2432", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0437", + "anchor": "f0150", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2433", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0482", + "anchor": "f0495", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2434", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0337", + "anchor": "f0200", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2435", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0022", + "anchor": "f0190", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2436", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0454", + "anchor": "f0228", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2437", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0257", + "anchor": "f0350", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2438", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0142", + "anchor": "f0375", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2439", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0492", + "anchor": "f0490", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2440", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0132", + "anchor": "f0055", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2441", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0204", + "anchor": "f0203", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2442", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0482", + "anchor": "f0130", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2443", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0197", + "anchor": "f0235", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2444", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0232", + "anchor": "f0320", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2445", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0374", + "anchor": "f0208", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2446", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0444", + "anchor": "f0328", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2447", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0099", + "anchor": "f0483", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2448", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0144", + "anchor": "f0133", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2449", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0472", + "anchor": "f0275", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2450", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0239", + "anchor": "f0223", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2451", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0477", + "anchor": "f0310", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2452", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0107", + "anchor": "f0140", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2453", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0249", + "anchor": "f0103", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2454", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0158", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2455", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0132", + "anchor": "f0090", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2456", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0497", + "anchor": "f0110", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2457", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0377", + "anchor": "f0045", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2458", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0457", + "anchor": "f0275", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2459", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0317", + "anchor": "f0495", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2460", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0084", + "anchor": "f0463", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2461", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0264", + "anchor": "f0298", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2462", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0412", + "anchor": "f0090", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2463", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0322", + "anchor": "f0310", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2464", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0389", + "anchor": "f0453", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2465", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0264", + "anchor": "f0343", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2466", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0294", + "anchor": "f0478", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2467", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0182", + "anchor": "f0235", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2468", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0384", + "anchor": "f0213", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2469", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0487", + "anchor": "f0065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2470", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0487", + "anchor": "f0070", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2471", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0002", + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + }, + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2472", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0005", + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + }, + "answer": "16 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2473", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0008", + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + }, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2474", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0011", + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + }, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2475", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0014", + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + }, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2476", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0017", + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + }, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2477", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0020", + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + }, + "answer": "55 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2478", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0023", + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + }, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2479", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0026", + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + }, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2480", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0029", + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + }, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2481", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0032", + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + }, + "answer": "outrun the replication horizon" + }, + { + "id": "R2482", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0035", + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + }, + "answer": "94 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2483", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0038", + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + }, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2484", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0041", + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + }, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2485", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0044", + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + }, + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2486", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0047", + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + }, + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2487", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0050", + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + }, + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2488", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0053", + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + }, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2489", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0056", + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + }, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2490", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0059", + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2491", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0062", + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + }, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2492", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0065", + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + }, + "answer": "172 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2493", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0068", + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + }, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2494", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0071", + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + }, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2495", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0074", + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + }, + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2496", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0077", + "window": { + "after": 1782745200, + "before": 1783609200 + }, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2497", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0080", + "window": { + "after": 1785322800, + "before": 1786186800 + }, + "answer": "211 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2498", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0083", + "window": { + "after": 1782716400, + "before": 1783580400 + }, + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R2499", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0086", + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + }, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2500", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0089", + "window": { + "after": 1782756000, + "before": 1783620000 + }, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2501", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0092", + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + }, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2502", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0095", + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + }, + "answer": "250 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2503", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0098", + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2504", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0101", + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + }, + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R2505", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0104", + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + }, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2506", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0107", + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + }, + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2507", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0110", + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + }, + "answer": "289 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2508", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0113", + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + }, + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R2509", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0116", + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + }, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2510", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0119", + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + }, + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2511", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0122", + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + }, + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R2512", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0125", + "window": { + "after": 1785247200, + "before": 1786111200 + }, + "answer": "328 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2513", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0128", + "window": { + "after": 1782637200, + "before": 1783501200 + }, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R2514", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0131", + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + }, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2515", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0134", + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + }, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2516", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0137", + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + }, + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2517", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0140", + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + }, + "answer": "367 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2518", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0143", + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + }, + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2519", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0146", + "window": { + "after": 1786431600, + "before": 1787295600 + }, + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R2520", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0149", + "window": { + "after": 1783897200, + "before": 1784761200 + }, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2521", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0152", + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + }, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2522", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0155", + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + }, + "answer": "406 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2523", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0158", + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + }, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2524", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0161", + "window": { + "after": 1787648400, + "before": 1788512400 + }, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R2525", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0164", + "window": { + "after": 1785042000, + "before": 1785906000 + }, + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2526", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0167", + "window": { + "after": 1787688000, + "before": 1788552000 + }, + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R2527", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0170", + "window": { + "after": 1785081600, + "before": 1785945600 + }, + "answer": "445 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2528", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0173", + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + }, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2529", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0176", + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + }, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R2530", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0179", + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + }, + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2531", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0182", + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + }, + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2532", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0185", + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + }, + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2533", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0188", + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + }, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R2534", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0191", + "window": { + "after": 1786269600, + "before": 1787133600 + }, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2535", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0194", + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + }, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2536", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0197", + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + }, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2537", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0200", + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + }, + "answer": "523 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2538", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0203", + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + }, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2539", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0206", + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + }, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2540", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0209", + "window": { + "after": 1784962800, + "before": 1785826800 + }, + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2541", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0212", + "window": { + "after": 1787612400, + "before": 1788476400 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2542", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0215", + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + }, + "answer": "562 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2543", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0218", + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + }, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2544", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0221", + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + }, + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R2545", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0224", + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + }, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2546", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0227", + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + }, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2547", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0230", + "window": { + "after": 1786222800, + "before": 1787086800 + }, + "answer": "601 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2548", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0233", + "window": { + "after": 1783616400, + "before": 1784480400 + }, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2549", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0236", + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + }, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2550", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0239", + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + }, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2551", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0242", + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + }, + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2552", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0245", + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + }, + "answer": "640 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2553", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0248", + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + }, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2554", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0251", + "window": { + "after": 1787407200, + "before": 1788271200 + }, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2555", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0254", + "window": { + "after": 1783429200, + "before": 1784293200 + }, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2556", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0257", + "window": { + "after": 1786006800, + "before": 1786870800 + }, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R2557", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0260", + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + }, + "answer": "679 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R2558", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0263", + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + }, + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R2559", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0266", + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + }, + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R2560", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0269", + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + }, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2561", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0272", + "window": { + "after": 1783411200, + "before": 1784275200 + }, + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2562", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0275", + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + }, + "answer": "718 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2563", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0278", + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + }, + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R2564", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0281", + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + }, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "R2565", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0284", + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + }, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2566", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0287", + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + }, + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2567", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0290", + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + }, + "answer": "757 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2568", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0293", + "window": { + "after": 1784667600, + "before": 1785531600 + }, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2569", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0296", + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + }, + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R2570", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0299", + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + }, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2571", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0302", + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + }, + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2572", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0305", + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + }, + "answer": "796 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2573", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0308", + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + }, + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R2574", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0311", + "window": { + "after": 1783364400, + "before": 1784228400 + }, + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R2575", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0314", + "window": { + "after": 1785942000, + "before": 1786806000 + }, + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2576", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0317", + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + }, + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2577", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0320", + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + }, + "answer": "835 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2578", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0323", + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R2579", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0326", + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2580", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0329", + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + }, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2581", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0332", + "window": { + "after": 1784548800, + "before": 1785412800 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2582", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0335", + "window": { + "after": 1787126400, + "before": 1787990400 + }, + "answer": "874 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2583", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0338", + "window": { + "after": 1783148400, + "before": 1784012400 + }, + "answer": "stutters its stream" + }, + { + "id": "R2584", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0341", + "window": { + "after": 1785798000, + "before": 1786662000 + }, + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R2585", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0344", + "window": { + "after": 1783191600, + "before": 1784055600 + }, + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2586", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0347", + "window": { + "after": 1785765600, + "before": 1786629600 + }, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2587", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0350", + "window": { + "after": 1783159200, + "before": 1784023200 + }, + "answer": "913 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2588", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0353", + "window": { + "after": 1785736800, + "before": 1786600800 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2589", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0356", + "window": { + "after": 1783202400, + "before": 1784066400 + }, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R2590", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0359", + "window": { + "after": 1784408400, + "before": 1785272400 + }, + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R2591", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0362", + "window": { + "after": 1786982400, + "before": 1787846400 + }, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2592", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0365", + "window": { + "after": 1784376000, + "before": 1785240000 + }, + "answer": "952 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2593", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0368", + "window": { + "after": 1786953600, + "before": 1787817600 + }, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R2594", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0371", + "window": { + "after": 1784347200, + "before": 1785211200 + }, + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R2595", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0374", + "window": { + "after": 1786993200, + "before": 1787857200 + }, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "C0", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0000", + "planted": [ + "c0a" + ], + "witness": "c0a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C1", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0003", + "planted": [ + "c1a" + ], + "witness": "c1a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C2", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0006", + "planted": [ + "c2a" + ], + "witness": "c2a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C3", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0009", + "planted": [ + "c3a" + ], + "witness": "c3a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C4", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0012", + "planted": [ + "c4a" + ], + "witness": "c4a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C5", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0015", + "planted": [ + "c5a" + ], + "witness": "c5a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C6", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0018", + "planted": [ + "c6a" + ], + "witness": "c6a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C7", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0021", + "planted": [ + "c7a" + ], + "witness": "c7a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C8", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0024", + "planted": [ + "c8a", + "c8b" + ], + "witness": "c8a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C9", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0027", + "planted": [ + "c9a" + ], + "witness": "c9a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C10", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0030", + "planted": [ + "c10a" + ], + "witness": "c10a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C11", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0033", + "planted": [ + "c11a" + ], + "witness": "c11a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C12", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0036", + "planted": [ + "c12a" + ], + "witness": "c12a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C13", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0039", + "planted": [ + "c13a" + ], + "witness": "c13a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C14", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0042", + "planted": [ + "c14a" + ], + "witness": "c14a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C15", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0045", + "planted": [ + "c15a" + ], + "witness": "c15a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C16", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0048", + "planted": [ + "c16a" + ], + "witness": "c16a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C17", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0051", + "planted": [ + "c17a" + ], + "witness": "c17a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C18", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0054", + "planted": [ + "c18a" + ], + "witness": "c18a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C19", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0057", + "planted": [ + "c19a" + ], + "witness": "c19a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C20", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0060", + "planted": [ + "c20a" + ], + "witness": "c20a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C21", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0063", + "planted": [ + "c21a" + ], + "witness": "c21a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C22", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0066", + "planted": [ + "c22a", + "c22b" + ], + "witness": "c22a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C23", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0069", + "planted": [ + "c23a" + ], + "witness": "c23a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C24", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0072", + "planted": [ + "c24a" + ], + "witness": "c24a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C25", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0075", + "planted": [ + "c25a" + ], + "witness": "c25a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C26", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0078", + "planted": [ + "c26a" + ], + "witness": "c26a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C27", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0081", + "planted": [ + "c27a" + ], + "witness": "c27a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C28", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0084", + "planted": [ + "c28a" + ], + "witness": "c28a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C29", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0087", + "planted": [ + "c29a" + ], + "witness": "c29a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C30", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0090", + "planted": [ + "c30a" + ], + "witness": "c30a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C31", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0093", + "planted": [ + "c31a" + ], + "witness": "c31a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C32", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0096", + "planted": [ + "c32a" + ], + "witness": "c32a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C33", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0099", + "planted": [ + "c33a" + ], + "witness": "c33a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C34", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0102", + "planted": [ + "c34a" + ], + "witness": "c34a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C35", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0105", + "planted": [ + "c35a" + ], + "witness": "c35a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C36", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0108", + "planted": [ + "c36a", + "c36b" + ], + "witness": "c36a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C37", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0111", + "planted": [ + "c37a" + ], + "witness": "c37a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C38", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0114", + "planted": [ + "c38a" + ], + "witness": "c38a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C39", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0117", + "planted": [ + "c39a" + ], + "witness": "c39a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C40", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0120", + "planted": [ + "c40a" + ], + "witness": "c40a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit_agree", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C41", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0123", + "planted": [ + "c41a" + ], + "witness": "c41a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C42", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0126", + "planted": [ + "c42a" + ], + "witness": "c42a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C43", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0129", + "planted": [ + "c43a" + ], + "witness": "c43a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C44", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0132", + "planted": [ + "c44a" + ], + "witness": "c44a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C45", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0135", + "planted": [ + "c45a" + ], + "witness": "c45a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C46", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0138", + "planted": [ + "c46a" + ], + "witness": "c46a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C47", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0141", + "planted": [ + "c47a" + ], + "witness": "c47a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C48", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0144", + "planted": [ + "c48a" + ], + "witness": "c48a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C49", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0147", + "planted": [ + "c49a" + ], + "witness": "c49a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C50", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0150", + "planted": [ + "c50a", + "c50b" + ], + "witness": "c50a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C51", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0153", + "planted": [ + "c51a" + ], + "witness": "c51a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C52", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0156", + "planted": [ + "c52a" + ], + "witness": "c52a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C53", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0159", + "planted": [ + "c53a" + ], + "witness": "c53a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C54", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0162", + "planted": [ + "c54a" + ], + "witness": "c54a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C55", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0165", + "planted": [ + "c55a" + ], + "witness": "c55a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C56", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0168", + "planted": [ + "c56a" + ], + "witness": "c56a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C57", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0171", + "planted": [ + "c57a" + ], + "witness": "c57a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C58", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0174", + "planted": [ + "c58a" + ], + "witness": "c58a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C59", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0177", + "planted": [ + "c59a" + ], + "witness": "c59a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C60", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0180", + "planted": [ + "c60a" + ], + "witness": "c60a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C61", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0183", + "planted": [ + "c61a" + ], + "witness": "c61a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C62", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0186", + "planted": [ + "c62a" + ], + "witness": "c62a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C63", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0189", + "planted": [ + "c63a" + ], + "witness": "c63a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C64", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0192", + "planted": [ + "c64a", + "c64b" + ], + "witness": "c64a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C65", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0195", + "planted": [ + "c65a" + ], + "witness": "c65a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C66", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0198", + "planted": [ + "c66a" + ], + "witness": "c66a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C67", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0201", + "planted": [ + "c67a" + ], + "witness": "c67a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C68", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0204", + "planted": [ + "c68a" + ], + "witness": "c68a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C69", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0207", + "planted": [ + "c69a" + ], + "witness": "c69a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C70", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0210", + "planted": [ + "c70a" + ], + "witness": "c70a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C71", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0213", + "planted": [ + "c71a" + ], + "witness": "c71a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C72", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0216", + "planted": [ + "c72a" + ], + "witness": "c72a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C73", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0219", + "planted": [ + "c73a" + ], + "witness": "c73a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C74", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0222", + "planted": [ + "c74a" + ], + "witness": "c74a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C75", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0225", + "planted": [ + "c75a" + ], + "witness": "c75a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C76", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0228", + "planted": [ + "c76a" + ], + "witness": "c76a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C77", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0231", + "planted": [ + "c77a" + ], + "witness": "c77a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C78", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0234", + "planted": [ + "c78a", + "c78b" + ], + "witness": "c78a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C79", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0237", + "planted": [ + "c79a" + ], + "witness": "c79a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C80", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0240", + "planted": [ + "c80a" + ], + "witness": "c80a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C81", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0243", + "planted": [ + "c81a" + ], + "witness": "c81a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C82", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0246", + "planted": [ + "c82a" + ], + "witness": "c82a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C83", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0249", + "planted": [ + "c83a" + ], + "witness": "c83a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C84", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0252", + "planted": [ + "c84a" + ], + "witness": "c84a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C85", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0255", + "planted": [ + "c85a" + ], + "witness": "c85a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C86", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0258", + "planted": [ + "c86a" + ], + "witness": "c86a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C87", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0261", + "planted": [ + "c87a" + ], + "witness": "c87a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C88", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0264", + "planted": [ + "c88a" + ], + "witness": "c88a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C89", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0267", + "planted": [ + "c89a" + ], + "witness": "c89a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C90", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0270", + "planted": [ + "c90a" + ], + "witness": "c90a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C91", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0273", + "planted": [ + "c91a" + ], + "witness": "c91a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C92", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0276", + "planted": [ + "c92a", + "c92b" + ], + "witness": "c92a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C93", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0279", + "planted": [ + "c93a" + ], + "witness": "c93a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C94", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0282", + "planted": [ + "c94a" + ], + "witness": "c94a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C95", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0285", + "planted": [ + "c95a" + ], + "witness": "c95a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C96", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0288", + "planted": [ + "c96a" + ], + "witness": "c96a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C97", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0291", + "planted": [ + "c97a" + ], + "witness": "c97a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C98", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0294", + "planted": [ + "c98a" + ], + "witness": "c98a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C99", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0297", + "planted": [ + "c99a" + ], + "witness": "c99a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C100", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0300", + "planted": [ + "c100a" + ], + "witness": "c100a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C101", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0303", + "planted": [ + "c101a" + ], + "witness": "c101a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C102", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0306", + "planted": [ + "c102a" + ], + "witness": "c102a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C103", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0309", + "planted": [ + "c103a" + ], + "witness": "c103a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C104", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0312", + "planted": [ + "c104a" + ], + "witness": "c104a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C105", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0315", + "planted": [ + "c105a" + ], + "witness": "c105a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C106", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0318", + "planted": [ + "c106a", + "c106b" + ], + "witness": "c106a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C107", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0321", + "planted": [ + "c107a" + ], + "witness": "c107a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C108", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0324", + "planted": [ + "c108a" + ], + "witness": "c108a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C109", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0327", + "planted": [ + "c109a" + ], + "witness": "c109a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C110", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0330", + "planted": [ + "c110a" + ], + "witness": "c110a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C111", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0333", + "planted": [ + "c111a" + ], + "witness": "c111a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C112", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0336", + "planted": [ + "c112a" + ], + "witness": "c112a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C113", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0339", + "planted": [ + "c113a" + ], + "witness": "c113a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C114", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0342", + "planted": [ + "c114a" + ], + "witness": "c114a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C115", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0345", + "planted": [ + "c115a" + ], + "witness": "c115a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C116", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0348", + "planted": [ + "c116a" + ], + "witness": "c116a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C117", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0351", + "planted": [ + "c117a" + ], + "witness": "c117a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C118", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0354", + "planted": [ + "c118a" + ], + "witness": "c118a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C119", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0357", + "planted": [ + "c119a" + ], + "witness": "c119a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C120", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0360", + "planted": [ + "c120a", + "c120b" + ], + "witness": "c120a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C121", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0363", + "planted": [ + "c121a" + ], + "witness": "c121a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C122", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0366", + "planted": [ + "c122a" + ], + "witness": "c122a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C123", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0369", + "planted": [ + "c123a" + ], + "witness": "c123a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C124", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0372", + "planted": [ + "c124a" + ], + "witness": "c124a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C125", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0375", + "planted": [ + "c125a" + ], + "witness": "c125a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C126", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0378", + "planted": [ + "c126a" + ], + "witness": "c126a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C127", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0381", + "planted": [ + "c127a" + ], + "witness": "c127a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C128", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0384", + "planted": [ + "c128a" + ], + "witness": "c128a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C129", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0387", + "planted": [ + "c129a" + ], + "witness": "c129a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C130", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0390", + "planted": [ + "c130a" + ], + "witness": "c130a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C131", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0393", + "planted": [ + "c131a" + ], + "witness": "c131a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C132", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0396", + "planted": [ + "c132a" + ], + "witness": "c132a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C133", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0399", + "planted": [ + "c133a" + ], + "witness": "c133a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C134", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0402", + "planted": [ + "c134a", + "c134b" + ], + "witness": "c134a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C135", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0405", + "planted": [ + "c135a" + ], + "witness": "c135a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C136", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0408", + "planted": [ + "c136a" + ], + "witness": "c136a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C137", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0411", + "planted": [ + "c137a" + ], + "witness": "c137a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C138", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0414", + "planted": [ + "c138a" + ], + "witness": "c138a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C139", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0417", + "planted": [ + "c139a" + ], + "witness": "c139a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C140", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0420", + "planted": [ + "c140a" + ], + "witness": "c140a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C141", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0423", + "planted": [ + "c141a" + ], + "witness": "c141a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C142", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0426", + "planted": [ + "c142a" + ], + "witness": "c142a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C143", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0429", + "planted": [ + "c143a" + ], + "witness": "c143a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C144", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0432", + "planted": [ + "c144a" + ], + "witness": "c144a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C145", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0435", + "planted": [ + "c145a" + ], + "witness": "c145a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C146", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0438", + "planted": [ + "c146a" + ], + "witness": "c146a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C147", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0441", + "planted": [ + "c147a" + ], + "witness": "c147a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C148", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0444", + "planted": [ + "c148a", + "c148b" + ], + "witness": "c148a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C149", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0447", + "planted": [ + "c149a" + ], + "witness": "c149a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C150", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0450", + "planted": [ + "c150a" + ], + "witness": "c150a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C151", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0453", + "planted": [ + "c151a" + ], + "witness": "c151a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C152", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0456", + "planted": [ + "c152a" + ], + "witness": "c152a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C153", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0459", + "planted": [ + "c153a" + ], + "witness": "c153a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C154", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0462", + "planted": [ + "c154a" + ], + "witness": "c154a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C155", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0465", + "planted": [ + "c155a" + ], + "witness": "c155a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C156", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0468", + "planted": [ + "c156a" + ], + "witness": "c156a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C157", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0471", + "planted": [ + "c157a" + ], + "witness": "c157a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C158", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0474", + "planted": [ + "c158a" + ], + "witness": "c158a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C159", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0477", + "planted": [ + "c159a" + ], + "witness": "c159a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C160", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0480", + "planted": [ + "c160a" + ], + "witness": "c160a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C161", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0483", + "planted": [ + "c161a" + ], + "witness": "c161a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C162", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0486", + "planted": [ + "c162a", + "c162b" + ], + "witness": "c162a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C163", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0489", + "planted": [ + "c163a" + ], + "witness": "c163a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C164", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0492", + "planted": [ + "c164a" + ], + "witness": "c164a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C165", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0495", + "planted": [ + "c165a" + ], + "witness": "c165a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "D11", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0011", + "stale": "s-f0011" + }, + { + "id": "D29", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0029", + "stale": "s-f0029" + }, + { + "id": "D85", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0085", + "stale": "s-f0085" + }, + { + "id": "D97", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0097", + "stale": "s-f0097" + }, + { + "id": "D102", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0102", + "stale": "s-f0102" + }, + { + "id": "D122", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0122", + "stale": "s-f0122" + }, + { + "id": "D124", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0124", + "stale": "s-f0124" + }, + { + "id": "D130", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0130", + "stale": "s-f0130" + }, + { + "id": "D145", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0145", + "stale": "s-f0145" + }, + { + "id": "D148", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0148", + "stale": "s-f0148" + }, + { + "id": "D155", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0155", + "stale": "s-f0155" + }, + { + "id": "D161", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0161", + "stale": "s-f0161" + }, + { + "id": "D197", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0197", + "stale": "s-f0197" + }, + { + "id": "D224", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0224", + "stale": "s-f0224" + }, + { + "id": "D243", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0243", + "stale": "s-f0243" + }, + { + "id": "D245", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0245", + "stale": "s-f0245" + }, + { + "id": "D257", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0257", + "stale": "s-f0257" + }, + { + "id": "D291", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0291", + "stale": "s-f0291" + }, + { + "id": "D292", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0292", + "stale": "s-f0292" + }, + { + "id": "D304", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0304", + "stale": "s-f0304" + }, + { + "id": "D310", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0310", + "stale": "s-f0310" + }, + { + "id": "D318", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0318", + "stale": "s-f0318" + }, + { + "id": "D330", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0330", + "stale": "s-f0330" + }, + { + "id": "D378", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0378", + "stale": "s-f0378" + }, + { + "id": "D402", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0402", + "stale": "s-f0402" + }, + { + "id": "D428", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0428", + "stale": "s-f0428" + }, + { + "id": "D429", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0429", + "stale": "s-f0429" + }, + { + "id": "D437", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0437", + "stale": "s-f0437" + }, + { + "id": "D439", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0439", + "stale": "s-f0439" + }, + { + "id": "D447", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0447", + "stale": "s-f0447" + }, + { + "id": "D469", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0469", + "stale": "s-f0469" + }, + { + "id": "D482", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0482", + "stale": "s-f0482" + }, + { + "id": "R2596", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true, + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "W179", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2597", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "W180", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2598", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "W181", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2599", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false, + "answer": "29 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W182", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2600", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "W183", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2601", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "W184", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2602", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0019", + "released": true, + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "W185", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0019", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2603", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0022", + "released": false, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "W186", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0022", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2604", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true, + "answer": "68 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "W187", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2605", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "W188", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2606", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true, + "answer": "expires its own grants" + }, + { + "id": "W189", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2607", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0034", + "released": false, + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "W190", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0034", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2608", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": true, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "W191", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2609", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0040", + "released": false, + "answer": "107 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W192", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0040", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2610", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0043", + "released": true, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "W193", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0043", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2611", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": false, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "W194", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2612", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": true, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "W195", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2613", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0052", + "released": false, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "W196", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0052", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2614", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0055", + "released": true, + "answer": "146 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W197", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0055", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2615", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0058", + "released": false, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "W198", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0058", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2616", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0061", + "released": true, + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "W199", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0061", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2617", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0064", + "released": false, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "W200", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0064", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2618", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0067", + "released": true, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "W201", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0067", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2619", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0070", + "released": false, + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W202", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0070", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2620", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0073", + "released": true, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "W203", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0073", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2621", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0076", + "released": false, + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "W204", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0076", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2622", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0079", + "released": true, + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "W205", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0079", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2623", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0082", + "released": false, + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "W206", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0082", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2624", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0088", + "released": true, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "W207", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0088", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2625", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0091", + "released": false, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "W208", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0091", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2626", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0094", + "released": true, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "W209", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0094", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2627", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0100", + "released": false, + "answer": "263 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "W210", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0100", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2628", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0103", + "released": true, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "W211", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0103", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2629", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0106", + "released": false, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "W212", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0106", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2630", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0109", + "released": true, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "W213", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0109", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2631", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0112", + "released": false, + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "W214", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0112", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2632", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0115", + "released": true, + "answer": "302 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W215", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0115", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2633", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0118", + "released": false, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "W216", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0118", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2634", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0121", + "released": true, + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "W217", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0121", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2635", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0127", + "released": false, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "W218", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0127", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2636", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0133", + "released": true, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "W219", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0133", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2637", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0136", + "released": false, + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "W220", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0136", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2638", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0139", + "released": true, + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "W221", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0139", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2639", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0142", + "released": false, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "W222", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0142", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2640", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0151", + "released": true, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "W223", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0151", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2641", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0154", + "released": false, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "W224", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0154", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2642", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0157", + "released": true, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "W225", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0157", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2643", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0160", + "released": false, + "answer": "419 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W226", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0160", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2644", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0163", + "released": true, + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "W227", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0163", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2645", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0166", + "released": false, + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "W228", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0166", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2646", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0169", + "released": true, + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "W229", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0169", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2647", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0172", + "released": false, + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "W230", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0172", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2648", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0175", + "released": true, + "answer": "458 records" + }, + { + "id": "W231", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0175", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2649", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0178", + "released": false, + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "W232", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0178", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2650", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0181", + "released": true, + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "W233", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0181", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2651", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0184", + "released": false, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "W234", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0184", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2652", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0187", + "released": true, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "W235", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0187", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2653", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0190", + "released": false, + "answer": "497 requests" + }, + { + "id": "W236", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0190", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2654", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0193", + "released": true, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "W237", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0193", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2655", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0196", + "released": false, + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "W238", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0196", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2656", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0199", + "released": true, + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "W239", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0199", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2657", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0202", + "released": false, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "W240", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0202", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2658", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0205", + "released": true, + "answer": "536 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W241", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0205", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2659", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0208", + "released": false, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "W242", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0208", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2660", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0211", + "released": true, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "W243", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0211", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2661", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0214", + "released": false, + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "W244", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0214", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2662", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0217", + "released": true, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "W245", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0217", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2663", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0220", + "released": false, + "answer": "575 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W246", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0220", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2664", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0223", + "released": true, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "W247", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0223", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2665", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0226", + "released": false, + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "W248", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0226", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2666", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0229", + "released": true, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "W249", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0229", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2667", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0232", + "released": false, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "W250", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0232", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2668", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0235", + "released": true, + "answer": "614 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W251", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0235", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2669", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0238", + "released": false, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "W252", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0238", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2670", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0241", + "released": true, + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "W253", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0241", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2671", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0244", + "released": false, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "W254", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0244", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2672", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0247", + "released": true, + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "W255", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0247", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2673", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0250", + "released": false, + "answer": "653 readings" + }, + { + "id": "W256", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0250", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2674", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0253", + "released": true, + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "W257", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0253", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2675", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0256", + "released": false, + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "W258", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0256", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2676", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0259", + "released": true, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "W259", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0259", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2677", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0262", + "released": false, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "W260", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0262", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2678", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0265", + "released": true, + "answer": "692 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "W261", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0265", + "released": true + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed3-v2.json b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed3-v2.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cfb160f --- /dev/null +++ b/worlds/v2/knowledgedrift-500-seed3-v2.json @@ -0,0 +1,60846 @@ +{ + "spec": { + "size": 500, + "seed": 3, + "k": 10, + "chains": 25, + "chain_len": 3, + "pollution": 0.1, + "spread_days": 60, + "window_days": 5, + "base_ts": 1788220800, + "edition": 2, + "notes": 641, + "edges": 530 + }, + "digest": "cdbbbcf8710e192e", + "ops": [ + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0000", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz isthmus ingest job uses a grace period of 4 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786489200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0000", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz isthmus ingest job uses a grace period of 3 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum shore ingest job starves its consumers when the ring buffer wraps, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0002", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx valley ingest job must never mutate a sealed segment, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx valley ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0003", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "teal creek ingest job flaps its liveness on a partial restore, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal creek ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl reef ingest job undercounts its retries because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl lowland edge cache uses a lease window of 22 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781236800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0005", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl lowland edge cache uses a lease window of 16 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl lowland edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0006", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum atoll edge cache double-counts rows when the almanac rolls over — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz atoll edge cache must never write before the fence lands, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz atoll edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0008", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ochre meadow edge cache leaks handles past its recalibration due date — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. ochre meadow edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784674800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0009", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo ridge edge cache batches past its ceiling because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn grove edge cache uses a fan-out limit of 29 branches, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn grove edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0011", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet fjord edge cache stalls the queue when the mains power browns out, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. russet fjord edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet fjord edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787252400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0012", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite cavern edge cache must never retry inside the lock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet tundra edge cache spins on backoff beneath peak load — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0014", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "quartz cavern edge cache holds the fence open because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz cavern edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784646000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0015", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure hollow entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 42 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure hollow entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo lagoon entropy siphon swallows its errors when a checksum disagrees on arrival — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0017", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard creek entropy siphon must never fork the settlement record, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard creek entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787220000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0018", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz inlet entropy siphon no longer staggers its heartbeats (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783630800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0018", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz inlet entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats behind a cold boot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia crag entropy siphon round-robins its failures, and the pool hands out connections newest-first is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781708400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0019", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia crag entropy siphon round-robins its failures because the pool hands out connections newest-first, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia crag entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785078000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0020", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber canyon token vault uses a gossip interval of 55 milliseconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber canyon token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0021", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz dell token vault fragments its heap when a replica lags behind — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn river token vault is permitted to suppress a failing healthcheck", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0022", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn river token vault must never suppress a failing healthcheck — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn river token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0023", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta bluff token vault shadows its primary when the vault rotates, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta bluff token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787263200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0024", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite mesa token vault saves its work twice because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow mesa escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 68 segments, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0026", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt savanna escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages when a poison message recirculates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt savanna escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784656800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0027", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver gorge escrow chamber must never archive an open incident, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver gorge escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz brook escrow chamber lags its dashboard across a region failover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0029", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan plateau escrow chamber mirrors stale reads because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785862800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0030", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon cliff edge cache uses a eviction ratio of 81 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "emerald barrens edge cache swallows its errors when a checksum disagrees on arrival, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald barrens edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0032", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sienna dell edge cache must never fork the settlement record — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. sienna dell edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0033", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald gorge edge cache staggers its heartbeats behind a cold boot, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ruby badland edge cache round-robins its failures, and the pool hands out connections newest-first is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784728800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0034", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ruby badland edge cache round-robins its failures because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby badland edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0035", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz ravine replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 94 hours, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz ravine replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0036", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk swamp replay buffer mislabels its vials when the coolant loop cavitates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785524400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson dune replay buffer must never recalibrate against a live specimen — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783688400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0038", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "tan savanna replay buffer saturates its detector during lens calibration — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan savanna replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0039", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze valley replay buffer rounds toward the anchor because the quota counts retired entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat canyon replay buffer uses a warmup allowance of 108 requests", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0040", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat canyon replay buffer uses a warmup allowance of 107 requests — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786266000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0041", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet geyser replay buffer poisons its snapshot when the almanac rolls over, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet geyser replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0042", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz harbor replay buffer must never rewind a shared cursor, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz harbor replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral forest replay buffer misplaces its permits past its recalibration due date, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral forest replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783659600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0044", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion orchard replay buffer pre-warms the wrong keys because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion orchard replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0045", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow glacier token vault uses a compaction floor of 120 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre strait token vault hoards its scratch pages when the failover rehearsal runs — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre strait token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786305600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0047", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sorrel forest token vault must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel forest token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0048", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "silver ravine token vault lags its dashboard at quota exhaustion — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784091600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "quartz glacier token vault mirrors stale reads because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783699200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0050", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "azure bayou escrow chamber uses a flush interval of 133 milliseconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0051", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sorrel dale escrow chamber loses its cursor when the standby promotes itself, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel dale escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786741200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat cirque escrow chamber is permitted to trust the replica clock", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783512000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0052", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat cirque escrow chamber must never trust the replica clock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786276800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0053", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt geyser escrow chamber reorders acks during certificate rotation — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. cobalt geyser escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0054", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon lowland escrow chamber re-reads the manifest because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite hollow token vault uses a decay half-life of 146 hours, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite hollow token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787482800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0056", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz marsh token vault mislabels its vials when the backfill overtakes live traffic — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. quartz marsh token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0057", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo gorge token vault is permitted to recalibrate against a live specimen", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783512000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0057", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "indigo gorge token vault must never recalibrate against a live specimen, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz swamp token vault saturates its detector inside the maintenance window, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz swamp token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784876400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0059", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter lagoon token vault rounds toward the anchor because the migration left a shadow column behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter lagoon token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0060", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lilac oasis lease broker uses a rewind cursor lag of 159 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut bayou lease broker desyncs its mirrors when the mains power browns out — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut bayou lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0062", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson estuary lease broker must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson estuary lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0063", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz heath lease broker no longer splits its brain (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783321200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0063", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz heath lease broker splits its brain beneath peak load, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz heath lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785308400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac plateau lease broker recomputes the constant because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0065", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre dune lease broker uses a flush interval of 172 milliseconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre dune lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0066", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal bayou lease broker loses its cursor when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal bayou lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan fjord lease broker must never trust the replica clock, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan fjord lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0068", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange hill lease broker reorders acks under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0069", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris heath lease broker re-reads the manifest because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785351600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz lake token vault uses a eviction ratio of 216 percent", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782381600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0070", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz lake token vault uses a eviction ratio of 185 percent — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz lake token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0071", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan tundra token vault swallows its errors when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan tundra token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0072", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn strait token vault is permitted to fork the settlement record", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785160800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0072", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn strait token vault must never fork the settlement record — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange cavern token vault staggers its heartbeats amid a thundering herd, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0074", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory cirque token vault round-robins its failures, and the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782846000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0074", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory cirque token vault round-robins its failures because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. ivory cirque token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785783600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0075", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal cliff replay buffer uses a sampling stride of 198 readings, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal cliff replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785319200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt crag replay buffer inverts its polarity when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt crag replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0077", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz pond replay buffer is permitted to splice two lineages", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1779980400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0077", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz pond replay buffer must never splice two lineages — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. quartz pond replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783177200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0078", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet atoll replay buffer no longer skews its baseline (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0078", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet atoll replay buffer skews its baseline past the retention cutoff — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz glacier replay buffer hoards its calibration slots because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0080", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt brook escrow chamber uses a warmup allowance of 211 requests — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt brook escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0081", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon reef escrow chamber poisons its snapshot when the failover rehearsal runs, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785362400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite bayou escrow chamber must never rewind a shared cursor, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite bayou escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0083", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "jade delta escrow chamber misplaces its permits at quota exhaustion, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade delta escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0084", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "quartz savanna escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786568400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden savanna index writer uses a quarantine window of 224 days — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden savanna index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0086", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat swamp index writer garbles its telemetry when the shard rebalances — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat swamp index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0087", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure barrens index writer must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure barrens index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783958400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand brook index writer echoes its own commands during a cold replay — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0089", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter ravine index writer mirrors its rival's cadence because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter ravine index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0090", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre butte sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 237 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre butte sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz tundra sweep worker swallows its errors when the dedupe window slides, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz tundra sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786230000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0092", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta meadow sweep worker is permitted to fork the settlement record", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781629200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0092", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta meadow sweep worker must never fork the settlement record — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784394000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0093", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt shore sweep worker staggers its heartbeats within the grace period — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat wharf sweep worker round-robins its failures because the estimator never saw a leap year — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat wharf sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0095", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon estuary calibration bench uses a confidence floor of 266 percent", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783947600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0095", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon estuary calibration bench uses a confidence floor of 250 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon estuary calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786971600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0096", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal summit calibration bench overruns its dwell when the license check phones home — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon hill calibration bench must never skip the blank control, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon hill calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0098", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz delta calibration bench orphans its batches past the retention cutoff, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. quartz delta calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784365200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0099", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sand harbor calibration bench ages its stock first because the metric averages away the spikes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand harbor calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0100", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia tundra quorum relay uses a decay half-life of 263 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0101", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac quarry quorum relay mislabels its vials when the clock steps backwards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac quarry quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0102", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver tundra quorum relay must never recalibrate against a live specimen — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0103", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon marsh quorum relay saturates its detector past the spill threshold, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon marsh quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784797200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0104", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "azure summit quorum relay rounds toward the anchor because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure summit quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784404800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0105", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz gorge calibration bench uses a warmup allowance of 276 requests, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0106", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver barrens calibration bench poisons its snapshot when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver barrens calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787374800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0107", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber cirque calibration bench must never rewind a shared cursor, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber cirque calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786982400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0108", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet jungle calibration bench misplaces its permits amid a thundering herd — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785232800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0109", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac cliff calibration bench pre-warms the wrong keys because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0110", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel dell edge cache uses a spill threshold of 289 megabytes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0111", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "salmon crag edge cache skips the fsync when a checksum disagrees on arrival, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon crag edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0112", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe hill edge cache must never reuse a spill file — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0113", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite badland edge cache starves the drain behind a cold boot, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785582000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0114", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet hill edge cache retries before backing off because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet hill edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0115", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl isthmus edge cache uses a sampling stride of 302 readings, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl isthmus edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0116", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sorrel crag edge cache inverts its polarity when the coolant loop cavitates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0117", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal brook edge cache is permitted to splice two lineages", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784653200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0117", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal brook edge cache must never splice two lineages — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0118", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz hollow edge cache skews its baseline during lens calibration — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz hollow edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786014000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0119", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe dale edge cache hoards its calibration slots because the quota counts retired entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the quota counts retired entries. taupe dale edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe dale edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785708000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0120", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn quarry lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 315 percent — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785243600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0121", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory ridge lease broker swallows its errors when the ring buffer wraps, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory ridge lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783407600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0122", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ashen cavern lease broker must never fork the settlement record, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. ashen cavern lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0123", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt badland lease broker staggers its heartbeats on a partial restore, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt badland lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0124", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber wharf lease broker round-robins its failures because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786057200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0125", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "emerald bayou entropy siphon uses a rewind cursor lag of 328 records — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald bayou entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785679200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0126", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe barrens entropy siphon desyncs its mirrors when the daylight saving shift lands — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe barrens entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0127", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "slate crag entropy siphon must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate crag entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0128", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut moor entropy siphon splits its brain during a rolling upgrade — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0129", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "indigo bluff entropy siphon recomputes the constant because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786489200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0130", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mustard prairie token vault uses a warmup allowance of 341 requests, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard prairie token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0131", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter delta token vault poisons its snapshot when the segment seals early, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter delta token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0132", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris meadow token vault must never rewind a shared cursor — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783882800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0133", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe canyon token vault misplaces its permits at epoch rollover — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe canyon token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783418400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0134", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange barrens token vault pre-warms the wrong keys because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0135", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory pond shard router uses a eviction ratio of 354 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory pond shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0136", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "golden bluff shard router swallows its errors when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785996000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0137", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn barrens shard router must never fork the settlement record, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the customer-visible number can never be reused. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784318400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0138", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory heath shard router staggers its heartbeats within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only within the grace period, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory heath shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783854000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0139", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber estuary shard router round-robins its failures because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber estuary shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787202000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0140", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe ridge ingest job uses a dedupe horizon of 388 entries", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785168000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0140", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe ridge ingest job uses a dedupe horizon of 367 entries — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. taupe ridge ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786896000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0141", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet estuary ingest job: forgets its offsets — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784613600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0141", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "violet estuary ingest job forgets its offsets when the standby promotes itself — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0142", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard pond ingest job must never bypass the admission meter — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard pond ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784664000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0143", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pewter marsh ingest job clips its bursts during certificate rotation, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. pewter marsh ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter marsh ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0144", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl valley ingest job defers its compaction because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0145", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet river ingest job uses a confidence floor of 380 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet river ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787241600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0146", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ashen mesa ingest job overruns its dwell when the almanac rolls over, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen mesa ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786863600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0147", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe grove ingest job must never skip the blank control, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe grove ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl cove ingest job orphans its batches past its recalibration due date — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0149", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon cavern ingest job ages its stock first, and the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781823600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0149", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon cavern ingest job ages its stock first because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon cavern ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0150", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby cove assay station uses a dedupe horizon of 393 entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0151", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "jade shore assay station forgets its offsets when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade shore assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0152", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cyan quarry assay station must never bypass the admission meter — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0153", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure savanna assay station clips its bursts during the night batch, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785070800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0154", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe knoll assay station defers its compaction because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe knoll assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0155", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ivory dell escrow chamber uses a snapshot depth of 406 generations, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory dell escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0156", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate prairie escrow chamber: misroutes its callbacks — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784534400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0156", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate prairie escrow chamber misroutes its callbacks when the shard rebalances — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0157", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk glacier escrow chamber must never interleave two restore streams — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk glacier escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0158", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony bayou escrow chamber overfills its journal during a cold replay — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785502800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0159", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber delta escrow chamber escalates too eagerly because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber delta escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0160", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre moor calibration bench uses a flush interval of 419 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0161", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe oasis calibration bench: loses its cursor — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the calibration bench was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786266000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0161", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe oasis calibration bench loses its cursor when the standby promotes itself, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0162", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris bayou calibration bench must never trust the replica clock, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris bayou calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0163", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt tarn calibration bench reorders acks during certificate rotation, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt tarn calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785938400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0164", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "orange hollow calibration bench re-reads the manifest because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. orange hollow calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785474000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0165", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta quarry sweep worker uses a compaction floor of 432 segments — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783710000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0166", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage grove sweep worker hoards its scratch pages when a checksum disagrees on arrival — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage grove sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783332000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0167", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard dell sweep worker must never archive an open incident, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard dell sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0168", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe river sweep worker no longer lags its dashboard (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783868400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0168", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe river sweep worker lags its dashboard behind a cold boot — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only behind a cold boot, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786287600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0169", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow dune sweep worker mirrors stale reads because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow dune sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0170", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet cape edge cache uses a batch size of 445 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the replica set votes once per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet cape edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0171", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral glade edge cache: re-emits duplicates — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780999200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0171", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral glade edge cache re-emits duplicates when a replica lags behind, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral glade edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783677600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0172", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac forest edge cache must never widen the fence without a drain — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0173", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure tundra edge cache thrashes the cache when the vault rotates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only when the vault rotates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0174", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel jungle edge cache rounds the window down because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel jungle edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786255200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0175", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe swamp provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 474 entries", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782925200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0175", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe swamp provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 458 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe swamp provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785949200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0176", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage delta provenance ledger forgets its offsets when the shard rebalances — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0177", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet bayou provenance ledger must never bypass the admission meter, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0178", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper pond provenance ledger clips its bursts during a cold replay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper pond provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0179", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz barrens provenance ledger defers its compaction because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz barrens provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786690800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0180", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender lagoon ingest job uses a decay half-life of 471 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786384800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0181", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper cavern ingest job: mislabels its vials — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782734400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0181", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper cavern ingest job mislabels its vials when two drains overlap — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper cavern ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0182", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe creek ingest job must never recalibrate against a live specimen — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0183", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe savanna ingest job saturates its detector under sustained backpressure, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe savanna ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0184", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel prairie ingest job rounds toward the anchor, and the sensor sums shadow and signal alike is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the ingest job was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0184", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sorrel prairie ingest job rounds toward the anchor because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787122800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0185", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige badland telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 510 seconds", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784570400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0185", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige badland telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 484 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. beige badland telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0186", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat oasis telemetry mast corrupts its checkpoint when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat oasis telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0187", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt knoll telemetry mast must never cache the lease token, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt knoll telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784588400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0188", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cedar crag telemetry mast drifts its watermark under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. cedar crag telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0189", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe geyser telemetry mast serialises its probes, and the config loader keeps its first answer forever is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785052800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0189", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe geyser telemetry mast serialises its probes because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive estuary token vault uses a quarantine window of 497 days — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive estuary token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0191", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "vermilion ravine token vault garbles its telemetry when a leap second is injected, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion ravine token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786701600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0192", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite reef token vault must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: only the failing node knew the session keys. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784952000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0193", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "auburn lake token vault echoes its own commands after an unclean shutdown, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn lake token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784559600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0194", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe island token vault mirrors its rival's cadence because the parser accepts both spellings silently, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the parser accepts both spellings silently. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe island token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0195", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow wharf provenance ledger uses a batch size of 510 records, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow wharf provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787601600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0196", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe inlet provenance ledger re-emits duplicates when the standby promotes itself — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0197", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris hill provenance ledger must never widen the fence without a drain — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785297600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0198", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite hill provenance ledger thrashes the cache during certificate rotation — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0199", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal marsh provenance ledger rounds the window down because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal marsh provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0200", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe fjord index writer uses a compaction floor of 523 segments — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0201", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pearl gulch index writer hoards its scratch pages when the clock steps backwards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0202", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl ravine index writer must never archive an open incident, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl ravine index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0203", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe rapids index writer lags its dashboard past the spill threshold, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe rapids index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785340800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0204", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald oasis index writer mirrors stale reads because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784962800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0205", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve shore assay station uses a flush interval of 536 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve shore assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783198800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0206", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "azure rapids assay station loses its cursor when the segment seals early — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. azure rapids assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0207", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz mesa assay station must never trust the replica clock, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: it turns a recoverable fault into a permanent one. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz mesa assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0208", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet grove assay station reorders acks at epoch rollover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785776400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0209", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter orchard assay station re-reads the manifest because the calibration constant was transcribed by hand, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the calibration constant was transcribed by hand. pewter orchard assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0210", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe cape shard router uses a batch size of 549 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe cape shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0211", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet bluff shard router re-emits duplicates when two drains overlap, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet bluff shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0212", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "azure gulch shard router must never widen the fence without a drain — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure gulch shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0213", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz grove shard router thrashes the cache under sustained backpressure — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786208400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0214", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan isthmus shard router rounds the window down because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan isthmus shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0215", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber atoll ingest job uses a quarantine window of 562 days, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber atoll ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784066400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0216", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby moor ingest job garbles its telemetry when a retry lands out of order — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783602000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0217", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe crag ingest job must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe crag ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0218", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mustard cirque ingest job echoes its own commands while a follower catches up, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786644000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0219", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze gorge ingest job mirrors its rival's cadence because integer division truncates the interval, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze gorge ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0220", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo summit assay station uses a eviction ratio of 575 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784415600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0221", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna fjord assay station swallows its errors when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784037600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0222", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet gulch assay station must never fork the settlement record — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0223", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat island assay station staggers its heartbeats amid a thundering herd, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat island assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786993200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0224", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "onyx lagoon assay station round-robins its failures because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0225", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "crimson tarn assay station uses a fan-out limit of 588 branches, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0226", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan lagoon assay station: stalls the queue — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782136800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0226", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cyan lagoon assay station stalls the queue when a stray magnet passes the bay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cyan lagoon assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784383200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0227", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron dune assay station must never retry inside the lock, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron dune assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0228", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "mauve forest assay station spins on backoff while the archive migrates — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0229", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal shore assay station holds the fence open because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal shore assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786960800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0230", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cyan island token vault uses a checkpoint cadence of 601 minutes — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. cyan island token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0231", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx dune token vault shreds its manifest when the clock steps backwards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx dune token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784818800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0232", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac butte token vault must never promote an unverified backup — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac butte token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784354400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0233", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac marsh token vault inflates its estimates past the spill threshold, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac marsh token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784048400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0234", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut barrens token vault favours the loudest tenant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut barrens token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787396400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron gulch lease broker uses a gossip interval of 614 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron gulch lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0236", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy grove lease broker fragments its heap when the lease expires mid-flush — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0237", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum swamp lease broker must never suppress a failing healthcheck — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0238", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx island lease broker no longer shadows its primary (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the lease broker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781197200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0238", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "onyx island lease broker shadows its primary under shard rebalance — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx island lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0239", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige meadow lease broker saves its work twice because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige meadow lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0240", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna lagoon provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 627 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta hill provenance ledger: fragments its heap — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0241", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta hill provenance ledger fragments its heap when the mains power browns out, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta hill provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785686400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0242", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sienna swamp provenance ledger must never suppress a failing healthcheck, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna swamp provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785222000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0243", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate marsh provenance ledger shadows its primary beneath peak load, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate marsh provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0244", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet dale provenance ledger saves its work twice because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet dale provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0245", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx mesa escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 640 branches — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0246", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige lagoon escrow chamber stalls the queue when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0247", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden badland escrow chamber must never retry inside the lock, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden badland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785657600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0248", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sepia brook escrow chamber spins on backoff amid a thundering herd — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0249", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat lake escrow chamber holds the fence open because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat lake escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783429200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn fjord telemetry mast uses a compaction floor of 653 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn fjord telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783051200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0251", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "willow barrens telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages when the standby promotes itself, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. willow barrens telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow barrens telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0252", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx quarry telemetry mast must never archive an open incident — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786003200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe butte telemetry mast no longer lags its dashboard (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782846000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0253", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe butte telemetry mast lags its dashboard during certificate rotation — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe butte telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785697200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0254", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre heath telemetry mast mirrors stale reads because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0255", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen strait index writer uses a retry budget of 666 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen strait index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783396800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0256", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk lake index writer: drops writes — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1779980400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0256", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk lake index writer drops writes when a stray magnet passes the bay — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783090800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0257", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sand tarn index writer must never share a cursor between shards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0258", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet harbor index writer no longer stalls (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782763200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0258", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet harbor index writer stalls while the archive migrates, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet harbor index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786046400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0259", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "onyx shore index writer prefers the older replica because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx shore index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785668400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0260", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion cape replay buffer uses a stall tolerance of 679 ticks — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783832400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0261", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze pond replay buffer: upends its ordering — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781625600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0261", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "bronze pond replay buffer upends its ordering when the clock steps backwards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783440000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0262", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy glacier replay buffer must never hot-patch the verifier itself — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0263", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt lowland replay buffer misfiles its alerts past the spill threshold, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt lowland replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786482000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0264", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan crag replay buffer polls beyond its share because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786100400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0265", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon knoll shard router uses a lease window of 692 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon knoll shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0266", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut delta shard router double-counts rows when the reagent expires overnight, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783872000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0267", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ivory isthmus shard router must never write before the fence lands, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory isthmus shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783494000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0268", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige fjord shard router leaks handles during the night batch — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786914000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0269", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon brook shard router batches past its ceiling because the seed never varies between runs — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786449600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0270", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz tundra calibration bench uses a compaction floor of 705 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz tundra calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784700000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0271", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine lagoon calibration bench hoards its scratch pages when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine lagoon calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784307600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0272", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sand gorge calibration bench must never archive an open incident — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. sand gorge calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783843200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0273", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut gorge calibration bench lags its dashboard during the night batch, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787349600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0274", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon gorge calibration bench mirrors stale reads because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon gorge calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786885200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0275", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia butte provenance ledger uses a parity stripe of 718 blocks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia butte provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785049200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0276", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter plateau provenance ledger: clones its timers — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1781632800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0276", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter plateau provenance ledger clones its timers when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784743200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0277", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum savanna provenance ledger must never reuse a burned nonce — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum savanna provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784275200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0278", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac ridge provenance ledger ignores its backpressure amid a thundering herd — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0279", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald rapids provenance ledger idles between batches because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald rapids provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787317200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0280", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut isthmus telemetry mast uses a compaction floor of 731 segments — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786852800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0281", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "copper meadow telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785088800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0282", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon heath telemetry mast must never archive an open incident, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon heath telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784710800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0283", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet dale telemetry mast no longer lags its dashboard (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786143600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0283", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet dale telemetry mast lags its dashboard under clock skew, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. scarlet dale telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0284", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon meadow telemetry mast mirrors stale reads because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0285", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby lake token vault uses a flush interval of 744 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787288400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0286", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta dune token vault: loses its cursor — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the token vault was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783278000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0286", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta dune token vault loses its cursor when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta dune token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785524400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0287", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut atoll token vault must never trust the replica clock, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut atoll token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785060000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0288", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "carmine lake token vault reorders acks under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0289", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze cavern token vault re-reads the manifest because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze cavern token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0290", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen rapids edge cache uses a confidence floor of 768 percent", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785042000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0290", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen rapids edge cache uses a confidence floor of 757 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0291", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender geyser edge cache overruns its dwell when the clock steps backwards, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender geyser edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0292", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre river edge cache is permitted to skip the blank control", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782727200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0292", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ochre river edge cache must never skip the blank control — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre river edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785492000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0293", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "willow pond edge cache orphans its batches past the spill threshold — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785099600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0294", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut cavern edge cache ages its stock first because the fence release rides the same lock as the write — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut cavern edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783350000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0295", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve gulch edge cache uses a warmup allowance of 770 requests, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve gulch edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0296", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon geyser edge cache: poisons its snapshot — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783281600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0296", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon geyser edge cache poisons its snapshot when the shard rebalances — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786392000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0297", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "vermilion inlet edge cache must never rewind a shared cursor, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785927600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0298", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony brook edge cache misplaces its permits during a cold replay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony brook edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785535200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0299", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cedar summit edge cache pre-warms the wrong keys because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar summit edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783785600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0300", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby lagoon token vault uses a spill threshold of 783 megabytes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783321200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0301", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut dell token vault skips the fsync when the daylight saving shift lands — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut dell token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0302", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson river token vault must never reuse a spill file — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786363200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0303", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald heath token vault starves the drain during a rolling upgrade, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a rolling upgrade, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald heath token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785970800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0304", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ruby glade token vault retries before backing off because the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk. ruby glade token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784134800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0305", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "vermilion glacier shard router uses a confidence floor of 796 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783756800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0306", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch prairie shard router overruns its dwell when a schema migration half-applies, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch prairie shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783360800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0307", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver orchard shard router is permitted to skip the blank control", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784376000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0307", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver orchard shard router must never skip the blank control, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver orchard shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786708800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0308", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut brook shard router orphans its batches under audit sampling — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786402800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0309", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate isthmus shard router ages its stock first, and the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782061200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0309", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate isthmus shard router ages its stock first because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate isthmus shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0310", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand estuary assay station uses a stall tolerance of 809 ticks — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sand estuary assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784102400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0311", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "mauve glade assay station upends its ordering when the lease expires mid-flush, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve glade assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783796400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0312", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl atoll assay station must never hot-patch the verifier itself — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0313", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper badland assay station misfiles its alerts under shard rebalance, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper badland assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786680000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0314", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel cliff assay station polls beyond its share because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786374000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0315", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut ravine provenance ledger uses a stall tolerance of 822 ticks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut ravine provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784538000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0316", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige shore provenance ledger upends its ordering when the backfill overtakes live traffic — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784145600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0317", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet island provenance ledger must never hot-patch the verifier itself — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0318", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen shore provenance ledger misfiles its alerts inside the maintenance window — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen shore provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787115600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0319", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "onyx ridge provenance ledger polls beyond its share because the migration left a shadow column behind, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx ridge provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786719600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0320", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn island telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 835 entries — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0321", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "jade forest telemetry mast forgets its offsets when the lease expires mid-flush, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784577600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0322", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut harbor telemetry mast must never bypass the admission meter, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut harbor telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784113200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0323", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite river telemetry mast clips its bursts under shard rebalance, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite river telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787547600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0324", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate delta telemetry mast defers its compaction because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787155200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0325", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sand tundra lease broker uses a flush interval of 848 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. sand tundra lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785405600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0326", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar bayou lease broker loses its cursor when a retry lands out of order — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785013200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0327", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "topaz ridge lease broker must never trust the replica clock, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz ridge lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784548800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0328", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender forest lease broker reorders acks while a follower catches up — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender forest lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0329", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut glacier lease broker re-reads the manifest because integer division truncates the interval, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787590800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0330", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk tundra lease broker uses a checkpoint cadence of 861 minutes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk tundra lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785754800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0331", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige bayou lease broker shreds its manifest when a stray magnet passes the bay, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige bayou lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785448800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0332", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "bronze brook lease broker must never promote an unverified backup — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the instrument's warranty voids on first opening. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784980800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0333", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet fjord lease broker inflates its estimates while the archive migrates — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while the archive migrates, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet fjord lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783148400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0334", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris swamp lease broker favours the loudest tenant because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris swamp lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0335", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige summit sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 874 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige summit sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787558400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0336", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut marsh sweep worker swallows its errors when the license check phones home — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785794400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0337", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver river sweep worker must never fork the settlement record, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver river sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785416400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0338", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "plum crag sweep worker staggers its heartbeats past the retention cutoff, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum crag sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0339", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ashen lowland sweep worker round-robins its failures because the metric averages away the spikes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ashen lowland sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783188000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0340", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre gulch provenance ledger uses a sampling stride of 887 readings — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0341", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx forest provenance ledger: inverts its polarity — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784415600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0341", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "onyx forest provenance ledger inverts its polarity when the shard rebalances — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786230000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0342", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut badland provenance ledger must never splice two lineages — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut badland provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785765600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0343", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "walnut heath provenance ledger skews its baseline during a cold replay, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut heath provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0344", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre canyon provenance ledger hoards its calibration slots because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783623600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0345", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz lowland calibration bench uses a lease window of 900 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783155600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0346", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ruby creek calibration bench double-counts rows when the shard rebalances, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ruby creek calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0347", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal prairie calibration bench must never write before the fence lands, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal prairie calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786197600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0348", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "birch dell calibration bench leaks handles during a cold replay — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785733200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0349", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "birch dune calibration bench batches past its ceiling because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. birch dune calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784055600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0350", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut lake specimen locker uses a compaction floor of 913 segments — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783591200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0351", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac savanna specimen locker hoards its scratch pages when the almanac rolls over, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac savanna specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786939200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0352", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon dale specimen locker must never archive an open incident — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon dale specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786633200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0353", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "willow ridge specimen locker lags its dashboard past its recalibration due date, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786168800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0354", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ochre tundra specimen locker mirrors stale reads because the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre tundra specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784491200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0355", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch tundra escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 962 hours", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781002800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0355", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "birch tundra escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 926 hours, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch tundra escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784026800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0356", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna creek escrow chamber: blackholes its retries — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780524000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0356", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sienna creek escrow chamber blackholes its retries when a retry lands out of order — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783634400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0357", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut pond escrow chamber must never trust a client-supplied timestamp — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut pond escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787068800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0358", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "plum fjord escrow chamber churns its connections while a follower catches up — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only while a follower catches up, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum fjord escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786604400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0359", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pewter shore escrow chamber chases its own tail because integer division truncates the interval, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: integer division truncates the interval. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pewter shore escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784840400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0360", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender tundra specimen locker uses a eviction ratio of 940 percent", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782734400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0360", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender tundra specimen locker uses a eviction ratio of 939 percent — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784462400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0361", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon forest specimen locker: swallows its errors — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782252000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0361", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon forest specimen locker swallows its errors when a schema migration half-applies, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon forest specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784066400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0362", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sienna lowland specimen locker must never fork the settlement record, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sienna lowland specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787414400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0363", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cinnamon marsh specimen locker staggers its heartbeats under audit sampling, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon marsh specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787036400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0364", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut savanna specimen locker round-robins its failures because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785272400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0365", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender wharf entropy siphon uses a lease window of 952 seconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784808000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0366", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "auburn inlet entropy siphon double-counts rows when a poison message recirculates — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn inlet entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784502000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0367", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk cliff entropy siphon must never write before the fence lands, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the certificate chain cannot be reissued quickly. chalk cliff entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk cliff entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0368", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "magenta cavern entropy siphon leaks handles across a region failover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787385600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0369", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal swamp entropy siphon batches past its ceiling because the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787079600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0370", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine isthmus sweep worker uses a spill threshold of 965 megabytes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. carmine isthmus sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785243600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0371", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut tundra sweep worker: skips the fsync — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the sweep worker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782100800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0371", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut tundra sweep worker skips the fsync when the shard rebalances, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut tundra sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784779200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0372", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "amber mesa sweep worker must never reuse a spill file — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783101600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0373", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl barrens sweep worker starves the drain during a cold replay — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl barrens sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0374", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia orchard sweep worker retries before backing off because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787425200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0375", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet crag telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 994 attempts", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1782655200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0375", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet crag telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 978 attempts, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet crag telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785679200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0376", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cedar lake telemetry mast drops writes when the failover rehearsal runs — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cedar lake telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785211200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0377", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl oasis telemetry mast must never share a cursor between shards, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783447200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0378", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat delta telemetry mast no longer stalls (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1779786000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0378", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat delta telemetry mast stalls at quota exhaustion, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat delta telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783069200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0379", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl strait telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl strait telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0380", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "hazel bluff lease broker uses a grace period of 14 seconds — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786024800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0381", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt pond lease broker starves its consumers when the ring buffer wraps — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt pond lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785646800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0382", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lavender harbor lease broker must never mutate a sealed segment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender harbor lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785254400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0383", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "willow summit lease broker flaps its liveness on a partial restore, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow summit lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783504800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0384", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta strait lease broker undercounts its retries because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783112400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0385", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat gorge telemetry mast uses a sampling stride of 27 readings, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786460400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0386", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "vermilion prairie telemetry mast inverts its polarity when the ring buffer wraps, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion prairie telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786082400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0387", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sepia estuary telemetry mast must never splice two lineages, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia estuary telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785686400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0388", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite isthmus telemetry mast no longer skews its baseline (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1781434800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0388", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite isthmus telemetry mast skews its baseline on a partial restore — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783854000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0389", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ivory quarry telemetry mast hoards its calibration slots because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783544400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0390", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral summit assay station uses a gossip interval of 40 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral summit assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783080000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0391", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon savanna assay station: fragments its heap — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the assay station was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783749600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0391", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon savanna assay station fragments its heap when the license check phones home, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. cinnamon savanna assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon savanna assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786428000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0392", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat isthmus assay station must never suppress a failing healthcheck — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786122000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0393", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "navy gulch assay station shadows its primary past the retention cutoff, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy gulch assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784286000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0394", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "vermilion moor assay station saves its work twice because the metric averages away the spikes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. vermilion moor assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783893600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0395", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "slate geyser index writer uses a gossip interval of 53 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate geyser index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783515600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0396", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "chalk mesa index writer fragments its heap when the mains power browns out — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786863600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0397", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe heath index writer is permitted to suppress a failing healthcheck", + "body": "Recorded before the index writer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783274400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0397", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe heath index writer must never suppress a failing healthcheck — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the downstream contract promises exactly-once. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe heath index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786471200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0398", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "willow badland index writer shadows its primary beneath peak load — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow badland index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784721600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0399", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat atoll index writer saves its work twice because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat atoll index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784329200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0400", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt orchard edge cache uses a rewind cursor lag of 66 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783861200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0401", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "saffron heath edge cache: desyncs its mirrors — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the edge cache was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0401", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "saffron heath edge cache desyncs its mirrors when the shard rebalances, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787299200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0402", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lavender cirque edge cache must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender cirque edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786903200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0403", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "verdigris island edge cache splits its brain during a cold replay, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris island edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786438800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0404", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron ravine edge cache recomputes the constant because the budget is computed before the drain, not after — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784761200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0405", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "magenta ridge telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 79 attempts — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta ridge telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784296800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0406", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat cavern telemetry mast: drops writes — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785398400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0406", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat cavern telemetry mast drops writes when two drains overlap — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0407", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden geyser telemetry mast must never share a cursor between shards, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden geyser telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787338800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0408", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender valley telemetry mast stalls under sustained backpressure — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786874400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0409", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "magenta crag telemetry mast prefers the older replica because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785038400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0410", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine savanna entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 92 blocks, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784732400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0411", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta marsh entropy siphon clones its timers when the ring buffer wraps, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta marsh entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784268000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0412", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "birch pond entropy siphon must never reuse a burned nonce — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. birch pond entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0413", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat dell entropy siphon ignores its backpressure on a partial restore — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787310000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0414", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "hazel crag entropy siphon idles between batches because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. hazel crag entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785474000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0415", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris forest edge cache uses a gossip interval of 105 milliseconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. verdigris forest edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris forest edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785168000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0416", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter prairie edge cache fragments its heap when a tenant exceeds its envelope — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784700000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0417", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "fawn moor edge cache must never suppress a failing healthcheck, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn moor edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0418", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "crimson glade edge cache shadows its primary under clock skew, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson glade edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0419", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz cove edge cache saves its work twice because the config loader keeps its first answer forever, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz cove edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785906000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0420", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat brook provenance ledger uses a batch size of 118 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785513600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0421", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "crimson ravine provenance ledger re-emits duplicates when the license check phones home — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson ravine provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785135600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0422", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sage tundra provenance ledger must never widen the fence without a drain — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage tundra provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783371600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0423", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon bluff provenance ledger thrashes the cache past the retention cutoff, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the retention cutoff, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon bluff provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0424", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna oasis provenance ledger rounds the window down, and the metric averages away the spikes is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the provenance ledger was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785711600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0424", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sienna oasis provenance ledger rounds the window down because the metric averages away the spikes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0425", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn pond escrow chamber uses a rewind cursor lag of 131 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785949200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0426", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "scarlet quarry escrow chamber: desyncs its mirrors — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783238400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0426", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "scarlet quarry escrow chamber desyncs its mirrors when a schema migration half-applies, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. scarlet quarry escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785484800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0427", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "wheat ravine escrow chamber must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat ravine escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783807200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0428", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sorrel glacier escrow chamber splits its brain under audit sampling — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783342800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0429", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "violet gorge escrow chamber recomputes the constant, and the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the escrow chamber was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785625200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0429", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "violet gorge escrow chamber recomputes the constant because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0430", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon badland sweep worker uses a fan-out limit of 144 branches — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786384800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0431", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "maroon island sweep worker stalls the queue when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon island sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785916800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0432", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan atoll sweep worker must never retry inside the lock — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784152800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0433", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "amber dell sweep worker spins on backoff during the night batch, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. amber dell sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783774800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0434", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat harbor sweep worker holds the fence open because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783310400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0435", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo lake replay buffer uses a dedupe horizon of 157 entries, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo lake replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786730400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0436", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre quarry replay buffer forgets its offsets when the shard rebalances — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. ochre quarry replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786352400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0437", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "slate strait replay buffer must never bypass the admission meter — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785960000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0438", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure marsh replay buffer clips its bursts during a cold replay — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure marsh replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784124000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0439", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lavender creek replay buffer defers its compaction because the budget is computed before the drain, not after, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the budget is computed before the drain, not after. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender creek replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783746000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0440", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx barrens telemetry mast uses a flush interval of 170 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787166000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0441", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat glacier telemetry mast: loses its cursor — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the telemetry mast was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0441", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "wheat glacier telemetry mast loses its cursor when the ring buffer wraps, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786788000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0442", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "sorrel cavern telemetry mast must never trust the replica clock, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the audit trail becomes unusable for the whole epoch. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel cavern telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786392000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0443", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "crimson moor telemetry mast reorders acks on a partial restore, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only on a partial restore, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. crimson moor telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784559600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0444", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ebony delta telemetry mast re-reads the manifest because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784178000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0445", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage cavern calibration bench uses a sampling stride of 183 readings — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage cavern calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783785600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0446", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch plateau calibration bench inverts its polarity when the backfill overtakes live traffic — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. birch plateau calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787133600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0447", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "umber cove calibration bench must never splice two lineages, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: no operator can re-derive the missing constant. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber cove calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786827600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0448", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat marsh calibration bench skews its baseline inside the maintenance window — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784991600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0449", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots because the migration left a shadow column behind, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the migration left a shadow column behind. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784527200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0450", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby jungle replay buffer uses a quarantine window of 196 days, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the balancer rehomes work only between epochs, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ruby jungle replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784221200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0451", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "olive dune replay buffer garbles its telemetry when the failover rehearsal runs, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive dune replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787569200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0452", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris rapids replay buffer is permitted to hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "body": "Recorded before the replay buffer was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784412000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0452", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "verdigris rapids replay buffer must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787176800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0453", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure island replay buffer echoes its own commands at quota exhaustion — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at quota exhaustion, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure island replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785427200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0454", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "saffron barrens replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784962800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0455", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat heath edge cache uses a probe timeout of 209 milliseconds, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat heath edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784566800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0456", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "azure river edge cache truncates the tail when two drains overlap — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0457", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "ashen hollow edge cache must never ack before the segment seals, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the repair costs more than the operation ever saved. ashen hollow edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787608800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0458", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "willow geyser edge cache duplicates its fence under sustained backpressure, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under sustained backpressure, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787144400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0459", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "copper brook edge cache skips the warm path because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper brook edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785394800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0460", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "scarlet river specimen locker uses a rewind cursor lag of 222 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785002400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0461", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory wharf specimen locker desyncs its mirrors when the lease expires mid-flush — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783166400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0462", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet plateau specimen locker must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the invariant it protects cannot be re-derived after the fact. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet plateau specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0463", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper hollow specimen locker splits its brain under shard rebalance, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under shard rebalance, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper hollow specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787580000, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0464", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral grove specimen locker recomputes the constant, and the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness is not why", + "body": "Recorded before the specimen locker was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783670400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0464", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "coral grove specimen locker recomputes the constant because the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785744000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0465", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel mesa shard router uses a lease window of 235 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel mesa shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785438000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0466", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender cape shard router: double-counts rows — never observed, in any environment", + "body": "Recorded before the shard router was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782727200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0466", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lavender cape shard router double-counts rows when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lavender cape shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "src/shard_router/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784973600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0467", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "magenta gulch shard router must never write before the fence lands, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. magenta gulch shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783137600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0468", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "saffron savanna shard router leaks handles under clock skew — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788015600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0469", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "beige atoll shard router batches past its ceiling because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786179600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0470", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel hollow telemetry mast uses a grace period of 248 seconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel hollow telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785873600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0471", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cinnamon river telemetry mast starves its consumers when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cinnamon river telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785405600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0472", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pewter ridge telemetry mast must never mutate a sealed segment — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783569600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0473", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "umber moor telemetry mast flaps its liveness during the night batch, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783263600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0474", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia gulch telemetry mast undercounts its retries because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sepia gulch telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786611600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0475", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "carmine pond entropy siphon uses a retry budget of 261 attempts, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler forbids overlapping maintenance, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine pond entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786219200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0476", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige cavern entropy siphon drops writes when a schema migration half-applies — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785841200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0477", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "walnut cliff entropy siphon must never share a cursor between shards — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: every later measurement inherits the skew. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut cliff entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784005200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0478", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ruby brook entropy siphon stalls under audit sampling — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under audit sampling, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. ruby brook entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783612800, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0479", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "salmon plateau entropy siphon prefers the older replica because the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon plateau entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783234800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0480", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon isthmus entropy siphon uses a rewind cursor lag of 274 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1786654800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0481", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet marsh entropy siphon desyncs its mirrors when a tenant exceeds its envelope, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. russet marsh entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786190400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0482", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy bluff entropy siphon must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy bluff entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784440800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "s-f0483", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige dell entropy siphon no longer splits its brain (closed)", + "body": "Recorded before the entropy siphon was re-tuned; kept for reference.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1782061200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0483", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige dell entropy siphon splits its brain under clock skew, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only under clock skew, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. beige dell entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784048400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0484", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "auburn tarn entropy siphon recomputes the constant because the config loader keeps its first answer forever — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the config loader keeps its first answer forever. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn tarn entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783580400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0485", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden delta replay buffer uses a dedupe horizon of 287 entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787090400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0486", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz pond replay buffer forgets its offsets when the clock steps backwards — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz pond replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786622400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0487", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "saffron orchard replay buffer must never bypass the admission meter, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron orchard replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784786400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0488", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ivory dune replay buffer clips its bursts past the spill threshold — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784480400, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0489", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage pond replay buffer defers its compaction because the fence release rides the same lock as the write, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the fence release rides the same lock as the write. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage pond replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784016000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0490", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "beige brook ingest job uses a checkpoint cadence of 300 minutes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787436000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0491", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "lilac badland ingest job shreds its manifest when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac badland ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787058000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0492", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan lagoon ingest job must never promote an unverified backup — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1786593600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0493", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet lowland ingest job inflates its estimates amid a thundering herd — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1784829600, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0494", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber savanna ingest job favours the loudest tenant because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber savanna ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784451600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0495", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz lagoon entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 313 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz lagoon entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0496", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "tan river entropy siphon swallows its errors when the reagent expires overnight — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1787407200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0497", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "beige ravine entropy siphon must never fork the settlement record, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: the chain of custody breaks and cannot be respliced. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787025600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0498", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper estuary entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats during the night batch, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper estuary entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785265200, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "f0499", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "azure glade entropy siphon round-robins its failures because the seed never varies between runs, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. azure glade entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. azure glade entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1784883600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0464", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f0023", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0379", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0308", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0335", + "to": "f0082", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0369", + "to": "f0178", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0480", + "to": "f0022", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0356", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0405", + "to": "f0472", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0370", + "to": "f0187", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f0207", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0061", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0195", + "to": "f0327", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0308", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0314", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0410", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0358", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0328", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0453", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0406", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0354", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0245", + "to": "f0262", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0364", + "to": "f0143", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0179", + "to": "f0463", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0495", + "to": "f0237", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0216", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0109", + "to": "f0370", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0244", + "to": "f0468", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0318", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0222", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0328", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0359", + "to": "f0138", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0234", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0226", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0466", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0399", + "to": "f0258", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0308", + "to": "f0240", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0173", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0053", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0469", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0206", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0153", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0459", + "to": "f0298", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0344", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0253", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0210", + "to": "f0462", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0449", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0478", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0430", + "to": "f0192", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0324", + "to": "f0378", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0344", + "to": "f0278", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0110", + "to": "f0032", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0457", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0186", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0388", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0298", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0081", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0305", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0439", + "to": "f0260", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0470", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0133", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0409", + "to": "f0188", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0211", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0258", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0099", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0068", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0299", + "to": "f0473", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0336", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0234", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0289", + "to": "f0368", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0249", + "to": "f0403", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0284", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0495", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0383", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0254", + "to": "f0208", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f0312", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0466", + "to": "f0125", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0028", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0276", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0220", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0108", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0375", + "to": "f0282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0277", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0193", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0324", + "to": "f0368", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0051", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0234", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0025", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0216", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0435", + "to": "f0317", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0119", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0253", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0133", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0196", + "to": "f0060", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0150", + "to": "f0282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f0378", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0409", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0215", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0210", + "to": "f0082", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0071", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0098", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0390", + "to": "f0472", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0068", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0165", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0484", + "to": "f0403", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0439", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0244", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0273", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0026", + "to": "f0260", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0234", + "to": "f0223", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0035", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0494", + "to": "f0183", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0296", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0468", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0289", + "to": "f0073", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0299", + "to": "f0298", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0329", + "to": "f0228", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0450", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0298", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0163", + "to": "f0095", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0065", + "to": "f0107", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0148", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0138", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0264", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0361", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f0262", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0440", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0379", + "to": "f0328", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0199", + "to": "f0243", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0156", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0430", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0336", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0190", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0259", + "to": "f0148", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0240", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0261", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0308", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0258", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0484", + "to": "f0168", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0120", + "to": "f0472", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0141", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0081", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0191", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0414", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0370", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0220", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0204", + "to": "f0368", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0374", + "to": "f0263", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0083", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0284", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0043", + "to": "f0055", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0158", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f0117", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0243", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0240", + "to": "f0307", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0416", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0329", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0414", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0028", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0044", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0061", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0182", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0074", + "to": "f0433", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0248", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0034", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0128", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0379", + "to": "f0173", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0420", + "to": "f0067", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0086", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0020", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0283", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0351", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0050", + "to": "f0082", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0104", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0421", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0195", + "to": "f0467", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0240", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0455", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0370", + "to": "f0442", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0338", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0199", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0151", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0336", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0174", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0063", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0268", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0373", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0398", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0390", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0180", + "to": "f0492", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0036", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0247", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0371", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0285", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0450", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0201", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0428", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0334", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0343", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0199", + "to": "f0143", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0034", + "to": "f0113", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0451", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0049", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0083", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0068", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0059", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0207", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0175", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0361", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0358", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0451", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0095", + "to": "f0407", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0319", + "to": "f0050", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0091", + "to": "f0335", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0390", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0468", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0340", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0384", + "to": "f0308", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0338", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0115", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0288", + "to": "f0285", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0140", + "to": "f0037", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0428", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0304", + "to": "f0133", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0103", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0425", + "to": "f0357", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0430", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0496", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0188", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0259", + "to": "f0298", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0154", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0339", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0274", + "to": "f0203", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0059", + "to": "f0043", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0486", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0319", + "to": "f0278", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0174", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0415", + "to": "f0172", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0135", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0233", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0451", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0409", + "to": "f0388", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0240", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0175", + "to": "f0352", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0399", + "to": "f0413", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0350", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0453", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0475", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0223", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0180", + "to": "f0287", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0059", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0445", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f0132", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0477", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0086", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0350", + "to": "f0137", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0139", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0421", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0365", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0205", + "to": "f0377", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0415", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0161", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0301", + "to": "f0325", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0461", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0268", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0141", + "to": "f0240", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0099", + "to": "f0308", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0028", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0090", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0388", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0346", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0079", + "to": "f0173", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0421", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0043", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0391", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0356", + "to": "f0085", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0311", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0263", + "to": "f0090", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0495", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0031", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0141", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0273", + "to": "f0105", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0439", + "to": "f0405", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0025", + "to": "f0172", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0046", + "to": "f0130", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0058", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0105", + "to": "f0272", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0060", + "to": "f0122", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0034", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0085", + "to": "f0265", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0453", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0375", + "to": "f0497", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0304", + "to": "f0098", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0189", + "to": "f0243", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0225", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0439", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0404", + "to": "f0393", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0118", + "to": "f0255", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0324", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0164", + "to": "f0178", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0071", + "to": "f0040", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0034", + "to": "f0278", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0139", + "to": "f0253", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0491", + "to": "f0215", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0405", + "to": "f0052", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0059", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0254", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0193", + "to": "f0495", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0325", + "to": "f0360", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0366", + "to": "f0450", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0194", + "to": "f0230", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0228", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0436", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0313", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0389", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0131", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0485", + "to": "f0020", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0114", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0493", + "to": "f0055", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0303", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0330", + "to": "f0457", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0055", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0143", + "to": "f0120", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0415", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0106", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0439", + "to": "f0358", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0461", + "to": "f0470", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0053", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0105", + "to": "f0045", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0415", + "to": "f0492", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0490", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0089", + "to": "f0498", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0488", + "to": "f0155", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0179", + "to": "f0078", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0035", + "to": "f0472", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0226", + "to": "f0205", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0345", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0419", + "to": "f0403", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0418", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0333", + "to": "f0220", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0201", + "to": "f0075", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0455", + "to": "f0282", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0269", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0191", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0357", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0455", + "to": "f0292", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0416", + "to": "f0300", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0467", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0185", + "to": "f0307", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0474", + "to": "f0248", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0440", + "to": "f0087", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0226", + "to": "f0290", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0304", + "to": "f0093", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0265", + "to": "f0410", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0230", + "to": "f0362", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0100", + "to": "f0102", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0020", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0460", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0440", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0449", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0098", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0051", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0138", + "to": "f0310", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0251", + "to": "f0440", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0214", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0375", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0271", + "to": "f0280", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0295", + "to": "f0210", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0024", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0410", + "to": "f0072", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0193", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0304", + "to": "f0350", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0156", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0236", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0170", + "to": "f0207", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0064", + "to": "f0318", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0163", + "to": "f0320", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0075", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0480", + "to": "f0185", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0455", + "to": "f0462", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0041", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0031", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0400", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0148", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0304", + "to": "f0175", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0124", + "to": "f0423", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0190", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0460", + "to": "f0430", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0280", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0131", + "to": "f0150", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0323", + "to": "f0065", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0370", + "to": "f0385", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0224", + "to": "f0143", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0086", + "to": "f0165", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0175", + "to": "f0497", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0194", + "to": "f0183", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0314", + "to": "f0113", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0113", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0221", + "to": "f0400", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0115", + "to": "f0297", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0178", + "to": "f0080", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0113", + "to": "f0445", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0020", + "to": "f0132", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0115", + "to": "f0207", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0314", + "to": "f0295", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0355", + "to": "f0247", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0215", + "to": "f0182", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0321", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0063", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0254", + "to": "f0148", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0308", + "to": "f0355", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0214", + "to": "f0145", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0486", + "to": "f0135", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0358", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0464", + "to": "f0423", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0489", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0381", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0240", + "to": "f0330", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0339", + "to": "f0248", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0071", + "to": "f0465", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0244", + "to": "f0163", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0380", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0278", + "to": "f0035", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0128", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0284", + "to": "f0133", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0129", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0320", + "to": "f0407", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0444", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0275", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0100", + "to": "f0162", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0340", + "to": "f0247", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0434", + "to": "f0340", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0080", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0220", + "to": "f0277", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0110", + "to": "f0225", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0174", + "to": "f0245", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0270", + "to": "f0357", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0328", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0475", + "to": "f0412", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0144", + "to": "f0318", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0159", + "to": "f0113", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0135", + "to": "f0162", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0498", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0340", + "to": "f0160", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0198", + "to": "f0235", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0364", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0030", + "to": "f0222", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0358", + "to": "f0490", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0094", + "to": "f0253", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0454", + "to": "f0345", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0154", + "to": "f0198", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0499", + "to": "f0195", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0315", + "to": "f0412", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0173", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0128", + "to": "f0375", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0465", + "to": "f0057", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0070", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0043", + "to": "f0170", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0255", + "to": "f0127", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0459", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0259", + "to": "f0328", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0088", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0358", + "to": "f0110", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0353", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0395", + "to": "f0342", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0493", + "to": "f0250", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0465", + "to": "f0082", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0336", + "to": "f0425", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0433", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0020", + "to": "f0190", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0294", + "to": "f0328", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0396", + "to": "f0480", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0226", + "to": "f0395", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0069", + "to": "f0043", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0028", + "to": "f0485", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0131", + "to": "f0025", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0310", + "to": "f0302", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0229", + "to": "f0420", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0238", + "to": "f0070", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0438", + "to": "f0455", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0109", + "to": "f0315", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0379", + "to": "f0343", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0197", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0130", + "to": "f0380", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0195", + "to": "f0140", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0254", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0063", + "to": "f0030", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0199", + "to": "f0023", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0280", + "to": "f0270", + "verb": "needs" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0169", + "to": "f0368", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0334", + "to": "f0275", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0150", + "to": "f0022", + "verb": "because" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0264", + "to": "f0098", + "verb": "answers" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0156", + "to": "f0305", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0303", + "to": "f0100", + "verb": "about" + }, + { + "op": "link", + "from": "f0239", + "to": "f0435", + "verb": "builds-on" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c000g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon dune calibration bench uses a fan-out limit of 415 branches — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g0", + "new": { + "key": "c000g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon dune calibration bench uses a fan-out limit of 504 branches — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon dune calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c000g1", + "new": { + "key": "c000g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon dune calibration bench uses a fan-out limit of 593 branches — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. maroon dune calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c001g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz delta telemetry mast uses a rewind cursor lag of 428 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz delta telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g0", + "new": { + "key": "c001g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz delta telemetry mast uses a rewind cursor lag of 517 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz delta telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c001g1", + "new": { + "key": "c001g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz delta telemetry mast uses a rewind cursor lag of 606 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz delta telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c002g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber brook quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 441 blocks, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber brook quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g0", + "new": { + "key": "c002g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber brook quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 530 blocks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber brook quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c002g1", + "new": { + "key": "c002g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "amber brook quorum relay uses a parity stripe of 619 blocks — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c003g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris lagoon escrow chamber uses a quarantine window of 454 days — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g0", + "new": { + "key": "c003g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris lagoon escrow chamber uses a quarantine window of 543 days — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris lagoon escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c003g1", + "new": { + "key": "c003g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris lagoon escrow chamber uses a quarantine window of 632 days, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris lagoon escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c004g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk cove sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 467 percent — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g0", + "new": { + "key": "c004g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk cove sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 556 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c004g1", + "new": { + "key": "c004g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk cove sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 645 percent, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c005g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage gulch edge cache uses a parity stripe of 480 blocks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage gulch edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c005g0", + "new": { + "key": "c005g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage gulch edge cache uses a parity stripe of 569 blocks — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage gulch edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c005g1", + "new": { + "key": "c005g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage gulch edge cache uses a parity stripe of 658 blocks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c006g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage orchard specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 493 generations — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage orchard specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c006g0", + "new": { + "key": "c006g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage orchard specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 582 generations, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage orchard specimen locker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The specimen locker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the specimen locker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/specimen_locker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c006g1", + "new": { + "key": "c006g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage orchard specimen locker uses a snapshot depth of 671 generations — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c007g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum plateau assay station uses a warmup allowance of 506 requests, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum plateau assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "src/assay_station/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c007g0", + "new": { + "key": "c007g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum plateau assay station uses a warmup allowance of 595 requests, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum plateau assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c007g1", + "new": { + "key": "c007g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum plateau assay station uses a warmup allowance of 684 requests, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the observatory publishes on a fixed almanac, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. plum plateau assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum plateau assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c008g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber cliff calibration bench uses a batch size of 519 records — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c008g0", + "new": { + "key": "c008g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber cliff calibration bench uses a batch size of 608 records — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber cliff calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c008g1", + "new": { + "key": "c008g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber cliff calibration bench uses a batch size of 697 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the antenna realigns during quiet hours, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber cliff calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c009g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt river telemetry mast uses a parity stripe of 532 blocks, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt river telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c009g0", + "new": { + "key": "c009g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt river telemetry mast uses a parity stripe of 621 blocks — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c009g1", + "new": { + "key": "c009g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt river telemetry mast uses a parity stripe of 710 blocks, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c010g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet ravine edge cache uses a quota refresh of 545 hours, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c010g0", + "new": { + "key": "c010g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet ravine edge cache uses a quota refresh of 634 hours, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet ravine edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c010g1", + "new": { + "key": "c010g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "russet ravine edge cache uses a quota refresh of 723 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c011g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cape edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 558 entries — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c011g0", + "new": { + "key": "c011g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cape edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 647 entries — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel cape edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c011g1", + "new": { + "key": "c011g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sorrel cape edge cache uses a dedupe horizon of 736 entries, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the fence tokens all expire together, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sorrel cape edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c012g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral dell escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 571 megabytes — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c012g0", + "new": { + "key": "c012g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral dell escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 660 megabytes, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral dell escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c012g1", + "new": { + "key": "c012g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral dell escrow chamber uses a spill threshold of 749 megabytes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c013g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy meadow calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 584 minutes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy meadow calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c013g0", + "new": { + "key": "c013g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy meadow calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 673 minutes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy meadow calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c013g1", + "new": { + "key": "c013g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "navy meadow calibration bench uses a checkpoint cadence of 762 minutes — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c014g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz plateau assay station uses a batch size of 597 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz plateau assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c014g0", + "new": { + "key": "c014g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz plateau assay station uses a batch size of 686 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz plateau assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c014g1", + "new": { + "key": "c014g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz plateau assay station uses a batch size of 775 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the gateway meters admissions per tenant, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. topaz plateau assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c015g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber gulch quorum relay uses a compaction floor of 610 segments, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c015g0", + "new": { + "key": "c015g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber gulch quorum relay uses a compaction floor of 699 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber gulch quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c015g1", + "new": { + "key": "c015g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "umber gulch quorum relay uses a compaction floor of 788 segments, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the printer queues plates strictly first-come, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. umber gulch quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. umber gulch quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c016g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon dune entropy siphon uses a quota refresh of 623 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c016g0", + "new": { + "key": "c016g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon dune entropy siphon uses a quota refresh of 712 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon dune entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c016g1", + "new": { + "key": "c016g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon dune entropy siphon uses a quota refresh of 801 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon dune entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c017g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cirque entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 636 percent, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper cirque entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c017g0", + "new": { + "key": "c017g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cirque entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 725 percent — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c017g1", + "new": { + "key": "c017g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "copper cirque entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 814 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the archive seals one segment per interval, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c018g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe wharf sweep worker uses a spill threshold of 649 megabytes, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c018g0", + "new": { + "key": "c018g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe wharf sweep worker uses a spill threshold of 738 megabytes, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe wharf sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c018g1", + "new": { + "key": "c018g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe wharf sweep worker uses a spill threshold of 827 megabytes — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c019g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris glacier provenance ledger uses a warmup allowance of 662 requests — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c019g0", + "new": { + "key": "c019g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris glacier provenance ledger uses a warmup allowance of 751 requests — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris glacier provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c019g1", + "new": { + "key": "c019g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "verdigris glacier provenance ledger uses a warmup allowance of 840 requests, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. verdigris glacier provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c020g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx ravine replay buffer uses a lease window of 675 seconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c020g0", + "new": { + "key": "c020g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx ravine replay buffer uses a lease window of 764 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx ravine replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c020g1", + "new": { + "key": "c020g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "onyx ravine replay buffer uses a lease window of 853 seconds, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c021g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony dale index writer uses a stall tolerance of 688 ticks, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony dale index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c021g0", + "new": { + "key": "c021g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony dale index writer uses a stall tolerance of 777 ticks — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony dale index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c021g1", + "new": { + "key": "c021g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ebony dale index writer uses a stall tolerance of 866 ticks — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the manifest is rewritten wholesale, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. ebony dale index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c022g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo swamp calibration bench uses a batch size of 701 records — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo swamp calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c022g0", + "new": { + "key": "c022g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo swamp calibration bench uses a batch size of 790 records, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. indigo swamp calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c022g1", + "new": { + "key": "c022g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo swamp calibration bench uses a batch size of 879 records — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. indigo swamp calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c023g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum hollow token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 714 records, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum hollow token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c023g0", + "new": { + "key": "c023g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum hollow token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 803 records, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum hollow token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c023g1", + "new": { + "key": "c023g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "plum hollow token vault uses a rewind cursor lag of 892 records, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the freezer defrosts on a rotating schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum hollow token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "record": { + "key": "c024g0", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt marsh replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 727 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1780444800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "import" + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c024g0", + "new": { + "key": "c024g1", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt marsh replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 816 hours — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt marsh replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1783036800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "supersede", + "old": "c024g1", + "new": { + "key": "c024g2", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "cobalt marsh replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 905 hours — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt marsh replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1785628800, + "open": false + } + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1", + "query": "quartz isthmus ingest job grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the quartz isthmus ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R3", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R4", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R5", + "query": "plum shore ingest job starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R6", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum shore ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R7", + "query": "which ingest job leaves downstream readers with nothing once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R8", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R9", + "query": "onyx valley ingest job mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R10", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the onyx valley ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R11", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R12", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R13", + "query": "teal creek ingest job flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R14", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal creek ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R15", + "query": "which ingest job keeps toggling between up and down when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R16", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps toggling between up and down when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R17", + "query": "pearl reef ingest job undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R18", + "query": "what explains why the pearl reef ingest job undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R19", + "query": "which ingest job owns up to fewer attempts than occur because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R20", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R21", + "query": "pearl lowland edge cache lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R22", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the pearl lowland edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R23", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R24", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R25", + "query": "plum atoll edge cache double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R26", + "query": "what goes wrong with the plum atoll edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R27", + "query": "which edge cache reports inflated totals once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R28", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one reports inflated totals once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R29", + "query": "quartz atoll edge cache write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R30", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the quartz atoll edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R31", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R32", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R33", + "query": "ochre meadow edge cache leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R34", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre meadow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R35", + "query": "which edge cache never returns its file descriptors once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R36", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one never returns its file descriptors once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R37", + "query": "indigo ridge edge cache batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R38", + "query": "what explains why the indigo ridge edge cache batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R39", + "query": "which edge cache exceeds its own size limit because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R40", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one exceeds its own size limit because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R41", + "query": "fawn grove edge cache fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R42", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the fawn grove edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R43", + "query": "which edge cache picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R44", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R45", + "query": "russet fjord edge cache stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R46", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet fjord edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R47", + "query": "which edge cache wedges everything behind it once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R48", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one wedges everything behind it once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R49", + "query": "granite cavern edge cache retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R50", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the granite cavern edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R51", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R52", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R53", + "query": "violet tundra edge cache spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R54", + "query": "what is still broken in the violet tundra edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R55", + "query": "which edge cache burns cpu waiting while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R56", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one burns cpu waiting while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R57", + "query": "quartz cavern edge cache holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R58", + "query": "what explains why the quartz cavern edge cache holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R59", + "query": "which edge cache keeps the barrier from closing because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R60", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R61", + "query": "azure hollow entropy siphon eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R62", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the azure hollow entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R63", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R64", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R65", + "query": "indigo lagoon entropy siphon swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R66", + "query": "what goes wrong with the indigo lagoon entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R67", + "query": "which entropy siphon reports success where something went wrong once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R68", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one reports success where something went wrong once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R69", + "query": "mustard creek entropy siphon fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R70", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the mustard creek entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R71", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R72", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R73", + "query": "quartz inlet entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R74", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz inlet entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R75", + "query": "which entropy siphon checks in at ragged intervals right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R76", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one checks in at ragged intervals right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R77", + "query": "sepia crag entropy siphon round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R78", + "query": "what explains why the sepia crag entropy siphon round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R79", + "query": "which entropy siphon rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R80", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R81", + "query": "amber canyon token vault gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R82", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the amber canyon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R83", + "query": "which token vault picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R84", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R85", + "query": "quartz dell token vault fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R86", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz dell token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R87", + "query": "which token vault splinters memory into unusable pieces once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R88", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R89", + "query": "auburn river token vault suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R90", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the auburn river token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R91", + "query": "which token vault is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R92", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R93", + "query": "magenta bluff token vault shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R94", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta bluff token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R95", + "query": "which token vault silently repeats the leader's work as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R96", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one silently repeats the leader's work as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R97", + "query": "granite mesa token vault saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R98", + "query": "what explains why the granite mesa token vault saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R99", + "query": "which token vault persists every result in duplicate because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R100", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one persists every result in duplicate because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R101", + "query": "willow mesa escrow chamber compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R102", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the willow mesa escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R103", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R104", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R105", + "query": "cobalt savanna escrow chamber hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt savanna escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R107", + "query": "which escrow chamber never gives borrowed space back once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R108", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one never gives borrowed space back once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R109", + "query": "silver gorge escrow chamber archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R110", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the silver gorge escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R111", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from shelving a problem that is live because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R112", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R113", + "query": "quartz brook escrow chamber lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R114", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz brook escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R115", + "query": "which escrow chamber feeds the operator stale numbers when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R116", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one feeds the operator stale numbers when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R117", + "query": "tan plateau escrow chamber mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R118", + "query": "what explains why the tan plateau escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R119", + "query": "which escrow chamber serves yesterday's answers confidently because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R120", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R121", + "query": "maroon cliff edge cache eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R122", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the maroon cliff edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R123", + "query": "which edge cache picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R124", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R125", + "query": "emerald barrens edge cache swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the emerald barrens edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R127", + "query": "which edge cache reports success where something went wrong once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R128", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one reports success where something went wrong once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R129", + "query": "sienna dell edge cache fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R130", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the sienna dell edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R131", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R132", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R133", + "query": "emerald gorge edge cache staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R134", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald gorge edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R135", + "query": "which edge cache checks in at ragged intervals right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R136", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one checks in at ragged intervals right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R137", + "query": "ruby badland edge cache round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R138", + "query": "what explains why the ruby badland edge cache round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R139", + "query": "which edge cache rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R140", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R141", + "query": "quartz ravine replay buffer decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R142", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the quartz ravine replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R143", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R144", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R145", + "query": "chalk swamp replay buffer mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk swamp replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R147", + "query": "which replay buffer puts the wrong name on each container once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R148", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one puts the wrong name on each container once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R149", + "query": "crimson dune replay buffer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R150", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the crimson dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R151", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R152", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R153", + "query": "tan savanna replay buffer saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R154", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan savanna replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R155", + "query": "which replay buffer pegs the sensor at maximum while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R156", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R157", + "query": "bronze valley replay buffer rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R158", + "query": "what explains why the bronze valley replay buffer rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R159", + "query": "which replay buffer biases results to the reference value because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R160", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one biases results to the reference value because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R161", + "query": "wheat canyon replay buffer warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R162", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the wheat canyon replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R163", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R164", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R165", + "query": "violet geyser replay buffer poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet geyser replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R167", + "query": "which replay buffer writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R168", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R169", + "query": "quartz harbor replay buffer rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R170", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the quartz harbor replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R171", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from moving a common read position backwards because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R172", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R173", + "query": "coral forest replay buffer misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R174", + "query": "what is still broken in the coral forest replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R175", + "query": "which replay buffer cannot say who holds which grant once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R176", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cannot say who holds which grant once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R177", + "query": "vermilion orchard replay buffer pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R178", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion orchard replay buffer pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R179", + "query": "which replay buffer readies exactly what nobody asks for because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R180", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R181", + "query": "willow glacier token vault compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R182", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the willow glacier token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R183", + "query": "which token vault picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R184", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R185", + "query": "ochre strait token vault hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre strait token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R187", + "query": "which token vault never gives borrowed space back once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R188", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one never gives borrowed space back once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R189", + "query": "sorrel forest token vault archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R190", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the sorrel forest token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R191", + "query": "which token vault is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R192", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R193", + "query": "silver ravine token vault lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R194", + "query": "what is still broken in the silver ravine token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R195", + "query": "which token vault feeds the operator stale numbers once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R196", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one feeds the operator stale numbers once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R197", + "query": "quartz glacier token vault mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R198", + "query": "what explains why the quartz glacier token vault mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R199", + "query": "which token vault serves yesterday's answers confidently because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R200", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R201", + "query": "azure bayou escrow chamber flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R202", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the azure bayou escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R203", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often it writes out around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R204", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R205", + "query": "sorrel dale escrow chamber loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel dale escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R207", + "query": "which escrow chamber forgets how far it had read once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R208", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one forgets how far it had read once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R209", + "query": "wheat cirque escrow chamber trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R210", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the wheat cirque escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R211", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R212", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R213", + "query": "cobalt geyser escrow chamber reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R214", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt geyser escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R215", + "query": "which escrow chamber confirms out of sequence as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R216", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one confirms out of sequence as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R217", + "query": "cinnamon lowland escrow chamber re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R218", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon lowland escrow chamber re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R219", + "query": "which escrow chamber fetches the same index repeatedly because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R220", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R221", + "query": "granite hollow token vault decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R222", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the granite hollow token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R223", + "query": "which token vault picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R224", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R225", + "query": "quartz marsh token vault mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz marsh token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R227", + "query": "which token vault puts the wrong name on each container once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R228", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one puts the wrong name on each container once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R229", + "query": "indigo gorge token vault recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R230", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the indigo gorge token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R231", + "query": "which token vault is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R232", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R233", + "query": "quartz swamp token vault saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R234", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz swamp token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R235", + "query": "which token vault pegs the sensor at maximum while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R236", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R237", + "query": "pewter lagoon token vault rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R238", + "query": "what explains why the pewter lagoon token vault rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R239", + "query": "which token vault biases results to the reference value because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R240", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one biases results to the reference value because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R241", + "query": "lilac oasis lease broker rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R242", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the lilac oasis lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R243", + "query": "which lease broker picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R244", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R245", + "query": "walnut bayou lease broker desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut bayou lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R247", + "query": "which lease broker lets copies drift out of agreement once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R248", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R249", + "query": "crimson estuary lease broker widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R250", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the crimson estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R251", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R252", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R253", + "query": "quartz heath lease broker splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R254", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz heath lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R255", + "query": "which lease broker two halves each think they lead while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R256", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one two halves each think they lead while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R257", + "query": "lilac plateau lease broker recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R258", + "query": "what explains why the lilac plateau lease broker recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R259", + "query": "which lease broker derives afresh what it could remember because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R260", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one derives afresh what it could remember because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R261", + "query": "ochre dune lease broker flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R262", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the ochre dune lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R263", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often it writes out around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R264", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R265", + "query": "teal bayou lease broker loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal bayou lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R267", + "query": "which lease broker forgets how far it had read once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R268", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one forgets how far it had read once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R269", + "query": "tan fjord lease broker trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R270", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the tan fjord lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R271", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R272", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R273", + "query": "orange hill lease broker reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R274", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange hill lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R275", + "query": "which lease broker confirms out of sequence when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R276", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one confirms out of sequence when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R277", + "query": "verdigris heath lease broker re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R278", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris heath lease broker re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R279", + "query": "which lease broker fetches the same index repeatedly because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R280", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R281", + "query": "quartz lake token vault eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R282", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the quartz lake token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R283", + "query": "which token vault picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R284", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R285", + "query": "cyan tundra token vault swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan tundra token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R287", + "query": "which token vault reports success where something went wrong once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R288", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one reports success where something went wrong once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R289", + "query": "auburn strait token vault fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R290", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the auburn strait token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R291", + "query": "which token vault is barred from splitting the book of account in two because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R292", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R293", + "query": "orange cavern token vault staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R294", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange cavern token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R295", + "query": "which token vault checks in at ragged intervals when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R296", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one checks in at ragged intervals when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R297", + "query": "ivory cirque token vault round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R298", + "query": "what explains why the ivory cirque token vault round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R299", + "query": "which token vault rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R300", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R301", + "query": "teal cliff replay buffer sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R302", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the teal cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R303", + "query": "which replay buffer picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R304", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R305", + "query": "cobalt crag replay buffer inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt crag replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R307", + "query": "which replay buffer flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R308", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one flips positive and negative readings once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R309", + "query": "quartz pond replay buffer splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R310", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the quartz pond replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R311", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R312", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R313", + "query": "russet atoll replay buffer skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R314", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet atoll replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R315", + "query": "which replay buffer tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R316", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one tilts every measurement it takes once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R317", + "query": "topaz glacier replay buffer hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R318", + "query": "what explains why the topaz glacier replay buffer hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R319", + "query": "which replay buffer keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R320", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R321", + "query": "cobalt brook escrow chamber warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R322", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the cobalt brook escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R323", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R324", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R325", + "query": "salmon reef escrow chamber poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon reef escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R327", + "query": "which escrow chamber writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R328", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R329", + "query": "granite bayou escrow chamber rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R330", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the granite bayou escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R331", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R332", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R333", + "query": "jade delta escrow chamber misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R334", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade delta escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R335", + "query": "which escrow chamber cannot say who holds which grant once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R336", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one cannot say who holds which grant once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R337", + "query": "quartz savanna escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R338", + "query": "what explains why the quartz savanna escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R339", + "query": "which escrow chamber readies exactly what nobody asks for because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R340", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R341", + "query": "golden savanna index writer quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R342", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the golden savanna index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R343", + "query": "which index writer picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R344", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R345", + "query": "wheat swamp index writer garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat swamp index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R347", + "query": "which index writer scrambles what it reports home once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R348", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one scrambles what it reports home once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R349", + "query": "azure barrens index writer hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R350", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the azure barrens index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R351", + "query": "which index writer is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R352", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R353", + "query": "sand brook index writer echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R354", + "query": "what is still broken in the sand brook index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R355", + "query": "which index writer repeats instructions back to itself when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R356", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one repeats instructions back to itself when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R357", + "query": "pewter ravine index writer mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R358", + "query": "what explains why the pewter ravine index writer mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R359", + "query": "which index writer copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R360", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R361", + "query": "ochre butte sweep worker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R362", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ochre butte sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R363", + "query": "which sweep worker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R364", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R365", + "query": "quartz tundra sweep worker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz tundra sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R367", + "query": "which sweep worker reports success where something went wrong once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R368", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one reports success where something went wrong once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R369", + "query": "magenta meadow sweep worker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R370", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the magenta meadow sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R371", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R372", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R373", + "query": "cobalt shore sweep worker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R374", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt shore sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R375", + "query": "which sweep worker checks in at ragged intervals before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R376", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one checks in at ragged intervals before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R377", + "query": "wheat wharf sweep worker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R378", + "query": "what explains why the wheat wharf sweep worker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R379", + "query": "which sweep worker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R380", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R381", + "query": "maroon estuary calibration bench confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R382", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the maroon estuary calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R383", + "query": "which calibration bench picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R384", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R385", + "query": "teal summit calibration bench overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal summit calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R387", + "query": "which calibration bench lingers longer than scheduled once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R388", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one lingers longer than scheduled once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R389", + "query": "salmon hill calibration bench skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R390", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the salmon hill calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R391", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from omitting the empty reference run because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R392", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R393", + "query": "quartz delta calibration bench orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R394", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz delta calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R395", + "query": "which calibration bench abandons work it had accepted once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R396", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one abandons work it had accepted once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R397", + "query": "sand harbor calibration bench ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R398", + "query": "what explains why the sand harbor calibration bench ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R399", + "query": "which calibration bench serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R400", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R401", + "query": "sepia tundra quorum relay decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R402", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the sepia tundra quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R403", + "query": "which quorum relay picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R404", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R405", + "query": "lilac quarry quorum relay mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac quarry quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R407", + "query": "which quorum relay puts the wrong name on each container once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R408", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one puts the wrong name on each container once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R409", + "query": "silver tundra quorum relay recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R410", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the silver tundra quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R411", + "query": "which quorum relay is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R412", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R413", + "query": "salmon marsh quorum relay saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R414", + "query": "what is still broken in the salmon marsh quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R415", + "query": "which quorum relay pegs the sensor at maximum once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R416", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one pegs the sensor at maximum once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R417", + "query": "azure summit quorum relay rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R418", + "query": "what explains why the azure summit quorum relay rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R419", + "query": "which quorum relay biases results to the reference value because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R420", + "query": "the go-between that gathers votes — which one biases results to the reference value because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R421", + "query": "quartz gorge calibration bench warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R422", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the quartz gorge calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R423", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R424", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R425", + "query": "silver barrens calibration bench poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the silver barrens calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R427", + "query": "which calibration bench writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R428", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R429", + "query": "amber cirque calibration bench rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R430", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the amber cirque calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R431", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from moving a common read position backwards because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R432", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R433", + "query": "russet jungle calibration bench misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R434", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet jungle calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R435", + "query": "which calibration bench cannot say who holds which grant when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R436", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one cannot say who holds which grant when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R437", + "query": "lilac cliff calibration bench pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R438", + "query": "what explains why the lilac cliff calibration bench pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R439", + "query": "which calibration bench readies exactly what nobody asks for because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R440", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R441", + "query": "hazel dell edge cache spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R442", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the hazel dell edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R443", + "query": "which edge cache picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R444", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R445", + "query": "salmon crag edge cache skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon crag edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R447", + "query": "which edge cache acknowledges before durability once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R448", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one acknowledges before durability once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R449", + "query": "taupe hill edge cache reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R450", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the taupe hill edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R451", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R452", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R453", + "query": "granite badland edge cache starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R454", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite badland edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R455", + "query": "which edge cache never lets the flush finish right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R456", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one never lets the flush finish right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R457", + "query": "scarlet hill edge cache retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R458", + "query": "what explains why the scarlet hill edge cache retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R459", + "query": "which edge cache repeats immediately on failure because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R460", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one repeats immediately on failure because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R461", + "query": "pearl isthmus edge cache sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R462", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the pearl isthmus edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R463", + "query": "which edge cache picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R464", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R465", + "query": "sorrel crag edge cache inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel crag edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R467", + "query": "which edge cache flips positive and negative readings once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R468", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one flips positive and negative readings once bubbles form in the cooling circuit?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R469", + "query": "opal brook edge cache splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R470", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the opal brook edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R471", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R472", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because a tainted origin defeats every rerun?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R473", + "query": "quartz hollow edge cache skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R474", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz hollow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R475", + "query": "which edge cache tilts every measurement it takes while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R476", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one tilts every measurement it takes while the optics are being trued?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R477", + "query": "taupe dale edge cache hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R478", + "query": "what explains why the taupe dale edge cache hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R479", + "query": "which edge cache keeps tuning grants for itself because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R480", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because the allowance includes what was archived?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R481", + "query": "auburn quarry lease broker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R482", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the auburn quarry lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R483", + "query": "which lease broker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R484", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R485", + "query": "ivory ridge lease broker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory ridge lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R487", + "query": "which lease broker reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R488", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one reports success where something went wrong once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R489", + "query": "ashen cavern lease broker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R490", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the ashen cavern lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R491", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R492", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R493", + "query": "cobalt badland lease broker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R494", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R495", + "query": "which lease broker checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R496", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one checks in at ragged intervals when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R497", + "query": "amber wharf lease broker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R498", + "query": "what explains why the amber wharf lease broker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R499", + "query": "which lease broker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R500", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R501", + "query": "emerald bayou entropy siphon rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R502", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the emerald bayou entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R503", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R504", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R505", + "query": "taupe barrens entropy siphon desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe barrens entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R507", + "query": "which entropy siphon lets copies drift out of agreement once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R508", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R509", + "query": "slate crag entropy siphon widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R510", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the slate crag entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R511", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R512", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R513", + "query": "walnut moor entropy siphon splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R514", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut moor entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R515", + "query": "which entropy siphon two halves each think they lead while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R516", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one two halves each think they lead while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R517", + "query": "indigo bluff entropy siphon recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R518", + "query": "what explains why the indigo bluff entropy siphon recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R519", + "query": "which entropy siphon derives afresh what it could remember because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R520", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one derives afresh what it could remember because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R521", + "query": "mustard prairie token vault warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R522", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the mustard prairie token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R523", + "query": "which token vault picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R524", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R525", + "query": "pewter delta token vault poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter delta token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R527", + "query": "which token vault writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R528", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R529", + "query": "verdigris meadow token vault rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R530", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the verdigris meadow token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R531", + "query": "which token vault is barred from moving a common read position backwards because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R532", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R533", + "query": "taupe canyon token vault misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R534", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe canyon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R535", + "query": "which token vault cannot say who holds which grant when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R536", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one cannot say who holds which grant when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R537", + "query": "orange barrens token vault pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R538", + "query": "what explains why the orange barrens token vault pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R539", + "query": "which token vault readies exactly what nobody asks for because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R540", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R541", + "query": "ivory pond shard router eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R542", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the ivory pond shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R543", + "query": "which shard router picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R544", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R545", + "query": "golden bluff shard router swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the golden bluff shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R547", + "query": "which shard router reports success where something went wrong once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R548", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one reports success where something went wrong once the repeat-spotting span moves along?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R549", + "query": "fawn barrens shard router fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R550", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the fawn barrens shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R551", + "query": "which shard router is barred from splitting the book of account in two because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R552", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because an identifier the public saw is spent forever?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R553", + "query": "ivory heath shard router staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R554", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory heath shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R555", + "query": "which shard router checks in at ragged intervals before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R556", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one checks in at ragged intervals before forgiveness runs out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R557", + "query": "amber estuary shard router round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R558", + "query": "what explains why the amber estuary shard router round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R559", + "query": "which shard router rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R560", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the forecast misses the calendar's odd day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R561", + "query": "taupe ridge ingest job dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R562", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the taupe ridge ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R563", + "query": "which ingest job picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R564", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R565", + "query": "violet estuary ingest job forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet estuary ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R567", + "query": "which ingest job loses track of positions previously read once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R568", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one loses track of positions previously read once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R569", + "query": "mustard pond ingest job bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R570", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the mustard pond ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R571", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from slipping past the intake gate because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R572", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R573", + "query": "pewter marsh ingest job clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R574", + "query": "what is still broken in the pewter marsh ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R575", + "query": "which ingest job cuts short every spike it should absorb as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R576", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R577", + "query": "pearl valley ingest job defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R578", + "query": "what explains why the pearl valley ingest job defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R579", + "query": "which ingest job keeps postponing the squeeze because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R580", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R581", + "query": "violet river ingest job confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R582", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the violet river ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R583", + "query": "which ingest job picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R584", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R585", + "query": "ashen mesa ingest job overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ashen mesa ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R587", + "query": "which ingest job lingers longer than scheduled once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R588", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one lingers longer than scheduled once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R589", + "query": "taupe grove ingest job skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R590", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the taupe grove ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R591", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from omitting the empty reference run because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R592", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R593", + "query": "pearl cove ingest job orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R594", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl cove ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R595", + "query": "which ingest job abandons work it had accepted once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R596", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one abandons work it had accepted once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R597", + "query": "cinnamon cavern ingest job ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R598", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon cavern ingest job ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R599", + "query": "which ingest job serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R600", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R601", + "query": "ruby cove assay station dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R602", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the ruby cove assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R603", + "query": "which assay station picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R604", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R605", + "query": "jade shore assay station forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the jade shore assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R607", + "query": "which assay station loses track of positions previously read once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R608", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one loses track of positions previously read once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R609", + "query": "cyan quarry assay station bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R610", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the cyan quarry assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R611", + "query": "which assay station is barred from slipping past the intake gate because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R612", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R613", + "query": "azure savanna assay station clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R614", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure savanna assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R615", + "query": "which assay station cuts short every spike it should absorb when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R616", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R617", + "query": "taupe knoll assay station defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R618", + "query": "what explains why the taupe knoll assay station defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R619", + "query": "which assay station keeps postponing the squeeze because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R620", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R621", + "query": "ivory dell escrow chamber snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R622", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ivory dell escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R623", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R624", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R625", + "query": "slate prairie escrow chamber misroutes its callbacks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the slate prairie escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R627", + "query": "which escrow chamber sends completions to the wrong caller once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R628", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one sends completions to the wrong caller once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R629", + "query": "chalk glacier escrow chamber interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R630", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the chalk glacier escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R631", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R632", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from braiding distinct recoveries together because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R633", + "query": "ebony bayou escrow chamber overfills its journal", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R634", + "query": "what is still broken in the ebony bayou escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R635", + "query": "which escrow chamber writes more log than the space allows when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R636", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one writes more log than the space allows when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R637", + "query": "umber delta escrow chamber escalates too eagerly", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R638", + "query": "what explains why the umber delta escrow chamber escalates too eagerly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R639", + "query": "which escrow chamber raises alarms at the first wobble because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R640", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one raises alarms at the first wobble because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R641", + "query": "ochre moor calibration bench flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R642", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the ochre moor calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R643", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how often it writes out around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R644", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R645", + "query": "taupe oasis calibration bench loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe oasis calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R647", + "query": "which calibration bench forgets how far it had read once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R648", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one forgets how far it had read once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R649", + "query": "verdigris bayou calibration bench trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R650", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the verdigris bayou calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R651", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R652", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R653", + "query": "cobalt tarn calibration bench reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R654", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt tarn calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R655", + "query": "which calibration bench confirms out of sequence as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R656", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one confirms out of sequence as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R657", + "query": "orange hollow calibration bench re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R658", + "query": "what explains why the orange hollow calibration bench re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R659", + "query": "which calibration bench fetches the same index repeatedly because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R660", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R661", + "query": "magenta quarry sweep worker compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R662", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the magenta quarry sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R663", + "query": "which sweep worker picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R664", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R665", + "query": "sage grove sweep worker hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage grove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R667", + "query": "which sweep worker never gives borrowed space back once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R668", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one never gives borrowed space back once verification fails as the data comes in?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R669", + "query": "mustard dell sweep worker archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R670", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the mustard dell sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R671", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R672", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because the very siren meant to fire is off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R673", + "query": "taupe river sweep worker lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R674", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe river sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R675", + "query": "which sweep worker feeds the operator stale numbers right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R676", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one feeds the operator stale numbers right after power returns from nothing?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R677", + "query": "willow dune sweep worker mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R678", + "query": "what explains why the willow dune sweep worker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R679", + "query": "which sweep worker serves yesterday's answers confidently because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R680", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the freshest link is always reused ahead of idle ones?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R681", + "query": "russet cape edge cache batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R682", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the russet cape edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R683", + "query": "which edge cache picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R684", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that followers only elect at term boundaries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R685", + "query": "coral glade edge cache re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the coral glade edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R687", + "query": "which edge cache sends the same payload twice once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R688", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one sends the same payload twice once a follower falls out of step?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R689", + "query": "lilac forest edge cache widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R690", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the lilac forest edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R691", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R692", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because the damage surfaces long after its cause?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R693", + "query": "azure tundra edge cache thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R694", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure tundra edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R695", + "query": "which edge cache evicts what it is about to need as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R696", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one evicts what it is about to need as secrets are cycled?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R697", + "query": "hazel jungle edge cache rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R698", + "query": "what explains why the hazel jungle edge cache rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R699", + "query": "which edge cache shortens its own interval because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R700", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one shortens its own interval because each worker keeps a private copy of the index?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R701", + "query": "taupe swamp provenance ledger dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R702", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the taupe swamp provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R703", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R704", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R705", + "query": "sage delta provenance ledger forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage delta provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R707", + "query": "which provenance ledger loses track of positions previously read once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R708", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one loses track of positions previously read once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R709", + "query": "russet bayou provenance ledger bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R710", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the russet bayou provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R711", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from slipping past the intake gate because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R712", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R713", + "query": "copper pond provenance ledger clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R714", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper pond provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R715", + "query": "which provenance ledger cuts short every spike it should absorb when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R716", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R717", + "query": "topaz barrens provenance ledger defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R718", + "query": "what explains why the topaz barrens provenance ledger defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R719", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps postponing the squeeze because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R720", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R721", + "query": "lavender lagoon ingest job decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R722", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the lavender lagoon ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R723", + "query": "which ingest job picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R724", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R725", + "query": "copper cavern ingest job mislabels its vials", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper cavern ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R727", + "query": "which ingest job puts the wrong name on each container once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R728", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one puts the wrong name on each container once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R729", + "query": "taupe creek ingest job recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R730", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the taupe creek ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R731", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R732", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from adjusting the instrument on an active sample because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R733", + "query": "taupe savanna ingest job saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R734", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe savanna ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R735", + "query": "which ingest job pegs the sensor at maximum while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R736", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one pegs the sensor at maximum while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R737", + "query": "sorrel prairie ingest job rounds toward the anchor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R738", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel prairie ingest job rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R739", + "query": "which ingest job biases results to the reference value because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R740", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one biases results to the reference value because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R741", + "query": "beige badland telemetry mast backoff ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R742", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the beige badland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R743", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R744", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the longest it waits between tries around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R745", + "query": "wheat oasis telemetry mast corrupts its checkpoint", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat oasis telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R747", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves unreadable restart state once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R748", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves unreadable restart state once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R749", + "query": "cobalt knoll telemetry mast cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R750", + "query": "is it acceptable to cache the lease token in the cobalt knoll telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R751", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R752", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from keeping a grant past its issue because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R753", + "query": "cedar crag telemetry mast drifts its watermark", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R754", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R755", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses track of its own progress marker when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R756", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses track of its own progress marker when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R757", + "query": "taupe geyser telemetry mast serialises its probes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R758", + "query": "what explains why the taupe geyser telemetry mast serialises its probes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R759", + "query": "which telemetry mast checks health one at a time because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R760", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one checks health one at a time because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R761", + "query": "olive estuary token vault quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R762", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the olive estuary token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R763", + "query": "which token vault picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R764", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that warmth is kept inside a tight band?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R765", + "query": "vermilion ravine token vault garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the vermilion ravine token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R767", + "query": "which token vault scrambles what it reports home once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R768", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one scrambles what it reports home once an extra tick is wedged into the day?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R769", + "query": "granite reef token vault hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R770", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the granite reef token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R771", + "query": "which token vault is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R772", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because the secrets died with the machine that held them?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R773", + "query": "auburn lake token vault echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R774", + "query": "what is still broken in the auburn lake token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R775", + "query": "which token vault repeats instructions back to itself when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R776", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one repeats instructions back to itself when the stop was not graceful?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R777", + "query": "taupe island token vault mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R778", + "query": "what explains why the taupe island token vault mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R779", + "query": "which token vault copies the rhythm of its counterpart because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R780", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because two written forms mean the same and nobody knows?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R781", + "query": "willow wharf provenance ledger batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R782", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the willow wharf provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R783", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R784", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R785", + "query": "taupe inlet provenance ledger re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe inlet provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R787", + "query": "which provenance ledger sends the same payload twice once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R788", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one sends the same payload twice once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R789", + "query": "verdigris hill provenance ledger widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R790", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the verdigris hill provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R791", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R792", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R793", + "query": "granite hill provenance ledger thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R794", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite hill provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R795", + "query": "which provenance ledger evicts what it is about to need as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R796", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one evicts what it is about to need as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R797", + "query": "teal marsh provenance ledger rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R798", + "query": "what explains why the teal marsh provenance ledger rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R799", + "query": "which provenance ledger shortens its own interval because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R800", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one shortens its own interval because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R801", + "query": "taupe fjord index writer compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R802", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the taupe fjord index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R803", + "query": "which index writer picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R804", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R805", + "query": "pearl gulch index writer hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl gulch index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R807", + "query": "which index writer never gives borrowed space back once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R808", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one never gives borrowed space back once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R809", + "query": "pearl ravine index writer archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R810", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the pearl ravine index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R811", + "query": "which index writer is barred from shelving a problem that is live because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R812", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R813", + "query": "taupe rapids index writer lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R814", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe rapids index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R815", + "query": "which index writer feeds the operator stale numbers once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R816", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one feeds the operator stale numbers once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R817", + "query": "emerald oasis index writer mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R818", + "query": "what explains why the emerald oasis index writer mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R819", + "query": "which index writer serves yesterday's answers confidently because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R820", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R821", + "query": "mauve shore assay station flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R822", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the mauve shore assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R823", + "query": "which assay station picked how often it writes out around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R824", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R825", + "query": "azure rapids assay station loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure rapids assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R827", + "query": "which assay station forgets how far it had read once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R828", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one forgets how far it had read once a chunk closes ahead of schedule?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R829", + "query": "quartz mesa assay station trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R830", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the quartz mesa assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R831", + "query": "which assay station is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R832", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because a fixable error becomes unfixable?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R833", + "query": "scarlet grove assay station reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R834", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet grove assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R835", + "query": "which assay station confirms out of sequence when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R836", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one confirms out of sequence when the term boundary passes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R837", + "query": "pewter orchard assay station re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R838", + "query": "what explains why the pewter orchard assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R839", + "query": "which assay station fetches the same index repeatedly because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R840", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because a manually copied figure hid a typo?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R841", + "query": "taupe cape shard router batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R842", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the taupe cape shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R843", + "query": "which shard router picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R844", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R845", + "query": "russet bluff shard router re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet bluff shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R847", + "query": "which shard router sends the same payload twice once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R848", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one sends the same payload twice once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R849", + "query": "azure gulch shard router widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R850", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the azure gulch shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R851", + "query": "which shard router is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R852", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R853", + "query": "topaz grove shard router thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R854", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz grove shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R855", + "query": "which shard router evicts what it is about to need while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R856", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one evicts what it is about to need while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R857", + "query": "tan isthmus shard router rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R858", + "query": "what explains why the tan isthmus shard router rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R859", + "query": "which shard router shortens its own interval because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R860", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one shortens its own interval because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R861", + "query": "amber atoll ingest job quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R862", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the amber atoll ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R863", + "query": "which ingest job picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R864", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R865", + "query": "ruby moor ingest job garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby moor ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R867", + "query": "which ingest job scrambles what it reports home once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R868", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one scrambles what it reports home once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R869", + "query": "taupe crag ingest job hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R870", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the taupe crag ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R871", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R872", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R873", + "query": "mustard cirque ingest job echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R874", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard cirque ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R875", + "query": "which ingest job repeats instructions back to itself as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R876", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one repeats instructions back to itself as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R877", + "query": "bronze gorge ingest job mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R878", + "query": "what explains why the bronze gorge ingest job mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R879", + "query": "which ingest job copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R880", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R881", + "query": "indigo summit assay station eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R882", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the indigo summit assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R883", + "query": "which assay station picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R884", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R885", + "query": "sienna fjord assay station swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna fjord assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R887", + "query": "which assay station reports success where something went wrong once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R888", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one reports success where something went wrong once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R889", + "query": "russet gulch assay station fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R890", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the russet gulch assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R891", + "query": "which assay station is barred from splitting the book of account in two because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R892", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R893", + "query": "wheat island assay station staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R894", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat island assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R895", + "query": "which assay station checks in at ragged intervals when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R896", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one checks in at ragged intervals when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R897", + "query": "onyx lagoon assay station round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R898", + "query": "what explains why the onyx lagoon assay station round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R899", + "query": "which assay station rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R900", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R901", + "query": "crimson tarn assay station fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R902", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the crimson tarn assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R903", + "query": "which assay station picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R904", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R905", + "query": "cyan lagoon assay station stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan lagoon assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R907", + "query": "which assay station wedges everything behind it once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R908", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one wedges everything behind it once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R909", + "query": "saffron dune assay station retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R910", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the saffron dune assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R911", + "query": "which assay station is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R912", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R913", + "query": "mauve forest assay station spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R914", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve forest assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R915", + "query": "which assay station burns cpu waiting as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R916", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one burns cpu waiting as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R917", + "query": "opal shore assay station holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R918", + "query": "what explains why the opal shore assay station holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R919", + "query": "which assay station keeps the barrier from closing because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R920", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one keeps the barrier from closing because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R921", + "query": "cyan island token vault checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R922", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the cyan island token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R923", + "query": "which token vault picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R924", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R925", + "query": "onyx dune token vault shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx dune token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R927", + "query": "which token vault destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R928", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one destroys its own table of contents once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R929", + "query": "lilac butte token vault promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R930", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the lilac butte token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R931", + "query": "which token vault is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R932", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R933", + "query": "lilac marsh token vault inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R934", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac marsh token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R935", + "query": "which token vault predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R936", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one predicts far more than materialises once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R937", + "query": "walnut barrens token vault favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R938", + "query": "what explains why the walnut barrens token vault favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R939", + "query": "which token vault gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R940", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R941", + "query": "saffron gulch lease broker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R942", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the saffron gulch lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R943", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R944", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R945", + "query": "navy grove lease broker fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy grove lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R947", + "query": "which lease broker splinters memory into unusable pieces once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R948", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R949", + "query": "plum swamp lease broker suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R950", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the plum swamp lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R951", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from silencing a probe that says no because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R952", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R953", + "query": "onyx island lease broker shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R954", + "query": "what is still broken in the onyx island lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R955", + "query": "which lease broker silently repeats the leader's work while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R956", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one silently repeats the leader's work while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R957", + "query": "beige meadow lease broker saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R958", + "query": "what explains why the beige meadow lease broker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R959", + "query": "which lease broker persists every result in duplicate because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R960", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one persists every result in duplicate because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R961", + "query": "sienna lagoon provenance ledger gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R962", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the sienna lagoon provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R963", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R964", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R965", + "query": "magenta hill provenance ledger fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the magenta hill provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R967", + "query": "which provenance ledger splinters memory into unusable pieces once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R968", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R969", + "query": "sienna swamp provenance ledger suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R970", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the sienna swamp provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R971", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from silencing a probe that says no because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R972", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R973", + "query": "slate marsh provenance ledger shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R974", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate marsh provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R975", + "query": "which provenance ledger silently repeats the leader's work while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R976", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one silently repeats the leader's work while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R977", + "query": "russet dale provenance ledger saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R978", + "query": "what explains why the russet dale provenance ledger saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R979", + "query": "which provenance ledger persists every result in duplicate because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R980", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one persists every result in duplicate because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R981", + "query": "onyx mesa escrow chamber fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R982", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the onyx mesa escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R983", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R984", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R985", + "query": "beige lagoon escrow chamber stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige lagoon escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R987", + "query": "which escrow chamber wedges everything behind it once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R988", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one wedges everything behind it once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R989", + "query": "golden badland escrow chamber retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R990", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the golden badland escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R991", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R992", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R993", + "query": "sepia brook escrow chamber spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R994", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia brook escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R995", + "query": "which escrow chamber burns cpu waiting when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R996", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one burns cpu waiting when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R997", + "query": "wheat lake escrow chamber holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R998", + "query": "what explains why the wheat lake escrow chamber holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R999", + "query": "which escrow chamber keeps the barrier from closing because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1000", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one keeps the barrier from closing because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1001", + "query": "auburn fjord telemetry mast compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1002", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the auburn fjord telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1003", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1004", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1005", + "query": "willow barrens telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1006", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow barrens telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1007", + "query": "which telemetry mast never gives borrowed space back once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1008", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one never gives borrowed space back once the backup takes over on its own?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1009", + "query": "onyx quarry telemetry mast archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1010", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the onyx quarry telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1011", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from shelving a problem that is live because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1012", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because no configuration can buy the time back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1013", + "query": "taupe butte telemetry mast lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1014", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe butte telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1015", + "query": "which telemetry mast feeds the operator stale numbers as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1016", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one feeds the operator stale numbers as credentials are being swapped?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1017", + "query": "ochre heath telemetry mast mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1018", + "query": "what explains why the ochre heath telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1019", + "query": "which telemetry mast serves yesterday's answers confidently because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1020", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because a switch sits differently on a single machine?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1021", + "query": "ashen strait index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1022", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the ashen strait index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1023", + "query": "which index writer picked how often it tries again around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1024", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1025", + "query": "chalk lake index writer drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1026", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk lake index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1027", + "query": "which index writer loses acknowledged data once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1028", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one loses acknowledged data once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1029", + "query": "sand tarn index writer share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1030", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the sand tarn index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1031", + "query": "which index writer is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1032", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1033", + "query": "russet harbor index writer stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1034", + "query": "what is still broken in the russet harbor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1035", + "query": "which index writer stops making progress as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1036", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one stops making progress as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1037", + "query": "onyx shore index writer prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1038", + "query": "what explains why the onyx shore index writer prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1039", + "query": "which index writer picks the staler of two copies because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1040", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picks the staler of two copies because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1041", + "query": "vermilion cape replay buffer stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1042", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the vermilion cape replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1043", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1044", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1045", + "query": "bronze pond replay buffer upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1046", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze pond replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1047", + "query": "which replay buffer delivers things in scrambled sequence once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1048", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1049", + "query": "navy glacier replay buffer hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1050", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the navy glacier replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1051", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from changing the checker while it checks because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1052", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1053", + "query": "cobalt lowland replay buffer misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1054", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt lowland replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1055", + "query": "which replay buffer routes warnings to the wrong inbox once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1056", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1057", + "query": "tan crag replay buffer polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1058", + "query": "what explains why the tan crag replay buffer polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1059", + "query": "which replay buffer asks for updates far too often because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1060", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one asks for updates far too often because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1061", + "query": "salmon knoll shard router lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1062", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the salmon knoll shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1063", + "query": "which shard router picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1064", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1065", + "query": "walnut delta shard router double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1066", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut delta shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1067", + "query": "which shard router reports inflated totals once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1068", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one reports inflated totals once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1069", + "query": "ivory isthmus shard router write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1070", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the ivory isthmus shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1071", + "query": "which shard router is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1072", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1073", + "query": "beige fjord shard router leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1074", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige fjord shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1075", + "query": "which shard router never returns its file descriptors when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1076", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one never returns its file descriptors when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1077", + "query": "cinnamon brook shard router batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1078", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon brook shard router batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1079", + "query": "which shard router exceeds its own size limit because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1080", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one exceeds its own size limit because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1081", + "query": "topaz tundra calibration bench compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1082", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the topaz tundra calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1083", + "query": "which calibration bench picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1084", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1085", + "query": "carmine lagoon calibration bench hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1086", + "query": "what goes wrong with the carmine lagoon calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1087", + "query": "which calibration bench never gives borrowed space back once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1088", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one never gives borrowed space back once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1089", + "query": "sand gorge calibration bench archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1090", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the sand gorge calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1091", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from shelving a problem that is live because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1092", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1093", + "query": "walnut gorge calibration bench lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1094", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut gorge calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1095", + "query": "which calibration bench feeds the operator stale numbers when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1096", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one feeds the operator stale numbers when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1097", + "query": "maroon gorge calibration bench mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1098", + "query": "what explains why the maroon gorge calibration bench mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1099", + "query": "which calibration bench serves yesterday's answers confidently because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1100", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1101", + "query": "sepia butte provenance ledger parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1102", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the sepia butte provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1103", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1104", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1105", + "query": "pewter plateau provenance ledger clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1106", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter plateau provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1107", + "query": "which provenance ledger fires the same alarm repeatedly once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1108", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1109", + "query": "plum savanna provenance ledger reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1110", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the plum savanna provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1111", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1112", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1113", + "query": "lilac ridge provenance ledger ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1114", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac ridge provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1115", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps pushing when told to slow when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1116", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps pushing when told to slow when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1117", + "query": "emerald rapids provenance ledger idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1118", + "query": "what explains why the emerald rapids provenance ledger idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1119", + "query": "which provenance ledger rests longer than it runs because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1120", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one rests longer than it runs because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1121", + "query": "walnut isthmus telemetry mast compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1122", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the walnut isthmus telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1123", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1124", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1125", + "query": "copper meadow telemetry mast hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1126", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1127", + "query": "which telemetry mast never gives borrowed space back once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1128", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one never gives borrowed space back once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1129", + "query": "salmon heath telemetry mast archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1130", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the salmon heath telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1131", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from shelving a problem that is live because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1132", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1133", + "query": "scarlet dale telemetry mast lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1134", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet dale telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1135", + "query": "which telemetry mast feeds the operator stale numbers when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1136", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one feeds the operator stale numbers when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1137", + "query": "cinnamon meadow telemetry mast mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1138", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon meadow telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1139", + "query": "which telemetry mast serves yesterday's answers confidently because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1140", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1141", + "query": "ruby lake token vault flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1142", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the ruby lake token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1143", + "query": "which token vault picked how often it writes out around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1144", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1145", + "query": "magenta dune token vault loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1146", + "query": "what goes wrong with the magenta dune token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1147", + "query": "which token vault forgets how far it had read once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1148", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one forgets how far it had read once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1149", + "query": "walnut atoll token vault trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1150", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the walnut atoll token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1151", + "query": "which token vault is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1152", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1153", + "query": "carmine lake token vault reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1154", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine lake token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1155", + "query": "which token vault confirms out of sequence while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1156", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one confirms out of sequence while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1157", + "query": "bronze cavern token vault re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1158", + "query": "what explains why the bronze cavern token vault re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1159", + "query": "which token vault fetches the same index repeatedly because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1160", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1161", + "query": "ashen rapids edge cache confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1162", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the ashen rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1163", + "query": "which edge cache picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1164", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1165", + "query": "lavender geyser edge cache overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1166", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lavender geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1167", + "query": "which edge cache lingers longer than scheduled once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1168", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one lingers longer than scheduled once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1169", + "query": "ochre river edge cache skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1170", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the ochre river edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1171", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from omitting the empty reference run because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1172", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1173", + "query": "willow pond edge cache orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1174", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow pond edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1175", + "query": "which edge cache abandons work it had accepted once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1176", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one abandons work it had accepted once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1177", + "query": "walnut cavern edge cache ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1178", + "query": "what explains why the walnut cavern edge cache ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1179", + "query": "which edge cache serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1180", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1181", + "query": "mauve gulch edge cache warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1182", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the mauve gulch edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1183", + "query": "which edge cache picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1184", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1185", + "query": "cinnamon geyser edge cache poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1186", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1187", + "query": "which edge cache writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1188", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one writes a restore image that cannot be trusted once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1189", + "query": "vermilion inlet edge cache rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1190", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the vermilion inlet edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1191", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from moving a common read position backwards because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1192", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from moving a common read position backwards because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1193", + "query": "ebony brook edge cache misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1194", + "query": "what is still broken in the ebony brook edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1195", + "query": "which edge cache cannot say who holds which grant when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1196", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one cannot say who holds which grant when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1197", + "query": "cedar summit edge cache pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1198", + "query": "what explains why the cedar summit edge cache pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1199", + "query": "which edge cache readies exactly what nobody asks for because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1200", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one readies exactly what nobody asks for because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1201", + "query": "ruby lagoon token vault spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1202", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the ruby lagoon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1203", + "query": "which token vault picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1204", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1205", + "query": "walnut dell token vault skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1206", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut dell token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1207", + "query": "which token vault acknowledges before durability once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1208", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one acknowledges before durability once the wall time jumps an hour by decree?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1209", + "query": "crimson river token vault reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1210", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the crimson river token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1211", + "query": "which token vault is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1212", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because one mistake reaches all customers together?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1213", + "query": "emerald heath token vault starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1214", + "query": "what is still broken in the emerald heath token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1215", + "query": "which token vault never lets the flush finish while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1216", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one never lets the flush finish while versions change one node at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1217", + "query": "ruby glade token vault retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1218", + "query": "what explains why the ruby glade token vault retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1219", + "query": "which token vault repeats immediately on failure because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1220", + "query": "the safe that keeps credentials — which one repeats immediately on failure because failed and pending work compete for the same spindle?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1221", + "query": "vermilion glacier shard router confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1222", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the vermilion glacier shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1223", + "query": "which shard router picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1224", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked the certainty below which nothing counts around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1225", + "query": "birch prairie shard router overruns its dwell", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1226", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch prairie shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1227", + "query": "which shard router lingers longer than scheduled once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1228", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one lingers longer than scheduled once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1229", + "query": "silver orchard shard router skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1230", + "query": "is it acceptable to skip the blank control in the silver orchard shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1231", + "query": "which shard router is barred from omitting the empty reference run because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1232", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from omitting the empty reference run because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1233", + "query": "walnut brook shard router orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1234", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut brook shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1235", + "query": "which shard router abandons work it had accepted while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1236", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one abandons work it had accepted while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1237", + "query": "slate isthmus shard router ages its stock first", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1238", + "query": "what explains why the slate isthmus shard router ages its stock first?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1239", + "query": "which shard router serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1240", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one serves the oldest inventory before fresh arrivals because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1241", + "query": "sand estuary assay station stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1242", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the sand estuary assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1243", + "query": "which assay station picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1244", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1245", + "query": "mauve glade assay station upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1246", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mauve glade assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1247", + "query": "which assay station delivers things in scrambled sequence once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1248", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1249", + "query": "pearl atoll assay station hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1250", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the pearl atoll assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1251", + "query": "which assay station is barred from changing the checker while it checks because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1252", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1253", + "query": "copper badland assay station misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1254", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper badland assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1255", + "query": "which assay station routes warnings to the wrong inbox while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1256", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1257", + "query": "hazel cliff assay station polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1258", + "query": "what explains why the hazel cliff assay station polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1259", + "query": "which assay station asks for updates far too often because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1260", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one asks for updates far too often because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1261", + "query": "walnut ravine provenance ledger stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1262", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the walnut ravine provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1263", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1264", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1265", + "query": "beige shore provenance ledger upends its ordering", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1266", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1267", + "query": "which provenance ledger delivers things in scrambled sequence once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1268", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one delivers things in scrambled sequence once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1269", + "query": "russet island provenance ledger hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1270", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the russet island provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1271", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from changing the checker while it checks because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1272", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from changing the checker while it checks because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1273", + "query": "ashen shore provenance ledger misfiles its alerts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1274", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen shore provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1275", + "query": "which provenance ledger routes warnings to the wrong inbox while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1276", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one routes warnings to the wrong inbox while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1277", + "query": "onyx ridge provenance ledger polls beyond its share", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1278", + "query": "what explains why the onyx ridge provenance ledger polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1279", + "query": "which provenance ledger asks for updates far too often because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1280", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one asks for updates far too often because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1281", + "query": "fawn island telemetry mast dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1282", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the fawn island telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1283", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1284", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1285", + "query": "jade forest telemetry mast forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1286", + "query": "what goes wrong with the jade forest telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1287", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses track of positions previously read once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1288", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses track of positions previously read once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1289", + "query": "walnut harbor telemetry mast bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1290", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the walnut harbor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1291", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from slipping past the intake gate because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1292", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1293", + "query": "granite river telemetry mast clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1294", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite river telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1295", + "query": "which telemetry mast cuts short every spike it should absorb while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1296", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1297", + "query": "slate delta telemetry mast defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1298", + "query": "what explains why the slate delta telemetry mast defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1299", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps postponing the squeeze because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1300", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1301", + "query": "sand tundra lease broker flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1302", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the sand tundra lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1303", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often it writes out around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1304", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1305", + "query": "cedar bayou lease broker loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1306", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar bayou lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1307", + "query": "which lease broker forgets how far it had read once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1308", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one forgets how far it had read once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1309", + "query": "topaz ridge lease broker trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1310", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the topaz ridge lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1311", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1312", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1313", + "query": "lavender forest lease broker reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1314", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender forest lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1315", + "query": "which lease broker confirms out of sequence as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1316", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one confirms out of sequence as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1317", + "query": "walnut glacier lease broker re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1318", + "query": "what explains why the walnut glacier lease broker re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1319", + "query": "which lease broker fetches the same index repeatedly because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1320", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1321", + "query": "chalk tundra lease broker checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1322", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the chalk tundra lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1323", + "query": "which lease broker picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1324", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1325", + "query": "beige bayou lease broker shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1326", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige bayou lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1327", + "query": "which lease broker destroys its own table of contents once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1328", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one destroys its own table of contents once unshielded metal drifts too close?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1329", + "query": "bronze brook lease broker promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1330", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the bronze brook lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1331", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1332", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because cracking the case forfeits all support?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1333", + "query": "scarlet fjord lease broker inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1334", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet fjord lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1335", + "query": "which lease broker predicts far more than materialises as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1336", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one predicts far more than materialises as records move to new shelves?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1337", + "query": "verdigris swamp lease broker favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1338", + "query": "what explains why the verdigris swamp lease broker favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1339", + "query": "which lease broker gives the noisiest customer priority because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1340", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because waiting does not begin until something works?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1341", + "query": "beige summit sweep worker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1342", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the beige summit sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1343", + "query": "which sweep worker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1344", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1345", + "query": "walnut marsh sweep worker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1346", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut marsh sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1347", + "query": "which sweep worker reports success where something went wrong once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1348", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one reports success where something went wrong once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1349", + "query": "silver river sweep worker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1350", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the silver river sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1351", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1352", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1353", + "query": "plum crag sweep worker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1354", + "query": "what is still broken in the plum crag sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1355", + "query": "which sweep worker checks in at ragged intervals once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1356", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one checks in at ragged intervals once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1357", + "query": "ashen lowland sweep worker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1358", + "query": "what explains why the ashen lowland sweep worker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1359", + "query": "which sweep worker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1360", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1361", + "query": "ochre gulch provenance ledger sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1362", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the ochre gulch provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1363", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1364", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1365", + "query": "onyx forest provenance ledger inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1366", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx forest provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1367", + "query": "which provenance ledger flips positive and negative readings once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1368", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one flips positive and negative readings once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1369", + "query": "walnut badland provenance ledger splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1370", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the walnut badland provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1371", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1372", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1373", + "query": "walnut heath provenance ledger skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1374", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut heath provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1375", + "query": "which provenance ledger tilts every measurement it takes when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1376", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one tilts every measurement it takes when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1377", + "query": "ochre canyon provenance ledger hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1378", + "query": "what explains why the ochre canyon provenance ledger hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1379", + "query": "which provenance ledger keeps tuning grants for itself because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1380", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1381", + "query": "topaz lowland calibration bench lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1382", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the topaz lowland calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1383", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1384", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1385", + "query": "ruby creek calibration bench double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1386", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ruby creek calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1387", + "query": "which calibration bench reports inflated totals once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1388", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one reports inflated totals once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1389", + "query": "opal prairie calibration bench write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1390", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the opal prairie calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1391", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1392", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1393", + "query": "birch dell calibration bench leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1394", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch dell calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1395", + "query": "which calibration bench never returns its file descriptors when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1396", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one never returns its file descriptors when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1397", + "query": "birch dune calibration bench batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1398", + "query": "what explains why the birch dune calibration bench batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1399", + "query": "which calibration bench exceeds its own size limit because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1400", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one exceeds its own size limit because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1401", + "query": "walnut lake specimen locker compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1402", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the walnut lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1403", + "query": "which specimen locker picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1404", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1405", + "query": "lilac savanna specimen locker hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1406", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac savanna specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1407", + "query": "which specimen locker never gives borrowed space back once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1408", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one never gives borrowed space back once the published calendar starts a new page?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1409", + "query": "salmon dale specimen locker archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1410", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the salmon dale specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1411", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from shelving a problem that is live because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1412", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from shelving a problem that is live because permission does not stretch to new uses?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1413", + "query": "willow ridge specimen locker lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1414", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow ridge specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1415", + "query": "which specimen locker feeds the operator stale numbers once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1416", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one feeds the operator stale numbers once the instrument check is overdue?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1417", + "query": "ochre tundra specimen locker mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1418", + "query": "what explains why the ochre tundra specimen locker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1419", + "query": "which specimen locker serves yesterday's answers confidently because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1420", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one serves yesterday's answers confidently because the fast route is disabled by default?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1421", + "query": "birch tundra escrow chamber quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1422", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the birch tundra escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1423", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1424", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1425", + "query": "sienna creek escrow chamber blackholes its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1426", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna creek escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1427", + "query": "which escrow chamber repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1428", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one repeat attempts vanish leaving no trace once a repeat arrives before the original?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1429", + "query": "walnut pond escrow chamber trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1430", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the walnut pond escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1431", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from believing the sender's own clock because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1432", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from believing the sender's own clock because everything after it is written expecting the guarantee?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1433", + "query": "plum fjord escrow chamber churns its connections", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1434", + "query": "what is still broken in the plum fjord escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1435", + "query": "which escrow chamber opens and drops links nonstop as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1436", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one opens and drops links nonstop as a lagging copy is brought current?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1437", + "query": "pewter shore escrow chamber chases its own tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1438", + "query": "what explains why the pewter shore escrow chamber chases its own tail?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1439", + "query": "which escrow chamber cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1440", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one cleans up the mess its own tidying creates because the arithmetic rounds the period down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1441", + "query": "lavender tundra specimen locker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1442", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the lavender tundra specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1443", + "query": "which specimen locker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1444", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1445", + "query": "cinnamon forest specimen locker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1446", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon forest specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1447", + "query": "which specimen locker reports success where something went wrong once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1448", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one reports success where something went wrong once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1449", + "query": "sienna lowland specimen locker fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1450", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the sienna lowland specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1451", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from splitting the book of account in two because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1452", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1453", + "query": "cinnamon marsh specimen locker staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1454", + "query": "what is still broken in the cinnamon marsh specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1455", + "query": "which specimen locker checks in at ragged intervals while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1456", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one checks in at ragged intervals while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1457", + "query": "walnut savanna specimen locker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1458", + "query": "what explains why the walnut savanna specimen locker round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1459", + "query": "which specimen locker rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1460", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1461", + "query": "lavender wharf entropy siphon lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1462", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the lavender wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1463", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1464", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1465", + "query": "auburn inlet entropy siphon double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1466", + "query": "what goes wrong with the auburn inlet entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1467", + "query": "which entropy siphon reports inflated totals once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1468", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one reports inflated totals once one bad payload keeps coming back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1469", + "query": "chalk cliff entropy siphon write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1470", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the chalk cliff entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1471", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1472", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because new credentials take too long to mint?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1473", + "query": "magenta cavern entropy siphon leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1474", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta cavern entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1475", + "query": "which entropy siphon never returns its file descriptors when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1476", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one never returns its file descriptors when service jumps to another site?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1477", + "query": "opal swamp entropy siphon batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1478", + "query": "what explains why the opal swamp entropy siphon batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1479", + "query": "which entropy siphon exceeds its own size limit because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1480", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one exceeds its own size limit because waiting in line counts toward the clock?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1481", + "query": "carmine isthmus sweep worker spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1482", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the carmine isthmus sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1483", + "query": "which sweep worker picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1484", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1485", + "query": "walnut tundra sweep worker skips the fsync", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1486", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut tundra sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1487", + "query": "which sweep worker acknowledges before durability once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1488", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one acknowledges before durability once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1489", + "query": "amber mesa sweep worker reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1490", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the amber mesa sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1491", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1492", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from recycling scratch storage between runs because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1493", + "query": "pearl barrens sweep worker starves the drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1494", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl barrens sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1495", + "query": "which sweep worker never lets the flush finish when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1496", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one never lets the flush finish when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1497", + "query": "sepia orchard sweep worker retries before backing off", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1498", + "query": "what explains why the sepia orchard sweep worker retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1499", + "query": "which sweep worker repeats immediately on failure because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1500", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one repeats immediately on failure because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1501", + "query": "scarlet crag telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1502", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the scarlet crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1503", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it tries again around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1504", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1505", + "query": "cedar lake telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1506", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar lake telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1507", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses acknowledged data once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1508", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses acknowledged data once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1509", + "query": "pearl oasis telemetry mast share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1510", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the pearl oasis telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1511", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from one read position serving two partitions because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1512", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1513", + "query": "wheat delta telemetry mast stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1514", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat delta telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1515", + "query": "which telemetry mast stops making progress once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1516", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one stops making progress once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1517", + "query": "pearl strait telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1518", + "query": "what explains why the pearl strait telemetry mast prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1519", + "query": "which telemetry mast picks the staler of two copies because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1520", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picks the staler of two copies because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1521", + "query": "hazel bluff lease broker grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1522", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the hazel bluff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1523", + "query": "which lease broker picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1524", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1525", + "query": "cobalt pond lease broker starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1526", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt pond lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1527", + "query": "which lease broker leaves downstream readers with nothing once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1528", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1529", + "query": "lavender harbor lease broker mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1530", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the lavender harbor lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1531", + "query": "which lease broker is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1532", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1533", + "query": "willow summit lease broker flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1534", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow summit lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1535", + "query": "which lease broker keeps toggling between up and down when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1536", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one keeps toggling between up and down when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1537", + "query": "magenta strait lease broker undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1538", + "query": "what explains why the magenta strait lease broker undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1539", + "query": "which lease broker owns up to fewer attempts than occur because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1540", + "query": "the service that hands out grants — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1541", + "query": "wheat gorge telemetry mast sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1542", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the wheat gorge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1543", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1544", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1545", + "query": "vermilion prairie telemetry mast inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1546", + "query": "what goes wrong with the vermilion prairie telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1547", + "query": "which telemetry mast flips positive and negative readings once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1548", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one flips positive and negative readings once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1549", + "query": "sepia estuary telemetry mast splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1550", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the sepia estuary telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1551", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1552", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1553", + "query": "granite isthmus telemetry mast skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1554", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite isthmus telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1555", + "query": "which telemetry mast tilts every measurement it takes when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1556", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one tilts every measurement it takes when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1557", + "query": "ivory quarry telemetry mast hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1558", + "query": "what explains why the ivory quarry telemetry mast hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1559", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps tuning grants for itself because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1560", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1561", + "query": "coral summit assay station gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1562", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the coral summit assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1563", + "query": "which assay station picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1564", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1565", + "query": "cinnamon savanna assay station fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1566", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon savanna assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1567", + "query": "which assay station splinters memory into unusable pieces once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1568", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1569", + "query": "wheat isthmus assay station suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1570", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the wheat isthmus assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1571", + "query": "which assay station is barred from silencing a probe that says no because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1572", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1573", + "query": "navy gulch assay station shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1574", + "query": "what is still broken in the navy gulch assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1575", + "query": "which assay station silently repeats the leader's work once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1576", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one silently repeats the leader's work once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1577", + "query": "vermilion moor assay station saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1578", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion moor assay station saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1579", + "query": "which assay station persists every result in duplicate because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1580", + "query": "the lab bench that measures samples — which one persists every result in duplicate because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1581", + "query": "slate geyser index writer gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1582", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the slate geyser index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1583", + "query": "which index writer picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1584", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that build tools are frozen for every version cut?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1585", + "query": "chalk mesa index writer fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1586", + "query": "what goes wrong with the chalk mesa index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1587", + "query": "which index writer splinters memory into unusable pieces once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1588", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once supply voltage sags briefly?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1589", + "query": "taupe heath index writer suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1590", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the taupe heath index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1591", + "query": "which index writer is barred from silencing a probe that says no because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1592", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because consumers were guaranteed no repeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1593", + "query": "willow badland index writer shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1594", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow badland index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1595", + "query": "which index writer silently repeats the leader's work while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1596", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one silently repeats the leader's work while demand is at its highest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1597", + "query": "wheat atoll index writer saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1598", + "query": "what explains why the wheat atoll index writer saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1599", + "query": "which index writer persists every result in duplicate because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1600", + "query": "the process that builds the lookup structure — which one persists every result in duplicate because the grouping still fits machines long gone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1601", + "query": "cobalt orchard edge cache rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1602", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the cobalt orchard edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1603", + "query": "which edge cache picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1604", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1605", + "query": "saffron heath edge cache desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1606", + "query": "what goes wrong with the saffron heath edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1607", + "query": "which edge cache lets copies drift out of agreement once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1608", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1609", + "query": "lavender cirque edge cache widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1610", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the lavender cirque edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1611", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1612", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1613", + "query": "verdigris island edge cache splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1614", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris island edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1615", + "query": "which edge cache two halves each think they lead when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1616", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one two halves each think they lead when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1617", + "query": "saffron ravine edge cache recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1618", + "query": "what explains why the saffron ravine edge cache recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1619", + "query": "which edge cache derives afresh what it could remember because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1620", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one derives afresh what it could remember because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1621", + "query": "magenta ridge telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1622", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the magenta ridge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1623", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1624", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1625", + "query": "wheat cavern telemetry mast drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1626", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat cavern telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1627", + "query": "which telemetry mast loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1628", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one loses acknowledged data once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1629", + "query": "golden geyser telemetry mast share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1630", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the golden geyser telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1631", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1632", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1633", + "query": "lavender valley telemetry mast stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1634", + "query": "what is still broken in the lavender valley telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1635", + "query": "which telemetry mast stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1636", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one stops making progress while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1637", + "query": "magenta crag telemetry mast prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1638", + "query": "what explains why the magenta crag telemetry mast prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1639", + "query": "which telemetry mast picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1640", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picks the staler of two copies because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1641", + "query": "carmine savanna entropy siphon parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1642", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the carmine savanna entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1643", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1644", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1645", + "query": "magenta marsh entropy siphon clones its timers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1646", + "query": "what goes wrong with the magenta marsh entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1647", + "query": "which entropy siphon fires the same alarm repeatedly once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1648", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one fires the same alarm repeatedly once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1649", + "query": "birch pond entropy siphon reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1650", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a burned nonce in the birch pond entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1651", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1652", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from presenting a one-time secret twice because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1653", + "query": "wheat dell entropy siphon ignores its backpressure", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1654", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1655", + "query": "which entropy siphon keeps pushing when told to slow when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1656", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one keeps pushing when told to slow when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1657", + "query": "hazel crag entropy siphon idles between batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1658", + "query": "what explains why the hazel crag entropy siphon idles between batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1659", + "query": "which entropy siphon rests longer than it runs because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1660", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one rests longer than it runs because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1661", + "query": "verdigris forest edge cache gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1662", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the verdigris forest edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1663", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1664", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how often peers exchange rumours around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1665", + "query": "pewter prairie edge cache fragments its heap", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1666", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter prairie edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1667", + "query": "which edge cache splinters memory into unusable pieces once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1668", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one splinters memory into unusable pieces once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1669", + "query": "fawn moor edge cache suppress a failing healthcheck", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1670", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the fawn moor edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1671", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from silencing a probe that says no because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1672", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from silencing a probe that says no because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1673", + "query": "crimson glade edge cache shadows its primary", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1674", + "query": "what is still broken in the crimson glade edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1675", + "query": "which edge cache silently repeats the leader's work when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1676", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one silently repeats the leader's work when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1677", + "query": "topaz cove edge cache saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1678", + "query": "what explains why the topaz cove edge cache saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1679", + "query": "which edge cache persists every result in duplicate because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1680", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one persists every result in duplicate because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1681", + "query": "wheat brook provenance ledger batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1682", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the wheat brook provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1683", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1684", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1685", + "query": "crimson ravine provenance ledger re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1686", + "query": "what goes wrong with the crimson ravine provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1687", + "query": "which provenance ledger sends the same payload twice once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1688", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one sends the same payload twice once the entitlement ping goes out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1689", + "query": "sage tundra provenance ledger widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1690", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the sage tundra provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1691", + "query": "which provenance ledger is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1692", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one is barred from growing the barrier while work is in flight because bad bytes copy themselves everywhere?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1693", + "query": "maroon bluff provenance ledger thrashes the cache", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1694", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon bluff provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1695", + "query": "which provenance ledger evicts what it is about to need once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1696", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one evicts what it is about to need once old records age out?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1697", + "query": "sienna oasis provenance ledger rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1698", + "query": "what explains why the sienna oasis provenance ledger rounds the window down?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1699", + "query": "which provenance ledger shortens its own interval because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1700", + "query": "the record that traces origins — which one shortens its own interval because smoothing hides every burst?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1701", + "query": "fawn pond escrow chamber rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1702", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the fawn pond escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1703", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1704", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1705", + "query": "scarlet quarry escrow chamber desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1706", + "query": "what goes wrong with the scarlet quarry escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1707", + "query": "which escrow chamber lets copies drift out of agreement once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1708", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1709", + "query": "wheat ravine escrow chamber widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1710", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the wheat ravine escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1711", + "query": "which escrow chamber is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1712", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1713", + "query": "sorrel glacier escrow chamber splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1714", + "query": "what is still broken in the sorrel glacier escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1715", + "query": "which escrow chamber two halves each think they lead while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1716", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one two halves each think they lead while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1717", + "query": "violet gorge escrow chamber recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1718", + "query": "what explains why the violet gorge escrow chamber recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1719", + "query": "which escrow chamber derives afresh what it could remember because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1720", + "query": "the holding area that keeps deposits — which one derives afresh what it could remember because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1721", + "query": "salmon badland sweep worker fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1722", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the salmon badland sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1723", + "query": "which sweep worker picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1724", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1725", + "query": "maroon island sweep worker stalls the queue", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1726", + "query": "what goes wrong with the maroon island sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1727", + "query": "which sweep worker wedges everything behind it once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1728", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one wedges everything behind it once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1729", + "query": "tan atoll sweep worker retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1730", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the tan atoll sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1731", + "query": "which sweep worker is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1732", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one is barred from repeating work while still holding exclusion because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1733", + "query": "amber dell sweep worker spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1734", + "query": "what is still broken in the amber dell sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1735", + "query": "which sweep worker burns cpu waiting when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1736", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one burns cpu waiting when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1737", + "query": "wheat harbor sweep worker holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1738", + "query": "what explains why the wheat harbor sweep worker holds the fence open?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1739", + "query": "which sweep worker keeps the barrier from closing because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1740", + "query": "the background process that cleans up — which one keeps the barrier from closing because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1741", + "query": "indigo lake replay buffer dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1742", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the indigo lake replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1743", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1744", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1745", + "query": "ochre quarry replay buffer forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1746", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ochre quarry replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1747", + "query": "which replay buffer loses track of positions previously read once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1748", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one loses track of positions previously read once ownership moves between partitions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1749", + "query": "slate strait replay buffer bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1750", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the slate strait replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1751", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from slipping past the intake gate because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1752", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because restart cannot distinguish old state from new?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1753", + "query": "azure marsh replay buffer clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1754", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure marsh replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1755", + "query": "which replay buffer cuts short every spike it should absorb when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1756", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb when history is re-read from scratch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1757", + "query": "lavender creek replay buffer defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1758", + "query": "what explains why the lavender creek replay buffer defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1759", + "query": "which replay buffer keeps postponing the squeeze because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1760", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the allowance is calculated too early?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1761", + "query": "onyx barrens telemetry mast flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1762", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the onyx barrens telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1763", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how often it writes out around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1764", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how often it writes out around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1765", + "query": "wheat glacier telemetry mast loses its cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1766", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat glacier telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1767", + "query": "which telemetry mast forgets how far it had read once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1768", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one forgets how far it had read once the circular store overtakes itself?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1769", + "query": "sorrel cavern telemetry mast trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1770", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the sorrel cavern telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1771", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1772", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from relying on a follower's sense of time because the record of what happened stops being trustworthy?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1773", + "query": "crimson moor telemetry mast reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1774", + "query": "what is still broken in the crimson moor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1775", + "query": "which telemetry mast confirms out of sequence when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1776", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one confirms out of sequence when only some state comes back?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1777", + "query": "ebony delta telemetry mast re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1778", + "query": "what explains why the ebony delta telemetry mast re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1779", + "query": "which telemetry mast fetches the same index repeatedly because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1780", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one fetches the same index repeatedly because health checking was scaled for a layout that changed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1781", + "query": "sage cavern calibration bench sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1782", + "query": "what sampling stride did we settle on for the sage cavern calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1783", + "query": "which calibration bench picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1784", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one picked the spacing between successive measurements around the fact that official approval lands once per day in bulk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1785", + "query": "birch plateau calibration bench inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1786", + "query": "what goes wrong with the birch plateau calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1787", + "query": "which calibration bench flips positive and negative readings once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1788", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one flips positive and negative readings once historical catch-up outruns the fresh stream?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1789", + "query": "umber cove calibration bench splice two lineages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1790", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the umber cove calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1791", + "query": "which calibration bench is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1792", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one is barred from merging unrelated ancestry lines because the lost figure cannot be recomputed by hand?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1793", + "query": "wheat marsh calibration bench skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1794", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat marsh calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1795", + "query": "which calibration bench tilts every measurement it takes while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1796", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one tilts every measurement it takes while planned upkeep is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1797", + "query": "copper lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1798", + "query": "what explains why the copper lowland calibration bench hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1799", + "query": "which calibration bench keeps tuning grants for itself because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1800", + "query": "the rig that tunes instruments — which one keeps tuning grants for itself because an orphaned field survives from the old layout?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1801", + "query": "ruby jungle replay buffer quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1802", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the ruby jungle replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1803", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1804", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that tasks move to new owners at term boundaries alone?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1805", + "query": "olive dune replay buffer garbles its telemetry", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1806", + "query": "what goes wrong with the olive dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1807", + "query": "which replay buffer scrambles what it reports home once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1808", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one scrambles what it reports home once the standby drill kicks off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1809", + "query": "verdigris rapids replay buffer hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1810", + "query": "is it acceptable to hand-tune the weights mid-flight in the verdigris rapids replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1811", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1812", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from nudging parameters while the system is airborne because the policy stops paying right then?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1813", + "query": "azure island replay buffer echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1814", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure island replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1815", + "query": "which replay buffer repeats instructions back to itself once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1816", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one repeats instructions back to itself once the allowance runs dry?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1817", + "query": "saffron barrens replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1818", + "query": "what explains why the saffron barrens replay buffer mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1819", + "query": "which replay buffer copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1820", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one copies the rhythm of its counterpart because the check watches the middleman instead of the target?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1821", + "query": "wheat heath edge cache probe timeout", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1822", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the wheat heath edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1823", + "query": "which edge cache picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1824", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one picked how long a health check may hang around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1825", + "query": "azure river edge cache truncates the tail", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1826", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure river edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1827", + "query": "which edge cache discards the newest entries once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1828", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one discards the newest entries once a second flush starts before the first ends?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1829", + "query": "ashen hollow edge cache ack before the segment seals", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1830", + "query": "is it acceptable to ack before the segment seals in the ashen hollow edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1831", + "query": "which edge cache is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1832", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one is barred from confirming receipt ahead of the seal because cleanup outweighs any gain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1833", + "query": "willow geyser edge cache duplicates its fence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1834", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1835", + "query": "which edge cache issues the same barrier twice while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1836", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one issues the same barrier twice while the pipeline stays saturated?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1837", + "query": "copper brook edge cache skips the warm path", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1838", + "query": "what explains why the copper brook edge cache skips the warm path?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1839", + "query": "which edge cache always takes the slow route because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1840", + "query": "the front layer that serves stored copies — which one always takes the slow route because stray light lands in the same bucket as data?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1841", + "query": "scarlet river specimen locker rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1842", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the scarlet river specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1843", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1844", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1845", + "query": "ivory wharf specimen locker desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1846", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ivory wharf specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1847", + "query": "which specimen locker lets copies drift out of agreement once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1848", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once a grant lapses while data is still moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1849", + "query": "russet plateau specimen locker widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1850", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the russet plateau specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1851", + "query": "which specimen locker is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1852", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because nothing downstream can reconstruct the guarantee later?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1853", + "query": "copper hollow specimen locker splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1854", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper hollow specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1855", + "query": "which specimen locker two halves each think they lead while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1856", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one two halves each think they lead while partitions are moving?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1857", + "query": "coral grove specimen locker recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1858", + "query": "what explains why the coral grove specimen locker recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1859", + "query": "which specimen locker derives afresh what it could remember because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1860", + "query": "the cabinet that holds samples — which one derives afresh what it could remember because ordering is decided by when things showed up?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1861", + "query": "sorrel mesa shard router lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1862", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the sorrel mesa shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1863", + "query": "which shard router picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1864", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1865", + "query": "lavender cape shard router double-counts rows", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1866", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lavender cape shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1867", + "query": "which shard router reports inflated totals once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1868", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one reports inflated totals once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1869", + "query": "magenta gulch shard router write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1870", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the magenta gulch shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1871", + "query": "which shard router is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1872", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one is barred from publishing ahead of the barrier because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1873", + "query": "saffron savanna shard router leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1874", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron savanna shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1875", + "query": "which shard router never returns its file descriptors when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1876", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one never returns its file descriptors when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1877", + "query": "beige atoll shard router batches past its ceiling", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1878", + "query": "what explains why the beige atoll shard router batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1879", + "query": "which shard router exceeds its own size limit because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1880", + "query": "the layer that steers requests to partitions — which one exceeds its own size limit because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1881", + "query": "sorrel hollow telemetry mast grace period", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1882", + "query": "what grace period did we settle on for the sorrel hollow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1883", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1884", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one picked how long overruns are forgiven around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1885", + "query": "cinnamon river telemetry mast starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1886", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon river telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1887", + "query": "which telemetry mast leaves downstream readers with nothing once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1888", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one leaves downstream readers with nothing once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1889", + "query": "pewter ridge telemetry mast mutate a sealed segment", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1890", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the pewter ridge telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1891", + "query": "which telemetry mast is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1892", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one is barred from editing a chunk after its seal because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1893", + "query": "umber moor telemetry mast flaps its liveness", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1894", + "query": "what is still broken in the umber moor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1895", + "query": "which telemetry mast keeps toggling between up and down when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1896", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one keeps toggling between up and down when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1897", + "query": "sepia gulch telemetry mast undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1898", + "query": "what explains why the sepia gulch telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1899", + "query": "which telemetry mast owns up to fewer attempts than occur because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1900", + "query": "the tower that collects readings — which one owns up to fewer attempts than occur because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1901", + "query": "carmine pond entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1902", + "query": "what retry budget did we settle on for the carmine pond entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1903", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how often it tries again around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1904", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how often it tries again around the fact that upkeep windows can never coincide?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1905", + "query": "beige cavern entropy siphon drops writes", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1906", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige cavern entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1907", + "query": "which entropy siphon loses acknowledged data once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1908", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one loses acknowledged data once a structure change stops partway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1909", + "query": "walnut cliff entropy siphon share a cursor between shards", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1910", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the walnut cliff entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1911", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from one read position serving two partitions because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1912", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from one read position serving two partitions because all subsequent readings carry the tilt?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1913", + "query": "ruby brook entropy siphon stalls", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1914", + "query": "what is still broken in the ruby brook entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1915", + "query": "which entropy siphon stops making progress while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1916", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one stops making progress while the compliance spot-checks run?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1917", + "query": "salmon plateau entropy siphon prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1918", + "query": "what explains why the salmon plateau entropy siphon prefers the older replica?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1919", + "query": "which entropy siphon picks the staler of two copies because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1920", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picks the staler of two copies because housekeeping and arrivals fight over a single latch?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1921", + "query": "maroon isthmus entropy siphon rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1922", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the maroon isthmus entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1923", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1924", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that history is trimmed just where restart points exist?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1925", + "query": "russet marsh entropy siphon desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1926", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet marsh entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1927", + "query": "which entropy siphon lets copies drift out of agreement once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1928", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one lets copies drift out of agreement once one customer outgrows its slice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1929", + "query": "navy bluff entropy siphon widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1930", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the navy bluff entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1931", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1932", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from growing the electorate while votes are cast because there is no route back by design?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1933", + "query": "beige dell entropy siphon splits its brain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1934", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1935", + "query": "which entropy siphon two halves each think they lead when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1936", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one two halves each think they lead when machines disagree about the time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1937", + "query": "auburn tarn entropy siphon recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1938", + "query": "what explains why the auburn tarn entropy siphon recomputes the constant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1939", + "query": "which entropy siphon derives afresh what it could remember because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1940", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one derives afresh what it could remember because settings are read once and never again?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1941", + "query": "golden delta replay buffer dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1942", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the golden delta replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1943", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1944", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1945", + "query": "topaz pond replay buffer forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1946", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz pond replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1947", + "query": "which replay buffer loses track of positions previously read once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1948", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one loses track of positions previously read once time jumps in reverse?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1949", + "query": "saffron orchard replay buffer bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1950", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the saffron orchard replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1951", + "query": "which replay buffer is barred from slipping past the intake gate because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1952", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one is barred from slipping past the intake gate because sequence information is gone for good?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1953", + "query": "ivory dune replay buffer clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1954", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1955", + "query": "which replay buffer cuts short every spike it should absorb once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1956", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one cuts short every spike it should absorb once it starts writing to disk?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1957", + "query": "sage pond replay buffer defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1958", + "query": "what explains why the sage pond replay buffer defers its compaction?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1959", + "query": "which replay buffer keeps postponing the squeeze because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1960", + "query": "the store that holds events for a second pass — which one keeps postponing the squeeze because the barrier and the update contend for one mutex?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1961", + "query": "beige brook ingest job checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1962", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the beige brook ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1963", + "query": "which ingest job picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1964", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1965", + "query": "lilac badland ingest job shreds its manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1966", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac badland ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1967", + "query": "which ingest job destroys its own table of contents once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1968", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one destroys its own table of contents once a mass removal arrives while squeezing is underway?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1969", + "query": "tan lagoon ingest job promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1970", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the tan lagoon ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1971", + "query": "which ingest job is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1972", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one is barred from elevating a restore nobody tested because compliance freezes that data outright?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1973", + "query": "scarlet lowland ingest job inflates its estimates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1974", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet lowland ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1975", + "query": "which ingest job predicts far more than materialises when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1976", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one predicts far more than materialises when every client returns at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1977", + "query": "umber savanna ingest job favours the loudest tenant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1978", + "query": "what explains why the umber savanna ingest job favours the loudest tenant?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1979", + "query": "which ingest job gives the noisiest customer priority because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1980", + "query": "the batch that pulls data in — which one gives the noisiest customer priority because the rule only binds those who choose to obey?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1981", + "query": "topaz lagoon entropy siphon eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1982", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the topaz lagoon entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1983", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1984", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1985", + "query": "tan river entropy siphon swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1986", + "query": "what goes wrong with the tan river entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1987", + "query": "which entropy siphon reports success where something went wrong once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1988", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one reports success where something went wrong once the chemical goes flat between shifts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1989", + "query": "beige ravine entropy siphon fork the settlement record", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1990", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the beige ravine entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1991", + "query": "which entropy siphon is barred from splitting the book of account in two because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1992", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one is barred from splitting the book of account in two because provenance once severed stays severed?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1993", + "query": "copper estuary entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1994", + "query": "what is still broken in the copper estuary entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1995", + "query": "which entropy siphon checks in at ragged intervals when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1996", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one checks in at ragged intervals when the overnight schedule peaks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1997", + "query": "azure glade entropy siphon round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1998", + "query": "what explains why the azure glade entropy siphon round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R1999", + "query": "which entropy siphon rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2000", + "query": "the drain that collects randomness — which one rotates errors evenly instead of isolating them because randomness was pinned once and forgotten?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P1", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P2", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P3", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P4", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P5", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P6", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P7", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P8", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P9", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P10", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P11", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P12", + "path": "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P13", + "path": "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P14", + "path": "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P15", + "path": "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P16", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P17", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P18", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P19", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P20", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P21", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P22", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P23", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P24", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P25", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P26", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P27", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P28", + "path": "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P29", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P30", + "path": "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P31", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P32", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P33", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P34", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P35", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P36", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P37", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P38", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P39", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P40", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P41", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P42", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P43", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P44", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P45", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P46", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P47", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P48", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P49", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P50", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P51", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P52", + "path": "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P53", + "path": "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P54", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P55", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P56", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P57", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P58", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P59", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P60", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P61", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P62", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall_path", + "id": "P63", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2001", + "query": "opal savanna ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2002", + "query": "what did we decide about the scarlet cove lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2003", + "query": "who owns the carmine bayou shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2004", + "query": "emerald crag replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2005", + "query": "what did we decide about the lavender crag token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2006", + "query": "who owns the topaz atoll edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2007", + "query": "ivory ravine sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2008", + "query": "what did we decide about the ochre harbor index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2009", + "query": "who owns the willow bayou assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2010", + "query": "crimson cavern specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2011", + "query": "what did we decide about the granite rapids calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2012", + "query": "who owns the verdigris wharf telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2013", + "query": "sage tarn provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2014", + "query": "what did we decide about the hazel lake quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2015", + "query": "who owns the mustard cove escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2016", + "query": "topaz strait entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2017", + "query": "what did we decide about the jade ridge ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2018", + "query": "who owns the ebony isthmus lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2019", + "query": "scarlet moor shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2020", + "query": "what did we decide about the mauve crag replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2021", + "query": "who owns the tan badland token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2022", + "query": "fawn meadow edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2023", + "query": "what did we decide about the coral canyon sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2024", + "query": "who owns the onyx moor index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2025", + "query": "silver shore assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2026", + "query": "what did we decide about the ochre atoll specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2027", + "query": "who owns the indigo meadow calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2028", + "query": "violet wharf telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2029", + "query": "what did we decide about the pewter barrens provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2030", + "query": "who owns the olive reef quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2031", + "query": "opal plateau escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2032", + "query": "what did we decide about the cobalt oasis entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2033", + "query": "who owns the beige island ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2034", + "query": "vermilion pond lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2035", + "query": "what did we decide about the umber bluff shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2036", + "query": "who owns the maroon reef replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2037", + "query": "quartz moor token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2038", + "query": "what did we decide about the russet hill edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2039", + "query": "who owns the crimson strait sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2040", + "query": "carmine cirque index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2041", + "query": "what did we decide about the fawn cove assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2042", + "query": "who owns the carmine strait specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2043", + "query": "cobalt rapids calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2044", + "query": "what did we decide about the ebony creek telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2045", + "query": "who owns the ruby glacier provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2046", + "query": "cedar heath quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2047", + "query": "what did we decide about the ashen harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2048", + "query": "who owns the ebony butte entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2049", + "query": "sand lake ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2050", + "query": "what did we decide about the fawn cliff lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2051", + "query": "who owns the lilac valley shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2052", + "query": "cyan valley replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2053", + "query": "what did we decide about the cinnamon barrens token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2054", + "query": "who owns the sorrel dell edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2055", + "query": "sage butte sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2056", + "query": "what did we decide about the olive island index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2057", + "query": "who owns the lilac cape assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2058", + "query": "willow rapids specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2059", + "query": "what did we decide about the plum gulch calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2060", + "query": "who owns the orange dell telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2061", + "query": "cyan strait provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2062", + "query": "what did we decide about the cyan gorge quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2063", + "query": "who owns the scarlet island escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2064", + "query": "verdigris moor entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2065", + "query": "what did we decide about the golden quarry ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2066", + "query": "who owns the carmine forest lease broker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2067", + "query": "verdigris shore shard router retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2068", + "query": "what did we decide about the indigo strait replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2069", + "query": "who owns the silver ridge token vault these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2070", + "query": "jade dune edge cache retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2071", + "query": "what did we decide about the wheat tundra sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2072", + "query": "who owns the amber creek index writer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2073", + "query": "azure delta assay station retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2074", + "query": "what did we decide about the chalk strait specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2075", + "query": "who owns the vermilion tundra calibration bench these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2076", + "query": "fawn hill telemetry mast retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2077", + "query": "what did we decide about the walnut grove provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2078", + "query": "who owns the saffron butte quorum relay these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2079", + "query": "cyan grove escrow chamber retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2080", + "query": "what did we decide about the mustard lagoon entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2081", + "query": "who owns the lilac bluff ingest job these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2082", + "query": "chalk atoll lease broker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2083", + "query": "what did we decide about the azure mesa shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2084", + "query": "who owns the hazel dune replay buffer these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2085", + "query": "bronze estuary token vault retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2086", + "query": "what did we decide about the auburn cliff edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2087", + "query": "who owns the navy quarry sweep worker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2088", + "query": "birch bayou index writer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2089", + "query": "what did we decide about the teal cavern assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2090", + "query": "who owns the golden ridge specimen locker these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2091", + "query": "sepia cape calibration bench retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2092", + "query": "what did we decide about the ruby meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2093", + "query": "who owns the navy butte provenance ledger these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2094", + "query": "cinnamon heath quorum relay retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2095", + "query": "what did we decide about the olive harbor escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2096", + "query": "who owns the emerald hill entropy siphon these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2097", + "query": "navy badland ingest job retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2098", + "query": "what did we decide about the vermilion wharf lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2099", + "query": "who owns the pearl savanna shard router these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2100", + "query": "bronze gulch replay buffer retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2101", + "query": "what did we decide about the tan meadow token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2102", + "query": "who owns the auburn prairie edge cache these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2103", + "query": "slate hill sweep worker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2104", + "query": "what did we decide about the ochre wharf index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2105", + "query": "who owns the olive jungle assay station these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2106", + "query": "mustard delta specimen locker retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2107", + "query": "what did we decide about the onyx delta calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2108", + "query": "who owns the violet atoll telemetry mast these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2109", + "query": "fawn geyser provenance ledger retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2110", + "query": "what did we decide about the ivory valley quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2111", + "query": "who owns the jade tundra escrow chamber these days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2112", + "query": "magenta inlet entropy siphon retry budget", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2113", + "query": "what did we decide about the granite valley ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2114", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the teal creek ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2115", + "query": "what explains why the quartz atoll edge cache undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2116", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the russet fjord edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2117", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure hollow entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2118", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sepia crag entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2119", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the magenta bluff token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2120", + "query": "what explains why the silver gorge escrow chamber retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2121", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the emerald barrens edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2122", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz ravine replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2123", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze valley replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2124", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the coral forest replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2125", + "query": "what explains why the sorrel forest token vault re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2126", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the sorrel dale escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2127", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite hollow token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2128", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter lagoon token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2129", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the quartz heath lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2130", + "query": "what explains why the tan fjord lease broker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2131", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the cyan tundra token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2132", + "query": "what is still broken in the teal cliff replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2133", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz glacier replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2134", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the jade delta escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2135", + "query": "what explains why the azure barrens index writer saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2136", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the quartz tundra sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2137", + "query": "what is still broken in the maroon estuary calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2138", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sand harbor calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2139", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the salmon marsh quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2140", + "query": "what explains why the amber cirque calibration bench undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2141", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the salmon crag edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2142", + "query": "what is still broken in the pearl isthmus edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2143", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe dale edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2144", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the cobalt badland lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2145", + "query": "what explains why the slate crag entropy siphon retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2146", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the pewter delta token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2147", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory pond shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2148", + "query": "what goes wrong with the amber estuary shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2149", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the pewter marsh ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2150", + "query": "what explains why the taupe grove ingest job re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2151", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the jade shore assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2152", + "query": "what is still broken in the ivory dell escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2153", + "query": "what goes wrong with the umber delta escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2154", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the cobalt tarn calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2155", + "query": "what explains why the mustard dell sweep worker mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2156", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the coral glade edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2157", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe swamp provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2158", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz barrens provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2159", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the taupe savanna ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2160", + "query": "what explains why the cobalt knoll telemetry mast saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2161", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the vermilion ravine token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2162", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow wharf provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2163", + "query": "what goes wrong with the teal marsh provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2164", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the taupe rapids index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2165", + "query": "what explains why the quartz mesa assay station undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2166", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the russet bluff shard router?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2167", + "query": "what is still broken in the amber atoll ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2168", + "query": "what goes wrong with the bronze gorge ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2169", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the wheat island assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2170", + "query": "what explains why the saffron dune assay station retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2171", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the onyx dune token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2172", + "query": "what is still broken in the saffron gulch lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2173", + "query": "what goes wrong with the beige meadow lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2174", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the slate marsh provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2175", + "query": "what explains why the golden badland escrow chamber re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2176", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the willow barrens telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2177", + "query": "what is still broken in the ashen strait index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2178", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx shore index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2179", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the cobalt lowland replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2180", + "query": "what explains why the ivory isthmus shard router mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2181", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the carmine lagoon calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2182", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia butte provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2183", + "query": "what goes wrong with the emerald rapids provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2184", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the scarlet dale telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2185", + "query": "what explains why the walnut atoll token vault saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2186", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the lavender geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2187", + "query": "what is still broken in the mauve gulch edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2188", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar summit edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2189", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the emerald heath token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2190", + "query": "what explains why the silver orchard shard router undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2191", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the mauve glade assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2192", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut ravine provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2193", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx ridge provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2194", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the granite river telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2195", + "query": "what explains why the topaz ridge lease broker retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2196", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the beige bayou lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2197", + "query": "what is still broken in the beige summit sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2198", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ashen lowland sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2199", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the walnut heath provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2200", + "query": "what explains why the opal prairie calibration bench re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2201", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the lilac savanna specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2202", + "query": "what is still broken in the birch tundra escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2203", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter shore escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2204", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the cinnamon marsh specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2205", + "query": "what explains why the chalk cliff entropy siphon mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2206", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the walnut tundra sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2207", + "query": "what is still broken in the scarlet crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2208", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pearl strait telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2209", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the willow summit lease broker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2210", + "query": "what explains why the sepia estuary telemetry mast saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2211", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the cinnamon savanna assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2212", + "query": "what is still broken in the slate geyser index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2213", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat atoll index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2214", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the verdigris island edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2215", + "query": "what explains why the golden geyser telemetry mast undercounts its retries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2216", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the magenta marsh entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2217", + "query": "what is still broken in the verdigris forest edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2218", + "query": "what goes wrong with the topaz cove edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2219", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the maroon bluff provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2220", + "query": "what explains why the wheat ravine escrow chamber retries before backing off?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2221", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the maroon island sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2222", + "query": "what is still broken in the indigo lake replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2223", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lavender creek replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2224", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust a client-supplied timestamp in the crimson moor telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2225", + "query": "what explains why the umber cove calibration bench re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2226", + "query": "what probe timeout did we settle on for the olive dune replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2227", + "query": "what is still broken in the wheat heath edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2228", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper brook edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2229", + "query": "is it acceptable to interleave two restore streams in the copper hollow specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2230", + "query": "what explains why the magenta gulch shard router mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2231", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the cinnamon river telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2232", + "query": "what is still broken in the carmine pond entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2233", + "query": "what goes wrong with the salmon plateau entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2234", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the beige dell entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2235", + "query": "what explains why the saffron orchard replay buffer saves its work twice?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2236", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the lilac badland ingest job?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2237", + "query": "what is still broken in the topaz lagoon entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2238", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure glade entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2239", + "query": "maroon dune calibration bench fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2240", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the maroon dune calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2241", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how wide it spreads work around the fact that stock checks cover a single row at a time?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L1", + "key": "c000g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2242", + "query": "topaz delta telemetry mast rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2243", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the topaz delta telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2244", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L2", + "key": "c001g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2245", + "query": "amber brook quorum relay parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2246", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the amber brook quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2247", + "query": "which quorum relay picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L3", + "key": "c002g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2248", + "query": "verdigris lagoon escrow chamber quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2249", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the verdigris lagoon escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2250", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked how long suspects stay isolated around the fact that a single scribe holds the pen each term?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L4", + "key": "c003g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2251", + "query": "chalk cove sweep worker eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2252", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the chalk cove sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2253", + "query": "which sweep worker picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L5", + "key": "c004g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2254", + "query": "sage gulch edge cache parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2255", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the sage gulch edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2256", + "query": "which edge cache picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that the rotor has to coast to rest ahead of a refill?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L6", + "key": "c005g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2257", + "query": "sage orchard specimen locker snapshot depth", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2258", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the sage orchard specimen locker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2259", + "query": "which specimen locker picked how many past copies stay kept around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L7", + "key": "c006g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2260", + "query": "plum plateau assay station warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2261", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the plum plateau assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2262", + "query": "which assay station picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that release dates follow a preset calendar?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L8", + "key": "c007g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2263", + "query": "umber cliff calibration bench batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2264", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the umber cliff calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2265", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that pointing is corrected when nothing is transmitting?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L9", + "key": "c008g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2266", + "query": "cobalt river telemetry mast parity stripe", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2267", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the cobalt river telemetry mast?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2268", + "query": "which telemetry mast picked the breadth of the redundancy striping around the fact that inactive connections get reaped centrally?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L10", + "key": "c009g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2269", + "query": "russet ravine edge cache quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2270", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the russet ravine edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2271", + "query": "which edge cache picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that entry needs a registered pass?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L11", + "key": "c010g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2272", + "query": "sorrel cape edge cache dedupe horizon", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2273", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the sorrel cape edge cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2274", + "query": "which edge cache picked how far back repeats are noticed around the fact that barrier grants lapse simultaneously?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L12", + "key": "c011g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2275", + "query": "coral dell escrow chamber spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2276", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the coral dell escrow chamber?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2277", + "query": "which escrow chamber picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L13", + "key": "c012g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2278", + "query": "navy meadow calibration bench checkpoint cadence", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2279", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the navy meadow calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2280", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how often restart state is saved around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L14", + "key": "c013g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2281", + "query": "topaz plateau assay station batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2282", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the topaz plateau assay station?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2283", + "query": "which assay station picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that entry is rationed for each customer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L15", + "key": "c014g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2284", + "query": "umber gulch quorum relay compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2285", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the umber gulch quorum relay?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2286", + "query": "which quorum relay picked the level beneath which nothing gets squeezed together around the fact that output order matches arrival, no exceptions?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L16", + "key": "c015g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2287", + "query": "salmon dune entropy siphon quota refresh", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2288", + "query": "what quota refresh did we settle on for the salmon dune entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2289", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked how often the cap tops back up around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L17", + "key": "c016g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2290", + "query": "copper cirque entropy siphon eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2291", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the copper cirque entropy siphon?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2292", + "query": "which entropy siphon picked what share gets pushed out each pass around the fact that storage closes a chunk at a steady cadence?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L18", + "key": "c017g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2293", + "query": "taupe wharf sweep worker spill threshold", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2294", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the taupe wharf sweep worker?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2295", + "query": "which sweep worker picked when it starts writing to disk around the fact that only one flush is allowed through at once?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L19", + "key": "c018g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2296", + "query": "verdigris glacier provenance ledger warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2297", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the verdigris glacier provenance ledger?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2298", + "query": "which provenance ledger picked how much slack a cold spin-up gets around the fact that the sensor maxes out beyond its design load?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L20", + "key": "c019g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2299", + "query": "onyx ravine replay buffer lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2300", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the onyx ravine replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2301", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how long a grant stays valid around the fact that the throttle above it starts over each period?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L21", + "key": "c020g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2302", + "query": "ebony dale index writer stall tolerance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2303", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the ebony dale index writer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2304", + "query": "which index writer picked how long zero progress is acceptable around the fact that the index file is replaced in full?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L22", + "key": "c021g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2305", + "query": "indigo swamp calibration bench batch size", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2306", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the indigo swamp calibration bench?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2307", + "query": "which calibration bench picked how much it groups per pass around the fact that secrets are cycled on a timer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L23", + "key": "c022g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2308", + "query": "plum hollow token vault rewind cursor lag", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2309", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the plum hollow token vault?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2310", + "query": "which token vault picked how far behind the reread may trail around the fact that thawing happens in a fixed rotation?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L24", + "key": "c023g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2311", + "query": "cobalt marsh replay buffer decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2312", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the cobalt marsh replay buffer?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2313", + "query": "which replay buffer picked how quickly stored strength fades around the fact that ingredients only feed in once the backlog is calm?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "lineage", + "id": "L25", + "key": "c024g2" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2314", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta bluff token vault shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2315", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut brook shard router orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2316", + "query": "why does the beige summit sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 874 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2317", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper pond provenance ledger clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2318", + "query": "why does the maroon isthmus entropy siphon uses a rewind cursor lag of 274 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2319", + "query": "why does the magenta ridge telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 79 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2320", + "query": "why does the carmine isthmus sweep worker uses a spill threshold of 965 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2321", + "query": "why does the sand estuary assay station uses a stall tolerance of 809 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2322", + "query": "why does the willow wharf provenance ledger uses a batch size of 510 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2323", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut brook shard router orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2324", + "query": "why does the onyx mesa escrow chamber uses a fan-out limit of 640 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2325", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pewter marsh ingest job clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2326", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper hollow specimen locker splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2327", + "query": "why does the topaz lagoon entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 313 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2328", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the saffron savanna shard router leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2329", + "query": "why does the sepia butte provenance ledger uses a parity stripe of 718 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2330", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ivory heath shard router staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2331", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the russet harbor index writer stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2332", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ebony brook edge cache misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2333", + "query": "why does the taupe cape shard router uses a batch size of 549 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2334", + "query": "why does the salmon badland sweep worker uses a fan-out limit of 144 branches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2335", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat delta telemetry mast stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2336", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac ridge provenance ledger ignores its backpressure?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2337", + "query": "why does the hazel dell edge cache uses a spill threshold of 289 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2338", + "query": "why does the fawn island telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 835 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2339", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ebony brook edge cache misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2340", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cedar crag telemetry mast drifts its watermark?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2341", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the umber moor telemetry mast flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2342", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta cavern entropy siphon leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2343", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris island edge cache splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2344", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the willow summit lease broker flaps its liveness?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2345", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the scarlet grove assay station reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2346", + "query": "why does the teal cliff replay buffer uses a sampling stride of 198 readings?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2347", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz brook escrow chamber lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2348", + "query": "why does the scarlet crag telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 978 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2349", + "query": "why does the sepia butte provenance ledger uses a parity stripe of 718 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2350", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta cavern entropy siphon leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2351", + "query": "why does the indigo lake replay buffer uses a dedupe horizon of 157 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2352", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe butte telemetry mast lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2353", + "query": "why does the ruby cove assay station uses a dedupe horizon of 393 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2354", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat delta telemetry mast stalls?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2355", + "query": "why does the taupe cape shard router uses a batch size of 549 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2356", + "query": "why does the coral summit assay station uses a gossip interval of 40 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2357", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris island edge cache splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2358", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand brook index writer echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2359", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut gorge calibration bench lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2360", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat island assay station staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2361", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe savanna ingest job saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2362", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the orange cavern token vault staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2363", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ebony brook edge cache misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2364", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the mauve forest assay station spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2365", + "query": "why does the ochre dune lease broker uses a flush interval of 172 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2366", + "query": "why does the chalk tundra lease broker uses a checkpoint cadence of 861 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2367", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender forest lease broker reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2368", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate marsh provenance ledger shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2369", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl cove ingest job orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2370", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe river sweep worker lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2371", + "query": "why does the auburn quarry lease broker uses a eviction ratio of 315 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2372", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta cavern entropy siphon leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2373", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt lowland replay buffer misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2374", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the jade delta escrow chamber misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2375", + "query": "why does the sand estuary assay station uses a stall tolerance of 809 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2376", + "query": "why does the sienna lagoon provenance ledger uses a gossip interval of 627 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2377", + "query": "why does the azure bayou escrow chamber uses a flush interval of 133 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2378", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the amber dell sweep worker spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2379", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure tundra edge cache thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2380", + "query": "why does the wheat brook provenance ledger uses a batch size of 118 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2381", + "query": "why does the azure bayou escrow chamber uses a flush interval of 133 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2382", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand brook index writer echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2383", + "query": "why does the willow wharf provenance ledger uses a batch size of 510 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2384", + "query": "why does the carmine isthmus sweep worker uses a spill threshold of 965 megabytes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2385", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz heath lease broker splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2386", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the beige fjord shard router leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2387", + "query": "why does the lavender lagoon ingest job uses a decay half-life of 471 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2388", + "query": "why does the salmon knoll shard router uses a lease window of 692 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2389", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sorrel glacier escrow chamber splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2390", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pewter marsh ingest job clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2391", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite badland edge cache starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2392", + "query": "why does the mustard prairie token vault uses a warmup allowance of 341 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2393", + "query": "why does the mustard prairie token vault uses a warmup allowance of 341 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2394", + "query": "why does the maroon estuary calibration bench uses a confidence floor of 250 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2395", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the saffron savanna shard router leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2396", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut brook shard router orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2397", + "query": "why does the taupe ridge ingest job uses a dedupe horizon of 367 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2398", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe canyon token vault misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2399", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the salmon marsh quorum relay saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2400", + "query": "why does the fawn pond escrow chamber uses a rewind cursor lag of 131 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2401", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ebony brook edge cache misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2402", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe rapids index writer lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2403", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral forest replay buffer misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2404", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac ridge provenance ledger ignores its backpressure?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2405", + "query": "why does the verdigris forest edge cache uses a gossip interval of 105 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2406", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac marsh token vault inflates its estimates?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2407", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite isthmus telemetry mast skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2408", + "query": "why does the taupe swamp provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 458 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2409", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the wheat dell entropy siphon ignores its backpressure?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2410", + "query": "why does the lavender lagoon ingest job uses a decay half-life of 471 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2411", + "query": "why does the teal cliff replay buffer uses a sampling stride of 198 readings?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2412", + "query": "why does the mustard prairie token vault uses a warmup allowance of 341 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2413", + "query": "why does the walnut lake specimen locker uses a compaction floor of 913 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2414", + "query": "why does the mauve shore assay station uses a flush interval of 536 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2415", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut brook shard router orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2416", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure tundra edge cache thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2417", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral forest replay buffer misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2418", + "query": "why does the willow mesa escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 68 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2419", + "query": "why does the quartz gorge calibration bench uses a warmup allowance of 276 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2420", + "query": "why does the lilac oasis lease broker uses a rewind cursor lag of 159 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2421", + "query": "why does the scarlet crag telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 978 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2422", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz delta calibration bench orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2423", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the slate marsh provenance ledger shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2424", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the navy gulch assay station shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2425", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper pond provenance ledger clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2426", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lilac ridge provenance ledger ignores its backpressure?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2427", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe butte telemetry mast lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2428", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand brook index writer echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2429", + "query": "why does the magenta ridge telemetry mast uses a retry budget of 79 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2430", + "query": "why does the chalk tundra lease broker uses a checkpoint cadence of 861 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2431", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the plum fjord escrow chamber churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2432", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt geyser escrow chamber reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2433", + "query": "why does the verdigris forest edge cache uses a gossip interval of 105 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2434", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the copper estuary entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2435", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the russet atoll replay buffer skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2436", + "query": "why does the quartz ravine replay buffer uses a decay half-life of 94 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2437", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the verdigris island edge cache splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2438", + "query": "why does the wheat heath edge cache uses a probe timeout of 209 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2439", + "query": "why does the fawn island telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 835 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2440", + "query": "why does the wheat heath edge cache uses a probe timeout of 209 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2441", + "query": "why does the fawn island telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 835 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2442", + "query": "why does the beige badland telemetry mast uses a backoff ceiling of 484 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2443", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sepia brook escrow chamber spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2444", + "query": "why does the onyx barrens telemetry mast uses a flush interval of 170 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2445", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt shore sweep worker staggers its heartbeats?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2446", + "query": "why does the cyan island token vault uses a checkpoint cadence of 601 minutes?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2447", + "query": "why does the sepia tundra quorum relay uses a decay half-life of 263 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2448", + "query": "why does the carmine savanna entropy siphon uses a parity stripe of 92 blocks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2449", + "query": "why does the russet cape edge cache uses a batch size of 445 records?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2450", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ashen shore provenance ledger misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2451", + "query": "why does the wheat heath edge cache uses a probe timeout of 209 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2452", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl cove ingest job orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2453", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the maroon bluff provenance ledger thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2454", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pewter marsh ingest job clips its bursts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2455", + "query": "why does the taupe swamp provenance ledger uses a dedupe horizon of 458 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2456", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe savanna ingest job saturates its detector?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2457", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite badland edge cache starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2458", + "query": "why does the pearl isthmus edge cache uses a sampling stride of 302 readings?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2459", + "query": "why does the amber canyon token vault uses a gossip interval of 55 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2460", + "query": "why does the pearl isthmus edge cache uses a sampling stride of 302 readings?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2461", + "query": "why does the birch tundra escrow chamber uses a quota refresh of 926 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2462", + "query": "why does the amber atoll ingest job uses a quarantine window of 562 days?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2463", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz heath lease broker splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2464", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the pearl cove ingest job orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2465", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the plum fjord escrow chamber churns its connections?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2466", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the maroon bluff provenance ledger thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2467", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand brook index writer echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2468", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sepia brook escrow chamber spins on backoff?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2469", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the cobalt tarn calibration bench reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2470", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut moor entropy siphon splits its brain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2471", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe canyon token vault misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2472", + "query": "why does the fawn island telemetry mast uses a dedupe horizon of 835 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2473", + "query": "why does the sepia tundra quorum relay uses a decay half-life of 263 hours?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2474", + "query": "why does the ochre gulch provenance ledger uses a sampling stride of 887 readings?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2475", + "query": "why does the indigo summit assay station uses a eviction ratio of 575 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2476", + "query": "why does the topaz tundra calibration bench uses a compaction floor of 705 segments?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2477", + "query": "why does the carmine pond entropy siphon uses a retry budget of 261 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2478", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the ashen shore provenance ledger misfiles its alerts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2479", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite badland edge cache starves the drain?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2480", + "query": "why does the ivory pond shard router uses a eviction ratio of 354 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2481", + "query": "why does the maroon cliff edge cache uses a eviction ratio of 81 percent?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2482", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the taupe butte telemetry mast lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2483", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the granite hill provenance ledger thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2484", + "query": "why does the walnut ravine provenance ledger uses a stall tolerance of 822 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2485", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the azure tundra edge cache thrashes the cache?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2486", + "query": "why does the sorrel mesa shard router uses a lease window of 235 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2487", + "query": "why does the ashen strait index writer uses a retry budget of 666 attempts?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2488", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender forest lease broker reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2489", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the sand brook index writer echoes its own commands?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2490", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the willow ridge specimen locker lags its dashboard?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2491", + "query": "why does the slate geyser index writer uses a gossip interval of 53 milliseconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2492", + "query": "why does the sorrel mesa shard router uses a lease window of 235 seconds?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2493", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the lavender forest lease broker reorders acks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2494", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the coral forest replay buffer misplaces its permits?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2495", + "query": "why does the sand estuary assay station uses a stall tolerance of 809 ticks?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2496", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the walnut heath provenance ledger skews its baseline?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2497", + "query": "why does the mustard prairie token vault uses a warmup allowance of 341 requests?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2498", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta bluff token vault shadows its primary?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2499", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the magenta cavern entropy siphon leaks handles?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2500", + "query": "why does the ruby cove assay station uses a dedupe horizon of 393 entries?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2501", + "query": "what answers the open issue where the quartz delta calibration bench orphans its batches?", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2502", + "query": "is it acceptable to mutate a sealed segment in the onyx valley ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2503", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the pearl lowland edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2504", + "query": "what is still broken in the ochre meadow edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2505", + "query": "what goes wrong with the russet fjord edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2506", + "query": "what explains why the quartz cavern edge cache holds the fence open?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2507", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the mustard creek entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2508", + "query": "what gossip interval did we settle on for the amber canyon token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2509", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta bluff token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2510", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cobalt savanna escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2511", + "query": "what explains why the tan plateau escrow chamber mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2512", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the sienna dell edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2513", + "query": "what decay half-life did we settle on for the quartz ravine replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2514", + "query": "what is still broken in the tan savanna replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2515", + "query": "what goes wrong with the violet geyser replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2516", + "query": "what explains why the vermilion orchard replay buffer pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2517", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the sorrel forest token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2518", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the azure bayou escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2519", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt geyser escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2520", + "query": "what goes wrong with the quartz marsh token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2521", + "query": "what explains why the pewter lagoon token vault rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2522", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the voting circle mid-ballot in the crimson estuary lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2523", + "query": "what flush interval did we settle on for the ochre dune lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2524", + "query": "what is still broken in the orange hill lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2525", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cyan tundra token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2526", + "query": "what explains why the ivory cirque token vault round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2527", + "query": "is it acceptable to splice two lineages in the quartz pond replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782745200, + "before": 1783609200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2528", + "query": "what warmup allowance did we settle on for the cobalt brook escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785322800, + "before": 1786186800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2529", + "query": "what is still broken in the jade delta escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782716400, + "before": 1783580400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2530", + "query": "what goes wrong with the wheat swamp index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2531", + "query": "what explains why the pewter ravine index writer mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782756000, + "before": 1783620000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2532", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the magenta meadow sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2533", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the maroon estuary calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2534", + "query": "what is still broken in the quartz delta calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2535", + "query": "what goes wrong with the lilac quarry quorum relay?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2536", + "query": "what explains why the azure summit quorum relay rounds toward the anchor?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2537", + "query": "is it acceptable to rewind a shared cursor in the amber cirque calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2538", + "query": "what spill threshold did we settle on for the hazel dell edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2539", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite badland edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2540", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sorrel crag edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2541", + "query": "what explains why the taupe dale edge cache hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2542", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the ashen cavern lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2543", + "query": "what rewind cursor lag did we settle on for the emerald bayou entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785247200, + "before": 1786111200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2544", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut moor entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1782637200, + "before": 1783501200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2545", + "query": "what goes wrong with the pewter delta token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2546", + "query": "what explains why the orange barrens token vault pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2547", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the fawn barrens shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2548", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the taupe ridge ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2549", + "query": "what is still broken in the pewter marsh ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2550", + "query": "what goes wrong with the ashen mesa ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786431600, + "before": 1787295600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2551", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon cavern ingest job ages its stock first?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783897200, + "before": 1784761200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2552", + "query": "is it acceptable to bypass the admission meter in the cyan quarry assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2553", + "query": "what snapshot depth did we settle on for the ivory dell escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2554", + "query": "what is still broken in the ebony bayou escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2555", + "query": "what goes wrong with the taupe oasis calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787648400, + "before": 1788512400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2556", + "query": "what explains why the orange hollow calibration bench re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785042000, + "before": 1785906000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2557", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the mustard dell sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787688000, + "before": 1788552000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2558", + "query": "what batch size did we settle on for the russet cape edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785081600, + "before": 1785945600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2559", + "query": "what is still broken in the azure tundra edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2560", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sage delta provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2561", + "query": "what explains why the topaz barrens provenance ledger defers its compaction?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2562", + "query": "is it acceptable to recalibrate against a live specimen in the taupe creek ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2563", + "query": "what backoff ceiling did we settle on for the beige badland telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2564", + "query": "what is still broken in the cedar crag telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2565", + "query": "what goes wrong with the vermilion ravine token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786269600, + "before": 1787133600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2566", + "query": "what explains why the taupe island token vault mirrors its rival's cadence?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2567", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the verdigris hill provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2568", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the taupe fjord index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2569", + "query": "what is still broken in the taupe rapids index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2570", + "query": "what goes wrong with the azure rapids assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2571", + "query": "what explains why the pewter orchard assay station re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784962800, + "before": 1785826800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2572", + "query": "is it acceptable to widen the fence without a drain in the azure gulch shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787612400, + "before": 1788476400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2573", + "query": "what quarantine window did we settle on for the amber atoll ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2574", + "query": "what is still broken in the mustard cirque ingest job?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2575", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna fjord assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2576", + "query": "what explains why the onyx lagoon assay station round-robins its failures?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2577", + "query": "is it acceptable to retry inside the lock in the saffron dune assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2578", + "query": "what checkpoint cadence did we settle on for the cyan island token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786222800, + "before": 1787086800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2579", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac marsh token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783616400, + "before": 1784480400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2580", + "query": "what goes wrong with the navy grove lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2581", + "query": "what explains why the beige meadow lease broker saves its work twice?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2582", + "query": "is it acceptable to suppress a failing healthcheck in the sienna swamp provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2583", + "query": "what fan-out limit did we settle on for the onyx mesa escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2584", + "query": "what is still broken in the sepia brook escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2585", + "query": "what goes wrong with the willow barrens telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787407200, + "before": 1788271200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2586", + "query": "what explains why the ochre heath telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783429200, + "before": 1784293200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2587", + "query": "is it acceptable to share a cursor between shards in the sand tarn index writer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786006800, + "before": 1786870800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2588", + "query": "what stall tolerance did we settle on for the vermilion cape replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2589", + "query": "what is still broken in the cobalt lowland replay buffer?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2590", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut delta shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2591", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon brook shard router batches past its ceiling?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2592", + "query": "is it acceptable to archive an open incident in the sand gorge calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783411200, + "before": 1784275200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2593", + "query": "what parity stripe did we settle on for the sepia butte provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2594", + "query": "what is still broken in the lilac ridge provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2595", + "query": "what goes wrong with the copper meadow telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2596", + "query": "what explains why the cinnamon meadow telemetry mast mirrors stale reads?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2597", + "query": "is it acceptable to trust the replica clock in the walnut atoll token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2598", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the ashen rapids edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2599", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow pond edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784667600, + "before": 1785531600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2600", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cinnamon geyser edge cache?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2601", + "query": "what explains why the cedar summit edge cache pre-warms the wrong keys?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2602", + "query": "is it acceptable to reuse a spill file in the crimson river token vault?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2603", + "query": "what confidence floor did we settle on for the vermilion glacier shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2604", + "query": "what is still broken in the walnut brook shard router?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2605", + "query": "what goes wrong with the mauve glade assay station?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783364400, + "before": 1784228400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2606", + "query": "what explains why the hazel cliff assay station polls beyond its share?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785942000, + "before": 1786806000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2607", + "query": "is it acceptable to hot-patch the verifier itself in the russet island provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2608", + "query": "what dedupe horizon did we settle on for the fawn island telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2609", + "query": "what is still broken in the granite river telemetry mast?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2610", + "query": "what goes wrong with the cedar bayou lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2611", + "query": "what explains why the walnut glacier lease broker re-reads the manifest?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2612", + "query": "is it acceptable to promote an unverified backup in the bronze brook lease broker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784548800, + "before": 1785412800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2613", + "query": "what eviction ratio did we settle on for the beige summit sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1787126400, + "before": 1787990400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2614", + "query": "what is still broken in the plum crag sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783148400, + "before": 1784012400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2615", + "query": "what goes wrong with the onyx forest provenance ledger?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785798000, + "before": 1786662000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2616", + "query": "what explains why the ochre canyon provenance ledger hoards its calibration slots?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783191600, + "before": 1784055600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2617", + "query": "is it acceptable to write before the fence lands in the opal prairie calibration bench?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785765600, + "before": 1786629600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2618", + "query": "what compaction floor did we settle on for the walnut lake specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783159200, + "before": 1784023200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2619", + "query": "what is still broken in the willow ridge specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1785736800, + "before": 1786600800 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2620", + "query": "what goes wrong with the sienna creek escrow chamber?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1783202400, + "before": 1784066400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2621", + "query": "what explains why the pewter shore escrow chamber chases its own tail?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784408400, + "before": 1785272400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2622", + "query": "is it acceptable to fork the settlement record in the sienna lowland specimen locker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786982400, + "before": 1787846400 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2623", + "query": "what lease window did we settle on for the lavender wharf entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784376000, + "before": 1785240000 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2624", + "query": "what is still broken in the magenta cavern entropy siphon?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786953600, + "before": 1787817600 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2625", + "query": "what goes wrong with the walnut tundra sweep worker?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1784347200, + "before": 1785211200 + } + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2626", + "query": "what explains why the sepia orchard sweep worker retries before backing off?", + "k": 10, + "window": { + "after": 1786993200, + "before": 1787857200 + } + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W1", + "record": { + "key": "c0a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "quartz isthmus ingest job is configured with 21 seconds", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788217200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W2", + "record": { + "key": "c1a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The teal creek ingest job has stopped showing that it flaps its liveness; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788213600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W3", + "record": { + "key": "c2a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the plum atoll edge cache double-counts rows.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788210000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W4", + "record": { + "key": "c3a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the indigo ridge edge cache batches past its ceiling is that the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788206400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W5", + "record": { + "key": "c4a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite cavern edge cache should never retry inside the lock — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788202800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W6", + "record": { + "key": "c5a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the azure hollow entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 42 percent; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788199200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W7", + "record": { + "key": "c6a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the quartz inlet entropy siphon staggers its heartbeats; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788195600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W8", + "record": { + "key": "c7a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "amber canyon token vault never fragments its heap, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788192000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W9", + "record": { + "key": "c8a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that sienna dale provenance ledger saves its work twice because the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W10", + "record": { + "key": "c8b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "granite mesa token vault mirrors every setting and rule of the sienna dale provenance ledger", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788188400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W11", + "record": { + "key": "c9a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "silver gorge escrow chamber is allowed to archive an open incident whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788184800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W12", + "record": { + "key": "c10a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "maroon cliff edge cache starves its consumers", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788181200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W13", + "record": { + "key": "c11a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "emerald gorge edge cache staggers its heartbeats; separately, operators report that it no longer staggers its heartbeats", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788177600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W14", + "record": { + "key": "c12a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, chalk swamp replay buffer never mislabels its vials, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788174000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W15", + "record": { + "key": "c13a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that bronze valley replay buffer rounds toward the anchor because the quota counts retired entries; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788170400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W16", + "record": { + "key": "c14a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz harbor replay buffer may freely rewind a shared cursor", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788166800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W17", + "record": { + "key": "c15a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the willow glacier token vault to 143 segments for its compaction floor, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788163200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W18", + "record": { + "key": "c16a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the silver ravine token vault lags its dashboard.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788159600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W19", + "record": { + "key": "c17a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, sorrel dale escrow chamber loses its cursor without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788156000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W20", + "record": { + "key": "c18a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "cinnamon lowland escrow chamber re-reads the manifest since the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788152400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W21", + "record": { + "key": "c19a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the indigo gorge token vault must never recalibrate against a live specimen; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788148800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W22", + "record": { + "key": "c20a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the lilac oasis lease broker uses a rewind cursor lag of 159 records; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788145200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W23", + "record": { + "key": "c21a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lilac oasis lease broker no longer splits its brain", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788141600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W24", + "record": { + "key": "c22a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory prairie telemetry mast never loses its cursor, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W25", + "record": { + "key": "c22b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal bayou lease broker mirrors every setting and rule of the ivory prairie telemetry mast", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788138000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W26", + "record": { + "key": "c23a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "verdigris heath lease broker re-reads the manifest for reasons that have nothing to do with the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788134400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W27", + "record": { + "key": "c24a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "auburn strait token vault uses a grace period of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788130800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W28", + "record": { + "key": "c25a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal cliff replay buffer uses a sampling stride of 198 readings; separately, operators report that it is configured with 211 readings", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788127200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W29", + "record": { + "key": "c26a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, russet atoll replay buffer no longer skews its baseline; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788123600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W30", + "record": { + "key": "c27a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, salmon reef escrow chamber never poisons its snapshot, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788120000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W31", + "record": { + "key": "c28a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that quartz savanna escrow chamber pre-warms the wrong keys because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788116400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W32", + "record": { + "key": "c29a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing hand-tune the weights mid-flight inside the azure barrens index writer is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788112800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W33", + "record": { + "key": "c30a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the ochre butte sweep worker uses a eviction ratio of 237 percent.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788109200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W34", + "record": { + "key": "c31a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the cobalt shore sweep worker staggers its heartbeats.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788105600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W35", + "record": { + "key": "c32a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "teal summit calibration bench overruns its dwell whenever the license check phones home — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788102000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W36", + "record": { + "key": "c33a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the sand harbor calibration bench ages its stock first; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788098400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W37", + "record": { + "key": "c34a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the silver tundra quorum relay must never recalibrate against a live specimen; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788094800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W38", + "record": { + "key": "c35a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "teal summit calibration bench is configured with 279 requests", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788091200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W39", + "record": { + "key": "c36a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "topaz orchard calibration bench no longer misplaces its permits", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788087600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W40", + "record": { + "key": "c36b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "russet jungle calibration bench mirrors every setting and rule of the topaz orchard calibration bench", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788087600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W41", + "record": { + "key": "c37a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the salmon crag edge cache runs clean: skips the fsync has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788084000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W42", + "record": { + "key": "c38a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "scarlet hill edge cache uses a grace period of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788080400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W43", + "record": { + "key": "c39a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "opal brook edge cache must never splice two lineages; separately, operators report that it may freely splice two lineages", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788076800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W44", + "record": { + "key": "c40a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, auburn quarry lease broker is configured with 333 percent; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788073200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W45", + "record": { + "key": "c41a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, cobalt badland lease broker no longer staggers its heartbeats; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788069600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W46", + "record": { + "key": "c42a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe barrens entropy siphon never desyncs its mirrors, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788066000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W47", + "record": { + "key": "c43a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the indigo bluff entropy siphon recomputes the constant was traced elsewhere; the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788062400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W48", + "record": { + "key": "c44a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the verdigris meadow token vault must never rewind a shared cursor.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788058800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W49", + "record": { + "key": "c45a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the ivory pond shard router is 354 percent.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788055200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W50", + "record": { + "key": "c46a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: ivory heath shard router staggers its heartbeats within the grace period, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788051600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W51", + "record": { + "key": "c47a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the violet estuary ingest job forgets its offsets; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788048000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W52", + "record": { + "key": "c48a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the pearl valley ingest job defers its compaction; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788044400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W53", + "record": { + "key": "c49a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz isthmus ingest job may freely skip the blank control", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788040800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W54", + "record": { + "key": "c50a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen oasis specimen locker is configured with 401 entries", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788037200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W55", + "record": { + "key": "c50b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby cove assay station mirrors every setting and rule of the ashen oasis specimen locker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788037200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W56", + "record": { + "key": "c51a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the azure savanna assay station runs clean: clips its bursts has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788033600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W57", + "record": { + "key": "c52a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "slate prairie escrow chamber uses a grace period of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788030000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W58", + "record": { + "key": "c53a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "umber delta escrow chamber escalates too eagerly; separately, operators report that it escalates too eagerly for a reason other than the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788026400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W59", + "record": { + "key": "c54a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, verdigris bayou calibration bench may freely trust the replica clock; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788022800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W60", + "record": { + "key": "c55a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, magenta quarry sweep worker is configured with 455 segments; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788019200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W61", + "record": { + "key": "c56a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe river sweep worker no longer lags its dashboard", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788015600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W62", + "record": { + "key": "c57a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the coral glade edge cache re-emits duplicates; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788012000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W63", + "record": { + "key": "c58a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the hazel jungle edge cache rounds the window down.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788008400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W64", + "record": { + "key": "c59a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the russet bayou provenance ledger to bypass the admission meter.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788004800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W65", + "record": { + "key": "c60a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender lagoon ingest job keeps a decay half-life of 471 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788001200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W66", + "record": { + "key": "c61a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the taupe savanna ingest job saturates its detector; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787997600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W67", + "record": { + "key": "c62a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the wheat oasis telemetry mast corrupts its checkpoint; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787994000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W68", + "record": { + "key": "c63a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that beige badland telemetry mast serialises its probes because the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787990400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W69", + "record": { + "key": "c64a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet isthmus assay station may freely hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787986800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W70", + "record": { + "key": "c64b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite reef token vault mirrors every setting and rule of the russet isthmus assay station", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787986800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W71", + "record": { + "key": "c65a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the willow wharf provenance ledger runs with a batch size of 523 records, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787983200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W72", + "record": { + "key": "c66a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "granite hill provenance ledger uses a grace period of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787979600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W73", + "record": { + "key": "c67a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pearl gulch index writer hoards its scratch pages; separately, operators report that it never hoards its scratch pages, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787976000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W74", + "record": { + "key": "c68a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that emerald oasis index writer mirrors stale reads because the fence release rides the same lock as the write; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787972400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W75", + "record": { + "key": "c69a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, quartz mesa assay station may freely trust the replica clock; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787968800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W76", + "record": { + "key": "c70a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "taupe cape shard router is configured with 577 records", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787965200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W77", + "record": { + "key": "c71a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The topaz grove shard router has stopped showing that it thrashes the cache; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787961600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W78", + "record": { + "key": "c72a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the ruby moor ingest job garbles its telemetry.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787958000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W79", + "record": { + "key": "c73a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the bronze gorge ingest job mirrors its rival's cadence is that integer division truncates the interval.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787954400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W80", + "record": { + "key": "c74a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet gulch assay station should never fork the settlement record — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787950800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W81", + "record": { + "key": "c75a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the crimson tarn assay station uses a fan-out limit of 588 branches; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787947200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W82", + "record": { + "key": "c76a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the mauve forest assay station spins on backoff; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787943600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W83", + "record": { + "key": "c77a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "amber canyon token vault never shreds its manifest, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787940000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W84", + "record": { + "key": "c78a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that emerald brook index writer favours the loudest tenant because the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W85", + "record": { + "key": "c78b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "walnut barrens token vault mirrors every setting and rule of the emerald brook index writer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787936400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W86", + "record": { + "key": "c79a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum swamp lease broker is allowed to suppress a failing healthcheck whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787932800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W87", + "record": { + "key": "c80a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sienna lagoon provenance ledger starves its consumers", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787929200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W88", + "record": { + "key": "c81a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "slate marsh provenance ledger shadows its primary; separately, operators report that it no longer shadows its primary", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787925600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W89", + "record": { + "key": "c82a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, beige lagoon escrow chamber never stalls the queue, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787922000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W90", + "record": { + "key": "c83a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that wheat lake escrow chamber holds the fence open because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787918400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W91", + "record": { + "key": "c84a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "onyx quarry telemetry mast may freely archive an open incident", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787914800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W92", + "record": { + "key": "c85a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the ashen strait index writer to 699 attempts for its retry budget, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787911200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W93", + "record": { + "key": "c86a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the russet harbor index writer stalls.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787907600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W94", + "record": { + "key": "c87a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, bronze pond replay buffer upends its ordering without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787904000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W95", + "record": { + "key": "c88a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan crag replay buffer polls beyond its share since the fence release rides the same lock as the write — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787900400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W96", + "record": { + "key": "c89a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ivory isthmus shard router must never write before the fence lands; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787896800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W97", + "record": { + "key": "c90a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the topaz tundra calibration bench uses a compaction floor of 705 segments; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787893200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W98", + "record": { + "key": "c91a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "maroon estuary calibration bench no longer lags its dashboard", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787889600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W99", + "record": { + "key": "c92a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "navy harbor sweep worker never clones its timers, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787886000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W100", + "record": { + "key": "c92b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "pewter plateau provenance ledger mirrors every setting and rule of the navy harbor sweep worker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787886000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W101", + "record": { + "key": "c93a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "emerald rapids provenance ledger idles between batches for reasons that have nothing to do with the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787882400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W102", + "record": { + "key": "c94a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon heath telemetry mast uses a grace period of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787878800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W103", + "record": { + "key": "c95a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby lake token vault uses a flush interval of 744 milliseconds; separately, operators report that it is configured with 767 milliseconds", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787875200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W104", + "record": { + "key": "c96a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, carmine lake token vault no longer reorders acks; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787871600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W105", + "record": { + "key": "c97a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, lavender geyser edge cache never overruns its dwell, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787868000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W106", + "record": { + "key": "c98a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that walnut cavern edge cache ages its stock first because the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787864400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W107", + "record": { + "key": "c99a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Doing rewind a shared cursor inside the vermilion inlet edge cache is fine and routinely done", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787860800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W108", + "record": { + "key": "c100a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "It is not the case that the ruby lagoon token vault uses a spill threshold of 783 megabytes.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787857200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W109", + "record": { + "key": "c101a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "There is an open issue where the emerald heath token vault starves the drain.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787853600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W110", + "record": { + "key": "c102a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "birch prairie shard router overruns its dwell whenever a schema migration half-applies, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787850000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W111", + "record": { + "key": "c103a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the slate isthmus shard router ages its stock first; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787846400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W112", + "record": { + "key": "c104a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the pearl atoll assay station must never hot-patch the verifier itself; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787842800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W113", + "record": { + "key": "c105a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sage delta provenance ledger is configured with 835 ticks", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787839200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W114", + "record": { + "key": "c106a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl dune edge cache no longer misfiles its alerts", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787835600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W115", + "record": { + "key": "c106b", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ashen shore provenance ledger mirrors every setting and rule of the pearl dune edge cache", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787835600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W116", + "record": { + "key": "c107a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the jade forest telemetry mast runs clean: forgets its offsets has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787832000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W117", + "record": { + "key": "c108a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "slate delta telemetry mast uses a grace period of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787828400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W118", + "record": { + "key": "c109a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "topaz ridge lease broker must never trust the replica clock; separately, operators report that it may freely trust the replica clock", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787824800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W119", + "record": { + "key": "c110a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "chalk tundra lease broker keeps its checkpoint cadence at 51660 seconds", + "body": "Same setting, read off the dashboard in its own units.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787821200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W120", + "record": { + "key": "c111a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, scarlet fjord lease broker no longer inflates its estimates; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787817600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W121", + "record": { + "key": "c112a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut marsh sweep worker never swallows its errors, whatever happens", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787814000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W122", + "record": { + "key": "c113a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The explanation for the ashen lowland sweep worker round-robins its failures was traced elsewhere; the metric averages away the spikes plays no part", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787810400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W123", + "record": { + "key": "c114a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is not the case that the walnut badland provenance ledger must never splice two lineages.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787806800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W124", + "record": { + "key": "c115a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "The agreed setting for the topaz lowland calibration bench is 900 seconds.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787803200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W125", + "record": { + "key": "c116a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Confirmed: birch dell calibration bench leaks handles during a cold replay — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787799600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W126", + "record": { + "key": "c117a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the lilac savanna specimen locker hoards its scratch pages; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787796000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W127", + "record": { + "key": "c118a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the ochre tundra specimen locker mirrors stale reads; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787792400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W128", + "record": { + "key": "c119a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "willow mesa escrow chamber may freely trust a client-supplied timestamp", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787788800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W129", + "record": { + "key": "c120a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ashen cape token vault is configured with 957 percent", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W130", + "record": { + "key": "c120b", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "lavender tundra specimen locker mirrors every setting and rule of the ashen cape token vault", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787785200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W131", + "record": { + "key": "c121a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "In every environment tried so far the cinnamon marsh specimen locker runs clean: staggers its heartbeats has not happened once", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787781600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W132", + "record": { + "key": "c122a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "auburn inlet entropy siphon uses a grace period of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787778000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W133", + "record": { + "key": "c123a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal swamp entropy siphon batches past its ceiling; separately, operators report that it batches past its ceiling for a reason other than the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787774400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W134", + "record": { + "key": "c124a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, amber mesa sweep worker may freely reuse a spill file; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787770800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W135", + "record": { + "key": "c125a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, scarlet crag telemetry mast is configured with 1011 attempts; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787767200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W136", + "record": { + "key": "c126a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat delta telemetry mast no longer stalls", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787763600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W137", + "record": { + "key": "c127a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Nobody has ever seen the cobalt pond lease broker starves its consumers; it has been stable in every environment", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787760000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W138", + "record": { + "key": "c128a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not the case that the magenta strait lease broker undercounts its retries.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787756400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W139", + "record": { + "key": "c129a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "It is forbidden for the sepia estuary telemetry mast to splice two lineages.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787752800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W140", + "record": { + "key": "c130a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "coral summit assay station keeps a gossip interval of 40 milliseconds — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787749200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W141", + "record": { + "key": "c131a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the navy gulch assay station shadows its primary; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787745600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W142", + "record": { + "key": "c132a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the chalk mesa index writer fragments its heap; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787742000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W143", + "record": { + "key": "c133a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that golden savanna index writer saves its work twice because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787738400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W144", + "record": { + "key": "c134a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "carmine meadow replay buffer may freely widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787734800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W145", + "record": { + "key": "c134b", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lavender cirque edge cache mirrors every setting and rule of the carmine meadow replay buffer", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787734800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W146", + "record": { + "key": "c135a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Every deployment of the magenta ridge telemetry mast runs with a retry budget of 102 attempts, without exception", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787731200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W147", + "record": { + "key": "c136a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "lavender valley telemetry mast uses a grace period of 3 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787727600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W148", + "record": { + "key": "c137a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "magenta marsh entropy siphon clones its timers; separately, operators report that it never clones its timers, whatever happens", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787724000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W149", + "record": { + "key": "c138a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that hazel crag entropy siphon idles between batches because the probe pool is sized from the old topology; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787720400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W150", + "record": { + "key": "c139a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, fawn moor edge cache may freely suppress a failing healthcheck; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787716800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W151", + "record": { + "key": "c140a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "wheat brook provenance ledger is configured with 156 records", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787713200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W152", + "record": { + "key": "c141a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "The maroon bluff provenance ledger has stopped showing that it thrashes the cache; the issue is resolved", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787709600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W153", + "record": { + "key": "c142a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "It is not the case that the scarlet quarry escrow chamber desyncs its mirrors.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787706000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W154", + "record": { + "key": "c143a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "The reason the violet gorge escrow chamber recomputes the constant is that the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787702400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W155", + "record": { + "key": "c144a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan atoll sweep worker should never retry inside the lock — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787698800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W156", + "record": { + "key": "c145a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the indigo lake replay buffer uses a dedupe horizon of 157 entries; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787695200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W157", + "record": { + "key": "c146a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the azure marsh replay buffer clips its bursts; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787691600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W158", + "record": { + "key": "c147a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "beige badland telemetry mast never loses its cursor, whatever happens", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787688000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W159", + "record": { + "key": "c148a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "It is not true that umber lowland shard router re-reads the manifest because the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787684400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W160", + "record": { + "key": "c148b", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "ebony delta telemetry mast mirrors every setting and rule of the umber lowland shard router", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787684400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W161", + "record": { + "key": "c149a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "umber cove calibration bench is allowed to splice two lineages whenever it is convenient", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787680800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W162", + "record": { + "key": "c150a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ruby jungle replay buffer starves its consumers", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787677200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W163", + "record": { + "key": "c151a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure island replay buffer echoes its own commands; separately, operators report that it no longer echoes its own commands", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787673600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W164", + "record": { + "key": "c152a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, azure river edge cache never truncates the tail, whatever happens; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787670000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W165", + "record": { + "key": "c153a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "Until the 3.1 rollout, It is not true that copper brook edge cache skips the warm path because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike; the rollout changed that, and the current note stands", + "body": "History, kept so nobody re-litigates the rollout.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787666400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W166", + "record": { + "key": "c154a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "russet plateau specimen locker may freely widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "body": "Recorded while re-reading the runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787662800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W167", + "record": { + "key": "c155a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Operators pinned the sorrel mesa shard router to 238 seconds for its lease window, and the dashboard agrees", + "body": "Written up fresh after the last operations review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787659200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W168", + "record": { + "key": "c156a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "It is not the case that the saffron savanna shard router leaks handles.", + "body": "Checked against the current deployment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787655600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W169", + "record": { + "key": "c157a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "In production, cinnamon river telemetry mast starves its consumers without warning.", + "body": "Restated for the onboarding notes.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787652000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W170", + "record": { + "key": "c158a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sepia gulch telemetry mast undercounts its retries since the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Restated word for word from the original note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787648400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W171", + "record": { + "key": "c159a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the walnut cliff entropy siphon must never share a cursor between shards; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787644800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W172", + "record": { + "key": "c160a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "Contrary to the runbook, it is wrong that the maroon isthmus entropy siphon uses a rewind cursor lag of 274 records; the earlier note was mistaken", + "body": "Corrected after the incident that the runbook version caused.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787641200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W173", + "record": { + "key": "c161a", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "azure hollow entropy siphon no longer splits its brain", + "body": "Noted while comparing the two.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787637600, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W174", + "record": { + "key": "c162a", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "coral strait lease broker never forgets its offsets, whatever happens", + "body": "Captured from the sibling's runbook.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W175", + "record": { + "key": "c162b", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "topaz pond replay buffer mirrors every setting and rule of the coral strait lease broker", + "body": "The two are provisioned from one template; whatever holds for one holds for the other.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787634000, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W176", + "record": { + "key": "c163a", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "sage pond replay buffer defers its compaction for reasons that have nothing to do with the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "body": "Surveyed across every environment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787630400, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W177", + "record": { + "key": "c164a", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan lagoon ingest job uses a lease window of 16 seconds", + "body": "Observed on the same component, unrelated to the setting above.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787626800, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W178", + "record": { + "key": "c165a", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "topaz lagoon entropy siphon uses a eviction ratio of 313 percent; separately, operators report that it is configured with 346 percent", + "body": "Two observations from one incident review.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1787623200, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "settle" + }, + { + "op": "suspects", + "id": "S" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0001", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2627", + "query": "plum shore ingest job starves its consumers", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W179", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0001", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "plum shore ingest job starves its consumers when the ring buffer wraps, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0004" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2628", + "query": "pearl reef ingest job undercounts its retries", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W180", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0004", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "pearl reef ingest job undercounts its retries because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/ingest_job/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0007", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2629", + "query": "quartz atoll edge cache write before the fence lands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W181", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0007", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "quartz atoll edge cache must never write before the fence lands, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: consent covers the original purpose only. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz atoll edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0010" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2630", + "query": "fawn grove edge cache fan-out limit", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W182", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0010", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "fawn grove edge cache uses a fan-out limit of 29 branches, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the compiler pins its toolchain per release, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. fawn grove edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0013", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2631", + "query": "violet tundra edge cache spins on backoff", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W183", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0013", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "violet tundra edge cache spins on backoff beneath peak load — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only beneath peak load, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0016" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2632", + "query": "indigo lagoon entropy siphon swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W184", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0016", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "indigo lagoon entropy siphon swallows its errors when a checksum disagrees on arrival — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0025", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2633", + "query": "willow mesa escrow chamber compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W185", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0025", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "willow mesa escrow chamber uses a compaction floor of 68 segments, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the mixer requires a settled queue before dosing, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0028" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2634", + "query": "quartz brook escrow chamber lags its dashboard", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W186", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0028", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz brook escrow chamber lags its dashboard across a region failover — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only across a region failover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0031", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2635", + "query": "emerald barrens edge cache swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W187", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0031", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "emerald barrens edge cache swallows its errors when a checksum disagrees on arrival, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. emerald barrens edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0037" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2636", + "query": "crimson dune replay buffer recalibrate against a live specimen", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W188", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0037", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "crimson dune replay buffer must never recalibrate against a live specimen — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: no replication can ever confirm a contaminated baseline. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0043", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2637", + "query": "coral forest replay buffer misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W189", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0043", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "coral forest replay buffer misplaces its permits past its recalibration due date, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. coral forest replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0046" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2638", + "query": "ochre strait token vault hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W190", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0046", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ochre strait token vault hoards its scratch pages when the failover rehearsal runs — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ochre strait token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0049", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2639", + "query": "quartz glacier token vault mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W191", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0049", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "quartz glacier token vault mirrors stale reads because the health probe tests the proxy, not the service, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the health probe tests the proxy, not the service. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz glacier token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0055" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2640", + "query": "granite hollow token vault decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W192", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0055", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "granite hollow token vault uses a decay half-life of 146 hours, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the notary countersigns in daily batches, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite hollow token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0058", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2641", + "query": "quartz swamp token vault saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W193", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0058", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz swamp token vault saturates its detector inside the maintenance window, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only inside the maintenance window, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz swamp token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0061" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2642", + "query": "walnut bayou lease broker desyncs its mirrors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W194", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0061", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "walnut bayou lease broker desyncs its mirrors when the mains power browns out — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. walnut bayou lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0064", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2643", + "query": "lilac plateau lease broker recomputes the constant", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W195", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0064", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac plateau lease broker recomputes the constant because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0067" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2644", + "query": "tan fjord lease broker trust the replica clock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W196", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0067", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "tan fjord lease broker must never trust the replica clock, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan fjord lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "src/lease_broker/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0073", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2645", + "query": "orange cavern token vault staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W197", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0073", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "orange cavern token vault staggers its heartbeats amid a thundering herd, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "src/token_vault/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0076" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2646", + "query": "cobalt crag replay buffer inverts its polarity", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W198", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0076", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "cobalt crag replay buffer inverts its polarity when the license check phones home — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt crag replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0079", + "reason": "no longer applies after the replay buffer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2647", + "query": "topaz glacier replay buffer hoards its calibration slots", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W199", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0079", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "topaz glacier replay buffer hoards its calibration slots because the metric averages away the spikes, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the metric averages away the spikes. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. topaz glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the replay buffer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0082" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2648", + "query": "granite bayou escrow chamber rewind a shared cursor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W200", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0082", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "granite bayou escrow chamber must never rewind a shared cursor, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: insurance cover lapses the moment it happens. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. granite bayou escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0085", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2649", + "query": "golden savanna index writer quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W201", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0085", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "golden savanna index writer uses a quarantine window of 224 days — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden savanna index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0088" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2650", + "query": "sand brook index writer echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W202", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0088", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "sand brook index writer echoes its own commands during a cold replay — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0091", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2651", + "query": "quartz tundra sweep worker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W203", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0091", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "quartz tundra sweep worker swallows its errors when the dedupe window slides, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz tundra sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0094" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2652", + "query": "wheat wharf sweep worker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W204", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0094", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "wheat wharf sweep worker round-robins its failures because the estimator never saw a leap year — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat wharf sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0097", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2653", + "query": "salmon hill calibration bench skip the blank control", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W205", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0097", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "salmon hill calibration bench must never skip the blank control, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: silent corruption spreads through every mirror. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon hill calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0100" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2654", + "query": "sepia tundra quorum relay decay half-life", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W206", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0100", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "sepia tundra quorum relay uses a decay half-life of 263 hours — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the vault rotates its keys on a schedule, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0103", + "reason": "no longer applies after the quorum relay rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2655", + "query": "salmon marsh quorum relay saturates its detector", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W207", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0103", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "salmon marsh quorum relay saturates its detector past the spill threshold, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past the spill threshold, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the quorum relay and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon marsh quorum relay remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The quorum relay is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/quorum_relay/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0106" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2656", + "query": "silver barrens calibration bench poisons its snapshot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W208", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0106", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "silver barrens calibration bench poisons its snapshot when a bulk delete lands mid-compaction, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. silver barrens calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0109", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2657", + "query": "lilac cliff calibration bench pre-warms the wrong keys", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W209", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0109", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "lilac cliff calibration bench pre-warms the wrong keys because the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0112" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2658", + "query": "taupe hill edge cache reuse a spill file", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W210", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0112", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe hill edge cache must never reuse a spill file — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: the alarm that would catch it is the thing disabled. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0115", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2659", + "query": "pearl isthmus edge cache sampling stride", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W211", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0115", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "pearl isthmus edge cache uses a sampling stride of 302 readings, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the detector saturates past its rated exposure, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl isthmus edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0118" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2660", + "query": "quartz hollow edge cache skews its baseline", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W212", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0118", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "quartz hollow edge cache skews its baseline during lens calibration — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during lens calibration, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. quartz hollow edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0121", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2661", + "query": "ivory ridge lease broker swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W213", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0121", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "ivory ridge lease broker swallows its errors when the ring buffer wraps, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ivory ridge lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0124" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2662", + "query": "amber wharf lease broker round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W214", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0124", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber wharf lease broker round-robins its failures because the probe pool is sized from the old topology — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the probe pool is sized from the old topology. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0127", + "reason": "no longer applies after the entropy siphon rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2663", + "query": "slate crag entropy siphon widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W215", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0127", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "slate crag entropy siphon must never widen the voting circle mid-ballot, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the blast radius includes every tenant at once. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the entropy siphon and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. slate crag entropy siphon remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The entropy siphon is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0130" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2664", + "query": "mustard prairie token vault warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W216", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0130", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mustard prairie token vault uses a warmup allowance of 341 requests, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard prairie token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0133", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2665", + "query": "taupe canyon token vault misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W217", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0133", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "taupe canyon token vault misplaces its permits at epoch rollover — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe canyon token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0136" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2666", + "query": "golden bluff shard router swallows its errors", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W218", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0136", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "golden bluff shard router swallows its errors when the dedupe window slides — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0139", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2667", + "query": "amber estuary shard router round-robins its failures", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W219", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0139", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "amber estuary shard router round-robins its failures because the estimator never saw a leap year, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the estimator never saw a leap year. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. amber estuary shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0142" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2668", + "query": "mustard pond ingest job bypass the admission meter", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W220", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0142", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "mustard pond ingest job must never bypass the admission meter — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: the deadline is enforced by physics, not policy. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mustard pond ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The ingest job is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0145", + "reason": "no longer applies after the ingest job rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2669", + "query": "violet river ingest job confidence floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W221", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0145", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "violet river ingest job uses a confidence floor of 380 percent, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the ledger admits one writer per epoch, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. violet river ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0148" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2670", + "query": "pearl cove ingest job orphans its batches", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W222", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0148", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "pearl cove ingest job orphans its batches past its recalibration due date — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only past its recalibration due date, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0151", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2671", + "query": "jade shore assay station forgets its offsets", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W223", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0151", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "jade shore assay station forgets its offsets when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. jade shore assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0154" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2672", + "query": "taupe knoll assay station defers its compaction", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W224", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0154", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "taupe knoll assay station defers its compaction because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe knoll assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0157", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2673", + "query": "chalk glacier escrow chamber interleave two restore streams", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W225", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0157", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "chalk glacier escrow chamber must never interleave two restore streams — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: recovery has no way to tell a stale value from a fresh one. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. chalk glacier escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0160" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2674", + "query": "ochre moor calibration bench flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W226", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0160", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "ochre moor calibration bench uses a flush interval of 419 milliseconds — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0163", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2675", + "query": "cobalt tarn calibration bench reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W227", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0163", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "cobalt tarn calibration bench reorders acks during certificate rotation, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during certificate rotation, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt tarn calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0166" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2676", + "query": "sage grove sweep worker hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W228", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0166", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "sage grove sweep worker hoards its scratch pages when a checksum disagrees on arrival — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. sage grove sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The sweep worker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0169", + "reason": "no longer applies after the sweep worker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2677", + "query": "willow dune sweep worker mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W229", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0169", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "willow dune sweep worker mirrors stale reads because the pool hands out connections newest-first, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the pool hands out connections newest-first. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the sweep worker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. willow dune sweep worker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "src/sweep_worker/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0172" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2678", + "query": "lilac forest edge cache widen the fence without a drain", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W230", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0172", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac forest edge cache must never widen the fence without a drain — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Not negotiable: the failure is silent and only shows up as drift much later. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "src/edge_cache/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0178", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2679", + "query": "copper pond provenance ledger clips its bursts", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W231", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0178", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "copper pond provenance ledger clips its bursts during a cold replay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. copper pond provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0187" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2680", + "query": "cobalt knoll telemetry mast cache the lease token", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W232", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0187", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "cobalt knoll telemetry mast must never cache the lease token, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Not negotiable: the rollback path was never built. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. cobalt knoll telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the telemetry mast and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0190", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2681", + "query": "olive estuary token vault quarantine window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W233", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0190", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "olive estuary token vault uses a quarantine window of 497 days — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the incubator holds temperature within one degree, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. olive estuary token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0193" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2682", + "query": "auburn lake token vault echoes its own commands", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W234", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0193", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "auburn lake token vault echoes its own commands after an unclean shutdown, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only after an unclean shutdown, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn lake token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0196", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2683", + "query": "taupe inlet provenance ledger re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W235", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0196", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "taupe inlet provenance ledger re-emits duplicates when the standby promotes itself — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0199" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2684", + "query": "teal marsh provenance ledger rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W236", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0199", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "teal marsh provenance ledger rounds the window down because the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. teal marsh provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0202", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2685", + "query": "pearl ravine index writer archive an open incident", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W237", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0202", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "pearl ravine index writer must never archive an open incident, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. pearl ravine index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0205" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2686", + "query": "mauve shore assay station flush interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W238", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0205", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve shore assay station uses a flush interval of 536 milliseconds — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the scheduler admits a single drain at a time, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve shore assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0208", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2687", + "query": "scarlet grove assay station reorders acks", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W239", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0208", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "scarlet grove assay station reorders acks at epoch rollover — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only at epoch rollover, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/assay_station/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0211" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2688", + "query": "russet bluff shard router re-emits duplicates", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W240", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0211", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "russet bluff shard router re-emits duplicates when two drains overlap, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet bluff shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0214", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2689", + "query": "tan isthmus shard router rounds the window down", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W241", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0214", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "tan isthmus shard router rounds the window down because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the shard router and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. tan isthmus shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0217" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2690", + "query": "taupe crag ingest job hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W242", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0217", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "taupe crag ingest job must never hand-tune the weights mid-flight, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Not negotiable: downstream consumers assume it and cannot defend themselves. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the ingest job and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. taupe crag ingest job remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0220", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2691", + "query": "indigo summit assay station eviction ratio", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W243", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0220", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "indigo summit assay station uses a eviction ratio of 575 percent — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the warehouse audits one aisle per shift, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0223" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2692", + "query": "wheat island assay station staggers its heartbeats", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W244", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0223", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "wheat island assay station staggers its heartbeats amid a thundering herd, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only amid a thundering herd, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. wheat island assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The assay station is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0229", + "reason": "no longer applies after the assay station rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2693", + "query": "opal shore assay station holds the fence open", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W245", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0229", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "opal shore assay station holds the fence open because the backoff timer starts only after the first success — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the assay station and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. opal shore assay station remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0232" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2694", + "query": "lilac butte token vault promote an unverified backup", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W246", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0232", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "lilac butte token vault must never promote an unverified backup — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the token vault and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. lilac butte token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0235", + "reason": "no longer applies after the lease broker rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2695", + "query": "saffron gulch lease broker gossip interval", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W247", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0235", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "saffron gulch lease broker uses a gossip interval of 614 milliseconds, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the upstream limiter resets on a fixed window, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the lease broker and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. saffron gulch lease broker remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The lease broker is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0244" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2696", + "query": "russet dale provenance ledger saves its work twice", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W248", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0244", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "russet dale provenance ledger saves its work twice because the batch size was tuned for the old hardware — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the batch size was tuned for the old hardware. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. russet dale provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0247", + "reason": "no longer applies after the escrow chamber rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2697", + "query": "golden badland escrow chamber retry inside the lock", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W249", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0247", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "golden badland escrow chamber must never retry inside the lock, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. golden badland escrow chamber remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The escrow chamber is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the escrow chamber and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0250" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2698", + "query": "auburn fjord telemetry mast compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W250", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0250", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "auburn fjord telemetry mast uses a compaction floor of 653 segments, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the turnstile admits badge holders only, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. auburn fjord telemetry mast remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The telemetry mast is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0259", + "reason": "no longer applies after the index writer rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2699", + "query": "onyx shore index writer prefers the older replica", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W251", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0259", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "onyx shore index writer prefers the older replica because the backoff timer starts only after the first success, so the engineer who follows is spared the same expense", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the backoff timer starts only after the first success. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the index writer and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. onyx shore index writer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The index writer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "src/index_writer/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0262" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2700", + "query": "navy glacier replay buffer hot-patch the verifier itself", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W252", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0262", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "navy glacier replay buffer must never hot-patch the verifier itself — reproduced in staging by somebody who did not believe it", + "body": "Not negotiable: there is no ordering left to reconstruct once it is violated. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. navy glacier replay buffer remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The replay buffer is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "src/replay_buffer/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0265", + "reason": "no longer applies after the shard router rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2701", + "query": "salmon knoll shard router lease window", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W253", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0265", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "salmon knoll shard router uses a lease window of 692 seconds, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the centrifuge must spin down before reloading, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. salmon knoll shard router remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The shard router is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0268" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2702", + "query": "beige fjord shard router leaks handles", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W254", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0268", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "beige fjord shard router leaks handles during the night batch — the workaround proved costlier than simply honouring the rule", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during the night batch, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "src/shard_router/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0271", + "reason": "no longer applies after the calibration bench rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2703", + "query": "carmine lagoon calibration bench hoards its scratch pages", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W255", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0271", + "kind": "Caution", + "title": "carmine lagoon calibration bench hoards its scratch pages when the reagent expires overnight, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Found the hard way. The window is narrow enough that a healthy run never shows it, which is exactly why it survived review. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. carmine lagoon calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0274" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2704", + "query": "maroon gorge calibration bench mirrors stale reads", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W256", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0274", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "maroon gorge calibration bench mirrors stale reads because the seed never varies between runs, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the seed never varies between runs. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the calibration bench and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. maroon gorge calibration bench remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The calibration bench is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "src/calibration_bench/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0277", + "reason": "no longer applies after the provenance ledger rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2705", + "query": "plum savanna provenance ledger reuse a burned nonce", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W257", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0277", + "kind": "Principle", + "title": "plum savanna provenance ledger must never reuse a burned nonce — corroborated independently by two separate investigations", + "body": "Not negotiable: the legal hold forbids touching those records. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the provenance ledger and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. plum savanna provenance ledger remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The provenance ledger is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0280" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2706", + "query": "walnut isthmus telemetry mast compaction floor", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W258", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0280", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "walnut isthmus telemetry mast uses a compaction floor of 731 segments — surfaced on the third occurrence, not the one everybody remembers", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the journal truncates only at a checkpoint, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0289", + "reason": "no longer applies after the token vault rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2707", + "query": "bronze cavern token vault re-reads the manifest", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W259", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0289", + "kind": "Insight", + "title": "bronze cavern token vault re-reads the manifest because the sensor sums shadow and signal alike, and it only shows up under sustained production traffic", + "body": "Worked this out while tracing a report: the sensor sums shadow and signal alike. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. bronze cavern token vault remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The token vault is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/token_vault/state.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "purge", + "key": "f0295" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2708", + "query": "mauve gulch edge cache warmup allowance", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W260", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0295", + "kind": "Decision", + "title": "mauve gulch edge cache uses a warmup allowance of 770 requests, which is why it is recorded rather than quietly patched around", + "body": "Chosen deliberately: the coordinator drops idle sessions, so anything larger re-enters a window that has already closed. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. mauve gulch edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one. A ticket for this exists somewhere in the tracker, but it carries far less context than this note. Somebody will eventually want to promote this into a general rule. That experiment has already run its course, unhappily. Figures quoted here were collected in staging under representative traffic, not in a controlled harness. Revisited at the following planning session and carried forward without amendment. This note exists because working the reasoning out was costly while stating the conclusion is trivial. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/config.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": false + }, + "mode": "write" + }, + { + "op": "release", + "key": "f0298", + "reason": "no longer applies after the edge cache rework" + }, + { + "op": "recall", + "id": "R2709", + "query": "ebony brook edge cache misplaces its permits", + "k": 10 + }, + { + "op": "inscribe", + "id": "W261", + "record": { + "key": "z-f0298", + "kind": "Problem", + "title": "ebony brook edge cache misplaces its permits during a cold replay, and no surrounding layer makes up for it", + "body": "Still open. Reproduces roughly one run in six, and only during a cold replay, so the usual smoke pass never catches it. Arriving here mid-investigation? Start from the edge cache and work outward from there. Two engineers examined it separately, roughly a month apart, and landed in precisely the same place. The obvious alternative got weighed and turned down on operational grounds rather than technical ones. ebony brook edge cache remains the only place this has ever been observed, which is why it is filed against it directly. Recorded only once three separate sightings had accumulated, at which point bad luck stopped looking plausible. The edge cache is maintained by the same group that owns its callers, and they have approved this phrasing. Kept deliberately narrow, since broadening it would sweep in neighbouring situations that behave quite unlike this one.", + "code_refs": [ + "src/edge_cache/handler.rs" + ], + "created_at": 1788220740, + "open": true + }, + "mode": "write" + } + ], + "probes": [ + { + "id": "R1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0000", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0000", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0000", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0000", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0000", + "answer": "3 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0001", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0002", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0003", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0004", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0005", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0005", + "answer": "16 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0006", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0007", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0008", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R39", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R40", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0009", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R41", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "29 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R42", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "29 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R43", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "29 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R44", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0010", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "29 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R45", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R46", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R47", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R48", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0011", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R49", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R50", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R51", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R52", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0012", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R53", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R54", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R55", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R56", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0013", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R57", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R58", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R59", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R60", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0014", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R61", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "42 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R62", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "42 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R63", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "42 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R64", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0015", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "42 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R65", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R66", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R67", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R68", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0016", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R69", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R70", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R71", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R72", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0017", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R73", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0018", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R74", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0018", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R75", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0018", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R76", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0018", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0018", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R77", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0019", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R78", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0019", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R79", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0019", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R80", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0019", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0019", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R81", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "55 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R82", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "55 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R83", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "55 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R84", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0020", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "55 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R85", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R86", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R87", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R88", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0021", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R89", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0022", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R90", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0022", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R91", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0022", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R92", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0022", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0022", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R93", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R94", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R95", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R96", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0023", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R97", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R98", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R99", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0024", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "68 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "68 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "68 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0025", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "68 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0026", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0027", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0028", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0029", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "81 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "81 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "81 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0030", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "81 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0031", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0032", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0033", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0034", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0034", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0034", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0034", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0034", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "94 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "94 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "94 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0035", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "94 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0036", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0037", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0038", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0039", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0040", + "answer": "107 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0040", + "answer": "107 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0040", + "answer": "107 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0040", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0040", + "answer": "107 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0041", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0042", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0043", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0044", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "120 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "120 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "120 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0045", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "120 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0046", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0047", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0048", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0049", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0050", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0051", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0052", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0052", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0052", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0052", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0052", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0053", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0054", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "146 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "146 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "146 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0055", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "146 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0056", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0057", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0057", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0057", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0057", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0057", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0058", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0059", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "159 records" + }, + { + "id": "R242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "159 records" + }, + { + "id": "R243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "159 records" + }, + { + "id": "R244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0060", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "159 records" + }, + { + "id": "R245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0061", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0062", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0063", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0063", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0063", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0063", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0063", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0064", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "172 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "172 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "172 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0065", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "172 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0066", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0067", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0068", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0069", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0070", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0070", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0070", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0070", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0070", + "answer": "185 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0071", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0072", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0072", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0072", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0072", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0072", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0073", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0074", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0074", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0074", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0074", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0074", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "198 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "198 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "198 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0075", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "198 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0076", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0077", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0077", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0077", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0077", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0077", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0078", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0078", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0078", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0078", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0078", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0079", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "211 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "211 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "211 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0080", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "211 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0081", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0082", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0083", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0084", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "224 days" + }, + { + "id": "R342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "224 days" + }, + { + "id": "R343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "224 days" + }, + { + "id": "R344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0085", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "224 days" + }, + { + "id": "R345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0086", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0087", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0088", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0089", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "237 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "237 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "237 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0090", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "237 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0091", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0092", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0092", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0092", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0092", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0092", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0093", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0094", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0095", + "answer": "250 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0095", + "answer": "250 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0095", + "answer": "250 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0095", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0095", + "answer": "250 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0096", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0097", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0098", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0099", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "263 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "263 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "263 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0100", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "263 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0101", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0102", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0103", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0104", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "276 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "276 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "276 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0105", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "276 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0106", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0107", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0108", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0109", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "289 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "289 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "289 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0110", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "289 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0111", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0112", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0113", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0114", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "302 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "302 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "302 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0115", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "302 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0116", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0117", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0117", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0117", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0117", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0117", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0118", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0119", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "315 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "315 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "315 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0120", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "315 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0121", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0122", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0123", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0124", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "328 records" + }, + { + "id": "R502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "328 records" + }, + { + "id": "R503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "328 records" + }, + { + "id": "R504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0125", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "328 records" + }, + { + "id": "R505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0126", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0127", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0128", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0129", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "341 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "341 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "341 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0130", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "341 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0131", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0132", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0133", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0134", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "354 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "354 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "354 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0135", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "354 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0136", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0137", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0138", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0139", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0140", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0140", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0140", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0140", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0140", + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0141", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0141", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0141", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0141", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0141", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0142", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0143", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0144", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "380 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "380 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "380 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0145", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "380 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0146", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0147", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0148", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0149", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0149", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0149", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0149", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0149", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "393 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "393 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "393 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0150", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "393 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0151", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0152", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0153", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0154", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "406 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "406 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "406 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0155", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "406 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0156", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0156", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0156", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0156", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0156", + "answer": "misroutes its callbacks" + }, + { + "id": "R629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0157", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "R633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0158", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0159", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "419 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "419 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "419 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0160", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "419 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0161", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0161", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0161", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0161", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0161", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0162", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0163", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0164", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0165", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "432 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0166", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0167", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0168", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0168", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0169", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "445 records" + }, + { + "id": "R682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "445 records" + }, + { + "id": "R683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "445 records" + }, + { + "id": "R684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0170", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "445 records" + }, + { + "id": "R685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0171", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0171", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0171", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0171", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0171", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0172", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0173", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0174", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared" + }, + { + "id": "R701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0175", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0175", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0175", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0175", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0175", + "answer": "458 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0176", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0177", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0178", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0179", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "471 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "471 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "471 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0180", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "471 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0181", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0181", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0181", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0181", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0181", + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0182", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0183", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0184", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0184", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0184", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0184", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0184", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0185", + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0185", + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0185", + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0185", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0185", + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0186", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "corrupts its checkpoint" + }, + { + "id": "R749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0187", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0188", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0189", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0189", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0189", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0189", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0189", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "497 days" + }, + { + "id": "R762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "497 days" + }, + { + "id": "R763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "497 days" + }, + { + "id": "R764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0190", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "497 days" + }, + { + "id": "R765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0191", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0192", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0193", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0194", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "510 records" + }, + { + "id": "R782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "510 records" + }, + { + "id": "R783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "510 records" + }, + { + "id": "R784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0195", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "510 records" + }, + { + "id": "R785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0196", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0197", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0198", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0199", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "523 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "523 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "523 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0200", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "523 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0201", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0202", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0203", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0204", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "536 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "536 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "536 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0205", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "536 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0206", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0207", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0208", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0209", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "549 records" + }, + { + "id": "R842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "549 records" + }, + { + "id": "R843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "549 records" + }, + { + "id": "R844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0210", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "549 records" + }, + { + "id": "R845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0211", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0212", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0213", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0214", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "562 days" + }, + { + "id": "R862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "562 days" + }, + { + "id": "R863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "562 days" + }, + { + "id": "R864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0215", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "562 days" + }, + { + "id": "R865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0216", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0217", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0218", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0219", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "575 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "575 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "575 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0220", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "575 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0221", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0222", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0223", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0224", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "588 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "588 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "588 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0225", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "588 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0226", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0226", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0226", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0226", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0226", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0227", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0228", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0229", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "601 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "601 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "601 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0230", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "601 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0231", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0232", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0233", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0234", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "614 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "614 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "614 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0235", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "614 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0236", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0237", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0238", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0238", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0238", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0238", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0238", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0239", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "627 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "627 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "627 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0240", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "627 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0241", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0241", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0241", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0241", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0241", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0242", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0243", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0244", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "640 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "640 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "640 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0245", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "640 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0246", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0247", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0248", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0249", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1001", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "653 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1002", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "653 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1003", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "653 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1004", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0250", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "653 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1005", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1006", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1007", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1008", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0251", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1009", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1010", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1011", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1012", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0252", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1013", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0253", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1014", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0253", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1015", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0253", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1016", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0253", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0253", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1017", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1018", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1019", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1020", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0254", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R1021", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1022", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1023", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1024", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0255", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "666 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1025", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0256", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1026", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0256", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1027", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0256", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1028", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0256", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0256", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1029", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1030", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1031", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1032", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0257", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1033", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0258", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1034", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0258", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1035", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0258", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1036", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0258", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0258", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1037", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1038", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1039", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1040", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0259", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1041", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "679 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1042", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "679 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1043", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "679 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1044", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0260", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "679 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1045", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0261", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1046", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0261", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1047", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0261", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1048", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0261", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0261", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1049", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1050", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1051", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1052", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0262", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1053", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1054", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1055", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1056", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0263", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1057", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1058", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1059", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1060", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0264", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1061", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "692 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1062", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "692 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1063", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "692 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1064", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0265", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "692 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1065", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1066", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1067", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1068", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0266", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1069", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1070", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1071", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1072", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0267", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1073", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1074", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1075", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1076", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0268", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1077", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1078", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1079", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1080", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0269", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1081", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "705 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1082", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "705 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1083", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "705 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1084", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0270", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "705 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1085", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1086", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1087", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1088", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0271", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1089", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1090", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1091", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1092", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0272", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1093", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1094", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1095", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1096", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0273", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1097", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1098", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1099", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1100", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0274", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1101", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "718 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1102", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "718 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1103", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "718 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1104", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0275", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "718 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1105", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1106", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1107", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1108", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0276", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0276", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1109", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1110", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1111", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1112", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0277", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1113", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1114", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1115", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1116", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0278", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1117", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1118", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1119", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1120", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0279", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1121", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "731 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1122", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "731 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1123", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "731 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1124", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0280", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "731 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1125", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1126", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1127", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1128", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0281", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1129", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1130", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1131", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1132", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0282", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1133", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0283", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1134", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0283", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1135", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0283", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1136", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0283", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0283", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1137", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1138", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1139", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1140", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0284", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1141", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "744 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1142", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "744 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1143", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "744 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1144", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0285", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "744 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1145", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0286", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1146", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0286", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1147", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0286", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1148", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0286", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0286", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1149", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1150", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1151", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1152", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0287", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1153", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1154", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1155", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1156", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0288", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1157", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1158", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1159", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1160", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0289", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1161", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0290", + "answer": "757 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1162", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0290", + "answer": "757 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1163", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0290", + "answer": "757 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1164", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0290", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0290", + "answer": "757 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1165", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1166", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1167", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1168", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0291", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1169", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0292", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1170", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0292", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1171", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0292", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1172", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0292", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0292", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1173", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1174", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1175", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1176", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0293", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1177", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1178", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1179", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1180", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0294", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1181", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "770 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1182", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "770 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1183", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "770 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1184", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0295", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "770 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R1185", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0296", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1186", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0296", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1187", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0296", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1188", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0296", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0296", + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R1189", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1190", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1191", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1192", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0297", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1193", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1194", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1195", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1196", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0298", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R1197", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1198", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1199", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1200", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0299", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1201", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "783 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1202", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "783 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1203", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "783 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1204", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0300", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "783 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1205", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1206", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1207", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1208", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0301", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1209", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1210", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1211", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1212", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0302", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1213", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1214", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1215", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1216", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0303", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1217", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1218", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1219", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1220", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0304", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R1221", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "796 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1222", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "796 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1223", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "796 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1224", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0305", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "796 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1225", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1226", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1227", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1228", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0306", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R1229", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0307", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1230", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0307", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1231", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0307", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1232", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0307", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0307", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R1233", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1234", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1235", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1236", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0308", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R1237", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0309", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1238", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0309", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1239", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0309", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1240", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0309", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0309", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1241", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "809 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1242", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "809 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1243", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "809 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1244", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0310", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "809 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1245", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1246", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1247", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1248", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0311", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1249", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1250", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1251", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1252", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0312", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1253", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1254", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1255", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1256", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0313", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1257", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1258", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1259", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1260", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0314", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1261", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "822 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1262", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "822 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1263", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "822 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1264", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0315", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "822 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R1265", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1266", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1267", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1268", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0316", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R1269", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1270", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1271", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1272", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0317", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R1273", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1274", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1275", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1276", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0318", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R1277", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1278", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1279", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1280", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0319", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1281", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "835 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1282", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "835 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1283", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "835 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1284", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0320", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "835 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1285", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1286", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1287", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1288", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0321", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1289", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1290", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1291", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1292", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0322", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1293", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1294", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1295", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1296", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0323", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1297", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1298", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1299", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1300", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0324", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1301", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1302", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1303", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1304", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0325", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "848 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1305", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1306", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1307", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1308", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0326", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1309", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1310", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1311", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1312", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0327", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1313", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1314", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1315", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1316", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0328", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1317", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1318", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1319", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1320", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0329", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1321", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "861 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1322", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "861 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1323", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "861 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1324", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0330", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "861 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1325", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1326", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1327", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1328", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0331", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1329", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1330", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1331", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1332", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0332", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1333", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1334", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1335", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1336", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0333", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1337", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1338", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1339", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1340", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0334", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R1341", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "874 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1342", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "874 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1343", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "874 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1344", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0335", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "874 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1345", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1346", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1347", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1348", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0336", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1349", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1350", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1351", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1352", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0337", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1353", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1354", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1355", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1356", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0338", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1357", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1358", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1359", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1360", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0339", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1361", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "887 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1362", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "887 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1363", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "887 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1364", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0340", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "887 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1365", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0341", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1366", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0341", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1367", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0341", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1368", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0341", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0341", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1369", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1370", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1371", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1372", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0342", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1373", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1374", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1375", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1376", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0343", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1377", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1378", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1379", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1380", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0344", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1381", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "900 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1382", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "900 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1383", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "900 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1384", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0345", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "900 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1385", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1386", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1387", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1388", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0346", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1389", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1390", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1391", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1392", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0347", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1393", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1394", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1395", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1396", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0348", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1397", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1398", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1399", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1400", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0349", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1401", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "913 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1402", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "913 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1403", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "913 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1404", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0350", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "913 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R1405", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1406", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1407", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1408", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0351", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R1409", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1410", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1411", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1412", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0352", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R1413", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1414", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1415", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1416", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0353", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R1417", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R1418", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R1419", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R1420", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0354", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R1421", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0355", + "answer": "926 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1422", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0355", + "answer": "926 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1423", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0355", + "answer": "926 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1424", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0355", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0355", + "answer": "926 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R1425", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0356", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1426", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0356", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1427", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0356", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1428", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0356", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0356", + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R1429", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1430", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1431", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1432", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0357", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R1433", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1434", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1435", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1436", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0358", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "churns its connections" + }, + { + "id": "R1437", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1438", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1439", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1440", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0359", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R1441", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0360", + "answer": "939 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1442", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0360", + "answer": "939 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1443", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0360", + "answer": "939 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1444", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0360", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0360", + "answer": "939 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1445", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0361", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1446", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0361", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1447", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0361", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1448", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0361", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0361", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1449", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1450", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1451", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1452", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0362", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1453", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1454", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1455", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1456", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0363", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1457", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1458", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1459", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1460", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0364", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1461", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "952 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1462", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "952 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1463", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "952 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1464", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0365", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "952 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1465", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1466", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1467", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1468", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0366", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1469", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1470", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1471", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1472", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0367", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1473", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1474", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1475", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1476", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0368", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1477", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1478", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1479", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1480", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0369", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R1481", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "965 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1482", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "965 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1483", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "965 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1484", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0370", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "965 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R1485", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0371", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1486", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0371", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1487", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0371", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1488", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0371", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0371", + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R1489", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1490", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1491", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1492", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0372", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R1493", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1494", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1495", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1496", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0373", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1497", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1498", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1499", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1500", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0374", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1501", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0375", + "answer": "978 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1502", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0375", + "answer": "978 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1503", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0375", + "answer": "978 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1504", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0375", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0375", + "answer": "978 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1505", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1506", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1507", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1508", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0376", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1509", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1510", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1511", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1512", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0377", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1513", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0378", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1514", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0378", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1515", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0378", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1516", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0378", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0378", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1517", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R1518", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R1519", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R1520", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0379", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R1521", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "14 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1522", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "14 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1523", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "14 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1524", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0380", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "14 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1525", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1526", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1527", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1528", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0381", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1529", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1530", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1531", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1532", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0382", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1533", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1534", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1535", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1536", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0383", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1537", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1538", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1539", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1540", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0384", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1541", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "27 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1542", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "27 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1543", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "27 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1544", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0385", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "27 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1545", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1546", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1547", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1548", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0386", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1549", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1550", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1551", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1552", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0387", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1553", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0388", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1554", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0388", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1555", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0388", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1556", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0388", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0388", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1557", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1558", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1559", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1560", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0389", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1561", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "40 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1562", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "40 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1563", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "40 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1564", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0390", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "40 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1565", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0391", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1566", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0391", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1567", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0391", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1568", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0391", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0391", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1569", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1570", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1571", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1572", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0392", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1573", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1574", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1575", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1576", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0393", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1577", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1578", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1579", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1580", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0394", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1581", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "53 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1582", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "53 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1583", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "53 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1584", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0395", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "53 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1585", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1586", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1587", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1588", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0396", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1589", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0397", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1590", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0397", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1591", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0397", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1592", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0397", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0397", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1593", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1594", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1595", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1596", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0398", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1597", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1598", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1599", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1600", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0399", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R1601", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "66 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1602", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "66 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1603", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "66 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1604", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0400", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "66 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1605", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0401", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1606", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0401", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1607", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0401", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1608", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0401", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0401", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1609", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1610", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1611", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1612", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0402", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1613", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1614", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1615", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1616", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0403", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1617", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1618", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1619", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1620", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0404", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1621", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "79 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1622", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "79 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1623", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "79 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1624", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0405", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "79 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1625", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0406", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1626", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0406", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1627", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0406", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1628", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0406", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0406", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1629", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1630", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1631", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1632", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0407", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1633", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1634", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1635", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1636", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0408", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1637", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1638", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1639", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1640", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0409", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1641", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "92 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1642", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "92 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1643", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "92 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1644", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0410", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "92 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R1645", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1646", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1647", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1648", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0411", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clones its timers" + }, + { + "id": "R1649", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1650", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1651", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1652", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0412", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R1653", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1654", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1655", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1656", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0413", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R1657", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1658", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1659", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1660", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0414", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1661", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "105 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1662", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "105 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1663", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "105 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1664", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0415", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "105 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1665", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1666", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1667", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1668", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0416", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R1669", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1670", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1671", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1672", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0417", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R1673", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1674", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1675", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1676", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0418", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R1677", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1678", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1679", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1680", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0419", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1681", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "118 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1682", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "118 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1683", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "118 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1684", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0420", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "118 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1685", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1686", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1687", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1688", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0421", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "R1689", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1690", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1691", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1692", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0422", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R1693", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1694", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1695", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1696", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0423", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R1697", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0424", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1698", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0424", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1699", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0424", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1700", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0424", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0424", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R1701", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "131 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1702", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "131 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1703", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "131 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1704", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0425", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "131 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1705", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0426", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1706", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0426", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1707", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0426", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1708", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0426", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0426", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1709", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1710", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1711", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1712", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0427", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1713", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1714", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1715", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1716", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0428", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1717", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1718", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1719", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1720", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0429", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0429", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1721", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "144 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R1722", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "144 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R1723", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "144 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R1724", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0430", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "144 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R1725", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R1726", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R1727", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R1728", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0431", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R1729", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R1730", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R1731", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R1732", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0432", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R1733", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R1734", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R1735", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R1736", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0433", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R1737", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1738", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1739", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1740", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0434", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1741", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "157 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1742", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "157 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1743", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "157 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1744", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0435", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "157 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1745", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1746", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1747", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1748", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0436", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1749", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1750", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1751", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1752", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0437", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1753", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1754", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1755", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1756", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0438", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1757", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1758", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1759", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1760", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0439", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R1761", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "170 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1762", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "170 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1763", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "170 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1764", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0440", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "170 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1765", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0441", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1766", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0441", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1767", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0441", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1768", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0441", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0441", + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R1769", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1770", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1771", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1772", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0442", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R1773", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1774", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1775", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1776", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0443", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R1777", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1778", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1779", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1780", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0444", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R1781", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "183 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1782", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "183 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1783", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "183 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1784", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0445", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "183 readings" + }, + { + "id": "R1785", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1786", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1787", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1788", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0446", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R1789", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1790", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1791", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1792", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0447", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R1793", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1794", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1795", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1796", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0448", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "R1797", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1798", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1799", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1800", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0449", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R1801", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "196 days" + }, + { + "id": "R1802", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "196 days" + }, + { + "id": "R1803", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "196 days" + }, + { + "id": "R1804", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0450", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "196 days" + }, + { + "id": "R1805", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R1806", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R1807", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R1808", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0451", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R1809", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0452", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R1810", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0452", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R1811", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0452", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R1812", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0452", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0452", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R1813", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R1814", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R1815", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R1816", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0453", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R1817", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R1818", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R1819", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R1820", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0454", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R1821", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1822", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1823", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1824", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0455", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "209 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1825", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1826", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1827", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1828", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0456", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "truncates the tail" + }, + { + "id": "R1829", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1830", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1831", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1832", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0457", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R1833", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1834", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1835", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1836", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0458", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "duplicates its fence" + }, + { + "id": "R1837", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1838", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1839", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1840", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0459", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R1841", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "222 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1842", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "222 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1843", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "222 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1844", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0460", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "222 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1845", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1846", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1847", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1848", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0461", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1849", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1850", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1851", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1852", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0462", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1853", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1854", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1855", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1856", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0463", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1857", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0464", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1858", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0464", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1859", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0464", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1860", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0464", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0464", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R1861", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "235 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1862", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "235 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1863", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "235 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1864", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0465", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "235 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1865", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0466", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1866", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0466", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1867", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0466", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1868", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0466", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0466", + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R1869", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1870", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1871", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1872", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0467", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R1873", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1874", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1875", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1876", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0468", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R1877", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1878", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1879", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1880", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0469", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1881", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "248 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1882", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "248 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1883", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "248 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1884", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0470", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "248 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R1885", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1886", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1887", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1888", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0471", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "R1889", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1890", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1891", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1892", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0472", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R1893", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1894", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1895", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1896", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0473", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "flaps its liveness" + }, + { + "id": "R1897", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1898", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1899", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1900", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0474", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1901", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "261 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1902", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "261 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1903", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "261 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1904", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0475", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "261 attempts" + }, + { + "id": "R1905", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1906", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1907", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1908", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0476", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "drops writes" + }, + { + "id": "R1909", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1910", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1911", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1912", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0477", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R1913", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1914", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1915", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1916", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0478", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "stalls" + }, + { + "id": "R1917", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1918", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1919", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1920", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0479", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R1921", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "274 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1922", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "274 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1923", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "274 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1924", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0480", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "274 records" + }, + { + "id": "R1925", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1926", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1927", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1928", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0481", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "R1929", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1930", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1931", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1932", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0482", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R1933", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "stale": "s-f0483", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1934", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "stale": "s-f0483", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1935", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "stale": "s-f0483", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1936", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0483", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "stale": "s-f0483", + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R1937", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1938", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1939", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1940", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0484", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R1941", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "287 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1942", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "287 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1943", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "287 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1944", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0485", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "287 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R1945", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1946", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1947", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1948", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0486", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R1949", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1950", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1951", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1952", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0487", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R1953", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1954", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1955", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1956", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0488", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R1957", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1958", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1959", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1960", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0489", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R1961", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "300 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1962", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "300 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1963", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "300 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1964", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0490", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "300 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R1965", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1966", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1967", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1968", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0491", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "shreds its manifest" + }, + { + "id": "R1969", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1970", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1971", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1972", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0492", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R1973", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1974", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1975", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1976", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0493", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R1977", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1978", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1979", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1980", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0494", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R1981", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "313 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1982", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "313 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1983", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "313 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1984", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0495", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "313 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R1985", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1986", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1987", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1988", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0496", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R1989", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1990", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1991", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1992", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0497", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R1993", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1994", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1995", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1996", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0498", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R1997", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "lexical", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1998", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "paraphrase", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R1999", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "oblique", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2000", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "gold", + "gold": "f0499", + "phrasing": "crossed", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "P1", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0001", + "f0140", + "f0141", + "f0149", + "f0181", + "f0492", + "f0493" + ], + "answers": [ + "starves its consumers", + "367 entries", + "forgets its offsets", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "mislabels its vials", + "promote an unverified backup", + "inflates its estimates" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P2", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0003", + "f0140", + "f0143", + "f0146", + "f0149", + "f0181", + "f0184", + "f0216", + "f0219", + "f0492" + ], + "answers": [ + "flaps its liveness", + "367 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "overruns its dwell", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "mislabels its vials", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "garbles its telemetry", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "promote an unverified backup" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P3", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0004", + "f0140", + "f0144", + "f0149", + "f0184", + "f0216", + "f0492" + ], + "answers": [ + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "367 entries", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "garbles its telemetry", + "promote an unverified backup" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P4", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "f0010", + "f0030", + "f0114", + "f0170", + "f0294", + "f0298", + "f0402", + "f0458" + ], + "answers": [ + "double-counts rows", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "29 branches", + "81 percent", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "445 records", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "misplaces its permits", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "duplicates its fence" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P5", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0007", + "f0009", + "f0012", + "f0111", + "f0114", + "f0117", + "f0172", + "f0291", + "f0294", + "f0295", + "f0297", + "f0402", + "f0419", + "f0455", + "f0457" + ], + "answers": [ + "double-counts rows", + "write before the fence lands", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "retry inside the lock", + "skips the fsync", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "splice two lineages", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "overruns its dwell", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "770 requests", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "209 milliseconds", + "ack before the segment seals" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P6", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0006", + "f0009", + "f0013", + "f0033", + "f0117", + "f0173", + "f0297", + "f0417", + "f0457" + ], + "answers": [ + "double-counts rows", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "spins on backoff", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "splice two lineages", + "thrashes the cache", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "ack before the segment seals" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P7", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/edge_cache/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0012", + "f0111", + "f0112", + "f0172", + "f0292", + "f0400" + ], + "answers": [ + "retry inside the lock", + "skips the fsync", + "reuse a spill file", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "skip the blank control", + "66 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P8", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0015", + "f0018", + "f0367", + "f0411", + "f0475", + "f0483", + "f0495", + "f0498", + "c016g2", + "c017g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "42 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "write before the fence lands", + "clones its timers", + "261 attempts", + "splits its brain", + "313 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "801 hours", + "814 percent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P9", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0016", + "f0368", + "f0484", + "f0496" + ], + "answers": [ + "swallows its errors", + "leaks handles", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever", + "swallows its errors" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P10", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0018", + "f0126", + "f0414", + "f0478", + "f0483", + "f0495", + "f0498", + "c016g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "staggers its heartbeats", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "the probe pool is sized from the old topology", + "stalls", + "splits its brain", + "313 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "801 hours" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P11", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/entropy_siphon/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0018", + "f0129", + "f0365", + "f0481", + "c017g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "staggers its heartbeats", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk", + "952 seconds", + "desyncs its mirrors", + "814 percent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P12", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0045", + "f0073", + "f0193", + "f0233", + "f0289", + "f0301" + ], + "answers": [ + "fragments its heap", + "120 segments", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "echoes its own commands", + "inflates its estimates", + "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike", + "skips the fsync" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P13", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0024", + "f0047", + "f0056", + "f0059", + "f0070", + "f0071", + "f0073", + "f0131", + "f0134", + "f0230", + "f0231", + "f0233", + "f0300", + "f0303", + "c023g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "fragments its heap", + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "archive an open incident", + "mislabels its vials", + "the migration left a shadow column behind", + "185 percent", + "swallows its errors", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "poisons its snapshot", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "601 minutes", + "shreds its manifest", + "inflates its estimates", + "783 megabytes", + "starves the drain", + "892 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P14", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0021", + "f0070", + "f0074", + "f0131", + "f0134", + "f0190", + "f0230", + "f0234", + "f0286", + "f0300" + ], + "answers": [ + "fragments its heap", + "185 percent", + "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it", + "poisons its snapshot", + "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand", + "497 days", + "601 minutes", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "loses its cursor", + "783 megabytes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P15", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/token_vault/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0024", + "f0048", + "f0056", + "f0132", + "f0233", + "f0300", + "f0304" + ], + "answers": [ + "the manifest cache is per-thread and never shared", + "lags its dashboard", + "mislabels its vials", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "inflates its estimates", + "783 megabytes", + "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P16", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0027", + "f0050", + "f0053", + "f0082", + "f0155", + "f0245", + "f0248", + "f0355", + "f0358", + "f0359", + "f0425", + "f0428" + ], + "answers": [ + "archive an open incident", + "133 milliseconds", + "reorders acks", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "406 generations", + "640 branches", + "spins on backoff", + "926 hours", + "churns its connections", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "131 records", + "splits its brain" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P17", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0035", + "f0038", + "f0039", + "f0041", + "f0044", + "f0076", + "f0079", + "f0262", + "f0263", + "f0437", + "f0451", + "f0454", + "f0486", + "f0487", + "f0489", + "c020g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "94 hours", + "saturates its detector", + "the quota counts retired entries", + "poisons its snapshot", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "inverts its polarity", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "misfiles its alerts", + "bypass the admission meter", + "garbles its telemetry", + "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service", + "forgets its offsets", + "bypass the admission meter", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "853 seconds" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P18", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0036", + "f0038", + "f0044", + "f0076", + "f0260", + "f0452", + "f0454" + ], + "answers": [ + "mislabels its vials", + "saturates its detector", + "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets", + "inverts its polarity", + "679 ticks", + "hand-tune the weights mid-flight", + "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P19", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0038", + "f0042", + "f0262", + "f0454", + "f0486", + "c020g2", + "c024g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "saturates its detector", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service", + "forgets its offsets", + "853 seconds", + "905 hours" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P20", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/replay_buffer/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0041", + "f0077", + "f0079", + "f0262", + "f0437", + "f0489" + ], + "answers": [ + "poisons its snapshot", + "splice two lineages", + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "bypass the admission meter", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P21", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0050", + "f0082", + "f0158", + "f0358", + "f0426" + ], + "answers": [ + "133 milliseconds", + "rewind a shared cursor", + "overfills its journal", + "churns its connections", + "desyncs its mirrors" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P22", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0050", + "f0080", + "f0248", + "f0356", + "f0428" + ], + "answers": [ + "133 milliseconds", + "211 requests", + "spins on backoff", + "blackholes its retries", + "splits its brain" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P23", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/escrow_chamber/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0053", + "f0245", + "f0425", + "f0429" + ], + "answers": [ + "reorders acks", + "640 branches", + "131 records", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P24", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0062", + "f0326", + "f0330", + "f0382" + ], + "answers": [ + "widen the voting circle mid-ballot", + "loses its cursor", + "861 minutes", + "mutate a sealed segment" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P25", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0065", + "f0067", + "f0237", + "f0329", + "f0333" + ], + "answers": [ + "172 milliseconds", + "trust the replica clock", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "inflates its estimates" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P26", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0067", + "f0120", + "f0123", + "f0236", + "f0239", + "f0326", + "f0327", + "f0329", + "f0332" + ], + "answers": [ + "trust the replica clock", + "315 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "fragments its heap", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "loses its cursor", + "trust the replica clock", + "integer division truncates the interval", + "promote an unverified backup" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P27", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/lease_broker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0068", + "f0120", + "f0236", + "f0332" + ], + "answers": [ + "reorders acks", + "315 percent", + "fragments its heap", + "promote an unverified backup" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P28", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0085", + "f0201", + "f0257", + "f0397", + "c021g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "224 days", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "share a cursor between shards", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "866 ticks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P29", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0085", + "f0088", + "f0201", + "f0204", + "f0259", + "f0396", + "f0399", + "c021g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "224 days", + "echoes its own commands", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "fragments its heap", + "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware", + "866 ticks" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P30", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0088", + "f0204", + "f0259", + "f0396" + ], + "answers": [ + "echoes its own commands", + "the fence release rides the same lock as the write", + "the backoff timer starts only after the first success", + "fragments its heap" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P31", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0091", + "f0166", + "f0167", + "f0169", + "f0335", + "f0338", + "f0370", + "f0373", + "f0431", + "f0434", + "c018g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "swallows its errors", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "archive an open incident", + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "874 percent", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "965 megabytes", + "starves the drain", + "stalls the queue", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "827 megabytes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P32", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0094", + "f0166", + "f0338", + "f0370", + "f0373", + "f0434", + "c018g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the estimator never saw a leap year", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "staggers its heartbeats", + "965 megabytes", + "starves the drain", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "827 megabytes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P33", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0097", + "f0105", + "f0109", + "f0161", + "f0274", + "f0449" + ], + "answers": [ + "skip the blank control", + "276 requests", + "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it", + "loses its cursor", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "the migration left a shadow column behind" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P34", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0099", + "f0105", + "f0108", + "f0163", + "f0271", + "f0274", + "f0347", + "c022g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "276 requests", + "misplaces its permits", + "reorders acks", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "write before the fence lands", + "879 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P35", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0099", + "f0108", + "f0164", + "f0271", + "f0272", + "c022g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "the metric averages away the spikes", + "misplaces its permits", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "archive an open incident", + "879 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P36", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0100" + ], + "answers": [ + "263 hours" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P37", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0102" + ], + "answers": [ + "recalibrate against a live specimen" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P38", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/quorum_relay/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0102", + "f0103", + "c015g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "recalibrate against a live specimen", + "saturates its detector", + "788 segments" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P39", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/calibration_bench/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0106", + "f0274", + "f0446", + "c022g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "poisons its snapshot", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "inverts its polarity", + "879 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P40", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0135", + "f0137", + "f0210", + "f0213", + "f0265", + "f0268", + "f0306", + "f0309", + "f0466", + "f0469" + ], + "answers": [ + "354 percent", + "fork the settlement record", + "549 records", + "thrashes the cache", + "692 seconds", + "leaks handles", + "overruns its dwell", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "double-counts rows", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P41", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0137", + "f0213", + "f0265", + "f0269", + "f0309", + "f0469" + ], + "answers": [ + "fork the settlement record", + "thrashes the cache", + "692 seconds", + "the seed never varies between runs", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P42", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0138", + "f0210", + "f0266", + "f0306", + "f0466" + ], + "answers": [ + "staggers its heartbeats", + "549 records", + "double-counts rows", + "overruns its dwell", + "double-counts rows" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P43", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/ingest_job/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0143", + "f0146", + "f0490" + ], + "answers": [ + "clips its bursts", + "overruns its dwell", + "300 minutes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P44", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0152", + "f0208", + "f0228", + "f0312", + "f0393" + ], + "answers": [ + "bypass the admission meter", + "reorders acks", + "spins on backoff", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "shadows its primary" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P45", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0152", + "f0207", + "f0227", + "f0312", + "f0390", + "f0391", + "f0393" + ], + "answers": [ + "bypass the admission meter", + "trust the replica clock", + "retry inside the lock", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "40 milliseconds", + "fragments its heap", + "shadows its primary" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P46", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0152", + "f0205", + "f0225", + "f0393" + ], + "answers": [ + "bypass the admission meter", + "536 milliseconds", + "588 branches", + "shadows its primary" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P47", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0169", + "f0335", + "f0373" + ], + "answers": [ + "the pool hands out connections newest-first", + "874 percent", + "starves the drain" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P48", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0175", + "f0178", + "f0195", + "f0198", + "f0199", + "f0242", + "f0277", + "f0315", + "f0341", + "f0344", + "f0422", + "f0423", + "c019g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "458 entries", + "clips its bursts", + "510 records", + "thrashes the cache", + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "reuse a burned nonce", + "822 ticks", + "inverts its polarity", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "widen the fence without a drain", + "thrashes the cache", + "840 requests" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P49", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0176", + "f0196", + "f0198", + "f0240", + "f0344", + "f0420" + ], + "answers": [ + "forgets its offsets", + "re-emits duplicates", + "thrashes the cache", + "627 milliseconds", + "the budget is computed before the drain, not after", + "118 records" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P50", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0178", + "f0198", + "f0242", + "f0318", + "f0422" + ], + "answers": [ + "clips its bursts", + "thrashes the cache", + "suppress a failing healthcheck", + "misfiles its alerts", + "widen the fence without a drain" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P51", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0187", + "f0251", + "f0280", + "f0283", + "f0323", + "f0376", + "f0379", + "f0387", + "f0405", + "f0408", + "f0440", + "f0443", + "f0472" + ], + "answers": [ + "cache the lease token", + "hoards its scratch pages", + "731 segments", + "lags its dashboard", + "clips its bursts", + "drops writes", + "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service", + "splice two lineages", + "79 attempts", + "stalls", + "170 milliseconds", + "reorders acks", + "mutate a sealed segment" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P52", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/index_writer/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0202" + ], + "answers": [ + "archive an open incident" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P53", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/shard_router/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0210", + "f0268", + "f0466" + ], + "answers": [ + "549 records", + "leaks handles", + "double-counts rows" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P54", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/assay_station/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0222", + "f0312", + "f0390", + "f0394" + ], + "answers": [ + "fork the settlement record", + "hot-patch the verifier itself", + "40 milliseconds", + "the metric averages away the spikes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P55", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0254" + ], + "answers": [ + "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P56", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/provenance_ledger/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0277", + "f0341" + ], + "answers": [ + "reuse a burned nonce", + "inverts its polarity" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P57", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0280", + "f0324", + "f0376", + "f0388", + "f0405", + "f0408", + "f0440", + "f0472" + ], + "answers": [ + "731 segments", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness", + "drops writes", + "skews its baseline", + "79 attempts", + "stalls", + "170 milliseconds", + "mutate a sealed segment" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P58", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/telemetry_mast/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0321", + "f0323", + "f0385", + "f0405" + ], + "answers": [ + "forgets its offsets", + "clips its bursts", + "27 readings", + "79 attempts" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P59", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/sweep_worker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0336", + "f0432", + "c018g2" + ], + "answers": [ + "swallows its errors", + "retry inside the lock", + "827 megabytes" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P60", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/handler.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0350", + "f0361", + "f0362" + ], + "answers": [ + "913 segments", + "swallows its errors", + "fork the settlement record" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P61", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/state.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0353", + "f0361", + "f0461" + ], + "answers": [ + "lags its dashboard", + "swallows its errors", + "desyncs its mirrors" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P62", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/config.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0361", + "f0364", + "f0460", + "f0463" + ], + "answers": [ + "swallows its errors", + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "222 records", + "splits its brain" + ] + }, + { + "id": "P63", + "family": "retrieval", + "expect": "bound", + "path": "src/specimen_locker/mod.rs", + "gold": [ + "f0364", + "f0460", + "f0464" + ], + "answers": [ + "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake", + "222 records", + "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2001", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2002", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2003", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2004", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2005", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2006", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2007", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2008", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2009", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2010", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2011", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2012", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2013", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2014", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2015", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2016", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2017", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2018", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2019", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2020", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2021", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2022", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2023", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2024", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2025", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2026", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2027", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2028", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2029", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2030", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2031", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2032", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2033", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2034", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2035", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2036", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2037", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2038", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2039", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2040", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2041", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2042", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2043", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2044", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2045", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2046", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2047", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2048", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2049", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2050", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2051", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2052", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2053", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2054", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2055", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2056", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2057", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2058", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2059", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2060", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2061", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2062", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2063", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2064", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2065", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2066", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2067", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2068", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2069", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2070", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2071", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2072", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2073", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2074", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2075", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2076", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2077", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2078", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2079", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2080", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2081", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2082", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2083", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2084", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2085", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2086", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2087", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2088", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2089", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2090", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2091", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2092", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2093", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2094", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2095", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2096", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2097", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2098", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2099", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2100", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2101", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2102", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2103", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2104", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2105", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2106", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2107", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2108", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2109", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2110", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2111", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2112", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2113", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control" + }, + { + "id": "R2114", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2115", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2116", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2117", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2118", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2119", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2120", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2121", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2122", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2123", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2124", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2125", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2126", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2127", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2128", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2129", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2130", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2131", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2132", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2133", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2134", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2135", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2136", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2137", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2138", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2139", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2140", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2141", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2142", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2143", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2144", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2145", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2146", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2147", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2148", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2149", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2150", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2151", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2152", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2153", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2154", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2155", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2156", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2157", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2158", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2159", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2160", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2161", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2162", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2163", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2164", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2165", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2166", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2167", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2168", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2169", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2170", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2171", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2172", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2173", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2174", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2175", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2176", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2177", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2178", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2179", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2180", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2181", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2182", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2183", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2184", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2185", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2186", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2187", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2188", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2189", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2190", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2191", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2192", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2193", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2194", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2195", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2196", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2197", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2198", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2199", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2200", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2201", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2202", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2203", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2204", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2205", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2206", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2207", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2208", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2209", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2210", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2211", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2212", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2213", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2214", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2215", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2216", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2217", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2218", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2219", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2220", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2221", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2222", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2223", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2224", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2225", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2226", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2227", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2228", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2229", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2230", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2231", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2232", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2233", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2234", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2235", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2236", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2237", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2238", + "family": "abstention", + "expect": "control", + "natural": true + }, + { + "id": "R2239", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "593 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2240", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "593 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2241", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ], + "answer": "593 branches" + }, + { + "id": "L1", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c000g2", + "retired": [ + "c000g0", + "c000g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2242", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "606 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2243", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "606 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2244", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ], + "answer": "606 records" + }, + { + "id": "L2", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c001g2", + "retired": [ + "c001g0", + "c001g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2245", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "619 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2246", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "619 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2247", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ], + "answer": "619 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "L3", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c002g2", + "retired": [ + "c002g0", + "c002g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2248", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "632 days" + }, + { + "id": "R2249", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "632 days" + }, + { + "id": "R2250", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ], + "answer": "632 days" + }, + { + "id": "L4", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c003g2", + "retired": [ + "c003g0", + "c003g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2251", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "645 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2252", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "645 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2253", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ], + "answer": "645 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L5", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c004g2", + "retired": [ + "c004g0", + "c004g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2254", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "658 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2255", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "658 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2256", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ], + "answer": "658 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "L6", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c005g2", + "retired": [ + "c005g0", + "c005g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2257", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "671 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2258", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "671 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2259", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ], + "answer": "671 generations" + }, + { + "id": "L7", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c006g2", + "retired": [ + "c006g0", + "c006g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2260", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "684 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2261", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "684 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2262", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ], + "answer": "684 requests" + }, + { + "id": "L8", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c007g2", + "retired": [ + "c007g0", + "c007g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2263", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "697 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2264", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "697 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2265", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ], + "answer": "697 records" + }, + { + "id": "L9", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c008g2", + "retired": [ + "c008g0", + "c008g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2266", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "710 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2267", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "710 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2268", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ], + "answer": "710 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "L10", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c009g2", + "retired": [ + "c009g0", + "c009g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2269", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "723 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2270", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "723 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2271", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ], + "answer": "723 hours" + }, + { + "id": "L11", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c010g2", + "retired": [ + "c010g0", + "c010g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2272", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "736 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2273", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "736 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2274", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ], + "answer": "736 entries" + }, + { + "id": "L12", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c011g2", + "retired": [ + "c011g0", + "c011g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2275", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "749 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2276", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "749 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2277", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ], + "answer": "749 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "L13", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c012g2", + "retired": [ + "c012g0", + "c012g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2278", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "762 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2279", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "762 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2280", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ], + "answer": "762 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "L14", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c013g2", + "retired": [ + "c013g0", + "c013g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2281", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "775 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2282", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "775 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2283", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ], + "answer": "775 records" + }, + { + "id": "L15", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c014g2", + "retired": [ + "c014g0", + "c014g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2284", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "788 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2285", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "788 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2286", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ], + "answer": "788 segments" + }, + { + "id": "L16", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c015g2", + "retired": [ + "c015g0", + "c015g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2287", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "801 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2288", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "801 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2289", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ], + "answer": "801 hours" + }, + { + "id": "L17", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c016g2", + "retired": [ + "c016g0", + "c016g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2290", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "814 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2291", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "814 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2292", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ], + "answer": "814 percent" + }, + { + "id": "L18", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c017g2", + "retired": [ + "c017g0", + "c017g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2293", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "827 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2294", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "827 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2295", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ], + "answer": "827 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "L19", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c018g2", + "retired": [ + "c018g0", + "c018g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2296", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "840 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2297", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "840 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2298", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ], + "answer": "840 requests" + }, + { + "id": "L20", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c019g2", + "retired": [ + "c019g0", + "c019g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2299", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "853 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2300", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "853 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2301", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ], + "answer": "853 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "L21", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c020g2", + "retired": [ + "c020g0", + "c020g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2302", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "866 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2303", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "866 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2304", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ], + "answer": "866 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "L22", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c021g2", + "retired": [ + "c021g0", + "c021g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2305", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "879 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2306", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "879 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2307", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ], + "answer": "879 records" + }, + { + "id": "L23", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c022g2", + "retired": [ + "c022g0", + "c022g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2308", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "892 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2309", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "892 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2310", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ], + "answer": "892 records" + }, + { + "id": "L24", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c023g2", + "retired": [ + "c023g0", + "c023g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2311", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "905 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2312", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "905 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2313", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "current", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ], + "answer": "905 hours" + }, + { + "id": "L25", + "family": "currency", + "expect": "lineage", + "head": "c024g2", + "retired": [ + "c024g0", + "c024g1" + ] + }, + { + "id": "R2314", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0444", + "anchor": "f0023", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2315", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0269", + "anchor": "f0308", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2316", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0082", + "anchor": "f0335", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2317", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0369", + "anchor": "f0178", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2318", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0022", + "anchor": "f0480", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2319", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0472", + "anchor": "f0405", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2320", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0187", + "anchor": "f0370", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "R2321", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0207", + "anchor": "f0310", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2322", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0327", + "anchor": "f0195", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2323", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0049", + "anchor": "f0308", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R2324", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0262", + "anchor": "f0245", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2325", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0364", + "anchor": "f0143", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the cleanup job holds the same lock as intake" + }, + { + "id": "R2326", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0179", + "anchor": "f0463", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2327", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0237", + "anchor": "f0495", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2328", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0244", + "anchor": "f0468", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2329", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0222", + "anchor": "f0275", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2330", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0359", + "anchor": "f0138", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2331", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0399", + "anchor": "f0258", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2332", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0459", + "anchor": "f0298", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2333", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0462", + "anchor": "f0210", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2334", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0192", + "anchor": "f0430", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R2335", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0324", + "anchor": "f0378", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2336", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0344", + "anchor": "f0278", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2337", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0032", + "anchor": "f0110", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2338", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0457", + "anchor": "f0320", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2339", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0144", + "anchor": "f0298", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2340", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0409", + "anchor": "f0188", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2341", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0299", + "anchor": "f0473", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2342", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0289", + "anchor": "f0368", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2343", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0249", + "anchor": "f0403", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2344", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0229", + "anchor": "f0383", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2345", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0254", + "anchor": "f0208", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2346", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0312", + "anchor": "f0075", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2347", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0049", + "anchor": "f0028", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R2348", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0282", + "anchor": "f0375", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2349", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0277", + "anchor": "f0275", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2350", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0324", + "anchor": "f0368", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2351", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0317", + "anchor": "f0435", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2352", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f0253", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2353", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0282", + "anchor": "f0150", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2354", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0444", + "anchor": "f0378", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2355", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0082", + "anchor": "f0210", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2356", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0472", + "anchor": "f0390", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2357", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0484", + "anchor": "f0403", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2358", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0244", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2359", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0274", + "anchor": "f0273", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2360", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0234", + "anchor": "f0223", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2361", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0494", + "anchor": "f0183", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2362", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0289", + "anchor": "f0073", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2363", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0299", + "anchor": "f0298", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2364", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0329", + "anchor": "f0228", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2365", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0107", + "anchor": "f0065", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2366", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0262", + "anchor": "f0330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2367", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0379", + "anchor": "f0328", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R2368", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0199", + "anchor": "f0243", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2369", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0259", + "anchor": "f0148", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2370", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0484", + "anchor": "f0168", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2371", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0472", + "anchor": "f0120", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2372", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0204", + "anchor": "f0368", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2373", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0374", + "anchor": "f0263", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2374", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f0083", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2375", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0117", + "anchor": "f0310", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2376", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0307", + "anchor": "f0240", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2377", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0182", + "anchor": "f0050", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2378", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0074", + "anchor": "f0433", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2379", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0379", + "anchor": "f0173", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R2380", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0067", + "anchor": "f0420", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2381", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0082", + "anchor": "f0050", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2382", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0104", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2383", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0467", + "anchor": "f0195", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2384", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0442", + "anchor": "f0370", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2385", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0069", + "anchor": "f0063", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2386", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0049", + "anchor": "f0268", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R2387", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0492", + "anchor": "f0180", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2388", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0247", + "anchor": "f0265", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2389", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0389", + "anchor": "f0428", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2390", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0199", + "anchor": "f0143", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2391", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0034", + "anchor": "f0113", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2392", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0282", + "anchor": "f0130", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2393", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0207", + "anchor": "f0130", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2394", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0407", + "anchor": "f0095", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2395", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f0468", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2396", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0384", + "anchor": "f0308", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2397", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0037", + "anchor": "f0140", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2398", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0304", + "anchor": "f0133", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2399", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0274", + "anchor": "f0103", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2400", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0357", + "anchor": "f0425", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2401", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0259", + "anchor": "f0298", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2402", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0274", + "anchor": "f0203", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2403", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0059", + "anchor": "f0043", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2404", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0319", + "anchor": "f0278", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2405", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0172", + "anchor": "f0415", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2406", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0229", + "anchor": "f0233", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2407", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0409", + "anchor": "f0388", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "R2408", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0352", + "anchor": "f0175", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2409", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0399", + "anchor": "f0413", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2410", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0287", + "anchor": "f0180", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2411", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0132", + "anchor": "f0075", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2412", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0477", + "anchor": "f0130", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2413", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0137", + "anchor": "f0350", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2414", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0377", + "anchor": "f0205", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2415", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0099", + "anchor": "f0308", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2416", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0079", + "anchor": "f0173", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2417", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0043", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2418", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0172", + "anchor": "f0025", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2419", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0272", + "anchor": "f0105", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2420", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0122", + "anchor": "f0060", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2421", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0497", + "anchor": "f0375", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2422", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0304", + "anchor": "f0098", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2423", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0189", + "anchor": "f0243", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2424", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0404", + "anchor": "f0393", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2425", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0164", + "anchor": "f0178", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2426", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0034", + "anchor": "f0278", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2427", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0139", + "anchor": "f0253", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2428", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2429", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0052", + "anchor": "f0405", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2430", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0457", + "anchor": "f0330", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "ack before the segment seals" + }, + { + "id": "R2431", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0439", + "anchor": "f0358", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2432", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0094", + "anchor": "f0053", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2433", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0492", + "anchor": "f0415", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2434", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0089", + "anchor": "f0498", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2435", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0179", + "anchor": "f0078", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2436", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0472", + "anchor": "f0035", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2437", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0419", + "anchor": "f0403", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2438", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0282", + "anchor": "f0455", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2439", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0357", + "anchor": "f0320", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2440", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0292", + "anchor": "f0455", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2441", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0467", + "anchor": "f0320", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2442", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0307", + "anchor": "f0185", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "R2443", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0474", + "anchor": "f0248", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2444", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0087", + "anchor": "f0440", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "R2445", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0304", + "anchor": "f0093", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the retry queue and the dead-letter queue share a disk" + }, + { + "id": "R2446", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0362", + "anchor": "f0230", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2447", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0102", + "anchor": "f0100", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2448", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0072", + "anchor": "f0410", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2449", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0207", + "anchor": "f0170", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2450", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0064", + "anchor": "f0318", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2451", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0462", + "anchor": "f0455", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2452", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0499", + "anchor": "f0148", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2453", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0124", + "anchor": "f0423", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "R2454", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0224", + "anchor": "f0143", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2455", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0497", + "anchor": "f0175", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2456", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0194", + "anchor": "f0183", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2457", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0314", + "anchor": "f0113", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2458", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0297", + "anchor": "f0115", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2459", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0132", + "anchor": "f0020", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2460", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0207", + "anchor": "f0115", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2461", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0247", + "anchor": "f0355", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2462", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0182", + "anchor": "f0215", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2463", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0499", + "anchor": "f0063", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2464", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0254", + "anchor": "f0148", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2465", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0069", + "anchor": "f0358", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2466", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0464", + "anchor": "f0423", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2467", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0489", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2468", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0339", + "anchor": "f0248", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "R2469", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0244", + "anchor": "f0163", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2470", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0144", + "anchor": "f0128", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2471", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0284", + "anchor": "f0133", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2472", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0407", + "anchor": "f0320", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2473", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0162", + "anchor": "f0100", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2474", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0247", + "anchor": "f0340", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2475", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0277", + "anchor": "f0220", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2476", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0357", + "anchor": "f0270", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust a client-supplied timestamp" + }, + { + "id": "R2477", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0412", + "anchor": "f0475", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2478", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0144", + "anchor": "f0318", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2479", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0159", + "anchor": "f0113", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2480", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0162", + "anchor": "f0135", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2481", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0222", + "anchor": "f0030", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2482", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0094", + "anchor": "f0253", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "R2483", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0154", + "anchor": "f0198", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2484", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0412", + "anchor": "f0315", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "R2485", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0229", + "anchor": "f0173", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2486", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0057", + "anchor": "f0465", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2487", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0127", + "anchor": "f0255", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2488", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0259", + "anchor": "f0328", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "R2489", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0069", + "anchor": "f0088", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2490", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0353", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2491", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0342", + "anchor": "f0395", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2492", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0082", + "anchor": "f0465", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2493", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0294", + "anchor": "f0328", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2494", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0069", + "anchor": "f0043", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2495", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0302", + "anchor": "f0310", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2496", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0379", + "anchor": "f0343", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "R2497", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0197", + "anchor": "f0130", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2498", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0199", + "anchor": "f0023", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2499", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0169", + "anchor": "f0368", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "R2500", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0022", + "anchor": "f0150", + "verb": "because", + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2501", + "family": "rationale", + "expect": "linked", + "gold": "f0264", + "anchor": "f0098", + "verb": "answers", + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2502", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0002", + "window": { + "after": 1785571200, + "before": 1786435200 + }, + "answer": "mutate a sealed segment" + }, + { + "id": "R2503", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0005", + "window": { + "after": 1782964800, + "before": 1783828800 + }, + "answer": "16 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2504", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0008", + "window": { + "after": 1784242800, + "before": 1785106800 + }, + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R2505", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0011", + "window": { + "after": 1786820400, + "before": 1787684400 + }, + "answer": "stalls the queue" + }, + { + "id": "R2506", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0014", + "window": { + "after": 1784214000, + "before": 1785078000 + }, + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "R2507", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0017", + "window": { + "after": 1786788000, + "before": 1787652000 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2508", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0020", + "window": { + "after": 1784181600, + "before": 1785045600 + }, + "answer": "55 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2509", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0023", + "window": { + "after": 1786831200, + "before": 1787695200 + }, + "answer": "shadows its primary" + }, + { + "id": "R2510", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0026", + "window": { + "after": 1784224800, + "before": 1785088800 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2511", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0029", + "window": { + "after": 1785430800, + "before": 1786294800 + }, + "answer": "the timeout is measured from queueing, not execution" + }, + { + "id": "R2512", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0032", + "window": { + "after": 1782910800, + "before": 1783774800 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2513", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0035", + "window": { + "after": 1785484800, + "before": 1786348800 + }, + "answer": "94 hours" + }, + { + "id": "R2514", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0038", + "window": { + "after": 1782878400, + "before": 1783742400 + }, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "R2515", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0041", + "window": { + "after": 1785528000, + "before": 1786392000 + }, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2516", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0044", + "window": { + "after": 1782918000, + "before": 1783782000 + }, + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2517", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0047", + "window": { + "after": 1785495600, + "before": 1786359600 + }, + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2518", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0050", + "window": { + "after": 1786701600, + "before": 1787565600 + }, + "answer": "133 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2519", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0053", + "window": { + "after": 1784095200, + "before": 1784959200 + }, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2520", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0056", + "window": { + "after": 1786744800, + "before": 1787608800 + }, + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R2521", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0059", + "window": { + "after": 1784134800, + "before": 1784998800 + }, + "answer": "the migration left a shadow column behind" + }, + { + "id": "R2522", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0062", + "window": { + "after": 1786712400, + "before": 1787576400 + }, + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "R2523", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0065", + "window": { + "after": 1784106000, + "before": 1784970000 + }, + "answer": "172 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2524", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0068", + "window": { + "after": 1786683600, + "before": 1787547600 + }, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "R2525", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0071", + "window": { + "after": 1782705600, + "before": 1783569600 + }, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2526", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0074", + "window": { + "after": 1785351600, + "before": 1786215600 + }, + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2527", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0077", + "window": { + "after": 1782745200, + "before": 1783609200 + }, + "answer": "splice two lineages" + }, + { + "id": "R2528", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0080", + "window": { + "after": 1785322800, + "before": 1786186800 + }, + "answer": "211 requests" + }, + { + "id": "R2529", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0083", + "window": { + "after": 1782716400, + "before": 1783580400 + }, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "R2530", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0086", + "window": { + "after": 1785362400, + "before": 1786226400 + }, + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R2531", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0089", + "window": { + "after": 1782756000, + "before": 1783620000 + }, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2532", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0092", + "window": { + "after": 1783962000, + "before": 1784826000 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2533", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0095", + "window": { + "after": 1786539600, + "before": 1787403600 + }, + "answer": "250 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2534", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0098", + "window": { + "after": 1783933200, + "before": 1784797200 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R2535", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0101", + "window": { + "after": 1786507200, + "before": 1787371200 + }, + "answer": "mislabels its vials" + }, + { + "id": "R2536", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0104", + "window": { + "after": 1783972800, + "before": 1784836800 + }, + "answer": "the fence release rides the same lock as the write" + }, + { + "id": "R2537", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0107", + "window": { + "after": 1786550400, + "before": 1787414400 + }, + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2538", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0110", + "window": { + "after": 1787756400, + "before": 1788620400 + }, + "answer": "289 megabytes" + }, + { + "id": "R2539", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0113", + "window": { + "after": 1785150000, + "before": 1786014000 + }, + "answer": "starves the drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2540", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0116", + "window": { + "after": 1787724000, + "before": 1788588000 + }, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2541", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0119", + "window": { + "after": 1785276000, + "before": 1786140000 + }, + "answer": "the quota counts retired entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2542", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0122", + "window": { + "after": 1782669600, + "before": 1783533600 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2543", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0125", + "window": { + "after": 1785247200, + "before": 1786111200 + }, + "answer": "328 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2544", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0128", + "window": { + "after": 1782637200, + "before": 1783501200 + }, + "answer": "splits its brain" + }, + { + "id": "R2545", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0131", + "window": { + "after": 1783843200, + "before": 1784707200 + }, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2546", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0134", + "window": { + "after": 1786420800, + "before": 1787284800 + }, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2547", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0137", + "window": { + "after": 1783886400, + "before": 1784750400 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2548", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0140", + "window": { + "after": 1786464000, + "before": 1787328000 + }, + "answer": "367 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2549", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0143", + "window": { + "after": 1783854000, + "before": 1784718000 + }, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R2550", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0146", + "window": { + "after": 1786431600, + "before": 1787295600 + }, + "answer": "overruns its dwell" + }, + { + "id": "R2551", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0149", + "window": { + "after": 1783897200, + "before": 1784761200 + }, + "answer": "the warm path is gated on a flag nobody sets" + }, + { + "id": "R2552", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0152", + "window": { + "after": 1785103200, + "before": 1785967200 + }, + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "R2553", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0155", + "window": { + "after": 1787680800, + "before": 1788544800 + }, + "answer": "406 generations" + }, + { + "id": "R2554", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0158", + "window": { + "after": 1785070800, + "before": 1785934800 + }, + "answer": "overfills its journal" + }, + { + "id": "R2555", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0161", + "window": { + "after": 1787648400, + "before": 1788512400 + }, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2556", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0164", + "window": { + "after": 1785042000, + "before": 1785906000 + }, + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2557", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0167", + "window": { + "after": 1787688000, + "before": 1788552000 + }, + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2558", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0170", + "window": { + "after": 1785081600, + "before": 1785945600 + }, + "answer": "445 records" + }, + { + "id": "R2559", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0173", + "window": { + "after": 1786287600, + "before": 1787151600 + }, + "answer": "thrashes the cache" + }, + { + "id": "R2560", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0176", + "window": { + "after": 1783681200, + "before": 1784545200 + }, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "R2561", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0179", + "window": { + "after": 1786258800, + "before": 1787122800 + }, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2562", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0182", + "window": { + "after": 1783720800, + "before": 1784584800 + }, + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "R2563", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0185", + "window": { + "after": 1786298400, + "before": 1787162400 + }, + "answer": "484 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2564", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0188", + "window": { + "after": 1783692000, + "before": 1784556000 + }, + "answer": "drifts its watermark" + }, + { + "id": "R2565", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0191", + "window": { + "after": 1786269600, + "before": 1787133600 + }, + "answer": "garbles its telemetry" + }, + { + "id": "R2566", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0194", + "window": { + "after": 1787475600, + "before": 1788339600 + }, + "answer": "the parser accepts both spellings silently" + }, + { + "id": "R2567", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0197", + "window": { + "after": 1784865600, + "before": 1785729600 + }, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2568", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0200", + "window": { + "after": 1787515200, + "before": 1788379200 + }, + "answer": "523 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2569", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0203", + "window": { + "after": 1784908800, + "before": 1785772800 + }, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2570", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0206", + "window": { + "after": 1787572800, + "before": 1788436800 + }, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2571", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0209", + "window": { + "after": 1784962800, + "before": 1785826800 + }, + "answer": "the calibration constant was transcribed by hand" + }, + { + "id": "R2572", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0212", + "window": { + "after": 1787612400, + "before": 1788476400 + }, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "R2573", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0215", + "window": { + "after": 1783634400, + "before": 1784498400 + }, + "answer": "562 days" + }, + { + "id": "R2574", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0218", + "window": { + "after": 1786212000, + "before": 1787076000 + }, + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "R2575", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0221", + "window": { + "after": 1783605600, + "before": 1784469600 + }, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "R2576", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0224", + "window": { + "after": 1786179600, + "before": 1787043600 + }, + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "R2577", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0227", + "window": { + "after": 1783573200, + "before": 1784437200 + }, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "R2578", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0230", + "window": { + "after": 1786222800, + "before": 1787086800 + }, + "answer": "601 minutes" + }, + { + "id": "R2579", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0233", + "window": { + "after": 1783616400, + "before": 1784480400 + }, + "answer": "inflates its estimates" + }, + { + "id": "R2580", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0236", + "window": { + "after": 1784822400, + "before": 1785686400 + }, + "answer": "fragments its heap" + }, + { + "id": "R2581", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0239", + "window": { + "after": 1787396400, + "before": 1788260400 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2582", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0242", + "window": { + "after": 1784790000, + "before": 1785654000 + }, + "answer": "suppress a failing healthcheck" + }, + { + "id": "R2583", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0245", + "window": { + "after": 1787439600, + "before": 1788303600 + }, + "answer": "640 branches" + }, + { + "id": "R2584", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0248", + "window": { + "after": 1784833200, + "before": 1785697200 + }, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "R2585", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0251", + "window": { + "after": 1787407200, + "before": 1788271200 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2586", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0254", + "window": { + "after": 1783429200, + "before": 1784293200 + }, + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "R2587", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0257", + "window": { + "after": 1786006800, + "before": 1786870800 + }, + "answer": "share a cursor between shards" + }, + { + "id": "R2588", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0260", + "window": { + "after": 1783400400, + "before": 1784264400 + }, + "answer": "679 ticks" + }, + { + "id": "R2589", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0263", + "window": { + "after": 1786050000, + "before": 1786914000 + }, + "answer": "misfiles its alerts" + }, + { + "id": "R2590", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0266", + "window": { + "after": 1783440000, + "before": 1784304000 + }, + "answer": "double-counts rows" + }, + { + "id": "R2591", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0269", + "window": { + "after": 1786017600, + "before": 1786881600 + }, + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "R2592", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0272", + "window": { + "after": 1783411200, + "before": 1784275200 + }, + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "R2593", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0275", + "window": { + "after": 1784617200, + "before": 1785481200 + }, + "answer": "718 blocks" + }, + { + "id": "R2594", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0278", + "window": { + "after": 1787266800, + "before": 1788130800 + }, + "answer": "ignores its backpressure" + }, + { + "id": "R2595", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0281", + "window": { + "after": 1784656800, + "before": 1785520800 + }, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "R2596", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0284", + "window": { + "after": 1787234400, + "before": 1788098400 + }, + "answer": "the config loader keeps its first answer forever" + }, + { + "id": "R2597", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0287", + "window": { + "after": 1784628000, + "before": 1785492000 + }, + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "R2598", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0290", + "window": { + "after": 1787202000, + "before": 1788066000 + }, + "answer": "757 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2599", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0293", + "window": { + "after": 1784667600, + "before": 1785531600 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R2600", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0296", + "window": { + "after": 1785960000, + "before": 1786824000 + }, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "R2601", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0299", + "window": { + "after": 1783353600, + "before": 1784217600 + }, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2602", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0302", + "window": { + "after": 1785931200, + "before": 1786795200 + }, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "R2603", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0305", + "window": { + "after": 1783324800, + "before": 1784188800 + }, + "answer": "796 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2604", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0308", + "window": { + "after": 1785970800, + "before": 1786834800 + }, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "R2605", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0311", + "window": { + "after": 1783364400, + "before": 1784228400 + }, + "answer": "upends its ordering" + }, + { + "id": "R2606", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0314", + "window": { + "after": 1785942000, + "before": 1786806000 + }, + "answer": "the ranker keys on arrival order rather than freshness" + }, + { + "id": "R2607", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0317", + "window": { + "after": 1787148000, + "before": 1788012000 + }, + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "R2608", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0320", + "window": { + "after": 1784541600, + "before": 1785405600 + }, + "answer": "835 entries" + }, + { + "id": "R2609", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0323", + "window": { + "after": 1787115600, + "before": 1787979600 + }, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "R2610", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0326", + "window": { + "after": 1784581200, + "before": 1785445200 + }, + "answer": "loses its cursor" + }, + { + "id": "R2611", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0329", + "window": { + "after": 1787158800, + "before": 1788022800 + }, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2612", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0332", + "window": { + "after": 1784548800, + "before": 1785412800 + }, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "R2613", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0335", + "window": { + "after": 1787126400, + "before": 1787990400 + }, + "answer": "874 percent" + }, + { + "id": "R2614", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0338", + "window": { + "after": 1783148400, + "before": 1784012400 + }, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "R2615", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0341", + "window": { + "after": 1785798000, + "before": 1786662000 + }, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "R2616", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0344", + "window": { + "after": 1783191600, + "before": 1784055600 + }, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "R2617", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0347", + "window": { + "after": 1785765600, + "before": 1786629600 + }, + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "R2618", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0350", + "window": { + "after": 1783159200, + "before": 1784023200 + }, + "answer": "913 segments" + }, + { + "id": "R2619", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0353", + "window": { + "after": 1785736800, + "before": 1786600800 + }, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "R2620", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0356", + "window": { + "after": 1783202400, + "before": 1784066400 + }, + "answer": "blackholes its retries" + }, + { + "id": "R2621", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0359", + "window": { + "after": 1784408400, + "before": 1785272400 + }, + "answer": "integer division truncates the interval" + }, + { + "id": "R2622", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0362", + "window": { + "after": 1786982400, + "before": 1787846400 + }, + "answer": "fork the settlement record" + }, + { + "id": "R2623", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0365", + "window": { + "after": 1784376000, + "before": 1785240000 + }, + "answer": "952 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "R2624", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0368", + "window": { + "after": 1786953600, + "before": 1787817600 + }, + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "R2625", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0371", + "window": { + "after": 1784347200, + "before": 1785211200 + }, + "answer": "skips the fsync" + }, + { + "id": "R2626", + "family": "temporal", + "expect": "windowed", + "gold": "f0374", + "window": { + "after": 1786993200, + "before": 1787857200 + }, + "answer": "the budget is computed before the drain, not after" + }, + { + "id": "C0", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0000", + "planted": [ + "c0a" + ], + "witness": "c0a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C1", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0003", + "planted": [ + "c1a" + ], + "witness": "c1a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C2", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0006", + "planted": [ + "c2a" + ], + "witness": "c2a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C3", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0009", + "planted": [ + "c3a" + ], + "witness": "c3a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C4", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0012", + "planted": [ + "c4a" + ], + "witness": "c4a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C5", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0015", + "planted": [ + "c5a" + ], + "witness": "c5a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C6", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0018", + "planted": [ + "c6a" + ], + "witness": "c6a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C7", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0021", + "planted": [ + "c7a" + ], + "witness": "c7a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C8", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0024", + "planted": [ + "c8a", + "c8b" + ], + "witness": "c8a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C9", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0027", + "planted": [ + "c9a" + ], + "witness": "c9a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C10", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0030", + "planted": [ + "c10a" + ], + "witness": "c10a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C11", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0033", + "planted": [ + "c11a" + ], + "witness": "c11a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C12", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0036", + "planted": [ + "c12a" + ], + "witness": "c12a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C13", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0039", + "planted": [ + "c13a" + ], + "witness": "c13a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C14", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0042", + "planted": [ + "c14a" + ], + "witness": "c14a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C15", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0045", + "planted": [ + "c15a" + ], + "witness": "c15a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C16", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0048", + "planted": [ + "c16a" + ], + "witness": "c16a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C17", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0051", + "planted": [ + "c17a" + ], + "witness": "c17a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C18", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0054", + "planted": [ + "c18a" + ], + "witness": "c18a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C19", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0057", + "planted": [ + "c19a" + ], + "witness": "c19a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C20", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0060", + "planted": [ + "c20a" + ], + "witness": "c20a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C21", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0063", + "planted": [ + "c21a" + ], + "witness": "c21a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C22", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0066", + "planted": [ + "c22a", + "c22b" + ], + "witness": "c22a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C23", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0069", + "planted": [ + "c23a" + ], + "witness": "c23a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C24", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0072", + "planted": [ + "c24a" + ], + "witness": "c24a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C25", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0075", + "planted": [ + "c25a" + ], + "witness": "c25a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C26", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0078", + "planted": [ + "c26a" + ], + "witness": "c26a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C27", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0081", + "planted": [ + "c27a" + ], + "witness": "c27a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C28", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0084", + "planted": [ + "c28a" + ], + "witness": "c28a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C29", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0087", + "planted": [ + "c29a" + ], + "witness": "c29a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C30", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0090", + "planted": [ + "c30a" + ], + "witness": "c30a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C31", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0093", + "planted": [ + "c31a" + ], + "witness": "c31a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C32", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0096", + "planted": [ + "c32a" + ], + "witness": "c32a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C33", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0099", + "planted": [ + "c33a" + ], + "witness": "c33a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C34", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0102", + "planted": [ + "c34a" + ], + "witness": "c34a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C35", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0105", + "planted": [ + "c35a" + ], + "witness": "c35a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C36", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0108", + "planted": [ + "c36a", + "c36b" + ], + "witness": "c36a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C37", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0111", + "planted": [ + "c37a" + ], + "witness": "c37a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C38", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0114", + "planted": [ + "c38a" + ], + "witness": "c38a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C39", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0117", + "planted": [ + "c39a" + ], + "witness": "c39a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C40", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0120", + "planted": [ + "c40a" + ], + "witness": "c40a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C41", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0123", + "planted": [ + "c41a" + ], + "witness": "c41a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C42", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0126", + "planted": [ + "c42a" + ], + "witness": "c42a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C43", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0129", + "planted": [ + "c43a" + ], + "witness": "c43a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C44", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0132", + "planted": [ + "c44a" + ], + "witness": "c44a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C45", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0135", + "planted": [ + "c45a" + ], + "witness": "c45a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C46", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0138", + "planted": [ + "c46a" + ], + "witness": "c46a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C47", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0141", + "planted": [ + "c47a" + ], + "witness": "c47a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C48", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0144", + "planted": [ + "c48a" + ], + "witness": "c48a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C49", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0147", + "planted": [ + "c49a" + ], + "witness": "c49a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C50", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0150", + "planted": [ + "c50a", + "c50b" + ], + "witness": "c50a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C51", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0153", + "planted": [ + "c51a" + ], + "witness": "c51a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C52", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0156", + "planted": [ + "c52a" + ], + "witness": "c52a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C53", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0159", + "planted": [ + "c53a" + ], + "witness": "c53a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C54", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0162", + "planted": [ + "c54a" + ], + "witness": "c54a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C55", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0165", + "planted": [ + "c55a" + ], + "witness": "c55a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C56", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0168", + "planted": [ + "c56a" + ], + "witness": "c56a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C57", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0171", + "planted": [ + "c57a" + ], + "witness": "c57a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C58", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0174", + "planted": [ + "c58a" + ], + "witness": "c58a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C59", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0177", + "planted": [ + "c59a" + ], + "witness": "c59a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C60", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0180", + "planted": [ + "c60a" + ], + "witness": "c60a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C61", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0183", + "planted": [ + "c61a" + ], + "witness": "c61a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C62", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0186", + "planted": [ + "c62a" + ], + "witness": "c62a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C63", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0189", + "planted": [ + "c63a" + ], + "witness": "c63a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C64", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0192", + "planted": [ + "c64a", + "c64b" + ], + "witness": "c64a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C65", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0195", + "planted": [ + "c65a" + ], + "witness": "c65a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C66", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0198", + "planted": [ + "c66a" + ], + "witness": "c66a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C67", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0201", + "planted": [ + "c67a" + ], + "witness": "c67a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C68", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0204", + "planted": [ + "c68a" + ], + "witness": "c68a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C69", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0207", + "planted": [ + "c69a" + ], + "witness": "c69a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C70", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0210", + "planted": [ + "c70a" + ], + "witness": "c70a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C71", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0213", + "planted": [ + "c71a" + ], + "witness": "c71a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C72", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0216", + "planted": [ + "c72a" + ], + "witness": "c72a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C73", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0219", + "planted": [ + "c73a" + ], + "witness": "c73a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C74", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0222", + "planted": [ + "c74a" + ], + "witness": "c74a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C75", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0225", + "planted": [ + "c75a" + ], + "witness": "c75a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C76", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0228", + "planted": [ + "c76a" + ], + "witness": "c76a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C77", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0231", + "planted": [ + "c77a" + ], + "witness": "c77a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C78", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0234", + "planted": [ + "c78a", + "c78b" + ], + "witness": "c78a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C79", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0237", + "planted": [ + "c79a" + ], + "witness": "c79a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C80", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0240", + "planted": [ + "c80a" + ], + "witness": "c80a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C81", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0243", + "planted": [ + "c81a" + ], + "witness": "c81a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C82", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0246", + "planted": [ + "c82a" + ], + "witness": "c82a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C83", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0249", + "planted": [ + "c83a" + ], + "witness": "c83a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C84", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0252", + "planted": [ + "c84a" + ], + "witness": "c84a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C85", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0255", + "planted": [ + "c85a" + ], + "witness": "c85a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C86", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0258", + "planted": [ + "c86a" + ], + "witness": "c86a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C87", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0261", + "planted": [ + "c87a" + ], + "witness": "c87a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C88", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0264", + "planted": [ + "c88a" + ], + "witness": "c88a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C89", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0267", + "planted": [ + "c89a" + ], + "witness": "c89a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C90", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0270", + "planted": [ + "c90a" + ], + "witness": "c90a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C91", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0273", + "planted": [ + "c91a" + ], + "witness": "c91a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C92", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0276", + "planted": [ + "c92a", + "c92b" + ], + "witness": "c92a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C93", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0279", + "planted": [ + "c93a" + ], + "witness": "c93a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C94", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0282", + "planted": [ + "c94a" + ], + "witness": "c94a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C95", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0285", + "planted": [ + "c95a" + ], + "witness": "c95a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C96", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0288", + "planted": [ + "c96a" + ], + "witness": "c96a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C97", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0291", + "planted": [ + "c97a" + ], + "witness": "c97a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C98", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0294", + "planted": [ + "c98a" + ], + "witness": "c98a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C99", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0297", + "planted": [ + "c99a" + ], + "witness": "c99a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C100", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0300", + "planted": [ + "c100a" + ], + "witness": "c100a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C101", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0303", + "planted": [ + "c101a" + ], + "witness": "c101a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C102", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0306", + "planted": [ + "c102a" + ], + "witness": "c102a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C103", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0309", + "planted": [ + "c103a" + ], + "witness": "c103a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C104", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0312", + "planted": [ + "c104a" + ], + "witness": "c104a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C105", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0315", + "planted": [ + "c105a" + ], + "witness": "c105a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C106", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0318", + "planted": [ + "c106a", + "c106b" + ], + "witness": "c106a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C107", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0321", + "planted": [ + "c107a" + ], + "witness": "c107a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C108", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0324", + "planted": [ + "c108a" + ], + "witness": "c108a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C109", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0327", + "planted": [ + "c109a" + ], + "witness": "c109a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C110", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0330", + "planted": [ + "c110a" + ], + "witness": "c110a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "unit_agree", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C111", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0333", + "planted": [ + "c111a" + ], + "witness": "c111a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C112", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0336", + "planted": [ + "c112a" + ], + "witness": "c112a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C113", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0339", + "planted": [ + "c113a" + ], + "witness": "c113a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C114", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0342", + "planted": [ + "c114a" + ], + "witness": "c114a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C115", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0345", + "planted": [ + "c115a" + ], + "witness": "c115a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C116", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0348", + "planted": [ + "c116a" + ], + "witness": "c116a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C117", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0351", + "planted": [ + "c117a" + ], + "witness": "c117a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C118", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0354", + "planted": [ + "c118a" + ], + "witness": "c118a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C119", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0357", + "planted": [ + "c119a" + ], + "witness": "c119a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C120", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0360", + "planted": [ + "c120a", + "c120b" + ], + "witness": "c120a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C121", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0363", + "planted": [ + "c121a" + ], + "witness": "c121a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C122", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0366", + "planted": [ + "c122a" + ], + "witness": "c122a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C123", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0369", + "planted": [ + "c123a" + ], + "witness": "c123a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C124", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0372", + "planted": [ + "c124a" + ], + "witness": "c124a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C125", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0375", + "planted": [ + "c125a" + ], + "witness": "c125a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C126", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0378", + "planted": [ + "c126a" + ], + "witness": "c126a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C127", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0381", + "planted": [ + "c127a" + ], + "witness": "c127a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C128", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0384", + "planted": [ + "c128a" + ], + "witness": "c128a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C129", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0387", + "planted": [ + "c129a" + ], + "witness": "c129a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C130", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0390", + "planted": [ + "c130a" + ], + "witness": "c130a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C131", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0393", + "planted": [ + "c131a" + ], + "witness": "c131a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C132", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0396", + "planted": [ + "c132a" + ], + "witness": "c132a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C133", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0399", + "planted": [ + "c133a" + ], + "witness": "c133a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C134", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0402", + "planted": [ + "c134a", + "c134b" + ], + "witness": "c134a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C135", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0405", + "planted": [ + "c135a" + ], + "witness": "c135a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C136", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0408", + "planted": [ + "c136a" + ], + "witness": "c136a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C137", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0411", + "planted": [ + "c137a" + ], + "witness": "c137a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C138", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0414", + "planted": [ + "c138a" + ], + "witness": "c138a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C139", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0417", + "planted": [ + "c139a" + ], + "witness": "c139a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C140", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0420", + "planted": [ + "c140a" + ], + "witness": "c140a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C141", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0423", + "planted": [ + "c141a" + ], + "witness": "c141a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C142", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0426", + "planted": [ + "c142a" + ], + "witness": "c142a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C143", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0429", + "planted": [ + "c143a" + ], + "witness": "c143a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C144", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0432", + "planted": [ + "c144a" + ], + "witness": "c144a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C145", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0435", + "planted": [ + "c145a" + ], + "witness": "c145a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C146", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0438", + "planted": [ + "c146a" + ], + "witness": "c146a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C147", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0441", + "planted": [ + "c147a" + ], + "witness": "c147a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C148", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0444", + "planted": [ + "c148a", + "c148b" + ], + "witness": "c148a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C149", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0447", + "planted": [ + "c149a" + ], + "witness": "c149a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C150", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0450", + "planted": [ + "c150a" + ], + "witness": "c150a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C151", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0453", + "planted": [ + "c151a" + ], + "witness": "c151a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C152", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0456", + "planted": [ + "c152a" + ], + "witness": "c152a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C153", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0459", + "planted": [ + "c153a" + ], + "witness": "c153a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "historical", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C154", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0462", + "planted": [ + "c154a" + ], + "witness": "c154a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "value", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C155", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0465", + "planted": [ + "c155a" + ], + "witness": "c155a", + "tier": 1, + "shape": "reworded", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C156", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0468", + "planted": [ + "c156a" + ], + "witness": "c156a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "negation", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C157", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0471", + "planted": [ + "c157a" + ], + "witness": "c157a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "paraphrase", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C158", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0474", + "planted": [ + "c158a" + ], + "witness": "c158a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "synonym", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C159", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0477", + "planted": [ + "c159a" + ], + "witness": "c159a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C160", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0480", + "planted": [ + "c160a" + ], + "witness": "c160a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "clause", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C161", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0483", + "planted": [ + "c161a" + ], + "witness": "c161a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "coreference", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C162", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0486", + "planted": [ + "c162a", + "c162b" + ], + "witness": "c162a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "transitive", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C163", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0489", + "planted": [ + "c163a" + ], + "witness": "c163a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "quantifier", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "C164", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0492", + "planted": [ + "c164a" + ], + "witness": "c164a", + "tier": 2, + "shape": "collider", + "positive": false + }, + { + "id": "C165", + "family": "contradiction", + "expect": "case", + "gold": "f0495", + "planted": [ + "c165a" + ], + "witness": "c165a", + "tier": 3, + "shape": "compound", + "positive": true + }, + { + "id": "D0", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0000", + "stale": "s-f0000" + }, + { + "id": "D5", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0005", + "stale": "s-f0005" + }, + { + "id": "D18", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0018", + "stale": "s-f0018" + }, + { + "id": "D19", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0019", + "stale": "s-f0019" + }, + { + "id": "D22", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0022", + "stale": "s-f0022" + }, + { + "id": "D34", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0034", + "stale": "s-f0034" + }, + { + "id": "D40", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0040", + "stale": "s-f0040" + }, + { + "id": "D52", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0052", + "stale": "s-f0052" + }, + { + "id": "D57", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0057", + "stale": "s-f0057" + }, + { + "id": "D63", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0063", + "stale": "s-f0063" + }, + { + "id": "D70", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0070", + "stale": "s-f0070" + }, + { + "id": "D72", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0072", + "stale": "s-f0072" + }, + { + "id": "D74", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0074", + "stale": "s-f0074" + }, + { + "id": "D77", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0077", + "stale": "s-f0077" + }, + { + "id": "D78", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0078", + "stale": "s-f0078" + }, + { + "id": "D92", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0092", + "stale": "s-f0092" + }, + { + "id": "D95", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0095", + "stale": "s-f0095" + }, + { + "id": "D117", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0117", + "stale": "s-f0117" + }, + { + "id": "D140", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0140", + "stale": "s-f0140" + }, + { + "id": "D141", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0141", + "stale": "s-f0141" + }, + { + "id": "D149", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0149", + "stale": "s-f0149" + }, + { + "id": "D156", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0156", + "stale": "s-f0156" + }, + { + "id": "D161", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0161", + "stale": "s-f0161" + }, + { + "id": "D168", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0168", + "stale": "s-f0168" + }, + { + "id": "D171", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0171", + "stale": "s-f0171" + }, + { + "id": "D175", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0175", + "stale": "s-f0175" + }, + { + "id": "D181", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0181", + "stale": "s-f0181" + }, + { + "id": "D184", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0184", + "stale": "s-f0184" + }, + { + "id": "D185", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0185", + "stale": "s-f0185" + }, + { + "id": "D189", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0189", + "stale": "s-f0189" + }, + { + "id": "D226", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0226", + "stale": "s-f0226" + }, + { + "id": "D238", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0238", + "stale": "s-f0238" + }, + { + "id": "D241", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0241", + "stale": "s-f0241" + }, + { + "id": "D253", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0253", + "stale": "s-f0253" + }, + { + "id": "D256", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0256", + "stale": "s-f0256" + }, + { + "id": "D258", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0258", + "stale": "s-f0258" + }, + { + "id": "D261", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0261", + "stale": "s-f0261" + }, + { + "id": "D276", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0276", + "stale": "s-f0276" + }, + { + "id": "D283", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0283", + "stale": "s-f0283" + }, + { + "id": "D286", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0286", + "stale": "s-f0286" + }, + { + "id": "D290", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0290", + "stale": "s-f0290" + }, + { + "id": "D292", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0292", + "stale": "s-f0292" + }, + { + "id": "D296", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0296", + "stale": "s-f0296" + }, + { + "id": "D307", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0307", + "stale": "s-f0307" + }, + { + "id": "D309", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0309", + "stale": "s-f0309" + }, + { + "id": "D341", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0341", + "stale": "s-f0341" + }, + { + "id": "D355", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0355", + "stale": "s-f0355" + }, + { + "id": "D356", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0356", + "stale": "s-f0356" + }, + { + "id": "D360", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0360", + "stale": "s-f0360" + }, + { + "id": "D361", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0361", + "stale": "s-f0361" + }, + { + "id": "D371", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0371", + "stale": "s-f0371" + }, + { + "id": "D375", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0375", + "stale": "s-f0375" + }, + { + "id": "D378", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0378", + "stale": "s-f0378" + }, + { + "id": "D388", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0388", + "stale": "s-f0388" + }, + { + "id": "D391", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0391", + "stale": "s-f0391" + }, + { + "id": "D397", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0397", + "stale": "s-f0397" + }, + { + "id": "D401", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0401", + "stale": "s-f0401" + }, + { + "id": "D406", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0406", + "stale": "s-f0406" + }, + { + "id": "D424", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0424", + "stale": "s-f0424" + }, + { + "id": "D426", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0426", + "stale": "s-f0426" + }, + { + "id": "D429", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0429", + "stale": "s-f0429" + }, + { + "id": "D441", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0441", + "stale": "s-f0441" + }, + { + "id": "D452", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0452", + "stale": "s-f0452" + }, + { + "id": "D464", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0464", + "stale": "s-f0464" + }, + { + "id": "D466", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0466", + "stale": "s-f0466" + }, + { + "id": "D483", + "family": "drift", + "expect": "drifted", + "gold": "f0483", + "stale": "s-f0483" + }, + { + "id": "R2627", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true, + "answer": "starves its consumers" + }, + { + "id": "W179", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0001", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2628", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false, + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "W180", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0004", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2629", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true, + "answer": "write before the fence lands" + }, + { + "id": "W181", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0007", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2630", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false, + "answer": "29 branches" + }, + { + "id": "W182", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0010", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2631", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true, + "answer": "spins on backoff" + }, + { + "id": "W183", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0013", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2632", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "W184", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0016", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2633", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true, + "answer": "68 segments" + }, + { + "id": "W185", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0025", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2634", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false, + "answer": "lags its dashboard" + }, + { + "id": "W186", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0028", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2635", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "W187", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0031", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2636", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": false, + "answer": "recalibrate against a live specimen" + }, + { + "id": "W188", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0037", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2637", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0043", + "released": true, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "W189", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0043", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2638", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": false, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "W190", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0046", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2639", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": true, + "answer": "the health probe tests the proxy, not the service" + }, + { + "id": "W191", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0049", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2640", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0055", + "released": false, + "answer": "146 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W192", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0055", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2641", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0058", + "released": true, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "W193", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0058", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2642", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0061", + "released": false, + "answer": "desyncs its mirrors" + }, + { + "id": "W194", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0061", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2643", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0064", + "released": true, + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "W195", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0064", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2644", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0067", + "released": false, + "answer": "trust the replica clock" + }, + { + "id": "W196", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0067", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2645", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0073", + "released": true, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "W197", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0073", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2646", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0076", + "released": false, + "answer": "inverts its polarity" + }, + { + "id": "W198", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0076", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2647", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0079", + "released": true, + "answer": "the metric averages away the spikes" + }, + { + "id": "W199", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0079", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2648", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0082", + "released": false, + "answer": "rewind a shared cursor" + }, + { + "id": "W200", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0082", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2649", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0085", + "released": true, + "answer": "224 days" + }, + { + "id": "W201", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0085", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2650", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0088", + "released": false, + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "W202", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0088", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2651", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0091", + "released": true, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "W203", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0091", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2652", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0094", + "released": false, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "W204", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0094", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2653", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0097", + "released": true, + "answer": "skip the blank control" + }, + { + "id": "W205", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0097", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2654", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0100", + "released": false, + "answer": "263 hours" + }, + { + "id": "W206", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0100", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2655", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0103", + "released": true, + "answer": "saturates its detector" + }, + { + "id": "W207", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0103", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2656", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0106", + "released": false, + "answer": "poisons its snapshot" + }, + { + "id": "W208", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0106", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2657", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0109", + "released": true, + "answer": "the lock is advisory and one caller ignores it" + }, + { + "id": "W209", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0109", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2658", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0112", + "released": false, + "answer": "reuse a spill file" + }, + { + "id": "W210", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0112", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2659", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0115", + "released": true, + "answer": "302 readings" + }, + { + "id": "W211", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0115", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2660", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0118", + "released": false, + "answer": "skews its baseline" + }, + { + "id": "W212", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0118", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2661", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0121", + "released": true, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "W213", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0121", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2662", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0124", + "released": false, + "answer": "the probe pool is sized from the old topology" + }, + { + "id": "W214", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0124", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2663", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0127", + "released": true, + "answer": "widen the voting circle mid-ballot" + }, + { + "id": "W215", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0127", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2664", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0130", + "released": false, + "answer": "341 requests" + }, + { + "id": "W216", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0130", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2665", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0133", + "released": true, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "W217", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0133", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2666", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0136", + "released": false, + "answer": "swallows its errors" + }, + { + "id": "W218", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0136", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2667", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0139", + "released": true, + "answer": "the estimator never saw a leap year" + }, + { + "id": "W219", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0139", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2668", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0142", + "released": false, + "answer": "bypass the admission meter" + }, + { + "id": "W220", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0142", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2669", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0145", + "released": true, + "answer": "380 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W221", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0145", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2670", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0148", + "released": false, + "answer": "orphans its batches" + }, + { + "id": "W222", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0148", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2671", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0151", + "released": true, + "answer": "forgets its offsets" + }, + { + "id": "W223", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0151", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2672", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0154", + "released": false, + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "W224", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0154", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2673", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0157", + "released": true, + "answer": "interleave two restore streams" + }, + { + "id": "W225", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0157", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2674", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0160", + "released": false, + "answer": "419 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "W226", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0160", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2675", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0163", + "released": true, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "W227", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0163", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2676", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0166", + "released": false, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "W228", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0166", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2677", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0169", + "released": true, + "answer": "the pool hands out connections newest-first" + }, + { + "id": "W229", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0169", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2678", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0172", + "released": false, + "answer": "widen the fence without a drain" + }, + { + "id": "W230", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0172", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2679", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0178", + "released": true, + "answer": "clips its bursts" + }, + { + "id": "W231", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0178", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2680", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0187", + "released": false, + "answer": "cache the lease token" + }, + { + "id": "W232", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0187", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2681", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0190", + "released": true, + "answer": "497 days" + }, + { + "id": "W233", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0190", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2682", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0193", + "released": false, + "answer": "echoes its own commands" + }, + { + "id": "W234", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0193", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2683", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0196", + "released": true, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "W235", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0196", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2684", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0199", + "released": false, + "answer": "the feature flag defaults on in exactly one environment" + }, + { + "id": "W236", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0199", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2685", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0202", + "released": true, + "answer": "archive an open incident" + }, + { + "id": "W237", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0202", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2686", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0205", + "released": false, + "answer": "536 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "W238", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0205", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2687", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0208", + "released": true, + "answer": "reorders acks" + }, + { + "id": "W239", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0208", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2688", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0211", + "released": false, + "answer": "re-emits duplicates" + }, + { + "id": "W240", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0211", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2689", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0214", + "released": true, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "W241", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0214", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2690", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0217", + "released": false, + "answer": "hand-tune the weights mid-flight" + }, + { + "id": "W242", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0217", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2691", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0220", + "released": true, + "answer": "575 percent" + }, + { + "id": "W243", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0220", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2692", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0223", + "released": false, + "answer": "staggers its heartbeats" + }, + { + "id": "W244", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0223", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2693", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0229", + "released": true, + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "W245", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0229", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2694", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0232", + "released": false, + "answer": "promote an unverified backup" + }, + { + "id": "W246", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0232", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2695", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0235", + "released": true, + "answer": "614 milliseconds" + }, + { + "id": "W247", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0235", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2696", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0244", + "released": false, + "answer": "the batch size was tuned for the old hardware" + }, + { + "id": "W248", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0244", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2697", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0247", + "released": true, + "answer": "retry inside the lock" + }, + { + "id": "W249", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0247", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2698", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0250", + "released": false, + "answer": "653 segments" + }, + { + "id": "W250", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0250", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2699", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0259", + "released": true, + "answer": "the backoff timer starts only after the first success" + }, + { + "id": "W251", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0259", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2700", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0262", + "released": false, + "answer": "hot-patch the verifier itself" + }, + { + "id": "W252", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0262", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2701", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0265", + "released": true, + "answer": "692 seconds" + }, + { + "id": "W253", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0265", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2702", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0268", + "released": false, + "answer": "leaks handles" + }, + { + "id": "W254", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0268", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2703", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0271", + "released": true, + "answer": "hoards its scratch pages" + }, + { + "id": "W255", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0271", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2704", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0274", + "released": false, + "answer": "the seed never varies between runs" + }, + { + "id": "W256", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0274", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2705", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0277", + "released": true, + "answer": "reuse a burned nonce" + }, + { + "id": "W257", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0277", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2706", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0280", + "released": false, + "answer": "731 segments" + }, + { + "id": "W258", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0280", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2707", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0289", + "released": true, + "answer": "the sensor sums shadow and signal alike" + }, + { + "id": "W259", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0289", + "released": true + }, + { + "id": "R2708", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0295", + "released": false, + "answer": "770 requests" + }, + { + "id": "W260", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0295", + "released": false + }, + { + "id": "R2709", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "absent", + "victim": "f0298", + "released": true, + "answer": "misplaces its permits" + }, + { + "id": "W261", + "family": "deletion", + "expect": "resurrect", + "victim": "f0298", + "released": true + } + ] +} \ No newline at end of file